Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma

Novel emerging biomarkers to immunotherapy in kidney cancer

The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has significantly evolved in recent years, particularly with the advent of novel immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Despite the striking benefits observed on a population level, outcomes vary and some patients do not respond to ICI-based regimens, ultimately require salvage therapies. An ever deeper understanding of the disease biology mediated by the development of multiple high-throughput molecular omics has led to significant progress in biomarkers discovery. But despite growing insights into the molecular underpinnings of the tumor microenvironment, biomarkers have not been integrated successfully into clinical practice. In this review, we discuss some of the novel emerging predictive biomarkers to ICIs in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Present and Future of Treatment Paradigms

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is an aggressive form of kidney cancer that is associated with poor prognosis. It can arise from any histologic type of renal cell carcinoma. The majority of cases will present with advanced or metastatic disease requiring systemic therapy. Nephrectomy is the treatment of choice in locally resectable disease. The therapeutic options for sRCC have evolved in the past decade. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and monotherapy with targeted therapy (VEGF and mTOR) have historically shown poor response rates and survival in the treatment of metastatic sRCC. The use of checkpoint inhibitors and their combination with targeted therapy against VEGF has changed the landscape and outcomes for renal cell carcinoma. Given the rarity of sRCC most of the data on treatment is from small cohorts or extrapolation from larger clinical trials. The benefit from the combination of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy to VEGF has shown promise in the sRCC population in post hoc analysis of large clinical trials. Future research focusing on further characterizing the unique biologic and clinical features of sRCC is critical in advancing the knowledge and developing effective therapy to improve clinical outcomes and survival.

Novel cut-off values of time from diagnosis to systematic therapy predict the overall survival and the efficacy of targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma: A long-term, follow-up, retrospective study

Objectives

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma can occur synchronously or metachronously. We characterized the time from diagnosis to systematic therapy as a categorical variable to analyze its effect on the overall survival and first‐line treatment efficacy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

Methods

We initially enrolled 949 consecutive metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with targeted therapies retrospectively from December 2005 to December 2019. X‐tile analysis was used to determine cut‐off values of time from diagnosis to systematic therapy referring to overall survival. Patients were divided into different groups based on the time from diagnosis to systematic therapy and then analyzed for survival.

Results

Of 358 eligible patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, 125 (34.9%) had synchronous metastases followed by cytoreductive nephrectomy, and 233 (65.1%) had metachronous metastases. A total of 28 patients received complete metastasectomy. Three optimal cut‐off values for the time from diagnosis to systematic therapy (months) – 1.1, 7.0 and 35.9 – were applied to divide the population into four groups: the synchro group (time from diagnosis to systematic therapy ≤1.0), early group (1.0 < time from diagnosis to systematic therapy ≤ 7.0), intermediate group (7.0 < time from diagnosis to systematic therapy < 36.0) and late group (time from diagnosis to systematic therapy ≥36.0). The targeted therapy‐related overall survival (P < 0.001) and progression‐free survival (P < 0.001) values were significantly different among the four groups. Patients with longer time from diagnosis to systematic therapy had better prognoses and promising efficacy of targeted therapy. With the prolongation of time from diagnosis to systematic therapy, complete metastasectomy was more likely to achieve and bring a better prognosis.

Conclusions

The time from diagnosis to systematic therapy impacts the survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with targeted therapy. The cutoff points of 1, 7 and 36 months were statistically significant. The statistical boundaries might be valuable in future model establishment.

Updates on Immunotherapy and Immune Landscape in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma

Several clinicopathological features of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC) contribute to make an "atypical" cancer, including resistance to chemotherapy, sensitivity to anti-angiogenesis therapy and ICIs despite a low mutational burden, and CD8+ T cell infiltration being the predictor for poor prognosis-normally CD8+ T cell infiltration is a good prognostic factor in cancer patients. These "atypical" features have brought researchers to investigate the molecular and immunological mechanisms that lead to the increased T cell infiltrates despite relatively low molecular burdens, as well as to decipher the immune landscape that leads to better response to ICIs. In the present study, we summarize the past and ongoing pivotal clinical trials of immunotherapies for ccRCC, emphasizing the potential molecular and cellular mechanisms that lead to the success or failure of ICI therapy. Single-cell analysis of ccRCC has provided a more thorough and detailed understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment and has facilitated the discovery of molecular biomarkers from the tumor-infiltrating immune cells. We herein will focus on the discussion of some major immune cells, including T cells and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) in ccRCC. We will further provide some perspectives of using molecular and cellular biomarkers derived from these immune cell types to potentially improve the response rate to ICIs in ccRCC patients.

Collecting duct carcinoma: A single-institution retrospective study

PURPOSE

Collecting duct carcinoma is a rare pathologic entity with a paucity of clinical data in the literature. We aim to evaluate our institutional experience with the management of this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All renal tumors in the Mayo Clinic Nephrectomy Registry were re-reviewed retrospectively by an expert urologic pathologist. Cases of collecting duct carcinoma were identified. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize these cases. Overall survival and metastases-free survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

Between 1970 and 2018, a total of 21 cases were identified with an incidence of 0.2%. Cases were seen predominantly in men (N = 17, 81%) with a median age at diagnosis of 57 years old. At the time of nephrectomy, high grade disease (grade 3 or 4) was noted in the majority of patients (90%). The median times to local recurrence and distant metastases were 5.6 and 5.1 months, respectively. Median overall survival occurred at 1.5 years. Median distant metastases-free survival among M0 patients occurred at 0.5 years. Four patients with localized disease and small tumor size who underwent nephrectomy lived longer than 10 years. No systemic therapies achieved a durable response in the metastatic setting.

CONCLUSION

The Mayo Clinic nephrectomy registry contains 21 patients with collecting duct carcinoma over nearly 50 years. Early local recurrence and distant metastases were seen after nephrectomy. However, M0 patients with a small tumor may have long-term benefits from nephrectomy. Neither chemotherapy nor targeted therapy resulted in a durable response in the metastatic setting.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Genitourinary Cancers: Treatment Indications, Investigational Approaches and Biomarkers

Cancers of the genitourinary (GU) tract are common malignancies in both men and women and are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1 have provided clinical benefit, particularly in renal cell and urothelial carcinoma, and have been incorporated into standard of care treatment in both localized and metastatic settings. However, a large fraction of patients do not derive benefit. Identification of patient and tumor-derived factors which associate with response have led to insights into mechanisms of response and resistance to ICI. Herein, we review current approvals and clinical development of ICI in GU malignancies and discuss exploratory biomarkers which aid in personalized treatment selection.

What's new in the management of metastatic bone disease

Metastatic bone disease is a common complication of malignant tumours. As cancer treatment improves the overall survival of patients, the number of patients with bone metastases is expected to increase. The treatments for bone metastases include surgery, radiotherapy, and bone-modifying agents, with patients with a short expected prognosis requiring less invasive treatment. Patients with metastatic bone disease show greatly varying primary tumour histology, metastases sites and numbers, and comorbidities. Therefore, randomised clinical trials are indispensable to compare treatments for these patients. This editorial reviews recent findings on the diagnosis and prognosis prediction and discusses the current treatment of patients with metastatic bone disease.

A Real-World, Population-Based Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Survival for Recurrent Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma After Nephrectomy

We retrospectively analyzed therapeutic strategies and risk factors for overall survival (OS) in disease recurrence following curative nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma (loRCC) using the Korean National Cancer Registry Database. We selected 1295 recurrent loRCC patients who underwent either partial or radical nephrectomy from 2007-2013. Patients were excluded for age <19 years, secondary RCC, multiple primary tumors, other SEER stages except for a localized or regional stage, postoperative recurrence within 3-month, and non-nephrectomized cases. Four therapeutic groups were statistically analyzed for OS and risk factors: surgery (OP, 12.0%), other systemic therapy (OST, 59.5%), radiotherapy (RT, 2.8%), and targeted therapy (TT, 25.8%). The overall mortality rate for recurrent loRCC was 32.5%, including 82.4% for RCC-related deaths. The baseline comparison among groups showed statistical differences for the diagnostic age of cancer and the SEER stage (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis of OS showed significance for the TT (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.27), OST (HR: 7.05), and RT (HR: 7.47) groups compared with the OP group, along with significance for the sex, SEER stage, and the time from nephrectomy to treatment for disease recurrence (p<0.05). The median OS curve showed a significantly better OS in the OP group (54.9 months) compared with the TT, OST, and RT groups (41.7, 42.9, and 38.0 months, respectively; p<0.001). In conclusion, the surgery-treated group had the best OS among the different therapeutic strategies for recurrent loRCC after nephrectomy, and the importance of the time from nephrectomy to secondary treatment was a significant prognostic factor.

Construction of a 5 immune-related lncRNA-based prognostic model of NSCLC via bioinformatics

Participate in tumorigenic, oncogenic, and tumor suppressive pathways through gene expression regulation. We aimed to build an immune-related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) prognostic model to enhance nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognostic prediction.The original data were collected from the cancer genome atlas database. Perl and R software were used for statistical analysis. The effects of lncRNAs expression on prognosis were analyzed by Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis. Silico functional analysis were performed by DAVID Bioinformatics Resources.The median risk score as a dividing value separated patients into high- and low-risk groups. These 2 groups had different 5-year survival rates, median survival times, and immune statuses. The 5-lncRNA signature was validated as an independent prognostic factor with high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic = 0.722). Silico functional analysis connected the lncRNAs with immune-related biological processes and pathways in carcinogenesis.The novel immune-related lncRNA prognostic model had significant clinical implication for enhancing lung adenocarcinoma outcome prediction and guiding the choice of treatment.

New approaches to first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

The treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is evolving rapidly, with promising new regimens being developed and approved for patients with advanced disease, particularly the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Within the last 6 months, favorable first-line setting results for patients with clear cell RCC have been reported for the combination of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in the phase III CheckMate 9ER study, leading to its regulatory approval, and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the phase III CLEAR study. Additional systemic first-line treatments for clear cell RCC include axitinib plus pembrolizumab, pazopanib, and sunitinib for favorable-risk patients and ipilimumab plus nivolumab, axitinib plus pembrolizumab, axitinib plus avelumab, and cabozantinib for intermediate- or poor-risk patients. In this review of novel approaches for first-line treatment of advanced RCC, we present an overview of current treatment strategies, the basis behind emerging treatment approaches, a summary of key results from the pivotal studies using tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy, novel treatments and strategies under development, and efforts for identifying biomarkers to guide treatment decisions.

Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells recognize a heterogeneously expressed functional neoantigen in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used in cancer immunotherapy to block programmed death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, but the response rate for ICIs is still low and tumor cell heterogeneity is considered to be responsible for resistance to immunotherapy. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have an essential role in the anti-tumor effect of cancer immunotherapy; however, the specificity of TILs in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is elusive. In this study, we analyzed a 58-year-old case with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) with the tumor showing macroscopic and microscopic heterogeneity. The tumor was composed of low-grade and high-grade ccRCC. A tumor cell line (1226 RCC cells) and TILs were isolated from the high-grade ccRCC lesion, and a TIL clone recognized a novel neoantigen peptide (YVVPGSPCL) encoded by a missense mutation of the tensin 1 (TNS1) gene in a human leukocyte antigen-C*03:03-restricted fashion. The TNS1 gene mutation was not detected in the low-grade ccRCC lesion and the TIL clone did not recognized low-grade ccRCC cells. The missense mutation of TNS1 encoding the S1309Y mutation was found to be related to cell migration by gene over-expression. These findings suggest that macroscopically and microscopically heterogenous tumors might show heterogenous gene mutations and reactivity to TILs.

[Current treatment options for recurrent/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)]

Renal cell carcinoma is a common malignant tumour, whose incidence is steadily increasing. Whilst operative techniques have recently improved, including possibilities of renal preservation and minimally invasive surgery, no use has been shown for adjuvant treatment strategies. When local therapies are not suitable in relapsed or metastatic disease, medical drug treatment is indicated. The first immunologic treatment for renal cell carcinoma consisted of cytokines and overall survival amounted to a median of 13 months. Over the last decade, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), which inhibit the tumour vasculature, dominated the therapeutic area and raised the clinical discussion about the best sequential pattern. More recently, checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have set a new standard as therapeutic tools in renal cell cancer. Modern first-line therapies consist of checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations, which have shifted the median overall survival expectation to >40 months. However, tyrosine kinase inhibitors have retained their therapeutic value as combination partners and also as monotherapy in individual cases. One combined immunotherapy and 3 combinations of a checkpoint inhibitor and a TKI are currently approved in Germany.

First-Line Immunotherapy Combinations in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Combination or multi-agent therapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors has shifted the landscape of the treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma. There are several approved immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations featuring antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor or its ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined with other immune checkpoint inhibitors, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), or other agents active in renal cell carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compile the evidence of available first-line combination therapies compared to sunitinib monotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA statement to identify all randomized Phase III clinical trial data in previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma featuring an immune checkpoint inhibitor combination compared against sunitinib. A two-stage selection process was utilized to determine eligible studies. Of a total of 124 studies and 94 additional abstracts, 6 studies were considered for final analysis. These studies were evaluated for progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), Grade III or higher adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), and complete response rate (CRR). RESULTS: 6 studies with 5,121 patients met our search criteria. For OS, ICI combination therapy was favored over sunitinib with an estimated combined hazard ratio of 0.74 (0.67–0.81 95% CI). For PFS, ICI combination therapy was favored over sunitinib with an estimated combined hazard ratio of 0.65 (0.52–0.82, 95% CI). The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab had the longest duration of response and less incidence of grade III or higher adverse events compared to the combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with TKI. The combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with TKI had higher rates of overall response and longer PFS than the combination of nivolumab/ipilimumab. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports the recommendation of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy over sunitinib monotherapy for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma by virtue of improved PFS and OS. The choice of which ICI combination therapy to use may be guided by patient-specific characteristics including IMDC risk status, adverse effect profile, and need for early response.

Cabozantinib and nivolumab as first-line treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

In the last decade, there have been substantial changes in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with combined regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) replacing targeted therapies. These combined regimens include the combination of cabozantinib plus nivolumab.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we provide an overview of clinical trials evaluating the combination of cabozantinib and nivolumab and the current clinical data on mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Dual immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab and ipilimumab as well as the combination of a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor have shown to improve outcomes in phase III trials in comparison to sunitinib (axitinib plus pembrolizumab, axitinib plus avelumab, bevacizumab plus atezolizumab, cabozantinib plus nivolumab, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab). However, to date, there are no head-to-head trials comparing these new combination therapies and no biomarkers are available to guide the optimal choice of first line therapy.

A Contemporary Review of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

The use of checkpoint inhibitors in advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) has rapidly evolved over the past several years. While immune-oncology (IO) drug therapy has been successful at resulting in improved responses and survival, combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have further improved outcomes. This article reviews the landmark trials that have led to the approval of IO therapies, including the Checkmate 214 trial and combination IO/VEGF TKI therapies with Checkmate 9ER, CLEAR, and Keynote-426, and it includes a discussion on promising therapies moving in the future.

Prognostic significance of hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio in patients with metastatic renal cancer

The aim of the current research was to investigate the prognostic significance of pretreatment hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and HRR were analyzed retrospectively to assess their prognostic value using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis in 198 patients with RCC. High HRR (0.72) and high LMR (2.43) were found to be associated with longer progression-free survival and overall survival. A multivariate analysis identified International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic score, tumor stage, node stage, LMR and HRR as independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival, as well as International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and HRR for overall survival. HRR is a an independent prognostic parameter predicting the progression and survival of patients with RCC.

Predictive value of De Ritis ratio in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Predictive markers can help tailor treatment to the individual in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). De Ritis ratio (DRR) is associated with oncologic outcomes in various solid tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of DRR in prognosticating survival in mRCC patients treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI).

METHODS

Overall, 220 mRCC patients treated with TKI first-line therapy were analyzed. An optimal cut-off point for DRR was determined with Youden's J. We used multiple strata for DRR, performed descriptive, Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox-regression analyses to assess associations of DRR with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients above the optimal cut-off point for DRR of ≥ 1.58 had fewer liver metastases (p = 0.01). There was no difference in PFS (p > 0.05) between DRR groups. DRR above the median of 1.08 (HR 1.42; p = 0.03), DRR ≥ 1.1(HR 1.44; p = 0.02), ≥ 1.8 (HR 1.56; p = 0.03), ≥ 1.9 (HR 1.59; p = 0.02) and ≥ 2.0 (HR 1.63; p = 0.047) were associated with worse OS. These associations did not remain after multivariable adjustment. In the intermediate MSKCC group, DRR was associated with inferior OS at cut-offs ≥ 1.0 (HR 1.78; p = 0.02), ≥ 1.1 (HR 1.81; p = 0.01) and above median (HR 1.88; p = 0.007) in multivariable analyses. In patients with clear-cell histology, DRR above median (HR 1.54; p = 0.029) and DRR ≥ 1.1 (HR 1.53; p = 0.029) were associated with OS in multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

There was no independent association between DRR and survival of mRCC patients treated with TKI in the entire cohort. However, OS of patients with intermediate risk and clear-cell histology were affected by DRR. DRR could be used for tailored decision-making in these subgroups.

Comorbidity and frailty assessment in renal cell carcinoma patients

PURPOSE

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) incidence has considerably increased during the last decades without any real impact on age-standardized mortality. It questions the relevance of aggressive treatments carrying potential side effects. Conservative management should be considered for frail patients. Comorbidity and frailty assessment in RCC patients is paramount before engaging a treatment.

METHODS

Narrative, non-systematic review based on PubMed and EMBASE search with the terms "renal neoplasm", "elderly, frail", "comorbidities", "active surveillance", "metastatic". The selection was restricted to articles written in English.

RESULTS

Comorbidity and frailty assessment go along with the cancer-specific aggressivity and intervention risks assessment. In localized disease, several standardized algorithms offer patient health evaluation to define how suitable the patient would be for curative treatment. The pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologists and the age-adjusted Charlson's scores are the most widely used. At the metastatic stage, drug combinations based on immunotherapies and targeted therapies improved cancer outcomes at the price of significant toxicities. Frail patients are not always suitable for such strategies. Commonly used scores like the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium or Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center integrate features to define patients' risk groups, more specifically the Karnofsky Performance Score is an easy way to document the frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidity and frailty have to be assessed at any stage of the RCC disease based on a standardized scoring system to define the most suitable treatment strategy ranging from surveillance to aggressive treatment.

Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score associated with survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is a composite biomarker that uses albumin and C reactive protein (CRP). There are multiple immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We investigated the ability of mGPS to predict outcomes in patients with mRCC receiving ICI.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with mRCC treated with ICI as monotherapy or in combination at Winship Cancer Institute between 2015 and 2020. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from the start date of ICI until death or clinical/radiographical progression, respectively. The baseline mGPS was defined as a summary score based on pre-ICI values with one point given for CRP>10 mg/L and/or albumin<3.5 g/dL, resulting in possible scores of 0, 1 and 2. If only albumin was low with a normal CRP, no points were awarded. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were carried out using Cox proportional hazard model. Outcomes were also assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

156 patients were included with a median follow-up 24.2 months. The median age was 64 years and 78% had clear cell histology. Baseline mGPS was 0 in 36%, 1 in 40% and 2 in 24% of patients. In UVA, a baseline mGPS of 2 was associated with shorter OS (HR 4.29, 95% CI 2.24 to 8.24, p<0.001) and PFS (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.01, p=0.006) relative to a score of 0; this disparity in outcome based on baseline mGPS persisted in MVA. The respective median OS of patients with baseline mGPS of 0, 1 and 2 was 44.5 (95% CI 27.3 to not evaluable), 15.3 (95% CI 11.0 to 24.2) and 10 (95% CI 4.6 to 17.5) months (p<0.0001). The median PFS of these three cohorts was 6.7 (95% CI 3.6 to 13.1), 4.2 (95% CI 2.9 to 6.2) and 2.6 (95% CI 2.0 to 5.6), respectively (p=0.0216). The discrimination power of baseline mGPS to predict survival outcomes was comparable to the IMDC risk score based on Uno's c-statistic (OS: 0.6312 vs 0.6102, PFS: 0.5752 vs 0.5533).

CONCLUSION

The mGPS is prognostic in this cohort of patients with mRCC treated with ICI as monotherapy or in combination. These results warrant external and prospective validation.

Development of a Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic Score (MUMPS) for Use in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Simple Summary

This is a retrospective cohort study of metastatic uveal melanoma patients. This study undertook to identify clinical characteristics that were predictive and prognostics of benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. We developed a Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic risk Score based on retrospective data that is comprised of 3 readily available clinical variables (time to metastatic diagnosis, presence of bone metastases, and LDH). Our findings demonstrated that the Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic risk Score was associated with a statistically significant association with overall survival outcomes in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma treated with ICI. There was a significant predictive association with disease control to ICI for patients with a ‘good risk’ Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic risk score. This is one of the larger analysis of clinical outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma patients to date and could inform clinical decision-making.

Abstract

Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) is a rare disease. There are limited data on prognostic clinical factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with mUM treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Retrospective and non-randomized prospective studies have reported response rates of 0–17% for anti-PD1/L1 ± anti-CTLA4 ICI in mUM, indicating a potential benefit only in a subset of patients. This study evaluates the characteristics associated with ICI benefit in patients with mUM. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with mUM who received anti-PD1/L1 ± anti-CTLA4 ICI between 2014–2019. Clinical and genomic characteristics were collected from a chart review. Treatment response and clinical progression were determined by physician assessment. Multivariable Cox regression models and Kaplan–Meier log-rank tests were used to assess differences in clinical progression-free survival (cPFS) and OS between groups and identify clinical variables associated with ICI outcomes. We identified 71 mUM patients who received 75 lines of ICI therapy. Of these, 54 received anti-PD1/L1 alone, and 21 received anti-PD1/L1 + anti-CTLA4. Patient characteristics were: 53% female, 48% were 65 or older, 72% received one or fewer lines of prior therapy. Within our cohort, 53% of patients had developed metastatic disease <2 years after their initial diagnosis. Bone metastases were present in 12% of patients. The median cPFS was 2.7 months, and the median OS was 10.0 months. In multivariable analyses for both cPFS and OS, the following variables were associated with a good prognosis: ≥2 years from the initial diagnosis to metastatic disease (n = 25), LDH < 1.5 × ULN (n = 45), and absence of bone metastases (n = 66). We developed a Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic Score (MUMPS). Patients were divided into 3 MUMPS groups based on the number of the above-mentioned prognostic variables: Poor prognosis (0–1), Intermediate prognosis (2) and Good prognosis (3). Good prognosis patients experienced longer cPFS (6.0 months) and OS (34.5 months) than patients with intermediate (2.3 months cPFS, 9.4 months OS) and poor prognosis disease (1.8 months cPFS, 3.9 months OS); p < 0.0001. We developed MUMPS—a prognostic score based on retrospective data that is comprised of 3 readily available clinical variables (time to metastatic diagnosis, presence of bone metastases, and LDH). This MUMPS score has a potential prognostic value. Further validation in independent datasets is warranted to determine the role of this MUMPS score in selecting ICI treatment management for mUM.

Study on HOXBs of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Detection of New Molecular Target

Our study examined the transcriptional and survival data of HOXBs in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from the ONCOMINE database, Human Protein Atlas, and STRING website. We discovered that the expression levels of HOXB3/5/6/8/9 were significantly lower in ccRCC than in normal nephritic tissues. In ccRCC, patients with a high expression of HOXB2/5/6/7/8/9 mRNA have a higher overall survival (OS) than patients with low expression. Further analysis by the GSCALite website revealed that the methylation of HOXB3/5/6/8 in ccRCC was significantly negatively correlated to gene expression, while HOXB5/9 was positively correlated to the CCT036477 drug target. As DNA abnormal methylation is one of the mechanisms of tumorigenesis, we hypothesized that HOXB5/6/8/9 are potential therapeutic targets for patients with ccRCC. We analyzed the function of enrichment data of HOXBs in patients with ccRCC from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment and the PANTHER pathway. The results of the analysis show that the function of HOXBs might be associated with the Wnt pathway and that HOXB5/6/8/9 was coexpressed with multiple Wnt pathway classical genes and proteins, such as MYC, CTNNB, Cyclin D1 (CCND1), and tumor protein P53 (TP53), which further confirms that HOXBs inhibit the growth of renal carcinoma cells through the Wnt signaling pathway. In conclusion, our analysis of the family of HOXBs and their molecular mechanism may provide a theoretical basis for further research.

QPCT regulation by CTCF leads to sunitinib resistance in renal cell carcinoma by promoting angiogenesis

Sunitinib is widely used as a first‑line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, a number of patients with RCC who receive sunitinib develop drug resistance; and the biological mechanisms involved in resistance to sunitinib remain unclear. It has previously been suggested that the protein glutaminyl‑peptide cyclotransferase (QPCT) is closely related to sunitinib resistance in RCC. Thus, in the present study, in order to further examine the molecular mechanisms responsible for sunitinib resistance in RCC, sunitinib‑non‑responsive and ‑responsive RCC tissue and plasma samples were collected and additional experiments were performed in order to elucidate the molecular mechanisms responsible for sunitinib resistance in RCC. The upstream and downstream regulatory mechanisms of QPCT were also evaluated. On the whole, the data from the present study suggest that QPCT, CCCTC‑binding factor (CTCF) and phosphatidylinositol‑4,5‑bisphosphate 3‑kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) may be used as targets for predicting, reversing and treating sunitinib‑resistant RCC.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation (SAbR) for Oligometastatic RCC

A significant proportion of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients present with oligometastatic disease. Retrospective and limited prospective data suggests that a subgroup of patients with oligometastatic mRCC benefits from aggressive local therapy. With the emerging data of high local control efficacy with low toxicity of stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) for both CNS and extra-cranial mRCC, SAbR may play a critical role in the multi-modality management of mRCC patients with oligometastatic disease. In addition to local control benefit, the benefit of SAbR in this patient population can range from longitudinal disease control, maintaining quality of life, deferring systemic therapy, immune-modulation and even improving survival. A review of the retrospective data suggests that SAbR benefits oligometastatic mRCC patients with metachronous metastases, and perhaps those with indolent biology. Large prospective trials are indicated to successfully integrate SAbR of oligometastatic mRCC with the available systemic therapies to harness the optimal benefit of SAbR for this patient population.

Prognosis of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in the targeted therapy era

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to investigate prognosis and validate prognostic models [Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Data Consortium (IMDC), and Japanese metastatic renal cancer (JMRC) models] in the targeted therapy era in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 692 patients who were diagnosed with mRCC from January 2008 to August 2018 in the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database. Nivolumab as sequential therapy was widely used. Other immune checkpoint inhibitors were excluded from this study.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (95% confident interval) in all, MSKCC favorable, intermediate, and poor risk patients was 41.0 months (33.9-46.8), not reached (63.5 to not estimable), 46.8 months (37.1-52.9), and 10.4 months (8.9-14.4), respectively. The median overall survival (95% confident interval) in IMDC favorable, intermediate, and poor risk patients was not reached (61.6 to not estimable), 47.4 months (41.4-56.5), and 11.5 (9.9-16.3), respectively. The c-index of the MSKCC, IMDC, and JMRC models calculated at mRCC diagnosis was 0.680, 0.689, and 0.700, respectively. No statistical differences were found in the c-index among the models.

CONCLUSION

While the real-world overall survival in Japanese patients with mRCC in the targeted therapy era improved compared to that previously reported in the cytokine era, there was no clear difference in the survival of poor risk patients between these eras. There were no differences in the superiority among the models.

Radiomics Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced CT Predicts Survival in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

To develop and validate the radiomics nomogram that combines clinical factors and radiomics features to estimate overall survival (OS) in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and assess the incremental value of radiomics for OS estimation.

Materials and Methods

One hundred ninety-four ccRCC cases were included in the training cohort and 188 ccRCC patients from another hospital as the test cohort. Three-dimensional region-of-interest segmentation was manually segmented on multiphasic contrast-enhanced abdominal CT images. Radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated from a formula generated via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression, after which the association between the Rad-score and OS was explored. The radiomics nomogram (clinical factors + Rad-score) was developed to demonstrate the incremental value of the Rad-score to the clinical nomogram for individualized OS estimation, which was then evaluated in relation to calibration and discrimination.

Results

Rad-score, calculated using a linear combination of the 11 screened features multiplied by their respective LASSO Cox coefficients, was significantly associated with OS. Calibration curves showed good agreement between the OS predicted by the nomograms and observed outcomes. The radiomics nomogram presented higher discrimination capability compared to clinical nomogram in the training (C-index: 0.884; 95% CI: 0.808–0.940 vs. 0.803; 95% CI: 0.705–0.899, P < 0.05) and test cohorts (C-index: 0.859; 95% CI: 0.800–0.921 vs. 0.846; 95% CI: 0.777–0.915, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The radiomics nomogram may be used for predicting OS in patients with ccRCC, and radiomics is useful to assist quantitative and personalized treatment.

Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma diagnosed before an era of first-line immune-oncology combination therapies

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prognostic role of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received their diagnosis between 2007 and 2018 and were treated with or without a first-line interferon or tyrosine kinase inhibitor at a single cancer center. The controlling nutritional status score was based on values for albumin, lymphocyte count and total cholesterol at the metastatic renal cell carcinoma diagnosis. Association of the controlling nutritional status score and clinical variables, including the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk classifications, with overall survival was examined using the Cox proportional hazard model. Predictive accuracy of the prognostic factors was assessed using Harrell's concordance index.

RESULTS

First-line interferon and tyrosine kinase inhibitor were given to 48 (45%) and 41 (38%) patients, respectively, and 28 (26%) and 33 (31%) patients underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy, respectively. During follow-up (median: 36.3 months), 64 patients died. The median controlling nutritional status score was 2 (range: 0-8). A controlling nutritional status score ≥ 2 was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (P < 0.01) independently of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk classifications. Integration of the controlling nutritional status score into the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk classifications improved concordance index from 0.702 to 0.770 and from 0.698 to 0.749, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The controlling nutritional status score may serve as a prognostic biomarker objectively reflecting the general physical condition of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with or without first-line interferon or tyrosine kinase inhibitor in terms of nutritional and immuno-inflammatory status.

External validation of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line axitinib therapy in a Japanese multi-center cohort

PURPOSE

To externally validate the utility of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model to predict the overall survival of previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The ability of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model to predict overall survival was validated and compared with those of other prognostication models using data from 421 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving second-line axitinib therapy at 36 hospitals belonging to the Japan Urologic Oncology Group.

RESULTS

The following factors in this cohort were independently associated with poor overall survival in a multivariate analysis: a low Karnofsky performance status, <1 year from diagnosis to targeted therapy, a high neutrophil count, and low albumin, elevated C-reactive protein, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and the Japan Urologic Oncology Group model was newly developed based on the presence/absence of these independent factors. In this cohort, 151 (35.9%), 125 (27.7%) and 145 (34.4%) patients were classified into the favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups, respectively, according to the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model; however, the proportions of patients in the intermediate risk group stratified by the Japan Urologic Oncology Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium models were >50%. The superiority of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium models, but not the Japan Urologic Oncology Group model, was demonstrated by multiple statistical analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The utility of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model as a simple and objective prognostication tool was successfully validated using data from 421 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving second-line axitinib.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors following the surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma spinal metastases

The efficacy of surgical resection in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is an active and important research field in the postcytokine era. Bone metastases, especially in the spine, compromise patient performance status. Metastasectomy is indicated, if feasible, because it helps to achieve the best clinical outcomes possible compared with other treatments. This study examined the postoperative survival and prognostic factors in patients who underwent metastasectomy of spinal lesions. The retrospective study included 65 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas who were operated on by spinal metastasectomy between 1995 and 2017 at our institution. The cancer‐specific survival times from the first spinal metastasectomy to death or the last follow‐up (≥3 years) were determined using Kaplan‐Meier analysis. Potential factors influencing survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Planned surgical resection of all the spine tumors was achieved in all patients. Of these, 38 had complete metastasectomy of all visible metastases, including extraspinal lesions. In all patients, the estimated median cancer‐specific survival time was 100 months. The 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year cancer‐specific survival rates were 77%, 62%, and 48%, respectively. The survival times after spinal metastasectomy were similar in both cytokine and postcytokine groups. In multivariate analyses, postoperative disability, the coexistence of liver metastases, multiple spinal metastases, and incomplete metastasectomy were significant risk factors associated with short‐term survival. Complete metastasectomy, including extraspinal metastases, was associated with improved cancer‐specific survival. Proper patient selection and complete metastasectomy provide a better prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab or everolimus has activity against advanced renal cell carcinoma. The efficacy of these regimens as compared with that of sunitinib is unclear.

METHODS

In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1:1 ratio) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and no previous systemic therapy to receive lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (18 mg orally once daily) plus everolimus (5 mg orally once daily), or sunitinib (50 mg orally once daily, alternating 4 weeks receiving treatment and 2 weeks without treatment). The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Overall survival and safety were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1069 patients were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (355 patients), lenvatinib plus everolimus (357), or sunitinib (357). Progression-free survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (median, 23.9 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.49; P<0.001) and was longer with lenvatinib plus everolimus than with sunitinib (median, 14.7 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.80; P<0.001). Overall survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.88; P = 0.005) but was not longer with lenvatinib plus everolimus than with sunitinib (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.50; P = 0.30). Grade 3 or higher adverse events emerged or worsened during treatment in 82.4% of the patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, 83.1% of those who received lenvatinib plus everolimus, and 71.8% of those who received sunitinib. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurring in at least 10% of the patients in any group included hypertension, diarrhea, and elevated lipase levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than sunitinib. (Funded by Eisai and Merck Sharp and Dohme; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02811861.).

Determinants of treatment for first-line immune-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a critical overview of recent evidence

The last three decades have witnessed a revolution in the therapeutic scenario of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), due to the advent of novel agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors and the combination of both treatments. These strategies have reported unprecedented response rates, thus improving the clinical outcomes of mRCC patients, and current international guidelines support the use of immune-based combinations as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic disease. However, more data are awaited to help clinicians in the decision-making process. Herein, we provide an overview of recently published results regarding immune-based combinations as first-line treatment in mRCC patients, critically discussing available data that could help in suggesting determinants of treatment in this setting.

Development and validation of the prognostic value of the immune-related genes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a highly heterogeneous tumor, resulting a challenge of developing target therapeutics. Not long ago, immune checkpoint blockade regimens combine with tyrosin kinase inhibitors have evolved frontline options in metastatic RCC, which implies arrival of the era of tumor immunotherapy. Studies have demonstrated immune-related genes (IRGs) could characterize tumor milieu and related to patient survival. Nevertheless, the clinical significance of classifier depending on IRGs in ccRCC has not been well established.

METHODS

The R package limma, univariate and LASSO cox regression analysis were used to screen the prognostic related IRGs from TCGA database. Multivariate cox regression was utilized to establish a risk prediction model for candidate genes. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to confirm the expression of candidates in clinical samples from our institution. CIBERSORT algorithm and correlation analysis were applied to explore tumor-infiltrating immune cells signature between different risk groups. A clinical nomogram was also developed to predict OS by using the rms R package based on the risk prediction model and other independent risk factors. The ICGC data was used for external validation of either gene risk model or nomogram.

RESULTS

We identified 382 differentially expressed immune related genes. Four unique prognostic IRGs (CRABP2, LTB4R, PTGER1 and TEK) were finally affirmed to associate with tumor survival independently and utilized to establish the risk score model. All candidates' expression was successfully laboratory confirmed by q-PCR. CIBERSORT analysis implied patients in unfavorable-risk group with high CD8 T cell, regulatory T cell and NK cell infiltration, as well as high expression of PD-1, CTLA4, TNFRSF9, TIGIT and LAG3. A nomogram combined IRGs risk score with age, gender, TNM stage, Fuhrman grade, necrosis was further generated to predict of 3- and 5-year OS, which exhibited superior discriminative power (AUCs were 0.811 and 0.795).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study established and validated a survival prognostic model system based on 4 unique immune related genes in ccRCC, which expands knowledge in tumor immune status and provide a potent prediction tool in future.

A qualitative framework of non-selection factors for cytoreductive nephrectomy

PURPOSE

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) benefits a subset of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), however proper patient selection remains complex and controversial. We aim to characterize urologists' reasons for not undertaking a CN at a quaternary cancer center.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with mRCC referred to MSKCC urologists for consideration of CN between 2009 and 2019 were included. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics were used to compare patients selected or rejected for CN. The reasons cited for not operating and the alternative management strategies recommended were extrapolated. Using an iterative thematic analysis, a framework of reasons for rejecting CN was designed. Kaplan-Meier estimates tested for associations between the reasons for not undertaking a CN and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 297 patients with biopsy-proven mRCC, 217 (73%) underwent CN and 80 (27%) did not. Median follow-up of patients alive at data cut-off was 27.3 months. Non-operative patients were older (p = 0.014), had more sites of metastases (p = 0.008), harbored non-clear cell histology (p = 0.014) and reduced performance status (p < 0.001). The framework comprised seven distinct themes for recommending non-operative management: two patient-fitness considerations and five oncological considerations. These considerations were associated with OS; four of the oncological factors conferred a median OS of less than 12 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We developed a framework of criteria by which patients were deemed unsuitable candidates for CN. These new insights provide a novel perspective on surgical selection, could potentially be applicable to other malignancies and possibly have prognostic implications.

Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitors have not been prospectively evaluated in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). The phase II KEYNOTE-427 study (cohort B) was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of single-agent pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in advanced nccRCC.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed, measurable (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) nccRCC and no prior systemic therapy received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks for ≤ 24 months. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

Among enrolled patients (N = 165), 71.5% had confirmed papillary, 12.7% had chromophobe, and 15.8% had unclassified RCC histology. Most patients (67.9%) had intermediate or poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk status and tumors with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 (61.8%). The median time from enrollment to database cutoff was 31.5 months (range, 22.7-38.8). In all patients, the ORR was 26.7%. The median duration of response was 29.0 months; 59.7% of responses lasted ≥ 12 months. The ORR by CPS ≥ 1 and CPS < 1 status was 35.3% and 12.1%, respectively. The ORR by histology was 28.8% for papillary, 9.5% for chromophobe, and 30.8% for unclassified. Overall, the median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 5.6); the 24-month rate was 18.6%. The median overall survival was 28.9 months (95% CI, 24.3 months to not reached); the 24-month rate was 58.4%. Overall, 69.7% of patients reported treatment-related adverse events, most commonly pruritus (20.0%) and hypothyroidism (14.5%). Two deaths were treatment related (pneumonitis and cardiac arrest).

CONCLUSION

First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy showed promising antitumor activity in nccRCC. The safety profile was similar to that observed in other tumor types.

Real-world outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma according to risk factors: the STAR-TOR registry

Aim: Examine outcomes in sunitinib-treated patients by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) or Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk factors. Patients & methods: Patients enrolled in STAR-TOR registry (n = 327). End points included overall survival, progression-free survival and objective response rate. Results: Overall survival was similar for IMDC 0 versus 1 (p = 0.238) or 2 versus ≥3 (p = 0.156), but different for MSKCC (0 vs 1, p = 0.037; 2 vs ≥3, p = 0.001). Progression-free survival was similar for IMDC 2 versus 3 (p = 0.306), but different for MSKCC (p = 0.009). Objective response rate was different for IMDC 1 (41.9%) and 2 (29.5%) and similar for MSKCC 1 (34.4%) and 2 (31.0%). Conclusion: Outcome data varied according to IMDC or MSKCC. MSKCC model accurately stratify patients into risk groups. Clinical trial registration: NCT00700258 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Can Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Create a New Perspective for the IMDC Scoring System in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to evaluate impact of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) on prognosis and survival within the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score groups.

METHODS

The records of 187 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were reviewed retrospectively. The SII was calculated as follows: SII = Neutrophil × Platelet/Lymphocyte. The patients were categorized into 2 groups based on a median SII of 730 (×109 per 1 L) as SII low (<730) and SII high (≥730). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and a Cox regression model was utilized to determine independent predictors of survival.

RESULTS

The median age was 61 years (range: 34-86 years). Kaplan-Meier tests revealed significant differences in survival between the SII-low and SII-high levels (27.0 vs. 12.0 months, respectively, p < 0.001). The Cox regression model revealed that SII was an independent prognostic factor. The implementation of the log-rank test in the IMDC groups according to the SII level provided the distinction of survival in the favorable group (SII low 49.0 months vs. SII high 11.0 months, p < 0.001), in the intermediate group (SII low 26.0 vs. SII high 15.0 months, p = 0.007), and in the poor group (SII low 19.0 vs. SII high 6.0 months, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The SII was an independent prognostic factor and provided significant differences in survival for the favorable, intermediate, and poor IMDC groups. Thus, the SII added to the IMDC score may be clinically beneficial in predicting survival.

Current status of antigen-specific T-cell immunotherapy for advanced renal-cell carcinoma

In renal-cell carcinoma (RCC), tumor-reactive T-cell responses can occur spontaneously or in response to systemic immunotherapy with cytokines and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer vaccines and engineered T-cell therapies are designed to selectively augment tumor antigen-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses with the goal to elicit tumor regression and avoid toxicities associated with nonspecific immunotherapies. In this review, we provide an overview of the central role of T-cell immunity in the treatment of advanced RCC. Clinical outcomes for antigen-targeted vaccines or other T-cell-engaging therapies for RCC are summarized and evaluated, and emerging new strategies to enhance the effectiveness of antigen-specific therapy for RCC are discussed.

A case of multiple metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma with complete response to nivolumab

Background

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC) is associated with poor prognosis. Although there is no standard treatment for SRCC, recent studies have reported the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Case

An 82‐year‐old Japanese man presented to our hospital with an incidental right renal tumor. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed an exophytic tumor in the right kidney with suspected right iliopsoas muscle invasion. Laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy was performed. Histopathological diagnosis revealed a clear cell RCC with a spindle cell carcinoma component. CT performed 3 months after surgery revealed multiple bilateral lung metastases and local recurrence. Although the patient received tyrosine‐kinase inhibitors for treating multiple metastases, the lung metastases continued to gradually increase, and peritonitis carcinomatosis was observed. Thus, the patient was intravenously administered nivolumab once every 2 weeks. After nivolumab administration, lung metastases, local recurrence, and peritonitis carcinomatosis gradually reduced. After 20 months of nivolumab treatment, the patient achieved a complete response of multiple metastases on CT.

Conclusion

Nivolumab may be used as a treatment option for sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma with multiple metastases.

Impact of Serum γ-Glutamyltransferase on Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Targeted Therapy

BACKGROUND

γ-Glutamyltransferase (GGT) is a marker of oxidative stress. Elevated serum GGT is linked to poor survival in various malignancies; however, there are no data on metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Additionally, GGT expression in cancer tissues remains largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to determine the prognostic role of serum GGT in patients with mRCC and the association between systemic and local GGT levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pretherapeutic serum GGT and other clinicopathological parameters were retrospectively compared with overall survival (OS) in 146 consecutive patients with mRCC receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. GGT expression was analyzed in 65 resected specimens using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients (56%) died during the follow-up period (median 34.9 months). Median OS was 16.0 months and 36.8 months in patients with elevated GGT levels and without elevated GGT, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, elevated serum GGT was an independent adverse prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] 4.04, P < 0.001), together with high neutrophils (HR 2.06, P = 0.041), low albumin (HR 2.00, P = 0.006), high lactate dehydrogenase (HR 2.68, P < 0.001), and high De Ritis ratio (HR 1.97, P = 0.004). Preoperative serum GGT levels were 29, 48, and 109 U/l in patients whose renal cancer cells showed negative to weak, moderate, and strong GGT expression, respectively (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated serum GGT was an unfavorable prognostic factor in mRCC, and overexpression of GGT in renal cancer cells might be responsible for elevation of serum GGT.

Sex-specific hormone changes during immunotherapy and its influence on survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a highly vascularized and immunogenic tumor, being an ideal candidate for checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapy. Accordingly, checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC). Sex-specific differences in cancer immunotherapy may be explained by the interaction of sex hormone signaling, genetic and environmental factors, affecting the innate and adaptive immune response in men and women in different ways. The aim of this prospective study was to monitor for the first time changes in sex hormones including luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), LH/FSH ratio and 17-ß-estradiol (E2) in 22 mRCC patients (12 male and 10 female) receiving nivolumab therapy. In contrast to female patients, male patients showed a significant increase in E2 (p = 0.006) and LH/FSH ratio (p = 0.013) from the beginning of nivolumab therapy to week 12 of follow-up. Moreover, survival analysis revealed a significant negative association between LH/FSH ratio and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.022) as well as between therapy response (p = 0.009) in males compared to females at interim evaluation (week 6/8). Our findings may therefore be the first reference to sex hormone changes during immunotherapy.

Integrative molecular characterization of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid renal cell carcinoma

Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid (S/R) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are highly aggressive tumors with limited molecular and clinical characterization. Emerging evidence suggests immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are particularly effective for these tumors, although the biological basis for this property is largely unknown. Here, we evaluate multiple clinical trial and real-world cohorts of S/R RCC to characterize their molecular features, clinical outcomes, and immunologic characteristics. We find that S/R RCC tumors harbor distinctive molecular features that may account for their aggressive behavior, including BAP1 mutations, CDKN2A deletions, and increased expression of MYC transcriptional programs. We show that these tumors are highly responsive to ICI and that they exhibit an immune-inflamed phenotype characterized by immune activation, increased cytotoxic immune infiltration, upregulation of antigen presentation machinery genes, and PD-L1 expression. Our findings build on prior work and shed light on the molecular drivers of aggressivity and responsiveness to ICI of S/R RCC.

Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid tumours are highly aggressive forms of renal cell carcinoma that are also responsive to immunotherapy. In this study, the authors perform a comprehensive molecular characterization of these tumours discovering an enrichment of specific alterations and an inflamed phenotype.

Development and internal validation of nomograms for the prediction of postoperative survival of patients with grade 4 renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

Background

To develop successful prognostic models for grade 4 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy.

Methods

The nomograms were established based on a retrospective study of 135 patients who underwent partial and radical nephrectomy for grade 4 RCC at the Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital from January 2013 to October 2018. The predictive performance of the nomograms was assessed by the calibration plot and C-index. The results were validated using bootstrap resampling.

Results

Aspartate transaminase (AST), the maximum diameter of tumor (cutoff value =7 cm), lymph node metastasis, and the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group were independent factors for determining the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in multivariate analysis. AST, the maximum diameter of the tumor (cutoff value =7 cm), and lymph node metastasis were found to be independent variables for progression-free survival (PFS) in multivariate analysis. These variables were used for the studies to establish nomograms. All calibration plots revealed excellent predictive accuracy of the models. The C-indexes of the nomograms for predicting OS, CSS and PFS were 0.729 (95% CI, 0.659-0.799), 0.725 (95% CI, 0.654-0.796) and 0.702 (95% CI, 0.626-0.778), respectively. Moreover, the recurrence rate was not associated with open or laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in our cohort (P=0.126).

Conclusions

We have developed easy-to-use models that are internally validated to predict postoperative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, CSS, and PFS rates of grade 4 RCC patients. The new models could aid in identifying high-risk patients, making postoperative therapeutic and follow-up strategies as well as predicting patients' survival after externally validated. Besides, our study shows that the recurrence rate is not associated with open or laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Encephalic Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis during Treatment with Sunitinib for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report

Renal cell carcinoma is a malignant tumor that arises in the kidney parenchyma. For many years, sunitinib has represented the mainstay of medical treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Herein, we present the case of a 66-year-old woman with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma undergoing treatment with sunitinib for two years that developed encephalic leukocytoclastic vasculitis, probably due to a paraneoplastic syndrome.

Current and emerging therapies for first line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

The therapeutic landscape for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is rapidly evolving with improved knowledge of the biology of disease leading to the incorporation of a variety of antiangiogenic agents and immunotherapies. In this review, we discuss historical, current, and emerging first line treatment options for patients with advanced ccRCC. These include data with single agent vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): sunitinib, pazopanib and cabozantinib as well as the recently reported results for the combination of lenvatinib and everolimus (mTOR inhibitor). We also discuss results of the nivolumab anti-programmed cell death (PD-1)/ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4) combination as well as emerging front-line data with nivolumab and pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) monotherapy. Finally, we review data supporting recent approvals of TKI and anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) combinations (e.g., axitinib/pembrolizumab, axitinib/avelumab and cabozantinib/nivolumab) and initial outcomes of lenvatinib (multi-kinase inhibitor) and pembrolizumab. With many individual and combination treatment options and the lack of head-to-head comparisons, treatment selection will depend on the goals of therapy (endpoints) and the identification and validation of clinical and tumor-based predictive biomarkers that are linked to the desired treatment endpoints.

Type I interferons in pancreatic cancer and development of new therapeutic approaches

Immunotherapy has emerged as a new treatment strategy for cancer. However, its promise in pancreatic cancer has not yet been realized. Understanding the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer, and identifying new therapeutic targets to increase tumor-specific immune responses, is necessary in order to improve clinical outcomes. Type I interferons, e.g. IFN-α and -β, are considered as an important bridge between the innate and adaptive immune system. Thereby, type I IFNs induce a broad spectrum of anti-tumor effects, including immunologic, vascular, as well as direct anti-tumor effects. While IFN therapies have been around for a while, new insights into exogenous and endogenous activation of the IFN pathway have resulted in new IFN-related cancer treatment strategies. Here, we focus on the pre-clinical and clinical evidence of novel ways to take advantage of the type I IFN pathway, such as IFN based conjugates and activation of the STING and RIG-I pathways.

The clinical significance of routine risk categorization in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and its impact on treatment decision-making: a systematic review

Aim: To analyze responses to first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment stratified by risk criteria. Patients & methods: Clinical trials and observational studies of patients aged ≥18 years, published January 2005-May 2019, were identified via Ovid from MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Trials Register and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Data extracted included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: 47/1269 articles met eligibility criteria. Most studies stratified patients by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (n = 19) or Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n = 21). PFS, OS and ORR varied according to risk group. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab + axitinib, ipilimumab + nivolumab and avelumab + axitinib were most effective across all risk groups. Favorable-risk patients benefit from sunitinib treatment.

Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Immunotherapies Have Demonstrated Overall Survival Benefits While Targeted Therapies Have Not

CONTEXT

Current guidelines suggest several targeted therapies (TTs) and immunotherapies (ITs) in the treatment of advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Ideal sequencing of these treatments is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) data of the treatments approved for mRCC. Secondary objectives included evaluating other signs of efficacy and adverse events.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We reviewed the current Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for mRCC. Trials associated with approval were reviewed. We also included pre- and postapproval publications when appropriate.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

There is minimal evidence supporting OS benefit for the nine approved TTs. They result in adverse events and are a considerable economic burden. For these reasons, their future role in mRCC treatment should be re-evaluated, given the emergence of IT that have demonstrated OS benefits. Accumulating long-term survival data with high-dose interleukin-2 treatment suggests that this older treatment could still be considered for eligible patients. Checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising OS and durable responses; as such, the high cost of treatment might be justified. However, the available evidence does not suggest that adding TT to IT would increase efficacy over IT alone, but would add toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Trial data supporting OS benefit are much stronger for ITs than for TTs. Combining checkpoint inhibitors with TTs has not been shown to produce better OS than checkpoint inhibitors alone, while more adverse events are present. Granting drug approvals based on efficacy without demonstrated OS benefit should be revisited.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Approved treatments for metastatic kidney cancer include targeted and immune-based therapies. The former commonly produces temporary tumour shrinkage, but survival benefits are unclear. All approved immunotherapies have increased survival, and a proportion of patients appear cured.

Clinicopathological and prognostic impact of somatic mutations in Chinese patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Background

The study of the genomic landscape of Chinese clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) entered its nascence in recent years, and the clinical relevance of individual genes in Chinese ccRCC has not yet been researched. The study aimed to explore the relationships between somatic mutations and clinical behaviors in Chinese ccRCC.

Methods

Tumor tissue samples were obtained from 105 Chinese patients with ccRCC and deep sequencing targeting 556 cancer genes was performed. Correlation analysis, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis and survival analysis were carried out using SPSS software.

Results

A total of 41 genes were used to investigate the relationship between genes and clinical behaviors. We found that different clinical indices were mutually correlated, and there were 12 genes associated with clinical indices. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that high Fuhrman grade and metastatic disease at diagnosis were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Mutations in BAP1, PTEN, ERBB2, TP53, CDK8, TSC1, SETD2, or SPEN were significantly associated with poor prognosis, consistent with the results of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. Mutation of BTG1 occurred much more frequently in Chinese ccRCC (10.5%) than in the TCGA cohort (0.60%), and it was associated with a better prognosis.

Conclusions

A total of 8 genes (BAP1, PTEN, ERBB2, TP53, CDK8, TSC1, SETD2, and SPEN) were found to be associated with poor prognosis of ccRCC, and a new gene (BTG1) was possibly associated with the good prognosis of Chinese ccRCC.

Review of Adjuvant Therapies in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evidence to Date

In 2018, there were 400,000 new cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) globally, with 175,000 deaths attributable to the disease. Three quarters of patients have potentially curable localised disease at diagnosis; however, recurrence rates are as high as 40% following surgery. There are currently no adjuvant therapies in routine clinical use which reliably improve outcomes. Effective adjuvant therapy is an urgent unmet need to reduce recurrence risk and improve outcomes. Early efforts explored chemotherapy, radiotherapy, cytokine therapy, hormonal treatments and tumour cell vaccines as adjuvant therapies, however, have yielded disappointing results. More recently, interest shifted to evaluating tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the adjuvant setting, as they improve outcomes in metastatic disease. Five phase III clinical trials testing adjuvant use of a range of TKIs have been performed, with the results of a sixth trial awaited. Unfortunately, these studies have thus far yielded conflicting and disappointing results, and there is currently no strong evidence for routine adjuvant TKI therapy. In parallel, novel immunotherapy treatment approaches have recently been developed, transforming the management of a range of malignancies, particularly through immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). These approaches are well established in the metastatic context in RCC, as well as in the adjuvant treatment of melanoma. On this basis, five phase III trials are currently ongoing to test the efficacy of a range of ICIs in adjuvant RCC patients, with initial results expected over the next few years. In this article, we review the current evidence for adjuvant therapies in RCC, discuss ongoing clinical trials and suggest directions for future work to address this unmet need.

Difficulty in differential diagnosis for renal cancer with microscopic papillary architecture: overlapped pathological features among papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), mutinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma, and unclassified RCC. Lessons from a Japanese multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

In our multicenter study evaluating metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), 29% of tumors diagnosed as PRCC in collaborative institutes were finally diagnosed as other RCCs under central review. In those tumors, mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) was the leading histology, followed by unclassified RCC (ucRCC). We focused on those patients with MTSCC or ucRCC.

METHODS

We reviewed the processes for the pathological diagnoses of nine tumors and reviewed their clinical features.

RESULTS

All of the MTSCCs and ucRCCs were positive for AMACR, which is frequently positive in PRCC. Mucin was demonstrated in 80% of the MTSCCs, and its presence is important for their diagnoses. One MTSCC was diagnosed as a mucin-poor variant. The presence of spindle cells with low-grade nuclei was suggestive of MTSCC, but the diagnosis of high-grade MTSCC was difficult. Four tumors were diagnosed as ucRCC by histological and immunohistochemical findings. Three of the four tumors were suspicious of ucRCC in the initial review due to atypical findings as PRCC. Sunitinib and interferon-α were effective for one MTSCC patient who survived for >5 years. Two MTSCC patients who were Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center poor risk had unfavorable prognoses. One patient with mucin-poor MTSCC had an indolent clinical course. Two of four ucRCC patients showed durable stable disease with targeted agents (TAs) and survived >3 years.

CONCLUSION

Some MTSCC metastases progressed very slowly and poor-risk tumors progressed rapidly. Systemic therapies including TAs showed some efficacies. Some patients who have metastatic ucRCC with microscopic papillary architecture can benefit from TAs.