151
|
Enblad M, Hammarström K, Folkesson J, Imam I, Golubovik M, Glimelius B. OUP accepted manuscript. BJS Open 2022; 6:6573991. [PMID: 35470381 PMCID: PMC9039122 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Enblad
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Colorectal Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Correspondence to: Malin Enblad, Department of Surgical Sciences, Colorectal Surgery, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden (e-mail: )
| | - Klara Hammarström
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Joakim Folkesson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Colorectal Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Israa Imam
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Milan Golubovik
- Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Bedi M, Singh R, Charlson JA, Kelly T, Johnstone C, Wooldridge A, Hackbarth DA, Moore N, Neilson JC, King DM. Could Five Be the New Twenty-Five? Long-term Oncologic Outcomes from a Phase II, Prospective, 5-Fraction Pre-operative Radiation Therapy Trial in Patients with Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100850. [PMID: 35647402 PMCID: PMC9133395 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Management of adult soft tissue sarcomas entails a multidisciplinary approach with surgery and radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. The use of preoperative irradiation has been well established, and although conventional fractionation involves daily treatments over the course of 5 weeks, higher doses per fraction may be beneficial due to the radiobiologic profile of sarcoma. In this study we report long-term oncologic outcomes from a single-institution, phase II study evaluating a 5-fraction hypofractionated course of preoperative radiation. Methods and materials Preoperative hypofractionated radiation therapy was administered to 35 Gy in 5 fractions every other day followed by resection 4 to 6 weeks later. If given, chemotherapy consisted of a doxorubicin-ifosfamide-based regimen delivered neoadjuvantly. The primary endpoint was local control. Additional survival and pathologic outcomes, including overall and distant metastasis-free survival, tumor, and treatment-related pathology, as well as acute and late toxicity were examined. Results Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm phase II trial. At a median follow-up of 36.4 months (range, 3-56), no patient developed a local recurrence, and the 3-year overall and distant metastasis-free survival was 82.2% and 69%, respectively. Major acute postoperative wound complications occurred in 25% of patients. Grade 2 and 3 fibrosis occurred in 21.7% and 13% of patients, respectively. The 2-year median and mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score for all patients was 28 and 27.4, respectively. Conclusions A condensed course of preoperative hypofractionated radiation therapy leads to excellent rates of local control and survival with acceptable toxicity profiles. Potential studies ideally with phase II or III randomized trials would help corroborate these findings and other preoperative hypofractionated results in soft tissue sarcomas.
Collapse
|
153
|
Lallemand F, Leroi N, Blacher S, Bahri MA, Balteau E, Coucke P, Noël A, Plenevaux A, Martinive P. Tumor Microenvironment Modifications Recorded With IVIM Perfusion Analysis and DCE-MRI After Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy: A Preclinical Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:784437. [PMID: 34993143 PMCID: PMC8724034 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.784437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NeoRT) improves tumor local control and facilitates tumor resection in many cancers. Some clinical studies demonstrated that both timing of surgery and RT schedule influence tumor dissemination, and subsequently patient overall survival. Previously, we developed a pre-clinical model demonstrating the impact of NeoRT schedule and timing of surgery on metastatic spreading. We report on the impact of NeoRT on tumor microenvironment by MRI. METHODS According to our NeoRT model, MDA-MB 231 cells were implanted in the flank of SCID mice. Tumors were locally irradiated (PXI X-Rad SmART) with 2x5Gy and then surgically removed at different time points after RT. Diffusion-weighted (DW) and Dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) MRI images were acquired before RT and every 2 days between RT and surgery. IntraVoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) analysis was used to obtain information on intravascular diffusion, related to perfusion (F: perfusion factor) and subsequently tumor vessels perfusion. For DCE-MRI, we performed semi-quantitative analyses. RESULTS With this experimental model, a significant and transient increase of the perfusion factor F [50% of the basal value (n=16, p<0.005)] was observed on day 6 after irradiation as well as a significant increase of the WashinSlope with DCE-MRI at day 6 (n=13, p<0.05). Using immunohistochemistry, a significant increase of perfused vessels was highlighted, corresponding to the increase of perfusion in MRI at this same time point. Moreover, Tumor surgical resection during this peak of vascularization results in an increase of metastasis burden (n=10, p<0.05). CONCLUSION Significant differences in perfusion-related parameters (F and WashinSlope) were observed on day 6 in a neoadjuvant radiotherapy model using SCID mice. These modifications are correlated with an increase of perfused vessels in histological analysis and also with an increase of metastasis spreading after the surgical procedure. This experimental observation could potentially result in a way to personalize treatment, by modulating the time of surgery guided on MRI functional data, especially tumor perfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Lallemand
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Liège, University of Liège (ULg), Liège, Belgium
- Laboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, University of Liège (ULg), Liège, Belgium
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Natacha Leroi
- Laboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, University of Liège (ULg), Liège, Belgium
| | - Silvia Blacher
- Laboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, University of Liège (ULg), Liège, Belgium
| | - Mohamed Ali Bahri
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Evelyne Balteau
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Philippe Coucke
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Liège, University of Liège (ULg), Liège, Belgium
| | - Agnès Noël
- Laboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, University of Liège (ULg), Liège, Belgium
| | - Alain Plenevaux
- GIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Philippe Martinive
- Laboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, University of Liège (ULg), Liège, Belgium
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Sclafani F, Corrò C, Koessler T. Debating Pros and Cons of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246361. [PMID: 34944980 PMCID: PMC8699289 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Rectal cancers represent one third of all colorectal tumours. Patients diagnosed with localised colon cancer undergo surgery upfront, likely followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Those diagnosed with localised rectal cancer, however, frequently benefit from neoadjuvant treatments with either radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy before undergoing surgery. On the other hand, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting is more controversial. The main challenges in treating patients affected by rectal cancer encompass: decreasing the risks of local relapse and distant metastases, preserving the sphincter and minimising treatment-associated functional sequelae, and improving overall survival. Some of these fuelled the concept of total neoadjuvant therapy, namely giving all available treatments including radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy before surgery. Here, we critically review the pros and cons of such a treatment strategy, but also discuss the biological rational to support neoadjuvant treatment intensification. Abstract Recently, two large, randomised phase III clinical trials of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer were published (RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23). These two trials compared short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by chemotherapy with standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy followed by CRT with standard CRT, respectively. They showed improvement in some of the outcomes such as distant recurrence and pathological complete response (pCR). No improvement, however, was observed in local disease control or the de-escalation of surgical procedures. Although it seems lawful to integrate TNT within the treatment algorithm of localised stage II and III rectal cancer, many questions remain unanswered, including which are the optimal criteria to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from this intensive treatment. Instead of providing a sterile summary of trial results, we put these in perspective in a pros and cons manner. Moreover, we discuss some biological aspects of rectal cancer, which may provide some insights into the current decision-making process, and represent the basis for the future development of alternative, more effective treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Sclafani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070 Anderlecht, Belgium;
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Claudia Corrò
- Translational Research Center in Onco-Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;
- Swiss Cancer Center Léman, Geneva and Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thibaud Koessler
- Translational Research Center in Onco-Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;
- Swiss Cancer Center Léman, Geneva and Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Vendrely V, Rivin Del Campo E, Modesto A, Jolnerowski M, Meillan N, Chiavassa S, Serre AA, Gérard JP, Créhanges G, Huguet F, Lemanski C, Peiffert D. Rectal cancer radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:272-278. [PMID: 34953708 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
We present the updated recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy for rectal cancer radiotherapy. The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer consists in chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery with total mesorectal resection and adjuvant chemotherapy according to nodal status. Although this strategy efficiently reduced local recurrences rates below 5% in expert centres, functional sequelae could not be avoided resulting in 20 to 30% morbidity rates. The early introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has proven beneficial in recent trials, in terms of recurrence free and metastasis free survivals. Complete pathological responses were obtained in 15% of tumours treated by chemoradiation, even reaching up to 30% of tumours when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated to chemoradiotherapy. These good results question the relevance of systematic radical surgery in good responders. Personalized therapeutic strategies are now possible by improved imaging modalities with circumferential margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, by intensity modulated radiotherapy and by refining surgical techniques, and contribute to morbidity reduction. Keeping the same objectives, ongoing trials are now evaluating therapeutic de-escalation strategies, in particular rectal preservation for good responders after neoadjuvant treatment, or radiotherapy omission in selected cases (Greccar 12, Opera, Norad).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, avenue de Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France; Inserm U1035, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - A Modesto
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Claudius-Regaud, université de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - M Jolnerowski
- Service universitaire de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - N Meillan
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - S Chiavassa
- Service de physique médicale, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO) centre René-Gauducheau, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - A-A Serre
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - J-P Gérard
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - G Créhanges
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - C Lemanski
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée, Institut du cancer de Montpellier, université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - D Peiffert
- Service universitaire de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, 54000 Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Kastner C, Petritsch B, Reibetanz J, Germer CT, Wiegering A. [Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer: implications for surgery]. Chirurg 2021; 93:144-151. [PMID: 34878582 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01540-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
For (locally advanced) rectal cancer, a multimodal therapy concept comprising neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, radical surgical resection with partial/complete mesorectal excision and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy represents the current international standard of care. Further developments in neoadjuvant therapy concepts, such as the principle of total neoadjuvant therapy, lead to an increasing number of patients who show a complete clinical response in restaging after neoadjuvant therapy without clinically detectable residual tumor. In view of the risk associated with radical surgical resection in terms of perioperative morbidity and a potentially non-continence-preserving procedure, the question of the oncological justifiability of an organ-preserving procedure in the case of a complete clinical response under neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being raised. The therapeutic principle of watch and wait, defined by refraining from immediate radical surgical resection and inclusion in a close-meshed, structured follow-up program, currently appears to be oncologically justifiable based on the current study situation; however, for the initial evaluation of the extent of the clinical response and for the structuring of the close-meshed follow-up program, further optimization and standardization based on broadly designed studies appear necessary in order to be able to provide this concept to a clearly defined patient collective as an oncologically equivalent therapy principle also outside specialized centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Kastner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
- Institut für Biochemie und molekulare Biologie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Bernhard Petritsch
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Joachim Reibetanz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Christoph-Thomas Germer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Armin Wiegering
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
- Institut für Biochemie und molekulare Biologie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Concurrent use of statins and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:2715-2727. [PMID: 34498133 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04016-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Statins are used primarily in patients with cardiovascular disease. More recently, they have demonstrated benefit in oncology patients. In vitro models have shown decreased rectal tumor cell viability in cells receiving chemoradiation and statin therapy. In vivo models have been less clear. This study aims to elucidate the impact of concurrent use of statins on the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. METHODS Search of Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL was performed. Articles were included if they reported complete pathological response (pCR), long-term oncologic outcomes, or chemoradiotherapy-induced toxicity in patients with rectal cancer receiving concurrent statin and neoadjuvant therapy. A pairwise meta-analyses was performed using inverse variance random effects. RESULTS From 1564 citations, six studies with 726 patients on statin therapy (24.5% female, age: 63.6 years) and 1863 patients not on statin therapy (35.6% female, age: 60.9 years) were included. There was no significant difference in pCR rate between patients on statin therapy and patients not on statin therapy (RR 1.23, 95%CI 0.98-1.54, p = 0.08). Similarly, no difference existed between groups in long-term oncologic outcomes (5-year overall survival: RR 1.03, 95%CI 0.86-1.24, p = 0.75; 5-year disease-free survival: RR 1.04, 95%CI 0.85-1.26, p = 0.73). Chemoradiotherapy-induced toxicities were similar between groups. CONCLUSION The concurrent use of statin and neoadjuvant therapy did not significantly impact short- or long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with rectal cancer. Yet, despite pooling of data, this study remained inadequately powered. Larger, prospective studies are required to further elucidate the impact of statins on patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.
Collapse
|
158
|
Johnson D, Li L, Lee KC, Lam KO, Wong KH, Ho WM, Ma B. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for High Risk Rectal Cancer in Western and Asian Populations – Current Evidence and Clinical Applications. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 21:45-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
159
|
Brajcich BC, Benson AB, Gantt G, Eng OS, Marsh RW, Mulcahy MF, Polite BN, Shogan BD, Yang AD, Merkow RP. Management of colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from a statewide multidisciplinary cancer collaborative. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:560-563. [PMID: 34820843 PMCID: PMC9015333 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
COVID‐19 has resulted in significant disruptions in cancer care. The Illinois Cancer Collaborative (ILCC), a statewide multidisciplinary cancer collaborative, has developed expert recommendations for triage and management of colorectal cancer when disruptions occur in usual care. Such recommendations would be applicable to future outbreaks of COVID‐19 or other large‐scale disruptions in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C Brajcich
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Al B Benson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Gerald Gantt
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Oliver S Eng
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Robert W Marsh
- Department of Medical Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Blase N Polite
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin D Shogan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Anthony D Yang
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ryan P Merkow
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Recent Advances in Functional MRI to Predict Treatment Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-021-00470-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
161
|
Erlandsson J, Fuentes S, Radu C, Frödin JE, Johansson H, Brandberg Y, Holm T, Glimelius B, Martling A. Radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer: long-term outcomes and health-related quality of life in the Stockholm III trial. BJS Open 2021; 5:6510898. [PMID: 35040942 PMCID: PMC8765334 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Stockholm III trial randomly assigned 840 patients to short-course radiotherapy of 5 × 5 Gy with surgery within 1 week (SRT), short-course radiotherapy of 5 × 5 Gy with surgery after 4-8 weeks (SRT-delay), or long-course radiotherapy of 25 × 2 Gy with surgery after 4-8 weeks (LRT-delay). This study details the long-term oncological outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS Patients with biopsy-proven resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum were included. Primary outcome was time to local recurrence (LR), and secondary endpoints were distant metastases (DMs), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and HRQoL. Patients were analysed in a three-arm randomization and a short-course radiotherapy comparison. RESULTS From 1998 to 2013, 357, 355, and 128 patients were randomized to the SRT, SRT-delay, and LRT-delay groups respectively. Median follow-up time was 5.7 (range 5.3-7.6) years. Comparing patients in the three-arm randomization, the incidence of LR was three of 129 patients, four of 128, and seven of 128, and DM 31 of 129 patients, 38 of 128, and 38 of 128 in the SRT, SRT-delay, and LRT-delay groups respectively. In the short-course radiotherapy comparison, the incidence of LR was 11 of 357 patients and 13 of 355, and DM 88 of 357 patients and 82 of 355 in the SRT and SRT-delay groups respectively. No comparisons showed statistically significant differences. Median OS was 8.1 (range 6.9-11.2), 10.3 (range 8.2-12.8), and 10.5 (range 7.0-11.3) years after SRT, SRT-delay, and LRT-delay respectively. Median OS was 8.1 (range 7.2-10.0) years after SRT and 10.2 (range 8.5-11.7) years after SRT-delay. There were no statistically significant differences in HRQoL. CONCLUSION After a follow-up of 5 years, delaying surgery for 4-8 weeks after radiotherapy treatment with 5 × 5 Gy was oncologically safe. Long-term HRQoL was similar among the treatment arms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTC00904813.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Erlandsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stina Fuentes
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Calin Radu
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jan-Erik Frödin
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yvonne Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Holm
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Shulman RM, Meyer JE. Current Trends in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Where We Are and How We Got Here. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-021-00471-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
163
|
Ng SP, Ngan SY, Leong T. Current State of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 21:63-70. [PMID: 34852972 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer, with rectal cancer accounting for 30% of cases. The current standard of care curative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is (chemo)radiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Although neoadjuvant radiotherapy has reduced the risk of local recurrence to less than 10%, the risk of distant metastasis remained high at 30% affecting patient survival. In addition, there is a recognition that there is heterogeneity in tumor biology and treatment response with good responders potentially suitable for treatment de-escalation. Therefore, new treatment sequencing and regimens were investigated. Here, we reviewed the evidence for current neoadjuvant treatment options in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, and highlight the new challenges in this new treatment landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; School of Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Samuel Y Ngan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Trevor Leong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Lin Z, Cai M, Zhang P, Li G, Liu T, Li X, Cai K, Nie X, Wang J, Liu J, Liu H, Zhang W, Gao J, Wu C, Wang L, Fan J, Zhang L, Wang Z, Hou Z, Ma C, Yang K, Wu G, Tao K, Zhang T. Phase II, single-arm trial of preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and camrelizumab in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-003554. [PMID: 34725214 PMCID: PMC8562535 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) with delayed surgery has been shown to be as effective as long-course chemoradiotherapy, with only modest benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative SCRT combined with subsequent CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) and the anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab in patients with LARC. Methods This was a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial. Treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed T3-4N0M0 or T1-4N+M0 rectal adenocarcinoma received 5×5 Gy SCRT with two subsequent 21-day cycles of CAPOX plus camrelizumab after 1 week, followed by radical surgery after 1 week. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Biomarker analysis was performed to identify a potential predictor of pCR to treatment. Results From November 7, 2019 to September 14, 2020, 30 patients were enrolled, and 27 patients received at least one dose of CAPOX plus camrelizumab. Surgery was performed in 27 (100%) patients. The pCR (ypT0N0) rate was 48.1% (13/27), including 46.2% (12/26) for proficient mismatch repair (MMR) tumors and 100% (1/1) for deficient MMR tumors. Immune-related adverse events were all grade 1–2, with the most common being reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (81.5%). No grade 4/5 adverse events occurred. Biomarker analysis showed patients without FGFR1–3 deletions had a better tendency for pCR. Conclusions SCRT combined with subsequent CAPOX plus camrelizumab followed by delayed surgery showed a favorable pCR rate with good tolerance in patients with LARC, especially in the proficient MMR setting. A randomized controlled trial is ongoing to confirm these results. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04231552.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyu Lin
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ming Cai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Liu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kailin Cai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiu Nie
- Department of Pathology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Junli Liu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hongli Liu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Weikang Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jingbo Gao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chuanqing Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Linfang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Fan
- Department of Pathology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiguo Hou
- Department of Medical Affairs, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Chi Ma
- Department of Medical Affairs, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Kunyu Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Gang Wu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kaixiong Tao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Devarakonda S, Malipatlolla DK, Patel P, Grandér R, Kuhn HG, Steineck G, Sjöberg F, Rascón A, Nyman M, Eriksson Y, Danial J, Ittner E, Naama Walid R, Prykhodko O, Masuram S, Kalm M, Bull C. Dietary Fiber and the Hippocampal Neurogenic Niche in a Model of Pelvic Radiotherapy. Neuroscience 2021; 475:137-147. [PMID: 34487821 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
We sought to determine whether radiation to the colorectum had an impact on parameters of hippocampal neurogenesis and, if so, whether it could be modulated by a fiber-rich diet. Male C57BL/6J mice were fed a diet containing bioprocessed oat bran or a fiber-free diet, starting two weeks before colorectal irradiation with 4 fractions of 8 Gray or sham-irradiation. Diets were then continued for 1, 6 or 18 weeks, whereafter parameters of hippocampal neurogenesis were analyzed and correlated to serum cytokine levels. No statistically significant changes in neuronal markers or cell proliferation were found at one week post-irradiation. Six weeks post-irradiation there was a decreased cell proliferation in the subgranular zone that appeared slightly more pronounced in irradiated animals on a fiber-free diet and increased numbers of immature neurons per mm2 dentate gyrus in the irradiated mice, with a statistically significant increase in mice on a fiber-rich diet. Microglial abundancy was similar between all groups. 18 weeks post-irradiation, a fiber-free diet had reduced the number of immature neurons, whereas irradiation resulted in an increase. Despite this, the population of mature neurons was stable. Analysis of serum cytokines revealed a negative correlation between MIP1-α and the number of immature neurons one week after irradiation, regardless of diet. Our findings show that pelvic radiotherapy has the potential to cause a long-lasting impact on hippocampal neurogenesis, and dietary interventions may modulate this impact. More in-depth studies on the relationship between irradiation-induced intestinal injury and brain health are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravani Devarakonda
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dilip Kumar Malipatlolla
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Piyush Patel
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rita Grandér
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - H Georg Kuhn
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Steineck
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fei Sjöberg
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ana Rascón
- Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Margareta Nyman
- Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Yohanna Eriksson
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jolie Danial
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ella Ittner
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rukaya Naama Walid
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Olena Prykhodko
- Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Spandana Masuram
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marie Kalm
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Bull
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Weiser MR, Chou JF, Keshinro A, Chapman WC, Bauer PS, Mutch MG, Parikh PJ, Cercek A, Saltz LB, Gollub MJ, Romesser PB, Crane CH, Shia J, Markowitz AJ, Garcia-Aguilar J, Gönen M. Development and Assessment of a Clinical Calculator for Estimating the Likelihood of Recurrence and Survival Among Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, and Surgery. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2133457. [PMID: 34748003 PMCID: PMC8576585 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Predicting outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer is challenging because of tumor downstaging. Validated clinical calculators that can estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with rectal cancer who have received multimodal therapy are needed. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate clinical calculators providing estimates of rectal cancer recurrence and survival that are better for individualized decision-making than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system or the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prognostic study developed risk models, graphically represented as nomograms, for patients with incomplete pathological response using Cox proportional hazards and multivariable regression analyses with restricted cubic splines. Because patients with complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy had uniformly favorable outcomes, their predictions were obtained separately. The study included 1400 patients with stage II or III rectal cancer who received treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery at 2 comprehensive cancer centers (Memorial Sloan Kettering [MSK] Cancer Center and Siteman Cancer Center [SCC]) between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2017. Patients from the MSK cohort received chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2014; these patients were randomly assigned to either a model training group or an internal validation group. Models were externally validated using data from the SCC cohort, who received either chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy group) or short-course radiotherapy, consolidation chemotherapy, and surgery (total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy group) from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2020, to January 10, 2021. EXPOSURES Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Recurrence-free survival and OS were the outcome measures, and the discriminatory performance of the clinical calculators was measured with concordance index and calibration plots. The ability of the clinical calculators to predict RFS and OS was compared with that of the AJCC staging system and the NAR score. The models for RFS and OS among patients with incomplete pathological response included postoperative pathological tumor category, number of positive lymph nodes, tumor distance from anal verge, and large- and small-vessel venous and perineural invasion; age was included in the risk model for OS. The final clinical calculators provided RFS and OS estimates derived from Kaplan-Meier curves for patients with complete pathological response and from risk models for patients with incomplete pathological response. RESULTS Among 1400 total patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, the median age was 57.8 years (range, 18.0-91.9 years), and 863 patients (61.6%) were male, with tumors at a median distance of 6.7 cm (range, 0-15.0 cm) from the anal verge. The MSK cohort comprised 1069 patients; of those, 710 were assigned to the model training group and 359 were assigned to the internal validation group. The SCC cohort comprised 331 patients; of those, 200 were assigned to the chemoradiotherapy group and 131 were assigned to the total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy group. The concordance indices in the MSK validation data set were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.76) for RFS and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65-0.80) for OS. In the external SCC data set, the concordance indices in the chemoradiotherapy group were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62-0.81) for RFS and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59-0.85) for OS; the concordance indices in the total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy group were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.49-0.75) for RFS and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.46-0.84) for OS. Calibration plots confirmed good agreement between predicted and observed events. These results compared favorably with predictions based on the AJCC staging system (concordance indices for MSK validation: RFS = 0.69 [95% CI, 0.64-0.74]; OS = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.58-0.75]) and the NAR score (concordance indices for MSK validation: RFS = 0.56 [95% CI, 0.50-0.63]; OS = 0.56 [95% CI, 0.46-0.66]). Furthermore, the clinical calculators provided more individualized outcome estimates compared with the categorical schemas (eg, estimated RFS for patients with AJCC stage IIIB disease ranged from 7% to 68%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this prognostic study, clinical calculators were developed and validated; these calculators provided more individualized estimates of the likelihood of RFS and OS than the AJCC staging system or the NAR score among patients with rectal cancer who received multimodal treatment. The calculators were easy to use and applicable to both short- and long-course radiotherapy regimens, and they may be used to inform surveillance strategies and facilitate future clinical trials and statistical power calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin R. Weiser
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joanne F. Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ajaratu Keshinro
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William C. Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Philip S. Bauer
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew G. Mutch
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Parag J. Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Leonard B. Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc J. Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul B. Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher H. Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, New York
| | - Arnold J. Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Dong J, Li Y, Xiao H, Zhang S, Wang B, Wang H, Li Y, Fan S, Cui M. Oral microbiota affects the efficacy and prognosis of radiotherapy for colorectal cancer in mouse models. Cell Rep 2021; 37:109886. [PMID: 34706245 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is inevitably intertwined with various side effects impairing the quality of life of cancer patients. Here, we report the possibility that alterations of the oral microbiota influence the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of radiotherapy for primary rectal cancer and colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases that pathologically disrupt gastrointestinal integrity and function. 16S rRNA sequencing shows that oral microbiota alterations change the gut bacterial composition within tumors but not in adjacent peritumor tissues in CRC mouse models. Specifically, buccal Fusobacterium nucleatum migrates to the CRC locus and impairs the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of radiotherapy. Administration of a specific antibiotic, metronidazole, abrogates the adverse effects of oral microbiome fluctuation on radiotherapy for CRC. The oral microbiota were also associated with radiation-induced intestinal injury via intestinal microbes. Our findings demonstrate that the oral microbiome in synergy with its intestinal counterparts impinges on the efficacy and prognosis of radiotherapy for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiali Dong
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Huiwen Xiao
- Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Shuqin Zhang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Haichao Wang
- The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA
| | - Yiliang Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Saijun Fan
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China.
| | - Ming Cui
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China.
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Jankowski M, Wysocki WM, Las-Jankowska M, Tkaczyński K, Wiśniewski D, Bała D, Zegarski W. Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:308. [PMID: 34670554 PMCID: PMC8529797 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02413-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Rectal cancer, one of most common neoplasms, is characterized by an overall survival rate exceeding 60%. Nonetheless, local recurrence (LR) following surgery for rectal cancer remains a formidable clinical problem. The aim of this study was to assess the value of postoperative endoscopic surveillance (PES) for the early detection of LR in rectal cancer after radical anterior resection with sigmoid-rectal anastomosis. Methods We performed an anterior resection in 228 patients with stages I‑III rectal cancer who had undergone surgery from 2001 to 2008 in the Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland. Of these patients, 169 had perioperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. All patients underwent PES with abdominal and pelvic imaging (abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance) and clinical examination. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to compare the value of colonoscopy versus imaging techniques for the diagnosis of LR. Results During the 5-year follow-up, recurrences occurred in 49 (21%) patients; of these, 15 (6%) had LR, which was most often located outside the intestinal lumen (n = 10, 4%). Anastomotic LR occurred in 5 (2%) patients. The mean time to anastomotic LR was 30 months after initial surgery, similar to that of other locations (29 months). Both imaging and endoscopy were shown to be efficient techniques for the diagnosis of LR in anastomotic sites. In the study group, endoscopy did not provide any additional benefit in patients who were receiving radiation therapy. Conclusions The benefit of PES for the detection of LR after curative treatment of rectal cancer is limited and not superior to imaging techniques. It remains a useful method, however, for the histopathological confirmation of suspected or confirmed recurrence. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02413-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Jankowski
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. .,Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, Romanowskiej 2 Street, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
| | - Wojciech M Wysocki
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1 Street, 30-705, Kraków, Poland.,Department of General, Oncological and Vascular Surgery, 5th Military Clinical Hospital in Kraków, Wrocławska 1-3 Street, 30-901, Kraków, Poland.,National Institute of Oncology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial, Scientific Editorial Office, W.K. Roentgena 5 Street, 02-781, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Manuela Las-Jankowska
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, Romanowskiej 2 Street, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Karol Tkaczyński
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, Romanowskiej 2 Street, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Dorian Wiśniewski
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, Romanowskiej 2 Street, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Dariusz Bała
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, Romanowskiej 2 Street, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Wojciech Zegarski
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, Romanowskiej 2 Street, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Pach R, Sierzega M, Szczepanik A, Popiela T, Richter P. Preoperative radiotherapy 5 × 5 Gy and short versus long interval between surgery for resectable rectal cancer: 10-Year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:268-274. [PMID: 34653526 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies on short-course preoperative radiotherapy in combination with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer reported improved local control without clear survival benefits. The optimal fractionation and interval between radiotherapy and surgery are still under debate. We, therefore, aimed to report 10-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RCT, NCT01444495) comparing different time intervals between irradiation and surgery for rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from the RCT conducted at a single academic centre were reviewed based on regular control visits with the median follow-up of 12 years. Patients with rectal cancer were randomly assigned to short-course preoperative radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) followed by surgery 7-10 days (short interval) or 4-5 weeks (long interval) after the end of irradiation. The primary endpoint was the local recurrence rate at 5 years. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, disease-free survival, systemic recurrence rate, and downstaging. RESULTS A total of 154 patients were randomly assigned to short (n = 77) or long interval (n = 77) surgery. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence at 10 years was 1.3% and 11.7% in the short and long-interval groups, respectively (p = 0.031). Accordingly, the incidence of systemic relapse was 14.3% versus 9.1% (p = 0.0319). There were no differences in the overall 10-year survival between patients subject to short and long-interval surgery (58% vs 61%, p = 0.754). However, patients with downstaging after radiotherapy had significantly better 10-year survival rates than non-responders. CONCLUSIONS Short-course preoperative radiotherapy with delayed surgery demonstrated an increased risk of local relapse over a 10-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radoslaw Pach
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Marek Sierzega
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Antoni Szczepanik
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Popiela
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Piotr Richter
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Chin RI, Roy A, Pedersen KS, Huang Y, Hunt SR, Glasgow SC, Tan BR, Wise PE, Silviera ML, Smith RK, Suresh R, Badiyan SN, Shetty AS, Henke LE, Mutch MG, Kim H. Clinical Complete Response in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Short-Course Radiation Therapy and Nonoperative Management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:715-725. [PMID: 34653579 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of nonoperative management (NOM) for patients with rectal cancer with a clinical complete response (cCR) after short-course radiation therapy and consolidation chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma underwent short-course radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy between January 2018 and May 2019 (n = 90). Clinical response was assessed by digital rectal examination, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopy. Of the patients with an evaluable initial response, those with a cCR (n = 43) underwent NOM, and those with a non-cCR (n = 43) underwent surgery. The clinical endpoints included local regrowth-free survival, regional control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Compared with patients with an initial cCR, patients with initial non-cCR had more advanced T and N stage (P = .05), larger primary tumors (P = .002), and more circumferential resection margin involvement on diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (P < .001). With a median follow-up of 30.1 months, the persistent cCR rate was 79% (30 of 38 patients) in the NOM cohort. The 2-year local regrowth-free survival was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-94%) in the initial cCR group, and all patients with local regrowth were successfully salvaged. Compared with those with a non-cCR, patients with a cCR had improved 2-year regional control (98% [95% CI, 93%-100%] vs 85% [95% CI, 74%-97%], P = .02), distant metastasis-free survival (100% [95% CI, 100%-100%] vs 80% [95% CI, 69%-94%], P < .01), disease-free survival (98% [95% CI, 93%-100%] vs 71% [95% CI, 59%-87%], P < .01), and overall survival (100% [95% CI, 100%-100%] vs 88% [95% CI, 79%-98%], P = .02). No late grade 3+ gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities were observed in the patients who underwent continued NOM. CONCLUSIONS Short-course radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy may be a feasible organ preservation strategy in rectal cancer. Additional prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Re-I Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Amit Roy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Katrina S Pedersen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Yi Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Steven R Hunt
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Sean C Glasgow
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Benjamin R Tan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Paul E Wise
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew L Silviera
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Radhika K Smith
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Rama Suresh
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Shahed N Badiyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Anup S Shetty
- Section of Abdominal Imaging, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren E Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew G Mutch
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Noticewala SS, Das P. Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:11-12. [PMID: 34617163 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10900-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sonal S Noticewala
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Zhao S, Zhang L, Gao F, Wu M, Zheng J, Bai L, Li F, Liu B, Pan Z, Liu J, Du K, Zhou X, Li C, Zhang A, Pu Z, Li Y, Feng B, Tong W. Transanal Drainage Tube Use for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:1151-1158. [PMID: 34613330 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) is crucial for colorectal surgery. Some studies have suggested a positive role of transanal drainage tubes (TDTs) in AL prevention after low anterior resection, but this finding is controversial. Objective To assess the effect of TDTs in AL prevention after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter randomized clinical trial with parallel groups (TDT vs non-TDT) was performed from February 26, 2016, to September 30, 2020. Participants included patients from 7 different hospitals in China who were undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection with the double-stapling technique for mid-low rectal cancer; 576 patients were initially enrolled in this study, and 16 were later excluded. Ultimately, 560 patients were randomly divided between the TDT and non-TDT groups. Interventions A silicone tube was inserted through the anus, and the tip of the tube was placed approximately 5 cm above the anastomosis under laparoscopy at the conclusion of surgery. The tube was fixed with a skin suture and connected to a drainage bag. The TDT was scheduled for removal 3 to 7 days after surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the postoperative AL rate within 30 days. Results In total, 576 patients were initially enrolled in this study; 16 of these patients were excluded. Ultimately, 560 patients were randomly divided between the TDT group (n = 280; median age, 61.5 years [IQR, 54.0-68.8 years]; 177 men [63.2%]) and the non-TDT group (n = 280; median age, 62.0 years [IQR, 52.0-69.0 years]; 169 men [60.4%]). Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the TDT and non-TDT groups in AL rates (18 [6.4%] vs 19 [6.8%]; relative risk, 0.947; 95% CI, 0.508-1.766; P = .87) or AL grades (grade B, 14 [5.0%] and grade C, 4 [1.4%] vs grade B, 11 [3.9%] and grade C, 8 [2.9%]; P = .43). In the stratified analysis based on diverting stomas, there was no significant difference in the AL rate between the groups, regardless of whether a diverting stoma was present (without stoma, 12 [5.8%] vs 15 [7.9%], P = .41; and with stoma, 6 [8.3%] vs 4 [4.5%], P = .50). Anal pain was the most common complaint from patients in the TDT group (130 of 280, 46.4%). Accidental early TDT removal occurred in 20 patients (7.1%), and no bleeding or iatrogenic colonic perforations were detected. Conclusions and Relevance The results from this randomized clinical trial indicated that TDTs may not confer any benefit for AL prevention in patients who undergo laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer without preoperative radiotherapy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02686567.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Zhao
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Luyang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of The Chinese People's Liberation Army, Gansu, China
| | - Miao Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hernia Surgery, Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, China
| | - Jianyong Zheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lian Bai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Fan Li
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Baohua Liu
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zehui Pan
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of The Chinese People's Liberation Army, Gansu, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hernia Surgery, Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, China
| | - Kunli Du
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiong Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chunxue Li
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Anping Zhang
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhizhong Pu
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Breast Surgery, The People's Hospital of Kaizhou District, Chongqing, China
| | - Yafei Li
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Preventive Medicine, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Bo Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weidong Tong
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Patel A, Spychalski P, Corrao G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Glynne-Jones R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kobiela J. Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1308-1316. [PMID: 34308767 PMCID: PMC8448977 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1953137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy (SCRT-CCT) has emerged as a promising alternative to the long course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) regimen in locally advanced rectal cancer management. The systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed at summarizing current evidence on SCRT-CCT and comparing it to LCRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS Electronic databases of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched using a predefined search strategy returning 3314 articles. This review included 11 studies (6 randomized trials and 5 non-randomized studies) on SCRT-CCT regimen based on seven different cohorts. Weighted arithmetic means and forest plots were generated to determine summary estimates. RESULTS The probability of achieving pathological complete response (pCR) was higher with SCRT-CCT compared to LCRT (risk ratio [RR] = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-2.19). No statistically significant difference in 3-year overall survival (OS) was observed between the two groups (RR= 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.14). The weighted arithmetic mean of 3-year OS and pCR was 83.6% versus 80.9%, and 24.5% versus 13.6% for SCRT-CCT and LCRT, respectively. R0 resection and T-downstaging rates ranged from 69.2-100% to 47-75% for SCRT-CCT, and 71-92.3% and 41-75% for LCRT, respectively. The regimens had similar compliance, postoperative, and late toxicity, however, acute toxicity rates varied primarily due to differences in treatment protocols. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights the ability of SCRT-CCT to produce improved tumor response with comparable OS, R0 resection, and T-downstaging at the cost of increased acute toxicity. However, heterogeneity in treatment protocols across studies makes it difficult to provide definitive conclusions regarding the regimen. Several ongoing trials are expected to provide further evidence confirming the findings of RAPIDO trial and detail appropriate SCRT-CCT protocols to improve oncological outcomes, minimize toxicity, and determine its effectiveness as the standard-of-care for locally advanced rectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agastya Patel
- Department of General Surgery, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Piotr Spychalski
- Department of General Surgery, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara A. Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert Glynne-Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Jarek Kobiela
- Department of General Surgery, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Husseini ZE, Haibe Y, Bouferraa Y, Kreidieh M, Darazi MA, Mukherji D, Temraz S, Charafeddine M, Shamseddine A. Total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: A tertiary medical center experience. Mol Clin Oncol 2021; 15:220. [PMID: 34476104 PMCID: PMC8408679 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) includes preoperative chemoradiation, followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. This multimodality treatment improves local control but is associated with low compliance rates without clear beneficial effects on overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis. In this retrospective study, the charts of patients diagnosed with cT3/4 or cT2-node-positive rectal cancer between January 2011 and June 2019 were reviewed. The chemoradiation therapy (CRT) group received a long course of CRT with capecitabine followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) group received 6 cycles mFOLFOX and a short course of radiation therapy followed by surgery. A total of 81 patients were included, among which 55 (67.9%) received CRT and 26 (32.1%) received TNT. In the CRT group, 15 (27.3%) patients achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) compared with 10 (38.5%) in the TNT group (P=0.22). A total of 19 (35.8%) cases in the CRT group downstaged to pT0N0 or pT1N0 compared with 11 (42.3%) in the TNT group (P=0.33). The 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 81.0% in the TNT group and 84.0% in the CRT group (P=0.15). Out of 55 patients in the CRT group, 30 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, 22 (40.0% of CRT cases) of which completed a full course. All 26 patients in the TNT group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, where 22 (84.6%) patients took a full course (P<0.001). In conclusion, the present study revealed that patients treated with TNT were more compliant to chemotherapy than those treated with CRT. A numerically higher pCR rate, and nodal and tumor downstaging were noted in the TNT group without significance. No difference was noted in the 2-year DFS. Longer follow-up is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad El Husseini
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Yolla Haibe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Youssef Bouferraa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Malek Kreidieh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Monita Al Darazi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Sally Temraz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Maya Charafeddine
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Ali Shamseddine
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Dou R, He S, Deng Y, Wang J. Comparison of guidelines on rectal cancer: exception proves the rule? Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2021; 9:290-298. [PMID: 34567560 PMCID: PMC8460091 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goab034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard of care for early or locally advanced rectal cancer is promoted by multiple clinical practice guidelines globally, but the considerable differences between the guidelines may cause confusion. We compared the latest updated clinical practice guidelines from five professional societies/authorities: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Colorectal Surgeons, European Society of Medical Oncology, Chinese National Health Commission, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. Key evidence is discussed for a better understanding of some seemingly contradictory recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruoxu Dou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Siqi He
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jianping Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Foresea Life Insurance Guangzhou General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Valadão M, Cesar D, Véo CAR, Araújo RO, do Espirito Santo GF, Oliveira de Souza R, Aguiar S, Ribeiro R, de Castro Ribeiro HS, de Souza Fernandes PH, Oliveira AF. Brazilian society of surgical oncology: Guidelines for the surgical treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:194-216. [PMID: 34585390 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer in North America, Western Europe, and Brazil, and represents an important public health problem. It is estimated that approximately 30% of all the CRC cases correspond to tumors located in the rectum, requiring complex multidisciplinary treatment. In an effort to provide surgeons who treat rectal cancer with the most current information based on the best evidence in the literature, the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (SBCO) has produced the present guidelines for rectal cancer treatment that is focused on the main topics related to daily clinical practice. OBJECTIVES The SBCO developed the present guidelines to provide recommendations on the main topics related to the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer based on current scientific evidence. METHODS Between May and June 2021, 11 experts in CRC surgery met to develop the guidelines for the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. A total of 22 relevant topics were disseminated among the participants. The methodological quality of a final list with 221 sources was evaluated, all the evidence was examined and revised, and the treatment guideline was formulated by the 11-expert committee. To reach a final consensus, all the topics were reviewed via a videoconference meeting that was attended by all 11 of the experts. RESULTS The prepared guidelines contained 22 topics considered to be highly relevant in the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer, covering subjects related to the tests required for staging, surgical technique-related aspects, recommended measures to reduce surgical complications, neoadjuvant strategies, and nonoperative treatments. In addition, a checklist was proposed to summarize the important information and offer an updated tool to assist surgeons who treat rectal cancer provide the best care to their patients. CONCLUSION These guidelines summarize concisely the recommendations based on the most current scientific evidence on the most relevant aspects of the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer and are a practical guide that can help surgeons who treat rectal cancer make the best therapeutic decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Valadão
- Division of Abdominal-Pelvic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Daniel Cesar
- Division of Abdominal-Pelvic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Rodrigo Otávio Araújo
- Division of Abdominal-Pelvic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Samuel Aguiar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Reitan Ribeiro
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
177
|
Nilsson PJ, Ahlberg M, Kordnejad S, Holm T, Martling A. Organ preservation following short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer. BJS Open 2021; 5:6408930. [PMID: 34686879 PMCID: PMC8536864 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Non-operative management of rectal cancer is increasingly being used in selected patients. Most reports include patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) before inclusion into a Watch & Wait (W&W) programme. The aim of this study was to report outcomes from a single-centre W&W programme involving a large cohort of patients. Methods Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) with or without chemotherapy, between 2008 and 2020, who showed signs of a clinical complete response (cCR) were reviewed. Patients were assessed using digital rectal examination, flexible endoscopy, carcinoembryonic antigen measurement, MRI, and CT imaging, discussed at the multidisciplinary tumour board meeting, and followed up in a dedicated W&W programme as from 2015. Outcomes including regrowth and 3-year survival (time to regrowth or death) were prospectively evaluated. Results Of 142 patients who were assessed, 88 fulfilled the criteria for cCR. Treatment before cCR included CRT, SCRT with chemotherapy, and SCRT alone in 16 (18 per cent), 28 (32 per cent), and 44 (50 per cent) patients, respectively. Patients treated with CRT and SCRT with chemotherapy had more advanced clinical T- and N-stage, compared with patients treated with SCRT alone (clinical T-stage > 2: 81 per cent and 89 per cent versus 47 per cent, respectively; clinical N-stage > 0: 75 per cent and 93 per cent versus 68 per cent, respectively). Overall rate of regrowth was 19 per cent, with 31 per cent, 21 per cent, and 14 per cent following CRT, SCRT with chemotherapy, and SCRT alone, respectively. Uni- and multivariable analyses evaluating the clinical parameters revealed no statistically significant associations with risk of local regrowth. All but one patient with regrowth underwent salvage surgery. The 3-year survival rate (death with regrowth as competing risk) was 93 per cent, with no significant difference between treatment groups. Conclusion In this cohort of W&W patients, the vast majority received SCRT with or without chemotherapy and results consistent with previous W&W reports were obtained. No statistically significant differences in terms of regrowth rate were obtained when comparing CRT, SCRT with chemotherapy, and SCRT alone. SCRT can induce sustained cCR and may precede a W&W strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per J Nilsson
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Madelene Ahlberg
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shahrzad Kordnejad
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Holm
- Department of Surgery, South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Wang K, Tepper JE. Radiation therapy-associated toxicity: Etiology, management, and prevention. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71:437-454. [PMID: 34255347 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a curative treatment for many malignancies and provides effective palliation in patients with tumor-related symptoms. However, the biophysical effects of RT are not specific to tumor cells and may produce toxicity due to exposure of surrounding organs and tissues. In this article, the authors review the clinical context, pathophysiology, risk factors, presentation, and management of RT side effects in each human organ system. Ionizing radiation works by producing DNA damage leading to tumor death, but effects on normal tissue may result in acute and/or late toxicity. The manifestation of toxicity depends on both cellular characteristics and affected organs' anatomy and physiology. There is usually a direct relationship between the radiation dose and volume to normal tissues and the risk of toxicity, which has led to guidelines and recommended dose limits for most tissues. Side effects are multifactorial, with contributions from baseline patient characteristics and other oncologic treatments. Technological advances in recent decades have decreased RT toxicity by dramatically improving the ability to deliver RT that maximizes tumor dose and minimizes organ dose. Thus the study of RT-associated toxicity is a complex, core component of radiation oncology training that continues to evolve alongside advances in cancer management. Because RT is used in up to one-half of all patients with cancer, an understanding of its acute and late effects in different organ systems is clinically pertinent to both oncologists and nononcologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Joel E Tepper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Moslim MA, Bastawrous AL, Jeyarajah DR. Neoadjuvant Pelvic Radiotherapy in the Management of Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: Is It Worth It? J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:2411-2422. [PMID: 34100244 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05042-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of neoadjuvant pelvic radiotherapy was a major advance in oncologic care for locally advanced rectal cancer in the twentieth century. The extrapolation of the care of locally advanced rectal cancer to the management of rectal cancer with treatable liver metastases is controversial. The aim of this review is to examine the available data on the role of pelvic radiotherapy and chemoradiation in the setting of treatable metastatic liver disease. METHODS A systematic search of MEDLINE was performed to report the landmark randomized controlled trials between 1993 and 2021. RESULTS Attaining liver clearance and total mesorectal excision with R0 margin remains the mainstay of cure. There is uncertainty regarding the sequencing of treatment. The literature lacks randomized clinical trials comparing the rectal first, liver first, interval strategy, and simultaneous surgical approaches. A multidisciplinary discussion regarding the utility of radiotherapy is emphasized to achieve the goals of treatment. Short-course radiotherapy has proved comparable disease-control outcomes to long-course chemoradiation with a significantly improved cost-performance. The implementation of short-course radiotherapy in the interval strategy and simultaneous surgical approach is promising. Neoadjuvant pelvic radiotherapy can be omitted in patients with metastatic rectal cancer if adequate margin clearance is achievable. CONCLUSION The use of radiotherapy in metastatic rectal cancer is popular but is based on limited data. Treatment should be tailored to the local extent of rectal cancer and priority of liver metastasis management. The optimal treatment strategy in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastatic disease needs to be studied in randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maitham A Moslim
- Methodist Richardson Medical Center, 2805 E. President George Bush Highway, Richardson, TX, USA
| | | | - D Rohan Jeyarajah
- Methodist Richardson Medical Center, 2805 E. President George Bush Highway, Richardson, TX, USA. .,TCU/UNTHSC School of Medicine, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Hanna CR, O’Cathail SM, Graham JS, Saunders M, Samuel L, Harrison M, Devlin L, Edwards J, Gaya DR, Kelly CA, Lewsley LA, Maka N, Morrison P, Dinnett L, Dillon S, Gourlay J, Platt JJ, Thomson F, Adams RA, Roxburgh CSD. Durvalumab (MEDI 4736) in combination with extended neoadjuvant regimens in rectal cancer: a study protocol of a randomised phase II trial (PRIME-RT). Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:163. [PMID: 34446053 PMCID: PMC8393812 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01888-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in multi-modality treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have resulted in low local recurrence rates, but around 30% of patients will still die from distant metastatic disease. In parallel, there is increasing recognition that with radiotherapy and systemic treatment, some patients achieve a complete response and may avoid surgical resection, including in many cases, the need for a permanent stoma. Extended neoadjuvant regimes have emerged to address these concerns. The inclusion of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting has the potential to further enhance this strategy by priming the local immune microenvironment and engaging the systemic immune response. METHODS PRIME-RT is a multi-centre, open label, phase II, randomised trial for patients with newly diagnosed LARC. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either: short course radiotherapy (25 Gray in 5 fractions over one week) with concomitant durvalumab (1500 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks), followed by FOLFOX (85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 350 mg folinic acid and 400 mg/m2 bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given on day 1 followed by 2400 mg/m2 5-FU infusion over 46-48 h, all administered intravenously every 2 weeks), and durvalumab, or long course chemoradiotherapy (50 Gray to primary tumour in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with concomitant oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice per day on days of radiotherapy) with durvalumab followed by FOLFOX and durvalumab. The primary endpoint is complete response rate in each arm. Secondary endpoints include treatment compliance, toxicity, safety, overall recurrence, proportion of patients with a permanent stoma, and survival. The study is translationally rich with collection of bio-specimens prior to, during, and following treatment in order to understand the molecular and immunological factors underpinning treatment response. The trial opened and the first patient was recruited in January 2021. The main trial will recruit up to 42 patients with LARC and commence after completion of a safety run-in that will recruit at least six patients with LARC or metastatic disease. DISCUSSION PRIME-RT will explore if adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with LARC can prime the tumour microenvironment to improve complete response rates and stoma free survival. Sequential biopsies are a key component within the trial design that will provide new knowledge on how the tumour microenvironment changes at different time-points in response to multi-modality treatment. This expectation is that the trial will provide information to test this treatment within a large phase clinical trial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04621370 (Registered 9th Nov 2020) EudraCT number 2019-001471-36 (Registered 6th Nov 2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R. Hanna
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Level 0, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Sean M. O’Cathail
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Janet S. Graham
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Mark Saunders
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX UK
| | | | - Mark Harrison
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Rd, Northwood, HA6 2RN UK
| | - Lynsey Devlin
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Joanne Edwards
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Bearsden, G61 1QH UK
| | - Daniel R. Gaya
- Gastroenterology Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 4th Floor Walton Building, Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF UK
| | - Caroline A. Kelly
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Level 0, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Liz-Anne Lewsley
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Level 0, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Noori Maka
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF UK
| | - Paula Morrison
- Snr Pharmacist Clinical Trials Oncology R&I, Research & Innovation, Dykebar Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Ward 11, Grahamston Road, Paisley, PA2 7DE UK
| | - Louise Dinnett
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Level 0, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Susan Dillon
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Level 0, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Jacqueline Gourlay
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Level 0, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Jonathan J. Platt
- Department of Radiology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF UK
| | - Fiona Thomson
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH UK
| | - Richard A. Adams
- Centre for Trials Research Cardiff University Heath Park, Cardiff University and Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | -
Campbell S. D. Roxburgh
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, University of Glasgow, Room 2.57, Level 2, New Lister Building, Glasgow, G31 2ER UK
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Mukherji R, Marshall JL. Lessons Learned in Managing Patients with Colorectal Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:93. [PMID: 34424418 PMCID: PMC8381863 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00888-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The COVID-19 pandemic forced us to rapidly and dramatically shift our medical priorities and decision making. With little literature or experience to rely on, the initial priority was to minimize patient exposure to the hospital and to others. It remains unclear whether cancer patients are at higher risk of infection or serious complications, or if it is our traditional therapies that place them to be at higher risk. By far, the greatest negative impact was on screening. Routine colonoscopies were considered elective, and as a result, delays in diagnosis will be felt for years to come. The most positive changes were the incorporation of tele-visits, increased use of oral therapies, alterations in treatment schedules of both chemotherapy and radiation, and an increased emphasis on neoadjuvant therapy. These too will be felt for years to come. The colorectal cancer medical community has responded collaboratively and effectively to maintain treatment and to optimize outcomes for our patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reetu Mukherji
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20057, USA
| | - John L Marshall
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Doi H, Yokoyama H, Beppu N, Fujiwara M, Harui S, Kakuno A, Yanagi H, Hishikawa Y, Yamanaka N, Kamikonya N. Neoadjuvant Modified Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Delayed Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164112. [PMID: 34439265 PMCID: PMC8394890 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Both short- and long-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NA-RT) followed by surgery have been adopted as standard treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We hypothesized that a modified short-course radiotherapy (mSC-RT) using an accelerated hyperfractionated regimen, with a dose of 2.5 Gy twice daily up to a total dose of 25 Gy in 10 fractions, can provide a favorable therapeutic ratio in comparison with the conventional regimens. Ninety-seven consecutive LARC patients undergoing mSC-RT followed by delayed surgery were analyzed in this retrospective study. Additionally, potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were also assessed. The results showed that mSC-RT followed by delayed surgery achieved equivalent anti-tumor efficacy and acute toxicity that were comparable with long- and short-course NA-RT, respectively. A neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 1.83 was independently associated with poor OS in LARC patients receiving mSC-RT. Thus, mSC-RT can be a promising alternative to both standard long- and short-course NA-RT regimens. Abstract This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and predictive factors of neoadjuvant modified short-course radiotherapy (mSC-RT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Data from 97 patients undergoing mSC-RT followed by radical surgery for LARC were retrospectively analyzed. A 2.5 Gy dose twice daily up to a total dose of 25 Gy in 10 fractions was administered through mSC-RT, and this was delivered with oral chemotherapy in 95 (97.9%) patients. Radical surgery was performed 6 (range, 3–13) weeks after mSC-RT. The median follow-up among surviving patients was 43 (8–86) months. All patients completed neoadjuvant radiotherapy with no acute toxicity grade ≥ 3. Three- and five-year local control rates were 96.3% and 96.3%, respectively. Three- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 92.7% and 79.8%, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed that poor OS was associated with no concurrent administration of capecitabine, C-reactive-protein-to-albumin ratio ≥ 0.053, carcinoembryonic antigen ≥ 3.4 ng/mL, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 1.83 (P = 0.045, 0.001, 0.041, and 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analyses indicated that NLR ≥ 1.83 was independently associated with poor OS (p = 0.018). mSC-RT followed by delayed surgery for LARC was deemed feasible and resulted in good clinical outcomes, whereas poor OS was associated with high NLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Doi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-72-366-0221; Fax: +81-72-368-2388
| | - Hiroyuki Yokoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Naohito Beppu
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (N.B.); (H.Y.); (N.Y.)
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Masayuki Fujiwara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Shogo Harui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
| | - Ayako Kakuno
- Department of Pathology, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan;
| | - Hidenori Yanagi
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (N.B.); (H.Y.); (N.Y.)
| | - Yoshio Hishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
| | - Naoki Yamanaka
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (N.B.); (H.Y.); (N.Y.)
| | - Norihiko Kamikonya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Eijkelenkamp H, Boekhoff MR, Verweij ME, Peters FP, Meijer GJ, Intven MPW. Planning target volume margin assessment for online adaptive MR-guided dose-escalation in rectal cancer on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Radiother Oncol 2021; 162:150-155. [PMID: 34280404 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assessed the margins needed to cover tumor intrafraction motion during an MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) dose-escalation strategy in intermediate risk rectal cancer. METHODS Fifteen patients with rectal cancer were treated with neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy, 5x5 Gy, according to an online adaptive workflow on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Per patient, 26 3D T2 weighted MRIs were made; one reference scan preceding treatment and five scans per treatment fraction. The primary tumor was delineated on each scan as gross tumor volume (GTV). Target coverage margins were assessed by isotropically expanding the reference GTV until more than 95% of the voxels of the sequential GTVs were covered. A margin with a coverage probability threshold of 90% was defined as adequate. Intra- and interfraction margins to cope with the movement of the GTV in the period between scans were calculated to indicate the target volume margins. Furthermore, the margin needed to cover GTV movement was calculated for different time intervals. RESULTS The required margins to cover inter- and intrafraction GTV motion were 17 mm and 6 mm, respectively. Analysis based on time intervals between scans showed smaller margins were needed for adequate GTV coverage as time intervals became shorter, with a 4 mm margin required for a procedure of 15 min or less. CONCLUSION The shorter the treatment time, the smaller the margins needed to cover for the GTV movement during an online adaptive MRgRT dose-escalation strategy for intermediate risk rectal cancer. When time intervals between replanning and the end of dose delivery could be reduced to 15 min, a 4 mm margin would allow adequate target coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidde Eijkelenkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Mick R Boekhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike E Verweij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Femke P Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands
| | - Gert J Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Ominelli J, Valadão M, Araujo RODC, Cristina de Melo A, Araujo LH. The Evolving Field of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally-advanced Rectal Cancer: Evidence and Prospects. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:288-298. [PMID: 34340916 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer comprises neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by total mesorectal excision. This strategy provides low local recurrence rate, however distant recurrence is still an issue and may impact on survival rates. Novel approaches in the neoadjuvant setting have been tested to improve early and late outcomes, as well as to reduce treatment-related toxicity and morbidity. In this review, we discuss the current literature of neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer, including total neoadjuvant methods, protocols for radiation delivery, chemotherapy regimen and efforts to add novel targeted therapies, selective withdrawal of surgery or radiotherapy, and future perspectives. Moreover, we highlight relevant issues that have emerged with these new treatment possibilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Ominelli
- Division of Clinical Research, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Marcus Valadão
- Department of Abdomino-Pelvic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Luiz H Araujo
- Division of Clinical Research, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Wang J, Long Y, Liu K, Pei Q, Zhu H. Comparing neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy with short-course radiotherapy in rectal cancer. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:277. [PMID: 34233606 PMCID: PMC8262029 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01851-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to compare short-course radiotherapy (SC) or neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy (LC) treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who had undergone neoadjuvant radiotherapy before surgery between 2013 and 2018 at the medical center in China were included in this study. All patients’ MRI confirmed T2N+M0 or T3-4N0-3M0 clinical stages. Patients in the SC group received pelvic radiotherapy with a dose of 5 × 5 Gy (with or without chemotherapy at any time), followed by immediate or delayed surgery. Patients in the LC group received a dose of 50–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions, concomitantly with FOLFOX or capecitabine-based chemotherapy, followed by surgery 4–6 weeks later. All clinical data were retrospectively collected, and long-term follow-up was completed and recorded at the same time. Results A total of 170 were eligible to participate in this study, 32 patients in the SC group, and 138 in the LC group. The median follow-up time of living patients was 39 months. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in the SC group and LC group at 3 years, were, 84.9% versus 72.4% (P = 0.273) and 96.2% versus 87.2% (P = 0.510), respectively. The complete pathological response (pCR) rates in the SC group and LC group were, 25% versus 18.1% (the difference was not statistically significant, P = 0.375), respectively. However, the SC group had better node(N) downstaging compared to the LC group (P = 0.011). Conclusions There were no differences observed in DFS and OS between short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiation, and both can be used as treatment options for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Wang
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Yiwen Long
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Kun Liu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Qian Pei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
| | - Hong Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Yuval JB, Garcia-Aguilar J. Watch-and-wait Management for Rectal Cancer After Clinical Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy. Adv Surg 2021; 55:89-107. [PMID: 34389102 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan B Yuval
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
[Neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer]. Bull Cancer 2021; 108:855-867. [PMID: 34140155 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has improved significantly in the past few years with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and total mesorectal excision. The rate of local recurrence is now around 5 % while the risk of metastatic recurrence has not been reduced which is about 30 %. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains questionable apart from patients with ypN+tumor after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for whom FOLFOX is an option. In recent years, several therapeutic trials have evaluated the benefit of extending the time between the end of RT and surgery and/or the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, administered as induction (before RT) or in consolidation (after RT and before surgery). The first results of two positive phase 3 trials, PRODIGE 23 and RAPIDO, have been reported in 2020. The two regimens evaluated in these trials are markedly different but have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduces the risk of distant metastasis. Current developments largely related to a de-escalation of therapy: organ conservation according to a "Watch and Wait" strategy or local resection of the scar, administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without RT. These therapeutic strategies have not yet been validated but should be in the news tomorrow. The purpose of this review is to present recent data reported in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
|
188
|
Tan JJ, Carten RV, Babiker A, Abulafi M, Lord AC, Brown G. Prognostic Importance of MRI-Detected Extramural Venous Invasion in Rectal Cancer: A Literature Review and Systematic Meta-Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:385-394. [PMID: 34119593 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) is recognized as a poor prognostic factor in rectal cancer. There are well-documented limitations associated with pathology detection of EMVI, including variable reporting and the inability to use it preoperatively to guide neoadjuvant treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected EMVI (mrEMVI) has been proposed as an imaging biomarker. This review assesses the prognostic significance of mrEMVI on survival outcomes and whether regression of mrEMVI after neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improvements in survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS An electronic search was carried out using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases using the search terms "rectum," "cancer,", "MRI," and "outcomes." A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using Review Manager software. A qualitative review was performed. RESULTS A total of 7399 articles were identified, of which 33 were relevant to the review question. After a qualitative assessment, 20 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Baseline mrEMVI positivity is associated with significantly worsened overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.54; P = .0001) and significantly worsened disease-free survival (HR 2.41; 95% CI, 2.02-2.89; P < .00001). After neoadjuvant treatment, a positive mrEMVI status is associated with a significantly worsened overall and disease-free survival. Only 3 papers specifically looked at mrEMVI regression, but the results show that persistent mrEMVI-positive status after treatment is associated with significantly worsened disease-free survival compared with a change in mrEMVI from positive to negative (HR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.39-2.68; P < .0001). A subgroup analysis of MRI-detected lymph node metastases showed no significant association with survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.33 (95% CI, 0.98-1.80; P = .06). CONCLUSION mrEMVI is significantly associated with worsened survival outcomes, both at baseline and after neoadjuvant treatment. Additionally, there is evidence that regression of mrEMVI after neoadjuvant treatment is associated with improved survival compared with mrEMVI persistence. The findings of this review emphasize the need for accurate and consistent reporting of mrEMVI status before and after neoadjuvant treatment and support the inclusion of mrEMVI into staging systems preferentially over lymph node metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Juliana Tan
- GI Cancer Imaging Research Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, United Kingdom.
| | - Rachel V Carten
- GI Cancer Imaging Research Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, United Kingdom
| | - Amna Babiker
- GI Cancer Imaging Research Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Muti Abulafi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, United Kingdom
| | - Amy C Lord
- GI Cancer Imaging Research Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Gina Brown
- GI Cancer Imaging Research Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Short-course radiotherapy in stage IV rectal cancer with resectable disease. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:2482-2488. [PMID: 34081292 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02647-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stage IV rectal cancer with resectable disease presents challenging issues, as the radical treatment of the whole disease is difficult. Surgery and chemotherapy (CT) play an unquestionable role, but the contribution of pelvic radiotherapy (RT) is not very clear. METHODS In 2009, we established a prospective treatment protocol that included CT, short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCRT) with surgery of the primary tumour and all metastatic locations. RESULTS Forty patients were included. Eight (20%) patients did not receive CT due to significant comorbidities. Radical surgery treatment was possible in 22 (55%) patients. The mean follow-up was 42.81 months (3.63-105.97). Overall survival at 24 and 36 months was 71.4% and 58.2%, respectively. There was good local control of the disease, as 97.2% of pelvic surgeries were R0 and there were no local recurrences. CONCLUSION In stage IV with resectable metastatic disease, the proposed therapeutic regimen seems very appropriate in well selected patients able to tolerate the treatment. We bet on the role of pelvic RT, due to the good local control of the disease in our series.
Collapse
|
190
|
Song SH, Park JS, Kang MK, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Kim JG, Kang BW, Baek JH, Baek DW, Kim JC, Park SH, Cho SH, Seo AN. Initial experience of preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by oxaliplatin-based consolidation chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1279-1286. [PMID: 33547945 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03875-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We analyzed the safety and feasibility of preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS From April 2018 to May 2019, 19 patients with LARC were treated with SCRT followed by three cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6) before surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy relied on oxaliplatin. Tumor response, patient compliance, and toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS The median age was 60 years (range 44-71), and 16 of the patients were male. The median tumor height was 5 cm (range 0-9) from anal verge. All patients received a total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions. The number of cycles of FOLFOX6 before surgery was three in 17, four in one, five in one. Five patients required dose reductions in consolidation chemotherapy. The median interval between initiation of SCRT and surgery was 10.6 weeks (range 8.6-16.4). A pathologic complete response was seen in two patients (11%). Grade III toxicities to the preoperative treatment were seen in five patients (26%): diarrhea in two, a decreased white blood cell count in one, and anemia in two. Postoperative complications arising within 30 days developed in five patients (26%). During the median follow-up period of 20.4 months, there was no tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION Preoperative SCRT followed by oxaliplatin-based consolidation chemotherapy showed acceptable toxicity and feasibility in patients with LARC. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to verify the efficacy and safety of this treatment strategy compared with conventional long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Ho Song
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Seok Park
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Min Kyu Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Gyu-Seog Choi
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo Yeun Park
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Jin Kim
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Gwang Kim
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Woog Kang
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Ho Baek
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Won Baek
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Chul Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Shin-Hyung Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hyun Cho
- Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - An Na Seo
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Liu T, Chang W, Wang J, Ren L, Wei Y, Zhang X, Chen Y, Tang W, Wang M, Zeng Z, Xu J. Efficacy of conversion therapy on initially unresectable locally advanced rectal cancer. J Cancer 2021; 12:4418-4423. [PMID: 34093842 PMCID: PMC8176423 DOI: 10.7150/jca.53824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: Research on the efficacy of conversion therapy for initially unresectable mid-low rectal cancer (IURC) remained limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the conversion regimen for IURC and analyze the long-term outcomes of these patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of clinically diagnosed IURC patients who received conversion therapy between October 2010 and April 2017. The conversion therapy consisted of long-term radiation, concurrent chemotherapy, delayed surgery and consolidation chemotherapy. The primary end point was the rate of R0 resection, and other short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled in this study. After conversion therapy, 51 (83.6%) patients received R0 resection. The rates of pathologic complete response and downstaging were 16.4% and 62.3%, respectively. The rate of grade 3-4 chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity events was 13.1%. The overall survival at 3 years was 75.4% in all patients, and the disease-free survival at 3 years was 72.5% in patients who received R0 resection. Conclusion: The conversion regimen showed a high conversion resection rate and good survival outcomes in IURC patients, and might benefit the patients if recommended in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyu Liu
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenju Chang
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive Technology (17DZ2252600), Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy; Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Ren
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive Technology (17DZ2252600), Shanghai, China
| | - Ye Wei
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive Technology (17DZ2252600), Shanghai, China
| | - Xian Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy; Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yijiao Chen
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wentao Tang
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mingliang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaochong Zeng
- Department of Radiotherapy; Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianmin Xu
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive Technology (17DZ2252600), Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Romesser PB, Crane CH. Chemo-Re-Irradiation and Salvage Surgery for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4769-4771. [PMID: 34031771 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10198-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Morarasu S, O'Brien L, Clancy C, Dietrich D, Maurer CA, Frasson M, Garcia-Granero E, Martin ST. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical and oncological outcomes of upper rectal, rectosigmoid and sigmoid tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2421-2428. [PMID: 34016500 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Management paradigms for tumours from the sigmoid colon to the lower rectum vary significantly. The upper rectum (UR) represents the transition point both anatomically and in treatment protocols. Above the UR is clearly defined and managed as colon cancer and below is managed as rectal cancer. This study compares outcomes between sigmoid, rectosigmoid and UR tumours to establish if differences exist in operative and oncological outcomes. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for published studies with comparative data on peri-operative and oncological outcome for upper rectal and sigmoid/rectosigmoid (SRS) tumours treated without neoadjuvant radiation. The search adhered to PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Data was combined using random-effects models. RESULTS Seven comparative series examined outcomes in 4355 patients. There was no difference in ASA grade (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.99-1.67; P = 0.06), T3/T4 tumours (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.95-1.63; P = 0.12), or lymph node positivity (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.70-1.36; P = 0.87). UR cancers had higher rates of operative morbidity (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93; P = 0.01) and anastomotic leak (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.71; P = 0.0004). There was no difference in local recurrence (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.37-1.08; P = 0.10). SRS tumours had lower rates of distant recurrence (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.68-1.0; P = 0.05). Rectosigmoid operative and cancer outcomes were closer to UR than sigmoid. CONCLUSIONS Based on existing data, UR and rectosigmoid tumours have higher morbidity, leak rates and distant recurrence than more proximal tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Morarasu
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Luke O'Brien
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cillian Clancy
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - Daniel Dietrich
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christoph A Maurer
- Hirslanden Group, Clinic Beau-Site, Schänzlihalde 11, 3000, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matteo Frasson
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital La Fe, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Eduardo Garcia-Granero
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital La Fe, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Sean T Martin
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Abstract
To date, we do not know the best therapeutic scheme in locally advanced rectal cancer when patients are older or have comorbidities.
Collapse
|
195
|
Otegbeye EE, Mitchem JB, Park H, Chaudhuri AA, Kim H, Mutch MG, Ciorba MA. Immunity, immunotherapy, and rectal cancer: A clinical and translational science review. Transl Res 2021; 231:124-138. [PMID: 33307273 PMCID: PMC8016725 DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Rectal cancer remains a challenging disease to treat. Therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), the most frequent presentation, has evolved to include a multimodal approach of radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. While this approach improves local disease control, the distant recurrence rate is nearly 30% and treatment-related morbidity is substantial, thus underscoring the need for new therapeutic approaches with better efficacy and lower side effects. Immunotherapy could potentially fill this need, but its promise is not yet realized in rectal cancer. In this translational science review, we address what is known about how cytotoxic therapies shape rectal cancer immunity and potentially prime the tumor microenvironment for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapies. We also address the role of current immunotherapies in colorectal cancer and highlight where novel immunotherapy approaches are currently being evaluated in LARC. Finally, we address important future directions in LARC immunotherapy including the need to define optimal therapeutic sequencing, predictive biomarkers, strategies to limit treatment-related side effects and the potential of gut microbiome manipulation to improve outcomes. In summary, this review provides a framework to guide future research and inform immunotherapy trial design so as to advance rectal cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebunoluwa E Otegbeye
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jonathan B Mitchem
- Department of Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri; Surgical Service, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Haeseong Park
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Aadel A Chaudhuri
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Hyun Kim
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew G Mutch
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Surgery, Section of Colorectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew A Ciorba
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center and the Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Hanna CR, O'Cathail SM, Graham J, Adams R, Roxburgh CS. Immune Checkpoint Inhibition as a Strategy in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY AND PRECISION ONCOLOGY 2021; 4:86-104. [PMID: 35663532 PMCID: PMC9153256 DOI: 10.36401/jipo-20-31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has seen major advances over the past 3 decades, with multimodality treatment now standard of care. Combining surgical resection with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy can reduce local recurrence from around 20% to approximately 5%. Despite improvements in local control, distant recurrence and subsequent survival rates have not changed. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved patient outcomes in several solid tumor types in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and advanced disease setting; however, in colorectal cancer, most clinical trials have been performed in the metastatic setting and the benefits confined to microsatellite instability-high tumors. In this article, we review the current preclinical and clinical evidence for using immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of LARC and discuss the rationale for specifically exploring the use of this therapy in the neoadjuvant setting. We summarize and discuss relevant clinical trials that are currently in setup and recruiting to test this treatment strategy and reflect on unanswered questions that still need to be addressed within future research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R. Hanna
- Cancer Research United Kingdom Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, Scotland
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Séan M. O'Cathail
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Janet Graham
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Richard Adams
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, Wales
| | - Campbell S.D. Roxburgh
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
Bigness A, Imanirad I, Sahin IH, Xie H, Frakes J, Hoffe S, Laskowitz D, Felder S. Locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: Treatment sequences, intensification, and rectal organ preservation. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71:198-208. [PMID: 33592118 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Bigness
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Iman Imanirad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Medical Oncology Section, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ibrahim Halil Sahin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Medical Oncology Section, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Hao Xie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Medical Oncology Section, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jessica Frakes
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Radiation Oncology Section, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sarah Hoffe
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Radiation Oncology Section, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Danielle Laskowitz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Surgical Oncology Section, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Seth Felder
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Surgical Oncology Section, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Sakamoto W, Ohki S, Onozawa H, Okayama H, Endo H, Fujita S, Saito M, Saze Z, Momma T, Takenoshita S, Kono K. Long-term Outcomes of Lower Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection after Preoperative Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy. J Anus Rectum Colon 2021; 5:129-136. [PMID: 33937552 PMCID: PMC8084532 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2020-054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The standard strategy for advanced rectal cancer (RC) is preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT)/chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) in Western countries; however, the survival benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy remains unclear. There is accumulating evidence that either SCRT/CRT or lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) alone may not be sufficient for local control of advanced RC. We herein retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients who were treated by SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND, particularly focusing on the prognostic impact of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (LPNM). METHODS Patients diagnosed as having clinical Stage II and III lower RC who received SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND between 1999 and 2012 at our hospital were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs), surgery-related complications (SRC), and therapeutic effects were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Fifty cases (SCRT:25, CRT:25) were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), local recurrence (LR), AE, and SRC between the SCRT and CRT groups, although the pathological therapeutic effect was higher in the CRT group. The patients with LPNM showed significantly inferior 5-year OS and 5-year RFS than those without LPNM. CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in OS, RFS, or LR between SCRT and CRT, although CRT had a significantly greater histological therapeutic effect. The prognosis of the pathological LPNM-positive cases was significantly poorer than that of pathological LPNM-negative cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wataru Sakamoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Shinji Ohki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hisashi Onozawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Okayama
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hisahito Endo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Shotaro Fujita
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Motonobu Saito
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Zenichiro Saze
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Momma
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Seiichi Takenoshita
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Koji Kono
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Abdalla S, Benoist S, Lefèvre JH, Penna C, Brouquet A. New treatment strategies for non-metastatic rectal cancer. J Visc Surg 2021; 158:497-505. [PMID: 33926836 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The most widely practiced (standard) treatment of non-metastatic rectal cancer is based on proctectomy with mesorectal excision (partial or total according to the location of the tumor and commonly called TME). Surgery is preceded by CAP50-type chemoradiotherapy (capecitabineand 50 Grays radiation) and performed 6-8 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy. The development of new endoscopic, surgical, radiation-based and chemotherapeutic modalities leads surgeons to envisage customized treatment to find the best compromise between functional and oncologic results according to the locoregional extension of the tumor. Superficial lesions are amenable to transanal excision. T2-3 tumors<4cm are amenable to rectal preservation when neoadjuvant treatment obtains a complete response, allowing local excision or close surveillance. Intensification endocavitary radiotherapy and induction and consolidation chemotherapy regimens to avoid recourse to salvage abdomino-perineal resection (APR) are under investigation. For locally advanced rectal cancers (T3-4 and all N+ irrespective of T), the following scenarios can be envisaged: for initially resectable tumors (T3N0, T1-T3N+, circumferential resection margin>2mm), neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone aims to minimize the risk of local recurrence while avoiding the sequelae of radiotherapy. In case of initially non-resectable tumors (T4, circumferential resection margin<1mm), induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy after short course radiotherapy provide better results than standard treatment in terms of complete response and recurrence-free survival, and should be routinely proposed in this indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Abdalla
- Department of digestive and oncological surgery, Bicêtre hospital, Paris Sud university hospital Group, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Paris Sud Faculty of Medicine, Paris Saclay university, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - S Benoist
- Department of digestive and oncological surgery, Bicêtre hospital, Paris Sud university hospital Group, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Paris Sud Faculty of Medicine, Paris Saclay university, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - J H Lefèvre
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Saint Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France; Faculty of Medicine Sorbonne University Paris VI, Paris, France
| | - C Penna
- Department of digestive and oncological surgery, Bicêtre hospital, Paris Sud university hospital Group, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Paris Sud Faculty of Medicine, Paris Saclay university, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - A Brouquet
- Department of digestive and oncological surgery, Bicêtre hospital, Paris Sud university hospital Group, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Paris Sud Faculty of Medicine, Paris Saclay university, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Kong JC, Soucisse M, Michael M, Tie J, Ngan SY, Leong T, McCormick J, Warrier SK, Heriot AG. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Oncological and Operative Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:7476-7486. [PMID: 33891203 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09837-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer refers to the administration of chemoradiotherapy plus chemotherapy before surgery. Recent studies have shown improved pathological complete response and disease-free survival with this approach. However, survival benefits remain unproven. Our objective is to present a metaanalysis of oncological outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholars. Studies comparing total neoadjuvant therapy with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included. Data extracted from the individual studies were pooled and a metaanalysis performed. The outcomes of interest are the rate of complete pathological response, nodal response, resection margin, anal preservation, anastomotic leak, local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS There were 15 comparative studies with 2437 patients in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and 2284 in the total neoadjuvant therapy group. The pooled complete pathological response was 22.3% in the total neoadjuvant therapy group, compared with 14.2% in the standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (p < 0.001). Even though there was no difference in local recurrence rate, there was a significantly lower rate of distant recurrence (OR 0.81, p = 0.02), and better 3-year disease-free survival (70.6% vs. 65.3%, respectively, p < 0.001) and overall survival (84.9% vs. 82.3%, respectively, p = 0.006), favoring the total neoadjuvant therapy group. Due to significant heterogeneity in the study protocols, there remains uncertainty on the ideal chemotherapy/radiotherapy sequence. CONCLUSIONS This study provides supporting evidence on the favorable immediate and intermediate oncological outcomes with the use of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Kong
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Mikael Soucisse
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Samuel Y Ngan
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Trevor Leong
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jacob McCormick
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|