A double-blind comparison of empirical oral and intravenous antibiotic therapy for low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy

Randomized comparison of antibiotics with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To determine if granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with empirical antibiotics accelerates febrile neutropenia resolution compared with antibiotics without it.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible children were treated without prophylactic G-CSF and presented with fever (temperature >38.3 degrees C) and neutropenia afterward. Patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome were excluded. Assignments were randomized between G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) or none beginning within 24 hr of antibiotics. Subcutaneous administration was recommended, but intravenous G-CSF was allowed. Patients remained on study until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >500/microl and > or =48 hr without fever.

RESULTS

One of 67 patients enrolled was ineligible, 59 had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Thirty-four were assigned to antibiotics, 32 to G-CSF plus antibiotics. Adding G-CSF significantly reduced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia recovery times. Median days to febrile neutropenia resolution was nine earlier with G-CSF (4 vs. 13 days) (P < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the resolution of fever between arms. Hospitalization median was shorter by 1 day with G-CSF (4 vs. 5 days) (P = 0.04). There was no difference in the duration of IV and oral antibiotic treatment, addition of antifungal therapy, and shock incidence. A trend for decreased incidence of late fever with G-CSF was noted (6.3 vs. 23.5%) (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding G-CSF to empiric antibiotic coverage accelerates chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia resolution by 9 days in pediatric patients, mainly with ALL, which results in a small but significant difference in the median length of hospitalization.

Outpatient treatment of low-risk neutropenic fever in cancer patients using oral moxifloxacin

BACKGROUND

Oral-based antibiotic therapy is the standard of care in the management of cancer patients with low-risk neutropenic fever. Nevertheless, to the authors' knowledge, the best antibiotic regimen and the feasibility of ambulatory treatment have not been clearly defined.

METHODS

The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin as outpatient treatment in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia who were selected according to the recently proposed Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk assessment model. Moxifloxacin was given at a dose of 400 mg orally once daily.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients with solid and hematologic malignancies, the majority of whom (84%) had advanced disease, were included in the current study. The median neutrophil count at the time of study entry was 340/mm3 (range, 20-950/mm3) and the median duration of neutropenia was 4 days (range, 3-14 days). Of 55 neutropenic episodes, 50 (91%) had a successful outcome with a median time to defervescence of 2 days (range, 1-5 days). A multivariate analysis indicated that severe neutropenia (an absolute neutrophil count of < 100 mm3) was the only independent factor associated with treatment failure (P < 0.04). Moxifloxacin was found to be well tolerated and there were no infectious deaths reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrated that moxifloxacin was a highly effective and safe regimen in the outpatient treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia.

Factors influencing predisposition to sepsis in children with cancers and acquired immunodeficiencies unrelated to human immunodeficiency virus infection

OBJECTIVES

The main objectives of this review are to provide insight into the various factors that affect the risk of sepsis in immunocompromised children and to discuss special issues that should be considered when such patients are enrolled in clinical trials.

STRATEGY

A literature review was conducted, and authoritative references were consulted when appropriate. This was supported by discussion among experts at an international consensus conference on pediatric sepsis.

OUTCOME

The review discusses general issues as they relate to the factors that are associated with a predisposition to sepsis in children with cancers and non-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related acquired immunodeficiencies. The host defects that are associated with specific infections are discussed, and an overview of the indicators of immune dysfunction in the previously well child is presented. Selected examples of patients with non-HIV-related acquired immunodeficiencies, including those with cancer or who have undergone solid-organ or hematopoietic stem-cell transplants are discussed. Special challenges that may affect clinical trials include the altered immune response as this relates to the definition of infection and disease and the assessment of outcomes and the heterogeneity of study populations due to the variable manifestations of immune deficiency states.

SUMMARY

Knowledge of the factors that are associated with sepsis in immunocompromised patients is important when such patients are to be entered into clinical trials on sepsis. These factors do not necessarily operate in isolation and may occur concurrently or sequentially. With these considerations in mind, clinical trials involving immunocompromised children can go forward and will very likely lead to significant advances in the care of this understudied population.

Perspectives for the management of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer in the 21st century

Over the past several decades, there has been substantial progress in the management of patients with febrile neutropenia. However, the ever-changing patterns of infection, ecology, and antibiotic-resistance trends do not allow the development of treatment guidelines that could be applied universally. Hence, the institution's predominant pathogens and resistance patterns should guide the empirical choice of antimicrobials. Prompt initiation of antimicrobial therapy remains the gold standard. Monotherapy with the newer broad-spectrum antimicrobials has tended to replace the classic combination therapy. Empirical administration of glycopeptides, such as vancomycin, without documentation of a gram-positive infection is not favored. The development of risk-stratification models has allowed for identification of low-risk patients with additional treatment options, such as early discharge and exclusively outpatient treatment with oral antimicrobials. The initiation of empirical antifungal therapy in persistently febrile neutropenic patients has become common practice, especially recently, since the introduction of new, effective, less toxic antifungal drugs. It is hoped that the development of new nonculture-based diagnostic methods will allow for the early detection of invasive fungal infections and, thus, the replacement of empirical antifungal therapy with pathogen-specific, preemptive therapy.

Assessment of systemic inflammation markers to differentiate a stable from a deteriorating clinical course in patients with febrile neutropenia

In this study, we evaluated the predictive values of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and serum amyloid A (SAA) for determining the clinical course in febrile neutropenic patients. Daily plasma analyses during the fever course were performed in 101 episodes with fever and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (neutrophil count <0.5 x 10(9)/L). Procalcitonin (PCT) and IL-6 values were significantly higher in febrile episodes in patients who developed complications. Procalcitonin with a cut-off value of < or =0.4 ng/mL or IL-6 < or =50 pg/mL 3 d after fever onset indicated daily high negative predictive values (NPVs) (91-100%) for episodes with complications. No marker could predict deterioration; however, daily low plasma concentrations of PCT or IL-6 during the first 8 d of fever were found to be a good predictor of no subsequent complications in neutropenic patients and therefore to be a helpful tool for limiting anti-microbial therapy.

Risk modeling: applying evidence-based risk assessment in oncology nursing practice

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To introduce nurses to the concept of evidence-based risk models and their use in practice.

DATA SOURCES

Poster presentations at meetings and published articles and books.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Evidence-based risk models can be used in many clinical situations to identify patients at higher risk for a particular disease or clinical outcome, such as adverse events. These models may be based on molecular, epidemiologic, clinical, or family information obtained from patients. Risk models also may provide information about the cost-effectiveness of prevention, treatment, or support strategies for specific patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Determining the risks of disease- or therapy-related adverse events can help healthcare providers and patients. Risk assessment to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from supportive care can lead to the cost-effective use of these supportive care measures and improved clinical outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Through awareness of relevant evidence-based risk models, nurses can become more effective in actively managing their patients care. Because of their close and ongoing contact with patients with cancer, oncology nurses are in an ideal position to assess risk factors for adverse events and to use appropriate supportive care for those patients who are at greatest risk.

Emergency Department evaluation of patients with fever and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

We sought to describe the common causes of infection in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with elevated temperature and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and to determine the frequency with which the ED diagnosis of infection is consistent with the final hospital discharge diagnosis. We performed a structured restrospective chart review of ED patients with fever (T > 38 degrees C) and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1000/mm(3)) over a 2-year period. Fifty-five episodes of neutropenic fever occurred in 52 patients (mean age 52 years, range 18-86 years; 53% men). Twenty-six patients (47%) were found to have a specific infection identified. Of these, 21/26 (81%; 95% CI, 70-91%) had the source of infection identified while in the ED. All patients who had a focal site of infection identified during their hospitalization were diagnosed in the ED (100%; 95% CI, 86-100%). The other 5 patients, without a source identified in the ED, were found to have bacteremia. The 29 patients without a source identified in the ED were hospitalized and had negative blood and urine cultures and were discharged to home after resolution of fever. A thorough history, physical examination, chest radiograph and urinalysis in the ED identified all patients with a focus of infection. Meticulous ED evaluation of patients with neutropenia and fever may be sufficient to diagnose most sources of infection; however, a significant number of patients without an identifiable focus may have bacteremia.

Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Fever occurring in a neutropenic patient remains a common life-threatening complication of cancer chemotherapy. The common practice is to admit the patient to hospital and treat empirically with intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics. Oral therapy could be an alternative approach for selected patients.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of oral antibiotics versus intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cancer Network Register of trials (November 2002), the Cochrane Library (issue 2, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (January 1980 to 2002) and LILACS (1982 to 2002). We searched several databases for ongoing trials. We checked the conference proceedings of the Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) 1995 to 2002 and all references of included studies and major reviews were scanned.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing oral antibiotic/s to intravenous antibiotic/s for the treatment of neutropenic cancer patients with fever. The comparison between the two could be started initially (initial oral), or following an initial course of intravenous antibiotic treatment (sequential).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality and extracted data. Data concerning mortality, treatment failures and adverse events were extracted from included studies assuming an "intention-to-treat" basis for the outcome measures whenever possible. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data were estimated.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials (median mortality 0, range 0 to 8.8%) were included in the analyses. The mortality rate was similar comparing oral to intravenous antibiotic treatment (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.62, 7 trials, 1223 patients). Treatment failure rates were also similar (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.05, all trials). No significant heterogeneity was shown for all comparisons but adverse events. This effect was stable in a wide range of patients. Quinolones alone or combined with another antibiotics were used with comparable results. Adverse reactions, mostly gastrointestinal were more common with oral antibiotics.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the present data, oral treatment is an acceptable alternative to intravenous antibiotic treatment in febrile neutropenic cancer patients (excluding patients with acute leukaemia) who are haemodynamically stable, without organ failure, not having pneumonia, infection of a central line or a severe soft-tissue infection. The wide confidence interval for mortality allows the present use of oral treatment in groups of patients with an expected low risk for mortality, and further research should be aimed at clarifying the definition of low risk patients.

Early hospital discharge followed by outpatient management versus continued hospitalization of children with cancer, fever, and neutropenia at low risk for invasive bacterial infection

PURPOSE

To compare outcome and cost of ambulatory versus hospitalized management among febrile neutropenic children at low risk for invasive bacterial infection (IBI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children presenting with febrile neutropenia at six hospitals in Santiago, Chile, were categorized as high or low risk for IBI. Low-risk children were randomly assigned after 24 to 36 hours of hospitalization to receive ambulatory or hospitalized treatment and monitored until episode resolution. Outcome and cost were determined for each episode and compared between both groups using predefined definitions and questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 161 (41%) of 390 febrile neutropenic episodes evaluated from June 2000 to February 2003 were classified as low risk, of which 149 were randomly assigned to ambulatory (n = 78) or hospital-based (n = 71) treatment. In both groups, mean age (ambulatory management, 55 months; hospital-based management, 66 months), sex, and type of cancer were similar. Outcome was favorable in 74 (95%) of 78 ambulatory-treated children and 67 (94%) of 71 hospital-treated children (P = NS). Mean cost of an episode was US 638 dollars (95% CI, 572 dollars to 703 dollars) and US 903 dollars (95% CI, 781 dollars to 1,025 dollars) for the ambulatory and hospital-based groups, respectively (P =.003).

CONCLUSION

For children with febrile neutropenia at low risk for IBI, ambulatory management is safe and significantly cost saving compared with standard hospitalized therapy.

Changes in the etiology of bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients and the susceptibilities of the currently isolated pathogens

The etiology of bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients in the past few decades has shifted from gram-negative to gram-positive organisms. Potential reasons include the use of indwelling catheters, local environmental conditions, and the administration of specific antibiotic agents, especially as prophylaxis. Other factors may emerge from new studies, such as the categorization of febrile neutropenic patients into groups at low risk and at high risk of developing serious complications, continuing changes in resistance in the community, the use of antibiotic-coated catheters, and future changes in cytotoxic chemotherapy or antineoplastic therapy. In addition, there has been a drift in susceptibility patterns, with resistance issues seen in the general population of hospitalized patients now emerging in febrile neutropenic patients, as well as some issues specific to these patients. These changes affect empirical therapy as it was practiced a decade ago. Among the most commonly used agents, cefepime and carbapenems continue to show the highest rates of in vitro susceptibility, providing coverage against most gram-positive and gram-negative organisms and reducing the need for glycopeptides. Older agents continue to show degradation of their effectiveness. Among Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, susceptibility to all agents continues to decline.

Management of fever in neutropenic patients with different risks of complications

Risk stratification of febrile neutropenic patients can have important implications in terms of management. The first prospectively validated risk scoring system was developed in 1992. A subsequent scoring system was developed in 2000, in which a score of < or =21 predicts a <5% risk for severe complications. Oral combination therapy in an ambulatory or home care setting is acceptable for low-risk patients. Hospital admission is mandatory for high-risk patients. Intravenous monotherapy can be given if neutropenia is anticipated to be of short duration; it is also acceptable if neutropenia is expected to be more prolonged but the patients is stable and do not have an infectious focus. All other patients should receive combination therapy with an aminoglycoside, if infection with a gram-negative pathogen is suspected, or a glycopeptide, if a gram-positive organism is suspected. However, antimicrobial therapy with coverage against gram-negative organisms should always be provided because of the significant mortality associated with these infections.

Microcalorimetric evaluation of the in vitro compatibility of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and ampicillin/sulbactam with ciprofloxacin

Solution calorimetric technique has been used to determine the compatibility of binary and ternary systems of ampicillin trihydrate (AMP), sulbactam sodium (SS), amoxicillin trihydrate (AM), potassium clavulanate (PC) and ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (CP). The enthalpy of solution (DeltasolH) were obtained over a wide range of composition in the pH range 2-9. For all the pure drugs the DeltasolH is endothermic in nature. The molar enthalpies of interaction of binary (DeltaHbi.E) and ternary (DeltaHter.E) mixtures of the drugs in aqueous buffers have been determined. The DeltaHbi.E for all binary systems is negative and pH dependent (maximum pH 6-8) indicating the interaction among charged species of the drugs. In case of binary systems with CP the magnitude of DeltaHbi.E indicate strong interactions. The variation and magnitude of DeltaHbi.E for the systems is discussed in terms of hydrogen bonding and van der Waal's interaction in the solution. The interaction parameter for ternary systems (A) is positive indicating repulsive interaction among the drugs. The coefficients hi's calculated from Redlich-Kister equation for binary systems (DeltaHbi.E) and ternary interaction parameter (A) were used to predict the compatibility of the marketed formulations in pH range studied.

Responsiveness to G-CSF before leukopenia predicts defense to infection in high-dose chemotherapy recipients

An active assessment of the host capacity to prevent infection during myelosuppression should be beneficial in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy. A single dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (5 μg/kg) was given to 57 patients with multiple myeloma early after the completion of 85 high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan 200 mg/m2) courses. This provoked a highly variable white blood cell (WBC) peak after 12 to 14 hours. The median WBC count was 21 000/μL (range, 6400-60 600/μL) after a first high-dose therapy (n = 50) and 13 500/μL (range, 4700-24 800/μL) after a second high-dose therapy (n = 35). The responsiveness to single G-CSF was associated with the risk of infection during subsequent cytopenia (P = .003). This association was significant after adjustment for neutropenia duration. Notably, the result of testing G-CSF responsiveness was opportunely available before the onset of leukopenia, and G-CSF responsiveness was more informative than neutropenia duration regarding the risk of infection. Furthermore, there was an association between the responsiveness to G-CSF and stem cell engraftment (P &lt; .005), which remained significant after adjustment for the number of transplanted CD34+ cells. Our results show for the first time that G-CSF potentially could be used for an early in vivo assessment of defense to infection in recipients of high-dose chemotherapy.

Anti-inflammatory effects of moxifloxacin on activated human monocytic cells: inhibition of NF-kappaB and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and of synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines

We previously showed that moxifloxacin (MXF) exerts protective anti-inflammatory effects in immunosuppressed mice infected with Candida albicans by inhibiting interleukin-8 (IL-8) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) production in the lung. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated inhibition of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB translocation in lung epithelium and macrophages in MXF-treated mice. In the present study we investigated the effects of MXF on the production of proinflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-8, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta) by activated human peripheral blood monocytes and THP-1 cells and analyzed the effects of the drug on the major signal transduction pathways associated with inflammation: NF-kappaB and the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). The levels of IL-8, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta secretion rose 20- and 6.7-fold in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated monocytes and THP-1 cells, respectively. MXF (5 to 20 microg/ml) significantly inhibited cytokine production by 14 to 80% and 15 to 73% in monocytes and THP-1 cells, respectively. In THP-1 cells, the level of NF-kappaB nuclear translocation increased fourfold following stimulation with LPS-phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), and this was inhibited (38%) by 10 microg of MXF per ml. We then assayed the degradation of inhibitor (I)-kappaB by Western blotting. LPS-PMA induced degradation of I-kappaB by 73%, while addition of MXF (5 microg/ml) inhibited I-kappaB degradation by 49%. Activation of ERK1/2 and the 46-kDa p-JNK protein was enhanced by LPS and LPS-PMA and was significantly inhibited by MXF (54 and 42%, respectively, with MXF at 10 microg/ml). We conclude that MXF suppresses the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in human monocytes and THP-1 cells and that it exerts its anti-inflammatory effects in THP-1 cells by inhibiting NF-kappaB, ERK, and JNK activation. Its anti-inflammatory properties should be further assessed in clinical settings.

Emergency department waiting times for patients with cancer with febrile neutropenia: a pilot study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To determine the time frame for evaluation and treatment of adult patients with febrile neutropenia in the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN

Prospective, descriptive survey.

SETTING

ED in a large, urban, academic health center.

SAMPLE

19 patients with febrile neutropenia during 23 ED visits in eight months.

METHODS

Demographic and treatment variables and durations of time were recorded from ED and medical records.

FINDINGS

Patients had fevers a mean of 21 hours (range = 1-72 hours) before seeking treatment. Median waiting time from ED admission to examination was 75 minutes, 210 minutes before antibiotics were given, and 5.5 hours to hospital admission. Patients with more comorbidities and more extensive cancer waited significantly longer than those at lower risk (p less than 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the standard of care is to treat febrile neutropenia as an oncologic emergency, patients waited prolonged periods prior to receiving treatment. Studies are indicated to examine early intervention for febrile neutropenia and to determine whether early intervention improves clinical outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses may repeat this study at other settings and with other populations of people with cancer. Other studies may provide evidence that clinical outcomes are dependent on rapid intervention for febrile neutropenia in the cancer population or evaluate the efficacy of education that oncology nurses deliver to people with cancer and febrile neutropenia.

Management of infections in the neutropenic patient

Neutropenic patients continue to be at increased risk for developing serious infections despite substantial advances in supportive care. Epidemiologic shifts occur periodically and need to be detected early because they influence prophylactic, empiric, and specific therapy strategies. Although effective in preventing bacterial and some fungal infections, prophylaxis must be used with caution because it is associated with the emergence of resistance. The choices for empiric therapy include combination regimens and monotherapy. Specific choices depend on local factors (epidemiology, susceptibility/resistance patterns, availability). Various treatment settings (hospital-based, early discharge, outpatient) are also available, and the choice depends on the patient's risk category. Early diagnosis and treatment of many fungal and viral infections remains suboptimal. Infection control and prevention are important strategies, especially with the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms.

[High and low-risk febrile neutropenic patients]

IDENTIFICATION OF LOW-RISK PATIENTS: These patients exhibit a low probability of dying (risk equal or lesser than 1%) and of developing major complications (risk to the order of 5%). A clinical model developed by Talcott et al. considers at low risk patients at home when the fever starts, without severe co-morbidity and in whom the neoplasia is under control. A prognostic score was established by the MASCC (Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer); it is based on objectively weighted and selected variables. In comparison, the Talcott's classification appears more restrictive (2.5-fold less patients at low risk) but also that it supplies greater safety. IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH-RISK PATIENTS: All the severity scores used in intensive care have their limits. However, the repeated calculation of severity scores (at 48 and 72 hours) might lead to an improvement in their predictive value. The number of organ dysfunction could also be used because the latter provides supplementary clinical information and hence the development of organ dysfunction scores over the past few Years. For febrile neutropenic patients other than in intensive care, the interest of the severity scores and organ dysfunction scores appears limited.

Antibiothérapie ambulatoire chez les enfants neutropéniques fébriles

NEW STRATEGIES: Fever in a neutropenic patient requires the rapid initiation of a broad spectrum antibiotic and continued until correction of the neutropenia. Several studies have been conducted recently in order to define the populations of children in whom the antibiotherapy could be suspended early without risk of relapse of fever and/or severe infection. Moreover, the high costs of hospitalisation and the limited number of beds in the departments of Paediatric Oncology Haematology have led to studies on the feasibility of an antibiotherapy at home. THE EARLY SUSPENSION OF THE ANTIBIOTHERAPY: The criteria retained in several studies for the early suspension of the antibiotherapy have been: apyrexia for at least 24 hours, a satisfactory clinical status, the absence of positive haemocultures and haematological signs showing the end of aplasia in patients in remission of their disease. Studies have confirmed the possibility of early suspension of intravenous antibiotics in low-risk patients, without fever and without microbiological signs. THE PLACE OF ORAL ANTIBIOTICS: In several comparative studies, the success rate with intravenous antibiotics and oral antibiotics was comparable. The rate of failures was greater in patients with severe initial neutropenia. OUTPATIENT ANTIBIOTICS: In children, 2 types of studies have been conducted. The first studied the feasibility of an antibiotherapy at home following antibiotherapy in the hospital in order to reduce the costs and duration of hospitalisation. The others proposed an antibiotherapy at home from the start, either with the intravenous or the oral route. Following all these studies, it appeared that, in certain low-risk neutropenic children with fever, not only the antibiotics could be suspended before the complete correction of the neutropenia, but also a large spectrum oral antibiotherapy could replace the intravenous antibiotherapy and outpatient treatment would therefore be feasible.

Traitement antibiotique oral des neutropénies fébriles en onco-hématologie

THE CONTEXT: Up until the nineties, the intravenous administration of a broad spectrum antibiotic was the classical treatment of any patient presenting with febrile neutropenia. Since then, in patients considered at low risk and with expected of neutropenia less than 7-10 days, oral antibiotherapy has become an attractive option. TWO LARGE STUDIES: A study by the antimicrobial group of the EORTC (European organisation for research and treatment of cancer) and a North American study have compared the efficacy of an oral combination of ciprofloxacine and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid with that of an intravenous antibiotherapy in low-risk patients presenting febrile neutropenia. In both studies, the success rate was the same in the group of patients treated with oral antibiotics and those treated with intravenous antibiotics. RESERVATIONS: These two studies were conducted in hospitalised patients. No conclusions can be drawn with regard to out-patient treatment. Out-patient management would only be possible after appropriate selection of patients at low risk.

Children with cancer, fever, and treatment-induced neutropenia: risk factors associated with illness requiring the administration of critical care therapies

OBJECTIVES

To identify clinical and laboratory characteristics of pediatric patients with cancer, fever, and treatment-induced neutropenia, available at existing at initial presentation, that are independently associated with the development of illnesses requiring administration of critical care therapies.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected historical, clinical, and laboratory data on initial presentation for all pediatric (younger than 18 years) cancer patients admitted for fever and treatment-induced neutropenia at our institution over a 5-year period. The outcome variable was the need for administration of a critical care therapy within 24 hours of admission. A multivariable analysis was performed and internally validated using bootstrap analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 303 events in 143 patients, of which 36 (11.9%) received a critical care therapy. Higher temperature at presentation and capillary filling time (CFT) of >3 seconds retained significance in the multivariable analysis and were validated by the bootstrap analysis. The positive and negative predictive values of the presence of either temperature of > or =39.5 degrees C or CFT of >3 seconds were 35% and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric patients with cancer, fever, and treatment-induced neutropenia who present with higher fever or prolonged CFT are at increased risk of developing life-threatening illnesses requiring administration of critical care therapies, independent of hematologic factors, type of cancer, or other physiologic signs of sepsis.

Once-Daily Oral Levofloxacin Monotherapy versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam Three Times a Day: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial in Patients with Febrile Neutropenia

A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral monotherapy with 500 mg levofloxacin in comparison with 4.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam 3 times a day in patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia. Low risk was defined by oral temperature > or = 38.5 degrees C on one occasion or > or = 38.0 degrees C twice within 24 hours and granulocytopenia < or = 500/microL for less than 10 days. The primary end point was defined as defervescence after 72 hours followed by at least 7 afebrile days. Secondary end points were overall response, time to defervescence, survival on day 30, and toxicity. Thirty-four episodes were included. Fever of unknown origin accounted for 26 (76.5%) of the episodes, microbiologically defined infection for 5 (14.7%) of the episodes, and clinically defined infection for 3 (8.8%) of the episodes. On an intent-to-treat basis, all episodes were evaluable for the primary end point. Levofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam were successful after 72 hours of treatment in 76.5% and 88.3% of the episodes. Overall response was achieved in 94.1% and 100% of the episodes, respectively. One inpatient in the oral treatment group died of septic shock without identification of a causative pathogen. A larger phase III trial is warranted to further evaluate the lack of inferiority of the oral monotherapy regimen versus standard intravenous therapy.

Ciprofloxacin in treatment of fever and neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients

This article reviews clinical trials of outpatient management of fever and neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients. The syndrome of fever and neutropenia is discussed, and strategies of identifying patients at low risk for complex or fatal infections are described. A number of clinical trials in a wide range of clinical settings and countries have demonstrated that low risk pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia can be prospectively identified and safely treated as outpatients. In addition outpatient management has been shown to be less costly than conventional intravenous therapy in hospitalized patients. Oral fluoroquinolones, including ciprofloxacin, have been used as a component of therapy in several trials because of their ease of administration and their activity against the majority of pathogenic bacteria causing illness in this group. The article also discusses the role of antibiotic prophylaxis of fever and neutropenia in certain high risk settings, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In selected high risk patients, prophylactic use of limited spectrum fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin may reduce the incidence of Gram-negative bacteremias. Use of fluoroquinolone therapy as prophylaxis, however, is controversial because of concerns about an emergence of resistant organisms. Prudent use of fluoroquinolones as therapy and prophylaxis is essential to prolonging the benefits of this class of compounds.

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein: a possible diagnostic marker for Gram-negative bacteremia in neutropenic cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Cancer patients with febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy have a variable risk of bacterial infection. Especially Gram-negative bacteremia is associated with high mortality and/or morbidity. Early diagnosis of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia at the onset of febrile neutropenia is potentially useful in tailoring therapy.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective study at the Department of Pediatric Oncology and Internal Medicine of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Were analyzed 66 febrile neutropenic episodes in 57 adults and children. Patients were divided into four groups: those with Gram-negative bacteremia, Gram-positive bacteremia, clinical sepsis, or fever of unknown origin.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were determined. LBP at the onset of febrile neutropenia was significantly higher in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia than those with fever of unknown origin and those with Gram-positive bacteremia. Using a cutoff value for LBP proved to have much greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for Gram-negative bacteremia than the best cutoff value for CRP.

CONCLUSIONS

An initial high LBP level might predict Gram-negative bacteremia in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. These results may have potential clinical impact by allowing therapy to be initiated for these patients at a very early stage.

Infections in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: aetiology, prevention, and treatment

Patients with cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy are highly susceptible, especially if neutropenic, to almost any type of bacterial or fungal infection. These infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic use of antibiotics should be avoided, however, since this practice is associated with a risk of emergence of resistant bacteria and it does not lower the risk of death. However, chemoprophylaxis has a role for candidal fungal infections. Because infection in a neutropenic host can be rapidly fatal if not treated, the empirical administration of broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics is generally indicated for these patients, and the local frequencies, susceptibility, and resistance patterns of various pathogens must be taken into account. Once therapy has been initiated, changes in antibiotic regimens during the first 5 days are useless unless the patient's clinical condition deteriorates substantially. The treatment of invasive fungal infections is particularly difficult. Many unsolved questions remain, and studies are proposed here that may shed light on these issues.

Oral antibiotics with early hospital discharge compared with in-patient intravenous antibiotics for low-risk febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer: a prospective randomised controlled single centre study

Neutropenic sepsis remains a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy. However, it is possible to identify patients who are at low risk for serious complications and for whom less-intensive, more-convenient treatment may be appropriate. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of oral antibiotics in conjunction with early hospital discharge in comparison with standard in-patient intravenous antibiotics in patients with low-risk neutropenic fever. In all, 126 episodes of low-risk neutropenic fever occurred in 102 patients. Patients were randomised to receive either: an oral regimen of ciprofloxacin (750 mg 12 hourly) plus amoxicillin-clavulanate (675 mg 8 hourly) for a total of 5 days, or a standard intravenous regimen of gentamicin and tazocin (piperacillin/tazobactam) until hospital discharge. Patients randomised to oral antibiotics were eligible for discharge following 24 h of hospitalisation, if clinically stable and symptomatically improved. The efficacy of the two arms was similar: initial treatment was successful without antibiotic modification in 90% of episodes in the intravenous arm and 84.8% of episodes in the oral arm, P=0.55, absolute difference between the groups 5.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference -7 to 17.3%. Only one episode in the oral arm was associated with significant clinical deterioration: this occurred within the initial in-patient assessment period. The median in-patient stay was 4 days in the intravenous arm (range 2-8) and 2 days in the oral arm (range 1-16 days), P&<0.0005. The reduction in hospital stay led to significant cost-savings in the oral arm. In conclusion, this study suggests that oral antibiotics in conjunction with early hospital discharge for patients who remain stable after a 24 h period of in-patient monitoring offers a feasible and cost-effective alternative to conventional management of low-risk neutropenic fever.

Immunomodulatory effects of quinolones

We review data on the in-vitro, ex-vivo, in-vivo, and clinical effects of fluoroquinolones on the synthesis of cytokines and their mechanisms of immunomodulation. In general, most fluoroquinolone derivatives superinduce in-vitro interleukin 2 synthesis but inhibit synthesis of interleukin 1 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha; furthermore, they enhance significantly the synthesis of colony-stimulating factors (CSF). Fluoroquinolones affect in-vivo cellular and humoral immunity by attenuating cytokine responses. Interleukins 10 and 12 have an important role in the functional differentiation of immunocompetent cells and trigger the initiation of the acquired immune response. In addition, certain fluoroquinolones were seen to enhance haematopoiesis by increasing the concentrations of CSF in the lung as well as in the bone marrow and shaft. Those fluoroquinolones exerting significant effects on haematopoiesis were those with a cyclopropyl moiety at position N1 of their quinolone core structure. Mechanisms that could explain the various immunomodulatory effects of fluoroquinolones include: (1) an effect on intracellular cyclic adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate and phosphodiesterases; (2) an effect on transcription factors such as nuclear factor (NF)kappaB, activator protein 1, NF-interleukin-6 and nuclear factor of activated T cells; and (3) a triggering effect on the eukaryotic equivalent of bacterial SOS response with its ensuing intracellular events. Further studies are required, especially in the clinical setting to exploit fully the potential of the immunomodulatory effect of fluoroquinolones during, for example, immunosuppression, chronic airway inflammatory diseases, and sinusitis.

Evaluation of imipenem 1.5 g daily in febrile patients with short duration neutropenia after chemotherapy for non-leukemic hematologic malignancies and solid tumors: personal experience and review of the literature

Numerous studies have demonstrated efficacy of imipenem-cilastatin, 50 mg/kg/day, as first line therapy in febrile patients with neutropenia of short duration consecutive to cytostatic chemotherapy. However, only two studies used low dosage of this antibiotic as 1.5 g/day, in prospective, double blind, randomized clinical trials, in this indication. Efficacy and tolerability of imipenem-cilastatin 0.5 g three times daily IV in 30-min infusions, as first-line empiric therapy, were retrospectively evaluated in our hematological unit. From January 1996 to September 2000, 30 neutropenic patients (12 females) with 45 febrile episodes were included. Median age was 57.5 years (31-75). Twenty-four of them had lymphomas, 4 solid tumors and 2 myelomas. There were 13 clinically documented infections, (CD, 28.8%), 16 microbiologically documented infections, (MD, 35.6%) and 16 febrile episodes corresponding to fever of unknown origin, (FUO, 35.6%). The median neutrophils count on nadir (n = 44), was 67/mm3 (8-369). The median duration of neutropenia was 5 days (3-15). Bacteremia was observed in 10 patients, urinary tract infection in 3 patients. The most frequently isolated microorganism was Escherichia coli. The overall success rate of the first line therapy was 66.7%. Adverse events were observed in 11.1% of the patients without necessity to stop treatment. The MD infections showed a lower rate of success compared with CD infections and FUO. These data were in accordance with the previous studies. The importance of number of microorganisms (p = 0.007) and of infected sites (p = 0.01) appeared as prognostic factors (univariate analysis). Although imipenem-cilastatin has been used in numerous studies as empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in the treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients, the exact dosage of this antibiotic is still not standardized. However, utilization of this antibiotic in monotherapy at low dosage seems to us to be safe and effective as usual dosage in the antimicrobial treatment ofthe febrile patients with post chemotherapy neutropenia of short duration.

Outpatient, sequential, parenteral-oral antibiotic therapy for lower risk febrile neutropenia in children with malignant disease: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial in Argentina

BACKGROUND

Recent reports and previous randomized trials conducted at the authors' institution suggested that children with lower risk febrile neutropenic (LRFN) may benefit from substitution of oral antibiotic therapy for parenteral therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of parenteral-oral outpatient therapy in the management of children with LRFN who were receiving treatment for malignant disease.

METHODS

From August 2000 to April 2002, 135 children with a median age of 7.5 years (range, 1.6-15.8 years) who had a total of 177 episodes of LRFN were included in a prospective, randomized, single-institution trial. Children with LRFN received a single dose of ceftriaxone and amikacin and completed a risk-assessment work-up. All patients were discharged immediately and, at 24 hours, were allocated randomly to two groups: Group A (89 episodes) received oral ciprofloxacin, and Group B (88 episodes) received intravenous ceftriaxone.

RESULTS

Most patients (61% in Group A and 51% in Group B) were receiving treatment for leukemia (P value not significant [NS]). Twenty-eight children (31%) in Group A and 22 children (25%) in Group B displayed unexplained fever (P value NS). No significant differences in sites of initial infection were found between the two groups. The median duration of neutropenia was 4.2 days and 4.7 days for Group A and Group B, respectively (P value NS); the median duration of fever was 2.3 days and 2.6 days, respectively (P value NS); and the median duration of antibiotic treatment was 4.5 days and 4.8 days, respectively (P value NS). The overall results of the study were excellent. Only four treatment failures in Group A (5%) and 6 treatment failures in Group B (7%) were observed. These patients were readmitted to the hospital and did well with appropriate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with LRFN who are receiving treatment for malignant disease, outpatient oral ciprofloxacin after 24 hours of a single dose of intravenous ceftriaxone and amikacin was as safe and efficacious as parenteral ceftriaxone. Outpatient management and early antibiotic withdrawal were safe for both groups.

Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients

Neutropenia and its subsequent infectious complications represent the most common dose-limiting toxicity of cancer chemotherapy. Febrile neutropenia (FN) occurs with common chemotherapy regimens in 25 to 40% of treatment-naive patients, and its severity depends on the dose intensity of the chemotherapy regimen, the patient's prior history of either radiation therapy or use of cytotoxic treatment, and comorbidities. The occurrence of FN often causes subsequent chemotherapy delays or dose reductions. It may also lengthen hospital stay, increase monitoring, diagnostic and treatment costs, and reduce patient quality of life. A decade after their introduction, colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are now an integral part of the prevention of potentially life-threatening FN; however, only G-CSF has US Food and Drug Administration approval for use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. These adjunctive agents accelerate formation of neutrophils from committed progenitors, thereby reducing the duration and severity of neutropenia. Important uses of CSFs in oncology are prevention of FN after chemotherapy, treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes and support following bone marrow transplantation, and collection of CSF-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cells. G-CSF is used more frequently than GM-CSF for all of these indications because of fewer associated adverse effects. Clinical trials to date have not demonstrated a significant effect on overall survival or disease-free survival, which is most likely to be due to small sample size and lack of power to prove effect. However, they have demonstrated clinical utility in allowing the delivery of planned chemotherapy dose on schedule, an important clinical goal especially in curative tumour settings. The high cost of these agents limits their widespread use. Current American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis, or first cycle use, with CSFs being confined to patients with > or = 40% risk of FN, which may include elderly patients and other high-risk patients. In addition to the risk of FN, primary prophylaxis should also be considered if the patient has risk factors that place them in the Special Circumstances category. These risk factors may include decreased immune function in patients who are already at an increased risk of infection and pre-existing neutropenia due to disease, extensive prior chemotherapy, or previous irradiation to the pelvis or other areas containing large amounts of bone marrow. Future studies are needed to better define the patients most likely to benefit from CSF therapy, both for prophylaxis and as an adjunct to antibiotics for treatment of FN. Other potential uses include combination therapy with stem cell factors and other cytokines to boost progenitor cell development, maintaining dose intensity of salvage therapy in metastatic cancer patients, and application in patients with pneumonia, Crohn's fistulas, diabetic foot infections and a variety of other infectious conditions.

Ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin as continuation treatment of febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The empiric administration of anti-microbial therapy significantly reduces the morbidity and mortality associated with febrile neutropenic episodes in oncology patients. Outpatient empiric antibiotic therapy can be safely administered to a subset of febrile neutropenic patients at low risk for clinical complications.

PROCEDURE

Pediatric cancer patients presenting with febrile neutropenia after non-myeloablative chemotherapy and who met institutional criteria for early hospital discharge following a minimum of 48-hr inpatient empiric intravenous ceftazidime were eligible for the study. The feasibility and efficacy of an outpatient continuation therapy of oral ciprofloxacin (CPR) 25-30 mg/kg/day divided BID and amoxicillin (AMX) 30-50 mg/kg/day divided TID was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty febrile neutropenic episodes in 26 patients were treated with outpatient oral CPR/AMX therapy. Oral CPR/AMX therapy was feasible in 28 (93%) and efficacious in 26 (87%) of treatment episodes. CPR/AMX was discontinued due to abdominal pain and diarrhea (n = 2), recurrent fever (n = 3), or gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1). No patient developed new bacteremia or cardiopulmonary decompensation. Bone/joint pain or gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 27% of treatment episodes. Duration of neutropenia, lower absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (< 100/mm(3)) at start of oral antibiotic therapy and active malignant disease were associated with failure of oral antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to administer oral CPR/AMX as continuation antibiotic therapy for a selected subgroup of febrile neutropenic episodes defined after initial hospitalization and empiric antibiotic therapy. Prospectively randomized trials will be required to analyze adequately the efficacy of an oral CPR/AMX outpatient antibiotic regimen for treatment of febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients.

Economic evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in small-cell lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: an EORTC double-blind placebo-controlled phase III study (08923)

BACKGROUND

To determine whether the cost of prophylactic antibiotics during chemotherapy is offset by cost savings due to a decreased incidence of febrile leukopenia (FL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients were randomised to standard or intensified chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to assess the impact on survival (n = 244). In addition, patients were randomised to prophylactic ciprofloxacin and roxithromycin or placebo to assess the impact on FL (n = 161). The economic evaluation examined the costs and effects of patients taking antibiotics versus placebo. Medical resource utilisation was documented prospectively, including 33 patients from one centre in The Netherlands (NL) and 49 patients from one centre in Germany (GE). The evaluation takes the perspective of the health insurance systems and of the hospitals. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In the main trial, prophylactic antibiotics reduced the incidence of FL, hospitalisation due to FL and use of therapeutic antibiotics by 50%. In GE, the incidence of FL was not reduced by prophylaxis. This resulted in an average cost difference of only 35 Euros [95% confidence interval (CI) (-)1.713-2.263] in favour of prophylaxis (not significant). In NL, prophylaxis reduced the incidence of FL by nearly 50%, comparable with the results of the main trial, resulting in a cost difference of 2706 Euros [95% CI 810-5948], demonstrating savings in favour of prophylactic antibiotics of nearly 45%. Sensitivity analyses indicate that with an efficacy of prophylaxis of 50%, and with expected costs of antibiotic prophylaxis of 500 Euros or less, cost savings will incur over a broad range of baseline risks for FL; that is, a risk >10-20% for FL per cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Giving oral prophylactic antibiotics to SCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy is the dominant strategy in both GE and NL, demonstrating both cost-savings and superior efficacy. The sensitivity analyses demonstrate that, due to the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics and their low unit cost, cost savings will incur over a broad range of baseline risks for FL. We recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients at risk for FL during chemotherapy.

Elderly haematological patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia have similar rates of infection and outcome to younger adults: a prospective study of risk-adapted therapy

We prospectively evaluated 131 consecutive episodes of fever and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in 85 adults with haematological malignancies to determine whether older patients (aged < 60 years) have different causes of fever and outcome than younger adults (aged < 60 years). Patients were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups according to previously published criteria. High-risk patients received ceftazidime plus amikacin and low-risk patients received ceftazidime alone. All patients were hospitalized until fever and neutropenia resolved. Ninety one high-risk episodes were documented: 56 occurring in older patients (mean age 69 years) and 35 in younger adults (mean age 45 years). Non-Hodkgin's lymphoma and acute myeloid leukaemia were the most frequent underlying neoplasias in both age groups. Intensity of chemotherapy was similar in both age groups. Mean neutrophil count at entry, median duration of neutropenia, rate of documented infection, incidence of bacteraemia, response to therapy, overall mortality and infectious mortality were similar in the two high-risk age subgroups. The elderly subgroup had a trend to have more Gram-negative infections and the younger patients more Gram-positive infections. In addition, 40 low-risk episodes were registered: 29 in elderly patients (mean age 68 years) and 11 in younger patients (mean age 44 years). Elderly low-risk patients had more concurrent diseases that younger ones (P = 0.124). Mean neutrophil count at entry, median duration of severe neutropenia and rate of response were similar in the two age subgroups. All low-risk patients survived. In conclusion, elderly haematological cancer patients with febrile neutropenia show similar rates of infection and outcome to younger ones.

Outpatient therapy for febrile neutropenia: clinical and economic implications

Although febrile episodes in neutropenic patients remain a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy, considerable progress has been achieved in understanding this issue. Febrile neutropenic patients represent a heterogeneous population that displays a very variable risk for serious medical complications. It has also been ascertained that in low-risk patients, the standard of care can be safely and effectively shifted from traditional hospital-based, parenteral, empiric, broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy to outpatient treatment, even for the entire duration of the febrile episode. Furthermore, in the last years some risk assessment models have been developed to identify, at the onset of febrile episodes, low-risk neutropenic patients who are most likely to have a favourable outcome (and who can effectively and safely be treated on an outpatient basis). With respect to traditional hospital-based therapy, the outpatient treatment of low-risk patients is associated with several advantages, including a conspicuous cost saving. Some strategies for inpatient therapy, such as switching from intravenous to oral antibacterials and early discharge, can allow some cost containment; however, the most substantial decrease in costs can be obtained by using outpatient treatment over the entire febrile episode, especially by using oral antibacterials. In spite of the considerable number of clinical studies published over the past 20 years, only limited pharmacoeconomic data on this issue are available. Future comparative studies between outpatient and inpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia, in addition to clinical outcomes (e.g. survival, time to clinical response), should therefore include the following: (i) a detailed analysis of total costs, specifying the setting of outpatient treatment and the method of administration of antimicrobial agents (home nursing, self administration or treatment at infusion centres or at a low-care unit of the hospital); (ii) cost of inpatient treatment if outpatient therapy fails; and (iii) out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the patients.

Toxinogenicity and markers of pathogenicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from patients with tumor diseases

Potential virulence factors (elastase, proteinase, lipase, phospholipase C, alginate) as well as surface properties (hydrophobicity, motility) were determined in 103 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from patients with cancer. Nontypable strains were the dominant group (60%), followed by serotypes O11 (17%), O12 (7%) and O4 (5%). Seventy-one strains (69%) produced high level of elastase (10-60 mg/L), 87% of the strains possessed high activity of proteinase (bacterial) (10-250 mg/L) and 69% of the strains demonstrated higher level of lipase (20-150 U/mL); these elevated levels of enzymes were associated mainly with nontypable strains. On the other hand, 79% of the strains did not produce or produced only a low level of phospholipase C and 60% of isolates did not manifest any or very low production of alginate. Hydrophobicity demonstrated by adherence of the bacteria to xylene was shown by 69% of strains; 94% of strains aggregated with ammonium sulfate. Motility in the range of 31-80 mm was found in 76 strains (74%). The considerable virulence of tested P. aeruginosa strains was confirmed. The nontypable strains manifested the most frequent group with high level of elastase, proteinase, lipase, hydrophobicity and motility.

Methodology for clinical trials involving patients with cancer who have febrile neutropenia: updated guidelines of the Immunocompromised Host Society/Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer, with emphasis on outpatient studies

Two multinational organizations, the Immunocompromised Host Society and the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer, have produced for investigators and regulatory bodies a set of guidelines on methodology for clinical trials involving patients with febrile neutropenia. The guidelines suggest that response (i.e., success of initial empirical antibiotic therapy without any modification) be determined at 72 h and again on day 5, and the reasons for modification should be stated. Blinding and stratification are to be encouraged, as should statistical consideration of trials specifically designed for showing equivalence. Patients enrolled in outpatient studies should be selected by use of a validated risk model, and patients should be carefully monitored after discharge from the hospital. Response and safety parameters should be recorded along with readmission rates. If studies use these guidelines, comparisons between studies will be simpler and will lead to further improvements in patient therapy.

Cost effective approaches to antimicrobial use in oncology patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the current era of cost containment, the management of the oncology patient who presents with neutropenia and fever remains a challenge. This article will review which measures of cost are helpful in determining cost effective antibiotic use in patients with febrile neutropenia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The majority of direct medical costs associated with treating febrile neutropenic patients are room and board costs. The most recent cost analysis reports a mean cost/day of US$1598.

SUMMARY

Over the past two decades, infection-related mortality rates have decreased from 50% to rates as low as 10%. In contrast to the numerous studies comparing clinical outcomes of patients receiving different antimicrobial regimens for febrile neutropenia, the recent literature revealed limited studies that evaluate economic data. Typically, new antibiotic regimens show equal efficacy to the standard regimens but are often more expensive. If efficacy rates and safety are the same for an antibiotic, the cost is often used to select the product.

Outpatient and home parenteral antibiotic therapy (OHPAT) in low-risk febrile neutropenia: consensus statement of a Belgian panel

Febrile neutropenia requires adequate antibiotic treatment. A subgroup of patients are only at low risk for complications and could be treated at home/as outpatients (OHPAT) after a short initial admission for work up. This position paper by a Belgian panel of experts presents criteria defining low-risk in febrile neutropenia, gives an overview of the existing experience and examines the present obstacles to a more widespread use of OHPAT in this country.

Fever and neutropenia in cancer patients: the diagnostic role of cytokines in risk assessment strategies

Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy are susceptible to bacterial infections. Therefore, all neutropenic cancer patients with fever receive standard therapy consisting of broad-spectrum antibiotics and hospitalization. However, febrile neutropenia in cancer patients is often due to other causes than bacterial infections. Therefore, standard therapy should be re-evaluated and new treatment strategies for patients with variable risk for bacterial infection should be considered. This paper reviews the changing spectrum of microorganisms and resistance of microorganisms to antibiotics in infection during neutropenia and discusses new strategies for the selection of patients with low-risk for bacterial infection using clinical and biochemical parameters such as acute phase proteins and cytokines. These low-risk patients may be treated with alternative therapies such as oral antibiotics, early discharge from the hospital or outpatient treatment.

A practical approach to neutrophil disorders

This review discusses disorders of altered neutrophil number and function and provide a basic framework for patient evaluation and management. The sections begin with neutropenia, neutrophilia and neutrophil dysfunction with a general screening approach to differentiate common, more benign syndromes from rare, often more serious disorders. Also included is a detailed discussion of some specific primary neutrophil syndromes at the end of each section. Focus is placed on specific disorders that are clinically common or particularly instructive.

Antimicrobial activity of a novel des-fluoro (6) quinolone, garenoxacin (BMS-284756), compared to other quinolones, against clinical isolates from cancer patients

The in vitro spectrum of a novel des-fluoro (6) quinolone, garenoxacin (BMS-284756), was compared with that of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and trovafloxacin against 736 clinical isolates from cancer patients. Garenoxacin was the most active agent overall against Gram-positive organisms, with potent activity against Aerococcus spp., Micrococcus spp., Rhodococcus equi, Stomatococcus mucilaginous, Bacillus spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp., and all beta-hemolytic and viridans streptococci. Although ciprofloxacin was the most active agent tested against the Enterobacteriaceae garenoxacin inhibited the majority of these isolates at <or=4.0 microg/ml, its proposed susceptibility break-point. All 4 agents had sub-optimal activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and variable activity against other non-fermenters, with Stenotrophomonas maltophila and Alcaligenes spp. being the most resistant isolates. The overall broad spectrum of garenoxacin warrants its evaluation for the prevention or treatment of infections in cancer patients.

Prospective evaluation of a model of prediction of invasive bacterial infection risk among children with cancer, fever, and neutropenia

A risk prediction model for invasive bacterial infection (IBI) was prospectively evaluated among children presenting with cancer, fever, and neutropenia. The model incorporated assessment of 5 previously identified risk factors: serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP) >/=90 mg/L, hypotension, identification of relapse of leukemia as the cancer type, platelet count of </=50,000 platelets/mm(3), and recent receipt of chemotherapy [16]. Children were uniformly evaluated at enrollment and were classified as having high or low risk for IBI according to a model that considers the number and type of variables present. Of the 263 febrile episodes evaluated during a 17-month period, 140 (53%) were in IBI-positive children. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the model were 92%, 76%, 82%, and 90%, respectively. Identification of these 5 risk factors during the first 24 h of hospitalization was helpful in discriminating between children with a high or low risk for IBI.

Treatment of febrile neutropenia: what is new?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To identify the more recent challenges in the treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia following antineoplastic chemotherapy or bone marrow transplant published in the English language in the period late 2000-early 2002 regarding: changes in etiology of bacteremia in neutropenic patients; new options for initial empirical antibacterial therapy; factors associated with the risk of developing infection in cancer patients; prediction of prognosis in febrile neutropenia; oral therapy; need for a specific anti-Gram-positive coverage in persistently febrile and neutropenic patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Findings may be summarized according with the identified topics as follows: many centers are reporting an increase in the incidence of Gram-negative bacteremias; piperacillin-tazobactam could be safely administered as monotherapy of febrile neutropenia; congenital factors and intensity of chemotherapy and other medical interventions, such as antifungal prophylaxis, are recognized as of increasing importance in the determination of infectious risk; it is now possible to identify patients with a good prognosis (low risk) by means of validated scoring systems; oral therapy is feasible in low risk patients; the empirical addition of a glycopeptide in persistently febrile neutropenic patients is not indicated.

SUMMARY

Many of the identified points may have a great impact in the daily management of febrile granulocytopenic patients. However, all recent epidemiological and therapeutical studies underline the absoloute need for the knowledge of the pattern of infecting organisms in each center.

Evolving concepts of management of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent investigations of febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients have identified subsets of low-risk patients who can be managed with less antibiotic therapy than previously recommended standards.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PubMed and Medline were searched for prospective trials and reviews of febrile neutropenia in children. Magnitude and duration of fever and neutropenia, comorbidities, and therapeutic strategies were examined.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven prospective trials and five reviews were identified. The child with cancer and low-risk febrile neutropenia is clinically well and afebrile within 24-96 hr of antibiotic therapy and has evidence of marrow recovery with a rising phagocyte count. Disqualifying comorbidities include leukemia at diagnosis or in relapse, uncontrolled cancer, age under 1 year, medical condition(s) that would otherwise require hospitalization and social or economic conditions that may potentially compromise access to care or compliance. Therapeutic strategies include parenteral or oral antibiotics in the hospital with early discharge or parenteral antibiotics in the outpatient setting followed by oral or parenteral therapy and daily reassessment. Although as many as 25% of low-risk patients require modification of therapy and/or hospitalization, life-threatening or fatal infection is exceptional.

CONCLUSION

One-third to one-half the children with febrile neutropenia are at low-risk of serious infection. In the context of clinic trials, they can be safely managed with inpatient or outpatient strategies that maintain close follow-up and reduce the burden of antibiotic therapy. Adoption of these alternative strategies as the standard of care should proceed with caution guided by written protocols.