International trends in clozapine use: a study in 17 countries

Patient characteristics, burden and pharmacotherapy of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: results from a survey of 204 US psychiatrists

BACKGROUND

Minimal/non-response to antipsychotic treatment, and persistent positive symptoms despite treatment, are common among patients with schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to characterize a US treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) population in terms of patient demographics, burden of symptoms, treatment history, and factors influencing therapeutic choice.

METHODS

In an online survey, 204 psychiatrists self-selected and completed three patient records: two TRS and one schizophrenia ('non-TRS').

RESULTS

Respondents reported that 29.5% of their schizophrenia caseload had TRS. Selected TRS (n = 408) vs non-TRS (n = 204) patients were more likely to be unemployed (74.5% vs 45.1%, p < 0.001), hospitalized at least once (93.4% vs 74.0%, p < 0.001), and to have physical/psychiatric comorbidities including obesity (40.2% vs 23.5%, p < 0.001) and depression (38.7% vs 25.0%, p = 0.001). Psychiatric symptoms were more frequent and severe in TRS, and interfered more with social and functioning domains. Of positive symptoms, eliminating delusions and hallucinations was considered most important to improve a patient's long-term prognosis. In TRS, clozapine monotherapy was the most common treatment (15.9%), though ranked fifth of ten options to treat TRS. Psychiatrists typically increased the antipsychotic dose or added a second antipsychotic before initiating clozapine or switching antipsychotics. Antipsychotic switches were most commonly due to lack of efficacy (TRS = 71.4% vs non-TRS = 54.3%, p < 0.001) and intolerability (34.4% vs 38.4%, p = 0.22) with the prior antipsychotic. Persistent hallucinatory behavior was the top symptom leading to treatment switches in TRS (63.9% vs 37.1%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

According to psychiatrists, symptoms have a greater clinical burden on patients with TRS than non-TRS. TRS is commonly managed by antipsychotic dose increases/combinations, with clozapine the fifth preference despite being the only approved TRS medication. New treatments are needed for patients who do not respond to available antipsychotics.

Functioning and cognitive characteristics of clozapine users referred to psychosocial rehabilitation centers: A REHABase cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To explore whether clozapine users have specific rehabilitation needs compared to users of other antipsychotics.

METHODS

The study was performed using the REHABase collecting data on persons referred to a French network of psychosocial rehabilitation centers. It was restricted to persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorder using antipsychotics. Multivariate analyses were used to compare baseline functioning and cognitive characteristics in clozapine users vs. users of other antipsychotics.

RESULTS

Of the 675 patients identified in the REHABase, one out of ten (n = 70) used clozapine. Compared to users of other antipsychotics, clozapine users had been more frequently hospitalized in psychiatry and presented less frequently with psychoactive substance use. Functional measures did not significantly differ between the two groups. Clozapine users had poorer short-term verbal memory performance than users of other antipsychotics and did not differ on executive performance.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine users may reach a recovery level comparable to that obtained in persons without treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In order to reduce the negative impact of memory deficits on the recovery process of clozapine users, it is necessary to optimize their psychotropic treatment and to promote their access to cognitive remediation programs addressing their specific needs.

Clozapine and desmethylclozapine: correlation with neutrophils and leucocytes counting in Mexican patients with schizophrenia

PURPOSE

The aim of present study is to measure plasma clozapine (CLZ) and N-desmethyl clozapine (DMC) as biomarkers to correlate drug concentrations with the appearance of preclinical adverse hematic effects.

METHODS

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method, using a diode-array (ultraviolet) detector, was validated to obtain reliable concentrations of CLZ and DMC, its main metabolite, in plasma of 41 schizophrenic patients taking CLZ. Blood neutrophils and leucocytes counting were concurrently assessed as a proxy to subclinical adverse reactions.

RESULTS

The analytical method employed was linear, reproducible, and stable to measure concentrations of CLZ between 30 and 1000 ng/mL, while 12.5-560 ng/mL of the metabolite. The method allowed us to correlate CLZ plasma concentrations, the time taking CLZ and CLZ dose as determinants of neutrophils' counting with a R² = 0.447, using a multiple regression analysis model. Likewise, the correlation of leucocyte counting vs CLZ plasma levels and CLZ time, showed a R² = 0.461. DMC correlated significantly with both neutrophils and leucocytes counting, but was excluded from the regression when CLZ concentration was included in the model. Finally, no other hematological adverse reactions were recorded. One patient presented a cardiovascular complication. The negative correlation between clozapine and neutrophil count observed in patients, suggest that CLZ itself, but not DMC, could be related to hematologic side-effects.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study, demonstrate for the first time, that plasma levels of CLZ and time taking the drug are independent determinants of blood neutrophils and leucocytes, so the monitoring of plasma CLZ may be useful in the clinic practice to determine safe dosing of the drug.

Improvement of psychiatrists' clinical knowledge of the treatment guidelines for schizophrenia and major depressive disorders using the 'Effectiveness of Guidelines for Dissemination and Education in Psychiatric Treatment (EGUIDE)' project: A nationwide dissemination, education, and evaluation study

AIM

Although treatment guidelines for pharmacological therapy for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder have been issued by the Japanese Societies of Neuropsychopharmacology and Mood Disorders, these guidelines have not been well applied by psychiatrists throughout the nation. To address this issue, we developed the 'Effectiveness of Guidelines for Dissemination and Education in Psychiatric Treatment (EGUIDE)' integrated education programs for psychiatrists to disseminate the clinical guidelines. Additionally, we conducted a systematic efficacy evaluation of the programs.

METHODS

Four hundred thirteen out of 461 psychiatrists attended two 1-day educational programs based on the treatment guidelines for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder from October 2016 to March 2018. We measured the participants' clinical knowledge of the treatment guidelines using self-completed questionnaires administered before and after the program to assess the effectiveness of the programs for improving knowledge. We also examined the relation between the participants' demographics and their clinical knowledge scores.

RESULTS

The clinical knowledge scores for both guidelines were significantly improved after the program. There was no correlation between clinical knowledge and participant demographics for the program on schizophrenia; however, a weak positive correlation was found between clinical knowledge and the years of professional experience for the program on major depressive disorder.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide evidence that educational programs on the clinical practices recommended in guidelines for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder might effectively improve participants' clinical knowledge of the guidelines. These data are encouraging to facilitate the standardization of clinical practices for psychiatric disorders.

Prevalence of treatment-resistant psychoses in the community: A naturalistic study

BACKGROUND

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is a major cause of disability. Clozapine is currently the only antipsychotic medication licensed for its treatment. However, the rate of treatment resistance among outpatients with schizophrenia or other psychoses, and the rate of use of clozapine among them, is not known.

AIMS

The aims of this study are (a) to determine the point prevalence of treatment-resistant psychosis in a community sample, and (b) to determine the number of patients with TRS who have never had a clozapine trial.

METHOD

Clinico-demographic data were extracted from the case notes for 202 patients from two community mental-health teams.

RESULTS

We found that 56% (99/176) had a diagnosis of TRS, and 52% (51/99) of these patients had never been treated with clozapine. Patients of non-white ethnicity were less likely to have had a clozapine trial (p=0.009). The point prevalence of treatment resistance within the bipolar affective disorder sample was 19% (5/26).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that TRS is common in the community mental-health team, and a large proportion of these patients have not received clozapine. These findings indicate that identifying and treating treatment resistance should be a focus of community services for schizophrenia.

Addressing clozapine under-prescribing and barriers to initiation: a psychiatrist, advanced practice provider, and trainee survey

Clozapine use has declined, despite its superior antipsychotic efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Implications for clozapine underutilization include suboptimal treatment outcomes and increased hospitalizations. Many barriers preventing the use of clozapine have been described in the literature, including suboptimal knowledge and poor perceptions. The aim of this study was to assess psychiatry prescribers' perception and knowledge of clozapine. A survey was distributed to advanced practice providers, psychiatrists, and trainees (i.e. residents and fellows) at 10 medical centers within the US and Canada. The survey asked respondents about their perception of clozapine use and assessed their pharmacotherapeutic knowledge of clozapine. Two hundred eleven individual submitted completed surveys of a possible 1152; a response rate of 18.3%. There were no statistically significant differences between the advanced practice provider plus psychiatrist groups and the trainee group for most perception (eight of nine) and knowledge (eight of nine) questions. The knowledge questions with the lowest scores pertained to clozapine reinitiation and myocarditis. The majority of all respondents (144, 68.2%) felt that clozapine prescribing was a burden. Findings of this study support the need for continued clozapine education regardless of a prescriber's age/experience. Future studies to assess barriers to clozapine prescribing should extend beyond academic centers.

Need to bleed? Clozapine haematological monitoring approaches a time for change

Regular haematological monitoring during clozapine treatment reduces the risk of complications and death from clozapine-related blood dyscrasias. However, many patients in the course of clozapine treatment develop neutropenia unrelated to drug treatment which leads to treatment discontinuation. The minimum haematological threshold allowed for the continuation of clozapine treatment was recently lowered in the US, but not in the UK. In this case series, we present four cases where lowering the haematological cut-off to that used in the US, allowed treatment continuation. Lowering the current UK threshold for clozapine cessation could avoid unnecessary interruptions in treatment with minimal impact on safety.

Clinical determinants of fever in clozapine users and implications for treatment management: A narrative review

OBJECTIVES

To identify the clinical determinants of fever in clozapine users and their impact on management of clozapine treatment.

METHODS

Articles published in English or French identified with a MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO search, from inception through February 2019, using the term "clozapine" in combination with "fever" OR "hyperthermia" OR "body temperature" OR "pyrexia" OR "febrile" OR "heat" OR "thermoregulation". Information extracted for each medical condition were frequency, time to onset after initiation of clozapine treatment, characteristics of fever, associated symptoms, laboratory tests used for diagnosis, course, lethality, discontinuation of clozapine. Data were synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 394 unique hits published from 1993 to 2018. We included 73 articles in the review: two meta-analyses, 14 reviews, six epidemiological studies, 11 clinical studies and 40 case reports. During clozapine initiation, fever is most frequently benign and transient but should be closely monitored as it may be the first stage of potentially life-threatening adverse drug reactions (ADR) (agranulocytosis, neuroleptic malignant syndrome myocarditis, hepatitis, pancreatitis, nephritis, colitis, etc.). Other ADR associated with fever are independent of duration of exposure to clozapine (heat stroke, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, necrotizing colitis). If fever is due to intercurrent infection, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to adjust clozapine daily dosage.

CONCLUSION

Benign causes of fever are much more frequent than life-threatening ADR during clozapine treatment. Discontinuation should not be considered as automatic in the event of fever, especially during the early phase of clozapine initiation.

Clozapine-associated neutropenia in Latin America: incidence report of 5380 Chilean users

Systematic information about Latino clozapine users is still scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the risk of clozapine-associated neutropenia in a Chilean cohort using the last Food and Drug Administration's recommendations for clozapine monitoring. Findings should improve clinical practice and promote changes in clozapine guidelines in Latin America. We conducted a retrospective observational study of 5380 Chilean clozapine users that started clozapine treatment between 2003 and 2015. The absolute risk of severe neutropenia was 0.61% (33/5380) with an incidence of 0.086 cases per 100 person-years of follow-up. 87.9% of cases with severe neutropenia appeared during first 18 weeks. Cases of mild neutropenia were 3.9% of total sample and occurred almost constantly without a specific risk time. 77.5% of cases of moderate or severe neutropenia didn't present an event of mild neutropenia before. 22.8% of clozapine users (1227/5380) discontinued treatment for any cause and 4.2% (225/5380) due to neutropenia in any severity level. Clozapine-associated neutropenia risk in Latino users is similar than in the rest of the world. The evidence of a very low risk for severe neutropenia and the behaviour of mild neutropenia cases confirm the feasibility of changes in Latin American clozapine guidelines using current Food and Drug Administration's recommendations as a model.

Shared preventive factors associated with relapse after a response to electroconvulsive therapy in four major psychiatric disorders

AIM

The efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been established in psychiatric disorders but the high rate of relapse is a critical problem. The current study sought preventative factors associated with relapse after a response to ECT in a continuum of four major psychiatric disorders.

METHODS

The records of 255 patients with four psychiatric disorders (83 unipolar depression, 60 bipolar depression, 91 schizophrenia, 21 schizoaffective disorder) were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The relapse-free rate of all patients at 1 year was 56.3% in the four psychiatric disorders without a difference. As a result of univariate analysis, three items could be considered as preventative factors associated with relapse: a small number of psychiatric symptom episodes before an acute course of ECT, the use of mood stabilizers, and the use of maintenance ECT. Multivariate analysis was performed, keeping age, sex, and diagnosis constant in addition to the three items, and small number of psychiatric symptom episodes before an acute course of ECT (P = 0.003), the use of lithium (P = 0.025), the use of valproate (P = 0.027), and the use of maintenance ECT (P = 0.001) were found to be significant preventative measures against relapse.

CONCLUSION

The use of mood stabilizers, such as lithium and valproate, and maintenance ECT could be shared preventive factors associated with relapse after a response to ECT in four major psychiatric disorders.

Psychopharmacological Treatment of Schizophrenia Over Time in 30 908 Inpatients: Data From the AMSP Study

BACKGROUND

Psychotropic drugs are the cornerstone of schizophrenia treatment, often requiring lifelong treatment. Data on pharmacotherapy in inpatient settings are lacking.

METHODS

Prescription data of schizophrenic inpatients within the time period 2000-2015 were obtained from the database of the Drug Safety Program in Psychiatry (AMSP). Data were collected at 2 index dates per year; the prescription patterns and changes over time were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 30 908 inpatients (mean age 41.6 years, 57.8% males), the drug classes administered most often were antipsychotics (94.8%), tranquilizers (32%), antidepressants (16.5%), antiparkinsonians (16%), anticonvulsants (14.1%), hypnotics (8.1%), and lithium (2.1%). The use of second-generation antipsychotics significantly increased from 62.8% in 2000 to 88.9% in 2015 (P < .001), whereas the prescription of first-generation antipsychotics decreased from 46.6% in 2000 to 24.7% in 2015 (P < .001). The administration of long-acting injectable antipsychotics decreased from 15.2% in 2000 to 11.7% in 2015 (P = .006). Clopazine was the most often used antipsychotic, having been used for 21.3% of all patients. Polypharmacy rates (≥5 drugs) increased from 19% in 2000 to 26.5% in 2015. Psychiatric polypharmacy (≥3 psychotropic drugs) was present in 44.7% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combinations of antipsychotics and augmentation therapies with other drug classes are frequently prescribed for schizophrenic patients. Though treatment resistance and unsatisfactory functional outcomes reflect clinical necessity, further prospective studies are needed on real-world prescription patterns in schizophrenia to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this common practice.

Which components of specialized early intervention for psychosis do senior providers see as most important?

AIM

Specialized early interventions improve outcomes in early psychosis (EP). Experts have proposed a number of essential treatment components. However, it is unclear whether these reflect the views of senior clinic staff charged with implementing this model in practice.

METHOD

Twenty-Five senior EP clinic staff across California completed a survey indicating which features of EP treatment they considered most important.

RESULTS

Components related to the service structure and the need for a prompt, comprehensive assessment and care planning were considered most important, despite the limited evidence base evaluating these aspects of care. Administration of clozapine to treatment-refractory patients and weight gain interventions were considered the least important, despite the relatively strong evidence base supporting these treatment components.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest a bi-directional dissemination gap, where components considered most important by senior providers receive limited research attention, while some areas with supporting evidence may be underappreciated in clinical practice.

Mentally disordered offenders discharged from designated hospital facilities under the medical treatment and supervision act in Japan: Reoffending and readmission

BACKGROUND

Current Japanese forensic mental health legislation (Medical Treatment and Supervision Act [MTSA]) was enacted in 2003. Little is known, however, about the actual outcomes for the offender patients detained within hospitals under this provision.

AIM

This study aimed to quantify reoffending and readmission following patients' discharge from forensic psychiatric hospital units across Japan and explore related risk factors.

METHODS

We followed up 526 offenders with mental disorder who had been detained under the MTSA and who were subsequently discharged from any of the 28 hospitals nationwide between 2007 and 2015.

RESULTS

The total cumulative reoffence rate was found to be 2.5% (1.1-3.9%) after 1 year and 7.5% (4.6-10.4%) after 3 years. The rate of serious reoffending was 0.4% (-0.18% to 0.99%) after 1 year and 2.0% (0.4-3.6%) after 3 years. The cumulative admission rate to local psychiatric hospitals following a discharge was 21.8% after 6 months and 37.6% after 1 year. Patients who had been discharged from their MTSA order but transferred to a general psychiatric hospital before open community residence-because it was necessary to build community supports-were more likely to reoffend than those discharged directly to the community. Patients who had been diagnosed with a substance use disorder (F10-F19) and had one subsequent admission were at higher risk of further readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

The low reoffending rates could be attributed to the intensive treatment and care plans required by the MTSA. The high rate of readmission to psychiatric hospitals may indicate shortcomings in community mental health services in Japan.

Can the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale (PANSS) differentiate treatment-resistant from non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia? A factor analytic investigation based on data from the Pattern cohort study

Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) and Non-Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (NTRS) may represent different subtypes of schizophrenia. However, few studies have investigated their PANSS symptom dimensions by Exploratory (EFA) or Confirmatory (CFA). Data from the present study are derived from 1429 patients of the Pattern study. TRS was defined by the use of clozapine in the previous year whereas NTRS by the use of non-clozapine antipsychotics ("by proxy"). Factors were chosen based on the Kaiser criterion and considered valid when loadings were greater than or equal to 0.5. The fit to the data was evaluated by CFA in comparison with well-established PANSS models, using fit indexes. The EFA yielded similar five-factor model in both groups: Negative, Positive, Anxiety/Depression, Cognitive and Excited. CFA showed a satisfactory, but not perfect, fit to the data, as compared with the previous PANSS factor analytic models. Despite the limitations regarding the 'by proxy' definition of TRS, the results of the present study show that there are no differences in the factorial structure of PANSS in patients with TRS and NTRS.

The impact of clozapine initiation and cessation on psychiatric hospital admissions and bed days: a mirror image cohort study

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the most effective medication for the positive symptoms of treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Although clozapine use is associated with fewer admissions, less is known about the impact of clozapine cessation on hospitalisation.

AIMS

The aims of this study were to investigate whether clozapine-reduced psychiatric inpatient admissions and bed days, and investigate patient factors associated with these changes from a sample of 1906 people commenced on clozapine.

METHODS

All people commencing clozapine during an acute hospitalisation over a 10-year period in Queensland, Australia, were included in this retrospective cohort study. A mirror image design was used to compare psychiatric bed days and hospitalisations 2 years before and after clozapine treatment, and the impact of clozapine continuation or early cessation. Changes in psychiatric bed days and hospitalisations were analysed using linear regression, adjusting for the duration on clozapine, sex, age, indigenous status, country of origin and time to clozapine commencement.

RESULTS/OUTCOMES

There was a significant reduction in bed days (29.55 days vs 24.46 days, p < 0.001) and admissions (2.27 vs 1.87 < 0.001) associated with clozapine commencement. This remained significant among clozapine continuers, but not among those with early cessation. Longer duration on clozapine was associated with greater reductions in psychiatric bed days and admissions. Age, sex and time to clozapine commencement, indigeneity and country of origin did not impact outcomes.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

Longer clozapine therapy led to a greater reduction in psychiatric bed days and hospitalisations. Early cessation was associated with a return to pre-clozapine levels of bed days and admissions.

Trends in utilization and dosing of antipsychotic drugs in Scandinavia: Comparison of 2006 and 2016

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate time trends in dosing and prevalence of antipsychotic prescriptions in Scandinavia.

METHODS

We retrieved data on antipsychotic use between 2006 and 2016 from Danish, Norwegian and Swedish national prescription registers. For each antipsychotic, we calculated prevalence of use and mean doses, overall and for specific age groups (young, adults and elderly).

RESULTS

Antipsychotic use in Scandinavia increased from 16.5 to 17.2 users/1000 inhabitants between 2006 and 2016 (+2.4%, annual change: 0.07 users/1000 inhabitants/year, 95% CI: 0.02-0.20, P = 0.02). In 2006, chlorprothixene and levomepromazine were the most commonly used antipsychotics. By 2016, quetiapine was the most used antipsychotic in all three countries and across all age groups, with an overall 1-year prevalence of 4.05-9.97 users/1000 inhabitants (annual change: 0.57 users/1000 inhabitants/year, 95% CI: 0.54-0.60, P < 0.001). Quetiapine showed a marked decrease in mean doses during the 11-year study period (0.46-0.28 defined daily doses (DDD)/user/day: 39.1%, -0.02 DDD/user/day/year, 95% CI: -0.020 to -0.015, P < 0.001). In 2016, the highest mean doses were seen for clozapine (0.90-1.07 DDD/user/day) and olanzapine (0.66-0.88 DDD/user/day).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased prevalence of antipsychotic prescriptions that coincides with low and/or decreasing mean doses of the majority of commonly used antipsychotics in Scandinavia. Of all antipsychotics, this development was most pronounced for quetiapine. Reasons for and consequences of increased antipsychotic use that lasts shorter periods of time requires further study.

Psychiatrists' attitude towards the use of clozapine in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia: A nationwide survey

OBJECTIVES

Clozapine is the most effective treatment for refractory schizophrenia, yet it remains underused in clinical practice. The current study examined the awareness, familiarity and attitude of a nationwide sample of Israeli psychiatrists regarding the use of clozapine.

METHODS

Data were collected using questionnaires, completed by 295 psychiatrists. Participants were asked to score questions regarding clozapine procedures; familiarity with guidelines, drug properties, prescription and attitude towards specialized clozapine resources.

RESULTS

About half (53.3%) of the psychiatrists reported initiating treatment with clozapine according to the guidelines, whereas 33% reported that they administered clozapine only after three or more unsuccessful antipsychotic treatments. Surprisingly, availability of specialized resources for clozapine treatment (such as clozapine clinics) was associated with delayed initiation of clozapine treatment, and a lower rate of clozapine administration. Barriers to clozapine use included concerns about patient adherence, side effects and partial compliance with the required blood monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying or avoiding clozapine treatment to potentially eligible patients, despite familiarity with the drug efficacy and treatment guidelines, is a major mental health concern. However, executive allocation of resources to support the use of clozapine may be ineffective in promoting clozapine use.

Clozapine and Long-Term Mortality Risk in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Lasting 1.1-12.5 Years

INTRODUCTION

Patients with schizophrenia have an elevated mortality risk compared to the general population, with cardiovascular-related deaths being the leading cause. The role of clozapine use in the long-term mortality risk is unclear. While clozapine treatment may increase the risk for cardiovascular mortality, it may have protective effects regarding suicidal behavior.

METHODS

We systematically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO and reviewed studies that used a long-term follow-up (ie, >52 weeks) and reported on mortality in adults diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders who had received clozapine treatment.

RESULTS

Altogether, 24 studies reported on 1327 deaths from any causes during 217691 patient years in patients treated with clozapine. The unadjusted mortality rate in 22 unique samples during a follow-up of 1.1-12.5 (median = 5.4) years was 6.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.4-7.9) per 1000 patient years. Long-term, crude mortality rate ratios were not significantly lower in patients ever treated with clozapine during follow-up, but significantly lower in patients continuously treated with clozapine compared to patients with other antipsychotics (mortality rate ratio = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.36-0.85, P-value = .007). Few studies reported on rates of long-term cause-specific mortality (suicide and ischemic heart disease), which showed no significant difference in patients using clozapine compared to patients using other antipsychotics. Statistical heterogeneity was high in all analyses.

DISCUSSION

Continuous clozapine treatment in schizophrenia patients was associated with a significantly lower long-term all-cause mortality rate compared to other antipsychotic use. These findings, combined with the known efficacy of clozapine, give reason to re-evaluate the hesitancy to prescribe clozapine in regular care settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42017069390.

Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic monotherapy and polytherapy in 1543 patients with acute-phase schizophrenia

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments in the acute phase of schizophrenia in actual clinical practice remains somewhat unclear. Therefore, the purpose of the present naturalistic, multi-center study conducted from 1 year starting in September 2017 was to examine the response rate to an initial or second antipsychotic in newly admitted patients with acute-phase schizophrenia, as well as the response rate and quality of augmentation with two antipsychotics in patients who failed to respond to both the initial and second antipsychotics.

RESULTS

In total, there were 660 (42.8%) and 243 (15.7%) responders to an initial and a second antipsychotic, respectively; thus, 58.5% of all patients were responders to an initial or second antipsychotic. Among 581 nonresponders (37.7%), the initial antipsychotic or a third antipsychotic was added to the second antipsychotic. Among these patients, 89.8% showed a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score ≤3 (from 'minimally improved' to 'very much improved'). The rates of adverse events such as hyperglycemia, hyper-low-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperprolactinemia, QTc prolongation, and extrapyramidal symptoms were not high in patients receiving augmentation with two antipsychotics compared with all patients, and no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Antipsychotic augmentation may be an option in acute-phase treatment for patients who do not respond to either an initial or a second antipsychotic.

Effects of Clozapine on the Gut: Cross-Sectional Study of Delayed Gastric Emptying and Small and Large Intestinal Dysmotility

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal hypomotility in people taking clozapine is common, poorly understood and potentially dangerous. It causes distress and sometimes sudden death, with greater associated morbidity than the better known adverse effect of clozapine, agranulocytosis. Neither the mechanism nor prevalence of clozapine-induced gastrointestinal hypomotility is well understood. Previous studies show clozapine impedes colon transit, likely owing to anticholinergic and anti-serotonergic properties. However, regional gastrointestinal transit times (including gastric and small bowel emptying) have not been quantified.

METHODS

We used wireless motility capsules to measure gastric emptying and small and large bowel transit times in clozapine-treated individuals. We tested 17 clozapine-treated patients without any known gastrointestinal dysfunction, and compared data with matched normative transit times.

RESULTS

Clozapine-treated participants had significant 'slow gut', with dysmotility in at least one region of the gastrointestinal tract evident in 82%, with 59% experiencing multi-regional dysmotility. Delayed gastric emptying was diagnosed in 41%, delayed small bowel transit in 71% and delayed colon transit in 50%. Only 18% of participants had normal studies. Hypomotility was not correlated with ethnicity, sex or duration of treatment. Subjective reporting of constipation had low sensitivity in predicting dysmotility. Delayed gastric emptying had been unrecognised clinically for all participants.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine is associated with significant multi-regional gastrointestinal dysfunction. This is relevant when considering the relationship between clozapine use and conditions such as gastroparesis, choking, aspiration pneumonia, constipation, ileus and intestinal pseudo-obstruction. While the constipating properties of clozapine are now well recognised, this study shows a high degree of vigilance is required for both lower and upper gastrointestinal dysmotility in people taking this antipsychotic.

Conference proceedings of the 4th Masterclass Psychiatry: Transcultural Psychiatry - Diagnostics and Treatment, Luleå, Sweden, 22-23 February 2018 (Region Norrbotten in collaboration with the Maudsley Hospital and Tavistock Clinic London)

BACKGROUND

According to estimates from the European Commission, Europe has experienced the greatest mass movement of people since the Second World War. More than one million refugees and migrants have arrived in the European Union in the past few years. Mental health and primary care professionals are more likely than ever to meet patients from different cultures and backgrounds.

AIMS

To equip mental health and primary care professionals with transcultural skills to deal with patients from unfamiliar backgrounds.

METHOD

Lectures and case discussions to explore the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of serious mental health problems in a transcultural context.

RESULTS

Lectures covered transcultural aspects of mental health problems, treatment in different cultural and ethnic contexts, and assessment of risk factors for self-harm and harm in migrant populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians require a sound grounding in transcultural skills to confidently and empathically deal with patients from unfamiliar backgrounds.

Mortality in schizophrenia: 30-year nationwide follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

Recent reports suggest that the mortality gap between persons with schizophrenia and the general population is increasing. We investigated the mortality, age at death, and causes of death among persons diagnosed with schizophrenia and the general population in Finland during 1984-2014.

METHODS

All persons with schizophrenia in Finland were identified from hospital discharge register, and compared with the Finnish population aged 16 years and older during 1984-2014, based on data from Statistics Finland. Age at death and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) were calculated for each follow-up year.

RESULTS

Mean age at death increased from 57.6 years in 1984 to 70.1 years in 2014 in persons with schizophrenia, and from 70.9 to 77.5 years in the general population. All-cause SMR remained stable during the follow-up (2.6 in 1984 and 2.7 in 2014). A major change was observed in SMR for suicides which decreased from 11.0 in 1984 to 6.6 in 2014 (-40%). The SMRs for cardiovascular and cancer deaths showed increasing trends.

CONCLUSION

The longevity of persons with schizophrenia is improving at approximately the same rate as the general population but suicide rates have declined substantially. However, there is still a major disparity in mortality compared with general population.

Treatment resistant schizophrenia - review and a call to action

Recovery rates in schizophrenia remain suboptimal with up to one-third resistant to standard treatments, a population prevalence of 0.2%. Clozapine is the only evidenced-based treatment for treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), yet there are significant delays in its use or it may not be trialled, potentially impacting the chance of recovery. Better outcomes with earlier use of clozapine may be possible. There is emerging evidence that early treatment resistance is not uncommon from the earliest stages of psychosis. In this review, we provide an update on TRS, its epidemiology and its management, with a specific focus on the optimal use and timing of clozapine and augmentation strategies for the one-third of patients who do not respond to clozapine.

Prescriber and institutional barriers and facilitators of clozapine use: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

As clozapine is under-prescribed in persons with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), it is necessary to better identify the determinants of health inequalities in access to clozapine use.

OBJECTIVE

To identify mental health professionals' characteristics or attitudes and institutional characteristics facilitating or limiting clozapine prescribing.

METHOD

We systematically searched multiple electronic databases for articles reporting: (i) mental health professionals' attitudes and characteristics favoring or limiting clozapine prescribing; (ii) institutional characteristics associated with variations in clozapine prescribing; (iii) interventions aimed at enhancing clozapine prescribing. Data were synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

A total of 31 articles reporting findings of 29 studies published from 1993 to 2017 in 11 countries fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The main prescriber-related barriers to clozapine prescribing are lack of personal prescribing experience and concern with pharmacological characteristics of clozapine (blood monitoring and adverse effects). Lack of knowledge about the effectiveness of clozapine does not appear as a major determinant of under-prescription. Institutional-related characteristics favoring clozapine prescribing are prescribers' adherence to evidence-based medicine principles and learning by modelling from experienced clozapine prescribers.

CONCLUSION

Effective strategies to increase access to clozapine in persons with TRS include implementation of integrated clozapine clinics, simplification of blood monitoring, education for prescribers and contact with experienced prescribers. Programs addressing barriers in clozapine prescription need to be disseminated more broadly to ensure persons with TRS have access to evidenced based treatments such as clozapine. Inequality in access to clozapine care should be more systematically handled by mental health facilities and health regulatory agencies.

The impact of delay in clozapine initiation on treatment outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A systematic review

Approximately one-third of patients with schizophrenia have treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TR-SCZ), which is a condition characterized by suboptimal response to antipsychotics other than clozapine. Importantly, treatment with clozapine-the only antipsychotic with an indication for TR-SCZ-is often delayed, which could contribute to negative outcomes. Given that the specific impact of delay in clozapine initiation is not well understood, we aimed to conduct a systematic search of the Ovid Medline^® database to identify English language publications exploring the impact of delay in clozapine initiation on treatment outcomes in patients with TR-SCZ. Additionally, clinico-demographic factors associated with clozapine delay were examined. Our search identified four retrospective studies that showed an association between longer delay in clozapine initiation and poorer treatment outcomes, even after including covariates, such as age, sex, and duration of illness. In addition, we found six studies that showed an association between age and clozapine delay, but results with regard to other clinico-demographic variables were inconsistent. Overall, the available literature reveals a possible link between delay in clozapine use and poorer treatment outcomes in patients with TR-SCZ. However, given the relatively small number of studies on this clinically important topic, future research is warranted to draw more definitive conclusions.

ECT augmentation of clozapine for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is common and debilitating. A subgroup of patients even has clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) augmentation of clozapine for CRS. Systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on ECT augmentation of clozapine in CRS. Co-primary outcomes included symptomatic improvement at post-ECT assessment and study endpoint. Eighteen RCTs (n = 1769) with 20 active treatment arms were identified and meta-analyzed. Adjunctive ECT was superior to clozapine regarding symptomatic improvement at post-ECT assessment (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = -0.88, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -1.33 to -0.44; I² = 86%, P = 0.0001) and endpoint assessment (SMD: -1.44, 95%CI: -2.05 to -0.84; I² = 95%, P < 0.00001), separating as early as week 1-2 (SMD = -0.54, 95%CI: -0.88 to -0.20; I² = 77%, P = 0.002). Adjunctive ECT was also superior regarding study-defined response at post-ECT assessment (53.6% vs. 25.4%, Risk Ratio (RR) = 1.94, 95%CI: 1.59-2.36; I² = 0%, P < 0.00001, number-needed-to-treat (NNT) = 3, 95%CI: 3-5) and endpoint assessment (67.7% vs. 41.4%, RR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.38-1.99; I² = 47%, P < 0.00001, NNT = 4, 95%CI: 3-8), and remission at post-ECT assessment (13.3% vs. 3.7%, RR = 3.28, 95%CI: 1.80-5.99; I² = 0%, P = 0.0001, NNT = 13, 95%CI: 6-100) and endpoint assessment (23.6% vs. 13.3%, RR = 1.80, 95%CI: 1.39 to 2.35; I² = 5%, P < 0.0001, NNT = 14, 95%CI: 6-50). Patient-reported memory impairment (24.2% vs. 0%; RR = 16.10 (95%CI: 4.53-57.26); I² = 0%, P < 0.0001, number-needed-to-harm (NNH) = 4, 95%CI: 2-14) and headache (14.5% vs 1.6%; RR = 4.03 (95%CI: 1.54-10.56); I² = 0%, P = 0.005, NNH = 8, 95%CI: 4-50) occurred more frequently with adjunctive ECT. No significant group differences were found regarding discontinuation and other adverse effects. Despite increased frequency of self-reported memory impairment and headache, ECT augmentation of clozapine is a highly effective and relatively safe treatment for CRS.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018089959.

Early treatment resistance in a Latin-American cohort of patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Failure to respond to antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia is a common clinical scenario with significant morbidity. Recent studies have highlighted that many patients present treatment-resistance from disease onset. We here present an analysis of clozapine prescription patterns, used as a real-world proxy marker for treatment-resistance, in a cohort of 1195 patients with schizophrenia from a Latin-American cohort, to explore the timing of emergence of treatment resistance and possible subgroup differences.

METHODS

Survival analysis from national databases of clozapine monitoring system, national disease notification registers, and discharges from an early intervention ward.

RESULTS

Echoing previous studies, we found that around 1 in 5 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were eventually prescribed clozapine, with an over-representation of males and those with a younger onset of psychosis. The annual probability of being prescribed clozapine was highest within the first year (probability of 0.11, 95% confidence interval of 0.093-0.13), compared to 0.018 (0.012-0.024) between years 1 and 5, and 0.006 (0-0.019) after 5years. Age at psychosis onset, gender, dose of clozapine used, and compliance with hematological monitoring at 12months, was not related to the onset of treatment resistance. A similar pattern was observed in a subgroup of 230 patients discharged from an early intervention ward with a diagnosis of non-affective first episode of psychosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight that treatment resistance is frequently present from the onset of psychosis. Future studies will shed light on the possible different clinical and neurobiological characteristics of this subtype of psychosis.

Antipsychotic prescribing patterns on admission to and at discharge from a tertiary care program for treatment-resistant psychosis

Retrospective data were collected from 330 individuals who were treated at a tertiary care program for treatment-resistant psychosis between 1994 and 2010. The main objectives were to compare the use of antipsychotic monotherapy to polypharmacy and to characterize within-individual changes in treatment and symptomatology between admission and discharge. At admission, individuals who were prescribed only one antipsychotic were comparable to those who were prescribed at least two antipsychotics with regard to demographics and symptom severity. The use of psychotropic medications other than antipsychotics was also similar between the two groups. However, the magnitude of antipsychotic utilization was greater in individuals who were receiving antipsychotic polypharmacy. In addition, a greater proportion received excessive doses at admission. Similar findings were observed when the two antipsychotic prescribing practices were compared at discharge. Three important patterns were identified when investigating within-individual changes. First, fewer individuals were prescribed more than one antipsychotic at discharge. This was accompanied by a general decrease in the magnitude of antipsychotic utilization. Second, the number of individuals who were prescribed clozapine had increased by discharge. Most who were already prescribed clozapine at admission had their doses increased. Third, improvements in symptomatology were observed across all of the subscales included in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS); 57.9% of individuals experienced a relative reduction in total PANSS scores exceeding 20%. Based on these findings, it is possible to alleviate symptom severity while reducing antipsychotic utilization when patients are treated at a tertiary care program for treatment-resistant psychosis.

Meta-analysis examining the epidemiology of clozapine-associated neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is associated with life-threatening neutropenia. There are no previous meta-analyses of the epidemiology of clozapine-associated neutropenia.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the cumulative incidence of mild, moderate and severe neutropenia, incidence of death related to severe neutropenia, case fatality rate of neutropenia and the longitudinal incidence of neutropenia following exposure to clozapine.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE and PsycINFO using search terms [clozapine OR clopine OR zaponex OR clozaril] AND [neutropenia OR agranulocytosis].

METHODS

Random effects meta-analysis to determine event rates and longitudinal incidence of events per 100 person-years of exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 108 studies were included. The incidence of clozapine-associated neutropenia was 3.8% (95% CI: 2.7-5.2%) and severe neutropenia 0.9% (95% CI: 0.7-1.1%). The incidence of death related to neutropenia following prescription of clozapine was 0.013% (95% CI: 0.01-0.017%). The case fatality rate of severe neutropenia was 2.1% (95% CI: 1.6-2.8%). The peak incidence of severe neutropenia occurred at one month of exposure and declined to negligible levels after one year of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Severe neutropenia associated with clozapine is a rare event and occurs early with a substantial decline in risk after one year of exposure. Death from clozapine-associated neutropenia is extremely rare. Implications for haematological monitoring are discussed.

Dilemmas in the treatment of early-onset first-episode psychosis

Early-onset first-episode psychosis (EOP) is a severe mental disorder that can pose a number of challenges to clinicians, young people and their families. Its assessment and differentiation from other neurodevelopmental and mental health conditions may at times be difficult, its treatment may not always lead to optimal outcomes and can be associated with significant side effects, and its long-term course and prognosis seem to be less favourable compared with the adult-onset disorder. In this paper, we discuss some dilemmas associated with the evaluation and management of EOP and propose approaches that can be used in the clinical decision-making process. A detailed and well-informed assessment of psychotic symptoms and comorbidities, a systematic approach to treatment with minimum possible medication doses and close monitoring of its effectiveness and adverse effects, and multidimensional interventions taking into consideration risks and expectations associated with EOP, are paramount in the achievement of the most favourable outcomes for affected children and young people.

Community pharmacists' attitudes and opinions towards supplying clozapine

Background Clozapine is very effective for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but its use has been limited due to the risk of agranulocytosis. From July 2015, clozapine has been accessible from Australian community pharmacies following regulatory changes, but pharmacists' attitudes towards these changes remain unknown. Objective To explore pharmacists' perspectives and experiences in supplying clozapine. Setting Australian community pharmacists. Methods A cross-sectional study with a mixed methods approach involving two phases. An online survey containing Likert-type and open-response questions was distributed to community pharmacists (n = 134) via ClopineCentral™ (clozapine monitoring system). Participants were then invited to participate in semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 12) regarding clozapine supply. Quantitative data were statistically analysed, while qualitative responses were thematically content-analysed. Main outcome measures Pharmacists' responses to surveys and interviews. Results Community pharmacists were supportive towards supplying clozapine as it increased access for consumers. Better patient-pharmacist relationships and holistic care approach were identified to benefit both consumers and pharmacists. Pharmacists reported to be confident (89.6%), have adequate support (73.1%), knowledge (86.6%) and skills (93.3%) in dispensing clozapine. Training and support received facilitated pharmacists' roles, whereas administrative issues, especially in obtaining valid haematology results, posed challenges. Educational and technical improvements were suggested to improve service provision. Conclusion Community pharmacists welcomed the regulatory changes positively and were confident in supporting consumers taking clozapine. Despite challenges present, benefits and facilitators identified supported the feasibility of this service in community pharmacies. Future research should explore other aspects of clozapine supply, such as attitudes of other stakeholders, to improve current supply systems.

Research Priorities for Optimizing Geriatric Pharmacotherapy: An International Consensus

Medication management is becoming increasingly challenging for older people, and there is limited evidence to guide medication prescribing and administration for people with multimorbidity, frailty, or at the end of life. Currently, there is a lack of clear research priorities in the field of geriatric pharmacotherapy. To address this issue, international experts from 5 research groups in geriatric pharmacotherapy and pharmacoepidemiology research were invited to attend the inaugural Optimizing Geriatric Pharmacotherapy through Pharmacoepidemiology Network workshop. A modified nominal group technique was used to explore and consolidate the priorities for conducting research in this field. Eight research priorities were elucidated: quality of medication use; vulnerable patient groups; polypharmacy and multimorbidity; person-centered practice and research; deprescribing; methodological development; variability in medication use; and national and international comparative research. The research priorities are discussed in detail in this article with examples of current gaps and future actions presented. These priorities highlight areas for future research in geriatric pharmacotherapy to improve medication outcomes in older people.

Prescription and Underprescription of Clozapine in Dutch Ambulatory Care

Purpose: To our knowledge, no study has examined in a structured way the extent of underprescription of clozapine in ambulatory patients with Non-Affective Psychotic Disorder (NAPD). In the Netherlands, psychiatric care for such patients is provided by Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) teams and by early intervention teams. In 20 FACT teams and 3 early intervention teams we assessed the proportion of patients who: use clozapine (type 1 patients), previously used this drug (type 2), have an unfulfilled indication for this drug, by type of indication (type 3), or were at least markedly psychotic, but had not yet received two adequate treatments with other antipsychotic drugs (type 4). We expected to find major differences between teams. To rule out that these differences are caused by differences in severity of psychopathology, we also calculated the proportions of patients who use clozapine given an indication at any time (number of type 1 patients divided by the sum of type 1, 2, and 3 patients). Materials and methods: The nurse practitioner of each team identified the patients already on clozapine. Next, using a highly-structured decision tree, the nurse practitioner and psychiatrist assessed whether the remaining patients had an indication for this drug. Indications were treatment-resistant positive symptoms, tardive dyskinesia, aggression and suicidality. The severity of positive symptoms was determined using the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale (CGI-SCH). Results: In the participating FACT-teams 2,286 NAPD patients were assessed. The range among teams in proportions was: type 1: 8.8-34.7% (mean: 23.0%), type 2: 0-8.2% (mean: 3.5%), type 3: 1.7-15.6% (mean: 6.9%), type 4: 1.8-16.3% (mean: 8.6%). The range in proportions of patients using this drug given an indication was 49.0-90.9% (mean: 68.8%). These figures were lower in early intervention teams. Conclusions: The proportion of patients in FACT-teams who have an unfulfilled indication for clozapine is 6.9%. There were considerable differences between teams with respect to this proportion. Almost a third of the outpatients had at any time an indication for clozapine. If one takes type 4 patients into account, this proportion may be higher. Registration number: NTR5135 http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asp.

Influence of dose, gender, and cigarette smoking on clozapine plasma concentrations

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of clozapine is a very useful method for verifying both the correct intake and the interindividual variability of its metabolism, thereby avoiding the risk of toxicity. The purposes of this paper were to discover how many patients using clozapine in common clinical practice have clozapine plasma concentration (PC) levels in the proposed reference range and to identify factors that influence clozapine PC levels.

METHODS

Our study included 100 inpatients (diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder) taking standard doses of clozapine (100-700 mg/day). Clozapine concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Correlations between doses and PC levels and the influence of smoking and gender on clozapine PC levels were calculated.

RESULTS

A large number of the patients (67%) had PC levels outside the proposed reference range. The clozapine PC levels were influenced by dose, gender, and cigarette smoking.

CONCLUSION

The correlations between dose, gender, and cigarette smoking and clozapine PC levels highlighted by our study overlap other research. It was surprising to find such a large number of patients with clozapine PC levels outside the therapeutic range. This result suggests the importance of clozapine TDM due to misunderstood inter- and/or intraindividual variability or misestimated partial therapeutic compliance.