151
|
Goldstone RL, Theiner G. The multiple, interacting levels of cognitive systems (MILCS) perspective on group cognition. PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2017.1295635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Georg Theiner
- Department of Philosophy, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
van Ravenzwaaij D, Donkin C, Vandekerckhove J. The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects. Psychon Bull Rev 2017; 24:547-556. [PMID: 27352898 PMCID: PMC5389995 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1081-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Over the last four decades, sequential accumulation models for choice response times have spread through cognitive psychology like wildfire. The most popular style of accumulator model is the diffusion model (Ratcliff Psychological Review, 85, 59-108, 1978), which has been shown to account for data from a wide range of paradigms, including perceptual discrimination, letter identification, lexical decision, recognition memory, and signal detection. Since its original inception, the model has become increasingly complex in order to account for subtle, but reliable, data patterns. The additional complexity of the diffusion model renders it a tool that is only for experts. In response, Wagenmakers et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 3-22, 2007) proposed that researchers could use a more basic version of the diffusion model, the EZ diffusion. Here, we simulate experimental effects on data generated from the full diffusion model and compare the power of the full diffusion model and EZ diffusion to detect those effects. We show that the EZ diffusion model, by virtue of its relative simplicity, will be sometimes better able to detect experimental effects than the data-generating full diffusion model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Don van Ravenzwaaij
- University of Groningen, Department of Psychology, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Heymans Building, room 169, 9712, TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Chris Donkin
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
153
|
Tosoni A, Committeri G, Calluso C, Galati G. The effect of reward expectation on the time course of perceptual decisions. Eur J Neurosci 2017; 45:1152-1164. [DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Revised: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa Tosoni
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences; G. D'Annunzio University; Via dei Vestini 33 66013 Chieti Italy
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies; G. D'Annunzio Foundation; Chieti Italy
| | - Giorgia Committeri
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences; G. D'Annunzio University; Via dei Vestini 33 66013 Chieti Italy
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies; G. D'Annunzio Foundation; Chieti Italy
| | - Cinzia Calluso
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences; G. D'Annunzio University; Via dei Vestini 33 66013 Chieti Italy
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies; G. D'Annunzio Foundation; Chieti Italy
| | - Gaspare Galati
- Department of Psychology; Sapienza University of Rome; Rome Italy
- Laboratory of Neuropsychology; Santa Lucia Foundation; Rome Italy
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Vestibular cognition: the effect of prior belief on vestibular perceptual decision making. J Neurol 2017; 264:74-80. [PMID: 28361254 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-017-8471-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Vestibular cognition is a growing field of interest and relatively little is known about the underlying mechanisms. We tested the effect of prior beliefs about the relative probability (50:50 vs. 80:20) of motion direction (yaw rotation) using a direction discrimination task. We analyzed choices individually with a logistic regression model and together with response times using a cognitive process model. The results show that self-motion perception is altered by prior belief, leading to a shift of the psychometric function, without a loss of sensitivity. Hierarchical drift diffusion analysis showed that at the group level, prior belief manifests itself as an offset to the drift criterion. However, individual model fits revealed that participants vary in how they use cognitive information in perceptual decision making. At the individual level, the response bias induced by a prior belief resulted either in a change in starting point (prior to evidence accumulation) or drift rate (during evidence accumulation). Participants incorporate prior belief in a self-motion discrimination task, albeit in different ways.
Collapse
|
155
|
de Lange FP, Fritsche M. Perceptual Decision-Making: Picking the Low-Hanging Fruit? Trends Cogn Sci 2017; 21:306-307. [PMID: 28343760 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
How do we decide what we perceive? Obviously, we base our decisions on sensory evidence. However, a new and surprising study by Hagura et al. shows that our perceptual decisions are also biased by the action costs that are associated with our decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris P de Lange
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthias Fritsche
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED This paper reviews some of the evidence that bears on the existence of a mental high-speed serial exhaustive scanning process (SES) used by humans to interrogate the active memory of a set of items to determine whether it contains a test item. First proposed in the 1960s, based on patterns of reaction times (RTs), numerous later studies supported, elaborated, extended, and limited the generality of SES, while critics claimed that SES never occurred, that predictions from SES were violated, and that other mechanisms produced the RT patterns that led to the idea. I show that some of these claims result from ignoring variations in experimental procedure that produce superficially similar but quantitatively different RT patterns and that, for the original procedures, the most frequently repeated claims that predictions are violated are false. I also discuss evidence against the generality of competing theories of active-memory interrogation, especially those that depend on discrimination of directly accessible "memory-strength". Some of this evidence has been available since the 1960s but has been ignored by some proponents of alternative theories. Other evidence presented herein is derived from results of one relevant experiment described for the first time, results of another described in more detail than heretofore, and new analyses of old data. Knowledge of brain function acquired during the past half century has increased the plausibility of SES. THE CONCLUSION SES is alive and well, but many associated puzzles merit further investigation, suggestions for which are offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saul Sternberg
- a Department of Psychology , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
White CN, Liebman E, Stone P. Decision mechanisms underlying mood-congruent emotional classification. Cogn Emot 2017; 32:249-258. [PMID: 28271732 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1296820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
There is great interest in understanding whether and how mood influences affective processing. Results in the literature have been mixed: some studies show mood-congruent processing but others do not. One limitation of previous work is that decision components for affective processing and responses biases are not dissociated. The present study explored the roles of affective processing and response biases using a drift-diffusion model (DDM) of simple choice. In two experiments, participants decided if words were emotionally positive or negative while listening to music that induced positive or negative mood. The behavioural results showed weak, inconsistent mood-congruency effects. In contrast, the DDM showed consistent effects that were selectively driven by an a-priori bias in response expectation, suggesting that music-induced mood influences expectations about the emotionality of upcoming stimuli, but not the emotionality of the stimuli themselves. Implications for future studies of emotional classification and mood are subsequently discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey N White
- a Department of Psychology , Syracuse University , Syracuse , NY , USA
| | - Elad Liebman
- b Department of Computer Science , University of Texas at Austin , Austin , TX , USA
| | - Peter Stone
- b Department of Computer Science , University of Texas at Austin , Austin , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
|
159
|
Coupled Decision Processes Update and Maintain Saccadic Priors in a Dynamic Environment. J Neurosci 2017; 37:3632-3645. [PMID: 28242793 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3078-16.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Revised: 01/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Much of what we know about how the brain forms decisions comes from studies of saccadic eye movements. However, saccadic decisions are often studied in isolation, which limits the insights that they can provide about real-world decisions with complex interdependencies. Here, we used a serial reaction time (RT) task to show that prior expectations affect RTs via interdependent, normative decision processes that operate within and across saccades. We found that human subjects performing the task generated saccades that were governed by a rise-to-threshold decision process with a starting point that reflected expected state-dependent transition probabilities. These probabilities depended on decisions about the current state (the correct target) that, under some conditions, required the accumulation of information across saccades. Without additional feedback, this information was provided by each saccadic decision threshold, which represented the total evidence in favor of the chosen target. Therefore, the output of the within-saccade process was used, not only to generate the saccade, but also to provide input to the across-saccade process. This across-saccade process, in turn, helped to set the starting point of the next within-saccade process. These results imply a novel role for functional information-processing loops in optimizing saccade generation in dynamic environments.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Saccades are the rapid, ballistic eye movements that we make approximately three times every second to scan the visual scene for interesting things to look at. The apparent ease with which we produce saccades belies their computational sophistication, which can be studied quantitatively in the laboratory to provide insights into how our brain manages the interplay between sensory input and motor output. The present work is important because we show for the first time how this interplay operates both within and across saccades to ensure that these eye movements are guided effectively by learned expectations in dynamic environments. More generally, this study shows how sensory-motor decision processes, typically studied in isolation, interact via functional information-processing loops in the brain to produce complex, adaptive behaviors.
Collapse
|
160
|
Hagura N, Haggard P, Diedrichsen J. Perceptual decisions are biased by the cost to act. eLife 2017; 6. [PMID: 28219479 PMCID: PMC5319835 DOI: 10.7554/elife.18422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Perceptual decisions are classically thought to depend mainly on the stimulus characteristics, probability and associated reward. However, in many cases, the motor response is considered to be a neutral output channel that only reflects the upstream decision. Contrary to this view, we show that perceptual decisions can be recursively influenced by the physical resistance applied to the response. When participants reported the direction of the visual motion by left or right manual reaching movement with different resistances, their reports were biased towards the direction associated with less effortful option. Repeated exposure to such resistance on hand during perceptual judgements also biased subsequent judgements using voice, indicating that effector-dependent motor costs not only biases the report at the stage of motor response, but also changed how the sensory inputs are transformed into decisions. This demonstrates that the cost to act can influence our decisions beyond the context of the specific action. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18422.001 Imagine you are in an orchard, trying to decide which of the many apples to pick. On what do you base your decision? Most research into this type of decision-making has focused on how the brain uses visual information – about features such as colour, size and shape – to make a choice. But what about the effort required to obtain the apple? Does an apple at the top of the tree look more or less tempting than the low-hanging fruit? To answer this kind of question, Hagura et al. asked volunteers to decide whether dots on a screen were moving to the left or to the right. The volunteers indicated their choice by moving one of two levers. If they thought the dots were moving to the right, they moved a lever in their right hand. If they thought the dots were moving to the left, they moved a lever in their left hand. What the volunteers did not know, however, is that one of the levers was slightly heavier and therefore harder to move than the other. Hagura et al. found that the volunteers biased their decisions away from the direction that would require the most effort. If the right-hand lever was heavier, the volunteers decided that dots with ambiguous motion were moving to the left. Those for whom the left-hand lever was heavier felt that the same dots were moving to the right. The participants showed this bias despite failing to notice that the levers had different weights. Moreover, they continued to show the bias even when subsequently asked to simply say their answers rather than use the levers. These results indicate that the effort required to act on a decision can influence the decision itself. The fact that participants were biased even when responding verbally, and despite being unaware that the levers differed in weight, suggests that they were not deliberately choosing the easier option. Instead, the cost to act changed how they perceived the stimuli themselves. The findings also suggest that it might be possible to help people make better decisions by designing environments in which less favourable options require more effort. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18422.002
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhiro Hagura
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Center for Information and Neural Networks (CiNet), National Institute of Communications and Technology, Suita City, Japan
| | - Patrick Haggard
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jörn Diedrichsen
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Abstract
For decades sequential sampling models have successfully accounted for human and monkey decision-making, relying on the standard assumption that decision makers maintain a pre-set decision standard throughout the decision process. Based on the theoretical argument of reward rate maximization, some authors have recently suggested that decision makers become increasingly impatient as time passes and therefore lower their decision standard. Indeed, a number of studies show that computational models with an impatience component provide a good fit to human and monkey decision behavior. However, many of these studies lack quantitative model comparisons and systematic manipulations of rewards. Moreover, the often-cited evidence from single-cell recordings is not unequivocal and complimentary data from human subjects is largely missing. We conclude that, despite some enthusiastic calls for the abandonment of the standard model, the idea of an impatience component has yet to be fully established; we suggest a number of recently developed tools that will help bring the debate to a conclusive settlement.
Collapse
|
162
|
Ellis AW, Mast FW. Toward a Dynamic Probabilistic Model for Vestibular Cognition. Front Psychol 2017; 8:138. [PMID: 28203219 PMCID: PMC5285352 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We suggest that research in vestibular cognition will benefit from the theoretical framework of probabilistic models. This will aid in developing an understanding of how interactions between high-level cognition and low-level sensory processing might occur. Many such interactions have been shown experimentally; however, to date, no attempt has been made to systematically explore vestibular cognition by using computational modeling. It is widely assumed that mental imagery and perception share at least in part neural circuitry, and it has been proposed that mental simulation is closely connected to the brain’s ability to make predictions. We claim that this connection has been disregarded in the vestibular domain, and we suggest ways in which future research may take this into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Ellis
- Department of Psychology, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fred W Mast
- Department of Psychology, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Turner BM, Forstmann BU, Love BC, Palmeri TJ, Van Maanen L. Approaches to Analysis in Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2017; 76:65-79. [PMID: 31745373 PMCID: PMC6863443 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of cognition has been advanced by two traditionally nonoverlapping and non-interacting groups. Mathematical psychologists rely on behavioral data to evaluate formal models of cognition, whereas cognitive neuroscientists rely on statistical models to understand patterns of neural activity, often without any attempt to make a connection to the mechanism supporting the computation. Both approaches suffer from critical limitations as a direct result of their focus on data at one level of analysis (cf. Marr, 1982), and these limitations have inspired researchers to attempt to combine both neural and behavioral measures in a cross-level integrative fashion. The importance of solving this problem has spawned several entirely new theoretical and statistical frameworks developed by both mathematical psychologists and cognitive neuroscientists. However, with each new approach comes a particular set of limitations and benefits. In this article, we survey and characterize several approaches for linking brain and behavioral data. We organize these approaches on the basis of particular cognitive modeling goals: (1) using the neural data to constrain a behavioral model, (2) using the behavioral model to predict neural data, and (3) fitting both neural and behavioral data simultaneously. Within each goal, we highlight a few particularly successful approaches for accomplishing that goal, and discuss some applications. Finally, we provide a conceptual guide to choosing among various analytic approaches in performing model-based cognitive neuroscience.
Collapse
|
164
|
Perceptual Decision Making in Rodents, Monkeys, and Humans. Neuron 2017; 93:15-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Revised: 11/28/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
165
|
Bonaiuto JJ, de Berker A, Bestmann S. Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models. eLife 2016; 5:e20047. [PMID: 28005007 PMCID: PMC5243027 DOI: 10.7554/elife.20047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Animals and humans have a tendency to repeat recent choices, a phenomenon known as choice hysteresis. The mechanism for this choice bias remains unclear. Using an established, biophysically informed model of a competitive attractor network for decision making, we found that decaying tail activity from the previous trial caused choice hysteresis, especially during difficult trials, and accurately predicted human perceptual choices. In the model, choice variability could be directionally altered through amplification or dampening of post-trial activity decay through simulated depolarizing or hyperpolarizing network stimulation. An analogous intervention using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) yielded a close match between model predictions and experimental results: net soma depolarizing currents increased choice hysteresis, while hyperpolarizing currents suppressed it. Residual activity in competitive attractor networks within dlPFC may thus give rise to biases in perceptual choices, which can be directionally controlled through non-invasive brain stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Bonaiuto
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Archy de Berker
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sven Bestmann
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Tremel JJ, Laurent PA, Wolk DA, Wheeler ME, Fiez JA. Neural signatures of experience-based improvements in deterministic decision-making. Behav Brain Res 2016; 315:51-65. [PMID: 27523644 PMCID: PMC5017924 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Feedback about our choices is a crucial part of how we gather information and learn from our environment. It provides key information about decision experiences that can be used to optimize future choices. However, our understanding of the processes through which feedback translates into improved decision-making is lacking. Using neuroimaging (fMRI) and cognitive models of decision-making and learning, we examined the influence of feedback on multiple aspects of decision processes across learning. Subjects learned correct choices to a set of 50 word pairs across eight repetitions of a concurrent discrimination task. Behavioral measures were then analyzed with both a drift-diffusion model and a reinforcement learning model. Parameter values from each were then used as fMRI regressors to identify regions whose activity fluctuates with specific cognitive processes described by the models. The patterns of intersecting neural effects across models support two main inferences about the influence of feedback on decision-making. First, frontal, anterior insular, fusiform, and caudate nucleus regions behave like performance monitors, reflecting errors in performance predictions that signal the need for changes in control over decision-making. Second, temporoparietal, supplementary motor, and putamen regions behave like mnemonic storage sites, reflecting differences in learned item values that inform optimal decision choices. As information about optimal choices is accrued, these neural systems dynamically adjust, likely shifting the burden of decision processing from controlled performance monitoring to bottom-up, stimulus-driven choice selection. Collectively, the results provide a detailed perspective on the fundamental ability to use past experiences to improve future decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David A Wolk
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
167
|
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), few studies have addressed scanner effects on performance. The studies that have examined this question show a wide variety of results. In this article we report analyses of three experiments in which participants performed a perceptual decision-making task both in a traditional setting as well as inside an MRI scanner. The results consistently show that response times increase inside the scanner. Error rates also increase, but to a lesser extent. To reveal the underlying mechanisms that drive the behavioral changes when performing a task inside the MRI scanner, the data were analyzed using the linear ballistic accumulator model of decision-making. These analyses show that, in the scanner, participants exhibit a slow down of the motor component of the response and have less attentional focus on the task. However, the balance between focus and motor slowing depends on the specific task requirements.
Collapse
|
168
|
Murphy PR, Boonstra E, Nieuwenhuis S. Global gain modulation generates time-dependent urgency during perceptual choice in humans. Nat Commun 2016; 7:13526. [PMID: 27882927 PMCID: PMC5123079 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Decision-makers must often balance the desire to accumulate information with the costs of protracted deliberation. Optimal, reward-maximizing decision-making can require dynamic adjustment of this speed/accuracy trade-off over the course of a single decision. However, it is unclear whether humans are capable of such time-dependent adjustments. Here, we identify several signatures of time-dependency in human perceptual decision-making and highlight their possible neural source. Behavioural and model-based analyses reveal that subjects respond to deadline-induced speed pressure by lowering their criterion on accumulated perceptual evidence as the deadline approaches. In the brain, this effect is reflected in evidence-independent urgency that pushes decision-related motor preparation signals closer to a fixed threshold. Moreover, we show that global modulation of neural gain, as indexed by task-related fluctuations in pupil diameter, is a plausible biophysical mechanism for the generation of this urgency. These findings establish context-sensitive time-dependency as a critical feature of human decision-making. Decision-making balances the benefits of additional information with the cost of time, but it is unclear whether humans adjust this balance within individual decisions. Here, authors show that we do make such adjustments to suit contextual demands and suggest that these are driven by modulation of neural gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter R Murphy
- Institute of Psychology and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Evert Boonstra
- Institute of Psychology and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Nieuwenhuis
- Institute of Psychology and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Lopez-Persem A, Domenech P, Pessiglione M. How prior preferences determine decision-making frames and biases in the human brain. eLife 2016; 5. [PMID: 27864918 PMCID: PMC5132340 DOI: 10.7554/elife.20317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding how option values are compared when making a choice is a key objective for decision neuroscience. In natural situations, agents may have a priori on their preferences that create default policies and shape the neural comparison process. We asked participants to make choices between items belonging to different categories (e.g., jazz vs. rock music). Behavioral data confirmed that the items taken from the preferred category were chosen more often and more rapidly, which qualified them as default options. FMRI data showed that baseline activity in classical brain valuation regions, such as the ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex (vmPFC), reflected the strength of prior preferences. In addition, evoked activity in the same regions scaled with the default option value, irrespective of the eventual choice. We therefore suggest that in the brain valuation system, choices are framed as comparisons between default and alternative options, which might save some resource but induce a decision bias. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20317.001 If you had the choice of listening to a piece of music by either the singer Céline Dion or jazz pianist Keith Jarrett, which would you pick? When choosing between two mutually exclusive options, the brain first assigns a value to each. An area called the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) compares these two values and calculates the difference between them. The vmPFC then relays this difference to other brain regions that trigger the movements required to obtain the selected option. But what exactly is the vmPFC comparing? A reasonable assumption is that we approach the decision with an existing preference for one of the options based on our previous experience. Lopez-Persem et al. set out to determine whether and how the vmPFC uses this existing preference – for example, for pop music over jazz – to drive the decision-making process. For the experiments, volunteers were asked to rate how much they liked individual musicians spanning a range of different genres. While lying inside a brain scanner, the subjects then had to choose their favorite from pairs of musicians selected from the list. When making such decisions, volunteers must consider both the overall category (do I prefer jazz or pop?) but also the individual examples (a pop music fan might choose jazz if the pop option is Britney Spears). Lopez-Persem et al. found that the volunteer’s decisions were biased towards their prior preference. Pop music fans chose Céline Dion or Britney Spears more often than would be expected based on the likability ratings they had given the individual artists in the study. Brain imaging revealed that the vmPFC represents choices as ‘default minus alternative’, where the default is any member of the previously preferred category (e.g. any pop artist for a pop music fan) and the alternative is from a different category (e.g. a jazz artist). Baseline vmPFC activity is higher for members of the preferred category, giving these options a head start over the alternatives. Asking volunteers to choose between other types of objects, including food and magazines, produced similar results. The brain thus uses a general strategy for decision-making that saves time and effort, but which also introduces bias. The next step is to work out how downstream brain regions use the vmPFC signal to select the preferred option. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20317.002
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alizée Lopez-Persem
- Motivation, Brain and Behavior lab, Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Paris, France.,Inserm U1127, CNRS U 7225, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Domenech
- Inserm U1127, CNRS U 7225, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.,CHU Henri Mondor, DHU Pe-PSY, Service de Neurochirurgie Fonctionnelle, Créteil, France.,Behavior, Emotion and Basal Ganglia lab, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Paris, France
| | - Mathias Pessiglione
- Motivation, Brain and Behavior lab, Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Paris, France.,Inserm U1127, CNRS U 7225, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Akdoğan B, Balcı F. The effects of payoff manipulations on temporal bisection performance. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2016; 170:74-83. [PMID: 27380621 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Revised: 06/06/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
There is growing evidence that alterations in reward rates modify timing behavior demonstrating the role of motivational factors in interval timing behavior. This study aimed to investigate the effects of manipulations of rewards and penalties on temporal bisection performance in humans. Participants were trained to classify experienced time intervals as short or long based on the reference durations. Two groups of participants were tested under three different bias conditions in which either the relative reward magnitude or penalty associated with correct or incorrect categorizations of short and long reference durations was manipulated. Participants adapted their choice behavior (i.e., psychometric functions shifted) based on these payoff manipulations in directions predicted by reward maximization. The signal detection theory-based analysis of the data revealed that payoff contingencies affected the response bias parameter (B″) without altering participants' sensitivity (A') to temporal distances. Finally, the response time (RT) analysis showed that short categorization RTs increased, whereas long categorization RTs decreased as a function of stimulus durations. However, overall RTs did not exhibit any modulation in response to payoff manipulations. Taken together, this study provides additional support for the effects of motivational variables on temporal decision-making.
Collapse
|
171
|
Shenhav A, Cohen JD, Botvinick MM. Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control. Nat Neurosci 2016; 19:1286-91. [DOI: 10.1038/nn.4384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 330] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
172
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for several neurological conditions, and is most commonly used to treat Parkinson's disease by implanting electrodes in the basal ganglia. Despite the fact that circuits involved in eye movement control traverse the basal ganglia and are thus likely to be affected by DBS, studies combining DBS with eye movement analysis have been infrequent. This review focuses on recent research studies that examine the relationship between DBS and various types of eye movements and which highlight the potential of this approach. RECENT FINDINGS Recent work shows that DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can improve smooth pursuit in Parkinson's disease. STN DBS has also been shown to modulate visuospatial attention, and has provided experimental evidence backing a Bayesian model of basal ganglia function. DBS in the pallidum can improve antisaccadic performance in Parkinson's disease, suggesting improvement in higher control of oculomotor function, and implying retrograde striatal stimulation as part of the mechanism of action. SUMMARY These studies show that the combination of DBS with eye movement analysis is a powerful research tool. It may be used to study oculomotor physiology, basal ganglia pathophysiology, and the mechanism of action of DBS.
Collapse
|
173
|
Germar M, Albrecht T, Voss A, Mojzisch A. Social conformity is due to biased stimulus processing: electrophysiological and diffusion analyses. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2016; 11:1449-59. [PMID: 27127228 PMCID: PMC5015799 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Revised: 02/26/2016] [Accepted: 04/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hundreds of studies have found that humans' decisions are strongly influenced by the opinions of others, even when making simple perceptual decisions. In this study, we aimed to clarify whether this effect can be explained by social influence biasing (early) perceptual processes. We employed stimulus evoked potentials, lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) and a diffusion model analysis of reaction time data to uncover the neurocognitive processes underlying social conformity in perceptual decision-making. The diffusion model analysis showed that social conformity was due to a biased uptake of stimulus information and accompanied by more careful stimulus processing. As indicated by larger N1-amplitudes, social influence increased early attentional resources for stimulus identification and discrimination. Furthermore, LRP analyses revealed that stimulus processing was biased even in cases of non-conformity. In conclusion, our results suggest that the opinion of others can cause individuals to selectively process stimulus information supporting this opinion, thereby inducing social conformity. This effect is present even when individuals do not blindly follow the majority but rather carefully process stimulus information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Germar
- Institut für Psychologie, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, Hildesheim D-31141, Germany
| | - Thorsten Albrecht
- Georg-Elias-Müller-Institut für Psychologie, University of Göttingen, Göttingen D-37073, Germany
| | - Andreas Voss
- Institut für Psychologie, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg D-69117, Germany
| | - Andreas Mojzisch
- Institut für Psychologie, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, Hildesheim D-31141, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Ratcliff R, Huang-Pollock C, McKoon G. Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-go Task with a Diffusion Model. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 5:42-62. [PMID: 29404378 DOI: 10.1037/dec0000065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The go/no-go task is one in which there are two choices, but the subject responds only to one of them, waiting out a time-out for the other choice. The task has a long history in psychology and modern applications in the clinical/neuropsychological domain. In this article we fit a diffusion model to both experimental and simulated data. The model is the same as the two-choice model and assumes that there are two decision boundaries and termination at one of them produces a response and at the other, the subject waits out the trial. In prior modeling, both two-choice and go/no-go data were fit simultaneously and only group data were fit. Here the model is fit to just go/no-go data for individual subjects. This allows analyses of individual differences which is important for clinical applications. First, we fit the standard two-choice model to two-choice data and fit the go/no-go model to RTs from one of the choices and accuracy from the two-choice data. Parameter values were similar between the models and had high correlations. The go/no-go model was also fit to data from a go/no-go version of the task with the same subjects as the two-choice task. A simulation study with ranges of parameter values that are obtained in practice showed similar parameter recovery between the two-choice and go/no-go models. Results show that a diffusion model with an implicit (no response) boundary can be fit to data with almost the same accuracy as fitting the two-choice model to two-choice data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Ratcliff
- The Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University and The Ohio State University
| | - Cynthia Huang-Pollock
- The Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University and The Ohio State University
| | - Gail McKoon
- The Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University and The Ohio State University
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Perugini A, Ditterich J, Basso MA. Patients with Parkinson's Disease Show Impaired Use of Priors in Conditions of Sensory Uncertainty. Curr Biol 2016; 26:1902-10. [PMID: 27322000 PMCID: PMC5633083 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Revised: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Perceptual decisions arise after considering the available sensory evidence [1]. When sensory information is unreliable, a good strategy is to rely on previous experience in similar situations to guide decisions [2-6]. It is well known that patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are impaired at value-based decision-making [7-11]. How patients combine past experience and sensory information to make perceptual decisions is unknown. We developed a novel, perceptual decision-making task and manipulated the statistics of the sensory stimuli presented to patients with PD and healthy participants to determine the influence of past experience on decision-making. We show that patients with PD are impaired at combining previously learned information with current sensory information to guide decisions. We modeled the results using the drift-diffusion model (DDM) and found that the impairment corresponds to a failure in adjusting the amount of sensory evidence needed to make a decision. Our modeling results also show that two complementary mechanisms operate to implement a bias when two sets of priors are learned concurrently. Asymmetric decision threshold adjustments, as reflected by changes in the starting point of evidence accumulation, are responsible for a general choice bias, whereas the adjustment of a dynamic bias that develops over the course of a trial, as reflected by a drift-rate offset, provides the stimulus-specific component of the prior. A proper interplay between these two processes is required to implement a bias based on concurrent, stimulus-specific priors in decision-making. We show here that patients with PD are impaired in these across-trial decision threshold adjustments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Perugini
- The Fuster Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Department of Neurobiology, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Brain Research Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive, Box 957332, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Jochen Ditterich
- Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95618, USA
| | - Michele A Basso
- The Fuster Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Department of Neurobiology, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Brain Research Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive, Box 957332, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Abstract
When making choices under conditions of perceptual uncertainty, past experience can play a vital role. However, it can also lead to biases that worsen decisions. Consistent with previous observations, we found that human choices are influenced by the success or failure of past choices even in a standard two-alternative detection task, where choice history is irrelevant. The typical bias was one that made the subject switch choices after a failure. These choice history biases led to poorer performance and were similar for observers in different countries. They were well captured by a simple logistic regression model that had been previously applied to describe psychophysical performance in mice. Such irrational biases seem at odds with the principles of reinforcement learning, which would predict exquisite adaptability to choice history. We therefore asked whether subjects could adapt their irrational biases following changes in trial order statistics. Adaptability was strong in the direction that confirmed a subject's default biases, but weaker in the opposite direction, so that existing biases could not be eradicated. We conclude that humans can adapt choice history biases, but cannot easily overcome existing biases even if irrational in the current context: adaptation is more sensitive to confirmatory than contradictory statistics.
Collapse
|
177
|
Abstract
The issue of optimal performance in speeded two-choice tasks has played a substantial role in the development and evaluation of decision making theories. For difficulty-homogeneous environments, the means to achieve optimality are prescribed by the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT), or equivalently, by the drift diffusion model (DDM). Biases in the external environments are easily accommodated into these models by adopting a prior integration bias. However, for difficulty-heterogeneous environments, the issue is more elusive. I show that in such cases, the SPRT and the DDM are no longer equivalent and both are suboptimal. Optimality is achieved by a diffusion-like accumulation of evidence while adjusting the choice thresholds during the time course of a trial. In the second part of the paper, assuming that decisions are made according to the popular DDM, I show that optimal performance in biased environments mandates incorporating a dynamic-bias component (a shift in the drift threshold) in addition to the prior bias (a shift in the starting point) into the model. These conclusions support a conjecture by Hanks, Mazurek, Kiani, Hopp, and Shadlen, (The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(17), 6339-6352, 2011) and contradict a recent attempt to refute this conjecture by arguing that optimality is achieved with the aid of prior bias alone (van Ravenzwaaij et al., 2012). The psychological plausibility of such "mathematically optimal" strategies is discussed. The current paper contributes to the ongoing effort to understand optimal behavior in biased and heterogeneous environments and corrects prior conclusions with respect to optimality in such conditions.
Collapse
|
178
|
Graphs versus numbers: How information format affects risk aversion in gambling. JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING 2016. [DOI: 10.1017/s1930297500003077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
AbstractIn lottery gambling, the common phenomenon of risk aversion shows up as preference of the option with the higher win probability, even if a riskier alternative offers a greater expected value. Because riskier choices would optimize profitability in such cases, the present study investigates the visual format, with which lotteries are conveyed, as potential instrument to modulate risk attitudes. Previous research has shown that enhanced attention to graphical compared to numerical probabilities can increase risk aversion, but evidence for the reverse effect — reduced risk aversion through a graphical display of outcomes — is sparse. We conducted three experiments, in which participants repeatedly selected one of two lotteries. Probabilities and outcomes were either presented numerically or in a graphical format that consisted of pie charts (Experiment 1) or icon arrays (Experiment 2 and 3). Further, expected values were either higher in the safer or in the riskier lottery, or they did not differ between the options. Despite a marked risk aversion in all experiments, our results show that presenting outcomes as graphs can reduce — albeit not eliminate — risk aversion (Experiment 3). Yet, not all formats prove suitable, and non-intuitive outcome graphs can even enhance risk aversion (Experiment 1). Joint analyses of choice proportions and response times (RTs) further uncovered that risk aversion leads to safe choices particularly in fast decisions. This pattern is expressed under graphical probabilities, whereas graphical outcomes can weaken the rapid dominance of risk aversion and the variability over RTs (Experiment 1 and 2). Together, our findings demonstrate the relevance of information format for risky decisions.
Collapse
|
179
|
de Hollander G, Labruna L, Sellaro R, Trutti A, Colzato LS, Ratcliff R, Ivry RB, Forstmann BU. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Influence the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Perceptual Decision-making: Evidence from Three Independent Studies. J Cogn Neurosci 2016; 28:1283-94. [PMID: 27054398 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
In perceptual decision-making tasks, people balance the speed and accuracy with which they make their decisions by modulating a response threshold. Neuroimaging studies suggest that this speed-accuracy tradeoff is implemented in a corticobasal ganglia network that includes an important contribution from the pre-SMA. To test this hypothesis, we used anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate neural activity in pre-SMA while participants performed a simple perceptual decision-making task. Participants viewed a pattern of moving dots and judged the direction of the global motion. In separate trials, they were cued to either respond quickly or accurately. We used the diffusion decision model to estimate the response threshold parameter, comparing conditions in which participants received sham or anodal tDCS. In three independent experiments, we failed to observe an influence of tDCS on the response threshold. Additional, exploratory analyses showed no influence of tDCS on the duration of nondecision processes or on the efficiency of information processing. Taken together, these findings provide a cautionary note, either concerning the causal role of pre-SMA in decision-making or on the utility of tDCS for modifying response caution in decision-making tasks.
Collapse
|
180
|
Ratcliff R, Smith PL, Brown SD, McKoon G. Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History. Trends Cogn Sci 2016; 20:260-281. [PMID: 26952739 PMCID: PMC4928591 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 688] [Impact Index Per Article: 86.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2015] [Revised: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
There is growing interest in diffusion models to represent the cognitive and neural processes of speeded decision making. Sequential-sampling models like the diffusion model have a long history in psychology. They view decision making as a process of noisy accumulation of evidence from a stimulus. The standard model assumes that evidence accumulates at a constant rate during the second or two it takes to make a decision. This process can be linked to the behaviors of populations of neurons and to theories of optimality. Diffusion models have been used successfully in a range of cognitive tasks and as psychometric tools in clinical research to examine individual differences. In this review, we relate the models to both earlier and more recent research in psychology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Ratcliff
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| | - Philip L Smith
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Level 12, Redmond Barry Building 115, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Scott D Brown
- School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Australia, Aviation Building, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Gail McKoon
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Predictive information speeds up visual awareness in an individuation task by modulating threshold setting, not processing efficiency. Vision Res 2016; 121:104-112. [DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2015] [Revised: 12/18/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
182
|
Low attention impairs optimal incorporation of prior knowledge in perceptual decisions. Atten Percept Psychophys 2016; 77:2021-36. [PMID: 25836765 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0897-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
When visual attention is directed away from a stimulus, neural processing is weak and strength and precision of sensory data decreases. From a computational perspective, in such situations observers should give more weight to prior expectations in order to behave optimally during a discrimination task. Here we test a signal detection theoretic model that counter-intuitively predicts subjects will do just the opposite in a discrimination task with two stimuli, one attended and one unattended: when subjects are probed to discriminate the unattended stimulus, they rely less on prior information about the probed stimulus' identity. The model is in part inspired by recent findings that attention reduces trial-by-trial variability of the neuronal population response and that they use a common criterion for attended and unattended trials. In five different visual discrimination experiments, when attention was directed away from the target stimulus, subjects did not adjust their response bias in reaction to a change in stimulus presentation frequency despite being fully informed and despite the presence of performance feedback and monetary and social incentives. This indicates that subjects did not rely more on the priors under conditions of inattention as would be predicted by a Bayes-optimal observer model. These results inform and constrain future models of Bayesian inference in the human brain.
Collapse
|
183
|
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation induces impulsive action when patients with Parkinson's disease act under speed pressure. Exp Brain Res 2016; 234:1837-1848. [PMID: 26892884 PMCID: PMC4893074 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4577-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is proposed to modulate response thresholds and speed–accuracy trade-offs. In situations of conflict, the STN is considered to raise response thresholds, allowing time for the accumulation of information to occur before a response is selected. Conversely, speed pressure is thought to reduce the activity of the STN and lower response thresholds, resulting in fast, errorful responses. In Parkinson’s disease (PD), subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) reduces the activity of the nucleus and improves motor symptoms. We predicted that the combined effects of STN stimulation and speed pressure would lower STN activity and lead to fast, errorful responses, hence resulting in impulsive action. We used the motion discrimination ‘moving-dots’ task to assess speed–accuracy trade-offs, under both speed and accuracy instructions. We assessed 12 patients with PD and bilateral STN-DBS and 12 age-matched healthy controls. Participants completed the task twice, and the patients completed it once with STN-DBS on and once with STN-DBS off, with order counterbalanced. We found that STN stimulation was associated with significantly faster reaction times but more errors under speed instructions. Application of the drift diffusion model showed that stimulation resulted in lower response thresholds when acting under speed pressure. These findings support the involvement of the STN in the modulation of speed–accuracy trade-offs and establish for the first time that speed pressure alone, even in the absence of conflict, can result in STN stimulation inducing impulsive action in PD.
Collapse
|
184
|
White CN, Curl RA, Sloane JF. Using Decision Models to Enhance Investigations of Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience. Front Psychol 2016; 7:81. [PMID: 26903896 PMCID: PMC4746304 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 01/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
There is great interest in relating individual differences in cognitive processing to activation of neural systems. The general process involves relating measures of task performance like reaction times or accuracy to brain activity to identify individual differences in neural processing. One limitation of this approach is that measures like reaction times can be affected by multiple components of processing. For instance, some individuals might have higher accuracy in a memory task because they respond more cautiously, not because they have better memory. Computational models of decision making, like the drift–diffusion model and the linear ballistic accumulator model, provide a potential solution to this problem. They can be fitted to data from individual participants to disentangle the effects of the different processes driving behavior. In this sense the models can provide cleaner measures of the processes of interest, and enhance our understanding of how neural activity varies across individuals or populations. The advantages of this model-based approach to investigating individual differences in neural activity are discussed with recent examples of how this method can improve our understanding of the brain–behavior relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey N White
- Department of Psychology, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Ryan A Curl
- Department of Psychology, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
185
|
Ho TC, Zhang S, Sacchet MD, Weng H, Connolly CG, Henje Blom E, Han LKM, Mobayed NO, Yang TT. Fusiform Gyrus Dysfunction is Associated with Perceptual Processing Efficiency to Emotional Faces in Adolescent Depression: A Model-Based Approach. Front Psychol 2016; 7:40. [PMID: 26869950 PMCID: PMC4740953 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 01/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
While the extant literature has focused on major depressive disorder (MDD) as being characterized by abnormalities in processing affective stimuli (e.g., facial expressions), little is known regarding which specific aspects of cognition influence the evaluation of affective stimuli, and what are the underlying neural correlates. To investigate these issues, we assessed 26 adolescents diagnosed with MDD and 37 well-matched healthy controls (HCL) who completed an emotion identification task of dynamically morphing faces during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We analyzed the behavioral data using a sequential sampling model of response time (RT) commonly used to elucidate aspects of cognition in binary perceptual decision making tasks: the Linear Ballistic Accumulator (LBA) model. Using a hierarchical Bayesian estimation method, we obtained group-level and individual-level estimates of LBA parameters on the facial emotion identification task. While the MDD and HCL groups did not differ in mean RT, accuracy, or group-level estimates of perceptual processing efficiency (i.e., drift rate parameter of the LBA), the MDD group showed significantly reduced responses in left fusiform gyrus compared to the HCL group during the facial emotion identification task. Furthermore, within the MDD group, fMRI signal in the left fusiform gyrus during affective face processing was significantly associated with greater individual-level estimates of perceptual processing efficiency. Our results therefore suggest that affective processing biases in adolescents with MDD are characterized by greater perceptual processing efficiency of affective visual information in sensory brain regions responsible for the early processing of visual information. The theoretical, methodological, and clinical implications of our results are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany C Ho
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Shunan Zhang
- Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla CA, USA
| | - Matthew D Sacchet
- Neuroscience Graduate Program and Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto CA, USA
| | - Helen Weng
- The Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Colm G Connolly
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Eva Henje Blom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San FranciscoCA, USA; Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetStockhold, Sweden
| | - Laura K M Han
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Nisreen O Mobayed
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Tony T Yang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Zhang J, Rittman T, Nombela C, Fois A, Coyle-Gilchrist I, Barker RA, Hughes LE, Rowe JB. Different decision deficits impair response inhibition in progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson's disease. Brain 2016; 139:161-73. [PMID: 26582559 PMCID: PMC4949391 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2015] [Revised: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 09/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson's disease have distinct underlying neuropathology, but both diseases affect cognitive function in addition to causing a movement disorder. They impair response inhibition and may lead to impulsivity, which can occur even in the presence of profound akinesia and rigidity. The current study examined the mechanisms of cognitive impairments underlying disinhibition, using horizontal saccadic latencies that obviate the impact of limb slowness on executing response decisions. Nineteen patients with clinically diagnosed progressive supranuclear palsy (Richardson's syndrome), 24 patients with clinically diagnosed Parkinson's disease and 26 healthy control subjects completed a saccadic Go/No-Go task with a head-mounted infrared saccadometer. Participants were cued on each trial to make a pro-saccade to a horizontal target or withhold their responses. Both patient groups had impaired behavioural performance, with more commission errors than controls. Mean saccadic latencies were similar between all three groups. We analysed behavioural responses as a binary decision between Go and No-Go choices. By using Bayesian parameter estimation, we fitted a hierarchical drift-diffusion model to individual participants' single trial data. The model decomposes saccadic latencies into parameters for the decision process: decision boundary, drift rate of accumulation, decision bias, and non-decision time. In a leave-one-out three-way classification analysis, the model parameters provided better discrimination between patients and controls than raw behavioural measures. Furthermore, the model revealed disease-specific deficits in the Go/No-Go decision process. Both patient groups had slower drift rate of accumulation, and shorter non-decision time than controls. But patients with progressive supranuclear palsy were strongly biased towards a pro-saccade decision boundary compared to Parkinson's patients and controls. This indicates a prepotency of responding in combination with a reduction in further accumulation of evidence, which provides a parsimonious explanation for the apparently paradoxical combination of disinhibition and severe akinesia. The combination of the well-tolerated oculomotor paradigm and the sensitivity of the model-based analysis provides a valuable approach for interrogating decision-making processes in neurodegenerative disorders. The mechanistic differences underlying participants' poor performance were not observable from classical analysis of behavioural data, but were clearly revealed by modelling. These differences provide a rational basis on which to develop and assess new therapeutic strategies for cognition and behaviour in these disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxiang Zhang
- 1 School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK 2 Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK
| | - Timothy Rittman
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - Cristina Nombela
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - Alessandro Fois
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - Ian Coyle-Gilchrist
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - Roger A Barker
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - Laura E Hughes
- 2 Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - James B Rowe
- 2 Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK 4 Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Turner BM, Rodriguez CA, Norcia TM, McClure SM, Steyvers M. Why more is better: Simultaneous modeling of EEG, fMRI, and behavioral data. Neuroimage 2015; 128:96-115. [PMID: 26723544 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2015] [Revised: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The need to test a growing number of theories in cognitive science has led to increased interest in inferential methods that integrate multiple data modalities. In this manuscript, we show how a method for integrating three data modalities within a single framework provides (1) more detailed descriptions of cognitive processes and (2) more accurate predictions of unobserved data than less integrative methods. Specifically, we show how combining either EEG and fMRI with a behavioral model can perform substantially better than a behavioral-data-only model in both generative and predictive modeling analyses. We then show how a trivariate model - a model including EEG, fMRI, and behavioral data - outperforms bivariate models in both generative and predictive modeling analyses. Together, these results suggest that within an appropriate modeling framework, more data can be used to better constrain cognitive theory, and to generate more accurate predictions for behavioral and neural data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Mark Steyvers
- Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Abstract
Perceptual decision making has been widely studied using tasks in which subjects are asked to discriminate a visual stimulus and instructed to report their decision with a movement. In these studies, performance is measured by assessing the accuracy of the participants’ choices as a function of the ambiguity of the visual stimulus. Typically, the reporting movement is considered as a mere means of reporting the decision with no influence on the decision-making process. However, recent studies have shown that even subtle differences of biomechanical costs between movements may influence how we select between them. Here we investigated whether this purely motor cost could also influence decisions in a perceptual discrimination task in detriment of accuracy. In other words, are perceptual decisions only dependent on the visual stimulus and entirely orthogonal to motor costs? Here we show the results of a psychophysical experiment in which human subjects were presented with a random dot motion discrimination task and asked to report the perceived motion direction using movements of different biomechanical cost. We found that the pattern of decisions exhibited a significant bias towards the movement of lower cost, even when this bias reduced performance accuracy. This strongly suggests that motor costs influence decision making in visual discrimination tasks for which its contribution is neither instructed nor beneficial.
Collapse
|
189
|
Suriya-Arunroj L, Gail A. I Plan Therefore I Choose: Free-Choice Bias Due to Prior Action-Probability but Not Action-Value. Front Behav Neurosci 2015; 9:315. [PMID: 26635565 PMCID: PMC4658425 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2015] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
According to an emerging view, decision-making, and motor planning are tightly entangled at the level of neural processing. Choice is influenced not only by the values associated with different options, but also biased by other factors. Here we test the hypothesis that preliminary action planning can induce choice biases gradually and independently of objective value when planning overlaps with one of the potential action alternatives. Subjects performed center-out reaches obeying either a clockwise or counterclockwise cue-response rule in two tasks. In the probabilistic task, a pre-cue indicated the probability of each of the two potential rules to become valid. When the subsequent rule-cue unambiguously indicated which of the pre-cued rules was actually valid (instructed trials), subjects responded faster to rules pre-cued with higher probability. When subjects were allowed to choose freely between two equally rewarded rules (choice trials) they chose the originally more likely rule more often and faster, despite the lack of an objective advantage in selecting this target. In the amount task, the pre-cue indicated the amount of potential reward associated with each rule. Subjects responded faster to rules pre-cued with higher reward amount in instructed trials of the amount task, equivalent to the more likely rule in the probabilistic task. Yet, in contrast, subjects showed hardly any choice bias and no increase in response speed in favor of the original high-reward target in the choice trials of the amount task. We conclude that free-choice behavior is robustly biased when predictability encourages the planning of one of the potential responses, while prior reward expectations without action planning do not induce such strong bias. Our results provide behavioral evidence for distinct contributions of expected value and action planning in decision-making and a tight interdependence of motor planning and action selection, supporting the idea that the underlying neural mechanisms overlap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexander Gail
- Sensorimotor Group, German Primate Center Göttingen, Germany ; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen, Germany ; Faculty of Biology and Psychology, Georg-Elias-Müller Institute, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Payoff Information Biases a Fast Guess Process in Perceptual Decision Making under Deadline Pressure: Evidence from Behavior, Evoked Potentials, and Quantitative Model Comparison. J Neurosci 2015; 35:10989-1011. [PMID: 26245962 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0017-15.2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED We used electroencephalography (EEG) and behavior to examine the role of payoff bias in a difficult two-alternative perceptual decision under deadline pressure in humans. The findings suggest that a fast guess process, biased by payoff and triggered by stimulus onset, occurred on a subset of trials and raced with an evidence accumulation process informed by stimulus information. On each trial, the participant judged whether a rectangle was shifted to the right or left and responded by squeezing a right- or left-hand dynamometer. The payoff for each alternative (which could be biased or unbiased) was signaled 1.5 s before stimulus onset. The choice response was assigned to the first hand reaching a squeeze force criterion and reaction time was defined as time to criterion. Consistent with a fast guess account, fast responses were strongly biased toward the higher-paying alternative and the EEG exhibited an abrupt rise in the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) on a subset of biased payoff trials contralateral to the higher-paying alternative ∼ 150 ms after stimulus onset and 50 ms before stimulus information influenced the LRP. This rise was associated with poststimulus dynamometer activity favoring the higher-paying alternative and predicted choice and response time. Quantitative modeling supported the fast guess account over accounts of payoff effects supported in other studies. Our findings, taken with previous studies, support the idea that payoff and prior probability manipulations produce flexible adaptations to task structure and do not reflect a fixed policy for the integration of payoff and stimulus information. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans and other animals often face situations in which they must make choices based on uncertain sensory information together with information about expected outcomes (gains or losses) about each choice. We investigated how differences in payoffs between available alternatives affect neural activity, overt choice, and the timing of choice responses. In our experiment, in which participants were under strong time pressure, neural and behavioral findings together with model fitting suggested that our human participants often made a fast guess toward the higher reward rather than integrating stimulus and payoff information. Our findings, taken with findings from other studies, support the idea that payoff and prior probability manipulations produce flexible adaptations to task structure and do not reflect a fixed policy.
Collapse
|
191
|
Javadi AH, Beyko A, Walsh V, Kanai R. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Biases Action Choice in a Perceptual Decision Task. J Cogn Neurosci 2015; 27:2174-85. [PMID: 26151605 PMCID: PMC4745131 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
One of the multiple interacting systems involved in the selection and execution of voluntary actions is the primary motor cortex (PMC). We aimed to investigate whether the transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of this area can modulate hand choice. A perceptual decision-making task was administered. Participants were asked to classify rectangles with different height-to-width ratios into horizontal and vertical rectangles using their right and left index fingers while their PMC was stimulated either bilaterally or unilaterally. Two experiments were conducted with different stimulation conditions: the first experiment (n = 12) had only one stimulation condition (bilateral stimulation), and the second experiment (n = 45) had three stimulation conditions (bilateral, anodal unilateral, and cathodal unilateral stimulations). The second experiment was designed to confirm the results of the first experiment and to further investigate the effects of anodal and cathodal stimulations alone in the observed effects. Each participant took part in two sessions. The laterality of stimulation was reversed over the two sessions. Our results showed that anodal stimulation of the PMC biases participants' responses toward using the contralateral hand whereas cathodal stimulation biases responses toward the ipsilateral hand. Brain stimulation also modulated the RT of the left hand in all stimulation conditions: Responses were faster when the response bias was in favor of the left hand and slower when the response bias was against it. We propose two possible explanations for these findings: the perceptual bias account (bottom-up effects of stimulation on perception) and the motor-choice bias account (top-down modulation of the decision-making system by facilitation of response in one hand over the other). We conclude that motor responses and the choice of hand can be modulated using tDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ryota Kanai
- University College London
- University of Sussex
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Unsigned value prediction-error modulates the motor system in absence of choice. Neuroimage 2015; 122:73-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 07/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
|
193
|
Toelch U, Dolan RJ. Informational and Normative Influences in Conformity from a Neurocomputational Perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 2015; 19:579-589. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Revised: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
194
|
Cicmil N, Cumming BG, Parker AJ, Krug K. Reward modulates the effect of visual cortical microstimulation on perceptual decisions. eLife 2015; 4:e07832. [PMID: 26402458 PMCID: PMC4616243 DOI: 10.7554/elife.07832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Effective perceptual decisions rely upon combining sensory information with knowledge of the rewards available for different choices. However, it is not known where reward signals interact with the multiple stages of the perceptual decision-making pathway and by what mechanisms this may occur. We combined electrical microstimulation of functionally specific groups of neurons in visual area V5/MT with performance-contingent reward manipulation, while monkeys performed a visual discrimination task. Microstimulation was less effective in shifting perceptual choices towards the stimulus preferences of the stimulated neurons when available reward was larger. Psychophysical control experiments showed this result was not explained by a selective change in response strategy on microstimulated trials. A bounded accumulation decision model, applied to analyse behavioural performance, revealed that the interaction of expected reward with microstimulation can be explained if expected reward modulates a sensory representation stage of perceptual decision-making, in addition to the better-known effects at the integration stage. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07832.001 Identifying how an object is moving in three-dimensional (3D) space depends upon a brain region known as V5/MT. The neurons that make up area V5/MT form groups that each have a ‘preference’ for a particular direction of movement and a particular 3D depth. If a group of neurons detects its preferred direction of movement and 3D depth, it will become highly active. The brain can assess which groups of neurons are active, in a process known as integration. This information can then be used to work out the object's movement in space. The process of integration can be influenced by whether a rewarding outcome is expected to result from identifying the 3D movement correctly. This allows the brain to increase its likelihood of success in situations where a large reward is on offer. Until now, it was thought that the activity in area V5/MT, which takes place before integration, was not affected by the likelihood of receiving a reward. As well as being ‘naturally’ stimulated by moving objects, the V5/MT neurons can also be ‘artificially’ activated by a technique called microstimulation, which uses a tiny electrode to electrically stimulate groups of neurons. Microstimulation can bias visual perception towards the movement and 3D depth ‘preference’ of the artificially activated neurons. If the V5/MT neurons do receive information about potential rewards from other areas of the brain, we would expect rewards to affect naturally and artificially stimulated neural activity in different ways. On the other hand, if the V5/MT neurons do not receive any information about reward, then it will not matter whether their activity is natural or artificial; the signal that they produce will be the same. Cicmil et al. gave two monkeys a task in which they could receive rewards for correctly identifying a three-dimensional cylinder's direction of rotation, and applied microstimulation to specific groups of V5/MT neurons on some of the trials. When a larger reward was available, microstimulation was less able to bias the monkeys' choices about the rotation direction of the 3D cylinders. Overall, Cicmil et al.'s results suggest that the V5/MT neurons are able to incorporate information about reward, before integration occurs. The next step will be to record the activity of area V5/MT to investigate exactly how this happens. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07832.002
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nela Cicmil
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Bruce G Cumming
- Lab of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, United States
| | - Andrew J Parker
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kristine Krug
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Hughes BL, Zaki J. The neuroscience of motivated cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2015; 19:62-4. [PMID: 25640642 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2014] [Revised: 11/14/2014] [Accepted: 12/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Goals and needs shape individuals' thinking, a phenomenon known as motivated cognition. We highlight research from social psychology and cognitive neuroscience that provides insight into the structure of motivated cognition. In addition to demonstrating its ubiquity, we suggest that motivated cognition is often effortless and pervades information processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent L Hughes
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Jamil Zaki
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Forstmann BU, Ratcliff R, Wagenmakers EJ. Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. Annu Rev Psychol 2015; 67:641-66. [PMID: 26393872 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 269] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Sequential sampling models assume that people make speeded decisions by gradually accumulating noisy information until a threshold of evidence is reached. In cognitive science, one such model--the diffusion decision model--is now regularly used to decompose task performance into underlying processes such as the quality of information processing, response caution, and a priori bias. In the cognitive neurosciences, the diffusion decision model has recently been adopted as a quantitative tool to study the neural basis of decision making under time pressure. We present a selective overview of several recent applications and extensions of the diffusion decision model in the cognitive neurosciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B U Forstmann
- Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - R Ratcliff
- Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
| | - E-J Wagenmakers
- Department of Methodology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
White CN, Ratcliff R, Vasey MW. Anxiety-related threat bias in recognition memory: the moderating effect of list composition and semantic-similarity effects. Cogn Emot 2015; 30:1446-1460. [PMID: 26243532 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1070120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Individuals with high anxiety show bias for threatening information, but it is unclear whether this bias affects memory. Recognition memory studies have shown biases for recognising and rejecting threatening items in anxiety, prompting the need to identify moderating factors of this effect. This study focuses on the role of semantic similarity: the use of many semantically related threatening words could increase familiarity for those items and obscure anxiety-related differences in memory. To test this, two recognition memory experiments varied the proportion of threatening words in lists to manipulate the semantic-similarity effects. When similarity effects were reduced, participants with high trait anxiety were biased to respond "new" to threatening words, whereas when similarity effects were strong there was no effect of anxiety on memory bias. Analysis of the data with the drift diffusion model showed that the bias was due to differences in processing of the threatening stimuli rather than a simple response bias. These data suggest that the semantic similarity of the threatening words significantly affects the presence or absence of anxiety-related threat bias in recognition memory. The results indicate that trait anxiety is associated with a bias to decide that threatening stimuli were not previously studied, but only when semantic-similarity effects are controlled. Implications for theories of anxiety and future studies in this domain are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey N White
- a Department of Psychology , Syracuse University , Syracuse , NY , USA
| | - Roger Ratcliff
- b Department of Psychology , The Ohio State University , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Michael W Vasey
- b Department of Psychology , The Ohio State University , Columbus , OH , USA
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Akdoğan B, Balcı F. Stimulus probability effects on temporal bisection performance of mice (Mus musculus). Anim Cogn 2015; 19:15-30. [PMID: 26242608 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0909-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Revised: 07/18/2015] [Accepted: 07/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In the temporal bisection task, participants classify experienced stimulus durations as short or long based on their temporal similarity to previously learned reference durations. Temporal decision making in this task should be influenced by the experienced probabilities of the reference durations for adaptiveness. In this study, we tested the temporal bisection performance of mice (Mus musculus) under different short and long reference duration probability conditions implemented across two experimental phases. In Phase 1, the proportion of reference durations (compared to probe durations) was 0.5, whereas in Phase 2 it was increased to 0.8 to further examine the adjustment of choice behavior with more frequent reference duration presentations (under higher reinforcement rate). Our findings suggest that mice developed adaptive biases in their choice behaviors. These adjustments in choice behavior were nearly optimal as the mice maximized their gain to a great extent which required them to monitor stimulus probabilities as well as the level of variability in their temporal judgments. We further found that short but not long categorization response times were sensitive to stimulus probability manipulations, which in turn suggests an asymmetry between short and long categorizations. Finally, we investigated the latent decision processes underlying the bias manifested in subjects' choice behavior within the diffusion model framework. Our results revealed that probabilistic information influenced the starting point and the rate of evidence accumulation process. Overall, the stimulus probability effects on choice behavior were modulated by the reinforcement rate. Our findings illustrate that mice can adapt their temporal behaviors with respect to the probabilistic contingencies in the environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Başak Akdoğan
- Department of Psychology, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450, Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fuat Balcı
- Department of Psychology, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450, Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference. Nat Commun 2015; 6:7455. [PMID: 26135809 PMCID: PMC4500827 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Do people intuitively favour certain actions over others? In some dual-process research, reaction-time (RT) data have been used to infer that certain choices are intuitive. However, the use of behavioural or biological measures to infer mental function, popularly known as ‘reverse inference', is problematic because it does not take into account other sources of variability in the data, such as discriminability of the choice options. Here we use two example data sets obtained from value-based choice experiments to demonstrate that, after controlling for discriminability (that is, strength-of-preference), there is no evidence that one type of choice is systematically faster than the other. Moreover, using specific variations of a prominent value-based choice experiment, we are able to predictably replicate, eliminate or reverse previously reported correlations between RT and selfishness. Thus, our findings shed crucial light on the use of RT in inferring mental processes and strongly caution against using RT differences as evidence favouring dual-process accounts. In cognitive neuroscience, it is common practice to use reaction time data to infer whether decisions are intuitive or deliberate. Here the authors demonstrate that they can replicate, eliminate and reverse previously reported correlations between selfishness and reaction time.
Collapse
|
200
|
Reckless GE, Andreassen OA, Server A, Østefjells T, Jensen J. Negative symptoms in schizophrenia are associated with aberrant striato-cortical connectivity in a rewarded perceptual decision-making task. Neuroimage Clin 2015. [PMID: 26106553 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.025.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Negative symptoms in schizophrenia have been associated with structural and functional changes in the prefrontal cortex. They often persist after treatment with antipsychotic medication which targets, in particular, the ventral striatum (VS). As schizophrenia has been suggested to arise from dysfunctional connectivity between neural networks, it is possible that residual aberrant striato-cortical connectivity in medicated patients plays a role in enduring negative symptomology. The present study examined the relationship between striato-cortical connectivity and negative symptoms in medicated schizophrenia patients. METHODS We manipulated motivation in a perceptual decision-making task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Comparing healthy controls (n = 21) and medicated patients with schizophrenia (n = 18) we investigated how motivation-mediated changes in VS activation affected functional connectivity with the frontal cortex, and how changes in connectivity strength from the neutral to motivated condition related to negative symptom severity. RESULTS A pattern of aberrant striato-cortical connectivity was observed in the presence of intact VS, but altered left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) motivation-mediated activation in patients. The more severe the patient's negative symptoms, the less the connectivity strength between the right VS and left IFG changed from the neutral to the motivated condition. Despite aberrant striato-cortical connectivity and altered recruitment of the left IFG among patients, both patients and healthy controls adopted a more liberal response strategy in the motivated compared to the neutral condition. CONCLUSIONS The present findings suggest that there is a link between dysfunctional striato-cortical connectivity and negative symptom severity, and offer a possible explanation as to why negative symptoms persist after treatment with antipsychotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg E Reckless
- NORMENT - KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole A Andreassen
- NORMENT - KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andres Server
- Department of Neuroradiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tiril Østefjells
- NORMENT - KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jimmy Jensen
- NORMENT - KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway ; Centre for Psychology, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|