Coronary side-effect potential of current and prospective antimigraine drugs

Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine: a review

The ergot alkaloids were the first specific antimigraine therapy available. However, with the advent of the triptans, their use in the treatment of migraine has declined and their role has become less clear. This review discusses the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of the ergots. In randomized clinical trials, oral ergotamine was found to be superior to placebo, but inferior to 100 mg of oral sumatriptan. In contrast, rectal ergotamine was found to have higher efficacy (73% headache relief) than rectal sumatriptan (63% headache relief). Intranasal dihydroergotamine was found to be superior to placebo, but less effective than subcutaneous and intranasal sumatriptan. Ergotamine is still widely used in some countries for the treatment of severe migraine attacks. It is generally regarded as a safe and useful drug if prescribed for infrequent use, in the correct dose, and in the absence of contraindications; however, safer and more effective options do exist in the triptans. In patients with status migrainous and patients with frequent headache recurrence, ergotamine is still probably useful.

Naratriptan in the preventive treatment of cluster headache

We describe the preventive use of naratriptan, mostly as add-on to high-dose verapamil treatment, in nine patients with cluster headache. The addition of the naratriptan further improved the headaches in seven of the nine patients.

Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials

The triptans, selective serotonin 5-HT1B/1D agonists, are very effective acute migraine drugs. Soon, seven different triptans will be clinically available at 13 different oral doses, making evidence-based selection guidelines necessary. Triptan trials have similar designs, facilitating meta-analysis. We wished to provide an evidence-based foundation for using triptans in clinical practice, and to review the methodological issues surrounding triptan trials. We asked pharmaceutical companies and the principal investigators of company-independent trials for the 'raw patient data' of all double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical trials with oral triptans in migraine. All data were cross-checked with published or presented data. We calculated summary estimates across studies for important efficacy and tolerability parameters, and compared these with those from direct, head-to-head, comparator trials. Out of 76 eligible clinical trials, 53 (12 not yet published) involving 24089 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Mean results (and 95% confidence intervals) for sumatriptan 100 mg, the first available and most widely prescribed oral triptan, are 59% (57-60) for 2 h headache response (improvement from moderate or severe to mild or no pain); 29% (27-30) for 2 h pain free (improvement to no pain); 20% (18-21) for sustained pain free (pain free by 2 h and no headache recurrence or use of rescue medication 2-24 h post-dose), and 67% (63-70) for consistency (response in at least two out of three treated attacks); placebo-subtracted proportions for patients with at least one adverse event (AE) are 13% (8-18), for at least one central nervous system AE 6% (3-9), and for at least one chest AE 1.9% (1.0-2.7). Compared with these data: rizatriptan 10 mg shows better efficacy and consistency, and similar tolerability; eletriptan 80 mg shows better efficacy, similar consistency, but lower tolerability; almotriptan 12.5 mg shows similar efficacy at 2 h but better sustained pain-free response, consistency, and tolerability; sumatriptan 25 mg, naratriptan 2.5 mg and eletriptan 20 mg show lower efficacy and better tolerability; zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and 5 mg, eletriptan 40 mg, and rizatriptan 5 mg show very similar results. The results of the 22 trials that directly compared triptans show the same overall pattern. We received no data on frovatriptan, but publicly available data suggest substantially lower efficacy. The major methodological issues involve the choice of the primary endpoint, consistency over multiple attacks, how to evaluate headache recurrence, use of placebo-subtracted proportions to control for across-study differences, and the difference between tolerability and safety. In addition, there are a number of methodological issues specific for direct comparator trials, including encapsulation and patient selection. At marketed doses, all oral triptans are effective and well tolerated. Differences among them are in general relatively small, but clinically relevant for individual patients. Rizatriptan 10 mg, eletriptan 80 mg and almotriptan 12.5 mg provide the highest likelihood of consistent success. Sumatriptan features the longest clinical experience and the widest range of formulations. All triptans are contra-indicated in the presence of cardiovascular disease.

Migraine and coronary heart disease in women and men

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated migraine as an independent risk factor for subsequent coronary heart disease (CHD) events among women in the Women's Health Study (WHS) and men in the Physicians' Health Study (PHS).

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have suggested that migraine is associated with increased risk of stroke, there are few and conflicting data on whether migraine predicts risk of future CHD events.

METHODS

The WHS is an ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low-dose aspirin and vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer in 39876 women health professionals aged > or =45 years in 1993, and the PHS is a completed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aspirin and beta-carotene in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer in 22071 men physicians aged 40 to 84 years in 1982. Primary endpoints were defined as major CHD (nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] or fatal CHD) and total CHD (major CHD plus angina and coronary revascularization).

RESULTS

After adjusting for other CHD risk factors, female health professionals and male physicians reporting migraine were not at increased risk for subsequent major CHD (women: relative risk [RR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 1.29; men: RR, 1.02; 95% Cl, 0.79 to 1.31) or total CHD (women: RR, 1.01; 95% Cl, 0.76 to 1.34; men: RR, 0.98; 95% Cl, 0.82 to 1.18). When considered separately, there was also no increase in risk of MI or angina.

CONCLUSION

These prospective data suggest that migraine is not associated with increased risk of subsequent CHD events in women or men.

Initial Abortive Treatments for Migraine Headache

Stratify care by choosing the optimal medication for a migraine. Severe pain, significant disability, and associated features such as nausea or vomiting necessitate early treatment with specific, high efficacy therapy. Migraine patients may have a spectrum of headache presentations ranging from tension-type headaches to migraine headaches with or without aura. Mild headache types may respond to simple analgesics, though there is evidence that migraineurs will respond to migraine-specific medications such as the triptans for a range of headache phenotypes. Physicians should provide patients with medication to treat nausea and vomiting. They may be infrequent accompaniments, but medication such as a neuroleptic may avoid a trip to the emergency room. Provide rescue medication for an occasional failure of usual treatment to avoid further disability or emergency room visits. Avoid medication overuse by matching treatment to patient needs. A cycle of repetitive and escalating medication use can lead to transformation of migraine into chronic daily headache with analgesic-dependent rebound.

The effect of rizatriptan, ergotamine, and their combination on human peripheral arteries: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in normal subjects

AIMS

To compare the peripheral vasoconstrictor effects of ergotamine, rizatriptan, and their combination, in normal subjects.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, four-way, crossover study. Sixteen young male volunteers, selected as responders to the vasoconstrictor effect of 0.5 mg ergotamine i.v., were administered 10 mg oral rizatriptan, 0.25 mg i.v. ergotamine, 10 mg oral rizatriptan+0.25 mg i.v. ergotamine, and placebo. The vasoconstrictor effect on peripheral arteries was measured with strain gauge plethysmography up to 8 h after dosing. The 8 h assessment period was divided into two 4 h intervals to assess the immediate (0-4 h) vs sustained effect (4-8 h) of treatment.

RESULTS

For the 0-4 h interval, the decreases in peripheral systolic blood pressure gradients were: placebo (-1 mmHg [95% CI: -3, 1])<rizatriptan (-5 mmHg [95% CI: -7, -3])<ergotamine (-15 mmHg [95% CI: -16, -13])=rizatriptan+ergotamine (-15 mmHg [95% CI: -17, -13]). For the 4-8 h interval, the decreases were: placebo (-5 mmHg [95% CI: -8, -3])=rizatriptan (-8 mmHg [95% CI: -11, -5])<ergotamine (-26 mmHg [95% CI: -29, -24])=rizatriptan+ergotamine (-28 mmHg [95% CI: -31, -26]).

CONCLUSIONS

In normal subjects, rizatriptan 10 mg orally had only a small transient vasoconstrictor effect on peripheral arteries compared with the sustained and more pronounced effect of 0.25 mg i.v. ergotamine. Furthermore, rizatriptan exerted no additional effect on ergotamine-induced constriction of peripheral arteries when the two drugs were given in combination.

Comparison of contractile responses to donitriptan and sumatriptan in the human middle meningeal and coronary arteries

Donitriptan is a potent, high efficacy agonist at 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors. We investigated the contractile effects of donitriptan and sumatriptan on human isolated blood vessels of relevance to therapeutic efficacy in migraine (middle meningeal artery) and coronary adverse events (coronary artery). Furthermore, using the concentration-response curves in the middle meningeal artery, we predicted the plasma concentration needed for the therapeutic effect of donitriptan. Both donitriptan and sumatriptan contracted the middle meningeal artery with similar apparent efficacy (E(max): 103+/-8% and 110+/-12%, respectively), but the potency of donitriptan (pEC(50): 9.07+/-0.14) was significantly higher than that of sumatriptan (pEC(50): 7.41+/-0.08). In the coronary artery, the contraction to donitriptan was biphasic with a significantly higher maximal response (E(max): 29+/-6%) than sumatriptan (E(max): 14+/-2%; pEC(50): 5.71+/-0.16), yielding two distinct pEC(50) values (8.25+/-0.16 and 5.60+/-0.24). Incubation with the 5-HT(2) receptor antagonist ketanserin (10 microM) eliminated the low affinity component of the concentration-response curve of donitriptan and the resultant E(max) and pEC(50) were 9+/-2% and 7.33+/-0.21, respectively. Ketanserin was without effect on the sumatriptan-induced contraction. Based on the middle meningeal artery contraction, concentrations (C(max)) of donitriptan that may be expected to have a therapeutic efficacy equivalent to that of 50 and 100 mg sumatriptan are predicted to be around 2.5 and 4.3 nM, respectively. Such concentrations are likely to induce only a small coronary artery contraction of 2.9+/-1.5% and 3.8+/-2.0%, respectively; these are not different from those by C(max) concentrations of sumatriptan (1.7+/-0.4% or 2.2+/-0.4%). The present results suggest that, like sumatriptan, donitriptan exhibits cranioselectivity and would be effective in aborting migraine attacks with a similar coronary side-effect profile as sumatriptan.

Agonist-directed trafficking explaining the difference between response pattern of naratriptan and sumatriptan in rabbit common carotid artery

1. Sumatriptan or eletriptan produced vasocontraction in common carotid artery (CCA) by stimulating 5HT(1B) receptors (see also Akin & Gurdal, this issue). 2. Naratriptan as a 5HT(1B/D) agonist, was unable to produce vasocontraction in this artery, but inhibited the vasocontractile response induced by sumatriptan or eletriptan. 3. All these agonists inhibited forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP production with comparable potencies and maximal responses. This inhibition was mediated by 5HT(1B) receptors: 5HT(1B) antagonist SB216641 (1 microM) completeley antagonized sumatriptan-, eletriptan- or naratriptan-induced cyclic AMP inhibition, but 5HT(1D) antagonist BRL15572 (1 microM) did not affect this response. 4. Naratriptan-induced stimulation of 5-HT(1B) receptors resulted only in adenylate cyclase inhibition, whereas stimulation of these receptors by sumatriptan or eletriptan produced vasocontraction as well. Hence, we concluded that the 5HT(1B)-mediated inhibition of adenylate cyclase was not a sufficient condition to couple the receptor stimulation to vasocontraction. 5. We discussed agonist-induced trafficking as a plausible mechanism for the observed phenomenon.

Triptans: do they differ?

Headache care specialists agree that the introduction of sumatriptan constitutes a major advance in headache therapy, but they differ about whether other triptans offer clinically significant advantages over sumatriptan. This article examines this issue by considering the similarities and differences among triptans.

Tolerability and safety of frovatriptan with short- and long-term use for treatment of migraine and in comparison with sumatriptan

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the tolerability and safety of frovatriptan 2.5 mg in patients with migraine.

BACKGROUND

Frovatriptan is a new, selective serotonin agonist (triptan) developed for the acute treatment of migraine. Dose range-finding studies identified 2.5 mg as the dose that conferred the optimal combination of efficacy and tolerability.

METHODS

The tolerability and safety of frovatriptan 2.5 mg were assessed during controlled, acute migraine treatment studies, including a study that compared frovatriptan 2.5 mg with sumatriptan 100 mg, as well as a 12-month open-label study during which patients could take up to three doses of frovatriptan 2.5 mg within a 24-hour period. Safety and tolerability were assessed through the collection of adverse events, monitoring of heart rate and blood pressure performance of 12-lead electrocardiogram, hematology screen, and blood chemistry studies.

RESULTS

In the short-term studies, 1554 patients took frovatriptan 2.5 mg and 838 took placebo. In the 12-month study, 496 patients treated 13 878 migraine attacks. Frovatriptan was well tolerated in the short- and long-term studies with 1% of patients in the short-term studies and 5% of patients in the long-term study withdrawing due to lack of tolerability. The incidence of adverse events was higher in the frovatriptan-treated patients than in the patients who took placebo (47% versus 34%) and the spectrum of adverse events was similar. When compared to sumatriptan 100 mg, significantly fewer patients taking frovatriptan experienced adverse events (43% versus 36%; P=.03) and the number of adverse events was lower (0.62 versus 0.91), there were also fewer adverse events suggestive of cardiovascular symptoms in the frovatriptan group. Analysis of the entire clinical database (n=2392) demonstrated that frovatriptan was well tolerated by the patients regardless of their age, gender, race, concomitant medication, or the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. No effects of frovatriptan on heart rate, blood pressure, 12-lead electrocardiogram, hematology screen, or blood chemistry were observed. No patient suffered any treatment-related serious adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Short- and long-term use of frovatriptan 2.5 mg was well tolerated by a wide variety of patients. Frovatriptan treatment produced an adverse events profile similar to that of placebo, and in a direct comparison study was better tolerated than sumatriptan 100 mg.

Almotriptan: a review of its use in migraine

Almotriptan is a selective serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist ('triptan'). Its efficacy and tolerability have been assessed in a number of randomised, controlled trials in over 4800 adults with moderate or severe attacks of migraine. Oral almotriptan has a rapid onset of action (significant headache relief is observed 0.5 hours after administration of a 12.5mg dose) and efficacy is sustained in most patients who respond by 2 hours. The drug is significantly more effective than placebo as measured by a number of parameters including 2-hour headache response and pain-free response rates. Other symptoms of migraine, including nausea, photophobia and phonophobia, are also alleviated by almotriptan. The efficacy of oral almotriptan appears to be maintained over repeated doses for multiple attacks of migraine treated over a long period (up to 1 year). High headache response rates were reported over all attacks without tachyphylaxis. For the relief of single attacks of migraine, oral almotriptan 12.5mg had similar efficacy to oral sumatriptan 50mg. Patients given almotriptan report less concern with adverse effects than patients given sumatriptan. The lower incidence of chest pain following treatment with almotriptan than with sumatriptan may lead to a reduction in direct costs, with fewer patients requiring management of chest pain. Almotriptan is well tolerated. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity, transient, and generally resolved without intervention or the need for treatment withdrawal. The most common adverse events associated with oral almotriptan 12.5mg treatment were dizziness, paraesthesia, nausea, fatigue, headache, somnolence, skeletal pain, vomiting and chest symptoms. The incidence of adverse events did not differ from placebo and decreased in the longer term. Almotriptan can be coadministered with drugs that share a common hepatic metabolic path; in addition, dosage reduction is required only in the presence of severe renal or hepatic impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Almotriptan is an effective drug for the acute treatment of moderate or severe attacks of migraine in adults. An oral dose of almotriptan 12.5mg has shown greater efficacy than placebo; current data indicate that efficacy is similar to that of oral sumatriptan 50mg, and is maintained in the long term (<or=1 year). Almotriptan has a good adverse event profile and a generally similar overall tolerability profile to sumatriptan; of note, almotriptan is associated with a significantly lower incidence of chest pain than sumatriptan. However, further clinical experience is required to clearly define the place of almotriptan among the other currently available triptans. Nevertheless, because triptans have an important place in various management regimens, and because the nature of individual patient response to triptans is idiosyncratic, almotriptan is likely to become a useful treatment option in the management of adults with moderate or severe migraine headaches.

Efficacy of the non-peptide CGRP receptor antagonist BIBN4096BS in blocking CGRP-induced dilations in human and bovine cerebral arteries: potential implications in acute migraine treatment

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a potent vasodilator in brain vessels and it has been implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine headache. Blocking post-junctional CGRP receptors, mediators of trigeminal-induced vasodilation, has been suggested as a potential antimigraine strategy. In this study, we tested the ability of a new non-peptide CGRP receptor antagonist, BIBN4096BS, to inhibit the CGRP-induced dilation in human and/or bovine brain vessels and compared it to that of the antagonist alpha-CGRP(8-37). BIBN4096BS and alpha-CGRP(8-37) both blocked the alpha-CGRP-induced dilation in bovine middle artery segments with respective potency (pK(B) values) of 6.3 and 7.8. In human pial vessels, BIBN4096BS was particularly potent. When tested at 10(-14)-10(-9) M concentrations, it induced a rightward shift in the alpha-CGRP concentration-response curve and yielded a biphasic Schild plot suggesting interaction with more than one receptor population, as was also indicated by the significant best fit of the alpha-CGRP-induced dilation in human brain vessels with a two receptor site interaction. Schild plot analysis in the linear portion of the BIBN4096BS inhibition curve revealed interaction with one high affinity site (pA(2) value approximately 14). In bovine vessels, both alpha-CGRP(8-37) and BIBN4096BS concentration-dependently reversed a pre-established CGRP-induced dilation ( approximately 59 and 85%, respectively), BIBN4096BS being approximately tenfold more potent than alpha-CGRP(8-37) (respective pIC(50) values of 7.5 and 6.75). In human middle cerebral and middle meningeal arteries, BIBN4096BS reversed the alpha-CGRP-induced dilation (> or =70%) by interaction with two different receptor populations: it exhibited a high affinity for one population (pIC(50) value approximately 13) and a lower affinity for the other (pIC(50) value approximately 8). The present data demonstrate that BIBN4096BS is a very potent antagonist that could, depending on its bioavailability and in vivo affinity, be of potential benefit in the acute treatment of migraine headache by blocking and/or reversing the CGRP-mediated dilation of intracranial vessels induced by activation of trigeminovascular afferents.

5-HT1B-receptors and vascular reactivity in human isolated blood vessels: assessment of the potential craniovascular selectivity of sumatriptan

AIMS

5-HT1B-receptor mediated vasoconstriction of cranial arteries is a potential mechanism by which 5-HT1B/1D-receptor agonists such as sumatriptan produce their antimigraine effects. 5-HT1B-receptors exist in other blood vessels which may give rise to unwanted vascular effects. Therefore we examined the distribution of 5-HT1B-receptor immunoreactivity (i.r.) in human blood vessels (including target and nontarget vessels) and confirmed the functionality of this receptor protein, by comparing the vasoconstrictor effects of sumatriptan and 5-HT (the endogenous ligand) in isolated vessels.

METHODS

Blood vessels (middle meningeal, pial, temporal and uterine arteries and saphenous veins) were obtained from surgical patients (with consent). Sections of the vessels were prepared for routine immunohistochemical studies using specific 5-HT1B- and 5-HT1D-receptor antibodies. For functional studies, ring segments of the vessels were mounted in organ baths for isometric tension recording.

RESULTS

5-HT1B-receptor i.r. was detected on the smooth muscle layer in middle meningeal, pial and uterine arteries and in saphenous vein and sumatriptan produced contractions in these vessels with potency values (mean pEC50) of 7.00, 7.08, 6.44 and 6.61, respectively, the magnitude of contraction was greatest in the cranial arteries with Emax values of 100.7, 60.3, 23.0 and 35.9%, respectively (expressed as a percentage of the reference agonist 45 mm KCl). 5-HT1B-receptor i.r. was not detected in temporal artery and sumatriptan had no effect in this artery. 5-HT1D-receptor i.r. was not detected in any of the vessels studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Sumatriptan can evoke vasoconstriction in antimigraine target vessels and also in nontarget vessels through an action at 5-HT1B-rcceptors. Sumatriptan acts preferentially to cause contraction in human cranial arteries compared with the other blood vessels we examined and this effect is likely to be shared by other drugs of this class.

Characterization of sumatriptan-induced contractions in human isolated blood vessels using selective 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptor antagonists and in situ hybridization

The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist sumatriptan is effective in aborting acute attacks of migraine and is known to cause constriction of cranial arteries as well as some peripheral blood vessels. The present study set out to investigate whether 5-HT(1B) and/or 5-HT(1D) receptors mediate contractions of the human isolated middle meningeal and temporal arteries (models for anti-migraine efficacy) and coronary artery and saphenous vein (models for side-effect potential). Concentration-response curves were made with sumatriptan (1 nm-100 microm) in blood vessels in the absence or presence of selective antagonists at 5-HT(1B) (SB224289) and 5-HT(1D) (BRL15572) receptors. SB224289 antagonized sumatriptan-induced contractions in all blood vessels, although the antagonism profile was different amongst these blood vessels. In the temporal artery, SB224289 abolished contraction to sumatriptan, whereas in the middle meningeal artery and saphenous vein sumatriptan-induced contractions were blocked in an insurmountable fashion. Moreover, SB224289 acted as a weak surmountable antagonist in the coronary artery (pK(B): 6.4 +/- 0.2). In contrast, BRL15572 had little or no effect on sumatriptan-induced contractions in the four blood vessels investigated. In situ hybridization revealed the expression of 5-HT(1B) receptor mRNA in the smooth muscle as well as endothelial cells of the blood vessels, whereas the mRNA for the 5-HT(1D) receptor was only very weakly expressed. These results show that the 5-HT(1B) receptor is primarily involved in sumatriptan-induced contractions of human cranial as well as peripheral blood vessels.

How does almotriptan compare with other triptans? A review of data from placebo-controlled clinical trials

Almotriptan, the new selective 5-HT1B/1D agonist, has a higher oral bioavailability than any other triptan, with more than two thirds of the administered dose absorbed within the first hour both inside and outside of a migraine attack. Gender or the presence of food in the stomach does not affect its pharmacokinetic profile, and the compound has no clinically relevant interactions with other drugs. Among the available triptans, response rates at 2 hours range from 50% to 80%, with 20% to 50% of patients pain-free. Almotriptan 12.5 mg provides similar efficacy, with significant advantage over placebo at 30 minutes and a reliable consistency (75% in two of three attacks). Headache typically recurs in 25% to 45% of patients with most triptans. The recurrence rate with almotriptan 12.5 mg, 18% to 27%, is among the lowest reported. The tolerability of almotriptan 12.5 mg is close to that of placebo with a low incidence of central nervous system side effects and chest symptoms. In conclusion, almotriptan's consistent pharmacokinetics and good efficacy, in combination with excellent tolerability, make it an attractive choice in the acute treatment of migraine attacks.

The safety of triptans in the treatment of patients with migraine

The introduction of the triptans (5-hydroxytryptophan [5-HT] (1B/1D) agonists) in the past decade has brought migraine-specific pain relief to those suffering from migraine. These drugs activate the serotonin receptors 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) on cerebral vessels. Concerns about their safety, particularly in patients with vascular risk factors, have been raised because triptans also activate the 5-HT(1B) receptors on coronary arteries. Although triptans are contraindicated in patients with cardiac or cerebrovascular disease, they are safer than many other medications used to treat patients with migraine, including the nonspecific serotonin-agonist ergot preparations.

Clinically significant drug interactions with agents specific for migraine attacks

The drugs which provide specific relief from migraine attacks, the ergopeptides (ergotamine and dihydroergotamine) and the various 'triptans' (notably sumatriptan), are often prescribed for persons already taking various migraine preventative agents, and sometimes drugs for other indications. As a result, migraine-specific drugs may become involved in drug-drug interactions. The migraine-specific drugs all act as agonists at certain subclasses of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptor, particularly those of the 5-HT1D subtype, and produce vasoconstriction through these receptor-mediated mechanisms. The oral bioavailabilities of these drugs, particularly those of the ergopeptides, are often incomplete, due to extensive presystemic metabolism. As a result, if migraine-specific agents are coadministered with drugs with vasoconstrictive properties, or with drugs which inhibit the metabolism of the migraine-specific agents, there is a risk of interactions occurring which produce manifestations of excessive vasoconstriction. This can also occur through pharmacodynamic mechanisms, as when ergopeptides or triptans are coadministered with methysergide or propranolol (although a pharmacokinetic element may apply in relation to the latter interaction), or if one migraine-specific agent is used shortly after another. When ergopeptide metabolism is inhibited by the presence of macrolide antibacterials, particularly troleandomycin and erythromycin, the resultant interaction can produce ergotism, sometimes leading to gangrene. Similar pharmacokinetic mechanisms, with their vasoconstrictive consequences, probably apply to combination of the ergopeptides with HIV protease inhibitors (indinavir and ritonavir), heparin, cyclosporin or tacrolimus. Inhibition of triptan metabolism by monoamine oxidase A inhibitors, e.g. moclobemide, may raise circulating triptan concentrations, although this does not yet seem to have led to reported clinical problems. Caffeine may cause increased plasma ergotamine concentrations through an as yet inadequately defined pharmacokinetic interaction. However, a direct antimigraine effect of caffeine may contribute to the claimed increased efficacy of ergotamine-caffeine combinations in relieving migraine attacks. Serotonin syndromes have been reported as probable pharmacodynamic consequences of the use of ergots or triptans in persons taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors. There have been two reports of involuntary movement disorders when sumatriptan has been used by patients already taking loxapine. Nearly all the clinically important interactions between the ergopeptide antimigraine agents and currently marketed drugs are likely to have already come to notice. In contrast, new interactions involving the triptans are likely to be recognised as additional members of this family of drugs, with their different patterns of metabolism and pharmacokinetics, are marketed.

New paradigms in the recognition and acute treatment of migraine

It would be ideal if clinical decisions regarding acute migraine treatment could be made on the basis of three parameters: a critical appraisal of available scientific evidence, clinical experience (including knowledge of the individual patient and his/her attack characteristics), and, of course, patient preferences. Patients are likely to prefer agents that offer rapid relief, pain-free status within 2 hours, no recurrence or need for rescue medication, extended time to recurrence (if present), consistency of therapeutic effect over multiple attacks, oral administration. good tolerability, safety, and minimal drug interactions. Fortunately, a number of specific therapies now are available which place these objectives within the patient's reach. Ongoing barriers to optimal migraine care include underrecognition, underconsultation, undertreatment, restrictions imposed by insurance companies, and exaggerated concerns regarding the safety of the triptans. Overcoming these barriers is likely to prove a more important contribution to patient care than endeavoring to establish the relative merits of one triptan over another. We have described in detail a number of strategies for improving recognition and treatment of migraine. Many headache specialists now believe that recurrent episodes of disabling headache, with a stable pattern over years, should be viewed as migraine until proven otherwise. In the end, this may represent the most useful paradigm in the primary care setting, where time is of the essence. Studies to validate this approach are needed. Acute treatment intervention that is based on scientific evidence, clinical experience, and patients' needs and desires will provide better outcomes than those presently obtained. Preliminary evidence favors early intervention with oral triptans, and randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, ideally employing a crossover design, are required to confirm this. The US Consortium's evidence-based guidelines, the National Headache Foundation's standards of care, and the Canadian guidelines have applied the standards of scientific inquiry to the field of headache management and "translation" of these guidelines into practical instruments for clinicians through vehicles such as the Primary Care Network's Patient-Centered Strategies for Effective Management of Migraine should raise the general standard of care for patients with migraine. Last, but far from least, initiatives undertaken by the World Health Organization (WHO) will add credibility to the many layfolk and professionals who have struggled to present headache as a disabling disorder worthy of scientific investigation and aggressive medical management. The WHO states: "These common complaints impose a significant health burden ... Despite this, both the public and the majority of healthcare professionals tend to perceive headache as a minor or trivial complaint. As a result, the physical, emotional, social and economic burdens of headache are poorly acknowledged in comparison with those of other, less prevalent, neurologic disorders." Migraine is finally out of the closet.

Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) in acute migraine treatment: a meta-analysis of 53 trials

BACKGROUND

The triptans, selective serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists, are very effective acute migraine drugs with a well- developed scientific rationale. Seven different triptans will soon be clinically available, making evidence-based selection guidelines necessary. Triptan trials have similar designs, facilitating meta-analysis; this will provide a foundation for using triptans in clinical practice.

METHOD

We asked pharmaceutical companies and the principal investigators of company-independent trials for raw patient data of all double-blind, randomised, controlled, clinical trials of oral triptans in migraine. We calculated summary estimates across studies for important efficacy and tolerability parameters, and separately summarised direct comparator trials.

RESULTS

53 clinical trials (12 unpublished) involving 24089 patients, met the criteria for inclusion. Mean results for 100 mg sumatriptan were 59% (95% CI 57-60) for 2 h headache response (improvement from moderate or severe to mild or no pain); 29% (27-30) for 2 h pain free (improvement to no pain); 20% (18-21) for sustained pain free (pain free by 2 h and no headache recurrence or use of rescue medication 2-24 h post dose); and 67% (63-70) for consistency (response in at least two of three treated attacks); placebo-subtracted proportions for patients with at least one adverse event (AE) were 13% (8-18), for at least one central nervous system AE 6% (3-9), and for at least one chest AE 1.9% (1.0-2.7). Compared with these data, 10 mg rizatriptan showed better efficacy and consistency, and similar tolerability; 80 mg eletriptan showed better efficacy, similar consistency, but lower tolerability; 12.5 mg almotriptan showed similar efficacy at 2 h but better other results; 2.5 mg naratriptan and 20 mg eletriptan showed lower efficacy and (the first two) better tolerability; 2.5 mg and 5 mg zolmitriptan, 40 mg eletriptan, and 5 mg rizatriptan showed very similar results. The results of the 22 trials that directly compared triptans show the same overall pattern. We received no data on frovatriptan, but publicly available data suggest lower efficacy.

INTERPRETATION

At marketed doses, all oral triptans were effective and well tolerated. 10 mg rizatriptan, 80 mg eletriptan, and 12.5 mg almotriptan provide the highest likelihood of consistent success.

Intraoral chilling versus oral sumatriptan for acute migraine

Migraine pathophysiology is associated with a dural inflammation. Recent evidence suggests that the primary inflammation occurs in a maxillary nerve segment, accessible intraorally. Local tenderness, related to symptom laterality, has been palpated consistently in asymptomatic migraine patients, and significant migraine relief has been obtained from chilling confined to this area. Thirty-five symptomatic episodic migraine patients were enrolled in this study, comparing 40 minutes of bilateral intraoral chilling, 50 mg of oral sumatriptan, and 40 minutes of sham (tongue) chilling. Hollow metal tubes chilled by circulating ice water were held in the maxillary molar periapical areas by the patient. Pain and nausea were recorded at baseline and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours after start of treatment, using a numeric symptom-relief scale. Significant mean headache relief was obtained by maxillary chilling and sumatriptan at all four time intervals, with poor relief obtained by placebo. Maxillary chilling was more effective than sumatriptan at all four time intervals. Significant nausea relief was obtained by maxillary chilling and sumatriptan at posttreatment and 2 and 4 hours later. At 24 hours, some headache and nausea recurrence was noted with sumatriptan. The repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated that both treatments, drug (P = 0.024) and maxillary chilling (P = 0.001), reduced the headache, as compared with the control group. Tenderness suggests local inflammation associated with vasodilatation and edema. Because chilling can resolve local edema, these findings raise the possibility that an intraoral inflammation may be a factor in migraine etiology.

Advances in pharmacological treatment of migraine

Migraine is a paroxysmal disorder with attacks of headache, nausea, vomiting, photo- and phonophobia and malaise. This review summarises new treatment options both for the therapy of the acute attack as well as for migraine prophylaxis. Analgesics like aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in treating migraine attacks. Few controlled trials were performed for the use of ergotamine or dihydroergotamine. These trials indicate inferior efficacy compared with serotonin (5-HT(1B/D)) agonists (triptans). The triptans (almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan), are highly effective. They improve headache as well as nausea, photo- and phonophobia. The different triptans show only minor differences in efficacy, headache recurrence and adverse effects. The knowledge of their different pharmacological profile allows a more specific treatment of the individual migraine characteristics. Migraine prophylaxis is recommended, when more than three attacks occur per month, if attacks do not respond to acute treatment or if side effects of acute treatment are severe. Substances with proven efficacy include the beta-blockers metoprolol and propranolol, the calcium channel blocker flunarizine, several 5-HT antagonists and amitriptyline. Recently anti-epileptic drugs (valproic acid, gabapentin, topiramate) were evaluated for the prophylaxis of migraine. The use of botulinum toxin is under investigation.

Vascular effects of the new anti-migraine agent almotriptan on human cranial and peripheral arteries

This paper describes the vascular effects of almotriptan in comparison with sumatriptan in human vessels and tissues in vitro. The contractile properties of almotriptan and sumatriptan were evaluated in vitro in the following arteries: meningeal, temporal, basilar, internal carotid, ophthalmic, pulmonary and coronary. In addition, the effects of almotriptan on the pulmonary vein and on bronchial tissues were studied. Almotriptan showed selectivity of action for migraine-related arteries (i.e. contractile EC(50) of 30 and 700 nm for meningeal and temporal arteries, respectively), whereas the effect on arteries supplying blood to the brain was lower. The contractile effect of almotriptan was lower than that of sumatriptan in pulmonary arteries, whereas in bronchial preparations no clinically relevant contractile responses were observed for either almotriptan or sumatriptan. In ophthalmic arteries the contractile effects of almotriptan and sumatriptan were similar, whereas lower contractile effects were obtained with almotriptan than with sumatriptan in coronary arteries.

Reduction in the intensity of abortive migraine drug use during coumarin therapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of coumarin therapy on migraine attack frequency.

BACKGROUND

Sporadic case reports and clinical studies have described beneficial effects of coumarin therapy on migraine severity.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective follow-up study based on a prescription database covering a population of 450 000 was conducted. All patients using an abortive migraine drug (ergotamine or sumatriptan) and subsequently treated with either coumarin (index group) or low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (control group) were analyzed. The impact of coumarin and low-dose acetylsalicylic acid on the frequency of migraine attacks was assessed by measuring the intensity of ergotamine and sumatriptan use, in defined daily doses per month per patient, before and during coumarin or acetylsalicylic acid treatment. In addition, a "therapeutic intensity reduction" was determined for each patient.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 92 patients; 35% had been prescribed coumarin and 65% had been prescribed low-dose acetylsalicylic acid after the initiation of ergotamine or sumatriptan. Two thirds of the study population was treated with ergotamine. Overall, ergotamine and sumatriptan use for the coumarin cohort decreased from 6.4 defined daily doses per month prior to coumarin treatment to 3.0 defined daily doses during coumarin treatment, compared with a reduction from 5.2 defined daily doses per month to 4.4 defined daily doses per month for the low-dose acetylsalicylic acid cohort (P>.05). The therapeutic intensity of ergotamine and sumatriptan use was significantly decreased by 40% for the coumarin cohort, compared with 4.7% for the low-dose acetylsalicylic acid cohort (P=.004).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that coumarin treatment was clearly associated with a reduction in the therapeutic intensity of abortive migraine drug use in comparison with low-dose aspirin treatment. This suggests that, overall, the coumarin cohort had experienced a substantial reduction in the frequency of migraine attacks during anticoagulation treatment. Our findings, as well as those of others, justify a controlled clinical trial to further establish the effects of coumarin therapy on migraine severity and its possible role in the prophylactic management of patients suffering from migraine.

Dihydroergotamine: discrepancy between arterial, arteriolar and pharmacokinetic data

AIMS

To investigate the peripheral vascular effects and pharmacokinetics of dihydroergotamine (DHE) 0.5 mg after a single subcutaneous administration in humans.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study was performed in 10 healthy male subjects. A wash-out period of 2 weeks separated the two study periods. During each period, just before and at regular intervals after drug administration, vascular measurements were performed and venous blood samples were drawn. Vessel wall properties were assessed at the brachial artery, by ultrasound and applanation tonometry. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded with an oscillometric device. Forearm blood flow was measured with venous occlusion plethysmography. For all parameter-time curves the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Differences in AUC after placebo and DHE (DeltaAUC) were analysed and the time-course of the difference assessed. DHE pharmacokinetics were analysed according to a two-compartment open model with an absorption phase.

RESULTS

AUC for blood pressure, heart rate and forearm vascular resistance did not change after DHE. Brachial artery diameter and compliance decreased (P < 0.01); DeltaAUC (95% confidence interval) equalled -8.81 mm h (-12.97/-4.65) and -0.98 mm2 kPa(-1) h (-1.61/-0.34), respectively. Diameter decreased (P < 0.05) from 1 until 24 h after DHE (peak decrease 9.7% at 10 h); compliance from 2 until 32 h (24.8% at 2 h). Time to reach maximum plasma concentration of DHE averaged 0.33 +/- 0.08 h (+/- s.e.mean); terminal half-life was 5.63 +/- 1.15 h.

CONCLUSIONS

DHE decreased diameter and compliance of the brachial artery whereas forearm vascular resistance remained unchanged. Thus, DHE acts on conduit arteries without affecting resistance arteries. Furthermore, a discrepancy was demonstrated between the plasma concentrations of DHE which rapidly reach peak levels and quickly decline, and its long lasting vasoconstrictor activity.

The lack of vasoconstrictor effect of the pineal hormone melatonin in an animal model predictive of antimigraine activity

The pineal hormone, melatonin, has been implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine and several studies have demonstrated its vasoconstrictor properties. In the present study, systemic and carotid haemodynamic effects of melatonin, administered directly into the carotid artery, were investigated in anaesthetized pigs. Ten-minute intracarotid infusions of melatonin (1, 10 and 100 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) produced slight decreases in blood pressure and total carotid and arteriovenous anastomotic blood flows, but nutrient blood flow was not affected. The decrease in carotid blood flow was entirely caused by the hypotension, since no changes in vascular conductance values were observed. It is concluded that melatonin itself is not capable of producing vasoconstriction in the cranial circulation of anaesthetized pigs. Thus, it appears that melatonin has no anti-migraine potential via a vasoconstrictor mechanism.

Safety and rational use of the triptans

The safety of the triptans has been established, with more than 8 million patients treating greater than 340 million attacks with sumatriptan alone. All triptans narrow coronary arteries by 10% to 20% at clinical doses and should not be administered to patients with coronary or cerebrovascular disease. Some triptans have the potential for significant drug-drug interactions (sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zomitriptan and monoamine oxidase inhibitors; rizatriptan and propanolol; zolmitriptan and cimetidine; and eletriptan and CYP3A4 metabolized medications and p-glycoprotein pump inhibitors). Rational use of triptans should be governed by the use of these medications for patients with disability associated with migraine. Patients with greater than 10 days of at least 50% disability during 3 months have benefited from treating with triptans as their first-line treatment for acute attacks. When the decision has been made to treat with a triptan, the patient should be instructed to treat early in the attack, when the pain is at a mild phase. This approach increases the likelihood of achieving a pain-free response, with fewer adverse events and lower likelihood of the headache recurring.

Oral almotriptan in the treatment of migraine: safety and tolerability

OBJECTIVE

To summarize safety and tolerability data on orally administered almotriptan from premarketing clinical trials.

BACKGROUND

Almotriptan is a new 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist similar to sumatriptan in mode of action and therapeutic efficacy. In addition, the safety and tolerability profile of almotriptan has been demonstrated in a number of controlled clinical trials. Sumatriptan is generally safe and well tolerated; however, in controlled clinical trials, it has been associated with chest symptoms (pressure, warmth, and other unpleasant sensations) with an incidence of 3% to 5%.

DESIGN

Three phase 1 dose-finding and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy men and women volunteers were reviewed to assess the safety and tolerability of oral almotriptan at single doses ranging from 2 to 200 mg. The objective of one study was to evaluate cardiovascular safety. Two phase 2 trials assessed the safety and tolerability of single doses of 2 to 150 mg in migraine (n=911). Two phase 3 trials assessed the safety and tolerability of a single 12.5-mg oral dose after three attacks (n=910) and repeated doses of 12.5 mg for multiple attacks over the long term (n=747). All studies were conducted in Europe. Data from the United States is currently being analyzed and will be published at a later date.

RESULTS

In phase 2 and 3 trials comprising more than 2500 patients with migraine and 15 000 attacks, adverse events were infrequent and mild. The most common events-dizziness, nausea and vomiting, headache, fatigue, paresthesia, and drowsiness-were reported in fewer than 3% of patients. At the recommended therapeutic dose of 12.5 mg, the adverse events profile was not statistically different from placebo. The incidence of chest symptoms was 0.2% in the phase 3 trials. The long-term safety and tolerability profile after treatment of more than 10 000 attacks was similar to that following the single-dose studies. In all clinical trials, almotriptan demonstrated a very favorable adverse event profile, particularly with respect to nonischemic-related chest symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Almotriptan was safe and well tolerated in nearly all adult patients with migraine, with and without aura, enrolled in these studies. The incidence of chest symptoms in preclinical studies was substantially lower than that reported for sumatriptan in premarketing studies, indicating that almotriptan may be better tolerated than sumatriptan at clinically anticipated doses. However, any potential difference in cardiovascular safety between almotriptan and sumatriptan cannot be determined or inferred from this data. Cardiovascular risk profiles for all drugs within this class (triptans) should be considered similar. Only extensive postmarketing data, not currently available, can potentially change this recommendation.

Efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan 10 mg in migraine: experience with 70 527 patient episodes

As patients who suffer from migraine need long-term treatment, the safety and consistent efficacy of such therapy is very important. Concurrent illness and additional medication can interfere with the treatment chosen for the attacks of migraine. The objective of this open-label study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan, in the treatment of up to three attacks of migraine, in the clinical setting. From October 1998 to July 1999, 6 174 doctors enrolled 33 147 patients into the study (26 644 women, 650 men). The mean age was 42.7 years. We were able to examine standardized migraine diaries relating to 25 501 patients and 70 537 migrainous episodes. Rizatriptan scored consistently high on efficacy and showed a consistently rapid onset. There was no evidence of tolerance to repeated use. An effect was reported within 1 hour of ingestion in 79% of attacks treated. In 27.8% of attacks, remission of headache was complete at 1 hour. Two hours after ingestion, 74% of attacks had subsided completely. Repeated administration of rizatriptan was well tolerated, and few adverse effects were seen. The most common unwanted effects were dizziness, weakness, fatigue, and nausea. No cardiovascular disturbance was seen. In the clinical setting, rizatriptan, 10 mg, is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of migraine attacks. Particularly noteworthy is the rapid onset of effect, with swift disappearance of headache. Rizatriptan has a favorable side effect profile, and, provided contraindications are observed, severe adverse cardiovascular complications are extremely unlikely.

Menstrual Migraine

Slightly less than half of women with migraine report that menstruation is an important trigger of headache episodes. However, it is rare that menstruation is the only trigger for a patient and its importance as a trigger may be over- emphasized. Accurate diagnosis requires a prospectively kept diary of information showing a consistent and mechanistically valid temporal correlation between migraine attacks and menstrual periods. Abnormal central nervous system response to normal fluctuations in hormones is the likely underlying cause of menstrual migraine. Patients with menstrual migraine do not generally have hormonal abnormalities. Currently available abortive therapy works well for menstrual-related migraine attacks. For the small subset of women for whom this is not the case, and whose menstrual periods and associated headaches are predictable, pre-emptive treatment of the expected headache with scheduled perimenstrual use of a number of agents can be helpful. A hormonal trigger for migraine headache does not mean that treatment must also be hormonal in nature. Choice of therapy depends on the frequency of menstrual migraine, predictability of menstrual periods, patient preference, and cost. For the small group of women with refractory menstrual migraine, hormonal therapy can be tried, with the understanding that the quality of evidence for these interventions is low and their risk to benefit ratios not established. The perimenstrual use of triptan medications is currently being investigated for the treatment of menstrual migraine. Preliminary results are inconclusive, and until further evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, practicality, and cost effectiveness of this approach is available, their routine use in this manner for menstrual migraine is not recommended.

Imidazoline-modified benzylimidazolines as h5-HT(1D/1B) serotonergic ligands

Sumatriptan, a h5-HT1D and h5-HT1B receptor agonist used clinically as a migraine-abortive, produces certain side effects thought to result from its affinity for h5-HT1B receptors. The present investigation extends our work with benzylimidazolines as novel non-tryptamine h5-HT(1D/1B) ligands. The effect of N-methylation, N-benzylation, ring-aromatization, and variation of the imidazoline ring on affinity both at h5-HT1D and h5-HT1B receptors was examined. Several compounds were identified with good affinity and enhanced (i.e., > 100-fold) h5-HT1D versus hS-HT1B selectivity.

Alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes mediating vasoconstriction in the carotid circulation of anaesthetized pigs: possible avenues for antimigraine drug development

It has recently been shown that the alpha-adrenoceptors mediating vasoconstriction of porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses resemble both alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptors, but no attempt was made to identify the specific subtypes (alpha1A, alpha1B and alpha1D) involved. Therefore, the present study was designed to elucidate the specific subtype(s) of alpha1-adrenoceptors involved in the above response, using the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine and alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists 5-methylurapidil (alpha1A), L-765 314 (alpha1B) and BMY 7378 (alpha1D). Ten-minute intracarotid infusions of phenylephrine (1, 3 and 10 microgkg-1.min-1) induced a dose-dependent decrease in total carotid and arteriovenous anastomotic conductance, accompanied by a small tachycardia. These carotid vascular effects were abolished by L-765 314 (1000 microgkg-1; i.v.), while these responses were only attenuated by 5-methylurapidil (1000 microgkg-1; i.v.), and BMY 7378 (1000 microgkg-1; i.v.). Furthermore, intravenous bolus injections of phenylephrine (3 and 10 microgkg-1) produced a dose-dependent vasopressor response, which was only affected by 1000 microgkg-1 of 5-methylurapidil, while the other antagonists were ineffective. These results, coupled to the binding affinities of the above antagonists at the different alpha1-adrenoceptors, suggest that both alpha1A- and alpha1B-adrenoceptors mediate constriction of carotid arteriovenous anastomoses in anaesthetized pigs. In view of the less ubiquitous nature of alpha1B- compared to alpha1A-adrenoceptors, the development of potent and selective alpha1B-adrenoceptor agonists may prove to be important for the treatment of migraine.

Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of almotriptan in healthy volunteers

We studied the possible cardiovascular effects of single oral doses of 12.5, 25, and 50 mg of almotriptan, a new triptan for treatment of migraine, in a randomized, double-blind, four-way crossover, placebo-controlled study in 24 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 35 years. Doses were given at 1-week intervals. Cardiovascular effects were assessed by frequent recording of blood pressure and heart rate, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (recorded at 25 mm/s paper speed and 1 cm/mV and at 50 mm/s and 2 cm/mV), and continuous ECG monitoring for 12 h after each dose. ECG variables, PR, QRS, QT interval, and QT dispersion, were measured. QT intervals were adjusted for heart rate using Bazett's formula. None of the doses of almotriptan differed significantly from placebo with respect to PR, QRS, or QTc intervals, QTc dispersion, heart rate, or continuous ECG monitoring. Almotriptan 12.5 mg did not differ significantly from placebo with respect to systolic or diastolic blood pressure, but almotriptan 25 and 50 mg raised systolic blood pressure by a mean of 2.78 and 4.17 mm Hg, and diastolic blood pressure by 3.77 and 6.11 mm Hg, respectively, during 0 to 4 h after dosing. Thus none of the doses of almotriptan affected the ECG, and the 12.5-mg dose (the expected therapeutic dose) had no hemodynamic effects. Almotriptan in doses of 25 and 50 mg caused a small, dose-related increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as seen with other triptans.

Comparative effects of frovatriptan and sumatriptan on coronary and internal carotid vascular haemodynamics in conscious dogs

The effects of frovatriptan and sumatriptan on internal carotid and coronary vascular haemodynamics were investigated and compared in conscious dogs. Frovatriptan and sumatriptan (0.1 - 100 microg kg(-1)) induced a transient increase in external coronary artery diameter (eCOD) of up to 2.9+/-1.2 and 1.8+/-0.6%, respectively (both P:<0.05). This was followed by a prolonged and dose-dependent decrease in eCOD of up to -5.2+/-1.2 and -5.3+/-0.9% (both P:<0.05), with ED(50) values of 86+/-21 and 489+/-113 micromol kg(-1), respectively. In contrast, only a decrease in the external diameter of the internal carotid artery was observed (-6.0+/-0.6 and -6.2+/-1.4%, both P:<0.05, and ED(50) values of 86+/-41 and 493+/-162 micromol kg(-1), respectively). Frovatriptan was thus 5.7 fold more potent than sumatriptan at the level of both large coronary and internal carotid arteries. After endothelium removal by balloon angioplasty in coronary arteries, the initial dilatation induced by the triptans was abolished and delayed constriction enhanced. The selective antagonist for the 5-HT(1B) receptors SB224289 dose-dependently blocked the effects of sumatriptan on large coronary and internal carotid arteries whereas the selective antagonist for the 5-HT(1D) receptors BRL15572 did not affect any of these effects. In conclusion, frovatriptan and sumatriptan initially dilate and subsequently constrict large coronary arteries in the conscious dog, whereas they directly constrict the internal carotid artery. The vascular endothelium modulates the effects of these triptans on large coronary arteries. Finally, 5-HT(1B) but not 5-HT(1D) receptors are primarily involved in canine coronary and internal carotid vasomotor responses to sumatriptan.

4991W93 inhibits release of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the cat but only at doses with 5HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist activity?

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a marker for trigeminovascular activation and is released during the headache phase of migraine and cluster headache. CGRP may have a role in migraine through its potent cranial vasodilator effects, or by an action on trigeminal nerve activity, both of which are targeted by 5HT(1B/1D) agonist drugs. CP122,288, a conformationally restricted analogue of sumatriptan that is a potent inhibitor of neurogenic plasma protein extravasation (PPE), was ineffective at inhibiting CGRP release at a single low dose; and is also ineffective as an acute anti-migraine compound. However, it remained unclear as to whether, as a class, the conformationally-restricted triptan analogues could have inhibitory effects on CGRP in higher doses. 4991W93, a conformationally restricted analogue of zolmitriptan, is also a potent inhibitor of PPE at doses without 5HT(1B/1D)-mediated effects, that was developed as an anti-migraine drug, and thus was suitable to test whether higher doses of such conformationally restricted triptan analogues could inhibit trigeminal-evoked CGRP release. The superior sagittal sinus (SSS) was stimulated in 14 anaesthetised cats and external jugular vein blood samples were analysed by radioimmunoassay for CGRP levels before, 1 min after SSS stimulation, and 1 min after SSS stimulation in the presence of 4991W93. Stimulation of the SSS resulted in release of CGRP from the external jugular vein. 4991W93 at a dose of 0.1 and 10 microg/kg, selected for maximal PPE blocking effects in rodents, was ineffective at inhibiting CGRP release, with an SSS stimulation level of 78+/-4 pmol/l compared to a post-4991W93 level of 79+/-3 pmol/l (n=4). In comparison CGRP release was inhibited after a dose of 100 microg/kg 4991W93 from 64+/-6 to 36+/-3 pmol/l (n=5). Given that 4991W93 is inactive clinically at non-vascular doses, it seems clear that the 5HT(1B/1D) agonist effects of the compound are necessary for blockade of CGRP release and thus any anti-migraine action. Taken with the clinical results, these data emphasise the importance of CGRP release in migraine, and suggest that other non-5HT-based pharmacological targets may account for PPE blockade in animal studies.

Gastric motor effects of triptans: open questions and future perspectives

Sumatriptan is a 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist of documented efficacy in relieving migraine and associated symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. In the past decade, several studies reported an important delay of gastric emptying induced by sumatriptan in healthy humans. The impact of this gastric motor effect of sumatriptan in migraineurs is difficult to predict: a further delay in gastric emptying could be detrimental (i.e. increased nausea and epigastric symptoms) in patients already having delayed gastric emptying. However, in patients with functional dyspepsia, sumatriptan is also reported to improve gastric accommodation to a meal and reduce perception of gastric distention, hence relieving epigastric symptoms. Thus, reduced visceral perception could be a mechanism involved in reducing nausea during a migraine attack. Paradoxically, sumatriptan is reported both to relieve the nausea of a migraine attack and to have nausea as a side effect. Although careful analysis of the time of onset of nausea may offer a clue as to the origin of this symptom, available data do not support definite conclusions, all the more so because the gastric motor effect of second-generation triptans are still unexplored. Taken together, the available evidence warrants further studies to clarify the following issues: first, the mechanism responsible for the gastric motor effect of sumatriptan [receptor subtype(s) involved; central vs peripheral mechanism]; secondly, the effects on gastric motility/visceral sensitivity of second-generation triptans (which are 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists) and more recent selective 5-HT1D receptor agonists (proposed as investigational antimigraine agents with less potential to induce coronary vasoconstriction through 5-HT1B receptors); finally, the possible use of drugs improving gastric accommodation to a meal in the management of those dyspeptic patients with impaired fundic relaxation/altered visceral sensitivity.

Acute treatment of migraine and the role of triptans

The use of triptans has improved the ability to treat migraine successfully compared with older treatments. Speed of relief, consistency of effect, and good tolerability have been the hallmarks of these agents. All of the currently available triptans have comparable efficacy and tolerability. Variables between the agents may lead to one agent or dose form being preferred over another in various clinical scenarios. The triptans that are forthcoming may improve on these options through enhanced efficacy rates, tolerability, and headache recurrence rates. There exist increasing options for migraine treatment that may further improve the clinical effects of the older and newer triptans through early treatment of migraine at the stages of mild migraine pain, or even during the prodromal phase of the attack. Additionally, recent work suggests that mini-prophylaxis of migraine at the menses is a highly successful treatment option with the triptans. In this age of managed care, providing cost-effective treatment of headache will take on increasing importance. Techniques such as stratification of acute treatments may enhance cost-effective care, whereas ready availability of the triptans may lead to significant improvements in utilization of parameters such as office visits, emergency room treatment, and even hospitalization.

A systematic review of the use of triptans in acute migraine

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken, to consolidate evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of triptans currently available in Canada (sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, zolmitriptan), and to provide guidelines for selection of a triptan.

METHODS

Data from published, randomized, placebo-controlled trials were pooled and a combined number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) was generated for each triptan. Direct comparative trials of triptans were also examined.

RESULTS

The lowest NNT for headache response/pain-free at one/two hours is observed with subcutaneous sumatriptan. Among the oral formulations, the lowest NNT is observed with rizatriptan and the highest NNT with naratriptan. The lowest NNH is observed with subcutaneous sumatriptan.

CONCLUSIONS

Triptans are relatively safe and effective medications for acute migraine attacks. However, differences among them are relatively small. Considerations in selecting a triptan include individual patient response/tolerance, characteristics of the attacks, relief of associated symptoms, consistency of response, headache recurrence, delivery systems and patient preference.

Sumatriptan elicits both constriction and dilation in human and bovine brain intracortical arterioles

1. Little is known about serotonin (5-HT) receptors present on brain microvessels that are innervated by brainstem serotonergic neurons. Using 5-HT, sumatriptan and subtype selective 5-HT(1) receptor agonists and/or the 5-HT(1) receptor antagonist GR127935, we characterized the 5-HT receptors involved in regulating microvascular tone of pressurized intracortical arterioles (approximately 40--50 microm) isolated from human and bovine cerebral cortex. The role of nitric oxide (NO) on these responses was assessed with the N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 10(-5) M), an inhibitor of NO synthesis. Bovine pial arteries were studied for comparative purposes. 2. At spontaneous tone, 5-HT induced a dose-dependent constriction of human and bovine microarteries (respective pD(2) values of 7.3+/-0.2 and 6.9+/-0.1); a response potently inhibited by GR127935 (pIC(50) value of 8.5+/-0.1) in bovine microvessels. 3. In both species, the 5-HT(1) receptor agonist sumatriptan induced a biphasic response consisting of a small but significant dilation at low concentrations (1 and/or 10 nM) followed by a constriction at higher doses (pD(2) for contraction of 6.9+/-0.1 and 6.6+/-0.2 in human and bovine vessels, respectively). Pre-incubation with L-NNA abolished the sumatriptan-induced dilation and significantly shifted the dose-response of the constriction curve to the left. In contrast, the selective 5-HT(1D) (PNU-109291) and 5-HT(1F) (LY344864) receptor agonists were devoid of any vasomotor effect. 4. In bovine pial vessels, 5-HT and sumatriptan elicited potent constrictions (respective pD(2) of 7.2+/-0.1 and 6.6+/-0.1), a weak dilation being occasionally observed at low sumatriptan concentrations. 5. A significant negative correlation was observed between pial and intracortical vessels diameter and the extent of the dilatory response to 10(-9) M sumatriptan. Together, these results indicate that sumatriptan, most likely via activation of distinctly localized microvascular 5-HT(1B) receptors, can induce a constriction and/or a dilation which is sensitive to inhibition of NO synthesis and dependent on the size and, possibly, the existing tone of the vessels.

Diverse signalling by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptors

Fourteen different receptor subtypes might be regarded as a diversity that is sufficient to accommodate the wide-ranging physiological roles of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). However, it is becoming clear that, for 5-HT as for other neurotransmitters, the concept of a receptor as a gatekeeper for a specific cellular process or event is too restrictive. Multiple receptor-mediated biochemical cascades can be activated in cells in response to an agonist by a number of mechanisms. Whereas it is well established that different agonists do not necessarily elicit the same magnitude of response, they probably also select between various possible signal transduction pathways. Receptor signalling may be diverse via a single receptor subtype as a consequence of specific agonist-receptor-G protein interactions. 5-HT receptors are even more heterogeneous when one considers that the amino acid sequence of these receptor subtypes may vary from individual to individual, and that there is an increasing number of receptor isoforms due to alternative splicing and RNA editing of 5-HT receptor transcripts. Activation, in particular constitutive, agonist-independent activation, of some of these receptor isoforms has been reported to be altered. This implies that ligands with similar binding affinities may display different pharmacological properties (partial agonist, antagonist, or inverse agonist) versus these receptor isoforms, depending on their activation state. Therefore, intervention with receptor ligands to modify hampered neurotransmission pathways is a difficult task, and one needs to consider the growing evidence of diversity in G protein-coupled receptor signalling.

The pharmacology of headache

Headache is a common problem which besets most of us at some time or the other. The pharmacology of headache is complex in an overall sense but can be understood in terms of the anatomy and physiology of the pain-producing structures. Migraine can be used as a template to understand the activation of nociceptive systems in the head and thus their neurotransmitter mediation and modulation. In recent years, the role of serotonin (5-HT) in headache pharmacology has been unravelled in the context of both understanding its role in the nociceptive systems related to headache and by exploiting its 5-HT1 receptor subtypes in headache therapeutics. The pharmacology of the head pain systems, as they are known and as they might evolve, are explored in the context of both, the anatomy and physiology of trigeminovascular nociception and in the context of clinical questions, such as those of efficacy, headache recurrence and adverse events.