151
|
Van Den Bent M, Eoli M, Sepulveda JM, Smits M, Walenkamp A, Frenel JS, Franceschi E, Clement PM, Chinot O, De Vos F, Whenham N, Sanghera P, Weller M, Dubbink HJ, French P, Looman J, Dey J, Krause S, Ansell P, Nuyens S, Spruyt M, Brilhante J, Coens C, Gorlia T, Golfinopoulos V. INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:684-693. [PMID: 31747009 PMCID: PMC7229258 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) is a tumor-specific antibody–drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. We investigated Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide or as a single agent in a randomized controlled phase II trial in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma. Methods Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR amplified glioblastoma at first recurrence after chemo-irradiation with temozolomide. Patients were randomized to either Depatux-M 1.25 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or this treatment combined with temozolomide 150–200 mg/m2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or either lomustine or temozolomide. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival. Results Two hundred sixty patients were randomized. In the primary efficacy analysis with 199 events (median follow-up 15.0 mo), the hazard ratio (HR) for the combination arm compared with the control arm was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50, 1.02; P = 0.062). The efficacy of Depatux-M monotherapy was comparable to that of the control arm (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.48; P = 0.83). The most frequent toxicity in Depatux-M treated patients was a reversible corneal epitheliopathy, occurring as grades 3–4 adverse events in 25–30% of patients. In the long-term follow-up analysis with median follow-up of 28.7 months, the HR for the comparison of the combination arm versus the control arm was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.48, 0.93). Conclusion This trial suggests a possible role for the use of Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide in EGFR amplified recurrent glioblastoma, especially in patients relapsing well after the end of first-line adjuvant temozolomide treatment. (NCT02343406)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Van Den Bent
- Brain Tumor Institute Erasmus Medical Center (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marica Eoli
- Department of Neurology, Carlo Besta Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemiek Walenkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jean-Sebastian Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, René Gauducheau Center for Cancer Care, Nantes, France
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Local Health Unit Agency/Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare (AUSL/IRCCS) Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paul M Clement
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olivier Chinot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Institute of Neurophysiopathology, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Filip De Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Whenham
- Department of Medical Oncology, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - H J Dubbink
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim French
- Brain Tumor Institute Erasmus Medical Center (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jyotirmoy Dey
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Abbvie, Chicago, IL USA
| | | | | | | | - Maarten Spruyt
- Brain Tumor Institute Erasmus Medical Center (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
152
|
Huang RY, Young RJ, Ellingson BM, Veeraraghavan H, Wang W, Tixier F, Um H, Nawaz R, Luks T, Kim J, Gerstner ER, Schiff D, Peters KB, Mellinghoff IK, Chang SM, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY. Volumetric analysis of IDH-mutant lower-grade glioma: a natural history study of tumor growth rates before and after treatment. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1822-1830. [PMID: 32328652 PMCID: PMC7746936 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and/or 2 (IDH1/2) mutations have long survival times, making evaluation of treatment efficacy difficult. We investigated the volumetric growth rate of IDH mutant gliomas before and after treatment with established glioma therapies to determine whether a significant change in growth rate could be documented and perhaps be used in the future to evaluate treatment response to investigational agents in LGG trials. METHODS In this multicenter retrospective study, 230 adult patients with IDH1/2 mutated LGGs (World Health Organization grade II or III) undergoing surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy for progressive non-enhancing tumor were identified. Subjects were required to have 3 MRI scans containing T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging spanning a minimum of 6 months prior to treatment. A mixed-effect model was used to estimate tumor growth prior to treatment. A subset of 95 patients who received chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy and had 2 posttreatment imaging time points available were evaluated for change in pre- and posttreatment volumetric growth rates using a piecewise mixed model. RESULTS The pretreatment volumetric growth rate across all 230 patients was 27.37%/180 days (95% CI: [23.36%, 31.51%]). In the 95 patients with both pre- and posttreatment scans available, there was a significant difference in volumetric growth rates before (26.63%/180 days, 95% CI: [19.31%, 34.40%]) and after treatment (-15.24% /180 days, 95% CI: [-21.37%, -8.62%]) (P < 0.0001). The growth rates for patient subgroup with 1p/19q codeletion (N = 118) was significantly slower than the rate of the 1p/19q non-codeleted group (N = 68) (22.84% vs 35.49%, P = 0.0108). CONCLUSION In this study, we evaluated the growth rates of IDH mutant gliomas before and after standard therapy. Further study is needed to establish whether a change in growth rate is associated with patient survival and its use as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials for IDH mutant LGGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Harini Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Wei Wang
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Florent Tixier
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hyemin Um
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rasheed Nawaz
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tracy Luks
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - John Kim
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - David Schiff
- Departments of Neurology, Neurological Surgery, and Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Accelerated 3D whole-brain T1, T2, and proton density mapping: feasibility for clinical glioma MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2021; 63:1831-1851. [PMID: 33835238 PMCID: PMC8528802 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02703-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Advanced MRI-based biomarkers offer comprehensive and quantitative information for the evaluation and characterization of brain tumors. In this study, we report initial clinical experience in routine glioma imaging with a novel, fully 3D multiparametric quantitative transient-state imaging (QTI) method for tissue characterization based on T1 and T2 values. Methods To demonstrate the viability of the proposed 3D QTI technique, nine glioma patients (grade II–IV), with a variety of disease states and treatment histories, were included in this study. First, we investigated the feasibility of 3D QTI (6:25 min scan time) for its use in clinical routine imaging, focusing on image reconstruction, parameter estimation, and contrast-weighted image synthesis. Second, for an initial assessment of 3D QTI-based quantitative MR biomarkers, we performed a ROI-based analysis to characterize T1 and T2 components in tumor and peritumoral tissue. Results The 3D acquisition combined with a compressed sensing reconstruction and neural network-based parameter inference produced parametric maps with high isotropic resolution (1.125 × 1.125 × 1.125 mm3 voxel size) and whole-brain coverage (22.5 × 22.5 × 22.5 cm3 FOV), enabling the synthesis of clinically relevant T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR contrasts without any extra scan time. Our study revealed increased T1 and T2 values in tumor and peritumoral regions compared to contralateral white matter, good agreement with healthy volunteer data, and high inter-subject consistency. Conclusion 3D QTI demonstrated comprehensive tissue assessment of tumor substructures captured in T1 and T2 parameters. Aiming for fast acquisition of quantitative MR biomarkers, 3D QTI has potential to improve disease characterization in brain tumor patients under tight clinical time-constraints.
Collapse
|
154
|
Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22083867. [PMID: 33918043 PMCID: PMC8069140 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22083867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant brain tumor in adults, with a dismal prognosis despite aggressive multi-modal therapy. Immunotherapy is currently being evaluated as an alternate treatment modality for recurrent GBMs in clinical trials. These immunotherapeutic approaches harness the patient's immune response to fight and eliminate tumor cells. Standard MR imaging is not adequate for response assessment to immunotherapy in GBM patients even after using refined response assessment criteria secondary to amplified immune response. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of effective and alternative neuroimaging techniques for accurate response assessment. To this end, some groups have reported the potential of diffusion and perfusion MR imaging and amino acid-based positron emission tomography techniques in evaluating treatment response to different immunotherapeutic regimens in GBMs. The main goal of these techniques is to provide definitive metrics of treatment response at earlier time points for making informed decisions on future therapeutic interventions. This review provides an overview of available immunotherapeutic approaches used to treat GBMs. It discusses the limitations of conventional imaging and potential utilities of physiologic imaging techniques in the response assessment to immunotherapies. It also describes challenges associated with these imaging methods and potential solutions to avoid them.
Collapse
|
155
|
Zhao MY, Fan AP, Chen DYT, Sokolska MJ, Guo J, Ishii Y, Shin DD, Khalighi MM, Holley D, Halbert K, Otte A, Williams B, Rostami T, Park JH, Shen B, Zaharchuk G. Cerebrovascular reactivity measurements using simultaneous 15O-water PET and ASL MRI: Impacts of arterial transit time, labeling efficiency, and hematocrit. Neuroimage 2021; 233:117955. [PMID: 33716155 PMCID: PMC8272558 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) reflects the capacity of the brain to meet changing physiological demands and can predict the risk of cerebrovascular diseases. CVR can be obtained by measuring the change in cerebral blood flow (CBF) during a brain stress test where CBF is altered by a vasodilator such as acetazolamide. Although the gold standard to quantify CBF is PET imaging, the procedure is invasive and inaccessible to most patients. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a non-invasive and quantitative MRI method to measure CBF, and a consensus guideline has been published for the clinical application of ASL. Despite single post labeling delay (PLD) pseudo-continuous ASL (PCASL) being the recommended ASL technique for CBF quantification, it is sensitive to variations to the arterial transit time (ATT) and labeling efficiency induced by the vasodilator in CVR studies. Multi-PLD ASL controls for the changes in ATT, and velocity selective ASL is in theory insensitive to both ATT and labeling efficiency. Here we investigate CVR using simultaneous 15O-water PET and ASL MRI data from 19 healthy subjects. CVR and CBF measured by the ASL techniques were compared using PET as the reference technique. The impacts of blood T1 and labeling efficiency on ASL were assessed using individual measurements of hematocrit and flow velocity data of the carotid and vertebral arteries measured using phase-contrast MRI. We found that multi-PLD PCASL is the ASL technique most consistent with PET for CVR quantification (group mean CVR of the whole brain = 42 ± 19% and 40 ± 18% respectively). Single-PLD ASL underestimated the CVR of the whole brain significantly by 15 ± 10% compared with PET (p<0.01, paired t-test). Changes in ATT pre- and post-acetazolamide was the principal factor affecting ASL-based CVR quantification. Variations in labeling efficiency and blood T1 had negligible effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moss Y Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
| | - Audrey P Fan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - David Yen-Ting Chen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University - Shuan-Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Magdalena J Sokolska
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jia Guo
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States
| | - Yosuke Ishii
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Dawn Holley
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Kim Halbert
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Andrea Otte
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Brittney Williams
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Taghi Rostami
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Jun-Hyung Park
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Bin Shen
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Greg Zaharchuk
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Mishkovsky M, Gusyatiner O, Lanz B, Cudalbu C, Vassallo I, Hamou MF, Bloch J, Comment A, Gruetter R, Hegi ME. Hyperpolarized 13C-glucose magnetic resonance highlights reduced aerobic glycolysis in vivo in infiltrative glioblastoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5771. [PMID: 33707647 PMCID: PMC7952603 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85339-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive brain tumor type in adults. GBM is heterogeneous, with a compact core lesion surrounded by an invasive tumor front. This front is highly relevant for tumor recurrence but is generally non-detectable using standard imaging techniques. Recent studies demonstrated distinct metabolic profiles of the invasive phenotype in GBM. Magnetic resonance (MR) of hyperpolarized 13C-labeled probes is a rapidly advancing field that provides real-time metabolic information. Here, we applied hyperpolarized 13C-glucose MR to mouse GBM models. Compared to controls, the amount of lactate produced from hyperpolarized glucose was higher in the compact GBM model, consistent with the accepted "Warburg effect". However, the opposite response was observed in models reflecting the invasive zone, with less lactate produced than in controls, implying a reduction in aerobic glycolysis. These striking differences could be used to map the metabolic heterogeneity in GBM and to visualize the infiltrative front of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mor Mishkovsky
- Laboratory of Functional and Metabolic Imaging, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Olga Gusyatiner
- Neuroscience Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Service of Neurosurgery Lausanne, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bernard Lanz
- Laboratory of Functional and Metabolic Imaging, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Cudalbu
- Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Irene Vassallo
- Neuroscience Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Service of Neurosurgery Lausanne, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marie-France Hamou
- Neuroscience Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Service of Neurosurgery Lausanne, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jocelyne Bloch
- Neuroscience Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Service of Neurosurgery Lausanne, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Arnaud Comment
- General Electric Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4SP, UK
| | - Rolf Gruetter
- Laboratory of Functional and Metabolic Imaging, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology, University of Geneva (UNIGE), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Monika E Hegi
- Neuroscience Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Service of Neurosurgery Lausanne, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Tatekawa H, Hagiwara A, Uetani H, Bahri S, Raymond C, Lai A, Cloughesy TF, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Pope WB, Salamon N, Ellingson BM. Differentiating IDH status in human gliomas using machine learning and multiparametric MR/PET. Cancer Imaging 2021; 21:27. [PMID: 33691798 PMCID: PMC7944911 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-021-00396-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to develop a voxel-wise clustering method of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) images using an unsupervised, two-level clustering approach followed by support vector machine in order to classify the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status of gliomas. Methods Sixty-two treatment-naïve glioma patients who underwent FDOPA PET and MRI were retrospectively included. Contrast enhanced T1-weighted images, T2-weighted images, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and relative cerebral blood volume maps, and FDOPA PET images were used for voxel-wise feature extraction. An unsupervised two-level clustering approach, including a self-organizing map followed by the K-means algorithm was used, and each class label was applied to the original images. The logarithmic ratio of labels in each class within tumor regions was applied to a support vector machine to differentiate IDH mutation status. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves, accuracy, and F1-socore were calculated and used as metrics for performance. Results The associations of multiparametric imaging values in each cluster were successfully visualized. Multiparametric images with 16-class clustering revealed the highest classification performance to differentiate IDH status with the AUC, accuracy, and F1-score of 0.81, 0.76, and 0.76, respectively. Conclusions Machine learning using an unsupervised two-level clustering approach followed by a support vector machine classified the IDH mutation status of gliomas, and visualized voxel-wise features from multiparametric MRI and FDOPA PET images. Unsupervised clustered features may improve the understanding of prioritizing multiparametric imaging for classifying IDH status. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-021-00396-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Tatekawa
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Uetani
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Shadfar Bahri
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Albert Lai
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Linda M Liau
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. .,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. .,UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Patel KS, Everson RG, Yao J, Raymond C, Goldman J, Schlossman J, Tsung J, Tan C, Pope WB, Ji MS, Nguyen NT, Lai A, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM. Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phenotypes Predict Overall Survival Benefit From Bevacizumab or Surgery in Recurrent Glioblastoma With Large Tumor Burden. Neurosurgery 2021; 87:931-938. [PMID: 32365185 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diffusion magnetic resonance (MR) characteristics are a predictive imaging biomarker for survival benefit in recurrent glioblastoma treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy; however, its use in large volume recurrence has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE To determine if diffusion MR characteristics can predict survival outcomes in patients with large volume recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab or repeat resection. METHODS A total of 32 patients with large volume (>20 cc or > 3.4 cm diameter) recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab and 35 patients treated with repeat surgery were included. Pretreatment tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis were used to phenotype patients as having high (>1.24 μm2/ms) or low (<1.24 μm2/ms) ADCL, the mean value of the lower peak in a double Gaussian model of the ADC histogram within the contrast enhancing tumor. RESULTS In bevacizumab and surgical cohorts, volume was correlated with overall survival (Bevacizumab: P = .009, HR = 1.02; Surgical: P = .006, HR = 0.96). ADCL was an independent predictor of survival in the bevacizumab cohort (P = .049, HR = 0.44), but not the surgical cohort (P = .273, HR = 0.67). There was a survival advantage of surgery over bevacizumab in patients with low ADCL (P = .036, HR = 0.43) but not in patients with high ADCL (P = .284, HR = 0.69). CONCLUSION Pretreatment diffusion MR imaging is an independent predictive biomarker for overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma with a large tumor burden. Large tumors with low ADCL have a survival benefit when treated with surgical resection, whereas large tumors with high ADCL may be best managed with bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal S Patel
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Richard G Everson
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jingwen Yao
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jodi Goldman
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jacob Schlossman
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joseph Tsung
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Caleb Tan
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew S Ji
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nhung T Nguyen
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Albert Lai
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Linda M Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Dynamic Susceptibility Perfusion Imaging for Differentiating Progressive Disease from Pseudoprogression in Diffuse Glioma Molecular Subtypes. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10040598. [PMID: 33562558 PMCID: PMC7915936 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives: Advanced adjuvant therapy of diffuse gliomas can result in equivocal findings in follow-up imaging. We aimed to assess the additional value of dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging in the differentiation of progressive disease (PD) from pseudoprogression (PsP) in different molecular glioma subtypes. Materials and Methods: 89 patients with treated diffuse glioma with different molecular subtypes (IDH wild type (Astro-IDHwt), IDH mutant astrocytomas (Astro-IDHmut) and oligodendrogliomas), and tumor-suspect lesions on post-treatment follow-up imaging were classified into two outcome groups (PD or PsP) retrospectively by histopathology or clinical follow-up. The relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) was assessed in the tumor-suspect FLAIR and contrast-enhancing (CE) lesions. We analyzed how a multilevel classification using a molecular subtype, the presence of a CE lesion, and two rCBV histogram parameters performed for PD prediction compared with a decision tree model (DTM) using additional rCBV parameters. Results: The PD rate was 69% in the whole cohort, 86% in Astro-IDHwt, 52% in Astro-IDHmut, and 55% in oligodendrogliomas. In the presence of a CE lesion, the PD rate was higher with 82%, 94%, 59%, and 88%, respectively; if there was no CE lesion, however, the PD rate was only 44%, 60%, 40%, and 33%, respectively. The additional use of the rCBV parameters in the DTM yielded a prediction accuracy for PD of 99%, 100%, 93%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusion: Utilizing combined information about the molecular tumor type, the presence or absence of CE lesions and rCBV parameters increases PD prediction accuracy in diffuse glioma.
Collapse
|
160
|
Park YW, Choi D, Park JE, Ahn SS, Kim H, Chang JH, Kim SH, Kim HS, Lee SK. Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma from radiation necrosis using diffusion radiomics with machine learning model development and external validation. Sci Rep 2021; 11:2913. [PMID: 33536499 PMCID: PMC7858615 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82467-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to establish a high-performing radiomics strategy with machine learning from conventional and diffusion MRI to differentiate recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) from radiation necrosis (RN) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or radiotherapy. Eighty-six patients with GBM were enrolled in the training set after they underwent CCRT or radiotherapy and presented with new or enlarging contrast enhancement within the radiation field on follow-up MRI. A diagnosis was established either pathologically or clinicoradiologically (63 recurrent GBM and 23 RN). Another 41 patients (23 recurrent GBM and 18 RN) from a different institution were enrolled in the test set. Conventional MRI sequences (T2-weighted and postcontrast T1-weighted images) and ADC were analyzed to extract 263 radiomic features. After feature selection, various machine learning models with oversampling methods were trained with combinations of MRI sequences and subsequently validated in the test set. In the independent test set, the model using ADC sequence showed the best diagnostic performance, with an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of 0.80, 78%, 66.7%, and 87%, respectively. In conclusion, the radiomics models models using other MRI sequences showed AUCs ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 in the test set. The diffusion radiomics may be helpful in differentiating recurrent GBM from RN..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yae Won Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Image Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| | - Dongmin Choi
- Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Soo Ahn
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Image Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
| | - Hwiyoung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Image Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Se Hoon Kim
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung-Koo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Image Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Abstract
Radiomics is a novel technique in which quantitative phenotypes or features are extracted from medical images. Machine learning enables analysis of large quantities of medical imaging data generated by radiomic feature extraction. A growing number of studies based on these methods have developed tools for neuro-oncology applications. Despite the initial promises, many of these imaging tools remain far from clinical implementation. One major limitation hindering the use of these models is their lack of reproducibility when applied across different institutions and clinical settings. In this article, we discuss the importance of standardization of methodology and reporting in our effort to improve reproducibility. Ongoing efforts of standardization for neuro-oncological imaging are reviewed. Challenges related to standardization and potential disadvantages in over-standardization are also described. Ultimately, greater multi-institutional collaborative effort is needed to provide and implement standards for data acquisition and analysis methods to facilitate research results to be interoperable and reliable for integration into different practice environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Tian Li
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Manfrini E, Smits M, Thust S, Geiger S, Bendella Z, Petr J, Solymosi L, Keil VC. From research to clinical practice: a European neuroradiological survey on quantitative advanced MRI implementation. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:6334-6341. [PMID: 33481098 PMCID: PMC8270851 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07582-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective Quantitative MRI (qMRI) methods provide versatile neuroradiological applications and are a hot topic in research. The degree of their clinical implementation is however barely known. This survey was created to illuminate which and how qMRI techniques are currently applied across Europe. Methods In total, 4753 neuroradiologists from 27 countries received an online questionnaire. Demographic and professional data, experience with qMRI techniques in the brain and head and neck, usage, reasons for/against application, and knowledge of the QIBA and EIBALL initiatives were assessed. Results Two hundred seventy-two responders in 23 countries used the following techniques clinically (mean values in %): DWI (82.0%, n = 223), DSC (67.3%, n = 183), MRS (64.3%, n = 175), DCE (43.4%, n = 118), BOLD-fMRI (42.6%, n = 116), ASL (37.5%, n = 102), fat quantification (25.0%, n = 68), T2 mapping (16.9%, n = 46), T1 mapping (15.1%, n = 41), PET-MRI (11.8%, n = 32), IVIM (5.5%, n = 15), APT-CEST (4.8%, n = 13), and DKI (3.3%, n = 9). The most frequent usage indications for any qMRI technique were tissue differentiation (82.4%, n = 224) and oncological monitoring (72.8%, n = 198). Usage differed between countries, e.g. ASL: Germany (n = 13/63; 20.6%) vs. France (n = 31/40; 77.5%). Neuroradiologists endorsed the use of qMRI because of an improved diagnostic accuracy (89.3%, n = 243), but 50.0% (n = 136) are in need of better technology, 34.9% (n = 95) wish for more communication, and 31.3% need help with result interpretation/generation (n = 85). QIBA and EIBALL were not well known (12.5%, n = 34, and 11.0%, n = 30). Conclusions The clinical implementation of qMRI methods is highly variable. Beyond the aspect of readiness for clinical use, better availability of support and a wider dissemination of guidelines could catalyse a broader implementation. Key Points • Neuroradiologists endorse the use of qMRI techniques as they subjectively improve diagnostic accuracy. • Clinical implementation is highly variable between countries, techniques, and indications. • The use of advanced imaging could be promoted through an increase in technical support and training of both doctors and technicians. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-020-07582-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elia Manfrini
- Department of Neuroradiology, Bonn University Hospital, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.,Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (Ne-515), Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Steffi Thust
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.,Department of Brain Rehabilitation and Repair, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Sergej Geiger
- Department of Neuroradiology, Bonn University Hospital, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Zeynep Bendella
- Department of Neuroradiology, Bonn University Hospital, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan Petr
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Laszlo Solymosi
- Department of Neuroradiology, Bonn University Hospital, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Vera C Keil
- Department of Neuroradiology, Bonn University Hospital, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. .,Department of Radiology, Section Neuroradiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Reuter G, Moïse M, Roll W, Martin D, Lombard A, Scholtes F, Stummer W, Suero Molina E. Conventional and advanced imaging throughout the cycle of care of gliomas. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44:2493-2509. [PMID: 33411093 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01448-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Although imaging of gliomas has evolved tremendously over the last decades, published techniques and protocols are not always implemented into clinical practice. Furthermore, most of the published literature focuses on specific timepoints in glioma management. This article reviews the current literature on conventional and advanced imaging techniques and chronologically outlines their practical relevance for the clinical management of gliomas throughout the cycle of care. Relevant articles were located through the Pubmed/Medline database and included in this review. Interpretation of conventional and advanced imaging techniques is crucial along the entire process of glioma care, from diagnosis to follow-up. In addition to the described currently existing techniques, we expect deep learning or machine learning approaches to assist each step of glioma management through tumor segmentation, radiogenomics, prognostication, and characterization of pseudoprogression. Thorough knowledge of the specific performance, possibilities, and limitations of each imaging modality is key for their adequate use in glioma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Reuter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium. .,GIGA-CRC In-vivo Imaging Center, ULiege, Liège, Belgium.
| | - Martin Moïse
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Wolfgang Roll
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Didier Martin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Lombard
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Félix Scholtes
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.,Department of Neuroanatomy, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Eric Suero Molina
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Michoux NF, Ceranka JW, Vandemeulebroucke J, Peeters F, Lu P, Absil J, Triqueneaux P, Liu Y, Collette L, Willekens I, Brussaard C, Debeir O, Hahn S, Raeymaekers H, de Mey J, Metens T, Lecouvet FE. Repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measurements: a prospective multicenter whole-body-MRI study. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:4514-4527. [PMID: 33409773 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07522-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Multicenter oncology trials increasingly include MRI examinations with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification for lesion characterization and follow-up. However, the repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) limits above which a true change in ADC can be considered relevant are poorly defined. This study assessed these limits in a standardized whole-body (WB)-MRI protocol. METHODS A prospective, multicenter study was performed at three centers equipped with the same 3.0-T scanners to test a WB-MRI protocol including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Eight healthy volunteers per center were enrolled to undergo test and retest examinations in the same center and a third examination in another center. ADC variability was assessed in multiple organs by two readers using two-way mixed ANOVA, Bland-Altman plots, coefficient of variation (CoV), and the upper limit of the 95% CI on repeatability (RC) and reproducibility (RDC) coefficients. RESULTS CoV of ADC was not influenced by other factors (center, reader) than the organ. Based on the upper limit of the 95% CI on RC and RDC (from both readers), a change in ADC in an individual patient must be superior to 12% (cerebrum white matter), 16% (paraspinal muscle), 22% (renal cortex), 26% (central and peripheral zones of the prostate), 29% (renal medulla), 35% (liver), 45% (spleen), 50% (posterior iliac crest), 66% (L5 vertebra), 68% (femur), and 94% (acetabulum) to be significant. CONCLUSIONS This study proposes R&R limits above which ADC changes can be considered as a reliable quantitative endpoint to assess disease or treatment-related changes in the tissue microstructure in the setting of multicenter WB-MRI trials. KEY POINTS • The present study showed the range of R&R of ADC in WB-MRI that may be achieved in a multicenter framework when a standardized protocol is deployed. • R&R was not influenced by the site of acquisition of DW images. • Clinically significant changes in ADC measured in a multicenter WB-MRI protocol performed with the same type of MRI scanner must be superior to 12% (cerebrum white matter), 16% (paraspinal muscle), 22% (renal cortex), 26% (central zone and peripheral zone of prostate), 29% (renal medulla), 35% (liver), 45% (spleen), 50% (posterior iliac crest), 66% (L5 vertebra), 68% (femur), and 94% (acetabulum) to be detected with a 95% confidence level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas F Michoux
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale & Clinique (IREC) - Radiology Department, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) - Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Jakub W Ceranka
- Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jef Vandemeulebroucke
- Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frank Peeters
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale & Clinique (IREC) - Radiology Department, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) - Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Lu
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale & Clinique (IREC) - Radiology Department, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) - Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julie Absil
- Radiology Department, Université libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Perrine Triqueneaux
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale & Clinique (IREC) - Radiology Department, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) - Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yan Liu
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurence Collette
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Olivier Debeir
- LISA (Laboratories of Image Synthesis and Analysis), Ecole Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stephan Hahn
- LISA (Laboratories of Image Synthesis and Analysis), Ecole Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Thierry Metens
- Radiology Department, Université libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frédéric E Lecouvet
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale & Clinique (IREC) - Radiology Department, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) - Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Jabehdar Maralani P, Myrehaug S, Mehrabian H, Chan AKM, Wintermark M, Heyn C, Conklin J, Ellingson BM, Rahimi S, Lau AZ, Tseng CL, Soliman H, Detsky J, Daghighi S, Keith J, Munoz DG, Das S, Atenafu EG, Lipsman N, Perry J, Stanisz G, Sahgal A. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) modeling of diffusion MRI during chemoradiation predicts therapeutic response in IDH wildtype glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 2021; 156:258-265. [PMID: 33418005 PMCID: PMC8186561 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: Prediction of early progression in glioblastoma may provide an opportunity to personalize treatment. Simplified intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI offers quantitative estimates of diffusion and perfusion metrics. We investigated whether these metrics, during chemoradiation, could predict treatment outcome. Methods: 38 patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma undergoing 6-week/30-fraction chemoradiation had standardized post-operative MRIs at baseline (radiation planning), and at the 10th and 20th fractions. Non-overlapping T1-enhancing (T1C) and non-enhancing T2-FLAIR hyperintense regions were independently segmented. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCT1C, ADCT2-FLAIR) and perfusion fraction (fT1C, fT2-FLAIR) maps were generated with simplified IVIM modelling. Parameters associated with progression before or after 6.9 months (early vs late progression, respectively), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were investigated. Results: Higher ADCT2-FLAIR at baseline [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.15, p = 0.025], lower fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10 (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.04–4.27, p = 0.018), and lack of increase in ADCT2-FLAIR at fraction 20 compared to baseline (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.02–1.22, p = 0.02) were associated with early progression. Combining ADCT2-FLAIR at baseline, fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10, ECOG and MGMT promoter methylation status significantly improved AUC to 90.3% compared to a model with only ECOG and MGMT promoter methylation status (p = 0.001). Using multivariable analysis, neither IVIM metrics were associated with OS but higher fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10 (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.56–0.95, p = 0.018) was associated with longer PFS. Conclusion: ADCT2-FLAIR at baseline, its lack of increase from baseline to fraction 20, or fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10 significantly predicted early progression. fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10 was associated with PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pejman Jabehdar Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada.
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Hatef Mehrabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Aimee K M Chan
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Max Wintermark
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, United States
| | - Chris Heyn
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John Conklin
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- Department of Radiological Sciences and Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles, United States
| | - Saba Rahimi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Angus Z Lau
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Shadi Daghighi
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Julia Keith
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - David G Munoz
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Nir Lipsman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - James Perry
- Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Greg Stanisz
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Viswanath P, Batsios G, Mukherjee J, Gillespie AM, Larson PEZ, Luchman HA, Phillips JJ, Costello JF, Pieper RO, Ronen SM. Non-invasive assessment of telomere maintenance mechanisms in brain tumors. Nat Commun 2021; 12:92. [PMID: 33397920 PMCID: PMC7782549 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20312-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Telomere maintenance is a universal hallmark of cancer. Most tumors including low-grade oligodendrogliomas use telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) expression for telomere maintenance while astrocytomas use the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway. Although TERT and ALT are hallmarks of tumor proliferation and attractive therapeutic targets, translational methods of imaging TERT and ALT are lacking. Here we show that TERT and ALT are associated with unique 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-detectable metabolic signatures in genetically-engineered and patient-derived glioma models and patient biopsies. Importantly, we have leveraged this information to mechanistically validate hyperpolarized [1-13C]-alanine flux to pyruvate as an imaging biomarker of ALT status and hyperpolarized [1-13C]-alanine flux to lactate as an imaging biomarker of TERT status in low-grade gliomas. Collectively, we have identified metabolic biomarkers of TERT and ALT status that provide a way of integrating critical oncogenic information into non-invasive imaging modalities that can improve tumor diagnosis and treatment response monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavithra Viswanath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Georgios Batsios
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joydeep Mukherjee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Helen Diller Research Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anne Marie Gillespie
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peder E Z Larson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - H Artee Luchman
- Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Joanna J Phillips
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Helen Diller Research Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joseph F Costello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Helen Diller Research Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Russell O Pieper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Helen Diller Research Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sabrina M Ronen
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Al Feghali KA, Randall JW, Liu DD, Wefel JS, Brown PD, Grosshans DR, McAvoy SA, Farhat MA, Li J, McGovern SL, McAleer MF, Ghia AJ, Paulino AC, Sulman EP, Penas-Prado M, Wang J, de Groot J, Heimberger AB, Armstrong TS, Gilbert MR, Mahajan A, Guha-Thakurta N, Chung C. Phase II trial of proton therapy versus photon IMRT for GBM: secondary analysis comparison of progression-free survival between RANO versus clinical assessment. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab073. [PMID: 34337411 PMCID: PMC8320688 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This secondary image analysis of a randomized trial of proton radiotherapy (PT) versus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compares tumor progression based on clinical radiological assessment versus Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO). METHODS Eligible patients were enrolled in the randomized trial and had MR imaging at baseline and follow-up beyond 12 weeks from completion of radiotherapy. "Clinical progression" was based on a clinical radiology report of progression and/or change in treatment for progression. RESULTS Of 90 enrolled patients, 66 were evaluable. Median clinical progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.8 (range: 9.4-14.7) months; 10.8 months IMRT versus 11.2 months PT (P = .14). Median RANO-PFS was 8.2 (range: 6.9, 12): 8.9 months IMRT versus 6.6 months PT (P = .24). RANO-PFS was significantly shorter than clinical PFS overall (P = .001) and for both the IMRT (P = .01) and PT (P = .04) groups. There were 31 (46.3%) discrepant cases of which 17 had RANO progression more than a month prior to clinical progression, and 14 had progression by RANO but not clinical criteria. CONCLUSIONS Based on this secondary analysis of a trial of PT versus IMRT for glioblastoma, while no difference in PFS was noted relative to treatment technique, RANO criteria identified progression more often and earlier than clinical assessment. This highlights the disconnect between measures of tumor response in clinical trials versus clinical practice. With growing efforts to utilize real-world data and personalized treatment with timely adaptation, there is a growing need to improve the consistency of determining tumor progression within clinical trials and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine A Al Feghali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - James W Randall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Diane D Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah A McAvoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Maguy A Farhat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary F McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John de Groot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amy B Heimberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Park JE, Kim HS, Lee J, Cheong EN, Shin I, Ahn SS, Shim WH. Deep-learned time-signal intensity pattern analysis using an autoencoder captures magnetic resonance perfusion heterogeneity for brain tumor differentiation. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21485. [PMID: 33293590 PMCID: PMC7723041 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78485-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Current image processing methods for dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) do not capture complex dynamic information of time-signal intensity curves. We investigated whether an autoencoder-based pattern analysis of DSC MRI captured representative temporal features that improves tissue characterization and tumor diagnosis in a multicenter setting. The autoencoder was applied to the time-signal intensity curves to obtain representative temporal patterns, which were subsequently learned by a convolutional neural network. This network was trained with 216 preoperative DSC MRI acquisitions and validated using external data (n = 43) collected with different DSC acquisition protocols. The autoencoder applied to time-signal intensity curves and clustering obtained nine representative clusters of temporal patterns, which accurately identified tumor and non-tumoral tissues. The dominant clusters of temporal patterns distinguished primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from glioblastoma (AUC 0.89) and metastasis from glioblastoma (AUC 0.95). The autoencoder captured DSC time-signal intensity patterns that improved identification of tumoral tissues and differentiation of tumor type and was generalizable across centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
| | - Junkyu Lee
- Department of Medical Science and Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - E-Nae Cheong
- Department of Medical Science and Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ilah Shin
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Soo Ahn
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Hyun Shim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.,Department of Medical Science and Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020; 18:170-186. [PMID: 33293629 PMCID: PMC7904519 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1046] [Impact Index Per Article: 209.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
In response to major changes in diagnostic algorithms and the publication of mature results from various large clinical trials, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) recognized the need to provide updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult patients with diffuse gliomas. Through these evidence-based guidelines, a task force of EANO provides recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of adult patients with diffuse gliomas. The diagnostic component is based on the 2016 update of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System and the subsequent recommendations of the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumour Taxonomy — Not Officially WHO (cIMPACT-NOW). With regard to therapy, we formulated recommendations based on the results from the latest practice-changing clinical trials and also provide guidance for neuropathological and neuroradiological assessment. In these guidelines, we define the role of the major treatment modalities of surgery, radiotherapy and systemic pharmacotherapy, covering current advances and cognizant that unnecessary interventions and expenses should be avoided. This document is intended to be a source of reference for professionals involved in the management of adult patients with diffuse gliomas, for patients and caregivers, and for health-care providers. Herein, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) provides recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of adult patients with diffuse gliomas. These evidence-based guidelines incorporate major changes in diagnostic algorithms based on the 2016 update of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System as well as on evidence from recent large clinical trials.
Collapse
|
170
|
Clement P, Booth T, Borovečki F, Emblem KE, Figueiredo P, Hirschler L, Jančálek R, Keil VC, Maumet C, Özsunar Y, Pernet C, Petr J, Pinto J, Smits M, Warnert EAH. GliMR: Cross-Border Collaborations to Promote Advanced MRI Biomarkers for Glioma. J Med Biol Eng 2020; 41:115-125. [PMID: 33293909 PMCID: PMC7712600 DOI: 10.1007/s40846-020-00582-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Purpose There is an annual incidence of 50,000 glioma cases in Europe. The optimal treatment strategy is highly personalised, depending on tumour type, grade, spatial localization, and the degree of tissue infiltration. In research settings, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown great promise as a tool to inform personalised treatment decisions. However, the use of advanced MRI in clinical practice remains scarce due to the downstream effects of siloed glioma imaging research with limited representation of MRI specialists in established consortia; and the associated lack of available tools and expertise in clinical settings. These shortcomings delay the translation of scientific breakthroughs into novel treatment strategy. As a response we have developed the network “Glioma MR Imaging 2.0” (GliMR) which we present in this article. Methods GliMR aims to build a pan-European and multidisciplinary network of experts and accelerate the use of advanced MRI in glioma beyond the current “state-of-the-art” in glioma imaging. The Action Glioma MR Imaging 2.0 (GliMR) was granted funding by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) in June 2019. Results GliMR’s first grant period ran from September 2019 to April 2020, during which several meetings were held and projects were initiated, such as reviewing the current knowledge on advanced MRI; developing a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliant consent form; and setting up the website. Conclusion The Action overcomes the pre-existing limitations of glioma research and is funded until September 2023. New members will be accepted during its entire duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Clement
- Ghent Institute for Metabolic and Functional Imaging (GIfMI), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH UK.,Department of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 9RS UK
| | - Fran Borovečki
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Kyrre E Emblem
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Patrícia Figueiredo
- Institute for Systems and Robotics - Lisboa and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lydiane Hirschler
- Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Radim Jančálek
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vera C Keil
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUmc, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Yelda Özsunar
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey
| | - Cyril Pernet
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences & Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jan Petr
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Joana Pinto
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther A H Warnert
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Schell M, Pflüger I, Brugnara G, Isensee F, Neuberger U, Foltyn M, Kessler T, Sahm F, Wick A, Nowosielski M, Heiland S, Weller M, Platten M, Maier-Hein KH, Von Deimling A, Van Den Bent MJ, Gorlia T, Wick W, Bendszus M, Kickingereder P. Validation of diffusion MRI phenotypes for predicting response to bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: post-hoc analysis of the EORTC-26101 trial. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1667-1676. [PMID: 32393964 PMCID: PMC7690360 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study validated a previously described diffusion MRI phenotype as a potential predictive imaging biomarker in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab (BEV). METHODS A total of 396/596 patients (66%) from the prospective randomized phase II/III EORTC-26101 trial (with n = 242 in the BEV and n = 154 in the non-BEV arm) met the inclusion criteria with availability of anatomical and diffusion MRI sequences at baseline prior treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histograms from the contrast-enhancing tumor volume were fitted to a double Gaussian distribution and the mean of the lower curve (ADClow) was used for further analysis. The predictive ability of ADClow was assessed with biomarker threshold models and multivariable Cox regression for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS ADClow was associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.625, P = 0.007) and OS (HR = 0.656, P = 0.031). However, no (predictive) interaction between ADClow and the treatment arm was present (P = 0.865 for PFS, P = 0.722 for OS). Independent (prognostic) significance of ADClow was retained after adjusting for epidemiological, clinical, and molecular characteristics (P ≤ 0.02 for OS, P ≤ 0.01 PFS). The biomarker threshold model revealed an optimal ADClow cutoff of 1241*10-6 mm2/s for OS. Thereby, median OS for BEV-patients with ADClow ≥ 1241 was 10.39 months versus 8.09 months for those with ADClow < 1241 (P = 0.004). Similarly, median OS for non-BEV patients with ADClow ≥ 1241 was 9.80 months versus 7.79 months for those with ADClow < 1241 (P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS ADClow is an independent prognostic parameter for stratifying OS and PFS in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Consequently, the previously suggested role of ADClow as predictive imaging biomarker could not be confirmed within this phase II/III trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Schell
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Computational Neuroimaging, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Irada Pflüger
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Computational Neuroimaging, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gianluca Brugnara
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Computational Neuroimaging, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Isensee
- Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulf Neuberger
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Computational Neuroimaging, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martha Foltyn
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Computational Neuroimaging, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kessler
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martha Nowosielski
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sabine Heiland
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Platten
- Department of Neurology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Klaus H Maier-Hein
- Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas Von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Thierry Gorlia
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Kickingereder
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Computational Neuroimaging, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Yao J, Chakhoyan A, Nathanson DA, Yong WH, Salamon N, Raymond C, Mareninov S, Lai A, Nghiemphu PL, Prins RM, Pope WB, Everson RG, Liau LM, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM. Metabolic characterization of human IDH mutant and wild type gliomas using simultaneous pH- and oxygen-sensitive molecular MRI. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:1184-1196. [PMID: 31066901 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutant gliomas are thought to have distinct metabolic characteristics, including a blunted response to hypoxia and lower glycolytic flux. We hypothesized that non-invasive quantification of abnormal metabolic behavior in human IDH1 mutant gliomas could be performed using a new pH- and oxygen-sensitive molecular MRI technique. METHODS Simultaneous pH- and oxygen-sensitive MRI was obtained at 3T using amine CEST-SAGE-EPI. The pH-dependent measure of the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) at 3 ppm and oxygen-sensitive measure of R2' were quantified in 90 patients with gliomas. Additionally, stereotactic, image-guided biopsies were performed in 20 patients for a total of 52 samples. The association between imaging measurements and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1α) expression was identified using Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS IDH1 mutant gliomas exhibited significantly lower MTRasym at 3 ppm, R2', and MTRasymxR2' (P = 0.007, P = 0.003, and P = 0.001, respectively). MTRasymxR2' could identify IDH1 mutant gliomas with a high sensitivity (81.0%) and specificity (81.3%). HIF1α was positively correlated with MTRasym at 3 ppm, R2' and MTRasymxR2' in IDH1 wild type (r = 0.610, P = 0.003; r = 0.667, P = 0.008; r = 0.635, P = 0.006), but only MTRasymxR2' in IDH1 mutant gliomas (r = 0.727, P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS IDH1 mutant gliomas have distinct metabolic and microenvironment characteristics compared with wild type gliomas. An imaging biomarker combining tumor acidity and hypoxia (MTRasymxR2') can differentiate IDH1 mutation status and is correlated with tumor acidity and hypoxia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingwen Yao
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ararat Chakhoyan
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - David A Nathanson
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - William H Yong
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sergey Mareninov
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Albert Lai
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Robert M Prins
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Richard G Everson
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Linda M Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Shankar A, Bomanji J, Hyare H. Hybrid PET-MRI Imaging in Paediatric and TYA Brain Tumours: Clinical Applications and Challenges. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10040218. [PMID: 33182433 PMCID: PMC7711629 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard for brain tumour imaging in paediatric and teenage and young adult (TYA) patients. Combining positron emission tomography (PET) with MRI offers an opportunity to improve diagnostic accuracy. (2) Method: Our single-centre experience of 18F-fluorocholine (FCho) and 18fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) PET–MRI in paediatric/TYA neuro-oncology patients is presented. (3) Results: Hybrid PET–MRI shows promise in the evaluation of gliomas and germ cell tumours in (i) assessing early treatment response and (ii) discriminating tumour from treatment-related changes. (4) Conclusions: Combined PET–MRI shows promise for improved diagnostic and therapeutic assessment in paediatric and TYA brain tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananth Shankar
- Children and Young People’s Cancer Services, University College London hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-20-3447-9950
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College London hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK;
| | - Harpreet Hyare
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK;
- Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Goncalves Filho ALM, Conklin J, Longo MGF, Cauley SF, Polak D, Liu W, Splitthoff DN, Lo WC, Kirsch JE, Setsompop K, Schaefer PW, Huang SY, Rapalino O. Accelerated Post-contrast Wave-CAIPI T1 SPACE Achieves Equivalent Diagnostic Performance Compared With Standard T1 SPACE for the Detection of Brain Metastases in Clinical 3T MRI. Front Neurol 2020; 11:587327. [PMID: 33193054 PMCID: PMC7653188 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.587327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations using high-resolution 3D post-contrast sequences offer increased sensitivity for the detection of metastases in the central nervous system but are usually long exams. We evaluated whether the diagnostic performance of a highly accelerated Wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI) post-contrast 3D T1 SPACE sequence was non-inferior to the standard high-resolution 3D T1 SPACE sequence for the evaluation of brain metastases. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three patients undergoing evaluation for brain metastases were prospectively evaluated with a standard post-contrast 3D T1 SPACE sequence and an optimized Wave-CAIPI 3D T1 SPACE sequence, which was three times faster than the standard sequence. Two blinded neuroradiologists performed a head-to-head comparison to evaluate the visualization of pathology, perception of artifacts, and the overall diagnostic quality. Wave-CAIPI post-contrast T1 SPACE was tested for non-inferiority relative to standard T1 SPACE using a 15% non-inferiority margin. Results: Wave-CAIPI post-contrast T1 SPACE was non-inferior to the standard T1 SPACE for visualization of enhancing lesions (P < 0.01) and offered equivalent diagnostic quality performance and only marginally higher background noise compared to the standard sequence. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that Wave-CAIPI post-contrast T1 SPACE provides equivalent visualization of pathology and overall diagnostic quality with three times reduced scan time compared to the standard 3D T1 SPACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Lio M Goncalves Filho
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - John Conklin
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Maria Gabriela F Longo
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Stephen F Cauley
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Daniel Polak
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wei Liu
- Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China
| | | | - Wei-Ching Lo
- Siemens Medical Solutions, Boston, MA, United States
| | - John E Kirsch
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kawin Setsompop
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Pamela W Schaefer
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Susie Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Otto Rapalino
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Implementation of a dedicated 1.5 T MR scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning featuring a novel high-channel coil setup for brain imaging in treatment position. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:246-256. [PMID: 33103231 PMCID: PMC7892740 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01703-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To share our experiences in implementing a dedicated magnetic resonance (MR) scanner for radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning using a novel coil setup for brain imaging in treatment position as well as to present developed core protocols with sequences specifically tuned for brain and prostate RT treatment planning. Materials and methods Our novel setup consists of two large 18-channel flexible coils and a specifically designed wooden mask holder mounted on a flat tabletop overlay, which allows patients to be measured in treatment position with mask immobilization. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of this setup was compared to the vendor-provided flexible coil RT setup and the standard setup for diagnostic radiology. The occurrence of motion artifacts was quantified. To develop magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols, we formulated site- and disease-specific clinical objectives. Results Our novel setup showed mean SNR of 163 ± 28 anteriorly, 104 ± 23 centrally, and 78 ± 14 posteriorly compared to 84 ± 8 and 102 ± 22 anteriorly, 68 ± 6 and 95 ± 20 centrally, and 56 ± 7 and 119 ± 23 posteriorly for the vendor-provided and diagnostic setup, respectively. All differences were significant (p > 0.05). Image quality of our novel setup was judged suitable for contouring by expert-based assessment. Motion artifacts were found in 8/60 patients in the diagnostic setup, whereas none were found for patients in the RT setup. Site-specific core protocols were designed to minimize distortions while optimizing tissue contrast and 3D resolution according to indication-specific objectives. Conclusion We present a novel setup for high-quality imaging in treatment position that allows use of several immobilization systems enabling MR-only workflows, which could reduce unnecessary dose and registration inaccuracies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-020-01703-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
176
|
Oughourlian TC, Yao J, Hagiwara A, Nathanson DA, Raymond C, Pope WB, Salamon N, Lai A, Ji M, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM. Relative oxygen extraction fraction (rOEF) MR imaging reveals higher hypoxia in human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplified compared with non-amplified gliomas. Neuroradiology 2020; 63:857-868. [PMID: 33106922 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02585-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification promotes gliomagenesis and is linked to lack of oxygen within the tumor microenvironment. Using hypoxia-sensitive spin-and-gradient echo echo-planar imaging and perfusion MRI, we investigated the influence of EGFR amplification on tissue oxygen availability and utilization in human gliomas. METHODS This study included 72 histologically confirmed EGFR-amplified and non-amplified glioma patients. Reversible transverse relaxation rate (R2'), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and relative oxygen extraction fraction (rOEF) were calculated for the contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing tumor regions. Using Student t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, median R2', rCBV, and rOEF were compared between EGFR-amplified and non-amplified gliomas. ROC analysis was performed to assess the ability of imaging characteristics to discriminate EGFR amplification status. Overall survival (OS) was determined using univariate and multivariate cox models. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS EGFR amplified gliomas exhibited significantly higher median R2' and rOEF than non-amplified gliomas. ROC analysis suggested that R2' (AUC = 0.7190; P = 0.0048) and rOEF (AUC = 0.6959; P = 0.0156) could separate EGFR status. Patients with EGFR-amplified gliomas had a significantly shorter OS than non-amplified patients. Univariate cox regression analysis determined both R2' and rOEF significantly influence OS. No significant difference was observed in rCBV between patient cohorts nor was rCBV found to be an effective differentiator of EGFR status. CONCLUSION Imaging of tumor oxygen characteristics revealed EGFR-amplified gliomas to be more hypoxic and contribute to shorter patient survival than EGFR non-amplified gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia C Oughourlian
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jingwen Yao
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - David A Nathanson
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Albert Lai
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Ji
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda M Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Lombardi G, Barresi V, Castellano A, Tabouret E, Pasqualetti F, Salvalaggio A, Cerretti G, Caccese M, Padovan M, Zagonel V, Ius T. Clinical Management of Diffuse Low-Grade Gliomas. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3008. [PMID: 33081358 PMCID: PMC7603014 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12103008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffuse low-grade gliomas (LGG) represent a heterogeneous group of primary brain tumors arising from supporting glial cells and usually affecting young adults. Advances in the knowledge of molecular profile of these tumors, including mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase genes, or 1p/19q codeletion, and in neuroradiological techniques have contributed to the diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and follow-up of these tumors. Optimal post-operative management of LGG is still controversial, though radiation therapy and chemotherapy remain the optimal treatments after surgical resection in selected patients. In this review, we report the most important and recent research on clinical and molecular features, new neuroradiological techniques, the different therapeutic modalities, and new opportunities for personalized targeted therapy and supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of oncology-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.C.); (M.C.); (M.P.); (V.Z.)
| | - Valeria Barresi
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy;
| | - Antonella Castellano
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Emeline Tabouret
- Team 8 GlioMe, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Aix-Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France;
| | | | - Alessandro Salvalaggio
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy;
- Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Giulia Cerretti
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of oncology-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.C.); (M.C.); (M.P.); (V.Z.)
| | - Mario Caccese
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of oncology-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.C.); (M.C.); (M.P.); (V.Z.)
| | - Marta Padovan
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of oncology-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.C.); (M.C.); (M.P.); (V.Z.)
| | - Vittorina Zagonel
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of oncology-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.C.); (M.C.); (M.P.); (V.Z.)
| | - Tamara Ius
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Hu LS, Erickson BJ, Gerstner ER, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Barboriak DP, Huang RH, Wick W, Weller M, Galanis E, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Shankar L, Jacobs P, Chung C, van den Bent MJ, Chang S, Al Yung WK, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY, Gilbert MR, Rosen BR, Ellingson BM, Schmainda KM. Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1262-1275. [PMID: 32516388 PMCID: PMC7523451 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the widespread clinical use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, DSC-MRI methodology has not been standardized, hindering its utilization for response assessment in multicenter trials. Recently, the DSC-MRI Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition issued an updated consensus DSC-MRI protocol compatible with the standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) for high-grade gliomas that is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is the default MRI protocol for the National Clinical Trials Network. After reviewing the basis for controversy over DSC-MRI protocols, this paper provides evidence-based best practices for clinical DSC-MRI as determined by the Committee, including pulse sequence (gradient echo vs spin echo), BTIP-compliant contrast agent dosing (preload and bolus), flip angle (FA), echo time (TE), and post-processing leakage correction. In summary, full-dose preload, full-dose bolus dosing using intermediate (60°) FA and field strength-dependent TE (40-50 ms at 1.5 T, 20-35 ms at 3 T) provides overall best accuracy and precision for cerebral blood volume estimates. When single-dose contrast agent usage is desired, no-preload, full-dose bolus dosing using low FA (30°) and field strength-dependent TE provides excellent performance, with reduced contrast agent usage and elimination of potential systematic errors introduced by variations in preload dose and incubation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
- Representative of the American Society of Functional Neuroradiology (ASFNR)
| | - Chad C Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Bradley J Erickson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC–University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Timothy J Kaufmann
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Daniel P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Raymond H Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Paula Jacobs
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - W K Al Yung
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Representative of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Psychiatry, and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
- Representative of the Ivy Consortium for Early Phase Clinical Trials
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Machine Learning Model to Predict Pseudoprogression Versus Progression in Glioblastoma Using MRI: A Multi-Institutional Study (KROG 18-07). Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092706. [PMID: 32967367 PMCID: PMC7564954 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Even after the introduction of a standard regimen consisting of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide, patients with glioblastoma multiforme mostly experience disease progression. Clinicians often encounter a situation where they need to distinguish progressive disease from pseudoprogression after treatment. We tried to investigate the feasibility of machine learning algorithm to distinguish pseudoprogression from progressive disease. In multi-institutional dataset, the developed machine learning model showed an acceptable performance. This algorithm involving MRI data and clinical features could help making decision during patients’ disease course. For the practical use, we calibrated the machine learning model to offer the probability of pseudoprogression to clinicians, then we constructed the web-based user interface to access the model. Abstract Some patients with glioblastoma show a worsening presentation in imaging after concurrent chemoradiation, even when they receive gross total resection. Previously, we showed the feasibility of a machine learning model to predict pseudoprogression (PsPD) versus progressive disease (PD) in glioblastoma patients. The previous model was based on the dataset from two institutions (termed as the Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) dataset, N = 78). To test this model in a larger dataset, we collected cases from multiple institutions that raised the problem of PsPD vs. PD diagnosis in clinics (Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG) dataset, N = 104). The dataset was composed of brain MR images and clinical information. We tested the previous model in the KROG dataset; however, that model showed limited performance. After hyperparameter optimization, we developed a deep learning model based on the whole dataset (N = 182). The 10-fold cross validation revealed that the micro-average area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) was 0.86. The calibration model was constructed to estimate the interpretable probability directly from the model output. After calibration, the final model offers clinical probability in a web-user interface.
Collapse
|
180
|
Young RJ, Demétrio De Souza França P, Pirovano G, Piotrowski AF, Nicklin PJ, Riedl CC, Schwartz J, Bale TA, Donabedian PL, Kossatz S, Burnazi EM, Roberts S, Lyashchenko SK, Miller AM, Moss NS, Fiasconaro M, Zhang Z, Mauguen A, Reiner T, Dunphy MP. Preclinical and first-in-human-brain-cancer applications of [ 18F]poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor PET/MR. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2:vdaa119. [PMID: 33392502 PMCID: PMC7758909 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We report preclinical and first-in-human-brain-cancer data using a targeted poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) binding PET tracer, [18F]PARPi, as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between brain cancers and treatment-related changes. Methods We applied a glioma model in p53-deficient nestin/tv-a mice, which were injected with [18F]PARPi and then sacrificed 1 h post-injection for brain examination. We also prospectively enrolled patients with brain cancers to undergo dynamic [18F]PARPi acquisition on a dedicated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) scanner. Lesion diagnosis was established by pathology when available or by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) or RANO-BM response criteria. Resected tissue also underwent PARPi-FL staining and PARP1 immunohistochemistry. Results In a preclinical mouse model, we illustrated that [18F]PARPi crossed the blood–brain barrier and specifically bound to PARP1 overexpressed in cancer cell nuclei. In humans, we demonstrated high [18F]PARPi uptake on PET/MR in active brain cancers and low uptake in treatment-related changes independent of blood–brain barrier disruption. Immunohistochemistry results confirmed higher PARP1 expression in cancerous than in noncancerous tissue. Specificity was also corroborated by blocking fluorescent tracer uptake with an excess unlabeled PARP inhibitor in patient cancer biospecimen. Conclusions Although larger studies are necessary to confirm and further explore this tracer, we describe the promising performance of [18F]PARPi as a diagnostic tool to evaluate patients with brain cancers and possible treatment-related changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,The Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Paula Demétrio De Souza França
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Giacomo Pirovano
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anna F Piotrowski
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,The Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Philip J Nicklin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher C Riedl
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jazmin Schwartz
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Chemical Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tejus A Bale
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,The Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patrick L Donabedian
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susanne Kossatz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eva M Burnazi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sheryl Roberts
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Serge K Lyashchenko
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexandra M Miller
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,The Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nelson S Moss
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Megan Fiasconaro
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Audrey Mauguen
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Reiner
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Chemical Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark P Dunphy
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Decorin expression is associated with predictive diffusion MR phenotypes of anti-VEGF efficacy in glioblastoma. Sci Rep 2020; 10:14819. [PMID: 32908231 PMCID: PMC7481206 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71799-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous data suggest that apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) imaging phenotypes predict survival response to anti-VEGF monotherapy in glioblastoma. However, the mechanism by which imaging may predict clinical response is unknown. We hypothesize that decorin (DCN), a proteoglycan implicated in the modulation of the extracellular microenvironment and sequestration of pro-angiogenic signaling, may connect ADC phenotypes to survival benefit to anti-VEGF therapy. Patients undergoing resection for glioblastoma as well as patients included in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and IVY Glioblastoma Atlas Project (IVY GAP) databases had pre-operative imaging analyzed to calculate pre-operative ADCL values, the average ADC in the lower distribution using a double Gaussian mixed model. ADCL values were correlated to available RNA expression from these databases as well as from RNA sequencing from patient derived mouse orthotopic xenograft samples. Targeted biopsies were selected based on ADC values and prospectively collected during resection. Surgical specimens were used to evaluate for DCN RNA and protein expression by ADC value. The IVY Glioblastoma Atlas Project Database was used to evaluate DCN localization and relationship with VEGF pathway via in situ hybridization maps and RNA sequencing data. In a cohort of 35 patients with pre-operative ADC imaging and surgical specimens, DCN RNA expression levels were significantly larger in high ADCL tumors (41.6 vs. 1.5; P = 0.0081). In a cohort of 17 patients with prospectively targeted biopsies there was a positive linear correlation between ADCL levels and DCN protein expression between tumors (Pearson R2 = 0.3977; P = 0.0066) and when evaluating different targets within the same tumor (Pearson R2 = 0.3068; P = 0.0139). In situ hybridization data localized DCN expression to areas of microvascular proliferation and immunohistochemical studies localized DCN protein expression to the tunica adventitia of blood vessels within the tumor. DCN expression positively correlated with VEGFR1 & 2 expression and localized to similar areas of tumor. Increased ADCL on diffusion MR imaging is associated with high DCN expression as well as increased survival with anti-VEGF therapy in glioblastoma. DCN may play an important role linking the imaging features on diffusion MR and anti-VEGF treatment efficacy. DCN may serve as a target for further investigation and modulation of anti-angiogenic therapy in GBM.
Collapse
|
182
|
Galldiks N, Abdulla DSY, Scheffler M, Wolpert F, Werner JM, Hüllner M, Stoffels G, Schweinsberg V, Schlaak M, Kreuzberg N, Landsberg J, Lohmann P, Ceccon G, Baues C, Trommer M, Celik E, Ruge MI, Kocher M, Marnitz S, Fink GR, Tonn JC, Weller M, Langen KJ, Wolf J, Mauch C. Treatment Monitoring of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy Using 18F-FET PET in Patients with Melanoma and Lung Cancer Brain Metastases: Initial Experiences. J Nucl Med 2020; 62:464-470. [PMID: 32887757 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.248278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the value of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET for treatment monitoring of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) or targeted therapy (TT) alone or in combination with radiotherapy in patients with brain metastasis (BM) since contrast-enhanced MRI often remains inconclusive. Methods: We retrospectively identified 40 patients with 107 BMs secondary to melanoma (n = 29 with 75 BMs) or non-small cell lung cancer (n = 11 with 32 BMs) treated with ICI or TT who had 18F-FET PET (n = 60 scans) for treatment monitoring from 2015 to 2019. Most patients (n = 37; 92.5%) had radiotherapy during the course of the disease. In 27 patients, 18F-FET PET was used to differentiate treatment-related changes from BM relapse after ICI or TT. In 13 patients, 18F-FET PET was performed for response assessment to ICI or TT using baseline and follow-up scans (median time between scans, 4.2 mo). In all lesions, static and dynamic 18F-FET PET parameters were obtained (i.e., mean tumor-to-brain ratios [TBR], time-to-peak values). Diagnostic accuracies of PET parameters were evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic analyses using the clinical follow-up or neuropathologic findings as a reference. Results: A TBR threshold of 1.95 differentiated BM relapse from treatment-related changes with an accuracy of 85% (P = 0.003). Metabolic responders to ICI or TT on 18F-FET PET had a significantly longer stable follow-up (threshold of TBR reduction relative to baseline, ≥10%; accuracy, 82%; P = 0.004). Furthermore, at follow-up, time to peak in metabolic responders increased significantly (P = 0.019). Conclusion: 18F-FET PET may add valuable information for treatment monitoring in BM patients treated with ICI or TT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany .,Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Diana S Y Abdulla
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Lung Cancer Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Scheffler
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Lung Cancer Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Fabian Wolpert
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hüllner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Viola Schweinsberg
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicole Kreuzberg
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jennifer Landsberg
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maike Trommer
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eren Celik
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maximilian I Ruge
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Wolf
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Lung Cancer Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mauch
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Park YW, Ahn SS, Kim EH, Kang SG, Chang JH, Kim SH, Zhou J, Lee SK. Differentiation of recurrent diffuse glioma from treatment-induced change using amide proton transfer imaging: incremental value to diffusion and perfusion parameters. Neuroradiology 2020; 63:363-372. [PMID: 32879995 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02542-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the incremental value of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging in differentiating recurrent diffuse gliomas (World Health Organization grade II-IV) from treatment-induced change after concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy. METHODS This study included 36 patients (25 patients with recurrent gliomas and 11 with treatment-induced changes) with post-treatment gliomas. The mean values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), normalized cerebral blood volume (nCBV), normalized cerebral blood flow, volume transfer constant, rate transfer coefficient, extravascular extracellular volume fraction, plasma volume fraction, and APT asymmetry index were assessed. Independent quantitative parameters were investigated to predict recurrent glioma using multivariable logistic regression. The incremental value of APT signal to other parameters was assessed by the increase of the area under the curve, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement. RESULTS Univariable analysis showed that lower ADC (p = 0.018), higher FA (p = 0.031), higher nCBV (p = 0.021), and higher APT signal (p = 0.009) were associated with recurrent gliomas. In multivariable logistic regression, the diagnostic performance of the model with ADC, FA, and nCBV significantly increased when APT signal was added, with areas under the curve of 0.87 and 0.92, respectively (net reclassification index of 0.77 and integrated discrimination improvement of 0.13). CONCLUSION APT imaging may be a useful imaging biomarker that adds value to DTI, DCE, and DSC parameters for distinguishing between recurrent gliomas and treatment-induced changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yae Won Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea
| | - Sung Soo Ahn
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
| | - Eui Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Gu Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hoon Kim
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinyuan Zhou
- Division of MRI Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Seung-Koo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Suh CH, Jung SC, Kim B, Cho SJ, Woo DC, Oh WY, Lee JG, Kim KW. Neuroimaging in Randomized, Multi-Center Clinical Trials of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review. Korean J Radiol 2020; 21:42-57. [PMID: 31920028 PMCID: PMC6960311 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Appropriate use and analysis of neuroimaging techniques is an inevitable aspect of clinical trials for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Neuroimaging examinations were recently used to define the core eligibility criteria and outcomes in acute ischemic stroke research. Recent clinical trials for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke have also demonstrated the efficacy or safety of endovascular treatment using various imaging modalities as well as clinical indices. Furthermore, independent imaging reviews and imaging core laboratory assessments are essential to manage and analyze imaging data in order to enhance the reliability of the outcomes. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the use of neuroimaging in recent randomized clinical trials for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in order to provide a thorough summary, which would serve as a resource guiding the use of appropriate imaging protocols and analyses in future clinical trials for acute ischemic stroke. This review will help researchers select appropriate imaging biomarkers among the various imaging protocols available and apply the selected type of imaging examination for each study in accordance with the academic purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chong Hyun Suh
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Chai Jung
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Byungjun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Jin Cho
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Cheol Woo
- Bioimaging Center, Biomedical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Yong Oh
- Clinical Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, Korea
| | - Jong Gu Lee
- Clinical Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, Korea
| | - Kyung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.,Asan Image Metrics, Clinical Trial Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Conventional MRI features of adult diffuse glioma molecular subtypes: a systematic review. Neuroradiology 2020; 63:353-362. [PMID: 32840682 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02532-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular parameters have become integral to glioma diagnosis. Much of radiogenomics research has focused on the use of advanced MRI techniques, but conventional MRI sequences remain the mainstay of clinical assessments. The aim of this research was to synthesize the current published data on the accuracy of standard clinical MRI for diffuse glioma genotyping, specifically targeting IDH and 1p19q status. METHODS A systematic search was performed in September 2019 using PubMed and the Cochrane Library, identifying studies on the diagnostic value of T1 pre-/post-contrast, T2, FLAIR, T2*/SWI and/or 3-directional diffusion-weighted imaging sequences for the prediction of IDH and/or 1p19q status in WHO grade II-IV diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumours as defined in the WHO 2016 Classification of CNS Tumours. RESULTS Forty-four studies including a total of 5286 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Correlations between key glioma molecular markers, namely IDH and 1p19q, and distinctive MRI findings have been established, including tumour location, signal composition (including the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign) and apparent diffusion coefficient values. CONCLUSION Consistent trends have emerged indicating that conventional MRI is valuable for glioma genotyping, particularly in presumed lower grade glioma. However, due to limited interobserver testing, the reproducibility of qualitatively assessed visual features remains an area of uncertainty.
Collapse
|
186
|
Wen PY, Weller M, Lee EQ, Alexander BM, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Barthel FP, Batchelor TT, Bindra RS, Chang SM, Chiocca EA, Cloughesy TF, DeGroot JF, Galanis E, Gilbert MR, Hegi ME, Horbinski C, Huang RY, Lassman AB, Le Rhun E, Lim M, Mehta MP, Mellinghoff IK, Minniti G, Nathanson D, Platten M, Preusser M, Roth P, Sanson M, Schiff D, Short SC, Taphoorn MJB, Tonn JC, Tsang J, Verhaak RGW, von Deimling A, Wick W, Zadeh G, Reardon DA, Aldape KD, van den Bent MJ. Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1073-1113. [PMID: 32328653 PMCID: PMC7594557 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 706] [Impact Index Per Article: 141.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastomas are the most common form of malignant primary brain tumor and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years there have been important advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, but this has not translated into significantly improved outcomes for patients. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), the current management of isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype (IDHwt) glioblastomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies such as targeted molecular therapies, agents targeting DNA damage response and metabolism, immunotherapies, and viral therapies will be reviewed, as well as the current challenges and future directions for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Y Wen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eudocia Quant Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian M Alexander
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Floris P Barthel
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School
| | - Ranjit S Bindra
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - E Antonio Chiocca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - John F DeGroot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Monika E Hegi
- Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Craig Horbinski
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Division of Neuroradiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- University of Lille, Inserm, Neuro-oncology, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery service, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France; Breast Cancer Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France and Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Department of Neurology and Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - David Nathanson
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael Platten
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, MCTN, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Patrick Roth
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marc Sanson
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière – Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France
| | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague and Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jonathan Tsang
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Roel G W Verhaak
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Neuropathology and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, University Heidelberg and German Cancer Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurology and Neuro-oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- MacFeeters Hamilton Centre for Neuro-Oncology Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - David A Reardon
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kenneth D Aldape
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
187
|
Jain AK, Aneja S, Fuller CD, Dicker AP, Chung C, Kim E, Kirby JS, Quon H, Lam CJK, Louv WC, Ahern C, Xiao Y, McNutt TR, Housri N, Ennis RD, Kang J, Tang Y, Higley H, Berny-Lang MA, Camphausen KA. Provider Engagement in Radiation Oncology Data Science: Workshop Report. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020; 4:700-710. [PMID: 32755458 PMCID: PMC7469584 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anshu K. Jain
- National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
- Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | | | | | - Adam P. Dicker
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Erika Kim
- National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Justin S. Kirby
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Harry Quon
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - Ying Xiao
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Nadine Housri
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- theMednet, New Haven, CT
| | | | - John Kang
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
188
|
Yuan T, Ying J, Zuo Z, Jin L, Gui S, Gao Z, Li G, Wang R, Zhang Y, Li C. Contrahemispheric Cortex Predicts Survival and Molecular Markers in Patients With Unilateral High-Grade Gliomas. Front Oncol 2020; 10:953. [PMID: 32793462 PMCID: PMC7390929 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Malignant high-grade gliomas are characterized by infiltration and destruction of surrounding brain tissue. Alterations in the contrahemispheric brain structure and their roles that may offer prognostically valuable information have not been investigated in high-grade gliomas. Methods: In total, 153 patients with unilateral glioma (low-grade, n = 77; high-grade, n = 76) and 115 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited and scanned with 3-D T1 imaging. The gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume in the contrahemisphere were examined. Partial correlation, logistic regression, and multivariate Cox's regression analyses were performed. Results: The contrahemispheric GM volume (CHGMV) in the high-grade glioma patients was significantly decreased compared to that in the HCs/low-grade gliomas (one-way ANOVA, Bonferroni corrected, p < 0.05). The CHGMV is significantly correlated with the WHO grade (r = -0.22, p < 0.05) and contrast-enhanced volume (r = -0.33, p < 0.01). In the high-grade gliomas, the binary logistic regression revealed that the CHGMV can independently predict isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and P53 mutations. The survival curves revealed that the patients with a low CHGMV had a shorter overall survival (OS) than the patients with a high CHGMV (p = 0.001). The multivariate Cox's regression analysis showed that a low CHGMV can independently predict unfavorable OS with a hazard ratio of 2.883 (p = 0.035). Conclusions: Volume of the contrahemispheric cortex can be potentially used in clinical practice as an imaging biomarker to predict survival and molecular markers in patients with unilateral high-grade gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taoyang Yuan
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianyou Ying
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhentao Zuo
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Jin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Songbai Gui
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhixian Gao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Guilin Li
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Wang
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yazhuo Zhang
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders Brain Tumor Center, Beijing, China
| | - Chuzhong Li
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders Brain Tumor Center, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Human IDH mutant 1p/19q co-deleted gliomas have low tumor acidity as evidenced by molecular MRI and PET: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:11922. [PMID: 32681084 PMCID: PMC7367867 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68733-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Co-deletion of 1p/19q is a hallmark of oligodendroglioma and predicts better survival. However, little is understood about its metabolic characteristics. In this study, we aimed to explore the extracellular acidity of WHO grade II and III gliomas associated with 1p/19q co-deletion. We included 76 glioma patients who received amine chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 T. Magnetic transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) at 3.0 ppm was used as the pH-sensitive CEST biomarker, with higher MTRasym indicating lower pH. To control for the confounder factors, T2 relaxometry and l-6-18F-fluoro-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalnine (18F-FDOPA) PET data were collected in a subset of patients. We found a significantly lower MTRasym in 1p/19q co-deleted gliomas (co-deleted, 1.17% ± 0.32%; non-co-deleted, 1.72% ± 0.41%, P = 1.13 × 10−7), while FDOPA (P = 0.92) and T2 (P = 0.61) were not significantly affected. Receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed that MTRasym could discriminate co-deletion status with an area under the curve of 0.85. In analysis of covariance, 1p/19q co-deletion status was the only significant contributor to the variability in MTRasym when controlling for age and FDOPA (P = 2.91 × 10−3) or T2 (P = 8.03 × 10−6). In conclusion, 1p/19q co-deleted gliomas were less acidic, which may be related to better prognosis. Amine CEST-MRI may serve as a non-invasive biomarker for identifying 1p/19q co-deletion status.
Collapse
|
190
|
Zakharova NE, Pronin IN, Batalov AI, Shults EI, Tyurina AN, Baev AA, Fadeeva LM. [Modern standards for magnetic resonance imaging of the brain tumors]. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEĬROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2020; 84:102-112. [PMID: 32649820 DOI: 10.17116/neiro202084031102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Neuroimaging is essential in survey of patients with brain tumors. An important objectives of neuroimaging are highly reliable non-invasive diagnosis, treatment planning and evaluation of treatment outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the modern neuroimaging methods. This technique ensures analysis of structural cerebral changes, vascular and metabolic characteristics of brain tumors. It is necessary to standardize imaging parameters and unify protocols and methods considering a widespread use of MRI for brain tumors. In our practice, we use our own experience, world literature data and evidence-based international guidelines on the diagnosis of various brain diseases. The purpose of this review is to study the modern principles of magnetic resonance imaging in adults with brain tumors in neurosurgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - I N Pronin
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A I Batalov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - E I Shults
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A N Tyurina
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A A Baev
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - L M Fadeeva
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Verburg N, de Witt Hamer PC. State-of-the-art imaging for glioma surgery. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 44:1331-1343. [PMID: 32607869 PMCID: PMC8121714 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01337-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Diffuse gliomas are infiltrative primary brain tumors with a poor prognosis despite multimodal treatment. Maximum safe resection is recommended whenever feasible. The extent of resection (EOR) is positively correlated with survival. Identification of glioma tissue during surgery is difficult due to its diffuse nature. Therefore, glioma resection is imaging-guided, making the choice for imaging technique an important aspect of glioma surgery. The current standard for resection guidance in non-enhancing gliomas is T2 weighted or T2w-fluid attenuation inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and in enhancing gliomas T1-weighted MRI with a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Other MRI sequences, like magnetic resonance spectroscopy, imaging modalities, such as positron emission tomography, as well as intraoperative imaging techniques, including the use of fluorescence, are also available for the guidance of glioma resection. The neurosurgeon’s goal is to find the balance between maximizing the EOR and preserving brain functions since surgery-induced neurological deficits result in lower quality of life and shortened survival. This requires localization of important brain functions and white matter tracts to aid the pre-operative planning and surgical decision-making. Visualization of brain functions and white matter tracts is possible with functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetoencephalography, and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. In this review, we discuss the current available imaging techniques for the guidance of glioma resection and the localization of brain functions and white matter tracts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Verburg
- Department of Neurosurgery and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hill Rd, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Philip C de Witt Hamer
- Department of Neurosurgery and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Gatson NTN, Bross SP, Odia Y, Mongelluzzo GJ, Hu Y, Lockard L, Manikowski JJ, Mahadevan A, Kazmi SAJ, Lacroix M, Conger AR, Vadakara J, Nayak L, Chi TL, Mehta MP, Puduvalli VK. Early imaging marker of progressing glioblastoma: a window of opportunity. J Neurooncol 2020; 148:629-640. [PMID: 32602020 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03565-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Therapeutic intervention at glioblastoma (GBM) progression, as defined by current assessment criteria, is arguably too late as second-line therapies fail to extend survival. Still, most GBM trials target recurrent disease. We propose integration of a novel imaging biomarker to more confidently and promptly define progression and propose a critical timepoint for earlier intervention to extend therapeutic exposure. METHODS A retrospective review of 609 GBM patients between 2006 and 2019 yielded 135 meeting resection, clinical, and imaging inclusion criteria. We qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed 2000+ sequential brain MRIs (initial diagnosis to first progression) for development of T2 FLAIR signal intensity (SI) within the resection cavity (RC) compared to the ventricles (V) for quantitative inter-image normalization. PFS and OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by SI. Specificity and sensitivity were determined using a 2 × 2 table and pathology confirmation at progression. Multivariate analysis evaluated SI effect on the hazard rate for death after adjusting for established prognostic covariates. Recursive partitioning determined successive quantifiers and cutoffs associated with outcomes. Neurological deficits correlated with SI. RESULTS Seventy-five percent of patients developed SI on average 3.4 months before RANO-assessed progression with 84% sensitivity. SI-positivity portended neurological decline and significantly poorer outcomes for PFS (median, 10 vs. 15 months) and OS (median, 20 vs. 29 months) compared to SI-negative. RC/V ratio ≥ 4 was the most significant prognostic indicator of death. CONCLUSION Implications of these data are far-reaching, potentially shifting paradigms for glioma treatment response assessment, altering timepoints for salvage therapeutic intervention, and reshaping glioma clinical trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Tosha N Gatson
- Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, 17822, USA. .,Cancer Institute, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, 17822, USA. .,Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, 18509, USA. .,Geisinger Medical Center, Neuroscience Institute MC 14-03, 100 N. Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
| | - Shane P Bross
- Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Yazmin Odia
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute/Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | | | - Yirui Hu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Laura Lockard
- Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, 18509, USA
| | | | - Anand Mahadevan
- Cancer Institute, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Syed A J Kazmi
- Department of Pathology, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Michel Lacroix
- Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Andrew R Conger
- Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.,Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, 18509, USA
| | - Joseph Vadakara
- Cancer Institute, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Lakshmi Nayak
- Harvard Medical School, Center for Neuro-Oncology,, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - T Linda Chi
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute/Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Vinay K Puduvalli
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, The OH State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James and OSU Neurological Institute, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Mellinghoff IK, Ellingson BM, Touat M, Maher E, De La Fuente MI, Holdhoff M, Cote GM, Burris H, Janku F, Young RJ, Huang R, Jiang L, Choe S, Fan B, Yen K, Lu M, Bowden C, Steelman L, Pandya SS, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY. Ivosidenib in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 -Mutated Advanced Glioma. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3398-3406. [PMID: 32530764 PMCID: PMC7527160 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.03327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Diffuse gliomas are malignant brain tumors that include lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) and glioblastomas. Transformation of low-grade glioma into a higher tumor grade is typically associated with contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene occur in most LGGs (> 70%). Ivosidenib is an inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) under evaluation in patients with solid tumors. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I, dose escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib in patients with mIDH1 solid tumors. Ivosidenib was administered orally daily in 28-day cycles. RESULTS In 66 patients with advanced gliomas, ivosidenib was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities reported. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 500 mg once per day was selected for the expansion cohort. The grade ≥ 3 adverse event rate was 19.7%; 3% (n = 2) were considered treatment related. In patients with nonenhancing glioma (n = 35), the objective response rate was 2.9%, with 1 partial response. Thirty of 35 patients (85.7%) with nonenhancing glioma achieved stable disease compared with 14 of 31 (45.2%) with enhancing glioma. Median progression-free survival was 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 33.2 months) and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.9 months) for the nonenhancing and enhancing glioma cohorts, respectively. In an exploratory analysis, ivosidenib reduced the volume and growth rates of nonenhancing tumors. CONCLUSION In patients with mIDH1 advanced glioma, ivosidenib 500 mg once per day was associated with a favorable safety profile, prolonged disease control, and reduced growth of nonenhancing tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mehdi Touat
- Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Elizabeth Maher
- Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Macarena I De La Fuente
- Department of Neurology and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Matthias Holdhoff
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - Gregory M Cote
- Henri and Belinda Termeer Center for Targeted Therapies, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert J Young
- Radiology, Neuroradiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raymond Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Liewen Jiang
- Biostatistics, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA
| | - Sung Choe
- Bioinformatics, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA
| | - Bin Fan
- Pharmacology, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA
| | - Katharine Yen
- Clinical Sciences, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA
| | - Min Lu
- Clinical Sciences, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA
| | | | | | | | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Belani P, Kihira S, Pacheco F, Pawha P, Cruciata G, Nael K. Addition of arterial spin-labelled MR perfusion to conventional brain MRI: clinical experience in a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036785. [PMID: 32532776 PMCID: PMC7295400 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The usage of arterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion has exponentially increased due to improved and faster acquisition time and ease of postprocessing. We aimed to report potential additional findings obtained by adding ASL to routine unenhanced brain MRI for patients being scanned in a hospital setting for various neurological indications. DESIGN Retrospective. SETTING Large tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS 676 patients. PRIMARY OUTCOME Additional findings from ASL sequence compared with conventional MRI. RESULTS Our patient cohorts consisted of 676 patients with 257 with acute infarcts and 419 without an infarct. Additional findings from ASL were observed in 13.9% (94/676) of patients. In the non-infarct group, additional findings from ASL were observed in 7.4% (31/419) of patients, whereas in patients with an acute infarct, supplemental information was obtained in 24.5% (63/257) of patients. CONCLUSION The addition of an ASL sequence to routine brain MRI in a hospital setting provides additional findings compared with conventional brain MRI in about 7.4% of patients with additional supplementary information in 24.5% of patients with acute infarct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puneet Belani
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shingo Kihira
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Felipe Pacheco
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Puneet Pawha
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Giuseppe Cruciata
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kambiz Nael
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Kaufmann TJ, Smits M, Boxerman J, Huang R, Barboriak DP, Weller M, Chung C, Tsien C, Brown PD, Shankar L, Galanis E, Gerstner E, van den Bent MJ, Burns TC, Parney IF, Dunn G, Brastianos PK, Lin NU, Wen PY, Ellingson BM. Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:757-772. [PMID: 32048719 PMCID: PMC7283031 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
A recent meeting was held on March 22, 2019, among the FDA, clinical scientists, pharmaceutical and biotech companies, clinical trials cooperative groups, and patient advocacy groups to discuss challenges and potential solutions for increasing development of therapeutics for central nervous system metastases. A key issue identified at this meeting was the need for consistent tumor measurement for reliable tumor response assessment, including the first step of standardized image acquisition with an MRI protocol that could be implemented in multicenter studies aimed at testing new therapeutics. This document builds upon previous consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) in high-grade gliomas and defines a protocol for brain metastases (BTIP-BM) that addresses unique challenges associated with assessment of CNS metastases. The "minimum standard" recommended pulse sequences include: (i) parameter matched pre- and post-contrast inversion recovery (IR)-prepared, isotropic 3D T1-weighted gradient echo (IR-GRE); (ii) axial 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo acquired after injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent and before post-contrast 3D T1-weighted images; (iii) axial 2D or 3D T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery; (iv) axial 2D, 3-directional diffusion-weighted images; and (v) post-contrast 2D T1-weighted spin echo images for increased lesion conspicuity. Recommended sequence parameters are provided for both 1.5T and 3T MR systems. An "ideal" protocol is also provided, which replaces IR-GRE with 3D TSE T1-weighted imaging pre- and post-gadolinium, and is best performed at 3T, for which dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion is included. Recommended perfusion parameters are given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jerrold Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Raymond Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elizabeth Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Terry C Burns
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ian F Parney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gavin Dunn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Departments of Radiological Sciences and Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Houston Z, Bunt J, Chen KS, Puttick S, Howard CB, Fletcher NL, Fuchs AV, Cui J, Ju Y, Cowin G, Song X, Boyd AW, Mahler SM, Richards LJ, Caruso F, Thurecht KJ. Understanding the Uptake of Nanomedicines at Different Stages of Brain Cancer Using a Modular Nanocarrier Platform and Precision Bispecific Antibodies. ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE 2020; 6:727-738. [PMID: 32490189 PMCID: PMC7256936 DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b01299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Increasing accumulation and retention of nanomedicines within tumor tissue is a significant challenge, particularly in the case of brain tumors where access to the tumor through the vasculature is restricted by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This makes the application of nanomedicines in neuro-oncology often considered unfeasible, with efficacy limited to regions of significant disease progression and compromised BBB. However, little is understood about how the evolving tumor-brain physiology during disease progression affects the permeability and retention of designer nanomedicines. We report here the development of a modular nanomedicine platform that, when used in conjunction with a unique model of how tumorigenesis affects BBB integrity, allows investigation of how nanomaterial properties affect uptake and retention in brain tissue. By combining different in vivo longitudinal imaging techniques (including positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging), we have evaluated the retention of nanomedicines with predefined physicochemical properties (size and surface functionality) and established a relationship between structure and tissue accumulation as a function of a new parameter that measures BBB leakiness; this offers significant advancements in our ability to relate tumor accumulation of nanomedicines to more physiologically relevant parameters. Our data show that accumulation of nanomedicines in brain tumor tissue is better correlated with the leakiness of the BBB than actual tumor volume. This was evaluated by establishing brain tumors using a spontaneous and endogenously derived glioblastoma model providing a unique opportunity to assess these parameters individually and compare the results across multiple mice. We also quantitatively demonstrate that smaller nanomedicines (20 nm) can indeed cross the BBB and accumulate in tumors at earlier stages of the disease than larger analogues, therefore opening the possibility of developing patient-specific nanoparticle treatment interventions in earlier stages of the disease. Importantly, these results provide a more predictive approach for designing efficacious personalized nanomedicines based on a particular patient's condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary
H. Houston
- Centre
for Advanced Imaging, The University of
Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- Australian
Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Jens Bunt
- Queensland
Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Kok-Siong Chen
- Queensland
Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
| | - Simon Puttick
- Australian
Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- Commonwealth
Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Probing Biosystems
Future Science Platform, Royal Brisbane
and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia
| | - Christopher B. Howard
- Centre
for Advanced Imaging, The University of
Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- Australian
Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- ARC Training
Centre for Innovation in Biomedical Imaging Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Biopharmaceutical
Innovation The University
of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Nicholas L. Fletcher
- Centre
for Advanced Imaging, The University of
Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- Australian
Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Adrian V. Fuchs
- Centre
for Advanced Imaging, The University of
Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- Australian
Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Jiwei Cui
- Department
of Chemical Engineering, The University
of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- Key
Laboratory of Colloid and Interface Chemistry of the Ministry of Education,
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China
| | - Yi Ju
- Department
of Chemical Engineering, The University
of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Gary Cowin
- Centre
for Advanced Imaging, The University of
Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Xin Song
- Centre
for Advanced Imaging, The University of
Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Andrew W. Boyd
- Leukaemia
Foundation Laboratory, QIMR-Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia
- Department
of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Stephen M. Mahler
- Australian
Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Biopharmaceutical
Innovation The University
of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Linda J. Richards
- Queensland
Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- The
School of Biomedical Sciences, The University
of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Frank Caruso
- Department
of Chemical Engineering, The University
of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Kristofer J. Thurecht
- Centre
for Advanced Imaging, The University of
Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- Australian
Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- ARC Training
Centre for Innovation in Biomedical Imaging Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
Brenner AJ, Peters KB, Vredenburgh J, Bokstein F, Blumenthal DT, Yust-Katz S, Peretz I, Oberman B, Freedman LS, Ellingson BM, Cloughesy TF, Sher N, Cohen YC, Lowenton-Spier N, Rachmilewitz Minei T, Yakov N, Mendel I, Breitbart E, Wen PY. Safety and efficacy of VB-111, an anticancer gene therapy, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: results of a phase I/II study. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:694-704. [PMID: 31844886 PMCID: PMC7229257 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND VB-111 is a non-replicating adenovirus carrying a Fas-chimera transgene, leading to targeted apoptosis of tumor vascular endothelium and induction of a tumor-specific immune response. This phase I/II study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of VB-111 with and without bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). METHODS Patients with rGBM (n = 72) received VB-111 in 4 treatment groups: subtherapeutic (VB-111 dose escalation), limited exposure (LE; VB-111 monotherapy until progression), primed combination (VB-111 monotherapy continued upon progression with combination of bevacizumab), and unprimed combination (upfront combination of VB-111 and bevacizumab). The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were safety, overall response rate, and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS VB-111 was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was transient mild-moderate fever. Median OS time was significantly longer in the primed combination group compared with both LE (414 vs 223 days; hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; P = 0.043) and unprimed combination (414 vs 141.5 days; HR, 0.24; P = 0.0056). Patients in the combination phase of the primed combination group had a median PFS time of 90 days compared with 60 in the LE group (HR, 0.36; P = 0.032), and 63 in the unprimed combination group (P = 0.72). Radiographic responders to VB-111 exhibited characteristic, expansive areas of necrosis in the areas of initial enhancing disease. CONCLUSIONS Patients with rGBM who were primed with VB-111 monotherapy that continued after progression with the addition of bevacizumab showed significant survival and PFS advantage, as well as specific imaging characteristics related to VB-111 mechanism of action. These results warrant further assessment in a randomized controlled study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Brenner
- University of Texas Health San Antonio Mays Cancer Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - James Vredenburgh
- Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Felix Bokstein
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Deborah T Blumenthal
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shlomit Yust-Katz
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Davidoff Cancer Center at Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikvah, Israel and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Idit Peretz
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Davidoff Cancer Center at Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikvah, Israel and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bernice Oberman
- Biostatistics and Biomathematics Unit, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Laurence S Freedman
- Biostatistics and Biomathematics Unit, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Kurz C, Buizza G, Landry G, Kamp F, Rabe M, Paganelli C, Baroni G, Reiner M, Keall PJ, van den Berg CAT, Riboldi M. Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:93. [PMID: 32370788 PMCID: PMC7201982 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01524-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for guidance in external beam radiotherapy has faced significant research and development efforts in recent years. The current availability of linear accelerators with an embedded MRI unit, providing volumetric imaging at excellent soft tissue contrast, is expected to provide novel possibilities in the implementation of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy (IGART) protocols. This study reviews open medical physics issues in MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) implementation, with a focus on current approaches and on the potential for innovation in IGART.Daily imaging in MRgRT provides the ability to visualize the static anatomy, to capture internal tumor motion and to extract quantitative image features for treatment verification and monitoring. Those capabilities enable the use of treatment adaptation, with potential benefits in terms of personalized medicine. The use of online MRI requires dedicated efforts to perform accurate dose measurements and calculations, due to the presence of magnetic fields. Likewise, MRgRT requires dedicated quality assurance (QA) protocols for safe clinical implementation.Reaction to anatomical changes in MRgRT, as visualized on daily images, demands for treatment adaptation concepts, with stringent requirements in terms of fast and accurate validation before the treatment fraction can be delivered. This entails specific challenges in terms of treatment workflow optimization, QA, and verification of the expected delivered dose while the patient is in treatment position. Those challenges require specialized medical physics developments towards the aim of fully exploiting MRI capabilities. Conversely, the use of MRgRT allows for higher confidence in tumor targeting and organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing.The systematic use of MRgRT brings the possibility of leveraging IGART methods for the optimization of tumor targeting and quantitative treatment verification. Although several challenges exist, the intrinsic benefits of MRgRT will provide a deeper understanding of dose delivery effects on an individual basis, with the potential for further treatment personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Giulia Buizza
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, P.za Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748, Garching, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Rabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, P.za Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, P.za Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy
- Bioengineering Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Privata Campeggi 53, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michael Reiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul J Keall
- ACRF Image X Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Cornelis A T van den Berg
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748, Garching, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Huang RY, Bi WL, Weller M, Kaley T, Blakeley J, Dunn I, Galanis E, Preusser M, McDermott M, Rogers L, Raizer J, Schiff D, Soffietti R, Tonn JC, Vogelbaum M, Weber D, Reardon DA, Wen PY. Proposed response assessment and endpoints for meningioma clinical trials: report from the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:26-36. [PMID: 30137421 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
No standard criteria exist for assessing response and progression in clinical trials involving patients with meningioma, and there is no consensus on the optimal endpoints for trials currently under way. As a result, there is substantial variation in the design and response criteria of meningioma trials, making comparison between trials difficult. In addition, future trials should be designed with accepted standardized endpoints. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Meningioma Working Group is an international effort to develop standardized radiologic criteria for treatment response for meningioma clinical trials. In this proposal, we present the recommendations for response criteria and endpoints for clinical trials involving patients with meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Kaley
- Neuro-Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Ian Dunn
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University Vienna-General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael McDermott
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Leland Rogers
- Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jeffrey Raizer
- Medical Neuro-Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Departments of Neurology, Neurological Surgery, and Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science University Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Michael Vogelbaum
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - David A Reardon
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Park JE, Kim HS. [Current Applications and Future Perspectives of Brain Tumor Imaging]. TAEHAN YONGSANG UIHAKHOE CHI 2020; 81:467-487. [PMID: 36238631 PMCID: PMC9431910 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2020.81.3.467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
뇌종양의 진단 및 치료 반응 평가의 기본이 되는 영상기법은 해부학적 영상이다. 현재 임상에서 사용 가능한 영상기법들 중 확산 강조 영상 및 관류 영상이 추가적인 정보를 제공하고 있다. 최근에는 종양의 유전체 변이와 이질성 평가가 중요해지면서 라디오믹스와 딥러닝을 이용한 영상분석기법의 임상 응용이 기대되고 있다. 본 종설에서는 뇌종양 영상 임상 적용에서 여전히 중요한 해부학적 영상을 중심으로 한 자기공명영상 촬영 권고안, 최신 영상기법 중 확산 강조 영상 및 관류 영상의 기본 원리, 병태생리학적 배경 및 임상응용, 마지막으로 최근 컴퓨터 기술의 발전으로 많이 연구되고 있는 라디오믹스와 딥러닝의 뇌종양에서의 향후 활용가치에 대해 기술하고자 한다.
Collapse
|