Regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activity by mitogen-activated protein kinase

Inhibition of cellular proliferation through IkappaB kinase-independent and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent repression of cyclin D1

The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) is a ligand-regulated nuclear receptor superfamily member. Liganded PPARgamma exerts diverse biological effects, promoting adipocyte differentiation, inhibiting tumor cellular proliferation, and regulating monocyte/macrophage and anti-inflammatory activities in vitro. In vivo studies with PPARgamma ligands showed enhancement of tumor growth, raising the possibility that reduced immune function and tumor surveillance may outweigh the direct inhibitory effects of PPARgamma ligands on cellular proliferation. Recent findings that PPARgamma ligands convey PPARgamma-independent activities through IkappaB kinase (IKK) raises important questions about the specific mechanisms through which PPARgamma ligands inhibit cellular proliferation. We investigated the mechanisms regulating the antiproliferative effect of PPARgamma. Herein PPARgamma, liganded by either natural (15d-PGJ(2) and PGD(2)) or synthetic ligands (BRL49653 and troglitazone), selectively inhibited expression of the cyclin D1 gene. The inhibition of S-phase entry and activity of the cyclin D1-dependent serine-threonine kinase (Cdk) by 15d-PGJ(2) was not observed in PPARgamma-deficient cells. Cyclin D1 overexpression reversed the S-phase inhibition by 15d-PGJ(2). Cyclin D1 repression was independent of IKK, as prostaglandins (PGs) which bound PPARgamma but lacked the IKK interactive cyclopentone ring carbonyl group repressed cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 repression by PPARgamma involved competition for limiting abundance of p300, directed through a c-Fos binding site of the cyclin D1 promoter. 15d-PGJ(2) enhanced recruitment of p300 to PPARgamma but reduced binding to c-Fos. The identification of distinct pathways through which eicosanoids regulate anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative effects may improve the utility of COX2 inhibitors.

Pioglitazone ameliorates tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced insulin resistance by a mechanism independent of adipogenic activity of peroxisome proliferator--activated receptor-gamma

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha is one of the candidate mediators of insulin resistance associated with obesity, a major risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes. The insulin resistance induced by TNF-alpha is antagonized by thiazolidinediones (TZDs), a new class of insulin-sensitizing drugs. The aim of the current study was to dissect the mechanism whereby pioglitazone, one of the TZDs, ameliorates TNF-alpha-induced insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Pioglitazone restored insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose (DOG) uptake, which was reduced by TNF-alpha, with concomitant restorations in tyrosine phosphorylation and protein levels of insulin receptor (IR) and insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1, as well as association of the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase with IRS-1 and PI 3-kinase activity. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of either wild-type human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma2 or a mutant carrying a replacement at the consensus mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation site (hPPAR-gamma2-S112A) promoted adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 fibroblasts and restored TNF-alpha-induced decrease of triglyceride in adipocytes as effectively as pioglitazone. Overexpression of the PPAR-gamma proteins in TNF-alpha-treated adipocytes restored protein levels of IR/IRS-1, but did not improve insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IR/IRS-1 or insulin-stimulated 2-DOG uptake. These results indicate that the ability of pioglitazone to restore insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IR/IRS-1, which is necessary for amelioration of TNF-alpha-induced insulin resistance, may be independent of the adipogenic activity of PPAR-gamma that regulates protein levels of IR/IRS-1.

Molecular regulation of adipogenesis

Adipogenesis, or the development of fat cells from preadipocytes, has been one of the most intensely studied models of cellular differentiation. In part this has been because of the availability of in vitro models that faithfully recapitulate most of the critical aspects of fat cell formation in vivo. More recently, studies of adipogenesis have proceeded with the hope that manipulation of this process in humans might one day lead to a reduction in the burden of obesity and diabetes. This review explores some of the highlights of a large and burgeoning literature devoted to understanding adipogenesis at the molecular level. The hormonal and transcriptional control of adipogenesis is reviewed, as well as studies on a less well known type of fat cell, the brown adipocyte. Emphasis is placed, where possible, on in vivo studies with the hope that the results discussed may one day shed light on basic questions of cellular growth and differentiation in addition to possible benefits in human health.

Interferon-gamma-induced regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and STATs in adipocytes

Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) is known primarily for its roles in immunological responses but also has been shown to affect fat metabolism and adipocyte gene expression. To further investigate the effects of IFN-gamma on fat cells, we examined the effects of this cytokine on the expression of adipocyte transcription factors in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Although IFN-gamma regulated the expression of several adipocyte transcription factors, IFN-gamma treatment resulted in a rapid reduction of both peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) protein and mRNA. A 48-h exposure to IFN-gamma also resulted in a decrease of both CCAAT/enhancer-binding alpha and sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP-1) expression. The short half-life of both the PPARgamma mRNA and protein likely contributed to the rapid decline of both cytosolic and nuclear PPARgamma in the presence of IFN-gamma. Our studies clearly demonstrated that the IFN-gamma-induced loss of PPARgamma protein is partially inhibited in the presence of two distinct proteasome inhibitors. Moreover, IFN-gamma also inhibited the transcription of PPARgamma, which was accompanied by a decrease in PPARgamma mRNA accumulation. In addition, exposure to IFN-gamma resulted in a substantial increase in STAT 1 expression and a small increase in STAT 3 expression. IFN-gamma treatment of 3T3-L1 adipocytes (48-96 h) resulted in a substantial inhibition of insulin-sensitive glucose uptake. These data clearly demonstrate that IFN-gamma treatment results in the development of insulin resistance, which is accompanied by the regulation of various adipocyte transcription factors, in particular the synthesis and degradation of PPARgamma.

Prostaglandin J(2) inhibition of mesangial cell iNOS expression

Mesangial cells from MRL/lpr mice, a model of lupus, overproduce nitric oxide (NO) compared to controls. J series prostaglandins (PG) and thiazolidinediones block LPS stimulation of NO production via the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) in macrophages but utilize an alternative mechanism in microglial cells. We investigated the mechanism by which PGJ(2) inhibits NO production in LPS/IFN-gamma-stimulated MRL/lpr mesangial cells. Our results demonstrated that LPS/IFN-gamma addition to MRL/lpr mesangial cells stimulated iNOS activation, expression of p-38 kinase and p44/42 MAPK, and NF-kappaB translocation to the nucleus. Both pioglitazone, a specific PPAR-gamma agonist, and PGJ(2) blocked NO production, iNOS protein expression, and iNOS mRNA transcription. PGJ(2) failed to inhibit nuclear NF-kappaB translocation or p44/42 MAPK or p-38 kinase induction in stimulated mesangial cells. These data suggest that PGJ(2) blocks iNOS expression and subsequent NO production in mesangial cells via a PPAR-gamma-mediated mechanism either by interfering with NF-kappaB transcriptional activity or by an NF-kappaB-independent mechanism.

Transcriptional control of adipogenesis

The major transcriptional factors involved in the adipogenic process include proteins belonging to the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein family, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, and adipocyte determination and differentiation dependent factor 1, also known as sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1. This process has been characterized with the aid of cell lines that represent various stages in the path of adipocyte commitment, ranging from pluripotent mesodermal fibroblasts to preadipocytes. Molecular analyses have led to a cascade model for adipogenesis based on timed expression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Gene targeting and transgenic-mouse technologies, which allow the manipulation of endogenous genes for these transcription factors, have also contributed to the understanding of adipogenesis. This review aims to integrate this information to gain an understanding of the transcriptional regulation of fat cell formation.

IL-4 inhibits osteoclast formation through a direct action on osteoclast precursors via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 1

IL-4 is a pleiotropic immune cytokine secreted by activated T(H)2 cells that inhibits bone resorption both in vitro and in vivo. The cellular targets of IL-4 action as well as its intracellular mechanism of action remain to be determined. We show here that IL-4 inhibits receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand-induced osteoclast differentiation through an action on osteoclast precursors that is independent of stromal cells. Interestingly, this inhibitory effect can be mimicked by both natural as well as synthetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma1 (PPARgamma1) ligands and can be blocked by the irreversible PPARgamma antagonist GW 9662. These findings suggest that the actions of IL-4 on osteoclast differentiation are mediated by PPARgamma1, an interpretation strengthened by the observation that IL-4 can activate a PPARgamma1-sensitive luciferase reporter gene in RAW264.7 cells. We also show that inhibitors of enzymes such as 12/15-lipoxygenase and the cyclooxygenases that produce known PPARgamma1 ligands do not abrogate the IL-4 effect. These findings, together with the observation that bone marrow cells from 12/15-lipoxygenase-deficient mice retain sensitivity to IL-4, suggest that the cytokine may induce novel PPARgamma1 ligands. Our results reveal that PPARgamma1 plays an important role in the suppression of osteoclast formation by IL-4 and may explain the beneficial effects of the thiazolidinedione class of PPARgamma1 ligands on bone loss in diabetic patients.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARdelta )-mediated regulation of preadipocyte proliferation and gene expression is dependent on cAMP signaling

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) is a key regulator of terminal adipocyte differentiation. PPARdelta is expressed in preadipocytes, but the importance of this PPAR subtype in adipogenesis has been a matter of debate. Here we present a critical evaluation of the role of PPARdelta in adipocyte differentiation. We demonstrate that treatment of NIH-3T3 fibroblasts overexpressing PPARdelta with standard adipogenic inducers led to induction of PPARgamma2 expression and terminal adipocyte differentiation in a manner that was strictly dependent on simultaneous administration of a PPARdelta ligand and methylisobutylxanthine (MIX) or other cAMP elevating agents. We further show that ligands and MIX synergistically stimulated PPARdelta-mediated transactivation. In 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, simultaneous administration of a PPARdelta-selective ligand and MIX significantly enhanced the early expression of PPARgamma and ALBP/aP2, but only modestly promoted terminal differentiation as determined by lipid accumulation. Finally, we provide evidence that synergistic activation of PPARdelta promotes mitotic clonal expansion in 3T3-L1 cells with or without forced expression of PPARdelta. In conclusion, our results suggest that PPARdelta may play a role in the proliferation of adipocyte precursor cells, whereas activation of endogenous PPARdelta in 3T3-L1 cells appears to have only minor impact on the processes leading to terminal adipocyte differentiation.

Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) by their ligands and protein kinase A activators

The nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) alpha, beta, and gamma activate the transcription of multiple genes involved in lipid metabolism. Several natural and synthetic ligands have been identified for each PPAR isotype but little is known about the phosphorylation state of these receptors. We show here that activators of protein kinase A (PKA) can enhance mouse PPAR activity in the absence and the presence of exogenous ligands in transient transfection experiments. Activation function 1 (AF-1) of PPARs was dispensable for transcriptional enhancement, whereas activation function 2 (AF-2) was required for this effect. We also show that several domains of PPAR can be phosphorylated by PKA in vitro. Moreover, gel retardation experiments suggest that PKA stabilizes binding of the liganded PPAR to DNA. PKA inhibitors decreased not only the kinase-dependent induction of PPARs but also their ligand-dependent induction, suggesting an interaction between both pathways that leads to maximal transcriptional induction by PPARs. Moreover, comparing PPAR alpha knockout (KO) with PPAR alpha WT mice, we show that the expression of the acyl CoA oxidase (ACO) gene can be regulated by PKA-activated PPAR alpha in liver. These data demonstrate that the PKA pathway is an important modulator of PPAR activity, and we propose a model associating this pathway in the control of fatty acid beta-oxidation under conditions of fasting, stress, and exercise.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and hepatic stellate cell activation

The present study examined the roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) in activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSC), a pivotal event in liver fibrogenesis. RNase protection assay detected mRNA for PPARgamma1 but not that for the adipocyte-specific gamma2 isoform in HSC isolated from sham-operated rats, whereas the transcripts for neither isoforms were detectable in HSC from cholestatic liver fibrosis induced by bile duct ligation (BDL). Semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction confirmed a 70% reduction in PPARgamma mRNA level in HSC from BDL. Nuclear extracts from BDL cells showed an expected diminution of binding to PPAR-responsive element, whereas NF-kappaB and AP-1 binding were increased. Treatment of cultured-activated HSC with ligands for PPARgamma (10 microm 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-PGJ(2) (15dPGJ(2)); 0.1 approximately 10 microm BRL49653) inhibited DNA and collagen synthesis without affecting the cell viability. Suppression of HSC collagen by 15dPGJ(2) was abrogated 70% by the concomitant treatment with a PPARgamma antagonist (GW9662). HSC DNA and collagen synthesis were inhibited by WY14643 at the concentrations known to activate both PPARalpha and gamma (>100 microm) but not at those that only activate PPARalpha (<10 microm) or by a synthetic PPARalpha-selective agonist (GW9578). 15dPGJ(2) reduced alpha1(I) procollagen, smooth muscle alpha-actin, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 mRNA levels while inducing matrix metalloproteinase-3 and CD36. 15dPGJ(2) and BRL49653 inhibited alpha1(I) procollagen promoter activity. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (10 ng/ml) reduced PPARgamma mRNA, and this effect was prevented by the treatment with 15dPGJ(2). These results demonstrate that HSC activation is associated with the reductions in PPARgamma expression and PPAR-responsive element binding in vivo and is reversed by the treatment with PPARgamma ligands in vitro. These findings implicate diminished PPARgamma signaling in molecular mechanisms underlying activation of HSC in liver fibrogenesis and the potential therapeutic value of PPARgamma ligands for liver fibrosis.

Role of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) in atherosclerosis

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) are ligand-activated transcription factors which form a subfamily of the nuclear receptor gene family. PPAR activators have effects on both metabolic risk factors and on vascular inflammation related to atherosclerosis. PPAR have profound effects on the metabolism of lipoproteins and fatty acids. PPAR alpha binds hypolipidemic fibrates, whereas PPAR gamma has a high affinity for antidiabetic glitazones. Both PPAR are activated by fatty acids and their derivatives. Activation of PPAR alpha increases the catabolism of fatty acids at several levels. In the liver, it increases uptake of fatty acids and activates their beta-oxidation. The effects that PPAR alpha exerts on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins is due to their stimulation of lipoprotein lipase and repression of apolipoprotein CIII expression, while the effects on high-density lipoproteins depend upon the regulation of apolipoproteins AI and AII. PPAR gamma has profound effects on the differentiation and function of adipose tissue, where it is highly expressed. PPAR are also expressed in atherosclerotic lesions. PPAR are present in vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, monocytes, and monocyte-derived macrophages. Via negative regulation of nuclear factor-kappa B and activator protein-1 signalling pathways, PPAR alpha inhibits expression of inflammatory genes, such as interleukin-6, cyclooxygenase-2, and endothelin-1. Furthermore, PPAR alpha inhibits expression of monocyte-recruiting proteins such as vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 and induces apoptosis in monocyte-derived macrophages. PPAR gamma activation in macrophages and foam cells inhibits the expression of activated genes such as inducible nitric oxide synthase, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and scavenger receptor A. PPAR gamma may also affect the recruitment of monocytes in atherosclerotic lesions as it is involved in the expression of VCAM-1 and intracellular adhesion molecule-1 in vascular endothelial cells. The involvement of PPAR in atherosclerosis, a disease with a chronic inflammatory character, suggests that they may play a role in other inflammatory-related diseases as well.

Regulation of the peroxisomal beta-oxidation-dependent pathway by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and kinases

The first PPAR (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor) was cloned in 1990 by Issemann and Green (Nature 347:645-650). This nuclear receptor was so named since it is activated by peroxisome proliferators including several drugs of the fibrate family, plasticizers, and herbicides. This receptor belongs to the steroid receptor superfamily. After activation by a specific ligand, it binds to a DNA response element, PPRE (peroxisome proliferator response element), which is a DR-1 direct repeat of the consensus sequence TGACCT x TGACCT. This mechanism leads to the transcriptional activation of target genes (Motojima et al., J Biol Chem 273:16710-16714, 1998). After the first discovery, several isoforms were characterized in most of the vertebrates investigated. PPAR alpha, activated by hypolipidemic agents of the fibrate family or by leukotrienes; regulates lipid metabolism as well as the detoxifying enzyme-encoding genes. PPAR beta/delta, which is not very well known yet, appears to be more specifically activated by fatty acids. PPAR gamma (subisoforms 1, 2, 3) is activated by the prostaglandin PGJ2 or by antidiabetic thiazolidinediones (Vamecq and Latruffe, Lancet 354:411-418, 1999). This latter isoform is involved in adipogenesis. The level of PPAR expression is largely dependent on the tissue type. PPAR alpha is mainly expressed in liver and kidney, while PPAR beta/delta is almost constitutively expressed. In contrast, PPAR gamma is largely expressed in white adipose tissue. PPAR is a transcriptional factor that requires other nuclear proteins in order to function, i.e. RXRalpha (9-cis-retinoic acid receptor alpha) in all cases in addition to other regulatory proteins. Peroxisomes are specific organelles for very long-chain and polyunsaturated fatty acid catabolism. From our results and those of others, the inventory of the role of PPAR alpha in the regulation of peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation is presented. In relation to this, we showed that PPAR alpha activates peroxisomal beta-oxidation-encoding genes such as acyl-CoA oxidase, multifunctional protein, and thiolase (Bardot et al., FEBS Lett 360:183-186, 1995). Moreover, rat liver PPAR alpha regulatory activity is dependent on its phosphorylated state (Passilly et al., Biochem Pharmacol 58:1001-1008, 1999). On the other hand, some signal transduction pathways such as protein kinase C are modified by peroxisome proliferators that increase the phosphorylation level of some specific proteins (Passilly et al. Eur J Biochem 230:316-321, 1995). From all these findings, PPAR alpha and kinases appear to play an important role in lipid homeostasis.

Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and their biological consequences

Two supergene families encode proteins with glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity: the family of soluble enzymes comprises at least 16 genes; the separate family of microsomal enzymes comprises at least 6 genes. These two GST families are believed to exert a critical role in cellular protection against oxidative stress and toxic foreign chemicals. They detoxify a variety of electrophilic compounds, including oxidized lipid, DNA and catechol products generated by reactive oxygen species-induced damage to intracellular molecules. An increasing number of GST genes are being recognized as polymorphic. Certain alleles, particularly those that confer impaired catalytic activity (e.g. GSTM1(*)0, GSTT1(*)0), may be associated with increased sensitivity to toxic compounds. GST polymorphisms may be disease modifying; for example, in subgroups of patients with basal cell carcinoma or bronchial hyper-responsiveness, certain GST appear to exert a statistically significant and biologically relevant impact on disease susceptibility.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent repression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that activates target gene transcription in a ligand-dependent manner. In addition, liganded PPARgamma can inhibit transcription of genes induced by gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) and/or lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), including the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) gene. Inhibition of the iNOS promoter is achieved partially through antagonizing the activities of NF-kappaB, AP-1, and STAT1, which are known to mediate effects of LPS and IFN-gamma. Previous studies have suggested that transrepression of these factors by nuclear receptors involves competition for limiting amounts of the general coactivators CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300. CBP and p300 are thought to be recruited to nuclear receptors through bridging factors that include SRC-1, although CBP also interacts directly with PPARgamma through its amino terminus. These observations have raised questions concerning the involvement of SRC-1-like factors in CBP recruitment and transrepression. We here provide evidence that PPARgamma's ability to repress iNOS transcription requires the ligand-dependent charge clamp that mediates interactions with CBP and SRC-1. Single amino acid mutations in PPARgamma that abolished ligand-dependent interactions with SRC-1 and CBP not only resulted in complete loss of transactivation activity but also abolished transrepression. Conversely, a CBP deletion mutant containing the SRC-1 interaction domain but lacking the N-terminal PPARgamma interaction domain was inactive as a PPARgamma coactivator and failed to rescue transrepression. Together, these findings are consistent with a model in which transrepression by PPARgamma is achieved by targeting CBP through direct interaction with its N-terminal domain and via SRC-1-like bridge factors.

Degradation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is linked to ligand-dependent activation

The nuclear hormone receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates several crucial biological processes such as adipogenesis, glucose homeostasis, and cell growth. It is also the functional receptor for a new class of insulin-sensitizing drugs, the thiazolidinediones, now widely used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Here we report that PPARgamma protein levels are significantly reduced in adipose cells and fibroblasts in response to specific ligands such as thiazolidinediones. Studies with several doses of different ligands illustrate that degradation of PPARgamma correlates well with the ability of ligands to activate this receptor. However, analyses of PPARgamma mutants show that, although degradation does not strictly depend on the transcriptional activity of the receptor, it is dependent upon the ligand-gated activation function 2 (AF2) domain. Proteasome inhibitors inhibited the down-regulation of PPARgamma and ligand activation enhanced the ubiquitination of this receptor. These data indicate that, although ligand binding and activation of the AF2 domain increase the transcriptional function of PPARgamma, these same processes also induce ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of this receptor by the proteasome.

The critical role of Shc in insulin-like growth factor-I-mediated mitogenesis and differentiation in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) stimulates mitogenesis in proliferating preadipocytes, but when cells reach confluence and become growth arrested, IGF-I stimulates differentiation into adipocytes. IGF-I induces signaling pathways that involve IGF-I receptor-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc and insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1). Either of these adaptor proteins can lead to activation of the three-kinase cascade ending in activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and -2 (ERK-1 and -2) mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Several lines of evidence suggest that activation of MAPK inhibits 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation. We have shown that IGF-I stimulation of MAPK activity is lost as 3T3-L1 preadipocytes begin to differentiate. This change in MAPK signaling coincides with loss of IGF-I-mediated Shc, but not IRS-1, tyrosine phosphorylation. We hypothesized that down-regulation of MAPK via loss of proximal signaling through Shc is an early component in the IGF-I switch from mitogenesis to differentiation in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Treatment of subconfluent cells with the MEK inhibitor PD098059 inhibited both IGF-I-activation of MAPK as well as 3H-thymidine incorporation. PD098059, in the presence of differentiation-inducing media, accelerated differentiation in subconfluent cells as measured by expression of adipocyte protein-2 (aP-2), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL). Transient transfection of subconfluent cells with Shc-Y317F, a dominant-negative mutant, attenuated IGF-I-mediated MAPK activation, inhibited DNA synthesis, and accelerated expression of differentiation markers aP-2, PPARgamma, and LPL. We conclude that signaling through Shc to MAPK plays a critical role in mediating IGF-I-stimulated 3T3-L1 mitogenesis. Our results suggest that loss of the ability of IGF-I to activate Shc signaling to MAPK may be an early component of adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells.

Role of MAP kinase signalling pathways in the mode of action of peroxisome proliferators

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are a class of non-genotoxic chemicals that cause rodent liver enlargement and hepatocarcinogenesis. In primary rat hepatocytes, PPs cause cell proliferation, suppression of apoptosis and peroxisome proliferation. We have investigated the role of different families of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases in the mode of action of PPs. Addition of 50 microM nafenopin to primary rat hepatocyte cultures caused weak activation of extracellular signal regulated kinases and p38 MAP kinase. However, incubation of primary hepatocytes with the p38 MAP kinase inhibitor SB203580 or the MAP kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD098059 prevented the induction of DNA synthesis and the suppression of transforming growth factor beta(1)-induced apoptosis by the PP nafenopin. In contrast, in the presence of these MAP kinase inhibitors, nafenopin still induced palmitoyl CoA oxidation, a measure of peroxisome proliferation. We have shown previously that PPs such as nafenopin require tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) to exert their effects on cellular proliferation and apoptosis. Here we show that treatment of primary rat hepatocyte cultures with nafenopin causes an increase in bioactive TNF-alpha and that this process requires p38 MAP kinase activity.

Adult human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation to the osteogenic or adipogenic lineage is regulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase

Adult human mesenchymal stem cells are primary, multipotent cells capable of differentiating to osteocytic, chondrocytic, and adipocytic lineages when stimulated under appropriate conditions. To characterize the molecular mechanisms that regulate osteogenic differentiation, we examined the contribution of mitogen-activated protein kinase family members, ERK, JNK, and p38. Treatment of these stem cells with osteogenic supplements resulted in a sustained phase of ERK activation from day 7 to day 11 that coincided with differentiation, before decreasing to basal levels. Activation of JNK occurred much later (day 13 to day 17) in the osteogenic differentiation process. This JNK activation was associated with extracellular matrix synthesis and increased calcium deposition, the two hallmarks of bone formation. Inhibition of ERK activation by PD98059, a specific inhibitor of the ERK signaling pathway, blocked the osteogenic differentiation in a dose-dependent manner, as did transfection with a dominant negative form of MAP kinase kinase (MEK-1). Significantly, the blockage of osteogenic differentiation resulted in the adipogenic differentiation of the stem cells and the expression of adipose-specific mRNAs peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma2, aP2, and lipoprotein lipase. These observations provide a potential mechanism involving MAP kinase activation in osteogenic differentiation of adult stem cells and suggest that commitment of hMSCs into osteogenic or adipogenic lineages is governed by activation or inhibition of ERK, respectively.

Cloning and characterization of a functional peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-gamma-responsive element in the promoter of the CAP gene

c-Cbl-associating protein (CAP) is a multifunctional signaling protein that interacts with c-Cbl, facilitating the tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Cbl in response to insulin. In 3T3-L1 adipocytes and diabetic rodents, CAP gene expression is stimulated by activators of peroxisome proliferator activator receptor gamma (PPARgamma), such as thiazolidinediones (TZDs), resulting in increased insulin-stimulated c-Cbl phosphorylation. Sequence analysis of 2.5 kilobases of the 5'-flanking region of the CAP gene reveals a predicted peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) from -1085 to -1097. The isolated promoter was functional in 3T3 fibroblasts and adipocytes. Co-transfection of the CAP promoter with PPARgamma and retinoic acid X receptor alpha caused fold stimulation of promoter activity. The TZD rosiglitazone produced an additional 2-3-fold stimulation of the promoter. Deletion of the predicted PPRE from the CAP promoter abolished its ability to respond to rosiglitazone. Gel shift analysis of the putative PPARgamma site demonstrates direct binding of PPAR/retinoid X receptor heterodimers to the PPRE in the CAP gene. These data demonstrate that TZDs directly stimulate transcription of the CAP gene through activation of PPARgamma.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: insight into multiple cellular functions

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, PPARs, (NR1C) are nuclear hormone receptors implicated in energy homeostasis. Upon activation, these ligand-inducible transcription factors stimulate gene expression by binding to the promoter of target genes. The different structural domains of PPARs are presented in terms of activation mechanisms, namely ligand binding, phosphorylation, and cofactor interaction. The specificity of ligands, such as fatty acids, eicosanoids, fibrates and thiazolidinediones (TZD), is described for each of the three PPAR isotypes, alpha (NR1C1), beta (NR1C2) and gamma (NR1C3), so as the differential tissue distribution of these isotypes. Finally, general and specific functions of the PPAR isotypes are discussed, namely their implication in the control of inflammatory responses, cell proliferation and differentiation, the roles of PPARalpha in fatty acid catabolism and of PPARgamma in adipogenesis.

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) mediates the action of gamma linolenic acid in breast cancer cells

Gamma linolenic acid (GLA) is a polyunsaturated fatty acid, which induces cytotoxicity and regulates cell adhesion in cancer cells. The molecular mechanism of these actions is not clear. We have shown that GLA acts via peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs), by stimulating their phosphorylation and translocation to the nucleus. Removing PPAR gamma with antisense oligos abolished the effect of GLA on the expression of adhesion molecules and tumour suppressor genes, whereas removal of PPAR alpha had no effect. Tissues from patients with breast cancer showed a reduction of expression of both PPARs in cancer tissues, as compared with normal. Thus, PPAR gamma serves as the receptor for GLA in the regulation of gene expression in breast cancer cells.

Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and TGF-beta2 decrease expression of CD36, the type B scavenger receptor, through mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma

CD36, the macrophage type B scavenger receptor, binds and internalizes oxidized low density lipoprotein, a key event in the development of macrophage foam cells within atherosclerotic lesions. Expression of CD36 in monocyte/macrophages is dependent on differentiation status and exposure to soluble mediators. In this study, we investigated the effect of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and TGF-beta2 on the expression of CD36 in macrophages. Treatment of phorbol ester-differentiated THP-1 macrophages with TGF-beta1 or TGF-beta2 significantly decreased expression of CD36 mRNA and surface protein. TGF-beta1/TGF-beta2 also inhibited CD36 mRNA expression induced by oxidized low density lipoprotein and 15-deoxyDelta(12,14) prostaglandin J(2), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma ligand, suggesting that the TGF-beta1/TGF-beta2 down-regulated CD36 expression by inactivating PPAR-gamma-mediated signaling. TGF-beta1/TGF-beta2 increased phosphorylation of both mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase and PPAR-gamma, whereas MAP kinase inhibitors reversed suppression of CD36 and inhibited PPAR-gamma phosphorylation induced by TGF-beta1/TGF-beta2. Finally, MAP kinase inhibitors alone increased expression of CD36 mRNA and surface protein but had no effect on PPAR-gamma protein levels. Our data demonstrate for the first time that TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta2 decrease expression of CD36 by a mechanism involving phosphorylation of MAP kinase, subsequent MAP kinase phosphorylation of PPAR-gamma, and a decrease in CD36 gene transcription by phosphorylated PPAR-gamma.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transcriptional regulation is involved in platelet-derived growth factor-induced proliferation of human hepatic stellate cells

During liver injury, hepatic stellate cells (HSC) acquire a myofibroblast-like phenotype associated with reduction of lipid droplets, increased collagen synthesis, and proliferation. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) regulates adipocyte differentiation and controls gene transcription in response to various activators including prostanoids and antidiabetic thiazolidinediones. We explored whether the presence of PPARgamma and its transcriptional activity were involved in control of HSC proliferation in vitro. PPARgamma ligands, 15-deoxy-triangle up(1214) prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)) and ciglitizone, significantly decrease platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced proliferation in activated human HSC and inhibit alpha smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) expression during HSC transdifferentiation. Treatment with 9-cis retinoic acid (9-cisRA) and LG268, ligands of the heterodimerization partner retinoic X receptor (RXR), had a negligible effect in PDGF-treated cells but caused a further reduction of proliferation when used in combination with ciglitizone. Transfection experiments with a reporter gene consisting of 3 copies of a PPAR response element (peroxisome proliferator response element [PPRE](3)-tk-luciferase) showed a progressive reduction of PPAR transcriptional activity during plastic-induced HSC transdifferentiation. Cotransfection with human PPARgamma expression vector restored the PPRE(3)-tk-luciferase reporter expression and the increased level of the receptor in activated HSC-inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Incubation of human PPARgamma-cotransfected HSC with PDGF strongly inhibited luciferase activity and this effect was blocked by the inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signal cascade. Our results indicate that depression of PPARgamma expression and activity is involved in HSC proliferation and that the PPARgamma ligand-mediated activation exerts a previously unrecognized inhibition of PDGF-induced mitogenesis in activated human HSC.

Characterization of the amino-terminal activation domain of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. Importance of alpha-helical structure in the transactivating function

The transactivating function of the A/B region of mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha; NR1C1) was characterized. The truncated version of PPARalpha lacking the A/B region had 60-70% lower transactivating function than full-length PPARalpha in both the presence and absence of the peroxisome proliferator ciprofibrate. When tethered to the yeast Gal4 DNA-binding domain, the A/B region exhibited the significant ligand-independent transactivating function, AF-1 activity. The first 44 amino acid residues were necessary for maximal transactivation, and the minimally essential region was further delimited to amino acids 15-44. This region is highly enriched with acidic residues, but mutational analyses showed that the protein structure, rather than the negative charge itself, was important for the AF-1 activity. An alpha-helical configuration was predicted for this region, and a CD spectrum analysis of the synthetic peptides showed that mutant sequences with higher AF-1 activity have higher helical contents and vice versa. The most active mutant, in which Met(31) was replaced with Leu, was approximately 5-fold more potent than the wild-type A/B region. These findings indicate that the AF-1 region of PPARalpha is an acidic activation domain and that the helix-forming property is implicated in the transactivating function.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: three isotypes for a multitude of functions

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are fatty acid and eicosanoid inducible nuclear receptors, which occur in three different isotypes. Upon activator binding, they modulate the expression of various target genes implicated in several important physiological pathways. During the past few years, the identification of both PPAR ligands, natural and synthetic, and PPAR targets and their associated functions has been one of the most important achievements in the field. It underscores the potential therapeutic application of PPAR-specific compounds on the one side, and the crucial biological roles of endogenous PPAR ligands on the other.

Mechanisms by which Thiazolidinediones Enhance Insulin Action

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are an exciting new class of insulin-sensitizing drugs being used currently for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The molecular target of these compounds is thought to be the nuclear hormone receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). PPARgamma is expressed predominantly in adipose tissue, yet a major site of TZD-responsive glucose disposal is skeletal muscle. Potential explanations for this paradox are discussed in this review.

Phosphorylation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha in rat Fao cells and stimulation by ciprofibrate

The basic mechanism(s) by which peroxisome proliferators activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) is (are) not yet fully understood. Given the diversity of peroxisome proliferators, several hypotheses of activation have been proposed. Among them is the notion that peroxisome proliferators could activate PPARs by changing their phosphorylation status. In fact, it is well known that several members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily are regulated by phosphorylation. In this report, we show that the rat Fao hepatic-derived cell line, known to respond to peroxisome proliferators, exhibited a high content of PPARalpha. Alkaline phosphatase treatment of Fao cell lysate as well as immunoprecipitation of PPARalpha from cells prelabeled with [32P] orthophosphate clearly showed that PPARalpha is indeed a phosphoprotein in vivo. Moreover, treatment of rat Fao cells with ciprofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator, increased the phosphorylation level of the PPARalpha. In addition, treatment of Fao cells with phosphatase inhibitors (okadaic acid and sodium orthovanadate) decreased the activity of ciprofibrate-induced peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase, an enzyme encoded by a PPARalpha target gene. Our results suggest that the gene expression controlled by peroxisome proliferators could be mediated in part by a modulation of the PPARalpha effect via a modification of the phosphorylation level of this receptor.

The extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway contributes to mitogenic and antiapoptotic effects of peroxisome proliferators in vitro

Peroxisome proliferators are a class of nongenotoxic rodent hepatocarcinogens thought to induce tumors by altering the balance between mitosis and apoptosis. Previous studies suggest mitogenic growth factors that act through the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway, including insulin and epidermal growth factor (EGF), modulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activation as well as the mitogenic activity of peroxisome proliferators. We have investigated whether the ERK pathway plays a role in regulating the growth and survival altering properties of peroxisome proliferators in primary mouse hepatocytes. Exposure of hepatocytes to Wy-14,643 and trichloroacetate resulted in a dose-dependent phosphorylation and activation of ERK. Peroxisome proliferator-induced ERK phosphorylation was blocked when cells were pretreated with the MEK (ERK kinase) inhibitor, PD098059, or the phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, LY294002 and apigenin, suggesting that both MEK and PI3K are involved in the initial response. The pathway leading to peroxisome proliferator-induced ERK activation is different than that induced by phorbol ester or EGF, since the PI3K inhibitors had no effect on ERK phosphorylation induced by these agents. Under defined culture conditions, Wy-14,643 increased the level of BrdU incorporation in primary hepatocytes and suppressed the incidence of apoptosis induced by transforming growth factor beta 1. In contrast, concentrations of PD098059 that block Wy-14,643-induced ERK phosphorylation also blocked the stimulation of DNA replicative synthesis and suppression of apoptosis by Wy-14,643. These studies indicate that activation of the ERK pathway through a PI3K-dependent mechanism may play a significant role in the tumor-promoting properties of peroxisome proliferators.

Regulation of the transcriptional activity of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha by phosphorylation of a ligand-independent trans-activating domain

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a subgroup of nuclear receptors activated by fatty acids and eicosanoids. In addition, they are subject to phosphorylation by insulin, resulting in the activation of PPARalpha, while inhibiting PPARgamma under certain conditions. However, it was hitherto unclear whether the stimulatory effect of insulin on PPARalpha was direct and by which mechanism it occurs. We now demonstrate that amino acids 1-92 of hPPARalpha contain an activation function (AF)-1-like domain, which is further activated by insulin through a pathway involving the mitogen-activated protein kinases p42 and p44. Further analysis of the amino-terminal region of PPARalpha revealed that the insulin-induced trans-activation occurs through the phosphorylation of two mitogen-activated protein kinase sites at positions 12 and 21, both of which are conserved across evolution. The characterization of a strong AF-1 region in PPARalpha, stimulating transcription one-fourth as strongly as the viral protein VP16, is compatible with the marked basal transcriptional activity of this isoform in transfection experiments. However, it is intriguing that the activity of this AF-1 region is modulated by the phosphorylation of two serine residues, both of which must be phosphorylated in order to activate transcription. This is in contrast to PPARgamma2, which was previously shown to be phosphorylated at a single site in a motif that is not homologous to the sites now described in PPARalpha. Although the molecular details involved in the phosphorylation-dependent enhancement of the transcriptional activity of PPARalpha remain to be elucidated, we demonstrate that the effect of insulin on the AF-1 region of PPARalpha can be mimicked by the addition of triiodothyronine receptor beta1, a strong binder of corepressor proteins. In addition, a triiodothyronine receptor beta1 mutant deficient in interacting with corepressors is unable to activate PPARalpha. These observations suggest that the AF-1 region of PPARalpha is partially silenced by corepressor proteins, which might interact in a phosphorylation-dependent manner.

Ligand-independent recruitment of SRC-1 to estrogen receptor beta through phosphorylation of activation function AF-1

The estrogen receptors (ERs) alpha and beta possess a constitutive N-terminal activation function (AF-1) whose activity can be modulated by kinase signalling pathways. We demonstrate here that phosphorylation of AF-1 by MAP kinase (MAPK) leads to the recruitment of steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) by ER beta in vitro. Enhancement of the interaction between SRC-1 and ER beta AF-1 is also observed in vivo in cells either treated with EGF or expressing activated Ras. Two serine residues in ER beta AF-1, of which one is contained within a motif present in other steroid receptors, are critical for physical interaction with SRC-1 and transcriptional activation. Our results establish a role for nuclear receptor phosphorylation in the recruitment of SRC-1 and provide a molecular basis for ligand-independent activation by ER beta via the MAPK pathway.

PPARgamma activators down-regulate the expression of PPARgamma in 3T3-L1 adipocytes

Transcriptional activation of PPARgamma by the anti-diabetic compound troglitazone enhances the rate of 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation. In this study, we examined the effects of troglitazone, a specific PPARgamma ligand, on the expression of PPARgamma during and after 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation. Troglitazone treatment caused a significant decrease in PPARgamma proteins and DNA binding activity. This reduction was associated with a similar decrease in transcription of PPARgamma mRNA. These data suggest that in 3T3-L1 cells, the expression of PPARgamma is auto-regulated.

p300 interacts with the N- and C-terminal part of PPARgamma2 in a ligand-independent and -dependent manner, respectively

The nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) activates the transcription of multiple genes involved in intra- and extracellular lipid metabolism. Several cofactors are crucial for the stimulation or the silencing of nuclear receptor transcriptional activities. The two homologous cofactors p300 and CREB-binding protein (CBP) have been shown to co-activate the ligand-dependent transcriptional activities of several nuclear receptors as well as the ligand-independent transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor. We show here that the interaction between p300/CBP and PPARgamma is complex and involves multiple domains in each protein. p300/CBP not only bind in a ligand-dependent manner to the DEF region of PPARgamma but also bind directly in a ligand-independent manner to a region in the AB domain localized between residue 31 to 99. In transfection experiments, p300/CBP could thereby enhance the transcriptional activities of both the activating function (AF)-1 and AF-2 domains. p300/CBP displays itself at least two docking sites for PPARgamma located in its N terminus (between residues 1 and 113 for CBP) and in the middle of the protein (between residues 1099 and 1460).

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: a critical link among fatty acids, gene expression and carcinogenesis

It has been known for many years that long-chain fatty acids derived from endogenous metabolism and/or nutrition can act as second messengers and regulators of cell signaling pathways. For example, fatty acids regulate the activity of protein kinase C (PKC) in a mechanism distinct from activation by diacylglycerol. Like PKC activators such as phorbol esters, essential fatty acids activate PKC and in doing so modulate the activity of growth factor receptors such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Unsaturated fatty acids can inhibit GTPase activating protein, thereby quenching signals from p21-ras. These studies have shown that fatty acids can influence numerous signaling pathways and that these small lipophilic substances may be ancient second messengers. Fatty acids are also known modulators of the carcinogenic process, showing distinct tissue-specific pro- or anticancer effects. However, the reason for such a dichotomous effect on cellular processes has not been adequately described. In this article, the inclusion of a steroid hormone receptor-signaling pathway in mediating fatty acids' effects will be summarized. This signaling molecule has been deemed the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) and has been extensively examined in regard to its response to xenobiotic, fatty acid-like chemicals (peroxisome proliferators, PP). PP, like fatty acids, activate PPAR and modulate tissue-specific responses. The goal of this review is to describe a potential role for PPAR in mediating the effects of fatty acids on gene expression, cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis.

Cross-talk between janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha) signaling pathways. Growth hormone inhibition of pparalpha transcriptional activity mediated by stat5b

Hepatic peroxisome proliferation induced by structurally diverse non-genotoxic carcinogens is mediated by the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARalpha) and can be inhibited by growth hormone (GH). GH-stimulated Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b (JAK2/STAT5b) signaling and the PPAR activation pathway were reconstituted in COS-1 cells to investigate the mechanism for this GH inhibitory effect. Activation of STAT5b signaling by either GH or prolactin inhibited, by up to 80-85%, ligand-induced, PPARalpha-dependent reporter gene transcription. GH failed to inhibit 15-deoxy-Delta12, 14-prostaglandin-J2-stimulated gene transcription mediated by an endogenous COS-1 PPAR-related receptor. GH inhibition of PPARalpha activity required GH receptor and STAT5b and was not observed using GH-activated STAT1 in place of STAT5b. GH inhibition was not blocked by the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway inhibitor PD98059. STAT5b-PPARalpha protein-protein interactions could not be detected by anti-STAT5b supershift analysis of PPARalpha-DNA complexes. The GH inhibitory effect required the tyrosine phosphorylation site (Tyr-699) of STAT5b, an intact STAT5b DNA binding domain, and the presence of a COOH-terminal trans-activation domain. Moreover, GH inhibition was reversed by a COOH-terminal-truncated, dominant-negative STAT5b mutant. STAT5b must thus be nuclear and transcriptionally active to mediate GH inhibition of PPARalpha activity, suggesting an indirect inhibition mechanism, such as competition for an essential PPARalpha coactivator or STAT5b-dependent synthesis of a more proximal PPARalpha inhibitor. The cross-talk between STAT5b and PPARalpha signaling pathways established by these findings provides new insight into the mechanisms of hormonal and cytokine regulation of hepatic peroxisome proliferation.

c-Jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma1 and negatively regulates its transcriptional activity

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) transcription factor plays a pivotal role in adipocyte differentiation and metabolic regulation. The transcriptional activity of PPARgamma is positively modulated by ligand binding and negatively regulated by phosphorylation mediated by the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. The phosphorylation of mouse PPARgamma1 at Ser82 by ERK causes a decrease in both basal and ligand-dependent transcriptional activity. In this report we examined the ability of other mitogen-activated protein kinase family members to phosphorylate PPARgamma1. We demonstrate that in vitro, PPARgamma1 is efficiently phosphorylated by JNK/SAPK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase or stress-activated protein kinase) but only weakly phosphorylated by p38. In transfected 293T cells, PPARgamma1 is phosphorylated at Ser82 in response to known JNK activators such as UV irradiation and anisomycin treatment. This phosphorylation is not blocked by either the specific MEK inhibitor PD98059 or the p38 inhibitor SB203580, indicating that it is independent of the MEK/ERK and p38 signaling pathways. Finally, in transient transfection reporter assays, activation of JNK by anisomycin or by overexpression of MKK4 (the upstream JNK kinase) decreased ligand-dependent PPARgamma1 transcriptional activity. These results suggest that the activation of the JNK/SAPK pathway by extracellular signals, perhaps by inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, would result in a reduction of PPARgamma transcriptional activity and reduce the effects of PPARgamma ligands.

Interdomain communication regulating ligand binding by PPAR-gamma

Binding to receptors in the cell nucleus is crucial for the action of lipophilic hormones and ligands. PPAR-gamma (for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor) is a nuclear hormone receptor that mediates adipocyte differentiation and modulates insulin sensitivity, cell proliferation and inflammatory processes. PPAR-gamma ligands have been implicated in the development of atherogenic foam cells and as potential cancer treatments. Transcriptional activity of PPAR-gamma is induced by binding diverse ligands, including natural fatty acid derivatives, antidiabetic thiazolidinediones, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ligand binding by PPAR-gamma, as well as by the entire nuclear-receptor superfamily, is an independent property of the carboxy-terminal ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the receptor. Here we show that ligand binding by PPAR-gamma is regulated by intramolecular communication between its amino-terminal A/B domain and its carboxy-terminal LBD. Modification of the A/B domain, for example by physiological phosphorylation by MAP kinase, reduces ligand-binding affinity, thus negatively regulating the transcriptional and biological functions of PPAR-gamma. The ability of the A/B domain to regulate ligand binding has important implications for the evaluation and mechanism of action of potentially therapeutic ligands that bind PPAR-gamma and that are likely to extend to other members of the nuclear-receptor superfamily.

Different subcellular distribution and regulation of expression of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-3 from those of IRS-1 and IRS-2

Adipocytes contain three major substrate proteins of the insulin receptor, termed IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-3. We demonstrated that IRS-1 and IRS-2 are located mainly in the low density microsome (LDM) fraction and are tyrosine phosphorylated in response to insulin stimulation, leading to phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase activation. In contrast, IRS-3 is located mainly in the plasma membrane (PM) fraction and contributes to PI 3-kinase activation in the PM fraction. The different cellular localizations of IRS proteins may account for the mechanism of insulin resistance induced by a high fat diet, considering that PI 3-kinase activation in the LDM fraction is reportedly essential for the translocation of GLUT4 in adipocytes. High fat feeding in rats increased both protein and mRNA levels of IRS-3 but decreased those of IRS-1 and IRS-2 in epididymal adipocytes. As a result, selective impairment of insulin-induced PI 3-kinase activation was observed in the LDM fraction, whereas PI 3-kinase activation was conserved in the PM fraction. This is the first report showing that different IRS proteins function in different subcellular compartments, which may contribute to determining the insulin sensitivity in adipocytes.

Induction of PPARgamma1 expression in human THP-1 monocytic leukemia cells by 9-cis-retinoic acid is associated with cellular growth suppression

9-cis-Retinoic acid (RA) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) regulates cellular growth and differentiation. In THP-1 cells, a human monocytic leukemia cell line, RA markedly induced PPARgamma1 RNA, nuclear PPARgamma1 protein and suppressed cell growth. The PPARgamma ligand, BRL49653 enhanced RA's growth suppression ability. With BRL49653 alone, THP-1 cell growth was only marginally suppressed. Cell cycle analysis revealed the G1 phase cell population was significantly increased when cells were treated with both ligands. RA induced growth suppression did not differentiate the THP-1 cells to macrophages. Phorbol ester (PMA) induced differentiation of cells to macrophage also induced PPARgamma1 expression, however when RA is given either simultaneously or sequentially to these cells, no further increase in expression of the nuclear receptor was observed. Overall, these data suggest RA induction of PPARgamma1 may block cell growth and may have application for the treatment of proliferative diseases.

Troglitazone effects on gene expression in human skeletal muscle of type II diabetes involve up-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma

Troglitazone, besides improving insulin action in insulin-resistant subjects, is also a specific ligand for the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma). To determine whether troglitazone might enhance insulin action by stimulation of PPARgamma gene expression in muscle, total PPARgamma messenger RNA (mRNA), and protein were determined in skeletal muscle cultures from nondiabetic control and type II diabetic subjects before and after treatment of cultures with troglitazone (4 days +/- troglitazone, 11.5 microM). Troglitazone treatment increased PPARgamma mRNA levels up to 3-fold in muscle cultures from type II diabetics (277 +/- 63 to 630 +/- 100 x 10(3) copies/microg total RNA, P = 0.003) and in nondiabetic control subjects (200 +/- 42 to 490 +/- 81, P = 0.003). PPARgamma protein levels in both diabetic (4.7 +/- 1.6 to 13.6 +/- 3.0 AU/10 microg protein, P < 0.02) and nondiabetic cells (7.4 +/- 1.0 to 12.7 +/- 1.8, P < 0.05) were also upregulated by troglitazone treatment. Increased PPARgamma was associated with stimulation of human adipocyte lipid binding protein (ALBP) and muscle fatty acid binding protein (mFABP) mRNA, without change in the mRNA for glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, PPARdelta, myogenin, uncoupling protein-2, or sarcomeric alpha-actin protein. In summary, we showed that troglitazone markedly induces PPARgamma, ALBP, and mFABP mRNA abundance in muscle cultures from both nondiabetic and type II diabetic subjects. Increased expression of PPARgamma protein and other genes involved in glucose and lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle may account, in part, for the insulin sensitizing effects of troglitazone in type II diabetes.

Understanding adipocyte differentiation

The adipocyte plays a critical role in energy balance. Adipose tissue growth involves an increase in adipocyte size and the formation of new adipocytes from precursor cells. For the last 20 years, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of adipocyte differentiation have been extensively studied using preadipocyte culture systems. Committed preadipocytes undergo growth arrest and subsequent terminal differentiation into adipocytes. This is accompanied by a dramatic increase in expression of adipocyte genes including adipocyte fatty acid binding protein and lipid-metabolizing enzymes. Characterization of regulatory regions of adipose-specific genes has led to the identification of the transcription factors peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), which play a key role in the complex transcriptional cascade during adipocyte differentiation. Growth and differentiation of preadipocytes is controlled by communication between individual cells or between cells and the extracellular environment. Various hormones and growth factors that affect adipocyte differentiation in a positive or negative manner have been identified. In addition, components involved in cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions such as preadipocyte factor-1 and extracellular matrix proteins are also pivotal in regulating the differentiation process. Identification of these molecules has yielded clues to the biochemical pathways that ultimately result in transcriptional activation via PPAR-gamma and C/EBP. Studies on the regulation of the these transcription factors and the mode of action of various agents that influence adipocyte differentiation will reveal the physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying adipose tissue development.

Subtype- and response element-dependent differences in transactivation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) modulate transcription by binding to specific peroxisome proliferator-response elements (PPRE) through heterodimerization with the 9-cis retinoic acid receptor (RXR). To investigate potential subtype- and response element-dependent differences in transcriptional activation by PPARs, we expressed PPARalpha or PPARgamma2, along with RXRalpha, in the yeast Saccharoromyces cerevisiae and compared their ability to activate transcription of reporter genes containing a PPRE from either the rat acyl-CoA oxidase (AOx) or hydratase-dehydrogenase (HD) gene. PPARgamma2 and RXRalpha, when coexpressed from low copy vectors, potently and synergistically activated transcription of the AOx-PPRE reporter gene, but only weakly stimulated transcription of the HD-PPRE reporter gene. This response element preference, which was also observed in mammalian cells, could not be attributed to differences in binding affinity of PPARgamma2/RXRalpha heterodimers to these elements in vitro. Interestingly, PPARgamma2 expressed from a high copy vector was able to strongly activate transcription of the HD-PPRE reporter gene, even in the absence of coexpressed RXRalpha. In comparison to the findings with PPARgamma2, the HD-PPRE served as a significantly more robust response element for PPARalpha as compared to the AOx-PPRE. PPRE-dependent transcriptional activation by PPARalpha correlated with binding efficiencies of PPARalpha/RXRalpha to the response element. Our findings demonstrate that the transactivation potential of PPAR subtypes can be differentially modulated by distinct PPREs.

Counteraction of retinoic acid and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on up-regulation of adipocyte differentiation with PPARgamma ligand, an antidiabetic thiazolidinedione, in 3T3-L1 cells

Retinoic acid (RA) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25 (OH)2 D3) inhibited adipocyte differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes in the presence of thiazolidinedione, a specific ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptory (PPARgamma). These fat-soluble vitamins repressed the up-regulated protein expression of PPARgamma2 during the first 40 hours of initiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation. Compared with RA, 1,25 (OH)2 D3 inhibited PPARgamma2 expression more effectively and caused concomitantly a greater inhibition of adipocyte differentiation. These results suggest that the inhibitory action of adipocyte differentiation by RA or 1,25 (OH)2 D3 is exhibited through direct repression of the expression of PPARgamma2 protein, even in the presence of its ligand. They also raise the intriguing possibility that attenuation or amplification of the pharmacological effects of thiazolidinedione that are dependent on PPARgamma in adipose cells is caused by alteration of the levels of these fat-soluble vitamins.

Transcriptional control of adipogenesis

Adipocyte differentiation is coordinatedly regulated by several transcription factors. C/EBP beta, C/EBP delta and ADD-1/SREBP-1 are active early during the differentiation process and induce the expression and/or activity of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPAR gamma), the pivotal coordinator of the adipocyte differentiation process. Activated PPAR gamma induces exit from the cell cycle and triggers the expression of adipocyte-specific genes, resulting in increased delivery of energy to the cells. C/EBP alpha, whose expression coincides with the later stages of differentiation, cooperates with PPAR gamma in inducing additional target genes and sustains a high level of PPAR gamma in the mature adipocyte as part of a feedforward loop. Altered activity and/or expression of these transcription factors might underlie the pathogenesis of disorders characterized by increased or decreased adipose tissue depots.