Oral, direct Factor Xa inhibition with BAY 59-7939 for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement

Enantiopure five-membered cyclicdiamine derivatives as potent and selective inhibitors of factor Xa. Improving in vitro metabolic stability via core modifications

We previously reported a series of enantiopure cis-(1R,2S)-cyclopentyldiamine derivatives as potent and selective inhibitors of Factor Xa (FXa). Herein, we describe our approach to improve the metabolic stability of this series via core modifications. Multiple resulting series of compounds demonstrated similarly high FXa potency and improved metabolic stability in human liver microsomes compared with the cyclopentyldiamide 1. (3R,4S)-Pyrrolidinyldiamide 31 was the best overall compound with human FXa K(i) of 0.50 nM, PT EC(2x) of 2.1 microM in human plasma, bioavailability of 25% and t(1/2)of 2.7h in dogs. Further biochemical characterization of compound 31 is also presented.

Treatment of Proximal Deep-Vein Thrombosis With the Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939)

Background— An effective and safe oral anticoagulant that needs no monitoring for dose adjustment is urgently needed for the treatment of diseases that require long-term anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor currently under clinical development.

Methods and Results— This randomized, parallel-group phase II trial in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis explored the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban 10, 20, or 30 mg BID or 40 mg once daily compared with enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID followed by vitamin K antagonist. Each treatment was administered for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was an improvement in thrombotic burden at day 21 (assessed by quantitative compression ultrasonography; ≥4-point improvement in thrombus score) without recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism or venous thromboembolism-related death. The primary safety end point was major bleeding during 12 weeks of treatment. Outcomes were adjudicated centrally without knowledge of treatment allocation. The primary efficacy end point was achieved in 53 (53.0%) of 100, 58 (59.2%) of 98, 62 (56.9%) of 109, and 49 (43.8%) of 112 patients receiving rivaroxaban 10, 20, or 30 mg BID or 40 mg once daily, respectively, compared with 50 (45.9%) of 109 patients treated with enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist. There was no significant trend in the dose-response relationship between rivaroxaban BID and the primary efficacy end point ( P =0.67). Major bleeding was observed in 1.7%, 1.7%, 3.3%, and 1.7% of patients receiving rivaroxaban 10, 20, or 30 mg BID or 40 mg once daily, respectively. There were no major bleeding events with enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist.

Conclusions— Results of this proof-of-concept and dose-finding study support phase III evaluation of the orally active direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban, because efficacy and safety were apparent in the treatment of proximal deep-vein thrombosis across a 3-fold range of fixed daily dosing.

Association between asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis detected by venography and symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee surgery

BACKGROUND

Venography is commonly used to compare the efficacy of different thromboprophylaxis strategies for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).

METHODS

We explored the relation between asymptomatic DVT and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing THR or TKR treated with standard doses of enoxaparin (30 mg b.i.d. or 40 mg o.d.) by comparing the incidence of asymptomatic DVT in venographic studies with the incidence of symptomatic VTE in studies where venography was not performed.

RESULTS

In 10 venographic studies involving 5796 patients, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT after THR was 13.2% [95% CI, 12.2-14.2%] and after TKR was 38.1% (95% CI, 35.5-40.8%). In two studies involving 3500 patients who did not undergo venography, the 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTE after THR was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.1-3.4%) and after TKR was 1.8% (95% CI, 0.9-2.7%). For every symptomatic VTE in THR studies where venography was not performed there were five asymptomatic DVTs in the venographic studies; for TKR, the ratio was 1:21. The incidence of asymptomatic DVT and the symptomatic VTE/asymptomatic DVT ratio was influenced by the venogram reading committee (Gothenburg vs. Hamilton: total DVT after THR, 19.5% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.0001; for TKR, 42.7% vs. 27.2%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparisons across trials show a consistent relation between asymptomatic venographic DVT in patients undergoing elective THR or TKR surgery and symptomatic VTE in patients not undergoing venography. Differences exist in the strength of the relation depending on the type of surgery and the venogram reading committee.

Ultrasound screening for asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis after major orthopaedic surgery: the VENUS study

BACKGROUND

Venography is currently used to assess the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in dose-finding and confirmatory trials of new antithrombotic agents. Centrally adjudicated, complete compression ultrasound (CCUS) could be a non-invasive alternative to venography.

OBJECTIVES

A substudy of two, similarly designed, phase IIb trials of a novel, oral anticoagulant for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip or knee arthroplasty was undertaken to validate CCUS against venography.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Patients received study drugs until mandatory, bilateral venography was performed 7 +/- 2 days after surgery. CCUS was performed within 24 h after venography by sonographers blinded to the venography result. Sonographers were trained and certified for the standardized examination and documentation procedure. Venograms and sonograms were adjudicated centrally at different sites by two independent readers; discrepancies between readers were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 1104 matching pairs of evaluable venograms and sonograms were obtained from the participants of the two trials (n = 1435): 19% of venograms and 20% of sonograms were not evaluable. The observed frequency of any DVT was 18.9% with venography and 11.5% with CCUS. Sensitivity of CCUS compared with venography was 31.1% for any DVT (95% confidence interval 23.4, 38.9), 21.0% (2.7, 39.4) for proximal DVT, and 30.8% (23.1, 38.6) for distal DVT. The figures for specificity were 93.0% (91.0, 95.1), 98.7% (98.0, 99.5), and 93.3% (91.5, 95.3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, centrally adjudicated CCUS will be unable to replace venography for DVT screening early after major orthopaedic surgery in studies evaluating anticoagulant drugs.

Latest medical treatment strategies for venous thromboembolism

Anticoagulant therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) followed by warfarin prevents thrombus extension, reduces the risk of recurrent thrombosis and prevents death in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has replaced UFH as the preferred initial anticoagulant therapy for VTE because it is as effective and safe as UFH, but does not require laboratory monitoring and is less likely to cause immune thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis. More recently, fondaparinux has been shown to be an effective and safe alternative to LMWH and several new parenteral anticoagulants are being evaluated. The most important unmet need in the anticoagulant management of VTE is a replacement for warfarin. New oral anticoagulants that selectively target individual steps in the coagulation cascade have been shown to be effective for the long-term treatment of VTE in Phase II and III trials and are likely to become available in the near future.

SAR and X-ray structures of enantiopure 1,2-cis-(1R,2S)-cyclopentyldiamine and cyclohexyldiamine derivatives as inhibitors of coagulation Factor Xa

In the search of Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors structurally different from the pyrazole-based series, we identified a viable series of enantiopure cis-(1R,2S)-cycloalkyldiamine derivatives as potent and selective inhibitors of FXa. Among them, cyclohexyldiamide 7 and cyclopentyldiamide 9 were the most potent neutral compounds, and had good anticoagulant activity comparable to the pyrazole-based analogs. Crystal structures of 7-FXa and 9-FXa illustrate binding similarities and differences between the five- and the six-membered core systems, and provide rationales for the observed SAR of P1 and linker moieties.

Body weight has limited influence on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, or pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) in healthy subjects

Anticoagulants are often dose adjusted, or their use restricted, in patients with extremes of body weight. Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is a novel, oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development. This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in healthy male and female subjects to assess the effect of extreme body weight (< or = 50 kg and >120 kg), and gender, on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban 10 mg, compared with subjects of normal weight (70-80 kg). Rivaroxaban was well tolerated. Cmax of rivaroxaban was unaffected in subjects >120 kg but was increased by 24% in subjects weighing < or = 50 kg, resulting in a small (15%) increase in prolongation of prothrombin time, which was not considered clinically relevant. The area under the curve was unaffected by body weight or gender. No other clinically relevant differences were observed, suggesting that rivaroxaban is unlikely to require dose adjustment for body weight or gender.

Beyond heparin and warfarin: the new generation of anticoagulants

Heparin and warfarin are widely used for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Although effective, both agents have important limitations; for example, both drugs must be monitored, which is inconvenient for patients and for physicians. Heparin requires parenteral administration and can cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an immune-mediated process that can lead to life-threatening thrombosis. Warfarin also has its limitations. Due to its slow onset of action, warfarin must be overlapped with heparin (or another rapidly acting anticoagulant) when treating patients with established thrombosis or who are at high risk for thrombosis. Warfarin dosing is variable because its activity is influenced by dietary intake of vitamin K, genetic polymorphisms in enzymes that are involved in its metabolism and numerous drug-drug interactions that promote or reduce its activity. New anticoagulants have been developed to overcome these problems. Building on a better understanding of coagulation pathways, advances in structure-based drug design and information derived from natural anticoagulants isolated from hematophagous organisms, most of the new anticoagulants target specific coagulation enzymes. Focussing on drugs that have at least completed Phase II evaluation, this article briefly reviews the coagulation pathways and its natural regulators; outlines the limitations of existing anticoagulants and identifies the opportunities for new ones; highlights the properties of selected new anticoagulants; describes the clinical trial results with these agents; and provides a perspective on their potential strengths and weaknesses.

A phase II study of the oral factor Xa inhibitor LY517717 for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee replacement

BACKGROUND

LY517717 is an oral direct inhibitor of activated factor X that is currently under clinical development.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this proof-of-concept study in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) or total hip replacement (THR) were to determine whether LY517717 can safely reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and to identify at least one dose of LY517717 that is non-inferior to enoxaparin.

METHODS

In a double-blind, parallel-arm, dose-ranging study, patients undergoing TKR or THR were randomly allocated to receive once-daily oral LY517717 (25, 50, 75, 100, 125 or 150 mg), started 6-8 h after wound closure, or s.c. enoxaparin, 40 mg, started in the evening before surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), detected by mandatory bilateral venography performed at the end of the study treatment (between days 5 and 9), and objectively confirmed symptomatic DVT and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), occurring during the treatment period. The combination of major and minor bleeding was the primary safety endpoint.

RESULTS

Five hundred and seven patients received at least one dose of LY517717 or enoxaparin (safety population). Three hundred and ninety-one patients had evaluable bilateral venography or experienced a clinical DVT and/or PE (primary efficacy population). LY517717 treatment resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the incidence of thromboembolic events (P = 0.0001). The incidences of VTE with 100, 125, and 150 mg of LY517717 were 19%, 19% and 16%, respectively, compared to 21% with enoxaparin. The efficacies of 100-mg, 125-mg and 150-mg doses of LY517717 were non-inferior to that of enoxaparin according to prespecified criteria. Bleeding events were uncommon in both LY517717 and enoxaparin patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Doses of 100, 125 and 150 mg of LY517717 are non-inferior to enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE after TKR or THR, and are associated with similar low rates of bleeding.

Oral, direct factor Xa inhibitors in development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases

Anticoagulants are recommended for the prevention and treatment of a wide variety of thromboembolic events. Although existing anticoagulants are effective, their use is limited by parenteral administration or the requirement for frequent monitoring and subsequent dose adjustment. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel, oral agents with a predictable anticoagulant action. Because of its key position in the coagulation cascade and its limited roles outside of coagulation, Factor Xa has emerged as an attractive target for novel anticoagulants. As a result, the past decade has witnessed an explosion of research into small-molecule, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitors, and several are now in clinical development. Rivaroxaban, LY517717, YM150, apixaban, PRT054021, and DU-176b, among others, have shown considerable promise; rivaroxaban is currently furthest ahead in its developmental program, having entered phase III in 3 indications. It is hoped that, before long, these anticoagulants will allow us to enter an era of convenient, oral anticoagulation, without the need for regular monitoring or dose adjustment.

Exploration of potential prodrugs of RWJ-445167, an oxyguanidine-based dual inhibitor of thrombin and factor Xa

Compound 2 (RWJ-445167; 3DP-10017), a dual inhibitor of thrombin and factor Xa, was advanced into human clinical studies. However, its oral bioavailability in humans proved to be below acceptable limits. To address this issue, we explored a prodrug approach involving numerous guanidine derivatives. Prodrug candidates of classes A (carbamate derivatives), B (imidate derivatives), and C (alkyl and acyl derivatives), compounds 3-6, were synthesized and evaluated for anticoagulant activity at 2 h after oral administration to rats. In comparison to the parent drug (2), little worthwhile improvement was observed for the prodrug candidates.

A once-daily, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939), for thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939)--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--could be an alternative to heparins and warfarin for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator-controlled, multinational, dose-ranging study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily rivaroxaban relative to enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Patients (n=873) were randomized to once-daily oral rivaroxaban doses of 5, 10, 20, 30, or 40 mg (initiated 6 to 8 hours after surgery) or a once-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin dose of 40 mg (given the evening before and > or = 6 hours after surgery). Study drugs were continued for an additional 5 to 9 days; mandatory bilateral venography was performed the following day. The primary end point (composite of any deep vein thrombosis, objectively confirmed pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality) was observed in 14.9%, 10.6%, 8.5%, 13.5%, 6.4%, and 25.2% of patients receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg rivaroxaban, and 40 mg enoxaparin, respectively (n=618, per-protocol population). No significant dose-response relationship was found for efficacy (P=0.0852). Major postoperative bleeding was observed in 2.3%, 0.7%, 4.3%, 4.9%, 5.1%, and 1.9% of patients receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg rivaroxaban, and 40 mg enoxaparin, respectively (n=845, safety population), representing a significant dose-response relationship (P=0.0391).

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban showed efficacy and safety similar to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement, with the convenience of once-daily oral dosing and without the need for coagulation monitoring. When both efficacy and safety are considered, these results suggest that 10 mg rivaroxaban once daily should be investigated in phase III studies.

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939)--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--has no clinically relevant interaction with naproxen

AIMS

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Frequent co-medications in the patient populations likely to receive rivaroxaban include NSAIDs. This randomized, two-way crossover study, with a naproxen run-in period, was performed to determine whether naproxen influences the tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban.

METHODS

Eleven healthy, young males received naproxen 500 mg on two consecutive days, a single dose of rivaroxaban 15 mg, or both.

RESULTS

Treatments were well tolerated: adverse events (eight in total), reported by three subjects, were mild and not drug related. Rivaroxaban inhibited Factor Xa activity by 35% and prolonged prothrombin time [by 1.4 times baseline (tb)], activated partial thromboplastin time (1.3 tb) and the HepTest (1.9 tb). Naproxen had no influence on these measures and the combination of rivaroxaban and naproxen did not affect platelet aggregation. Rivaroxaban and naproxen given together significantly increased bleeding time compared with rivaroxaban alone (P = 0.017). However, this difference was small compared with the effect of naproxen given alone, except in one subject. Least squares-means ratios for the AUC and C(max) of rivaroxaban after administration alone and with naproxen were 1.125 [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.995, 1.271] and 1.095 (90% CI 0.905, 1.325), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There appeared to be no clinically relevant interaction between rivaroxaban and naproxen in healthy subjects, although some individuals may be more sensitive to the combination. Large-scale Phase III clinical studies will be required to confirm whether there is an increased risk of bleeding during treatment with rivaroxaban and concomitant NSAIDs.

Cibles des médicaments antithrombotiques

New antithrombotic agents are being developed not only to improve efficacy, but also to increase safety in comparison with widely used conventional agents such as the oral anticoagulants. New anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and profibrinolytic compounds are currently under study in drug development programs, and most of those in phase II or III of development are derived from the observation of natural phenomena and merely mimic processes developed by mammalians, including humans, to avoid thrombosis, or by blood-sucking insects or animals to prevent coagulation of the blood their are feeding on. By contrast, drug candidates identified by means of rigorous research and designed to target new pathways and achieve direct and specific inhibition of factors that are presumed to play an important role in thrombogenesis have generally failed to show any benefit and sometimes even induce deleterious effects. The clinical development of new drugs, even those mimicking natural phenomena, improves our knowledge of the pathogenesis of thrombosis and sheds light, retrospectively, on previous conceptual errors. The improvement in our basic knowledge and the development of new types of drugs suggest that, in contrast to the current antithrombotic compounds that are used in a broad range of clinical settings, use of new drugs should be restricted to specific situations in which their mechanisms of action are predicted to deliver the highest medical benefit. A major obstacle resides in the fact that current drug development programs are still required to comply with long obsolete guidelines based on the characteristics of first-generation antithrombotic agents, and that do not take into account the specific mechanisms of action of new drugs. This situation should change, however, and new antithrombotic drugs should soon be able to benefit from adapted development programs that will make it possible to determine their optimal risk-benefit ratio.

Novel factor Xa inhibitors for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases

Novel anticoagulants to replace unfractionated heparins, low molecular weight heparins and vitamin K antagonists, are needed urgently. Coagulation factor Xa is an attractive target for drug development because of its position at the convergence of the intrinsic and extrinsic clotting pathways. There are two differing strategies of inhibiting factor Xa that are being pursued: indirect inhibition by compounds such as fondaparinux and idraparinux, requiring antithrombin as a cofactor; and direct inhibition by compounds such as rivaroxaban (BAY 597939), DX-9065a, otamixaban, LY517717 and YM150. Of these compounds, fondaparinux is approved for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and idraparinux is in Phase III for venous thromboembolism treatment and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Rivaroxaban has undergone extensive Phase II studies for venous thromboembolism prevention after orthopaedic surgery, and Phase III studies have begun. In this review, we will discuss the pharmacological effects of factor Xa inhibitors and the latest clinical developments.

The status of new anticoagulants

Currently available anticoagulants include heparin, low-molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux and warfarin. Despite advances with low-molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux, the currently available agents have limitations that have provided the impetus for the development of new drugs for prevention and treatment of both venous and arterial thromboembolism. Novel anticoagulants targeting specific steps in coagulation are in various stages of development. This paper reviews the pharmacology of these new agents and describes the results of clinical trials with new anticoagulants in more advanced stages of clinical testing.

New Anticoagulants

Traditional anticoagulant drugs, including unfractionated heparin and warfarin, have several limitations. New anticoagulants have been developed that target a single coagulation factor and have predictable dose-response relationships. These include direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors. Two parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors, lepirudin and argatroban, have FDA approval for the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Bivalirudin is a parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor that is licensed for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and for those with HIT who require percutaneous coronary interventions. Ximelagatran, an oral prodrug of the direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran, showed efficacy in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism as well as stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, due to nonhematologic safety concerns, it did not receive FDA approval in the US. Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide, which binds to antithrombin, thereby indirectly selectively inhibiting factor Xa. Fondaparinux demonstrated efficacy compared to low-molecular-weight heparin in randomized clinical trials and is FDA approved for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. The OASIS 5 trial in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes recently demonstrated that the fondaparinux dose approved for prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis is as efficacious with respect to ischemic outcomes as therapeutic doses of enoxaparin; fondaparinux, however, was associated with a substantial reduction in major bleeding at 9 days and mortality at 1 and 6 months. A number of oral direct factor Xa inhibitors as well as other oral direct thrombin inhibitors are in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis; the current status of these anticoagulants is reviewed along with the challenges faced in designing pivotal clinical trials of these agents in comparison to existing anticoagulants.

Oral Anticoagulants in Development

Current anticoagulant provision is dominated by parenteral heparin and oral warfarin, which act by inhibiting several steps of the coagulation pathway indirectly. Recent research efforts have focused on the identification of small molecule inhibitors of the coagulation enzymes as novel therapies for thrombotic disorders. There has been particular success in developing nonpeptidic, orally available, small molecules to directly inhibit the key proteases, factor IIa and factor Xa. Of the new oral anticoagulants in development, the two agents in the most advanced stage are dabigatran etexilate (BIBR 1048) and rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939), which inhibit factor IIa and factor Xa, respectively. Other agents in the early stages of development include several Xa inhibitors (LY-517717, YM150, DU-176b and apixaban [BMS-562247]), a factor IXa inhibitor (TTP889), and an orally active glycosaminoglycan enhancer (odiparcil [SB-424323]), which indirectly enhances thrombin inhibition via heparin cofactor II. Results have been reported from important, phase II dose-finding studies, and a number of registration-track phase III studies have been initiated, reflecting the drive towards potentially more effective, but primarily safer and more convenient therapies for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis. Indeed, two unmet needs for anticoagulation that can be easily identified are safety and ease of use. Safety relates primarily to the incidence of major bleeding and this remains the key concern of orthopaedic surgeons, over and above any efficacy advantage, and convenience of use, which centres on oral administration replacing the need for injections. The clinical development of these new anticoagulants is following the well tested strategy of dose-ranging and registration studies in major orthopaedic surgery, prior to development in arterial indications. There are a number of subtle issues, including the timing of the first perioperative dose, duration of prophylactic treatment and definition/assessment of study endpoints that can influence study outcome and require careful consideration when evaluating study results with new agents and in the comparison with established agents, and which are considered in this review. It is anticipated that over the next 3 years, at least one of these agents will be successfully licensed for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery, which will act as a springboard for the gradual replacement of current anticoagulants.