Diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation: as deleterious as non-transplant-associated diabetes?

Outcomes in kidney transplantation

It is estimated that there are greater than 100000 kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft in the United States. Recent advances in immunosuppression have improved short-term graft survival rates and decreased early mortality by decreasing the incidence and therapy for acute rejection episodes. For those accepted on the waiting list, transplant prolongs patient survival compared with remaining on dialysis. During the 1990s, 3 new immunosuppressive drugs were introduced in clinical kidney transplantation. All were approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration after large, controlled, randomized trials. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), when combined with cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone, lowered acute rejection rates by nearly 50% compared with control. Tacrolimus compared with CSA also significantly reduced acute rejection rates in kidney transplant recipients, but was associated with a significant increase in posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in the early trials. When evaluated in combination with MMF, the incidence of PTDM was much lower. At the end of the decade, sirolimus was shown in several randomized trials to lower acute rejection rates and is believed to be less nephrotoxic compared with calcineurin inhibitors. All of the randomized trials were not statistically powered to assess long-term superiority. Registry analyses have been performed that appear to show some long-term benefit of immunosuppressive therapy with MMF. Other outcome assessments in kidney transplant recipients include risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and bone disease. Although there are few randomized trials, understanding of the significance of these common complications has progressed and strategies for therapy and intervention have been developed. This article focuses on the randomized trials of immunosuppressive therapy and complications associated with use of these drugs. In addition, we review the current management and intervention for the comorbidities associated with the long-term clinical management of the kidney transplant recipient.

High incidence of tacrolimus-associated posttransplantation diabetes in the Korean renal allograft recipients according to American Diabetes Association criteria

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) has been reported to vary according to different study populations or different definitions. In this study, using American Diabetes Association criteria, the incidence and clinical characteristics of PTDM in Korean renal allograft recipients undergoing tacrolimus-based immunosuppression were examined.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 21 patients taking tacrolimus as primary immunosuppressant were recruited and tested with a serial 75-g oral glucose tolerance test at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months after renal transplantation.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of PTDM was 52.4% at 1 month and 57.1% at 3 and 6 months. The baseline characteristics of the PTDM group were old age (especially >40 years), a high BMI, a high fasting glucose level, a high plasma insulin level, and increased insulin resistance. Among these parameters, old age was the only independent risk factor. The insulin secretory capacity in the PTDM group was maximally suppressed 3 months after transplantation. Thereafter, it was gradually restored along with dose reduction of tacrolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine screening for PTDM is necessary in patients over 40 years of age who are undergoing a relatively higher dose tacrolimus therapy during the early course of postrenal transplantation.

Diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation in the United States

New onset diabetes is a major complication after kidney transplantation. However, the incidence, risk factors and clinical relevance of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) vary among reports from single-center observational studies and clinical trials. Using data from the United Renal Data System we identified 11 659 Medicare beneficiaries who received their first kidney transplant in 1996-2000. The cumulative incidence of PTDM was 9.1% (95% confidence interval = 8.6-9.7%), 16.0% (15.3-16.7%), and 24.0% (23.1-24.9%) at 3, 12, and 36 months post-transplant, respectively. Using Cox's proportional hazards analysis, risk factors for PTDM included age, African American race (relative risk = 1.68, range: 1.52-1.85, p < 0.0001), Hispanic ethnicity (1.35, range: 1.19-1.54, p < 0.0001), male donor (1.12, range: 1.03-1.21, p = 0.0090), increasing HLA mismatches, hepatitis C infection (1.33, range: 1.15-1.55, p < 0.0001), body mass index >or=30 kg/m2 (1.73, range: 1.57-1.90, p < 0.0001), and the use of tacrolimus as the initial maintenance immunosuppressive medication (1.53, range: 1.29-1.81, p < 0.0001). Factors that reduced the risk for PTDM included the use of mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, younger recipient age, glomerulonephritis as a cause of kidney failure, and a college education. As a time-dependent covariate in Cox analyses that also included multiple other risk factors, PTDM was associated with increased graft failure (1.63, 1.46-1.84, p < 0.0001), death-censored graft failure (1.46, 1.25-1.70, p < 0.0001), and mortality (1.87, 1.60-2.18, p < 0.0001). We conclude that high incidences of PTDM are associated with the type of initial maintenance immunosuppression, race, ethnicity, obesity and hepatitis C infection. It is a strong, independent predictor of graft failure and mortality. Efforts should be made to minimize the risk of this important complication.

Recurrent and de novo diabetic nephropathy in renal allografts

BACKGROUND

Histologic findings of diabetic nephropathy (DN) are observed in allografts of patients with pretransplant (PreTx) diabetes mellitus (DM) and in patients who develop DM posttransplant (PostTx). Patients with allograft biopsies (Bx) were retrospectively studied to determine the incidence of recurrent and de novo DN and to ascertain what, if any, risk factors predispose to histologic DN in either patient population.

METHODS

From the renal transplant services at four hospitals from 1992 to 2000, the authors identified all patients with PreTxDM and PostTxDM (n=81). Those with renal biopsies performed >/=18 months PostTx were classified according to the presence or absence of histologic DN (Bx-positive, n=23; Bx-negative, n=35). Patients were then subdivided into four categories-recurrent DN (n=16), de novo DN (n=7), no recurrent DN (n=27), and no de novo DN (n=8)-for analyses.

RESULTS

Among these 58 patients, 74.1% had PreTx and 25.9% had PostTx diabetes. Of those with histologic DN, 69.6% were recurrent DN and 30.4% were de novo DN, making de novo DN at least as likely to develop as recurrent DN. After the onset of diabetes in the de novo population, the time to development of histologic DN was similar in the recurrent and the de novo patients (6.68+/-3.86 years vs. 5.90+/-3.13 years, P=0.66) and more rapid than previously reported. Apart from a more frequent family history of hypertension in patients with allograft DN compared with those without allograft DN, known risk factors for the development of native DN did not significantly differ among patients in the four cohorts. Proposed risk factors related to transplantation did not correlate with the development of recurrent or de novo DN.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with histologic DN, de novo DN occurred at least as frequently as recurrent DN, and the time to onset of histologically apparent DN was more rapid than previously reported. Neither the usual clinical predictors of DN nor clinical variables related to transplantation clearly distinguished the group with DN from the group without it, potentially implicating novel mechanisms in its pathogenesis.

Cardiovascular disease after renal transplantation

Cardiovascular disease is a major hazard limiting the life expectancy of renal transplant recipients and the most frequent cause of late allograft loss. Patients with renal disease have usually been exposed for both traditional, and for them unique, risk factors over a prolonged period of time and may carry the burden of advanced atherosclerotic disease already at the time of transplantation. The observed survival benefit of transplantation is probably from elimination of the numerous uremia-related risk factors. However, immunosuppressive therapy and the chronic inflammatory state, together with genetic susceptibility and not infrequently impaired renal function, may bring about new potentially atherogenic conditions. Metabolic risk factors may jeopardize both patient and graft survival. Several observational studies provide evidence for the negative impact of preexisting metabolic abnormalities on long-term outcomes. Identification of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors may enable risk reduction also in renal transplant recipients. Results of ongoing intervention trials are awaited. The observed improvement of patient survival after renal transplantation during the past decade may reflect the increasing awareness and more optimal care of patients throughout the course of renal disease.

Association of hepatitis C with posttransplant diabetes in renal transplant patients on tacrolimus

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) remains a common complication of immunosuppression. Although multiple risk factors have been implicated, none have been clearly identified as predisposing to the increased PTDM frequency observed in patients on tacrolimus. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been associated with diabetes and is a significant renal transplant comorbidity. In this study, records of 427 kidney recipients who had no known diabetes before transplantation were retrospectively examined. A multivariate logistic regression model was fit with covariates that had unadjusted relationships with PTDM to examine the independent relationship of HCV and the odds of development of PTDM by 12 mo posttransplant. A potential interaction between HCV and the use of tacrolimus as maintenance therapy on the odds of the development of PTDM was examined. Overall, PTDM occurred more frequently in HCV(+) than HCV(-) patients (39.4% versus 9.8%; P = 0.0005). By multivariate logistic regression, HCV (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.63 to 11.83; P = 0.0001), weight at transplantation (adjusted OR 1.028; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.05; P = 0.001), and tacrolimus (adjusted OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.01 to 5.28; P = 0.047) were associated with PTDM. A significant interaction (P = 0.0001) was detected between HCV status and tacrolimus use for the odds of PTDM. Among the HCV(+) cohort, PTDM occurred more often in tacrolimus-treated than cyclosporine A-treated patients (57.8% versus 7.7%; P < 0.0001). PTDM rates in HCV(-) patients were similar between the two calcineurin inhibitors (10.0% versus 9.4%; P = 0.521, tacrolimus versus cyclosporine A). In conclusion, HCV is strongly associated with PTDM in renal transplant recipients and appears to account for the increased diabetogenicity observed with tacrolimus.

Posttransplantation diabetes: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the incidence of posttransplantation diabetes (PTD), risk factors for its development, prognostic implications, and optimal management.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We searched databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and others) from inception to September 2000, reviewed bibliographies in reports retrieved, contacted transplantation experts, and reviewed specialty journals. Two reviewers independently determined report inclusion (original studies, in all languages, of PTD in adults with no history of diabetes before transplantation), assessed study methods, and extracted data using a standardized form. Meta-regression was used to explain between-study differences in incidence.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies with 3,611 patients were included. The 12-month cumulative incidence of PTD is lower (<10% in most studies) than it was 3 decades ago. The type of immunosuppression explained 74% of the variability in incidence (P = 0.0004). Risk factors were patient age, nonwhite ethnicity, glucocorticoid treatment for rejection, and immunosuppression with high-dose cyclosporine and tacrolimus. PTD was associated with decreased graft and patient survival in earlier studies; later studies showed improved outcomes. Randomized trials of treatment regimens have not been conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should consider modification of immunosuppressive regimens to decrease the risk of PTD in high-risk transplant recipients. Randomized trials are needed to evaluate the use of oral glucose-lowering agents in transplant recipients, paying particular attention to interactions with immunosuppressive drugs.

Glucose metabolism in the first 3 years after renal transplantation in patients receiving tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression

The long-term effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on pancreatic islet cell function in renal transplant recipients are unclear. Therefore, a prospective, randomized, longitudinal study was performed that compared glucose metabolism in adult kidney allograft recipients on tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Twenty-three white renal allograft recipients, randomized for either therapy with cyclosporine or tacrolimus, underwent intravenous glucose tolerance tests 6 times during the first 3 yr after transplantation. Concomitant therapy (low-dose steroids and azathioprine) was the same in both groups. Insulin sensitivity index (kG), insulin resistance (insulin/glucose ratio and homeostasis model assessment), and C-peptide and insulin secretion were calculated. Trough levels of tacrolimus and cyclosporine were measured. The occurrence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus was prospectively monitored. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA for repeated measures, and parametric and nonparametric tests were also performed. Although only one patient treated with cyclosporine developed posttransplantation diabetes mellitus, kG levels were below normal in up to one-third of both patients who received tacrolimus and cyclosporine. The only significant difference between patients who received tacrolimus and those who received cyclosporine was in pancreatic secretion capacity at week 3 after transplantation, when the increment of C-peptide secretion was 57% lower and the increment of insulin secretion was 48% lower for patients receiving tacrolimus. In both groups, from week 3 to month 6, there was a tendency toward an increase in kG, despite a significant increase in fasting glucose and insulin resistance calculated by homeostasis model assessment. After month 6, there were no significant changes in any of the parameters of glucose metabolism, indicating that long-term use of either tacrolimus or cyclosporine does not cause chronic, cumulative pancreatic toxicity.

Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus in FK-506-treated renal transplant recipients: analysis of incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

The development of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus has a major impact on the quality of life and long-term outcome.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-nine patients without known glucose metabolism abnormalities and treated with FK-506, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil/azathioprine were analyzed for incidence of and risk factors for developing impaired fasting glycemia (IFG) and diabetes mellitus (DM).

RESULTS

Using the American Diabetes Association criteria, 15% developed IFG and 32% developed DM in the first year after transplantation. High trough levels of FK-506 during the first month after transplantation (especially >15 ng/ml) and high body mass index (BMI) were significant risk factors for IFG or DM. Patients with (steroid-treated) acute rejections in addition to high trough levels of FK-506 were most prone to develop DM, whereas high BMI conferred risk of developing IFG. Patients with posttransplantation glycemic abnormalities also had higher levels of serum triglycerides at the time of transplantation, but they needed a lower dose of FK-506 to obtain higher trough levels of FK-506, suggesting metabolic differences already present before transplantation. The only risk factor retained for persistent IFG or DM beyond the first year was a higher number of trough levels of FK-506 >15 ng/ml during the first month after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction with an FK-506 based immunosuppressive regimen resulted in a high incidence of glucose metabolism disorders in renal transplantation recipients. Higher trough levels of FK-506 during the first month, acute rejections, and higher BMI were the most obvious risk factors.

Risk factors for and management of post-transplantation cardiovascular disease

The mortality rates due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in transplant recipients are greater than in the general population. CVD is a major cause of both graft loss and patient death in renal transplant recipients, and improving cardiovascular health in transplant recipients will presumably help to extend both patient and graft survival. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of risk modification on subsequent CVD morbidity and mortality. There is no reason to consider risk factors for CVD such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus in transplant recipients differently from in the general population. In addition, there are specific transplantation risk factors such as acute rejection episodes and the use of immunosuppressive drugs. It is obvious that several of the immunosuppressive agents used today have disadvantageous influences on risk factors for CVD such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), but the relative importance of immunosuppressant-induced increases in these risk factors is basically unknown. This may be a strong argument for the selective use and individual tailoring of immunosuppressive agents based upon the risk factor profile of the patient, without jeopardising the function of the graft. Hyperlipidaemia is common after transplantation, and immunosuppression with corticosteroids, cyclosporin, or sirolimus (rapamycin) causes different types of post-transplantation hyperlipidaemia. However, to date, no studies have demonstrated that lipid lowering strategies significantly reduce CVD morbidity or mortality and improve allograft survival in transplant recipients. Several studies using preventive or interventional approaches are ongoing and will be reported in the near future. Post-transplantation hypertension appears to be a major risk factor determining graft and patient survival, and immunosuppressive agents have different effects on hypertension. Controlled studies support the opinion that post-transplantation hypertension must be treated as strictly as in a population with essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or chronic renal failure. As increasing numbers of immunosuppressive agents become available for use, we may be in a better position to tailor immunosuppressive therapy to the individual patient, avoiding the use of diabetogenic drugs, drug combinations, or inappropriate doses in patients susceptible to PTDM. Multiple acute rejection episodes have also been demonstrated to be a risk factor for CVD - a strong argument for the use of immunosuppressive drugs to reduce acute rejection. Until we have a better understanding from ongoing landmark studies on the management of CVD, presently available therapy to reduce risk factors needs to be used together with individual tailoring of immunosuppressive therapy with the aim of reducing CVD in these patients.

beta-Cell dysfunction rather than insulin resistance is the main contributing factor for the development of postrenal transplantation diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Our study was undertaken to investigate the pathogenesis and possible risk factors for postrenal transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM).

METHODS

We recruited 114 patients with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and performed both 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) and short insulin tolerance tests 1 week before and 9-12 months after transplantation.

RESULTS

The subjects were classified into three groups by World Health Organization criteria on the basis of OGTT after transplantation: (a) 36 (31.6%) subjects with normal glucose tolerance; (b) 51 (45.7%) subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT); and (c) 27 (23.7%) subjects with postrenal transplantation diabetes mellitus. Dosages of steroid and cyclosporine were equivalent among the three groups. Before transplantation, the fasting and 2-hr plasma glucose and proinsulin/insulin (PI/I) ratios were significantly higher in the IGT and PTDM groups than in the NGT group, but the insulin sensitivity index (ISI) was not significantly different among the three groups. In addition, the area under the curve-insulin on OGTT was significantly lower in the PTDM group than in the NGT group. After transplantation, however, the ISI was increased in all groups. Furthermore, the ISI and PI/I ratios revealed significantly higher values in the PTDM group than in the NGT group after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results revealed that fasting and 2-hr plasma glucose levels, as well as the proinsulin/insulin ratio before transplantation, are both possible indicators of beta-cell dysfunction and may be predictors for the development of PTDM. Furthermore, beta-cell dysfunction, rather than insulin resistance, was proven to be the main factor for the pathogenesis of PTDM.

Tapering off prednisolone and cyclosporin the first year after renal transplantation: the effect on glucose tolerance

BACKGROUND

Glucose intolerance is an untoward side effect of some immunosuppressive and anti-hypertensive drugs. The primary aim of the present prospective observational study was to test the hypothesis that tapering off prednisolone and cyclosporin (CsA) the first year after transplantation may have beneficial effects on glucose tolerance in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Ninety-one non-diabetic recipients were included, and 87 patients underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test both 10 weeks and 1 year after renal transplantation. The change over time in 2-h blood glucose was compared with a number of variables potentially influencing glucose tolerance.

RESULTS

The proportion of glucose intolerant recipients was reduced from 55 to 34% during the study. Univariate linear regression analysis showed a significant association between the reduction in daily prednisolone dose down to 5 mg and decline in blood glucose (P=0.001), whereas weight gain was associated with increasing blood glucose (P=0.031). Each 1-mg reduction of prednisolone dose leads to an estimated decline in 2-h blood glucose of 0.12 mmol/l based on the multiple linear regression model (P=0.003). Twelve out of 22 patients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) at baseline improved to normal or impaired glucose tolerance. Ten PTDM-subjects who remained diabetic 1 year after transplantation had lower serum insulin levels during the oral glucose challenge, and five patients treated with anti-diabetic drugs at baseline required hypoglycaemic drugs also at follow up. The decline in CsA level of 100 microg/l and the lower number of patients treated with beta-blockers at follow-up, did not alter glucose tolerance significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Tapering off prednisolone, but not CsA, significantly improves glucose tolerance during the first year after renal transplantation.

Influence of diabetes mellitus on patient and graft survival in recipients of kidney transplantation

AIMS

To investigate the outcomes in patients who have pre-existing diabetes and those who develop post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 939 patients who received a first functioning renal transplant in the cyclosporine (CyA) era between 1984 and 1999.

RESULTS

Sixty-six (7%) patients had renal failure due to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and 7 (0.8%) patients due to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Ten (1.1%) patients had coexistent diabetes and 48 (5.1%) recipients developed PTDM. The mean graft survival for the patients with PTDM was 9.7 yr versus 11.3 yr for the non-diabetic patients, while mean graft survival was 10.1 yr for patients with IDDM and 2.9 yr with NIDDM and 8.3 yr for those with coexistent diabetes (p=ns). However, there was a statistically significant difference in patient survival between patients who developed PTDM and in those who did not develop this complication. The mean survivals of patients with IDDM, NIDDM, coexistent diabetics and PTDM were 8.4, 3.7, 8.6 and 10.3 yr, respectively. The mean survival of the patients without pre-existing diabetes or PTDM was 12.8 yr (p<0.001). The survival of patients older than 55 yr with PTDM was no different to the control group. However, in those younger than 55 yr, PTDM was associated with a higher risk of death (relative risk of 2.54, p<0.001). Fifty percent of patients with IDDM developed acute rejection episodes, whereas rejection rate was 57.1% in NIDDM group, 50.0% in the PTDM group, 20.0% in the coexistent diabetes group and 44.3% in the control group (p=ns).

CONCLUSION

Patient survival, but not graft survival, was adversely affected by both pre-existing diabetes and by PTDM, particularly in those with an age less than 55 yr.

Influence of tacrolimus on glucose metabolism before and after renal transplantation: a prospective study

Most studies concerning the influence of tacrolimus on glucose metabolism have been performed either in animals or after organ transplantation. These clinical studies have largely been transversal with patients who were using steroids. Therefore, this prospective, longitudinal study investigated the influence of tacrolimus on glucose metabolism before and after transplantation. Eighteen Caucasian dialysis patients underwent an intravenous glucose tolerance test before and 5 d after the start of tacrolimus. Insulin sensitivity index (k(G)), insulin resistance (insulin/glucose ratio and homeostasis model assessment), and C-peptide and insulin secretion were calculated. Trough levels of tacrolimus were measured. After transplantation, the occurrence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) was prospectively monitored. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Spearman's rho for correlation. Before tacrolimus, k(G) was indeterminate in three patients. During tacrolimus, k(G) decreased in 16 of 18 patients, from a median of 1.74 mmol/L per min to 1.08 mmol/L per min (P<0.0001). The correlation between C-peptide and insulin data was excellent. Insulin secretion decreased from 851.0 mU x min/L to 558.0 mU x min/L (P = 0.014), whereas insulin resistance did not change. Insulin sensitivity correlated negatively with tacrolimus trough level. After transplantation, three patients developed PTDM; before tacrolimus, two had an indeterminate and one a low normal k(G). During tacrolimus administration, k(G) decreased in almost all patients as a result of a diminished insulin secretion response to a glucose load, whereas insulin resistance did not change. Patients with an abnormal or indeterminate k(G) seem to be at risk of developing PTDM while on tacrolimus.

Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation

Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.

Post-transplant diabetes: incidence, relationship to choice of immunosuppressive drugs, and treatment protocol

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is one of the feared complications of immunosuppressive therapy. Despite advances, including the introduction of the steroid-sparing calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, the incidence rate remains greater than 10% to 30%, especially in minority populations. PTDM increases the subsequent risk of both graft loss and patient death, and predisposes patients to all complications of diabetes, including retinopathy and neuropathy. Patients should be monitored closely, especially during the first 3 months post-transplant, and treated aggressively, should glucose intolerance be detected. Minimization of immunosuppression dose, diet, oral hypoglycemic agents, and insulin have all been used in the treatment of PTDM, however, the insulin-sensitizing agents have not been studied. It is hoped that newer immunosuppressive regimens and, ultimately, the ability to achieve tolerance will eventually solve the problem of PTDM.

Impaired glucose oxidation and glucose-induced thermogenesis in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Renal transplant recipients often show various metabolic abnormalities including reduced glucose tolerance, impaired insulin sensitivity and altered lipid metabolism. However, the acute effects of carbohydrate ingestion on substrate utilization and energy expenditure have not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

We evaluated: (i) basal energy expenditure (EE) and substrate utilization, (ii) metabolic fate of an oral glucose load, and (iii) substrate-induced thermogenesis in: (a) 15 non-diabetic renal transplant recipients (Tx) (BMI 25+/-1) on triple immunosuppressive therapy, (b) 11 patients with primary glomerulonephritis (BMI 25+/-1) (Cort) receiving prednisone treatment, and (c) 12 healthy subjects (BMI 26+/-1) (N). Continuous indirect calorimetry was performed in the basal post-absorptive state for 60 min and continued for an additional 180 min following an oral glucose load (75 g).

RESULTS

In the basal state, EE was similar in the three study groups. It averaged 14.6+/-0.7, 15.7+/-1.3, and 14.1+/-0.8 cal/kg/min in Tx, Cort, and N respectively. Glucose oxidation was higher in N (1.3+/- 0.2 mg/kg/min) than in Tx (0.7+/-0.2) and Cort (1.0+/-0.2) (P<0.05 in N vs. Tx and vs. Cort), whereas lipid oxidation was lower in N (0.6+/-0.1 mg/kg/min) than in Tx (0.9+/-0.1) and Cort (0.9+/-0.05) (P<0.03 in N vs. Tx and vs. Cort). After glucose ingestion, total carbohydrate oxidation averaged 21.2+/-2, 31.0+/-3, and 29.6+/-3 g, which represented 28+/-3, 41+/-3 and 39+/-2% of the total glucose load in Tx, Cort and N respectively (P<0.01 Tx vs Cort and N). The cumulative increase of EE (180 min) was 9.7+/-2, 13.2+/-3 and 13+/-3 kcal in Tx, Cort, and N respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data show that in non-diabetic renal transplant recipients basal EE is normal. However, basal lipid oxidation is higher and glucose oxidation is lower than in healthy subjects. In addition, the oxidative disposal of a glucose load and substrate-induced thermogenesis are impaired.

The metabolic effects of cyclosporin and tacrolimus

The introduction of cyclosporin and, more recently, tacrolimus in the immunosuppression of transplanted patients has lead to prolonged graft survival and increased patients' life expectancy. It has been therefore possible to evaluate the effects of long-term treatment with these drugs and metabolic alterations in patients on cyclosporin or tacrolimus have been reported by several authors. In particular, the use of these drugs is associated with abnormalities of glucose and lipid metabolism. Post-transplant diabetes is more common with tacrolimus, probably due to more marked effects on the pancreatic beta-cells, whereas increased levels of cholesterol and triglycerides are more frequently associated with cyclosporin treatment, even though, in this latter case, steroid treatment seems to play a major role. Comparison and intervention studies must be planned to evaluate the best therapeutical approaches to control these abnormalities and to assess the possibility to further increase graft and patient survival by appropriate treatment of diabetes and hyperlipidemia.

Cardiovascular effects of an immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A

Cyclosporin A (CsA) is now routinely used for transplantation of all solid organs, bone marrow transplantation, and for an increasing number of immunological diseases. However, treatment with CsA is an important iatrogenic cause of post-transplant hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, which may contribute to the high cardiovascular morbidity in transplant recipients. Recently, the calcineurin inhibitor CsA has been employed in vivo and in vitro to examine the role of calcineurin in the signal transduction leading to cardiac hypertrophy. A cell culture study demonstrated the inhibitory effect of CsA on cytokine production by cardiac myxoma cells, the most common primary tumor of the heart. This review discusses recent data on the cardiovascular effects of CsA.

Which calcineurin inhibitor is preferred in renal transplantation: tacrolimus or cyclosporine?

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus are potent inhibitors of the calcineurin-dependent cytokine synthesis in activated lymphocytes. In renal transplant patients tacrolimus is more powerful in preventing severe and refractory rejections, even when compared with the new cyclosporine microemulsion formulation. Both drugs are equally nephrotoxic, but tacrolimus induces less hypertension and less pronounced hyperlipidaemia. Especially in some categories of patients, a higher incidence of de-novo diabetes mellitus is seen with tacrolimus therapy.

Islet cell damage associated with tacrolimus and cyclosporine: morphological features in pancreas allograft biopsies and clinical correlation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of the potent immunosuppressive drugs tacrolimus (FK) and cyclosporine (CSA) has markedly improved the outcome of solid organ transplantation. However, these drugs can cause posttransplantation diabetes mellitus. Abnormalities in the glucose metabolism are of particular significance in pancreas transplantation.

METHODS

We studied 26 pancreas allograft biopsies, performed 1-8 months posttransplantation, from 20 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients, randomized to receive either FK or CSA. The biopsies were studied by light microscopy, immunoperoxidase stains for insulin and glucagon, in situ DNA-end labeling for detection of apoptosis, and electron microscopy. The islet morphology was correlated with the mean and peak levels of CSA and FK in serum, with corticosteroid administration and with glycemia.

RESULTS

On light microscopy cytoplasmic swelling, vacuolization, apoptosis, and abnormal immunostaining for insulin were seen in biopsies from patients receiving either FK or CSA. The islet cell damage was more frequent and severe in the group receiving FK than in the group receiving CSA (10/13 and 5/13, respectively) but the differences were not statistically significant. Significant correlation was seen between the presence of islet cell damage and serum levels of CSA or FK during the 15 days previous to the biopsy, as well as with the peak level of FK. Toxic levels of CSA or FK and administration of pulse steroids were associated with hyperglycemia when these occurred concurrently (P=0.005). Toxic levels of CSA or FK by themselves were associated with hyperglycemia in a minority of cases (8 and 26%, respectively). Electron microscopy showed cytoplasmic swelling and vacuolization, and marked decrease or absence of dense-core secretory granules in beta cells; the changes were more pronounced in patients on FK. Serial biopsies from two hyperglycemic patients receiving FK and evidence of islet cell damage demonstrated reversibility of the damage when FK was discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

The structural damage to beta cells demonstrated in this study is similar to morphological and functional abnormalities previously described in experimental animal models and can at least partially account for the glucose metabolism abnormalities seen in patients receiving these drugs. Toxic levels of CSA or FK and higher steroid doses potentiate each others' diabetogenic effects.

Risk for posttransplant Diabetes mellitus with current immunosuppressive medications

With improvements in the practice of transplantation and the introduction of new immunosuppressive medications, there has been a substantial increase in 1-year allograft survival rates. Consequently, the pool of potential candidates for organ transplants continues to grow and a greater preponderance of older patients with more comorbidities are undergoing transplantation. As a result, there is interest in such medical complications as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) that develop after the transplantation of a successful allograft. PTDM is an undesirable consequence of transplantation because of its associated morbidity and impairment of both patient and graft survival. Although some controversy exists, it is likely that glucose intolerance after transplantation results in both macrovascular and microvascular disease, and there is an increasing risk for infectious and cardiovascular diseases, to which transplant recipients are already at increased susceptibility. Both experimental and clinical observations have shown that immunosuppressive agents currently used in transplantation account for a large degree of the increased risk for PTDM. Consequently, improved understanding of the effects of currently used immunosuppressive medicines on glycemic tolerance is of interest in clinical transplantation.