Oligomerization of mu- and delta-opioid receptors. Generation of novel functional properties

Mu-opioid receptor desensitization in mature rat neurons: lack of interaction between DAMGO and morphine

Mu-opioid receptors (MORs) exhibit rapid desensitization and internalization during exposure to various opioid agonists. In some studies, however, morphine has been observed to produce little MOR desensitization or internalization. We examined desensitization in mature rat locus ceruleus (LC) neurons and confirmed that morphine is a very poor desensitizing agent, whereas [D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO), a high-efficacy agonist, and methadone, an agonist we observed to be of equivalent efficacy to morphine, produced profound rapid desensitization. Similarly, by measuring plasma membrane receptor levels in HEK293 cells stably expressing T7-epitope-tagged rat MOR1 at near physiological levels (HEK293-MOR1 cells), DAMGO and methadone but not morphine caused rapid MOR internalization. It has been reported that a low concentration of DAMGO, coapplied with morphine, caused morphine to induce MOR internalization. We examined whether this interaction occurred in mature mammalian neurons at the level of receptor desensitization. Coapplication of low concentrations of DAMGO did not increase morphine-induced desensitization in LC neurons but caused a lesser degree of desensitization than DAMGO alone. We also failed to observe an enhancement by DAMGO of morphine-induced desensitization in the electrically stimulated guinea pig ileum myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation. In HEK293-MOR1 cells, low concentrations of DAMGO did not convert morphine into a receptor-internalizing agent. The data presented here fail to support the theory that low concentrations of DAMGO can increase morphine-induced MOR desensitization or internalization.

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form homo-oligomeric and hetero-oligomeric complexes. This understanding has prompted a re-evaluation of many aspects of GPCR biology, however the concept of receptor complexes has not been fully integrated into the current thinking about GPCR structure and function. Nevertheless, receptor oligomerization is a pivotal aspect of the structure and function of GPCRs that has been shown to have implications for receptor trafficking, signaling, and pharmacology and more intricate models for understanding the physiological roles of these receptors are emerging. Here, we summarize some of the advances made in understanding the structural basis and the functional roles of homo- and hetero- oligomerization in this important group of receptors. Although this discussion focuses primarily on the dopamine receptors, particularly the D2 dopamine receptor, and the opioid and serotonin receptors, we discuss the principles governing the oligomerization of all rhodopsin-like GPCRs and potentially of the entire superfamily of these receptors.

G-protein coupled receptor oligomerization in neuroendocrine pathways

Protein-protein interactions are fundamental processes for many biological systems including those involving the superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). A growing body of biochemical and functional evidence supports the existence of GPCR-GPCR homo- and hetero-oligomers. In particular, hetero-oligomers can display pharmacological and functional properties distinct from those of the homodimer or oligomer thus adding another level of complexity to how GPCRs are activated, signal and traffick in the cell. Dimerization may also play a role in influencing the activity of agonists and antagonists. We are only beginning to unravel how and why such complexes are formed, the functional implications of which will have an enormous impact on GPCR biology. Future research that studies GPCRs as dimeric or oligomeric complexes will enhance not only our understanding of GPCRs in cellular function but will also be critical for novel drug design and improved treatment of the vast array of GPCR-related conditions.

Subtype-Specific Dimerization of α1-Adrenoceptors: Effects on Receptor Expression and Pharmacological Properties

The potential role of dimerization in controlling the expression and pharmacological properties of alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes was examined using coimmunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged receptors. Human alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes (alpha1A, alpha1B, alpha1D) were tagged at their amino-termini with Flag or hemagglutinin epitopes and transfected into human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Homodimerization of all three subtypes was observed by coimmunoprecipitation of receptors with different tags and was not altered by norepinephrine treatment. Heterodimer formation between hemagglutinin-tagged alpha1B-adrenoceptors and Flag-tagged alpha1A- or alpha1D-adrenoceptors was also observed. However, no alpha1A/alpha1D-adrenoceptor heterodimers were observed, suggesting that dimerization is subtype-specific. The extent of heterodimerization was also unaltered by norepinephrine treatment. alpha1-Adrenoceptor truncation mutants lacking carboxyl or amino-terminal sequences formed homo- and heterodimers similarly to full-length receptors, suggesting that these domains play little or no role in dimerization. Biotinylation with a membrane-impermeable agent showed that monomers and homo- and hetero-oligomers of all three subtypes are expressed on the cell surface. Radioligand binding studies showed that heterodimerization did not alter the affinity of alpha1-adrenoceptors for norepinephrine, prazosin, or subtype-selective antagonists, suggesting that dimerization does not result in pharmacologically distinct subtypes. However, coexpression of alpha1B-adrenoceptors significantly increased both binding site density and protein expression of alpha1A- and alpha1D-adrenoceptors, and increased cell surface expression of alpha1D-adrenoceptors, suggesting a functional role for heterodimerization. Conversely, coexpression of alpha1A-with alpha1D-adrenoceptors, which did not heterodimerize, had no effect on receptor density or protein. These studies demonstrate subtype-selective heterodimerization of alpha1-adrenoceptors, which does not change their pharmacological properties but seems to have functional consequences in regulating receptor expression and trafficking.

Design and Synthesis of Novel Dimeric Morphinan Ligands for κ and μ Opioid Receptors

A novel series of morphinans were synthesized, and their binding affinity at and functional selectivity for micro, delta, and kappa opioid receptors were evaluated. These dimeric ligands can be viewed as dimeric morphinans, which were formed by coupling two identical morphinan pharmacophores (cyclorphan (1) or MCL 101 (2)) with varying connecting spacers. Ligands 6 and 7 with alkyl spacers on the nitrogen position and ligands 8 and 9 in which the two morphinan pharmacophores were coupled by ether moieties at the 3-hydroxyl positions showed significant decrease in affinity at all three opioid receptors. An improvement in the affinity was achieved by introducing an ester moiety as the spacer in the dimeric morphinans. It was observed that the affinity of these ligands was sensitive to the character and length of the spacer. Compound 13 (MCL-139) with a 4-carbon ester spacer, compound 17 (MCL-144) containing a 10-carbon spacer, and compound 19 (MCL-145) with the conformationally constrained fumaryl spacer were the most potent ligands in this series, displaying excellent affinities at micro and kappa receptors (K(i) = 0.09-0.2 nM at micro and K(i) = 0.078-0.049 nM at kappa), which were comparable to the parent compound 2. Ligand 12, a compound containing only one morphinan pharmacophore and a long-chain ester group, had affinity at both micro and kappa receptors almost identical to that of the parent ligand 2. In the [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assay, ligands 13, 17, and 19 and their parent morphinans 1 and 2 stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding mediated by the micro and kappa receptors. Compounds 13 and 17 were full kappa agonists and partial micro agonists, while compound 19 was a partial agonist at both micro and kappa receptors. These novel ligands, as well as their interesting pharmacological properties, will serve as the basis for our continuing investigation of the dimeric ligands as potential probes for the pharmacotherapy of cocaine abuse and may also open new avenues for the characterization of opioid receptors.

Ligand-independent CXCR2 dimerization

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization have been reported for several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The CXCR2 is a GPCR that is activated, among the others, by the chemokines CXCL8 (interleukin-8) and CXCL2 (growth-related gene product beta) to induce cell chemotaxis. We have investigated the oligomerization of CXCR2 receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney cells and generated a series of truncated mutants to determine whether they could negatively regulate the wild-type (wt) receptor functions. CXCR2 receptor oligomerization was also studied by coimmunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein- and V5-tagged CXCR2. Truncated CXCR2 receptors retained their ability to form oligomers only if the region between the amino acids Ala-106 and Lys-163 was present. In contrast, all of the deletion mutants analyzed were able to form heterodimers with the wt CXCR2 receptor, albeit with different efficiency, competing for wt/wt dimer formation. The truncated CXCR2 mutants were not functional and, when coexpressed with wt CXCR2, interfered with receptor functions, impairing cell signaling and chemotaxis. When CXCR2 was expressed with the AMPA-type glutamate receptor GluR1, CXCR2 dimerization was again impaired in a dose-dependent way, and receptor functions were prejudiced. In contrast, CXCR1, a chemokine receptor that shares many similarities with CXCR2, did not dimerize alone or with CXCR2 and when coexpressed with CXCR2 did not impair receptor signaling and chemotaxis. The formation of CXCR2 dimers was also confirmed in cerebellar neuron cells. Taken together, we conclude from these studies that CXCR2 functions as a dimer and that truncated receptors negatively modulate receptor activities competing for the formation of wt/wt dimers.

Local μ and δ opioid receptors regulate amphetamine-induced behavior and neuropeptide mRNA in the striatum

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role that mu and delta opioid receptor blockade has upon stimulant-induced behavior and neuropeptide gene expression in the striatum. Acute administration of amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg i.p.) caused an increase in behavioral activity and preprodynorphin, substance P, and preproenkephalin mRNA expression. Intrastriatal infusion of the mu opioid antagonist, H-D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2) (CTAP), or the delta opioid antagonist, H-Tyr-Tic[CH(2)NH]-Phe-Phe-OH (TIPPpsi), significantly decreased amphetamine-induced vertical activity. However, only CTAP reduced amphetamine-induced distance traveled. Quantitative in situ hybridization histochemistry revealed that CTAP blocked amphetamine-induced preprodynorphin and substance P mRNA. However, preproenkephalin mRNA levels in the dorsal striatum were increased to the same extent by CTAP, amphetamine, or a combination of the two drugs. In contrast, TIPPpsi significantly decreased amphetamine-induced mRNA expression of all three neuropeptides. These data indicate that both mu and delta receptor subtypes differentially regulate amphetamine-induced behavior and neuropeptide gene expression in the rat striatum.

Effect of opioid receptor ligands on the μ-S196A knock-in and μ knockout mouse vas deferens

We have determined the effect of naltrexone, naloxone, [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin (DADLE), and morphine on the mu-S196A opioid receptor knock-in and mu-opioid receptor knockout mouse vas deferens preparations. The antagonists, naltrexone and naloxone, exhibited agonist activity and possessed IC50 values that were 14- and 37-fold greater than morphine on the S196A preparation. Morphine was found to be threefold more potent at S196A relative to wild-type mu-opioid receptor. The mouse vas deferens data suggest that S196 in transmembrane helix 4 of the mu-opioid receptor modulates efficacy. It is proposed that this may be due to decreased dimerization of the receptor. Identical IC50 values of DADLE obtained on the wild-type, S196A knock-in, and mu-opioid receptor knockout preparations support the absence of mu-delta heterodimers in the mouse vas deferens.

Paradoxical Effects of Opioid Antagonist Naloxone on SSRI-Induced Analgesia and Tolerance in Mice

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been used clinically as co-analgesics in various devastating painful conditions. Upon chronic treatment tolerance develops to their analgesic effect, which is often refractory to increasing dose. Although modulation of serotonergic pathways considerably explains their clinical efficacy, numerous reports nevertheless indicate the direct/indirect role of the opioidergic pathway in SSRI-induced analgesia. The present study was designed to investigate the effect, if any, of the opioid antagonist naloxone on SSRIs-induced analgesia and tolerance employing acetic acid-induced writhing assay. Two SSRIs, fluoxetine (FLX), and citalopram (CTP) were used in the study. Acute systemic (5-40 mg kg(-1) i.p.), or intrathecal (5-40 microg per mouse, i.t.) administration of fluoxetine or citalopram exhibited a dose-dependent and significant (p < 0.05) antinociceptive effect. Single systemic (2-5 mg kg(-1) i.p.) or intrathecal (1 microg per mouse, i.t.) administration of opioid antagonist naloxone blocked where as systemic ultra-low dose (10 ng/kg) or intrathecal (0.05 ng) naloxone potentiated the acute antinociceptive effect of both SSRIs (10 mg kg(-1) i.p. and 10 microg i.t.). Animals treated chronically over a 7-day period with SSRIs developed tolerance to their antinociceptive effect. Further, chronic administration of ultra-low dose of naloxone intrathecal (0.05 ng per mouse, i.t.) or systemic (10 ng kg(-1) i.p.) with fluoxetine or citalopram (10 microg i.t.; 5 mg kg(-1) i.p.) over a 7-day period reversed the tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of SSRIs. Thus, in ultra-low doses, naloxone paradoxically enhances SSRIs-induced analgesia and reverse tolerance through spinal and peripheral action. These effects of opioid antagonist naloxone on SSRIs-induced antinociception may have an implication in refractory cases upon chronic use of SSRIs as co-analgesics.

Mechanisms of cross-talk between G-protein-coupled receptors resulting in enhanced release of intracellular Ca2+

Alteration in [Ca(2+)](i) (the intracellular concentration of Ca(2+)) is a key regulator of many cellular processes. To allow precise regulation of [Ca(2+)](i) and a diversity of signalling by this ion, cells possess many mechanisms by which they are able to control [Ca(2+)](i) both globally and at the subcellular level. Among these are many members of the superfamily of GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors), which are characterized by the presence of seven transmembrane domains. Typically, those receptors able to activate PLC (phospholipase C) enzymes cause release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores and influence Ca(2+) entry across the plasma membrane. It has been well documented that Ca(2+) signalling by one type of GPCR can be influenced by stimulation of a different type of GPCR. Indeed, many studies have demonstrated heterologous desensitization between two different PLC-coupled GPCRs. This is not surprising, given our current understanding of negative-feedback regulation and the likely shared components of the signalling pathway. However, there are also many documented examples of interactions between GPCRs, often coupling preferentially to different signalling pathways, which result in a potentiation of Ca(2+) signalling. Such interactions have important implications for both the control of cell function and the interpretation of in vitro cell-based assays. However, there is currently no single mechanism that adequately accounts for all examples of this type of cross-talk. Indeed, many studies either have not addressed this issue or have been unable to determine the mechanism(s) involved. This review seeks to explore a range of possible mechanisms to convey their potential diversity and to provide a basis for further experimental investigation.

Molecular mechanisms and therapeutical implications of intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors with examples from the striatopallidal GABA neurons

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among G protein-coupled receptors was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype-specific interactions between different types of receptor homomers. The discovery of GABAB heterodimers started this field rapidly followed by the discovery of heteromerization among isoreceptors of several G protein-coupled receptors such as delta/kappa opioid receptors. Heteromerization was also discovered among distinct types of G protein-coupled receptors with the initial demonstration of somatostatin SSTR5/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 heteromeric receptor complexes. The functional meaning of these heteromeric complexes is to achieve direct or indirect (via adapter proteins) intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions in the complex. G protein-coupled receptors also form heteromeric complexes involving direct interactions with ion channel receptors, the best example being the GABAA/dopamine D5 receptor heteromerization, as well as with receptor tyrosine kinases and with receptor activity modulating proteins. As an example, adenosine, dopamine, and glutamate metabotropic receptor/receptor interactions in the striatopallidal GABA neurons are discussed as well as their relevance for Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and drug dependence. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex, and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist. These complexes may assist in the process of linking G protein-coupled receptors and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for some forms of learning and memory.

Opioid receptor interactions: local and nonlocal, symmetric and asymmetric, physical and functional

The pharmacological effects of opioid drugs and endogenous opioid peptides are mediated by several kinds of receptors, the major ones being mu, delta and kappa. Though classically it has been thought that a particular effect mediated by a drug or other ligand results from its interaction with a single type of receptor, accumulating evidence demonstrates that interactions between receptors play a major role in opioid actions. These interactions may be either local, involving receptors within the same tissue, or nonlocal, between receptors located in different tissues. Nonlocal interactions always involve intercellular mechanisms, whereas local interactions may involve either intercellular or intracellular interactions, the latter including physical association of receptors. Both local and nonlocal interactions, moreover, may be either symmetric, with ligand interaction at one receptor affecting interaction at the other, or asymmetric; and either potentiating or inhibitory. In this article we discuss major examples of these kinds of interactions, and their role in the acute and chronic effects of opioids. Knowledge of these interactions may have important implications for the design of opioids with more specific actions, and for eliminating the addictive liability of these drugs.

Selective interactions between helix VIII of the human mu-opioid receptors and the C terminus of periplakin disrupt G protein activation

Analysis of interactions between the C-terminal tail of the MOP-1 and MOP-1A variants of the human mu-opioid receptor with proteins derived from a human brain cDNA library resulted in identification of the actin and intermediate filament-binding protein periplakin. Mapping of this interaction indicated that the predicted fourth intracellular loop/helix VIII of the receptor interacts with the C-terminal rod and linker region of periplakin. Periplakin is widely expressed in the central nervous system of both man and rat and demonstrated an overlapping but not identical distribution with mu-opioid (MOP) receptors. Co-expression of periplakin with MOP-1 or a MOP-1-eYFP fusion construct in HEK293 cells did not interfere with agonist-mediated internalization of the receptor. When co-expressed with a MOP-1-Gi1 alpha fusion protein periplakin significantly reduced the capacity of the agonist to stimulate binding of 35S-labeled guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) to the receptor-associated G protein. By contrast, periplakin did not interfere with agonist-stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding to either an alpha 2A-adrenoreceptor-Gi1 alpha fusion protein or a beta2-adrenoreceptor-Gs alpha fusion protein, indicating its selectivity of function. This represents the first example of an opioid receptor-interacting protein that functions to disrupt agonist-mediated G protein activation.

Regulation of delta-opioid receptor trafficking via mu-opioid receptor stimulation: evidence from mu-opioid receptor knock-out mice

We recently demonstrated that prolonged treatment with morphine increases the antinociceptive potency of the delta-opioid receptor (deltaOR) agonist deltorphin and promotes cell surface targeting of deltaORs in neurons of the dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord (Cahill et al., 2001b). In the present study we examined whether these effects were mediated selectively via muOR. Using the same intermittent treatment regimen as for morphine, we found that methadone and etorphine, but not fentanyl, enhanced [D-Ala2]-deltorphin-mediated antinociception. However, continuous delivery of fentanyl for 48 hr resulted in augmented deltaOR-mediated antinociception when compared with saline-infused animals. Time course studies confirmed that a 48 hr treatment with morphine was necessary for the establishment of enhanced deltaOR-mediated antinociception. The observed increases in deltaOR agonist potency and deltaOR plasma membrane density were reversed fully 48 hr after discontinuation of morphine injections. Wild-type C57BL/6 mice pretreated with morphine for 48 hr similarly displayed enhanced deltaOR-mediated antinociception in a tonic pain paradigm. Accordingly, the percentage of plasma membrane-associated deltaOR in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, as assessed by immunogold electron microscopy, increased from 6.6% in naive to 12.4% in morphine-treated mice. In contrast, morphine treatment of muOR gene knock-out (KO) mice did not produce any change in deltaOR plasma membrane density. These results demonstrate that selective activation of muOR is critical for morphine-induced targeting of deltaOR to neuronal membranes, but not for basal targeting of this receptor to the cell surface.

Biochemical and pharmacological control of the multiplicity of coupling at G-protein-coupled receptors

For decades, it has been generally proposed that a given receptor always interacts with a particular GTP-binding protein (G-protein) or with multiple G-proteins within one family. However, for several G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), it now becomes generally accepted that simultaneous functional coupling with distinct unrelated G-proteins can be observed, leading to the activation of multiple intracellular effectors with distinct efficacies and/or potencies. Multiplicity in G-protein coupling is frequently observed in artificial expression systems where high densities of receptors are obtained, raising the question of whether such complex signalling reveals artefactual promiscuous coupling or is a genuine property of GPCRs. Multiple biochemical and pharmacological evidence in favour of an intrinsic property of GPCRs were obtained in recent studies. Thus, there are now many examples showing that the coupling to multiple signalling pathways is dependent on the agonist used (agonist trafficking of receptor signals). In addition, the different couplings were demonstrated to involve distinct molecular determinants of the receptor and to show distinct desensitisation kinetics. Such multiplicity of signalling at the level of G-protein coupling leads to a further complexity in the functional response to agonist stimulation of one of the most elaborate cellular transmission systems. Indeed, the physiological relevance of such versatility in signalling associated with a single receptor requires the existence of critical mechanisms of dynamic regulation of the expression, the compartmentalisation, and the activity of the signalling partners. This review aims at summarising the different studies that support the concept of multiplicity of G-protein coupling. The physiological and pharmacological relevance of this coupling promiscuity will be discussed.

Expression of the murine CB2 cannabinoid receptor using a recombinant Semliki Forest virus

A recombinant Semliki Forest virus (SFV) RNA construct, SFV1-mCB(2) RNA, was employed for the high-level expression of the murine CB(2) (mCB(2)) cannabinoid receptor in baby hamster kidney cells. Biosynthetic radiolabel incorporation studies in concert with urea-sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (urea-SDS-PAGE) and western immunoblotting revealed that two major proteins of approximately 26 and 40kDa were produced by the construct. The 40kDa product, but not the 26kDa product, was glycosylated as determined by 2-deoxy-D-glucose incorporation and peptide-N-glycosidase F digestion analysis. Assessment of [3H]CP55940 ([3H]-(-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol) binding data for membranes of cells transfected with SFV1-mCB(2) RNA indicated a K(d) of 0.35+/-0.04nM and a B(max) of 24.4+/-2.7pmol/mg. A rank order of binding affinities for cannabinoids, which paralleled that reported for native mCB(2) receptors, was observed. The CB(2) receptor-specific antagonist SR144528 (N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide) blocked binding of [3H]CP55940, while the CB(1) receptor-specific antagonist SR141716A [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride] had a minimal effect. These results indicate that the recombinant receptor expressed from SFV1-mCB(2) RNA exhibits properties, including ligand binding features, that are consistent with those for the native mCB(2) receptor. However, the presence of both 26 and 40kDa receptor species is consistent with alternative translation from two AUG start sites using the SFV1-mCB(2) RNA expression system.

Self organization of membrane proteins via dimerization

Protein-protein dimerization is ubiquitous in biology, but its role in self-organization remains unexplored. Here we use Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate that under diffusion-limited conditions, reversible dimerization alone can cause membrane proteins to cluster into oligomer-like structures. When multiple distinct protein species are able to form dimers, then heterodimerization and homodimerization can organize proteins into structured clusters that can affect cellular physiology. As an example, we demonstrate how receptor dimerization could provide a physical mechanism for regulating information flow by controlling receptor-receptor cross talk. These results are physically realistic for some membrane proteins, including members of the G-protein coupled receptor family, and may provide a physiological reason as to why many proteins dimerize.

Structural models for dimerization of G-protein coupled receptors: the opioid receptor homodimers

Among the most exciting functional features of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are coming into focus lately are those relating to the role and structural characteristics of their oligomerization (mostly homo- and heterodimers). The structural underpinnings of these novel functional insights are still not clear, as current experimental techniques have not yet succeeded in identifying the dimerization interfaces between GPCR monomers. Two computational approaches have recently been designed in our lab to provide reasonable three-dimensional (3D) molecular models of the transmembrane (TM) regions of GPCR dimers based on a combination of the structural information of receptor monomers and analyses of correlated mutations in receptor families. The modeling of GPCR heterodimers has been described recently. We present here a related approach for modeling of GPCR homodimers that identifies the interfaces in the most likely configurations of the complexes. The approach is illustrated for the three cloned opioid receptor subtypes (OPRD, OPRM, and OPRK).

Heterodimerization of alpha 2A- and beta 1-adrenergic receptors

beta- and alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors are known to exhibit substantial cross-talk and mutual regulation in tissues where they are expressed together. We have found that the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor (beta(1)AR) and alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2A)AR) heterodimerize when coexpressed in cells. Immunoprecipitation studies with differentially tagged beta(1)AR and alpha(2A)AR expressed in HEK-293 cells revealed robust co-immunoprecipitation of the two receptors. Moreover, agonist stimulation of alpha(2A)AR was found to induce substantial internalization of coexpressed beta(1)AR, providing further evidence for a physical association between the two receptors in a cellular environment. Ligand binding assays examining displacement of [(3)H]dihydroalprenolol binding to the beta(1)AR by various ligands revealed that beta(1)AR pharmacological properties were significantly altered when the receptor was coexpressed with alpha(2A)AR. Finally, beta(1)AR/alpha(2A)AR heterodimerization was found to be markedly enhanced by a beta(1)AR point mutation (N15A) that blocks N-linked glycosylation of the beta(1)AR as well as by point mutations (N10A/N14A) that block N-linked glycosylation of the alpha(2A)AR. These data reveal an interaction between beta(1)AR and alpha(2A)AR that is regulated by glycosylation and that may play a key role in cross-talk and mutual regulation between these receptors.

Several delta-opioid receptor ligands display no subtype selectivity to the human delta-opioid receptor

Pharmacological studies performed in vivo suggested that the delta-opioid receptor could exist as two distinct subtypes, delta(1) and delta(2), while in vitro studies are inconclusive. Therefore, we measured the binding and functional selectivity of several putative delta(1)- and delta(2)-opioid receptor-selective compounds in membranes from Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing the human delta-opioid receptor. The compounds characterized were the agonists [D-Pen(2),D-Pen(5)]enkephalin (DPDPE, delta(1)) and deltorphin II (delta(2)), and the antagonists 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (BNTX, delta(1)), naltriben (delta(2)), naltrindole 5'-isothiocyanate (delta(2)), and naltrindole (delta(1) and delta(2)). In competition binding assays, all compounds tested showed no preference for the [3H]DPDPE, [3H]deltorphin II, or [3H]naltrindole binding sites. BNTX also showed no selectivity for the delta-opioid receptor over the mu-opioid receptor. In functional assays, the stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding induced by either DPDPE or deltorphin II was potently inhibited by both delta(1)- and delta(2)-opioid receptor-selective antagonists. Together, these results indicate that these compounds are not selective for either the delta(1)- or delta(2)-opioid receptor binding sites in binding or functional assays.

Mu and delta receptors mediate morphine effects on phagocytosis by murine peritoneal macrophages

Studies with selective opioid agonists show that mu- and delta(2)-opioid receptors, but not kappa, are involved in opioid inhibition of phagocytosis in elicited murine macrophages. All mu and delta(2) agonists tested had similar maximal effects on phagocytosis, and all dose-response curves suggest positive cooperativity. In addition, mu and delta antagonists antagonized the effect of both mu and delta agonists. Furthermore, in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice (MORKO), we observed a decrease in potency and maximal effect for a delta agonist. These data suggest that mu and delta receptors are not only involved in the modulation of phagocytosis in macrophages, but they also affect each other's activity by an unknown cooperative mechanism.

Expression of delta opioid receptor mRNA and protein in the rat cerebral cortex and cerebellum is decreased by growth hormone

Hormones released from the pituitary have been shown to regulate the expression of different proteins in the central nervous system. We wanted to examine whether peripheral administration of bovine growth hormone (bGH) regulates the expression of delta-opioid receptor (DOR) in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. Expression of the DOR protein was quantified using Western blot densitometry. DOR mRNA was quantified with a solution hybridization RNase protection assay. Hypophysectomized (Hx) and untreated normal female rats were included in the study. All Hx rats were hormonally treated with cortisol (400 microg/kg/day) and L-thyroxine (10 microg/kg/day) for 19 days. Hypophysectomy resulted in a threefold increase in cerebral cortex and a twofold increase in cerebellum of the DOR protein compared with normal rats. One subgroup of Hx rats received bGH (1 mg/kg body weight) as a daily subcutaneous injection for 19 days. This treatment normalized the levels of DOR protein in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. Immunohistochemical experiments showed that GH decreased DOR expression especially in layers II-VI in cerebral cortex and in stratum moleculare in cerebellum. Quantification of DOR mRNA by solution hybridization RNase protection assay corresponded to the DOR protein measurements. We conclude that the expression of DORs in cerebral cortex and cerebellum is regulated by GH.

Chemokines: attractive mediators of the immune response

An effective inflammatory immune response first requires the recruitment of cells to the site of inflammation and then their appropriate activation and regulation. Chemokines are critical in this response since they are both chemotactic and immunoregulatory molecules. In this regard, the interaction between CCL5 and CCR5 may be critical in regulating T cell functions, by mediating their recruitment and polarization, activation, and differentiation. Various tyrosine phosphorylation signaling cascades can be engaged following chemokine receptor aggregation on T cells, including the Jak-Stat pathway, FAK activation, the MAP kinase pathway, PI3-kinase activation, and transactivation of the T cell receptor. This review will address specific aspects related to chemokine-T cell interactions and the molecular signaling mechanisms that influence T cell function in an inflammatory immune response.

Human prostacyclin receptor

Prostacyclin, a member of the eicosanoid family of lipid mediators, is the major product of arachidonic acid metabolism formed in the marcovascular endothelium. It is a potent vasodilator, antithrombotic, and antiplatelet agent that mediates it effects through a membrane-associated receptor termed the IP. Cloning of the cDNA for IP, from human and other species, indicated its membership of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and has allowed detailed examination of the signaling and regulatory pathways utilized by this receptor. This article examines the current state of knowledge of the IP, its signaling and regulation, and its biological role in vivo and examines the possible existence of multiple PGI2 receptor sites.

Coexpression of delta-opioid receptors with micro receptors in GH3 cells changes the functional response to micro agonists from inhibitory to excitatory

GH3 cells show spontaneous activity characterized by bursts of action potentials and oscillations in [Ca 2+]i. This activity is modulated by the activation of exogenously expressed opioid receptors. In GH3 cells expressing only micro receptors (GH3MOR cells), the micro receptor-specific ligand [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) inhibited spontaneous Ca 2+ signaling by the inhibition of voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels, activation of inward-rectifying K+ channels, and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. In contrast, in cells expressing both micro and delta receptors (GH3MORDOR cells), DAMGO had an excitatory effect on Ca 2+ signaling that was mediated by phospholipase C and release of Ca 2+ from intracellular stores. The excitatory effect of DAMGO was also inhibited by pretreatment with pertussis toxin. Despite the excitatory effect on Ca 2+ signaling, DAMGO inhibited Ca 2+ channels and activated inward-rectifying K+ channels in GH3MORDOR cells, although to a lesser extent than in GH3MOR cells. Long-term treatment with the delta receptor-specific ligand [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]-enkephalin reduced the excitatory effect of DAMGO in the majority of GH3MORDOR cells and restored the inhibitory response to DAMGO in some cells. The inhibitory effect of somatostatin on Ca 2+ signaling was not different in GH3MORDOR versus GH3MOR cells. These results indicate that interaction between micro- and delta-opioid receptors causes a change in the functional response to micro ligands, possibly by the formation of a micro/delta heterodimer with distinct functional properties.

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor subtypes. Differential regulation of beta-arrestins 1 and 2

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are regulated by a complex network of mechanisms such as oligomerization and internalization. Using the GPCR subtypes for thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRHR1 and TRHR2), the aim of this study was to determine if subtype-specific differences exist in the trafficking process. If so, we wished to determine the impact of homo- and hetero-oligomerization on TRHR subtype trafficking as a potential mechanism for the differential cellular responses induced by TRH. Expression of either beta-arrestin 1 or 2 promoted TRHR1 internalization. In contrast, only beta-arrestin 2 could enhance TRHR2 internalization. The preference for beta-arrestin 2 by TRHR2 was supported by the impairment of TRHR2 trafficking in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from either a beta-arrestin 2 knockout or a beta-arrestin 1/2 knockout, while TRHR1 trafficking was only abolished in MEFs lacking both beta-arrestins. The differential beta-arrestin-dependence of TRHR2 was directly measured in live cells using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). Both BRET and confocal microscopy were also used to demonstrate that TRHR subtypes form hetero-oligomers. In addition, these hetero-oligomers have altered internalization kinetics compared with the homo-oligomer. The formation of TRHR1/2 heteromeric complexes increased the interaction between TRHR2 and beta-arrestin 1. This may be due to conformational differences between TRHR1/2 hetero-oligomers versus TRHR2 homo-oligomers as a mutant TRHR1 (TRHR1 C335Stop) that does not interact with beta-arrestins, could also enhance TRHR2/beta-arrestin 1 interaction. This study demonstrates that TRHR subtypes are differentially regulated by the beta-arrestins and also provides the first evidence that the interactions of TRHRs with beta-arrestin may be altered by hetero-oligomer formation.

Quantitative codon optimisation of DNA libraries encoding sub-random peptides: design and characterisation of a novel library encoding transmembrane domain peptides

Codons for amino acids sharing similar chemical properties seem to cluster on the genetic codon table. Such a geographical distribution of the codons was exploited to create chemically synthesised DNA that encodes peptide libraries containing only a subset of the 20 natural amino acids. The frequency of each amino acid in the subset was further optimised by quantitatively manipulating the ratio of the four phosphoamidites during chemical synthesis of the libraries. Peptides encoded by such libraries show a reduced complexity and could be enriched in peptides of a desired property, which are thus more suitable when screening for functional peptides. Proof of concept for the codon-biased design of peptide libraries was shown by design, synthesis, and characterisation of a transmembrane peptide library that contains >80% transmembrane peptides, representing a 160-fold enrichment compared with a fully randomised library.

Demonstration of enhanced potency of a chimeric somatostatin-dopamine molecule, BIM-23A387, in suppressing growth hormone and prolactin secretion from human pituitary somatotroph adenoma cells

In acromegaly, the combination of somatostatin (SS) and dopamine (DA) agonists has been shown to enhance suppression of GH secretion. In the present study, a new chimeric molecule, BIM-23A387, which selectively binds to the SS subtype 2 receptor (sst(2); K(i) = 0.10 nM) and to the DA D2 receptor (D2DR; K(i) = 22.1 nM) was tested in cultures prepared from 11 human GH-secreting tumors for its ability to suppress GH and prolactin (PRL) secretion. The chimeric compound was compared with individual sst(2) and D2DR agonists of comparable activity at the individual receptors. All tumors expressed both sst(2) and D2DR mRNAs (0.8 +/- 0.2 and 4.7 +/- 0.7 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase mRNA, respectively). In cell cultures from seven octreotide-sensitive tumors, the maximal inhibition of GH release induced by the individual sst(2) and D2DR analogs and by BIM-23A387 was similar. However, the mean EC(50) for GH suppression by BIM-23A387 (0.2 pM) was 50 times lower than that of the individual sst(2) and D2DR analogs, either used individually or combined. Similar data were obtained in four tumors that were only partially responsive to octreotide. The inhibition of GH release by BIM-23A387 was only partially reversed by the D2R2 antagonist, sulpiride, or by the sst(2) antagonist, BIM-23454. Only when both antagonists were combined was the GH suppressive effect of BIM-23A387 totally reversed. Finally, BIM-23A387 produced a mean 73 +/- 6% inhibition of PRL in six mixed GH plus PRL tumors. These data demonstrate an enhanced potency of the chimeric molecule, BIM-23A387, in suppressing GH and PRL secretion from acromegalic tumors, which cannot be explained merely on the basis of binding affinity for SS and/or DA receptors.

Ligand-dependent inhibition of oligomerization at the human thyrotropin receptor

Recently, several studies have reported oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors, although the functional implications of this phenomenon are still unclear. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and coimmunoprecipitation (COIP), we previously reported that the human thyrotropin (TSH) receptor tagged with green fluorescent protein (TSHR(GFP)) and expressed in a heterologous system was present as oligomeric complexes on the cell surface. Here, we have extended this biophysical and biochemical approach to study the regulation of such oligomeric complexes. Co-expression of TSHR(GFP) and TSHR(Myc) constructs in Chinese hamster ovary cells resulted in FRET-positive cells. The specificity of the FRET signal was verified by the absence of energy transfer in individually transfected TSHR(GFP) and TSHR(Myc):Cy3 cells cultured together and also by acceptor photobleaching. Occupation of the receptor molecule by the ligand (TSH) resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the FRET index from 20% in the absence of TSH to <1% with 10(3) microunits/ml of TSH. Such reduction in oligomeric forms was also confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation. Exposure of TSHR(GFP/Myc) cells to forskolin or cytochalasin D caused no change in the FRET index, confirming that the decrease in the oligomeric complexes was a receptor-dependent phenomenon and free of energy or microtuble requirements. The TSH-induced decrease in TSHR oligomers was found to be secondary to dissociation of the TSHR complexes as evidenced by an increase in fluorescent intensity of photobleached spots of GFP fluorescence with 10(3) microunits/ml of TSH. These data indicated that the less active conformation of the TSHR was comprised of receptor complexes and that such complexes were dissociated on the binding of ligand. Such observations support the concept of a constitutively active TSHR dimer or monomer that is naturally inhibited by the formation of higher order complexes. Inhibition of these oligomeric forms by ligand binding returns the TSHR to an activated state.

Dimerization of morphine and orphanin FQ/nociceptin receptors: generation of a novel opioid receptor subtype

Although orphanin FQ/nociceptin (OFQ/N) receptors are a member of the opioid receptor family of receptors, they bind traditional opioids with very poor affinity. We now demonstrate that mu opioid receptors can physically associate with OFQ/N receptors, resulting in a complex with a unique binding selectivity profile. Immunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged OFQ/N receptors co-precipitates mu receptors. When the two receptors were co-expressed in CHO cells, [3H]OFQ/N retained its high binding affinity for its receptor. However, co-expression of the two receptors increased by up to 250-fold the affinity of a series of opioids in [3H]OFQ/N binding assays. This enhanced affinity was limited to agonists with high affinity for mu receptors. Selective kappa(1) and delta opioids did not lower binding. Despite the dramatic increase in affinity for the opioid agonists in co-expressing cells, the opioid antagonists naloxone and diprenorphine failed to compete [3H]OFQ/N binding.

Prediction of heterodimerization interfaces of G-protein coupled receptors with a new subtractive correlated mutation method

Recent studies employing differential epitope tagging, selective immunoprecipitation of receptor complexes and fluorescence or bioluminescence resonance energy transfer techniques provide direct evidence for heterodimerization between both closely and distantly related members of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family. Since heterodimerization appears to play a role in modulating agonist affinity, efficacy and/or trafficking properties, the molecular models of GPCRs required to understand receptor function must consider these oligomerization hypotheses. To advance knowledge in this field, we present here a computational approach based on correlated mutation analysis and the structural information contained in three-dimensional molecular models of the transmembrane regions of GPCRs built using the rhodopsin crystal structure as a template. The new subtractive correlated mutation method reveals likely heterodimerization interfaces amongst the different alternatives for the positioning of two tightly packed bundles of seven transmembrane domains next to each other in contact heterodimers of GPCRs. Predictions are applied to GPCRs in the class of opioid receptors. However, in the absence of a known structure of any GPCR dimer, the features of the method and predictions are also illustrated and analyzed for a dimeric complex of known structure.

Comparison of receptor mechanisms and efficacy requirements for delta-agonist-induced convulsive activity and antinociception in mice

Delta-opioid receptor-selective agonists produce antinociception and convulsions in several species, including mice. This article examines two hypotheses in mice: 1) that antinociception and convulsive activity are mediated through the same type of delta-receptor and 2) that greater delta-agonist efficacy is required for antinociception than for convulsive activity. Delta-mediated antinociception was evaluated in the acetic acid-induced abdominal constriction assay, which involves a low-intensity noxious stimulus; convulsive activity was indicated as a mild tonic-clonic convulsive episode followed by a period of catalepsy. In delta-opioid receptor knockout mice [DOR-1(-/-)], the nonpeptidic delta-agonists (+/-)-4-[(R*)-[(2S*,5R*)-2,5-dimethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-1- piperazinyl]-(3-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide hydrochloride (BW373U86) and (+)-4-[(R)-[(2S,5R)-2,5-dimethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-(3-methoxyphenyl)methyl]-N, N-diethylbenzamide (SNC80) failed to produce convulsive behavior demonstrating the absolute involvement of DOR-1 in this effect. In NIH Swiss mice expressing delta-opioid receptors, BW373U86 produced both antinociception and convulsive activity. These effects were antagonized by the putative delta(1)-receptor-selective antagonist 7-benzylidenenaltrexone and the putative delta(2)-receptor-selective antagonist naltriben. Tolerance developed to both the convulsive and antinociceptive effects of BW373U86. Tolerance to the convulsive, but not the antinociceptive, effects of BW373U86 was largely prevented when the antagonist naltrindole was given 20 min after each dose of the agonist in a 3-day treatment paradigm. The convulsive action of BW373U86 was also less sensitive than the antinociceptive action to treatment with the irreversible delta-antagonist naltrindole isothiocyanate. Collectively, these data suggest that the convulsive and antinociceptive activities of delta-agonists are mediated through the same receptor but that the receptor reserve for delta-mediated convulsive activity is greater than for delta-mediated antinociceptive activity.

G-protein-coupled receptor oligomerization and its potential for drug discovery

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent by far the largest class of targets for modern drugs. Virtually all therapeutics that are directed towards GPCRs have been designed using assays that presume that these receptors are monomeric. The recent realization that these receptors form homo-oligomeric and hetero-oligomeric complexes has added a new dimension to rational drug design. However, this important aspect of GPCR biology remains largely unincorporated into schemes to search for new therapeutics. This review provides a synopsis of the current thinking surrounding GPCR homo-oligomerization and hetero-oligomerization and shows how new models point towards unexplored avenues in the development of new therapies.

Beta 1/beta 2-adrenergic receptor heterodimerization regulates beta 2-adrenergic receptor internalization and ERK signaling efficacy

Beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenergic receptors (beta(1)AR and beta(2)AR) are co-expressed in numerous tissues where they play a central role in the responses of various organs to sympathetic stimulation. Although the two receptor subtypes share some signaling pathways, each has been shown to have specific signaling and regulatory properties. Given the recent recognition that many G protein-coupled receptors can form homo- and heterodimers, the present study was undertaken to determine whether the beta(1)AR and beta(2)AR can form dimers in cells and, if so, to investigate the potential functional consequences of such heterodimerization. Using co-immunoprecipitation and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, we show that beta(1)AR and beta(2)AR can form heterodimers in HEK 293 cells co-expressing the two receptors. Functionally, beta-adrenergic stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was found to be identical in cells expressing beta(1)AR, beta(2)AR, or both receptors at similar levels, indicating that heterodimerization did not affect this signaling pathway. When considering ERK1/2 MAPK activity, a significant agonist-promoted activation was detected in beta(2)AR- but not beta(1)AR-expressing cells. Similarly to what was observed in cells expressing the beta(1)AR alone, no beta-adrenergic stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was observed in cells co-expressing the two receptors. A similar inhibition of agonist-promoted internalization of the beta(2)AR was observed upon co-expression of the beta(1)AR, which by itself internalized to a lesser extent. Taken together, our data suggest that heterodimerization between beta(1)AR and beta(2)AR inhibits the agonist-promoted internalization of the beta(2)AR and its ability to activate the ERK1/2 MAPK signaling pathway.

Differential effects of mu-opioid receptor ligands on Ca(2+) signaling

Activation of mu-opioid receptors (MORs) transfected into human embryonic kidney 293 cells, caused a multiphasic increase in cytosolic free Ca(2+) levels (Ca(2+)i). The first Ca(2+)i maximum (peak 1) between 5 and 7 s depended on the presence of extracellular Ca(2+) (Ca(2+)e). The second phase peaking at approximately 15 s (peak 2) was independent of Ca(2+)e and thus represents Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores. A decrease in temperature from 37 to 25 degrees C also caused reduction of peak 1 but not peak 2, suggesting that the two responses arise from mechanistically distinct pathways. A delayed Ca(2+)e-dependent third response phase is thought to represent capacitative Ca(2+)e influx evoked after release of Ca(2+) from internal stores. Agonists and antagonists of two major classes of opioid ligands, oxymorphinans (morphine and naloxone) and oripavines (etorphine and diprenorphine), had differential effects on Ca(2+) currents. Although morphine activated both phases with equal potency, etorphine was 20-fold less potent at stimulating peak 1 over peak 2. Similarly, the antagonists, naloxone and diprenorphine, blocked the Ca(2+) response to each agonist with greatly varying potencies. Specifically, concomitant injection of diprenorphine failed to affect peak 1 (thought to represent rapid Ca(2+)e influx) stimulated by morphine while fully blocking peak 2 (intracellular Ca(2+) release). However, diprenorphine potently inhibited peak 1 as well when added to the cells before morphine, indicating limited or slow access of diprenorphine to these morphine binding sites. The existence of multiple, functionally distinct binding site conformations could account for these findings. In conclusion, different opioid ligands can differentially affect Ca(2+) response patterns resulting from MOR activation.

Dimerization and phosphorylation of thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptors are modulated by agonist stimulation

Dimerization and phosphorylation of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptors was characterized using HEK293 and pituitary GHFT cells expressing epitope-tagged receptors. TRH receptors tagged with FLAG and hemagglutinin epitopes were co-precipitated only if they were co-expressed, and 10-30% of receptors were isolated as hemagglutinin/FLAG-receptor dimers under basal conditions. The abundance of receptor dimers was increased when cells had been stimulated by TRH, indicating that TRH either stabilizes pre-existing dimers or increases dimer formation. TRH increased receptor dimerization and phosphorylation within 1 min in a dose-dependent manner. TRH increased phosphorylation of both receptor monomers and dimers, documented by incorporation of (32)P and an upshift in receptor mobility reversed by phosphatase treatment. The ability of TRH to increase receptor phosphorylation and dimerization did not depend on signal transduction, because it was not inhibited by the phospholipase C inhibitor. Receptor phosphorylation required an agonist but was not blocked by the casein kinase II inhibitor apigenin, the protein kinase C inhibitor GF109203X, or expression of a dominant negative form of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. TRH receptors lacking most of the cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus formed dimers constitutively but failed to undergo agonist-induced dimerization and phosphorylation. TRH also increased phosphorylation and dimerization of TRH receptors expressed in GHFT pre-lactotroph cells.

Analysis of G-protein-coupled receptor dimerization following chemokine signaling

An abundance of information has been generated in recent decades on the signaling events triggered through G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Nonetheless, the structural changes at the cell surface that provoke receptor activation are only now beginning to be understood. It is becoming clear that receptors are not isolated entities that are activated following ligand binding, but that they interact with other molecules already present or recruited to the vicinity, which results in a wide variety of new signaling possibilities. Understanding receptor interactions with relatives and/or friends on the cell surface is thus critical. The most important point is to determine which of these interactions are "casual" and which give rise to functional consequences.

Identification of two C-terminal amino acids, Ser(355) and Thr(357), required for short-term homologous desensitization of mu-opioid receptors

Our recent study suggests that a cluster of Ser/Thr residues (T(354)S(355)S(356)T(357)) at the intracellular carboxyl tail of rat mu-opioid receptor (MOR1) is required for the development of short-term homologous desensitization. To investigate the functional role played by individual serine or threonine residue of this (TSST) cluster in the agonist-induced mu-opioid receptor desensitization, point mutant (T354A), (S355A), (S356A) and (T357A) mu-opioid receptors were prepared and stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells (HEK 293 cells). Similar to wild-type mu-opioid receptors, mutant (T354A) and (S356A) mu-opioid receptors stably expressed in HEK 293 cells developed homologous desensitization after 30 min pretreatment of DAMGO ([D-Ala(2),N-methyl-Phe(4),Gly-ol(5)]enkephalin), a specific mu-opioid receptor agonist. Substituting Ser(355)or Thr(357) with alanine resulted in a significant attenuation of agonist-induced mu-opioid receptor desensitization. In HEK 293 cells stably expressing double mutant (S355A/T357A) mu-opioid receptors, DAMGO pretreatment failed to significantly affect the efficacy and potency by which DAMGO inhibits forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. Consistent with the general belief that agonist-induced phosphorylation of guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors is involved in homologous desensitization. Treating HEK 293 cells expressing wild-type mu-opioid receptors with 5 microM DAMGO for 30 min induced the receptor phosphorylation. Mutation of Ser(355) and Thr(357) also greatly impaired DAMGO-induced mu-opioid receptor phosphorylation. These results suggest that two C-terminal amino acids, Ser(355) and Thr(357), are required for short-term homologous desensitization and agonist-induced phosphorylation of mu-opioid receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells.

Homo- and hetero-oligomeric interactions between G-protein-coupled receptors in living cells monitored by two variants of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET): hetero-oligomers between receptor subtypes form more efficiently than between less closely related sequences

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were examined in HEK-293 cells using two variants of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). BRET(2) (a variant of BRET) offers greatly improved separation of the emission spectra of the donor and acceptor moieties compared with traditional BRET. Previously recorded homo-oligomerization of the human delta-opioid receptor was confirmed using BRET(2). Homo-oligomerization of the kappa-opioid receptor was observed using both BRET techniques. Both homo- and hetero-oligomers, containing both delta- and kappa-opioid receptors, were unaffected by the presence of receptor ligands. BRET detection of opioid receptor homo- and hetero-oligomers required expression of 50,000-100,000 copies of the receptor energy acceptor construct per cell. The effectiveness of delta-kappa-opioid receptor hetero-oligomer formation was as great as for homomeric interactions. The capacity of the two opioid receptors to form oligomeric complexes with the beta(2)-adrenoceptor was also assessed. Although such interactions were detected, at least 250,000 copies per cell of the energy acceptor were required. Requirement for high levels of receptor expression was equally pronounced in attempts to measure hetero-oligomer formation between the kappa-opioid receptor and the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor-1. These studies indicate that constitutively formed homo- and hetero-oligomers of opioid receptor subtypes can be detected in living cells containing less than 100,000 copies of the receptors. However, although hetero-oligomeric interactions between certain less closely related GPCRs can be detected, they appear to be of lower affinity than homo- or hetero-oligomers containing closely related sequences. Interactions recorded between certain GPCR family members in heterologous expression systems are likely to be artefacts of extreme levels of overexpression.

Profound spinal tolerance after repeated exposure to a highly selective mu-opioid peptide agonist: role of delta-opioid receptors

Recent studies suggest that delta-opioid receptors play a role in the development of opioid tolerance and led us to hypothesize that highly selective mu-opioid agonists may produce less tolerance. H-2',6'-dimethyltyrosine-D-Arg-Phe-Lys-NH(2) ([Dmt(1)]DALDA) has extraordinary selectivity for mu-receptors (K(i)(delta)/K(i)(mu) > 14,000). Daily administration of [Dmt(1)]DALDA (5 times ED(50); s.c.) for 7 days increased ED(50) 3.6-fold from 0.16 to 0.58 micromol/kg. A higher dose of [Dmt(1)]DALDA (10 times ED(50), every 12 h) for 2.5 days resulted in a 11.7 times increase in the ED(50) (1.9 micromol/kg). Complete cross-tolerance to morphine was observed, with a 3.4- and 15.1-fold shift in the morphine ED(50), respectively. We also compared the extent of spinal versus supraspinal tolerance after repeated s.c. [Dmt(1)]DALDA administration. Five doses of [Dmt(1)]DALDA (10 times ED(50), every 12 h) resulted in a 3.4 times shift in the i.c.v. ED(50) (15.4 versus 4.6 pmol/mouse) but a 44 times shift in the i.t. ED(50) (52.9 versus 1.2 pmol/mouse). Tolerance to [Dmt(1)]DALDA was associated with 30 to 35% reduction in [(3)H][Dmt(1)]DALDA binding in brain and spinal cord. Coadministration of [Dmt(1)]DALDA with delta-antagonist naltriben (NTB) reduced spinal tolerance by 50%. Even after spinal tolerance had been established, addition of a delta-antagonist (NTB or H-Tyr-TicPsi[CH(2)NH]Phe-Phe-OH) significantly enhanced the potency of i.t. [Dmt(1)]DALDA 2- to 4-fold. These results suggest that agonist activation of delta-receptors is not necessary for the development of opioid tolerance; however, delta-receptors play a modulatory role in the maintenance of the tolerant state.

Heterodimerization of somatostatin and opioid receptors cross-modulates phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization

Heterodimerization has been shown to modulate the ligand binding, signaling, and trafficking properties of G protein-coupled receptors. However, to what extent heterodimerization may alter agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of these receptors has not been documented. We have recently shown that heterodimerization of sst(2A) and sst(3) somatostatin receptors results in inactivation of sst(3) receptor function (Pfeiffer, M., Koch, T., Schröder, H., Klutzny, M., Kirscht, S., Kreienkamp, H. J., Höllt, V., and Schulz, S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 14027-14036). Here we examine dimerization of the sst(2A) somatostatin receptor and the mu-opioid receptor, members of closely related G protein-coupled receptor families. In coimmunoprecipitation studies using differentially epitope-tagged receptors, we provide direct evidence for heterodimerization of sst(2A) and MOR1 in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Unlike heteromeric assembly of sst(2A) and sst(3), sst(2A)-MOR1 heterodimerization did not substantially alter the ligand binding or coupling properties of these receptors. However, exposure of the sst(2A)-MOR1 heterodimer to the sst(2A)-selective ligand L-779,976 induced phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization of sst(2A) as well as MOR1. Similarly, exposure of the sst(2A)-MOR1 heterodimer to the mu-selective ligand [d-Ala(2),Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin induced phosphorylation and desensitization of both MOR1 and sst(2A) but not internalization of sst(2A). Cross-phosphorylation and cross-desensitization of the sst(2A)-MOR1 heterodimer were selective; they were neither observed with the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer nor with the endogenously expressed lysophosphatidic acid receptor. Heterodimerization may thus represent a novel regulatory mechanism that could either restrict or enhance phosphorylation and desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors.

mu-Opioid receptors desensitize less rapidly than delta-opioid receptors due to less efficient activation of arrestin

Receptor desensitization by G-protein receptor kinases (GRK) and arrestins is likely to be an important component underlying the development of tolerance to opioid drugs. Reconstitution of this process in Xenopus oocytes revealed distinct differences in the kinetics of GRK and arrestin regulation of the closely related opioid receptors mu (MOR), delta (DOR), and kappa (KOR). We demonstrated that under identical conditions, GRK and arrestin-dependent desensitization of MOR proceeds dramatically slower than that of DOR. Furthermore, GRK3 phosphorylation sites required for opioid receptor desensitization also greatly differ. The determinants for DOR and KOR desensitization reside in the carboxyl-terminal tail, whereas MOR depends on Thr-180 in the second intracellular loop. Although this later finding might indicate an inefficient phosphorylation of MOR Thr-180, increasing the amount of arrestin expressed greatly increased the rate of MOR desensitization to a rate comparable with that of DOR. Similarly, coexpression of a constitutively active arrestin 2(R169E) with MOR and DOR desensitized both receptors in an agonist-dependent, GRK-independent manner at rates that were indistinguishable. Together, these data suggest that it is the activation of arrestin, rather than its binding, that is the rate-limiting step in MOR desensitization. In addition, mutation of Thr-161 in DOR, homologous to MOR Thr-180, significantly inhibited the faster desensitization of DOR. These results suggest that DOR desensitization involves phosphorylation of both the carboxyl-terminal tail and the second intracellular loop that together leads to a more efficient activation of arrestin and thus faster desensitization.

Dimerization: an emerging concept for G protein-coupled receptor ontogeny and function

In the last four to five years, the view that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) function as monomeric proteins has been challenged by numerous studies, which suggests that GPCRs exist as dimers or even higher-structure oligomers. Recently, biophysical methods based on luminescence and fluorescence energy transfer have confirmed the existence of such oligomeric complexes in living cells. Although no consensus exists on the role of receptor dimerization, converging evidence suggests potential roles in various aspects of receptor biogenesis and function. In several cases, receptors appear to fold as constitutive dimers early after biosynthesis, whereas ligand-promoted dimerization at the cell surface has been proposed for others. The reports of heterodimerization between receptor subtypes suggest a potential level of receptor complexity that could account for previously unexpected pharmacological diversities. In addition to fundamentally changing our views on the structure and activation processes of GPCRs, the concept of homo- and heterodimerization could have dramatic impacts on drug development and screening.

Molecular, pharmacological and functional diversity of 5-HT receptors

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) is probably unique among the monoamines in that its effects are subserved by as many as 13 distinct heptahelical, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and one (presumably a family of) ligand-gated ion channel(s). These receptors are divided into seven distinct classes (5-HT(1) to 5-HT(7)) largely on the basis of their structural and operational characteristics. Whilst this degree of physical diversity clearly underscores the physiological importance of serotonin, evidence for an even greater degree of operational diversity continues to emerge. The challenge for modern 5-HT research has therefore been to define more precisely the properties of the systems that make this incredible diversity possible. Much progress in this regard has been made during the last decade with the realisation that serotonin is possibly the least conservative monoamine transmitter and the cloning of its many receptors. Coupled with the actions of an extremely avid and efficient reuptake system, this array of receptor subtypes provides almost limitless signalling capabilities to the extent that one might even question the need for other transmitter systems. However, the complexity of the system appears endless, since posttranslational modifications, such as alternate splicing and RNA editing, increase the number of proteins, oligomerisation and heteromerisation increase the number of complexes, and multiple G-protein suggest receptor trafficking, allowing phenotypic switching and crosstalk within and possibly between receptor families. Whether all these possibilities are used in vivo under physiological or pathological conditions remains to be firmly established, but in essence, such variety will keep the 5-HT community busy for quite some time. Those who may have predicted that molecular biology would largely simplify the life of pharmacologists have missed the point for 5-HT research in particular and, most probably, for many other transmitters. This chapter is an attempt to summarise very briefly 5-HT receptor diversity. The reward for unravelling this complex array of serotonin receptor--effector systems may be substantial, the ultimate prize being the development of important new drugs in a range of disease areas.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

Methadone and heroin antinociception: predominant delta-opioid-receptor responses in methadone-tolerant mice

Antinociceptive tail flick responses to heroin and 6-monoacetylmorphine mediated in the brain by mu-opioid receptor are switched by morphine pellet implantation to delta1- and delta2-opioid-receptors mediation, respectively. Present results showed that the mu-receptor response (inhibited by beta-funaltrexamine) to methadone was changed by morphine pellet implantation to delta1 (inhibited by 7-benzylidenenaltrexone)- and delta2 (inhibited by naltriben)-opioid-receptor responses. Methadone pellet implantation likewise changed mediation from mu- to delta-opioid receptors for heroin and methadone but not for morphine (beta-funaltrexamine continued to inhibit). Methadone mu action in the brain was linked through a descending system to activate spinal serotonin receptors (inhibited by methysergide), but this link was gone in the methadone-pellet-implanted group. In the latter group, the new delta1- and delta2-receptor responses were mediated by spinal GABAA (inhibited by bicuculline) and GABAB (inhibited by 2-hydroxysaclofen) receptors. These shifts in neuronal systems meant that mu receptors on a given neuron were not changed into delta receptors. Preliminary results showed that delta-agonist action for methadone was prevented from appearing by MK801, a NMDA-receptor antagonist, and did not occur in 129S6/SvEv mice which lack NMDA responsiveness. Could methadone maintenance treatment in humans uncover delta-agonist actions?

Opioid receptor polymorphisms and opioid abuse

The sequencing of the human genome is only the first step. The next step is to determine the function of these genes and in particular, how alterations in specific genes lead to major human disorders. Many laboratories are now focusing on identifying and characterizing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), to determine which correlate in frequency with certain population groups who may be particularly susceptible to certain diseases. The mu opioid receptor (MOR), which mediates the clinically important analgesic effects of drugs like morphine as well as the euphoria sought by heroin abusers, exhibits several dozen polymorphisms. Several of these are associated with altered receptor function and individuals at risk for drug abuse.

Comparison of the peripheral and central effects of the opioid agonists loperamide and morphine in the formalin test in rats

The effects of the peripherally restricted opioid agonist loperamide were compared to those of morphine in the formalin test in rats. Both loperamide and morphine were efficacious in producing antihyperalgesia after both subcutaneous and intracisternal administration. The antihyperalgesic effects of peripherally administered loperamide and morphine were antagonized by both naloxone and its quaternary derivative naloxone methiodide. The effects of intracisternally administered loperamide and morphine were antagonized by naloxone SC. However, quaternary naloxone SC did not block the effects of intracisternally administered loperamide, and, quaternary naloxone blocked intracisternally morphine only at a dose approximately 10-fold higher than that required to block peripherally administered morphine. In addition, approximately 10-fold higher doses of naloxone administered SC were required to antagonize loperamide compared to doses required to antagonize morphine when the agonists were administered subcutaneously, suggesting that the effects of loperamide might be mediated by opioid receptors different from those which mediated the effects of morphine. However, neither the kappa-receptor selective antagonist nor-binaltorphimine nor the delta-receptor selective antagonist naltrindole blocked the effects of either opioid agonist. The present results are consistent with the interpretation that the antihyperalgesic effects of opioid agonists can have both a peripheral and a central component of action, and that the peripheral component of action is sufficient to produce antihyperalgesia in the formalin test after peripheral administration. The present results provide further evidence that peripherally restricted opioid agonists might provide clinically useful treatment of some pain states, in particular pain states that might involve sensitization of peripheral nociceptors.

Paradoxical effects of the opioid antagonist naltrexone on morphine analgesia, tolerance, and reward in rats

Opioid agonists such as morphine have been found to exert excitatory and inhibitory receptor-mediated effects at low and high doses, respectively. Ultra-low doses of opioid antagonists (naloxone and naltrexone), which selectively inhibit the excitatory effects, have been reported to augment systemic morphine analgesia and inhibit the development of tolerance/physical dependence. This study investigated the site of action of the paradoxical effects of naltrexone and the generality of this effect. The potential of ultra-low doses of naltrexone to influence morphine-induced analgesia was investigated in tests of nociception. Administration of intrathecal (0.05 and 0.1 ng) or systemic (10 ng/kg i.p.) naltrexone augmented the antinociception produced by an acute submaximal dose of intrathecal (5 microg) or systemic (7.5 mg/kg i.p.) morphine in the tail-flick test. Chronic intrathecal (0.005 and 0.05 ng) or systemic (10 ng/kg) naltrexone combined with morphine (15 microg i.t.; 15 mg/kg i.p.) over a 7-day period inhibited the decline in morphine antinociception and prevented the loss of morphine potency. In animals rendered tolerant to intrathecal (15 microg) or systemic (15 mg/kg) morphine, administration of naltrexone (0.05 ng i.t.; 10 and 50 ng/kg i.p.) significantly restored the antinociceptive effect and potency of morphine. Thus, in ultra-low doses, naltrexone paradoxically enhances morphine analgesia and inhibits or reverses tolerance through a spinal action. The potential of naltrexone to influence morphine-induced reward was also investigated using a place preference paradigm. Systemic administration of ultra-low doses of naltrexone (16.7, 20.0, and 25.0 ng/kg) with morphine (1.0 mg/kg) extended the duration of the morphine-induced conditioned place preference. These effects of naltrexone on morphine-induced reward may have implications for chronic treatment with agonist-antagonist combinations.