Positive cross-regulation and enhancer sharing: two mechanisms for specifying overlapping Hox expression patterns

Spatially restricted factors cooperate with notch in the regulation of Enhancer of split genes

Expression of the Drosophila Enhancer of split [E(spl)] genes, and their homologues in other species, is dependent on Notch activation. The seven E(spl) genes are clustered in a single complex and their functions overlap significantly; however, the individual genes have distinct patterns of expression. To investigate how this regulation is achieved and to find out whether there is shared or cross regulation between E(spl) genes, we have analysed the enhancer activity of sequences from the adjacent E(spl)mbeta, E(spl)mgamma and E(spl)mdelta genes and made comparisons to E(spl)m8. We find that although regulatory elements can be shared, most aspects of the expression of each individual gene are recapitulated by small (400-500 bp) evolutionarily conserved enhancers. Activated Notch or a Suppressor of Hairless-VP16 fusion are only sufficient to elicit transcription from the E(spl) enhancers in a subset of locations, indicating a requirement for other factors. In tissue culture cells, proneural proteins synergise with Suppressor of Hairless and Notch to promote expression from E(spl)mgamma and E(spl)m8, but this synergy is only observed in vivo with E(spl)m8. We conclude that additional factors besides the proneural proteins limit the response of E(spl)mgamma in vivo. In contrast to the other genes, E(spl)mbeta exhibits little response to proneural proteins and its high level of activity in the wing imaginal disc suggests that wing-specific factors cooperate with Notch to activate the E(spl)mbeta enhancer. These results demonstrate that Notch activity must be integrated with other transcriptional regulators and, since the activation of target genes is critical in determining the developmental consequences of Notch activity, provide a framework for understanding Notch function in different developmental contexts.

Homeobox genes and gut development

The gut of vertebrates exhibits a common anteroposterior regional differentiation. The role of homeobox genes in establishing this pattern is inferred by their sites of expression. It is suggested that the primary source of positional information is in the endoderm, which subsequently establishes a 'dialogue' with the surrounding visceral layer of the lateral plate mesoderm. This results in the anatomical and physiological specialization of the adult gut.

Hox C cluster genes are dispensable for overall body plan of mouse embryonic development

Hox genes encode transcription factors which provide positional information during morphogenesis along the body axis; genetic interaction among Hox genes is thought to be necessary for correct pattern formation. One of the most curious features of the 39 vertebrate Hox genes is that they form four clusters each composed of several genes paralogous between clusters. This raises the question are all four clusters necessary for the development of vertebrates and, if so, what is the function of each cluster? To provide an answer to this question, we prepared Hox C cluster null mice utilizing the Cre-loxP system. Hox C cluster null mice, lacking all nine Hox C genes, die at the time of birth; however, the mutant pups develop to this stage with minor transformations. This development shows that the Hox C genes are dispensable for the overall body plan of mouse embryogenesis. Furthermore, transformations observed in the skeletal system of the Hox C cluster null mice are milder than those observed in the Hoxc-9 null mice, providing further evidence that at least some genes within a cluster exhibit interaction functions with each other.

The design and analysis of a homeotic response element

We have shown that the 26 bp bx1 element from the regulatory region of Distal-less is capable of imposing control by the homeotic genes Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A on a general epidermal activator in Drosophila. This provides us with an assay to analyze the sequence requirements for specific repression by these Hox genes. Both the core Hox binding site, 5'-TAAT, and the adjacent EXD 5'-TGAT core site are required for repression by Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A. The Distal-less bx1 site thus fits with the model of Hox protein binding specificity based on the consensus PBX/HOX-family site TGATNNAT[g/t][g/a], where the key elements of binding specificity are proposed to lie in the two base pairs following the TGAT. A single base pair deletion in the bx1 sequence generates a site, bx1:A(-)mut, that on the consensus PBX/HOX model would be expected to be regulated by the Deformed Hox gene. We observed, however, that the bx1:A(-)mut site was regulated predominantly by Sex combs reduced, Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A. The analysis of this site indicates that the specificity of action of Hox proteins may depend not only on selective DNA binding but also on specific post-binding interactions.

A highly conserved enhancer in the Dlx5/Dlx6 intergenic region is the site of cross-regulatory interactions between Dlx genes in the embryonic forebrain

Four Dlx homeobox genes, Dlx1, Dlx2, Dlx5, and Dlx6 are expressed in the same primordia of the mouse forebrain with temporally overlapping patterns. The four genes are organized as two tail-to-tail pairs, Dlx1/Dlx2 and Dlx5/Dlx6, a genomic arrangement conserved in distantly related vertebrates like zebrafish. The Dlx5/Dlx6 intergenic region contains two sequences of a few hundred base pairs, remarkably well conserved between mouse and zebrafish. Reporter transgenes containing these two sequences are expressed in the forebrain of transgenic mice and zebrafish with patterns highly similar to endogenous Dlx5 and Dlx6 expression. The activity of the transgene is drastically reduced in mouse mutants lacking both Dlx1 and Dlx2, consistent with the decrease in endogenous Dlx5 and Dlx6 expression. These results suggest that cross-regulation by Dlx proteins, mediated by the intergenic sequences, is essential for Dlx5 and Dlx6 expression in the forebrain. This hypothesis is supported by cotransfection and DNA-protein binding experiments. We propose that the Dlx genes are part of a highly conserved developmental pathway that regulates forebrain development.

Developmental patterning genes and their conserved functions: from model organisms to humans

Molecular and genetic evidence accumulated during the past 20 years in the field of developmental biology indicates that different animals possess many common genetic systems for embryonic patterning. In this review we describe the conserved functions of such developmental patterning genes and their relevance for human pathological conditions. Special attention is given to the Hox genetic system, involved in establishing cell identities along the anterior-posterior axis of all higher metazoans. We also describe other conserved genetic systems, such as the involvement of Pax6 genes in eye development and the role of Nkx2.5-type proteins in heart development. Finally, we outline some fascinating problems at the forefront of the studies of developmental patterning genes and show how knowledge obtained from model genetic organisms such as Drosophila helps to explain normal human morphogenesis and the genetic basis of some birth defects.

Plasticity in mouse neural crest cells reveals a new patterning role for cranial mesoderm

The anteroposterior identity of cranial neural crest cells is thought to be preprogrammed before these cells emigrate from the neural tube. Here we test this assumption by developing techniques for transposing cells in the hindbrain of mouse embryos, using small numbers of cells in combination with genetic and lineage markers. This technique has uncovered a surprising degree of plasticity with respect to the expression of Hox genes, which can be used as markers of different hindbrain segments and cells, in both hindbrain tissue and cranial neural crest cells. Our analysis shows that the patterning of cranial neural crest cells relies on a balance between permissive and instructive signals, and underscores the importance of cell-community effects. These results reveal a new role for the cranial mesoderm in patterning facial tissues. Furthermore, our findings argue against a permanently fixed prepatterning of the cranial neural crest that is maintained by passive transfer of positional information from the hindbrain to the periphery.

Beyond the Hox complex

The Hox complex is an example of a gene cluster created by tandem duplications. Recent findings suggest the Hox complex may be just part of a larger chromosomal assemblage of homeobox-containing genes that existed in the ancestor to all vertebrates.

Hoxd4 and Rarg interact synergistically in the specification of the cervical vertebrae

We show that, relative to single null mutants, mice bearing mutations in both Hoxd4 and Rarg display malformations of the basioccipital bone, and first (C1) and second cervical vertebrae (C2) at increased penetrance and expressivity, demonstrating synergy between Hoxd4 and Rarg in the specification of the cervical skeleton. In contrast to Rarg mutants, retinoic acid (RA) treatment on embryonic day 10.5 of Hoxd4 single or Hoxd4;Rarg double mutants does not rescue normal development of C2. Somitic expression of Hoxd4 is not altered in wild-type or Rarg mutant animals before or after RA treatment on day 10.5, suggesting that Hoxd4 and Rarg act in parallel to regulate the expression of target genes directing skeletogenesis.

Patterning the ascidian nervous system: structure, expression and transgenic analysis of the CiHox3 gene

Hox genes play a fundamental role in the establishment of chordate body plan, especially in the anteroposterior patterning of the nervous system. Particularly interesting are the anterior groups of Hox genes (Hox1-Hox4) since their expression is coupled to the control of regional identity in the anterior regions of the nervous system, where the highest structural diversity is observed. Ascidians, among chordates, are considered a good model to investigate evolution of Hox gene, organisation, regulation and function. We report here the cloning and the expression pattern of CiHox3, a Ciona intestinalis anterior Hox gene homologous to the paralogy group 3 genes. In situ hybridization at the larva stage revealed that CiHox3 expression was restricted to the visceral ganglion of the central nervous system. The presence of a sharp posterior boundary and the absence of transcript in mesodermal tissues are distinctive features of CiHox3 expression when compared to the paralogy group 3 in other chordates. We have investigated the regulatory elements underlying CiHox3 neural-specific expression and, using transgenic analysis, we were able to isolate an 80 bp enhancer responsible of CiHox3 activation in the central nervous system (CNS). A comparative study between mouse and Ciona Hox3 promoters demonstrated that divergent mechanisms are involved in the regulation of these genes in vertebrates and ascidians.

PBX and MEIS as non-DNA-binding partners in trimeric complexes with HOX proteins

HOX, PBX, and MEIS transcription factors bind DNA through a homeodomain. PBX proteins bind DNA cooperatively as heterodimers with MEIS family members and also with HOX proteins from paralog groups 1 to 10. MEIS proteins cooperatively bind DNA with ABD-B class HOX proteins of groups 9 and 10. Here, we examine aspects of dimeric and higher-order interactions between these three homeodomain classes. The most significant results can be summarized as follows. (i) Most of PBX N terminal to the homeodomain is required for efficient cooperative binding with HOXD4 and HOXD9. (ii) MEIS and PBX proteins form higher-order complexes on a heterodimeric binding site. (iii) Although MEIS does not cooperatively bind DNA with ANTP class HOX proteins, it does form a trimer as a non-DNA-binding partner with DNA-bound PBX-HOXD4. (iv) The N terminus of HOXD4 negatively regulates trimer formation. (v) MEIS forms a similar trimer with DNA-bound PBX-HOXD9. (vi) A related trimer (where MEIS is a non-DNA-binding partner) is formed on a transcriptional promoter within the cell. (vii) We observe an additional trimer class involving non-DNA-bound PBX and DNA-bound MEIS-HOXD9 or MEIS-HOXD10 heterodimers that is enhanced by mutation of the PBX homeodomain. (viii) In this latter trimer, PBX is likely to contact both MEIS and HOXD9/D10. (ix) The stability of DNA binding by all trimers is enhanced relative to the heterodimers. These findings suggest novel functions for PBX and MEIS in modulating the function of DNA-bound MEIS-HOX and PBX-HOX heterodimers, respectively.

Evolution of the HOXB6 intergenic region: motif conservation at the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) enhancer element

This study reports the results of a comparative sequencing study in higher primates, focusing on the intergenic region located between HOXB6 and HOXB7. We have examined an 832 bp. region, encompassing a putative Lateral Plate Mesoderm (LPM) enhancer element in a variety of anthropoid apes. The interspecific comparisons reveal extensive substitutions occurring within this region, with a marked bias in favor of C-->T transitions within the enhancer element. The pattern of these substitutions suggests that the LPM enhancer region is subject to specific sequence and compositional constraints that are only revealed through comparative sequencing. These constraints produce an enhancer signature, the CpG microisland, which may be useful in identifying additional regulatory elements located within the HOX complexes. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 285:170-176, 1999.

The role of kreisler in segmentation during hindbrain development

The mouse kreisler gene is expressed in rhombomeres (r) 5 and 6 during neural development and kreisler mutants have patterning defects in the hindbrain that are not fully understood. Here we analyzed this phenotype with a combination of genetic, molecular, and cellular marking techniques. Using Hox/lacZ transgenic mice as reporter lines and by analyzing Eph/ephrin expression, we have found that while r5 fails to form in these mice, r6 is present. This shows that kreisler has an early role in the formation of r5. We also observed patterning defects in r3 and r4 that are outside the normal domain of kreisler expression. In both heterozygous and homozygous kreisler embryos some r5 markers are induced in r3, suggesting that there is a partial change in r3 identity that is not dependent upon the loss of r5. To investigate the cellular character of r6 in kreisler embryos we performed heterotopic grafting experiments in the mouse hindbrain to monitor its mixing properties. Control experiments revealed that cells from even- or odd-numbered segments only mixed freely with themselves, but not with cells of opposite character. Transposition of cells from the r6 territory of kreisler mutants reveals that they adopt mature r6 characteristics, as they freely mix only with cells from even-numbered rhombomeres. Analysis of Phox2b expression shows that some aspects of later neurogenesis in r6 are altered, which may be associated with the additional roles of kreisler in regulating segmental identity. Together these results suggest that the formation of r6 has not been affected in kreisler mutants. This analysis has revealed phenotypic and mechanistic differences between kreisler and its zebrafish equivalent valentino. While valentino is believed to subdivide preexisting segmental units, in the mouse kreisler specifies a particular segment. The formation of r6 independent of r5 argues against a role of kreisler in prorhombomeric segmentation of the mouse hindbrain. We conclude that the mouse kreisler gene regulates multiple steps in segmental patterning involving both the formation of segments and their A-P identity.

RARbeta mediates the response of Hoxd4 and Hoxb4 to exogenous retinoic acid

One action of retinoids in development is the regulation of Hox gene expression. Hoxd4 and Hoxb4 expression in the embryonic hindbrain is anteriorized by retinoic acid (RA) treatment of mid-gestation mouse embryos. Here we demonstrate that retinoic acid receptor beta (Rarb) deficient mice present only a partial anteriorization of either Hoxd4 or Hoxb4 in response to RA treatment. Our results strongly suggest that RARbeta is a mediator of their RA-response, and reveal anteroposterior polarity within a single rhombomere (r). Additionally, we generated mice doubly mutated for Hoxd4 and Rarb in an attempt to identify common morphogenetic pathways between these two genes. We conclude that there are no synergistic interactions between Hoxd4 and Rarb in the specification of the cervical vertebrae.

Breaking colinearity in the mouse HoxD complex

Vertebrate Hox genes are activated in a spatiotemporal sequence that reflects their clustered organization. While this colinear relationship is a property of most metazoans with an anterior to posterior polarity, the underlying molecular mechanisms are unknown. Previous work suggested that Hox genes were made progressively available for transcription in the course of gastrulation, implying the existence of an element capable of initiating a repressive conformation, subsequently relieved from the clusters sequentially. We searched for this element by combining a genomic walk with successive transgene insertions upstream of the HoxD complex followed by a series of deletions. The largest deficiency induced posterior homeotic transformations coincidentally with an earlier activation of Hoxd genes. These data suggest that a regulatory element located upstream of the complex is necessary for setting up the early pattern of Hox gene colinear activation.

HOXA9 forms triple complexes with PBX2 and MEIS1 in myeloid cells

Aberrant activation of the HOX, MEIS, and PBX homeodomain protein families is associated with leukemias, and retrovirally driven coexpression of HOXA9 and MEIS1 is sufficient to induce myeloid leukemia in mice. Previous studies have demonstrated that HOX-9 and HOX-10 paralog proteins are unique among HOX homeodomain proteins in their capacity to form in vitro cooperative DNA binding complexes with either the PBX or MEIS protein. Furthermore, PBX and MEIS proteins have been shown to form in vivo heterodimeric DNA binding complexes with each other. We now show that in vitro DNA site selection for MEIS1 in the presence of HOXA9 and PBX yields a consensus PBX-HOXA9 site. MEIS1 enhances in vitro HOXA9-PBX protein complex formation in the absence of DNA and forms a trimeric electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) complex with these proteins on an oligonucleotide containing a PBX-HOXA9 site. Myeloid cell nuclear extracts produce EMSA complexes which appear to contain HOXA9, PBX2, and MEIS1, while immunoprecipitation of HOXA9 from these extracts results in coprecipitation of PBX2 and MEIS1. In myeloid cells, HOXA9, MEIS1, and PBX2 are all strongly expressed in the nucleus, where a portion of their signals are colocalized within nuclear speckles. However, cotransfection of HOXA9 and PBX2 with or without MEIS1 minimally influences transcription of a reporter gene containing multiple PBX-HOXA9 binding sites. Taken together, these data suggest that in myeloid leukemia cells MEIS1 forms trimeric complexes with PBX and HOXA9, which in turn can bind to consensus PBX-HOXA9 DNA targets.

Evidence that Hoxa expression domains are evolutionarily transposed in spinal ganglia, and are established by forward spreading in paraxial mesoderm

Transposition of anatomical structures along the anteroposterior axis has been a commonly used mechanism for changing body proportions during the course of evolutionary time. Earlier work (Gaunt, S.J., 1994. Conservation in the Hox code during morphological evolution. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 38, 549-552; Burke, A.C., Nelson, C.E., Morgan, B.A., Tabin, C., 1995. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 121, 333-346) showed how transposition in mesodermal derivatives (vertebrae) could be attributed to transposition in the expression of Hox genes along the axial series of somites. We now show how transposition in the segmental arrangement of the spinal nerves can also be correlated with shifts in the expression domains of Hox genes. Specifically, we show how the expression domains of Hoxa-7, a-9 and a-10 in spinal ganglia correspond similarly in both mouse and chick with the positions of the brachial and lumbosacral plexuses, and that this is true even though the brachial plexus of chick is shifted posteriorly, relative to mouse, by seven segmental units. In spite of these marked species differences in the boundaries of Hoxa-7 expression, cis regulatory elements located up to 5 kb upstream of the chick Hoxa-7 gene showed much functional and structural conservation with those described in the mouse (Puschel, A.W., Balling, R., Gruss, P., 1991. Separate elements cause lineage restriction and specify boundaries of Hox-1.1 expression. Development 112, 279-287; Knittel, T., Kessel, M., Kim, M.H., Gruss, P., 1995. A conserved enhancer of the human and murine Hoxa-7 gene specifies the anterior boundary of expression during embryonal development. Development 121, 1077-1088). We also show that chick Hoxa-7 and a-10 expression domains spread forward into regions of somites that are initially negative for the expression of these genes. We discuss this as evidence that Hox expression in paraxial mesoderm spreads forward, as earlier found for neurectoderm and lateral plate mesoderm, in a process that occurs independently of cell movement.

The gamma-globin promoter has a major role in competitive inhibition of beta-globin gene expression in early erythroid development

The human gamma-globin gene competitively inhibits beta-globin gene expression in early erythroid development. To identify the gamma-globin gene sequences required for this effect, transgenic mice and stable transfection analyses with constructs containing 5'HS2 from the locus control region, modified gamma-globin genes, and the beta-globin gene were used. The -136 to +56 region of the gamma-globin promoter is necessary for competitive inhibition, as the beta-globin gene was inappropriately expressed in mouse embryos and in K562 and HEL cells containing constructs in which this region was deleted. Independently, the -140 to +56 region of gamma-globin gene was not sufficient to inhibit beta-globin transcription in mouse embryos or in cultured cells. Competitive inhibition of beta-globin gene expression was observed in K562 and HEL cells having a gamma-globin gene with a -161 promoter. The data suggest that the -161 gamma-globin promoter, which includes the CACCC box, two CCAAT boxes, the stage selector element (SSE), and TATA box, has a major role in suppressing beta-globin transcription early in development. Proteins binding to these or other gamma-globin promoter elements may interact with those binding to the locus control region, consequently precluding beta-globin transcription.

Patterning of Caenorhabditis elegans posterior structures by the Abdominal-B homolog, egl-5

The Caenorhabditis elegans body axis, like that of other animals, is patterned by the action of Hox genes. In order to examine the function of one C. elegans Hox gene in depth, we determined the postembryonic expression pattern of egl-5, the C. elegans member of the Abdominal-B Hox gene paralog group, by means of whole-mount staining with a polyclonal antibody. A major site of egl-5 expression and function is in the epithelium joining the posterior digestive tract with the external epidermis. Patterning this region and its derived structures is a conserved function of Abd-B paralog group genes in other animals. Cells that initiate egl-5 expression during embryogenesis are clustered around the presumptive anus. Expression is initiated postembryonically in four additional mesodermal and ectodermal cell lineages or tissues. Once initiated in a lineage, egl-5 expression continues throughout development, suggesting that the action of egl-5 can be regarded as defining a positional cell identity. A variety of cross-regulatory interactions between egl-5 and the next more anterior Hox gene, mab-5, help define the expression domains of their respective gene products. In its expression in a localized body region, function as a marker of positional cell identity, and interactions with another Hox gene, egl-5 resembles Hox genes of other animals. This suggests that C. elegans, in spite of its small cell number and reproducible cell lineages, may not differ greatly from other animals in the way it employs Hox genes for regional specification during development.

Conserved and distinct roles of kreisler in regulation of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes

During anteroposterior patterning of the developing hindbrain, the anterior expression of 3′ Hox genes maps to distinct rhombomeric boundaries and, in many cases, is upregulated in specific segments. Paralogous genes frequently have similar anterior boundaries of expression but it is not known if these are controlled by common mechanisms. The expression of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes extends from the posterior spinal cord up to the rhombomere (r) 4/5 boundary and both genes are upregulated specifically in r5. However, in this study, we have found that Hoxa3 expression is also upregulated in r6, showing that there are differences in segmental expression between paralogues. We have used transgenic analysis to investigate the mechanisms underlying the pattern of segmental expression of Hoxa3. We found that the intergenic region between Hoxa3 and Hoxa4 contains several enhancers, which summed together mediate a pattern of expression closely resembling that of the endogenous Hoxa3 gene. One enhancer specifically directs expression in r5 and r6, in a manner that reflects the upregulation of the endogenous gene in these segments. Deletion analysis localized this activity to a 600 bp fragment that was found to contain a single high-affinity binding site for the Maf bZIP protein Krml1, encoded by the kreisler gene. This site is necessary for enhancer activity and when multimerized it is sufficient to direct a kreisler-like pattern in transgenic embryos. Furthermore the r5/r6 enhancer activity is dependent upon endogenous kreisler and is activated by ectopic kreisler expression. This demonstrates that Hoxa3, along with its paralog Hoxb3, is a direct target of kreisler in the mouse hindbrain. Comparisons between the Krml1-binding sites in the Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 enhancers reveal that there are differences in both the number of binding sites and way that kreisler activity is integrated and restricted by these two control regions. Analysis of the individual sites revealed that they have different requirements for mediating r5/r6 and dorsal roof plate expression. Therefore, the restriction of Hoxb3 to r5 and Hoxa3 to r5 and r6, together with expression patterns of Hoxb3 in other vertebrate species suggests that these regulatory elements have a common origin but have later diverged during vertebrate evolution.

Multiple cis-acting regulatory regions are required for restricted spatio-temporal Hoxa5 gene expression

Genetic analyses have revealed the essential role of the murine Hoxa5 gene for the correct specification of the cervical and upper thoracic region of the skeleton, and for the normal organogenesis and function of the respiratory tract, both structures expressing Hoxa5 during embryogenesis. To understand how the expression domains of the Hoxa5 gene are established during development, we have analyzed the cis-acting control regions mediating Hoxa5 gene expression using a transgenic approach. Four transcripts are derived from the Hoxa5 locus. The shortest and most abundant one displays a specific spatio-temporal profile of expression at earlier stages and in more anterior structures along the embryonic axis than the larger forms. We established that an 11.1 kilobase pair (kb) genomic fragment, extending from position -3.8 kb to +7.3 kb relative to Hoxa5 transcription initiation site, was sufficient to reproduce the temporal expression and substantially reconstitute the spatial pattern of the major Hoxa5 transcript. By deletion analyses, we identified a 2.1 kb fragment located downstream of the Hoxa5 gene that possesses mesodermal enhancer activity. Overall, the findings demonstrate that cis-acting regulatory elements essential for the correct expression of the major Hoxa5 transcript are located both upstream and downstream of the Hoxa5 coding sequences.

Dynamic repositioning of genes in the nucleus of lymphocytes preparing for cell division

We show that several transcriptionally inactive genes localize to centromeric heterochromatin in the nucleus of cycling but not quiescent (noncycling) primary B lymphocytes. In quiescent cells, centromeric repositioning of inactive loci was induced after mitogenic stimulation. A dynamic repositioning of selected genes was also observed in developing T cells. Rag and TdT loci were shown to relocate to centromeric domains following heritable gene silencing in primary CD4+8+ thymocytes, but not in a phenotypically similar cell line in which silencing occurred but was not heritable. Collectively, these data indicate that the spatial organization of genes in cycling and noncycling lymphocytes is different and that locus repositioning may be a feature of heritable gene silencing.

Hoxa1 and Krox-20 synergize to control the development of rhombomere 3

The transcription factor genes Hoxa1 and Krox-20 have been shown to play important roles in vertebrate hindbrain segmentation. In this report, we present evidence for novel functions of these genes which co-operate in specifying cellular identity in rhombomere (r) 3. Although Hoxa1 has not been observed to be expressed rostrally to the prospective r3/r4 boundary, its inactivation results in (i) the appearance of patches of cells presenting an r2-like molecular identity within r3, (ii) early neuronal differentiation in r3, normally characteristic of even-numbered rhombomeres, and (iii) abnormal navigation of r3 motor axons, similar to that observed in even-numbered rhombomeres. These phenotypic manifestations become more severe in the context of the additional inactivation of one allele of the Krox-20 gene, demonstrating that Hoxa1 and Krox-20 synergize in a dosage-dependent manner to specify r3 identity and odd- versus even-numbered rhombomere characters. In addition, these data suggest that the control of the development of r3 may not be autonomous but dependent on interactions with Hoxa1-expressing cells.

Recombinogenic targeting: a new approach to genomic analysis--a review

Currently, recombinational cloning procedures based upon methods developed for yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are being exploited for targeted cloning and in-vivo modification of genomic clones. In this review, we will discuss the development of large-insert vectors, homologous recombination-based techniques for cloning and modification, and their application towards functional analysis of genes using transgenic mouse model systems.

Transducing positional information to the Hox genes: critical interaction of cdx gene products with position-sensitive regulatory elements

Studies of pattern formation in the vertebrate central nervous system indicate that anteroposterior positional information is generated in the embryo by signalling gradients of an as yet unknown nature. We searched for transcription factors that transduce this information to the Hox genes. Based on the assumption that the activity levels of such factors might vary with position along the anteroposterior axis, we devised an in vivo assay to detect responsiveness of cis-acting sequences to such differentially active factors. We used this assay to analyze a Hoxb8 regulatory element, and detected the most pronounced response in a short stretch of DNA containing a cluster of potential CDX binding sites. We show that differentially expressed DNA binding proteins are present in gastrulating embryos that bind to these sites in vitro, that cdx gene products are among these, and that binding site mutations that abolish binding of these proteins completely destroy the ability of the regulatory element to drive regionally restricted expression in the embryo. Finally, we show that ectopic expression of cdx gene products anteriorizes expression of reporter transgenes driven by this regulatory element, as well as that of the endogenous Hoxb8 gene, in a manner that is consistent with them being essential transducers of positional information. These data suggest that, in contrast to Drosophila Caudal, vertebrate cdx gene products transduce positional information directly to the Hox genes, acting through CDX binding sites in their enhancers. This may represent the ancestral mode of action of caudal homologues, which are involved in anteroposterior patterning in organisms with widely divergent body plans and modes of development.

Definition of the transcriptional activation domains of three human HOX proteins depends on the DNA-binding context

Hox proteins control developmental patterns and cell differentiation in vertebrates by acting as positive or negative regulators of still unidentified downstream target genes. The homeodomain and other small accessory sequences encode the DNA-protein and protein-protein interaction functions which ultimately dictate target recognition and functional specificity in vivo. The effector domains responsible for either positive or negative interactions with the cell transcriptional machinery are unknown for most Hox proteins, largely due to a lack of physiological targets on which to carry out functional analysis. We report the identification of the transcriptional activation domains of three human Hox proteins, HOXB1, HOXB3, and HOXD9, which interact in vivo with the autoregulatory and cross-regulatory enhancers of the murine Hoxb-1 and human HOXD9 genes. Activation domains have been defined both in a homologous context, i.e., within a HOX protein binding as a monomer or as a HOX-PBX heterodimer to the specific target, and in a heterologous context, after translocation to the yeast Gal4 DNA-binding domain. Transfection analysis indicates that activation domains can be identified in different regions of the three HOX proteins depending on the context in which they interact with the DNA target. These results suggest that Hox proteins may be multifunctional transcriptional regulators, interacting with different cofactors and/or components of the transcriptional machinery depending on the structure of their target regulatory elements.

Vertebrate hox gene regulation: clustering and/or colinearity?

The relationship between the clustered organization of vertebrate Hox genes and their coordinate transcription in space and time is still lacking a convincing mechanistic explanation. Recent work on the regulatory interactions within Hox complexes suggests some reasons why these genes have remained clustered. Although these results do not address the puzzling issue of colinearity directly, they nevertheless add novel important input to the debate.

How to build a vertebrate hindbrain. Lessons from genetics

During vertebrate embryogenesis, the hindbrain is the site of a segmentation process which leads to the formation, along the anterior-posterior axis, of 7-8 metameres called rhombomeres. This phenomenon plays an essential role in early hindbrain regionalisation and in the specification of the pattern of developing structures in this region of the brain. Data accumulated during the last 10 years have also shown that rhombomeres are units of gene expression and of cell lineage. Hence, a number of regulatory genes are expressed according to segment-specific patterns in the hindbrain and have been implicated in the pattern formation process. In this review, we focus on the analysis of the function and regulation of these genes along the different steps of hindbrain segmentation, from segment delimitation to acquisition of positional identity. On this basis, we propose a model for the control of early hindbrain development.

Genetic analysis of a conserved sequence in the HoxD complex: regulatory redundancy or limitations of the transgenic approach?

Extensive sequencing in the HoxD complex of several vertebrate species has revealed a set of conserved DNA sequences interspersed between neighboring Hox genes. Their high degree of conservation strongly suggested that they are used for regulatory purposes, a hypothesis that was largely confirmed by using "classical transgenesis" or in vivo mutagenesis through the embryonic stem (ES) cell technology. Here, we show that this is not always the case. We report that the deletion of a conserved regulatory sequence located in the HoxD complex gives different results, depending on the transgenic approach that was used. In "conventional" transgenesis, this sequence was necessary for proper expression in a subdomain of the developing limb. However, a deletion of this sequence in complexo did not confirm this effect, thereby creating an important discrepancy between the classical transgenic and the ES cell-based, targeted mutagenesis. This unexpected observation may show the limitations of the former technology. Alternatively, it could illustrate a redundancy in regulatory circuits and, thus, justify the combination of parallel strategies.

Murine Hoxc-9 gene contains a structurally and functionally conserved enhancer

Reporter gene analysis of the Hoxc-9 genomic region in transgenic mice allowed us to identify a positional enhancer in the Hoxc-9 intron that drives expression in the posterior neural tube of midgestation mouse embryos in a Hoxc-9-related manner. Sequence comparison to the chicken Choxc-9 intron revealed the existence of two highly conserved sequence elements (CSEs) in a similar spatial arrangement. These structural similarities in the mammalian and avian lineage are mirrored by conserved function of the chicken Choxc-9 intron in transgenic mice. Deletion analysis of the two introns suggests that full activity of both enhancers depends on cooperation between the two CSEs located close to the respective 5' and 3' splice sites. Following the paradigm of phylogenetically conserved developmental control mechanisms, the Hoxc-9 intragenic enhancer was tested in Drosophila. Our data show that the mouse Hoxc-9 enhancer acts in a conserved fashion in transgenic flies, conferring posteriorly restricted reporter gene expression to the developing central nervous system in third instar larvae. This finding indicates that the Hoxc-9 intragenic enhancer is involved in transcriptional regulatory circuits conserved between vertebrates and arthropods.

Initiation of rhombomeric Hoxb4 expression requires induction by somites and a retinoid pathway

Anteroposterior (AP) patterning in the vertebrate hindbrain is dependent upon the establishment of segmental domains of Hox expression. We investigated the mechanism that governs the early expression of Hoxb4 and found that transient signaling from the paraxial mesoderm induces expression in the hindbrain. Induction involves a retinoid pathway requiring retinoic acid receptor (RAR) function within the neural plate. Characterization of a prerhombomeric enhancer from Hoxb4 reveals that a retinoic acid (RA) response element is an essential component of the early neural response to somite (s) signaling and can interpret positional information for setting the anterior boundary of expression. These data suggest a mechanism whereby, during normal hindbrain development, Hoxb4 expression is initiated by extrinsic signals and is subsequently maintained by Hox feedback circuits. This mechanism also accounts for the ectopic response of Hoxb4 in rhombomere (r) transpositions and after exposure to retinoids.

Expression of the murine Hoxa4 gene requires both autoregulation and a conserved retinoic acid response element

Analysis of the regulatory regions of the Hox genes has revealed a complex array of positive and negative cis-acting elements that control the spatial and temporal pattern of expression of these genes during embryogenesis. In this study we show that normal expression of the murine Hoxa4 gene during development requires both autoregulatory and retinoic acid-dependent modes of regulation. When introduced into a Hoxa4 null background, expression of a lacZ reporter gene driven by the Hoxa4 regulatory region (Hoxa4/lacZ) is either abolished or significantly reduced in all tissues at E10. 5-E12.5. Thus, the observed autoregulation of the Drosophila Deformed gene is conserved in a mouse homolog in vivo, and is reflected in a widespread requirement for positive feedback to maintain Hoxa4 expression. We also identify three potential retinoic acid response elements in the Hoxa4 5′ flanking region, one of which is identical to a well-characterized element flanking the Hoxd4 gene. Administration of retinoic acid to Hoxa4/lacZ transgenic embryos resulted in stage-dependent ectopic expression of the reporter gene in the neural tube and hindbrain. When administered to Hoxa4 null embryos, however, persistent ectopic expression was not observed, suggesting that autoregulation is required for maintenance of the retinoic acid-induced expression. Finally, mutation of the consensus retinoic acid response element eliminated the response of the reporter gene to exogenous retinoic acid, and abolished all embryonic expression in untreated embryos, with the exception of the neural tube and prevertebrae. These data add to the evidence that Hox gene expression is regulated, in part, by endogenous retinoids and autoregulatory loops.

Genetic analysis of a Hoxd-12 regulatory element reveals global versus local modes of controls in the HoxD complex

Vertebrate Hoxd genes are essential determinants of limb morphogenesis. In order to understand the genetic control of their complex expression patterns, we have used a combined approach involving interspecies sequence alignments in parallel with transgenic analyses, followed by in vivo mutagenesis. Here, we report on the identification of a regulatory element that is located in the vicinity of the Hoxd-12 gene. While this element is well conserved in tetrapods, little sequence similarity was scored when compared to the cognate fish DNA. The regulatory potential of this region XI (RXI) was first assayed in the context of a Hoxd-12/lacZ reporter transgene and shown to direct reporter gene expression in posterior limb buds. A deletion of this region was generated by targeted mutagenesis in ES cells and introduced into mice. Analyses of animals homozygous for the HoxDRXI mutant allele revealed the function of this region in controlling Hoxd-12 expression in the presumptive posterior zeugopod where it genetically interacts with Hoxa-11. Downregulation of Hoxd-12 expression was also detected in the trunk suggesting that RXI may mediate a rather general function in the activation of Hoxd-12. These results support a model whereby global as well as local regulatory influences are necessary to build up the complex expression patterns of Hoxd genes during limb development.

Transcriptional interferences at the Hoxa4/Hoxa5 locus: importance of correct Hoxa5 expression for the proper specification of the axial skeleton

We have previously described a Hoxa5 mutant mouse line in which specification of axial identity is perturbed and viability is markedly reduced. In the present study, we assay the Hoxa5 mutation in different genetic backgrounds and carry out a complete analysis of skeletal transformations. Although Hoxa5 is expressed over a large domain during embryogenesis, homeotic transformations of the axial skeleton are confined between cervical vertebra C3 and thoracic vertebra T2, which corresponds to the specific expression domain of the major Hoxa5 transcript. Loss of Hoxa5 function also affects the formation of the acromion in the appendicular skeleton. Disruption of the adjacent Hoxa4 gene leads to similar homeotic transformations of the cervicothoracic vertebrae. To discriminate the respective role of each gene, we generated transheterozygous animals carrying inactivated Hoxa4 and Hoxa5 alleles on different chromosomes. Compound heterozygous mutants exhibit homeotic transformations in the cervicothoracic transition region more reminiscent to those observed in Hoxa5 homozygous mutants. Although the Hoxa5 mutation does not significantly affect Hoxa4 expression, the pattern of Hoxa5 expression is impaired in cis by the Hoxa4 mutation, specifically in the cervicothoracic region of the prevertebral column. The expression of Hoxa5 in this particular domain is also perturbed by the Hoxa5 mutation itself, raising the possibility of regional autoregulation. Altogether, these results demonstrate the crucial role of Hoxa5 in the specification of the cervical and upper thoracic region of the skeleton and establish the importance of its correct expression for the proper patterning of the embryo.

Selectivity, sharing and competitive interactions in the regulation of Hoxb genes

The clustered organisation of Hox complexes is highly conserved in vertebrates and the reasons for this are believed to be linked with the regulatory mechanisms governing their expression. In analysis of the Hoxb4-Hoxb6 region of the HoxB complex we identified enhancers which lie in the intergenic region between Hoxb4 and Hoxb5, and which are capable of mediating the correct boundaries of neural and mesodermal expression for Hoxb5. We examined their regulatory properties in the context of the local genomic region spanning the two genes by transgenic analysis, in which each promoter was independently marked with a different reporter, to monitor simultaneously the relative transcriptional read-outs from each gene. Our analysis revealed that within this intergenic region: (i) a limb and a neural enhancer selectively activate Hoxb4 as opposed to Hoxb5; (ii) a separate neural enhancer is able to activate both genes, but expression is dependent upon competition between the two promoters for the enhancer and is influenced by the local genomic context; (iii) mesodermal enhancer activities can be shared between the genes. We found similar types of regulatory interactions between Hoxb5 and Hoxb6. Together these results provide evidence for three separate general mechanisms: selectivity, competition and sharing, that control the balance of cis-regulatory interactions necessary for generating the proper spatial and temporal patterns of Hox gene expression. We suggest that these mechanisms are part of a regulatory basis for maintenance of Hox organisation.

Genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveal new roles in regulation of early hindbrain patterning

In the developing vertebrate hindbrain Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 play important roles in patterning segmental units (rhombomeres). In this study, genetic analysis of double mutants demonstrates that both Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 participate in the establishment and maintenance of Hoxb1 expression in rhombomere 4 through auto- and para-regulatory interactions. The generation of a targeted mutation in a Hoxb1 3′ retinoic acid response element (RARE) shows that it is required for establishing early high levels of Hoxb1 expression in neural ectoderm. Double mutant analysis with this Hoxb1(3′RARE) allele and other targeted loss-of-function alleles from both Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveals synergy between these genes. In the absence of both genes, a territory appears in the region of r4, but the earliest r4 marker, the Eph tyrosine kinase receptor EphA2, fails to be activated. This suggests a failure to initiate rather than maintain the specification of r4 identity and defines new roles for both Hoxb1 and Hoxa1 in early patterning events in r4. Our genetic analysis shows that individual members of the vertebrate labial-related genes have multiple roles in different steps governing segmental processes in the developing hindbrain.

Differential regulation of levels of nicotinic receptor subunit transcripts in adult sympathetic neurons after axotomy

Axotomy of adult peripheral neurons produces decreases in the levels of transcripts for a number of proteins involved in synaptic transmission. For example, tyrosine hydroxylase and neuropeptide Y mRNA decrease in axotomized sympathetic neurons in the superior cervical ganglion (SCG). In the present study, the effects of axotomy on the expression of nicotinic receptor subunit transcripts were examined in the SCG and the results were compared to those produced by deafferentation and explantation. Normally, neurons in the SCG express five different nicotinic subunits: alpha3, alpha5, alpha7, beta2, and beta4. Forty-eight hours after axotomy in vivo or explantation, dramatic decreases in these transcripts were seen, except for beta2, which increased. In contrast, deafferentation of the SCG had negligible effects on any of these transcripts. Both leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and nerve growth factor (NGF) have been shown to play a role in the decrease in neuropeptide Y mRNA expression after axotomy. In the cases of these nicotinic receptor transcripts, however, similar decreases were seen in wild-type and LIF knockout animals. Furthermore, administration of an antiserum to NGF in intact animals produced no changes in transcript levels. On the other hand, providing exogenous NGF to axotomized SCG in vivo or in explant cultures partially prevented the decreases in the transcripts for alpha3, alpha5, alpha7, and beta4. These data indicate that axotomy produces dramatic decreases in the expression of several nicotinic receptor subunit transcripts, and that the molecular signals underlying these changes differ from those previously shown to mediate the decrease in neuropeptide Y expression.

HOX homeobox genes exhibit spatial and temporal changes in expression during human skin development

The spatial and temporal deployment of HOX homeobox genes along the spinal axis and in limb buds during fetal development is a key program in embryonic pattern formation. Although we have previously reported that several of the HOX homeobox genes are expressed during murine skin development, there is no information about developmental expression of HOX genes in human skin. We have now used reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, in conjunction with a set of degenerate oligonucleotide primers, to identify a subset of HOX genes that are expressed during human fetal skin development. In situ hybridization analyses demonstrated that there were temporal and spatial shifts in expression of these genes. Strong HOXA4 expression was detected in the basal cell layers of 10 wk fetal epidermis and throughout the epidermis and dermis of 17 wk skin, whereas weak signal was present in the granular layer of newborn and adult skin. The expression patterns of HOXA5 and HOXA7 were similar, but their expression was weaker. In situ hybridization analysis also revealed strong HOXC4 and weaker HOXB7 expression throughout fetal development, whereas HOXB4 was expressed at barely detectable levels. Differential HOX gene expression was also observed in developing hair follicles, and sebaceous and sweat glands. None of the HOX genes examined were detected in the adult dermis.

Shaping animal body plans in development and evolution by modulation of Hox expression patterns

Most animals exhibit distinctive and diverse morphological features on their anterior-posterior body axis. However, underneath the variation in design and developmental strategies lies a shared ancient structural blueprint that is based on the expression patterns of Hox genes. Both the establishment and maintenance of the spatial and temporal distribution of Hox transcripts play an important role in determining axial pattern. The study of many animal systems, both vertebrate and invertebrate, suggests that the mechanisms used to establish Hox transcription are nearly as diverse as the body plans they specify. The strategies for maintenance of Hox expression pattern seem more conserved among different phyla, and rely on the action of Pc and trx group genes as well as auto- and cross-regulation among Hox genes. In mice, the sharing of regulatory elements coupled with auto- and cross-regulation could explain the conservation of the clustered arrangement of Hox genes. In contrast, fly Hox genes seem to have evolved insulators or boundary elements to avoid sharing regulatory regions. Differences in Hox transcription patterns can be correlated with morphological modifications in different species, and it seems likely that evolutionary variation of Hox cis-regulatory elements has played a major role in the emergence of novel body plans in different taxa of the animal kingdom.

Control of colinearity in AbdB genes of the mouse HoxD complex

During development, vertebrate Hox genes are activated in a temporal and spatial sequence colinear with the position of the genes within their clusters. To investigate the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon, we used the ES cell technology and the loxP/Cre system to engineer a conditional fusion of the 5' exon of Hoxd-13 with the 3' exon of Hoxd-12. This hybrid transcription unit was regulated like Hoxd-11, with expression limits in the trunk, limbs, intestinal, and urogenital systems more anterior than those expected for either Hoxd-13 or Hoxd-12. An in vivo interspecies replacement by the fish homologous DNA fragment showed that anteriorization was not due to a distance effect, thus suggesting the presence of a regulatory element between Hoxd-13 and Hoxd-12 that may contribute to the establishment, early on, of a repressive state over these two genes.

AbdB-like Hox proteins stabilize DNA binding by the Meis1 homeodomain proteins

Recent studies show that Hox homeodomain proteins from paralog groups 1 to 10 gain DNA binding specificity and affinity through cooperative binding with the divergent homeodomain protein Pbx1. However, the AbdB-like Hox proteins from paralogs 11, 12, and 13 do not interact with Pbx1a, raising the possibility of different protein partners. The Meis1 homeobox gene has 44% identity to Pbx within the homeodomain and was identified as a common site of viral integration in myeloid leukemias arising in BXH-2 mice. These integrations result in constitutive activation of Meis1. Furthermore, the Hoxa-9 gene is frequently activated by viral integration in the same BXH-2 leukemias, suggesting a biological synergy between these two distinct classes of homeodomain proteins in causing malignant transformation. We now show that the Hoxa-9 protein physically interacts with Meis1 proteins by forming heterodimeric binding complexes on a DNA target containing a Meis1 site (TGACAG) and an AbdB-like Hox site (TTTTACGAC). Hox proteins from the other AbdB-like paralogs, Hoxa-10, Hoxa-11, Hoxd-12, and Hoxb-13, also form DNA binding complexes with Meis1b, while Hox proteins from other paralogs do not appear to interact with Meis1 proteins. DNA binding complexes formed by Meis1 with Hox proteins dissociate much more slowly than DNA complexes with Meis1 alone, suggesting that Hox proteins stabilize the interactions of Meis1 proteins with their DNA targets.

The mouse Ulnaless mutation deregulates posterior HoxD gene expression and alters appendicular patterning

The semi-dominant mouse mutation Ulnaless alters patterning of the appendicular but not the axial skeleton. Ulnaless forelimbs and hindlimbs have severe reductions of the proximal limb and less severe reductions of the distal limb. Genetic and physical mapping has failed to separate the Ulnaless locus from the HoxD gene cluster (Peichel, C. L., Abbott, C. M. and Vogt, T. F. (1996) Genetics 144, 1757–1767). The Ulnaless limb phenotypes are not recapitulated by targeted mutations in any single HoxD gene, suggesting that Ulnaless may be a gain-of-function mutation in a coding sequence or a regulatory mutation. Deregulation of 5′ HoxD gene expression is observed in Ulnaless limb buds. There is ectopic expression of Hoxd-13 and Hoxd-12 in the proximal limb and reduction of Hoxd-13, Hoxd-12 and Hoxd-11 expression in the distal limb. Skeletal reductions in the proximal limb may be a consequence of posterior prevalence, whereby proximal misexpression of Hoxd-13 and Hoxd-12 results in the transcriptional and/or functional inactivation of Hox group 11 genes. The Ulnaless digit phenotypes are attributed to a reduction in the distal expression of Hoxd-13, Hoxd-12, Hoxd-11 and Hoxa-13. In addition, Hoxd-13 expression is reduced in the genital bud, consistent with the observed alterations of the Ulnaless penian bone. No alterations of HoxD expression or skeletal phenotypes were observed in the Ulnaless primary axis. We propose that the Ulnaless mutation alters a cis-acting element that regulates HoxD expression specifically in the appendicular axes of the embryo.

Elements both 5' and 3' to the murine Hoxd4 gene establish anterior borders of expression in mesoderm and neurectoderm

In this report, we show that a lacZ reporter spanning 12.5 kb of murine Hoxd4 genomic DNA contains the major regulatory elements controlling Hoxd4 expression in the mouse embryo. Mutational analysis revealed multiple regulatory regions both 5' and 3' to the coding region. These include a 3' enhancer region required for expression in the central nervous system (CNS) and setting the anterior border in the paraxial mesoderm, and a 5' mesodermal enhancer that directs expression in paraxial and lateral plate mesoderm. A previously defined retinoic acid response element (RARE) is a component of the 5' mesodermal enhancer. Our results support a model in which retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and HOX proteins mediate the initiation and maintenance of Hoxd4 expression.

HOXD4 and regulation of the group 4 paralog genes

From an evolutionary perspective, it is important to understand the degree of conservation of cis-regulatory mechanisms between paralogous Hox genes. In this study, we have used transgenic analysis of the human HOXD4 locus to identify one neural and two mesodermal 3′ enhancers that are capable of mediating the proper anterior limits of expression in the hindbrain and paraxial mesoderm (somites), respectively. In addition to directing expression in the central nervous system (CNS) up to the correct rhombomere 6/7 boundary in the hindbrain, the neural enhancer also mediates a three rhombomere anterior shift from this boundary in response to retinoic acid (RA), mimicking the endogenous Hoxd4 response. We have extended the transgenic analysis to Hoxa4 identifying mesodermal, neural and retinoid responsive components in the 3′ flanking region of that gene, which reflect aspects of endogenous Hoxa4 expression. Comparative analysis of the retinoid responses of Hoxd4, Hoxa4 and Hoxb4 reveals that, while they can be rapidly induced by RA, there is a window of competence for this response, which is different to that of more 3′ Hox genes. Mesodermal regulation involves multiple regions with overlapping or related activity and is complex, but with respect to neural regulation and response to RA, Hoxb4 and Hoxd4 appear to be more closely related to each other than Hoxa4. These results illustrate that much of the general positioning of 5′ and 3′ flanking regulatory regions has been conserved between three of the group 4 paralogs during vertebrate evolution, which most likely reflects the original positioning of regulatory regions in the ancestral Hox complex.

Functions of mammalian Polycomb group and trithorax group related genes

Genes of the Polycomb and trithorax groups (PcG and trxG) are part of a cellular memory system that maintains inactive and active states of homeotic gene expression in Drosophila. Recent genetic evidence indicates that several related loci in mammals are also involved in the regulation of Hox genes. Like their Drosophila counterparts, the vertebrate gene products are components of multiprotein complexes that regulate transcriptional activation, repression and aspects of chromatin structure. Initial indications suggest the existence of a large mammalian PcG and trxG family, with a potential to encode multiple specialised functions in cell fate and cell-cycle control.

Why are Hox genes clustered?

The evolutionarily conserved genomic organization of the Hox genes has been a puzzle ever since it was discovered that their order along the chromosome is similar to the order of their functional domains along the antero-posterior axis. Why has this colinearity been maintained throughout evolution? A close look at regulatory sequences from the mouse Hox clusters suggests that enhancer sharing between adjacent Hox genes may be one reason. Moreover, characterizing the activity of one of these mouse enhancers in Drosophila illustrates that despite many similarities, not all Hox clusters are built in the same way.

Deletion of a HoxD enhancer induces transcriptional heterochrony leading to transposition of the sacrum

A phylogenetically conserved transcriptional enhancer necessary for the activation of Hoxd-11 was deleted from the HoxD complex of mice by targeted mutagenesis. While genetic and expression analyses demonstrated the role of this regulatory element in the activation of Hoxd-11 during early somitogenesis, the function of this gene in developing limbs and the urogenital system was not affected, suggesting that Hox transcriptional controls are different in different axial structures. In the trunk of mutant embryos, transcriptional activation of Hoxd-11 and Hoxd-10 was severely delayed, but subsequently resumed with appropriate spatial distributions. The resulting caudal transposition of the sacrum indicates that proper vertebral specification requires a precise temporal control of Hox gene expression, in addition to spatial regulation. A slight time delay in expression (transcriptional heterochrony) cannot be compensated for at a later developmental stage, eventually leading to morphological alterations.

Cross-regulation in the mouse HoxB complex: the expression of Hoxb2 in rhombomere 4 is regulated by Hoxb1

Correct regulation of the segment-restricted patterns of Hox gene expression is essential for proper patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain. We have examined the molecular basis of restricted expression of Hoxb2 in rhombomere 4 (r4), by using deletion analysis in transgenic mice to identify an r4 enhancer from the mouse gene. A bipartite Hox/Pbx binding motif is located within this enhancer, and in vitro DNA binding experiments showed that the vertebrate labial-related protein Hoxb1 will cooperatively bind to this site in a Pbx/Exd-dependent manner. The Hoxb2 r4 enhancer can be transactivated in vivo by the ectopic expression of Hoxb1, Hoxa1, and Drosophila labial in transgenic mice. In contrast, ectopic Hoxb2 and Hoxb4 are unable to induce expression, indicating that in vivo this enhancer preferentially responds to labial family members. Mutational analysis demonstrated that the bipartite Hox/Pbx motif is required for r4 enhancer activity and the responses to retinoids and ectopic Hox expression. Furthermore, three copies of the Hoxb2 motif are sufficient to mediate r4 expression in transgenic mouse embryos and a labial pattern in Drosophila embryos. This reporter expression in Drosophila embryos is dependent upon endogenous labial and exd, suggesting that the ability of this Hox/Pbx site to interact with labial-related proteins has been evolutionarily conserved. The endogenous Hoxb2 gene is no longer upregulated in r4 in Hoxb1 homozygous mutant embryos. On the basis of these experiments we conclude that the r4-restricted domain of Hoxb2 in the hindbrain is the result of a direct cross-regulatory interaction by Hoxb1 involving vertebrate Pbx proteins as cofactors. This suggests that part of the functional role of Hoxb1 in maintaining r4 identity may be mediated by the Hoxb2 gene.