1
|
Farmer N, McPherson A, Thomson J, Lowrie R. Perspectives of people experiencing homelessness with recent non-fatal street drug overdose on the Pharmacist and Homeless Outreach Engagement and Non-medical Independent prescribing Rx (PHOENIx) intervention. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302988. [PMID: 38739649 PMCID: PMC11090330 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Scotland, a third of all deaths of people experiencing homelessness (PExH) are street-drug-related, and less than half of their multiple physical- and mental health conditions are treated. New, holistic interventions are required to address these health inequalities. PHOENIx (Pharmacist Homeless Outreach Engagement and Non-medical Independent prescribing Rx) is delivered on outreach by National Health Service (NHS) pharmacist independent prescribers in partnership with third sector homelessness charity workers. We describe participant's perspectives of PHOENIx. METHODS This study aims to understand experiences of the PHOENIx intervention by participants recruited into the active arm of a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). Semi-structured in-person interviews explored participants' evaluation of the intervention. In this study, the four components (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, reflexive monitoring) of the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) framework underpinned data collection and analyses. RESULTS We identified four themes that were interpreted within the NPT framework that describe participant evaluation of the PHOENIx intervention: differentiating the intervention from usual care (coherence), embedding connection and consistency in practice (cognitive participation), implementation of practical and emotional operational work (collective action), and lack of power and a commitment to long-term support (reflexive monitoring). Participants successfully engaged with the intervention. Facilitators for participant motivation included the relationship-based work created by the PHOENIx team. This included operational work to fulfil both the practical and emotional needs of participants. Barriers included concern regarding power imbalances within the sector, a lack of long-term support and the impact of the intervention concluding. CONCLUSIONS Findings identify and describe participants' evaluations of the PHOENIx intervention. NPT is a theoretical framework facilitating understanding of experiences, highlighting both facilitators and barriers to sustained engagement and investment. Our findings inform future developments regarding a subsequent definitive RCT of PHOENIx, despite challenges brought about by challenging micro and macro-economic and political landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Farmer
- School of Social Work, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew McPherson
- Pharmacy Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Richard Lowrie
- Pharmacy Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Centre for Homelessness and Inclusion Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goulding A, McQuaid F, Lindsay L, Agrawal U, Auyeung B, Calvert C, Carruthers J, Denny C, Donaghy J, Hillman S, Hopcroft L, Hopkins L, McCowan C, McLaughlin T, Moore E, Ritchie L, Simpson CR, Taylor B, Fenton L, Pollock L, Gale C, Kurinczuk JJ, Robertson C, Sheikh A, Stock S, Wood R. Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in Scottish neonates 2020-2022: a national, population-based cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2023; 108:367-372. [PMID: 36609412 PMCID: PMC10313998 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine neonates in Scotland aged 0-27 days with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by viral testing; the risk of confirmed neonatal infection by maternal and infant characteristics; and hospital admissions associated with confirmed neonatal infections. DESIGN Population-based cohort study. SETTING AND POPULATION All live births in Scotland, 1 March 2020-31 January 2022. RESULTS There were 141 neonates with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection over the study period, giving an overall infection rate of 153 per 100 000 live births (141/92 009, 0.15%). Among infants born to women with confirmed infection around the time of birth, the confirmed neonatal infection rate was 1812 per 100 000 live births (15/828, 1.8%). Two-thirds (92/141, 65.2%) of neonates with confirmed infection had an associated admission to neonatal or (more commonly) paediatric care. Six of these babies (6/92, 6.5%) were admitted to neonatal and/or paediatric intensive care; however, none of these six had COVID-19 recorded as their main diagnosis. There were no neonatal deaths among babies with confirmed infection. IMPLICATIONS AND RELEVANCE Confirmed neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection was uncommon over the first 23 months of the pandemic in Scotland. Secular trends in the neonatal confirmed infection rate broadly followed those seen in the general population, although at a lower level. Maternal confirmed infection at birth was associated with an increased risk of neonatal confirmed infection. Two-thirds of neonates with confirmed infection had an associated admission to hospital, with resulting implications for the baby, family and services, although their outcomes were generally good. Ascertainment of confirmed infection depends on the extent of testing, and this is likely to have varied over time and between groups: the extent of unconfirmed infection is inevitably unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fiona McQuaid
- Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Utkarsh Agrawal
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Bonnie Auyeung
- School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Clara Calvert
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sam Hillman
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lisa Hopcroft
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Colin McCowan
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | | | | | - Lewis Ritchie
- Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Colin R Simpson
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- School of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Louisa Pollock
- Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK
| | - Chris Gale
- Academic Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Chris Robertson
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sarah Stock
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rachael Wood
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lowrie R, McPherson A, Mair F, Maguire D, Paudyal V, Blair B, Brannan D, Moir J, Hughes F, Duncan C, Stock K, Farmer N, Ramage R, Lombard C, Ross S, Scott A, Provan G, Sills L, Hislop J, Reilly F, Williamson AE. Pharmacist and Homeless Outreach Engagement and Non-medical Independent prescribing Rx (PHOENIx): a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064792. [PMID: 36526321 PMCID: PMC9764622 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of people experiencing homelessness (PEH) is increasing worldwide. Systematic reviews show high levels of multimorbidity and mortality. Integrated health and social care outreach interventions may improve outcomes. No previous studies have targeted PEH with recent drug overdose despite high levels of drug-related deaths and few data describe their health/social care problems. Feasibility work suggests a collaborative health and social care intervention (Pharmacist and Homeless Outreach Engagement and Non-medical Independent prescribing Rx, PHOENIx) is potentially beneficial. We describe the methods of a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with parallel process and economic evaluation of PEH with recent overdose. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Detailed health and social care information will be collected before randomisation to care-as-usual plus visits from a pharmacist and a homeless outreach worker (PHOENIx) for 6-9 months or to care-as-usual. The outcomes are the rates of presentations to emergency department for overdose or other causes and whether to progress to a definitive RCT: recruitment of ≥100 participants within 4 months, ≥60% of patients remaining in the study at 6 and 9 months, ≥60% of patients receiving the intervention, and ≥80% of patients with data collected. The secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life, hospitalisations, treatment uptake and patient-reported measures. Semistructured interviews will explore the future implementation of PHOENIx, the reasons for overdose and protective factors. We will assess the feasibility of conducting a cost-effectiveness analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by South East Scotland National Health Service Research Ethics Committee 01. Results will be made available to PEH, the study funders and other researchers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN10585019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Lowrie
- Pharmacy Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Frances Mair
- General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Donogh Maguire
- Emergency Department, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Vibhu Paudyal
- School of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Jane Moir
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Kate Stock
- Homeless Health, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Cian Lombard
- Homeless Health, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Jenni Hislop
- NHS Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Andrea E Williamson
- GPPC, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, MVLS, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Osborne-Grinter M, Kwiecinski J, Doris M, McElhinney P, Cadet S, Adamson PD, Moss AJ, Alam S, Hunter A, Shah ASV, Mills NL, Pawade T, Wang C, Weir-McCall JR, Roditi G, van Beek EJR, Shaw LJ, Nicol ED, Berman D, Slomka PJ, Newby DE, Dweck MR, Dey D, Williams MC. Association of coronary artery calcium score with qualitatively and quantitatively assessed adverse plaque on coronary CT angiography in the SCOT-HEART trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 23:1210-1221. [PMID: 34529050 PMCID: PMC9612790 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Coronary artery calcification is a marker of cardiovascular risk, but its association with qualitatively and quantitatively assessed plaque subtypes is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS In this post-hoc analysis, computed tomography (CT) images and 5-year clinical outcomes were assessed in SCOT-HEART trial participants. Agatston coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was measured on non-contrast CT and was stratified as zero (0 Agatston units, AU), minimal (1-9 AU), low (10-99 AU), moderate (100-399 AU), high (400-999 AU), and very high (≥1000 AU). Adverse plaques were investigated by qualitative (visual categorization of positive remodelling, low-attenuation plaque, spotty calcification, and napkin ring sign) and quantitative (calcified, non-calcified, low-attenuation, and total plaque burden; Autoplaque) assessments. Of 1769 patients, 36% had a zero, 9% minimal, 20% low, 17% moderate, 10% high, and 8% very high CACS. Amongst patients with a zero CACS, 14% had non-obstructive disease, 2% had obstructive disease, 2% had visually assessed adverse plaques, and 13% had low-attenuation plaque burden >4%. Non-calcified and low-attenuation plaque burden increased between patients with zero, minimal, and low CACS (P < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference between those with medium, high, and very high CACS. Myocardial infarction occurred in 41 patients, 10% of whom had zero CACS. CACS >1000 AU and low-attenuation plaque burden were the only predictors of myocardial infarction, independent of obstructive disease, and 10-year cardiovascular risk score. CONCLUSION In patients with stable chest pain, zero CACS is associated with a good but not perfect prognosis, and CACS cannot rule out obstructive coronary artery disease, non-obstructive plaque, or adverse plaque phenotypes, including low-attenuation plaque.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maia Osborne-Grinter
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
| | - Jacek Kwiecinski
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
- Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mhairi Doris
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
| | - Priscilla McElhinney
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sebastien Cadet
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Philip D Adamson
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
- Christchurch Heart Institute, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Alastair J Moss
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Shirjel Alam
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
| | - Amanda Hunter
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
| | - Anoop S V Shah
- Department of non-communicable disease epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Nicholas L Mills
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tania Pawade
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
| | - Chengjia Wang
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
| | | | - Giles Roditi
- Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, Glasgow University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Edwin J R van Beek
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
- Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Edward D Nicol
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Daniel Berman
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Piotr J Slomka
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David E Newby
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
- Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marc R Dweck
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
- Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Damini Dey
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michelle C Williams
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH164SB, UK
- Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Campbell D, Green MJ, Davies N, Demou E, Howe LD, Harrison S, Smith DJ, Howard DM, McIntosh AM, Munafò M, Katikireddi SV. Effects of depression on employment and social outcomes: a Mendelian randomisation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2022; 76:563-571. [PMID: 35318279 PMCID: PMC9118074 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2021-218074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is associated with socioeconomic disadvantage. However, whether and how depression exerts a causal effect on employment remains unclear. We used Mendelian randomisation (MR) to investigate whether depression affects employment and related outcomes in the UK Biobank dataset. METHODS We selected 227 242 working-age participants (40-64 in men, 40-59 years for women) of white British ethnicity/ancestry with suitable genetic data in the UK Biobank study. We used 30 independent genetic variants associated with depression as instruments. We conducted observational and two-sample MR analyses. Outcomes were employment status (employed vs not, and employed vs sickness/disability, unemployment, retirement or caring for home/family); weekly hours worked (among employed); Townsend Deprivation Index; highest educational attainment; and household income. RESULTS People who had experienced depression had higher odds of non-employment, sickness/disability, unemployment, caring for home/family and early retirement. Depression was associated with reduced weekly hours worked, lower household income and lower educational attainment, and increased deprivation. MR analyses suggested depression liability caused increased non-employment (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.26) and sickness/disability (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.82), but was not causal for caring for home/family, early retirement or unemployment. There was little evidence from MR that depression affected weekly hours worked, educational attainment, household income or deprivation. CONCLUSIONS Depression liability appears to cause increased non-employment, particularly by increasing disability. There was little evidence of depression affecting early retirement, hours worked or household income, but power was low. Effective treatment of depression might have important economic benefits to individuals and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desmond Campbell
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michael James Green
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Neil Davies
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- K.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Evangelia Demou
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Laura D Howe
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sean Harrison
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Daniel J Smith
- Division of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David M Howard
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew M McIntosh
- Division of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marcus Munafò
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fawns-Ritchie C, Miller CB, van der Pol M, Douglas E, Bell D, O'Carroll RE, Deary IJ. Psychological correlates of free colorectal cancer screening uptake in a Scottish sample: a cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e042210. [PMID: 35105557 PMCID: PMC8808413 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in Scotland is 56%. This study examined whether psychological factors were associated with CRC screening uptake. DESIGN Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING This study used data from the Healthy AGeing In Scotland (HAGIS) pilot study, a study designed to be representative of Scottish adults aged 50 years and older. PARTICIPANTS 908 (505 female) Scottish adults aged 50-80 years (mean age=65.85, SD=8.23), who took part in the HAGIS study (2016-2017). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Self-reported participation in CRC screening was the outcome measure. Logistic regression was used to test whether scores on measures of health literacy, cognitive ability, risk aversion, time preference (eg, present oriented or future oriented) and personality were associated with CRC screening when these psychological factors were entered individually and simultaneously in the same model. RESULTS Controlling for age, age-squared, sex, living arrangement, and sex*living arrangement, a one-point increase in risk aversion (OR=0.66, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.85) and present orientation (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.94) was associated with reduced odds of screening. Higher scores on health literacy (OR per one-point increase=1.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.31), cognitive ability (OR per SD increase=1.51, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.81) and the intellect personality trait (OR per one-point increase=1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09) were associated with increased odds of screening. Higher risk aversion was the only psychological variable that was associated with CRC screening participation when all psychological variables were entered in the same model and remained associated with CRC screening when additionally adjusting for deprivation and education. A backward elimination model retained two psychological variables as correlates of CRC screening: risk aversion and cognitive ability. CONCLUSION Individuals who are more risk averse are less likely to participate in free, home CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Elaine Douglas
- Division of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - David Bell
- Division of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Ian J Deary
- Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dutey-Magni PF, Williams H, Jhass A, Rait G, Lorencatto F, Hemingway H, Hayward A, Shallcross L. COVID-19 infection and attributable mortality in UK care homes: cohort study using active surveillance and electronic records (March-June 2020). Age Ageing 2021; 50:1019-1028. [PMID: 33710281 PMCID: PMC7989651 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND epidemiological data on COVID-19 infection in care homes are scarce. We analysed data from a large provider of long-term care for older people to investigate infection and mortality during the first wave of the pandemic. METHODS cohort study of 179 UK care homes with 9,339 residents and 11,604 staff. We used manager-reported daily tallies to estimate the incidence of suspected and confirmed infection and mortality in staff and residents. Individual-level electronic health records from 8,713 residents were used to model risk factors for confirmed infection, mortality and estimate attributable mortality. RESULTS 2,075/9,339 residents developed COVID-19 symptoms (22.2% [95% confidence interval: 21.4%; 23.1%]), while 951 residents (10.2% [9.6%; 10.8%]) and 585 staff (5.0% [4.7%; 5.5%]) had laboratory-confirmed infections. The incidence of confirmed infection was 152.6 [143.1; 162.6] and 62.3 [57.3; 67.5] per 100,000 person-days in residents and staff, respectively. Sixty-eight percent (121/179) of care homes had at least one COVID-19 infection or COVID-19-related death. Lower staffing ratios and higher occupancy rates were independent risk factors for infection.Out of 607 residents with confirmed infection, 217 died (case fatality rate: 35.7% [31.9%; 39.7%]). Mortality in residents with no direct evidence of infection was twofold higher in care homes with outbreaks versus those without (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.2 [1.8; 2.6]). CONCLUSIONS findings suggest many deaths occurred in people who were infected with COVID-19, but not tested. Higher occupancy and lower staffing levels were independently associated with risks of infection. Protecting staff and residents from infection requires regular testing for COVID-19 and fundamental changes to staffing and care home occupancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter F Dutey-Magni
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, NW1 2DA, London, UK
| | | | - Arnoupe Jhass
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, NW1 2DA, London, UK
- Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, NW3 2PF, London, UK
| | - Greta Rait
- Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, NW3 2PF, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, W1T 7DN, London, UK
| | - Fabiana Lorencatto
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, WC1E 7HB, London, UK
| | - Harry Hemingway
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, NW1 2DA, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, W1T 7DN, London, UK
- Health Data Research UK, University College London, NW1 2DA, London, UK
| | - Andrew Hayward
- Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, WC1E 7HB, London, UK
| | - Laura Shallcross
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, NW1 2DA, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee JGL, Cristello JV, Buckton CH, Carey RN, Trucco EM, Schenk PM, Ikegwuonu T, Hilton S, Golden SD, Conway DI. Message framing to inform cancer prevention pricing interventions in the UK and USA: a factorial experiment, 2019. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e041324. [PMID: 33495253 PMCID: PMC7839858 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To advance understanding of how message framing can be used to maximise public support across different pricing policies for alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks/foods that prevent consumption of cancer-causing products. DESIGN We designed a 3×4×3 randomised factorial experiment to test responses to messages with three pricing policies, four message frames and three products. SETTING Online survey panel (Qualtrics) in 2019. PARTICIPANTS Adults (N=1850) from the UK and USA. INTERVENTIONS Participants randomly viewed one of 36 separate messages that varied by pricing policy (increasing taxes, getting rid of price discounts, getting rid of low-cost products), four frames and product (alcohol, tobacco, sugary drinks/foods). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES We assessed the relationship between the message characteristics and four dependent variables. Three were related to policy support: (1) increasing taxes on the product mentioned in the message, (2) getting rid of price discounts and special offers on the product mentioned in the message and (3) getting rid of low-cost versions of the product mentioned in the message. One was related to reactance, a psychological response to having one's freedom limited. RESULTS We found no effect for pricing policy in the message. Frames regarding children and reducing cancer risk moderated some outcomes, showing promise for real-world use. We found differences in support by product and reactance with greatest support and least reactance for tobacco policies, less support and more reactance for alcohol policies, and the least support and most reactance for sugary drinks/foods policies. CONCLUSIONS Cancer prevention efforts using policy interventions can be informed by the message framing literature. Our results offer insights for cancer prevention advocacy efforts across the UK and USA and highlight that tax versus non-tax approaches to increasing the cost of cancer-causing products result in similar responses from consumers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph G L Lee
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Julie V Cristello
- Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Christina H Buckton
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rachel N Carey
- Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elisa M Trucco
- Department of Psychology and Center for Children and Families, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Paulina M Schenk
- Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Theresa Ikegwuonu
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Shona Hilton
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Shelley D Golden
- Cancer Prevention and Control, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - David I Conway
- School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Nursing, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sullivan FM, Mair FS, Anderson W, Armory P, Briggs A, Chew C, Dorward A, Haughney J, Hogarth F, Kendrick D, Littleford R, McConnachie A, McCowan C, McMeekin N, Patel M, Rauchhaus P, Ritchie L, Robertson C, Robertson J, Robles-Zurita J, Sarvesvaran J, Sewell H, Sproule M, Taylor T, Tello A, Treweek S, Vedhara K, Schembri S. Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer in a randomised trial of an autoantibody blood test followed by imaging. Eur Respir J 2021; 57:2000670. [PMID: 32732334 PMCID: PMC7806972 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00670-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The EarlyCDT-Lung test is a high-specificity blood-based autoantibody biomarker that could contribute to predicting lung cancer risk. We report on the results of a phase IV biomarker evaluation of whether using the EarlyCDT-Lung test and any subsequent computed tomography (CT) scanning to identify those at high risk of lung cancer reduces the incidence of patients with stage III/IV/unspecified lung cancer at diagnosis compared with the standard clinical practice at the time the study began.The Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Scotland (ECLS) trial was a randomised controlled trial of 12 208 participants at risk of developing lung cancer in Scotland in the UK. The intervention arm received the EarlyCDT-Lung test and, if test-positive, low-dose CT scanning 6-monthly for up to 2 years. EarlyCDT-Lung test-negative and control arm participants received standard clinical care. Outcomes were assessed at 2 years post-randomisation using validated data on cancer occurrence, cancer staging, mortality and comorbidities.At 2 years, 127 lung cancers were detected in the study population (1.0%). In the intervention arm, 33 out of 56 (58.9%) lung cancers were diagnosed at stage III/IV compared with 52 out of 71 (73.2%) in the control arm. The hazard ratio for stage III/IV presentation was 0.64 (95% CI 0.41-0.99). There were nonsignificant differences in lung cancer and all-cause mortality after 2 years.ECLS compared EarlyCDT-Lung plus CT screening to standard clinical care (symptomatic presentation) and was not designed to assess the incremental contribution of the EarlyCDT-Lung test. The observation of a stage shift towards earlier-stage lung cancer diagnosis merits further investigations to evaluate whether the EarlyCDT-Lung test adds anything to the emerging standard of low-dose CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frances S Mair
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Pauline Armory
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Andrew Briggs
- Dept of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Cindy Chew
- Radiology, NHS Lanarkshire, Bothwell, UK
| | - Alistair Dorward
- Respiratory Medicine, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Haughney
- General Practice, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Fiona Hogarth
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Denise Kendrick
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roberta Littleford
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Colin McCowan
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Nicola McMeekin
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Manish Patel
- Respiratory Medicine, NHS Lanarkshire, Bothwell, UK
| | - Petra Rauchhaus
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Lewis Ritchie
- The Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Chris Robertson
- Dept of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Robertson
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Herbert Sewell
- School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Agnes Tello
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kavita Vedhara
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stock SJ, McAllister D, Vasileiou E, Simpson CR, Stagg HR, Agrawal U, McCowan C, Hopkins L, Donaghy J, Ritchie L, Robertson C, Sheikh A, Wood R. COVID-19 in Pregnancy in Scotland (COPS): protocol for an observational study using linked Scottish national data. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e042813. [PMID: 33243817 PMCID: PMC7691999 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effects of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy are not fully delineated. We will describe the incidence of COVID-19 in pregnancy at population level in Scotland, in a prospective cohort study using linked data. We will determine associations between COVID-19 and adverse pregnancy, neonatal and maternal outcomes and the proportion of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in neonates associated with maternal COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Prospective cohort study using national linked data sets. We will include all women in Scotland, UK, who were pregnant on or became pregnant after, 1 March 2020 (the date of the first confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Scotland) and all births in Scotland from 1 March 2020 onwards. Individual-level data will be extracted from data sets containing details of all livebirths, stillbirth, terminations of pregnancy and miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies treated in hospital or attending general practice. Records will be linked within the Early Pandemic Evaluation and Enhanced Surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II) platform, which includes primary care records, virology and serology results and details of COVID-19 Community Hubs and Assessment Centre contacts and deaths. We will perform analyses using definitions for confirmed, probable and possible COVID-19 and report serology results (where available). Outcomes will include congenital anomaly, miscarriage, stillbirth, termination of pregnancy, preterm birth, neonatal infection, severe maternal disease and maternal deaths. We will perform descriptive analyses and appropriate modelling, adjusting for demographic and pregnancy characteristics and the presence of comorbidities. The cohort will provide a platform for future studies of the effectiveness and safety of therapeutic interventions and immunisations for COVID-19 and their effects on childhood and developmental outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION COVID-19 in Pregnancy in Scotland is a substudy of EAVE II(, which has approval from the National Research Ethics Service Committee. Findings will be reported to Scottish Government, Public Health Scotland and published in peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Jane Stock
- Tommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, The University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David McAllister
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Colin R Simpson
- School of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Helen R Stagg
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Utkarsh Agrawal
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK
| | - Colin McCowan
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK
| | | | | | - Lewis Ritchie
- General Practice and Primary Care, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Chris Robertson
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rachael Wood
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
- Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Genie MG, Loría-Rebolledo LE, Paranjothy S, Powell D, Ryan M, Sakowsky RA, Watson V. Understanding public preferences and trade-offs for government responses during a pandemic: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment in the UK. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e043477. [PMID: 33444217 PMCID: PMC7682450 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Social distancing and lockdown measures are among the main government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. These measures aim to limit the COVID-19 infection rate and reduce the mortality rate of COVID-19. Given we are likely to see local lockdowns until a treatment or vaccine for COVID-19 is available, and their effectiveness depends on public acceptability, it is important to understand public preference for government responses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), this study will investigate the public's preferences for pandemic responses in the UK. Attributes (and levels) are based on: (1) lockdown measures described in policy documents; (2) literature on preferences for lockdown measures and (3) a social media analysis. Attributes include: lockdown type; lockdown length; postponement of usual non-urgent medical care; number of excess deaths; number of infections; impact on household spending and job losses. We will prepilot the DCE using virtual think aloud interviews with respondents recruited via Facebook. We will collect preference data using an online survey of 4000 individuals from across the four UK countries (1000 per country). We will estimate the relative importance of the attributes, and the trade-offs individuals are willing to make between attributes. We will test if respondents' preferences differ based on moral attitudes (using the Moral Foundation Questionnaire), socioeconomic circumstances (age, education, economic insecurity, health status), country of residence and experience of COVID-19. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The University of Aberdeen's College Ethics Research Board (CERB) has approved the study (reference: CERB/2020/6/1974). We will seek CERB approval for major changes from the developmental and pilot work. Peer-reviewed papers will be submitted, and results will be presented at public health and health economic conferences nationally and internationally. A lay summary will be published on the Health Economics Research Unit blog.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mesfin G Genie
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | | - Daniel Powell
- Health Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mandy Ryan
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Verity Watson
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Langdon R, Richmond R, Elliott HR, Dudding T, Kazmi N, Penfold C, Ingarfield K, Ho K, Bretherick A, Haley C, Zeng Y, Walker RM, Pawlita M, Waterboer T, Gaunt T, Smith GD, Suderman M, Thomas S, Ness A, Relton C. Identifying epigenetic biomarkers of established prognostic factors and survival in a clinical cohort of individuals with oropharyngeal cancer. Clin Epigenetics 2020; 12:95. [PMID: 32600451 PMCID: PMC7322918 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-020-00870-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking status, alcohol consumption and HPV infection (acquired through sexual activity) are the predominant risk factors for oropharyngeal cancer and are thought to alter the prognosis of the disease. Here, we conducted single-site and differentially methylated region (DMR) epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) of these factors, in addition to ∼ 3-year survival, using Illumina Methylation EPIC DNA methylation profiles from whole blood in 409 individuals as part of the Head and Neck 5000 (HN5000) study. Overlapping sites between each factor and survival were then assessed using two-step Mendelian randomization to assess whether methylation at these positions causally affected survival. RESULTS Using the MethylationEPIC array in an OPC dataset, we found novel CpG associations with smoking, alcohol consumption and ~ 3-year survival. We found no CpG associations below our multiple testing threshold associated with HPV16 E6 serological response (used as a proxy for HPV infection). CpG site associations below our multiple-testing threshold (PBonferroni < 0.05) for both a prognostic factor and survival were observed at four gene regions: SPEG (smoking), GFI1 (smoking), PPT2 (smoking) and KHDC3L (alcohol consumption). Evidence for a causal effect of DNA methylation on survival was only observed in the SPEG gene region (HR per SD increase in methylation score 1.28, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.43, P 2.12 × 10-05). CONCLUSIONS Part of the effect of smoking on survival in those with oropharyngeal cancer may be mediated by methylation at the SPEG gene locus. Replication in data from independent datasets and data from HN5000 with longer follow-up times is needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Langdon
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Richmond
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Hannah R. Elliott
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tom Dudding
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nabila Kazmi
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Penfold
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kate Ingarfield
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Karen Ho
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Bretherick
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Scotland Bristol, EH4 2XU UK
| | - Chris Haley
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Scotland Bristol, EH4 2XU UK
| | - Yanni Zeng
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Scotland Bristol, EH4 2XU UK
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rosie M. Walker
- Medical Genetics Section, Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ UK
| | - Michael Pawlita
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tim Waterboer
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tom Gaunt
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - George Davey Smith
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew Suderman
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Steve Thomas
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Andy Ness
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Caroline Relton
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brunsdon D, Biesty L, Brocklehurst P, Brueton V, Devane D, Elliott J, Galvin S, Gamble C, Gardner H, Healy P, Hood K, Jordan J, Lanz D, Maeso B, Roberts A, Skene I, Soulsby I, Stewart D, Torgerson D, Treweek S, Whiting C, Wren S, Worrall A, Gillies K. What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study. Trials 2019; 20:593. [PMID: 31615577 PMCID: PMC6794792 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3687-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the top three research priorities for the UK clinical trial community is to address the gap in evidence-based approaches to improving participant retention in randomised trials. Despite this, there is little evidence supporting methods to improve retention. This paper reports the PRioRiTy II project, a Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) that identified and prioritised unanswered questions and uncertainties around trial retention in collaboration with key stakeholders. METHODS This PSP was conducted in collaboration with the James Lind Alliance, a non-profit making initiative, to support key stakeholders (researchers, patients, and the public) in jointly identifying and agreeing on priority research questions. There were three stages. (1) First an initial online survey was conducted consisting of six open-ended questions about retention in randomised trials. Responses were coded into thematic groups to create a longlist of questions. The longlist of questions was checked against existing evidence to ensure that they had not been answered by existing research. (2) An interim stage involved a further online survey where stakeholders were asked to select questions of key importance from the longlist. (3) A face-to-face consensus meeting was held, where key stakeholder representatives agreed on an ordered list of 21 unanswered research questions for methods of improving retention in randomised trials. RESULTS A total of 456 respondents yielded 2431 answers to six open-ended questions, from which 372 questions specifically about retention were identified. Further analysis included thematically grouping all data items within answers and merging questions in consultation with the Steering Group. This produced 27 questions for further rating during the interim survey. The top 21 questions from the interim online survey were brought to a face-to-face consensus meeting in which key stakeholder representatives prioritised the order. The 'Top 10' of these are reported in this paper. The number one ranked question was 'What motivates a participant's decision to complete a clinical trial?' The entire list will be available at www.priorityresearch.ie . CONCLUSION The Top 10 list can inform the direction of future research on trial methods and be used by funders to guide projects aiming to address and improve retention in randomised trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Brunsdon
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Linda Biesty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Peter Brocklehurst
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Valerie Brueton
- Department of Adult Nursing, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Declan Devane
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jim Elliott
- Health Research Authority, National Health Service, London, UK
| | - Sandra Galvin
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland
| | - Carrol Gamble
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Heidi Gardner
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Patricia Healy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Doris Lanz
- Women’s Health Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Beccy Maeso
- James Lind Alliance, Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Irene Soulsby
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Derek Stewart
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Caroline Whiting
- James Lind Alliance, Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sharon Wren
- Action on Hearing Loss, British Deaf Association, Deafscotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Worrall
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|