ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

Genetic determinants of enhanced von Willebrand factor clearance from plasma

BACKGROUND

Enhanced von Willebrand factor (VWF) clearance from plasma is associated with von Willebrand disease (VWD). However, the genetic background of this disease mechanism is not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine VWF variants that are associated with reduced VWF survival.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-four patients with VWD (type 1 = 50 and type 2 = 204) were investigated, and the results were compared with 120 healthy controls. The patients were comprehensively characterized for phenotypic and genetic features. The ratio of VWF propeptide (VWFpp)/VWF antigen (VWFpp ratio) was used to establish in each patient the VWF clearance state.

RESULTS

Out of 92 variants associated with type 1 (7 were novel) and type 2 VWD, 19 had a VWFpp ratio ranging from 1.7 to 2.2, 24 had a VWFpp ratio between 2.3 and 2.9, and 24 variants had a ratio of ≥3. The VWFpp median ratio in healthy controls was 0.98 (0.55-1.6) so that a cut-off value of >1.6 was considered an indicator of accelerated VWF clearance from plasma. An enhanced VWF clearance was observed in 34% of type 1 cases, 100% of type 1 Vicenza cases, 81% of 2A cases, 77% of 2B cases, 88% of 2M cases, and 36% of 2N cases.

CONCLUSIONS

An accelerated VWF clearance was found in most patients with type 2A, 2B, and 2M VWD, with a lower proportion of type 1 and 2N. Sixty-seven different variants alone or in combination with other variants were associated with an increased VWFpp ratio. The variants with the highest VWFpp ratio were mostly located in the D3-A1 VWF domains.

Novel Approach to Improve the Identification of the Bleeding Phenotype in Noonan Syndrome and Related RASopathies

OBJECTIVES

To characterize bleeding phenotype in Noonan Syndrome, to test the utility of following national guidelines in detecting this phenotype, to evaluate thromboelastography (TEG) as a diagnostic tool and to evaluate the cohort for genotype-phenotype correlations.

STUDY DESIGN

Participants with a clinical diagnosis NS or related RASopathy were enrolled in a cohort study. Study procedures included clinical bleeding assessment, coagulation testing per guidelines and hematology consultation. TEG was completed in a subset and genetic testing was conducted for those without a molecular diagnosis. International Society of Haemostasis and Thrombosis Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) scores were calculated with hematology consultation. Bleeding phenotype was defined as abnormal bleeding score.

RESULTS

Twenty participants enrolled; 12completed clinical and laboratory evaluation, five of whom met the definition for bleeding phenotype. Four of the five participants with a bleeding phenotype had platelet aggregation defects and at least one additional coagulation defect. TEG was performed in nine participants, four with bleeding phenotype and five without, and results were normal in all cases. No genotype-phenotype correlation was found.

CONCLUSION

Five of 20 participants had a bleeding phenotype identified. Based on available data we do not recommend incorporating TEG into clinical practice for NS patients. Platelet aggregation defects were the most common abnormalities, which would not be detected on Tier 1 testing of current guidelines, therefore we propose a new algorithm.

The diagnosis, natural history, and management of von Willebrand disease in women in the age of guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Women and girls with bleeding disorders face multiple bleeding challenges throughout their life. The most significant morbidity and mortality are due to heavy menstrual bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage in their reproductive years. The ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH 2021 guidelines on diagnosing and managing von Willebrand disease (VWD) provide several new updates.

AREAS COVERED

Women with VWD have a higher prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding. The subpopulation of adolescents is particularly vulnerable, as the diagnosis is often delayed with increased comorbidity of iron deficiency anemia and associated symptoms. A detailed review is done on the prevalence of bleeding-related complications, especially heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and post-partum hemorrhage (PPH). The management strategies are also reviewed in detail, with a specific focus on the target factor levels and the use of antifibrinolytics.

EXPERT OPINION

The 2021 ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH diagnostic and management recommendations are reviewed with a specific focus on hormonal methods of HMB management and antifibrinolytics in this situation. The reviewed topics include neuraxial anesthesia, factor cutoff, and tranexamic acid use in the postpartum period.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Activity by a Glycoprotein Ib-Binding Assay (VWF:GPIbR): HemosIL von Willebrand Factor Ristocetin Cofactor Activity on ACL TOP®

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a lifelong and common inherited bleeding disorder caused by a quantitative deficiency and/or qualitative defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF). In order to establish the correct diagnosis of VWD, various tests must be conducted, including evaluation of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), and VWF functional activity. The platelet-dependent VWF activity is measured in different ways, with the historical ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) using platelet aggregometry now replaced with newer assays that offer better precision, lower limits of detection, low coefficient of variation, and are fully automated. The VWF activity by glycoprotein Ib-binding assays (VWF:GPIbR) measured on the ACL TOP^® platform represents an automated assay that instead of using platelets employs latex beads coated with recombinant wild-type GPIb. VWF in the test sample agglutinates the polystyrene beads coated with GPIb in the presence of ristocetin. The reduction of turbidity as beads agglutinate represents a linear relationship with VWF:GPIbR activity. Using a ratio of VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag, the VWF:GPIbR assay also provides good sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing type 1 VWD from type 2. The following chapter describes a detailed protocol for the VWF:GPIbR assay.

Perioperative Outcomes of Patients with Bleeding Disorders Undergoing Major Surgery at an Academic Hemophilia Treatment Center

Persons with bleeding disorders (PwBD) are at high risk for bleeding with invasive procedures. However, the risk of bleeding in PwBD undergoing major surgery and outcomes of patients managed perioperatively at a hemophilia treatment center (HTC) are not well described. We performed a retrospective review of surgical outcomes among PwBD undergoing major surgery between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2019 at the Cardeza Foundation Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center in Philadelphia, PA. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding, assessed according to the ISTH-SSC's 2010 definition. Secondary outcomes included use of unplanned postoperative hemostatic therapy, LOS, and 30-day readmission rate. Results were compared to non-PwBD population from a surgical database, matched for surgery, age, and sex. During the study period, 50 PwBD underwent 63 major surgeries. The most common diagnoses were VWD (64%) and hemophilia A (20.0%). The most common surgical procedure category was orthopedic (33.3%), predominantly arthroplasties. Postoperatively,4.8% of procedures were complicated by major bleeding and 1.6% by non-major bleeding. The mean LOS was 1.65 days, and 30-day readmission rate was 1.6%. In comparison to matched, non-PwBD patients in a national surgical database undergoing the same procedures, study patients had a similar rate of bleeding complications per procedure (5.0% vs 1.04% P = .071, Fisher's exact test). PwBD undergoing major surgeries have low rates of major bleeding when receiving comprehensive care at an HTC. Bleeding and hospital readmission rates were similar to non-PwBD baseline in a large database.

Automation in the Thrombosis and Hemostasis Laboratory

Automation continues to advance into hemostasis and thrombosis laboratories. Integration of hemostasis testing into an existing chemistry track systems and adoption of a separate hemostasis track systems are important considerations. Unique issues must be addressed to maintain quality and efficiency when automation is introduced. Among other challenges, this chapter discusses centrifugation protocols, incorporation of specimen-check modules in the workflow, and inclusion of tests amenable to automation.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Disease Using a Composite Rapid 3-Test Chemiluminescence-Based von Willebrand Factor Assay Panel

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most commonly reported inherited bleeding disorder and may alternatively occur as an acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). VWD/AVWS develops from defects and/or deficiency in the adhesive plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD/AVWS diagnosis/exclusion remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of VWF defects and the technical limitations of many VWF tests, as well as the VWF test panels (number and type of tests) chosen by many laboratories. Laboratory testing for these disorders utilizes evaluation of VWF level and activity, with activity assessment needing several tests due to the many functions performed by VWF in order to help counteract bleeding. This report explains procedures for evaluating VWF level (antigen; VWF:Ag) and activity by means of a chemiluminescence-based panel. Activity assays comprise collagen binding (VWF:CB) and a ristocetin-based recombinant glycoprotein Ib-binding (VWF:GPIbR) assay that reflects a contemporary alternative to classical ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). This 3-test VWF panel (Ag, CB, GPIbR [RCo]) reflects the only such composite panel available on a single platform and is performed on an AcuStar instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory). Certain regional approvals may also allow this 3-test VWF panel to be performed on the BioFlash instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory).

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor: Factor VIII Binding for the Diagnosis or Exclusion of Type 2N von Willebrand Disease: An Update

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a large adhesive plasma protein that expresses several functional activities. One of these activities is to bind coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and to protect it from degradation. Deficiency of, and/or defects in, VWF can give rise to a bleeding disorder called von Willebrand disease (VWD). The defect in VWF that affects its ability to bind to and protect FVIII is captured within type 2N VWD. In these patients, FVIII is produced normally; however, plasma FVIII quickly degrades as it is not bound to and protected by VWF. These patients phenotypically resemble those with hemophilia A, where instead, FVIII is produced in lower amount. Both hemophilia A and 2N VWD patients therefore present with reduced levels of plasma FVIII relative to VWF level. However, therapy differs, since patients with hemophilia A are given FVIII replacement products, or FVIII mimicking products; instead, patients with 2N VWD require VWF replacement therapy, since FVIII replacement will only be effective for a short term, given this replacement product will quickly degrade in the absence of functional VWF. Thus, 2N VWD needs to be differentiated from hemophilia A. This can be achieved by genetic testing or by use of a VWF:FVIII binding assay. The current chapter provides a protocol for the performance of a commercial VWF:FVIII binding assay.

Von Willebrand Disease Epidemiology, Burden of Illness and Management: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Although hereditary von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common bleeding disorder, its epidemiology is not well understood. A systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020197674/CRD42021244374) on the epidemiology/burden of illness of VWD was conducted to better understand patients' unmet needs.

Methods

Observational studies (published January 1, 2010 to April 14, 2021) were identified in MEDLINE and Embase databases, using free-text keywords and thesaurus terms for VWD and outcomes of interest. Pragmatic web-based searches of the gray literature, including conference abstracts, were performed, and reference lists of retained publications were manually searched for additional sources. Case reports and clinical trials (phase 1-3) were excluded. Outcomes of interest were incidence, prevalence, mortality, patient characteristics, burden of illness, and therapeutic management/treatments currently used for VWD.

Results

Of the 3095 identified sources, 168 were included in this systematic review. Reported VWD prevalence (22 sources) ranged from 108.9 to 2200 per 100,000 in population-based studies and from 0.3 to 16.5 per 100,000 in referral-based studies. Reported times between first symptom onset and diagnosis (two sources; mean 669 days; median 3 years) highlighted gaps in timely VWD diagnosis. Bleeding events reported in 72-94% of the patients with VWD (all types; 27 sources) were mostly mucocutaneous including epistaxis, menorrhagia, and oral/gum bleeding. Poorer health-related quality of life (three sources) and greater health care resource utilization (three sources) were reported for patients with VWD than in general populations.

Conclusion

Available data suggest that patients with VWD experience high disease burden in terms of bleeding, poor quality of life, and health care resource utilization.

Preanalytical Variables in Hemostasis Testing

Hemostasis testing performed in clinical laboratories are critical for assessing hemorrhagic and thrombotic disorders. The assays performed can be used to provide the information required for diagnosis, risk assessment, efficacy of therapy, and therapeutic monitoring. As such, hemostasis tests should be performed to the highest level of quality, including the standardization, implementation, and monitoring of all phases of the testing, which include the preanalytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases. It is well established that the preanalytical phase is the most critical component of the testing process, being the hands-on activities, including patient preparation for blood collection, as well as the actual blood collection, including sample identification and the post-collection handling to include sample transportation, processing, and storage of samples when testing is not performed immediately. The purpose of this article is to provide an update to the previous edition of coagulation testing-related preanalytical variables (PAV) and, when properly addressed and performed, can reduce the most common causes of errors in the hemostasis laboratory.

Post-analytical Issues in Hemostasis and Thrombosis Testing: An Update

There are typically three phases identified as contributing to the total testing process. The preanalytical phase starts with the clinician and the patient, when laboratory testing is being considered. This phase also includes decisions about which tests to order (or not), patient identification, blood collection, blood transport, sample processing, and storage to name a few. There are many potential failures that may occur in this preanalytical phase, and these are the topic of another chapter in this book. The second phase, the analytical phase, represents the performance of the test, which is essentially covered in various protocols in this book and the previous edition. The third is the post-analytical phase, which is what occurs after sample testing, and is the topic of the current chapter. Post-analytical issues are generally related to reporting and interpretation of test results. This chapter provides a brief description of these events, as well as guidance for preventing or minimizing post-analytical issues. In particular, there are several strategies for improved post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, with this providing the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in patient diagnosis or management.

Challenges in the management of women with type 2B von Willebrand disease during pregnancy and the postpartum period: evidence from literature and data from an international registry and physicians' survey-communication from the Scientific and Standardization Committees of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

BACKGROUND

Management of women with type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD) during pregnancy is challenging because of dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) and the complexity resulting from discrepant VWF/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) levels, impaired platelet-dependent VWF activity, progressive thrombocytopenia, and risks associated with the use of desmopressin. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we examined the current diagnostic and management approaches and outcomes in women with VWD during pregnancy.

METHODS

Data were collected via 3 avenues: literature review, an international registry, and an international survey on physicians' practices for the management of pregnancy in women with VWD. The registry and survey were supported by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

RESULTS

Data on clinical and laboratory features, management and bleeding complications, and pregnancy outcomes of a total of 55 pregnancies from 49 women across the globe (literature: 35, registry: 20) and data reported by 112 physicians were analyzed. We describe the largest dataset on pregnancies in women with type 2B VWD available to date. The data highlight the following key issues: a) bleeding complications remain a concern in these patients, b) the target safe VWF level and the ideal monitoring approach are unknown, c) there is a wide range of hemostatic management practices in the type and timing of treatment, and d) physicians have diverse views on the mode of delivery and use of neuraxial anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that an international consensus and guidance are critically required for better care and improved outcomes in this patient cohort.

Von Willebrand Disease in Older Patients: A Retrospective Electronic Health Record Review

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is often diagnosed as a consequence of symptoms experienced with hemostatic stressors, such as menstruation and childbirth. Thus, patients seeking medical care for VWD are generally younger. As a result, the natural course of VWD in older adults has not been well described. A retrospective electronic health record review was performed to provide a descriptive analysis of older VWD patients with at least one clinic visit at the Hemophilia Center of Western Pennsylvania (HCWP) between June 1, 2015, and May 31, 2021, and age 45 or older at the time of the visit. Data collected included VWD-related information, multimorbidity, and medications. Age-related change in von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels and the influence of multimorbidity on VWF levels were assessed. Seventy patients had 131 HCWP clinic visits. Hypertension, 34.3%, and osteoarthritis, 32.3%, were the most common multimorbidity-associated conditions. More than 33% of patients were receiving at least one antihemostatic medication. The most common bleeding symptom was ecchymosis, 22.9%. VWF antigen levels, 0.76 IU/mL, and the proportion of patients with normal VWF levels, 54.5%, increased with age to 0.99 IU/mL, p < 0.001, and 78.8%, p < 0.001, respectively. Multimorbidity did not predict change in VWF levels, p = 0.84. Of 62 invasive procedures performed, bleeding occurred in one of nine where VWD-specific therapy was omitted. These findings underscore the importance of describing the natural course of VWD in older adults, especially the critical nature of determining bleeding risk to guide clinical decision-making with the use of antihemostatic drugs and periprocedural VWD-specific therapy.

Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome Secondary to Normally Functioning Mechanical Aortic Valve and High-Output Cardiac State

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is caused by an acquired deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a multimeric protein required for primary hemostasis. For patients with heart valve diseases, high gradient across the malfunctioning valves could cause elevated shear stress and damage the most effective large VWF, eventually resulting in AVWS. However, AVWS has not been reported in association with normally functioning mechanical valves. Herein, we reported a 74-year-old female who suffered from recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding with a history of mechanical aortic and mitral valve replacement. This patient's function/antigen ratio of VWF was decreased and gel electrophoresis revealed the loss of large VWF, which confirmed the diagnosis of AVWS. Echocardiogram showed that the function of the prostheses was normal. However, the gradient across aortic valve was increased due to a high cardiac state which is secondary to chronic anemia, resulting in the disruption of large VWF multimers and exacerbation of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. After managing the patient's anemia with transfusion, the gradient across the aortic valve had improved, with the resolution of GI bleeding. This is the first case report of AVWS that is associated with a normally functioning mechanical valve. AVWS should be considered one of the differential diagnoses if patients present with unexplained GI bleeding on the background of having prosthetic heart valves. The management of the underlying condition is essential.

What have we learned about the patient's experience of von Willebrand disease? A focus on women

Von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder (IBD), disproportionately affects females, given the hemostatic challenges they may encounter throughout their lifetimes. Despite this, research about VWD remains grossly underrepresented, particularly compared to hemophilia, which is historically diagnosed in males. Structural sexism, stigmatization of menstrual bleeding, delayed diagnosis, and a lack of timely access to care result in an increased frequency of bleeding events, iron deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, and a decreased quality of life. However, we are only beginning to recognize and acknowledge the magnitude of the burden of this disease. With an increasing number of studies documenting the experiences of women with IBDs and recent international guidelines suggesting changes to optimal management, a paradigm shift in recognition and treatment is taking place. Here, we present a fictional patient case to illustrate one woman's history of bleeding. We review the evidence describing the impact of VWD on quality of life, normalization of vaginal bleeding, diagnostic delays, and the importance of access to multidisciplinary care. Furthermore, we discuss considerations around reproductive decision-making and the intergenerational nature of bleeding, which often renders patients as caregivers. Through incorporating the patient perspective, we argue for an equitable and compassionate path to overcome decades of silence, misrecognition, and dismissal. This path moves toward destigmatization, open dialogue, and timely access to specialized care.

Diagnostic pitfalls and conundrums in type 1 von Willebrand disease

Most people with von Willebrand disease (VWD) have a partial quantitative deficiency of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) or type 1 VWD. In contrast to type 2 and type 3 VWD, laboratory assays will not always establish the diagnosis in type 1 VWD. This is because plasma VWF levels in type 1 VWD, especially those with levels closer to 50 IU/dL, overlap with the general population. Assessment is further complicated by increased plasma VWF levels in response to physiologic stressors or aging. Diagnosis of those with type 1 VWD with plasma VWF levels 30 to 50 IU/dL (previously referred to as "low VWF") requires expert assessment of bleeding phenotype as well as an understanding of the limitations of both bleeding assessment tools (BATs) and laboratory testing. Using the available evidence and highlighting research gaps, we discuss common dilemmas facing providers relating to assessment of adolescents, transition from pediatrics to adult care, and older individuals with type 1 VWD.

Type 1 von Willebrand Disease in a Pediatric Patient Caused by a Novel Heterozygous Deletion of Exons 1 to 6 of the von Willebrand Factor Gene: A Case Report

A 6-year-old boy was referred to a hematologist due to excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. Diagnostic assessment for von Willebrand disease (VWD) was indicated and included both coagulation and genetic testing. Laboratory testing revealed proportionally decreased von Willebrand factor (VWF) glycoprotein Ib-binding activity (23.6%) compared to VWF antigen (24.7%), similarly decreased VWF collagen-binding activity (24.2%), and normally distributed VWF multimers, with decreased intensity of all fractions. Diagnosis of type 1 VWD was established. Genetic analysis by means of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of VWF and coagulation factor VIII genes did not identify any causative mutations. Additionally, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) of VWF gene exons revealed a heterozygous deletion of exons 1 to 6, which is reported in type 1 VWD for the first time. Application of MLPA was crucial for revealing the genetic basis of type 1 VWD in this case, which would have remained undetected if only NGS was used.

Von Willebrand factor in diagnostics and treatment of cardiovascular disease: Recent advances and prospects

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a large multimeric glycoprotein involved in hemostasis. It is essential for platelet adhesion to the subendothelium of the damaged endothelial layer at high shear rates. Such shear rates occur in small-diameter arteries, especially at stenotic sites. Moreover, VWF carries coagulation factor VIII and protects it from proteolysis in the bloodstream. Deficiency or dysfunction of VWF predisposes to bleeding. In contrast, an increase in the concentration of high molecular weight multimers (HMWM) of VWF is closely associated with arterial thrombotic events. Severe aortic stenosis (AS) or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) can deplete HMWM of VWF and lead to cryptogenic, gastrointestinal, subcutaneous, and mucosal bleeding. Considering that VWF facilitates primary hemostasis and a local inflammatory response at high shear rates, its dysfunction may contribute to the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its complications. However, current diagnostic methods do not allow for an in-depth analysis of this contribution. The development of novel diagnostic techniques, primarily microfluidic, is underway. Such methods can provide physiologically relevant assessments of VWF function at high shear rates; however, they have not been introduced into clinical practice. The development and use of agents targeting VWF interaction with the vessel wall and/or platelets may be reasonable in prevention of CAD and its complications, given the prominent role of VWF in arterial thrombosis.

Analysis of von Willebrand Disease in the "Heart of Europe"

Background  von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a genetic bleeding disorder caused by defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF), quantitative (type 1 and 3) or qualitative (type 2). The laboratory phenotyping is heterogenic making diagnosis difficult.

Objectives  Complete laboratory analysis of VWD as an expansion of the previously reported cross-sectional family-based VWD study in the Czech Republic (BRNO-VWD) and Slovakia (BRA-VWD) under the name “Heart of Europe,” in order to improve the understanding of laboratory phenotype/genotype correlation.

Patients and Methods  In total, 227 suspected VWD patients were identified from historical records. Complete laboratory analysis was established using all available assays, including VWF multimers and genetic analysis.

Results  A total of 191 patients (from 119 families) were confirmed as having VWD. The majority was characterized as a type 1 VWD, followed by type 2. Multimeric patterns concordant with laboratory phenotypes were found in approximately 83% of all cases. A phenotype/genotype correlation was present in 84% (77% type 1, 99% type 2, and 61% type 3) of all patients. Another 45 candidate mutations (23 novel variations), not found in the initial study, could be identified (missense 75% and truncating 24%). An exon 1–3 gene deletion was identified in 14 patients where no mutation was found by direct DNA sequencing, increasing the linkage up to 92%, overall.

Conclusion  This study provides a cross-sectional overview of the VWD population in a part of Central Europe. It is an addition to the previously published BRNO-VWD study, and provides important data to the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis/European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders VWD mutation database with identification of novel causal mutations.

Origin and timing of de novo variants implicated in type 2 von Willebrand disease

Very few studies have shown the real origin and timing of de novo variants (DNV) implicated in von Willebrand disease (VWD). We investigated four families with type 2 VWD. First, we conducted linkage analysis using single nucleotide variant genotyping to recognize the possible provenance of DNV. Second, we performed amplification refractory mutation system‐quantitative polymerase chain reaction to confirm the real origin of variant (~0% mutant cells) or presence of a genetic mosaic variant (0%–50% mutant cells) in three embryonic germ layer‐derived tissues and sperm cells. Then, three possible timings of DNV were categorized based on the relative likelihood of occurrence according to the number of cell divisions during embryogenesis. Two each with type 2B VWD (proband 1 p.Arg1308Cys, proband 4 p.Arg1306Trp) and type 2A VWD (proband 2 p.Leu1276Arg, proband 3 p.Ser1506Leu) were identified. Variant origins were identified for families 1, 2 and 3 and confirmed to originate from the mother, father and father, respectively. However, the father of family 4 was confirmed to have isolated germline mosaicism with 2.2% mutant sperm cells. Further investigation confirmed the paternal grandfather to be the origin of variant. Thus, we proposed that DNV originating from the two fathers most likely occurred at the single sperm cell, the one originating from the mother occurred at the zygote during the first few cellular divisions; alternatively, in family 4, the DNV most likely occurred at the early postzygotic development in the father. Our findings are essential for understanding genetic pathogenesis and providing accurate genetic counselling.

Von Willebrand Disease—Specific Aspects in Women

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, which results from a deficiency or dysfunction of von Willebrand factor (VWF). The major symptoms of patients affected by VWD include mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal bleeding, easy bruising, and prolonged provoked bleeding due to injury or surgery. Although women and men are equally likely to be affected by VWD, women continue to be disproportionately affected by the bleeding challenges. Women with VWD suffer from sex-specific symptoms, such as menorrhagia, and are at higher risk of reproductive problems and recurrent miscarriage. Furthermore, pregnant women with VWD are more likely at higher risk of suffering from primary and secondary peripartal hemorrhage and anemia and the need for transfusions. Despite being affected by gynecologic and obstetrical bleeding, women face multiple barriers in obtaining an accurate diagnosis. This constitutes a problem that needs to be addressed, and early appropriate medical care should be ensured. There are several effective treatment options for women with VWD that can significantly improve their quality of life, including desmopressin, VWF concentrates, hormonal therapy, and antifibrinolytic therapy. During pregnancy, the monitoring of VWF activity levels is essential. The peripartal management depends on the type of VWD and on the measured levels of VWF levels and activity prior to delivery.

Ristocetin dependent cofactor activity in von Willebrand disease diagnosis: Limitations of relying on a single measure

Background

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder, however the diagnosis can be complicated by a subjective bleeding history and issues with some current von Willebrand factor (VWF) laboratory assays.

Objectives

In the Zimmerman Program, we sought to determine how often a type 1 diagnosis was based on a single low VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) level resulting from the common genetic variant p.D1472H or an isolated assay issue, if that low value was corroborated by the VWF glycoprotein-IbM (VWF:GPIbM) assay, and if retesting confirmed original levels.

Methods

New patients being evaluated for bleeding were consented. Analysis included VWF sequencing, bleeding scores, and comparisons of local VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF:RCo to central VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIbM.

Results

A total of 18% of VWD subjects had a low local VWF:RCo, but normal VWF:Ag and normal central testing including VWF:GPIbM. Seventy percent of the low VWF:RCo cohort had no pathogenic VWF variants; however, 33% carried p.D1472H. Low VWF:RCo subjects with follow-up local testing within 2 years showed those with p.D1472H continued to have low VWF:RCo and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio with normal VWF:GPIbM. Subjects without p.D1472H had an increase mean VWF:RCo, resulting in 59% with normal levels on repeat testing.

Conclusions

The diagnosis of VWD based on a single low VWF:RCo but normal VWF:Ag, was often attributed to p.D1472H or variability in VWF:RCo that was eliminated with VWF:GPIbM. Our study suggests that using VWF:RCo alone for diagnostic purposes may be insufficient while repeat VWF:RCo or VWF:GPIbM testing can be valuable in establishing a VWD diagnosis.

Longitudinal bleeding assessment in von Willebrand disease utilizing an interim bleeding score

BACKGROUND

Assessment of bleeding phenotype is critically important in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Despite advances in bleeding assessment tools (BATs), standardized tools to evaluate bleeding following diagnosis (interim bleeding) are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the clinical utility of an interim bleeding protocol in a multicenter, international study involving patients with VWD.

METHODS

The enrolment ISTH BAT formed the original bleeding score (0 BS). At follow-up, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis BAT was repeated but included only interval bleeding (Interim BS, 1 BS). Both scores were annualized (0 BS/yr, 1 BS/yr). BS were analyzed by VWD subtype, plasma VWF level, sex, and age.

RESULTS

Interim BS discriminated by subtype, with significantly increased 0 BS and 1 BS in patients with type 3 VWD. In patients with type 1 VWD, a positive or negative 0 BS did not predict future bleeding, with similar 1 BS/yr (median 1.0 vs. 0.7, p = .2). Despite significantly higher 0 BS in females with type 1 VWD than males (median 7 vs. 5, p = .0012), 1 BS were not significantly different (median 4 vs. 4, p = .16). While 0 BS were lower in children than adults with type 1 VWD, interim BS were similar (median 5 vs. 3, p = .5; 1BS/yr, median 1 vs. 0.8, p = .7). Interestingly, in those with plasma von Willebrand factor:ristocetin cofactor levels >50 IU/dl, interim BS rates were similar to those 30-50 IU/dl (1 BS/yr 0.8 vs. 1.3, p = .5).

CONCLUSION

This study provides both a new approach to longitudinal bleeding assessment and insights into the evolution of bleeding in VWD.

Evaluating for Suspected Child Abuse: Conditions That Predispose to Bleeding

Child abuse might be suspected when children present with cutaneous bruising, intracranial hemorrhage, or other manifestations of bleeding. In these cases, it is necessary to consider medical conditions that predispose to easy bleeding or bruising. When evaluating for the possibility of bleeding disorders and other conditions that predispose to hemorrhage, it is important for pediatricians to consider the child's presenting history, medical history, and physical examination findings before initiating a laboratory investigation. Many medical conditions can predispose to easy bleeding. Before ordering laboratory tests for a disease, it is useful to understand the biochemical basis and clinical presentation of the disorder, condition prevalence, and test characteristics. This technical report reviews the major medical conditions that predispose to bruising or bleeding and should be considered when evaluating for abusive injury.

Von Willebrand factor activity levels are influenced by driver mutation status in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia patients with well-controlled platelet counts

Von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor (VWF activity) and platelet count (PLT) are negatively correlated in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). However, VWF activity does not always normalize upon controlling PLT in those patients. To address this issue, we investigated the correlation between VWF activity and PLT in PV and ET patients. The negative correlation between VWF activity and PLT was stronger in calreticulin mutation-positive (CALR+) ET than in Janus kinase 2 mutation-positive (JAK2+) PV or ET groups. When PLT were maintained at a certain level (<600 × 10⁹ /L), low VWF activity (<50%) was more frequently observed in JAK2+ PV patients than in JAK2+ ET (p=0.013) or CALR+ ET (p=0.013) groups, and in PV and ET patients with ≥50% JAK2+ allele burden than in those with allele burden <50% (p=0.015). High VWF activity (>150%) was more frequent in the JAK2+ ET group than in the CALR+ ET group (p=0.005), and often associated with vasomotor symptoms (p=0.002). This study suggests that some patients with JAK2+ PV or ET have VWF activity outside the standard range even with well-controlled PLT, and that the measurement of VWF activity is useful for assessing the risk of thrombosis and hemorrhage.

Diagnostic Testing for von Willebrand Disease: Trends and Insights from North American Laboratories over the Last Decade

Accurate diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) depends on the quality, precision, and variability of the laboratory assays. The North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) is a provider of external quality assessment (EQA) for approximately 60 specialized coagulation laboratories in North America. In this report, NASCOLA EQA data from 2010 to 2021 are reviewed for trends in methodology and precision among various assays. In particular, recent ASH ISTH NHF WFH (American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Hemophilia Federation) guidelines for diagnosis of VWD are reviewed in light of EQA data. In contrast to other geographic regions, laboratories in North America predominantly use three-assay screening panels (antigen, platelet-binding activity, and factor VIII [FVIII] activity) rather than four-assay panels (antigen, platelet-binding activity, FVIII activity, and collagen-binding activity). They also use latex immunoassays rather than chemiluminescence immunoassays, and the classic ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assay and monoclonal antibody (VWF:Ab) assay to assess VWF platelet-binding activity over newer recommended assays (VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR). Factors that may be influencing these North American practice patterns include lack of Food and Drug Administration approval of the VWF:GPIbM, VWF:GPIbR, collagen binding assays, and chemiluminescence methodologies, and the influence of the 2008 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines on laboratory practice. Lastly, systems-based solutions are urgently needed to improve the overall accuracy of laboratory testing for VWD by minimizing preanalytical variables and adopting assay standardization.

Analysis of College of American Pathologists von Willebrand Factor Proficiency Testing Program

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) level and/or function is altered in von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common heritable bleeding disorder worldwide. Laboratory assessment of VWF is continually evolving. Historically, the primary method for the assessment of VWF platelet-binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). Contemporary alternative measures of VWF platelet-binding activity include VWF:GPIbR (recombinant; using ristocetin), VWF:GPIbM (recombinant; gain-of-function mutant), and monoclonal antibody. Recently, the American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Federation of Hemophilia collaboration issued guidelines recommending the use of newer assays of VWF platelet-binding activity (VWF: GPIbM, VWF: GPIbR) over VWF:RCo, given known limitations of the VWF:RCo assay. Despite this recommendation, the newer VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR assays are not United States Food and Drug Administration cleared, limiting their availability in the United States. We sought to assess assay utilization trends, agreement of VWF testing methods, and imprecision of VWF testing (based on assigned sample type) from the College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Surveys. The analysis confirms that, while VWF antigen testing has low imprecision, the various VWF activity assays have significant interassay variability, with VWF:RCo showing greater imprecision than the newer GPIb-binding assays. The overall trends in assay utilization reflect the barriers to complete compliance with modern VWD diagnostic guidelines in North America.

How Do Laboratories Perform von Willebrand Disease Diagnostics and Classification of von Willebrand Disease Patients? Results from External Quality Data and an International Survey

BACKGROUND

 Reduced or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) may lead to von Willebrand disease (VWD), which is a common inherited bleeding disorder. VWD is classified into three major types: type 1 is a partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 is a complete quantitative deficiency of VWF, and type 2 consists of qualitative abnormalities of VWF. To arrive at a correct VWD diagnosis, multiple tests and a correct interpretation of these tests are needed.

AIM

 The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the approach of laboratories toward VWD diagnosis.

METHODS

 Data from four samples of the external quality assessment (EQA) VWF surveys of the ECAT (External Quality Control for Assays and Tests) were evaluated. Furthermore, results were analyzed of a questionnaire that was sent to hemostasis laboratories about VWD diagnostic approaches.

RESULTS

 For most EQA samples, the majority of participants indicated the correct classification. However, 6 to 60% indicated another classification. For all samples, significant differences in VWF results were observed between the correct and incorrect classifications. The questionnaire demonstrated that the testing approach varied between the laboratories, especially for parameters that were essential for discrimination between VWD type 1 and healthy individuals, as well as the cutoff values used to discriminate VWD types 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

 Diagnosis of VWD is heterogeneous in diagnostic approach, guidelines, and cutoff values within large ranges of VWF results between laboratories. Harmonization of approaches and increased accuracy of VWF measurements may help to establish a correct diagnosis.

External Quality Assessment Data for Investigation of von Willebrand Disease: Focus on Relative Utility of Contemporary Functional von Willebrand Factor Assays. The United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) Experience

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is one of the most common hereditary bleeding disorders. Effective management of patients and their families depends on accurate diagnosis and subtype classification, and quality assurance including participation in proficiency testing programs is essential to ensure the accuracy of the panel of assays required to achieve this diagnosis. We report here findings from recent external quality assessment (EQA) exercises, as well as from a questionnaire about diagnostic practices employed by centers in the United Kingdom National Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) performing von Willebrand factor (VWF) assays. Plasma samples from donors with VWD, "normal" donors, the International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific Subcommittee (ISTH SSC) plasma standard, and whole blood samples were sent to participants in the UK NEQAS BC program for VWF investigation. Calibration of lot#5 of the ISTH SSC plasma standard was shown to give improved comparability between the recovered value from an EQA exercise and the assigned potency for VWF activity assays. Diagnostic accuracy and precision amongst UK NEQAS participants was good, with an average 99% of centers reporting the correct interpretation for normal, type 1 and type 2 VWD samples, 100% diagnostic accuracy for centers performing FVIII binding assays, and good agreement amongst centers performing multimeric analysis. Genetic analysis of the VWF gene by specialist centers demonstrated errors in the genotyping process in one center, but also demonstrated failings in the interpretation of results in other centers. Despite evidence of good laboratory accuracy and precision in their assays, a questionnaire identified marked variation in diagnostic criteria employed, underlining the importance of guidelines to support the diagnosis of VWD.

Laboratory Diagnosis of von Willebrand Disease (VWD): Geographical Perspectives

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is reportedly the most common inherited bleeding disorder, and can also arise as an acquired (von Willebrand) syndrome (AVWS). The hemostasis laboratory plays a key role in the diagnosis or exclusion of VWD/AVWS, which may otherwise be suspected due to the patient's clinical (bleeding) history. VWD/AVWS arise from deficiency and/or defects in the adhesive plasma protein, von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWF undertakes various roles within hemostasis, but principally acts within primary hemostasis to anchor platelets to sites of vascular damage, thereby facilitating thrombus formation to arrest bleeding. The diagnosis or exclusion of VWD/AVWS requires laboratory testing for both VWF level and activity, with the latter potentially comprising several of a potential plethora of different assays. Complete diagnosis of VWD also requires the differentiation of VWD type, with six types comprising the current classification (i.e., qualitative [types 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N VWD] vs. quantitative [types 1 and 3 VWD] deficiency/defects). Although appropriate diagnosis and type classification hold important therapeutic consequences, these remain problematic and sometimes elusive for some laboratories to achieve. This report reviews the laboratory aided diagnosis or exclusion of VWD from a geographic perspective, and focuses on the disparities of approaches and methods in different regions of the world. This is primarily done from the perspective of data available from published reports related to external quality assessment (or proficiency testing) from different geographic localities. Moreover, differences in approaches between laboratories may arise due to differential adherence of particular guidelines, as well as regulatory aspects and predominance of local manufacturers and suppliers.

How Do Laboratories Perform von Willebrand Disease Diagnostics and Classification of von Willebrand Disease Patients? Results from External Quality Data and an International Survey

Background Reduced or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) may lead to von Willebrand disease (VWD), which is a common inherited bleeding disorder. VWD is classified into three major types: type 1 is a partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 is a complete quantitative deficiency of VWF, and type 2 consists of qualitative abnormalities of VWF. To arrive at a correct VWD diagnosis, multiple tests and a correct interpretation of these tests are needed.

Aim The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the approach of laboratories toward VWD diagnosis.

Methods Data from four samples of the external quality assessment (EQA) VWF surveys of the ECAT (External Quality Control for Assays and Tests) were evaluated. Furthermore, results were analyzed of a questionnaire that was sent to hemostasis laboratories about VWD diagnostic approaches.

Results For most EQA samples, the majority of participants indicated the correct classification. However, 6 to 60% indicated another classification. For all samples, significant differences in VWF results were observed between the correct and incorrect classifications. The questionnaire demonstrated that the testing approach varied between the laboratories, especially for parameters that were essential for discrimination between VWD type 1 and healthy individuals, as well as the cutoff values used to discriminate VWD types 1 and 2.

Conclusions Diagnosis of VWD is heterogeneous in diagnostic approach, guidelines, and cutoff values within large ranges of VWF results between laboratories. Harmonization of approaches and increased accuracy of VWF measurements may help to establish a correct diagnosis.

How Do Laboratories Perform von Willebrand Disease Diagnostics and Classification of von Willebrand Disease Patients? Results from External Quality Data and an International Survey

BACKGROUND

 Reduced or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) may lead to von Willebrand disease (VWD), which is a common inherited bleeding disorder. VWD is classified into three major types: type 1 is a partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 is a complete quantitative deficiency of VWF, and type 2 consists of qualitative abnormalities of VWF. To arrive at a correct VWD diagnosis, multiple tests and a correct interpretation of these tests are needed.

AIM

 The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the approach of laboratories toward VWD diagnosis.

METHODS

 Data from four samples of the external quality assessment (EQA) VWF surveys of the ECAT (External Quality Control for Assays and Tests) were evaluated. Furthermore, results were analyzed of a questionnaire that was sent to hemostasis laboratories about VWD diagnostic approaches.

RESULTS

 For most EQA samples, the majority of participants indicated the correct classification. However, 6 to 60% indicated another classification. For all samples, significant differences in VWF results were observed between the correct and incorrect classifications. The questionnaire demonstrated that the testing approach varied between the laboratories, especially for parameters that were essential for discrimination between VWD type 1 and healthy individuals, as well as the cutoff values used to discriminate VWD types 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

 Diagnosis of VWD is heterogeneous in diagnostic approach, guidelines, and cutoff values within large ranges of VWF results between laboratories. Harmonization of approaches and increased accuracy of VWF measurements may help to establish a correct diagnosis.

Analysis of College of American Pathologists von Willebrand Factor Proficiency Testing Program

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) level and/or function is altered in von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common heritable bleeding disorder worldwide. Laboratory assessment of VWF is continually evolving. Historically, the primary method for the assessment of VWF platelet-binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). Contemporary alternative measures of VWF platelet-binding activity include VWF:GPIbR (recombinant; using ristocetin), VWF:GPIbM (recombinant; gain-of-function mutant), and monoclonal antibody. Recently, the American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Federation of Hemophilia collaboration issued guidelines recommending the use of newer assays of VWF platelet-binding activity (VWF: GPIbM, VWF: GPIbR) over VWF:RCo, given known limitations of the VWF:RCo assay. Despite this recommendation, the newer VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR assays are not United States Food and Drug Administration cleared, limiting their availability in the United States. We sought to assess assay utilization trends, agreement of VWF testing methods, and imprecision of VWF testing (based on assigned sample type) from the College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Surveys. The analysis confirms that, while VWF antigen testing has low imprecision, the various VWF activity assays have significant interassay variability, with VWF:RCo showing greater imprecision than the newer GPIb-binding assays. The overall trends in assay utilization reflect the barriers to complete compliance with modern VWD diagnostic guidelines in North America.

Analysis of College of American Pathologists von Willebrand Factor Proficiency Testing Program

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) level and/or function is altered in von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common heritable bleeding disorder worldwide. Laboratory assessment of VWF is continually evolving. Historically, the primary method for the assessment of VWF platelet-binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). Contemporary alternative measures of VWF platelet-binding activity include VWF:GPIbR (recombinant; using ristocetin), VWF:GPIbM (recombinant; gain-of-function mutant), and monoclonal antibody. Recently, the American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Federation of Hemophilia collaboration issued guidelines recommending the use of newer assays of VWF platelet-binding activity (VWF: GPIbM, VWF: GPIbR) over VWF:RCo, given known limitations of the VWF:RCo assay. Despite this recommendation, the newer VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR assays are not United States Food and Drug Administration cleared, limiting their availability in the United States. We sought to assess assay utilization trends, agreement of VWF testing methods, and imprecision of VWF testing (based on assigned sample type) from the College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Surveys. The analysis confirms that, while VWF antigen testing has low imprecision, the various VWF activity assays have significant interassay variability, with VWF:RCo showing greater imprecision than the newer GPIb-binding assays. The overall trends in assay utilization reflect the barriers to complete compliance with modern VWD diagnostic guidelines in North America.

Gynaecological management of women with inherited bleeding disorders

Women with inherited bleeding disorders (IBDs) may present to healthcare professionals in a variety of ways and commonly will be encountered by either haematology or gynaecology services. Heavy menstrual bleeding is very often the first manifestation of an IBD. There is a wide variation in severity of bleeding for women with IBD and diagnosis and subsequent management of their condition requires multidisciplinary specialised care which is tailored to the individual and includes excellent cross-specialty communication between gynaecology and haematology teams. This guideline is intended for both haematologists and gynaecologists who are involved in the diagnosis and management of women with bleeding disorders. It sets out recommendations about how to investigate heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), the commonest presentation for women with IBD to hospital services, to guide physicians about how to diagnose an IBD and covers the management of women with known IBD and HMB. The second section sets out recommendations for patients known to have IBD and covers management of patients with IBD in the setting of gynaecological surgery and management for all other non-surgical gynaecological situations.

VWF-Gly2752Ser, a novel non-cysteine substitution variant in the CK domain, exhibits severe secretory impairment by hampering C-terminal dimer formation

BACKGROUND

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric glycoprotein that plays important roles in hemostasis and thrombosis. C-terminal interchain-disulfide bonds in the cystine knot (CK) domain are essential for VWF dimerization. Previous studies have reported that missense variants of cysteine in the CK domain disrupt the intrachain-disulfide bond and cause type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD). However, type 3 VWD-associated noncysteine substitution variants in the CK domain have not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the molecular mechanism of a novel non-cysteine variant in the CK domain, VWF c.8254 G>A (p.Gly2752Ser), which was identified in a patient with type 3 VWD as homozygous.

METHODS

Genetic analysis was performed by whole exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing. VWF multimer analysis was performed using SDS-agarose electrophoresis. VWF production and subcellular localization were analyzed using ex vivo endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) and an in vitro recombinant VWF (rVWF) expression system.

RESULTS

The patient was homozygous for VWF-Gly2752Ser. Plasma VWF enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay showed that the VWF antigen level of the patient was 1.2% compared with healthy subjects. A tiny amount of VWF was identified in the patient's ECFC. Multimer analysis revealed that the circulating VWF-Gly2752Ser presented only low molecular weight multimers. Subcellular localization analysis of VWF-Gly2752Ser-transfected cell lines showed that rVWF-Gly2752Ser was severely impaired in its ER-to-Golgi trafficking.

CONCLUSION

VWF-Gly2752Ser causes severe secretory impairment because of its dimerization failure. This is the first report of a VWF variant with a noncysteine substitution in the CK domain that causes type 3 VWD.

Prolonged APTT and autoimmune overt hypothyroidism identified postpartum: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid disorders have been linked to abnormalities in the coagulation system, and a hypocoagulant state has been proposed in hypothyroidism. The assessment of thyroid function is, however, not routinely recommended as part of the assessment for coagulation disorders.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a 32-year-old woman who had no history of thyroid disease and who recently gave birth preterm because of severe preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Due to severe placental dysfunction, she underwent a routine biochemical assessment of the coagulation system 6 months postpartum, and a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (43 s) was identified along with a low level of coagulation factor VIII (0.44 IU/mL), and a low level of von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen (0.35 IU/mL), vWF activity (0.38 IU/mL) as well as reduced generation of thrombin. The assessment of thyroid function in the patient identified autoimmune, overt hypothyroidism with a thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration of 139 mIU/L, low levels of the peripheral thyroid hormones (total thyroxine: 43 nmol/L, total triiodothyronine: 0.9 nmol/L), and high levels of thyroid peroxidase antibodies (296 U/mL) as well as thyroglobulin antibodies (927 U/mL).

CONCLUSION

In this case, prolonged APTT provided a diagnostic clue for the assessment of thyroid function in a young woman with a recent history of severe placental dysfunction. The identification of autoimmune, overt hypothyroidism emphasizes that measurement of TSH may be of clinical importance in cases of unexplained prolonged APTT or other biochemical signs of abnormalities in the coagulation system.

ESTABLISHED FACTS

Hypothyroidism has been associated with alterations of the coagulation system suggesting a hypocoagulant state. At present, measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone is not routinely recommended as part of the assessment for coagulation disorders.

NOVEL INSIGHTS

In this case, biochemical assessment of the coagulation system was routinely performed following a pregnancy complicated by severe placental dysfunction. Overt hypothyroidism of autoimmune origin was identified secondary to prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) postpartum along with low levels of coagulation factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, and thrombin generation. Measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone may be considered in cases of unexplained prolonged APTT.

Desmopressin testing in von Willebrand disease: Lowering the burden

Background

Individuals with von Willebrand disease (VWD) require desmopressin testing because of interindividual response differences. However, testing is burdensome, while not all patients may need extensive testing.

Objectives

To provide von Willebrand factor (VWF) cutoffs that predict desmopressin nonresponse and thereby identify individuals who do not need extensive testing in a retrospective cohort. We validated these cutoffs in a prospective cohort.

Patients and Methods

We included 376 patients (Type 1 VWD with VWF activity [VWF:Act] <0.30 IU/ml: n = 112; with VWF:Act 0.30–0.50 IU/ml: n = 206; Type 2 VWD: n = 58; ages, 5–76 years) from January 2000 to July 2020. We collected VWF:Act and factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) at baseline and several time points after desmopressin (T1–T6). We defined response as VWF:Act and FVIII:C 0.50 IU/ml or greater at T1 and T4. We compared VWF:Act and FVIII:C distribution (historically lowest level, baseline, and T1) between responders and nonresponders and determined cutoffs discriminating between these groups. Results were validated in a group of 30 individuals.

Results

All individuals with Type 1 VWD and Type 2 VWD, respectively, with baseline VWF:Act 0.34 IU/ml or greater or 0.28 IU/ml or greater were responders. In individuals with T1 VWF:Act ≥0.89 IU/ml (Type 1 VWD) or T1 VWF:Act 1.10 IU/ml or greater (Type 2 VWD), response remained at T4.

Conclusion

Desmopressin testing is not needed when lowest historical VWF:Act is 0.30 IU/ml or greater. In patients with Type 1 VWD who require testing, measurements after T1 are often not needed. In patients with Type 2 VWD who require testing, we advise performing T1 and T4 measurements.

The p.P1127S pathogenic variant lowers von Willebrand factor levels through higher affinity for the macrophagic scavenger receptor LRP1: Clinical phenotype and pathogenic mechanisms

BACKGROUND

The index case is a 21-year-old Italian woman with a mild hemorrhagic syndrome and von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) = 34.3 U/dl, VWF recombinant glycoprotein Ib (VWF:GpIbR) = 32.8 U/dl, and factor VIII (FVIII) = 55.3 IU/dl.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to characterize from a genetic and biochemical standpoint this low VWF phenotype.

METHODS

Coagulation and biochemical methods were used to study the structural and functional pattern of VWF multimers in the index case's plasma. Recombinant wild-type and p.P1127S VWF variants were produced using human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells. In addition, genetic screening was carried out to detect single nucleotide variants of some scavenger VWF/FVIII receptor genes such as CLEC4M, STAB2, and ASGR2.

RESULTS

Genetic investigation revealed that the index case inherited from her mother the heterozygous missense mutation c.3379C > T (VWF exon 25), causing the p.P1127S substitution in the VWF D'D3 domain. The index case was also homozygous for the scavenger receptor ASGR2 c.-95 CC-genotype. Desmopressin normalized the VWF level of the patient, although its clearance was faster (t1/2  = 6.7 h) than in normal subjects (t1/2  = 12 ± 0.7 h). FVIII-VWF interaction, A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease with ThromboSpondin type 1 motif-13 levels, ristocetin-induced-platelet-aggregation, and VWF multimeric pattern were normal. The p.P1127S variant was normally synthesized and secreted by HEK-293 cells, and molecular modeling predicts a conformational change showing higher affinity for the macrophagic scavenger receptor lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), as also experimentally verified.

CONCLUSIONS

The p.P1127S variant may cause a low VWF phenotype, stemming from an increased VWF affinity for the scavenger receptor LRP1 and, consequently, an accelerated clearance of VWF.

Non‐factor therapies for bleeding disorders: A primer for the general haematologist

Management of patients with severe bleeding disorders, particularly haemophilia A and B, and to a lesser extent, von Willebrand disease, has come on leaps and bounds over the past decade. Until recently, patients relied upon the administration of factor concentrates to prevent or treat bleeding episodes. Factor administration requires intravenous access and, in up to one‐third of patients, leads to the development of neutralising antibodies, or inhibitors, which are associated with more frequent bleeding episodes and higher morbidity. Novel non‐factor therapies may offer a solution to these unmet needs. In this review, we discuss the factor mimetics, particularly emicizumab, and the rebalancing agents, which inhibit antithrombin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor and activated protein C, and novel treatments to enhance von Willebrand factor levels. We review the available trial data, unanswered questions and challenges associated with these new treatment modalities. Finally, we provide practical management algorithms to aid the general haematologist when faced with a patient receiving emicizumab who requires surgery or may develop bleeding.

The Vascular Endothelium and Coagulation: Homeostasis, Disease, and Treatment, with a Focus on the Von Willebrand Factor and Factors VIII and V

The vascular endothelium has several important functions, including hemostasis. The homeostasis of hemostasis is based on a fine balance between procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins and between fibrinolytic and antifibrinolytic ones. Coagulopathies are characterized by a mutation-induced alteration of the function of certain coagulation factors or by a disturbed balance between the mechanisms responsible for regulating coagulation. Homeostatic therapies consist in replacement and nonreplacement treatments or in the administration of antifibrinolytic agents. Rebalancing products reestablish hemostasis by inhibiting natural anticoagulant pathways. These agents include monoclonal antibodies, such as concizumab and marstacimab, which target the tissue factor pathway inhibitor; interfering RNA therapies, such as fitusiran, which targets antithrombin III; and protease inhibitors, such as serpinPC, which targets active protein C. In cases of thrombophilia (deficiency of protein C, protein S, or factor V Leiden), treatment may consist in direct oral anticoagulants, replacement therapy (plasma or recombinant ADAMTS13) in cases of a congenital deficiency of ADAMTS13, or immunomodulators (prednisone) if the thrombophilia is autoimmune. Monoclonal-antibody-based anti-vWF immunotherapy (caplacizumab) is used in the context of severe thrombophilia, regardless of the cause of the disorder. In cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation, the treatment of choice consists in administration of antifibrinolytics, all-trans-retinoic acid, and recombinant soluble human thrombomodulin.

The impact of bicuspid aortic valve morphology on von Willebrand factor function in patients with severe aortic stenosis and its change after TAVI

BACKGROUND

Aortic stenosis (AS) can cause acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) and valve replacement has been shown to lead to von Willebrand factor (vWF) recovery. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of AVWS in different severe AS phenotypes and its course after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS

143 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI were included in the study. vWF function was assessed at baseline, 6 and 24 h after TAVI. AVWS was defined as a reduced vWF:Ac/Ag ratio ≤ 0.7. Phenotypes were classified by tricuspid (TAV) and bicuspid (BAV) valve morphology, mean transvalvular gradient (P_mean), stroke volume index (SVI), ejection fraction (EF) and indexed effective orifice area (iEOA).

RESULTS

AVWS was present in 36 (25.2%) patients before TAVI. vWF:Ac/Ag ratio was significantly lower in high gradient compared to low-gradient severe AS [0.78 (IQR 0.67-0.86) vs. 0.83 (IQR 0.74-0.93), p < 0.05] and in patients with BAV compared to TAV [0.70 (IQR 0.63-0.78) vs. 0.81 (IQR 0.71-0.89), p < 0.05]. Normalization of vWF:Ac/Ag ratio was achieved in 61% patients 24 h after TAVI. As in the overall study cohort, vWF:Ac/Ag ratio increased significantly in all severe AS subgroups 6 h after TAVI (each p < 0.05). Regarding binary logistic regression analysis, BAV was the only significant predictor for AVWS.

CONCLUSIONS

BAV morphology is a strong predictor for AVWS in severe AS. TAVI restores vWF function in most patients with severe AS independently of AS phenotype and valve morphology.

Phenotypic and genetic characterizations of the Milan cohort of von Willebrand disease type 2

von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2 is caused by qualitative abnormalities of von Willebrand factor (VWF). This study aimed to determine the genotypic and phenotypic characterizations of a large VWD type 2 cohort from Milan. We included 321 patients (54% female) within 148 unrelated families from 1995 to 2021. Patients were fully characterized using laboratory phenotypic tests, and the genotypic diagnosis was confirmed by target genetic analysis using Sanger sequencing. Patients were diagnosed with type 2A (n = 98; 48 families), 2B (n = 85; 38 families), 2M (n = 112; 50 families), or 2N (n = 26; 12 families). Eighty-two unique VWF variants, including 8 novel variants, were found. The potential pathogenic effect of novel variants was assessed by in silico analysis. Most patients were heterozygous for a single variant (n = 259; 81%), whereas 37 cases (11%) had 2 variants (4 homozygous, 9 in trans, and 24 in cis). Twenty-five patients (8%) had ≥3 variants, mainly as a result of gene conversions. Among the 82 distinct variants identified, 5 different types, including missense (n = 64), gene conversion (n = 10), synonymous (n = 1), deletion (n = 4), and splice (n = 3), were observed. The results from this large cohort showed that VWD type 2 is invariably due to variants that do not prevent the synthesis of the protein, and a vast majority of patients (88%) had missense variants. Given the complexity of type 2 diagnosis and the necessity of performing several phenotypic tests, genetic analysis for patients suspected of having type 2 is beneficial to establish the correct diagnosis.

Evaluating Performance of Contemporary and Historical von Willebrand Factor (VWF) Assays in the Laboratory Identification of von Willebrand Disease (VWD): The Australasian Experience

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder that arises from deficiency and/or defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Appropriate diagnosis of VWD, including differential identification of qualitative (types 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N VWD) versus quantitative (types 1 and 3 VWD) defects remains problematic but has important management implications, given differential therapy. Complete assessment for VWD in a patient with a bleeding history requires comprehensive test panels, including VWF activity and antigen. We describe the Australasian experience, using data from the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) related to VWF testing in their VWD test module. The RCPAQAP has been providing samples for VWF testing since 1998, representing 25 years of proficiency testing related to VWD diagnosis. A total of 109 samples have been dispatched to participants over these years, with current assessment involving dispatches of two samples (=4 samples) per year. Samples have represented all types of VWD, as well as normal or other samples, including acquired von Willebrand syndrome and plasma VWF concentrates as used in VWD therapy. Different VWF assays and activity/antigen ratios show different utility in VWD and type identification. In the past 9 years of data capture, a total of 166 errors were identified from a total of 1,839 interpretations, representing a base error rate of 9.0%. Identification errors were highest for type 2 VWD samples (15.3%), intermediate for type 1 VWD samples (7.5%), and lowest for normal samples (2.4%). Errors can be linked to assay limitations, including assay variability and low-level VWF detection limits, as well as laboratory issues (including test result misinterpretation, which accounts for approximately 40% of all errors for type 2 VWD). For test-associated errors, VWF:RCo and VWF:GPIbM were associated with the highest variability and error rate, which was up to 10x higher than that using VWF:CB. As a test group, chemiluminescence-based procedures were associated with lowest inter-laboratory variability, best low-level VWF detection (down to <1 U/dL), and least errors overall. These findings inform on reasons behind high rates of errors associated with VWD diagnosis, with some assays and methodologies performing substantially better than others.

Interaction of von Willebrand factor with blood cells in flow models: a systematic review

The presence of blood flow influences the interaction between von Willebrand factor (VWF) and blood cells, affecting characteristics of forming blood clots. The interactions between coagulation and inflammation have mainly been studied in thrombosis models, but it remains unclear whether these interactions might also play a role in reduced bleeding in patients with bleeding disorders. In this systematic review, we provide an overview of the literature investigating the interactions between VWF and blood cells in flow models. For article selection, a systematic search was performed in Embase, Medline-Ovid, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases, and Google Scholar. After selection, 24 articles were included. These articles describe direct or platelet-dependent interactions between VWF and neutrophils, monocytes, erythrocytes, or lymphocytes under different flow conditions. Almost all the described interactions required the presence of activated platelets. Only erythrocytes, monocytes, and natural killer cells were capable of directly binding the VWF multimers. Overall, interactions between VWF and blood cells mainly occurred in the presence of platelets. Because of the large variation in study design and used flow rates, further research is necessary to compare the results between studies and draw firm conclusions on when and under what conditions these interactions can occur. After our findings, many questions remained unanswered. This review might provide a starting point for future research. Extended knowledge on the influence of blood flow on VWF and blood cell interactions can contribute to improved understanding of the variation in bleeding in patients with bleeding disorders.

JTH in Clinic - Obstetric bleeding: VWD and other inherited bleeding disorders

Individuals with inherited bleeding disorders (IBDs) have higher bleeding risk during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. Clinical management requires recognition of the IBD as high risk for postpartum hemorrhage and a personalized multidisciplinary approach that includes the patient in decision making. When the fetus is known or at risk to inherit a bleeding disorder, fetal and neonatal bleeding risk also need to be considered. In pregnant IBD patients, it is common for providers to need to make decisions in the absence of high level of certainty evidence. We here present the case of a pregnant von Willebrand disease patient that reached multiple decision points where there is currently clinical ambiguity due to a lack of high level of certainty evidence. For each stage of her care, from diagnosis to the postpartum period, we discuss current literature and describe our approach. This is followed by a brief overview of considerations in other IBDs and pregnancy.