1
|
Yogeswaran V, Kim Y, Franco RL, Lucas AR, Sutton AL, LaRose JG, Kenyon J, D’Agostino RB, Sheppard VB, Reding K, Hundley WG, Cheng RK. Association of poverty-income ratio with cardiovascular disease and mortality in cancer survivors in the United States. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0300154. [PMID: 38968306 PMCID: PMC11226125 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower income is associated with high incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. CVD is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. However, there is limited research on the association between income, CVD, and mortality in this population. METHODS This study utilized nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a cross-sectional survey evaluating the health and nutritional status of the US population. Our study included NHANES participants aged ≥20 years from 2003-2014, who self-reported a history of cancer. We evaluated the association between income level, prevalence of CVD, and all-cause mortality. All-cause mortality data was obtained through public use mortality files. Income level was assessed by poverty-income ratio (PIR) that was calculated by dividing family (or individual) income by poverty guideline. We used multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models through a backward elimination method to evaluate associations between PIR, CVD, and all-cause mortality in cancer survivors. RESULTS This cohort included 2,464 cancer survivors with a mean age of 62 (42% male) years. Compared with individuals with a higher PIR tertiles, those in the lowest PIR tertile had a higher rate of pre-existing CVD and post-acquired CVD. In participants with post-acquired CVD, the lowest PIR tertile had over two-fold increased risk mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.27-3.71) when compared to the highest PIR tertile. Additionally, we found that PIR was as strong a predictor of mortality in cancer survivors as CVD. In patients with no CVD, the lowest PIR tertile continued to have almost a two-fold increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.69-4.35) when compared to a reference of the highest PIR tertile. CONCLUSIONS In this large national study of cancer survivors, low PIR is associated with a higher prevalence of CVD. Low PIR is also associated with an increased risk of mortality in cancer survivors, showing a comparable impact to that of pre-existing and post-acquired CVD. Urgent public health resources are needed to further study and improve screening and access to care in this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidhushei Yogeswaran
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Youngdeok Kim
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - R. Lee Franco
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Alexander R. Lucas
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Arnethea L. Sutton
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Jessica G. LaRose
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Jonathan Kenyon
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Ralph B. D’Agostino
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | - Vanessa B. Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Kerryn Reding
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - W. Gregory Hundley
- Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Richard K. Cheng
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fei-Zhang DJ, Schellenberg SJ, Bentrem DJ, Wayne JD, Pawlik TM. The associations of food environment with gastrointestinal cancer outcomes in the United States. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1490-1500. [PMID: 38648421 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social conditions and dietary behaviors have been implicated in the rising burden of gastrointestinal cancers (GIC). The "food environment" reflects influences on a community level relative to food availability, nutritional assistance, and social determinants of health. Using the US Department of Agriculture-Food Environment Atlas (FEA), we sought to characterize the association of food environment on GIC presenting stage and long-term survival. METHODS Patients diagnosed with GIC between 2013 and 2017 were identified using the SEER database. FEA-scores were based on 282 county-level food security variables, store-restaurant availability, SNAP/WIC enrollment, pricing/taxes, and producer vicinity adjusted-for factors of socioeconomic status, race-ethnicity, transportation access, and comorbidities. Relative FEA rankings across US counties were averaged into a composite score and assigned to patients by county-of-residence. The association of FEA, cancer stage, and survival were analyzed using multiple logistic regression and cox-proportional hazard models relative to White/non-White race/ethnicity. RESULTS Among 287,148 patients, the most common GIC-sites were colon (n = 97,942, 34%), pancreas (n = 49,785, 17.3%), liver (n = 31,098, 11.0%) and esophagus (n = 16,271, 5.7%). A worse food environment was independently associated with increased odds of late-stage diagnosis (esophageal odds ratio [OR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.05; hepatic OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08; pancreatic OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06) among all patients; in contrast, food environment was associated with colorectal cancer stage among non-White patients only (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03-1.06). Worse food environment was associated with worse 3-year survival (colon OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04; hepatic OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08-1.17; gastric OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13). Similar associations were noted relative to overall survival among the entire cohort (biliary tract hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05; esophageal HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04; hepatic HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.09; pancreatic HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05; rectum HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04; gastric HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.07), as well as among non-White patients (biliary HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07; colon HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05; esophageal HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08; hepatic HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.06-1.10) (all p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Food environment was independently associated with late-stage tumor presentation and worse 3-year and overall survival among GIC patients. Interventions to address inequities across communities relative to food environments are needed to alleviate disparities in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Fei-Zhang
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - David J Bentrem
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Wayne
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sahyoun L, Chen K, Tsay C, Chen G, Protiva P. Clinical and socioeconomic determinants of survival in biliary tract adenocarcinomas. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1374-1383. [PMID: 38660666 PMCID: PMC11037051 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in detection and treatments, biliary tract cancers continue to have poor survival outcomes. Currently, there is limited data investigating the significance of socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and environmental factors in biliary tract cancer survival. AIM To investigate how socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity are associated with survival. METHODS Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for biliary and gallbladder adenocarcinomas were extracted from 1975 to 2016. Socioeconomic data included smoking, poverty level, education, adjusted household income, and percentage of foreign-born persons and urban population. Survival was calculated with Cox proportional hazards models for death in the 5-year period following diagnosis. RESULTS Our study included 15883 gallbladder, 11466 intrahepatic biliary, 12869 extrahepatic biliary and 7268 ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma cases. When analyzing county-specific demographics, patients from counties with higher incomes were associated with higher survival rates [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97, P <0.05]. Similarly, counties with a higher percentage of patients with a college level education and counties with a higher urban population had higher 5-year survival rates (HR = 0.96, P = 0.002 and HR = 0.97, P = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSION Worse survival outcomes were observed in lower income counties while higher income and education level were associated with higher 5-year overall survival among gallbladder and biliary malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Sahyoun
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Kay Chen
- Gastroenterology Section, Jennifer Moreno VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, United States
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
| | - Cynthia Tsay
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - George Chen
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06520, United States
| | - Petr Protiva
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06520, United States
- Department of Gastroenterology, VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT 06516, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moss JL, Geyer NR, Lengerich EJ. Patterns of Cancer-Related Healthcare Access across Pennsylvania: Analysis of Novel Census Tract-Level Indicators of Persistent Poverty. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:616-623. [PMID: 38329390 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-1255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persistent poverty census tracts have had ≥20% of the population living below the federal poverty line for 30+ years. We assessed the relationship between persistent poverty and cancer-related healthcare access across census tracts in Pennsylvania. METHODS We gathered publicly available census tract-level data on persistent poverty, rurality, and sociodemographic variables, as well as potential access to healthcare (i.e., prevalence of health insurance, last-year check-up), realized access to healthcare (i.e., prevalence of screening for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers), and self-reported cancer diagnosis. We used multivariable spatial regression models to assess the relationships between persistent poverty and each healthcare access indicator. RESULTS Among Pennsylvania's census tracts, 2,789 (89.8%) were classified as non-persistent poverty, and 316 (10.2%) were classified as persistent poverty (113 did not have valid data on persistent poverty). Persistent poverty tracts had lower prevalence of health insurance [estimate = -1.70, standard error (SE) = 0.10], screening for cervical cancer (estimate = -4.00, SE = 0.17) and colorectal cancer (estimate = -3.13, SE = 0.20), and cancer diagnosis (estimate = -0.34, SE = 0.05), compared with non-persistent poverty tracts (all P < 0.001). However, persistent poverty tracts had higher prevalence of last-year check-up (estimate = 0.22, SE = 0.08) and screening for breast cancer (estimate = 0.56, SE = 0.15; both P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Relationships between persistent poverty and cancer-related healthcare access outcomes differed in direction and magnitude. Health promotion interventions should leverage data at fine-grained geographic units (e.g., census tracts) to motivate focus on communities or outcomes. IMPACT Future studies should extend these analyses to other states and outcomes to inform public health research and interventions to reduce geographic disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Moss
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Eugene J Lengerich
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porcacchia AS, Pires GN, Andersen ML, Tufik S. A cross-sectional analysis of the association between sleep disorders and cancer using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2014. J Clin Sleep Med 2024; 20:515-520. [PMID: 38054465 PMCID: PMC10985309 DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.10932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES Cancer is one of the main causes of death in the world, and sleep disorders are a serious public health problem, especially in large cities; of these, insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are the most common. In the last decade, studies have pointed to a possible association between sleep disorders and cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether there is any association between sleep disorders and cancer. METHODS Five National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) (2005-2014) from the United States were combined in order to obtain the sample. Two main sleep variables were assessed: having trouble sleeping and/or ever telling a doctor one had a sleep problem. The odds ratio of ever having a cancer diagnosis was the main outcome. Data were analyzed by binary logistic regression models in Jamovi. RESULTS The final sample comprised 26,821 participants. Individuals who reported having trouble sleeping had an odds ratio of 1.48 (95% confidence interval = [1.336-1.646]; P < .001) of having been diagnosed with cancer, and those who had already been diagnosed with a sleep disorder had an odds ratio of 1.21 (95% confidence interval = [1.046-1.415]; P = .011), showing an increased chance of having been diagnosed with cancer. In men, these values were even greater, with an odds ratio of 1.56 (95% confidence interval = [1.321-1.843]; P < .001) and an odds ratio of 1.26 (95% confidence interval = [1.013-1.582]; P = .037), respectively, for having trouble sleeping and for having been diagnosed with a sleep disorder, in relation to having been diagnosed with cancer. CONCLUSIONS Individuals who had trouble sleeping or who had been diagnosed with a sleep disorder at any time in their life were more likely to have been diagnosed with cancer. CITATION Porcacchia AS, Pires GN, Andersen ML, Tufik S. A cross-sectional analysis of the association between sleep disorders and cancer using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2014. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(4):515-520.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Saj Porcacchia
- Departamento de Psicobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gabriel Natan Pires
- Departamento de Psicobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Sleep Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Monica Levy Andersen
- Departamento de Psicobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Sleep Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sergio Tufik
- Departamento de Psicobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Sleep Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Washington SL, Lonergan PE, Odisho AY, Meng MV, Porten SP. Association of household net worth with healthcare costs after radical cystectomy using real-world data. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7116. [PMID: 38553953 PMCID: PMC10980929 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial toxicity of bladder cancer care may influence how patients utilize healthcare resources, from emergency department (ED) encounters to office visits. We aim to examine whether greater household net worth (HHNW) confers differential access to healthcare resources after radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS This population-based cohort study examined the association between HHNW and healthcare utilization costs in the 90 days post-RC in commercially insured patients with bladder cancer. Costs accrued from the index hospitalization to 90 days after including health plan costs (HPC) and out-of-pocket costs (OPC). Multivariable logistic regression models were generated by encounter (acute inpatient, ED, outpatient, and office visit). RESULTS A total of 141,903 patients were identified with HHNW categories near evenly distributed. Acute inpatient encounters incurred the greatest HPC and OPC. Office visits conferred the lowest HPC while ED visits had the lowest OPC. Black patients harbored increased odds of an acute inpatient encounter (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16-1.29) and ED encounter (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.27) while Asian (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.85) and Hispanic (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69-0.78, p < 0.001) patients had lower odds of an outpatient encounter, compared to White counterpart. Increasing HHNW was associated with decreasing odds of acute inpatient or ED encounters and greater odds of office visits. CONCLUSIONS Lower HHNW conferred greater risk of costly inpatient encounters while greater HHNW had greater odds of less costly office visits, illustrating how financial flexibility fosters differences in healthcare utilization and lower costs. HHNW may serve as a proxy for financial flexibility and risk of financial hardship than income alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel L. Washington
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Peter E. Lonergan
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Department of UrologySt. James's HospitalDublinIreland
- Department of SurgeryTrinity CollegeDublinIreland
| | - Anobel Y. Odisho
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Maxwell V. Meng
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sima P. Porten
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yared JA, Lee TY, Cooke CE, Johnson A, Summers A, Yang K, Liu S, Tang B, Onukwugha E. Disparity in treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an analysis of patient and contextual factors. Leuk Lymphoma 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38323907 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2310150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
This study characterizes the patterns and timing of CLL treatment and, to our knowledge, is the first to identify social vulnerability factors associated with CLL treatment receipt in the Medicare population. A total of 3508 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with CLL from 2017 to 2019 were identified. We reported the proportion of individuals who received CLL treatment and the time until the first CLL treatment receipt after the first observed claim with a CLL diagnosis. Logistic regression and time-to-event models provided adjusted odds ratios and hazard ratios associated with baseline individual-level and county-level factors. Sixteen percent of individuals received CLL treatment, and the median follow-up time was 540 d. The median time to receipt of CLL treatment was 61 d. Older age and residence in a county ranked high in social vulnerability (as defined by minority status and language) were negatively associated with treatment receipt and time to treatment receipt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean A Yared
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tsung-Ying Lee
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Catherine E Cooke
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Abree Johnson
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda Summers
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Keri Yang
- Beigene USA, Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - Sizhu Liu
- Beigene USA, Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA
| | | | - Eberechukwu Onukwugha
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zheng S, Xie S, Yu H, Duan X, He Y, Ho C, Wan Y, Hang T, Chen W, Lyu J, Deng L. Competing-risks analysis for evaluating the prognosis of patients with microinvasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma based on the SEER database. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:286. [PMID: 38062392 PMCID: PMC10701925 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02109-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Utilizing the traditional Cox regression model to identify the factors affecting the risk of mortality due to microinvasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (micSCC) may produce skewed results. Since cause-specific mortality can guide clinical decision-making, this study employed the Fine-Gray model based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify significant predictive variables for the risk of micSCC-related mortality. METHODS This study used the information of patients with micSCC who were listed in the SEER database during 2000-2015. Cox regression and Fine-Gray models were utilized for the multivariable analysis, and Gray's test and the cumulative incidence function were used for the univariable analyses. RESULTS There were 100 patients who died from other reasons and 38 who died from micSCC among the 1259 qualified patients with micSCC. Most were female, white, married, had localized metastasis, etc. According to the univariable Gray's test (P < 0.05), the cumulative incidence rate for events of interest was strongly associated with age, sex, marital status, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, radiation status, summary stage, chemotherapy status, surgery status, and tumor size. Multivariable Cox regression analysis and multivariable competing-risks analysis indicated that age, tumor size, and income were independent risk variables for the prognosis of patients with micSCC. In both age and tumor size variables, the competing-risks model showed a slight decrease in the hazard ratio and a slight narrowing of the 95% confidence interval compared with the Cox regression model. However, this pattern is not evident in the income variable. CONCLUSIONS This study established a Fine-Gray model for identifying the independent risk factors that influence the risk of mortality among patients with micSCC. This study uncovers that, in the context of competing risks, age, tumor size, and income serve as independent risk factors influencing the risk of mortality due to micSCC among patients. Our findings have the potential to provide more accurate risk assessments for patient outcomes and contribute to the development of individualized treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzheng Zheng
- Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University and Jinan University Institute of Dermatology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuping Xie
- School of Basic Medicine and Public Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai Yu
- Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University and Jinan University Institute of Dermatology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xi Duan
- Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University and Jinan University Institute of Dermatology, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Yong He
- Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University and Jinan University Institute of Dermatology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chichien Ho
- Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University and Jinan University Institute of Dermatology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Wan
- Guangzhou Jnumeso Bio-Technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tie Hang
- Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine Greater Bay Area, Zhongshan, China
| | - Wenhui Chen
- Shanghai Aige Medical Beauty Clinic Co., Ltd. (Agge), Shanghai, China.
| | - Jun Lyu
- Department of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatization, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Liehua Deng
- Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University and Jinan University Institute of Dermatology, Guangzhou, China.
- Department of Dermatology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Heyuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
DiPeri TP, Manguso N, Gong J, Atkins KM, Hendifar AE, Gangi A. Socioeconomic disparities in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:1278-1284. [PMID: 37668060 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Demographic and socioeconomic disparities affect cancer specific outcomes in numerous malignancies, but the impact of these for patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) is not well understood. The primary objective was to investigate the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on overall survival (OS) for patients with SBNETs. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Database to assess patients diagnosed with SBNET between 2004 and 2015. Patients were stratified by demographics, socioeconomic factors, insurance status, and place of living. RESULTS The 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 78.5%. The 5-year survival was worse in patients with lower income (p < 0.0001), lower education (p < 0.0001), not in proximity to a metro area (p = 0.0004), and treatment at a community cancer center (p < 0.0001). Adjusting for age and sex, factors associated with worse OS were lower income (<$38 000) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.28), lower education (>20% no HSD) (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), no insurance (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.33-2.06), and not living in proximity to a metro area (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10-1.47). CONCLUSIONS Patient demographics and socioeconomic factors play an important role in survival of patients with SBNETs, specifically proximity to a metro area, median income, education level, and type of treatment center. Strategies to improve access to care must be considered in this at-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P DiPeri
- Department of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nicholas Manguso
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Pennington Cancer Institute, Renown Health, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Jun Gong
- Department of Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Katelyn M Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andrew E Hendifar
- Department of Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alexandra Gangi
- Department of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cotangco K, Pineda E, Hingarh V, Nyakudarika NC, Cohen JG, Holschneider CH. Integrating social care into gynecologic oncology: Identifying and addressing patient's social needs. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:138-144. [PMID: 37980768 PMCID: PMC11218889 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify social needs of gynecologic oncology patients using a self-administered social needs assessment tool (SNAT), compare the SNAT to a formal social work assessment performed by cancer care navigators (CCN), and provide SNAT-informed community resources. METHODS We analyzed prospectively collected data from a performance improvement initiative in a safety-net gynecologic oncology clinic between October 2021 and July 2022. We screened for eight social needs domains, health literacy, desire for social work, and presence of urgent needs. Clinicodemographic data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Univariate descriptive statistics were used. Inter-rater reliability for social needs domains was assessed using percent agreement. RESULTS 1010 unique patients were seen over this study period. 488 (48%) patients completed the SNAT, of which 265 (54%) screened positive for ≥1 social need. 83 (31%) patients were actively receiving cancer treatment, 140 (53%) were in post-treatment surveillance, and 42 (16%) had benign gynecologic diagnoses. Transportation (19% vs 25%), housing insecurity (18% vs 19%), and desire to speak with a social worker (16% vs 27%) were the 3 most common needs in both the entire cohort and among patients actively receiving cancer treatment. 78% patients in active treatment were seen by a CCN and received SNAT informed community resources. The percent agreement between the SNAT and formal CCN assessment ranged from 72%-94%. CONCLUSIONS The self-administered SNAT identified many unmet social needs among gynecologic oncology patients, corresponded well with the formal social work CCN assessment, and informed the provision of community resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Cotangco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Veda Hingarh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, USA
| | - Natsai C Nyakudarika
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Joshua G Cohen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, City of Hope Orange County, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Christine H Holschneider
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhu B, Hu FH, Jia YJ, Zhao DY, Zhang WQ, Tang W, Hu SQ, Ge MW, Du W, Shen WQ, Chen HL. Socioeconomic status on survival outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:15641-15655. [PMID: 37658279 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05344-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is widely acknowledged as a prevalent malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine the independent impact of Median Household Income (MHI) on prognosis and survival outcomes in patients with CRC. METHODS Data from 17 cancer registries of the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, with follow-up extended until November 2022 was analyzed. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of different levels of MHI on survival outcomes among patients with CRC. A total of 761,697 CRC patient records were retrieved from the SEER database. RESULTS The Cox regression analysis results indicated that patients with higher MHI exhibited improved overall survival outcomes when compared to those with lower MHI (MMHI: P < 0.001; HMHI: P < 0.001). Regardless of the specific tumor location, gender, stage of CRC, or treatment method, higher MHI is consistently linked to improved survival outcomes. However, this association was not found to be statistically significant among American Indian/Alaska Native (MMHI: P = 0.017; HMHI: P = 0.081), Asian or Pacific Islander (MMHI: P = 0.223; HMHI: P = 0.002) and unmarried or domestic partner patients (MMHI: P = 0.311; HMHI: P = 0.011). CONCLUSION These results emphasize the importance of considering socioeconomic factors, such as income level, in understanding and addressing disparities in survival outcomes of CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nantong First People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No. 666 Shengli Road, Nantong, People's Republic of China
| | - Fei-Hong Hu
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi-Jie Jia
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan-Yan Zhao
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Wan-Qing Zhang
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen Tang
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi-Qi Hu
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Meng-Wei Ge
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Du
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Wang-Qin Shen
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong-Lin Chen
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhu A, Rhodes S, Dong W, Rose J, Cullen J, Miller DB, Spratt DE, Ponsky L, Shoag D, Trapl E, Schumacher F, Penukonda S, Brant A, Strasser MO, Koroukian SM, Markt S, Shoag JE. Individual-level home values and cancer mortality in a statewide registry. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad076. [PMID: 37796836 PMCID: PMC10646779 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior work assessing disparities in cancer outcomes has relied on regional socioeconomic metrics. These metrics average data across many individuals, resulting in a loss of granularity and confounding with other regional factors. METHODS Using patients' addresses at the time of diagnosis from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System, we retrieved individual home price estimates from an online real estate marketplace. This individual-level estimate was compared with the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) at the census block group level. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the relationship between home price estimates and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS A total of 667 277 patients in Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System were linked to individual home prices across 16 cancers. Increasing home prices, adjusted for age, stage at diagnosis, and ADI, were associated with a decrease in the hazard of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.92 to 0.93, and HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.94 to 0.95, respectively). Following a cancer diagnosis, individuals with home prices 2 standard deviations above the mean had an estimated 10-year survival probability (7.8%, 95% CI = 7.2% to 8.3%) higher than those with home prices 2 standard deviations below the mean. The association between home price and mortality was substantially more prominent for patients living in less deprived census block groups (Pinteraction < .001) than for those living in more deprived census block groups. CONCLUSION Higher individual home prices were associated with improved all-cause and cancer-specific mortality, even after accounting for regional measures of deprivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Zhu
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen Rhodes
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Weichuan Dong
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Johnie Rose
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer Cullen
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David B Miller
- Department of Social Work, Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lee Ponsky
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daniel Shoag
- Department of Economics, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erika Trapl
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Fredrick Schumacher
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Suhas Penukonda
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aaron Brant
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary O Strasser
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Siran M Koroukian
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sarah Markt
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jonathan E Shoag
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Munro HM, Yu D, Zheng W, Blot WJ, Cai Q, Shrubsole MJ. Diet quality and lung cancer incidence in a low-income population in the United States. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:626-635. [PMID: 37400676 PMCID: PMC10421925 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02342-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although tobacco smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer, interest in the relationship of diet quality on risk has been growing. METHODS We examined the association between Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-10) at enrollment and lung cancer incidence among 70,802 participants in a predominantly African American and low-income prospective cohort in the southern United States. Outcomes were ascertained through linkages with state cancer registries and the National Death Index (NDI). Hazard ratios by HEI-10 quartiles were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS During ≤16 years of follow-up, 1454 incident lung cancers were identified. The lowest HEI-10 quartile compared to the highest was adversely associated with lung cancer risk (HR: 1.89, 95% CI 1.16-3.07) among male former smokers and female never smokers (HR: 2.58, 95% CI 1.06-6.28). CONCLUSIONS Low-quality diet was associated with increased lung cancer risk among male former smokers and female never smokers but cautious interpretation of the findings should be taken due to the small number of lung cancers among never smokers and the possibility of residual confounding by smoking in ever smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather M Munro
- International Epidemiology Field Station, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Danxia Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - William J Blot
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Qiuyin Cai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Martha J Shrubsole
- International Epidemiology Field Station, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Guadamuz JS, Wang X, Ryals CA, Miksad RA, Snider J, Walters J, Calip GS. Socioeconomic status and inequities in treatment initiation and survival among patients with cancer, 2011-2022. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad058. [PMID: 37707536 PMCID: PMC10582690 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with suboptimal cancer care and reduced survival. Most studies examining cancer inequities across area-level socioeconomic status tend to use less granular or unidimensional measures and pre-date the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we examined the association of area-level socioeconomic status on real-world treatment initiation and overall survival among adults with 20 common cancers. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record-derived deidentified data (Flatiron Health Research Database, 2011-2022) linked to US Census Bureau data from the American Community Survey (2015-2019). Area-level socioeconomic status quintiles (based on a measure incorporating income, home values, rental costs, poverty, blue-collar employment, unemployment, and education information) were computed from the US population and applied to patients based on their mailing address. Associations were examined using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for diagnosis year, age, sex, performance status, stage, and cancer type. RESULTS This cohort included 291 419 patients (47.7% female; median age = 68 years). Patients from low-SES areas were younger and more likely to be Black (21.9% vs 3.3%) or Latinx (8.4% vs 3.0%) than those in high-SES areas. Living in low-SES areas (vs high) was associated with lower treatment rates (hazard ratio = 0.94 [95% confidence interval = 0.93 to 0.95]) and reduced survival (median real-world overall survival = 21.4 vs 29.5 months, hazard ratio = 1.20 [95% confidence interval = 1.18 to 1.22]). Treatment and survival inequities were observed in 9 and 19 cancer types, respectively. Area-level socioeconomic inequities in treatment and survival remained statistically significant in the COVID-19 era (after March 2020). CONCLUSION To reduce inequities in cancer outcomes, efforts that target marginalized, low-socioeconomic status neighborhoods are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny S Guadamuz
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Program on Medicines and Public Health, University of Southern California School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Rebecca A Miksad
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Gregory S Calip
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA
- Program on Medicines and Public Health, University of Southern California School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patel MI, Hinyard L, Hlubocky FJ, Merrill JK, Smith KT, Kamaraju S, Carrizosa D, Kalwar T, Fashoyin-Aje L, Gomez SL, Jeames S, Florez N, Kircher SM, Tap WD. Assessing the Needs of Those Who Serve the Underserved: A Qualitative Study among US Oncology Clinicians. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3311. [PMID: 37444421 PMCID: PMC10341104 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Society of Clinical Oncology established the 'Supporting Providers Serving the Underserved' (SUS) Task Force with a goal to develop recommendations to support cancer clinicians who deliver care for populations at risk for cancer disparities. As a first step, the Task Force explored barriers and facilitators to equitable cancer care delivery. METHODS Clinicians across the United States who deliver care predominantly for low-income and racially and ethnically minoritized populations were identified based on lists generated by the Task Force and the Health Equity Committee. Through purposive sampling based on geographical location, clinicians were invited to participate in 30-60 min semi-structured interviews to explore experiences, barriers, and facilitators in their delivery of cancer care. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, imported into qualitative data management software, and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Thematic analysis revealed three major themes regarding barriers (lack of executive leadership recognition of resources; patient-related socio-economic needs; clinician burnout) and two major themes regarding facilitators (provider commitment, experiential training). CONCLUSIONS Findings reveal modifiable barriers and potential solutions to facilitate equitable cancer care delivery for populations at risk for cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manali I. Patel
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Medical Services, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Leslie Hinyard
- Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA;
| | - Fay J. Hlubocky
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA;
| | - Janette K. Merrill
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA; (J.K.M.); (K.T.S.)
| | - Kimberly T. Smith
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA; (J.K.M.); (K.T.S.)
| | - Sailaja Kamaraju
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA;
| | | | - Tricia Kalwar
- Medical Services, Veterans Administration, Miami Healthcare System, Miami, FL 33125, USA;
| | | | - Scarlett L. Gomez
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California—San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 93701, USA
| | - Sanford Jeames
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Huston Tillotson University College of Arts and Sciences, Austin, TX 78702, USA;
| | - Narjust Florez
- Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Sheetal M. Kircher
- Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - William D. Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Patel SR, Suero-Abreu GA, Ai A, Ramachandran MK, Meza K, Florez N. Inequity in care delivery in cardio-oncology: dissecting disparities in underrepresented populations. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1124447. [PMID: 37361603 PMCID: PMC10289233 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1124447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
It is well known that patients with cancer have a significantly higher cardiovascular mortality risk than the general population. Cardio-oncology has emerged to focus on these issues including risk reduction, detection, monitoring, and treatment of cardiovascular disease or complications in patients with cancer. The rapid advances in early detection and drug development in oncology, along with socioeconomic differences, racial inequities, lack of support, and barriers to accessing quality medical care, have created disparities in various marginalized populations. In this review, we will discuss the factors contributing to disparities in cardio-oncologic care in distinct populations, including Hispanic/Latinx, Black, Asian and Pacific Islander, indigenous populations, sex and gender minorities, and immigrants. Some factors that contribute to differences in outcomes in cardio-oncology include the prevalence of cancer screening rates, genetic cardiac/oncologic risk factors, cultural stressors, tobacco exposure rates, and physical inactivity. We will also discuss the barriers to cardio-oncologic care in these communities from the racial and socioeconomic context. Appropriate and timely cardiovascular and cancer care in minority groups is a critical component in addressing these disparities, and there need to be urgent efforts to address this widening gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti Rajesh Patel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, United States
| | | | - Angela Ai
- Olive View-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Maya K. Ramachandran
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Kelly Meza
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eom KY, Berg KA, Joseph NE, Runner K, Tarabichi Y, Khiyami A, Perzynski AT, Sossey-Alaoui K. Neighborhood and racial influences on triple negative breast cancer: evidence from Northeast Ohio. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:369-381. [PMID: 36781520 PMCID: PMC10716786 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06883-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer (BC) with higher recurrence rates and poorer prognoses and most prevalent among non-Hispanic Black women. Studies of multiple health conditions and care processes suggest that neighborhood socioeconomic position is a key driver of health disparities. We examined roles of patients' neighborhood-level characteristics and race on prevalence, stage at diagnosis, and mortality among patients diagnosed with BC at a large safety-net healthcare system in Northeast Ohio. METHODS We used tumor registry to identify BC cases from 2007 to 2020 and electronic health records and American Community Survey for individual- and area-level factors. We performed multivariable regression analyses to estimate associations between neighborhood-level characteristics, measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), race and comparative TNBC prevalence, stage at diagnosis, and total mortality. RESULTS TNBC was more common among non-Hispanic Black (53.7%) vs. non-Hispanic white patients (46.4%). Race and ADI were individually significant predictors of TNBC prevalence, stage at diagnosis, and total mortality. Race remained significantly associated with TNBC subtype, adjusting for covariates. Accounting for TNBC status, a more disadvantaged neighborhood was significantly associated with a worse stage at diagnosis and higher death rates. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that both neighborhood socioeconomic position and race are strongly associated with TNBC vs. other BC subtypes. The burden of TNBC appears to be highest among Black women in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our study suggests a complex interplay of social conditions and biological disease characteristics contributing to racial disparities in BC outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Y Eom
- Center for Health Care Research and Policy, The MetroHealth System and Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Dr. Rammelkamp Building R225, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA.
| | - Kristen A Berg
- Center for Health Care Research and Policy, The MetroHealth System and Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Dr. Rammelkamp Building R225, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA
| | - Natalie E Joseph
- Division of Surgical Oncology, MetroHealth Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kristen Runner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, MetroHealth Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yasir Tarabichi
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Amer Khiyami
- Department of Pathology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Adam T Perzynski
- Center for Health Care Research and Policy, The MetroHealth System and Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Dr. Rammelkamp Building R225, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Snider NG, Hastert TA, Nair M, Madhav K, Ruterbusch JJ, Schwartz AG, Peters ES, Stoffel EM, Rozek LS, Purrington KS. Area-level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Cancer Survival in Metropolitan Detroit. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:387-397. [PMID: 36723416 PMCID: PMC10071652 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial segregation is linked to poorer neighborhood quality and adverse health conditions among minorities, including worse cancer outcomes. We evaluated relationships between race, neighborhood social disadvantage, and cancer survival. METHODS We calculated overall and cancer-specific survival for 11,367 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and 29,481 non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer using data from the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. The area deprivation index (ADI) was used to measure social disadvantage at the census block group level, where higher ADI is associated with poorer neighborhood factors. Associations between ADI and survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards mixed-effects models accounting for geographic grouping and adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS Increasing ADI quintile was associated with increased overall mortality for all four cancer sites in multivariable-adjusted models. Stratified by race, these associations remained among breast (NHW: HR = 1.16, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.20, P < 0.0001), colorectal (NHW: HR = 1.11, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.09, P = 0.00378), prostate (NHW: HR = 1.18, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.18, P < 0.0001), and lung cancers (NHW: HR = 1.06, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.07, P = 0.00177). Cancer-specific mortality estimates were similar to overall mortality. Adjustment for ADI substantially attenuated the effects of race on mortality for breast [overall proportion attenuated (OPA) = 47%, P < 0.0001; cancer-specific proportion attenuated (CSPA) = 37%, P < 0.0001] prostate cancer (OPA = 51%, P < 0.0001; CSPA = 56%, P < 0.0001), and colorectal cancer (OPA = 69%, P = 0.032; CSPA = 36%, P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage is related to cancer mortality in a racially diverse population, impacting racial differences in cancer mortality. IMPACT Understanding the role of neighborhood quality in cancer survivorship could improve community-based intervention practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie G. Snider
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Theresa A. Hastert
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Mrudula Nair
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - K.C. Madhav
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Julie J. Ruterbusch
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Ann G. Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Edward S. Peters
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Elena M. Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Laura S. Rozek
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Kristen S. Purrington
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bonner A, Herring B, Wang R, Gillis A, Zmijewski P, Lindeman B, Fazendin J, Chen H. The Association of Socioeconomic Factors and Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. J Surg Res 2023; 283:973-981. [PMID: 36915026 PMCID: PMC10478758 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) is the most common thyroid malignancy, and the worldwide incidence is increasing. Early stage disease is curable with surgery. We hypothesized that patients who live at greater distances from health care institutions or have complicating socioeconomic barriers may present with more advanced diseases and have worse outcomes. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients who were diagnosed with WDTC between 2004 and 2018. Race, ethnicity, insurance status, income status, and distance from residence to health care clinic of diagnosis (great circle distance [GCD]) were analyzed with respect to the severity of disease at presentation (stage) and outcomes. Binary logistic regression and Cox regression were used to determine associations between socioeconomic variables and tumor stage or survival. RESULTS The Hispanic (OR: 1.49, CI: 1.45-1.54, P < 0.001) and Asian (OR: 1.49, CI: 1.43-1.55, P < 0.001) populations had higher odds of developing an advanced disease when compared to the White population separately. Patients without insurance displayed higher odds of developing an advanced disease at diagnosis compared to those with insurance (OR: 1.39, CI: 1.31-1.47, P < 0.001). Adjusted-Cox regression analysis of survival revealed that Black patients had detrimental survival outcomes when compared to White patients (HR: 1.24, P < 0.001), and patients with private insurance had improved survival outcomes when compared to those without insurance (HR: 0.58, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Hispanic and Asian patients were found to be more likely to present with an advanced disease but also displayed greater overall survival when compared to the White population. The Black population, patients without insurance, and patients with lower income status exhibited worse survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Bonner
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Brendon Herring
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Rongzhi Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Andrea Gillis
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Polina Zmijewski
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Brenessa Lindeman
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jessica Fazendin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Herbert Chen
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen E, Deshane A, Damico N, Kharouta M, Kim U, Kemmann M, Kyasaram R, Wu AK, Biswas T, Dorth J, Mansur D, Choi S, Bhatt A. An Analysis of Cancer Center-Provided Rideshare Utilization for Radiation Therapy. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:40-50. [PMID: 36581084 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The potential of rideshare services to facilitate timely radiation therapy (RT), especially for resource-limited patients, is understudied. METHODS Patients (n = 63) who received 73 courses of RT (1,513 fractions) and utilized free hospital-provided rideshare service (537 rides) were included in this retrospective study. A multidimensional analysis was conducted including a comparison of demographic, disease characteristics, and treatment completion data; a revenue analysis to evaluate the financial impact of rideshare services; and a geospatial analysis to evaluate community-level characteristics of patients. RESULTS Median age was 59; most were female (56%) and self-identified as Black or African American (56%), not working (91%), not partnered (83%), high school educated or less (78%), and insured with Medicaid (51%). Geospatial analysis revealed that patients lived in communities with significantly higher rates of resource deprivation. Median rideshare distance was 6.4 miles (interquartile range 3.4-11.2) with a median cost of $13.04 per rideshare (interquartile range 9-19). Of the rideshare-facilitated treatments, 100% were completed, with an overall course completion rate of 97.3% compared with 85.4% for those who did not use rideshare (P = .001); two patients discontinued RT for reasons unrelated to transportation. High rideshare utilization (n = 32), defined as utilization ≥ 45% of the treatment course, was associated with significantly shorter treatment courses and lower radiation doses compared with low rideshare utilization (P = .04). Total rideshare cost for high utilizers and whole cohort was $11,589 and $16,895, facilitating an estimated revenue of $401,952 and $1,175,119, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Free hospital-provided rideshare service is economically feasible and associated with high RT completion rates. It may help enhance quality radiation care for those who come from resource-limited communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Chen
- Resident, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alok Deshane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; and Medical Student, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nicholas Damico
- Resident, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael Kharouta
- Resident, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Uriel Kim
- Medical Student, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Matthew Kemmann
- Director, Strategic Planning and Analytics, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ravi Kyasaram
- Cancer Informatics Senior Data Architect, Cancer Informatics, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anna K Wu
- Medical Student, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tithi Biswas
- Thoracic Section Leader, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; and Professor, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- Head and Neck Section Leader, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; and Associate Professor, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David Mansur
- Pediatric Section Leader, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; and Professor, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Serah Choi
- CNS Section Leader, and Vice Chair of Laboratory Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; and Assistant Professor, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Aashish Bhatt
- Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; and Associate Professor, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lin SY, Zhou W, Koch JR, Barnes AJ, Yang R, Xue H. The Association Between Tobacco Retailer Outlet Density and Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking in Virginia. Nicotine Tob Res 2023; 25:36-42. [PMID: 35752162 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We examine the association between tobacco retail outlet density and adult smoking prevalence at the county level in Virginia, controlling for spatial autocorrelations. AIMS AND METHODS Pooling data from 2020 County Health Rankings (compiled data from various sources including, but not limited to, the National Center for Health Statistics-Mortality Files, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and the American Community Survey) and Counter Tools, we conducted regression analyses that accounted for spatial autocorrelation (spatial lag models, LMlag) and adjusted for county-level access to healthcare, demographics, SES, environmental factors, risk conditions or behaviors, and population health measures. RESULTS Our estimates provide evidence that every increase of one tobacco retail outlet per 1000 persons was associated with 1.16 percentage points (95% CI: 0.80-1.52) higher smoking prevalence at the county level in Virginia after controlling for spatial autocorrelation. The effect of outlet density was largely explained by social determinants of health such as SES, risky conditions or behaviors, and environmental factors. We further noticed that the impact of social determinants of health were closely related and can be explained by indicators of population health (rates of mental distress (β = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.31-1.67) and physical inactivity (β = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04-0.10). CONCLUSIONS Although higher tobacco outlet density was associated with an increase in county-level smoking prevalence, the impact of outlet density was largely explained by social determinants of health and mental illness. Improving well-being at the community level could be a promising strategy in future tobacco control policies. IMPLICATION The influence of tobacco outlet density seems to be explained by other social determinants of health and population level of mental or physical health. Thus, efforts to reduce tobacco use and consequent negative health effects should explore the impact of improving regional living standards. However, a sole focus on economic growth may not be sufficient, whereas a focus on such things as promoting work-life balance and improving overall well-being at the community level may be more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo-Yu Lin
- Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Weiyu Zhou
- Department of Statistics, Volgenau School of Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - J Randy Koch
- Department of Psychology and the Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Andrew J Barnes
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Ruixin Yang
- Department of Geography and Geoinformation Science, College of Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Hong Xue
- Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ahadinezhad B, Maleki A, Amerzadeh M, Mohtashamzadeh B, Safdari M, Khosravizadeh O. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Incidence: A Comparative Investigation Based on Population of Iranian Provinces. CURRENT HEALTH SCIENCES JOURNAL 2023; 49:85-95. [PMID: 37780192 PMCID: PMC10541078 DOI: 10.12865/chsj.49.01.85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is the second important cause of death worldwide. Cancer is one of the top health priorities in Iran. We aimed to study the socio-economic inequality of cancer incidence in Iran provinces. We conducted this cross-sectional study using provincial data. We obtained the required data from the statistical yearbook report, the Statistics Center Report and the National Cancer Registration Program Report of Iran's Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MoHME) for 2018. Socio-economic inequality of cancer incidence was analyzed by estimating the concentration index and extracting the concentration curve. Statistical analyzes were performed using STATA 14. Our findings revealed that cancer incidence was unequally distributed in terms of the socio-economic status in Iranian provinces. Cancer incidence is slightly concentrated in the provinces with higher than average literacy, per capita income and insurance coverage and household size below average. The concentration of cancer incidence has been to the detriment of the provinces that have a slightly better ranking in terms of the socio-economic index. The employment rate did not significantly affect cancer's distribution burden. We recommend policymakers facilitate early cancer detection by providing insurance coverage for screening services, payment exemptions, and public awareness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahman Ahadinezhad
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Aisa Maleki
- Student Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
- Health Products Safety Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amerzadeh
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | | | - Mahdi Safdari
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Omid Khosravizadeh
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Amiri S, Greer MD, Muller CJ, Johansson P, Petras A, Allick CC, London SM, Abbey MC, Halasz LM, Buchwald DS. Disparities in Access to Radiation Therapy by Race and Ethnicity in the United States With Focus on American Indian/Alaska Native People. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1929-1938. [PMID: 35525833 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Striking disparities in access to radiation therapy (RT) exist, especially among racial and ethnic-minority patients. We analyzed census block group data to evaluate differences in travel distance to RT as a function of race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and rurality. METHODS The Directory of Radiotherapy Centers provided the addresses of facilities containing linear accelerators for RT. We classified block groups as majority (≥ 50%) American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), black, white, Asian, no single racial majority, or Hispanic regardless of race. We used the Area Deprivation Index to classify deprivation and Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes to classify rurality. Generalized linear mixed models tested associations between these factors and distance to nearest RT facility. RESULTS Median distance to nearest RT facility was 72 miles in AI/AN-majority block groups, but 4 to 7 miles in block groups with non-AI/AN majorities. Multivariable models estimated that travel distances in AI/AN-majority block groups were 39 to 41 miles longer than in areas with non-AI/AN majorities. Travel distance was 1.3 miles longer in the more deprived areas versus less deprived areas and 16 to 32 miles longer in micropolitan, small town, and rural areas versus metropolitan areas. CONCLUSIONS Cancer patients in block groups with AI/AN-majority populations, nonmetropolitan location, and low socioeconomic status experience substantial travel disparities in access to RT. Future research with more granular community- and individual-level data should explore the many other known barriers to access to cancer care and their relationship to the barriers posed by distance to RT care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solmaz Amiri
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Matthew D Greer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Clemma J Muller
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Patrik Johansson
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anthippy Petras
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cole C Allick
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sara M London
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Morgan C Abbey
- Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dedra S Buchwald
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guo L, Wright ME, Osias MC, Vaezi M, Hughes MC. Creation and Evaluation of the Illinois Cancer Risk Index as a Predictor of Four Common Cancers. Prev Chronic Dis 2022; 19:E75. [DOI: 10.5888/pcd19.220104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Guo
- School of Interdisciplinary Health Professions, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois
| | | | - Meredith C. Osias
- School of Health Studies, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois
| | - Mahdi Vaezi
- Department of Engineering Technology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois
| | - M. Courtney Hughes
- School of Health Studies, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Erfani P, Ojo A, John Orav E, Chino F, Lam MB. Utilization of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers by Medicare Beneficiaries with Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7250-7258. [PMID: 35780214 PMCID: PMC11064741 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12047-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about which patients use National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers (NCICCs) nationally. This study aimed to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with decreased NCICC use among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS This study examined a national cohort of 534,008 Medicare beneficiaries with cancer in 2017 using multivariable logistic regressions for NCICC use. The covariates in the study were sex, age, cancer type, race/ethnicity, dual-eligibility status for Medicaid and Medicare, and NCICC presence in the home state. RESULTS In 2017, 19.5 % of Medicare beneficiaries with cancer used an NCICC at least once. Dual-eligible beneficiaries had 29 % lower adjusted odds of NCICC use than non-dual-eligible beneficiaries (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.71; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.73; p < 0.001). American Indian/Alaska Native beneficiaries had 40 % lower odds of NCICC use than non-Hispanic white (NHW) beneficiaries (aOR, 0.60; 95 % CI, 0.53-0.68; p < 0.001). Compared with NHW beneficiaries, the odds of NCICC use were higher for black beneficiaries by 15 % (aOR, 1.15; 95 % CI, 1.12-1.18; p < 0.001), for Hispanic beneficiaries by 31 % (aOR, 1.31; 95 % CI, 1.26-1.35; p < 0.001), and for Asian/Pacific Islander beneficiaries by 126 % (aOR, 2.26; 95 % CI, 2.16-2.36; p < 0.001). Utilization declined steadily in older groups, with beneficiaries older than 95 years showing 73 % lower odds of NCICC use than beneficiaries younger than 65 years (aOR, 0.27; 95 % CI, 0.24-0.29; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Medicaid-eligible, American Indian/Alaska Native, and older patients are substantially less likely to use NCICCs. Future research should focus on defining and addressing the barriers to NCICC access for these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - E John Orav
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Miranda B Lam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hall JM, Szurek SM, Cho H, Guo Y, Gutter MS, Khalil GE, Licht JD, Shenkman EA. Cancer disparities related to poverty and rurality for 22 top cancers in Florida. Prev Med Rep 2022; 29:101922. [PMID: 35928594 PMCID: PMC9344025 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to examine poverty and rurality as potential predictors of cancer health disparities. This cross-sectional study used data from the Florida Cancer Data System on all cancer diagnoses in the years 2014–2018 to determine age-adjusted incidence and mortality (per 100,000 population) for the 22 most common cancer sites within rural and urban counties, and high poverty and low poverty communities. Rural/urban and high/low poverty related cancer disparities were tested for statistical significance using the Rate Ratio statistical test. Overall cancer incidence was significantly lower in rural areas than in urban, but significantly higher in high poverty communities. Rurality and poverty were both associated with disparity in cancer incidence risk for tobacco-related cancers. The overall mortality was 22% higher in high poverty areas compared to low poverty areas. Ten cancer sites had mortality disparity from 83% to 17% higher in high poverty areas. Only three cancer sites, all tobacco-related, had higher mortality in rural areas than urban areas, demonstrating the intersectional nature of inhaled and smokeless tobacco use in rural low-income communities. Cancer and mortality rates in rural and urban areas may be largely driven by poverty. The high disparities related to high poverty areas reflects poor access to preventative care and treatment. Low income communities, rural or urban, will require focused efforts to address challenges specific to each population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn M. Hall
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States
- Corresponding author at: Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, College of Medicine, 2199 Mowry Road, Room 116, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States.
| | - Sarah M. Szurek
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States
| | - Heedeok Cho
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States
| | - Yi Guo
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States
| | - Michael S. Gutter
- Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, United States
| | - Georges E. Khalil
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States
| | - Jonathan D. Licht
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida Cancer Center, United States
| | - Elizabeth A. Shenkman
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zambrano CN, Lu W, Johnson C, Beeber M, Panitz A, Ibrahim S, Fraser M, Ma GX, Navder K, Yeh MC, Ogunwobi OO. Dietary behavior and urinary gallic acid concentration differences among underserved elder racial and ethnic minorities in New York City. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:929-937. [PMID: 35438359 PMCID: PMC9188520 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01581-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Diet and nutrition are important for cancer prevention. To investigate associations between dietary behavior, demographics, and risk of cancer, we assessed dietary behavior and urinary concentration of gallic acid, a polyphenol with anticancer properties found in various fruits and vegetables, in racial and ethnic minorities. Methods Ninety-one (91) participants were recruited from senior centers in East Harlem, New York City, a racially diverse and underserved community. A National Institute of Health (NIH)—validated dietary survey questionnaire—was used to collect dietary fruits and vegetables consumption data. Demographic and cancer information were also collected. All 91 participants completed the survey and forty-five (45) participants provided urine samples for gallic acid analysis. Results Gender differences were significantly associated with dietary behavior and urinary gallic acid concentration (UGAC). Female participants had a higher total daily intake of fruits and a significantly higher UGAC compared to male participants (p < 0.05). Age was negatively associated with the serving quantity of French fries/fried potatoes and white potatoes (p < 0.05), while positively associated with the daily intake frequency and daily intake of fruits (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Asian race was associated with higher daily intake frequencies of fruits and vegetable soup (p < 0.05), compared to other races. In a multivariate analysis, a significant association was observed between the serving quantities of fruits and other vegetables and UGAC (p < 0.05) after controlling for demographic characteristics. Conclusion The observed differences in dietary behavior and UGAC in this study provide limited information on the association between demographic differences and cancer prevalence in elder racial and ethnic minorities. Future research should investigate this association further for potential implications in cancer prevention. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-022-01581-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina N Zambrano
- Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, USA
- Hunter College Center for Cancer Health Disparities Research (CCHDR), Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, HN310A, New York, 10065, USA
| | - Wenyue Lu
- Center for Asian Health, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sociology Department, College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cicely Johnson
- Hunter College Center for Cancer Health Disparities Research (CCHDR), Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, HN310A, New York, 10065, USA
| | - Maayan Beeber
- Nutrition Program, School of Urban Public Health, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, USA
| | - April Panitz
- Nutrition Program, School of Urban Public Health, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Safa Ibrahim
- Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, USA
- Hunter College Center for Cancer Health Disparities Research (CCHDR), Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, HN310A, New York, 10065, USA
| | - Marilyn Fraser
- Arthur Ashe Institute for Urban Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Grace X Ma
- Center for Asian Health, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Khursheed Navder
- Hunter College Center for Cancer Health Disparities Research (CCHDR), Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, HN310A, New York, 10065, USA
- Nutrition Program, School of Urban Public Health, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Ming-Chin Yeh
- Hunter College Center for Cancer Health Disparities Research (CCHDR), Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, HN310A, New York, 10065, USA
- Nutrition Program, School of Urban Public Health, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Olorunseun O Ogunwobi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, USA.
- Hunter College Center for Cancer Health Disparities Research (CCHDR), Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, HN310A, New York, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ahmad J, Muthyala A, Kumar A, Dani SS, Ganatra S. Disparities in Cardio-oncology: Effects On Outcomes and Opportunities for Improvement. Curr Cardiol Rep 2022; 24:1117-1127. [PMID: 35759170 PMCID: PMC9244335 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01732-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of available data on health disparities and the interconnected social determinants of health (SDOH) in cardio-oncology. We identify the gaps in the literature and suggest areas for future research. In addition, we propose strategies to address these disparities at various levels. Recent Findings There has been increasing recognition of health disparities and the role of SODH on an individual’s access to health care, quality of care, and outcomes of the illness. There is growing evidence of sex and race-based differences in cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity. Recent studies have shown how access and quality of health care are affected by financial stability and rurality. Our recent study utilizing the social vulnerability index (SVI) and county-level patient data found graded increase in county-level cardio-oncology mortality with greater social vulnerability. The incremental impact of social vulnerability was higher for cardio-oncology mortality than for mortality related to either cancer or CVD alone. The mortality rates in these patients were higher in rural areas compared to urban areas regardless of social vulnerability. Additionally, for those within the counties within highest social vulnerability, Black individuals had significantly higher cardio-oncology mortality compared with White individuals. Summary Disparities in the cardio-oncology population are deep-rooted and widespread, leading to poor quality of life and increased mortality. It is crucial to integrate SDOH, not only in clinical care delivery but also in future research, and registry data to improve our understanding and the outcomes in our unique subset of cardio-oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javaria Ahmad
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Anjani Muthyala
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH, USA
| | - Sourbha S Dani
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Sarju Ganatra
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mutebi M, Dehar N, Nogueira LM, Shi K, Yabroff KR, Gyawali B. Cancer Groundshot: Building a Robust Cancer Control Platform in Addition To Launching the Cancer Moonshot. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-16. [PMID: 35561297 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_359521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cancer Groundshot is a philosophy that calls for prioritization of strategies in global cancer control. The underlying principle of Cancer Groundshot is that one must ensure access to interventions that are already proven to work before focusing on the development of new interventions. In this article, we discuss the philosophy of Cancer Groundshot as it pertains to priorities in cancer care and research in low- and middle-income countries and the utility of technology in addressing global cancer disparities; we also address disparities seen in high-income countries. The oncology community needs to realign our priorities and focus on improving access to high-value cancer control strategies, rather than allocating resources primarily to the development of technologies that provide only marginal gains at a high cost. There are several "low-hanging fruit" actions that will improve access to quality cancer care in low- and middle-income countries and in high-income countries. Worldwide, cancer morbidity and mortality can be averted by implementing highly effective, low-cost interventions that are already known to work, rather than investing in the development of resource-intensive interventions to which most patients will not have access (i.e., we can use Cancer Groundshot to first save more lives before we focus on the "moonshots").
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Mutebi
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Navdeep Dehar
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leticia M Nogueira
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kewei Shi
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Bishal Gyawali
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Thorndike AN, Gardner CD, Kendrick KB, Seligman HK, Yaroch AL, Gomes AV, Ivy KN, Scarmo S, Cotwright CJ, Schwartz MB. Strengthening US Food Policies and Programs to Promote Equity in Nutrition Security: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022; 145:e1077-e1093. [PMID: 35535604 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Nutritionally inadequate dietary intake is a leading contributor to chronic cardiometabolic diseases. Differences in dietary quality contribute to socioeconomic and racial and ethnic health disparities. Food insecurity, a household-level social or economic condition of limited access to sufficient food, is a common cause of inadequate dietary intake. Although US food assistance policies and programs are designed to improve food security, there is growing consensus that they should have a broader focus on nutrition security. In this policy statement, we define nutrition security as an individual or household condition of having equitable and stable availability, access, affordability, and utilization of foods and beverages that promote well-being and prevent and treat disease. Despite existing policies and programs, significant gaps remain for achieving equity in nutrition security across the life span. We provide recommendations for expanding and improving current food assistance policies and programs to achieve nutrition security. These recommendations are guided by several overarching principles: emphasizing nutritional quality, improving reach, ensuring optimal utilization, improving coordination across programs, ensuring stability of access to programs across the life course, and ensuring equity and dignity for access and utilization. We suggest a critical next step will be to develop and implement national measures of nutrition security that can be added to the current US food security measures. Achieving equity in nutrition security will require coordinated and sustained efforts at the federal, state, and local levels. Future advocacy, innovation, and research will be needed to expand existing food assistance policies and programs and to develop and implement new policies and programs that will improve cardiovascular health and reduce disparities in chronic disease.
Collapse
|
31
|
Du S, Zhong Y, Zheng S, Lyu J. Analysis and Prediction of the Survival Trends of Patients with Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Model-Based Period Analysis, 2001-2015. Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221121226. [PMID: 35981235 PMCID: PMC9393668 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221121226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common malignant
tumors worldwide whose poor prognosis results in a serious disease burden on
patients. The changing trend of the long-term relative survival rates (RSRs)
of patients with ccRCC was analyzed in this study to evaluate their
treatment results over a 15-year period. Methods This study is a retrospective study, which assessed and predicted the 1-, 3-,
and 5-year survival rates of patients with ccRCC during 2001-2005,
2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020 using data extracted from the
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Period analysis
was used in this study to analyze the data from the SEER database and to
assess survival differences according to age, sex, race, and socioeconomic
status (SES) during the 15-year study period by comparing Kaplan-Meier
curves. Results During 2001-2015, the 5-year RSR of patients with ccRCC increased from 78.4%
to 83.0%, and the generalized linear model predicted that the 5-year RSR
increased to 85.7% during 2016-2020. The RSR of patients with ccRCC differed
significantly with SES, race, sex, and age. Compared with male patients, the
survival advantage of female patients decreased as their age increased. The
RSR of all patients with ccRCC was also lower in patients with a lower SES
and of black race. Conclusion This study found an improvement in the RSR of patients with ccRCC during
2001-2020. Understanding the change trend of the survival rate of patients
with ccRCC is helpful to improve the design of clinical trials. It also
provides basic data and a scientific basis for evaluating the harm of ccRCC
on the health of affected patients and the effect of cancer prevention, and
developing cancer prevention plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicong Du
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, 74644Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Clinical Research, 107652The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Zhong
- School of Public Health, 107652Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuai Zheng
- School of Public Health, 107652Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Lyu
- Department of Clinical Research, 107652The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Burton-Obanla AA, Sloane S, Koester B, Gundersen C, Fiese BH, Arthur AE. Oncology registered dietitian nutritionists' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to food insecurity among cancer patients: a qualitative study. J Acad Nutr Diet 2021; 122:2267-2287. [PMID: 34896629 DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the knowledge, attitudes and practices pertaining to food insecurity among oncology Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDNs) is critical to ensuring that cancer survivors have adequate nutrition-a fundamental component of successful treatment and recovery. OBJECTIVE To qualitatively assess Oncology RDN's knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the food access needs of their patients using a qualitative semantic approach to thematic analysis. DESIGN The qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2018 to January 2019. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING Forty-one oncology RDNs working with cancer survivors in various clinical settings across the U.S participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participants completed a semi-structured, in-depth interview via telephone, lasting an average of 49 minutes. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED Two coders (primary and secondary) trained in qualitative thematic data analysis methods used a semantic approach to thematic analysis to analyze transcripts. A qualitative and mixed methods online coding program, Dedoose, was used to organize and analyze the data. RESULTS Participants defined FI as a lack of access to nutritious foods and a lack of resources to purchase nutritious foods. RDNs stated they believe FI is a serious problem in the U.S., has a greater impact on cancer survivors than healthy individuals and they have specific concerns about FI among their own patients. Despite their concerns, most expressed that they do not use a validated tool to identify FI, nor were they aware that any exists. Only a small proportion of the RDNs stated that they regularly ask patients about their food access needs. CONCLUSIONS While Oncology RDNs have heard of FI, they do not routinely assess patients' food security status with a validated tool, nor do they consistently ask patients directly about their food access needs. These findings suggest there is a need for developing education and training opportunities for oncology RDNs in order to enhance their ability to screen for and address FI with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amirah A Burton-Obanla
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois
| | - Stephanie Sloane
- Family Resiliency Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois
| | - Brenda Koester
- Family Resiliency Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois
| | - Craig Gundersen
- Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois
| | - Barbara H Fiese
- Family Resiliency Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois
| | - Anna E Arthur
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Moss JL, Wang M, Liang M, Kameni A, Stoltzfus KC, Onega T. County-level characteristics associated with incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality from screenable cancers. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 75:102033. [PMID: 34560364 PMCID: PMC8627446 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer screening differs by rurality and racial residential segregation, but the relationship between these county-level characteristics is understudied. Understanding this relationship and its implications for cancer outcomes could inform interventions to decrease cancer disparities. METHODS We linked county-level information from national data sources: 2008-2012 cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality rates (for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer) from U.S. Cancer Statistics and the National Death Index; metropolitan status from U.S. Department of Agriculture; residential segregation derived from American Community Survey; and prevalence of cancer screening from National Cancer Institute's Small Area Estimates. We used multivariable, sparse Poisson generalized linear mixed models to assess cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality rates by county-level characteristics, controlling for density of physicians and median household income. RESULTS Cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality rates were 6-18% lower in metropolitan counties for breast and colorectal cancer, and 2-4% lower in more segregated counties for breast and colorectal cancer. Generally, reductions in cancer associated with residential segregation were limited to non-metropolitan counties. Cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality rates were associated with screening, with rates for corresponding cancers that were 2-9% higher in areas with more breast and colorectal screening, but 2-15% lower in areas with more cervical screening. DISCUSSION Lower cancer burden was observed in counties that were metropolitan and more segregated. Effect modification was observed by metropolitan status and county-level residential segregation, indicating that residential segregation may impact healthcare access differently in different county types. Additional studies are needed to inform interventions to reduce county-level disparities in cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ming Wang
- Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Menglu Liang
- Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Alain Kameni
- Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Tracy Onega
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Punekar SR, Griffin MM, Masri L, Roman SD, Makarov DV, Sherman SE, Becker DJ. Socioeconomic Determinants of the Use of Molecular Testing in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:597-602. [PMID: 34753883 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies extends life for patients with advanced colorectal cancers (CRCs) whose tumors exhibit wild-type KRAS, but KRAS testing may be underused. We studied the role of socioeconomic factors in the application of KRAS testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified subjects with stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed 2010-2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate associations between clinical/demographic factors and the rate of KRAS testing. We used multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to assess survival. RESULTS We identified 37,676 patients with stage IV CRC, 31.1% of whom were tested for KRAS mutations, of those who had documented KRAS testing, 44% were KRAS mutant. Patients were more likely to be tested if they were younger (odds ratio [OR]=5.10 for age 20 to 29 vs. 80+, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.99-6.54, P<0.01), diagnosed more recently (OR=1.92 for 2015 vs. 2010, 95% CI: 1.77-2.08, P<0.01), or lived in an area of high median household income (OR=1.24 for median household income of >$69,311 vs. <$49,265, 95% CI: 1.14-1.35, P<0.01). Patients were less likely to be tested if they had Medicaid (OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.88, P<0.01) or were unmarried (OR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.75-0.82, P<0.0001). The risk of death was decreased in patients who received KRAS testing (hazard ratio=0.77, 95% CI: 0.75-0.80, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS We found a low rate of KRAS testing in CRC patients with those living in low-income areas less likely to be tested, even after controlling for Medicaid insurance. Our study suggests that socioeconomic disparities persist despite Medicaid insurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salman R Punekar
- Department of Medical Oncology, NYU Langone Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center
| | - Megan M Griffin
- Department of Medical Oncology, NYU Langone Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Danil V Makarov
- Urology, VA-NYHHS
- Departments of Urology
- Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Scott E Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, NYU Langone Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center
| | - Daniel J Becker
- Department of Medical Oncology, NYU Langone Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center
- Departments of Hematology and Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cohn AM, Blount BC, Hashibe M. Nonmedical Cannabis Use: Patterns and Correlates of Use, Exposure, and Harm, and Cancer Risk. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2021; 2021:53-67. [PMID: 34850898 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgab006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cannabis has certain health benefits, but some people may experience harms from use. Co-use of tobacco and cannabis is common. Smoke from cannabis contains many of the same carcinogens and toxicants as the smoke from tobacco, raising concerns that cannabis smoking may be a risk factor for cancer. With growing access to and acceptance of medical and nonmedical cannabis, there is an urgent need to understand the risks and benefits of the current modes of cannabis use and how cannabis may be associated with cancer risk. This monograph summarizes a session from a National Cancer Institute Symposium on nonmedical cannabis use and cancer risk. We had 3 objectives: describe the relation between nonmedical cannabis use and cancer risk, delineate patterns and correlates of cannabis co-use with tobacco, and document potentially harmful inhalational exposure resulting from smoked and vaped cannabis. Methodological limitations in the literature and future research recommendations are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Cohn
- TSET Health Promotion Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Stephenson Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Benjamin C Blount
- Tobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Herbert C, Paro A, Diaz A, Pawlik TM. ASO Author Reflections: Association of Community Economic Distress and Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Rates among U.S. Counties. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:849-850. [PMID: 34599435 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10864-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Herbert
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dublin, OH, USA
| | - Alessandro Paro
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, 395 West 12th Avenue, Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Adrian Diaz
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, 395 West 12th Avenue, Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, 395 West 12th Avenue, Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Herbert C, Paro A, Diaz A, Pawlik TM. Association of Community Economic Distress and Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Rates Among US Counties. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:837-848. [PMID: 34585297 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10849-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Not all Americans may benefit equally from current improvements in breast and colorectal cancer screening and mortality rates. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional retrospective review of county-level screening, incidence, and mortality rates for breast and colon cancer utilizing three publicly available data sources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and their association with the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), a measure of local economic prosperity across communities. RESULTS After controlling for other factors, DCI was associated with county-level screening, incidence, and death rates per 100,000 for breast and colorectal cancer. There was an absolute increase of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.85, p < 0.001) in the proportion of women aged 40 years or older who had a screening mammogram for every 10-point decrease in DCI, which in turn correlated with an increase in the age-adjusted incidence by 1.68 per 100,000 (95% CI 1.37-2.00, p < 0.001). While the age-adjusted death rate for breast cancer was highest in the most distressed communities, the overall incidence of age-adjusted death decreased by 0.28 per 100,000 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.19, p < 0.001) with every 10-point decrease in DCI. For colorectal cancer, every 10-point decrease in DCI was similarly associated with an absolute 0.60 (95% CI 0.52-0.69, p < 0.001) increase in the proportion of individuals who had screening endoscopy. Increased colorectal screening in low-DCI counties was associated with a lower age-adjusted incidence rate (-0.80 per 100,000; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.65) and age-adjusted death rate (-0.55 per 100,000; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.49) of colorectal cancer per every 10-point decrease in DCI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The association of county-level socioeconomic and healthcare factors with breast and colorectal cancer outcomes was notable, with level of community distress impacting cancer screening, incidence, and mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Herbert
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dublin, OH, USA.,Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alessandro Paro
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Adrian Diaz
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. .,National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. .,Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pinheiro LC, Reshetnyak E, Akinyemiju T, Phillips E, Safford MM. Social determinants of health and cancer mortality in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort study. Cancer 2021; 128:122-130. [PMID: 34478162 PMCID: PMC9301452 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social determinants of health (SDOHs) cluster together and can have deleterious impacts on health outcomes. Individually, SDOHs increase the risk of cancer mortality, but their cumulative burden is not well understood. The authors sought to determine the combined effect of SDOH on cancer mortality. METHODS Using the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort, the authors studied 29,766 participants aged 45+ years and followed them 10+ years. Eight potential SDOHs were considered, and retained SDOHs that were associated with cancer mortality (P < .10) were retained to create a count (0, 1, 2, 3+). Cox proportional hazard models estimated associations between the SDOH count and cancer mortality through December 31, 2017, adjusting for confounders. Models were age-stratified (45-64 vs 65+ years). RESULTS Participants were followed for a median of 10.6 years (interquartile range [IQR], 6.5, 12.7 years). Low education, low income, zip code poverty, poor public health infrastructure, lack of health insurance, and social isolation were significantly associated with cancer mortality. In adjusted models, among those <65 years, compared to no SDOHs, having 1 SDOH (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11-1.75), 2 SDOHs (aHR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.26-2.07), and 3+ SDOHs (aHR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.58-2.75) were associated with cancer mortality (P for trend <.0001). Among individuals 65+ years, compared to no SDOH, having 1 SDOH (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.35) and 3+ SDOHs (aHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04-1.52) was associated with cancer mortality (P for trend = .032). CONCLUSIONS A greater number of SDOHs were significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer mortality, which persisted after adjustment for confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Pinheiro
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Evgeniya Reshetnyak
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Tomi Akinyemiju
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Erica Phillips
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Monika M Safford
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nathan NH, Bakhsheshian J, Ding L, Mack WJ, Attenello FJ. Evaluating Medicaid expansion benefits for patients with cancer: National Cancer Database analysis and systematic review. J Cancer Policy 2021; 29:100292. [PMID: 35559947 PMCID: PMC8276859 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insurance status modifies healthcare access and inequities. The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid coverage for people with low incomes in the United States. This study assessed the consequences of this policy change for cancer care after expansion in 2014. METHODS National Cancer Database (NCDB) public benchmark reports were queried for each malignancy in 2013 and 2016. Furthermore, a systematic search [PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane] was performed. Data on insurance status, access to cancer screening and treatment, and socioeconomic disparities in these metrics was collected. RESULTS Two-tailed analysis of the NCDB revealed that 14 out of 18 eligible states had a statistically significant increase in Medicaid-insured patients with cancer after expansion. The average percentage increase was 51 % (13.2-204 %). From the systematic review, 229 studies were identified, 26 met inclusion. All 21 relevant articles reported lower uninsured rates. The average increase of Medicaid-insured patients was 77 % (9.5-230 %) and the average decrease of uninsured rates was 55 % (13.4-73 %). 15 out of 21 articles reported increased access to care. 16 out of 17 articles reported reductions in inequities. CONCLUSION Medicaid expansion in 2014 increased the number of insured patients with cancer. Expansion also improved access to screening and treatment in most oncologic care, and reduced socioeconomic disparities. Further studies evaluating correlative survival outcomes are needed. POLICY SUMMARY This study informs debates on expansion of Medicaid in state governments and electorates in the United States, and on health insurance reform broadly, by providing insight into how health insurance can benefit people with cancer while revealing how less insurance coverage could harm patients with cancer before and after their diagnosis. This study also contributes to discussions of health insurance mandates, subsidized coverage for people with low incomes, and covered healthcare services determinations by public and private health insurance providers in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal H Nathan
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| | - Joshua Bakhsheshian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1200 North State Street, Suite 3300, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Preventative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 North Soto Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
| | - William J Mack
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1200 North State Street, Suite 3300, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| | - Frank J Attenello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1200 North State Street, Suite 3300, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hu B, Boselli D, Pye LM, Chen T, Bose R, Symanowski JT, Blackley K, Moyo TK, Jacobs R, Park SI, Soni A, Avalos BR, Copelan EA, Raghavan D, Ghosh N. Equal access to care and nurse navigation leads to equitable outcomes for minorities with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer 2021; 127:3991-3997. [PMID: 34289094 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) are curable, but previous studies have shown inferior outcomes in minorities. Nurse navigation programs can improve patient outcomes by providing patient support. This study presents the outcomes of White and minority patients with aggressive LBCL at an institution with an active nurse navigation program. METHODS The authors prospectively collected baseline characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcome data for patients with aggressive LBCL. Navigation encounters were characterized as low or high intensity. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier methods. Baseline characteristics were compared with Fisher exact tests. RESULTS Two hundred four consecutive patients (47 minority patients and 157 White patients) were included. Results were presented as minorities versus Whites. There were no differences in prognostic scores (Revised International Prognostic Index score of 3-5, 43% vs 47%; P = .50), frontline chemotherapy (98% vs 96%; P = .68), or the incidence of relapsed/refractory disease (40% vs 38%; P = .74). For relapsed/refractory LBCL, similar proportions of patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (32% vs 29%; P > .99) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (16% vs 19%; P > .99). Enrollment in clinical trials was comparable (17% vs 14%; P = .64). More than 85% received nurse navigation, but minorities had higher intensity navigation encounters (42% vs 21%; P = .01). The 2-year OS rates were 81% and 76% for minorities and Whites, respectively (P = .27); the 2-year PFS rates were 62% and 65%, respectively (P = .78). CONCLUSIONS This study shows similar survival between Whites and minorities with aggressive LBCL, which was likely due to equal access to guideline-concordant therapy. Minorities received higher intensity navigation encounters, which may have helped them to overcome socioeconomic disadvantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bei Hu
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Danielle Boselli
- Department of Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Lisa M Pye
- Department of Patient Navigation, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Tommy Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Rupali Bose
- Department of Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - James T Symanowski
- Department of Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Kris Blackley
- Department of Patient Navigation, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Tamara K Moyo
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Ryan Jacobs
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Steven I Park
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Amy Soni
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Belinda R Avalos
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Edward A Copelan
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Derek Raghavan
- Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Nilanjan Ghosh
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nyakudarika NC, Holschneider CH, Sinno AK. Universal social needs assessment in gynecologic oncology: An important step toward more informed and targeted care in the public safety net. Cancer 2021; 127:3809-3816. [PMID: 34250590 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social needs are actionable mediators of social determinants of health. Along with distress, they affect quality of life and survival in patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were to identify the most common social needs and distress in a largely immigrant gynecologic oncology patient population at a public safety-net hospital and to evaluate for specific needs associated with distress and poor outcomes. METHODS This was a prospective, survey-based cohort study of patients who participated in a performance-improvement initiative offering social needs assessment and distress screening. Patients provided sociodemographic information and completed validated surveys adapted from the Health Leads Social Needs Screening Toolkit, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer, and the Emotion Thermometers Tool. Associations between social needs, distress, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS In total, 135 women were included. Of these, 65.2% had at least 1 unmet social need, and 36.3% screened positive for distress. Help reading hospital materials (30.4%) was the most frequently reported need. Social isolation (odds ratio [OR], 3.65; 95% CI, 1.35-9.9; P = .01) and lack of safety at home (OR, 4.90; 95% CI, 2.23-10.62; P = .0001) were associated with distress. Perceived lack of finances for medical care (OR, 5.69; 95% CI, 1.12-28.9; P = .036) and lack of transportation (OR, 20.5; 95% CI, 2.69-156.7; P = .004) were associated with nonadherence-related treatment interruption, whereas positive distress scores were associated with interruption because of comorbidities or treatment-related toxicities (OR, 20.5; 95% CI, 1.5-268.6; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Systematically identifying social needs and developing interventions aimed at mitigating them may lead to more actionable health care disparities research and affect treatment outcomes. LAY SUMMARY Social needs are individual-level social conditions that drive health disparities. In this survey-based study, the objective was to identify common social needs and how these relate to distress and poor health outcomes in a largely immigrant and underserved gynecologic oncology patient population. The authors found that greater than one-third of patients screened positive for distress, nearly two-thirds had at least 1 unmet social need, and these factors were associated with emergency room visits, hospital admissions, and treatment interruptions. These findings suggest that screening for universal social needs allows providers to identify unrecognized needs and implement interventions to mitigate distress and improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natsai C Nyakudarika
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Olive View-University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center, Sylmar, California.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California-Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christine H Holschneider
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Olive View-University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center, Sylmar, California.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California-Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Abdulrahman K Sinno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Olive View-University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center, Sylmar, California.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Taksler GB, Peterse EFP, Willems I, Ten Haaf K, Jansen EEL, de Kok IMCM, van Ravesteyn NT, de Koning HJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Modeling Strategies to Optimize Cancer Screening in USPSTF Guideline-Noncompliant Women. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:885-894. [PMID: 33914025 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Importance In 2018, only half of US women obtained all evidence-based cancer screenings. This proportion may have declined during the COVID-19 pandemic because of social distancing, high-risk factors, and fear. Objective To evaluate optimal screening strategies in women who obtain some, but not all, US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-recommended cancer screenings. Design, Setting, and Participants This modeling study was conducted from January 31, 2017, to July 20, 2020, and used 4 validated mathematical models from the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network using data from 20 million simulated women born in 1965 in the US. Interventions Forty-five screening strategies were modeled that combined breast, cervical, colorectal, and/or lung cancer (LC) screenings; restricted to 1, 2, 3 or 4 screenings per year; or all eligible screenings once every 5 years. Main Outcomes and Measures Modeled life-years gained from restricted cancer screenings as a fraction of those attainable from full compliance with USPSTF recommendations (maximum benefits). Results were stratified by LC screening eligibility (LC-eligible/ineligible). We repeated the analysis with 2018 adherence rates, evaluating the increase in adherence required for restricted screenings to have the same population benefit as USPSTF recommendations. Results This modeling study of 20 million simulated US women found that it was possible to reduce screening intensity to 1 carefully chosen test per year in women who were ineligible for LC screening and 2 tests per year in eligible women while maintaining 94% or more of the maximum benefits. Highly ranked strategies screened for various cancers, but less often than recommended by the USPSTF. For example, among LC-ineligible women who obtained just 1 screening per year, the optimal strategy frequently delayed breast and cervical cancer screenings by 1 year and skipped 3 mammograms entirely. Among LC-eligible women, LC screening was essential; strategies omitting it provided 25% or less of the maximum benefits. The top-ranked strategy restricted to 2 screenings per year was annual LC screening and alternating fecal immunochemical test with mammography (skipping mammograms when due for cervical cancer screening, 97% of maximum benefits). If adherence in a population of LC-eligible women obtaining 2 screenings per year were to increase by 1% to 2% (depending on the screening test), this model suggests that it would achieve the same benefit as USPSTF recommendations at 2018 adherence rates. Conclusions and Relevance This modeling study of 45 cancer screening strategies suggests that women who are noncompliant with cancer screening guidelines may be able to reduce USPSTF-recommended screening intensity with minimal reduction in overall benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glen B Taksler
- Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Population Health Research Institute, Case Western Reserve University at The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Elisabeth F P Peterse
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Isarah Willems
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kevin Ten Haaf
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik E L Jansen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge M C M de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Harry J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Núñez ER, Caverly TJ, Zhang S, Glickman ME, Qian SX, Boudreau JH, Slatore CG, Miller DR, Wiener RS. Adherence to Follow-up Testing Recommendations in US Veterans Screened for Lung Cancer, 2015-2019. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2116233. [PMID: 34236409 PMCID: PMC8267608 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Lung cancer screening (LCS) can reduce lung cancer mortality with close follow-up and adherence to management recommendations. Little is known about factors associated with adherence to LCS in real-world practice, with data limited to case series from selected LCS programs. OBJECTIVE To analyze adherence to follow-up based on standardized follow-up recommendations in a national cohort and to identify factors associated with delayed or absent follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities across the US. Veterans were screened for lung cancer between 2015 to 2019 with sufficient follow-up time to receive recommended evaluation. Patient- and facility-level logistic regression analyses were performed. Data were analyzed from November 26, 2019, to December 16, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Receipt of the recommended next step after initial LCS according to Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS) category, as captured in VHA or Medicare claims. RESULTS Of 28 294 veterans (26 835 [94.8%] men; 21 969 individuals [77.6%] were White; mean [SD] age, 65.2 [5.5] years) who had an initial LCS examination, 17 863 veterans (63.1%) underwent recommended follow-up within the expected timeframe, whereas 3696 veterans (13.1%) underwent late evaluation, and 4439 veterans (15.7%) had no apparent evaluation. Facility-level differences were associated with 9.2% of the observed variation in rates of late or absent evaluation. In multivariable-adjusted models, Black veterans (odds ratio [OR], 1.19 [95% CI, 1.10-1.29]), veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03-1.23]), veterans with substance use disorders (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.01-1.22]), veterans with lower income (OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.79-0.98]), and those living at a greater distance from a VHA facility (OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.10]) were more likely to experience delayed or no follow-up; veterans with higher risk findings (Lung-RADS category 4 vs Lung-RADS category 1: OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.28-0.43]) and those screened in high LCS volume facilities (OR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21-0.67]) or academic facilities (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80-0.92]) were less likely to experience delayed or no follow-up. In sensitivity analyses, varying how stringently adherence was defined, expected evaluation ranged from 14 486 veterans (49.7%) under stringent definitions to 20 578 veterans (78.8%) under liberal definitions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study that captured follow-up care from the integrated VHA health care system and Medicare, less than two-thirds of patients received timely recommended follow-up after initial LCS, with higher risk of delayed or absent follow-up among marginalized populations, such as Black individuals, individuals with mental health disorders, and individuals with low income, that have long experienced disparities in lung cancer outcomes. Future work should focus on identifying facilities that promote high adherence and disseminating successful strategies to promote equity in LCS among marginalized populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo R. Núñez
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, Bedford VA Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tanner J. Caverly
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor
| | - Sanqian Zhang
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, Bedford VA Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Mark E. Glickman
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, Bedford VA Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Shirley X. Qian
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, Bedford VA Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jacqueline H. Boudreau
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, Bedford VA Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher G. Slatore
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Donald R. Miller
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, Bedford VA Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Renda Soylemez Wiener
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, Bedford VA Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Madigan KE, Leiman DA, Palakshappa D. Food Insecurity Is an Independent Risk Factor for Depressive Symptoms in Survivors of Digestive Cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1122-1128. [PMID: 33849966 PMCID: PMC8172480 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal and other digestive cancer survivors are at increased risk of depression, which can negatively affect health outcomes. Food insecurity (FI), the lack of consistent access to enough food, can also contribute to these health complications. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between FI and depressive symptoms within this population. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2007-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We included all adults (≥20 years) with a self-reported history of a digestive cancer (including colorectal, esophageal, stomach, liver, and pancreas cancer). Our primary exposure was household FI, and our outcome of interest was depressive symptoms, as measured by the validated 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. We used multivariable ordinal logistic regression to test the association between FI and depressive symptoms, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS We included 229 adult digestive cancer survivors (weighted N = 1,510,579). The majority of the study sample was female and non-Hispanic White with mean of 11.0 years since cancer diagnosis; 14.3% reported FI. In multivariable models controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, we found that food insecure digestive cancer survivors had significantly higher odds of depressive symptoms than food secure digestive cancer survivors (OR: 3.25; 95% confidence interval: 1.24-8.55; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Among a nationally representative sample of colorectal cancer and other digestive cancer survivors, FI was associated with increased odds of depressive symptoms. IMPACT This study adds further evidence to the negative impact FI may have on survivors' physical and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn E Madigan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - David A Leiman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Deepak Palakshappa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
- Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Arsanjani R, Khera N. Financial Toxicity in Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: A Threat to Access and Quality of Care. JACC CardioOncol 2021; 3:247-249. [PMID: 34396330 PMCID: PMC8352244 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
46
|
Song S, Duan Y, Huang J, Wong MCS, Chen H, Trisolini MG, Labresh KA, Smith SC, Jin Y, Zheng ZJ. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Premature Cancer Mortality Among U.S. Counties During 1999 to 2018. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1375-1386. [PMID: 33947656 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated socioeconomic inequalities in premature cancer mortality by cancer types, and evaluated the associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and premature cancer mortality by cancer types. METHODS Using multiple databases, cancer mortality was linked to SES and other county characteristics. The outcome measure was cancer mortality among adults ages 25-64 years in 3,028 U.S. counties, from 1999 to 2018. Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality were calculated as a concentration index (CI) by income (annual median household income), educational attainment (% with bachelor's degree or higher), and unemployment rate. A hierarchical linear mixed model and dominance analyses were used to investigate SES associated with county-level mortality. The analyses were also conducted by cancer types. RESULTS CIs of SES factors varied by cancer types. Low-SES counties showed increasing trends in mortality, while high-SES counties showed decreasing trends. Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality among high-SES counties were larger than those among low-SES counties. SES explained 25.73% of the mortality. County-level cancer mortality was associated with income, educational attainment, and unemployment rate, at -0.24 [95% (CI): -0.36 to -0.12], -0.68 (95% CI: -0.87 to -0.50), and 1.50 (95% CI: 0.92-2.07) deaths per 100,000 population with one-unit SES factors increase, respectively, after controlling for health care environment and population health. CONCLUSIONS SES acts as a key driver of premature cancer mortality, and socioeconomic inequalities differ by cancer types. IMPACT Focused efforts that target socioeconomic drivers of mortalities and inequalities are warranted for designing cancer-prevention implementation strategies and control programs and policies for socioeconomically underprivileged groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhang Song
- Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Yuqi Duan
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China.,Institute for Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Junjie Huang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P.R. China
| | - Martin C S Wong
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China.,Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P.R. China
| | - Hongda Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | | | | | - Sidney C Smith
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yinzi Jin
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China. .,Institute for Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Zhi-Jie Zheng
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China.,Institute for Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Xu H, Kadambi S, Mohile SG, Yang S, Kehoe LA, Wells M, Culakova E, Kamen C, Obrecht S, Mohamed M, Gilmore NJ, Magnuson A, Grossman VA, Hopkins JO, Geer J, Berenberg J, Mustian K, Cupertino A, Mohile N, Loh KP. Caregiving burden of informal caregivers of older adults with advanced cancer: The effects of rurality and education. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:1015-1021. [PMID: 33858803 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rural-urban disparities in the experiences of caregivers of older adults with advanced cancer may exist. This study examined factors associated with caregiver mastery and burden and explored whether rural-urban disparities in caregiver outcomes differed by education. MATERIALS AND METHODS Longitudinal data (baseline, 4-6 weeks, and 3 months) on caregivers of older adults (≥ 70) with advanced cancer were obtained from a multicenter geriatric assessment (GA) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02107443). Rurality was determined based on 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Caregivers' education was categorized as ≥ some college vs ≤ high school. Caregiver outcomes included Ryff Environmental Mastery (scored 7-35) and Caregiver Reaction Assessment (including self-esteem, disrupted schedules, financial problems, lack of social support, and health problems; each scored 1-5). Separate linear mixed models with interaction term of education and rurality were performed. RESULTS Of 414 caregivers, 64 (15.5%) were from rural areas and 263 (63.5%) completed ≥ some college. Rurality was significantly associated with more disrupted schedules (β = 0.21), financial problems (β = 0.17), and lack of social support (β = 0.11). A significant interaction between education and rurality was found, with rurality associated with lower mastery (β = -1.27) and more disrupted schedule (β = 0.25), financial problems (β = 0.33), and lack of social support (β = 0.32) among caregivers with education ≤ high school. CONCLUSION Our study identifies subgroups of caregivers who are vulnerable to caregiving burden, specifically those from rural areas and with lower education. Multifaceted interventions are needed to improve caregivers' competency and reduce caregiving burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiwen Xu
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA; James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Sindhuja Kadambi
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Shuhan Yang
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Lee A Kehoe
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Megan Wells
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Eva Culakova
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Charles Kamen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Spencer Obrecht
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Mostafa Mohamed
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Nikesha J Gilmore
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA; James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Allison Magnuson
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | | | - Judith O Hopkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| | - Jodi Geer
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Program, St Louis Park, MN, USA.
| | | | - Karen Mustian
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Anapaula Cupertino
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Nimish Mohile
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nejatinamini S, Godley J, Minaker LM, Sajobi TT, McCormack GR, Cooke MJ, Nykiforuk CIJ, de Koning L, Olstad DL. Quantifying the contribution of modifiable risk factors to socio-economic inequities in cancer morbidity and mortality: a nationally representative population-based cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2021; 50:1498-1511. [PMID: 33846746 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared with those with a higher socio-economic position (SEP), individuals with a lower SEP have higher cancer morbidity and mortality. However, the contribution of modifiable risk factors to these inequities is not known. This study aimed to quantify the mediating effects of modifiable risk factors to associations between SEP and cancer morbidity and mortality. METHODS This study used a prospective observational cohort design. We combined eight cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2000/2001-2011) as baseline data to identify a cohort of adults (≥35 years) without cancer at the time of survey administration (n = 309 800). The cohort was linked to the Discharge Abstract Database and the Canadian Mortality Database for cancer morbidity and mortality ascertainment. Individuals were followed from the date they completed the Canadian Community Health Survey until 31 March 2013. Dates of individual first hospitalizations for cancer and deaths due to cancer were captured during this time period. SEP was operationalized using a latent variable combining measures of education and household income. Self-reported modifiable risk factors, including smoking, excess alcohol consumption, low fruit-and-vegetable intake, physical inactivity and obesity, were considered as potential mediators. Generalized structural equation modelling was used to estimate the mediating effects of modifiable risk factors in associations between low SEP and cancer morbidity and mortality in the total population and stratified by sex. RESULTS Modifiable risk factors together explained 45.6% of associations between low SEP and overall cancer morbidity and mortality. Smoking was the most important mediator in the total population and for males, accounting for 15.5% and 40.2% of the total effect, respectively. For females, obesity was the most important mediator. CONCLUSIONS Modifiable risk factors are important mediators of socio-economic inequities in cancer morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, more than half of the variance in these associations remained unexplained. Midstream interventions that target modifiable risk factors may help to alleviate inequities in cancer risk in the short term. However, ultimately, upstream interventions that target structural determinants of health are needed to reduce overall socio-economic inequities in cancer morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Nejatinamini
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jenny Godley
- Department of Sociology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Leia M Minaker
- School of Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Tolulope T Sajobi
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gavin R McCormack
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Martin J Cooke
- School of Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence de Koning
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Dana Lee Olstad
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
El-Deiry WS, Giaccone G. Challenges in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Research and Clinical Oncology. Front Oncol 2021; 11:642112. [PMID: 33842350 PMCID: PMC8024634 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.642112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Disparities are common and well-known in the field of clinical oncology and cancer research. In patient care, poor access and a number of other factors disadvantage patients and this can lead to inadequate screening, prevention or treatment of cancer and poor patient outcomes. World-wide, socioeconomic status, health care expenditures and a number of other challenges contribute to disparities in cancer care and patient outcomes. Access to cancer clinical trials remains inadequate for underrepresented minorities as well as non-white racial and ethnic groups. There are also disparities and many challenges in the biomedical research enterprise that can limit innovation and that must be addressed as part of active interventions.
Collapse
|
50
|
Meadows RJ, Padamsee TJ. Financial constraints on genetic counseling and further risk-management decisions among U.S. women at elevated breast cancer risk. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:1452-1467. [PMID: 33749063 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Clinical guidelines recommend that women at high risk of breast cancer should consider various risk-management options, which remain widely underutilized. We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 50 high-risk women to understand how financial constraints affect use of genetic counseling, genetic testing, and further risk-management decisions. Inductive analyses revealed three categories of health-related financial constraint: (a) lack of insurance, (b) underinsurance, and (c) other financial constraints (e.g., medical debt, raising children, managing comorbidities). Various breast cancer risk-management actions were limited by these financial constraints, including genetic counseling, genetic testing, enhanced screening, and prophylactic surgeries. Women's narratives also identified complex relationships between financial constraint and perceptions of healthcare providers and insurance companies, particularly as related to bias, price transparency, and potential genetic discrimination. Results from this study have implications for further research and expansion of genetic counseling services delivery to more economically and racially diverse women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel J Meadows
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Tasleem J Padamsee
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|