Effect of Oral Iron Repletion on Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Iron Deficiency: The IRONOUT HF Randomized Clinical Trial

The role of impaired iron transport on exercise performance and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure

Background

Iron deficiency (ID) is frequent in chronic heart failure (HF). Among HF-ID patients those with impaired iron transport (IIT) (Transferrin saturation (TSAT) < 20 %) have the worst prognosis. In HF survival is strictly related to exercise limitation but the link between IIT, exercise limitation and survival is at present undefined.

Methods

We evaluated in 999 consecutive patients hospitalized for worsening HF whether IIT affects prognosis through cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), i.e. peak oxygen uptake (VO2) and ventilation vs. carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2) slope. In all patients at stabilization iron metabolism and maximal CPET were performed. Survival was assessed as all cause death, urgent LVAD and heart transplant were considered death equivalents. The causal relationship between survival and IIT, peakVO2 and VE/VCO2slope was assessed applying path analysis.

Results

PeakVO2, VE/VCO2slope and TSAT were 68 ± 44 %pred, 35 ± 9 and 24.4 ± 12.9, respectively. PeakVO2 and, VE/VCO2slope were 61 ± 18 vs. 72 ± 53 %pred and 38 ± 10 vs. 33 ± 8, in IIT vs. non IIT patients (p < 0.0001 in both). At univariable and multivariable analysis a correlation between survival and VO2, VE/VCO2slope and TSAT was observed; at Kaplan-Myer lower peakVO2, higher VE/VCO2slope and lower TSAT showed worst survival; at path analysis IIT showed both an important effect on survival independent from peakVO2 and VE/VCO2slope (48 %) and an effect on survival independently mediated by VE/VCO2slope and peakVO2 (52 %), contributing to the IIT negative effect on survival.

Conclusions

The adverse impacts of low TSAT on prognosis are in part direct and in part mediated by mechanisms related to reduced peakVO2 and increased @VE/VCO2slope.

Age-stratified effects of intravenous ferric derisomaltose in heart failure with iron deficiency: insights from the IRONMAN trial

BACKGROUND

Intravenous iron therapy with ferric derisomaltose (FDI) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and iron deficiency. However, its effects across different age groups remain unclear. This analysis of the Effectiveness of Intravenous Iron Treatment versus Standard Care in Patients with Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency (IRONMAN) trial explored the efficacy and safety of FDI across age groups.

METHODS

The IRONMAN trial was a prospective, open-label, blinded end point randomised controlled trial enrolling patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency. This prespecified analysis stratified the population into four quarters by age group: <67 years, 67-73 years, 74-79 years, >79 years. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent heart failure hospitalisations and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included changes in haemoglobin and quality of life. Clinical outcomes comparing FDI versus usual care in each age subgroup were analysed by the method of Lin et al for recurrent events and Cox proportional hazards model for time to first event. Interactions between age and treatment effects were explored.

RESULTS

Among 1137 randomised patients (median age 73 years), the primary outcome rate ratio (FDI vs usual care) was 0.87 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.23) in patients <67 years, 0.93 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.32) in those aged 67-73 years, 0.88 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.33) in those aged 74-79 years and 0.66 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.96) in those aged >79 years (p-interaction=0.38). Improvements in haemoglobin and quality of life scores at 4 months did not differ statistically across age groups (p-interaction=0.92 and 0.64, respectively). Older patients were more symptomatic at baseline, with higher N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels and poorer renal function, but safety outcomes did not differ across age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that the effects of FDI on heart failure hospitalisations, cardiovascular death, haemoglobin and quality of life differed by age. These findings support its use in patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency, including older adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02642562.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a prognosis-assessing tool in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction represent half of the heart failure patients nowadays, an at least steady trend due to the aging of the population. We investigated whether the parameters obtained from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) correlated with the prognosis of these patients. This prospective observational cohort study assesses the relationship between the CPET parameters peakVO2 and VE/VCO2 slope and the number of heart failure hospitalizations or cardiovascular death of these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From August 2016 until May 2019, 99 patients from our outpatient unit with newly diagnosed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction underwent CPET. Median follow-up was 30 months [interquartile range, 24-38.5]. We selected peakVO2 < 14 mL/min/kg and a VE/VCO2 slope > 34 as threshold values for our primary clinically relevant endpoint, a composite of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death. Mean age was 75.07 ± 7.31 years, 49% were women, 75% were at NYHA class II and median NTproBNP was 511 pg/mL. Mean peakVO2 was 15.09 ± 4.75, and mean VE/VCO2 was 36.05 ± 6.60. During follow-up, there were 207 all-cause hospitalizations, 126 cardiovascular hospitalizations, 58 heart failure hospitalizations and 4 deaths. Over a median follow-up of 30 months, the primary clinically relevant endpoint occurred in 5 of 40 patients (12.5%) with a VE/VCO2 slope ≤ 34 and in 19 of 59 patients (32.2%) with a VE/VCO2 slope > 34 [hazard ratio, 2.69; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-7.21; P = 0.04]. On multivariate analysis, VE/VCO2 slope was independently associated with heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death as a terminal event.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a VE/VCO2 slope > 34 predicts heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death.

Erythropoietic response to oral iron with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Anemia and iron deficiency are common in heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). These conditions are associated with upregulation of hepcidin, which impairs the enteric absorption of iron, limiting the use of oral iron formulations in these populations. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are associated with enhanced erythropoiesis and have been shown to augment the erythropoietic response to intravenous iron. The effect of baseline SGLT2i therapy in the erythropoietic response following oral iron supplementation is currently not known.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the erythropoietic response to oral iron supplementation in patients with HF or CKD, using and not using SGLT2i as background therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of ambulatory patients with HF or CKD followed in cardio-kidney-metabolic clinics from a quaternary care hospital in Canada and a tertiary care hospital from Portugal. An age- and sex-matched population of patients using (n = 76) and not using (n = 76) a SGLT2i was compared for changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit following oral iron supplementation. Secondary outcomes included changes in iron biomarkers, natriuretic peptides and kidney function.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean age was 75 ± 9 years, 49% were men, 119 (78%) had CKD, 107 (70%) HF, and 113 (74%) had anemia. After adjustment for baseline differences, SGLT2i users experienced a greater increase in hemoglobin and hematocrit compared to SGLT2i non-users: hemoglobin + 0.80 g/dL (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-1.21 g/dL, p < 0.001); hematocrit + 3.0% (95% CI 1.0-4.0%, p < 0.001). No significant differences on iron biomarkers or any of the secondary outcomes were found between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral iron supplementation in patients with background therapy including a SGLT2i (vs. SGLT2i non-users) was associated with a greater increase in hemoglobin and hematocrit. These results suggest that patients with HF or CKD patients treated with SGLT2i might have an enhanced erythropoietic response to oral iron supplementation.

A novel iron fortifier prepared through quinoa protein peptides hydrolyzed with different proteases

Iron deficiency is a widespread global issue that leads to nutritional disorders and iron deficiency anemia (IDA). In this study, quinoa protein peptide (QPP) was selected to design a novel iron supplement, quinoa protein peptide‑iron chelate (QPP-Fe). Notably, QPP with a molecular weight of <2000 Da, prepared using Alcalase, exhibited the highest iron chelation ratio of 79.2 ± 0.36 mg/g. Furthermore, FTIR, UV-Vis, CD, and fluorescence spectroscopy results indicated that the addition of Fe2+ significantly altered the secondary structure of QPP. This alteration was primarily attributed to the interaction of Fe2+ with carboxyl, amino, and imidazole groups. Moreover, we observed that the QPP-Fe form compact spherical structures, leading to reduced and much more uniform particle sizes. The molecular docking results revealed that Fe2+ formed ligand bonds with Glu, His, Ala, and Gly through electrostatic interactions. Then a pocket structure that wrapped Fe2+ around the peptide was formed, which changed the peptide from a free and disordered state to a more stable state. These results can provide a reference for the development of iron-fortified functional foods.

Iron Deficiency Treatment in Heart Failure-Challenges and Therapeutic Solutions

Iron deficiency (ID) is a common comorbidity in heart failure (HF), affecting nearly 50% of patients and worsening symptoms, exercise capacity, and prognosis. This review summarizes recent evidence from meta-analyses, clinical trials, and guidelines on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of ID in HF. ID in HF results from chronic inflammation, intestinal congestion, and impaired iron metabolism. Diagnosis is based on serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels. While oral iron therapy has limited efficacy, intravenous iron, particularly ferric carboxymaltose and ferric derisomaltose, improves symptoms and exercise tolerance and reduces hospitalizations. Timely diagnosis and treatment of ID in HF are essential. Intravenous iron is the preferred therapeutic approach, but further research is needed to optimize long-term management.

Gaps in knowledge and management of iron deficiency in heart failure: a nationwide survey of cardiologists in China

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) guidelines recommend routine testing for iron deficiency (ID) and, for those with ID, intravenous iron if the left ventricular ejection fraction is <50%. Guideline adherence to these recommendations by cardiologists in China is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An independent academic web-based survey was designed and distributed via social networks to cardiologists across China. Overall, 1342 cardiologists (median age 34 years, IQR 30-39, 51% women) from all provinces of China completed this survey. More than half were unaware of the need to screen for ID in HF and did not do so routinely in their clinical practice. Approximately 80% were not familiar with the diagnostic criteria for ID in HF guidelines, and only 0.8% recognised transferrin saturation <20% as an independent marker of ID. Regarding iron repletion, only 14% preferred intravenous to oral iron for correcting ID compared with 68% favouring oral iron. Three-quarters were unfamiliar with methods for calculating intravenous iron dose. Furthermore, over 80% were unaware that current guidelines only recommend ferric carboxymaltose or ferric derisomaltose for correcting ID. The main barriers to using intravenous iron were lack of knowledge and experience. Despite such poor awareness and practice, most cardiologists were interested in learning more about managing ID in HF.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide survey of cardiologists in China, we identified large gaps in both knowledge and management of ID. This survey will help guide the development of educational programmes to improve care for patients with HF and ID in China.

A Prospective Clinical Study of Ferric Citrate Hydrate for Chronic Heart Failure with Iron Deficiency Anemia

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of intravenous iron preparations for chronic heart failure with iron deficiency has been reported, but the efficacy of oral iron preparations has not been demonstrated. In this study, we conducted a prospective clinical study using ferric citrate hydrate tablets in patients with chronic heart failure complicated by iron deficiency anemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A prospective study was conducted using ferric citrate hydrate in patients with chronic heart failure complicated by iron deficiency anemia. The registered patients were divided into two groups: those administered ferric citrate hydrate and those switched from iron sulfate sustained-release to ferric citrate hydrate. The primary endpoint was hemoglobin level. The secondary endpoints included hematocrit, serum iron, saturation, ferritin, and cardiac-, renal-, and hepatic-related biomarkers. A total of 141 patients were enrolled in this study, including 95 patients who were newly administered ferric citrate hydrate and 46 patients who were switched from iron sulfate sustained-release to ferric citrate hydrate.

CONCLUSIONS

Ferric citrate hydrate significantly increased hemoglobin, serum iron, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and ferritin levels, and decreased atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. Ferric citrate hydrate could be continued without side effects such as gastrointestinal symptoms. Improvement in iron metabolism and anemia due to iron supplementation with ferric citrate hydrate led to improvement in heart failure biomarkers.

Anemia Management in the Cardiorenal Patient: A Nephrological Perspective

Heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently coexist, sharing significant overlap in prevalence and pathophysiological mechanisms. This coexistence, termed cardiorenal syndrome (CRS), often leads to anemia, which exacerbates both HF and CKD, thereby increasing morbidity and death. Managing anemia in CRS is complex due to conflicting guidelines and the multifactorial nature of the condition. Anemia in CRS is influenced by factors such as inadequate erythropoietin production, iron deficiency, reduced red blood cell life span, and chronic inflammation, which inhibit iron absorption and mobilization. This interplay of mechanisms worsens anemia, further aggravating HF and CKD. Anemia significantly impacts the prognosis of both HF and CKD, and recent trials have shown that hemoglobin increases, particularly with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, can improve outcomes in patients with HF and CKD. Iron deficiency is also prevalent in both patients with HF and patients with CKD and is associated with poorer exercise capacity and a higher mortality rate. Guidelines for diagnosing and treating iron deficiency differ between HF and CKD. Furthermore, treatment of anemia in CRS is controversial: While sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and intravenous iron has shown consistent benefits in patients with CRS, normalization of hemoglobin with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents improves symptoms and quality of life but have not consistently demonstrated cardiovascular benefits. There are no definitive guidelines for anemia management in CRS. Treatment should address HF, CKD, and anemia concurrently. A proposed algorithm includes correcting iron deficiency, initiating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and considering erythropoiesis-stimulating agents if hemoglobin remains <10 g/dL. Further research is needed to optimize anemia management strategies in patients with CRS.

Understanding the Interplay between Iron Deficiency and Congestive Heart Failure: A comprehensive review

Iron is an essential micronutrient for abounding physiological processes in the body, and its deficiency can be caused by various factors, such as low iron intake due to economic difficulties or loss of appetite, decreased iron absorption due to gastrointestinal issues, or increased iron loss due to hemorrhages or proteinuria. Iron deficiency is a prevalent issue among heart failure (HF) patients and is a significant contributor to anemia, affecting 30-50% of patients regardless of their gender, ethnicity, or left ventricular ejection fraction. Individuals with HF have high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which can inhibit erythropoiesis by degrading the membrane iron exporter ferroportin, mediated by an increased release of hepcidin. In addition, elevated sympathetic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity retains salt and water, resulting in high cardiac output HF in people with normal left ventricular function. This review provides an overview of iron deficiency and HF.

Diagnosis and treatment of iron deficiency in chronic heart failure : Position statement of the heart failure working group of the Austrian Society of Cardiology

Iron deficiency (ID) is a common comorbidity in heart failure (HF), affecting 55% of chronic and up to 80% of acute HF patients, regardless of ejection fraction (EF). An ID is associated with reduced quality of life, impaired exercise capacity (VO2 peak), higher hospitalization rate and lower survival rate. It is also an independent predictor of HF outcomes. This consensus statement critically reviews the diagnostic criteria for ID in HF and provides recommendations for their use. The efficacy and safety of intravenous iron supplements, including ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) and ferric derisomaltose (FDI), are analyzed highlighting the indications and potential adverse effects. Key clinical trials and guideline recommendations are summarized. In summary, the document addresses the diagnostics, treatment and monitoring of ID in HF.

The prognostic role of iron deficiency in acute ischemic stroke patients: A prospective multicentric cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Iron deficiency (ID) is a prognostic factor in heart failure and acute coronary syndrome. However, its role in cerebrovascular diseases is controversial. We aimed to determine the impact of ID on the functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients.

METHODS

This was an observational prospective multicentric cohort study. From January to December 2023, we enrolled acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to the stroke units of four comprehensive stroke centers. Venous blood samples were collected at admission to determine the iron status (serum iron, ferritin, transferrin). ID was defined as a serum ferritin concentration < 100 ng/mL or 100-299 ng/mL with transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20 %. The primary endpoint was the poor functional outcome at 90 days defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6. We used binary logistic regression models including confounding factors to test the association between ID and the primary outcome.

RESULTS

The analysis included 442 patients (mean age 73 ± 13, 47.5 % female, median NIHSS 7 [IQR 3-15], 61.3 % treated with intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular treatment). ID prevalence was 65.6 %. In all binary logistic regression models, ID predicted poor functional outcome at 3 months irrespective from demographics, stroke severity and characteristics, anemia, risk factors, signs/symptoms of heart failure, glucose at admission, and inflammatory biomarkers (aOR 2.328, 95 % CI 1.272-4.263, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

ID was strongly associated with poor functional outcome at 90 days in acute ischemic stroke patients. Further research is required to explore whether iron supplementation could be a potential therapeutic strategy to improve patient outcomes.

Iron deficiency and supplementation in patients with heart failure: Results from the IRON-HF international survey

AIMS

Iron deficiency (ID) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with poor outcomes, regardless of anaemia status. Iron supplementation has been demonstrated to improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with HF with an ejection fraction <50% and ID. This survey aimed to provide data on real-world practices related to ID screening and management.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We designed and distributed an online survey (23 questions) regarding ID screening and management in the HF setting. Overall, 256 cardiologists completed the survey (59.8% male, mostly between 30 and 50 years). The majority of physicians defined ID according to the most recent HF recommendations (98.4%) and reported screening for ID in more than half of their patients (68.4%). However, only 54.3% of the respondents performed periodic screening (every 6 months to 1 year). A total of 93.0% of participants prescribed and/or administered iron supplementation, using intravenous iron as the preferred method of administration (86.3%). After iron supplementation, 96.1% of the respondents reassessed ID, most frequently at 3-6 months (67.6%). Most physicians (93.8%) perceived ID as an underestimated comorbidity in HF. Cardiologists' age, training status, subspecialty and work setting (academic vs. non-academic hospitals) were associated with heterogeneity in the answers.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey highlight the need for more consistent strategies of ID screening and treatment for patients with HF.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease: a focus on therapies and interventions

In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the presence of concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) predicts poorer cardiovascular outcomes, more aggravated heart failure (HF) status, and higher mortality. Physicians might be reluctant to initiate life-saving anti-HF medications out of fear of worsening renal function and a higher incidence of adverse events. Moreover, international guidelines do not give clear recommendations on managing this subgroup of patients as well as advanced CKD was always an exclusion criterion in most major HF trials. Nevertheless, in this review, we will highlight several recent clinical trials and post-hoc analyses of major trials that showed the safety and efficacy of the different therapies in HFrEF patients with CKD, besides several small-scale cohorts that tested guideline-directed medical therapies in End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD). Regarding interventions in this subgroup of patients, we will provide up-to-date data on implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and coronary revascularization, in addition to mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors.

Translating evidence into practice: Managing electrolyte imbalances and iron deficiency in heart failure

Mineral abnormalities are a common complication of heart failure (HF). In particular, dyskalaemia, hyponatraemia, and hypomagnesaemia are prevalent, with hypo- and hyperkalaemia observed in over 40 % of HF patients, hyponatraemia in 18-27 %, hypomagnesaemia in 7-52 %, and phosphate imbalance in 13 %. These abnormalities serve as indicators of the severity of HF and are strongly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The neurohumoral activation, including the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), the sympathetic nervous system, and vasopressin, HF medications such as diuretics and RAAS inhibitors, amd concomitant diseases such as chronic kidney disease, can disrupt mineral homeostasis. Iron deficiency (ID) is another of the most common mineral abnormalities, affecting up to 60 % of HF patients. ID is significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes such as reduced quality of life and exercise capacity, HF re-hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Various pathways contribute to the development of ID in HF, including reduced iron intake due to anorexia, increased hepcidin levels associated with chronic inflammation and hepatic congestion, and occult gastrointestinal bleeding due to the concomitant use of antithrombotic agents. The efficacy of iron replacement therapy has been demonstrated in clinical trials, particularly in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), whilst more recently, it has also been shown to improve exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This review focuses on potassium and phosphate abnormalities, hyponatraemia, hypomagnesaemia, and ID in HF, providing a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms, clinical significance, and intervention strategies with the latest findings.

Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: Iron deficiency (ID) is associated with heart failure (HF) in a considerable proportion of patients. To improve the quality of life, lower the frequency of hospitalizations, and lower mortality rates of chronic HF patients (HF), this meta-analysis will look into the role of iron supplementation using ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). Methods & results: From inception until 1 October 2023, we conducted a thorough literature search of electronic databases for peer-reviewed publications. Around 5229 HF patients were included, of which 2691 received FCM while 2538 received placebo. Conclusion: FCM reduces HF-related hospitalizations but doesn't improve overall or cardiovascular mortality in those with HF and ID. The overall results support FCM's role in managing iron deficiency in heart failure.

Impact of Intravenous Iron in patients with heart failure and Iron Deficiency: an updated Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The actual effects of intravenous iron therapy on hospitalizations, mortality and safety in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency remained controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to elucidate the cardiovascular benefits and safety of intravenous iron therapy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant RCTs of intravenous iron therapy in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency published from inception through April 20, 2024. Our primary endpoints of interest were heart failure hospitalizations, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular hospitalizations, and cardiovascular death. Additional risk of treatment complications included infections, administration site conditions, poisoning and procedural complications. We employed the fragility index and the reverse fragility index to further assess the robustness of our meta-analysis results. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential clinical benefits.

RESULTS

Eleven trials encompassing a collective cohort of 6511 participants met our predefined eligibility criteria and were included in our meta-analysis. Intravenous iron therapy yielded a 21% relative reduction in heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death (P<0.01), a 24% relative reduction in heart failure hospitalization (P<0.01) and a 28% relative reduction in cardiovascular hospitalizations and cardiovascular death (P<0.01). The corresponding high fragility indexes showed these pooled results to be robust. Our analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in terms of all-cause mortality (P = 0.11). Subgroup analyses revealed more favorable effects of intravenous iron therapy in trials that had a treatment duration of ≥ 24 weeks. The administration of intravenous iron did not have an additional risk of treatment-related complications (P = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous iron therapy in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency significantly reduced rehospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death but was not associated with all-cause mortality. Long-term administration of iron supplements holds significant promise as a routine therapeutic approach for heart failure patients with iron deficiency.

[Iron deficiency in cardiovascular disease]

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency is worldwide the most frequently occurring deficiency of a trace element. Meanwhile, the indications are increasing that iron deficiency plays a relevant role in many cardiovascular diseases and that treatment is accessible with intravenous administration of iron.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

The aim of this article is to elucidate the clinical comorbidities, diagnostic dilemmas and treatment possibilities of iron deficiency in cardiovascular diseases. The study situation on iron deficiency and iron substitution in heart failure, aortic valve stenosis, atrial fibrillation and pulmonary hypertension (PH) is summarized.

RESULTS

The diagnostic criteria of iron deficiency in cardiovascular diseases are not finally decided. The guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommend either ferritin below 100 ng/ml alone or ferritin between 100 and 299 ng/ml with a transferrin saturation (TSAT) < 20 %. Some authors consider the determination of TSAT as sufficient as the only diagnostic criterion for iron deficiency in heart failure. Most studies on iron substitution in heart failure showed an improvement in the physical capacity and a reduction of the probability of a heart failure-related hospitalization by the substitution of an existing iron deficiency; however, it has been determined that a relevant proportion of patients show no response to iron substitution and that the cause for this is ultimately unclear. Whether the diagnostic criteria for iron deficiency in heart failure can be transferred to other cardiovascular symptoms, cannot be clearly answered due to the lack of data from prospective interventional studies.

CONCLUSION

The substitution of iron deficiency is one of very few possibilities to improve the physical capability in heart failure. The pivotal point of the discussion on iron deficiency and substitution in cardiovascular diseases is the correct identification of patients who benefit from treatment.

Management of Iron Deficiency in Heart Failure: Practical Considerations and Implementation of Evidence-Based Iron Supplementation

Iron deficiency (ID) is present in approximately 50% of patients with heart failure (HF) and even higher prevalence rate up to 80% in post-acute HF setting. The current guidelines for HF recommend intravenous (IV) iron replacement in HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction and ID based on clinical trials showing improvements in quality of life and exercise capacity, and an overall treatment benefit for recurrent HF hospitalization. However, several barriers cause challenges in implementing IV iron supplementation in practice due, in part, to clinician knowledge gaps and limited resource availability to protocolize routine utilization in appropriate patients. Thus, the current review will discuss practical considerations in ID treatment, implementation of evidence-based ID treatment to improve regional health disparities with toolkits, inclusion/exclusion criteria of IV iron supplementation, and clinical controversies in ID treatment, as well as gaps in evidence and questions to be answered.

Iron and cardiovascular health: A review

Iron is an essential element for the biological processes of living organisms, including the production of crucial oxygen-carrying proteins, formation of heme enzymes, and playing roles in electron transfer and oxidation-reduction reactions. It plays a significant role in various cardiovascular functions, including bioenergetics, electrical activity, and programmed cell death. Minor deficiencies of iron have been found to have negative impact on cardiovascular function in patients with heart failure (HF). The contractility of human cardiomyocytes is impaired by iron deficiency (ID), which results in reduced mitochondrial function and lower energy production, ultimately leading to cardiac function impairment, contributing to significant morbidity and mortality in patients with HF. This review discusses iron homeostasis within the human body, as well as ID pathophysiology and its role in HF. Focusing on therapeutic approaches including iron supplementation and/or repletion in patients with ID and HF, comparing results from recent clinical trials. Intravenous (IV) iron therapy has shown promising results in treating ID in HF patients. Large, randomized trials and meta-analysis, like Ferinject Assessment in patients with ID and chronic HF, AFFIRM-AHF, IRONMAN, and HEART-FID have demonstrated the efficacy of IV iron supplementation with IV ferric carboxymaltose or IV ferric derisomaltose in reducing hospitalizations and improving quality of life in patients with Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-III. However, survival and mortality have demonstrated no improvement during acute exacerbations of HF or in outpatient management. The potential benefits of IV iron across the entire HF spectrum and its interaction with other HF therapies remain areas of interest for further research.

Efficacy of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose in Heart Failure Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-analysis of 6271 Patients

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency is prevalent among heart failure patients and is associated with worse clinical outcomes, including decreased quality of life and functional capacity. This condition often results in a higher incidence of hospitalization and mortality. Iron supplementation, particularly with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), has shown potential benefits as an adjunct therapy in heart failure management. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of FCM in the treatment of patients with heart failure and iron deficiency anemia, with a focus on its impact on mortality and hospitalization rates.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from their inception until 1st December 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, employing a random-model effect. The results were reported as risk ratios (RRs), standard mean differences (SMDs), and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 13 studies with a total of 6271 patients. Ferric carboxymaltose administration resulted in a significant improvement in the 6-minute walk distance (SMD: 1.45; 95 % CI: 0.55, 2.36; p = 0.002), quality of life, as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) (SMD: 1.49; 95 % CI: 0.87, 2.11; p < 0.00001), the rate of first hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death (RR: 0.91; 95 % CI: 0.84, 0.98; p = 0.02). However, FCM did not show a significant impact on the risk of cardiovascular death (RR: 0.90; 95 % CI: 0.77, 1.05; p = 0.17), the need for intervention due to worsening heart failure (RR: 0.41; 95 % CI: 0.04, 4.51; p = 0.47), or all-cause mortality rates (RR: 0.89; 95 % CI: 0.69, 1.16; p = 0.28).

CONCLUSION

While FCM treatment in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency anemia significantly improves functional capacity and quality of life, it has no notable effect on mortality rates or the likelihood of hospitalization. These findings highlight the need for further research to explore comprehensive treatment strategies that address both the symptomatic and survival aspects of heart failure management in this patient population.

Pharmacological management of heart failure: a patient-centred approach

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) is a global health challenge that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Despite recent advances in pharmacological and interventional therapy, morbidity and mortality in these patients remain high. For this reason, and because of its interplay with other cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases, HF represents a major area of research, with new trials being published every year and international guidelines constantly updated.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the current status and possible future developments in HF pharmacotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The treatment of HF has made significant advances in recent years, and the current recommendations are based on large outcome trials. This has led to significant reductions in both mortality and morbidity, but the death rate remains unacceptably high. In this context, a patient-centered approach that considers comorbidities and specific clinical scenarios when dosing HF medication is essential. Prevention of hospital admissions for cardiac decompensation is of utmost importance in patients with HF as is the enablement of activities of daily living, an endpoint which has only recently been incorporated into major HF trials.

Treating iron deficiency in patients with heart failure: what, why, when, how, where and who

For patients with heart failure and reduced or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, iron deficiency is common and associated with more severe symptoms, worse quality of life and an increased risk of hospitalisations and death. Iron deficiency can be swiftly, effectively and safely treated by administering intravenous iron, either as ferric carboxymaltose or ferric derisomaltose, which improves patient well-being and reduces the risk of hospitalisations including those for heart failure. However, the current definition of iron deficiency in heart failure has serious flaws. A serum ferritin <100 µg/L does not identify patients more likely to respond to intravenous iron. In contrast, patients with transferrin saturations <20%, most of whom are also anaemic, are more likely to have a beneficial response to intravenous iron. In this review, we summarise the available evidence for use of intravenous iron in heart failure and provide recommendations for targeted future research and practical considerations for the general cardiologist.

Iron therapy effect on chronic heart failure and iron-deficiency anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Heart failure complicated with iron deficiency is associated with impaired functional capacity, poor quality of life, increased hospitalization, and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the effect of oral and intravenous iron therapy on functional capacity, hospitalization risk, and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure and iron-deficiency anemia.

METHODS

Search for published scientific articles using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting, Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) method conducted on Cochrane Library, PubMed Central, and Medline databases published in the last 20 years. Further systematic review and meta-analysis using RevMan version 5.4 were performed based on the included published scientific articles.

RESULTS

Based on the meta-analysis of included studies, the analytical results of intravenous iron therapy in patient with chronic heart failure and iron-deficiency anemia showed there is 30.82 (MD = 30.82: 95% CI 18.23-43.40) meter change in patient 6MWT, there is likelihood of 0.55 times (55%) (RR = 0.45: 95% CI 0.30-0.68) lower risk of hospitalization and lower risk of mortality (RR = 0.18: 95% CI 0.04-0.78), because heart failure worsening both with statistically significant overall effect compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

There is statistically significant effect of intravenous iron therapy to improve patient functional capacity and reduce likelihood of hospitalization risk of 0.55 times (55%) in patient with chronic heart failure and iron-deficiency anemia.

Iron biology

Iron is a fundamental element for biological life, from bacteria to humans. Iron is essential for cell function and survival, energy production and metabolism, whereas increased levels cause oxidative stress. It is also a constituent of haemoglobin and thus it is necessary for oxygen transportation through the body. Given these multiple functions, the regulation of iron metabolism is complex and tight coupled with oxygen homeostasis at tissue and cellular levels, thanks to the interaction with the hypoxia inducible factor system. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), iron deficiency significantly contributes to anaemia development. This frequently overlaps with chronic inflammation, causing iron- restricted erythropoiesis. To add further complexity, metabolic hyperferritinemia may, on one hand, increase the risk for CKD and, on the other, overlaps with functional iron deficiency. Excessive intracellular iron in certain cell types during CKD can also mediate cellular death (called ferroptosis), and contribute to the pathogenesis of kidney damage, atherosclerosis and vascular calcifications. This review is aimed at broadening the perspective of iron metabolism in the setting of CKD not just as a contributor to anaemia in CKD patients, but also as an important player with an impact on cell metabolism, renal fibrosis and the cardiovascular system.

Associations of iron metabolism and inflammation with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a large NHANES community sample: Moderating and mediating effects

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to assess the associations between serum iron concentration, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration and the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in the general population and to explore potential mediating and moderating effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey spanning the years 1999-2010, encompassing 23,634 participants. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to investigate the independent associations of serum iron and CRP with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Moderation and mediation analyses explored the moderating effect of CRP on the association between the serum iron concentration and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and the mediating role of the serum iron concentration in the association between the CRP concentration and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. After multivariate adjustments in the Cox model, serum iron and CRP levels were independently correlated with both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk. Moderation analyses revealed a more pronounced correlation between the serum iron concentration and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in participants with higher CRP levels. Mediation analysis indicated that the serum iron concentration partly mediated the impact of CRP on the risk of all-cause mortality (13.79%) and cardiovascular mortality (24.12%).

CONCLUSION

Serum iron and CRP are independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Moreover, the associations between serum iron concentrations and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality are more pronounced in individuals with elevated CRP. Serum iron partially mediates the effect of CRP on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

Iron Deficiency in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Iron deficiency is a common and independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure. The implications of iron deficiency in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are less established. This review recaps data on the prevalence, characteristics and impact of Iron deficiency in the LVAD population. A systematic search yielded eight studies involving 517 LVAD patients, with iron deficiency prevalence ranging from 40% to 82%. IV iron repletion was not associated with adverse events and effectively resolved iron deficiency in most patients. However, the effects of iron deficiency and iron repletion on post-implant survival and exercise capacity remain unknown. Although iron deficiency is highly prevalent in LVAD patients, its true prevalence and adverse effects may be misestimated due to inexact diagnostic criteria. Future randomised controlled trials on IV iron treatment in LVAD patients are warranted to clarify the significance of this common comorbidity.

Redefining Iron Deficiency in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

A serum ferritin level <15 to 20 μg/L historically identified patients who had absent bone marrow iron stores, but serum ferritin levels are distorted by the systemic inflammatory states seen in patients with chronic kidney disease or heart failure. As a result, nearly 25 years ago, the diagnostic ferritin threshold was increased 5- to 20-fold in patients with chronic kidney disease (ie, iron deficiency was identified if the serum ferritin level was <100 μg/L, regardless of transferrin saturation [TSAT], or 100 to 299 μg/L if TSAT was <20%). This guidance was motivated not by the findings of studies of total body or tissue iron depletion, but by a desire to encourage the use of iron supplements to potentiate the response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with renal anemia. However, in patients with heart failure, this definition does not reliably identify patients with an absolute or functional iron-deficiency state, and it includes individuals with TSATs (≥20%) and serum ferritin levels in the normal range (20-100 mg/L) who are not iron deficient, have an excellent prognosis, and do not respond favorably to iron therapy. Furthermore, serum ferritin levels may be distorted by the use of both neprilysin and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, both of which may act to mobilize endogenous iron stores. The most evidence-based and trial-tested definition of iron deficiency is the presence of hypoferremia, as reflected by as a TSAT <20%. These hypoferremic patients are generally iron deficient on bone marrow examination, and after intravenous iron therapy, they exhibit an improvement in exercise tolerance and functional capacity (when meaningfully impaired) and show the most marked reduction (ie, 20%-30%) in the risk of cardiovascular death or total heart failure hospitalizations. Therefore, we propose that the current ferritin-driven definition of iron deficiency in heart failure should be abandoned and that a definition based on hypoferremia (TSAT <20%) should be adopted.

Identification of three mechanistic pathways for iron-deficient heart failure

Current understanding of iron-deficient heart failure is based on blood tests that are thought to reflect systemic iron stores, but the available evidence suggests greater complexity. The entry and egress of circulating iron is controlled by erythroblasts, which (in severe iron deficiency) will sacrifice erythropoiesis to supply iron to other organs, e.g. the heart. Marked hypoferraemia (typically with anaemia) can drive the depletion of cardiomyocyte iron, impairing contractile performance and explaining why a transferrin saturation < ≈15%-16% predicts the ability of intravenous iron to reduce the risk of major heart failure events in long-term trials (Type 1 iron-deficient heart failure). However, heart failure may be accompanied by intracellular iron depletion within skeletal muscle and cardiomyocytes, which is disproportionate to the findings of systemic iron biomarkers. Inflammation- and deconditioning-mediated skeletal muscle dysfunction-a primary cause of dyspnoea and exercise intolerance in patients with heart failure-is accompanied by intracellular skeletal myocyte iron depletion, which can be exacerbated by even mild hypoferraemia, explaining why symptoms and functional capacity improve following intravenous iron, regardless of baseline haemoglobin or changes in haemoglobin (Type 2 iron-deficient heart failure). Additionally, patients with advanced heart failure show myocardial iron depletion due to both diminished entry into and enhanced egress of iron from the myocardium; the changes in iron proteins in the cardiomyocytes of these patients are opposite to those expected from systemic iron deficiency. Nevertheless, iron supplementation can prevent ventricular remodelling and cardiomyopathy produced by experimental injury in the absence of systemic iron deficiency (Type 3 iron-deficient heart failure). These observations, taken collectively, support the possibility of three different mechanistic pathways for the development of iron-deficient heart failure: one that is driven through systemic iron depletion and impaired erythropoiesis and two that are characterized by disproportionate depletion of intracellular iron in skeletal and cardiac muscle. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and all pathways may be operative at the same time or may occur sequentially in the same patients.

Iron homeostasis, recycling and vulnerability in the stressed kidney: A neglected dimension of iron-deficient heart failure

The available evidence suggests that the kidney may contribute importantly to the development of an iron deficiency state in patients with heart failure and may be injured by therapeutic efforts to achieve iron repletion. The exceptional workload of the proximal renal tubule requires substantial quantities of iron for ATP synthesis, which it derives from Fe3+ bound to transferrin in the bloodstream. Following ferrireduction, Fe2+ is conveyed by divalent transporters (e.g. DMT1) out of the endosome of the proximal renal tubule, and highly reactive Fe2+ can be directed to the mitochondria, sequestered safely in a ferritin nanocage or exported through the actions of hepcidin-inhibitable ferroportin. The actions of ferroportin, together with transferrin endocytosis and DMT1-mediated transport, play a key role in the recycling of iron from the tubular fluid into the bloodstream and preventing the loss of filtered iron in the urine. Activation of endogenous neurohormonal systems and proinflammatory signalling in heart failure decrease megalin-mediated uptake and DMT1 expression, and increase hepcidin-mediated suppression of ferroportin, promoting the loss of iron in the urine and contributing to the development of an iron deficiency state. Furthermore, the failure of ferroportin-mediated efflux at the basolateral membrane heightens the susceptibility of the renal tubules to cytosolic excesses of Fe2+, causing lipid peroxidation and synchronized cell death (ferroptosis) through the iron-dependent free radical theft of electrons from lipids in the cell membrane. Ferroptosis is a central mechanism to most disorders that can cause acute and chronic kidney disease. Short-term bolus administration of intravenous iron can cause oxidative stress and is accompanied by markers of renal injury. Experimentally, long-term maintenance of an iron-replete state is accompanied by accelerated loss of nephrons, oxidative stress, inflammation and fibrosis. Intravenous iron therapy increases glomerular filtration rate rapidly in patients with heart failure (perhaps because of a haemodynamic effect) but not in patients with chronic kidney disease, and the effects of intravenous iron on the progression of renal dysfunction in the long-term trials - AFFIRM-AHF, IRONMAN and HEART-FID - have not yet been reported. Given the potential role of dysregulated renal iron homeostasis in the pathogenesis of iron deficiency and the known vulnerability of the kidney to intravenous iron, the appropriate level of iron repletion with respect to the risk of acute and chronic kidney injury in patients with heart failure requires further study.

Iron deficiency and supplementation in heart failure

Non-anaemic iron deficiency (NAID) is a strategic target in cardiovascular medicine because of its association with a range of adverse effects in various conditions. Endeavours to tackle NAID in heart failure have yielded mixed results, exposing knowledge gaps in how best to define 'iron deficiency' and the handling of iron therapies by the body. To address these gaps, we harness the latest understanding of the mechanisms of iron homeostasis outside the erythron and integrate clinical and preclinical lines of evidence. The emerging picture is that current definitions of iron deficiency do not assimilate the multiple influences at play in patients with heart failure and, consequently, fail to identify those with a truly unmet need for iron. Additionally, current iron supplementation therapies benefit only certain patients with heart failure, reflecting differences in the nature of the unmet need for iron and the modifying effects of anaemia and inflammation on the handling of iron therapies by the body. Building on these insights, we identify untapped opportunities in the management of NAID, including the refinement of current approaches and the development of novel strategies. Lessons learned from NAID in cardiovascular disease could ultimately translate into benefits for patients with other chronic conditions such as chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer.

Iron Deficiency Among Hospitalized Patients With Congestive Heart Failure

INTRODUCTION

Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous (IV) iron when administered to patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and iron deficiency (ID). We aimed to better understand the adherence of treatment for ID among a population with CHF, with particular interest in high-risk groups not often studied due to inadequate recruitment.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review at our institution was conducted from January 1, 2012, to July 7, 2021. Analysis included hospitalized patients with CHF and ID and dividing these patients into two time periods based on changes in iron treatment patterns and treatment between sexes.

RESULTS

Four thousand eight hundred thirteen patients were included in this study. During the "early era," 7.0% of patients with CHF and ID received IV iron compared with 20.9% of "late-era" patients. Female patients with ID were statistically less likely to receive IV iron when compared with male patients, both unadjusted (0.66, confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.79, p < .0001) and adjusted (0.72, CI 0.59-0.87, p < .0001) for covariates.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates improved adherence to treatment for ID among hospitalized population with CHF and ID over time but persistent undertreatment remains. Future studies will need to identify the barriers to treating female patients with CHF and ID to reduce these disparities.

Iron Metabolism in the Recovery Phase of Critical Illness with a Focus on Sepsis

Iron is an essential nutrient for humans and microbes, such as bacteria. Iron deficiency commonly occurs in critically ill patients, but supplementary iron therapy is not considered during the acute phase of critical illness since it increases iron availability for invading microbes and oxidative stress. However, persistent iron deficiency in the recovery phase is harmful and has potential adverse outcomes such as cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, and cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Therefore, it is important to treat iron deficiency quickly and efficiently. This article reviews current knowledge about iron-related biomarkers in critical illness with a focus on patients with sepsis, and provides possible criteria to guide decision-making for iron supplementation in the recovery phase of those patients.

Intravenous Iron Repletion for Patients With Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Iron deficiency and heart failure frequently co-occur, sparking clinical research into the role of iron repletion in this condition over the last 20 years. Although early nonrandomized studies and subsequent moderate-sized randomized controlled trials showed an improvement in symptoms and functional metrics with the use of intravenous iron, 3 recent larger trials powered to detect a difference in hard cardiovascular outcomes failed to meet their primary endpoints. Additionally, there are potential concerns related to side effects from intravenous iron, both in the short and long term. This review discusses the basics of iron biology and regulation, the diagnostic criteria for iron deficiency and the clinical evidence for intravenous iron in heart failure, safety concerns, and alternative therapies. We also make practical suggestions for the management of patients with iron deficiency and heart failure and outline key areas in need of future research.

The findings of a service evaluation on the practice of assessment and treatment of iron deficiency in people admitted to a UK hospital with decompensated Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Iron Deficiency (ID) is common in Heart Failure (HF) and associated with poor outcomes. Replacement with intravenous (IV) iron can improve functional status, quality of life and risk of unplanned admission. In 2015/16 a local service evaluation was performed which found that of people admitted with HF, only 27.5 % had assessment of iron status, and when identified, replacement occurred in fewer than half. Education strategies were employed to increase awareness of the importance of assessment and correction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess if practice had improved following education strategies.

METHODS

A review of 220 patient records for people admitted with HF in 2020/21 to establish if iron status assessed, presence of ID, and whether if ID identified it was treated, and by which route. Trends in 2020/21 data were explored in sub-groups by age, sex, type of HF, anaemia status, input from HF specialists and type of ID.

RESULTS

Compared to 2015/16, more assessments of iron status were performed (45% vs 27.5 %), ID was corrected more frequently (57% vs 46 %) and increased use of the IV route for replacement (83% vs 58 %) CONCLUSIONS: Despite the impact of COVID-19 on usual care in 2020/21, improvement was seen in proportion of assessment and treatment of ID following simple education strategies for key stakeholders. There may be scope to improve practice further if the findings remain similar post pandemic. If so, a formal Quality Improvement approach may be helpful.

Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Advancements in Heart Failure Treatment

Heart failure (HF) is a complex, life-threatening condition characterized by high mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life. Despite studies of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapies, the rate of HF hospitalization is still increasing due to the growing and aging population and an increase in obesity in relatively younger individuals. It remains a predominant issue in the public health and the global economic burden. Current research has focused on how HF affects the entire range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), especially the three HF subgroups. This review provides a latest overview of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies of these three subgroups (HF with preserved ejection fraction, HF with reduced ejection fraction, and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction). We summarize conventional therapies, investigate novel strategies, and explore the new technologies such as aortic thoracic stimulation and interatrial shunting devices.

Critical re-evaluation of the identification of iron deficiency states and effective iron repletion strategies in patients with chronic heart failure

According to current guidelines, iron deficiency is defined by a serum ferritin level <100 ng/ml or a transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20% if the serum ferritin level is 100-299 μg/L. These criteria were developed to encourage the use of intravenous iron as an adjunct to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of renal anaemia. However, in patients with heart failure, these criteria are not supported by any pathophysiological or clinical evidence that they identify an absolute or functional iron deficiency state. A low baseline TSAT-but not serum ferritin level-appears to be a reliable indicator of the effect of intravenous iron to reduce major heart failure events. In randomized controlled trials, intravenous iron decreased the risk of cardiovascular death or total heart failure hospitalization in patients with a TSAT <20% (risk ratio 0.67 [0.49-0.92]) but not in patients with a TSAT ≥20% (risk ratio 0.99 [0.74-1.30]), with the magnitude of the risk reduction being proportional to the severity of hypoferraemia. Patients who were enrolled in clinical trials solely because they had a serum ferritin level <100 μg/L showed no significant benefit on heart failure outcomes, and it is noteworthy that serum ferritin levels of 20-300 μg/L lie entirely within the range of normal values for healthy adults. Current guidelines reflect the eligibility criteria of clinical trials, which inadvertently adopted unvalidated criteria to define iron deficiency. Reliance on these guidelines would lead to the treatment of many patients who are not iron deficient (serum ferritin level <100 μg/L but normal TSAT) and ignores the possibility of iron deficiency in patients with a low TSAT but with serum ferritin level of >300 μg/L. Importantly, analyses of benefit based on trial eligibility-driven guidelines substantially underestimate the magnitude of heart-failure-event risk reduction with intravenous iron in patients who are truly iron deficient. Based on all available data, we recommend a new mechanism-based and trial-tested approach that reflects the totality of evidence more faithfully than the historical process adopted by clinical investigators and by the guidelines. Until additional evidence is forthcoming, an iron deficiency state in patients with heart failure should be defined by a TSAT <20% (as long as the serum ferritin level is <400 μg/L), and furthermore, the use of a serum ferritin level <100 μg/L alone as a diagnostic criterion should be discarded.

Expert recommendations for the management of iron deficiency in patients with heart failure in Asia

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency is a common comorbidity in heart failure (HF) and is independently associated with a worse quality-of-life and exercise capacity, as well as increased risk of hospitalization, regardless of anemia status. Although international guidelines have provided recommendations for the management of iron deficiency in patients with HF, guidelines in Asia are less established, and practical use of guidelines for management of iron deficiency is limited in the region.

METHODS

A panel comprising cardiologists from China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand convened to share insights and provide guidance for the optimal management of iron deficiency in patients with HF, tailored for the Asian community.

RESULTS

Expert opinions were provided for the screening, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of iron deficiency in patients with HF. It was recommended that all patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction should be screened for iron deficiency, and iron-deficient patients should be treated with intravenous iron. Monitoring of iron levels in patients with HF should be carried out once or twice yearly. Barriers to the management of iron deficiency in patients with HF in the region include low awareness of iron deficiency amongst general physicians, lack of reimbursement for screening and treatment, and lack of proper facilities for administration of intravenous iron.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations provide a structured approach to the management of iron deficiency in patients with HF in Asia.

Imbalance of Iron Availability and Demand in Patients With Acute and Chronic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency (ID) is a frequent comorbidity in patients with acute (AHF) and chronic heart failure (CHF) associated with morbidity and death. We aimed to better characterize iron homeostasis in patients with heart failure applying different biomarkers and to evaluate the accuracy of current ID definition by the European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association to indicate tissue iron availability and demand.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective cohort study investigating 277 patients with AHF and 476 patients with CHF between February 2021 and May 2022. Patients with AHF had more advanced ID than patients with CHF, reflected by increased soluble transferrin receptor and soluble transferrin receptor-ferritin index, and lower ferritin, serum iron, transferrin saturation, hepcidin, and reticulocyte hemoglobin. Decreased iron availability or increased tissue iron demand, reflected by increased soluble transferrin receptor-ferritin index and decreased reticulocyte hemoglobin, was found in 84.1% (AHF) and 28.0% (CHF) with absolute ID and in 50.0% (AHF) and 10.5% (CHF) with combined ID according to the current European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association-based ID definition. Low hepcidin expression as an indicator of systemic ID was found in 91.1% (AHF) and 80.4% (CHF) of patients with absolute ID and in 32.3% (AHF) and 18.8% (CHF) of patients with combined ID. ID definitions with higher specificity reduce the need for iron supplementation by 25.5% in patients with AHF and by 65.6% in patients with CHF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the current European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association-based ID definition might overestimate true ID, particularly in CHF. More stringent thresholds for ID could more accurately identify patients with heart failure with reduced tissue iron availability who benefit from intravenous iron supplementation.

Intravenous iron for acute and chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients with iron deficiency: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients with heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. We searched databases for randomised controlled trials that compared IV iron to placebo, in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A total of 7,813 participants, all having HFrEF with 3,998 receiving IV iron therapy, and 3,815 control recipients were included. There was a significant improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire favouring IV iron with MD 7.39, 95% CI [3.55, 11.22], p = 0.0002. Subgroup analysis, based on acute and chronic HF, has displayed a sustained statistical significance. Additionally, a significant increase in the left ventricular ejection fraction % was observed, with MD 3.76, 95% CI [2.32, 5.21], p < 0.00001. A significant improvement in 6-min walk test was noted, with MD 34.87, 95% CI [20.02, 49.72], p < 0.00001. Furthermore, IV iron showed significant improvement in NYHA class, peak VO2, serum ferritin, and haemoglobin levels. Finally, despite the lack of difference in terms of all-cause hospitalisation and HF-related death, IV iron was associated with a significant reduction in HF-related, any cardiovascular reason hospitalisations, and all-cause death; which supports the need for implementation of IV iron as a standard of care in patients with HF and iron deficiency.

Intravenous iron in patients with iron deficiency and heart failure: a review of modern evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Iron deficiency is common in patients with heart failure, affecting up to half of ambulatory patients and an even greater percentage of patients admitted for acute decompensation. Iron deficiency in this population is also associated with poor outcomes, including worse quality of life in addition to increased hospitalizations for heart failure and mortality. Evidence suggests that patients with iron deficiency in heart failure may benefit from repletion with IV iron.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we outline the etiology and pathophysiology of iron deficiency in heart failure as well as various iron formulations available. We discuss evidence for intravenous iron repletion with a particular focus on recent studies that have evaluated its effects on hospitalizations and mortality. Finally, we discuss areas of uncertainty and future study and provide practical guidance for iron repletion.

SUMMARY

In summary, there is overwhelming evidence that intravenous iron repletion in patients with iron deficiency in heart failure is both beneficial and safe. However, further evidence is needed to better identify which patients would most benefit from iron repletion as well as the ideal repletion strategy.

Acute heart failure - an EFIM guideline critical appraisal and adaptation for internists

BACKGROUND

Over the past two decades, several studies have been conducted that have tried to answer questions on management of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Updated international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have endorsed the findings of these studies. The aim of this document was to adapt recommendations of existing guidelines to help internists make decisions about specific and complex scenarios related to AHF.

METHODS

The adaptation procedure was to identify firstly unresolved clinical problems in patients with AHF in accordance with the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) process, then conduct a critical assessment of existing CPGs and choose recommendations that are most applicable to these specific scenarios.

RESULTS

Seven PICOs were identified and CPGs were assessed. There is no single test that can help clinicians in discriminating patients with acute dyspnoea, congestion or hypoxaemia. Performing of echocardiography and natriuretic peptide evaluation is recommended, and chest X-ray and lung ultrasound may be considered. Treatment strategies to manage arterial hypotension and low cardiac output include short-term continuous intravenous inotropic support, vasopressors, renal replacement therapy, and temporary mechanical circulatory support. The most updated recommendations on how to treat specific patients with AHF and certain comorbidities and for reducing post-discharge rehospitalization and mortality are provided. Overall, 51 recommendations were endorsed and the rationale for the selection is provided in the main text.

CONCLUSION

Through the use of appropriate tailoring process methodology, this document provides a simple and updated guide for internists dealing with AHF patients.

Comorbidity of patients with noncommunicable diseases in general practice. Eurasian guidelines

Создание руководства поддержано Советом по терапевтическим наукам отделения клинической медицины Российской академии наук.

Medicines optimization prior to discharge in patients admitted to hospital with heart failure

AIMS

Approximately half of patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HeFREF) are discharged from hospital on triple therapy [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers (BBs), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs)]. We investigated what proportion of patients are on optimal doses prior to discharge and how many might be eligible for initiation of sacubitril-valsartan or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2017, 1277 patients admitted with suspected heart failure were enrolled at a single hospital serving a local community around Kingston upon Hull, UK. Eligibility for sacubitril-valsartan or SGLT2I was based on entry criteria for the PIONEER-HF, DAPA-HF, and EMPEROR-Reduced trials. Four hundred fifty-five patients had HeFREF with complete data on renal function, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) prior to discharge. Eighty-three per cent of patients were taking an ACE-I or ARB, 85% a BB, and 63% an MRA at discharge. More than 60% of patients were eligible for sacubitril-valsartan and >70% for SGLT2I. Among those not already receiving a prescription, 37%, 28%, and 49% were eligible to start ACE-I or ARB, BB, and MRA, respectively. Low SBP (≤105 mmHg) was the most frequent explanation for failure to initiate or up-titrate therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients admitted for heart failure are eligible for initiation of life-prolonging medications prior to discharge. A hospital admission may be a common missed opportunity to improve treatment for patients with HeFREF.

Iron Deficiency, Anemia, and Iron Supplementation in Patients With Heart Failure: A Population-Level Study

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown an association between iron deficiency (ID) and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), irrespective of the presence of ID anemia (IDA). The current study used population-level data from a large, single-payer health care system in Canada to investigate the epidemiology of ID and IDA in patients with acute HF and those with chronic HF, and the iron supplementation practices in these settings.

METHODS

All adult patients with HF in Alberta between 2012 and 2019 were identified and categorized as acute or chronic HF. HF subtypes were determined through echocardiography data, and ID (serum ferritin concentration <100 μg/L, or ferritin concentration between 100 and 300 μg/L along with transferrin saturation <20%), and IDA through laboratory data. Broad eligibility for 3 clinical trials (AFFIRM-AHF [Study to Compare Ferric Carboxymaltose With Placebo in Patients With Acute HF and ID], IRONMAN [Intravenous Iron Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency], and HEART-FID [Randomized Placebocontrolled Trial of Ferric Carboxymaltose as Treatment for HF With ID]) was determined.

RESULTS

Among the 17 463 patients with acute HF, 38.5% had iron studies tested within 30 days post-index-HF episode (and 34.2% of the 11 320 patients with chronic HF). Among tested patients, 72.6% of the acute HF and 73.9% of the chronic HF were iron-deficient, and 51.4% and 49.0% had IDA, respectively. Iron therapy was provided to 41.8% and 40.5% of patients with IDA and acute or chronic HF, respectively. Of ID patients without anemia, 19.9% and 21.7% were prescribed iron therapy. The most common type of iron therapy was oral (28.1% of patients). Approximately half of the cohort was eligible for each of the AFFIRM-AHF, intravenous iron treatment in patients with HF and ID, and HEART-FID trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Current practices for investigating and treating ID in patients with HF do not align with existing guideline recommendations. Considering the gap in care, innovative strategies to optimize iron therapy in patients with HF are required.

Nutrition Assessment and Education of Patients with Heart Failure by Cardiologists

Although nutritional assessment and education are important for hospitalized patients with heart failure, the extent of their implementation in real-world clinical practice is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the evaluation and management of nutrition during hospitalization for heart failure using a questionnaire survey for cardiologists.In this cross-sectional multicenter survey, 147 cardiologists from 32 institutions completed a web-based questionnaire (response rate, 95%).The survey showed that 78.2% of the respondents performed a nutritional assessment for hospitalized patients, whereas 38.3% used objective tools. In contrast, only 9.5% of the respondents evaluated the presence or absence of cardiac cachexia. Most respondents (89.8%) reported providing nutritional education to their patients before hospital discharge. However, compared with the number of respondents who provided information on sodium (97.0%) and water (63.6%) restrictions, a limited number of respondents provided guidance on optimal protein (20.5%) and micronutrient (9.1%) intake as part of the nutritional education. Less than 50% of the respondents provided guidance on optimal calorie intake (43.2%) and ideal body weight (34.8%) as a part of the nutritional education for patients identified as malnourished.Although nutritional assessment is widely performed for hospitalized patients with heart failure, most assessments are subjective rather than objective. Nutritional education, frequently provided before hospital discharge, is limited to information on water or salt intake restrictions. Therefore, more comprehensive and individualized nutritional assessments and counselling with a scientific basis are required.

Iron deficiency: prevalence, mortality risk, and dietary relationships in general and heart failure populations

Background

Iron deficiency (ID) is the most common nutritional deficiency, with little research on its prevalence and long-term outcomes in the general population and those with heart failure (HF). Both the relationships between dietary iron and ID, as well as dietary folate and ID, are understudied.

Methods

We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2002 to investigate the prevalence, prognosis, and relationship between dietary and ID defined by different criteria in the general population (n = 6,660) and those with HF (n = 182).

Results

There was no significant difference in the prevalence of ID between HF patients and the general population after propensity score matching. Transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20% was associated with higher 5-year all-cause mortality (HR: 3.49, CI: 1.40-8.72, P = 0.007), while ferritin <30 ng/ml was associated with higher 10-year (HR: 2.70, CI: 1.10-6.67, P = 0.031) and 15-year all-cause mortality (HR: 2.64, CI: 1.40-5.00, P = 0.003) in HF patients. Higher dietary total folate but dietary iron reduced the risk of ID (defined as ferritin <100 ng/ml) in HF patients (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65-1.00; P = 0.047).

Conclusions

The prevalence of ID was identical in HF and non-HF individuals. Ferritin <30 ng/ml was associated with long-term outcomes whereas TSAT <20% was associated with short-term prognosis in both the general population and HF patients. A diet rich in folate might have the potential for prevention and treatment of ID in HF patients.