151
|
Walker E, Fu Y, Sadowski DC, Stewart D, Tang P, Kaposhi B, Chappell H, Robson P, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. Delayed Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Alberta: A Framework for Analyzing Barriers to Diagnosis and Generating Evidence to Support Health System Changes Aimed at Reducing Time to Diagnosis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18179098. [PMID: 34501687 PMCID: PMC8430515 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18179098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The frequency of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis has decreased due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Health system planning is needed to address the backlog of undiagnosed patients. We developed a framework for analyzing barriers to diagnosis and estimating patient volumes under different system relaunch scenarios. This retrospective study included CRC cases from the Alberta Cancer Registry for the pre-pandemic (1 January 2016–4 March 2020) and intra-pandemic (5 March 2020–1 July 2020) periods. The data on all the diagnostic milestones in the year prior to a CRC diagnosis were obtained from administrative health data. The CRC diagnostic pathways were identified, and diagnostic intervals were measured. CRC diagnoses made during hospitalization were used as a proxy for severe disease at presentation. A modified Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted relative risk (adjRR) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the effect of the pandemic on the risk of hospital-based diagnoses. During the study period, 8254 Albertans were diagnosed with CRC. During the pandemic, diagnosis through asymptomatic screening decreased by 6·5%. The adjRR for hospital-based diagnoses intra-COVID-19 vs. pre-COVID-19 was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.49). Colonoscopies were identified as the main bottleneck for CRC diagnoses. To clear the backlog before progression is expected, high-risk subgroups should be targeted to double the colonoscopy yield for CRC diagnosis, along with the need for a 140% increase in monthly colonoscopy volumes for a period of 3 months. Given the substantial health system changes required, it is unlikely that a surge in CRC cases will be diagnosed over the coming months. Administrators in Alberta are using these findings to reduce wait times for CRC diagnoses and monitor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Walker
- Surveillance and Reporting, Advanced Analytics, Cancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3H1, Canada; (Y.F.); (B.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Yunting Fu
- Surveillance and Reporting, Advanced Analytics, Cancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3H1, Canada; (Y.F.); (B.K.)
| | - Daniel C. Sadowski
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2X8, Canada; (D.C.S.); (S.V.v.Z.)
| | - Douglas Stewart
- Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3H1, Canada;
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada;
| | - Patricia Tang
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada;
| | - Bethany Kaposhi
- Surveillance and Reporting, Advanced Analytics, Cancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3H1, Canada; (Y.F.); (B.K.)
| | - Heather Chappell
- Cancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3C6, Canada; (H.C.); (P.R.)
| | - Paula Robson
- Cancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3C6, Canada; (H.C.); (P.R.)
| | - Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2X8, Canada; (D.C.S.); (S.V.v.Z.)
- Digestive Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3E4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Potential applications of BPFP1 in Bcl-2 protein quantification, carcinoma cell visualization, cell sorting and early cancer diagnosis. Eur J Med Chem 2021; 224:113725. [PMID: 34375882 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Overexpression of the Bcl-2 protein has emerged as a hallmark of carcinoma cells and can be employed as a biochemical biomarker of these cells. Therefore, some Bcl-2 protein fluorescence probes (BPFPs) were designed for Bcl-2 protein quantification and carcinoma cells labeling. The high Bcl-2 protein binding affinity (Ki < 1 nM) and selectivity (over 50,000-fold Bcl-2 protein selectivity against Mcl-1 protein) of BPFP1 endow it with the ability to detect trace amounts of Bcl-2 protein. After being incubated with a range of concentrations of Bcl-2 protein, BPFP1 exhibited the desired fluorescence properties and its fluorescence intensity is proportional to Bcl-2 protein concentration. Therefore, BPFP1 provides a convenient approach for Bcl-2 protein quantification and we could determine the concentration of Bcl-2 protein based on the BPFP1's fluorescence intensity. Subsequent studies revealed that BPFP1 can fluorescently label carcinoma cells by binding to overexpressed Bcl-2 protein in living cells, and can distinguish carcinoma cells (HL-60 cells and ACHN cells) from normal-tissue cells (HUVECs) according to the different Bcl-2 protein expression levels between carcinoma cells and normal tissue cells. In the present study, BPFP1 represents a new tool for Bcl-2 protein quantification, carcinoma cell visualization and cell sorting. Moreover, BPFP1 can be used in the future for early cancer diagnosis by detecting carcinoma cells in patient tissues.
Collapse
|
153
|
Choi DT, Davila JA, Sansgiry S, David E, Singh H, El-Serag HB, Sada YHF. Factors Associated With Delay of Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1679-1687. [PMID: 32693047 PMCID: PMC7855025 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We examined the frequency of and factors associated with delays in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a cohort of patients with cirrhosis in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS In a retrospective study, we collected and analyzed data from the Veterans Health Administration's electronic health records. We used a multivariate logistic regression model to identify factors associated with a delay in diagnosis of HCC of more than 60 days following a red flag (defined as the earliest date at which a diagnosis of HCC could have been made, based on American Association for the Study of Liver Disease 2005 guidelines). We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the effects of delayed diagnosis on survival, adjusting for patient and provider characteristics. RESULTS Among 655 patients with cirrhosis and a diagnosis of HCC from 2006 through 2011, 46.9% had a delay in diagnosis of more than 60 days following a red flag for HCC. Delays in diagnosis for more than 60 days were significantly associated with lack of provider adherence to the guidelines (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.82; 95% CI, 3.12-7.45), a diagnostic imaging evaluation instead of only measurement of alfa fetoprotein (adjusted OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.09-6.24), and diagnosis as an incidental finding during examination for an unrelated medical problem (compared with an HCC-related assessment) (adjusted OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.09-4.67). Diagnostic delays of 60 days or more were associated with lower mortality compared to patients without a delay in diagnosis (unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.68 and adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50-0.78). CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of veterans with cirrhosis have delays in diagnosis of HCC of 60 days or more after a red flag, defined by guidelines. Interventions are needed to improve timely follow-up of red flags for HCC and adherence to guidelines, to increase early detection of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra T. Choi
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Jessica A. Davila
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Shubhada Sansgiry
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Veterans Affairs South Central Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Eric David
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hardeep Singh
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Hashem B. El-Serag
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Yvonne Hsiao-Fan Sada
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Dereje N, Addissie A, Worku A, Assefa M, Abraha A, Tigeneh W, Kantelhardt EJ, Jemal A. Extent and Predictors of Delays in Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Population-Based Prospective Study. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 6:277-284. [PMID: 32109158 PMCID: PMC7055465 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.19.00242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A substantial proportion of cervical cancers are diagnosed at advanced stage in Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the extent and predictors of delays in cervical cancer diagnosis in Addis Ababa. PATIENTS AND METHODS We prospectively recruited 231 patients with cervical cancer diagnosed from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018, in 7 health facilities in Addis Ababa, representing 99% of all cervical cancers recorded in the Addis Ababa population-based cancer registry. A structured questionnaire on patients’ experience was administered face to face by trained interviewers. Health-seeking intervals > 90 days (date from recognition of symptoms to medical consultation) and diagnostic intervals > 30 days (dates from medical consultation to diagnostic confirmation) were categorized as delayed. Factors associated with these delays were assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression models. RESULTS The median health-seeking and diagnostic intervals for patients with cervical cancer in Addis Ababa were 10 and 97 days, respectively. Approximately one quarter of the patients were delayed in seeking medical consultation, and three fourths of the patients had delayed diagnostic confirmation. Factors associated with health-seeking delays included poor cervical cancer awareness, practicing of religious rituals, and waiting for additional symptoms before visiting a health facility. Factors associated with diagnostic delays included first contact with primary health care units and visits to ≥ 4 different health facilities before diagnosis. CONCLUSION A considerable proportion of patients with cervical cancer in Addis Ababa have delays in seeking medical care and diagnostic conformation. These findings reinforce the need for programs to enhance awareness about cervical cancer signs and symptoms and the importance of early diagnosis in the community and among health care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nebiyu Dereje
- School of Public Health, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.,Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Adamu Addissie
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Alemayehu Worku
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Mathewos Assefa
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Aynalem Abraha
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Wondemagegnehu Tigeneh
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
- Department of Gynaecology and Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Mazza D, Lin X, Walter FM, Young JM, Barnes DJ, Mitchell PL, Brijnath B, Martin A, O'Byrne KJ, Emery JD. Do ethnic patients report longer lung cancer intervals than Anglo-Australian patients?: Findings from a prospective, observational cohort study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13492. [PMID: 34312918 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lung cancer patients from ethnic minorities have poorer outcomes than their Caucasian counterparts. We compared lung cancer intervals between culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) and Anglo-Australian patients to identify ethnic disparities. METHODS This was a prospective, observational cohort study comprising a patient survey and reviews of patients' hospital and general practice records. Across three states, 577 (407 Anglo-Australian and 170 CALD) patients were recruited and their hospital records reviewed. The survey was returned by 189 (135 Anglo-Australian and 54 CALD) patients, and a review was completed by general practitioners (GPs) of 99 (76 Anglo-Australian and 23 CALD) patients. Survival and Cox regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS CALD patients had longer hospital diagnostic interval [median 30 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) 26-34] than Anglo-Australian patients (median 17, 95% CI 14-20), p = 0.005, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.32 (95% CI 1.09-1.60). This difference persisted after relevant factors were taken into consideration, adjusted HR = 1.26 (95% CI 1.03-1.54, p = 0.022). CALD patients also reported longer prehospital intervals; however, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Target interventions need to be developed to address ethnic disparity in hospital diagnostic interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Xiaoping Lin
- Department of General Practice & Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fiona M Walter
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jane M Young
- Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David J Barnes
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul L Mitchell
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health &University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bianca Brijnath
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Martin
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kenneth J O'Byrne
- Princess Alexandra Hospital & Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Mburu W, Boamah Mensah AB, Virnig B, Amuasi JH, Awuah B, Porta CM, Osei-Bonsu E, Kulasingam S. Pathways to Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Among Women in Ghana: A Qualitative Study. WOMEN'S HEALTH REPORTS 2021; 2:234-244. [PMID: 34318293 PMCID: PMC8310750 DOI: 10.1089/whr.2020.0117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among Ghanaian women and most women are identified once they develop symptoms. Women then must navigate a complex health care system to get diagnosed and receive orthodox medicine. We describe Ghanaian women's pathways of care from breast cancer-related symptom detection to treatment receipt. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using an empirical phenomenological approach. We used a purposive sampling technique to recruit 31 women with breast cancer who were receiving treatment at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. They participated in semistructured in-depth interviews between November 2019 and March 2020. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a deductive coding approach. Results: Women navigate approximately nine steps from symptom detection to receiving orthodox breast cancer treatment. The breast cancer care pathway is not linear and women frequently move among different management approaches, including alternative therapy (faith healing and traditional herbal healing). All the women detected the symptoms themselves. Some of the women sought orthodox medicine due to information from the media. Conclusions: Alternative therapy providers play a critical role in the breast cancer diagnosis and care pathways in Ghana underscoring the need to formally integrate them into the health care system. Breast cancer awareness programs through the media and educational programs aimed at alternative therapy providers may reduce the time from symptom detection to receipt of orthodox medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waruiru Mburu
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Beth Virnig
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - John H Amuasi
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Baffour Awuah
- Ministry of Health, Accra, Ghana.,Department of Medical Oncology and Radiation, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Carolyn M Porta
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ernest Osei-Bonsu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiation, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Shalini Kulasingam
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Gbenonsi G, Boucham M, Belrhiti Z, Nejjari C, Huybrechts I, Khalis M. Health system factors that influence diagnostic and treatment intervals in women with breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1325. [PMID: 34229634 PMCID: PMC8259007 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11296-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer patients in sub-Saharan Africa experience long time intervals between their first presentation to a health care facility and the start of cancer treatment. The role of the health system in the increasing treatment time intervals has not been widely investigated. This review aimed to identify existing information on health system factors that influence diagnostic and treatment intervals in women with breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa to contribute to the reorientation of health policies in the region. METHODS PubMed, ScienceDirect, African Journals Online, Mendeley, ResearchGate and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant studies published between 2010 and July 2020. We performed a qualitative synthesis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Related health system factors were extracted and classified according to the World Health Organization's six health system building blocks. The quality of qualitative and quantitative studies was assessed by using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program Quality-Assessment Tool and the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool, respectively. In addition, we used the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research tool to assess the evidence for each qualitative finding. RESULTS From 14,184 identified studies, this systematic review included 28 articles. We identified a total of 36 barriers and 8 facilitators that may influence diagnostic and treatment intervals in women with breast cancer. The principal health system factors identified were mainly related to human resources and service delivery, particularly difficulty accessing health care, diagnostic errors, poor management, and treatment cost. CONCLUSION The present review shows that diagnostic and treatment intervals among women with breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa are influenced by many related health system factors. Policy makers in sub-Saharan Africa need to tackle the financial accessibility to breast cancer treatment by adequate universal health coverage policies and reinforce the clinical competencies for health workers to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate care for women with breast cancer in this region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Gbenonsi
- International School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco.
| | - Mouna Boucham
- International School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco
| | | | - Chakib Nejjari
- International School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco
| | | | - Mohamed Khalis
- International School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Soomers V, Husson O, Young R, Desar I, Van der Graaf W. The sarcoma diagnostic interval: a systematic review on length, contributing factors and patient outcomes. ESMO Open 2021; 5:S2059-7029(20)30008-9. [PMID: 32079621 PMCID: PMC7046415 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Sarcomas are rare and heterogeneous mesenchymal tumours of soft tissue or bone, making them prone to late diagnosis. In other malignancies, early diagnosis has an impact on stage of disease, complexity of therapeutic procedures, survival and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Little is known about what length of diagnostic interval should be considered as delay in patients with bone (BS) or soft tissue sarcomas (STS). To quantify total interval (defined as time from first symptom to histological diagnosis) and its components, identify contributing factors to its length and determine the impact on patients’ outcome in terms of mortality and HRQoL. A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Seventy-six articles out of 2310 met the predefined inclusion criteria. Total intervals, varied broadly; 9–120.4 weeks for BS and 4.3–614.9 weeks for STS. Older age and no initial radiological examinations were contributing factors for a long interval in BS, while in STS results were conflicting. The impact of length of total interval on clinical outcomes in terms of survival and morbidity remains ambiguous; no clear relation could be identified for both BS and STS. No study examined the impact on HRQoL. The length of total interval is variable in BS as well as STS. Its effect on outcomes is contradictory. There is no definition of a clinically relevant cut-off point that discriminates between a short or long total interval. Prospero: CRD42017062492.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Soomers
- Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, London, UK.,Psychosocial research and epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robin Young
- Medical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ingrid Desar
- Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Winette Van der Graaf
- Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leewenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Virgilsen LF, Pedersen AF, Vedsted P, Petersen GS, Jensen H. Alignment between the patient's cancer worry and the GP's cancer suspicion and the association with the interval between first symptom presentation and referral: a cross-sectional study in Denmark. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:129. [PMID: 34167486 PMCID: PMC8228922 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01480-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND General practitioners (GPs) have a key role in the diagnosis of cancer. It is crucial to identify factors influencing the decision to refer for suspected cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the alignment between the patient's cancer worry and the GP's suspicion of cancer in the first clinical encounter and the association with the time interval from the first symptom presentation until the first referral to specialist care, i.e. the primary care interval (PCI). METHOD The study was performed as a cross-sectional study using survey data on patients diagnosed with incident cancer in 2010 or 2016 and their GPs in Denmark. We defined four alignment groups: 1) patient worry and GP suspicion, 2) GP suspicion only, 3) patient worry only, and 4) none of the two. A long PCI was defined as an interval longer than the 75th percentile. RESULTS Among the 3333 included patients, both patient worry and GP suspicion was seen in 39.5%, only GP suspicion was seen in 28.2%, only patient worry was seen in 13.6%, and neither patient worry nor GP suspicion was seen in 18.2%. The highest likelihood of long PCI was observed in group 4 (group 4 vs. group 1: PPR 3.99 (95% CI 3.34-4.75)), mostly pronounced for easy-to-diagnose cancer types. CONCLUSION Misalignment between the patient's worry and the GP's suspicion was common at the first cancer-related encounter. Importance should be given to the patient interview, due to a potential delayed GP referral among patients diagnosed with "easy-to-diagnose" cancer types presenting with unspecific symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Flytkjær Virgilsen
- Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | - Anette Fischer Pedersen
- Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, 8200, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Peter Vedsted
- Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, 8200, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | | | - Henry Jensen
- Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
McCutchan G, Weiss B, Quinn-Scoggins H, Dao A, Downs T, Deng Y, Ho H, Trung L, Emery J, Brain K. Psychosocial influences on help-seeking behaviour for cancer in low-income and lower middle-income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2020-004213. [PMID: 33531348 PMCID: PMC7868297 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Starting cancer treatment early can improve outcomes. Psychosocial factors influencing patients’ medical help-seeking decisions may be particularly important in low and lower middle-income countries (LMIC) where cancer outcomes are poor. Comprehensive review evidence is needed to understand the psychosocial influences on medical help-seeking for cancer symptoms, attendance for diagnosis and starting cancer treatment. Methods Mixed-methods systematic review registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018099057). Peer-reviewed databases were searched until April 2020 for studies assessing patient-related barriers and facilitators to medical help-seeking for cancer symptoms, diagnosis and treatment in adults (18+ years) living in LMICs. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Data were synthesised using meta-analytic techniques, meta-ethnography or narrative synthesis as appropriate. Results Of 3963 studies identified, 64 were included. In quantitative studies, use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM) was associated with 3.60 higher odds of prolonged medical help-seeking (95% CI 2.06 to 5.14). Qualitative studies suggested that use of TCAM was a key barrier to medical help-seeking in LMICs, and was influenced by causal beliefs, cultural norms and a preference to avoid biomedical treatment. Women face particular barriers, such as needing family permission for help-seeking, and higher stigma for cancer treatment. Additional psychosocial barriers included: shame and stigma associated with cancer such as fear of social rejection (eg, divorce/disownment); limited knowledge of cancer and associated symptoms; and financial and access barriers associated with travel and appointments. Conclusion Due to variable quality of studies, future evaluations would benefit from using validated measures and robust study designs. The use of TCAM and gender influences appear to be important barriers to help-seeking in LMIC. Cancer awareness campaigns developed with LMIC communities need to address cultural influences on medical help-seeking behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace McCutchan
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK .,Wales Cancer Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Bahr Weiss
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Harriet Quinn-Scoggins
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.,PRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Anh Dao
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Tom Downs
- Department of Acute Medicine, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Yunfeng Deng
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ha Ho
- Center for Research, Information and Services in Psychology, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Lam Trung
- Danang Psychiatric Hospital, Da Nang, Vietnam
| | - Jon Emery
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Brain
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Price S, Abel GA, Hamilton W. Guideline interval: A new time interval in the diagnostic pathway for symptomatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 73:101969. [PMID: 34157609 PMCID: PMC8316604 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A standard measure of the cancer diagnostic pathway, diagnostic interval, is the time from "first presentation of cancer" to diagnosis. Cancer presentation may be unclear in patients with multimorbidity or non-specific symptoms, signs or test results ("features"). We propose an alternative, guideline interval, with a more certain start date; namely, when the patient first meets suspected-cancer criteria for investigation or referral. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and English cancer registry data. Participants, aged ≥55 years, had diagnostic codes for oesophagogastric cancers in 1/1/12-31/12/17. Features of oesophagogastric cancer in the year before diagnosis were identified from CPRD codes for dysphagia, haematemesis, upper-abdominal mass or pain, low haemoglobin, reflux, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, weight loss or thrombocytosis. Diagnostic interval was the time from first feature to diagnosis; guidance interval, the time from first meeting criteria in NICE suspected-cancer guidance to diagnosis. Multimorbidity burden was quantified using Adjusted Clinical Groups®. Accelerated failure-time models explored associations between multimorbidity burden and length of both diagnostic and guideline interval. RESULTS There were 3,793 eligible participants (69.0 % male), mean age 74.1 years (SD 10.5). 3,097 (81.7 %) presented with ≥1 feature in the year before diagnosis, and 1,990 (52.5 %) met NICE suspected-cancer criteria. The median for both intervals was 11 days in healthy users, and rose with increasing morbidity burden. At very high multimorbidity burden, diagnostic interval was 5.47 (95%CI 3.25-9.20) times longer and guideline interval was 3.91 (2.63-5.80) times longer than for healthy users. CONCLUSIONS Guideline interval is proposed as a new measure of the cancer diagnostic pathway. It has a more certain start date than diagnostic interval, and is lengthened less than diagnostic interval in people with a very high multimorbidity burden. Guideline interval has potential for assessing the implementation of suspected-cancer policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Price
- College House, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
| | - Gary A Abel
- Smeall Building, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
| | - Willie Hamilton
- College House, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Baymler Lundberg AS, Esbensen BA, Jensen MB, Hauge EM, de Thurah A. Facilitators and barriers in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis as described by general practitioners: a Danish study based on focus group interviews. Scand J Prim Health Care 2021; 39:222-229. [PMID: 33905289 PMCID: PMC8293939 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1913925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) on facilitators and barriers in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DESIGN Qualitative study based on focus group interviews, and using latent thematic analysis. SETTING General practices from Central Region Denmark. SUBJECTS Eleven GPs participated in three different focus groups. Forty percent were female, the mean age was 53 years (range 37-64), and the mean since medical licensing was 16 years (range 5-23). Sixty percent of the GPs worked in an area served by a university hospital, and 40% were served by a regional hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Themes describing experiences and reflections about facilitators and barriers in diagnosing Rheumatoid Arthritis. RESULTS Four themes emerged: (A) If the patient is not a textbook example, (B) The importance of maintaining the gatekeeper function, (C) Difficulties in referral of patients to the rheumatologist, and (D) Laboratory tests-can they be trusted? Barriers were identified in all themes, but facilitators only in A, C, and D. The overarching theme was Like finding a needle in a haystack. CONCLUSION The GPs found several barriers for diagnosing RA (symptom awareness, GP's gatekeeper function, suboptimal collaboration with rheumatologists and limitations in laboratory tests). They identified education, more specific tests and better access to rheumatologists as possible facilitators for diagnosing RA. To facilitate earlier referral of suspected RA in general practice and strengthen mutual information and collaboration, future research should focus on these facilitators and barriers.KeypointsEarly diagnosis is essential for the prognosis of RA, and the diagnostic process begins in general practice.Suggested facilitators: training courses in interpretation of laboratory tests and the clinical manifestation of RA, and videos on joint examinations.Suggested barriers: compliance with the gatekeeper function, suboptimal collaboration with rheumatologists, limitations of laboratory tests, and diversity of clinical manifestations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Sofie Baymler Lundberg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University,Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bente Appel Esbensen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Ellen Margrethe Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- CONTACT Annette de Thurah Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Wilcock J, Grafton-Clarke C. Diagnostic intervals in oropharyngeal cancers from a primary care perspective: a ten-year case note review. Br Dent J 2021:10.1038/s41415-021-2947-6. [PMID: 33986482 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-2947-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background Rates of oropharyngeal (OP) cancer are increasing and mortality is related to stage at diagnosis. Early diagnosis is vital to improving patient outcomes.Aim To describe current general practice pathways and time intervals in OP cancer and: a) compare to current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance to refer from general practitioners (GPs) to general medical dentists (dentists); and b) referral pathways for pharyngeal cancers.Design and setting A ten-year retrospective study of patients diagnosed with OP cancer in one suburban general practice in England using GP notes, including secondary care correspondence.Results There were 12 cases of OP cancer; six oral and six pharyngeal. There were marked differences in referral pathways and time intervals for people with visible, or palpable, oral cancers and those with non-visible, or impalpable, pharyngeal cancers. No one had GP to dentist referral. General practice 'safety-netting' or follow-up was not commonly recorded.Conclusion GPs are pivotal in diagnosing symptomatic OP cancers. General practice and dental teams encountering symptoms of uncertain aetiology (for example, pharyngitis) should offer safety-netting to shorten patient intervals to re-attendance. Pathways for oral cancer referral were usually clear and linear. Pathways for pharyngeal cancer were usually complex, with much longer time intervals in primary and secondary care, and would benefit from a single national referral pathway to ENT.
Collapse
|
164
|
Nnaji CA, Kuodi P, Walter FM, Moodley J. Timeliness of diagnosis of breast and cervical cancers and associated factors in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044093. [PMID: 33958339 PMCID: PMC8103943 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast and cervical cancer are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in women globally, with disproportionately high burdens in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). While the incidence of both cancers increases across LMICs, many cases continue to go undiagnosed or diagnosed late. The aim of this review is to comprehensively map the current evidence on the time to breast or cervical cancer diagnosis and its associated factors in LMICs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This scoping review (ScR) will be informed by Arksey and O'Malley's enhanced ScR methodology framework. It will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We will conduct a comprehensive search of the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, Scopus and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Two reviewers will independently screen all abstracts and full texts using predefined inclusion criteria. All publications describing the time to diagnosis and its associated factors in the contexts of breast or cervical cancer will be considered for inclusion. Evidence will be narratively synthesised and analysed using a predefined conceptual framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As this is a ScR of publicly available data, with no primary data collection, it will not require ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated widely through a peer-reviewed publication and forums such as conferences and community engagement sessions. This review will provide a user-friendly evidence summary for understanding the enormity of diagnostic delays and associated factors for breast and cervical cancers in LMICs, while helping to inform policy actions and implementation of interventions for addressing such delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chukwudi A Nnaji
- Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- Women's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Paul Kuodi
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Lira University, Lira, Uganda
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jennifer Moodley
- Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- Women's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- SAMRC Gynaecology Cancer Research Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Laake JP, Vulkan D, Quaife SL, Hamilton WT, Martins T, Waller J, Parmar D, Sasieni P, Duffy SW. Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:e339-e346. [PMID: 33875418 PMCID: PMC8087296 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x713489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For some common cancers, survival is lower in the UK than in comparable high-income countries. AIM To assess the effectiveness of a targeted postal intervention (to promote awareness of cancer symptoms and earlier help seeking) on patient consultation rates. DESIGN AND SETTING A two-arm randomised controlled trial was carried out on patients aged 50-84 years registered at 23 general practices in rural and urban areas of Greater London, Greater Manchester, and the North East of England. METHOD Patients who had not had a consultation at their general practice in the previous 12 months and had at least two other risk factors for late presentation with cancer were randomised to intervention and control arms. The intervention consisted of a posted letter and leaflet. Primary outcome was the number of consultations at the practice with patients randomised to each arm in the 6 months subsequent to posting the intervention. All patients with outcome data were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. RESULTS In total, 1513 patients were individually randomised to the intervention (n = 783) and control (n = 730) arms between Nov 2016 - May 2017; outcome data were available for 749 and 705 patients, respectively, with a statistically significantly higher rate of consultation in the intervention arm compared with the control arm: 436 versus 335 consultations (relative risk 1.40, 95% confidence interval = 1.11 to 1.77, P = 0.004). There was, however, no difference in the numbers of patients consulting. CONCLUSION Targeted interventions of this nature can change behaviour; there is a need to develop interventions that can be more effective at engaging patients with primary care. This study demonstrates that targeted interventions promoting both awareness of possible cancer symptoms and earlier health seeking, can change behaviour. There is a need to develop and test interventions that can be more effective at engaging the most at-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pierre Laake
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London; medical student, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry
| | - Daniel Vulkan
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London
| | - Samantha L Quaife
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London; senior research fellow, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London
| | | | | | - Jo Waller
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London; reader in cancer behavioural science, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London
| | - Dharmishta Parmar
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London
| | | | - Stephen W Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Difficulties in Accessing Cancer Care in a Small Island State: A Community-Based Pilot Study of Cancer Survivors in Saint Lucia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18094770. [PMID: 33947123 PMCID: PMC8124473 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Developing robust systems for cancer care delivery is essential to reduce the high cancer mortality in small island developing states (SIDS). Indigenous data are scarce, but community-based cancer research can inform care in SIDS where formal research capacity is lacking, and we describe the experiences of cancer survivors in Saint Lucia in accessing health services. Purposive and snowball sampling was used to constitute a sample of survivors for interviews. Subjects were interviewed with a questionnaire regarding socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, health services accessed (physicians, tests, treatment), and personal appraisal of experience. We recruited 50 survivors (13 men, 37 women). Only 52% of first presentations were with general practitioners. The mean turnaround for biopsy results in Saint Lucia was three times longer than overseas (p = 0.0013). Approximately half of survivors commenced treatment more than one month following diagnosis (median of 32 days, IQR 19-86 days), and 56% of survivors traveled out-of-country for treatment. Most survivors (60%) paid for care with family/friends support, followed by savings and medical insurance (38% each). In conclusion, cancer survivors in Saint Lucia are faced with complex circumstances, including access-to-care and health consequences. This study can guide future research, and possibly guide practice improvements in the near term.
Collapse
|
167
|
Evaluating the delay prior to primary care presentation in patients with lung cancer: a cohort study. BJGP Open 2021; 5:BJGPO.2020.0130. [PMID: 33293412 PMCID: PMC8170596 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2020.0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about 'within-patient delay', which is the time from first symptom of lung cancer to contacting primary care. Aim Primary outcomes were length of within-patient delay and the proportion of total delay it represents. Secondary outcomes were factors causing delay and survival. Design & setting A cohort study of newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer at two hospitals in Norfolk. Method Patients completed questionnaires regarding onset of symptoms, whether they had delayed, and their reasons. GPs completed correlating questionnaires. Pathway times and other data were extracted from cancer registry and hospital records, and outcomes obtained prospectively. Factors causing delay were compared using ratios of geometric means. Results In 379 patients, mean within-patient delay and pre-secondary care delay were 188.6 days and 241 days (61.4% and 78.5% of total delay, respectively). It was found that 38.8% of patients felt they had delayed. Patient-related causes of delay were denial (ratio of means [ROM] = 4.36; P = 0.002, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.71 to 11.1); anxiety (ROM = 3.36; P = 0.026; 95% CI = 1.16 to 9.76); non-recognition of symptoms (ROM = 2.80; P = 0.004; 95% CI = 1.41 to 5.59); and smoking (ROM = 1.76; P = 0.021; 95% CI = 1.09 to 2.86), respectively. These symptoms were associated with delay: finger swelling or discomfort (ROM = 2.72; P = 0.009, 95% CI = 1.29 to 5.74); cough (ROM = 2.53; P<0.001; 95% CI = 1.52 to 4.19); weight loss (ROM = 2.41; P<0.001; 95% CI = 1.49 to 3.88); weakness (ROM = 2.35; P = 0.001; 95% CI = 1.45 to 3.83); dyspnoea (ROM = 2.30; P = 0.001; 95% CI = 1.40 to 3.80); voice change (ROM = 1.90; P = 0.010; 95% CI = 1.17 to 3.10); and sputum (ROM = 1.66; P = 0.039; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.67), respectively, also having more than five symptoms (compared with 1–3) (ROM = 3.69; P<0.001; 95% CI = 2.05 to 6.64). No overall relation between within-patient delay and survival was seen. Conclusion Using smoking registers, awareness literature, and self-care manuals, primary care staff could liaise with people who have ever smoked regarding their symptoms to ensure early referral to secondary care.
Collapse
|
168
|
Al Achkar M, Zigman Suchsland M, Walter FM, Neal RD, Goulart BHL, Thompson MJ. Experiences along the diagnostic pathway for patients with advanced lung cancer in the USA: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045056. [PMID: 33888529 PMCID: PMC8070881 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with lung cancer are diagnosed at advanced stages. However, the advent of oral targeted therapies has improved the prognosis of many patients with lung cancer. PURPOSE We aimed to understand the diagnostic experiences of patients with advanced lung cancer with oncogenic mutations. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with oncogenic alterations. Patients were recruited from online support groups within the USA. Interviews were conducted remotely or in person. Analysis used an iterative inductive and deductive process. Themes were mapped to the Model for Pathways to Treatment. RESULTS 40 patients (12 male and 28 female) with a median age of 48 were included. We identified nine distinct themes. During the 'patient interval', individuals became concerned about symptoms, but often attributed them to other causes. Prolonged or more severe symptoms prompted care-seeking. During the 'primary care interval', doctors initially treated for illnesses other than cancer. Discovery of an imaging abnormality was a turning point in diagnostic pathways. Occasionally, severity of symptoms prompted patients to seek emergency care. During the 'secondary care interval', obtaining tissue samples was pivotal in confirming diagnosis. Delays in accessing oncology care sometimes led to patient distress. Obtaining genetic testing was crucial in directing patients to receive targeted treatments. CONCLUSIONS Patients experienced multiple different routes to their diagnosis. Some patients perceived delays, inefficiencies and lack of coordination, which could be distressing. Shifting the stage of diagnosis of lung cancer to optimise the impact of targeted therapies will require concerted efforts in early detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morhaf Al Achkar
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Fiona M Walter
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Matthew J Thompson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Disbeschl S, Surgey A, Roberts JL, Hendry A, Lewis R, Goulden N, Hoare Z, Williams N, Anthony BF, Edwards RT, Law RJ, Hiscock J, Carson-Stevens A, Neal RD, Wilkinson C. Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:100. [PMID: 33883033 PMCID: PMC8059131 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to the rest of Europe, the UK has relatively poor cancer outcomes, with late diagnosis and a slow referral process being major contributors. General practitioners (GPs) are often faced with patients presenting with a multitude of non-specific symptoms that could be cancer. Safety netting can be used to manage diagnostic uncertainty by ensuring patients with vague symptoms are appropriately monitored, which is now even more crucial due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its major impact on cancer referrals. The ThinkCancer! workshop is an educational behaviour change intervention aimed at the whole general practice team, designed to improve primary care approaches to ensure timely diagnosis of cancer. The workshop will consist of teaching and awareness sessions, the appointment of a Safety Netting Champion and the development of a bespoke Safety Netting Plan and has been adapted so it can be delivered remotely. This study aims to assess the feasibility of the ThinkCancer! intervention for a future definitive randomised controlled trial. METHODS The ThinkCancer! study is a randomised, multisite feasibility trial, with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis. Twenty-three to 30 general practices will be recruited across Wales, randomised in a ratio of 2:1 of intervention versus control who will follow usual care. The workshop will be delivered by a GP educator and will be adapted iteratively throughout the trial period. Baseline practice characteristics will be collected via questionnaire. We will also collect primary care intervals (PCI), 2-week wait (2WW) referral rates, conversion rates and detection rates at baseline and 6 months post-randomisation. Participant feedback, researcher reflections and economic costings will be collected following each workshop. A process evaluation will assess implementation using an adapted Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire and qualitative interviews. An economic feasibility analysis will inform a future economic evaluation. DISCUSSION This study will allow us to test and further develop a novel evidenced-based complex intervention aimed at general practice teams to expedite the diagnosis of cancer in primary care. The results from this study will inform the future design of a full-scale definitive phase III trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04823559 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Disbeschl
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Cambrian 2, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK.
| | - Alun Surgey
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Cambrian 2, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK
| | - Jessica L Roberts
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Cambrian 2, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK
| | - Annie Hendry
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Cambrian 2, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK
| | - Ruth Lewis
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Cambrian 2, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK
| | - Nia Goulden
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health (NWORTH), Bangor University, The Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health (NWORTH), Bangor University, The Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Nefyn Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Bethany Fern Anthony
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Bangor University, The Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Bangor University, The Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Rebecca-Jane Law
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Cambrian 2, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK
| | - Julia Hiscock
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Cambrian 2, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK
| | - Andrew Carson-Stevens
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UHW Main Building, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Richard D Neal
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Clare Wilkinson
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Cambrian 2, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Petrova D, Pollán M, Rodriguez-Barranco M, Garrido D, Borrás JM, Sánchez MJ. Anticipated help-seeking for cancer symptoms before and after the coronavirus pandemic: results from the Onco-barometer population survey in Spain. Br J Cancer 2021; 124:2017-2025. [PMID: 33854210 PMCID: PMC8044659 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01382-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The patient interval—the time patients wait before consulting their physician after noticing cancer symptoms—contributes to diagnostic delays. We compared anticipated help-seeking times for cancer symptoms and perceived barriers to help-seeking before and after the coronavirus pandemic. Methods Two waves (pre-Coronavirus: February 2020, N = 3269; and post-Coronavirus: August 2020, N = 1500) of the Spanish Onco-barometer population survey were compared. The international ABC instrument was administered. Pre–post comparisons were performed using multiple logistic and Poisson regression models. Results There was a consistent and significant increase in anticipated times to help-seeking for 12 of 13 cancer symptoms, with the largest increases for breast changes (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.22–1–96) and unexplained bleeding (OR = 1.50, 1.26–1.79). Respondents were more likely to report barriers to help-seeking in the post wave, most notably worry about what the doctor may find (OR = 1.58, 1.35–1.84) and worry about wasting the doctor’s time (OR = 1.48, 1.25–1.74). Women and older individuals were the most affected. Conclusions Participants reported longer waiting times to help-seeking for cancer symptoms after the pandemic. There is an urgent need for public interventions encouraging people to consult their physicians with symptoms suggestive of cancer and counteracting the main barriers perceived during the pandemic situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dafina Petrova
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | - Marina Pollán
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,National Center for Epidemiology, Health Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Rodriguez-Barranco
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. .,Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain. .,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
| | | | - Josep M Borrás
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Hospitalet, Spain.,NHS Cancer Strategy, Ministry of Health, Hospitalet, Spain
| | - Maria-José Sánchez
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Blackmore T, Chepulis L, Keenan R, Kidd J, Stokes T, Weller D, Emery J, Lawrenson R. How do colorectal cancer patients rate their GP: a mixed methods study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:67. [PMID: 33832431 PMCID: PMC8034162 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01427-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New Zealand (NZ) has a high incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and low rates of early diagnosis. With screening not yet nationwide, the majority of CRC is diagnosed through general practice. A good patient-general practitioner (GP) relationship can facilitate prompt diagnosis, but when there is a breakdown in this relationship, delays can occur. Delayed diagnosis of CRC in NZ receives a disproportionally high number of complaints directed against GPs, suggesting deficits in the patient-GP connection. We aimed to investigate patient-reported confidence and ratings of their GP following the diagnostic process. METHODS This study is a mixed methods analysis of responses to a structured questionnaire and free text comments from patients newly diagnosed with CRC in the Midland region of NZ. A total of 195 patients responded to the structured questionnaire, and 113 patients provided additional free text comments. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population and chi square analysis determined the statistical significance of factors possibly linked to delay. Free text comments were analysed using a thematic framework. RESULTS Most participants rated their GP as 'Very good/Good' at communication with patients about their health conditions and involving them in decisions about their care, and 6.7% of participants rated their overall level of confidence and trust in their GP as 'Not at all'. Age, gender, ethnicity and a longer diagnostic interval were associated with lower confidence and trust. Free text comments were grouped in to three themes: 1. GP Interpersonal skills; (communication, listening, taking patient symptoms seriously), 2. Technical competence; (speed of referral, misdiagnoses, lack of physical examination), and 3. Organisation of general practice care; (appointment length, getting an appointment, continuity of care). CONCLUSIONS Māori, females, and younger participants were more likely to report low confidence and trust in their GP. Participants associate a poor diagnostic experience with deficits in the interpersonal and technical skills of their GP, and health system factors within general practice. Short appointment times, access to appointments and poor GP continuity are important components of how patients assess their experience and are particularly important to ensure equal access for Māori patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Blackmore
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
| | - Lynne Chepulis
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Rawiri Keenan
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Jacquie Kidd
- Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Tim Stokes
- Department of General Practice and Rural Health, Dunedin, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - David Weller
- Centre for Population Health Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Jon Emery
- Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ross Lawrenson
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Molenaar CJL, Janssen L, van der Peet DL, Winter DC, Roumen RMH, Slooter GD. Conflicting Guidelines: A Systematic Review on the Proper Interval for Colorectal Cancer Treatment. World J Surg 2021; 45:2235-2250. [PMID: 33813632 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06075-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) is a quality indicator in oncological care. However, patients with CRC might benefit more from preoperative optimization rather than rapid treatment initiation. The objectives of this study are (1) to determine the definition of the CRC treatment interval, (2) to study international recommendations regarding this interval and (3) to study whether length of the interval is associated with outcome. METHODS We performed a systematic search of the literature in June 2020 through MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, complemented with a web search and a survey among colorectal surgeons worldwide. Full-text papers including subjects with CRC and a description of the treatment interval were included. RESULTS Definition of the treatment interval varies widely in published studies, especially due to different starting points of the interval. Date of diagnosis is often used as start of the interval, determined with date of pathological confirmation. The end of the interval is rather consistently determined with date of initiation of any primary treatment. Recommendations on the timeline of the treatment interval range between and within countries from two weeks between decision to treat and surgery, to treatment within seven weeks after pathological diagnosis. Finally, there is no decisive evidence that a longer treatment interval is associated with worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS The interval from diagnosis to treatment for CRC treatment could be used for prehabilitation to benefit patient recovery. It may be that this strategy is more beneficial than urgently proceeding with treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte J L Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Loes Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Desmond C Winter
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, D04T6F4, Ireland
| | - Rudi M H Roumen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Brice SN, Harper P, Crosby T, Gartner D, Arruda E, England T, Aspland E, Foley K. Factors influencing the delivery of cancer pathways: a summary of the literature. J Health Organ Manag 2021; 35:121-139. [PMID: 33818048 PMCID: PMC9136872 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-05-2020-0192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aims to summarise the literature on cancer care pathways at the diagnostic and treatment phases. The objectives are to find factors influencing the delivery of cancer care pathways; to highlight any interrelating factors; to find gaps in the literature concerning areas of research; to summarise the strategies and recommendations implemented in the studies. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH The study used a qualitative approach and developed a causal loop diagram to summarise the current literature on cancer care pathways, from screening and diagnosis to treatment. A total of 46 papers was finally included in the analysis, which highlights the recurring themes in the literature. FINDINGS The study highlights the myriad areas of research applied to cancer care pathways. Factors influencing the delivery of cancer care pathways were classified into different albeit interrelated themes. These include access barriers to care, hospital emergency admissions, fast track diagnostics, delay in diagnosis, waiting time to treatment and strategies to increase system efficiency. ORIGINALITY/VALUE As far as the authors know, this is the first study to present a visual representation of the complex relationship between factors influencing the delivery of cancer care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Harper
- School of Mathematics
,
Cardiff University
, Cardiff,
UK
| | | | - Daniel Gartner
- School of Mathematics
,
Cardiff University
, Cardiff,
UK
| | - Edilson Arruda
- Department of Decision Analytics and Risk,
Southampton Business School
,
University of Southampton
, Southampton,
UK
- Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute-Graduate School and Research in Engineering
,
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil
| | - Tracey England
- Department of Decision Analytics and Risk,
Southampton Business School
,
University of Southampton
, Southampton,
UK
| | - Emma Aspland
- School of Mathematics
,
Cardiff University
, Cardiff,
UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
174
|
Saki S, Ali NR, Saki SS, AlRabeea ZS, AlRemeithi FN, Carrick FR, Abdulrahman M. Barriers to healthcare seeking, beliefs about ovarian cancer and the role of socio-economic position. A cross-sectional multilevel study in Dubai, a multicultural society. J Public Health Res 2021; 10. [PMID: 33759446 PMCID: PMC8419630 DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Studies have shown that public awareness of ovarian cancer is weak, and women are often diagnosed at late stages when treatment is difficult. This study aimed to determine the barriers for seeking early medical care and level of knowledge and awareness among women regarding ovarian cancer. Design and methods: A structured questionnaire was designed and adapted from the validated cancer awareness measure. Results: The recognition level of ovarian cancer symptoms among women in this study varied from 12-51%, and the most alarming ones, back pain, eating difficulties, and persistent abdominal pain, were missed by most of the surveyed women. The most recognized ovarian cancer risk factors were never being pregnant, having a history of infertility, and going through menopause, while the least recognized was having personal or family history of breast cancer. Non-UAE nationals women with higher educational levels had better knowledge of ovarian cancer compared to their peers. Conclusions:A change or implementation model is highly recommended in order to improve women’s awareness of ovarian cancer symptoms. Strengthening education among women with regards to risk factors, early symptoms, and the need to seek early medical help should help to increase ovarian cancer awareness and reduce a delay in the diagnosis. Significance for public health In the absence of effective screening, "appropriate clinical suspicion" of the signs and symptoms of the ovarian cancer is currently the best strategy to detect the disease. To reduce the diagnostic interval, several countries have implemented referral guidelines and organizational changes. Most of these guidelines suggest that individuals presenting with symptoms indicative of cancer (alarm symptoms) should be urgently referred to specialized investigative trajectories. However, many studies worldwide have shown that public awareness levels of ovarian cancer are poor, therefore women are often diagnosed at late stages when treatment is difficult. Our findings demonstrate that the overall level of recognition of risk factors and symptoms of ovarian cancer among women in the UAE is indeed low and within a critical level. Thus, strengthening education among women with regards to risk factors, early symptoms, and the need to seek early medical will be helpful in increasing ovarian cancer awareness and reducing the delay in diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sallam Saki
- Department of Public Health, Dubai Medical College, Dubai.
| | - Noor Radhi Ali
- Department of Public Health, Dubai Medical College, Dubai.
| | - Safa Sofi Saki
- Department of Public Health, Dubai Medical College, Dubai.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
175
|
Hassen AM, Hussien FM, Asfaw ZA, Assen HE. Factors Associated with Delay in Breast Cancer Presentation at the Only Oncology Center in North East Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021; 14:681-694. [PMID: 33776446 PMCID: PMC7989045 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s301337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Female breast cancer is becoming an emerging public health problem which accounts for 33% of all cancers in women and 23% of all cancer cases in Ethiopia. The majority of women with breast cancer are diagnosed at later stages due to delayed presentation to seek treatment. OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence and factors associated with patient delay at presentation among breast cancer patients at Dessie Referral Hospital, the only oncology center in North East Ethiopia. METHODS We conducted an institution-based cross-sectional study among 204 female patients with pathology-confirmed breast cancer at the only oncology center of North East Ethiopia from January to June 2020. An interviewer administered questionnaire and a medical record data extraction tool were used to address the objective of the study. Patients were said to be delayed for diagnosis if the time duration between first clinical presentations to first clinical consultation was more than 3 months. Then, bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was employed to analyze the association between dependent and independent variables. RESULTS Among a total of 209 eligible participants, 5 refused to participate with a response rate of 97.6%. The proportion of patients with delayed presentation was 103 (50.5%), with the median time taken to visit a healthcare provider after recognition of the first symptom was 4 months. Age above 40 years (AOR=4.81; 95% CI=1.26-18.65) P<0.024, college and above educational status (AOR=0.05; 95% CI=0.01-0.77) p<0.036, government employee (AOR=0.19, 95% CI=0.03-0.91) P<0.002, urban residence (AOR= 0.21; 95% CI=0.01-0.82) p<0.001, visit traditional healer (AOR=0.38; 95% CI=0.2-0.69) P<0.0037, and no lump in under armpit (AOR= 9.05; 95% CI=1.14-22.69) P<0.002 were associated with delayed presentation. CONCLUSION Delays to seek treatment is generally high in our study. Age, educational status, occupation, residence, visiting traditional healer, and absence of lump in under armpit were significant factors for delayed presentation. Intervention programs focusing on reducing delayed presentation should be employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anissa Mohammed Hassen
- Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Foziya Mohammed Hussien
- Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Zinet Abegaz Asfaw
- Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Hussien Endris Assen
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Time-to-Treatment in Oral Cancer: Causes and Implications for Survival. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061321. [PMID: 33809427 PMCID: PMC8000007 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review was to identify and describe the causes that influence the time-intervals in the pathway of diagnosis and treatment of oral cancer and to assess its impact on prognosis and survival. The review was structured according to the recommendations of the Aarhus statement, considering original data from individual studies and systematic reviews that reported outcomes related to the patient, diagnostic and pre-treatment intervals. The patient interval is the major contributor to the total time-interval. Unawareness of signs and/or symptoms, denial and lack of knowledge about oral cancer are the major contributors to the process of seeking medical attention. The diagnostic interval is influenced by tumor factors, delays in referral due to higher number of consultations and previous treatment with different medicines or dental procedures and by professional factors such as experience and lack of knowledge related to the disease and diagnostic procedures. Patients with advanced stage disease, primary treatment with radiotherapy, treatment at an academic facility and transitions in care are associated with prolonged pre-treatment intervals. An emerging body of evidence supports the impact of prolonged pre-treatment and treatment intervals with poorer survival from oral cancer.
Collapse
|
177
|
Ilhan B, Guneri P, Wilder-Smith P. The contribution of artificial intelligence to reducing the diagnostic delay in oral cancer. Oral Oncol 2021; 116:105254. [PMID: 33711582 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Oral cancer (OC) is the sixth most commonly reported malignant disease globally, with high rates of disease-related morbidity and mortality due to advanced loco-regional stage at diagnosis. Early detection and prompt treatment offer the best outcomes to patients, yet the majority of OC lesions are detected at late stages with 45% survival rate for 2 years. The primary cause of poor OC outcomes is unavailable or ineffective screening and surveillance at the local point-of-care level, leading to delays in specialist referral and subsequent treatment. Lack of adequate awareness of OC among the public and professionals, and barriers to accessing health care services in a timely manner also contribute to delayed diagnosis. As image analysis and diagnostic technologies are evolving, various artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, specific algorithms and predictive models are beginning to have a considerable impact in improving diagnostic accuracy for OC. AI based technologies combined with intraoral photographic images or optical imaging methods are under investigation for automated detection and classification of OC. These new methods and technologies have great potential to improve outcomes, especially in low-resource settings. Such approaches can be used to predict oral cancer risk as an adjunct to population screening by providing real-time risk assessment. The objective of this study is to (1) provide an overview of components of delayed OC diagnosis and (2) evaluate novel AI based approaches with respect to their utility and implications for improving oral cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betul Ilhan
- Ege University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.
| | - Pelin Guneri
- Ege University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
178
|
Schoonbeek RC, Zwertbroek J, Plaat BEC, Takes RP, Ridge JA, Strojan P, Ferlito A, van Dijk BAC, Halmos GB. Determinants of delay and association with outcome in head and neck cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1816-1827. [PMID: 33715909 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Head and neck cancers (HNC) are relatively fast-growing tumours, and delay in treatment initiation is associated with tumour progression and adverse outcome. An overview of factors contributing to delay can provide critical insights on necessary adjustments to optimize care pathways. This systematic review aims to identify factors associated with delay and summarize the effect of delay on oncological outcome measures. METHODS A search strategy was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to search electronic databases for studies assessing the carepathway interval (days between first visit in head and neck oncology center and treatment initiation) and/or time-to-treatment-initiation interval (days between histological diagnosis and treatment initiation) and 1) determinants of delay and/or 2) effect of delay on outcome within these timeframes. Due to heterogeneity between included studies, a meta-analysis was not possible. RESULTS Fifty-two studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. Non-Caucasian race, academic setting, Medicaid/no insurance and radiotherapy as primary treatment were associated with delay. Advanced tumour stage was related to increased time-to-treatment initiation in the four common sites combined (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx). Separate determinants for delay in different tumour locations were identified. In laryngeal, oral cavity cancer and the four common HNC sites combined, delay in start of treatment is associated with decreased overall survival, although no cut-off time point could be determined. CONCLUSION Race, facility type, type of insurance and radiotherapy as primary treatment were associated with delay and subsequent inferior survival in the four common sites combined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanne C Schoonbeek
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Julia Zwertbroek
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn E C Plaat
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Robert P Takes
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - John A Ridge
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Head and Neck Surgery Section, 333 Cottman Avenue, 19111, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Primož Strojan
- Institute of Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zaloška Cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| | - Boukje A C van Dijk
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Department of Research, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511, DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - György B Halmos
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Yamada Y, Kobayashi D, Terashima K, Kiyotani C, Sasaki R, Michihata N, Kobayashi T, Ogiwara H, Matsumoto K, Ishiguro A. Initial symptoms and diagnostic delay in children with brain tumors at a single institution in Japan. Neurooncol Pract 2021; 8:60-67. [PMID: 33664970 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A prolonged interval between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of childhood brain tumor is associated with worse neurological outcomes. The objectives of this study are to determine factors contributing to diagnostic delay and to find an interventional focus for further reduction in the interval between symptom onset and diagnosis in Japan. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 154 patients younger than 18 years with newly diagnosed brain tumors who visited our institution from January 2002 to March 2013. Results The median age at diagnosis was 6.2 years and the median total diagnostic interval (TDI) was 30 days. Patients with low-grade tumors and cerebral midline tumor location had significantly long TDI. Durations between the first medical consultation and diagnosis (diagnostic interval, DI) were exceedingly longer for patients with visual, hearing, or smelling abnormalities as the first symptom (median, 303 days). TDI and DI of patients who visited ophthalmologists or otolaryngologist for the first medical consultation were significantly longer. Among these patients, longer DI was associated with worse visual outcome. Conclusion Raising awareness of brain tumor diagnosis among ophthalmologists and otolaryngologists may reduce diagnostic delay and may improve the neurological impairment of children with brain tumors in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Yamada
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daiki Kobayashi
- Center for Postgraduate Education and Training, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chikako Kiyotani
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuji Sasaki
- Division of Pediatric Emergency and Transport Services, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Michihata
- Center for Postgraduate Education and Training, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Kobayashi
- Department of Management and Strategy, Clinical Research Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ogiwara
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kimikazu Matsumoto
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Ishiguro
- Center for Postgraduate Education and Training, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Barclay ME, Abel GA, Greenberg DC, Rous B, Lyratzopoulos G. Socio-demographic variation in stage at diagnosis of breast, bladder, colon, endometrial, lung, melanoma, prostate, rectal, renal and ovarian cancer in England and its population impact. Br J Cancer 2021; 124:1320-1329. [PMID: 33564123 PMCID: PMC8007585 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01279-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stage at diagnosis strongly predicts cancer survival and understanding related inequalities could guide interventions. METHODS We analysed incident cases diagnosed with 10 solid tumours included in the UK government target of 75% of patients diagnosed in TNM stage I/II by 2028. We examined socio-demographic differences in diagnosis at stage III/IV vs. I/II. Multiple imputation was used for missing stage at diagnosis (9% of tumours). RESULTS Of the 202,001 cases, 57% were diagnosed in stage I/II (an absolute 18% 'gap' from the 75% target). The likelihood of diagnosis at stage III/IV increased in older age, though variably by cancer site, being strongest for prostate and endometrial cancer. Increasing level of deprivation was associated with advanced stage at diagnosis for all sites except lung and renal cancer. There were, inconsistent in direction, sex inequalities for four cancers. Eliminating socio-demographic inequalities would translate to 61% of patients with the 10 studied cancers being diagnosed at stage I/II, reducing the gap from target to 14%. CONCLUSIONS Potential elimination of socio-demographic inequalities in stage at diagnosis would make a substantial, though partial, contribution to achieving stage shift targets. Earlier diagnosis strategies should additionally focus on the whole population and not only the high-risk socio-demographic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Barclay
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - G A Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School (Primary Care), Exeter, UK
| | - David C Greenberg
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - B Rous
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - G Lyratzopoulos
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Understanding health-seeking and adherence to treatment by patients with esophageal cancer at the Uganda cancer Institute: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:159. [PMID: 33602201 PMCID: PMC7890846 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06163-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the low- and middle-income countries, most patients with esophageal cancer present with advanced stage disease and experience poor survival. There is inadequate understanding of the factors that influence decisions to and actual health-seeking, and adherence to treatment regimens among esophageal cancer patients in Uganda, yet this knowledge is critical in informing interventions to promote prompt health-seeking, diagnosis at early stage and access to appropriate cancer therapy to improve survival. We explored health-seeking experiences and adherence to treatment among esophageal cancer patients attending the Uganda Cancer Institute. METHODS We conducted an interview based qualitative study at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI). Participants included patients with established histology diagnosis of esophageal cancer and healthcare professionals involved in the care of these patients. We used purposive sampling approach to select study participants. In-depth and key informant interviews were used in data collection. Data collection was conducted till point of data saturation was reached. Thematic content analysis approach was used in data analyses and interpretations. Themes and subthemes were identified deductively. RESULTS Sixteen patients and 17 healthcare professionals were included in the study. Delayed health-seeking and poor adherence to treatment were related to (i) emotional and psychosocial factors including stress of cancer diagnosis, stigma related to esophageal cancer symptoms, and fear of loss of jobs and livelihood, (ii) limited knowledge and recognition of esophageal cancer symptoms by both patients and primary healthcare professionals, and (iii) limited access to specialized cancer care, mainly because of long distance to the facility and associated high transport cost. Patients were generally enthused with patient - provider relationships at the UCI. While inadequate communication and some degree of incivility were reported, majority of patients thought the healthcare professionals were empathetic and supportive. CONCLUSION Health system and individual patient factors influence health-seeking for symptoms of esophageal cancer and adherence to treatment schedule for the disease. Interventions to improve access to and acceptability of esophageal cancer services, as well as increase public awareness of esophageal cancer risk factors and symptoms could lead to earlier diagnosis and potentially better survival from the disease in Uganda.
Collapse
|
182
|
Webber C, Whitehead M, Eisen A, Holloway CMB, Groome PA. Factors associated with waiting time to breast cancer diagnosis among symptomatic breast cancer patients: a population-based study from Ontario, Canada. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 187:225-235. [PMID: 33486544 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06051-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A prolonged time from first presentation to cancer diagnosis has been associated with worse disease-related outcomes. This study evaluated potential determinants of a long diagnostic interval among symptomatic breast cancer patients. METHODS This was a population-based, cross-sectional study of symptomatic breast cancer patients diagnosed in Ontario, Canada from 2007 to 2015 using administrative health data. The diagnostic interval was defined as the time from the earliest breast cancer-related healthcare encounter before diagnosis to the diagnosis date. Potential determinants of the diagnostic interval included patient, disease and usual healthcare utilization characteristics. We used multivariable quantile regression to evaluate their relationship with the diagnostic interval. We also examined differences in diagnostic interval by the frequency of encounters within the interval. RESULTS Among 45,967 symptomatic breast cancer patients, the median diagnostic interval was 41 days (interquartile range 20-92). Longer diagnostic intervals were observed in younger patients, patients with higher burden of comorbid disease, recent immigrants to Canada, and patients with higher healthcare utilization prior to their diagnostic interval. Shorter intervals were observed in patients residing in long-term care facilities, patients with late stage disease, and patients who initially presented in an emergency department. Longer diagnostic intervals were characterized by an increased number of physician visits and breast procedures. CONCLUSIONS The identification of groups at risk of longer diagnostic intervals provides direction for future research aimed at better understanding and improving breast cancer diagnostic pathways. Ensuring that all women receive a timely breast cancer diagnosis could improve breast cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen Webber
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Andrea Eisen
- Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Claire M B Holloway
- Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patti A Groome
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. .,ICES Queen's, Kingston, ON, Canada. .,Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Methods for Studying Endometrial Pathology and the Potential of Atomic Force Microscopy in the Research of Endometrium. Cells 2021; 10:cells10020219. [PMID: 33499261 PMCID: PMC7911798 DOI: 10.3390/cells10020219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The endometrium lines the uterine cavity, enables implantation of the embryo, and provides an environment for its development and growth. Numerous methods, including microscopic and immunoenzymatic techniques, have been used to study the properties of the cells and tissue of the endometrium to understand changes during, e.g., the menstrual cycle or implantation. Taking into account the existing state of knowledge on the endometrium and the research carried out using other tissues, it can be concluded that the mechanical properties of the tissue and its cells are crucial for their proper functioning. This review intends to emphasize the potential of atomic force microscopy (AFM) in the research of endometrium properties. AFM enables imaging of tissues or single cells, roughness analysis, and determination of the mechanical properties (Young’s modulus) of single cells or tissues, or their adhesion. AFM has been previously shown to be useful to derive force maps. Combining the information regarding cell mechanics with the alternations of cell morphology or gene/protein expression provides deeper insight into the uterine pathology. The determination of the elastic modulus of cells in pathological states, such as cancer, has been proved to be useful in diagnostics.
Collapse
|
184
|
Covid-19 pandemic: A new contributing factor to diagnostic and treatment delay in oral cancer patients. Oral Oncol 2021; 116:105176. [PMID: 33485790 PMCID: PMC7832748 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
185
|
Time from presentation to pre-diagnostic chest X-ray in patients with symptomatic lung cancer: a cohort study using electronic patient records from English primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:e273-e279. [PMID: 33431382 PMCID: PMC7805412 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x714077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND National guidelines in England recommend prompt chest X-ray (within 14 days) in patients presenting in general practice with unexplained symptoms of possible lung cancer, including persistent cough, shortness of breath, or weight loss. AIM To examine time to chest X-ray in symptomatic patients in English general practice before lung cancer diagnosis, and explore demographical variation. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice, cancer registry, and imaging data from England. METHOD Patients with lung cancer who presented symptomatically in general practice in the year pre-diagnosis and who had a pre-diagnostic chest X-ray were included. Time from presentation to chest X-ray (presentation-test interval) was determined and intervals classified based on national guideline recommendations as concordant (≤14 days) or non-concordant (>14 days). Variation in intervals was examined by age, sex, smoking status, and deprivation. RESULTS In a cohort of 2102 patients with lung cancer, the median presentation-test interval was 49 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-172) days. Of these, 727 (35%) patients had presentation-test intervals of ≤14 days (median 1 [IQR 0-6] day) and 1375 (65%) had presentation-test intervals of >14 days (median 128 [IQR 52-231] days). Intervals were longer among patients who smoke (equivalent to 63% longer than non-smokers; P<0.001), older patients (equivalent to 7% longer for every 10 years from age 27; P = 0.013), and females (equivalent to 12% longer than males; P = 0.016). CONCLUSION In symptomatic primary care patients who underwent chest X-ray before lung cancer diagnosis, only 35% were tested within the timeframe recommended by national guidelines. Patients who smoke, older patients, and females experienced longer intervals. These findings could help guide initiatives aimed at improving timely lung cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|
186
|
Lung Cancer Pre-Diagnostic Pathways from First Presentation to Specialist Referral. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:378-389. [PMID: 33440696 PMCID: PMC7903286 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is often diagnosed at a late stage with high associated mortality. Timely diagnosis depends on timely referral to a respiratory specialist; however, in Canada, little is known about how patients move through primary care to get to a respiratory specialist. Accordingly, we aimed to identify and describe lung cancer pre-diagnostic pathways in primary care from first presentation to referral. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with primary lung cancer were recruited using consecutive sampling (n = 50) from a lung cancer center in Montréal, Québec. Data on healthcare service utilization in primary care were collected from chart reviews and structured patient interviews and analyzed using latent class analysis to identify groups of patients with similar pre-diagnostic pathways. Each group was described based on patient- and tumor-related characteristics and the sequence of utilization activities. Results: 68% of the patients followed a pathway where family physician (FP) visits were dominant (“FP-centric”) and 32% followed a pathway where walk-in clinic and emergency department (ED) visits were dominant (“ED-centric”). Time to referral in the FP group was double that of the ED group (45 days (IQR: 12–111) vs. 22 (IQR: 5–69)) with more advanced disease (65% vs. 50%). In the FP group, 29% of the patients saw their FP three times or more before being referred and 41% had an ED visit. Conclusions: Our findings may reflect the challenge of diagnosing lung cancer in primary care, missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis, and a lack of integration between primary and specialist care.
Collapse
|
187
|
Schliemann D, Ismail R, Donnelly M, Su TT. Anticipated delay in help-seeking for cancer symptoms: Findings from a nationwide study of Malaysian adults. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 71:101882. [PMID: 33433363 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the relationship between anticipated delay in help-seeking and cancer symptom recognition and the extent to which this relationship varied according to socio-demographic and health-related characteristics. METHODS A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted of 1895 adults aged ≥40 years who were randomly selected across Malaysia and interviewed using the Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer questionnaire, which was previously validated and culturally adapted by the research team. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the associations between anticipated delay for help seeking >2 weeks and socio-demographic and health-related variables. RESULTS Anticipated delay in help-seeking was reported for persistent cough (19.3 %), rectal bleeding (6.1 %) and breast changes (2.5 %). Difficulty in accessing a doctor was associated with anticipated delayed help-seeking for breast changes and rectal bleeding (adjusted ORs 7.58; 95 % CI 1.98, 28.94 and 2.37; 95 % CI 1.21, 4.66, respectively); not recognising the symptom 'unexplained bleeding' as a colorectal cancer warning sign was associated with anticipated delayed help-seeking for rectal bleeding (adjusted OR 1.54; 95 % CI 1.03, 2.31); and ethnicity was associated with anticipated delay for rectal bleeding and persistent cough. CONCLUSIONS Generally, anticipated delay to help-seeking for cancer symptoms in Malaysia (a middle-income country) appeared to be a less significant problem compared to other countries including high-income countries. There appeared to be a significant association between social variation indicators in Malaysia and anticipated delay in help-seeking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Désirée Schliemann
- Centre for Public Health and UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Roshidi Ismail
- South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO) & Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University, Malaysia; Centre for Population Health (CePH), Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Centre for Public Health and UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Tin Tin Su
- South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO) & Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University, Malaysia; Centre for Population Health (CePH), Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Marzo-Castillejo M, Vela-Vallespín C, Bellas-Beceiro B, Bartolomé-Moreno C, Ginés-Díaz Y, Melús-Palazón E. [PAPPS Cancer Expert Group. Cancer Prevention Recommendations. 2020 PAPPS update]. Aten Primaria 2021; 52 Suppl 2:44-69. [PMID: 33388117 PMCID: PMC7801199 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
El cáncer es una de las principales causas de morbilidad y mortalidad. El consumo de tabaco, la dieta poco saludable, la inactividad física son algunos de los factores de riesgo que forman parte del estilo de vida y que han provocado un aumento del cáncer. En este artículo se actualizan las evidencias y recomendaciones de las estrategias de prevención para cada uno de los cánceres con mayor incidencia, con base en la disminución de los factores de riesgo (prevención primaria) y en el diagnóstico precoz del cáncer, a través del cribado y la detección temprana de los signos y síntomas, en población de riesgo medio y de riesgo elevado.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercè Marzo-Castillejo
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Metropolitana Sud, IDIAP Jordi Gol, Direcció d'Atenció Primària Costa de Ponent, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, España.
| | - Carmen Vela-Vallespín
- ABS del Riu Nord i Riu Sud, Institut Català de la Salut, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Barcelona, España
| | - Begoña Bellas-Beceiro
- Unidad Docente de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria La Laguna-Tenerife Norte, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
| | - Cruz Bartolomé-Moreno
- Centro de Salud Parque Goya de Zaragoza y Unidad Docente de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Sector Zaragoza I, Servicio Aragonés de Salud, Zaragoza, España
| | | | - Elena Melús-Palazón
- Centro de Salud Actur Oeste de Zaragoza y Unidad Docente de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Sector Zaragoza I, Servicio Aragonés de Salud, Zaragoza, España
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Williams G, McLean R, Liu JF, Ritzmann TA, Dandapani M, Shanmugavadivel D, Sachdev P, Brougham M, Mitchell RT, Conway NT, Law J, Cunnington A, Ogunnaike G, Brougham K, Bayman E, Walker D. Multicentre service evaluation of presentation of newly diagnosed cancers and type 1 diabetes in children in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Paediatr Open 2021; 5:e001078. [PMID: 34805556 PMCID: PMC8587587 DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in patterns of presentation to emergency departments. Child health professionals were concerned that this could contribute to the delayed diagnosis of life-threatening conditions, including childhood cancer (CC) and type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Our multicentre, UK-based service evaluation assessed diagnostic intervals and disease severity for these conditions. METHODS We collected presentation route, timing and disease severity for children with newly diagnosed CC in three principal treatment centres and T1DM in four centres between 1 January and 31 July 2020 and the corresponding period in 2019. Total diagnostic interval (TDI), patient interval (PI), system interval (SI) and disease severity across different time periods were compared. RESULTS For CCs and T1DM, the route to diagnosis and severity of illness at presentation were unchanged across all time periods. Diagnostic intervals for CCs during lockdown were comparable to that in 2019 (TDI 4.6, PI 1.1 and SI 2.1 weeks), except for an increased PI in January-March 2020 (median 2.7 weeks). Diagnostic intervals for T1DM during lockdown were similar to that in 2019 (TDI 16 vs 15 and PI 14 vs 14 days), except for an increased PI in January-March 2020 (median 21 days). CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence of diagnostic delay or increased illness severity for CC or T1DM, during the first phase of the pandemic across the participating centres. This provides reassuring data for children and families with these life-changing conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Williams
- Paediatric Oncology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Ross McLean
- Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Wishaw, Wishaw, UK
| | - Jo-Fen Liu
- Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Timothy A Ritzmann
- Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Division of Family Health, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madhumita Dandapani
- Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Division of Family Health, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Pooja Sachdev
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mark Brougham
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rod T Mitchell
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nicholas T Conway
- Department of Paediatrics, Tayside Children's Hospital, Dundee, UK.,Division of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - James Law
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alice Cunnington
- Division of Family Health, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Gbemi Ogunnaike
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Karen Brougham
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Elizabeth Bayman
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Walker
- Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Koo MM, Unger-Saldaña K, Mwaka AD, Corbex M, Ginsburg O, Walter FM, Calanzani N, Moodley J, Rubin GP, Lyratzopoulos G. Conceptual Framework to Guide Early Diagnosis Programs for Symptomatic Cancer as Part of Global Cancer Control. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:35-45. [PMID: 33405957 PMCID: PMC8081530 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnosing cancer earlier can enable timely treatment and optimize outcomes. Worldwide, national cancer control plans increasingly encompass early diagnosis programs for symptomatic patients, commonly comprising awareness campaigns to encourage prompt help-seeking for possible cancer symptoms and health system policies to support prompt diagnostic assessment and access to treatment. By their nature, early diagnosis programs involve complex public health interventions aiming to address unmet health needs by acting on patient, clinical, and system factors. However, there is uncertainty regarding how to optimize the design and evaluation of such interventions. We propose that decisions about early diagnosis programs should consider four interrelated components: first, the conduct of a needs assessment (based on cancer-site-specific statistics) to identify the cancers that may benefit most from early diagnosis in the target population; second, the consideration of symptom epidemiology to inform prioritization within an intervention; third, the identification of factors influencing prompt help-seeking at individual and system level to support the design and evaluation of interventions; and finally, the evaluation of factors influencing the health systems' capacity to promptly assess patients. This conceptual framework can be used by public health researchers and policy makers to identify the greatest evidence gaps and guide the design and evaluation of local early diagnosis programs as part of broader cancer control strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minjoung Monica Koo
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karla Unger-Saldaña
- CONACYT (National Council of Science and Technology)–National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Amos D. Mwaka
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center and the Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Fiona M. Walter
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Natalia Calanzani
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Moodley
- Women's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- SAMRC Gynaecology Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Greg P. Rubin
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Sullivan FM, Mair FS, Anderson W, Armory P, Briggs A, Chew C, Dorward A, Haughney J, Hogarth F, Kendrick D, Littleford R, McConnachie A, McCowan C, McMeekin N, Patel M, Rauchhaus P, Ritchie L, Robertson C, Robertson J, Robles-Zurita J, Sarvesvaran J, Sewell H, Sproule M, Taylor T, Tello A, Treweek S, Vedhara K, Schembri S. Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer in a randomised trial of an autoantibody blood test followed by imaging. Eur Respir J 2021; 57:2000670. [PMID: 32732334 PMCID: PMC7806972 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00670-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The EarlyCDT-Lung test is a high-specificity blood-based autoantibody biomarker that could contribute to predicting lung cancer risk. We report on the results of a phase IV biomarker evaluation of whether using the EarlyCDT-Lung test and any subsequent computed tomography (CT) scanning to identify those at high risk of lung cancer reduces the incidence of patients with stage III/IV/unspecified lung cancer at diagnosis compared with the standard clinical practice at the time the study began.The Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Scotland (ECLS) trial was a randomised controlled trial of 12 208 participants at risk of developing lung cancer in Scotland in the UK. The intervention arm received the EarlyCDT-Lung test and, if test-positive, low-dose CT scanning 6-monthly for up to 2 years. EarlyCDT-Lung test-negative and control arm participants received standard clinical care. Outcomes were assessed at 2 years post-randomisation using validated data on cancer occurrence, cancer staging, mortality and comorbidities.At 2 years, 127 lung cancers were detected in the study population (1.0%). In the intervention arm, 33 out of 56 (58.9%) lung cancers were diagnosed at stage III/IV compared with 52 out of 71 (73.2%) in the control arm. The hazard ratio for stage III/IV presentation was 0.64 (95% CI 0.41-0.99). There were nonsignificant differences in lung cancer and all-cause mortality after 2 years.ECLS compared EarlyCDT-Lung plus CT screening to standard clinical care (symptomatic presentation) and was not designed to assess the incremental contribution of the EarlyCDT-Lung test. The observation of a stage shift towards earlier-stage lung cancer diagnosis merits further investigations to evaluate whether the EarlyCDT-Lung test adds anything to the emerging standard of low-dose CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frances S Mair
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Pauline Armory
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Andrew Briggs
- Dept of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Cindy Chew
- Radiology, NHS Lanarkshire, Bothwell, UK
| | - Alistair Dorward
- Respiratory Medicine, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Haughney
- General Practice, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Fiona Hogarth
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Denise Kendrick
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roberta Littleford
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Colin McCowan
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Nicola McMeekin
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Manish Patel
- Respiratory Medicine, NHS Lanarkshire, Bothwell, UK
| | - Petra Rauchhaus
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Lewis Ritchie
- The Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Chris Robertson
- Dept of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Robertson
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Herbert Sewell
- School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Agnes Tello
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kavita Vedhara
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
192
|
Golding H, Webber CE, Groome PA. Factors contributing to time to diagnosis in symptomatic colorectal cancer: A scoping review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 30:e13397. [PMID: 33377574 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide (Ferlay et al., 2015, International Journal of Cancer, 136, E359), and delayed diagnosis is associated with mortality (Tørring et al., 2011, British Journal of Cancer, 104, 934; Tørring et al., 2012, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 669). The purpose of this review was to determine the factors associated with time to diagnosis in symptomatic CRC using scoping review methods. METHODS We performed database and citation searches to identify studies which examine the length of any interval from symptom presentation to diagnosis. Study selection was conducted by two independent reviewers. Factors contributing to time to diagnosis were extracted from selected articles and mapped onto a conceptual framework consisting of four levels: patient and disease factors, provider factors, organisation/setting factors and sectors of influence. RESULTS From the 31 studies included in this review, we identified 138 unique factors, 17 of which were investigated by at least three studies and 11 of which had consistent results. Patient and disease factors were most commonly studied. Patient perception that their symptoms were benign, a non-urgent referral, female sex and rectal tumour location were each associated with a longer time to diagnosis. CONCLUSION Thus far, the literature has focused on patient or disease-related factors, while other levels of influence have been relatively understudied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley Golding
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Colleen E Webber
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Patti A Groome
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Nnaji CA, Kuodi P, Walter FM, Moodley J. Effectiveness of interventions for improving timely diagnosis of breast and cervical cancers in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e042788. [PMID: 33293328 PMCID: PMC7722835 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast and cervical cancers pose a major public health burden globally, with disproportionately high incidence, morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The majority of women diagnosed with cancer in LMICs present with late-stage disease, the treatment of which is often costlier and less effective. While interventions to improve the timely diagnosis of these cancers are increasingly being implemented in LMICs, there is uncertainty about their role and effectiveness. The aim of this review is to systematically synthesise available evidence on the nature and effectiveness of interventions for improving timely diagnosis of breast and cervical cancers in LMICs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A comprehensive search of published and relevant grey literature will be conducted. The following electronic databases will be searched: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Evidence will be synthesised in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two reviewers will independently screen the search outputs, select studies using predefined inclusion criteria and assess each included study for risk of bias. If sufficient data are available and studies are comparable in terms of interventions and outcomes, a meta-analysis will be conducted. Where studies are not comparable and a meta-analysis is not appropriate, a narrative synthesis of findings will be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As this will be a systematic review of publicly available data, with no primary data collection, it will not require ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated widely through a peer-reviewed publication and forums such as conferences, workshops and community engagement sessions. This review will provide a user-friendly evidence summary for informing further efforts at developing and implementing interventions for addressing delays in breast and cervical cancer diagnosis in LMICs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020177232.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chukwudi Arnest Nnaji
- Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Paul Kuodi
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Lira University, Lira, Uganda
| | - Fiona M Walter
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Moodley
- Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- Women's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- SAMRC Gynaecology Cancer Research Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Soomers VLMN, van der Graaf WTA, Zaidi S, Kaal SEJ, Hayes AJ, Schreuder BHWB, Jones RL, Desar IME, Husson O. The route to diagnosis of sarcoma patients: Results from an interview study in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0243439. [PMID: 33284856 PMCID: PMC7721153 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sarcomas are rare tumours. Early diagnosis is challenging, but important for local control and potentially survival and quality of life(QoL). We investigated (1)the route to diagnosis (RtD) experienced by sarcoma patients, including factors contributing to the length of the RtD from patients' perspective; (2)the impact of the RtD on QoL and care satisfaction; and (3)differences in aims 1-2 between English and Dutch patients. METHODS Fifteen sarcoma patients from The Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom, and Radboud University Medical Centre, The Netherlands, were interviewed, exploring RtD experiences. Interviews were analysed according to qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The main themes were: patient interval, diagnostic interval, reflection on the RtD and recommendations for improvement. Patient interval was long if symptoms were attributed as benign, did not interfere with daily life or were expected to cease. An incorrect working diagnosis, ineffective process of additional investigations, long referral times and lack of a lead clinician lengthened the diagnostic interval. Long waiting times, false reassurance and inadequate information provision led to dissatisfaction and a high emotional burden. Factors for improvement included increasing awareness of patients and healthcare providers, empowering patients, and having a lead clinician. CONCLUSION The RtD of sarcoma patients is complex. Increasing awareness of patients and healthcare providers may contribute to shorten the RtD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Winette T. A. van der Graaf
- Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shane Zaidi
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew J. Hayes
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robin L. Jones
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Olga Husson
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Price S, Spencer A, Zhang X, Ball S, Lyratzopoulos G, Mujica-Mota R, Stapley S, Ukoumunne OC, Hamilton W. Trends in time to cancer diagnosis around the period of changing national guidance on referral of symptomatic patients: A serial cross-sectional study using UK electronic healthcare records from 2006-17. Cancer Epidemiol 2020; 69:101805. [PMID: 32919226 PMCID: PMC7480981 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND UK primary-care referral guidance describes the signs, symptoms, and test results ("features") of undiagnosed cancer. Guidance revision in 2015 liberalised investigation by introducing more low-risk features. We studied adults with cancer whose features were in the 2005 guidance ("Old-NICE") or were introduced in the revision ("New-NICE"). We compared time to diagnosis between the groups, and its trend over 2006-2017. METHODS Clinical Practice Research Datalink records were analysed for adults with incident myeloma, breast, bladder, colorectal, lung, oesophageal, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, stomach or uterine cancers in 1/1/2006-31/12/2017. Cancer-specific features in the year before diagnosis were used to create New-NICE and Old-NICE groups. Diagnostic interval was time between the index feature and diagnosis. Semiparametric varying-coefficient analyses compared diagnostic intervals between New-NICE and Old-NICE groups over 1/1/2006-31/12/2017. RESULTS Over all cancers (N = 83,935), median (interquartile range) Old-NICE diagnostic interval rose over 2006-2017, from 51 (20-132) to 64 (30-148) days, with increases in breast (15 vs 25 days), lung (103 vs 135 days), ovarian (65·5 vs 100 days), prostate (80 vs 93 days) and stomach (72·5 vs 102 days) cancers. Median New-NICE values were consistently longer (99, 40-212 in 2006 vs 103, 42-236 days in 2017) than Old-NICE values over all cancers. After guidance revision, New-NICE diagnostic intervals became shorter than Old-NICE values for colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS Despite improvements for colorectal cancer, scope remains to reduce diagnostic intervals for most cancers. Liberalised investigation requires protecting and enhancing cancer-diagnostic services to avoid their becoming a rate-limiting step in the diagnostic pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Price
- University of Exeter Medical School, Room 1.20 College House, St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK.
| | - Anne Spencer
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Xiaohui Zhang
- University of Exeter Business School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Susan Ball
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | | | | | - Sal Stapley
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Obioha C Ukoumunne
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Willie Hamilton
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Crapnell RD, Dempsey-Hibbert NC, Peeters M, Tridente A, Banks CE. Molecularly imprinted polymer based electrochemical biosensors: Overcoming the challenges of detecting vital biomarkers and speeding up diagnosis. TALANTA OPEN 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.talo.2020.100018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
197
|
Sundquist J, Palmér K, Rydén S, Sävblom C, Ji J, Stenman E. Time Intervals Under the Lens at Sweden's First Diagnostic Center for Primary Care Patients With Nonspecific Symptoms of Cancer. A Comparison With Matched Control Patients. Front Oncol 2020; 10:561379. [PMID: 33330029 PMCID: PMC7735559 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.561379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Fast-track referral pathways for patients with nonspecific, serious symptoms have been implemented in several countries. Our objective was to analyze time intervals in the diagnostic routes of patients diagnosed with cancer at Sweden’s first Diagnostic Center (DC) for nonspecific symptoms and compare with time intervals of matched control patients. Methods Adult patients with nonspecific symptoms that could not be explained by an initial investigation in primary care were eligible for referral to the DC. Patients diagnosed with cancer were matched with patients at another hospital within the same healthcare organization. We aimed for two control patients per DC-patient and matched on tumor type, age and sex. Five time intervals were compared: 1) patient interval (first symptom—primary care contact), 2) primary care interval (first visit—referral to the DC/secondary care), 3) diagnostic interval (first visit—cancer diagnosis), 4) information interval (cancer diagnosis—patient informed) and 5) treatment interval (cancer diagnosis—treatment start). Comparisons between groups and matched cohort analyses were made. Results Sixty-four patients (22.1%) were diagnosed with cancer at the DC, of which eight were not matchable. Forty-two patients were matched with two controls and 14 were matched with one control. There were no significant differences in patient-, primary care-, or diagnostic intervals between the groups. The information interval was shorter at the DC compared to the control group (difference between matched pairs 7 days, p = 0.001) and the treatment interval was also shorter at the DC with significant differences in the matched analysis (difference between matched pairs 13 days, p = 0.049). The findings remained the same in four sensitivity analyses, made to compensate for differences between the groups. Conclusions Up to diagnosis, we could not detect significant differences in time intervals between the DC and the control group. However, the shorter information and treatment intervals at the DC should be advantageous for these patients who will get timely access to treatment or palliative care. Due to limitations regarding comparability between the groups, the results must be interpreted with caution and further research is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov-ID: NCT01709539. Registration-date: October 18, 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Sundquist
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Skåne Regional Council, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.,Center for Community-based Healthcare Research and Education (CoHRE), Department of Functional Pathology, Shimane University, Shimane, Japan
| | - Karolina Palmér
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Skåne Regional Council, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Stefan Rydén
- Regional Cancer Centre South, Skåne Regional Council, Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Charlotta Sävblom
- Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm Regional Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jianguang Ji
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Skåne Regional Council, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Emelie Stenman
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Skåne Regional Council, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
|
199
|
ADVANCE-1: An adapted collaborative benchmarking approach in centre-based lung cancer care. Lung Cancer 2020; 151:44-52. [PMID: 33307417 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The majority of research within lung cancer is focused on prevention, diagnosis and treatment rather than examining infrastructure or processes of lung cancer centres. Benchmarking is a systematic method for documenting and comparing processes, functions or performance of organisations against the best in the world. ADVANCE-1 is a European Respiratory Society funded pilot study with the main aim of creating a benchmarking tool that can easily document and reflect the structure and process within a lung cancer centre and its associated registry. By doing this we can then compare centres and generate best practice learning points from each centre in order to learn from each other. The ADVANCE-1 study group was constituted by two ERS fellowship-holders and senior lung cancer specialists from the two participating lung cancer services in Glasgow, Scotland, and Berlin, Germany. The study design and benchmarking tools were reviewed externally. Once the benchmarking tools were created, prospective testing was undertaken in the two participating centres in order to allow comparison to ascertain best practice in a so called 'collaborative benchmarking approach'. We were then able to create personalised learning points for each centre. The next phase of the project will be to expand the benchmarking across several European centres in the ADANCE-2 project.
Collapse
|
200
|
Lu P, Raynald, Liu W, Gong J, Sun T, Li C, Ma'ruf L, Fan Y, Zhu R, Tian Y. Factors impacting time to diagnosis in pediatric CNS tumors in Chinese children. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:3633-3642. [PMID: 33179135 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05863-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the factors impacting time to diagnosis in pediatric central nervous system tumors. METHODS A descriptive, cross-sectional design was used in this study. A self-developed questionnaire for health-seeking behavior and influencing factors was used in children with intracranial tumors. The factors related to time to diagnosis and the long-term prognosis of children were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 433 families replied to the questionnaire. The median parental interval was 50 days (range 0 ~ 884), the median diagnostic interval was 97 days (range 4 ~ 1646), and the median prediagnostic symptomatic interval (PSI) was 123 days (range 8 ~ 1844). Higher education was associated with a shorter parental interval (mother: P = 0.048; father: P = 0.035). The diagnostic interval was shortened in patients with dizziness (P = 0.022), abnormal eye movement (P = 0.034), or drowsiness (P = 0.021). A shorter PSI was observed in patients who presented with high intracranial pressure such as headache (P = 0.016), dizziness (P = 0.009), or drowsiness (P = 0.023) and those who went to a higher-level health institution or patients who went to neurology or neurosurgery department as the first medical consultation. No statistically significant difference was found in the interval time (parental interval, diagnostic interval, and PSI) regarding patients' outcomes. CONCLUSION Different time intervals showed different factors influencing the long delay in diagnosing central nervous system tumors, highlighting the need for increased awareness to improve the treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengwei Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Raynald
- Neurointervention Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Jian Gong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Chunde Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Lukman Ma'ruf
- Department of Neurosurgery, Central Army Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Yanzhu Fan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Ruifang Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Yongji Tian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
| |
Collapse
|