GABA synchronizes clock cells within the suprachiasmatic circadian clock

Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: repressilators coupled by quorum sensing

Diverse biochemical rhythms are generated by thousands of cellular oscillators that somehow manage to operate synchronously. In fields ranging from circadian biology to endocrinology, it remains an exciting challenge to understand how collective rhythms emerge in multicellular structures. Using mathematical and computational modeling, we study the effect of coupling through intercell signaling in a population of Escherichia coli cells expressing a synthetic biological clock. Our results predict that a diverse and noisy community of such genetic oscillators interacting through a quorum-sensing mechanism should self-synchronize in a robust way, leading to a substantially improved global rhythmicity in the system. As such, the particular system of coupled genetic oscillators considered here might be a good candidate to provide the first quantitative example of a synchronization transition in a population of biological oscillators.

The circadian clock in the brain: a structural and functional comparison between mammals and insects

The circadian master clocks in the brains of mammals and insects are compared in respect to location, organization and function. They show astonishing similarities. Both clocks are anatomically and functionally connected to the optic system and possess multiple output pathways allowing synchronization with the environmental light-dark cycles as well as the control of diverse endocrine, autonomic and behavioral functions. Both circadian master clocks are composed of multiple neurons, which are organized in populations with different morphology, physiology and neurotransmitter content and appear to subserve different functions. In the hamster and in the cockroach, the master clock consists of a core region that gets input from the eyes, and a shell region from which the majority of output projections originate. Communication between core and shell, between all other populations of clock neurons as well as between the master clocks of both brain hemispheres is a prerequisite of normal rhythmic function. Phenomena like rhythm splitting and internal desynchronization can be observed under constant light conditions and are caused by the "uncoupling" of the master clocks of both brain hemispheres.

Circadian regulation of GABAA receptor function by CKI epsilon-CKI delta in the rat suprachiasmatic nuclei

The type A GABA receptors are thought to mediate synchronization of clock cell activity within the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). Here we report that casein kinases I epsilon and delta (CKI epsilon and CKI delta), the crucial clock regulators, form a complex with GABA(A) receptors and inhibit the receptors' function within the SCN according to a circadian rhythm. These results indicate that circadian variation of the kinase-receptor association may mediate regulation of GABA(A) receptor function by CKI epsilon-CKI delta in the SCN.

A circadian rhythm in the expression of PERIOD2 protein reveals a novel SCN-controlled oscillator in the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis

Circadian rhythms in mammals are regulated not only globally by the master clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), but also locally by widely distributed populations of clock cells in the brain and periphery that control tissue-specific rhythmic outputs. Here we show that the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST-OV) exhibits a robust circadian rhythm in expression of the Period2 (PER2) clock protein. PER2 expression is rhythmic in the BNST-OV in rats housed under a light/dark cycle or in constant darkness, in blind rats, and in mice, and is in perfect synchrony with the PER2 rhythm of the SCN. Constant light or bilateral SCN lesions abolish the rhythm of PER2 in the BNST-OV. Large abrupt shifts in the light schedule transiently uncouple the BNST-OV rhythm from that of the SCN. Re-entrainment of the PER2 rhythm is faster in the SCN than in the BNST-OV, and it is faster after a delay than an advance shift. Bilateral adrenalectomy blunts the PER2 rhythm in the BNST-OV. Thus, the BNST-OV contains circadian clock cells that normally oscillate in synchrony with the SCN, but these cells appear to require both input from the SCN and circulating glucocorticoids to maintain their circadian oscillation. Taken together with what is known about the functional organization of the connections of the BNST-OV with systems of the brain involved in stress and motivational processes, these findings place BNST-OV oscillators in a position to influence specific physiological and behavioral rhythms downstream from the SCN clock.

Potential pathways for intercellular communication within the calbindin subnucleus of the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus

In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the master circadian pacemaker. Within the caudal hamster SCN, a cluster of neurons containing the calcium binding protein, calbindin-D28K (CB), has been implicated in circadian locomotion. However, calbindin-immunoreactive (CB+) neurons in the calbindin subnucleus (CBsn) do not display a circadian rhythm in spontaneous firing [Eur J Neurosci 16 (2002) 2469]. Previously, we proposed that intercellular communication might be essential in integrating outputs from rhythmic (CB-) neurons and nonrhythmic (CB+) neurons to produce a circadian output in the intact animal. The primary aim of this study is to provide a neuroanatomical framework to better understand intercellular communication within the CBsn. Using reconstructions of previously recorded neurons, we demonstrate that CB+ neurons have significantly more dendrites than CB- neurons. In addition, CBsn neurons have dorsally oriented dendritic arbors. Using double-label confocal microscopy, we show that GABA colocalizes with CB+ neurons and GABA(A) receptor subunits make intimate contacts with neurons in the CBsn. Transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha), a substance shown to inhibit locomotion [Science 294 (2001) 2511], is present within the CBsn. In addition, neurons in this region express the epidermal growth factor receptor, the only receptor for TGFalpha. Lastly, we show that CB+ neurons are coupled to CB+ and CB- neurons by gap junctions. The current study provides a structural framework for synaptic communication, electrical coupling, and signaling via a growth factor within the CBsn of the hamster SCN. Our results reveal connections that have the potential for integrating cellular communication within a subregion of the SCN that is critically involved in circadian locomotion.

Circadian rhythm in inhibitory synaptic transmission in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus

It is widely accepted that most suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) neurons express the neurotransmitter GABA and are likely to use this neurotransmitter to regulate excitability within the SCN. To evaluate the possibility that inhibitory synaptic transmission varies with a circadian rhythm within the mouse SCN, we used whole cell patch-clamp recording in an acute brain slice preparation to record GABA-mediated spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs). We found that the sIPSC frequency in the dorsal SCN (dSCN) exhibited a TTX-sensitive daily rhythm that peaked during the late day and early night in mice held in a light:dark cycle. We next evaluated whether vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was responsible for the observed rhythm in IPSC frequency. Pretreatment of SCN slices with VPAC(1)/VPAC(2)- or VPAC(2)-specific receptor antagonists prevented the increase in sIPSC frequency in the dSCN. The rhythm in sIPSC frequency was absent in VIP/peptide histidine isoleucine (PHI)-deficient mice. Finally, we were able to detect a rhythm in the frequency of inhibitory synaptic transmission in mice held in constant darkness that was also dependent on VIP and the VPAC(2) receptor. Overall, these data demonstrate that there is a circadian rhythm in GABAergic transmission in the dorsal region of the mouse SCN and that the VIP is required for expression of this rhythm.

Riluzole-Sensitive Slowly Inactivating Sodium Current in Rat Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Neurons

The persistent (i.e., slowly inactivating) fraction of the Na current ( INa,P) regulates excitability of CNS neurons. In isolated rat suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) neurons with a ramp-type voltage-clamp protocol, we have studied the properties of a robust current that has the general properties of INa,P but exhibits a slow inactivation ( INa,S). The time dependence of the development of the inactivation was also studied by clamping of the membrane potential at different levels: time constants ranging from ∼50 to ∼700 ms, depending on the voltage level, were revealed. The INa,S (50–150 pA) was present in both spontaneously active and silent neurons. The neurons exhibited INa,S without visible rundown during ∼1-h recordings. INa,S had a threshold between –65 and –60 mV and was maximal at about –45 mV. Tetrodotoxin (TTX; 1 μM) completely and reversibly blocked INa,S. Riluzole, an effective blocker of INa,P, inhibited reversibly INa,S with an EC50 of 1–2 μM. Microapplication of 10 μM riluzole during either extracellular or intracellular recording suppressed spontaneous activity in isolated SCN neurons. In the slice preparation, bath application of 20 μM riluzole resulted in decreased firing rate or complete suppression of spontaneous activity in some neurons (9/14) but had no effect on other neurons (5/14). In riluzole-resistant neurons in cell-attached experiments, low-amplitude current spikes were present in 1 μM TTX. We concluded that INa,S is ubiquitously expressed by all SCN neurons and that this current is a necessary but not sufficient depolarizing component of the mechanism for spontaneous firing.

Mechanism of Irregular Firing of Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Neurons in Rat Hypothalamic Slices

The mechanisms of irregular firing of spontaneous action potentials in neurons from the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) were studied in hypothalamic slices using cell-attached and whole cell recording. The firing pattern of spontaneous action potentials could be divided into regular and irregular, based on the interspike interval (ISI) histogram and the membrane potential trajectory between action potentials. Similar to previous studies, regular neurons had a firing rate about >3.5 Hz and irregular neurons typically fired about <3.5 Hz. The ISI of irregular-firing neurons was a linear function of the sum of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) between action potentials. Bicuculline (10–30 μM) suppressed IPSPs and converted an irregular pattern to a more regular firing. Bicuculline also depolarized SCN neurons and induced bursting-like activity in some SCN neurons. Gabazine (20 μM), however, suppressed IPSPs without depolarization, and also converted irregular activity to regular firing. Thus GABAA receptor–mediated IPSPs appear responsible for irregular firing of SCN neurons in hypothalamic slices.

A Notch feeling of somite segmentation and beyond

Vertebrate segmentation is manifested during embryonic development as serially repeated units termed somites that give rise to vertebrae, ribs, skeletal muscle and dermis. Many theoretical models including the "clock and wavefront" model have been proposed. There is compelling genetic evidence showing that Notch-Delta signaling is indispensable for somitogenesis. Notch receptor and its target genes, Hairy/E(spl) homologues, are known to be crucial for the ticking of the segmentation clock. Through the work done in mouse, chick, Xenopus and zebrafish, an oscillator operated by cyclical transcriptional activation and delayed negative feedback regulation is emerging as the fundamental mechanism underlying the segmentation clock. Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation and probably other posttranslational regulations are also required. Fgf8 and Wnt3a gradients are important in positioning somite boundaries and, probably, in coordinating tail growth and segmentation. The circadian clock is another biochemical oscillator, which, similar to the segmentation clock, is operated with a negative transcription-regulated feedback mechanism. While the circadian clock uses a more complicated network of pathways to achieve homeostasis, it appears that the segmentation clock exploits the Notch pathway to achieve both signal generation and synchronization. We also discuss mathematical modeling and future directions in the end.

Heterogeneity of rhythmic suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons: Implications for circadian waveform and photoperiodic encoding

Circadian rhythms in neuronal ensemble, subpopulations, and single unit activity were recorded in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of rat hypothalamic slices. Decomposition of the ensemble pattern revealed that neuronal subpopulations and single units within the SCN show surprisingly short periods of enhanced electrical activity of approximately 5 h and show maximal activity at different phases of the circadian cycle. The summed activity accounts for the neuronal ensemble pattern of the SCN, indicating that circadian waveform of electrical activity is a composed tissue property. The recorded single unit activity pattern was used to simulate the responsiveness of SCN neurons to different photoperiods. We inferred predictions on changes in peak width, amplitude, and peak time in the multiunit activity pattern and confirmed these predictions with hypothalamic slices from animals that had been kept in a short or long photoperiod. We propose that the animals' ability to code for day length derives from plasticity in the neuronal network of oscillating SCN neurons.

Novel phase-shifting effects of GABAA receptor activation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of a diurnal rodent

The vast majority of neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the primary circadian pacemaker in mammals, contain the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. Most studies investigating the role of GABA in the SCN have been performed using nocturnal rodents. Activation of GABA(A) receptors by microinjection of muscimol into the SCN phase advances the circadian activity rhythm of nocturnal rodents, but only during the subjective day. Nonphotic stimuli that reset the circadian pacemaker of nocturnal rodents also produce phase advances during the subjective day. The role of GABA in the SCN of diurnal animals and how it may differ from nocturnal animals is not known. In the studies described here, the GABA(A) agonist muscimol was microinjected directly into the SCN region of diurnal unstriped Nile grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus) at various times in their circadian cycle. The results demonstrate that GABA(A) receptor activation produces large phase delays during the subjective day in grass rats. Treatment with TTX did not affect the ability of muscimol to induce phase delays, suggesting that muscimol acts directly on pacemaker cells within the SCN. These data suggest that the circadian pacemakers of nocturnal and diurnal animals respond to the most abundant neurochemical signal found in SCN neurons in opposite ways. These findings are the first to demonstrate a fundamental difference in the functioning of circadian pacemaker cells in diurnal and nocturnal animals.

Primary cell culture of suprachiasmatic nucleus

In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contains a biological clock that drives circadian rhythms in vivo and in vitro. Primary dissociated neuronal culture is a useful research tool, which allows cell-by-cell morphological and physiological study of the SCN. A long-term primary dissociated SCN neuron culture is the prerequisite to understanding how neural activity and morphology interact in the SCN. The essential details of recent effective SCN culture methods are reviewed, including preparation of cells, medium and substrate, maintenance of cultures, and characterization of cultured SCN neurons. This technique is growing in importance, especially with the advent of multi-electrode array (MEA) recording.

Disrupted circadian rhythms in VIP- and PHI-deficient mice

The related neuropeptides vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and peptide histidine isoleucine (PHI) are expressed at high levels in the neurons of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), but their function in the regulation of circadian rhythms is unknown. To study the role of these peptides on the circadian system in vivo, a new mouse model was developed in which both VIP and PHI genes were disrupted by homologous recombination. In a light-dark cycle, these mice exhibited diurnal rhythms in activity which were largely indistinguishable from wild-type controls. In constant darkness, the VIP/PHI-deficient mice exhibited pronounced abnormalities in their circadian system. The activity patterns started approximately 8 h earlier than predicted by the previous light cycle. In addition, lack of VIP/PHI led to a shortened free-running period and a loss of the coherence and precision of the circadian locomotor activity rhythm. In about one-quarter of VIP/PHI mice examined, the wheel-running rhythm became arrhythmic after several weeks in constant darkness. Another striking example of these deficits is seen in the split-activity patterns expressed by the mutant mice when they were exposed to a skeleton photoperiod. In addition, the VIP/PHI-deficient mice exhibited deficits in the response of their circadian system to light. Electrophysiological analysis indicates that VIP enhances inhibitory synaptic transmission within the SCN of wild-type and VIP/PHI-deficient mice. Together, the observations suggest that VIP/PHI peptides are critically involved in both the generation of circadian oscillations as well as the normal synchronization of these rhythms to light.

Simulation of circadian rhythm generation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus with locally coupled self-sustained oscillators

In mammals, circadian rhythms are driven by a pacemaker located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the anterior hypothalamus. The firing rate of neurons within the SCN exhibits a circadian rhythm. There is evidence that individual neurons within the SCN act as circadian oscillators. Rhythm generation in the SCN was therefore modeled by a system of self-sustained oscillators. The model is composed of up to 10000 oscillatory elements arranged in a square array. Each oscillator has its own (randomly determined) intrinsic period reflecting the widely dispersed periods observed in the SCN. The model behavior was investigated mainly in the absence of synchronizing zeitgebers. Due to local coupling the oscillators synchronized and an overall rhythm emerged. This indicates that a locally coupled system is capable of integrating the output of individual clock cells with widely dispersed periods. The period of the global output (average of all oscillators) corresponded to the average of the intrinsic periods and was stable even for small amplitudes and during transients. Noise, reflecting biological fluctuations at the cellular level, distorted the global rhythm in small arrays. The period of the rhythm could be stabilized by increasing the array size, which thus increased the robustness against noise. Since different regions of the SCN have separate output pathways, the array of oscillators was subdivided into four quadrants. Sudden deviations of periodicity sometimes appeared in one quadrant, while the periods of the other quadrants were largely unaffected. This result could represent a model for splitting, which has been observed in animal experiments. In summary, the multi-oscillator model of the SCN showed a broad repertoire of dynamic patterns, revealed a stable period (even during transients) with robustness against noise, and was able to account for such a complex physiological behavior as splitting.

GABA receptor-mediated inhibition of neuronal activity in rat SCN in vitro: pharmacology and influence of circadian phase

The effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on neuronal firing rate in rat suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) slices was examined using continuous recording methods. GABA inhibited neuronal discharge during both the subjective day and the subjective night in a concentration-dependent manner characterized by two apparent affinity states. The GABAA receptor agonist muscimol caused potent inhibition regardless of circadian time; repeated applications of the agonist did not reverse the direction of effect. The GABAA receptor antagonists bicuculline and picrotoxin increased excitability when applied during either subjective day or subjective night. A significant increase in GABAA receptor- mediated inhibition, as well as endogenous GABAergic tone, was observed on the second day after slice preparation. The GABAB receptor agonist baclofen inhibited cell firing during subjective day and night, but the GABAB antagonist phaclofen had no significant effect. These data provide additional strong support for a predominantly inhibitory role of GABA in the rat SCN, regardless of the time of application in relation to the circadian rhythm, and demonstrate an important level of plasticity of this system in vitro.

Regulation of inhibitory synaptic transmission by vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus

Circadian rhythmicity in mammals is generated by a pair of nuclei in the anterior hypothalamus known as the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), whose neurons express a variety of neuropeptides that are thought to play an important role in the circadian timing system. To evaluate the influence of VIP on inhibitory synaptic transmission between SCN neurons, we used whole cell patch-clamp recording in an acute brain slice preparation of mouse SCN. Baseline spontaneous GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) varied significantly between regions and across phases, with a greater frequency of IPSCs observed in the dorsomedial region during the early night. Bath-applied VIP caused a significant increase in the frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSC) in a reversible and dose-dependent manner with no effect on the mean amplitude or kinetic parameters. The effect of VIP was widespread throughout the SCN and observed in both ventrolateral (VL) and dorsomedial (DM) regions. In the presence of tetrodotoxin, VIP increased the frequency of miniature IPSCs without affecting the mean magnitude or kinetic parameters. The magnitude of the enhancement by VIP was significantly larger during the day than during the night. Pretreatment with the VIP-PACAP receptor antagonist [Ac-Tyr1, D-Phe2]-GHRF 1-29 or the selective VPAC2 receptor antagonist PG 99-465 completely blocked the VIP-induced enhancement. The effect of VIP appears to be mediated by a cAMP/PKA-dependent mechanism as forskolin mimics, while the PKA antagonist H-89 blocks the observed enhancement of GABA currents. Our data suggest that VIP activates presynaptic VPAC2 receptors to regulate inhibitory synaptic transmission within the SCN and that this effect varies from day to night.

Differential responses of circadian activity onset and offset following GABA-ergic and opioid receptor activation

The circadian pacemaker in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei is responsive to photic and nonphotic stimuli. In the present study, the authors have investigated the response of activity onset and offset to application of nonphotic stimuli: the benzodiazepine midazolam and the opioid receptor agonist fentanyl. In correspondence with previous studies, both stimuli induced phase advances of the activity onset when given in the mid- to late subjective day. In contrast, activity offset did not phase advance following these injections. Injections during the early subjective day induced small phase delays of the activity onset, while large phase delays occurred in activity offset. Phase shifts, induced at both circadian time zones, were paralleled by an increase in the length of daily activity (alpha). The increase in a remained present during several days after the injection. The different kinetics in phase shifting of the activity onset and offset indicate complexity in phase-shifting behavior of the circadian pacemaker in response to nonphotic stimuli. Moreover, the data show responsiveness of the circadian system to GABA-ergic and opioid receptor activation, not only during the mid- to late subjective day but also during the early subjective day. The data implicate that the early subjective day is an interesting phase for analysis of molecular and biochemical processes involved in nonphotic phase shifting.

Circadian entrainment to temperature, but not light, in the isolated suprachiasmatic nucleus

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the master pacemaker that drives circadian rhythms in mammalian physiology and behavior. The abilities to synchronize to daily cycles in the environment and to keep accurate time over a range of physiologic temperatures are two fundamental properties of circadian pacemakers. Recordings from a bioluminescent reporter (Per1-luc) of Period1 gene activity in rats showed that the cultured SCN entrained to daily, 1.5 degrees C cycles of temperature, but did not synchronize to daily light cycles. Temperature entrainment developed by 1 day after birth. Light cycles failed to affect the isolated SCN of rats aged 2 to 339 days. Entrainment to a 3-h shift in the warm-cool cycle was possible in <3 days with 3 degrees C cycles. Importantly, Per1-luc expression in vitro was similar to that seen in vivo where peak expression occurs approximately 1 h prior to the daily increase in temperature. In addition, the firing rate of individual mouse SCN neurons continued to express near 24-h rhythms from 24-37 degrees C. At lower temperatures, the percentage of rhythmic cells was reduced, but periodicity was temperature compensated. The results indicate that normal rhythms in brain temperature may serve to stabilize rhythmicity of the circadian system in vivo and that temperature compensation of this period is determined at the level of individual SCN cells.

In search of the pathways for light-induced pacemaker resetting in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the mammalian hypothalamus is a circadian pacemaker that functions as a clock. Its endogenous period is adjusted to the external 24-h light-dark cycle, primarily by light-induced phase shifts that reset the pacemaker's oscillation. Evidence using a wide variety of neurobiological and molecular genetic tools has elucidated key elements that comprise the visual input pathway for SCN photoentrainment in rodents. Important questions remain regarding the intracellular signals that reset the autoregulatory molecular loop within photoresponsive cells in the SCN's retino-recipient subdivision, as well as the intercellular coupling mechanisms that enable SCN tissue to generate phase shifts of overt behavioral and physiological circadian rhythms such as locomotion and SCN neuronal firing rate. Multiple neurotransmitters, protein kinases, and photoinducible genes add to system complexity, and we still do not fully understand how dawn and dusk light pulses ultimately produce bidirectional, advancing and delaying phase shifts for pacemaker entrainment.

Electrophysiology of the circadian pacemaker in mammals

The neurons of the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) control circadian rhythms in molecular, physiological, endocrine, and behavioral functions. In the SCN, circadian rhythms are generated at the level of individual neurons. The last decade has provided a wealth of information on the genetic basis for circadian rhythm generation. In comparison, a modest but growing number of studies have investigated how the molecular rhythm is translated into neuronal function. Neuronal attributes have been measured at the cellular and tissue level with a variety of electrophysiological techniques. We have summarized electrophysiological research on neurons that constitute the SCN in an attempt to provide a comprehensive view on the current state of the art.

Defined cell groups in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus have different day/night rhythms of single-unit activity in vivo

The electrical activity of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was examined in anesthetized rats in vivo using single-unit electrophysiological techniques. The present data confirm the daily variation in the electrical activity of the SCN previously reported in vitro and in vivo using multiple-unit recording techniques. They further suggest that subpopulations of suprachiasmatic neurons with different neural connections have a different daily rhythm of activity. Neurons in the SCN region showed a significant rhythm of activity (p = 0.034; Kruskall-Wallis analysis of variance [KW-ANOVA]). The greatest activity occurred during the second part of the light period (ZT 10-12), and the lowest activity occurred in the early part of the light period (ZT 0-2). The subgroup of cells in the suprachiasmatic region with output projections to the arcuate nucleus (ARC) and/or supraoptic nucleus (SON) regions also showed a significant rhythm (p = 0.001; K-W ANOVA). Their activity appeared to show two peaks near the light-dark (ZT 10-12) and dark-light (ZT 22-24) transition periods with the lowest activity at ZT 16-18. This rhythm was significantly different (p = 0.016) from that of neurons without an output projection to the ARC and/or SON. Retinorecipient suprachiasmatic neurons appeared to have a less robust daily rhythm in their activity. The change in the firing behavior of the cells was not reflected simply by changes in mean firing rate. Examination of the coefficient of variation of the interspike interval distribution of cells at different times of day revealed changes in the firing pattern of cells in the SCN region that did not have output projections (p = 0.032; K-W ANOVA). The present results thus suggest that the SCN is composed of a heterogeneous population of neurons and that different rhythms of activity are expressed by neurons with different neural connections. There were changes in both firing pattern and firing rate.

Developmental and circadian changes in Ca2+ mobilization mediated by GABAA and NMDA receptors in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) develops as the circadian pacemaker during postnatal life. Although both GABAA and NMDA receptors are expressed in the majority of SCN neurons, postnatal development of their functions has not been analysed. Thus, we studied the receptor-mediated Ca2+ responses in mouse hypothalamic slices prepared on postnatal days (P) 6-16. The NMDA-induced Ca2+ flux was prominent in the SCN and maximal Ca2+ responses in Mg2+-free conditions had no day-night variations in P14-16 mice. At P6-7, extracellular Mg2+ reduced the NMDA-induced Ca2+ flux irrespective of the circadian time whereas, after P9-10, Mg2+ produced a larger reduction at night than during the daytime. Muscimol also significantly increased Ca2+ in the developing SCN. Voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channel blockers inhibited the muscimol-induced Ca2+ increase whereas tetrodotoxin had no effect, suggesting that stimulation of postsynaptic GABAA receptors depolarizes SCN neurons to increase Ca2+. Macroscopic imaging analysis demonstrated a developmental reduction in the muscimol-induced Ca2+ increase preferentially in the nighttime group older than P9-10. The day-night variation in the magnitude of the Ca2+ response was due to two cell populations, one of which exhibited an increase and the other a decrease in Ca2+ in response to muscimol. Because the critical developmental stages for exhibiting day-night variations in the receptor-mediated Ca2+ responses overlapped the maturation of firing rhythms in SCN neurons, the Ca2+ signalling may be necessary for or regulated by the mature circadian clock.

Per and neuropeptide expression in the rat suprachiasmatic nuclei: compartmentalization and differential cellular induction by light

Per1 and Per2, two clock genes rhythmically expressed in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), are implicated in the molecular mechanism of the circadian pacemaker and play a major role in its entrainment by light. To date, it is not known if every cell of the SCN, a heterogeneous structure in respect of neuropeptide content, expresses clock genes equally. The aim of this study was to identify, by single and double non-radioactive and/or radioactive hybridizations, the cell types (AVP, VIP and GRP) expressing Per1 or Per2 in the SCN of rats, (1) when Per are highly expressed during the daytime, and (2) after induction of Per expression by a light pulse at night. Our results indicate that, during the daytime, Per1 and Per2 genes are both mainly expressed in the AVP cells of the dorso-median part of the SCN, whereas only a few VIP cells in the ventral part of the SCN exhibit Per gene expression. In contrast, following a light pulse at night, there is differential induction of the two Per genes. Per1 expression essentially occurs in the ventro-lateral GRP cells, while Per2 expression is not restricted to the retinorecipient part of the SCN as it also occurs in AVP cells. Altogether, our results suggest that Per1 and Per2 are mainly expressed in AVP cells during the daytime and suggest that GRP cells play an important role in resetting of the clock by light.

[Chrono-endocrinology--quo vadis?]

The present review deals with important new chronobiological results especially in the field of chronoendocrinology, shedding new light on the circadian organisation of mammals including man. In vitro studies have shown that the concept of the existence of a single circadian oscillator located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus has to be extended. Circadian oscillators have also been found to exist in the retina, islets of Langerhans, liver, lung, and fibroblasts. Another major result is the detection of a new photopigment, melanopsin, present in a subpopulation of retinal ganglion cells which are lightsensitive and project to the suprachiasmatic nucleus, acting as zeitgeber for the photic entrainment of the circadian rhythm. We are only beginning to understand how the circadian oscillator transmits the circadian message to the endocrine system. The generation of circadian and seasonal rhythms of hormone synthesis is best understood in the pineal gland and its hormone melatonin. Seasonal changes of melatonin synthesis are transduced in the pars tuberalis of the adenohypophysis which is now entering the limelight of chronoendocrinological research. Currently, the elucidation of the genetic basis and the molecular organisation of the circadian oscillator within individual cells is a major thrust in chronobiological research.

Coordination of circadian timing in mammals

Time in the biological sense is measured by cycles that range from milliseconds to years. Circadian rhythms, which measure time on a scale of 24 h, are generated by one of the most ubiquitous and well-studied timing systems. At the core of this timing mechanism is an intricate molecular mechanism that ticks away in many different tissues throughout the body. However, these independent rhythms are tamed by a master clock in the brain, which coordinates tissue-specific rhythms according to light input it receives from the outside world.

Intercellular coupling mechanism for synchronized and noise-resistant circadian oscillators

The circadian clock in multicellular organisms consists of multiple autonomous single-cell oscillators. These individual oscillator cells produce coherent oscillations even in the presence of internal noise associated with rhythm-generating reaction rates and in the absence of external time cues such as light and temperature. Thus, an intercellular coupling mechanism must synchronize the cells to induce coherent circadian oscillations. We propose the roles of a synchronizing factor that is secreted from individual cells during subjective day to induce light-pulse-type phase shifts in the neighboring cells or, alternatively, a factor that is secreted during subjective night to induce dark-pulse-type phase shifts. Here, we present our multicellular stochastic model of Drosophila circadian rhythms that emulates the intercellular coupling mechanism and suggest that the mechanism facilitates the constancy of the circadian rhythm with possible functional redundancy among different synchronizing factors.

GABA interacts with photic signaling in the suprachiasmatic nucleus to regulate circadian phase shifts

Circadian rhythms of physiology and behavior in mammals are driven by a circadian pacemaker located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus. The majority of neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus are GABAergic, and activation of GABA receptors in the suprachiasmatic nucleus can induce phase shifts of the circadian pacemaker both in vivo and in vitro. GABA also modulates the phase shifts induced by light in vivo, and photic information is thought to be conveyed to the suprachiasmatic nucleus by glutamate. In the present study, we examined the interactions between GABA receptor agonists, glutamate agonists, and light in hamsters in vivo. The GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol and the GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen were microinjected into the suprachiasmatic nucleus at circadian time 13.5 (early subjective night), followed immediately by a microinjection of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA). Both muscimol and baclofen significantly reduced the phase shifting effects of NMDA. Further, coadministration of tetrodotoxin with baclofen did not alter the inhibition of NMDA by baclofen, suggesting a postsynaptic mechanism for the inhibition of NMDA-induced phase shifts by baclofen. Finally, the phase shifting effects of microinjection of muscimol into the suprachiasmatic nucleus during the subjective day were blocked by a subsequent light pulse. These data suggest that GABA regulates the phase of the circadian clock through both pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms.

Circadian modulation of GABA function in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: excitatory effects during the night phase

Gramicidin-perforated patch-clamp recordings were made from slices of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of adult rats to characterize the role of gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) in the circadian timing system. During the day, activation of GABA(A) receptors hyperpolarized the membrane of SCN neurons. During the night, however, activation of GABA(A) receptors either hyperpolarized or depolarized the membrane. These night-restricted depolarizations in a large subset of SCN neurons were capable of triggering spikes and thus appeared to be excitatory. The GABA(A) reversal potentials of SCN neurons revealed a significant day-night difference with more depolarized GABA(A) reversal potentials during the night than during the day. The emergence of depolarizing GABA(A)-mediated responses in a subset of SCN neurons at night can be ascribed to a depolarizing shift in GABA(A) reversal potential. The GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline (12.5 microM) increased the spontaneous firing rate of all SCN neurons during the day, indicating that spontaneous GABA(A)-mediated inputs inhibited the SCN neurons during this period. The effect of bicuculline (12.5 microM) on the spontaneous firing rate of SCN neurons during the night was heterogeneous due to the mixture of depolarizing and hyperpolarizing GABA(A)-mediated inputs during this period. We conclude that GABA uniformly acts as an inhibitory transmitter during the day but excites a large subset of SCN neurons at night. This day-night modulation of GABAergic neurotransmission provides the SCN with a time-dependent gating mechanism that may counteract propagation of excitatory signals throughout the biological clock at day but promotes it at night.

The suprachiasmatic nucleus exhibits diurnal variations in spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic activity

A most prominent feature of neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the circadian rhythm in spontaneous firing frequency. To disclose synaptic mechanisms associated with the rhythmic activity, the spontaneous postsynaptic activity was studied using whole-cell, patch clamp recordings in the ventral region of the SCN in slice preparations from rats. The synaptic events were compared between two time intervals corresponding to the highest and lowest electrical activity within the SCN during subjective daytime and nighttime, respectively. The gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated spontaneous inhibitory activity showed no diurnal variations, but the excitatory activity was markedly higher in frequency, without differences in amplitude, during the subjective day compared to the subjective night. Spontaneous and evoked inhibitory synaptic events were blocked by the GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline. The alpha-amino-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA/kainate) receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2, 3-dione (CNQX) blocked most of the excitatory activity. In addition, CNQX reduced the spontaneous inhibitory activity. The N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid reduced the inhibitory activity to a lesser degree, and there was no significant difference in amplitude or frequency of synaptic events in control and Mg2+-free solutions, indicating that the AMPA receptor plays an important role in regulating the inhibitory release of GABA within the SCN. Ipsi- and contralateral stimulation of the SCN consistently evoked excitatory synaptic responses. Inhibitory synaptic responses occurred in some neurons upon increasing stimulus strength. In conclusion, this study shows that there is a substantial influence from spontaneous glutamatergic synapses on the ventral part of the SCN and that these exhibit daily variations in activity. Diurnal fluctuations in spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic activity within this network may contribute to the mechanisms for synchronization of rhythms between individual SCN neurons and may underlie the daily variations in the spontaneous firing frequency of SCN neurons.

A neural clockwork for encoding circadian time

Many daily biological rhythms are governed by an innate timekeeping mechanism or clock. Endogenous, temperature-compensated circadian clocks have been localized to discrete sites within the nervous systems of a number of organisms. In mammals, the master circadian pacemaker is the bilaterally paired suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the anterior hypothalamus. The SCN is composed of multiple single cell oscillators that must synchronize to each other and the environmental light schedule. Other tissues, including those outside the nervous system, have also been shown to express autonomous circadian periodicities. This review examines 1) how intracellular regulatory molecules function in the oscillatory mechanism and in its entrainment to environmental cycles; 2) how individual SCN cells interact to create an integrated tissue pacemaker with coherent metabolic, electrical, and secretory rhythms; and 3) how such clock outputs are converted into temporal programs for the whole organism.

Molecular regulation of circadian rhythms in Drosophila and mammals

Through the use of genetically amenable model systems, we have begun to form a relatively clear idea as to the molecular mechanisms that constitute a functioning circadian clock. It is now known that mechanisms that underlie overt rhythms are conserved across species. At the basic core of the clock lies a transcriptional/translational feedback loop. The primary components of this loop are called clock genes and are similar for the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, and mammalian systems. However, many questions regarding their regulation remain unanswered. In addition to their localization in brain areas associated with pacemaking function, clock genes are also found in peripheral tissues where their presence may confer circadian regulation upon local, tissue-specific functions. The light-dark cycle is the primary environmental stimulus for the synchronization of the circadian clock. In Drosophila, light is known to induce the degradation of a clock component resulting in the synchronization of the core clock mechanism. Photic signals are transmitted to the clock, at least in part, by the blue light photoreceptor cryptochrome. Although expression of several mammalian clock gene products is also altered in response to light, the photoreceptor(s) involved have not yet been defined.

Signaling to the mammalian circadian clocks: in pursuit of the primary mammalian circadian photoreceptor

The mammalian circadian system is critical for the proper regulation of behavioral and physiological rhythms. The central oscillator, or master clock, is located in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Additional circadian clocks are dispersed throughout most organs and tissues of an animal. The most prominent stimuli capable of synchronizing circadian oscillations to the environment is light. This occurs through daily photic signaling to the SCN, which ultimately results in the appropriate phasing of the various biological rhythms. Two critical aspects of circadian biology that will be discussed here are photic signaling and the communication between central and peripheral clocks. After 10 years of investigation, the primary mammalian circadian photoreceptor remains elusive. Recent findings suggest that multiple photoreceptive molecules may contribute to the perception of environmental light cycles. In addition, the relatively recent identification of cell-autonomous peripheral clocks has opened up an entirely new area of investigation. Deciphering the communication networks responsible for harmonious central and peripheral clock function is a critical step toward the development of effective therapies for circadian-related disorders.

Rhythmic variation in gamma-aminobutyric acid(A)-receptor subunit composition in the circadian system and median eminence of Syrian hamsters

Temporal changes in the level of expression of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptor subunits alpha2, alpha5, beta1 and beta3 were characterized by Western blot analysis in the hamster suprachiasmatic nuclei, retina and median eminence. A nocturnal maximum in the level of GABA(A) receptor beta1 subunit at midday and midnight (12:00 and 00.00 h) was found in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the retina and the median eminence of Syrian hamsters. Alpha2 and beta3 subunit levels peaked during the day in the median eminence. Finally, retinal alpha5 levels were maximal during the night. beta1 temporal changes in the SCN and median eminence, as well as alpha2 variations in the median eminence were maintained under constant dark conditions, suggesting an endogenous control, while the other variations were only observed under light-dark cycle conditions.

Role of individual neurons and neural networks in cognitive functioning of the brain: a new insight

The prevailing concept in modern neuroscience is that neuron networks play a dominant role in the functioning of the nervous system, whereas the role of individual neurons is rather insignificant. This concept suggests that "individuality" of single neurons is primarily determined by their place in a network rather than their intrinsic properties. Here I argue that individual neurons may play an important, if not decisive, role in performing cognitive functions of the brain. This tentative viewpoint is supported by experimental and clinical insights into disorders of cognitive functions and by genetic studies of cognitive abilities and disabilities. The results obtained in these studies indicate that many specific cognitive functions are carried out by groups of highly specialized neurons whose roles in performing these functions are genetically predetermined and their activity could not be substituted by the activity of other neurons. In this context, the main role of neural networks and intercellular interactions is to form dynamic ensembles of neurons involved in performing a given cognitive function.

The mammalian circadian clock shop

In mammals, a master circadian pacemaker driving daily rhythms in behavior and physiology resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The SCN contains multiple circadian oscillators that synchronize to environmental cycles and to each other in vivo. Rhythm production, an intracellular event, depends on more than eight identified genes. The period of the rhythms within the SCN also depends upon intercellular communication. Many other tissues also retain the ability to generate near 24 -h periodicities although their place in the organization of circadian timing is still unclear. This paper focuses on the tissue-, cellular- and molecular-level events that generate and entrain circadian rhythms in behavior in mammals and emphasizes the apparent differences between the SCN and peripheral oscillators.

Regional pacemakers composed of multiple oscillator neurons in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus

Regional specificities of the dorsal and ventral regions of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) were examined to elucidate the structure of multioscillator circadian organization. The circadian rhythms of arginine vasopressin (AVP) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) release, and of electrical activity of individual neurons were measured in an organotypic, static slice culture of the SCN obtained from neonatal rats. Five days after the start of culture, robust circadian rhythms were detected in AVP release with a peak located consistently at the middle of the original light phase, while the 24 h profiles of VIP release were either arrhythmic or rhythmic. In the latter case, a phase delay of 5-7 h was observed in the circadian peak from the AVP rhythm. Multi-channel, extracellular recording revealed that 51 (76.1%) out of 67 firing neurons, examined in the SCN, showed circadian rhythms in their firing rate. The percentage of rhythmic neurons was significantly larger in the dorsal (86.8%) than in the ventral (62.1%) region of the SCN, where the AVP and VIP containing neurons predominate, respectively. Twenty-seven percent of the firing rhythms were almost antiphasic from the majority of rhythms. There was no regional specificity in the distribution of the antiphasic rhythm. These findings, that the dorsal and ventral regions of the SCN both contain circadian pacemakers with different properties that regulate the AVP and VIP release separately, is probably due to differences in the number and, hence, the coupling strength of oscillating neurons.

Cellular communication and coupling within the suprachiasmatic nucleus

In mammals, the part of the nervous system responsible for most circadian behavior can be localized to a pair of structures in the hypothalamus known as the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Importantly, when SCN neurons are removed from the organism and maintained in a brain slice preparation, they continue to generate 24h rhythms in electrical activity, secretion, and gene expression. Previous studies suggest that the basic mechanism responsible for the generation of these rhythms is intrinsic to individual cells in the SCN. If we assume that individual cells in the SCN are competent circadian oscillators, it is obviously important to understand how these cells communicate and remain synchronized with each other. Cell-to-cell communication is clearly necessary for conveying inputs to and outputs from the SCN and may be involved in ensuring the high precision of the observed rhythm. In addition, there is a growing body of evidence that a number of systems-level phenomena could be dependent on the cellular communication between circadian pacemaker neurons. It is not yet known how this cellular synchronization occurs, but it is likely that more than one of the already proposed mechanisms is utilized. The purpose of this review is to summarize briefly the possible mechanisms by which the oscillatory cells in the SCN communicate with each other.

Multiple oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus is the site of the pacemaker that controls circadian rhythms of a variety of physiological functions. Data strongly indicate the majority of the SCN neurons express self-sustaining oscillations that can be detected as rhythms in the spontaneous firing of individual neurons. The period of single SCN neurons in a dissociated cell culture is dispersed in a wide range (from 20h to 28h in rats), but that of the locomotor rhythm is close to 24h, suggesting individual oscillators are coupled to generate an averaged circadian period in the nucleus. Electrical coupling via gap junctions, glial regulation, calcium spikes, ephaptic interactions. extracellular ion flux, and diffusible substances have been discussed as possible mechanisms that mediate the interneuronal rhythm synchrony. Recently, GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid), a major neurotransmitter in the SCN, was reported to regulate cellular communication and to synchronize rhythms through GABA(A) receptors. At present, subsequent intracellular processes that are able to reset the genetic loop of oscillations are unknown. There may be diverse mechanisms for integrating the multiple circadian oscillators in the SCN. This article reviews the knowledge about the various circadian oscillations intrinsic to the SCN, with particular focus on the intercellular signaling of coupled oscillators.

Chimera analysis of the Clock mutation in mice shows that complex cellular integration determines circadian behavior

The Clock mutation lengthens periodicity and reduces amplitude of circadian rhythms in mice. The effects of Clock are cell intrinsic and can be observed at the level of single neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. To address how cells of contrasting genotype functionally interact in vivo to control circadian behavior, we have analyzed a series of Clock mutant mouse aggregation chimeras. Circadian behavior in Clock/Clock <--> wild-type chimeric individuals was determined by the proportion of mutant versus normal cells. Significantly, a number of intermediate phenotypes, including Clock/+ phenocopies and novel combinations of the parental behavioral characteristics, were seen in balanced chimeras. Multivariate statistical techniques were used to quantitatively analyze relationships among circadian period, amplitude, and suprachiasmatic nucleus composition. Together, our results demonstrate that complex integration of cellular phenotypes determines the generation and expression of coherent circadian rhythms at the organismal level.

Photic regulation of circadian rhythms and the expression of p75 neurotrophin receptor immunoreactivity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus in rats

Neurotrophic factors have been implicated in the mechanism underlying photic regulation of circadian rhythms in mammals. In rats, the most abundant neurotrophin receptor found in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the circadian clock, is the low affinity p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR). This receptor is expressed by retinal afferents of the SCN, but nothing is known about its role in photic regulation of circadian rhythms. We show here that neonatal treatment with the retinal neurotoxin, monosodium glutamate (MSG), which has no effect on photic entrainment of circadian rhythms, nearly completely abolished p75NTR immunoreactivity in the SCN in rats. These findings suggest that p75NTR from retinal sources do not play an essential role in the mechanism mediating photic entrainment of circadian rhythms in rats.

Human casein kinase Idelta phosphorylation of human circadian clock proteins period 1 and 2

Casein kinase Iepsilon (CKIepsilon), a central component of the circadian clock, interacts with and phosphorylates human period protein 1 (hPER1) [Keesler, G.A. et al. (2000) NeuroReport 5, 951-955]. A mutation in CKIepsilon causes a shortened circadian period in Syrian Golden hamster. We have now extended our previous studies to show that human casein kinase Idelta (hCKIdelta), the closest homologue to hCKIepsilon, associates with and phosphorylates hPER1 and causes protein instability. Furthermore, we observed that both hCKIdelta and hCKIepsilon phosphorylated and caused protein instability of human period 2 protein (hPER2). Immunohistochemical staining of rat brains demonstrates that CKIdelta protein is localized in the suprachiasmatic nuclei, the central location of the master clock. These results indicate that CKIdelta may play a role similar to CKIepsilon, suggesting that it may also be involved in regulating circadian rhythmicity by post-translation modification of mammalian clock proteins hPER1 and 2.

Biochemical networks in nervous systems: expanding neuronal information capacity beyond voltage signals

In addition to synaptically mediated signals that are based on changes in membrane potential, neurons also generate and receive many types of signals that involve biochemical pathways, some of which are independent of voltage. Although networks of biochemical pathways have often been thought of as being only neuromodulatory, recent computational and experimental studies have highlighted how these pathways can also integrate and transfer information themselves. Interactions between biochemical pathways involving positive and negative feedback loops allow biochemical signals to exhibit emergent properties, most notably bistability and oscillations. New and evolving techniques, including real-time imaging of second messengers, hold the promise of illuminating information processing that cannot be detected using microelectrodes, and revealing how 'biochemical integration' might contribute to the computational abilities of the nervous system.

Light induces chromatin modification in cells of the mammalian circadian clock

The mammalian circadian clock resides in neurons of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Light entrains phase resetting of the clock using the retino-hypothalamic tract, via release of glutamate. Nighttime light exposure causes rapid, transient induction of clock and immediate-early genes implicated in phase-shifting the pacemaker. Here we show that a nighttime light pulse caused phosphorylation of Ser10 in histone H3's tail, in SCN clock cells. The effect of light was specific, and the kinetics of H3 phosphorylation were characteristic of the early response, paralleling c-fos and Per1 induction. Using fos-lacZ transgenic mice, we found that H3 phosphorylation and Fos induction occurRed in the same SCN neurons. Systemic treatment with the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen prevented light-induced c-fos and Per1 expression and H3 phosphorylation, indicating that one signaling pathway governs both events. Our results suggest that dynamic chromatin remodeling in the SCN occurs in response to a physiological stimulus in vivo.

Multilevel regulation of the circadian clock

Living organisms adapt to light-dark rhythmicity using a complex programme based on internal clocks. These circadian clocks, which are regulated by the environment, direct various physiological functions. As the molecular mechanisms that govern clock function are unravelled, we are starting to appreciate simple patterns as well as exquisite layers of regulation.

Functional independence of circadian clocks that regulate plant gene expression

BACKGROUND

Circadian clocks regulate the gene expression, metabolism and behaviour of most eukaryotes, controlling an orderly succession of physiological processes that are synchronised with the environmental day/night cycle. Central circadian pacemakers that control animal behaviour are located in the brains of insects and rodents, but the location of such a pacemaker has not been determined in plants. Peripheral plant and animal tissues also maintain circadian rhythms when isolated in culture, indicating that these tissues contain circadian clocks. The degree of autonomy that the multiple, peripheral circadian clocks have in the intact organism is unclear.

RESULTS

We used the bioluminescent luciferase reporter gene to monitor rhythmic expression from three promoters in transgenic Arabidopsis and tobacco plants. The rhythmic expression of a single gene could be set at up to three phases in different anatomical locations of a single plant, by applying light/dark treatments to restricted tissue areas. The initial phases were stably maintained after the entraining treatments ended, indicating that the circadian oscillators in intact plants are autonomous. This result held for all the vegetative plant organs and for promoters expressed in all major cell types. The rhythms of one organ were unaffected by entrainment of the rest of the plant, indicating that phase-resetting signals are also autonomous.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher plants contain a spatial array of autonomous circadian clocks that regulate gene expression without a localised pacemaker. Circadian timing in plants might be less accurate but more flexible than the vertebrate circadian system.

The suprachiasmatic nucleus and the circadian time-keeping system revisited

Many physiological and behavioral processes show circadian rhythms which are generated by an internal time-keeping system, the biological clock. In rodents, evidence from a variety of studies has shown the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) to be the site of the master pacemaker controlling circadian rhythms. The clock of the SCN oscillates with a near 24-h period but is entrained to solar day/night rhythm by light. Much progress has been made recently in understanding the mechanisms of the circadian system of the SCN, its inputs for entrainment and its outputs for transfer of the rhythm to the rest of the brain. The present review summarizes these new developments concerning the properties of the SCN and the mechanisms of circadian time-keeping. First, we will summarize data concerning the anatomical and physiological organization of the SCN, including the roles of SCN neuropeptide/neurotransmitter systems, and our current knowledge of SCN input and output pathways. Second, we will discuss SCN transplantation studies and how they have contributed to knowledge of the intrinsic properties of the SCN, communication between the SCN and its targets, and age-related changes in the circadian system. Third, recent findings concerning the genes and molecules involved in the intrinsic pacemaker mechanisms of insect and mammalian clocks will be reviewed. Finally, we will discuss exciting new possibilities concerning the use of viral vector-mediated gene transfer as an approach to investigate mechanisms of circadian time-keeping.

Cellular and molecular basis of circadian timing in mammals

In mammals, a master circadian clock resides in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of the anterior hypothalamus. The suprachiasmatic nuclei is composed of multiple, single-cell circadian oscillators, which, when synchronized, lead to coordinated circadian outputs that ultimately regulate overt rhythms. Several "clock genes" have been cloned that are involved in interacting transcriptional/translational feedback loops that comprise the molecular clockwork. The daily light-dark cycle ultimately impinges on the control of 2 clock genes that reset the core clock mechanism. Output genes are also generated by the central clock mechanism, but their protein products transduce downstream effects. Greater understanding of the cellular and molecular control of the suprachiasmatic nuclei provides opportunities for pharmacological manipulation of circadian timing.