Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

Nivolumab and hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma: A phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy is thought to enhance anti-tumor immunity, particularly when delivered in a hypofractionated and multisite manner. Therefore, we investigated the effects of combining radiotherapy with nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, non-randomized, phase 2 trial that enrolled patients with treatment-naïve metastatic melanoma. They received nivolumab (240 mg / 2 weeks) plus radiotherapy (day 15, 6 Gy × 3). When feasible, one target from each organ was irradiated (no irradiation of all targets). The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

This trial included 64 patients between March 2017 and July 2019. The median follow-up was 23.5 (2.3-43.8) months. The median age was 68 (35-95) years, patients were mostly male (67 %) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) score of 0 (72 %), stage IV-M1c disease (47 %), and were BRAF-wild-type (67 %). The 2-year OS and 1-year PFS rates were 65.2 % and 56 %, respectively (P = 0.22 and P = 0.03, vs. 58 % and 43 %, respectively, in the Checkmate 066 study). Thirty-seven (58 %) and twenty-seven (42 %) patients were irradiated at one and multiple targets, respectively. The ECOG-PS (1 vs. 0; HR = 3.5; P = 0.005) was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Irradiating more than one site and irradiating a smaller cumulative tumor volume tended to correlate with better outcome. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21.9 % of the patients (no grade 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined immunotherapy and hypofractionated radiotherapy did not improve survival compared to historical cohorts. The radiotherapy schedule needs to be optimized in order to improve these results.

Advances in Melanoma and Skin Cancers

Cutaneous melanoma, with a continuously rising incidence worldwide, represents one of the most aggressive forms of skin cancer [...].

Colony-stimulating factor 3 and its receptor promote leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B2 expression and ligands in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Colony-stimulating factor 3 (CSF3) and its receptor (CSF3R) are known to promote gastric cancer (GC) growth and metastasis. However, their effects on the immune microenvironment remain unclear. Our analysis indicated a potential link between CSF3R expression and the immunosuppressive receptor leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B2 (LILRB2) in GC. We hypothesized that CSF3/CSF3R may regulate LILRB2 and its ligands, angiopoietin-like protein 2 (ANGPTL2) and human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G), contributing to immunosuppression.

AIM

To investigate the relationship between CSF3/CSF3R and LILRB2, as well as its ligands ANGPTL2 and HLA-G, in GC.

METHODS

Transcriptome sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas were analyzed, stratifying patients by CSF3R expression. Differentially expressed genes and immune checkpoints were evaluated. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on GC tissues. Correlation analyses of CSF3R, LILRB2, ANGPTL2, and HLA-G were conducted using The Cancer Genome Atlas data and IHC results. GC cells were treated with CSF3, and expression levels of LILRB2, ANGPTL2, and HLA-G were measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and western blotting.

RESULTS

Among 122 upregulated genes in high CSF3R expression groups, LILRB2 showed the most significant increase. IHC results indicated high expression of LILRB2 (63.0%), ANGPTL2 (56.5%), and HLA-G (73.9%) in GC tissues. Strong positive correlations existed between CSF3R and LILRB2, ANGPTL2, and HLA-G mRNA levels (P < 0.001). IHC confirmed positive correlations between CSF3R and LILRB2 (P < 0.001), and HLA-G (P = 0.010), but not ANGPTL2 (P > 0.05). CSF3 increased LILRB2, ANGPTL2, and HLA-G expression in GC cells. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H1 modulation significantly altered their expression, impacting CSF3's regulatory effects.

CONCLUSION

The CSF3/CSF3R pathway may contribute to immunosuppression in GC by upregulating LILRB2 and its ligands, with heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H1 playing a regulatory role.

Presence of brain metastasis differentially impacts long-term survival after first-line therapy in melanoma depending on BRAF mutation status

Background

Modern therapeutic strategies have significantly improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma patients. Predictive factors of therapy response include serum LDH; however, predictive markers for long-term survival are currently largely lacking.

Patients and methods

Patients diagnosed with stage IV melanoma (AJCCv8) of cutaneous origin or unknown primary were identified from the prospective multicenter German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG) skin cancer registry ADOREG. Baseline characteristics were compared between patient groups with short-term versus long-term survival. Statistical analysis included ROC analysis and multinomial regression analysis.

Results

Of 3066 stage IV melanoma patients entered into the ADOREG between 05/2014 and 06/2021, 395 were identified for this study, of whom 301 (76.2%) survived ≤1 year, and 94 (23.8%) survived ≥5 years after stage IV diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 6 months (range 0-129 months). Regarding the baseline characteristics, only elevated serum LDH (P <0.001) was found to be independently predicting survival ≤1 year. Type of first-line therapy, immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) versus BRAF/MEK targeted therapy (TT), was not predictive of long-term survival ≥5 years. For survival ≤1 year, the presence of brain metastases at treatment start was an independent predictor in BRAF-mutated patients regardless if they received TT (N=113; P=0<0.001) or ICI (N=69; P=0.015), but not in BRAF-wildtype patients who received ICI (N=161; P=0.47).

Conclusions

Low serum LDH independently predicts long-term survival of stage IV melanoma patients in every subgroup of treatment type and BRAF status. Brain metastasis has a negative impact on long-term survival in BRAF-mutated, but not in BRAF-wildtype patients. Investigation of molecular features of brain metastases in BRAF-mutated vs. BRAF-wildtype melanomas may lead to new insights in tumor biology and may yield new therapeutic approaches.

Arcyriaflavin A, a cyclin D1/CDK4 inhibitor, suppresses tumor growth, migration, and invasion of metastatic melanoma cells

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, cutaneous melanoma continues to have a high mortality rate and poor prognosis, with therapies having limited efficacy in advanced melanoma. Therefore, it is crucial to develop novel therapeutics with proven clinical potential. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of arcyriaflavin A (ArcA), a potent inhibitor of the cyclin D1/CDK4 complex, in suppressing aggressive phenotypes of metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

The effects of ArcA on viability and cell cycle were evaluated across four melanoma cell lines: WM239A and its metastatic derivatives: 113-6/4L, 131/4-5B1, and 131/4-5B2. Additionally, we performed wound healing and transwell invasion assays, followed by western blot. We further established xenograft mouse models by subcutaneously injecting them with the four melanoma cell lines and measured tumor size and weight biweekly. Immunohistochemistry analysis was performed to compare protein expression.

RESULTS

ArcA demonstrated dose-dependent cytotoxicity, selectively targeting melanoma cells without affecting normal cells, and induced G1 cell cycle arrest. Moreover, ArcA significantly inhibited cell migration and invasion in metastatic melanoma cell lines, accompanied by reduced expression levels of p-GSK-3β (Ser9), MMP-9, and MMP-13, suggesting that its anti-metastatic effects may be partially mediated through GSK-3β, MMP-9, and MMP-13. These findings were further validated using mouse xenograft models; ArcA-treated mice exhibited significantly smaller tumor volumes and lighter tumor weights compared to vehicle-treated mice. Immunohistochemistry further confirmed decreased expression of p-GSK-3β, MMP-9, and MMP-13 in tumor tissues from ArcA-treated mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our findings indicate that ArcA possesses substantial anti-tumor potential, including cytotoxic effects and inhibition of migration and invasion in metastatic melanoma. These results suggest that ArcA could enhance therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Radiomic analysis of patient and interorgan heterogeneity in response to immunotherapies and BRAF-targeted therapy in metastatic melanoma

Variability in treatment response may be attributable to organ-level heterogeneity in tumor lesions. Radiomic analysis of medical images can elucidate non-invasive biomarkers of clinical outcome. Organ-specific radiomic comparison across immunotherapies and targeted therapies has not been previously reported. We queried the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center registry for patients with metastatic melanoma (MEL) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) (ipilimumab+nivolumab; I+N) or anti-PD-1 monotherapy) or BRAF-targeted therapy. The best overall response was measured using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Lesions were segmented into discrete volume-of-interest with 400 radiomics features extracted. Overall and organ-specific machine-learning models were constructed to predict disease control (DC) versus progressive disease (PD) using XGBoost. 291 patients with MEL were identified, including 242 ICI (91 I+N, 151 PD-1) and 49 BRAF. 667 metastases were analyzed, including 541 ICI (236 I+N, 305 PD-1) and 126 BRAF. Across cohorts, baseline demographics included 39-47% women, 24%-29% M1C, 24-46% M1D, and 61-80% with elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Among ICI patients experiencing DC, the organs with the greatest reduction were liver (-66%±8%; mean±SEM) and lung (-63%±5%). For patients with multiple same-organ target lesions, the highest interlesion heterogeneity was observed in brain among patients who received ICI while no intraorgan heterogeneity was observed in BRAF. 221 ICI patients were included for radiomic modeling, consisting of 86 I+N and 135 PD-1. Models consisting of optimized radiomic signatures classified DC/PD across I+N (area under curve (AUC)=0.85) and PD-1 (0.71) and within individual organ sites (AUC=0.72~0.94). Integration of clinical variables improved the models' performance. Comparison of models between treatments and across organ sites suggested mostly non-overlapping DC or PD features. Skewness, kurtosis, and informational measure of correlation (IMC) were among the radiomic features shared between overall response models. Kurtosis and IMC were also used by multiple organ-site models. In conclusion, differential organ-specific response was observed across BRAF and ICI with within organ heterogeneity observed for ICI but not for BRAF. Radiomic features of organ-specific response demonstrated little overlap. Integrating clinical factors with radiomics improves the prediction of disease course outcome and prediction of tumor heterogeneity.

Case report: Low-dose radiation reverses pembrolizumab resistance in melanoma

Immunotherapy has been the mainstay of the initial systemic treatment for metastatic melanoma regardless of the tumor's genetic mutation status (Atkins et al., 2022). It is known to offer long-term overall and treatment-free survival benefits, also with generally tolerable side effect profiles. However, upon disease progression on first- and second-line immunotherapy, further systemic treatment options are limited especially for cases without actionable molecular alterations. With emerging evidence suggesting that radiotherapy can enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy via various mechanisms, together with its potential abscopal effect, the possibility of overcoming immunotherapy resistance with radiotherapy is theoretically sound. We report a case of metastatic melanoma which demonstrated a reversal of immunotherapy resistance after the addition of low-dose radiotherapy to progressive tumor. Complete metabolic remission is achieved with durable response observed.

Mechanisms of Resistance to Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Melanoma and Strategies to Overcome It

Resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma remains a major obstacle in achieving effective and durable treatment outcomes, highlighting the need to understand and address the underlying mechanisms. The first key factor is innate anti-PD-1 resistance signature (IPRES), an expression of a group of genes associated with tumor plasticity and immune evasion. IPRES promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), increasing melanoma cells' invasiveness and survival. Overexpressed AXL, TWIST2, and WNT5a induce phenotypic changes. The upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines frequently coincides with EMT-related changes, further promoting a resistant and aggressive tumor phenotype. Inflamed tumor microenvironment may also drive the expression of resistance. The complexity of immune resistance development suggests that combination therapies are necessary to overcome it. Furthermore, targeting epigenetic regulation and exploring novel approaches such as miR-146a modulation may provide new strategies to counter resistance in melanoma.

Complete metabolic response as early predictor of long-term efficacy after adoptive T cell therapy using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Introduction: Adoptive cell therapy using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has proved to be an effective treatment for metastatic melanoma, even in patients failing anti-PD-1 blockade. Nevertheless, progression is observed in a substantial subgroup of patients following an initial objective response to treatment with TILs. These patients might benefit from additional consolidating treatment before clinical progression, but thus far, it is not possible to identify this subgroup of patients prone to progress. In this study the predictive value of early metabolic response after TIL therapy is explored.Materials and methods: 60 patients treated with TIL therapy in 4 different clinical trials and with available [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography-CT (FDG-PET/CT) scans at baseline and at least one follow-up scan 6-8 weeks and/or 12-16 weeks post-TIL infusion were included.Results: Obtaining complete metabolic response (CMR) was associated with significantly superior median overall survival (mOS) compared with not obtaining CMR (p<0.0001). Of particular interest, metabolic response divided RECIST partial responders (22 patients) into two groups with significantly different clinical outcomes. Neither mOS (range 32.2-149.8+) nor median progression-free survival (mPFS; range 20.7-123.4+) were reached for patients with partial response (PR)/CMR (10 patients), whereas patients with PR/non-CMR (12 patients) had a mOS of 28.7 months (p=0.0016) and a mPFS of 7.8 months (p<0.0001).Overall, not achieving a CMR was associated with a short mPFS of 3.2 months, and 97.9% (47/48) of all patients in this group progressed within 12 months.Conclusion: In conclusion, early CMR is a strong predictor of long-term survival after TIL therapy in metastatic melanoma patients. Furthermore, FDG-PET/CT scans appear superior to CT scans for providing early prognostic information after TIL therapy in melanoma and can be used to tailor patient-specific management and follow-up strategies.

A review on intrathecal administration of medications for leptomeningeal metastases in solid tumors

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a particular mode of central metastasis in malignant tumors. It occurs when tumor cells infiltrate the subarachnoid space and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), spreading throughout the central nervous system (CNS). LMD is a rare but devastating complication of malignant tumors. It can occur in various types of cancers, with lung and breast cancer being the most frequently associated. The treatment approach for LMD includes a combination of supportive care, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and intrathecal (IT) therapy, among other modalities. Despite the challenges in determining the optimal treatment for LMD, IT therapy remains one of the primary therapeutic strategies. This therapy can directly circumvent the blood-brain barrier. Moreover, a low-dose medication can achieve a higher drug concentration in the CSF, resulting in better cytotoxic effects. Chemotherapy drugs such as methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa have been widely studied as traditional IT therapies. In recent years, the advent of novel anti-tumor drugs has led to a growing number of agents being employed for IT administration in the treatment of malignant tumors with LMD. This article presents a comprehensive review of the current advancements in IT administration of chemotherapy, targeted, and immunotherapy drugs for the treatment of LMD in solid tumors. In addition, we also discuss the safety issues associated with IT therapy, summarize the advantages of IT administration of different types of anti-tumor drugs, and put forward some suggestions for reducing adverse reactions. It is hoped that future research will focus on exploring more potentially effective anti-tumor drugs for IT treatment, conducting in-depth pharmacokinetic studies, and developing long-acting and low-toxic IT administration regimens for the treatment of meningeal metastases.

The Relationship Between Response Rate and Survival Benefits in Randomized Immunotherapy Studies

Understanding the relationship between the Objective Response Rate (ORR) and survival outcomes, notably Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), is relevant for assessing the efficacy of regimens in oncology. We evaluate the relationship between ORR, PFS and OS in immuno-oncology (IO) trials. Data from 68 clinical trials submitted to the FDA were evaluated, examining immunotherapy regimens, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed death (ligand)-1 [anti-PD-(L)1], cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and combination therapies [e.g., IO + IO, anti-PD-L1 + chemotherapy, anti-PD-L1 + CTLA-4, anti-PD-L1 + TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitors)]. Studies were included based on their reporting of ORR, PFS, and OS. Of the 68 clinical trials reviewed, 55 were included in the analysis. The correlation between ORR and PFS was moderate across most immunotherapy regimens, indicating that ORR can serve as a useful predictor of short-term disease control. However, the correlation between ORR and OS was weaker, especially in trials including combination therapies, indicating that ORR alone may not reliably predict long-term survival outcomes. ORR predicts PFS better in first-line treatment but declines in later lines and remains a weak OS predictor overall. Differing degrees of correlation between ORR and survival metrics, particularly across treatment lines and combinations, are observed. While ORR can serve as a surrogate marker for PFS in IO trials, its utility in predicting OS is restricted and the interpretation of the relationship between ORR and PFS or OS is a key limitation. Rather, a decline in PFS with increasing ORR may reflect trial differences rather than a direct relationship. Future analyses should adopt better methodologies to capture these dynamics and focus on improving surrogate endpoints for immunotherapy to improve clinical trial design and patient outcomes.

Patient and Caregiver Experience With the Hope and Prognostic Uncertainty of Immunotherapy: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy has improved survival for patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet, as responses vary widely, immunotherapy also introduces challenges in prognostic communication. In this study, we sought to explore how patients and caregivers learned about the goal of immunotherapy and their experience of living with uncertainty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study of patients with stage III or IV melanoma or stage IV NSCLC within 12 weeks of initiating or 12 months of discontinuing immunotherapy, and their caregivers. We conducted in-depth interviews with participants to explore how they learned about immunotherapy from oncology clinicians and how they experienced uncertainty. We used a framework approach to analyze interview transcripts and synthesized concepts into themes.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients and 10 caregivers participated; median age was 67 years and most were male (68%), white (95%), married (61%), and had melanoma (62%). We identified four themes: (1) the oncology team shaped participants' hopeful expectations of immunotherapy, including as a potential cure among those with melanoma; (2) distress related to prognostic uncertainty particularly affected patients who experienced toxicity or progressive disease; (3) patients who did not have long-term responses experienced overwhelming disappointment; and (4) some patients and caregivers had conflicting preferences for prognostic information. Participants provided suggestions to improve education and underscored unmet psychosocial needs.

CONCLUSION

Patients and caregivers held optimistic expectations of immunotherapy, which resulted in heightened disappointment among the subset with progression or toxicity. Clinicians should elicit information preferences of both patients and caregivers, as these may be disparate. Our results highlight the need to optimize prognostic communication and support for living with uncertainty among patients receiving immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy rechallenge after significant toxicity - can it be done successfully?

AIM

We describe a single-center burden of admissions for irAE management and rechallenge feasibility.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of patients receiving immunotherapy between 2015-2018 assessing irAE and immunotherapy rechallenge outcomes.

RESULTS

69 of 307 patients (22%) required 124 hospitalizations for irAEs. 8 required ICU admission (2.6%). 6 (1.9%) died from irAEs. Corticosteroids were used in 96% of admissions. Additional immunosuppression was required in 26 admissions (21%). 47 of 69 patients were rechallenged (68%). The median duration between toxicity and rechallenge was 49 days (range 17-994 days). 19 of 47 rechallenged patients (40%) were admitted for subsequent irAE. 19 patients of the rechallenged group (40%) were alive at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Immunotherapy rechallenge following prior irAE hospitalization is feasible but carries significant toxicity risk.

Real-life effectiveness on overall survival of continued immune checkpoint inhibition following progression in advanced melanoma: estimation from the Melbase cohort

The link between palliative care and oncology must continue to develop, taking into account advances in treatment.Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for metastatic melanoma is associated with different types of response, making it difficult to assess the benefits to the patient. Some clinical trials suggest a survival advantage of ICI even in the absence of an objective radiographic response. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of continuing ICI after progression of the disease on the overall survival (OS) in a cohort of final-line metastatic melanoma patients. Clinical data from 120 patients with metastatic melanoma were collected via Melbase, a French multicentric biobank, prospectively enrolling unresectable melanoma. Two groups were defined: patients continuing final-line ICI at progression (treated) and patients stopping ICI at progression (controls). The primary end-point is the OS from progression. Propensity score weighting was used to correct for indication bias. From the 120 patients, 72 (60%) continued ICI. Median OS from progression was 4.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-6.27] in the treated group and median OS was 1.3 months (95% CI 0.95-1.74) in the control group ( P  < 0.0001). The calculated hazard ratio was 0.20 (0.13-0.33). Continued ICI was discovered to have an association with a higher rate of hospitalization at the end of life; more treatments received in the last 15 days of life and less utilization of specialist palliative care. This study discovered that patients with metastatic melanoma show a significant decrease in the instantaneous probability of mortality when they continue with finale-line ICI after progression.

Paradigm of biomarkers in metastatic melanoma (Review)

Metastatic melanoma is an aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer, known for its rapid ability to spread to other organs. Melanoma metastasis involves several steps: Local invasion, lymphovascular invasion and proliferation to new sites. This process is facilitated by genetic alterations, interactions with the tumor microenvironment and evasion of the immune system. Despite advances in therapies, the 5-year survival rate remains low at ~22.5%. Notably, current research is focused on identifying patients who may benefit from specific treatments, considering factors such as mutational load and programmed death ligand 1 expression. BRAF inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved survival, although numerous patients do not respond or develop resistance, underscoring the need for novel biomarkers to optimize treatment and monitoring of the disease. In summary, the purpose of the present article is to review the different serological, histological, microRNA and circulating tumor cell biomarkers that have proven useful in the diagnosis, follow-up and prognosis of metastatic melanoma. These biomarkers represent a promising area for research and clinical application, with the aim of offering more precise and personalized treatments.

Phase Ib Study of Immunocytokine Simlukafusp Alfa (FAP-IL2v) Combined with Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Advanced and/or Metastatic Melanoma

PURPOSE

This study explored the combination of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) IL2 variant (FAP-IL2v), a novel immune-cytokine, with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and/or metastatic melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, multicenter, phase Ib clinical study (NCT03875079) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of FAP-IL2v (simlukafusp alfa, RO6874281) in combination with pembrolizumab. Patients with advanced and/or metastatic melanoma were either checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-naïve or CPI-experienced. Patients received 10 mg FAP-IL2v either continuously once every 3 weeks (Q3W) or in an induction/maintenance setting consisting of a 3-week induction phase with weekly (QW) dosing followed by continuous Q3W dosing. Pembrolizumab was dosed Q3W at 200 mg.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were treated: 16 patients in two safety run-in cohorts and 67 patients in two extension cohorts; 75 (90.4%) patients were CPI-experienced. The pharmacokinetics of FAP-IL2v in combination with pembrolizumab was similar to that after administration as monotherapy. Consistent with the proposed mode of action, FAP-IL2v preferentially expanded NK and CD8 T cells. The most common FAP-IL2v-related grade 3/4 adverse events were lymphopenia (23%), elevated γ-glutamyltransferase (8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (6%), and infusion-related reaction (6%). A response was observed in 5 of 75 (6.7%) CPI-experienced patients (all partial responses) and 2 of 8 CPI-naïve patients (one complete response and one partial response). The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of FAP-IL2v in combination with pembrolizumab was manageable and consistent with the known safety profile. However, further exploration of FAP-IL2v and pembrolizumab was precluded in patients with melanoma with prior CPI due to the lack of clinical activity.

SIGNIFICANCE

In this phase Ib study, the combination of FAP-IL2v, an immune-cytokine developed to overcome the limitations of wild-type IL2, with the CPI pembrolizumab did not show meaningful antitumor activity in patients who had progressed on prior CPI therapy, suggesting that FAP-IL2v alone cannot overcome CPI resistance or unresponsiveness.

Evaluation of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune-checkpoint inhibition

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized melanoma treatment, yet approximately half of patients do not respond to these therapies. Identifying prognostic biomarkers is crucial for treatment decisions. Our retrospective study assessed liquid biopsies and tumor tissue analyses for two potential biomarkers: danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) S100A8/A9 and its source, neutrophils. In 43 metastatic unresected stage III/IV melanoma patients, elevated serum levels of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils before and during ICI treatment correlated with worse outcomes. Furthermore, in 113 melanoma patients, neutrophil expression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) was associated with relapse and reduced survival. Measuring S100A8/A9 and neutrophils could enhance immunotherapy monitoring by predicting impaired clinical outcomes and non-response to ICIs. Serum S100A8/A9 levels and neutrophil counts at baseline (T0) and during treatment (T3) correlated with reduced progression-free survival (PFS). Elevated S100A8/A9 levels at T0 and T3 negatively impacted overall survival (OS). Notably, neutrophil infiltration was more prevalent in primary melanomas than in nevi and metastases, and its presence in primary melanomas was linked to poorer survival. S100A8/A9 serum levels, neutrophil counts, and tumor-associated neutrophil infiltration represent promising biomarkers for predicting treatment response and clinical outcomes in melanoma patients receiving ICIs. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings underscore the critical need for reliable biomarkers in melanoma research, particularly for predicting responses to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Identifying S100A8/A9 levels and neutrophil infiltration as potential indicators of treatment outcomes offers valuable insights for personalized therapy decisions. By enhancing monitoring and prognosis assessment, these biomarkers contribute to refining treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes. This research bridges gaps in understanding melanoma response mechanisms and highlights avenues for further investigation into immune-related markers, fostering advancements in precision medicine for melanoma patients.

Discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors for reasons other than disease progression and the impact on relapse and survival of advanced melanoma patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Despite durable responses achieved with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), data about optimal duration of treatment, especially in the context of adverse events, remain scarce.

Objective

To systematically review the evidence concerning the impact of treatment discontinuation with ICIs for reasons other than progressive disease (PD) on relapse rates and survival of melanoma patients.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in three electronic databases until July 2024. Studies referring to melanoma patients who ceased ICIs electively (i.e. due to complete response (CR), protocol completion or patient/physician's wish) or due to treatment-limiting toxicities (TLTs) were selected. Relapse rates (RRs) post cessation, time to PD, rechallenge and disease control rate (DCR) after 2nd course were the main outcomes. Random-effects models were preferred, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate possible sources of heterogeneity.

Results

38 and 35 studies were included in qualitative and quantitative synthesis, respectively. From 2542 patients discontinued treatment with ICIs electively or due to TLTs, 495 experienced progression [number of studies (n)=34, RR 20.9%, 95%CI 17.1 - 24.7%, I2 85%) and higher rates were detected in patients with TLTs compared to elective discontinuation. Mean time to PD was 14.26 months (n=18, mean time 14.26, 95%CI 11.54 - 16.98, I2 93%) and was numerically higher in patients who ceased for CR compared to patients with TLTs. Treatment duration before cessation was not associated with risk and time to relapse, while mucosal melanomas and non-CR as BOR during treatment led to increased risk for relapse and shorter time to PD compared to other histologic subtypes or CR. Rechallenge with ICI resulted in 57.3% DCR and 28.6% pooled CR rates (n=22, CR rate 28.6%, 95%CI 17.1 - 40.2, I2 68%). Heterogeneity among studies was high, but subgroup analysis based on type of ICI used (anti-CTL4 and anti-PD1 inhibitor or anti-PD1 monotherapy) and type of study (RCTs or observational studies), along with sensitivity analyses did not reveal significant alterations in results.

Conclusion

Discontinuation of ICIs in patients without progression is possible. Outcomes to rechallenge with ICIs may differ depending on the reason for discontinuation, but remains a considerable option.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024547792.

Exploring the Impact of the Multimodal CAPABLE eHealth Intervention on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Melanoma Undergoing Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition: Prospective Pilot Study

Background

Patients with melanoma receiving immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors often experience immune-related adverse events, cancer-related fatigue, and emotional distress, affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and clinical outcome to immunotherapy. eHealth tools can aid patients with cancer in addressing issues, such as adverse events and psychosocial well-being, from various perspectives.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the effect of the Cancer Patients Better Life Experience (CAPABLE) system, accessed through a mobile app, on HRQoL compared with a matched historical control group receiving standard care. CAPABLE is an extensively tested eHealth app, including educational material, remote symptom monitoring, and well-being interventions.

Methods

This prospective pilot study compared an exploratory cohort that received the CAPABLE smartphone app and a multisensory smartwatch for 6 months (intervention) to a 2:1 individually matched historical prospective control group. HRQoL data were measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 at baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2) after start of treatment. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to compare HRQoL between the 2 groups over time.

Results

From the 59 eligible patients for the CAPABLE intervention, 31 (53%) signed informed consent to participate. Baseline HRQoL was on average 10 points higher in the intervention group compared with controls, although equally matched on baseline and clinical characteristics. When correcting for sex, age, disease stage, and baseline scores, an adjusted difference in fatigue of -5.09 (95% CI -15.20 to 5.02, P=.32) at month 3 was found. No significant nor clinically relevant adjusted differences on other HRQoL domains over time were found. However, information satisfaction was significantly higher in the CAPABLE group (β=8.71, 95% CI 1.54-15.88, P=.02).

Conclusions

The intervention showed a limited effect on HRQoL, although there was a small improvement in fatigue at 3 months, as well as information satisfaction. When aiming at personalized patient and survivorship care, further optimization and prospective investigation of eHealth tools is warranted.

Real-world outcomes in patients with melanoma brain metastasis: a US multisite retrospective chart review study of systemic treatments

OBJECTIVE

This study examined real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) treated with first-line immunotherapy consisting of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) monotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or targeted therapy consisting of BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review study.

SETTING

Academic medical centres, community hospitals and private practice offices.

PARTICIPANTS

Included patients diagnosed with melanoma with brain metastasis in the USA.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The statistical analysis was descriptive in nature. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatments in a univariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

In total, 472 patients with MBM who received first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=246), anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n=112) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (n=114) were identified. Patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab, compared with patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors, had favourable baseline prognostic factors, such as younger age, fewer or smaller brain metastases, better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and less frequently elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Median follow-up times were 15.4 months (range 0.1 to 37.0), 13.3 months (range 0.3 to 36.6) and 13.9 months (range 1.9 to 36.5), respectively. Numerically longer OS was observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.67) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.04) and numerically longer PFS was observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.02) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.12). With nivolumab plus ipilimumab, anti-PD-1 monotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, 1-year OS rates were 79%, 60% and 72%, respectively; 1-year PFS rates were 68%, 58% and 59%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab appeared to provide benefit versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with MBM, consistent with pivotal trial data. However, the observed benefit may have been due to confounding and selection bias, given that patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab had favourable baseline prognostic factors compared with patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

Lymphatic vessel network injury reduces local tumor control despite preservation of the tumor-draining lymph node

The lymphatic system plays complex, often contradictory, roles in many cancers, including melanoma; these roles include contributions to tumor cell metastasis and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment as well as generation of antitumor immunity. Advancing our understanding of lymphatic vessel involvement in regulating tumor growth and immune response may provide new therapeutic targets or treatment plans to enhance the efficacy of existing therapies. We utilized a syngeneic murine melanoma model in which we surgically disrupted the lymphatic vessel network draining from the tumor to the tumor-draining lymph node (TDLN) while leaving the TDLN intact. Although transport of lymphatic-specific molecular weight tracers to the TDLN remains present after surgery, disruption of the tumor-draining lymphatic vessels results in decreased local tumor control, as reflected in an increase in the rate of tumor growth and reduction in effector-like T cell infiltration into the tumor. Our findings suggest that preservation of the functional tumor-draining lymphatic network may be essential in promoting a robust antitumor immune response.

Immunotherapy-Related Hypophysitis: A Narrative Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized oncology, providing a groundbreaking therapeutic option for patients with various advanced-stage cancers. While these treatments can significantly extend survival, they also carry a substantial risk of immune-related adverse events, among which hypophysitis is particularly detrimental to endocrine function. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of ICI-induced hypophysitis (IH) based on an in-depth analysis of the recent literature and clinical trials. The diagnosis of IH presents unique challenges due to its overlap with systemic symptoms commonly associated with the underlying malignancy. These symptoms can include asthenia, anorexia, headache, vomiting, weight loss, hypotension, dizziness, decreased libido, and visual disturbances. Diagnostic evaluation typically combines clinical assessment, hormonal profiling, and findings from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Effective management of IH requires a personalized, multidisciplinary approach, focusing on hormone replacement therapy and vigilant monitoring. Long-term care depends on the severity of hypophysitis, and the specific hormonal axes involved. This review aims to enhance awareness of the critical aspects of recognizing and managing IH, underscoring the importance of early diagnosis and timely intervention to reduce its long-term effects on patient quality of life.

Efficacy and safety of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo-Ipi) combination therapy is an effective first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its effectiveness and feasibility in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line Nivo-Ipi therapy in elderly patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 57 patients with NSCLC (52 men and 5 women), aged ≥ 75 years (range: 75-86) who received first-line Nivo-Ipi therapy from December 2020 to November 2022 at four institutes in Japan. Patient characteristics, therapeutic efficacy, and the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE) were assessed.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 42.1%, the disease control rate was 73.6%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 14.1 months. Common Grade ≥ 3 AEs included pneumonitis, elevated aspartate transaminase, elevated alanine transaminase, adrenal insufficiency, and colitis. No treatment-related deaths were reported. PFS and OS were longer in patients who experienced treatment-related AEs. Patients with and without AEs had a median PFS of 11.7 and 2.8 months, respectively. Similarly, the median OS of patients with and without AEs was 20.4 and 9.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

First-line Nivo-Ipi therapy is effective in elderly patients with NSCLC. Although there was an increased incidence of pneumonitis, the treatment was manageable and presented as a viable treatment option. Notably, the occurrence of treatment-related AEs was associated with improved clinical outcomes, suggesting a potential prognostic value of AEs in this population.

Exploring the relation between TGF-β pathway activity and response to checkpoint inhibition in patients with metastatic melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is highly effective for the treatment of melanoma, but intrinsic resistance is present in a subgroup of patients. TGF-β pathway activity may play a role in this resistance by preventing T-cells from entering the tumor microenvironment, causing immune escape. We investigated the association of TGF-β signal transduction pathway activity with resistance to ICI treatment in advanced melanoma. Furthermore, other pathway activities were analyzed to better understand their potential role in ICI resistance.

METHOD

The activity of 8 signaling pathways (TGF-β, Hedgehog, MAPK, AR, NOTCH, PI3K, JAK/STAT1-2, and NFkB) was analyzed from tumor tissue from patients with advanced melanoma. Pathway activity scores (PAS) were explored for associations with survival and response to ICI in 34 patients (19 non-responders and 15 responders). A second, independent method to investigate the predictive value of TGF-β pathway activation was conducted by determining levels of phosphorylated SMAD2.

RESULTS

The mean TGF-β PAS of responders vs non-responders was 53.9 vs 56.8 (P = 0.265). No significant relation with progression-free survival was detected for TGF-β activity (P = 0.078). No association between pSMAD2 staining and treatment response or survival was identified. In contrast, Hedgehog scores of responders versus non-responders were 35.7 vs 41.6 (P = 0.038). High Hedgehog PAS was the sole significant predictor of resistance to ICI (OR 0.88, P = 0.033) and worse progression-free survival (HR 1-1.1, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

TGF-β pathway activation showed no significant relation with treatment response to ICI or survival in patients with advanced melanoma. Hedgehog PAS was identified as a possible biomarker associated with both treatment response and survival.

Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsy: Current Techniques and Potential Applications in Melanoma

The treatment landscape for advanced melanoma has transformed significantly with the advent of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) targeting BRAFV600 mutations, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) like anti-PD-1 monotherapy or its combinations with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-LAG-3. Despite that, many patients still do not benefit from these treatments at all or develop resistance mechanisms. Therefore, prognostic and predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients who should switch or escalate their treatment strategies or initiate an intensive follow-up. In melanoma, liquid biopsy has shown promising results, with a potential role in predicting relapse in resected high-risk patients or in disease monitoring during the treatment of advanced disease. Several components in peripheral blood have been analyzed, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and circulant tumoral DNA (ctDNA), which have turned out to be particularly promising. To analyze ctDNA in blood, different techniques have proven to be useful, including digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to detect specific mutations and, more recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, which allow analyzing a broader repertoire of the mutation landscape of each patient. In this review, our goal is to update the current understanding of liquid biopsy, focusing on the use of ctDNA as a biological material in the daily clinical management of melanoma patients, in particular those with advanced disease treated with ICI.

Steroid-refractory immune mediated hepatitis managed with budesonide in patients with metastatic melanoma: proof of concept and literature review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have advanced the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, some patients develop ICI-associated toxicities like hepatitis (ie, immune-mediated hepatitis; IMH). Although these toxicities usually resolve with steroids, steroid-refractory events may occur, which may be a major source of morbidity and mortality without obviously defined treatment algorithms. Herein, we present 2 patients with metastatic melanoma who had IMH that was steroid-refractory and only partially mycophenolate-responsive, but fully resolved with budesonide. The case suggests that budesonide is a potential option to treat IMH that is refractory to standard treatments, but further investigation in a larger series is needed to identify the most optimal setting for budesonide use.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2024

A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to two-centimeter safety margins. For a correct stage classification and treatment decision, a sentinel lymph node biopsy shall be offered in patients with tumor thickness ≥ 1.0 mm or ≥ 0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("Tumor Board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in completely resected stage IIB-IV. In stage II only PD-1 inhibitors are approved. In stage III anti-PD-1 therapy or dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with BRAFV600 mutated melanoma can be discussed. In resected stage IV, nivolumab can be offered, as well as ipilimumab and nivolumab, in selected, high-risk patients. In patients with clinically detected macroscopic, resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed complete surgical resection and adjuvant therapy according to pathological response and BRAF status can be offered. Neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab followed by complete surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab is also recommended. For patients with disease recurrence after (neo) adjuvant therapy, further treatment should consider the type of (neo) adjuvant therapy received as well as the time of recurrence, i.e., on or off therapy. In patients with irresectable stage III/IV disease systemic treatment is always indicated. For first line treatment PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 or LAG-3 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAFV600 mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy, in selected cases. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAFV600 mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second line. Other second line therapies include therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors not used in first line. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

Resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint inhibitors: updated insights

The last decade has witnessed unprecedented succusses with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating cancer. Nevertheless, the proportion of patients who respond favorably to the treatment remained rather modest, partially due to treatment resistance. This has fueled a wave of research into potential mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors which can be classified into primary resistance or acquired resistance after an initial response. In the current review, we summarize what is known so far about the mechanisms of resistance in terms of being tumor-intrinsic or tumor-extrinsic taking into account the multimodal crosstalk between the tumor, immune system compartment and other host-related factors.

Anti-CTLA-4 generates greater memory response than anti-PD-1 via TCF-1

The effects of T cell differentiation arising from immune checkpoint inhibition targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on the immunological memory response remain unclear. Our investigation into the effects of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 on memory T cell formation in mice reveals that memory T cells generated by anti-CTLA-4 exhibit greater expansion, cytokine production, and antitumor activity than those from anti-PD-1. Notably, anti-CTLA-4 preserves more T cell factor-1 (TCF-1)+ T cells during priming, while anti-PD-1 leads to more thymocyte selection-associated high mobility group box (TOX)+ T cells. Experiments using conditional Tcf7- or Tox-knockout mice highlight that TCF-1 is essential for the memory response generated by anti-CTLA-4, whereas TOX deletion alone in T cells has no effect on the response to anti-PD-1. Deepening our understanding of how checkpoint inhibition affects memory response is crucial for advancing our understanding of the enduring impacts of these immunotherapies on the immune system.

Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Melanoma and PD-L1 Expression: The Jury Is Still Out

This comment discusses the use of PD-L1 as a biomarker to guide treatment decisions for metastatic melanoma.

CD49a Targeting Enhances NK Cell Function and Antitumor Immunity

Approximately 70% of patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade therapies develop treatment resistance. Thus, there is a need for the identification of additional immunotherapeutic targets. CD49a is a membrane protein expressed on NK cells and T cells. In this study, we found that CD49a was highly expressed on the surface of tumor-infiltrating NK cells in various mouse tumor models and that CD49a+ tumor-infiltrating NK cells were more exhausted than CD49a- tumor-infiltrating NK cells. Furthermore, CD49a or NK-specific CD49a deficiency slowed tumor growth and prolonged survival in several mouse tumor models, primarily through the essential role played by NK cells in antitumor activities. Blockade of CD49a using an mAb suppressed tumor development in mice, and combination treatment with anti-PD-L1 further enhanced antitumor efficacy. Our research reveals CD49a on NK cells as an immunotherapeutic target and highlights the potential clinical applications of CD49a-targeted therapies.

Trends in cutaneous melanoma mortality and incidence in European Union 15+ countries between 1990 and 2019

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is the leading cause of skin cancer mortality with associated high healthcare costs. Up-to-date reporting of epidemiological trends for CM is required to project future trends, assess the burden of disease and aid evaluation of new diagnostic, therapeutic and preventative strategies.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the trends in CM mortality, incidence, mortality-to-incidence indices (MIIs) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over the last three decades.

METHODS

A population-based cross-sectional study of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database between 1990 and 2019 was performed. Nineteen high-income countries with similar health expenditure and classified as having high-quality mortality data including the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia and selected European Union countries were included. Annual age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs), age-standardized death rates (ASDRs) and DALYs for each country were extracted. Mortality-to-incidence indexes were calculated by dividing the ASDR by the ASIR. Trends were described using Joinpoint regression analysis.

RESULTS

Almost all countries demonstrated increasing ASDR in males over the observation period with greatest percentage increase in Greece (+87%), and there was greater heterogeneity between countries in females. CM mortality was greater for males than females in all countries. Most recent Joinpoint analysis shows significantly decreasing mortality in all countries except the United Kingdom (+0.5% males between 2007 and 2019, +0.1% females between 2002 and 2019). Incidence rates increased in all countries, with evidence of plateau from 2015 onwards. While MIIs cannot be used as a proxy for survival, statistically significant decreases in MII were observed in all countries. Overall, DALYs remained static.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past 30 years, CM mortality and incidence has increased in most EU15+ countries. There is evidence that in recent years, CM mortality is decreasing. The burden of disease as assessed using DALYs has remained mostly unchanged. Future work should not solely focus on expensive innovative therapies, but also on optimizing primary prevention.

The Relationship Between the Modulation of Intestinal Microbiota and the Response to Immunotherapy in Patients with Cancer

The intestinal microbiota is an important part of the human body, and its composition can affect the effectiveness of immunotherapy. In the last few years, the modulation of intestinal microbiota in order to improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy has become a current topic in the scientific community, but there is a lack of research in this area. In this review, the goal was to analyze the current relevant literature related to the modulation of intestinal microbiota and the effectiveness of immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer. The effects of antibiotics, probiotics, diet, and fecal microbial transplantation were analyzed separately. It was concluded that the use of antibiotics, especially broad-spectrum types or larger quantities, causes dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota, which can reduce the effectiveness of immunotherapy. While dysbiosis could be repaired by probiotics and thus improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy, the use of commercial probiotics without evidence of intestinal dysbiosis has not yet been sufficiently tested to confirm its safety for cancer for immunotherapy-treated cancer patients. A diet consisting of sufficient amounts of fiber, as well as a diet with higher salt content positively correlates with the success of immunotherapy. Fecal transplantation is a safe and realistic adjuvant option for the treatment of cancer patients with immunotherapy, but more clinical trials are necessary. Modulating the microbiota composition indeed changes the effectiveness of immunotherapy, but in the future, more human studies should be organized to precisely determine the types and procedures of microbiota modulation.

Final, 10-Year Outcomes with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Previous results from this trial showed longer overall survival after treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or with nivolumab monotherapy than with ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. Given that patients with advanced melanoma are living longer than 7.5 years, longer-term data were needed to address new clinically relevant questions.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to one of the following regimens: nivolumab (1 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks; nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks plus placebo; or ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks for four doses plus placebo. Treatment was continued until the occurrence of disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Randomization was stratified according to BRAF mutation status, metastasis stage, and programmed death ligand 1 expression. Here, we report the final, 10-year results of this trial, including results for overall survival and melanoma-specific survival, as well as durability of response.

RESULTS

With a minimum follow-up of 10 years, median overall survival was 71.9 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 36.9 months with nivolumab, and 19.9 months with ipilimumab. The hazard ratio for death was 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.65) for nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with ipilimumab and was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76) for nivolumab as compared with ipilimumab. Median melanoma-specific survival was more than 120 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (not reached, with 37% of the patients alive at the end of the trial), 49.4 months with nivolumab, and 21.9 months with ipilimumab. Among patients who had been alive and progression-free at 3 years, 10-year melanoma-specific survival was 96% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 97% with nivolumab, and 88% with ipilimumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The final trial results showed a continued, ongoing survival benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and with nivolumab monotherapy, as compared with ipilimumab monotherapy, in patients with advanced melanoma. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 067 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01844505.).

Cancer immunotherapy in elderly patients: The concept of immune senescence challenged by clinical experience

Cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, has led to major improvements in the treatment of a wide range of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. However, age-mediated immune system modifications, known as immunosenescence, may preclude its efficacy in elderly patients. In this review, we assessed the efficacy of these different cancer immunotherapies in elderly patients compared to young patients to revisit the concept of immunosenescence from a therapeutic perspective.

Current status and future prospects of combined immunotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a malignancy with a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients with HNSCC are diagnosed at later stages owing to its hidden anatomical location and atypical clinical symptoms. It is notably prone to recurrence and metastasis. The traditional treatments include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Although multiple treatment strategies have been established, the prognosis remains poor because most patients develop resistance to traditional treatments. In recent years, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to provide clinical benefits to these patients. Based on the promising results of both anti-EGFR therapy and immunotherapy, as well as the biological rationale for combining immunotherapy with anti-EGFR drugs, numerous preclinical and ongoing or completed clinical trials have explored the use of their synergistic effects. This review summarizes the feasibility of combining immunotherapy with EGFR inhibitors for HNSCC treatment and analyses the relevant biomarkers. It also summarizes the strategies for clinical applications. We found that immunotherapy and EGFR inhibitor combination therapy showed promise in treating patients with HNSCC and exhibited safety with acceptable adverse events. This review may provide valuable insights for the future development of treatments and formulation of therapeutic strategies for HNSCC, as well as useful information for the future design of clinical trials.

Response and outcome of patients with melanoma skin metastases and immune checkpoint inhibition

It is known, that different metastatic organ systems respond differently to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this study, we aimed to investigate the extent to which skin/subcutaneous metastases respond to ICI or targeted therapies (TTs) and whether the response rate differs from that of distant metastases in the same patient. Patients with melanoma diagnosed between January 2021 and September 2023 with at least one skin/subcutaneous metastasis who had received therapy with ICI or TT in an advanced setting were included in the analysis. Best overall response (BOR) was classified according to the revised response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). The BOR of skin metastases and visceral metastases to ICI and TT was compared using the chi-square test. Skin metastases treated with ICI a first-line setting showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 44.1%. In contrast, visceral metastases had a higher ORR of 51.1%. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = .77). Regarding TT, the ORR for skin metastases was 57.1%, compared to 38.5% for visceral metastases (p = .59). Interestingly, the ORR for skin/subcutaneous metastases was notably lower with ICI compared to visceral metastases, in contrast to patients who underwent TT. Skin metastases showed a poorer response to ICI than visceral metastases. Therefore, careful monitoring is recommended to detect non-response early in patients with skin metastases as skin metastases may have a worse response than TT. A larger cohort is needed for a comprehensive analysis and confirmation of our results.

Overcoming Resistance Mechanisms to Melanoma Immunotherapy

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized treatment of advanced melanoma. While most patients derive survival benefit from established immunotherapies, notably monoclonal antibodies blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1, a subset does not optimally respond due to the manifestation of innate or acquired resistance to these therapies. Combination regimens have proven efficacious relative to single-agent blockade, but also yield high-grade treatment toxicities that are often dose-limiting for patients. In this review, we discuss the significant strides made in the past half-decade toward expanding the melanoma immunotherapy treatment paradigm. These include newly approved therapies, adoption of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and studies in the clinical trials pipeline targeting alternative immune checkpoints and key immunoregulatory molecules. We then review how developments in molecular and functional diagnostics have furthered our understanding of the tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving immunotherapy resistance, as well as highlight novel biomarkers for predicting treatment response. Throughout, we discuss potential approaches for targeting these resistance mechanisms in rational combination with established immunotherapies to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma.

Current and emerging treatment options for BRAFV600-mutant melanoma

INTRODUCTION

BRAF mutations are the most common driver mutation in cutaneous melanoma, present in 40% of cases. Rationally designed BRAF targeted therapy (TT) has been developed in response to this, and alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), forms the backbone of systemic therapy options for BRAF-mutant melanoma. Various therapeutic approaches have been studied in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and advanced settings, and there is a wealth of information to guide clinicians managing these patients. Despite this, certain challenges remain.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the available literature regarding BRAF mutation types and resistance mechanisms, neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches for patients with early-stage disease, management of advanced disease, including patients with brain metastases, as well as identified areas of further research.

EXPERT OPINION

Although there is a significant amount of literature to guide the management of BRAF-mutant melanoma, several questions remain. Thus far, the management of stage III BRAF-mutant patients following neoadjuvant ICI, treatment de-escalation in long-term TT responders in the advanced setting and the management of symptomatic brain metastases remain areas of debate. Further work on predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma patients will assist in clinical decision-making.

Long-term outcomes among patients who respond within the first year to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy: A pooled analysis in 935 patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the predictive value of RECIST response within 3, 6, or 12 months on long-term survival, and explore differences between nivolumab+ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy, we analyzed pooled 5-year data of 935 responder and non-responder patients at various time points after treatment initiation in CheckMate 069, 066, and 067 studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naive advanced melanoma patients received nivolumab+ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy. To decrease immortal time bias, 3-, 6-, or 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) landmark analyses were performed. Association between characteristics and response was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Response rates at any time were 58 % (239/409) for nivolumab+ipilimumab and 44 % (230/526) for nivolumab monotherapy. In 12-month landmark analyses, 5-year OS rates for responders versus non-responders were 82 % versus 40 % with nivolumab+ipilimumab (HR=0.23 [95 % CI, 0.15-0.35]) and 76 % versus 32 % with nivolumab monotherapy (HR=0.22 [95 % CI, 0.16-0.31]). PFS rates were 83 % versus 32 % and 69 % versus 46 %, respectively. Similar strong associations between response at 3 and 6 months and 5-year OS and PFS were also observed with more than 70 % of the responses observed in the first 3 months. Response rates correlated with baseline LDH and PD-L1 status by multivariate analysis but the association between response and long-term survival was maintained in landmark analyses even among patients with high LDH and low PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

Clinical response evaluated in the first months of therapy is a strong predictor of long-term survival, even in patients with poor prognostic biomarkers.

Adverse neurologic events of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy vs. combination therapy for melanoma

Background

Over the past decade, novel immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized melanoma treatment. These new therapies are associated with complex immune-related adverse events. This study examines whether combination anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 immunotherapy for melanoma is associated with increased incidence of neurologic irAEs (n-irAEs) compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective, multicenter study using TriNetX identified adult melanoma patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) (Cohort 1: n = 10,586) and patients receiving anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 combination therapy (nivolumab + ipilimumab) (Cohort 2: n = 5,705). Propensity score matching generated final cohorts (n = 5,185) using covariates: gender, race, age at diagnosis, TNM staging, nervous system metastasis, and history of neurologic disease. Odds ratios (OR) for n-irAE subtypes at 3- and 5-year post-therapy initiation were calculated, and Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed overall survival by aggregate n-irAE status in each cohort.

Results

At 3 years, patients receiving combination immunotherapy exhibited increased risk of immune-related meningitis (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: [1.7, 4.1]) and encephalitis (OR: 3.0, 95% CI: [1.9, 4.9]), peripheral neuropathy (OR: 1.3, 95% CI [1.1, 1.5]), and myopathy (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: [1.1, 2.1]), but no significantly increased risk of demyelinating syndromes (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: [0.82, 2.6]), vasculitis (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: [0.43, 1.8]), or neuromuscular junction disorders (OR: 1.3, 95% CI: [0.87, 2.0]). At 5 years, these trends for risk of neurologic irAEs persisted. There was no significant difference in overall survival by n-irAE presence at 3 or 5 years in either cohort.

Conclusions

Melanoma patients receiving combination anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 immunotherapy have greater long-term risk of n-irAEs than patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

Size matters: Early progression of melanoma brain metastases after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective treatments for patients with metastatic melanoma, including patients with brain metastasis (BM). However, half of patients with melanoma BM have intracranial progression within 6 months after the start of ICIs. We investigated whether size affects response to ICIs in patients with melanoma BM.

Methods

In this single-center cohort study, patients with melanoma BM who were treated with ICIs between 2012 and 2021 were included. Clinical and radiologic features were collected at baseline. Longest axial diameter of all BMs was measured on baseline and follow-up MRI, and segmentation was performed for all BMs on baseline MRI. Lesion-level logistic regression analysis and patient-level survival analysis were performed for early BM progression (ie, within 6 months after start of ICIs) and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), respectively.

Results

A total of 82 patients were included with a total of 464 BMs. At baseline, 37.8% of patients had ≥ 4 BMs and 53.7% of patients had at least one BM with a diameter ≥ 10 mm. In multivariable analysis on the lesion level, baseline BM diameter was associated with early BM progression (odds ratio 1.10, 95%CI 1.05-1.15, P < .001). On the patient level, having at least one BM ≥ 10mm was associated with shorter intracranial PFS (hazard ratio 2.08, 95%CI 1.64-5.56, P < .001).

Conclusions

Large BM diameter was associated with a higher risk of early progression after the start of ICIs. Therefore, local therapy should be considered for patients who are treated with ICIs and who have melanoma BMs ≥ 10 mm.

Improved survival of advanced melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy with concomitant antithrombotic therapy - A multicenter study on 2419 patients from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg

BACKGROUND

Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized melanoma treatment, but the high number of non-responders still emphasizes the need for improvement of therapy. One potential avenue for enhancing anti-tumor treatment is through the modulation of coagulation and platelet activity. Both have been found to play an important role in the tumor microenvironment, tumor growth and metastasis. Preclinical studies indicate a beneficial effect, clinical data has been inconsistent.

METHODS

We examined a cohort of advanced, non-resectable melanoma patients (n = 2419) derived from the German prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOReg, who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The patients were classified based on whether it was documented that they received platelet aggregation inhibition (PAI) (n = 137) (acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or clopidogrel), anticoagulation (AC) (n = 185) (direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC), phenprocoumon, heparins) at the start of ICI or no antithrombotic medication (n = 2097) at any point during ICI treatment. The study endpoints were best overall response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A significantly improved PFS was observed in patients documented to receive ASA (15.1 vs 6.4 months, HR 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.5 to 0.88, p = 0.0047) as well as in patients to receive AC (15.1 vs. 6.4 months, HR 0.7, 95 % CI: 0.53 to 0.91, p = 0.01) compared to patients for whom no antithrombotic medication was documented. Multivariate analysis of OS showed significant risk reduction in patients who received DOAC (HR 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.92, p = 0.0170) or phenprocoumon (HR: 0.44, 95 % CI: 0.19 to 0.85, p = 0.0301).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates a positive prognostic effect of anticoagulant and antiplatelet concomitant medication in melanoma patients receiving ICI. Further studies are needed to confrim the cancer-related benefit of adding anticoagulation or platelet inhibition to ICI treatment.

Circulating tumor-reactive KIR+CD8+ T cells suppress anti-tumor immunity in patients with melanoma

Effective anti-tumor immunity is driven by cytotoxic CD8+ T cells with specificity for tumor antigens. However, the factors that control successful tumor rejection are not well understood. Here we identify a subpopulation of CD8+ T cells that are tumor-antigen-specific and can be identified by KIR expression but paradoxically impair anti-tumor immunity in patients with melanoma. These tumor-antigen-specific KIR+CD8+ regulatory T cells target other tumor-antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, can be detected in both the tumor and the blood, have a conserved transcriptional program and are associated with a poor overall survival. These findings broaden our understanding of the transcriptional and functional heterogeneity of human CD8+ T cells and implicate KIR+CD8+ regulatory T cells as a cellular mediator of immune evasion in human cancer.

Deep learning on CT scans to predict checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in advanced melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has proven successful for advanced melanoma, but is associated with potentially severe toxicity and high costs. Accurate biomarkers for response are lacking. The present work is the first to investigate the value of deep learning on CT imaging of metastatic lesions for predicting ICI treatment outcomes in advanced melanoma. Adult patients that were treated with ICI for advanced melanoma were retrospectively identified from ten participating centers. A deep learning model (DLM) was trained on volumes of lesions on baseline CT to predict clinical benefit. The DLM was compared to and combined with a model of known clinical predictors (presence of liver and brain metastasis, level of lactate dehydrogenase, performance status and number of affected organs). A total of 730 eligible patients with 2722 lesions were included. The DLM reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.607 [95%CI 0.565-0.648]. In comparison, a model of clinical predictors reached an AUROC of 0.635 [95%CI 0.59 -0.678]. The combination model reached an AUROC of 0.635 [95% CI 0.595-0.676]. Differences in AUROC were not statistically significant. The output of the DLM was significantly correlated with four of the five input variables of the clinical model. The DLM reached a statistically significant discriminative value, but was unable to improve over known clinical predictors. The present work shows that the assessment over known clinical predictors is an essential step for imaging-based prediction and brings important nuance to the almost exclusively positive findings in this field.

Current trends in sensitizing immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically transformed the treatment landscape for various malignancies, achieving notable clinical outcomes across a wide range of indications. Despite these advances, resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remains a critical clinical challenge, characterized by variable response rates and non-durable benefits. However, growing research into the complex intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of tumors has advanced our understanding of the mechanisms behind ICI resistance, potentially improving treatment outcomes. Additionally, robust predictive biomarkers are crucial for optimizing patient selection and maximizing the efficacy of ICBs. Recent studies have emphasized that multiple rational combination strategies can overcome immune checkpoint resistance and enhance susceptibility to ICIs. These findings not only deepen our understanding of tumor biology but also reveal the unique mechanisms of action of sensitizing agents, extending clinical benefits in cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we will explore the underlying biology of ICIs, discuss the significance of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and clinical predictive biomarkers, analyze the current mechanisms of resistance, and outline alternative combination strategies to enhance the effectiveness of ICIs, including personalized strategies for sensitizing tumors to ICIs.

Insight of immune checkpoint inhibitor related myocarditis

As the understanding of immune-related mechanisms in the development and progression of cancer advances, immunotherapies, notably Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), have become integral in comprehensive cancer treatment strategies. ICIs reactivate T-cell cytotoxicity against tumors by blocking immune suppressive signals on T cells, such as Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Despite their beneficial effects, ICIs are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), manifesting as autoimmune side effects across various organ systems. A particularly alarming irAE is life-threatening myocarditis. This rare but severe side effect of ICIs leads to significant long-term cardiac complications, including arrhythmias and heart failure, and has been observed to have a mortality rate of up to 50% in affected patients. This greatly limits the clinical application of ICI-based immunotherapy. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of ICI-related myocarditis. We also discuss the utility of preclinical mouse models in understanding and addressing this critical challenge.