Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial

Health-Related Quality of Life in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Methodological Appraisal Based on a Systematic Literature Review

Background: The majority of lung cancer patients are diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the bulk of which receive palliative systemic treatment with the goal to provide effective symptom palliation and safeguard health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Advanced NSCLC trials with HRQoL endpoints face methodological constraints limiting interpretability.

Objectives: We provide a comprehensive overview of recent clinical trials evaluating the impact of systemic therapies on HRQoL in advanced NSCLC, focusing on the methodological quality, with the ultimate goal to improve interpretation, comparison and reporting of HRQoL data.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed. Prospective studies published over the last decade evaluating the impact of systemic treatments on HRQoL in advanced NSCLC were included. Methodological quality of HRQoL reporting was assessed with the CONSORT-PRO extension.

Results: Hundred-twelve manuscripts describing 85 trials met all criteria. No formal conclusion can be drawn regarding the impact on HRQoL of different treatments. We report an important variety in methodological quality in terms of definitions of HRQoL, missing data points, lack of standardization of analyzing and presenting HRQoL and no standard follow-up time. The quality of HRQoL data reporting varies substantially between studies but improves over time.

Conclusion: This review shows that in the heterogeneous landscape of trials addressing HRQoL in advanced stage NSCLC. Methodology reporting remains generally poor. Adequate reporting of HRQoL outcome data is equally important to support clinical decision-making as to correctly inform health policy regarding direct approval and reimbursement of the new drugs and combinations that will come online.

Skin Toxicities with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

We fully investigate the skin toxicities of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in cancer patients. The studies about randomized controlled trials in cancer treatment with EGFR-TKIs were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted. The results suggest that EGFR-TKIs significantly increase the risk of skin toxicities including all-grade rash, pruritus, dry skin, and high-grade rash, pruritus. However, the risk of high-grade dry skin did not increase. Rash was the most common toxicity. Physicians should be aware of skin toxicities and should monitor cancer patients when receiving EGFR-TKIs.

Comparative Efficacy of Second- and Subsequent-line Treatments for Metastatic NSCLC: A Fractional Polynomials Network Meta-analysis of Cancer Immunotherapies

BACKGROUND

Extended onset of treatment effect and longer-term survival with anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapies, atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, have changed the landscape of second- or subsequent-line (2L+) treatments for adults with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic literature review included phase I to IV randomized, controlled trials of 2L+ NSCLC therapies from MEDLINE, Embase, and secondary sources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies of treatments approved in the European Union or United States had to be in English with ≥ 10 patients per arm. A fractional polynomials network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted because traditional NMA of hazard ratios does not account for delayed onset of clinical effect or long-term survival observed in PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitor trials. Adjusted analyses accounted for treatment switching in the atezolizumab OAK trial. Expected survival time reflected area under the curve over the time horizon. Expected overall survival (OS) was ranked by median ranking with 95% credible intervals and by surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Of 25,115 screened records, 28 studies were included in the quantitative analyses of OS and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors had comparable expected 5-year OS; all performed better than other treatment options. In unadjusted analyses, surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranked nivolumab first (87.9%), followed by atezolizumab (85.8%) and pembrolizumab (82.8%). Analyses adjusted for patients switching from docetaxel to immunotherapy ranked atezolizumab first (89.6%), followed by nivolumab (86.5%) and pembrolizumab (81.9%).

CONCLUSION

This NMA applied an appropriate approach for indirect comparisons, including cancer immunotherapies, and supported robustness of PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapies for 2L+ treatment of NSCLC.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of simotinib, a novel specific EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of a phase Ib trial

Purpose: The aim of this phase Ib study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01772732) was to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of simotinib (a novel EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR gene mutation.

Patients and methods: 41 patients with EGFR gene mutations were enrolled and received simotinib orally administered twice daily with dose escalating from 100 to 650 mg in 28 days cycle. Safety and tolerability were assessed through the study. Blood samples were collected for PK analysis on Days 1, 8, 9, 10, 15, 22 and 29. Tumor response was assessed at baseline, on Day 29 and every 8 weeks thereafter.

Results: Simotinib was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not found. 95.1% of patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE), and most of them were mild or moderate. Rash (41.5%) and diarrhea (56.1%) were the most frequently reported AEs. Simotinib was rapidly absorbed and eliminated with average T_max ranging from 1 to 4 hrs and T_1/2 ranging between 6.2 and 13.0 hrs after multiple-dose administration. No dose–response relationship between dose and exposure was observed after multiple-dose administration. 39.3% of the enrolled patients achieved a partial response and 46.3% had stable disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.9 (CI% 4.7; 12.1) months and 14.6 (95%CI 12.3; 22.5) months, respectively.

Conclusion: Simotinib was well tolerated, with manageable AEs at doses of up to 650 mg and MTD was not reached. Further studies to explore higher doses are ongoing.

Relationship between Progression-free Survival and Overall Survival in Randomized Clinical Trials of Targeted and Biologic Agents in Oncology

Introduction: With a gap in a full understanding of the mechanisms by which survival is extended for patients with cancer who are treated with novel biologic and targeted agents, there is the risk that discordant progression-free and overall survival outcomes are observed due to poor clinical trial design or biases in the interpretation of data. This study was designed to examine the role of study quality and design on the outcomes observed with biologic and targeted agents. Methods: A review of studies in clinicaltrials.gov supplemented with a literature review in OVID Medline was conducted to identify all randomized trials of a biologic/targeted agent versus a non-biologic/targeted comparator in oncology that report both median overall and progression-free survival outcomes. Details of the study, design, population, drugs, and outcomes were extracted. Study quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale. Data were summarized using SPSS 22.0.0.0. Results: A total of 192 unique studies of 206 pairwise comparisons between a biologic/targeted and comparator were identified. The average absolute magnitude of post-progression survival (difference between OS and PFS) was 9.7 months for biologic/targeted therapy and 9.8 for the comparator. A total of 64 comparisons (31.1%) showed an increase in OS and decrease in PFS, or vice versa, and 25 (12.1%) showed a magnitude of more than 4 months difference between the delta of OS and delta of PFS between the biologic/targeted and comparator arms. Average study quality was high overall (7.7/10), and was comparable for studies with directional differences (7.2/10) as well as for those with the greatest magnitude in post-progression survival (7.4/10). Conclusion: This review and analysis specifically examined small PFS benefit with large OS benefit as well as small OS benefit with large PFS benefit, including differences in direction of PFS and OS outcomes. No evidence was identified that these are the result of poor study design, but may rather be due to the mechanism of action, specific disease, and population under study. Further work is needed to understand the mechanism of action of novel biologic/targeted agents to better understand their interaction with the tumor microenvironment.

The Effect of Next-Generation TKI in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer after Failure of First-Line Treatment: a Meta-Analysis

Resistance develops against first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), after a while for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, researchers have developed specific inhibitors against them. Among those inhibitors, next-generation EGFR-TKIs have gained prominence due to the greater efficacy and more favorable tolerability. Today, the efficacy of next-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC after failure on first-generation EGFR-TKIs still remains under investigation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically assess the efficacy and safety profiles of next-generation EGFR-TKIs in advanced NSCLC after failure on first-generation EGFR-TKIs. We performed a comprehensive search of the several electronic databases to September, 2018 to identify clinical trials. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease controlled rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Severe adverse events (AEs) (grade ≥ 3) based on the EGFR-TKIs were analysed. Odds Ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were utilized for the main outcome analysis. In total, we had 3 randomized controlled trials in this analysis. The group of next-generation EGFR-TKIs was significantly improved PFS (OR = 0.34,95%CI = 0.29-0.40, P < 0.00001), as well with the ORR (OR = 10.48,95%CI = 3.87-28.34, P < 0.00001) and DCR (OR = 6.03,95%CI = 4.41-8.25, P < 0.00001), respectively. However, there is no significant difference in overall survival with next-generation EGFR-TKIs (OR = 1.05,95%CI = 0.85-1.31, P = 0.66). While, the OR for the treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or 4 (diarrhoea, rash/acne, nausea, vomiting, anemia) between the patients who received next-generation EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy did not show safety benefit (P>0.05). Next-generation EGFR-TKIs was shown to be the better agent to achieve higher response rate and the longer PFS in NSCLC patients as the later-line therapy for previously treated patients with first-generation EGFR-TKIs. While, the benefit of the OS and safety compared with the chemotherapy did not achieved. Further research is needed to develop a database of all EGFR mutations and their individual impact on the differing treatments.

Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the primary subtype of lung cancer. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to serve prominent roles in cancer progression. However, the expression patterns and potential roles of lncRNAs in NSCLC remain to be elucidated. In the present study, four public datasets were analyzed to identify differentially expressed lncRNAs (DElncs) in NSCLC. A further dataset, GSE19188, was analyzed to validate the findings. A total of 38 upregulated and 31 downregulated lncRNAs were identified in NSCLC, compared with samples from healthy controls. Among these, 12 lncRNAs were associated with the progression of NSCLC, and dysregulated between high grade (stage III and IV) and low grade (stage II) NSCLC samples. Moreover, dysregulation of lncRNA-SIGLEC17P, GGTA1P, A2M-AS1, LINC00938, GVINP1, LINC00667 and TMPO-AS1 was associated with overall survival time in patients with NSCLC. Co-expression analyses, combined with the construction of protein-protein interaction networks, were performed to reveal the potential roles of key lncRNAs in NSCLC. The present study revealed a series of lncRNAs involved in the progression of NSCLS, which may serve as novel biomarkers for the disease.

Real-world study of afatinib in first-line or re-challenge settings for patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Afatinib, a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), was approved in Japan in 2014. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of afatinib in real-world practice. Medical records of patients who received afatinib for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 128 patients were analyzed. Seventy-six patients received afatinib as the first-line setting and 52 as the re-challenge setting (i.e., after failure of prior first-generation TKI). There was no difference in patient characteristics, such as age, sex, and PS, between the first-line and the re-challenge settings. In the first-line setting, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.7-21.5 months). The overall survival (OS) was 39.5 months (95% CI 34.4- not reached). The response rate (RR) was 64.4%. Subset analysis indicated that patients with dose reduction showed longer PFS than those without dose reduction (18.5 months versus 7.9 months) (P = 0.016). In the re-challenge setting, the median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI 4.9-9.5 months). The RR was 25%. Most common adverse events leading to dose modification or treatment discontinuation included diarrhea, paronychia, and oral mucositis in both settings. Interstitial lung disease occurred in 5.4% (7/128). In the real-world practice in Japan, afatinib showed comparable or better efficacy compared with that shown in previous clinical trials in both the first-line and the re-challenge settings.

Duration of treatment among patients prescribed afatinib or erlotinib as first-line therapy for EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the USA

Aim: Evaluate duration of therapy among patients treated with afatinib or erlotinib as first-line therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials & methods: NSCLC patients initiating afatinib or erlotinib between 2014 and 2017 were identified in three large claims databases in the USA. Propensity score matching was conducted to compare the duration of treatment between patients by treatment. Results: Patients prescribed afatinib had a significantly longer median duration of treatment compared with those prescribed erlotinib (12.1 vs 9.9 months; p = 0.035) and experienced a 14% reduction in risk of discontinuing therapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.86; CI: 0.75–0.99). Conclusion: First-line treatment duration in a real-world setting was significantly longer for patients prescribed afatinib compared with erlotinib.

Design, synthesis and anticancer evaluation of thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitors and apoptosis inducers

Deregulation of many kinases is directly linked to cancer development and the tyrosine kinase family is one of the most important targets in current cancer therapy regimens. In this study, we have designed and synthesized a series of thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as an EGFR and HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. All the synthesized compounds were evaluated in vitro for their inhibitory activities against EGFR^WT; and the most active compounds that showed promising IC₅₀ values against EGFR^WT were tested in vitro for their inhibitory activities against mutant EGFR^T790M and HER2 kinases. Moreover, the antitumor activities of these compounds were tested against four cancer cell lines (HepG2, HCT-116, MCF-7 and A431). Compounds 13g, 13h and 13k exhibited the highest activities against the examined cell lines with IC₅₀ values ranging from 7.592 ± 0.32 to 16.006 ± 0.58 µM comparable to that of erlotinib (IC₅₀ ranging from 4.99 ± 0.09 to 13.914 ± 0.36 µM). Furthermore, the most potent antitumor agent (13k) was selected for further studies to determine its effect on the cell cycle progression and apoptosis in MCF-7 cell line. The results indicated that this compound arrests G₂/M phase of the cell cycle and it is a good apoptotic agent. Finally, molecular docking studies showed a good binding pattern of the synthesized compounds with the prospective target, EGFR^WT and EGFR^T790M.

Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Afatinib, a second-generation, irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, shows better suppression of T790M-positive lung cancer cells than gefitinib in preclinical studies. However, whether the effect of afatinib on T790M acquisition differs from that of gefitinib when used clinically as first-line therapy remains unclear. To reaffirm the preclinical efficacy of afatinib on T790M-positive lung cancer cells, H1975 cells and established PC-9 cells resistant to gefitinib and erlotinib by T790M were used. In total, 398 patients with second biopsy at progression with stage IIIB/IV non–small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation, treated with afatinib or gefitinib as first-line therapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was used to balance covariates. Afatinib inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells with low T790M allele frequencies, which are resistant to gefitinib, but not those with high T790M allele frequencies. Afatinib and gefitinib showed similar efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (11.5 vs 13.4 months, P = .08) and overall survival (OS) (29.3 vs 28.5 months, P = .76). T790M patients had better PFS and OS than those without T790M. There was no significant difference in the cumulative T790M acquisition ratio over time between afatinib and gefitinib (48.8% vs 59.3%, P = .317). The median time to acquire T790M was 12.9 months for afatinib and 15.7 months for gefitinib (P = .342). Although afatinib inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells with low T790M allele frequencies in preclinical studies, this could not be translated into clinical efficacy in terms of lowering the rate or delaying the time of T790M acquisition.

New Electrophiles and Strategies for Mechanism-Based and Targeted Covalent Inhibitor Design

Covalent inhibitors are experiencing a growing resurgence in drug design and are an increasingly useful tool in molecular biology. The ability to attach inhibitors to their targets by a covalent linkage offers pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic advantages, but this can also be a liability if undesired off-target reactions are not mitigated. The discovery of new electrophilic groups that react selectively with specific amino acid residues is therefore highly desirable in the design of targeted covalent inhibitors (TCIs). Additionally, the ability to control the reactivity through exploitation of the target enzyme's machinery, as in mechanism-based inhibitors (MBIs), greatly benefits from the discovery of new strategies. This Perspective showcases recent advances in electrophile development and their application in TCIs and MBIs, exhibiting high selectivity for their targets.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapies in mesothelioma

INTRODUCTION

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive malignancy arising from the mesothelial cells lining the pleura and other serosal membranes. It is associated with an extremely poor prognosis and has limited therapeutic options.

AREAS COVERED

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is known to be highly overexpressed in mesothelioma with reported EGFR overexpression between 44 to 97%. Given this, several anti-EGFR agents have been trialed in mesothelioma. In this review, we provide an overview of the current available data on anti-EGFR therapies in MM and future directions of investigation with these targeted agents in MM.

EXPERT OPINION

While many anti-EGFR therapies have failed to show significant efficacy in the management of MM, the pathway is biologically active and its abrogation preclinically points toward it being a valid target. Toward targeting the pathway, many novel EGFR-based therapies are still being investigated. Current ongoing research of interest in MM include EGFR-targeted nanotechnology approach for drug delivery, antibodies targeting the extracellular EGFR and potentially anti-EGFR antibody drug conjugates.

Determination of BPI15086 and its metabolite in human plasma by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study

Aim: BPI15086 is a potent, irreversible mutant-selective inhibitor of both EGFR (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and the T790M resistance mutations tyrosine kinase. A simultaneous quantification method of BPI15086 and its main metabolite in human plasma using LC-MS/MS is documented and fully validated in this study. Methodology & results: Plasma samples were extracted and chromatographed on an Acquity ultra-high performance liquid chromatography BEH C18 column with a gradient elution. Detection was performed on a Sciex 5500 QTRAP^® mass spectrometer using positive electrospray ionization. The results indicated that the method had excellent sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: For the first time a sensitive and robust ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-MS/MS method was established and validated of BPI15086 in human plasma, this method was successfully applied in a first-in-human Phase I clinical trial studying the pharmacokinetics of the BPI15086 tablet in Chinese non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Role of cytokines in combinatorial immunotherapeutics of non-small cell lung cancer through systems perspective

Lung cancer is the leading cause of deaths related to cancer and accounts for more than a million deaths per year. Various new strategies have been developed and adapted for treatment; still the survival for 5 years is just 16% in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most of these strategies to combat NSCLC whether it is a drug molecule or immunotherapy/vaccine candidate require a big cost and time. Integration of computational modeling with systems biology has opened new avenues for understanding complex cancer biology. Resolving the complex interactions of various pathways and their crosstalk leading to oncogenic changes could identify new therapeutic targets with lesser cost and time. Herein, this review provides an overview of various aspects of NSCLC along with available strategies for its cure concluding with our insight into how systems approach could serve as a therapeutic intervention dissecting the immunologic parameters and cross talk between various pathways involved.

The in cis compound EGFR mutations in Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Literatures regarding the prevalence and clinical significance of compound EGFR mutations are limited. Until now, none of retrospective or prospective research has focused on in cis compound EGFR mutations except case reports. In this study, we screened a cohort of 3,000 treatment-naïve Chinese advanced NSCLC patients using capture-based ultra-deep targeted sequencing to evaluate the prevalence of EGFR in cis compound mutations and the efficacy of EGFR-TKI in this population. Of the 3,000 patients screened, 1,266 (42.2%) had EGFR mutation; among them, 15 patients (1.2%) harboring in cis compound EGFR mutations, with 10 patients carrying EGFR L858R in combination with a rare mutation and five patients carrying two rare EGFR mutations. No patient with EGFR 19del was observed. Interestingly, no in trans configuration was identified in this cohort. All of the patients harboring in cis compound EGFR mutations were non-smokers, histologically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and received first-generation EGFR-TKI. Furthermore, our data also revealed that patients with in cis compound EGFR mutations exhibit comparable PFS to first generation EGFR-TKI comparing to patients with single activating EGFR mutation. This observation was further supported by in silico molecular modeling analyses which demonstrated in cis compound mutations do not alter the ATP-binding pocket of EGFR, thus having no effect on the interaction between gefitinib and EGFR.

Newer-Generation EGFR Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: How Are They Best Used?

The FLAURA trial established osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), as a viable first-line therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitizing EGFR mutations, namely exon 19 deletion and L858R. In this phase 3 randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of treatment-naïve patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC, osimertinib was compared to standard-of-care EGFR TKIs (i.e., erlotinib or gefinitib) in the first-line setting. Osimertinib demonstrated improvement in median progression-free survival (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.57; p < 0.001) and a more favorable toxicity profile due to its lower affinity for wild-type EGFR. Furthermore, similar to later-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors, osimertinib has improved efficacy against brain metastases. Despite this impressive effect, the optimal sequencing of osimertinib, whether in the first line or as subsequent therapy after the failure of earlier-generation EGFR TKIs, is not clear. Because up-front use of later-generation TKIs may result in the inability to use earlier-generation TKIs, this treatment paradigm must be evaluated carefully. For EGFR mutant NSCLC, considerations include the incidence of T790M resistance mutations, quality of life, whether there is a potential role for earlier-generation TKIs after osimertinib failure, and overall survival. This review explores these issues for EGFR inhibitors and other molecularly targeted therapies.

Phase II Trial of Cabozantinib Plus Erlotinib in Patients With Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Progressive Disease on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: A California Cancer Consortium Phase II Trial (NCI 9303)

Introduction: Mesenchymal epidermal transition and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways are important in mediating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumorigenesis and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance. We hypothesized that treatment with cabozantinib plus erlotinib in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC following progression on EGFR TKI therapy may allow tumors to overcome this resistance or restore sensitivity to therapy regardless of T790M status. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC, known EGFR mutation and progressive disease on an EGFR TKI immediately prior to enrollment without intervening therapy were enrolled. Patients received erlotinib 150 mg and cabozantinib 40 mg daily. The primary endpoint was evaluation of efficacy by objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included assessment of progression free survival (PFS), overall survival, change in tumor growth rate, safety and toxicity, and the evaluation of specific EGFR mutations and MET amplification in pre-treatment tissue and plasma. Results: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled at 4 centers. Four patients had partial response (10.8%) and 21 had stable disease (59.5%). A greater than 30% increase in tumor doubling time was observed in 79% of assessable patients (27/34). Median PFS was 3.6 months for all patients. Diarrhea (32%) was the most common grade 3 adverse event; 3 patients had asymptomatic grade 4 elevation of amylase and lipase. Conclusions: Combination erlotinib and cabozantinib demonstrates activity in a highly pretreated population of patients with EGFR mutation and progression on EGFR TKI. Further elucidation of beneficial patient subsets is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01866410.

Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) Contributes to Second-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Second-generation irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), afatinib, has been approved for treating EGFR mutant lung cancer patients, but the mechanism of acquired resistance to afatinib has not been well studied. In this study, we established afatinib acquired resistant cell lines. Gene array technology was used to screen changes in gene expression between afatinib-resistant lung cancer cells and parental cells. Our results showed that secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) was significantly increased in afatinib-resistant lung cancer cells. To study the effect of SPP1 on afatinib resistance, siSPP1 was used to knock down SSP1 in afatinib-resistant lung cancer cells. Then sensitivity to afatinib and invasive ability were studied. We found that knockdown of SPP1 increased sensitivity of lung cancer cells to afatinib and decrease the ability of invasion. Of clinical significance, we found that SSP1 was upregulated in lung cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues, and low level of SSP1 was strongly associated with better overall survival. Our results suggest that SPP1 enhanced the second-generation EGFR TKI resistance in lung cancer, and inhibiting SPP1 might be a therapeutic target to overcome afatinib resistance.

Modeling Exposure-Driven Adverse Event Time Courses in Oncology Exemplified by Afatinib

Models were developed to characterize the relationship between afatinib exposure and diarrhea and rash/acne adverse event (AE) trajectories, and their predictive ability was assessed. Based on pooled data from seven phase II/III clinical studies including 998 patients, mixed‐effects models for ordered categorical data were applied to describe daily AE severity. Clinical trial simulation aided by trial execution models was used for internal and external model evaluation. The final exposure‐safety model consisted of longitudinal logistic regression models with first‐order Markov elements for both AEs. Drug exposure was included as daily area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC), and drug effects on the AEs were correlated. Clinical trial simulation allowed adequate prediction of maximum AE grades and AE severity time courses but overestimated the proportion of AE‐dependent dose reductions and discontinuations. Both diarrhea and rash/acne were correlated with afatinib exposure. The developed modeling framework allows a prospective comparison of dosing strategies and study designs with respect to safety.

Re-challenge of afatinib after 1st generation EGFR-TKI failure in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation

BACKGROUND

Re-challenge of erlotinib after gefitinib failure is reported to yield some benefit in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. However, little is known about the re-challenge of afatinib after 1st generate on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure.

METHODS

From May 2015 to August 2018, 62 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutation received afatinib after gefitinib and/or erlotinib failure at our institution was included in our retrospective study.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of afatinib as re-challenge were 17.0% and 79.2%, respectively. The median time on treatment of 1st generation EGFR-TKI (1st TKI) was 14 months. By multivariate analysis, smoking, performance status (PS), and time on treatment of 1st TKI with more than 10 months were confirmed to be independent prognostic factors predicting a worse progression-free survival (PFS), and significant prognostic markers for overall survival (OS) were PS and time on treatment of 1st TKI with more than 10 months, especially in patients with exon 19 deletion.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-challenge of afatinib was identified as one of the therapeutic options after 1st TKI failure in the patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation when the time of treatment by prior 1st TKI is more than 10 months.

Covalent vs. Non-Covalent Inhibition: Tackling Drug Resistance in EGFR - A Thorough Dynamic Perspective

A persistent challenge in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR is the emergence of drug-resistant caused by somatic mutations. The EGFR L858R/T790 M double mutant (EGFR^DM ) was found to be the most alarming variant. Despite the development of a wide range of inhibitors, none of them could inhibit EGFR^DM effectively. Recently, 11h and 45a, have been found to be potent inhibitors against EGFR^DM through two distinctive mechanisms, non-covalent and covalent binding, respectively. However, the structural and dynamic implications of the two modes of inhibitions remain unexplored. Herein, two molecular dynamics simulation protocols, coupled with free-energy calculations, were applied to gain insight into the atomistic nature of each binding mode. The comparative analysis confirmed that there is a significant difference in the binding free energy between 11h and 45a (ΔΔG_bind =-21.17 kcal/mol). The main binding force that governs the binding of both inhibitors is vdW, with a higher contribution for 45a. Two residues ARG841 and THR854 were found to have curtailed role in the binding of 45a to EGFR^DM by stabilizing its flexible alcohol chain. The 45a binding to EGFR^DM induces structural rearrangement in the active site to allow easier accessibility of 45a to target residue CYS797. The findings of this work can substantially shed light on new strategies for developing novel classes of covalent and non-covalent inhibitors with increased specificity and potency.

The Impact of Afatinib on Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Afatinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib in advanced NSCLC.

Methods: We searched PubMed, PMC database, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science to obtain the relevant literature. The efficacy and safety of afatinib was assessed based on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), primary grade 3/4 adverse events and fatal adverse events (FAEs). A subgroup analysis was performed according to control type for all end-points.

Results: Seven randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 3093 patients. The meta-analysis showed that afatinib treatment significantly prolonged PFS in patients compared with control groups (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.76; P = 0.00), increased OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.99; P = 0.04) and ORR (RR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.13-2.93; P = 0.01). In terms of safety, afatinib significantly increased the incidence of diarrhea (RR = 8.9, 95% CI: 5.33-14.93; P = 0.00), rash (RR = 7.31, 95% CI: 1.56-34.12; P = 0.01) and stomatitis (RR = 6.45, 95% CI: 1.27-32.78; P = 0.03), compared with the control group. However, there was no significant difference in FAEs (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.38-1.49; P = 0.41).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis confirmed that afatinib extended survival, improved response rates and did not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality in advanced NSCLC. As a novel EGFR-TKI, afitinib has significant potential for clinical application.

Efficacy and safety of osimertinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC: A meta-analysis

Osimertinib is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI). A meta-analysis was performed to aggregate the mixed results of published clinical trials to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases was performed to identify eligible literature. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). A total of 3,086 advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients from 11 studies have been identified. The aggregate efficacy parameters for treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-TKI-sensitizing mutations are as follows: ORR 79% (95% CI 75-84%), DCR 97% (95% CI 95-99%), 6-month PFS 83% (95% CI 80-87%), and 12-month PFS 64% (95% CI 59-69%). The aggregate efficacy parameters for advanced NSCLC harboring T790M mutations after earlier-generation EGFR-TKI therapy are as follows: ORR 58% (95% CI 46-71%), DCR 80% (95% CI 63-98%), 6-month PFS 63% (95% CI 58-69%), and 12-month PFS 32% (95% CI 17-47%). EGFR-TKI-naïve patients with EGFR-positive mutations tend to have longer median PFS than EGFR-TKI-pretreated counterparts (19.17 vs. 10.58 months). The most common AEs were diarrhea and rash, of which the pooled incidences were 44 and 42%, respectively. Generally, osimertinib is a favorable treatment option for previously treated T790M mutation-positive advanced NSCLC as well as a preferable therapy for untreated EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Additionally, osimertinib is well tolerated by most patients.

Structural Insights into Characterizing Binding Sites in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase Mutants

Over the last two decades epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase has become an important target to treat nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, three generations of EGFR kinase-targeted small molecule drugs have been FDA approved. They nominally produce a response at the start of treatment and lead to a substantial survival benefit for patients. However, long-term treatment results in acquired drug resistance and further vulnerability to NSCLC. Therefore, novel EGFR kinase inhibitors that specially overcome acquired mutations are urgently needed. To this end, we carried out a comprehensive study of different EGFR kinase mutants using a structural systems pharmacology strategy. Our analysis shows that both wild-type and mutated structures exhibit multiple conformational states that have not been observed in solved crystal structures. We show that this conformational flexibility accommodates diverse types of ligands with multiple types of binding modes. These results provide insights for designing a new generation of EGFR kinase inhibitor that combats acquired drug-resistant mutations through a multiconformation-based drug design strategy.

Prognostic model of survival outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients initiated on afatinib: pooled analysis of clinical trial data

Objective

Several predictors of survival have been identified in EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first generation EGFR inhibitors. Prognostic models of survival outcomes with afatinib have not been evaluated.

Methods

A prognostic tool for overall survival (OS)/ progression free survival (PFS) based on pre-treatment clinicopathological factors was developed for EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line afatinib using penalised regression of individual-participant data from LUX-Lung 3 and 6 (n = 468). Favourable, intermediate and poor risk groups were identified and externally validated using LUX-Lung 1 (n = 390) and LUX-Lung 2 (n = 129) trials that initiated afatinib following previous chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitor treatment.

Results

Discriminative performance was good in the development and validation cohorts. For patients treated with first-line afatinib, the median OS for the favourable, intermediate and poor risk groups were > 47.7, 29.3 and 16.4 months, respectively, and the median PFS were 17.3, 13.2 and 8.3 months, respectively. The improvement in median OS with afatinib use compared to chemotherapy was > 12.4 months for the favourable risk group, whereas no OS benefit was apparent for the poor risk group. The improvement in median PFS with afatinib use compared to chemotherapy was 10.2 months for the favourable risk group and 3.2 months for the poor risk group.

Conclusions

A prognostic tool was developed and validated to identify favourable, intermediate and poor risk groups for OS/PFS in EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC patients treated with afatinib. The prognostic groups can inform the likely absolute OS/PFS benefit expected from afatinib compared to chemotherapy in first-line treatment.

Targeted therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a serious health problem and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, due to its high incidence and mortality. 85% of lung cancers are represented by the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Traditional chemotherapy has been the main treatment option in NSCLC. However, it is often associated with limited efficacy and overall poor patient survival. In recent years, molecular targeting has achieved great progress in therapeutic treatment of cancer and plays a crucial role in the current clinical treatment of NSCLC, due to enhanced efficacy on cancer tissues and reduced toxicity for normal tissues. In this review, we summarize the current targeting treatment of NSCLC, including inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3Ks), mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ErbB2), vascular epidermal growth factor receptor (VEGFR), kirsten human rat sarcoma protein (KRAS), mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor or hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-MET), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF). This article may serve as a guide to clinicians and researchers alike by assisting in making therapeutic decisions. Challenges of acquired drug resistance targeted therapy and imminent newer treatment modalities against NSCLC are also discussed.

Diarrhea with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We performed an meta-analysis to fully investigate the diarrhea of EGFR-TKIs in cancer patients. The relevant studies of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer patients treated with EGFR-TKIs were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched for articles published till August 2017. The relevant RCTs in cancer patients treated with EGFR-TKIs were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted. Twenty-four RCTs and 13,748 patients were included. The current analysis suggested that the use of EGFR-TKIs increased the risk of all-grade diarrhea (RR 3.45; 95%CI, 2.94-4.06; p＜0.00001) and high-grade (≥grade 3) diarrhea (RR 8.22；95%CI, 6.02-11.23; p＜0.00001). On subgroup analysis, the risk of all-grade and high-grade diarrhea varied significantly within drug type. The risk of all-grade diarrhea varied significantly according to cancer type, whereas the risk of high-grade diarrhea did not. The risk of all-grade and high-grade diarrhea did not varied significantly based on treatment line, treatment duration and median age. The available data suggested that the use of EGFR-TKIs is associated with a significantly increased risk of diarrhea in cancer patients.

Mechanisms of acquired resistance to afatinib clarified with liquid biopsy

Although mechanisms of acquired resistance to 1^st and 3^rd generation EGFR-TKI continue to be elucidated, there have been few clinical investigations into the mechanisms of acquired resistance to the 2^nd generation EGFR-TKI afatinib. We analyzed data from 20 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who acquired resistance to afatinib, including resistance during EGFR-TKI re-challenge. We examined EGFR T790M and C797S mutations, BRAF V600E mutation, and MET amplification with the MBP-QP method and with droplet digital PCR using ctDNA and re-biopsy samples obtained before and after afatinib treatment. Just before afatinib treatment, 15 of the 20 patients were T790M negative and five were positive. Among the T790M negative patients, 40.0% (6/15) became positive at the time of PD under afatinib. In patients positive for T790M, changes in T790M allele frequency were correlated with afatinib treatment efficacy. C797S was not detected in any patients just before afatinib treatment, but it appeared after treatment in three patients, although with very low allele frequency. Two of these three patients, although positive for both C797S and T790M, achieved PR to osimertinib. However, PFS of these patients was somewhat shorter than that of patients positive for T790M only. BRAF V600E was detected in one patient at PD under afatinib. MET amplification was not detected in this study. T790M is associated with acquired resistance to afatinib, as with 1^st generation EGFR-TKI, but with somewhat lower frequency. The influence of C797S on resistance to afatinib is less than that of T790M, but C797S might cause shorter PFS under osimertinib.

Click chemistry for improvement in selectivity of quinazoline-based kinase inhibitors for mutant epidermal growth factor receptors

Discovery of mutant-selective kinase inhibitors is one of the challenges in medicinal chemistry and is a main issue for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We tried to improve the selectivity of pan-HER inhibitors for mutant EGFRs. Utilizing click chemistry, triazole-tethered quinazoline derivatives were synthesized, based on a quinazoline scaffold showing pan-HER inhibition. The representative compound 5j exhibited 17- and 52-fold improved selectivity for EGFR L858R/T790M over wild-type EGFR and HER2, respectively, and demonstrated 6.7-fold more potent antiproliferative activity against PC9 cells harboring EGFR-activating mutation than gefitinib. Although the described quinazolines did not surpass pyrimidines as 3rd generation EGFR inhibitors in terms of selectivity for mutant EGFRs, our approach might provide information that would help in the identification of mutant-selective compounds among pan-HER inhibitors using the quinazoline scaffold.

Modulators of Redox Metabolism in Head and Neck Cancer

SIGNIFICANCE

Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is a complex disease characterized by high genetic and metabolic heterogeneity. Radiation therapy (RT) alone or combined with systemic chemotherapy is widely used for treatment of HNSCC as definitive treatment or as adjuvant treatment after surgery. Antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor are used in definitive or palliative treatment. Recent Advances: Emerging targeted therapies against other proteins of interest as well as programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 immunotherapies are being explored in clinical trials.

CRITICAL ISSUES

The disease heterogeneity, invasiveness, and resistance to standard of care RT or chemoradiation therapy continue to constitute significant roadblocks for treatment and patients' quality of life (QOL) despite improvements in treatment modality and the emergence of new therapies over the past two decades.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

As reviewed here, alterations in redox metabolism occur at all stages of HNSCC management, providing opportunities for improved prevention, early detection, response to therapies, and QOL. Bioinformatics and computational systems biology approaches are key to integrate redox effects with multiomics data from cells and clinical specimens and to identify redox modifiers or modifiable target proteins to achieve improved clinical outcomes. Antioxid. Redox Signal.

Afatinib in advanced pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer- a Canadian experience

Background

Afatinib, an irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (egfr tki), is approved for first-line therapy in advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) and has previously demonstrated activity after failure of chemotherapy and reversible egfr tkis, with improved response and progression-free survival, compared with placebo. Outcomes in pretreated patients with advanced nsclc receiving afatinib through a Canadian special access program (sap) are reported here.

Methods

Patients with nsclc progressing after at least 1 line of chemotherapy and an egfr tki were eligible to enrol in the sap. Characteristics of patients from the two largest accruing Canadian centres were retrospectively reviewed, including demographics, disease and treatment data, and patient outcomes.

Results

The 53 patients who received afatinib (57% women, 51% never-smokers, 26% of East Asian ethnicity, and 66% with adenocarcinoma) had a median age of 59 years. EGFR mutations were documented in 25%, and EGFR wild-type in 8%. All patients had received prior egfr tki treatment, with 42% achieving a response. Patients took afatinib for a median of 2 months (range: 0-26 months); 17% required 1 or more dose reductions. Of 47 evaluable patients receiving afatinib, 10 experienced tumour shrinkage, and 11, stable disease. Median survival from afatinib initiation was 5 months (95% confidence interval: 2 months to 8 months). Grade 3 or greater diarrhea, rash, paronychia, and stomatitis were seen in 9%, 11%, 6%, and 4% of patients respectively.

Conclusions

In an unselected population of pretreated patients with advanced nsclc after tki failure, median survival with afatinib therapy was 5 months. Through a sap, afatinib demonstrated activity in clinical practice, with manageable toxicity.

Synthesis and structure‑activity‑relationship of 3,4‑Diaryl‑1H‑pyrrolo[2,3‑b]pyridines as irreversible Inhibitors of mutant EGFR‑L858R/T790M

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a well‑validated drug target for the treatment of non‑small cell lung cancer. Here we present an optimization approach and preliminary structure‑activity relationship for 1H‑pyrrolo[2,3‑b]pyridines as covalent irreversible mutant EGFR inhibitors. We synthesized a focused library to investigate the effect of different aromatic substituents in the 4‑position of this scaffold, interacting with the gatekeeper. We determined the activity of the synthesized compounds mutant EGFR enzyme assays and determined the selectivity over the wild type.

Three new disease-progression modes in NSCLC patients after EGFR-TKI treatment by next-generation sequencing analysis

INTRODUCTION

Most non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who exhibit good clinical responses to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) will inevitably develop disease progression. Herein, through next-generation sequencing (NGS), we aimed to investigate three new disease-progression modes of NSCLC patients after EGFR-TKI treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with sensitive EGFR-mutations who acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs and whose tissues were subjected to post-progression NGS were enrolled. The clinical characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), genomic alterations and expression of EGFR-mutations among the three disease-progression modes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The sites of disease progression were as follows: primary foci in 19.5% (8/41) (Mode 1), metastatic foci in 31.7% (13/41) (Mode 2), and both primary and metastatic foci in 48.8% (20/41) (Mode 3). The median PFS in Mode 1 was 6 months (95% CI 1-8), which was significantly shorter than the 11 months (95% CI 8-14) in Mode 2 and the 10 months (95% CI 3-16) in Mode 3 (p = 0.0084). The expression of Del19 was significantly different among the three modes (p = 0.02). The numbers and species of mutant genes in Mode 3 were obviously greater than those in Modes 1 and 2, and no gene amplifications were observed in Mode 2. Mutations in the TP53 gene were the most frequent genetic alteration found in our study, and these accounted for 48.8% (20/41) of all alterations. TP53 mutations in Mode 1 were mainly in exons 6 and 8, while in Mode 2 and Mode 3, all mutations were located from exon 4 to exon 8. A significant benefit in PFS was observed in the metastatic foci progression mode and in the dual primary and metastatic foci progression mode rather than in the primary foci progression mode, which had significant value in the design of therapeutic strategies.

Correlation between image characteristics and pathologic findings in non small cell lung cancer patients after anatomic resection

Introduction

Tumor characteristics in computed tomography (CT) are correlated to pathologic presentation and survival. However, most studies have been based on thin slice thickness CT while lymph node metastatic pattern has remained unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between image characteristics under 5 mm slice thickness and pathology findings in non small lung cancer patients who have received curative resection.

Materials and methods

From January 2010 to May 2014, 440 patients who underwent curative resection were included and medical records were reviewed retrospectively. The tumor size and consolidation tumor ratio were simultaneously evaluated and measured by a physician, a thoracic surgeon, and a radiologist. The correlation between image and pathology characteristics and its survival impact was analyzed.

Results

Tumor sizes, as measured by CT and by pathologic measurement were highly coincident. (p < 0.001) GGO predominant lesions were correlated to well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, (p< 0.001), and less tumor necrosis (p<0.0001), lymphocyte infiltration (p = 0.0042) and tumor purity (p <0.0001). In addition, less risk of visceral pleura (p < 0.0001) and angiolymphatic invasion, and fewer metastases to N1 lymph node (p = 0.004) involvement were identified. No lymph node metastasis (0/12) was identified in sub-centimeter pure GGO lesion. The consolidation tumor ratio could be used to differentiate patients’ survival and excellent 5-year overall survival was identified in pure GGO lesion cases.

Conclusion

No lymph node metastasis was identified in sub-centimeter pure GGO lesion. The consolidation tumor ratio could be used to differentiate patients’ disease status and overall survival, while excellent 5-year overall survival was identified in cases with pure GGO lesion.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of third-line salvage therapy for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of third-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and Methods

Relevant trials were identified by searching electronic databases and conference meetings. Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing third-line therapy in advanced NSCLC patients were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 1,985 advanced NSCLC patients received third-line treatment from 11 RCTs were included for analysis. The use of single targeted agent as third-line therapy for advanced NSCLC did not significantly improved PFS (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.28–2.04, p = 0.58) and OS (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86–1.17, p = 0.95) when compared to docetaxel alone. In addition, erlotinib-based doublet combination therapy did not significantly improved PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.78–1.13, p = 0.49) and OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.78–1.51, p = 0.65) in comparison with erlotinib alone.

Conclusions

The findings of this study show that the efficacy of single novel targeted agent is comparable to that of docetaxel alone in terms of PFS and OS for heavily pretreated NSCLC patients. In addition, no survival benefits are obtained from erlotinib-based doublet therapy, thus single agent erlotinib could be recommended as third-line treatment for unselected advanced NSCLC patients.

Risk Factors for Severe Diarrhea with an Afatinib Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Trials

Afatinib is an effective therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but it is associated with a relatively high incidence of severe diarrhea. The association between pre-treatment candidate predictors (age, sex, race, performance status, renal function, hemoglobin, and measures of body mass) and severe (grade ≥ 3) diarrhea was evaluated using logistic regression with pooled individual participant data from seven clinical studies. A risk score was developed based on the count of major risk factors. Overall, 184 of 1151 participants (16%) experienced severe diarrhea with use of afatinib. Body weight, body mass index, and body surface area all exhibited a prominent non-linear association where risk increased markedly at the lower range (p < 0.005). Low weight (<45 kg), female sex, and older age (≥60 years) were identified as major independent risk factors (p < 0.01). Each risk factor was associated with a two-fold increase in the odds of severe diarrhea, and this was consistent between individuals commenced on 40 mg or 50 mg afatinib. A simple risk score based on the count of these risk factors identifies individuals at lowest and highest risk (C-statistic of 0.65). Risk of severe diarrhea for individuals commenced on 40 mg afatinib ranged from 6% for individuals with no risk factors to 33% for individuals with all three risk factors.

A phase II trial of EGFR-TKI readministration with afatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring a sensitive non-T790M EGFR mutation: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group trial 1403

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) readministration using afatinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a sensitive non-T790M EGFR mutation who had received cytotoxic chemotherapy after acquiring resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

Eligible patients had EGFR-mutant tumors resistant to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and an EGFR-TKI-free period with cytotoxic agents. Confirmation of absence of the T790M mutation was required before registration. Afatinib (40 mg/body) was administered daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). We assumed estimated and threshold PFS times of 3.3 and 1 months, with an α of 0.05 and β of 0.1, respectively.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled from December 2014 to May 2017. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 17% and 84%, respectively. The median PFS time was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-5.8), which met the pre-defined primary endpoint. The median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% CI 9.2-not reached). Grade 3 or worse adverse events included diarrhea (25%), elevated creatinine levels (8%), and hypokalemia (8%), without any treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

EGFR-TKI readministration with afatinib for sensitive EGFR-mutant NSCLC without T790M after resistance to a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI yielded modest activity with tolerable toxicity. It might be one of the treatment options in patients who do not possess T790M tumors, although further studies in this patient setting are warranted.

Systematic bias between blinded independent central review and local assessment: literature review and analyses of 76 phase III randomised controlled trials in 45 688 patients with advanced solid tumour

OBJECTIVE

Unbiased assessment of tumour response is crucial in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Blinded independent central review is usually used as a supplemental or monitor to local assessment but is costly. The aim of this study is to investigate whether systematic bias existed in RCTs by comparing the treatment effects of efficacy endpoints between central and local assessments.

DESIGN

Literature review, pooling analysis and correlation analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2017.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Eligible articles are phase III RCTs comparing anticancer agents for advanced solid tumours. Additionally, the articles should report objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP); the treatment effect of these endpoints, OR or HR, should be based on central and local assessments.

RESULTS

Of 76 included trials involving 45 688 patients, 17 (22%) trials reported their endpoints with statistically inconsistent inferences (p value lower/higher than the probability of type I error) between central and local assessments; among them, 9 (53%) trials had statistically significant inference based on central assessment. Pooling analysis presented no systematic bias when comparing treatment effects of both assessments (ORR: OR=1.02 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.07), p=0.42, I2=0%; DCR: OR=0.97 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.03), p=0.32, I2=0%); PFS: HR=1.01 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.02), p=0.32, I2=0%; TTP: HR=1.04 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.14), p=0.37, I2=0%), regardless of funding source, mask, region, tumour type, study design, number of enrolled patients, response assessment criteria, primary endpoint and trials with statistically consistent/inconsistent inferences. Correlation analysis also presented no sign of systematic bias between central and local assessments (ORR, DCR, PFS: r>0.90, p<0.01; TTP: r=0.90, p=0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

No systematic bias could be found between local and central assessments in phase III RCTs on solid tumours. However, statistically inconsistent inferences could be made in many trials between both assessments.

Treatment effectiveness and tolerability of afatinib at different doses in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma: How low can we go?

INTRODUCTION

Afatinib is commonly used as the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. However, dose adjustments are frequently required. This study aimed to investigate the treatment effectiveness of afatinib administered at different doses to patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma who received afatinib therapy between May 2014 and September 2016 were enrolled retrospectively. Collected clinical data included age, sex, smoking history, performance status, disease stages, EGFR mutation status, initial doses of afatinib, dose adjustments, treatment responses, progression-free survival and treatment-associated adverse events. The average daily dose was calculated by dividing the summation of all doses of prescribed tablets during the treatment period by the total days of afatinib use. The patients were classified into five treatment groups based on average daily doses: 40 mg, <40 and >30 mg, 30 mg, <30 and ≥ 20 mg and <20 mg.

RESULTS

A total of 254 patients were included. No significant differences were found among these five treatment groups with respect to response rates (69.3%, 68.3%, 70.5%, 77.8% and 66.7%, respectively, p = 0.920) and disease control rates (97.4%, 95.2%, 97.7%, 100% and 100%, respectively, p = 0.749). However, the treatment group with an average daily dose of <20 mg had a significant shorter progression-free survival as compared with the other groups (16.8, 12.4, 13.9, 17.0 and 5.3 months, respectively, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Dose reduction may not affect the treatment effectiveness until the average daily dose is below 20 mg. Further prospective studies of afatinib therapy at different daily doses are warranted.