251
|
Churilla TM, DeMora L, Handorf E, Zaorsky NG, Dong Y, Denlinger CS, Sigurdson ER, Meyer JE. Deviations From Standard Chemoradiation Among Early-Stage Anal Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:945-949. [PMID: 29485073 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Churilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lyudmila DeMora
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth Handorf
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yanqun Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Crystal S Denlinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elin R Sigurdson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joshua E Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
252
|
De Bari B, Lestrade L, Franzetti-Pellanda A, Jumeau R, Biggiogero M, Kountouri M, Matzinger O, Miralbell R, Bourhis J, Ozsahin M, Zilli T. Modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy with image guidance allows low toxicity rates and good local control in chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018; 144:781-789. [PMID: 29441419 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-018-2608-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report outcomes of a population of anal cancer patients treated with modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy and daily image-guided radiotherapy techniques. METHODS We analyzed data of 155 patients consecutively treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy in three radiotherapy departments. One hundred twenty-two patients presented a stage II-IIIA disease. Chemotherapy was administered in 138 patients, mainly using mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil (n = 81). All patients received 36 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) on the pelvic and inguinal nodes, on the rectum, on the mesorectum and on the anal canal, and a sequential boost up to a total dose of 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) on the anal canal and on the nodal gross tumor volumes. RESULTS Median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range 12-51). Toxicity data were available for 143 patients: 22% of them presented a G3+ acute toxicity, mainly as moist desquamation (n = 25 patients) or diarrhea (n = 10). Three patients presented a late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (anal incontinence). No grade 4 acute or late toxicity was recorded. Patients treated with fixed-gantry IMRT delivered with a sliding window technique presented a significantly higher risk of acute grade 3 (or more) toxicity compared to those treated with VMAT or helical tomotherapy (38.5 vs 15.3%, p = 0.049). Actuarial 4-year local control rate was 82% (95% CI 76-91%). CONCLUSIONS Modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy with daily image-guided radiotherapy is effective and safe in treating anal cancer patients and should be considered the standard of care in this clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois-CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland. .,Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz", INSERM U1098 EFS/BFC, 3, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon Cedex, France.
| | - Laëtitia Lestrade
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz", INSERM U1098 EFS/BFC, 3, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon Cedex, France.,Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Raphael Jumeau
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois-CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maira Biggiogero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clinica Luganese, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Melpomeni Kountouri
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Oscar Matzinger
- Radiation Oncology Department, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Vevey, Switzerland
| | - Raymond Miralbell
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois-CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mahmut Ozsahin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois-CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
253
|
Phase I–III development of the EORTC QLQ-ANL27, a health-related quality of life questionnaire for anal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 126:222-228. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Revised: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
254
|
Dralle H, Kols K, Witzigmann H, Viebahn R. Primärtherapie des Analkarzinoms. Chirurg 2018; 89:152-154. [DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0573-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
255
|
Safran H, Leonard KL, Perez K, Vrees M, Klipfel A, Schechter S, Oldenburg N, Roth L, Shah N, Rosati K, Rajdev L, Mantripragada K, Sheng IY, Barth P, DiPetrillo TA. Tolerability of ADXS11-001 Lm-LLO Listeria-Based Immunotherapy With Mitomycin, Fluorouracil, and Radiation for Anal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:1175-1178. [PMID: 29722659 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 12/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To obtain safety and preliminary efficacy data of the combination of ADXS11-001, live attenuated Listeria monocytogenes bacterium, with mitomycin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and intensity modulated radiation therapy in locally advanced anal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligibility included patients with previously untreated, nonmetastatic anal cancer with a primary tumor >4 cm or node-positive disease. Patients received 2 cycles of mitomycin and 5-FU concurrent with 54.0 Gy intensity modulated radiation therapy. One intravenous dose of ADXS11-001 (1 × 109 colony-forming units) was administered before chemoradiation; 3 additional monthly doses were given after chemoradiation. RESULTS Ten patients were treated, including 1 with N2 and 4 with N3 disease. Two patients had grade 3 acute toxicities after the initial dose of ADXS11-001, including chills/rigors (n = 2), back pain (n = 1), and hyponatremia (n = 1). All ADXS11-001 toxicities occurred within 24 hours of administration. There was no apparent increase in chemoradiation toxicities or myelosuppression. One patient had a grade 5 cardiopulmonary event shortly after beginning 5-FU treatment. All 9 assessable patients had complete clinical responses by sigmoidoscopy. Eight of 9 patients (89%) are progression-free at a median follow-up of 42 months. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary data show that ADXS11-001 can be safely administered with standard chemoradiation for anal cancer. Further studies of listeria-based immunotherapy with radiation are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Safran
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island.
| | - Kara-Lynne Leonard
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Kimberly Perez
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Matthew Vrees
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Adam Klipfel
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Steven Schechter
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Nicklas Oldenburg
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Leslie Roth
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Nishit Shah
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Kayla Rosati
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Lakshmi Rajdev
- The Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Kalyan Mantripragada
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Iris Y Sheng
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Peter Barth
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Thomas A DiPetrillo
- The Department of Medicine, The Brown University Oncology Research Group, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
256
|
Radiation Therapy in Anal Cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_48-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
257
|
Liang F, Zhang S, Xue H, Chen Q. Risk of second primary cancers in cancer patients treated with cisplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:871. [PMID: 29258467 PMCID: PMC5738212 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3902-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2016] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Case reports, retrospective analyses, and observational studies have linked the use of cisplatin to increased risk of second cancers, especially life-threatening secondary leukemia. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of second cancers associated with receipt of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, trial registers, conference proceedings, review articles, and reference lists of trial publications for all relevant RCTs comparing cisplatin- versus non-cisplatin-containing chemotherapy with data on second cancers. We extracted data about study characteristics and second cancers, especially leukemia/ myelodysplasia. The primary and secondary outcomes were the odds ratios (ORs) for all second cancers and for secondary leukemia/ myelodysplasia, respectively. Results We identified 28 eligible trials with 7403 patients. Second cancers were reported in 143 patients, including 75 patients in the cisplatin arm and 68 in the non-cisplatin arm (raw event rates of 1.91 and 1.96%, respectively). The pooled OR for risk of all second cancers associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy was 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67–1.33, P = 0.76). Secondary leukemia/ myelodysplasia was reported in 14 patients on cisplatin arms and in 6 patients on non-cisplatin arms of 11 eligible RCTs with 2629 patients (raw event rates of 1.09 and 0.45%, respectively; pooled OR = 2.34, 95%CI 0.97–5.65, P = 0.06). Conclusion Cisplatin was not associated with a significantly increased risk of second cancers compared with non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy. There is a non-significant trend to increased risk of leukemia/ myelodysplasia and the absolute risk was low. The concern about risk of second cancers should not influence decisions to use an efficacious regimen containing cisplatin. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3902-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Liang
- Shanghai Cancer Center and Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng Zhang
- Shanghai Cancer Center and Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. .,Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Hongxi Xue
- Rizhao City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 35 Wanghai Road, Rizhao, China
| | - Qiang Chen
- Department of clinical biochemistry, School of public health Taishan medical university, Taishan, China
| |
Collapse
|
258
|
Chin AL, Pollom EL, Qian Y, Koong AC, Chang DT. Impact of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy on Health Care Costs of Patients With Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Oncol Pract 2017; 13:e992-e1001. [PMID: 29035618 PMCID: PMC6202035 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2017.024810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Drivers of variation in the cost of care after chemoradiotherapy for the management of anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have not been fully elucidated. We sought to characterize the direct and indirect impact of radiotherapy modality on health care costs among patients with anal SCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2014 linkage of the SEER-Medicare database. We identified 1,025 patients with anal SCC diagnosed between 2001 and 2011 and treated with chemoradiotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline differences between patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and those treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Differences in total, cancer-attributable, and procedure-specific costs between groups were measured. RESULTS Radiation-related, patient out-of-pocket, and total costs in the 1-year period after radiotherapy start were all higher for the IMRT group than the 3D-CRT group (median total cost, $35,890 v $27,262, respectively; P < .001). Patients who received IMRT had lower cumulative costs associated with urgent hospitalizations and emergency department visits at both 9 months and 1 year after treatment start compared with a matched cohort of patients who received 3D-CRT (median, $711 v $4,957 at 1 year, respectively; P = .021). CONCLUSION Although total costs of care were higher for IMRT compared with 3D-CRT, primarily as a result of higher radiotherapy-specific costs, IMRT was associated with decreased unplanned health care utilization costs starting at 9 months after treatment start. Radiotherapy-centered episodes of care may need to encompass a longer time horizon to capture the full cost savings associated with more advanced radiation modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander L. Chin
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA; and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Erqi L. Pollom
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA; and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Yushen Qian
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA; and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA; and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Daniel T. Chang
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA; and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| |
Collapse
|
259
|
Jhaveri J, Rayfield L, Liu Y, Chowdhary M, Cassidy RJ, Madden NA, Tanenbaum DG, Gillespie TW, Patel PR, Patel KR, Landry JC. Prognostic relevance of human papillomavirus infection in anal squamous cell carcinoma: analysis of the national cancer data base. J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 8:998-1008. [PMID: 29299360 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.10.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To examine the prognostic relevance of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) patients treated with chemoradiation (CRT) in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Methods The 2014 NCDB was queried for non-metastatic, histologically confirmed, ASCC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013. Patients were required to have HPV status documented in order to be eligible. Patients were then stratified into two groups: HPV+ and HPV-. Univariate analysis (UVA) was performed using the χ2 test for categorical covariates and ANOVA for numerical covariates. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox proportional hazard model for overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated for each covariate. To minimize selection bias, propensity score (PS) weighting was implemented to balance OS related variables between the groups including: age, education level, stage, diagnosis year, insurance type, and agent of chemotherapy. Results A total of 1,063 patients were eligible. Patients were stratified into HPV+ (n=498, 46.8%) and HPV- (n=565, 53.2%). After PS weighting, MVA for OS showed that for men, HPV infection was associated with better OS (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.96; P=0.034). However, for women, HPV infection did not significantly influence survival (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.96-2.25; P=0.074). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the largest patient series evaluating the impact of HPV infection on OS in patients with anal cancer. We found that HPV infection is associated with a statistically significant better survival for men with ASCC. In contrast, for women, HPV infection did not significantly influence survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaymin Jhaveri
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lael Rayfield
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yuan Liu
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mudit Chowdhary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Richard J Cassidy
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nicholas A Madden
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Daniel G Tanenbaum
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Pretesh R Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kirtesh R Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jerome C Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
260
|
Fish R, Sanders C, Williamson PR, Renehan AG. Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e018726. [PMID: 29170292 PMCID: PMC5719280 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) has increased threefold in the last 30 years. Initial treatment is chemoradiotherapy, associated with short-term and long-term side effects. Future therapy innovations aim to reduce morbidity in treatment of early tumours while maintaining treatment efficacy, and to escalate treatment intensity in locally advanced tumours with acceptable quality of life (QoL). However, all phase III randomised controlled trials to-date have utilised different primary outcomes, which hinders evidence synthesis and presents challenges to the selection of optimal outcomes in future trials. No trial comprehensively assessed long-term side effects and QoL, suggesting outcomes reflecting issues important to patients are under-represented. This project aims to determine the priority outcomes for all stakeholders and reach agreement on a standardised core set of outcomes to be measured and reported on in all future ASCC trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic review will identify all outcomes reported in trials and observational studies of chemoradiotherapy as primary treatment for ASCC. Outcomes of importance to patients will be identified through patient interviews. The long list of outcomes generated from the systematic review and interviews will be used to create a two-round Delphi process, including key stakeholders (patients and healthcare professionals). The results of the Delphi will be discussed at a face-to-face consensus meeting. Discussion will focus on outcomes that did not achieve consensus through the Delphi process and conclude with anonymous voting to ratify the final core outcome set (COS). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The final COS will feed directly into the PersonaLising Anal cancer radioTherapy dOse (PLATO) national anal cancer trials and the Association of coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) supported national anal cancer database. Utilisation of the COS will increase the relevance of research output to all stakeholders and increase the capacity for data synthesis between trials. This study has ethical approval and is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42016036540.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Fish
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline Sanders
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paula R Williamson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Medical Research Council North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew G Renehan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
261
|
Franco P, Fiandra C, Arcadipane F, Trino E, Giglioli FR, Ragona R, Ricardi U. Incorporating 18FDG-PET-defined pelvic active bone marrow in the automatic treatment planning process of anal cancer patients undergoing chemo-radiation. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:710. [PMID: 29096619 PMCID: PMC5668955 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3708-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate whether the incorporation of 18FDG-PET into the automatic treatment planning process may be able to decrease the dose to active bone marrow (BM) for locally advanced anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation (CHT-RT). METHODS Ten patients with locally advanced anal cancer were selected. Bone marrow within the pelvis was outlined as the whole outer contour of pelvic bones or employing 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within osseous structures. Four treatment planning solutions were employed with different automatic optimization approaches toward bone marrow. Plan A used iliac crests for optimization as per RTOG 05-29 trial; plan B accounted for all pelvic BM as outlined by the outer surface of external osseous structures; plan C took into account both active and inactive BM as defined using 18FDG-PET; plan D accounted only for the active BM subregions outlined with 18FDG-PET. Dose received by active bone marrow within the pelvic (ACTPBM) and in different subregions such as lumbar-sacral (ACTLSBM), iliac (ACTIBM) and lower pelvis (ACTLPBM) bone marrow was analyzed. RESULTS A significant difference was found for ACTPBM in terms of Dmean (p = 0.014) V20 (p = 0.015), V25 (p = 0.030), V30 (p = 0.020), V35 (p = 0.010) between Plan A and other plans. With respect to specific subsites, a significant difference was found for ACTLSBM in terms of V30 (p = 0.020)), V35 (p = 0.010), V40 (p = 0.050) between Plan A and other solutions. No significant difference was found with respect to the investigated parameters between Plan B,C and D. No significant dosimetric differences were found for ACTLSPBM and ACTIBM and inactive BM subregions within the pelvis between any plan solution. CONCLUSIONS Accounting for pelvic BM as a whole compared to iliac crests is able to decrease the dose to active bone marrow during the planning process of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The same degree of reduction may be achieved optimizing on bone marrow either defined using the outer bone contour or through 18FDG-PET imaging. The subset of patients with a benefit in terms of dose reduction to active BM through the inclusion of 18FDG-PET in the planning process needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Christian Fiandra
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Trino
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Romana Giglioli
- Department of Medical Imaging, Medical Physics, AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ragona
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
262
|
Repka MC, Aghdam N, Karlin AW, Unger KR. Social determinants of stage IV anal cancer and the impact of pelvic radiotherapy in the metastatic setting. Cancer Med 2017; 6:2497-2506. [PMID: 28980407 PMCID: PMC5673908 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Revised: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Anal cancer is a relatively rare malignancy, and a minority of patients present with metastatic disease in the United States. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify factors associated with metastatic disease at presentation and evaluate the role of pelvic radiotherapy in these patients. The NCDB was queried for patients with squamous cell cancer of the anus diagnosed between 2004 and 2013. Patients were stratified by clinical stage at diagnosis, and a binary logistic regression model was created to identify factors associated with metastatic disease at diagnosis. A secondary metastatic cohort was generated and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was created to identify factors associated with improved survival. To validate findings, propensity-score matching was performed to generate a 1:1 paired dataset stratified by receipt of pelvic radiotherapy. The primary analysis cohort consisted of 28,500 patients. Facility location, male gender, and lack of insurance were confirmed as independent risk factors for metastatic disease. The metastatic cohort consisted of 1264 patients. Multivariable analysis confirmed female sex, possession of a private or Medicare insurance plan, pelvic radiotherapy, and chemotherapy as independent predictors of improved survival. A propensity-score matched cohort of 730 patients was generated. The median survival was 17.6 months in patients who received radiotherapy versus 14.5 months in those who did not (P < 0.01). In this cohort, male gender and lack of insurance were associated with metastatic disease at presentation. Furthermore, a significant benefit was associated with the use of pelvic radiotherapy. Future prospective research is warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C. Repka
- Department of Radiation MedicineGeorgetown University HospitalWashingtonWashington DC
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation MedicineGeorgetown University HospitalWashingtonWashington DC
| | - Andrew W. Karlin
- Department of Radiation MedicineGeorgetown University HospitalWashingtonWashington DC
| | - Keith R. Unger
- Department of Radiation MedicineGeorgetown University HospitalWashingtonWashington DC
| |
Collapse
|
263
|
|
264
|
Sekhar H, Zwahlen M, Trelle S, Malcomson L, Kochhar R, Saunders MP, Sperrin M, van Herk M, Sebag-Montefiore D, Egger M, Renehan AG. Nodal stage migration and prognosis in anal cancer: a systematic review, meta-regression, and simulation study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:1348-1359. [PMID: 28802802 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30456-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Revised: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), lymph node positivity (LNP) indicates poor prognosis for survival and is central to radiotherapy planning. Over the past three decades, LNP proportion has increased, mainly reflecting enhanced detection with newer imaging modalities; a process known as nodal stage migration. If accompanied by constant T stage distributions, prognosis for both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative groups may improve without any increase in overall survival for individual patients; a paradox termed the Will Rogers phenomenon. Here, we aim to systematically evaluate the impact of nodal stage migration on survival in SCCA and address a novel hypothesis that this phenomenon results in reduced prognostic discrimination. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-regression to quantify changes in LNP over time and the impact of this change on survival and prognostic discrimination. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomised trials and observational studies in patients with SCCA published between Jan 1, 1970, and Oct 11, 2016. Studies were eligible if patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy as the main treatment, reported LNP proportions (all studies), and reported overall survival (not necessarily present in all studies). We excluded studies with fewer than 50 patients. We extracted study-level data with a standardised, piloted form. The primary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival. To investigate scenarios in which reduced prognostic discrimination might occur, we simulated varying true LNP proportions and true overall survival, and compared these with expected observed outcomes for varying levels of misclassification of true nodal state. FINDINGS We identified 62 studies reporting LNP proportions, which included 10 569 patients. From these, we included 45 studies (6302 patients) with whole cohort 5-year overall survival, 11 studies with 5-year survival stratified by nodal status, and 20 studies with hazard ratios in our analyses of temporal changes. In 62 studies, the LNP proportions increased from a mean estimate of 15·3% (95% CI 10·5-20·1) in 1980 to 37·1% (34·0-41·3) in 2012 (p<0·0001). In 11 studies with prognostic data, increasing LNP was associated with improved overall survival in both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative categories, whereas the proportions with combined tumour stage T3 and T4 remained constant. In 20 studies, across a range of LNP proportions from 15% to 40%, the hazard ratios for overall survival of lymph node-positive versus lymph node-negative patients decreased significantly from 2·5 (95% CI 1·8-3·3) at 15% LNP to 1·3 (1·2-1·9; p=0·014) at 40% LNP. The simulated scenarios reproduced this effect if the true LNP proportions were 20% or 25%, but not if the true LNP proportions were 30% or greater. INTERPRETATION We describe a consequence of staging misclassification in anal cancer that we have termed reduced prognostic discrimination. We used this new observation to infer that the LNP proportions of more than 30% seen in modern clinical series (11 out of 15 studies with a median year since 2007) are higher than the true LNP proportion. The introduction of new staging technologies in oncology might misclassify true disease stage, spuriously informing disease management and ultimately increasing the risk of overtreatment. FUNDING Bowel Disease Research Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hema Sekhar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Marcel Zwahlen
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sven Trelle
- Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lee Malcomson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Rohit Kochhar
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark P Saunders
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Sperrin
- Farr Institute, MRC Health eResearch Centre (HeRC), Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthias Egger
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrew G Renehan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
265
|
Durot C, Dohan A, Boudiaf M, Servois V, Soyer P, Hoeffel C. Cancer of the Anal Canal: Diagnosis, Staging and Follow-Up with MRI. Korean J Radiol 2017; 18:946-956. [PMID: 29089827 PMCID: PMC5639160 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Although a rare disease, anal cancer is increasingly being diagnosed in patients with risk factors, mainly anal infection with the human papilloma virus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with external phased-array coils is recommended as the imaging modality of choice to grade anal cancers and to evaluate the response assessment after chemoradiotherapy, with a high contrast and good anatomic resolution of the anal canal. MRI provides a performant evaluation of size, extent and signal characteristics of the anal tumor before and after treatment, as well as lymph node involvement and extension to the adjacent organs. MRI is also particularly helpful in the assessment of complications after treatment, and in the diagnosis for relapse of the diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Durot
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Reims, Reims 51092, France
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, Paris 75010, France
| | - Mourad Boudiaf
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, Paris 75010, France
| | - Vincent Servois
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris 75005, France
| | - Philippe Soyer
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, Paris 75010, France
| | - Christine Hoeffel
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Reims, Reims 51092, France.,CRESTIC, Reims Champagne-Ardenne University, Reims 51867, France
| |
Collapse
|
266
|
Sakanaka K, Itasaka S, Ishida Y, Fujii K, Horimatsu T, Mizowaki T, Sakai Y, Hiraoka M. Dosimetric advantages and clinical outcomes of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol J 2017; 35:368-379. [PMID: 28893059 PMCID: PMC5769885 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2017.00227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the dosimetric difference between simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), and the clinical outcomes of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) chemoradiotherapy featuring SIB-IMRT. Materials and Methods This study included ten patients with ASCC who underwent chemoradiotherapy using SIB-IMRT with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. SIB-IMRT delivered 54 Gy to each primary tumor plus metastatic lymph nodes and 45 Gy to regional lymph nodes, in 30 fractions. Four patients received additional boosts to the primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes; the median total dose was 54 Gy (range, 54 to 60 Gy). We additionally created 3DCRT plans following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9811 protocol to allow dosimetric comparisons with SIB-IMRT. Locoregional control, overall survival, and toxicity were calculated for the clinical outcome evaluation. Results Compared to 3DCRT, SIB-IMRT significantly reduced doses to the external genitalia, bladder, and intestine, delivering the doses to target and elective nodal region. At a median follow-up time of 46 months, 3-year locoregional control and overall survival rates were 88.9% and 100%, respectively. Acute toxicities were treated conservatively. All patients completed radiotherapy with brief interruptions (range, 0 to 2 days). No patient experienced ≥grade 3 late toxicity during the follow-up period. Conclusion The dosimetric advantages of SIB-IMRT appeared to reduce the toxicity of chemoradiotherapy for ASCC achieving high locoregional control in the extended period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuyuki Sakanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoshi Itasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuichi Ishida
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kota Fujii
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Horimatsu
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiharu Sakai
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masahiro Hiraoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
267
|
Gravante G, Stephenson JA, Elshaer M, Osman A, Vasanthan S, Mullineux JH, Gani MAD, Sharpe D, Yeung J, Norwood M, Miller A, Boyle K, Hemingway D. Analysis of outcomes achieved with squamous cell carcinomas of the anus in a single university hospital over the last two decades: Clinical response rate, relapse and survival of 190 patients. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:269-274. [PMID: 28891266 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We reviewed our series of anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC) treated over the last two decades. METHODS ASCC patients undergoing treatment at the Leicester Royal Infirmary between 1998 and 2016 were selected. Age, gender, pathological tumor characteristics, treatment adopted, the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5-year follow-up were recorded and calculated. RESULTS A total of 190 ASCC were reviewed, of these 64.2% (n = 122) received primary radical chemoradiotherapy. Complete response rate was 92.6% (n = 113) and four patients with residual disease underwent a salvage APER. Twenty-eight patients experienced recurrent disease (23.0%) either systemic (n = 8), local (n = 14), or both (n = 6); six had a salvage APER. Complete follow-up data are available for 63.1% patients (77/122). Overall, the locoregional failure rate of primary chemoradiotherapy (residual + recurrent disease) was present in 29 patients (29/122; 23.8%). OS was 41.6% CSS was 69.2% and DFS 60.0% at 5 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In our series of ASCC primary chemoradiotherapy had achieved significant initial complete response rates, however, long term-follow ups still present systemic and local recurrences. APR is able to treat 30% of the pelvic recurrences (6/20), the others are either associated with systemic disease or locally inoperable masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpiero Gravante
- Departmentof Colorectal Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mohamed Elshaer
- Department of Surgery, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Osman
- Department of Oncology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Joseph H Mullineux
- Department of Radiology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Akil Dilawar Gani
- Departmentof Colorectal Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - David Sharpe
- Departmentof Colorectal Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Justin Yeung
- Departmentof Colorectal Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Norwood
- Departmentof Colorectal Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Miller
- Departmentof Colorectal Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsten Boyle
- Departmentof Colorectal Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - David Hemingway
- Departmentof Colorectal Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
268
|
Alongi F, Giaj-Levra N, Sciascia S, Fozza A, Fersino S, Fiorentino A, Mazzola R, Ricchetti F, Buglione M, Buonfrate D, Roccatello D, Ricardi U, Bisoffi Z. Radiotherapy in patients with HIV: current issues and review of the literature. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e379-e393. [PMID: 28677574 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30440-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 05/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Although the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy has radically improved the life expectancy of patients with HIV, HIV positivity is still considered a major barrier to oncological treatment for patients with cancer because of their worse prognosis and increased susceptibility to toxic effects compared with patients who are immunocompetent. The use of radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or molecular targeted therapy is the standard of care for several cancers. These new drugs and substantial improvements in radiotherapy techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, are optimising the feasibility of such anticancer treatments and are providing new opportunities for patients with cancer and HIV. In this Review, we discuss the role of radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy or new drugs, in the treatment of cancer in patients with HIV, with a focus on the efficacy and tolerability of this approach on the basis of available evidence. Moreover, we analyse and discuss the biological basis of interactions between HIV and radiotherapy, evidence from preclinical studies, and immunomodulation by radiotherapy in the HIV setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Alongi
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Cancer Care Center, Negrar-Verona, Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Cancer Care Center, Negrar-Verona, Italy; Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
| | - Savino Sciascia
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, Centre of Research of Immunopathology and Rare Diseases-Coordinating Centre of Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta Network for Rare Disease, Torino, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fozza
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Ospedale dell'Angelo, Mestre-Venezia, Italy
| | - Sergio Fersino
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Cancer Care Center, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Cancer Care Center, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Cancer Care Center, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Cancer Care Center, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Michela Buglione
- Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Dora Buonfrate
- Centre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Dario Roccatello
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, Centre of Research of Immunopathology and Rare Diseases-Coordinating Centre of Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta Network for Rare Disease, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Zeno Bisoffi
- Centre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
269
|
Arcadipane F, Franco P, Ceccarelli M, Furfaro G, Rondi N, Trino E, Martini S, Iorio GC, Mistrangelo M, Cassoni P, Racca P, Morino M, Ricardi U. Image-guided IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost as per RTOG 0529 for the treatment of anal cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2017; 14:217-223. [PMID: 28856848 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM To report on clinical outcomes of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy as per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0529 protocol in anal cancer patients. METHODS Clinical stage T1-T4 N0-N3 anal cancer patients were submitted to concomitant chemoradiation. Patients with cT2N0 disease were prescribed 50.4 Gy/28 fractions to the gross tumor planning target volume (PTV) and 42 Gy/28 fractions to the elective nodal PTV. Patients staged as cT3-T4/N0-N3 were given 54 Gy/30 fractions to the macroscopic anal PTV, while clinical nodes were prescribed 50.4 Gy/30 fractions if <3 cm or 54 Gy/30 fractions if ≥3 cm; elective nodal PTV was prescribed 45 Gy/30 fractions. Two cycles of concomitant 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C were planned for all patients. Oncological outcomes, acute and late toxicity profiles and pattern of failure were reported. RESULTS The 3-year colostomy-free survival rate was 64% (95% CI 0.52-0.75). The 3-year local control, disease-free and overall survival rates were 69% (95% CI 0.57-0.79), 71% (95% CI 0.59-0.80) and 79% (95% CI 0.66-0.87), respectively. The cumulative incidence of colostomies was 15.1% (95% CI 8.15-23.88) at 24 months. The cumulative incidence of cancer-specific deaths was 16.4% (95% CI 8.60-26.47) at 36 months. Major acute toxicity consisted of hematological (G3-G4: 26%) and cutaneous (G3-G4: 16%) events. Only one case of ≥G3 late toxicity was documented. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous integrated boost IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy as per RTOG 0529 protocol seems to be safe and feasible with consistent oncological outcomes and a mild acute and late toxicity profile in anal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Manuela Ceccarelli
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology and CPO Piedmont, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriella Furfaro
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Nadia Rondi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Trino
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefania Martini
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Paola Cassoni
- Department of Medical Sciences Pathology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Patrizia Racca
- Department of Oncology, Oncological Centre for Gastrointestinal Neoplasm, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Morino
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology and CPO Piedmont, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
270
|
Kim S, Jary M, André T, Vendrely V, Buecher B, François E, Bidard FC, Dumont S, Samalin E, Peiffert D, Pernot S, Baba-Hamed N, El Hajbi F, Bouché O, Desrame J, Parzy A, Zoubir M, Louvet C, Bachet JB, Nguyen T, Abdelghani MB, Smith D, De La Fouchardière C, Aparicio T, Bennouna J, Gornet JM, Jacquin M, Bonnetain F, Borg C. Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study of French interdisciplinary GERCOR and FFCD groups (Epitopes-HPV02 study). BMC Cancer 2017; 17:574. [PMID: 28841909 PMCID: PMC5574110 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3566-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare disease, but its incidence is markedly increasing. About 15% of patients are diagnosed at metastatic stage, and more than 20% with a localized disease treated by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) will recur. In advanced SCCA, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) combination is the standard option but complete response is a rare event and the prognosis remains poor with most disease progression occurring within the first 12 months. We have previously published the potential role of the addition of docetaxel (D). Among 8 consecutive patients with advanced recurrent SCCA after CRT, the DCF regimen induced a complete response in 4 patients, including 3 pathological complete responses. Then, the Epitopes-HPV02 study was designed to confirm the interest of DCF regimen in SCCA patients. Methods This multicentre phase II trial assesses the DCF regimen in advanced SCCA patients. Main eligibility criteria are: histologically proven SCCA, unresectable locally advanced recurrent or metastatic disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status (ECOG-PS) <2, and being eligible for DCF. Patients receive either 6 cycles of standard DCF or 8 cycles of modified DCF depending on age (> vs. ≤ 75 years-old) and ECOG-PS (0 vs. 1). The trial was set up based on a Simon’s optimal two-stage design for phase II trials, allowing an early futility interim analysis. The primary endpoint is the observed progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 months from the first DCF cycle. A PFS rate below 10% is considered uninteresting, while a PFS rate above 25% is expected. With a unilateral alpha error of 5% and a statistical power of 90%, 66 evaluable patients should be included. Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS, response rate, safety, health-related quality of life, and the correlation of biomarkers with treatment efficacy. Discussion Since the recommended CF regimen is based in a small retrospective analysis and generates a low rate of complete responses, the Epitopes-HPV02 study will establish a new standard in case of a positive result. Associated biomarker studies will contribute to understand the underlying mechanism of resistance and the role of immunity in SCCA. Trial registration NCT02402842, EudraCT: 2014–001789-81.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Kim
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France. .,Clinical Investigational Center, CIC-1431, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France. .,INSERM, Unit 1098, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France. .,Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) Oncology Multidisciplinary Group, Besançon, France. .,Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Dijon, France. .,Department of Oncology, Jean Minjoz University Teaching Hospital, 3 Boulevard Alexander Fleming, F-25030, Besancon, France.
| | - Marine Jary
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.,Clinical Investigational Center, CIC-1431, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.,INSERM, Unit 1098, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.,Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) Oncology Multidisciplinary Group, Besançon, France
| | - Thierry André
- Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) Oncology Multidisciplinary Group, Besançon, France.,Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Vendrely
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Dijon, France.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bruno Buecher
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Dijon, France.,Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - François-Clément Bidard
- Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) Oncology Multidisciplinary Group, Besançon, France.,Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Simon Pernot
- Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Olivier Bouché
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Dijon, France.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, Reims, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Thierry Nguyen
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.,Polyclique de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
| | | | - Denis Smith
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Marion Jacquin
- Clinical Investigational Center, CIC-1431, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.,Cancéropôle Grand Est, Besançon, France
| | - Franck Bonnetain
- INSERM, Unit 1098, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.,Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Dijon, France.,Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.,French National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Besançon, France
| | - Christophe Borg
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.,Clinical Investigational Center, CIC-1431, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.,INSERM, Unit 1098, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.,Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) Oncology Multidisciplinary Group, Besançon, France.,Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
271
|
Fredman ET, Abdel-Wahab M, Kumar AMS. Influence of radiation treatment technique on outcome and toxicity in anal cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 6:413-421. [PMID: 29213359 PMCID: PMC5700990 DOI: 10.1007/s13566-017-0326-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Objective Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has largely supplanted three-dimensional conformal radiation (3D-CRT) for definitive anal cancer treatment due to decreased toxicity and potentially improved outcomes. Convincing data demonstrating its advantages, however, remain limited. We compared outcomes and toxicity with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT vs 3D-CRT for anal cancer. Methods We performed a single-institution retrospective review of patients treated with IMRT or 3D-CRT as part of definitive mitomycin-C/5-fluorouricil-based chemoradiation for anal cancer from January 2003 to December 2012. Results One hundred sixty-five patients were included, with 61 and 104 receiving IMRT and 3D-CRT, respectively. Overall, 92.7% had squamous cell carcinoma. The mean initial pelvic dose was 48.3 and 44 Gy for IMRT and 3D-CRT, respectively. Complete response, partial response, and disease progression rates were similar (IMRT 83.6, 8.2, 8.2%; 3D-CRT 85.6, 6.7, 7.7%; p = 0.608, p = 0.728, p = 0.729). There was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.971), event-free survival (p = 0.900), or local or distant recurrence rates (p = 0.118, p = 0.373). IMRT caused significantly less acute grade 1–2 incontinence (p = 0.035), grade 3–4 pain (p = 0.033), and fatigue (p = 0.030). IMRT patients had significantly fewer chronic post-treatment toxicities (p = 0.008), outperforming 3D-CRT in six of eight toxicities reviewed. Though total treatment length was comparable (43.6 and 44.5 days), IMRT recipients had fewer (27.9 vs 41.3% of patients, p = 0.89), shorter treatment breaks (mean 2.9 vs 4.1 days, p = 0.229). Conclusion This report represents the largest series directly comparing concurrent chemotherapy with IMRT vs 3D-CRT for definitive treatment of anal cancer. IMRT significantly reduced acute and post-treatment toxicities and allowed for safe and effective pelvic dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisha T Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
| | - May Abdel-Wahab
- Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) Division of Human Health, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aryavarta M S Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA.,University Hospitals Parma Seidman Cancer Center, Parma, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
272
|
Abstract
Management of anal carcinoma began as abdominoperineal resection and has evolved to combined chemotherapy and radiation. Early randomized trials demonstrated superior clinical outcomes of combined modality therapy over radiotherapy alone. Subsequent trials investigated alterations in the standard backbone of radiotherapy concurrent with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C with intent to maintain clinical outcomes while reducing treatment-related morbidity. The addition of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to radiation planning and delivery has subsequently reduced acute toxicity and detrimental treatment breaks. Ongoing and future trials are aimed at reducing therapy in favorable patient populations to decrease morbidity while intensifying treatment in patients with negative prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clayton A Smith
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, 1660 Spring Hill Avenue, Mobile, AL 36604, USA
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Preston Research Building B-1003, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
273
|
Surgery is essential in squamous cell cancer of the rectum. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402:1055-1062. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1614-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
274
|
Multimodal Therapy of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus With Distant Metastasis: A Single-Institution Experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60:785-791. [PMID: 28682963 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the rarity of the condition, studies concerning the management of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus with distant metastasis are scarce. The available studies indicate poor outcomes with exclusive chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary treatment on overall survival among patients presenting with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. DESIGN This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS The study was conducted at a single French institution between 2000 and 2014. PATIENTS Consecutive patients with histologically proven, newly diagnosed, or recurrent metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus were included. INTERVENTIONS Study interventions included multimodal therapy combining systemic chemotherapy and local ablative treatment to remove all metastases through surgery, radiofrequency ablation, or radiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was overall survival. RESULTS Fifty patients (median age, 62 years; men/women: 8/42) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 39 were available for Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Forty had metastatic relapse after previous treatment of localized disease, and 10 presented with synchronous metastasis. P16 status was not available. Patients received at least 1 chemotherapy regimen, including 5-fluorouracil-mitomycin C (n = 22), cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (n = 20), or 5-fluorouracil alone (n = 3). Thirteen also had surgical metastasectomy, 11 had radiotherapy, and 6 had radiofrequency ablation. Median overall survival was 20.0 months (95% CI, 18.2-21.8 mo), and median time to failure of strategy was 6.0 months (95% CI, 2.9-9.1 mo). Overall response rate was 56% (95% CI, 40%-73%). Outcomes from the 5-fluorouracil-mitomycin C and cisplatin regimens did not statistically differ. Patients treated with multimodal therapy had a median overall survival of 22.0 months (95% CI, 15.3-28.6 mo) versus 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.5-16.5 mo; p = 0.002). Median time to failure of strategy was 10.0 months (95% CI, 4.2-15.7 mo) versus 5.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-7.2; p = 0.007). After 2 years, 40% of patients with multimodal treatment and 20% of those without ablative treatment were alive. LIMITATIONS This study is limited by its retrospective design and modest sample size. CONCLUSIONS Stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the anus outcomes are poor, but first-line chemotherapy can enable good response rates. Other treatment modalities, including surgery, radiotherapy, and thermoablation, should be considered, because they may provide a survival advantage. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A336.
Collapse
|
275
|
Moureau-Zabotto L, Vendrely V, Abramowitz L, Borg C, Francois E, Goere D, Huguet F, Peiffert D, Siproudhis L, Ducreux M, Bouché O. Anal cancer: French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SNFCP). Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49:831-840. [PMID: 28610905 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of anal carcinomas, published in November 2016. METHODS It is a collaborative work produced under the auspices of the majority of the French medical societies involved in the management of anal cancer. It is based on the previous guidelines published in 2010. Recommendations are graded in three categories, according to the amount of evidence found in the literature. RESULTS Non-metastatic anal carcinomas can be divided into two risk groups, according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or endorectal-ultrasonograpy. Localized small cancers (T1N0) are mainly treated by exclusive radiation therapy in the case of cancers of the anal canal, or by surgery in the case of cancers of the anal margin. The recommended treatment of locally advanced tumours (T2-T4, N0-N2) is definitive concomitant radio-chemotherapy. Salvage surgery should be reserved for patients with poor response, tumour progression or local relapse after radio-chemotherapy, or in cases of persistent vaginal fistula or total anal incontinence after the cessation of radio-chemotherapy. In the case of metastatic tumours, current therapeutic recommendations are based on less robust evidence; with chemotherapy playing a major role. CONCLUSION These recommendations are permanently being reviewed, and each individual case must be discussed inside a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Didier Peiffert
- Cancerology Institute of Lorraine (Centre Alexis Vautrin), Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
276
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the rectum is a rare disease with <80 cases reported in the English literature. We reviewed outcomes in patients with SCC of the rectum treated with definitive chemoradiation at a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 14 patients treated definitively with chemoradiation for SCC of the rectum. All patients were female and the median age was 56 years at presentation. Patients were treated with external beam radiation therapy with a median dose of 54 Gy (range, 38 to 58.8 Gy). All patients received concurrent chemotherapy, with 5-flourouracil and cisplatin in 10 patients and capecitabine and cisplatin in 4 patients. RESULTS The median follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 1.8 to 16.3 y). Only 3 of the 14 patients had relapse or persistent disease, and 2 of these underwent successful salvage surgery. The remaining 11 patients had no evidence for local or distant relapse after chemoradiation. Only 1 patient died of SCC of the rectum, 1 died of a second primary, and 12 are alive with no evidence of disease. The 5-year actuarial overall survival, disease-free survival, and disease-specific survival rates were 81%, 72%, and 88% respectively. CONCLUSIONS Chemoradiation is an ideal strategy for definitive therapy of SCC of the rectum with excellent disease-free survival and overall survival. In patients with local failure, salvage surgery can provide excellent outcomes.
Collapse
|
277
|
Macchia G, Deodato F, Cilla S, Cammelli S, Guido A, Ferioli M, Siepe G, Valentini V, Morganti AG, Ferrandina G. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for treatment of solid tumors: current insights. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10:3755-3772. [PMID: 28794640 PMCID: PMC5538686 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s113119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim This article discusses the current use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques in clinical practice and reviews the available data from clinical outcome studies in different clinical settings. An overview of available literature about clinical outcomes with VMAT stereotactic/radiosurgical treatment is also reported. Materials and methods All published manuscripts reporting the use of VMAT in a clinical setting from 2009 to November 2016 were identified. The search was carried out in December 2016 using the National Library of Medicine (PubMed/Medline). The following words were searched: “volumetric arc therapy”[All Fields] OR “vmat”[All Fields] OR “rapidarc”[All Fields], AND “radiotherapy”[All Fields] AND “Clinical Trial”[All Fields]. Results Overall, 37 studies (21 prospective and 16 retrospective) fulfilling inclusion criteria and thus included in the review evaluated 2,029 patients treated with VMAT; of these patients, ~30.8% had genitourinary (GU) tumors (81% prostate, 19% endometrial), 26.2% head-and-neck cancer (H&NC), 13.9% oligometastases, 11.2% had anorectal cancer, 10.6% thoracic neoplasms (81% breast, 19% lung), and 7.0% brain metastases (BMs). Six different clinical scenarios for VMAT use were identified: 1) BMs, 2) H&NC, 3) thoracic neoplasms, 4) GU cancer, 5) anorectal tumor, and 6) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) performed by VMAT technique in the oligometastatic patient setting. Conclusion The literature addressing the clinical appropriateness of VMAT is scarce. Current literature suggests that VMAT, especially when used as simultaneous integrated boost or SBRT strategy, is an effective safe modality for all cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, "Giovanni Paolo II" Foundation, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Campobasso
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Alessandra Guido
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Martina Ferioli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome.,Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
278
|
Cardenas ML, Spencer CR, Markovina S, DeWees TA, Mazur TR, Weiner AA, Parikh PJ, Olsen JR. Quantitative FDG-PET/CT predicts local recurrence and survival for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Adv Radiat Oncol 2017; 2:281-287. [PMID: 29114593 PMCID: PMC5605304 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Revised: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-(PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging is used for staging and treatment planning of patients with anal cancer. Quantitative pre- and posttreatment metrics that are predictive of recurrence are unknown. We evaluated the association between pre- and posttreatment FDG-PET/CT parameters and outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). METHODS AND MATERIALS The records of 110 patients treated between 2003 and 2013 with definitive radiation therapy for SCCA were reviewed under an institutional review board-approved protocol. The median radiation therapy dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 35-60 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy was administered for 109 of 110 patients and generally consisted of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C (n = 94). All patients underwent pretreatment FDG-PET/CT and 101 of 110 underwent posttreatment FDG-PET/CT 3 months after completion of radiation therapy. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was analyzed, in addition to multiple patient and treatment factors, by univariate and multivariate Cox regression for correlation with local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The median follow-up was 28.6 months. LR occurred in 1 of 15 (6.7%), 5 of 47 (10.6%), and 6 of 48 (12.5%) patients with stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. On univariate analysis, a significant association was observed between reduced LR and posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 (P = .0095) and between increased OS and posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 (P = .0086). On multivariate analysis, a significant association was observed between reduced LR and posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 (P = .0013) and the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (P < .001). A significant multivariate association was observed between increased OS and posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 (P = .0373) and the use of 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C chemotherapy (P = .001). CONCLUSION Posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 is associated with reduced LR and increased OS after chemoradiation therapy for SCCA independent of T and N stage on multivariate analysis. Greater follow-up is required to confirm this association with late patterns of failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Davis, California
| | - Christopher R. Spencer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stephanie Markovina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Thomas R. Mazur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ashley A. Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Parag J. Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jeffrey R. Olsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
279
|
Castaneda SA, Romak LB. Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer: Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Future Directions. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2017; 26:467-475. [PMID: 28576183 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2017.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of anal cancer has evolved remarkably in the past 30 years. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care, allowing organ preservation and maintenance of continence for most patients. This article reviews recent advances in radiotherapy planning and delivery that have resulted in improvements in treatment-related toxicity. Most notably, the advent and wide adoption of intensity-modulated radiotherapy provides a superior toxicity profile compared with older techniques, while maintaining similar oncologic outcomes. Current areas of active research include optimizing and individualizing treatment intensity and possible integration of biologic agents and immunotherapies in the treatment of anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serguei A Castaneda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, 4701 Ogletown-Stanton RR, S-1110, Newark, DE 19713, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 North 15th Street, MS #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
| | - Lindsay B Romak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, 4701 Ogletown-Stanton RR, S-1110, Newark, DE 19713, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
280
|
Coen M, Rigamonti F, Roth A, Koessler T. Chemotherapy-induced Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, a case report and review of the literature. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:394. [PMID: 28578653 PMCID: PMC5457651 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3384-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several chemotherapy molecules, monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have been linked to Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC). CASE PRESENTATION In this article, we describe the case of a 45-year-old woman who developed TC after receiving an intra-arterial and intra-venous polychemotherapy for locally advanced epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. This is the first described case of TC associated with intra-arterial chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS A review of the literature points to 5-fluorouracil as the most common molecule associated with TC and highlights the potential risk associated with rechallenging patient with the same drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Coen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Rigamonti
- Department of Internal Medical Specialties, Division of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Arnaud Roth
- Department of Internal Medical Specialties, Division of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - Thibaud Koessler
- Department of Internal Medical Specialties, Division of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
281
|
Kent C, Bessell EM, Scholefield JH, Chappell S, Marsh L, Mills J, Sayers I. Chemoradiotherapy with Brachytherapy or Electron Therapy Boost for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus-Reducing the Colostomy Rate. J Gastrointest Cancer 2017; 48:1-7. [PMID: 27412395 PMCID: PMC5310557 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-016-9850-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study is to determine overall survival, disease-specific survival and stoma-free survival after treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus with chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy or electron boost in a recent cohort of patients. Methods Fifty-two patients (median age 62 years) were treated with radical chemoradiotherapy (mitomycin C, infusional 5-fluorouracil concurrently with conformal radical radiotherapy 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks) followed by a radiotherapy boost between 1 December 2000 and 30 April 2011. Follow-up was to 30 November 2014. Thirty-six patients received a boost (15–20 Gy) over 2 days with 192Ir needle brachytherapy for anal canal tumours, and 16 patients received electron beam therapy (20 Gy in 10 fractions in 2 weeks) for anal margin tumours. A defunctioning stoma was only created prior to chemoradiotherapy for fistula or severe anal pain. Results The overall survival for the 36 patients treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy was 75 % (95 % CI, 61–89) at 5 years, the disease-specific survival was 91 % (95 % CI, 81–101 %), and the stoma-free survival was 97 % (95 % CI, 91–103 %) all at 5 years. For the 16 patients treated with an electron boost for anal margin tumours, the 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival and stoma-free survival were 68 % (95 % CI, 44–92 %), 78 % (95 % CI, 56–100 %) and 80 % (95 % CI, 60–100 %), respectively. Conclusions A very low stoma formation rate can be obtained with radical chemoradiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal but not with an electron boost for anal margin tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Kent
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Nottingham, UK
| | - E M Bessell
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Nottingham, UK.
| | | | - S Chappell
- School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - L Marsh
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Nottingham, UK
| | - J Mills
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Nottingham, UK
| | - I Sayers
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
282
|
Ott PA, Piha-Paul SA, Munster P, Pishvaian MJ, van Brummelen EMJ, Cohen RB, Gomez-Roca C, Ejadi S, Stein M, Chan E, Simonelli M, Morosky A, Saraf S, Emancipator K, Koshiji M, Bennouna J. Safety and antitumor activity of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent carcinoma of the anal canal. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:1036-1041. [PMID: 28453692 PMCID: PMC5406758 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab, a humanized programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody, was assessed in KEYNOTE-028, a multicohort, phase Ib trial for patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced solid tumors. We report results for the cohort of patients with advanced anal carcinoma. Patients and methods Patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (≥1%) received intravenous pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for up to 2 years or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed every 8 weeks for the first 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate per investigator review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and response duration. Data cutoff date was 1 July 2015. Results Of the 43 patients with advanced anal carcinoma evaluable for PD-L1 expression, 32 (74%) had PD-L1-positive tumors as assessed with the 22C3 prototype assay, of whom 25 were enrolled between April and September 2014. Sixteen patients (64%) experienced treatment-related adverse events; the most common ones were diarrhea and fatigue in four patients (16%) each and nausea in three patients (12%). There were no treatment-related deaths or discontinuations as of the data cutoff date. Among the 24 patients with squamous cell carcinoma histology, four had confirmed partial response, for an overall response rate of 17% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5%-37%) and 10 (42%) had confirmed stable disease, for a disease control rate of 58%. One additional patient with non-squamous histology had confirmed stable disease. Conclusion In this population of patients with PD-L1-positive advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma, pembrolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity. These data support further study of pembrolizumab for this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02054806.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Anal Canal/pathology
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Anus Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Anus Neoplasms/mortality
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality
- Disease-Free Survival
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. A. Ott
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - S. A. Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - P. Munster
- Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - M. J. Pishvaian
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA
| | - E. M. J. van Brummelen
- Department of Molecular Pathology & Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. B. Cohen
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - C. Gomez-Roca
- Clinical Research Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud and Institut Universitaire du Cancer—Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - S. Ejadi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Virginia G. Piper Cancer Center, Scottsdale
| | - M. Stein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - E. Chan
- Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, USA
| | - M. Simonelli
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Italy
| | - A. Morosky
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Merck & Co, Inc., Kenilworth, USA
| | - S. Saraf
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Merck & Co, Inc., Kenilworth, USA
| | - K. Emancipator
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Merck & Co, Inc., Kenilworth, USA
| | - M. Koshiji
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Merck & Co, Inc., Kenilworth, USA
| | - J. Bennouna
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
283
|
Su Z, Guo ZW, Mao YP, Tang J, Lan XW, Xie FY, Li Q. Anal adenocarcinoma requires prophylactic inguinal nodal treatment: Results from a single Chinese institution. J Cancer 2017; 8:1097-1102. [PMID: 28529624 PMCID: PMC5436264 DOI: 10.7150/jca.17513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Literature pertaining to prophylactic inguinal nodal treatment for anal adenocarcinoma in China is scarce. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 126 patients from 1965 to 2015. Among these, 67 patients received surgery only, 18 patients received chemoradiotherapy only, 27 patients received a combination of both, and the remaining 14 patients received palliative treatment. Results: The median follow up period was 30 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 85.8%, 62.5%, and 43.4%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 46.9% for patients with negative inguinal lymph nodes and 19.1% for patients with positive inguinal lymph nodes (p=0.007). The overall 5-year inguinal node relapse-free survival was 83.0%. The 5-year inguinal node relapse-free survival was 87.5% for stage I, 86.9% for stage II, and 76.5% for stage III cancers. Among those with negative inguinal nodes, the 5-year inguinal node relapse-free survival was 85.7% for negative regional lymph nodes and 75.4% for positive regional lymph nodes (p=0.089). Conclusion: Inguinal lymph node is a high-risk subclinical area. Prophylactic inguinal nodal treatment is necessary for patients with anal adenocarcinoma irrespective of positive or negative inguinal lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Zhan-Wen Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command, No.83, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, Liaoning province, 110016, China
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jie Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiao-Wen Lan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Fang-Yun Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Qun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
284
|
Glynne-Jones R, Adams R, Lopes A, Meadows H. Clinical endpoints in trials of chemoradiation for patients with anal cancer. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e218-e227. [PMID: 28368260 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30190-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2016] [Revised: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 12/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
This Review examines the reporting of endpoints in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of radical chemoradiation for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. The types, frequency, and definitions of clinical primary and secondary endpoints, and patient-reported outcome measures, reported in the methods and results sections of papers (and protocols, if available) were examined. Only six published RCTs comprising 2877 patients were identified. Primary outcome measures varied across the trials analysed: two used disease-free survival, one used progression-free survival, two used local failure, and one used colostomy-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, complete clinical response, quality of life, toxicity, and compliance. The definitions for primary and secondary endpoints were not consistent across trials, particularly for treatment failure (local, regional, and distant). We conclude that the quality of outcome reporting in RCTs of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is inconsistent. A core set of outcomes, including clinical and patient-reported outcome measures with standardised definitions, is needed to improve the reporting of RCTs examining chemoradiation for treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard Adams
- Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Andre Lopes
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Helen Meadows
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
285
|
Mitra D, Hong TS, Horick N, Rose B, Drapek LN, Blaszkowsky LS, Allen JN, Kwak EL, Murphy JE, Clark JW, Ryan DP, Cusack JC, Bordeianou LG, Berger DL, Wo JY. Long-term outcomes and toxicities of a large cohort of anal cancer patients treated with dose-painted IMRT per RTOG 0529. Adv Radiat Oncol 2017; 2:110-117. [PMID: 28740921 PMCID: PMC5514246 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the outcomes and toxicities of the largest cohort to date of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma uniformly treated with concurrent chemoradiation using dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy (DP-IMRT) according to RTOG 0529. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 99 eligible patients with anal cancer who were treated at our institution with definitive chemoradiation using DP-IMRT between 2005 and 2015 per RTOG 0529 dosing guidelines. Primary study endpoints included event-free survival (defined as recurrence, colostomy, or death) and overall survival. Secondary endpoints were treatment duration and acute and late toxicity. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 49 months (range, 2-114 months), 92% of patients had a clinical complete response. Fifteen percent underwent colostomy, including 4 pretreatment colostomies, 6 planned abdominoperineal resections (APRs), 4 salvage APRs, and 1 APR for treatment-related complications. Thirteen patients developed local recurrence, of whom 6 developed synchronous metastatic disease. The 4-year overall survival was 85.8%, and 4-year event-free survival was 75.5%. Median treatment duration was 43 days (range, 10-68 days). The overall rate of non-hematologic grade 3+ acute and grade 2+ late toxicities was 20% and 15%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Long-term outcomes and tolerability were excellent In the largest cohort to date of patients with anal cancer who received DP-IMRT prescribed per RTOG 0529.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devarati Mitra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Theodore S. Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nora Horick
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brent Rose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lorraine N. Drapek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jill N. Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eunice L. Kwak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Janet E. Murphy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey W. Clark
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David P. Ryan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James C. Cusack
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - David L. Berger
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Y. Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
286
|
Liu Y, Zhao G, Xu Y, He X, Li X, Chen H, Wu Q, Yao S, Yan G, Chen T. Multicenter Phase 2 Study of Peri-Irradiation Chemotherapy Plus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Weekly Docetaxel for Inoperable or Medically Unresectable Nonmetastatic Gastric Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:1096-1105. [PMID: 28721893 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) plus preradiation and postradiation chemotherapy for patients with nonmetastatic gastric carcinoma who do not undergo surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with inoperable (due to medical comorbid conditions or patient's refusal to undergo surgery) or unresectable gastric cancer received up to 2 21-day cycles of preradiation and postradiation chemotherapy (docetaxel 37.5 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1-3, and a continuous infusion of fluorouracil [FU] 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5), respectively. CCRT between preradiation and postradiation chemotherapy was initiated on day 43 and consisted of intensity modulated radiation therapy (50.4 Gy) plus concurrent docetaxel 20 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks. RESULTS 36 patients were evaluable; 21 patients with comorbid conditions were unsuitable for surgery (group 1), 8 had unresectable disease (group 2), and 7 refused surgery (group 3). The clinical complete response (cCR) rate for the 36 evaluable patients was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19%-53%) and the overall response rate was 83% (95% CI, 75%-97%). The median survival time and estimated 2-year survival rate were 25.8 months (95% CI, 7.1-44.5 months) and 52% (95% CI, 38%-67%), respectively. The estimated median OS and 2-year OS rates for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 37.0 months (95% CI, 7.9-66.1 months) and 52% (95% CI, 31%-73%), 17.7 months (95% CI, 7.8-27.6 months) and 20% (95% CI, 0%-49%), and 38.9 months (95% CI, 16.6-58.3 months) and 67% (95% CI, 30%-100%), respectively. Achieving a cCR was associated with significantly better overall survival (P=.004) and progression-free survival (P=.003). The most common grade 3 or greater toxicity during the chemotherapy phase was neutropenia. Common grade 3/4 toxicities during CCRT were nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS This regimen is tolerable and shows promising efficacy in inoperable or medically unresectable GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Guoqi Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Yi Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Xia He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China
| | - Xiaodong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing BenQ Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China
| | - Hui Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China
| | - Qin Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Shengyu Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Ge Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Tingfeng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
287
|
Rose B, Mitra D, Hong TS, Jee KW, Niemierko A, Drapek LN, Blaszkowsky LS, Allen JN, Murphy JE, Clark JW, Ryan DP, Wo JY. Irradiation of anatomically defined pelvic subsites and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:e291-e297. [PMID: 28462895 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Revised: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 03/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemoradiation for the treatment of anal cancer is known to cause significant hematologic toxicity (HT). We sought to investigate if radiation dose to specific pelvic subsites is associated with increased HT risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty-five patients with nonmetastatic anal cancer who received definitive chemoradiation with intensity modulated radiation therapy and concurrent mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil were studied. Total pelvic bone marrow (TBM) was divided into 3 subsites: lumbosacral bone marrow (LSBM), including the entire sacrum and L5 vertebral body; iliac bone marrow (IBM) extending from the iliac crests to the superior border of the femoral head; and lower pelvic bone marrow, including the pubic bones, ischia, acetabula, and proximal femurs. The primary endpoint was absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir during or within 2 weeks of treatment completion. Generalized linear modeling was used to analyze the correlation between the equivalent uniform dose (with an "a" value of 0.5) to the individual pelvic subsites and the various hematologic endpoints. Age, body mass index, sex, baseline blood counts, and immunosuppression were analyzed as potential covariates. RESULTS Mean ± standard deviation ANC nadir was 0.77 × 109/L (±0.66 × 109/L). Grades 3+ and 4+ neutropenia occurred in 71.1% and 44.4% of patients, respectively. In addition to radiation dose to pelvic bone marrow, baseline ANC was the only significant predictor of hematologic toxicity on multivariable analysis and was included in all models. The equivalent uniform doses of TBM, LSBM, and IBM were each significantly associated with neutropenia. The model performance of TBM (adjusted R2 = 0.226) was similar to both LSBM (adjusted R2 = 0.206) and IBM (adjusted R2 = 0.249). CONCLUSIONS Radiation doses to TBM, LSBM, and IBM were individually associated with HT, suggesting that sparing just a portion of pelvic bone marrow is insufficient to decrease rates of clinically significant bone marrow suppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent Rose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Devarati Mitra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kyung-Wook Jee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lorraine N Drapek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jill N Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Janet E Murphy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David P Ryan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
288
|
Chong LC, Healey T, Michele T, Price TJ. Capecitabine in locally advanced anal cancer, do we need randomised evidence? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:411-416. [PMID: 28277833 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1302333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Standard treatment for locally advanced anal cancer is chemoradiotherapy with mitomycin C and fluorouracil. However, infusional fluorouracil requires central venous catheter placement potentiating risk of infection and thrombosis. Capecitabine which is an oral tumor activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate is an established treatment alternative to infusional fluorouracil for patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Areas covered: This review examines and discusses the current evidence for substitution of Capecitabine for infusional fluorouracil in locally advanced anal cancer. Two phase II studies, one phase I study and three retrospective reviews were identified. The rate of complete response and locoregional control with the use of Capecitabine in all of these studies ranged from 77% to 89.1% and 79% to 94% respectively, and these results are comparable with prior pivotal studies. The main toxicity with radiation and Capecitabine is radiation dermatitis occurring in 23% to 63% of patients. Despite high rates of radiation dermatitis, treatment completion rates were high, suggesting that it is a well tolerated protocol. Expert commentary: Capecitabine has been used widely in other gastrointestinal cancers, including rectal cancer in chemo-radiotherapy protocols, with proven efficacy and safety and could be a reasonable treatment alternative to fluorouracil in locally advanced anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Chia Chong
- a Department of Medical Oncology , Adelaide Oncology and Haematology , North Adelaide , Australia.,b Department of Medical Oncology , Royal Adelaide Hospital , Adelaide , Australia
| | - Tabitha Healey
- a Department of Medical Oncology , Adelaide Oncology and Haematology , North Adelaide , Australia
| | - Tony Michele
- a Department of Medical Oncology , Adelaide Oncology and Haematology , North Adelaide , Australia
| | - Timothy J Price
- c Department of Medical Oncology , The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and University of Adelaide , Adelaide , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
289
|
Houard C, Pinaquy JB, Mesguich C, Henriques de Figueiredo B, Cazeau AL, Allard JB, Laharie H, Bordenave L, Fernandez P, Vendrely V. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Posttreatment Evaluation of Anal Carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:1414-1420. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.185280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
290
|
Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Meadows HM, Cunningham D, Begum R, Adab F, Benstead K, Harte RJ, Stewart J, Beare S, Hackshaw A, Kadalayil L. Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:347-356. [PMID: 28209296 PMCID: PMC5337624 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30071-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6-12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy. METHODS The previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m2 on day 1) or intravenous cisplatin (one dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with intravenous fluorouracil (one dose of 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-4 and 29-32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); and also did a second randomisation after initial therapy to maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin) or no maintenance chemotherapy. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (the absence of primary and nodal tumour by clinical examination), in addition to overall survival and progression-free survival from time of randomisation. In this post-hoc analysis, we analysed complete clinical response at three timepoints: 11 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 1), 18 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 2), and 26 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 3) as well as the overall and progression-free survival estimates of patients with complete clinical response or without complete clinical response at each assessment. We analysed both the overall trial population and a subgroup of patients who had attended each of the three assessments by modified intention-to-treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN 26715889. FINDINGS We enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3 was 83% (95% CI 79-86), 84% (81-87), and 87% (84-89), respectively and was 72% (66-78), 59% (49-67), and 46% (37-55) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3, respectively. In the subgroup of 691 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3 was 85% (81-88), 86% (82-88), and 87% (84-90), respectively, and was 75% (68-80), 61% (50-70), and 48% (36-58) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival in both the overall trial population and the subgroup was longer in patients who had a complete clinical response, compared with patients who did not have a complete clinical response, at all three assessments. INTERPRETATION Many patients who do not have a complete clinical response when assessed at 11 weeks after commencing chemoradiotherapy do in fact respond by 26 weeks, and the earlier assessment could lead to some patients having unnecessary surgery. Our data suggests that the optimum time for assessment of complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is 26 weeks from starting chemoradiotherapy. We suggest that guidelines should be revised to indicate that later assessment is acceptable. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Helen M Meadows
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Rubina Begum
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Fawzi Adab
- North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, Stoke, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sandy Beare
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Latha Kadalayil
- Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
291
|
Doll CM, Moughan J, Klimowicz A, Ho CK, Kornaga EN, Lees-Miller SP, Ajani JA, Crane CH, Kachnic LA, Okawara GS, Berk LB, Roof KS, Becker MJ, Grisell DL, Ellis RJ, Sperduto PW, Marsa GW, Guha C, Magliocco AM. Significance of Co-expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Ki67 on Clinical Outcome in Patients With Anal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiotherapy: An Analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 9811. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97:554-562. [PMID: 28126304 PMCID: PMC5687248 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To measure co-expression of EGFR and Ki67 proteins in pretreatment tumor biopsies of anal cancer patients enrolled on NRG Oncology RTOG 9811, a phase III trial comparing 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin-C/radiation therapy (Arm A) versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin/radiation therapy (Arm B), and to correlate expression with clinical outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS EGFR and Ki67 co-expression was measured after constructing a tissue microarray using fluorescence immunohistochemistry and automated quantitative image analysis. The Ki67 score within EGFR high versus low areas (Ki67ratio in EGFRhigh:low) in each tumor core was analyzed at the median, quartiles, and as a continuous variable. Associations between the tumor markers and clinical endpoints (overall and disease-free survival, locoregional and colostomy failure, and distant metastases) were explored. RESULTS A total of 282 pretreatment tumors were analyzed from NRG Oncology RTOG 9811. Of evaluated specimens, 183 (65%, n=89, Arm A; n=94, Arm B) were eligible and analyzable. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or outcomes between analyzable and unanalyzable patient cases. Median follow-up was 6.0 years. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for gender, patients with Ki67ratio in EGFRhigh:low ≥median had worse overall survival (hazard ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.38-4.19, P=.0019). After adjusting for N stage and largest tumor dimension, patients with Ki67ratio in EGFRhigh:low ≥ median had a higher risk of a disease-free failure (hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.92, P=.0078). Technical validation with an independent anal cancer patient cohort was performed and shows a very similar biomarker score distribution. CONCLUSIONS High Ki67ratio in EGFRhigh:low is associated with worse clinical outcome in this subset of patients with anal cancer treated with chemoradiation on NRG Oncology RTOG 9811. Evaluation within a clinical trial will be required to determine whether patients with these tumor characteristics may specifically benefit from an EGFR-targeted therapeutic agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Moughan
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Clement K Ho
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Jaffer A Ajani
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Gordon S Okawara
- McMaster University Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence B Berk
- Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP), Miami Beach, Florida
| | - Kevin S Roof
- Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Inc, CCOP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | - Gerald W Marsa
- Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program CCOP, Toledo, Ohio
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
292
|
Franco P, Arcadipane F, Ragona R, Mistrangelo M, Cassoni P, Racca P, Morino M, Numico G, Ricardi U. Hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients during combined chemo-radiation: a radiation oncologist perspective. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:335-345. [PMID: 28277103 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1288104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hematologic toxicity is an important side effect occurring in patients affected with anal cancer, undergoing combined radio-chemotherapy, with consistent clinical meaningfulness. Areas covered: Since more than a half of bone marrow is comprised within the pelvic region, the radiation dose received by this functional compartment is crucial. Modern imaging modalities may provide a useful tool to identify bone marrow and new delivery technology may enhance the radiation oncologist's possibility to selectively spare these structures, potentially decreasing acute hematologic toxicity profile in this setting. Expert commentary: Correlation between dose to pelvic structures and acute hematologic toxicity has been studied in several oncological settings, mainly on a retrospective frame. Different dose metrics were found to be correlated including mean doses and different points within the dose-volume histogram ranging from low to medium-high doses. Several imaging modalities were used to identify bone marrow both morphological and functional. Several clinical endpoints were used. In general, accounting for bone marrow during the treatment planning process may be important to decrease the acute hematologic toxicity profile during concurrent chemo-radiation in anal cancer patients. The most appropriate strategy to address this issue need further investigation and deserve validation in a prospective clinical framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- a Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology , University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- a Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology , University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| | - Riccardo Ragona
- a Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology , University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| | | | - Paola Cassoni
- c Department of Medical Sciences , University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| | - Patrizia Racca
- d Department of Oncology , Oncological Centre for Gastrointestinal Neoplasm, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza , Turin , Italy
| | - Mario Morino
- b Department of Surgical Sciences , University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| | - Gianmauro Numico
- e Department of Oncology , Medical Oncology, AO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo , Alessandria , Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- a Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology , University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
293
|
Olsen JR, Moughan J, Myerson R, Abitbol A, Doncals DE, Johnson D, Schefter TE, Chen Y, Fisher B, Michalski J, Narayan S, Chang A, Crane CH, Kachnic L. Predictors of Radiation Therapy-Related Gastrointestinal Toxicity From Anal Cancer Dose-Painted Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Secondary Analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 0529. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:400-408. [PMID: 28463160 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Revised: 01/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE NRG Oncology RTOG 0529 assessed the feasibility of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy (DP-IMRT) to reduce the acute morbidity of chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) for T2-4N0-3M0 anal cancer. This secondary analysis was performed to identify patient and treatment factors associated with acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs). METHODS AND MATERIALS NRG Oncology RTOG 0529 treatment plans were reviewed to extract dose-volume data for tightly contoured small bowel, loosely contoured anterior pelvic contents (APC), and uninvolved colon outside the target volume (UC). Univariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate association between volumes of each structure receiving doses ≥5 to 60 Gy (V5-V60) in 5-Gy increments between patients with and without grade ≥2 acute and late GI AEs, and grade ≥3 acute GI AEs. Additional patient and treatment factors were evaluated in multivariate logistic regression (acute AEs) or Cox proportional hazards models (late AEs). RESULTS Among 52 evaluable patients, grade ≥2 acute, grade ≥2 late, and grade ≥3 acute GI AEs were observed in 35, 17, and 10 patients, respectively. Trends (P<.05) toward statistically significant associations were observed between grade ≥2 acute GI AEs and small bowel dose (V20-V40), grade ≥2 late GI AEs and APC dose (V60), grade ≥3 acute GI AEs and APC dose (V5-V25), increasing age, tumor size >4 cm, and worse Zubrod performance status. Small bowel volumes of 186.0 cc, 155.0 cc, 41.0 cc, and 30.4 cc receiving doses greater than 25, 30, 35, and 40 Gy, respectively, correlated with increased risk of acute grade ≥2 GI AEs. CONCLUSIONS Acute and late GI AEs from 5FU/MMC chemoradiation using DP-IMRT correlate with radiation dose to the small bowel and APC. Such associations will be incorporated in the dose-volume normal tissue constraint design for future NRG oncology anal cancer studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Moughan
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Desiree E Doncals
- Summa Akron City Hospital accruals for Akron City Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Douglas Johnson
- Florida Radiation Oncology Group-Baptist Regional, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Yuhchyau Chen
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Barbara Fisher
- London Regional Cancer Program-University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Samir Narayan
- Michigan Cancer Research Consortium CCOP, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Albert Chang
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Lisa Kachnic
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
294
|
Balermpas P, Martin D, Wieland U, Rave-Fränk M, Strebhardt K, Rödel C, Fokas E, Rödel F. Human papilloma virus load and PD-1/PD-L1, CD8 + and FOXP3 in anal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy: Rationale for immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2017; 6:e1288331. [PMID: 28405521 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2017.1288331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined the prognostic role of immune markers programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), FOXP3+ Tregs and phosphorylated Caspase-8 (T273) in patients with anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC) treated with standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The baseline immunohistochemical expression of immune markers was correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics, and cumulative incidence of local failure, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in 150 patients, also in the context of human papilloma virus 16 (HPV16) DNA load and p16INK4a expression. After a median follow-up of 40 mo (1-205 mo), the 5-y cumulative incidence of local failure and DFS was 19.4% and 67.2%, respectively. Strong immune marker expression was significantly more common in tumors with high HPV16 viral load. In multivariant analysis, high CD8+ and PD-1+ TILs expression predicted for improved local control (p = 0.023 and p = 0.007, respectively) and DFS (p = 0.020 and p = 0.014, respectively). Also, high p16INK4a (p = 0.011) and PD-L1 (p = 0.033) expression predicted for better local control, whereas high FOXP3+ Tregs (p = 0.050) and phosphorylated Caspase-8 (p = 0.031) expression correlated with superior DFS. Female sex and high HPV16 viral load correlated with favorable outcome for all three clinical endpoints. The present data provide, for the first time, robust explanation for the favorable clinical outcome of HPV16-positive ASCC patients harboring strong immune cell infiltration. Our findings are relevant for treatment stratification with immune PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors to complement CRT and should be explored in a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site: Frankfurt/Mainz, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University , Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ulrike Wieland
- Institute of Virology, National Reference Centre for Papilloma- and Polyomaviruses, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany
| | - Margret Rave-Fränk
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen , Göttingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Strebhardt
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site: Frankfurt/Mainz, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Gynecology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site: Frankfurt/Mainz, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site: Frankfurt/Mainz, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Franz Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site: Frankfurt/Mainz, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
295
|
Kochhar R, Renehan AG, Mullan D, Chakrabarty B, Saunders MP, Carrington BM. The assessment of local response using magnetic resonance imaging at 3- and 6-month post chemoradiotherapy in patients with anal cancer. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:607-617. [PMID: 27090113 PMCID: PMC5209434 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4337-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the use of MRI-determined tumour regression grading (TRG) in local response assessment and detection of salvageable early local relapse after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). METHODS From a prospective database of patients with ASCC managed through a centralised multidisciplinary team, 74 patients who completed routine post-CRT 3- and 6-month MRIs (2009-2012) were reviewed. Two radiologists blinded to the outcomes consensus read and retrospectively assigned TRG scores [1 (complete response) to 5 (no response)] and related these to early local relapse (within 12 months) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Seven patients had early local relapse. TRG 1/2 scores at 3 and 6 months had a 100 % negative predictive value; TRG 4/5 scores at 6 months had a 100 % positive predictive value. All seven patients underwent salvage R0 resections. We identified a novel 'tram-track' sign on MRI in over half of patients, with an NPV for early local relapse of 83 % at 6 months. No imaging characteristic or TRG score independently prognosticated for late relapse or 3-year DFS. CONCLUSIONS Post-CRT 3- and 6-month MRI-determined TRG scores predicted salvageable R0 early local relapses in patients with ASCC, challenging current clinical guidelines. KEY POINTS • Post-chemoradiotherapy MRI (3 and 6 months) helps local response assessment in ASCC. • The MRI-TRG system can be used reproducibly in patients with ASCC. • The TRG system facilitates patient selection for examination under anaesthesia and biopsy. • The use of MRI-TRG predicts for detection of salvageable early local relapses. • The TRG system allows for a standardised follow-up pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohit Kochhar
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - Andrew G Renehan
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Damian Mullan
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Bipasha Chakrabarty
- Department of Histopathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark P Saunders
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Bernadette M Carrington
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
296
|
Zhang Q, Freidlin B, Korn EL, Halabi S, Mandrekar S, Dignam JJ. Comparison of futility monitoring guidelines using completed phase III oncology trials. Clin Trials 2017; 14:48-58. [PMID: 27590208 PMCID: PMC5300958 DOI: 10.1177/1740774516666502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Futility (inefficacy) interim monitoring is an important component in the conduct of phase III clinical trials, especially in life-threatening diseases. Desirable futility monitoring guidelines allow timely stopping if the new therapy is harmful or if it is unlikely to demonstrate to be sufficiently effective if the trial were to continue to its final analysis. There are a number of analytical approaches that are used to construct futility monitoring boundaries. The most common approaches are based on conditional power, sequential testing of the alternative hypothesis, or sequential confidence intervals. The resulting futility boundaries vary considerably with respect to the level of evidence required for recommending stopping the study. PURPOSE We evaluate the performance of commonly used methods using event histories from completed phase III clinical trials of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group. METHODS We considered published superiority phase III trials with survival endpoints initiated after 1990. There are 52 studies available for this analysis from different disease sites. Total sample size and maximum number of events (statistical information) for each study were calculated using protocol-specified effect size, type I and type II error rates. In addition to the common futility approaches, we considered a recently proposed linear inefficacy boundary approach with an early harm look followed by several lack-of-efficacy analyses. For each futility approach, interim test statistics were generated for three schedules with different analysis frequency, and early stopping was recommended if the interim result crossed a futility stopping boundary. For trials not demonstrating superiority, the impact of each rule is summarized as savings on sample size, study duration, and information time scales. RESULTS For negative studies, our results show that the futility approaches based on testing the alternative hypothesis and repeated confidence interval rules yielded less savings (compared to the other two rules). These boundaries are too conservative, especially during the first half of the study (<50% of information). The conditional power rules are too aggressive during the second half of the study (>50% of information) and may stop a trial even when there is a clinically meaningful treatment effect. The linear inefficacy boundary with three or more interim analyses provided the best results. For positive studies, we demonstrated that none of the futility rules would have stopped the trials. CONCLUSION The linear inefficacy boundary futility approach is attractive from statistical, clinical, and logistical standpoints in clinical trials evaluating new anti-cancer agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Zhang
- Statistics and Data Management Center, NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Boris Freidlin
- Biometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Edward L Korn
- Biometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Sumithra Mandrekar
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James J Dignam
- Statistics and Data Management Center, NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
297
|
Baughman DM, Shah BK. Disparities in receipt of radiotherapy and survival by age, sex, and race among patients with non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 7:968-973. [PMID: 28078120 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2016.11.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combination chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for treatment of non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). This population based study evaluated disparities in receipt of radiotherapy (RT) as well as comparative survival rates for SCCA patients in the United States. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database was used to identify patients with non-metastatic SCCA diagnosed between 1998 and 2008. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the relationships between age, sex, and race and the receipt of RT, adjusting for marital status and stage of disease. Relative survival (RS) rates were compared by each factor, with added adjustment for RT status, using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS A total of 3,885 patients with localized or regional SCCA as the only primary malignancy were included in the study, of which, 3,192 (82%) received RT. In our multivariate analysis, lower rates of RT were found for those 65+ years old [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.71; P<0.001], males (adjusted OR 0.65; P<0.001), and blacks (adjusted OR 0.78; P=0.049). Multivariate survival analysis showed worse survival among those 65+ years old (adjusted HR 1.65; P<0.001), males (adjusted HR 1.53; P<0.001), and blacks (adjusted HR 1.35; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS This population based study identified older patients, males, and blacks as less likely to receive RT. Worse survival was also found in these groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doug M Baughman
- Medical Student, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Binay K Shah
- Hematologist and Medical Oncologist, North Puget Cancer Center, Sedro-Woolley, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
298
|
Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M. Cetuximab in the Context of Current Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:699-701. [PMID: 28068173 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.70.9394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Rob Glynne-Jones and Mark Harrison, Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Harrison
- Rob Glynne-Jones and Mark Harrison, Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
299
|
Garg MK, Zhao F, Sparano JA, Palefsky J, Whittington R, Mitchell EP, Mulcahy MF, Armstrong KI, Nabbout NH, Kalnicki S, El-Rayes BF, Onitilo AA, Moriarty DJ, Fitzgerald TJ, Benson AB. Cetuximab Plus Chemoradiotherapy in Immunocompetent Patients With Anal Carcinoma: A Phase II Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Group Trial (E3205). J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:718-726. [PMID: 28068178 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.1667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) is characterized by high locoregional failure (LRF) rates after sphincter-preserving definitive chemoradiation (CRT) and is typically associated with anogenital human papilloma virus infection. Because cetuximab enhances the effect of radiation therapy in human papilloma virus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, we hypothesized that adding cetuximab to CRT would reduce LRF in SCCAC. Methods Sixty-one patients with stage I to III SCCAC received CRT including cisplatin, fluorouracil, and radiation therapy to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (45 to 54 Gy) plus eight once-weekly doses of concurrent cetuximab. The study was designed to detect at least a 50% reduction in 3-year LRF rate (one-sided α, 0.10; power 90%), assuming a 35% LRF rate from historical data. Results Poor risk features included stage III disease in 64% and male sex in 20%. The 3-year LRF rate was 23% (95% CI, 13% to 36%; one-sided P = .03) by binomial proportional estimate using the prespecified end point and 21% (95% CI, 7% to 26%) by Kaplan-Meier estimate in a post hoc analysis using methods consistent with historical data. Three-year rates were 68% (95% CI, 55% to 79%) for progression-free survival and 83% (95% CI, 71% to 91%) for overall survival. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 32%, and 5% had treatment-associated deaths. Conclusion Although the addition of cetuximab to chemoradiation for SCCAC was associated with lower LRF rates than historical data with CRT alone, toxicity was substantial, and LRF still occurs in approximately 20%, indicating the continued need for more effective and less toxic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhur K Garg
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Joel Palefsky
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Richard Whittington
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Edith P Mitchell
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Karin I Armstrong
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Nassim H Nabbout
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Shalom Kalnicki
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Bassel F El-Rayes
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Adedayo A Onitilo
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Daniel J Moriarty
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Thomas J Fitzgerald
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Al B Benson
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
300
|
The Impact of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy on Hospitalization Outcomes in the SEER-Medicare Population With Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:177-185. [PMID: 28258896 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Revised: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We examined the impact of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on hospitalization rates in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare population with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a retrospective cohort study using the SEER-Medicare database. We identified patients with nonmetastatic anal SCC diagnosed between 2001 and 2011 and treated with chemoradiation therapy. We assessed the relation between IMRT and first hospitalization by use of a multivariate competing-risk model, as well as instrumental variable analysis, using provider IMRT affinity as our instrument. RESULTS Of the 1165 patients included in our study, 458 (39%) received IMRT. IMRT use increased over time and was associated more with regional and provider characteristics than with patient characteristics. The 3- and 6-month cumulative incidences of first hospitalization were 41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.3%-46.4%) and 47.6% (95% CI, 43.0%-52.2%), respectively, for the IMRT cohort and 46.7% (95% CI, 43.0%-50.4%) and 52.1% (95% CI, 48.4%-55.7%), respectively, for the non-IMRT cohort. IMRT was associated with a decreased hazard of first hospitalization compared with 3-dimensional radiation techniques (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.84; P=.0002). Instrumental variable analysis suggested an even greater reduction in hospitalizations with IMRT after controlling for unmeasured confounders. There was a trend toward improved overall survival with IMRT, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-1.00; P=.05). CONCLUSIONS The use of IMRT is associated with reduced hospitalizations in elderly patients with anal SCC. Further work is warranted to understand the long-term health and cost impact of IMRT, particularly for patient subgroups most at risk of toxicity and hospitalization.
Collapse
|