Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin – evaluation of seven commercial MIC products against standard broth microdilution for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp

In vitro activity of imipenem-relebactam against resistant phenotypes of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intraabdominal and urinary tract infection samples - SMART Surveillance Europe 2015-2017

Introduction. Infections attributable to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli are increasing globally. New antimicrobial agents are urgently needed to treat patients with these infections.Aim. To describe susceptibility to the novel carbapenem-β-lactamase inhibitor combination imipenem-relebactam and comparators of clinical isolates of non-Proteeae Enterobacteriaceae (NPE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from intraabdominal infections (IAIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs).Methods. Broth microdilution MICs were determined for isolates collected in 22 European countries in 2015-2017 and interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints; imipenem-relebactam MICs were interpreted using imipenem breakpoints.Results. For NPE, 98.4 % of isolates from IAIs (n=10,465) and 98.5 % of UTI isolates (n=7,446) were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam, as were 42.4 % of imipenem-nonsusceptible (n=474), 98.6 % of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-positive (n=138), and 93.9 % of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates (n=4,424) from IAIs and UTIs combined. Molecular analysis demonstrated that two-thirds of imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates rendered susceptible by relebactam carried KPCs; 96 % (261/271) of imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates of NPE that remained nonsusceptible in the presence of relebactam carried metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-type and/or OXA-48-like carbapenemases. Among P. aeruginosa, 94.4 % of IAI (n=1,245) and 93.0 % of UTI isolates (n=714) were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam, as were 74.4 % of imipenem-nonsusceptible (n=469) and 79.8 % of MDR isolates (n=595) from IAIs and UTIs combined. Among the 120 isolates of P. aeruginosa that remained nonsusceptible to imipenem upon addition of relebactam, 72 % carried MBLs. The distribution of NPE and P. aeruginosa carrying carbapenemases varied substantially across Europe, as did resistance to imipenem and imipenem-relebactam.Conclusions. Continued surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and resistance mechanisms, including the study of imipenem-relebactam as it approaches regulatory approval, appears warranted.

Evaluation of resazurin-based assay for rapid detection of polymyxin-resistant gram-negative bacteria

Background

Colistin resistance is considered a serious problem due to a lack of alternative antibiotics. The Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test is a resazurin reduction-based technique that relies on the visual detection of bacterial growth in the presence of a defined concentration of colistin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test in the detection of colistin susceptibility in common clinical Gram-negative bacteria.

Results

A total of 253 clinical isolates from a teaching hospital, including Acinetobacter baumanii (n = 58, 8 colistin-resistant), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 61, 11 colistin-resistant), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 70, 20 colistin-resistant) and Escherichia coli (n = 64, 14 colistin-resistant) were tested in this study. The sensitivity and specificity of the Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test compared to Broth microdilution method was 100 and 99%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test could be used as an accurate detection method for colistin resistance.

Molecular epidemiology of mcr gene group

Colistin and polymyxin B are the “last reserve” antimicrobials for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. The rapidly increasing prevalence of polymyxin resistance mediated by the mcr gene localized on plasmid DNA currently poses a high epidemiological threat. In order to control a distribution of mcr genes, it is necessary to develop highly accurate, highly sensitive and easy-to-use diagnostic tools. This paper provides a review of the most relevant studies on the molecular epidemiology as well as current approaches to microbiological and molecular detection of mcr group genes.

Emergence and nosocomial spread of ST11 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae co-producing OXA-48 and KPC-2 in a regional hospital in Taiwan

Purpose. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has emerged as a major challenge for global healthcare systems. The objectives of this study were to determine the nosocomial spread of CRKP clones and analyse the molecular characteristics of CRKP in our hospital.Methodology. Ninety-eight non-duplicated clinical CRKP isolates were collected from March 2014-June 2015. Clinical, demographic and microbiological data of patients with CRKP were reviewed. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multi-locus sequence typing were applied to investigate the genetic relationship between the 98 isolates. Antibiotic resistance genes were identified by conventional PCR-sequencing.Results. PFGE patterns were grouped into 26 clusters. Two main PFGE clusters were identified: L (53 isolates, belonging to ST11) and N (11 isolates, belonging to ST11). The most dominant ST was ST11 (79 %, 77/98), followed by ST273 (5 %, 5/98). KPC-2 (n=82) was the predominant carbapenemase followed by OXA-48 (n=64). Fifty isolates (51 %, 50/98) harboured bla _KPC-2 and bla _OXA-48 simultaneously, and three of these isolates were detected with the third carbapenemase genes (bla _IMP-8 or bla _VIM-1).Conclusion. The clonal spread of K. pneumoniae ST11 expressing OXA-48, KPC-2 and CTX-M-14 β-lactamases was the cause of an outbreak of CRKP. To the best of our knowledge, a single strain harbouring A-, B- and D-class carbapenemase genes has not previously been identified. There is a high prevalence of plasmid-encoded KPC-2- and OXA-48-producing CRKP in our hospital; most isolates were members of ST11, which may be representative of a high-risk CRKP clone disseminating in central Taiwan.

Prevalence of Genes Involved in Colistin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: First Report from Iraq

Background and Aim: Colistin is increasingly being used as a "last-line" therapy to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, when essentially no other options are available in these days. The aim of this study was to detect genes associated with colistin resistance in A. baumannii. Methods: One hundred twenty-one isolates of A. baumannii were collected from clinical and environmental samples during 2016 to 2018 in Baghdad. Isolates were diagnosed as A. baumannii by using morphological tests, Vitek-2 system, 16SrRNA PCR amplification, and sequencing. Antibiotic susceptibility test was carried out using disk diffusion method. Phenotypic detection of colistin resistance was performed by CHROMagar™ COL-APSE medium and broth microdilution method for the determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration. Molecular detection of genes responsible for colistin resistance in A. baumannii was performed by PCR. Results: Ninety-two (76%) of the 121 A. baumannii isolates were colistin resistant. Twenty-six (21.5%) of the 121 isolates showed positive growth on CHROMagar Acinetobacter base for MDR. PCR detected mcr-1, mcr-2, and mcr-3 genes in 89 (73.5%), 78 (64.5%), and 82 (67.8%) A. baumannii isolates, respectively. Seventy-eight (64.5%) of the 121 isolates harbored the integron intI2 gene and 81 (66.9%) contained intI3 gene. Moreover, 60 (49.6%) of the 121 isolates were positive for the quorum sensing lasI gene. Conclusion: The presence of a large percentage of colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains in Baghdad may be due to the presence of mobile genetic elements, and it is urgent to avoid unnecessary clinical use of colistin.

Colistin Resistance in Enterobacterales Strains - A Current View

Colistin is a member of cationic polypeptide antibiotics known as polymyxins. It is widely used in animal husbandry, plant cultivation, animal and human medicine and is increasingly used as one of the last available treatment options for patients with severe infections with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Due to the increased use of colistin in treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, the resistance to this antibiotic ought to be monitored. Bacterial resistance to colistin may be encoded on transposable genetic elements (e.g. plasmids with the mcr genes). Thus far, nine variants of the mcr gene, mcr-1 – mcr-9, have been identified. Chromosomal resistance to colistin is associated with the modification of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Various methods, from classical microbiology to molecular biology methods, are used to detect the colistin-resistant bacterial strains and to identify resistance mechanisms. The broth dilution method is recommended for susceptibility testing of bacteria to colistin.

An alternative disk diffusion test in broth and macrodilution method for colistin susceptibility in Enterobacteriales

Colistin and polymyxin B are old drugs that have been reintroduced to treat Gram-negative infections lacking other treatment options; however, colistin resistance have been reported. To know the correct susceptibility pattern is mandatory for multidrug resistant bacteria. Broth microdilution method is the gold standard to evaluate colistin and polymyxin B susceptibility; nevertheless, it is time consuming and needs expertise to be performed. Disk diffusion method on Müeller-Hinton agar is no longer recommended to evaluate polymyxins susceptibility. In this study we evaluated two methods (disk diffusion in broth and broth macrodilution) as alternative options to identify polymyxin resistance in an easy way. A total of 536 Enterobacteriales isolates were assessed for colistin susceptibility. All non-wild type Enterobacteriales (41) were chosen and 31 wild type bacteria were randomly selected, were used to perform disk diffusion tests in broth and for broth macrodilution tests. We found 100% of concordance between both tested methods and broth microdilution. In conclusion, these two methods are reliable and easier options that complement as initial screening susceptibility for colistin in Enterobacteriales in microbiology laboratories lacking personnel and infrastructure to perform broth microdilution method.

Colistin susceptibility test evaluation of multiple-resistance-level Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates generated in a morbidostat device

Objectives

Colistin is a last-resort antibiotic against the critical-status pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. There is still uncertainty regarding how to accurately measure colistin susceptibility in P. aeruginosa. Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods is largely hampered by the lack of resistant isolates and those around the susceptibility breakpoint. The aim of this study was to generate such strains in a morbidostat device for use in AST method evaluation.

Methods

A morbidostat device was used to cultivate susceptible clinical strains into isolates with a wide range of colistin MICs. Subsequently, five commercial AST methods were compared against the gold standard broth microdilution (BMD) method: MICRONAUT-S, SensiTest, Sensititre, Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas and Etest.

Results

A total of 131 P. aeruginosa isolates were used for colistin susceptibility test evaluation (100 colistin susceptible and 31 colistin resistant). The 31 colistin-resistant isolates evolved resistance in the morbidostat to different MIC ranges (4-512 mg/L, 100% resistance generation efficacy). The categorical agreement (CA) rates for MICRONAUT-S, SensiTest and Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas were 94.7%, 93.9% and 92.4%, respectively. The Sensititre achieved the highest CA score (96.9%), whereas the Etests had the lowest CA score (84%). The very major discrepancy (VMD) rates for all tests were between 3.2% and 67.7%.

Conclusions

The morbidostat device can efficiently provide laboratories with colistin-resistant strains for test evaluation. Although CA rates were high for commercial AST methods except for Etests, none met the ≤1.5% CLSI limit for VMD rates. Performance was generally inferior when using isolates with low-level resistance.

Multicenter Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution and Colistin Agar Test: a Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

Susceptibility testing of the polymyxins (colistin and polymyxin B) is challenging for clinical laboratories. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee evaluated two methods to enable accurate testing of these agents. These methods were a colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) and a colistin agar test (CAT), the latter of which was evaluated using two inoculum volumes, 1 μl (CAT-1) and 10 μl (CAT-10). The methods were evaluated using a collection of 270 isolates of Enterobacterales, 122 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, and 106 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Overall, 94.4% of CBDE results were in essential agreement and 97.9% in categorical agreement (CA) with reference broth microdilution MICs. Nine very major errors (VME; 3.2%) and 3 major errors (ME; 0.9%) were observed. With the CBDE, 98.6% CA was observed for Enterobacterales (2.5% VME, 0% ME), 99.3% CA was observed for P. aeruginosa (0% VME, 0.7% ME), and 93.1% CA was observed for Acinetobacter spp. (5.6% VME, 3.3% ME). Overall, CA was 94.9% with 6.8% VME using CAT-1 and improved to 98.3% with 3.9% VME using CAT-10. No ME were observed using either CAT-1 or CAT-10. Using the CAT-1/CAT-10, the CA observed was 99.4%/99.7% for Enterobacterales (1%/0.5% VME), 98.7%/100% for P. aeruginosa (8.3%/0% VME), and 88.5%/92.3% for Acinetobacter spp. (21.4%/14.3% VME). Based on these data, the CLSI antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) subcommittee endorsed the CBDE and CAT-10 methods for colistin testing of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa.

Mutations that increase expression of the EmrAB-TolC efflux pump confer increased resistance to nitroxoline in Escherichia coli

Objectives

To determine the mechanism of resistance to the antibiotic nitroxoline in Escherichia coli.

Methods

Spontaneous nitroxoline-resistant mutants were selected at different concentrations of nitroxoline. WGS and strain reconstruction were used to define the genetic basis for the resistance. The mechanistic basis of resistance was determined by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and by overexpression of target genes. Fitness costs of the resistance mutations and cross-resistance to other antibiotics were also determined.

Results

Mutations in the transcriptional repressor emrR conferred low-level resistance to nitroxoline [nitroxoline MIC (MICNOX) = 16 mg/L] by increasing the expression of the emrA and emrB genes of the EmrAB-TolC efflux pump. These resistant mutants showed no fitness reduction and displayed cross-resistance to nalidixic acid. Second-step mutants with higher-level resistance (MICNOX = 32–64 mg/L) had mutations in the emrR gene, together with either a 50 kb amplification, a mutation in the gene marA, or an IS upstream of the lon gene. The latter mutations resulted in higher-level nitroxoline resistance due to increased expression of the tolC gene, which was confirmed by overexpressing tolC from an inducible plasmid in a low-level resistance mutant. Furthermore, the emrR mutations conferred a small increase in resistance to nitrofurantoin only when combined with an nfsAB double-knockout mutation. However, nitrofurantoin-resistant nfsAB mutants showed no cross-resistance to nitroxoline.

Conclusions

Mutations in different genes causing increased expression of the EmrAB-TolC pump lead to an increased resistance to nitroxoline. The structurally similar antibiotics nitroxoline and nitrofurantoin appear to have different modes of action and resistance mechanisms.

Diversity of esterase and lipase producing haloalkaliphilic bacteria from Lake Magadi in Kenya

Lipids are hydrocarbons comprised of long-chain fatty acids and are found in all living things. In the environment, microorganisms degrade them to obtain energy using esterases and lipases. These enzymes are nowadays used in different industrial applications. We report isolation of 24 bacteria with esteresic and lipolytic activity from Lake Magadi, Kenya. The isolates were characterised using morphological, biochemical, and molecular methods. Isolates grew at an optimum salt concentration of 5-8% (w/v), pH range of 8.0-9.0, and temperature range of 35-40°C. The isolates were positive for esterase and lipase assay as well as other extracellular enzymes. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene showed that the isolates were affiliated to the genus Bacillus, Alkalibacterium, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, Halomonas, and Alkalilimnicola. None of the bacterial isolates produced antimicrobial agents, and all of them were resistant to trimethoprim and nalidixic acid but susceptible to streptomycin, amoxillin, chloramphenicol, and cefotaxime. Growth at elevated pH, salt, and temperature is an indicator that the enzymes from these organisms could function well under haloalkaline conditions. Therefore, Lake Magadi could be a good source of isolates with the potential to produce unique biocatalysts for the biotechnology industry.

Performance of three commercial assays for colistin susceptibility in clinical isolates and Mcr-1 carrying reference strain

Objective

Commercially available antibiotic susceptibility tests (cAST) for colistin are reported to shows variable performance. The current controversy on the colistin susceptibility testing and scarce data from India has left the clinical laboratories in a dilemma on the appropriate and practical approach to tackle the colistin antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) issue. This study was aimed to evaluate the performance of commonly used cAST for colistin against broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method in the clinical isolates.

Materials and Methods

Colistin AST was performed on 225 nonduplicate isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii by BMD as the reference method and compared with Vitek-2, Micronaut-S and E-test. The accuracy of the various cASTs was analysed by assessing categorical and essential agreement (EA).

Results

We observed an overall categorical agreement of 98.2%, 99.6% and 96.4% and EA of 92%, 92.4% and 72% for Vitek-2, Micronaut-S and E-test, respectively. Unacceptable rates of major error (10.5%) and very major error (21%) were observed for P. aeruginosa with Vitek-2 and E-test, respectively. All the categorical errors (CEs) (7.7%) with Vitek-2 were seen for minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging within two-fold dilution breakpoint of 2 mg/L.

Conclusion

Micronaut-S was found to be an acceptable method for colistin AST. In contrast, E-test was unreliable in terms of EA. Vitek-2 was found to be reliable for colistin AST, although it was more prone to CE near the colistin breakpoints.

Evaluation of an In-House Colistin NP Test for Use in Resource-Limited Settings

Colistin has become increasingly important in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance to colistin has emerged globally, necessitating the need for an accurate method to detect colistin resistance. The colistin NP test has shown promise as a rapid screening assay for colistin resistance. This study compared the performance of an in-house-prepared colistin NP test against broth microdilution (BMD) as the gold standard and against Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) as an alternative method. A total of 215 stored Enterobacteriaceae isolates were evaluated, of which 159 were resistant and 56 susceptible to colistin by BMD. The categorical agreement of the colistin NP test with BMD was found to be 98.1%, compared to 87.9% for the Etest. One major error was detected with both the colistin NP test and the Etest. Three very major errors were detected with the colistin NP test compared to 25 with the Etest. This resulted in a major error rate of 1.8% for both the colistin NP test and the Etest and a very major error rate of 1.9% and 15.7% for the colistin NP test and the Etest, respectively. The colistin NP test compared satisfactorily to the BMD reference method in determining colistin susceptibility. The colistin NP test is a rapid, inexpensive screening method for colistin resistance, especially in resource-limited settings.

Using Colistin as a Trojan Horse: Inactivation of Gram-Negative Bacteria with Chlorophyllin

Colistin (polymyxin E) is a membrane-destabilizing antibiotic used against Gram-negative bacteria. We have recently reported that the outer membrane prevents the uptake of antibacterial chlorophyllin into Gram-negative cells. In this study, we used sub-toxic concentrations of colistin to weaken this barrier for a combination treatment of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium with chlorophyllin. In the presence of 0.25 µg/mL colistin, chlorophyllin was able to inactivate both bacteria strains at concentrations of 5-10 mg/L for E. coli and 0.5-1 mg/L for S. Typhimurium, which showed a higher overall susceptibility to chlorophyllin treatment. In accordance with a previous study, chlorophyllin has proven antibacterial activity both as a photosensitizer, illuminated with 12 mW/cm2, and in darkness. Our data clearly confirmed the relevance of the outer membrane in protection against xenobiotics. Combination treatment with colistin broadens chlorophyllin's application spectrum against Gram-negatives and gives rise to the assumption that chlorophyllin together with cell membrane-destabilizing substances may become a promising approach in bacteria control. Furthermore, we demonstrated that colistin acts as a door opener even for the photodynamic inactivation of colistin-resistant (mcr-1-positive) E. coli cells by chlorophyllin, which could help us to overcome this antimicrobial resistance.

Polymyxin Susceptibility Testing and Breakpoint Setting

Susceptibility testing of polymyxins has been subject to intensive review and revision in recent years. A joint working group was established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing to establish a reference method. Issues examined included the effects of divalent cations, binding to laboratory materials, and addition of polysorbate 80. The working group recommended the use of broth microdilution without the addition of polysorbate 80 as the reference method. Published studies have shown that other testing methods, including agar dilution, disk diffusion and gradient diffusion, have unacceptably high levels of very major errors compared to the reference method, and are not recommended for routine laboratory use. Most data were for the testing of colistin; less information was available for polymyxin B. The joint working group was also asked to consider the setting of clinical breakpoints for relevant pathogens. This task involved examination of the available pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic-toxicodynamic and population clinical pharmacokinetic data. All current pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets are based on MICs generated using the reference broth dilution procedure.

Clinical and Microbiological Outcomes in Obese Patients Receiving Colistin for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection

Carbapenem-resistant infections are associated with poor outcomes, and treatment options are limited. Colistin is one of few antibiotics which retain in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant pathogens. However, despite the availability of international consensus guidelines for the dosing of polymyxins, there are limited data on the effects of dosing on clinical outcomes among obese patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia. This retrospective study evaluated whether obesity was associated with day 7 global cure rates among patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia who were treated with an ideal body weight (IBW)-based colistin dosing regimen. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, clinical cure, length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and day 7 acute kidney injury. After screening to identify 167 patients, 77 (46.1%) and 90 (53.9%) were classified as obese and nonobese, respectively. Patient characteristics were well balanced at baseline, except that obese patients were more often female and received a higher daily dose per IBW (3.7 versus 2.9 mg/kg/day, P = 0.03). Global cure rates were similar between groups (44.2% for obese versus 55.6% for nonobese, P = 0.14). After adjusting for baseline differences, obesity was not a significant predictor of global cure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 1.11; P = 0.10). Obesity was associated with a lower likelihood of microbiological clearance (72.7% versus 91.1%, P = 0.02). No other secondary outcome differences were observed, though each outcome was numerically worse among obese patients. Obesity was not associated with differences in global cure rates. However, the difference in microbiological clearance warrants further investigation.

[Latin American consensus to define, categorize, and report multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, or pandrug-resistant pathogensConsenso latino-americano para definição, categorização e notificação de patógenos multirresistentes, com resistência ampliada ou panresistentes]

Se presenta un consenso latinoamericano que permite estandarizar las definiciones de los diferentes niveles de resistencia a los antimicrobianos en bacterias de importancia en salud pública. Se describen los criterios de inclusión y exclusión para las metodologías a utilizar y para los antibióticos a incluir (por disponibilidad, relevancia y existencia de puntos de corte). Como propuesta piloto se eligieron tres microorganismos gramnegativos de gran impacto en el ambiente hospitalario (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa y Acinetobacter spp.). La falta de puntos de corte para ciertos antibióticos (por ejemplo, tigeciclina, fosfomicina y colistina), claves para el tratamiento de infecciones causadas por estos patógenos que presentan multirresistencia o resistencia extendida, llevó a la necesidad de discutir y consensuar puntos de corte provisorios para la vigilancia de la resistencia a estos fármacos. Se abordó y consensuó también el uso de pruebas de sensibilidad alternativas a los métodos aprobados por las guías internacionales, de aplicación más sencilla como pruebas de rutina en los laboratorios de bacteriología clínica. El principal beneficio de este documento es proporcionar a los laboratorios latinoamericanos un marco estandarizado y consensuado para la identificación y la vigilancia constante y unificada de microorganismos resistentes. Las recomendaciones incluidas en este documento son el resultado consensuado por los representantes de los laboratorios nacionales de referencia de los países que integran la Red Latinoamericana de Vigilancia de la Resistencia a los Antibióticos coordinada por la Organización Panamericana de la Salud.

Evaluation of in vitro methods for testing tigecycline combinations against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) frequently involves combination therapy with various antimicrobial agents in the hope of achieving synergistic effects. Routine laboratory antimicrobial synergy testing is a service that is currently unavailable owing to the laborious nature of the reference time-kill assay (TKA) as well as the widely used chequerboard method. In this study, we explored whether easier methods, based on the Etest technique, might offer a suitable alternative.

METHODS

In vitro interactions of tigecycline combination with colistin, gentamicin, fosfomycin or meropenem against 26 CPKP isolates were evaluated employing the TKA, chequerboard method and three Etest methodologies (the MIC/MIC ratio, the cross formation and the agar/Etest method). Rates of consequent synergy and concordance of the studied methods were determined.

RESULTS

All antimicrobial combinations demonstrated some degree of synergy against the CPKP isolates tested. No antagonism was observed for any of the combinations. All methods showed poor synergy concordance with the TKA, producing non-significant kappa (κ) results. Etest methods (MIC/MIC ratio and agar/Etest) exhibited fair agreement (κ=0.29 and 0.38, respectively) with the chequerboard method.

CONCLUSION

There is a poor correlation between synergy testing methods of tigecycline combinations, which may be associated with their different endpoints. To elucidate method comparability and reliability, their correlation with clinical outcomes appears important.

Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by resistant gram-negative bacteria: which is the best strategy to treat?

Introduction: Treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a major challenge. The increase in multi-drug resistant bacteria has not been accompanied by the validation of new drugs, or by any new antimicrobial strategies to exploit the available agents. VAP due to Gram-negative bacteria has increased mortality, both due to the resistant pathogens themselves and due to inappropriate treatment. Local epidemiology, patients' characteristics and clinical responses provide the most important information for therapeutic decision-making. Moreover, data on VAP therapy due to resistant bacteria are lacking, and the choice of treatment is often based on clinical practice and individual experience. Areas covered: This review summarizes the strategies available for treating the three most prevalent resistant Gram-negative organisms causing VAP: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacteriaceae. The review covers the results of a Pubmed search, clinical practice guidelines and reviews, and the authors' experience. Expert opinion: The existing evidence focuses on bloodstream infections or other sites rather than pneumonia and there are no recommendations for the treatment of VAP by multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria, especially for combination regimens. The approval of new drugs is needed to provide effective and safe alternatives for treating carbapenemase-producing strains. Precision medicine and personalized approach are also fundamental in future research.

Emerging serotype III sequence type 17 group B streptococcus invasive infection in infants: the clinical characteristics and impacts on outcomes

BACKGROUND

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is an important pathogen that causes high mortality and morbidity in young infants. However, data on clinical manifestations between different GBS serotypes and correlation with molecular epidemiology are largely incomplete. The aim of this study was to determine the serotype distribution, antimicrobial resistance, clinical features and molecular characteristics of invasive GBS isolates recovered from Taiwanese infants.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2017, 182 non-duplicate GBS isolates that caused invasive disease in infants less than one year of age underwent serotyping, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and antibiotic susceptibility testing. The clinical features of these infants with GBS disease were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 182 patients with invasive GBS disease, 41 (22.5%) were early-onset disease, 121 (66.5%) were late-onset disease and 20 (11.0%) were late late-onset disease (> 90 days of age). All these patients were treated with effective antibiotics on time. Among them, 51 (28.0%) had meningitis, 29 (16.0%) had neurological complications, 12 (6.6%) died during hospitalization, and 15 (8.8%) out of 170 patients who survived had long-term neurological sequelae at discharge. Serotype III GBS strains accounted for 64.8%, followed by serotype Ia (18.1%) and Ib (8.2%). MLST analysis revealed 11 different sequence types among the 182 isolates and ST-17 was the most dominant sequence type (56.6%). The correlation between serotype III and ST17 was evident, as ST17 accounted for 87.3% of all serotype III isolates. There was an obvious increasing trend of type III/ST-17 GBS that caused invasive disease in infants. All isolates were susceptible to penicillin, cefotaxime, and vancomycin, while 68.1 and 65.9% were resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite timely and appropriate antibiotic treatment, a significant proportion of invasive GBS disease still inevitably causes adverse outcomes. Further study to explore preventive strategies and development of serotype-based vaccines will be necessary in the future.

Structural characterization of phosphoethanolamine-modified lipid A from probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917

Gut microbiota, a complex microbial community inhabiting human or animal intestines recently regarded as an endocrine organ, has a significant impact on human health. Probiotics can modulate gut microbiota and the gut environment by releasing a range of bioactive compounds. Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain Nissle 1917 (EcN), a Gram-negative bacterial strain, has been used to treat gastrointestinal (GI) disorders (i.e., inflammatory bowel disease, diarrhea, ulcerative colitis, and so on). However, endotoxicity of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a major component of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria in the gut, is known to have a strong influence on gut inflammation and maintenance of gut homeostasis. Therefore, characterizing the chemical structure of lipid A which determines the toxicity of LPS is needed to understand nonpathogenic colonization and commensalism properties of EcN in the gut more precisely. In the present study, MALDI multiple-stage mass spectrometry analysis of lipid A extracted from EcN demonstrates that hexaacylated lipid A (m/z 1919.19) contains a glucosamine disaccharide backbone, a myristate, a laurate, four 3-hydroxylmyristates, two phosphates, and phosphoethanolamine (PEA). PEA modification of lipid A is known to contribute to cationic antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. To confirm the role of PEA in CAMP resistance of EcN, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of polymyxin B and colistin were determined using a wild-type strain and a mutant strain with deletion of eptA gene encoding PEA transferase. Our results confirmed that MICs of polymyxin B and colistin for the wild-type were twice as high as those for the mutant. These results indicate that EcN can more efficiently colonize the intestine through PEA-mediated tolerance despite the presence of CAMPs in human gut such as human defensins. Thus, EcN can be used to help treat and prevent many GI disorders.

Use of colistin in adult patients: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess colistin use in a country endemic for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB).

METHODS

Colistin prescription patterns were evaluated in 22 Italian centres. Factors associated with use of colistin in combination with other anti-MDR-GNB agents were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 221 adults receiving colistin were included in the study. Their median age was 64 years (interquartile range 52-73 years) and 134 (61%) were male. Colistin was mostly administered intravenously (203/221; 92%) and mainly for targeted therapy (168/221; 76%). The most frequent indications for colistin therapy were bloodstream infection and lower respiratory tract infection. Intravenous colistin was administered in combination with at least another anti-MDR-GNB agent in 80% of cases (163/203). A loading dose of 9 MU of colistimethate was administered in 79% of patients receiving i.v. colistin and adequate maintenance doses in 85%. In multivariable analysis, empirical therapy [odds ratio (OR) = 3.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-8.53;P = 0.017] and targeted therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infection (OR = 4.76, 95% CI 1.69-13.43; P = 0.003) were associated with use of colistin in combination with other agents, whilst chronic renal failure (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.88; P =  0.024) was associated with use of colistin monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Colistin remains an important option for severe MDR-GNB infections when other treatments are not available. Despite inherent difficulties in optimising its use owing to peculiar pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics, colistin was mostly used appropriately in a country endemic for MDR-GNB.

Influence of local epidemiology on the performance of common colistin drug susceptibility testing methods

Objectives

To determine the influence of local spread of clonal strains and testing of follow-up isolates on categorical (CA) and essential agreement rates (EA) of common colistin (COL) drug susceptibility testing methods with the broth microdilution (BMD) reference method.

Methods

COL MICs were determined for 178 bacterial isolates (Enterobacteriaceae, n = 97; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n = 81) collected within one year from 64 patients by BMD according to ISO standard 20776–1 (reference method), the SensiTest BMD panel (ST), agar dilution (AD), the VITEK 2 instrument, and gradient diffusion (GD) using antibiotic strips of two and Muller-Hinton agar plates of three manufacturers. CA and EA with BMD were calculated for all isolates and compared to the subset of 68 unique isolates.

Results

CA ranges were 79.4% to 94.1% for the unique isolateq panel and 89.9% to 96.1% for all tested isolates. EA ranges were 64.7% to 86.8% and 67.4% to 91.0%, respectively. In both panels, EA for all GD assays was lower than 90%. Both lower and higher EA values ranging from—18.3% (MTS on BD agar) to + 6.3% (AD, Vitek 2) were observed in the full one-year sample. Acquisition of colistin resistance under therapy was observed for 3 patients.

Conclusions

i) Repeat testing and local spread of clonal strains can positively or negatively affect CA and EA, ii) CA is more robust towards local influences than EA, iii) EA of GD and AD methods for COL with the reference BMD method is insufficient.

Bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Clinical features, therapy and outcome from a multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

bloodstream infections (BSI) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) have been increasingly observed among hospitalized patients.

METHODS

prospective, observational study conducted among 12 large tertiary-care hospitals, across 7 Italian regions. From June 2017 to June 2018 all consecutive hospitalized patients with bacteremia due to MDR-AB were included and analyzed in the study.

RESULTS

During the study period 281 episodes of BSI due to MDR-AB were observed: 98 (34.8%) episodes were classified as primary bacteremias, and 183 (65.2%) as secondary bacteremias; 177 (62.9%) of them were associated with septic shock. Overall, 14-day mortality was observed in 172 (61.2%) patients, while 30-day mortality in 207 (73.6%) patients. On multivariate analysis, previous surgery, continuous renal replacement therapy, inadequate source control of infection, and pneumonia were independently associated with higher risk of septic shock. Instead, septic shock and Charlson Comorbidity Index >3 were associated with 14-day mortality, while adequate source control of infection and combination therapy with survival. Finally, septic shock, previous surgery, and aminoglycoside-containing regimen were associated with 30-day mortality, while colistin-containing regimen with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

BSI caused by MDR-AB represents a difficult challenge for physicians, considering the high rates of septic shock and mortality associated with this infection.

Evaluation of six commercial products for colistin susceptibility testing in Enterobacterales

OBJECTIVES

The recommended technique for colistin susceptibility testing by both EUCAST and CLSI is broth microdilution (BMD). However, many routine laboratories still use other methods such as gradient strips or semi-automated systems. The objective of this study was to compare six of the most widespread commercial products for colistin susceptibility testing in Europe with in-house prepared BMD.

METHODS

A collection of 325 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales was tested for colistin susceptibility with three semi-automated systems (Vitek 2, BD Phoenix, MicroScan WalkAway), one gradient-strip test (Etest®) and two commercial BMD products (MICRONAUT-S, TREK Sensititre). BMD, in-house prepared according to ISO standard 20776-1, served as reference.

RESULTS

The MICRONAUT-S BMD performed best with only one false-resistant (major error, ME) and four false-susceptible (very major error, VME) results while the TREK BMD performed poorer with 16 ME and seven VME. The semi-automated systems Vitek 2 and Phoenix performed poorly with 31 and 26 VME, respectively. The WalkAway semi-automated system showed 16 and 13 false results, depending on the inoculation method. The Etest® showed six ME and 10 VME.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that colistin susceptibility testing remains a challenging task for laboratories. It emphasizes the need for selecting the most reliable test method to advocate proper treatment and shows that critical evaluation and precautious usage of colistin susceptibility testing results is constantly required.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Polymyxins: Challenges, Issues, and Recommendations

Polymyxins, including polymyxin B and polymyxin E (colistin), are now increasingly being used worldwide to treat patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. This necessitates that laboratories employ an accurate and reliable method for the routine performance of polymyxin susceptibility testing. A number of reasons have accounted for the difficulties with susceptibility testing for the polymyxins, including their multicomponent composition, poor diffusion in the agar medium, adsorption to microtiter plates, the lack of a reliable susceptibility test, the lack of a specific breakpoint from professional organizations, the synergistic effect of polysorbate 80, and the development of heteroresistance. This minireview discusses such problems that impact the results of currently available susceptibility testing methods. We also provide emerging concepts on mechanisms of polymyxin resistance, including chromosomally and plasmid-mediated mcr-related resistance. Broad-range investigations on such critical issues in relation to polymyxins can be beneficial for the implementation of effective treatment against MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Comparative evaluation of the UMIC Colistine kit to assess MIC of colistin of gram-negative rods

Background

The recent description of the first plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant gene mcr-1, conferring transferable and low-level resistance to colistin, raised concern about the need to implement a rapid and reliable screening method to detect colistin-resistant clinical isolates. The only valid method to assess the MIC of colistin is the broth microdilution according to the joint CLSI-EUCAST Polymyxin Breakpoints Working Group. UMIC Colistine is a ready-to-use broth microdilution kit developed to easily assess colistin MIC by proposing unitary polystyrene strips containing 11 concentrations of dehydrated colistin. Here, we evaluated the UMIC Colistine kit on 235 Gram-negative rods (176 Enterobacterales, including 70 harboring a mcr gene, and 59 non-fermentative), through comparison to the reference broth microdilution method prepared in accordance with EN ISO 20776-1:2006 standard. Reproducibility of the UMIC Colistine was assayed with the three recommended quality control strains E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli NCTC 13846 (mcr-1 positive), and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, as for stability testing.

Results

Categorical agreement was 100% with 63.4% (n = 149) of colistin-resistant strains, and 36.6% (n = 86) of colistin-susceptible strains with both methods (S ≤ 2 μg/mL and R > 2 μg/mL). No major error or very major error was reported. Essential agreement was 94.0% (n = 221), and 100% for detection of colistin-resistant strains as compared to the reference method. Pearson’s correlation between UMIC Colistine and the reference method was 0.98. Reproducibility of the UMIC Colistine system was 97.8% with MICs of the quality control strains within the target ranges. However, some isolates had lower MIC with UMIC Colistine, but that did not change their categorization as colistin-susceptible, and this phenomenon should be further explored.

Conclusions

The UMIC Colistine kit is an easy to perform unitary device that showed excellent results when compared to the reference method. The UMIC Colistine system is a rapid and reliable broth microdilution method that is suitable to assess the colistin MIC of clinical isolates in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Two-Site Evaluation of the Colistin Broth Disk Elution Test To Determine Colistin In Vitro Activity against Gram-Negative Bacilli

Limited methods for colistin MIC determination are available to clinical microbiology laboratories. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) test compared to that of broth microdilution (BMD) for identifying colistin MICs. CBDE was compared to colistin BMD using a collection of Gram-negative bacilli tested at two U.S. microbiology laboratories. The isolates tested included 121 retrospective clinical isolates, 45 prospective clinical isolates, and 6 mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli isolates. CBDE was performed with four 10-ml cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth tubes per isolate, to which 0, 1, 2, and 4 colistin 10-µg disks were added, generating final concentrations in the tubes of 0 (growth control), 1, 2, and 4 µg/ml, respectively. MICs were evaluated visually and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Site 2 also compared CBDE to the reference broth macrodilution (BMAD) method (n = 110 isolates). Overall, CBDE yielded a categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) of 98% and 99%, respectively, compared to the results of colistin BMD. Very major errors occurred for mcr-1-producing strains, with MICs fluctuating from 2 to 4 µg/ml on repeat testing. The results for all other isolates were in CA with those of BMD. CBDE versus BMAD had an EA of 100% and a CA of 100%. Compared to currently used techniques, CBDE is an easy and practical method to perform colistin MIC testing. Some mcr-1-producing isolates yielded MICs of 2 µg/ml by CBDE and 4 µg/ml by BMD. As such, the results for isolates with colistin MICs of 2 µg/ml by CBDE should be confirmed by the reference BMD method, and isolates with MICs of ≥2 µg/ml should be evaluated for the presence of mcr genes.

Reproducibility between two readout methods of a commercial broth microdilution assay for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with Cystic Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients are growing slowly, and frequently rendering automated susceptibility testing unsuitable. Colistin is an important antibiotic for treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. Broth microdilution is the only EUCAST endorsed antimicrobial susceptibility test for colistin. The VIZION™ device aids in reading broth microdilution plates and allows safe data transfer to laboratory information systems. In this study, reproducibility between visual MIC readout and readout, employing the VIZION™ device was assessed in susceptibility testing of colistin and beta-lactam antibiotics in P. aeruginosa isolates from CF patients.

METHODS

Fifty-six unique P. aeruginosa isolates were derived from respiratory secretions of CF patients. Susceptibility testing was performed using commercially available microdilution plates. MIC readout by VIZION™ was compared to visual readout aided by a mirror (reference test).

RESULTS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates displayed significantly slower growth rates compared to quality control isolates. Colistin exact MIC agreement between VIZION™ and visual readout after 24 and 48 h incubation, respectively, was 82% and 95%, essential MIC agreement was 98% and 100%, categorical agreement was 98% and 98% and reliability (weighted kappa) was 0.95 (95% CI = 0.91-0.99) and 0.99 (95% CI = 0.97-1.00). For all five antibiotics, the total number of errors (using VIZION™, in comparison with visual readout) decreased from 15 (5%) to 10 (4%) after 24 and 48 h incubation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VIZION™ readout reproducibly determines MIC values in comparison with visual readout after 24 h of incubation. Reproducibility between the VIZION™ and visual readout increases after prolonged incubation of 48 h.

Applying Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing To Predict Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Results among Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates

Standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) approaches lead to delays in the selection of optimal antimicrobial therapy. Here, we sought to determine the accuracy of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants identified by Nanopore whole-genome sequencing in predicting AST results. Using a cohort of 40 clinical isolates (21 carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, 10 non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, and 9 carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae isolates), three separate sequencing and analysis pipelines were performed, as follows: (i) a real-time Nanopore analysis approach identifying acquired AMR genes, (ii) an assembly-based Nanopore approach identifying acquired AMR genes and chromosomal mutations, and (iii) an approach using short-read correction of Nanopore assemblies. The short-read correction of Nanopore assemblies served as the reference standard to determine the accuracy of Nanopore sequencing results. With the real-time analysis approach, full annotation of acquired AMR genes occurred within 8 h from subcultured isolates. Assemblies sufficient for full resistance gene and single-nucleotide polymorphism annotation were available within 14 h from subcultured isolates. The overall agreement of genotypic results and anticipated AST results for the 40 K. pneumoniae isolates was 77% (range, 30% to 100%) and 92% (range, 80% to 100%) for the real-time approach and the assembly approach, respectively. Evaluating the patients contributing the 40 isolates, the real-time approach and assembly approach could shorten the median time to effective antibiotic therapy by 20 h and 26 h, respectively, compared to standard AST. Nanopore sequencing offers a rapid approach to both accurately identify resistance mechanisms and to predict AST results for K. pneumoniae isolates. Bioinformatics improvements enabling real-time alignment, coupled with rapid extraction and library preparation, will further enhance the accuracy and workflow of the Nanopore real-time approach.

Antibiotic resistance trends of ESKAPE pathogens in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: A five-year retrospective analysis

Background

To combat antimicrobial resistance, the World Health Organization developed a global priority pathogen list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria for prioritisation of research and development of new, effective antibiotics.

Objective

This study describes a five-year resistance trend analysis of the ESKAPE pathogens: Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp., from Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa.

Methods

This retrospective study used National Health Laboratory Services data on 64 502 ESKAPE organisms isolated between 2011 and 2015. Susceptibility trends were ascertained from minimum inhibitory concentrations and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.

Results

S. aureus was most frequently isolated (n = 24, 495, 38%), followed by K. pneumoniae (n = 14, 282, 22%). Decreasing rates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (28% to 18%, p < 0.001) and increasing rates of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing K. pneumoniae (54% to 65% p < 0.001) were observed. Carbapenem resistance among K. pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp. was less than 6% during 2011–2014, but increased from 4% in 2014 to 16% in 2015 (p < 0.001) among K. pneumoniae. P. aeruginosa increased (p = 0.002), but resistance to anti-pseudomonal antimicrobials decreased from 2013 to 2015. High rates of multi-drug resistance were observed in A. baumanni (> 70%).

Conclusion

This study describes the magnitude of antimicrobial resistance in KwaZulu-Natal and provides a South African perspective on antimicrobial resistance in the global priority pathogen list, signalling the need for initiation or enhancement of antimicrobial stewardship and infection control measures locally.

Development of New Tools to Detect Colistin-Resistance among Enterobacteriaceae Strains

The recent discovery of the plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene conferring resistance to colistin is of clinical concern. The worldwide screening of this resistance mechanism among samples of different origins has highlighted the urgent need to improve the detection of colistin-resistant isolates in clinical microbiology laboratories. Currently, phenotypic methods used to detect colistin resistance are not necessarily suitable as the main characteristic of the mcr genes is the low level of resistance that they confer, close to the clinical breakpoint recommended jointly by the CLSI and EUCAST expert systems (S ≤ 2 mg/L and R > 2 mg/L). In this context, susceptibility testing recommendations for polymyxins have evolved and are becoming difficult to implement in routine laboratory work. The large number of mechanisms and genes involved in colistin resistance limits the access to rapid detection by molecular biology. It is therefore necessary to implement well-defined protocols using specific tools to detect all colistin-resistant bacteria. This review aims to summarize the current clinical microbiology diagnosis techniques and their ability to detect all colistin resistance mechanisms and describe new tools specifically developed to assess plasmid-mediated colistin resistance. Phenotyping, susceptibility testing, and genotyping methods are presented, including an update on recent studies related to the development of specific techniques.

SuperPolymyxin™ Medium for the Screening of Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Stool Samples

Colistin is one of the last resort antimicrobials for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. After the emergence of transferable colistin resistance genes (mcr-1–5), a reliable culture-based screening method to detect colonization with colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGN) is needed. The objective of this study was to test the performance of SuperPolymyxin™ medium to screen for CRGN in stool samples and to compare different methods for the confirmation of colistin resistance (e.g., Etest®, broth microdilution [BMD], and the Rapid Polymyxin™ NP test). Colonization with CRGN was analyzed in a prospective cohort study among travelers. Stool samples (Fecal Transwab^TM) taken before, during and after travel were cultured on SuperPolymyxin™ agar. Every phenotypically different colony was subcultured for species identification using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Susceptibility to colistin was tested using Etest® and confirmed by BMD and the Rapid Polymyxin™ NP test. In total, 128 participants provided 1,495 stool samples. After culture on SuperPolymyxin™ medium (37°C, 24–48 h), 1,851 phenotypically different colonies were isolated. Isolates belonging to intrinsically colistin-resistant genera (e.g., Morganella, Providencia, Proteus) or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were excluded from further analysis (n = 421). Among the remaining 1,430 isolates, colistin resistance was confirmed in 279 by Etest® (19.5%) and 218 by BMD (15.3%). The Rapid Polymyxin™ NP test was compared with BMD (reference) to detect colistin resistance (specificity: 88.6%, sensitivity 71.1%). SuperPolymyxin™ medium is suitable to screen for fecal colonization with CRGN. The high proportion of colistin-susceptible isolates growing on SuperPolymyxin™ medium caused a high workload. The confirmation of CRGN with the Rapid Polymyxin™ NP Test could be a less labor-intensive alternative to BMD.

Evaluation of EDTA- and DPA-Based Microdilution Phenotypic Tests for the Detection of MCR-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae

The emergence of the colistin-resistant (COL-R) Enterobacteriaceae represents a worrying health issue. However, only a portion of these strains may carry the plasmid-mediated mcr colistin resistance genes. We evaluated the ability of both ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-based and dipicolinic acid (DPA)-based broth microdilution (BMD) tests to detect mcr-1 to mcr-5 producers. Of 92 Enterobacteriaceae (85 COL-R), 44 mcr-positive strains (39 Escherichia coli, 3 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 2 Salmonella spp.) were tested. EDTA (100 μg/mL) was tested in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB), whereas the DPA (900 μg/mL) was used in cation-adjusted MHB. Results were categorized as positive if in presence of chelator strains exhibited ≥3 two fold MIC decrease compared to the COL MIC alone. The EDTA-based BMD assay detected 41 mcr-positive strains, but 22 false-positive strains (including 12 E. coli and 4 K. pneumoniae) were recorded (sensitivity [SN], 93.2%; specificity [SP], 54.2%). The DPA-based BMD assay detected 37 mcr-positive strains, with 7 false-negative (2 E. coli, 3 K. pneumoniae, 2 Salmonella spp.) strains (SN, 84.1%; SP, 100%). Overall, the EDTA-based BMD assay is not accurate to detect mcr producers, whereas the DPA-based BMD test ("colistin-MAC test") demonstrated good accuracy, but only when implemented for E. coli strains (SN, 94.9%; SP, 100%). With the aim to prevent the dissemination of mcr-possessing E. coli strains, the COL-MAC test could be implemented by clinical laboratories that are unable to perform molecular tests. Moreover, this assay could be applied to screen large collections of isolates to reveal the expression of new mcr-like genes not yet targeted by the current molecular assays.

Combining VITEK® 2 with colistin agar dilution screening assist timely reporting of colistin susceptibility

OBJECTIVES

The rise in carbapenem resistance among Gram-negative bacteria has renewed interest in colistin. Recently, the EUCAST-CLSI Polymyxin Breakpoints Working Group declared that broth microdilution (BMD) is the only valid method for colistin susceptibility testing. BMD is not easily incorporated into the routine work of clinical laboratories, and usually this test is incorporated serially, resulting in delayed susceptibility reporting. We tested a strategy of combining VITEK^® 2 with a 2 μg/mL colistin agar dilution (VITEK^® 2/AD) screening plate to improve performance and time to reporting of colistin susceptibility.

METHODS

Colistin susceptibility for 364 clinical isolates was determined by VITEK^® 2/AD and compared with the reference standard BMD according to the ISO 20776-1:2007 and CLSI guidelines. The EUCAST colistin susceptibility breakpoint of ≤2 μg/mL was used. Escherichia coli NCTC 13846 served as quality control strain. Agreement, very major error (VME) and major error rates were determined using ISO 20776-2:2007.

RESULTS

The VME rate for VITEK^® 2 alone was 30.6% (15/49, 95% CI 18.3-45.4%), and was reduced to 10.2% (5/49, 95% CI 3.4-22.2%) using the VITEK^® 2/AD combined testing. The combined testing had categorical agreement with BMD of 97% (354/364, 95% CI 95.0-98.7%), and a major error (ME) rate of 1.6% (5/315, 95% CI 0.5-3.7%). Using the combined testing, even against challenging strains, 349 (95.8%, 95% CI 93.3-97.7%) colistin susceptibility results could be reported, and only 15 isolates required further analysis by BMD.

DISCUSSION

Our method is simple to apply and allows rapid reporting of colistin susceptibility.

The EDTA-based disk-combination tests are unreliable for the detection of MCR-mediated colistin-resistance in Enterobacteriaceae

We evaluated several EDTA-based combined-disk tests to detect 25 mcr producers among 48 Enterobacteriaceae. Colistin disks plus EDTA (292/584 μg) on MH and CAMH agar were used. Results were positive if with chelator there was an inhibition zone increase ≥3 mm compared to colistin alone. All tests resulted unreliable (sensitivity ≤68%).

Hypoalbuminemia as a predictor of acute kidney injury during colistin treatment

This study aimed to assess the predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) during colistin therapy in a cohort of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) due to colistin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the role of serum albumin levels. The study consisted of two parts: (1) a multicentre retrospective clinical study to assess the predictors of AKI during colistin therapy, defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria; and (2) bioinformatic and biochemical characterization of the possible interaction between human serum albumin and colistin. Among the 170 patients included in the study, 71 (42%), 35 (21%), and 11 (6%) developed KDIGO stage 1 (K1-AKI), KDIGO stage 2 (K2-AKI), and KDIGO stage 3 (K3-AKI), respectively. In multivariable analyses, serum albumin <2.5 g/dL was independently associated with K1-AKI (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-2.93, p = 0.009) and K2-AKI (sHR 2.37, 95% CI 1.15-4.87, p = 0.019). Bioinformatic and biochemical analyses provided additional information nurturing the discussion on how hypoalbuminemia favors development of AKI during colistin therapy. In conclusion, severe hypoalbuminemia independently predicted AKI during colistin therapy in a large cohort of patients with BSI due to colistin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria. Further study is needed to clarify the underlying causal pathways.

Evaluation of ComASP™ Colistin (formerly SensiTest™ Colistin), a commercial broth microdilution-based method to evaluate the colistin minimum inhibitory concentration for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

OBJECTIVES

Colistin is often the last option to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant micro-organisms such as carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin has been fraught with difficulties, which resulted in the need for updated recommendations from the CLSI and EUCAST. Both committees proposed that the ISO 20776-1-2016 standard broth microdilution (BMD) method must be the preferred method for colistin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the commercial ComASP™ Colistin (Liofilchem^® srl), a compact panel containing the antibiotic in seven two-fold dilutions (0.25-16mg/L), using frozen BMD plates (according to CLSI) as reference.

METHODS

Colistin susceptibility testing was performed on a nationwide collection of 392 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates using BMD according to the CLSI and by ComASP™ Colistin according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Susceptibility test results were interpreted according to EUCAST v.7.1 breakpoints (2017). Colistin was active in vitro against 251 K. pneumoniae isolates (64.0%) with an MIC range of 0.5mg/L to >64mg/L and MIC_50/90 values of 1/64mg/L. Essential and categorical agreements were calculated according to ISO20776-2.

RESULTS

ComASP™ Colistin showed high levels of overall/evaluable essential agreement (94.9%/93.6%) and categorical agreement (97.2%), with very major errors in 0.7% (1/141 colistin-resistant), and met the current acceptance criteria proposed by the CLSI. Ten major errors were observed [4.0% (10/251) colistin-susceptible], three of which were within essential agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

ComASP™ Colistin is a commercial BMD method that reliably determined colistin MICs in a large collection of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates.

Mcr colistin resistance gene: a systematic review of current diagnostics and detection methods

Resistance to colistin, mediated by chromosomal mutations and more recently, by plasmid‐borne mcr genes, is increasingly being reported in bacterial isolates taken from humans, animals, farms, foods, and the environment. To easily identify and contain this quickly spreading menace, efficient diagnostics that are cheaper, faster, simpler, sensitive, and specific have become indispensable and urgently necessary. A thorough and systematic review of the literature available at Pubmed, ScienceDirect and Web of Science was thus undertaken to identify articles describing novel and efficient colistin resistance‐ and mcr gene‐detecting methods. From the final 23 studies included in this review, both phenotypic and molecular tests were found. The phenotypic tests consisted of novel culture media viz., SuperPolymyxin™, CHROMagar COL‐APSE and LBJMR media, commercial automated MIC‐determining instruments such as MICRONAUT‐S, Vitek 2, BD Phoenix, Sensititre and MicroScan, and novel assays such as Colistin MAC test, Colispot, rapid polymxin NP test (RPNP), alteration of Zeta potential, modified RPNP test, MICRONAUT‐MIC Strip, MIC Test Strip, UMIC System, and Sensitest™ Colistin. Molecular diagnostics consisted of the CT103XL microarray, eazyplex^® SuperBug kit, and Taqman^®/SYBR Green^® real‐time PCR assays, with 100% sensitivity and specificity plus a shorter turnaround time (<3 hr). Based on the sensitivity, specificity, cost, required skill and turnaround time, the RPNP test and/or novel culture media is recommended for under‐resourced laboratories while the Multiplex PCR or Taqman^®/SYBR Green^® real‐time PCR assay alongside the RPNP or novel culture media is suggested for well‐resourced ones.

A challenging case of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae septic thrombophlebitis and right mural endocarditis successfully treated with ceftazidime/avibactam

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumonia (KPC-Kp) has become a significant problem in terms of public health and clinical outcome in many hospitals in Southern Europe. Treatment options are usually limited and effective treatment of infections caused by these pathogens is a considerable challenge for clinicians. Ceftazidime-avibactam has been recently approved for the treatment of difficult-to-treat infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms in patients with limited treatment options.

CASE REPORT

We reported the first case of KPC-Kp septic thrombophlebitis and right atrial endocarditis associated with metastatic lung abscesses successfully treated with a prolonged ceftazidime/avibactam plus ertapenem treatment course, suggesting that this combination therapy could be safe and effective for serious Gram-negative infections. Interestingly, we also observed an apparent discrepancy between clinical and microbiological courses: the patient became rapidly afebrile; hemodynamically stable and his procalcitonin levels showed a prompt decreasing trend. Nevertheless, blood cultures remained persistently positive for a prolonged period.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, ceftazidime-avibactam plus ertapenem was a safe and effective therapy of serious endovascular infection due to KPC-Kp. Moreover, in this setting, follow-up blood cultures might represent an irreplaceable tool to guide the therapy.