401
|
Shi H, Li J, Li K, Yang X, Zhu Z, Tian D. Minimally invasive versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2019; 47:4604-4618. [PMID: 31638461 PMCID: PMC6997785 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519864806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive radical cystectomy (MIRC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer. Methods We searched the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of MIRC versus ORC in the treatment of bladder cancer. Results Eight articles describing nine RCTs (803 patients) were analyzed. No significant differences were found between MIRC and ORC in two oncologic outcomes: the recurrence rate and mortality. Additionally, no significant differences were found in three pathologic outcomes: lymph node yield, positive lymph nodes, and positive surgical margins. With respect to perioperative outcomes, however, MIRC showed a significantly longer operating time, less estimated blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate, shorter time to regular diet, and shorter length of hospital stay than ORC. The incidence of complications was similar between the two techniques. We found no statistically significant differences in the above outcomes between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and ORC or between laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ORC with the exception of the complication rate. Conclusions MIRC is an effective and safe surgical approach in the treatment of bladder cancer. However, a large-scale multicenter RCT is needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongbin Shi
- Department of Urology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Jiangsong Li
- Department of Urology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong, China
| | - Kui Li
- Department of Urology Surgery, The People's Hospital of Yucheng, Yucheng, China
| | - Xiaobo Yang
- Department of Urology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Zaisheng Zhu
- Department of Urology, Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China
| | - Daxue Tian
- Department of Urology, Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
402
|
Chen J, Djaladat H, Schuckman AK, Aron M, Desai M, Gill IS, Clifford TG, Ghodoussipour S, Miranda G, Cai J, Daneshmand S. Surgical approach as a determinant factor of clinical outcome following radical cystectomy: Does Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) level the playing field? Urol Oncol 2019; 37:765-773. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
403
|
Kaouk J, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Bertolo R. Step-by-step technique for single-port robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph nodes dissection using the da Vinci ® SP™ surgical system. BJU Int 2019; 124:707-712. [PMID: 30868722 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe a step-by-step technique for robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed using the da Vinci® SP™ surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). PATIENTS AND METHODS Four consecutive patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were counselled for RARC with PLND and ileal conduit urinary diversion performed using the da Vinci SP surgical system. A 3-cm midline incision was made 5-cm above the umbilicus. Dissection was performed to access the abdominal cavity. Insertion of the GelPOINT® advanced access platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) with the SP Cannula was performed through the incision made. A 12-mm AirSeal® (SurgiQuest Inc., Milfort, CT, USA) port for the assistant was placed on the pre-marked stoma site, where an ileal conduit urinary diversion was desired. Demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected under Institutional Review Board approval (IRB 13-780). The surgeries were performed by reproducing the steps of the institutional approach for RARC performed with the multi-arm robotic platform. RESULTS The surgeries were successfully completed. There was neither conversion to standard multi-arm robotic or open approaches nor the need for additional port placement. The mean (range) operative time was 454 (420-496) min. Blood loss averaged 312 mL. No transfusions were required and no intraoperative complications occurred. All patients had negative surgical margins. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 5. CONCLUSION From our preliminary experience, RARC with PLND and ileal conduit urinary diversion is feasible and safe using the da Vinci SP surgical system. Further comparative studies with open and multi-arm robotic approaches are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Juan Garisto
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mohamed Eltemamy
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
404
|
Venkatramani V, Parekh DJ. Editorial Comment on: Does the Use of the Robot Decrease the Complication Rate Adherent to Radical Cystectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Open to Robotic Counterparts by Tzelves et al. (From: Tzelves L, Skolarikos A, Mourmouris P, et al. J Endourol 2019;33:971-984; DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0226). J Endourol 2019; 33:985. [PMID: 31544492 DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Venkatramani
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, Florida
| | - Dipen J Parekh
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
405
|
Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup. J Urol 2019; 203:522-529. [PMID: 31549935 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The RAZOR (Randomized Open versus Robotic Cystectomy) trial revealed noninferior 2-year progression-free survival for robotic radical cystectomy. This update was performed with extended followup for 3 years to determine potential differences between the approaches. We also report 3-year overall survival and sought to identify factors predicting recurrence, and progression-free and overall survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed the per protocol population of 302 patients from the RAZOR study. Cumulative recurrence was estimated using nonbladder cancer death as the competing risk event and the Gray test was applied to assess significance in differences. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log rank test. Predictors of outcomes were determined by Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS Estimated progression-free survival at 36 months was 68.4% (95% CI 60.1-75.3) and 65.4% (95% CI 56.8-72.7) in the robotic and open groups, respectively (p=0.600). At 36 months overall survival was 73.9% (95% CI 65.5-80.5) and 68.5% (95% CI 59.8-75.7) in the robotic and open groups, respectively (p=0.334). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence rates of recurrence (p=0.802). Patient age greater than 70 years, poor performance status and major complications were significant predictors of 36-month progression-free survival. Stage and positive margins were significant predictors of recurrence, and progression-free and overall survival. Surgical approach was not a significant predictor of any outcome. CONCLUSIONS This analysis showed no difference in recurrence, 3-year progression-free survival or 3-year overall survival for robotic vs open radical cystectomy. It provides important prospective data on the oncologic efficacy of robotic radical cystectomy and high level data for patient counseling.
Collapse
|
406
|
Taylor J, Meng X, Renson A, Smith AB, Wysock JS, Taneja SS, Huang WC, Bjurlin MA. Different models for prediction of radical cystectomy postoperative complications and care pathways. Ther Adv Urol 2019; 11:1756287219875587. [PMID: 31565072 PMCID: PMC6755632 DOI: 10.1177/1756287219875587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer has one of the highest rates of
morbidity among urologic surgery, but the ability to predict postoperative
complications remains poor. Our study objective was to create machine
learning models to predict complications and factors leading to extended
length of hospital stay and discharge to a higher level of care after
radical cystectomy. Methods: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement
Program, peri-operative adverse outcome variables for patients undergoing
elective radical cystectomy for bladder cancer from 2005 to 2016 were
extracted. Variables assessed include occurrence of minor, infectious,
serious, or any adverse events, extended length of hospital stay, and
discharge to higher-level care. To develop predictive models of radical
cystectomy complications, we fit generalized additive model (GAM), least
absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic, neural network,
and random forest models to training data using various candidate predictor
variables. Each model was evaluated on the test data using receiver
operating characteristic curves. Results: A total of 7557 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria, and
2221 complications occurred. LASSO logistic models demonstrated the highest
area under curve for predicting any complications (0.63), discharge to a
higher level of care (0.75), extended length of stay (0.68), and infectious
(0.62) adverse events. This was comparable with random forest in predicting
minor (0.60) and serious (0.63) adverse events. Conclusions: Our models perform modestly in predicting radical cystectomy complications,
highlighting both the complex cystectomy process and the limitations of
large healthcare datasets. Identifying the most important variable leading
to each type of adverse event may allow for further strategies to model
cystectomy complications and target optimization of modifiable variables
pre-operative to reduce postoperative adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Taylor
- Divison of Urologic Oncology, Department of
Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Divison of Urologic Oncology, Department of
Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Audrey Renson
- Department of Clinical Research, NYU Langone
Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Angela B. Smith
- Department of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive
Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - James S. Wysock
- Divison of Urologic Oncology, Department of
Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samir S. Taneja
- Divison of Urologic Oncology, Department of
Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - William C. Huang
- Divison of Urologic Oncology, Department of
Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
407
|
Van Hemelrijck M, Sparano F, Josephs D, Sprangers M, Cottone F, Efficace F. Patient-reported outcomes in randomised clinical trials of bladder cancer: an updated systematic review. BMC Urol 2019; 19:86. [PMID: 31521149 PMCID: PMC6744649 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0518-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite international recommendations of including patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised clinical trials (RCTs), a 2014 review concluded that few RCTs of bladder cancer (BC) report PRO as an outcome. We therefore aimed to update the 2014 review to synthesise current evidence-based knowledge of PROs from RCTs in BC. A secondary objective was to examine whether quality of PRO reporting has improved over time and to provide evidence-based recommendations for future studies in this area. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed/Medline, from April 2014 until June 2018. We included the RCTs identified in the previous review as well as newly published RCTs. Studies were evaluated using a predefined electronic-data extraction form that included information on basic trial demographics, clinical and PRO characteristics and standards of PRO reporting based on recommendation from the International Society of Quality of Life Research. RESULTS Since April 2014 only eight new RCTs for BC included PROs as a secondary outcome. In terms of methodology, only the proportion of RCTs documenting the extent of missing PRO data (75% vs 11.1%, p = 0.03) and the identification of PROs in trial protocols (50% vs 0%, p = 0.015) improved. Statistical approaches for dealing with missing data were not reported in most new studies (75%). CONCLUSION Little improvement into the uptake and assessment of PRO as an outcome in RCTs for BC has been made during recent years. Given the increase in (immunotherapy) drug trials with a potential for severe adverse events, there is urgent need to adopt the recommendations and standards available for PRO use in bladder cancer RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- King’s College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), London, SE1 9RT UK
| | - Francesco Sparano
- Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Disease (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| | - Debra Josephs
- King’s College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), London, SE1 9RT UK
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Oncology, London, UK
| | - Mirjam Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Location AMC, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Cottone
- Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Disease (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Disease (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
408
|
Michels CTJ, Wijburg CJ, Abma IL, Witjes JA, Grutters JPC, Rovers MM. Translation and validation of two disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (Bladder Cancer Index and FACT-Bl-Cys) in Dutch bladder cancer patients. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2019; 3:62. [PMID: 31522328 PMCID: PMC6745039 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-019-0149-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder-Cystectomy (FACT-Bl-Cys) were developed to measure disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in bladder cancer patients and patients treated with radical cystectomy, respectively. Both patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used in clinical practice, but are not yet validated according to the COSMIN criteria and not yet available in Dutch. Therefore, the aim of this study was to translate the BCI and FACT-Bl-Cys into Dutch and to evaluate their measurement properties according to the COSMIN criteria. METHODS The BCI and FACT-Bl-Cys were translated into Dutch using a forward-backward method, and subsequently administered at baseline (pre-operatively) and 3 months post-operatively in bladder cancer patients who received a radical cystectomy. Validity (content and construct), reliability (internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error), floor and ceiling effects, and responsiveness were assessed according to the COSMIN criteria. RESULTS Forward-backward translation encountered no particular linguistic problems. In total 260 patients completed the baseline measurement, while 182 patients completed the three-month measurement. Only a ceiling effect was identified for the BCI. Hypotheses testing for construct validity was satisfying, as 67% and 92% of the hypothesized correlations were confirmed. Structural validity was moderate for both measures, as confirmatory factor analyses showed limited fit. Reliability of both PROMs was good. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the BCI domains ranged from 0.47 to 0.93, minimal value of Cronbach's α was 0.70, smallest detectable change on group level (SDC group) ranged from 1.9 to 8.6. The ICC of the FACT-Bl-Cys domains ranged from 0.43 to 0.83, minimal value of Cronbach's α was 0.77, SDC group was around 1. Only the FACT-Bl-Cys total score was found to be responsive to changes in generic quality of life. CONCLUSIONS The Dutch versions of the BCI and FACT-Bl-Cys were shown to be reliable and have good content validity. Structural validity was limited for both measures. Only the FACT-Bl-Cys total score was responsive to changes in generic HRQOL. Despite some limitations, both PROMs seem suitable for use in clinical practice and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte T. J. Michels
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Carl J. Wijburg
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Inger L. Abma
- IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - J. Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Janneke P. C. Grutters
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Maroeska M. Rovers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
409
|
Honore M, Roberts MJ, Morton A, Teloken PE, Navaratnam A, Coughlin GD. Outcomes and learning curve for robotic‐assisted radical cystectomy: an Australian experience. ANZ J Surg 2019; 89:1593-1598. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.15413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Honore
- Department of UrologyRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Faculty of MedicineThe University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Matthew J. Roberts
- Department of UrologyRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Faculty of MedicineThe University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Andrew Morton
- Department of UrologyRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Patrick E. Teloken
- Department of UrologyRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Anojan Navaratnam
- Department of UrologyRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
410
|
Cacciamani GE, De Marco V, Sebben M, Rizzetto R, Cerruto MA, Porcaro AB, Gill IS, Artibani W. Robot-assisted Vescica Ileale Padovana: A New Technique for Intracorporeal Bladder Replacement Reproducing Open Surgical Principles. Eur Urol 2019; 76:381-390. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
411
|
|
412
|
Mannas MP, Lee T, Forbes CM, Hong T, Bisaillon A, Gleave ME, So AI, Mayson K, Black PC. Predicting complications following radical cystectomy with the ACS NSQIP universal surgical risk calculator. World J Urol 2019; 38:1215-1220. [PMID: 31456016 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02915-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical cystectomy (RC) is a challenging procedure with significant morbidity, though remains the standard of care treatment for many patients with bladder cancer. There has been debate regarding the utility of universal risk calculators to aid in point-of-care prediction of complications in individual patients preoperatively. We retrospectively evaluated the predictive value of the ACS NSQIP universal surgical risk calculator in our patients who underwent RC. METHODS A prospective cohort of patients undergoing RC was retrospectively reviewed between October 2014 and August 2017. Only patients who underwent a RC for genitourinary cancer without significant deviation from NSQIP surgery codes 51590, 51595, and 51596 (n = 29) were included. The accuracy of the risk calculator was assessed by ROC AUC and Brier scores for both NSQIP and Clavien-Dindo defined complications. Additionally, each NSQIP risk factor was individually assessed for association with postoperative complications. RESULTS 223 patients who underwent open or robotic RC (n = 18) were included for analysis. Determined by AUC C-stat and Brier scores, prediction was good for cardiac complications (0.80 and 0.021), fair for pneumonia (0.75 and 0.017), poor for UTI (0.64 and 0.078), 30-day mortality (0.62 and 0.013), any complication (0.60 and 0.19) and serious complication (0.60 and 0.17). There was a significant discordance between the rate of NSQIP predicted vs. Clavien-Dindo observed any and serious complications: 28.8% vs. 67.3%, and 25.3% vs. 11.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION The NSQIP universal surgical risk calculator did not perform with enough accuracy to consider adoption into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miles P Mannas
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V6N 2W6, Canada
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Taeweon Lee
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V6N 2W6, Canada
| | - Connor M Forbes
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V6N 2W6, Canada
| | - Tracey Hong
- Operations Director, Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Andrea Bisaillon
- Clinical Quality and Patient Safety Department, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Martin E Gleave
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V6N 2W6, Canada
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alan I So
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V6N 2W6, Canada
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kelly Mayson
- Department of Anesthesia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V6N 2W6, Canada.
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
413
|
Moschini M, Zamboni S, Soria F, Mathieu R, Xylinas E, Tan WS, Kelly JD, Simone G, Meraney A, Krishna S, Konety B, Mattei A, Baumeister P, Mordasini L, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gallina A, Stabile A, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Rink M, Necchi A, Karakiewicz PI, Rouprêt M, Koupparis A, Kassouf W, Scherr DS, Ploussard G, Boorjian SA, Lotan Y, Sooriakumaran P, Shariat SF. Open Versus Robotic Cystectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis Comparing Survival Outcomes. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8081192. [PMID: 31395826 PMCID: PMC6722857 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8081192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To assess the differential effect of robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) on survival outcomes in matched analyses performed on a large multicentric cohort. Methods: The study included 9757 patients with urothelial bladder cancer (BCa) treated in a consecutive manner at each of 25 institutions. All patients underwent radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching 2:1 was performed with two ORC patients matched to one RARC patient. The propensity-matched cohort included 1374 patients. Multivariable competing risk analyses accounting for death of other causes, tested association of surgical technique with recurrence and cancer specific mortality (CSM), before and after propensity score matching. Results: Overall, 767 (7.8%) patients underwent RARC and 8990 (92.2%) ORC. The median follow-up before and after propensity matching was 81 and 102 months, respectively. In the overall population, the 3-year recurrence rates and CSM were 37% vs. 26% and 34% vs. 24% for ORC vs. RARC (all p values > 0.1), respectively. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, RARC and ORC had similar recurrence and CSM rates before and after matching (all p values > 0.1). Conclusions: Patients treated with RARC and ORC have similar survival outcomes. This data is helpful in consulting patients until long term survival outcomes of level one evidence is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Stefania Zamboni
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology Bichat Hospital, Paris Descartes University, 75877 Paris, France
| | - Wei Shen Tan
- Division of Surgery and Intervention Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Department of Uro-Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London W1T 4EU, UK
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Intervention Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Department of Uro-Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London W1T 4EU, UK
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Anoop Meraney
- Urology Division, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Hartford, CT 06106, USA
| | - Suprita Krishna
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Badrinath Konety
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Baumeister
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Livio Mordasini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Urology, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Xavier Cathelineau
- Department of Urology, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Anthony Koupparis
- Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H4A3J1, Canada
| | - Douglas S Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10038, USA
| | | | - Stephen A Boorjian
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Prasanna Sooriakumaran
- Department of Uro-Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London W1T 4EU, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10021, USA.
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
414
|
Nelson MH, Quek ML. Perioperative mortality following radical cystectomy: the slippery slope of complications. Transl Androl Urol 2019; 8:S289-S290. [PMID: 31392148 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.02.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marc H Nelson
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Marcus L Quek
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
415
|
Seigne JD, Cass I, Wong SL. Requiem for Robotic Cancer Surgery? Not So Fast. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:3425-3427. [PMID: 31376038 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07669-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John D Seigne
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Ilana Cass
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
416
|
Teishima J, Matsubara A. Editorial Comment to Current status and future perspective of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Int J Urol 2019; 26:1042-1043. [PMID: 31364188 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Teishima
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Akio Matsubara
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
417
|
Fujimura T. Current status and future perspective of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Int J Urol 2019; 26:1033-1042. [PMID: 31364203 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy was reviewed 16 years after the initial robot-assisted radical cystectomy for the treatment of invasive bladder cancer. Articles associated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy and written in English were selected from the PubMed database from January 2003 to February 2019. The present review article focused on the distribution of robot-assisted radical cystectomy, patient selection, preoperative management, surgical technique, lymph node dissection, urinary diversion, recurrence pattern, oncological outcomes, cost, learning curve, complications and educational programs. A total of 400 articles were divided according to the country of the first author's affiliation. The USA was the most dominant at 198 (50%), whereas the number of articles from the countries belonging to the Urological Association of Asia was 15 (3.8%) for China, 17 (4.3%) for South Korea, 10 (2.5%) for Japan, eight (2%) for Taiwan, eight (2%) for Turkey and one (0.2%) for Iran. The percentage of robot-assisted radical cystectomy carried out is increasing, and intracorporeal urinary diversion and ileal neobladder are also frequently carried out. With a refined technique being performed in high-volume centers, robot-assisted radical cystectomy has contributed to the reduction in transfusion rate, length of stay and severe complications; however, it has not yet shown any cancer-specific survival benefits. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is not fully spread throughout the Urological Association of Asia. Further investigation with respect to worldwide results is needed to prove the real benefit of robot-assisted radical cystectomy regarding low morbidity, reduced total medical cost, and survival benefit. In the era of precision medicine, appropriate drug and surgery will be given based on each genetic profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Fujimura
- Department of Urology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
418
|
Tzelves L, Skolarikos A, Mourmouris P, Lazarou L, Kostakopoulos N, Manatakis DK, Kural AR. Does the Use of a Robot Decrease the Complication Rate Adherent to Radical Cystectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Open with Robotic Counterparts. J Endourol 2019; 33:971-984. [PMID: 31161777 DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the mainstay of treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In 2003, the first robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) was performed and since then many studies, mainly observational, were conducted to compare robotic and open methods. This study aims to assess perioperative outcomes between the two methods based on pooled data from existing literature. Methods: A literature search of articles in English and French languages was performed in three databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane) until 30th of June 2018, as well as in urology conference programs and reference lists of included studies. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018103063). Terms such as "robotic," "open," and "radical cystectomy" and synonyms were used for the searching algorithm. The primary outcome was the number of minor and major postoperative complications (Clavien grading system). Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Comparison of continuous outcomes was performed with weighted mean differences, while for dichotomous outcomes, odds ratios (ORs) were used. Review Manager 5.3 was used. Results: Fifty-four studies (5 randomized trials and 49 observational) were eligible, including 29,697 patients (6500 in the RARC group and 23,197 in the open radical cystectomy group). Minor complications (grade 1-2) in pooled data of 29 studies were fewer in the RARC group (OR = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-0.76, p < 0.001), a difference persisting after sensitivity analysis for 30 and 90 days. Major complications (grade 3-5) in 31 studies were fewer in the RARC group (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p = 0.009), but this difference disappeared in the 30-day subanalysis. RARC was associated with lower blood transfusion rates (p < 0.001), lower length of stay (p < 0.001), faster return to regular diet (p < 0.001), and lower postoperative mortality rates (p < 0.001), but longer operating time. Conclusions: RARC appears to be associated with fewer complications and favoring perioperative outcomes in comparison with the open method. Due to the observational nature of most studies, larger randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lazaros Tzelves
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Andreas Skolarikos
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Mourmouris
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Lazaros Lazarou
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kostakopoulos
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Ali Riza Kural
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
419
|
Rai BP, Bondad J, Vasdev N, Adshead J, Lane T, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Guru K, Chlosta PL, Aboumarzouk OM. Robot-assisted vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. BJU Int 2019; 125:765-779. [PMID: 31309688 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been suggested that, in comparison with open radical cystectomy (ORC), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) results in less blood loss, shorter convalescence and fewer complications, with equivalent short-term oncological and functional outcomes; however, uncertainty remains as to the magnitude of these benefits. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of RARC vs ORC in adults with bladder cancer. SEARCH METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search, with no restrictions on language of publication or publication status, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared RARC with ORC. The date of the last search was 1 July 2018. Databases searched included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1999 to July 2018), PubMed Embase (1999 to July 2018), Web of Science (1999 to July 2018), Cancer Research UK (www.cancerresearchuk.org/), and the Institute of Cancer Research (www.icr.ac.uk/). We also searched the following trial registers: ClinicalTrials.gov (clinicaltrials.gov/); BioMed Central International Standard Randomized Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry (www.isrctn.com); and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The review was based on a published protocol. Primary outcomes of the review were recurrence-free survival and major postoperative complications (Clavien grade III to V). Secondary outcomes were minor postoperative complications (Clavien grades I and II), transfusion requirement, length of hospital stay (days), quality of life, and positive surgical margins (%). Three review authors independently assessed relevant titles and abstracts of records identified by the literature search to determine which studies should be assessed further. Two review authors assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and rated the quality of evidence according to GRADE. We used Review Manager 5 to analyse the data. RESULTS We included in the review five RCTs comprising a total of 541 participants. Total numbers of participants included in the ORC and RARC cohorts were 270 and 271, respectively. We found that RARC and ORC may result in a similar time to recurrence (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 1.43; two trials, low-certainty evidence). In absolute terms at 5 years of follow-up, this corresponds to 16 more recurrences per 1000 participants (95% CI 79 fewer to 123 more) with 431 recurrences per 1000 participants for ORC. We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. RARC and ORC may result in similar rates of major complications (risk ratio [RR] 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.48; five trials, low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 11 more major complications per 1000 participants (95% CI 44 fewer to 89 more). We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. We were very uncertain whether RARC reduces minor complications (very-low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and very serious imprecision. RARC probably results in substantially fewer transfusions than ORC (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80; two trials, moderate-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 193 fewer transfusions per 1000 participants (95% CI 262 fewer to 92 fewer) based on 460 transfusion per 1000 participants for ORC. We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations. RARC may result in a slightly shorter hospital stay than ORC (mean difference -0.67, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.12; five trials, low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. RARC and ORC may result in a similar quality of life (standardized mean difference 0.08, 95% CI 0.32 lower to 0.16 higher; three trials, low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. RARC and ORC may result in similar positive surgical margin rates (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.40; five trials, low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to eight more (95% CI 21 fewer to 67 more) positive surgical margins per 1000 participants, based on 48 positive surgical margins per 1000 participants for ORC. We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that RARC and ORC may have similar outcomes with regard to time to recurrence, rates of major complications, quality of life, and positive surgical margin rates (all low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain whether the robotic approach reduces rates of minor complications (very-low-certainty evidence), although it probably reduces the risk of blood transfusions substantially (moderate-certainty evidence) and may reduce hospital stay slightly (low-certainty evidence). We were unable to conduct any of the preplanned subgroup analyses to assess the impact of patient age, pathological stage, body habitus, or surgeon expertise on outcomes. This review did not address issues of cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavan Prasad Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jasper Bondad
- Department of Urology, Southend Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, UK
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Jim Adshead
- Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Tim Lane
- Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Kamran Ahmed
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mohammed S Khan
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Khurshid Guru
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Piotr L Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
420
|
Bertolo R, Agudelo J, Garisto J, Armanyous S, Fergany A, Kaouk J. Perioperative Outcomes and Complications after Robotic Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion: Head-to-head Comparison From a Single-Institutional Prospective Study. Urology 2019; 129:98-105. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
421
|
Voigt M, Hemal K, Matthews C. Influence of Simple and Radical Cystectomy on Sexual Function and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Female Patients: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Sex Med Rev 2019; 7:408-415. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
422
|
Carrion A, Piñero A, Raventós C, Lozano F, Díaz F, Morote J. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of robot assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal vs intracorporeal urinary diversion. Actas Urol Esp 2019; 43:277-283. [PMID: 31036392 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare perioperative outcomes and complications of robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with extracorporeal (ECUD) vs. intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) for bladder cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective revision of 43 patients who underwent RARC for bladder cancer between 2015-2018 with at least 3 months of follow-up. The analysis included the initial series of RARC performed by one surgeon with extensive experience in open radical cystectomy. RESULTS Forty-three patients, 40 men (93%) and 3 women (7%), with a median age of 65 years (44-83) and mean follow-up of 27.7 months (±20.1) underwent RARC. A ECUD was performed in 22 cases (51%), of whom 10 were ileal conduits (45.5%) and 12 neobladders (54.5), and ICUD in 21 cases (49%), of whom 14 were ileal conduits (66.7%) and 7 neobladders (33.3%). Clinical and preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups. The median operative time was 360 minutes (240-540) and length of hospital stay was 12 days (7-73). Thirty-five patients (81%) had postoperative complications, of whom 10 (23%) were major. Operative time, peroperative complications, pathological stage, positive margins, and number of lymph nodes removed did not significantly differ among groups. Patients who underwent ECUD had a higher rate of uretero-ileal strictures than those with ICUD (45.5% vs. 14.3%, P=.026). Among the neobladders, the ECUD developed a higher rate of urethro-neobladder stricture than the ICUD (33% vs. 0%, P=.044). CONCLUSIONS RARC with ICUD achieved peroperative outcomes and complication rates comparable than those with ECUD. The ICUD could reduce the risk of developing uretero-ileal and urethro-neobladder strictures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Carrion
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
| | - A Piñero
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - C Raventós
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - F Lozano
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - F Díaz
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - J Morote
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
423
|
EDITORIAL COMMENT. Urology 2019; 129:97-98. [PMID: 31235008 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
424
|
Tostivint V, Roumiguié M, Cabarrou B, Verhoest G, Gas J, Coloby P, Soulié M, Thoulouzan M, Beauval JB. [Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction for bladder cancer: robotic-assisted versus open-radical cystectomy for perioperative outcomes, functional results and quality of life]. Prog Urol 2019; 29:440-448. [PMID: 31239101 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Open radical cystectomy (ORC) is the gold standard technique for carcinologic cystectomies. Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) was introduced in 2003 and its development is booming. OBJECTIVE To compare ORC and RARC with totally intracorporal (IC) orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction, in terms of perioperative outcomes, morbidity, functional results and quality of life (Qol). PATIENTS AND METHODS From February 2010 to February 2017, a French multicentric, prospective study on patients who had a RC and ONB reconstruction for bladder cancer was performed. All patients completed the following questionnaires: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic (QLQ-C30) and the bladder cancer specific instruments (QLQ-BLM30). To assess urinary symptoms, patients also completed the Urinary Symptom Profile questionnaire (USP) and a three-day voiding diary. Patients were divided in two groups: ORC and RARC. RESULTS We included 72 patients: 55 in the ORC group (76,4%) and 17 (33,6%) in the RARC group. Operative time was longer in RARC group (median 360 vs 300min; P<0.001) but length of stay was 5 days shorter (median 12 vs 17 days; P<0,05). Patients in RARC group had less blood transfusion (0 vs 23.6%; P<0.05), but a higher rate of uretero-ileal anastomosis stenosis and eventration at long term (respectively 25.5 vs 3.6% et 23 vs 2%; P<0.05). No statistical differences were found concerning quality of life items and functional results between the groups. CONCLUSION RARC with totally IC ONB reconstruction lead to less perioperative morbidity with a reduced rate of blood transfusion and a reduced hospital length of stay. At long term, RARC could provide higher rates of uretero-ileal stenosis and eventration. RARC and ORC do not have any differences in terms of functional outcomes and Qol at long term after ONB reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Tostivint
- Département d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France.
| | - M Roumiguié
- Département d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France.
| | - B Cabarrou
- Institut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT, 31100 Toulouse, France.
| | - G Verhoest
- Département d'urologie CHU de Rennes-Pontchaillou, 35000 Rennes, France.
| | - J Gas
- Département d'urologie, centre hospitalier Pontoise, 95303 Pontoise, France.
| | - P Coloby
- Département d'urologie, centre hospitalier Pontoise, 95303 Pontoise, France.
| | - M Soulié
- Département d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France.
| | - M Thoulouzan
- Département d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France.
| | - J-B Beauval
- Département d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
425
|
Ghandour R, Singla N, Lotan Y. Treatment Options and Outcomes in Nonmetastatic Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Trends Cancer 2019; 5:426-439. [PMID: 31311657 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) represents 25% of newly diagnosed bladder cancer. MIBC is aggressive and requires timely management. The current standard of care is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, an approach that could result in significant morbidities. Modifications in the chemotherapy regimens, as well as in perioperative care and surgical approach, have resulted in better overall toxicity profile and faster recovery. However, bladder-preservation in carefully selected patients can lead to acceptable oncological outcomes and better quality of life. Optimization of bladder-preservation protocols and proper identification of patients who tolerate and respond to various treatment modalities will significantly impact patient survival in the coming future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashed Ghandour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
426
|
Brassetti A, Cacciamani G, Anceschi U, Ferriero M, Tuderti G, Miranda G, Mastroianni R, Desai M, Aron M, Gill I, Gallucci M, Simone G. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD): a multi-center study. World J Urol 2019; 38:837-843. [PMID: 31190152 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02842-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report survival outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) for recurrent/muscle-invasive non-metastatic bladder cancer. METHODS Prospectively maintained databases were queried for "robotic cystectomy AND ICUD". Patients treated after October 2013 and those treated without curative intent were excluded. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot stage-specific survival outcomes, computed at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses assessed predictors of recurrence-free (RFS), cancer-specific (CSS) and overall (OS) survival. RESULTS 113 consecutive patients were included, mostly men (82%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 23% of cases, median lymph node (LN) yield was 36 (IQR 28-45) and the rate of positive surgical margins (PSM) was 8%. Orthotopic ileal neobladder was the preferred ICUD type (57%). An organ-confined disease was observed in 51% of cases and 21% were pT0 on final histology. Overall, 5-year RFS, CSS and OS probabilities were 58 ± 5%, 61 ± 5% and 54 ± 5%, respectively. At Kaplan-Meier method, tumor stage group was a significant predictor of survival probabilities (all p < 0.001) and this was confirmed at multivariable Cox regression analysis (RFS-OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.58-3.32; p < 0.001) (CSS-OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.3-2.53; p < 0.001) (OS-OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.46-3.14; p < 0.001). PSM status was associated to CSS (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.13-5.69; p = 0.024) and OS (OR 2.82; 95% CI 1.17-6.77; p = 0.021), but did not predict RFS (p = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS Long-term oncologic outcomes after RARC with ICUD appear similar to recent robotic series with extracorporeal diversion and historical open experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gus Miranda
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Mihir Desai
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Monish Aron
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
427
|
Porreca A, Mineo Bianchi F, Romagnoli D, D'Agostino D, Corsi P, Giampaoli M, Salvaggio A, Bianchi L, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Artibani W. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion: surgical and early functional outcomes through the learning curve in a single high-volume center. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:261-269. [PMID: 31124038 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00977-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study is to report surgical and early functional outcomes of first 100 patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) in a single center. The main surgeon (A.P.) attended a modular training program at a referring center mentored by a worldwide-recognized robotic surgeon (P.W.). The program consisted of: (a) 10 h of theoretical lessons; (b) video session (c) step-by-step in vivo modular training. Each procedure was performed as taught, without any technique variation. Demographics, intra-operative data and post-operative complications, along with early functional outcomes, were recorded for each patient. We retrospectively evaluated the first consecutive 100 patients submitted to RARC with totally ICUD from July 2015 to December 2018. Median age at surgery was 69 years (IQR 60-74). 52 (52%), 32 (32%), and 17 (17%) patients received orthotopic neobladder, ileal conduit and uretero-cutaneostomy, respectively. Median operative time was 410 min. A median number of lymph nodes retrieved were 27 and median estimated blood loss was 240 mL with median hospitalization time of 7 days. All procedures were completed successfully without open conversion. A statistically significant improvement was found in the late (30-90 post-operative days) post-operative complications (p = 0.02) and operative time for urinary derivation. At multivariate logistic regression model ASA score ≥ 3 (OR = 4.2, p = 0.002) and number of lymph nodes retrieved (OR = 1.16, p = 0.02) were found to be predictors of 90-day complications. An adequate modular training is paramount to obtain successful results and reduce the learning curve of RARC, as demonstrated by our experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Porreca
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Di Abano, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - F Mineo Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Di Abano, Abano Terme, Italy.
- Department of Urology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - D Romagnoli
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Di Abano, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - D D'Agostino
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Di Abano, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - P Corsi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Di Abano, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - M Giampaoli
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Di Abano, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - A Salvaggio
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Di Abano, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - L Bianchi
- Department of Urology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Schiavina
- Department of Urology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - E Brunocilla
- Department of Urology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - W Artibani
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Di Abano, Abano Terme, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
428
|
Kimura S, Iwata T, Foerster B, Fossati N, Briganti A, Nasu Y, Egawa S, Abufaraj M, Shariat SF. Comparison of perioperative complications and health-related quality of life between robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol 2019; 26:760-774. [PMID: 31083783 PMCID: PMC6851708 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
To compare postoperative complications and health‐related quality of life of patients undergoing robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with those of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy. A systematic search was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement. A pooled meta‐analysis was carried out to assess the differences between robot‐assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy according to randomized and non‐randomized comparative studies, respectively. We identified six randomized comparative studies and 31 non‐randomized comparative studies. Most robot‐assisted radical cystectomy patients were treated with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Robot‐assisted radical cystectomy was associated with longer operative times, and lower blood loss and transfusion rates compared with open radical cystectomy in both randomized comparative studies and non‐randomized comparative studies. There was no significant difference between robot‐assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy in the rate of patients with any or major complications within 90 days both in randomized comparative studies and non‐randomized comparative studies. Non‐randomized comparative studies reported a lower rate of complications at 30 days, mortality at 90 days and length of stay for patients treated with robot‐assisted radical cystectomy, which were not confirmed in randomized comparative studies. Additionally, there were no differences in postoperative quality of life score assessment at 3 and 6 months between robot‐assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy. Robot‐assisted radical cystectomy is associated with less blood loss and lower transfusion rates. There is no difference in complications, length of stay, mortality, and quality of life between robot‐assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy. Data from non‐randomized comparative studies favor perioperative outcomes in robot‐assisted radical cystectomy patients, the failure to confirm in randomized comparative studies, likely due to bias in study design and reporting. Further randomized comparative studies comparing postoperative complications and quality of life between robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion and open radical cystectomy are required to assess potential differences between these two surgical approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Beat Foerster
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
429
|
Tyritzis SI, Gaya JM, Wallestedt-Lantz A, Pini G, Everaerts W, de Naeyer G, Palou J, Kelly J, Wiklund NP. Current role of robotic bladder cancer surgery. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:301-308. [PMID: 31086134 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03435-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex and morbid surgical procedures in urology, that is not devoid of postoperative complications. Minimally invasive surgery, and especially robot-assisted RC (RARC) has emerged as an alternative to open RC (ORC) in an attempt to minimize surgical morbidity and facilitate the surgical approach. The aim of this paper was to present the current knowledge on the oncological efficacy and complication outcomes of RARC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A non-systematic review on all relevant studies with the keywords "Radical cystectomy," "Open," "Robot-assisted," "Complications," "Recurrence," "Survival," "Neobladder," "Potency," "Continence" and "Intracorporeal" was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, American Urological Association (AUA), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS RARC shows similar lymph node yields and positive surgical margin rates as well as perioperative complication outcomes compared with ORC. RARC exhibits significantly less blood loss and less intra- and postoperative blood transfusion. Moreover, survival and recurrence rates are not related to the surgical approach. Finally, RARC seems to be more expensive and has a longer operating time compared to the open technique. CONCLUSIONS As current evidence shows, RARC seems as a technically feasible and safe procedure, providing equivalent perioperative and oncological results compared to ORC. More prospective, randomized-controlled trials are necessary to draw definitive conclusions on all comparative aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros I Tyritzis
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden - .,Department of Urology, HYGEIA Hospital, Athens, Greece -
| | - Josep M Gaya
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Wallestedt-Lantz
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden
| | - Giovannalberto Pini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Turro Hospital, San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - John Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nils P Wiklund
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden.,ICAHN School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
430
|
Jubber I, Pang KH, Groves R, Reed O, Noon AP, Catto JWF, Cumberbatch MG. Impact of Anaesthetist Volume on Radical Cystectomy Outcomes. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 7:117-123. [PMID: 31072807 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy (RC) is a gold standard treatment for aggressive bladder cancer. Higher surgical volumes through centralisation are associated with improved RC outcomes. The impact of anaesthetist experience and RC volume on outcomes is less clear. OBJECTIVE We sought to examine RC outcomes stratified by anaesthetist volume using a contemporary homogenous series. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected, single-surgeon database of RC patients over a 10-yr period. INTERVENTION Four hundred and fifty-three consecutive patients underwent RC, including 430 (95%) with anaesthetist annotation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Anaesthetists were stratified into low- (<10 cases) and high-volume (≥10 cases) classes. Primary outcomes were blood loss, transfusion rates, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative mortality. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In total, 63 anaesthetists were included for analysis (median two RCs per anaesthetist). Of 63 anaesthetists, 56 (88.9%) and seven (11.1%) were classified, respectively, into low and high volume, and these provided cover for 110 (25.6%) and 320 (74.4%) patients, respectively. When comparing high- versus low-volume anaesthetists, there were shorter LOS (median [interquartile range {IQR}]: 10 [6-14] vs 12 [7-19] d, p = 0.008), lower blood loss (median [IQR]: 600 [384-1000] vs 800 [500-1275] ml, p<0.001), and lower transfusion rate (23/320, 7.2% vs 22/110, 20%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in disease-specific mortality, overall mortality, or readmission rates. In multivariable analysis, a high anaesthetist volume was independently associated with transfusion rate (odds ratio 0.24 [0.07-0.83], p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Higher-volume anaesthetists have lower transfusion rates for RC patients. Whilst LOS and blood loss may also differ with experience, there is no difference in mortality after RC. PATIENT SUMMARY Radical cystectomy is a major operation. Experienced anaesthetists give fewer blood products to patients undergoing this operation. They may also help reduce blood loss and speed recovery. However, all other recovery measures were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Jubber
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Karl H Pang
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ruth Groves
- Department of Anaesthetics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Oliver Reed
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Aidan P Noon
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
431
|
Murali-Krishnan S, Pang KH, Greco F, Fiori C, Catto JW, Vavassori VL, Esperto F. Bladder-sparing treatment in MIBC: where do we stand? MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:101-112. [DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03317-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
432
|
Gandaglia G, Larcher A, Gallina A, Fossati N, Briganti A, Montorsi F. Requiem for Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 2:196-197. [PMID: 31017096 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In the hands of experienced surgeons at referral centers, robotic surgery with an intracorporeal urinary diversion has the potential to provide better perioperative outcomes without affecting cancer control when compared to open surgery for radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
433
|
Bianchi FM, Romagnoli D, D'Agostino D, Corsi P, Giampaoli M, Salvaggio A, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Artibani W, Porreca A. Is robotic approach useful to palliate advanced bladder cancer? A monocentric single surgeon experience. Cent European J Urol 2019; 72:113-120. [PMID: 31482017 PMCID: PMC6715081 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to assess surgical and functional outcomes of 17 consecutive patients undergoing robot- assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with palliative intent in a monocentric single surgeon series. Material and methods We collected data from 17 consecutive patients who underwent RARC with palliative intent performed by a single surgeon at our institution. Patients undergoing palliative RARC were those with advanced bladder cancer (BC) or advanced comorbidities. Clinical, surgical and functional outcomes were prospectively collected. Patients completed a specific questionnaire (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder Cancer, FACT-BL) before and after surgery to assess the role of palliative RARC in terms of quality of life improvement. Results Median age at surgery was 78 years, with median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and age-adjusted CCI of 3 and 7, respectively. Clinical stage was T2, T3 or T4 in 7, 8 and 2 patients respectively, with 52.9% and 29.4% with cN+ and cM+ disease. Median estimated blood loss was 200 ml, with 1 patient requiring intra-operative blood transfusion. Median hospital stay was 7 days. A total of 3 and 2 patients were re-hospitalized during the first 30 and 30–90 post-operative days, respectively. One major Clavien grade complication was recorded. At median follow-up of 8 months, 9 and 2 patients succumbed due to tumor progression and other causes. Pre-operative and post-operative FACT-BL scores improved significantly in each domain. Conclusions A RARC is a safe and feasible technique which could be offered as part of palliative care in patients with advanced BC or comorbidities. Precise guidelines for palliating BC patients should be better.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Mineo Bianchi
- Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Department of Urology, Bologna, Italy.,Abano Terme Hospital, Department of Urology, Abano Terme, Italy
| | | | | | - Paolo Corsi
- Abano Terme Hospital, Department of Urology, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Marco Giampaoli
- Abano Terme Hospital, Department of Urology, Abano Terme, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Department of Urology, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Department of Urology, Bologna, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Abano Terme Hospital, Department of Urology, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Abano Terme Hospital, Department of Urology, Abano Terme, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
434
|
Rai BP, Bondad J, Vasdev N, Adshead J, Lane T, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Guru K, Chlosta PL, Aboumarzouk OM. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 4:CD011903. [PMID: 31016718 PMCID: PMC6479207 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011903.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been suggested that in comparison with open radical cystectomy, robotic-assisted radical cystectomy results in less blood loss, shorter convalescence, and fewer complications with equivalent short-term oncological and functional outcomes; however, uncertainty remains as to the magnitude of these benefits. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in adults with bladder cancer. SEARCH METHODS Review authors conducted a comprehensive search with no restrictions on language of publication or publication status for studies comparing open radical cystectomy and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. The date of the last search was 1 July 2018 for the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1999 to July 2018), PubMed Embase (1999 to July 2018), Web of Science (1999 to July 2018), Cancer Research UK (www.cancerresearchuk.org/), and the Institute of Cancer Research (www.icr.ac.uk/). We searched the following trials registers: ClinicalTrials.gov (clinicaltrials.gov/), BioMed Central International Standard Randomized Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry (www.isrctn.com), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. SELECTION CRITERIA We searched for randomised controlled trials that compared robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with open radical cystectomy (ORC). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS This study was based on a published protocol. Primary outcomes of the review were recurrence-free survival and major postoperative complications (class III to V). Secondary outcomes were minor postoperative complications (class I and II), transfusion requirement, length of hospital stay (days), quality of life, and positive margins (%). Three review authors independently assessed relevant titles and abstracts of records identified by the literature search to determine which studies should be assessed further. Two review authors assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and rated the quality of evidence according to GRADE. We used Review Manager 5 to analyse the data. MAIN RESULTS We included in the review five randomised controlled trials comprising a total of 541 participants. Total numbers of participants included in the ORC and RARC cohorts were 270 and 271, respectively.Primary outomesTime-to-recurrence: Robotic cystectomy and open cystectomy may result in a similar time to recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.43); 2 trials; low-certainty evidence). In absolute terms at 5 years of follow-up, this corresponds to 16 more recurrences per 1000 participants (95% CI 79 fewer to 123 more) with 431 recurrences per 1000 participants for ORC. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and imprecision.Major complications (Clavien grades 3 to 5): Robotic cystectomy and open cystectomy may result in similar rates of major complications (risk ratio (RR) 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.48); 5 trials; low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 11 more major complications per 1000 participants (95% CI 44 fewer to 89 more). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and imprecision.Secondary outcomesMinor complications (Clavien grades 1 and 2): We are very uncertain whether robotic cystectomy may reduce minor complications (very low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and for very serious imprecision.Transfusion rate: Robotic cystectomy probably results in substantially fewer transfusions than open cystectomy (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80; 2 trials; moderate-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 193 fewer transfusions per 1000 participants (95% CI 262 fewer to 92 fewer) based on 460 transfusion per 1000 participants for ORC. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations.Hospital stay: Robotic cystectomy may result in a slightly shorter hospital stay than open cystectomy (mean difference (MD) -0.67, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.12); 5 trials; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and imprecision.Quality of life: Robotic cystectomy and open cystectomy may result in a similar quality of life (standard mean difference (SMD) 0.08, 95% CI 0.32 lower to 0.16 higher; 3 trials; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and imprecision.Positive margin rates: Robotic cystectomy and open cystectomy may result in similar positive margin rates (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.40; 5 trials; low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 8 more (95% CI 21 fewer to 67 more) positive margins per 1000 participants based on 48 positive margins per 1000 participants for ORC. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Robotic cystectomy and open cystectomy may have similar outcomes with regard to time to recurrence, rates of major complications, quality of life, and positive margin rates (all low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain whether the robotic approach reduces rates of minor complications (very low-certainty evidence), although it probably reduces the risk of blood transfusions substantially (moderate-certainty evidence) and may reduce hospital stay slightly (low-certainty evidence). We were unable to conduct any of the preplanned subgroup analyses to assess the impact of patient age, pathological stage, body habitus, or surgeon expertise on outcomes. This review did not address issues of cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavan Prasad Rai
- Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of UrologyNewcastle Upon TyneUK
| | - Jasper Bondad
- Southend HospitalDepartment of UrologyPrittlewell ChaseWestcliff‐on‐SeaUKSS0 0RY
| | | | - Jim Adshead
- Lister HospitalDepartment of UrologyStevenageUK
| | - Tim Lane
- Lister HospitalDepartment of UrologyStevenageUK
| | - Kamran Ahmed
- King's College LondonMRC Centre for Transplantation, Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, School of MedicineSt Thomas StreetLondonEnglandUKSE1 9RT
| | - Mohammed S Khan
- King's College LondonMRC Centre for Transplantation, Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, School of MedicineSt Thomas StreetLondonEnglandUKSE1 9RT
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- King's College LondonMRC Centre for Transplantation, Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, School of MedicineSt Thomas StreetLondonEnglandUKSE1 9RT
| | - Khurshid Guru
- Roswell Park Cancer InstituteDepartment of UrologyBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Piotr L Chlosta
- Jagiellonian University, Collegium MedicumDepartment of UrologyGrzegorzecka 18KrakowPoland31531
| | - Omar M Aboumarzouk
- NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeDepartment of UrologyQueen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowScotlandUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
435
|
Azhar RA, Elkoushy MA, Aldousari S. Robot-assisted urological surgery in the Middle East: Where are we and how far can we go? Arab J Urol 2019; 17:106-113. [PMID: 31285921 PMCID: PMC6600062 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2019.1601003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in Urology in the Middle East, and its status and future perspectives. Methods: A Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) search was performed using the following keywords: ‘robotics’, ‘robot-assisted surgery’, ‘laparoscopy’, at first with each specific procedure name, such as radical cystectomy, followed by ‘Middle East’ and country names. All abstracts and articles in English that adhered to the scope of the current issue were selected, giving special consideration to relevant landmark articles and those describing trends and the future of RAS in Urology. Results: Only a few index case reports characterised RAS in the Middle East. The Middle East possess only 1% of the da Vinci® Surgical Systems (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) installed worldwide, including 19 in Saudi Arabia; six in Qatar; two in each of Kuwait and Lebanon; three in the United Arab Emirates; and only one in Egypt. The total number of RAS performed in the Middle East is low compared to Europe and the USA. Many countries in the Middle East still lack surgical robots despite having the expertise and appropriate caseload, whilst others seem not to utilise the surgical robot at a suitable rate, as reflected by the sparse number of operated cases and outgoing publications. There are major differences in RAS availability, usage, and perception according to the geographical place of practice and acceptance of robots by surgeons and patients. Conclusion: RAS in Urology continues to grow in the Middle East, with increasing caseloads and diversity of operated cases. Acceptance of robots by Middle East surgeons is significantly increasing. Abbreviations: 3D: three-dimensional; KSA: Kingdom Saudi Arabia;MIS: minimally invasive surgery; RAA: robot-assisted adrenalectomy; RAP: robot-assisted pyeloplasty; (O)(RA)PN: (open) (robot-assisted) partial nephrectomy; RAS: robot-assisted surgery; (O)(RA)RC: (open) (robot-assisted) radical cystectomy; (RA)RP: (robot-assisted) radical prostatectomy; SAUC: Sabah Al-Ahmad Urology Center
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raed A Azhar
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed A Elkoushy
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Saad Aldousari
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
436
|
Hosseini A, Ebbing J, Collins J. Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy and continent urinary diversion. Scand J Urol 2019; 53:81-88. [DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1598486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Abolfazl Hosseini
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institut, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Ebbing
- Urology, Universitat Basel Medizinische Fakultat, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Justin Collins
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institut, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
437
|
Oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2019; 37:1557-1570. [PMID: 30976902 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02708-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The efficacy of RARC in oncologic outcomes compared ORC is controversial. We assess potential differences in oncologic outcomes between robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC). METHODS We performed the literature search systematically according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. A pooled meta-analysis was performed to assess the difference in oncologic outcomes between RARC and ORC, separately in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRCTs). RESULTS Five RCTs and 28 NRCTs were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. There was no difference in the rate of overall positive surgical margin (PSM) in RCTs, while NRCTs showed a lower rate for RARC. There was no difference in the soft tissue PSM rate between RARC and ORC in both RCTs and NRCTs. There was no difference in the lymph node yield by standard and extended lymph node dissection between RARC and ORC in both RCTs and NRCTs. There was no significant difference in survival outcomes between RARC and ORC in both RCTs and NRCTs. CONCLUSIONS Based on the current evidence, there is no difference in the rate of PSMs, lymph node yield, recurrence rate and location as well as short-term survival outcomes between RARC and ORC in RCTs. In NRCTs, only PSM rates were better for RARC compared to ORC, but this was likely due to selection and reporting bias which are inherent to retrospective study designs.
Collapse
|
438
|
Kaouk J, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Bertolo R. Single-port Robotic Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion During Radical Cystectomy Using the SP Surgical System: Step-by-step Technique. Urology 2019; 130:196-200. [PMID: 30965039 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the step-by-step technique for robotic intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICUD) following radical cystectomy performed by using the novel da Vinci SP surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). METHODS Four consecutive patients (2 males and 2 females) were initially counseled for robotic cystectomy with ICUD performed by using the da Vinci SP surgical system. Surgeries were performed by duplicating the steps of the institutional approach for intracorporeal ICUD performed with the multiarms robotic platform. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Data were collected under institutional review board approval (IRB 13-780). RESULTS Single-port robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ICUD was successfully completed in 3 patients (2 males and 1 female). Mean robotic operative time for ICUD was 75 minutes (range 67-90). There was no conversion to standard multiarms robotic approach. One patient needed to be converted to extracorporeal urinary diversion due to severe adhesions of small bowels. No additional ports were placed. Neither transfusions nor intraoperative complications occurred. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 5. One patient reported self-limited nausea and vomiting after discharge (Clavien grade I). CONCLUSION In our preliminary experience, ICUD after robot-assisted radical cystectomy is feasible using the da Vinci SP surgical system. Further comparative studies with open and multiarms robotic approaches are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| | - Juan Garisto
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mohamed Eltemamy
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
439
|
|
440
|
Abrishami P, Boer A, Horstman K. When the Evidence Basis Breeds Controversies: Exploring the Value Profile of Robotic Surgery Beyond the Early Introduction Phase. Med Care Res Rev 2019; 77:596-608. [PMID: 30902036 DOI: 10.1177/1077558719832797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This article investigates qualitatively the value profile of the da Vinci® surgical robot after almost two decades of extensive clinical use and research. We aimed to understand whether the swiftly growing body of published studies on robotic prostate surgery can now, that is, beyond an early stage, guide decisions on the acquisition, procurement, and public provision of this innovation. We explored both published studies and the perspectives of diverse stakeholders in the Netherlands. Both arenas represent conflicting, often polarised arguments on the (added) value of da Vinci surgery. What was unclear a decade ago due to lack of evidence is now unclear because of controversies about evidence. The article outlines controversial value issues and indicates the unlikelihood that awaiting more research - amid the mantra "further studies are needed" - will resolve the controversy. The study underscores multi-stakeholder deliberation to resolve controversies regarding the value of advanced medical innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payam Abrishami
- Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Boer
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
441
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dipen J Parekh
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine - Urology, Miami, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
442
|
Moschini M, Soria F, Mathieu R, Xylinas E, D'Andrea D, Tan WS, Kelly JD, Simone G, Tuderti G, Meraney A, Krishna S, Konety B, Zamboni S, Baumeister P, Mattei A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Galucci M, Rink M, Karakiewicz PI, Rouprêt M, Aziz A, Perry M, Rowe E, Koupparis A, Kassouf W, Scherr DS, Ploussard G, Boorjian SA, Sooriakumaran P, Shariat SF. Propensity-score-matched comparison of soft tissue surgical margins status between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:179.e1-179.e7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
443
|
Audenet F, Attalla K, Giordano M, Pfail J, Lubin MA, Waingankar N, Gainsburg D, Badani KK, Sim A, Sfakianos JP. Prospective implementation of a nonopioid protocol for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:300.e17-300.e23. [PMID: 30777392 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a nonopioid (NOP) perioperative pain management protocol for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We prospectively included 52 consecutive patients undergoing RARC at our institution for bladder cancer. Patients received a multimodal pain management protocol, including a combination of nonopioid pain medications and regional anesthesia. For comparison, we retrospectively included 41 consecutive patients who received the same procedure before implementation of the NOP protocol. RESULTS There was no significant difference in demographic and perioperative characteristics between the two groups. Patients included in the NOP protocol received a much lower dose of postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (2.5 [IQR: 0-23] vs. 44 [14.5-128], P < 0.001), with no difference in pain scores. In the NOP protocol, the median time to regular diet was significantly shorter (4days [IQR: 3-5] vs. 5days [IQR: 4-8], P = 0.002) and the length of stay was 2days shorter compared to the control group (5days [IQR: 4-7] vs. 7days [IQR: 6-11], P < 0.001). When evaluating the direct costs within 30days after initial surgery, the NOP protocol was associated with an 8.6% reduction as compared to the control group (P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, the receipt of the NOP protocol was a significant predictor of a length of stay <7days after RARC (OR: 12.09; 95% CI: 1.70-140; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS The prospective implementation of a NOP protocol for patients undergoing RARC is feasible, allowing for minimal narcotic usage and provides benefits to patients, institutions, and population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Kyrollis Attalla
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Morgane Giordano
- Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn school of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - John Pfail
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Marc A Lubin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Nikhil Waingankar
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Gainsburg
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn school of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Ketan K Badani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Alan Sim
- Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn school of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
444
|
Khetrapal P, Catto JWF, Kelly JD. Robot-assisted versus open cystectomy in the RAZOR trial. Lancet 2019; 393:644-645. [PMID: 30782337 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32998-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pramit Khetrapal
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW1 2FD, UK; Department of Urology, University College Hospital at Westmoreland Street, London, UK.
| | - James W F Catto
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW1 2FD, UK; Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW1 2FD, UK; Department of Urology, University College Hospital at Westmoreland Street, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
445
|
Parekh DJ, Venkatramani V. Robot-assisted versus open cystectomy in the RAZOR trial - Authors' reply. Lancet 2019; 393:645-646. [PMID: 30782338 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32848-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dipen J Parekh
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
446
|
Larcher A, Gandaglia G, Wiklund P, Mottrie A, Briganti A, Montorsi F. Robot-assisted versus open cystectomy in the RAZOR trial. Lancet 2019; 393:645. [PMID: 30782339 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33006-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
447
|
Dal Moro F. Tomorrow (and surgery) never dies. Lancet 2019; 393:642-644. [PMID: 30782336 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33069-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology-Urology, University of Padova, Padova 35128, Italy; Urologic Clinic, University of Udine, Udine 33100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
448
|
Faraj K, Chang YHH, Neville MR, Blodgett G, Etzioni DA, Habermann EB, Andrews PE, Castle EP, Humphreys MR, Tyson MD. Robotic vs. open cystectomy: How length-of-stay differences relate conditionally to age. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:354.e1-354.e8. [PMID: 30770298 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The length-of-stay (LOS) benefit of minimally invasive cystectomy varies in the published literature, potentially because of subgroup effects. Here, we investigated the effect of minimally invasive cystectomy on LOS among different age groups. METHODS AND MATERIALS Adult patients who underwent cystectomy (open or minimally invasive) from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016, were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the adjusted association between the surgical approach and LOS after stratifying patients by age (40-64, 65-79, and ≥80 years). A sensitivity analysis was performed after multiple imputation by using age as a continuous variable with a third-order polynomial term. RESULTS Of the 5,561 patients identified, 640 underwent minimally invasive cystectomy and 4,921 had open cystectomy. The unadjusted analysis showed that minimally invasive cystectomy was associated with a shorter mean LOS compared with the open approach (8.0 vs. 9.7 days; P < 0.001). The predicted difference in LOS between the 2 approaches was 0.72 days (95% confidence interval (CI), -0.28 to 1.72; P = 0.16) for patients aged 40 to 64 years, 1.48 days (95% CI, 0.73-2.23; P < 0.001) for 65 to 79 years, and 2.56 days (95% CI, 0.84-4.29; P = 0.01) for ≥80 years favoring the minimally invasive approach. The sensitivity analysis did not materially change the results. CONCLUSIONS Older patients may derive more LOS benefit from minimally invasive approaches than younger patients. Given the greater expense associated with the minimally invasive approach, an age-adapted strategy to using this technology may be reasonable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kassem Faraj
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | - Gail Blodgett
- Biostatistics, and Patient Collaborator, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - David A Etzioni
- Department of Urology, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Paul E Andrews
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Erik P Castle
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Mark D Tyson
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ.
| |
Collapse
|
449
|
Ohlmann CH, Hadaschik B. Re: Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. Eur Urol 2019; 75:875. [PMID: 30718007 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
450
|
Kanno T, Ito K, Sawada A, Saito R, Kobayashi T, Yamada H, Inoue T, Ogawa O. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a Japanese multicenter cohort. Int J Urol 2019; 26:493-498. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.13917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital Kyoto Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center Kyoto Japan
| | - Atsuro Sawada
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
| | - Ryoich Saito
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
| | - Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital Kyoto Japan
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
| | - Osamu Ogawa
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
| |
Collapse
|