Equitability of Depression Screening After Implementation of General Adult Screening in Primary Care

Depression Treatment After a Positive Depression Screen Result

Importance

As primary care practices increase depression screening, it is unknown whether screening is associated with appropriate and equitable treatment.

Objective

To investigate factors associated with initial treatment among patients who screen positive for depression and/or suicidal ideation (SI).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cohort study using electronic health record data from September 2017 to September 2021, from a large US academic health system. Participants were adult primary care patients with elevated depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥10) and/or SI, excluding patients with baseline depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or dementia. Data were analyzed from December 30, 2022, to February 17, 2024.

Exposure

Patient characteristics including gender, age, preferred language, and race and ethnicity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcome was antidepressant or mental health referral ordered at screening. Secondary outcomes were antidepressant/referral and antidepressant/referral or follow-up visit within 8 weeks.

Results

Of 60 062 patients screened, 3980 (7%) reported elevated depressive symptoms or SI. The cohort was 68.1% women (2711), and the mean (SD) age was 46.5 (17.6) years; 0.8% were 12.4% African American or Black (493), American Indian or Alaska Native (30), 24.8% Asian (988), 14.6% Latino/Latina/Latinx (582), 1.5% Pacific Islander (58), and 36.9% White (1470), and 9.0% other/unknown (359); 5.6% preferred a non-English language (223). Approximately 38% (1518) received antidepressants/referrals when screened (including 44% of 461 patients [203] with SI). By 8 weeks, 2785 patients (70%) received antidepressant/referral and/or follow-up (including 75% of 783 patients with SI). In multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for site and clustered on primary care physician, there were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome by gender, preferred language, or health insurance. African American or Black and Asian patients had lower estimated probabilities of treatment ordered when screened (34.0% [95% CI, 28.4%-39.6%] for Black patients and 35.4% [95% CI, 31.5%-39.4%] for Asian patients) than White patients (40.5% [95% CI 37.4%-43.5%]). Estimated treatment decreased with increasing age (46.4% [95% CI, 41.2%-51.5%] for patients aged 18-30 years and 17.5% [95% CI, 12.1%-22.9%] for patients aged ≥75 years). Patients with SI had greater estimated treatment than those without SI (43.5% [95% CI, 39.9%-47.1%] vs 35.2% [95% CI, 33.0%-37.5%]), although treatment was overall low for this high-risk group. Secondary outcomes were consistent, although there were no statistically significant differences in follow-up visits for African American or Black and Asian patients compared with White patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, moderate rates of initial treatment among patients with elevated depressive symptoms and/or SI were found. Targeted interventions are needed for patients at risk of undertreatment, including patients with SI, African American or Black and Asian patients, and older adults.

Mental health screenings in dental settings: Feasibility and outcomes from a study by The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

BACKGROUND

With the rising importance of mental health screenings in nontraditional settings, dental offices offer an important opportunity to provide these services. This feasibility study examined mental health screenings and referral to treatment procedures in dental practices.

METHODS

A total of 17 dentists, dental hygienists, and dental office staff members (dental office personnel [DOP]) from 5 dental practices enrolled 36 patients in the study. Patients completed 4 validated mental health screening instruments. In addition to training in study procedures, DOP also were trained on how to review patient screening measures and provide appropriate mental health follow-up (ie, provide a list of area mental health resources) when necessary.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (61.1%) met the study threshold for follow-up on any mental health screening form. DOP provided appropriate follow-up for all 22 patients, which included providing a list of area mental health resources. DOP reported that the mental health screening procedures did not disrupt the workflow in 93% of patient encounters.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, DOP reported minimal disruption in their workflow. The findings suggest the viability of incorporating regular mental health screenings as part of the regular dental patient workflow. This study also highlights the potential for the scalability and impact of screening procedures in dental practices.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

This feasibility study highlights the potential of dental offices becoming an avenue for screening patient mental health concerns and providing area resources, thus enhancing comprehensive patient care and overall patient well-being.

Implementing universal maternal depression screening in Head Start: A convergent mixed methods study

Aims

Implementing maternal depression screening in child-serving programs can help ensure that more mothers receive mental health services. This study examined the implementation of universal maternal depression screening in community-based Head Start programs.

Methods

Quantitative and qualitative data were merged in a convergent mixed method design to assess four domains from the RE-AIM implementation science framework (Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance). Qualitative data included interviews with stakeholders and meeting minutes from the implementation period. Quantitative data included intervention outcomes and administrative data.

Results

In terms of reach, 85% of eligible Head Start mothers were screened for depression, and English-speaking mothers were more likely to refuse screening than Spanish-speaking or bilingual mothers. Barriers to screening included lack of availability, stigma, privacy concerns, lack of interest, and lack of trust. In terms of adoption, all sites and staff adopted screening due to organizational mandates. In terms of implementation, there was wide variation in rates of positive screenings across staff completing the screening (ranging from 0% to 46%), and barriers included concerns about staff role and lack of training. In terms of maintenance, screening was not sustained after the study period due to organizational priorities and lack of buy-in from staff.

Conclusion

Universal maternal depression screening has the potential to reach low-income Head Start mothers, but additional efforts should be made to build staff capacity to engage mothers in screening.

Collaborative Recognition of Wellbeing Needs: A Novel Approach to Universal Psychosocial Screening on the Neonatal Unit

Universal screening for the psychological needs of families in neonatal care is internationally recommended, but is not routinely practiced in the United Kingdom (UK). The present quality improvement project explores the clinical and operational feasibility of a novel approach to universal screening on a neonatal intensive care unit in the UK. The approach to screening taken adopts collaborative, strengths-based and dialogical methods for recognising the psychological needs of families whose baby is in hospital. A novel screening tool, developed through consultation with families, is described. Over one month, 42 out of 80 eligible families engaged with the screening protocol either at admission to the unit, transition to the special care nursery within the unit, or discharge home, with completion rates higher at admission than discharge. This led to an eightfold increase in the number of families accessing targeted or specialist psychological intervention compared to the period prior to this pilot. This project demonstrates the need for adequate capacity in the workforce to carry out a screening programme and to respond to the needs identified.

Perceptions of mental health screening and referral to treatment in National Dental-Practice Based Research Network practices: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

Dental practices can have additional positive impacts on public health by implementing mental health screening and referral to treatment in dental care workflows. In this study, we examined how dental practices identify and address adult patient mental health concerns, attitudes about implementing mental health screening and referral, and potential barriers and facilitators to treatment.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured focus groups with 17 dentists, 10 dental hygienists, and 5 dental assistants/office staff in the South-Central region of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We identified five main themes from dental practitioners and office staff responses. Practitioners and office staff: (1) discover patient mental health concerns through record review, patient/caregiver disclosure, and patient observation; (2) respond to patients' mental health concerns by making the patient more comfortable, documenting the concern in the patient's chart, and directly addressing the mental health concern; (3) want a systematic process for mental health screening and referral to treatment in their dental office; (4) recognize potential barriers in implementing health screening and referral to treatment processes; (5) desire training on mental health matters. An overarching theme emerged: developing a trusting relationship with patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants noted the importance of implementing systematic procedures for mental health screening and referral to services into dental practices, while also recognizing the potential barriers for integrating such processes. They also expressed a desire for quality training and resources that can support better care for patients with mental health concerns.

Mental health screening and referral to treatment in dental practices: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review to examine and summarize the characteristics of research related to mental health (MH) screenings and/or referrals to treatment in dental practices.

METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for Scoping Reviews and searched multiple databases for terms connected with dental care, MH concerns, screening, and referral. Included articles: (1) described care provided in a dental practice, (2) described a situation where the patient is experiencing the potential MH problem, (3) did not involve dental anxiety exclusively, and (4) involved some form of MH screening and/or referral to treatment. Article analysis included a summary of key study characteristics, types of evidence, study design, and central concepts and definitions.

RESULTS

The search generated 2050 records, with 26 ultimately included. Most studies involved only adults (22, 85%), but only three (12%) reported on rurality (two urban; one mixed) and only two each (8%) reported race or ethnicity. Fifteen (58%) articles were prospective and 11 (42%) were retrospective. The studies varied widely in study designs, from 11 (42%) cross-sectional methodologies to only one (4%) randomized controlled trial. Thirty-four screening tools were used to screen for symptoms of 43 MH conditions, with depression and anxiety screened for most frequently. Few articles discussed making referrals, practice workflows, or follow-up outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Included studies provide evidence of viable options for dental practitioners regarding MH screening, referring, and conducting follow-up, but lack specificity regarding these processes. Overall, more research is needed to clarify what workflows are most efficient for dental practitioners and efficacious in identifying patients with MH concerns.

Association between sociodemographic factors, clinic characteristics and mental health screening rates in primary care

BACKGROUND

Screening for mental health problems has been shown to be effective to detect depression and initiate treatment in primary care. Current guidelines recommend periodic screening for depression and anxiety. This study examines the association of patient sociodemographic factors and clinic characteristics on mental health screening in primary care.

DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study, electronic medical record (EMR) data from a 14-month period from 10/15/2021 to 12/14/2022 were analyzed. Data were retrieved from 18 primary care clinics from the Corewell Health healthcare system in West Michigan. The main outcome was documentation of any Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4/PHQ-9/GAD-7) screening in the EMR within the 14-month period at patient level. General linear regression models with logit link function were used to assess adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of having a documented screening.

RESULTS

In total, 126,306 unique patients aged 16 years or older with a total of 291,789 encounters were included. The prevalence of 14-month screening was 79.8% (95% CI, 79.6-80.0). Regression analyses revealed higher screening odds for patients of smaller clinics (<5,000 patients, aOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.80-1.98 vs. clinics >10.000 patients), clinics in areas with mental health provider shortages (aOR 1.69; 95% CI 1.62-1.77), frequent visits (aOR 1.80; 95% CI, 1.78-1.83), and having an annual physical / well child visit encounter (aOR 1.52; 95% CI, 1.47-1.57). Smaller positive effect sizes were also found for male sex, Black or African American race, Asian race, Latinx ethnicity (ref. White/Caucasians), and having insurance through Medicaid (ref. other private insurance).

DISCUSSION

The 14-month mental health screening rates have been shown to be significantly lower among patients with infrequent visits seeking care in larger clinics and available mental health resources in the community. Introducing and incentivizing mandatory mental health screening protocols in annual well visits, are viable options to increase screening rates.

Telemedicine and Depression Screening After the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic

This cohort study investigates the probability of depression screening by visit type and by patient demographic characteristics in a large health system during the early COVID-19 pandemic.

Relationship Between Cognitive Impairment and Depression Among Middle Aged and Older Adults in Primary Care

Objectives: To determine rates of previously undetected cognitive impairment among patients with depression in primary care. Methods: Patients ages 55 and older with no documented history of dementia or mild cognitive impairment were recruited from primary care practices in New York City, NY and Chicago, IL (n = 855). Cognitive function was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire-8. Results: The mean age was 66.8 (8.0) years, 45.3% were male, 32.7% Black, and 29.2% Latinx. Cognitive impairment increased with severity of depression: 22.9% in persons with mild depression, 27.4% in moderate depression and 41.8% in severe depression (p = .0002). Severe depression was significantly associated with cognitive impairment in multivariable analysis (standardized β = -.11, SE = 0.33, p < .0001). Discussion: Depression was strongly associated with previously undetected cognitive impairment. Primary care clinicians should consider screening, or expand their screening, for both conditions.

Expanding Access to Psychiatric Care Through Universal Depression Screening: Lessons from an Urban Student-Run Free Clinic

The purpose of this study is to report the utility of a universal depression screening in a student-run free clinic (SRFC) to improve bridging to psychiatric care. Patients (n = 224) seen by an SRFC between April 2017 and November 2022 were screened for depression in the patient's primary language using the standardized Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). A PHQ-9 score greater or equal to 5 prompted psychiatry referral. Retrospective chart review was conducted to determine clinical characteristics and length of psychiatry follow-up. Out of 224 patients screened, 77 patients had positive depression screens and were referred to the SRFC's adjacent psychiatry clinic. Of these 77 patients, 56 patients (73%) were female, the average age was 43.7 (SD = 14.5), and the mean PHQ score was 10 (SD = 5.13). Thirty-seven patients (48%) accepted referral, while 40 (52%) declined or were lost to follow-up. There were no statistical differences in age or number of medical comorbidities between the two groups. Patients who accepted referrals were more likely to be female, as well as to have psychiatric histories, higher PHQ-9 scores, and a history of trauma. Reasons for declining and being lost to follow-up included transition to insurance, geographic relocation and deferral due to hesitancy in seeking psychiatric care. Implementation of a standardized depression screening reveals a significant rate of depressive symptoms among an urban uninsured primary care population. Universal screening may serve as a tool to improve the delivery of psychiatric care to underserved patients.

Untreated major depression in healthcare workers: Results from the nationwide AMADEUS survey

AIMS

Recent studies have suggested increased rates of depression in healthcare workers (HCWs), with direct impact on care quality and productivity. The objective was to determine the proportion of HCWs adequately treated for their major depression in a nationwide survey, the proportion of lifestyle risk factors for depression, and to determine if working in psychiatry department or professional status may modulate these outcomes.

DESIGN

The method followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement guidelines. A survey comprising the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale was sent to public and private national healthcare facilities.

RESULTS

Overall, 10,325 participants were recruited; 3438 (33.3%) [95% confidence interval 32.4-34.2] met likely diagnostic criteria for clinical depression. Almost 80% of them declared that they had a history of major depressive episode. However, only approximately 23% of them were treated with antidepressants and approximately 13% had a psychiatric follow-up. Depressed HCWs working in psychiatry departments received slightly better care for their depression, but they also consumed more anxiolytics and hypnotics and had more risk factors for depression (including smoking and hazardous drinking). We found specificities according to professions, physicians reported higher rates of hazardous drinking while nurses, nurse assistants, and health executives had higher rates of smoking and twice as much obesity as physicians.

CONCLUSION

Disseminating tools to detect major depression, programs destigmatizing depression and antidepressants, promoting physical activity, weight loss, tobacco cessation and reduced alcohol consumption are promising strategies to improve the care of major depression in HCWs.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Reducing depression in healthcare workers is necessary to improve the quality of care, to limit burnout, medical errors, absenteeism and turn-over and globally to improve the wellbeing at work.

"How's your mood": Recorded physician mental health conversations with Chinese and Latino patients in routine primary care visits

OBJECTIVE

Patient-physician communication patterns may influence discussions around depressive symptoms and contribute to engagement in depression care among racial/ethnic minority adults. We examined patient-physician communication about depressive symptoms during routine primary care visits with Chinese and Latino patients with and without language barriers.

METHODS

We examined 17 audio-recorded conversations between primary care physicians and Chinese (N = 7) and Latino (N = 10) patients who discussed mental health during their visit and reported depressive symptoms on a post-visit survey. Conversations (in English, Cantonese, Mandarin, Hoisan-wa, Spanish) were transcribed and translated by bilingual/bicultural research assistants and analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic and discourse analysis.

RESULTS

Patients initiated mental health discussion in eleven visits. Physicians demonstrated care in word choice and sometimes avoided openly mentioning depression; this could contribute to miscommunication around symptoms and treatment goals. Interpreters had difficulty finding single words to convey terms used by either patients or physicians.

CONCLUSION

Patients and doctors appeared willing to discuss mental health; however, variability in terminology presented challenges in mental health discussions in this culturally and linguistically diverse sample.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Further understanding patient preferred terminology about mental health symptoms and interpreter training in these terms could improve patient-physician communication about depressive symptoms and treatment preferences.

Psychiatric health care need in Hungary identified by the short screening algorithm of depression and suicide risk used in general medical practices

Suicides are often related to depression. General medical practices (GMPs) should play a role in screening depression. We aimed to test the screening algorithm of Rihmer and Torzsa for depression and suicide and determine the prevalence and number of patients in the nationwide representative Hungarostudy 2002 population, and to estimate the corresponding extra health care need in an average GMP and in the Hungarian population in addition to patients who are already cared for by specialized care. The short version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) and the Hungarian version of the short form of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-9) were used to screen for suicide risk and depression. The prevalence of suicidal thoughts and depression was determined and findings were extrapolated to an average GMP of 1,600 adults and to the population over 25 years of age. This screening would generate a considerable extra psychiatric care to organize and implement in an average GMP and throughout the country. Our findings show that with easily administered screening instruments a significant number of patients likely to have depression can be identified at the primary care level, arguing for the establishment of the extra psychiatric care capacity in Hungary.

Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9

Background

Case finding for low mood is essential in primary care, but it is time-consuming using current depression inventories. The Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) is a short, simple inventory which assesses mood for today, and we aimed to validate it in this study.

Materials and Methods

Consecutive patients with emotional distress seen in a single primary care clinic by one of the authors over 22 months were eligible for this retrospective audit (N = 160). Multiple visits (N = 421) from the same patient were included in the study. The index test was BDST, which assesses the patient's mood for today. The reference standard was the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which assesses mood over the past 2 weeks. PHQ-9 had a cut-off point of ≥10 and BDST had a cut-off point of ≥6 for a significant mood issue.

Results

The median age of patients was 35 years, and 63% of the cohort were women. The median BDST score was 8, indicative of moderately low mood, and the median PHQ-9 score was 15, indicative of moderately severe depression. For patients with a BDST score ≥6, the likelihood ratio of a positive test was 2.67. The sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%-96%) and the specificity was 68% (95% CI: 60%-76%). The area under the curve was 84% (95% CI: 80%-87%).

Conclusion

This audit validates BDST against PHQ-9 and finds it an excellent case-finding tool compared to PHQ-9. This is the first validation study of BDST.

Depression and Suicide Risk Screening: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Importance

Depression is common and associated with substantial burden. Suicide rates have increased over the past decade, and both suicide attempts and deaths have devastating effects on individuals and families.

Objective

To review the benefits and harms of screening and treatment for depression and suicide risk and the accuracy of instruments to detect these conditions among primary care patients.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Cochrane library through September 7, 2022; references of existing reviews; ongoing surveillance for relevant literature through November 25, 2022.

Study Selection

English-language studies of screening or treatment compared with control conditions, or test accuracy of screening instruments (for depression, instruments were selected a priori; for suicide risk, all were included). Existing systematic reviews were used for treatment and test accuracy for depression.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

One investigator abstracted data; a second checked accuracy. Two investigators independently rated study quality. Findings were synthesized qualitatively, including reporting of meta-analysis results from existing systematic reviews; meta-analyses were conducted on original research when evidence was sufficient.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Depression outcomes; suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths; sensitivity and specificity of screening tools.

Results

For depression, 105 studies were included: 32 original studies (N=385 607) and 73 systematic reviews (including ≈2138 studies [N ≈ 9.8 million]). Depression screening interventions, many of which included additional components beyond screening, were associated with a lower prevalence of depression or clinically important depressive symptomatology after 6 to 12 months (pooled odds ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.50-0.73]; reported in 8 randomized clinical trials [n=10 244]; I2 = 0%). Several instruments demonstrated adequate test accuracy (eg, for the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire at a cutoff of 10 or greater, the pooled sensitivity was 0.85 [95% CI, 0.79-0.89] and specificity was 0.85 [95% CI, 0.82-0.88]; reported in 47 studies [n = 11 234]). A large body of evidence supported benefits of psychological and pharmacologic treatment of depression. A pooled estimate from trials used for US Food and Drug Administration approval suggested a very small increase in the absolute risk of a suicide attempt with second-generation antidepressants (odds ratio, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.09-2.15]; n = 40 857; 0.7% of antidepressant users had a suicide attempt vs 0.3% of placebo users; median follow-up, 8 weeks). Twenty-seven studies (n = 24 826) addressed suicide risk. One randomized clinical trial (n=443) of a suicide risk screening intervention found no difference in suicidal ideation after 2 weeks between primary care patients who were and were not screened for suicide risk. Three studies of suicide risk test accuracy were included; none included replication of any instrument. The included suicide prevention studies generally did not demonstrate an improvement over usual care, which typically included specialty mental health treatment.

Conclusions and Relevance

Evidence supported depression screening in primary care settings, including during pregnancy and postpartum. There are numerous important gaps in the evidence for suicide risk screening in primary care settings.

Increasing Identification and Follow-Up of Older Adult Depression in Primary Care

INTRODUCTION

Depression is a common mental health disorder faced by older adults that can go undetected and untreated. It was determined that the project site was not screening for depression among their older patient population. Aims: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine if the implementation of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) would impact the identification of risk factors for depression and follow-up among adults 65 and older.

METHODS

Implementation started in June 2021 in a primary care office in Southern California. Data was collected for this project over a total of 8 weeks. This project was a quality improvement project designed to implement routine depression screening among older adult patients using the GDS-15. Depressive symptoms were identified, and follow-up and treatment for depression in primary care was initiated if indicated by GDS-15 scores. Data were obtained from the project site's electronic medical record on a total sample size of 443 patients (n = 252 in the comparison group and n = 191 in the implementation group).

RESULTS

A chi-square test indicated a clinical and statistically significant improvement in the identification rate of depression, X2 (1, N = 443) = 49.76, P < .0001; and follow-up rate X2 (1, N = 70) = 23.94, P < .0001. Clinical significance was found with an increase in the identification of depression and follow-up of older adults in primary care. Demographic variables were also compared for the QI intervention group patients according to those who scored <5 (n = 134) and patients who scored 5 or greater on the GDS-15 (n = 57) again using chi-square tests. The results showed significant differences between gender (P = .016) and primary diagnosis (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings of this project suggest all older adults should receive a depression screening routinely in primary care to increase the recognition of depression as well as follow-up and treatment.

Mental Health Screening Differences in Non-English Speaking Patients: Results From a Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To assess differences in mental health screening based on patient's preferred language.

METHODS

For this retrospective cohort study, data for 85 725 unique patients from 10 primary care clinics in West Michigan were analyzed if patients received at least 1 mental health screening with the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4) within a 12-month period (10/15/2021-10/14/2022). A general linear regression model was used to assess the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of being screened.

RESULTS

Patients having a preferred language other than English (n = 2755) had an 87.0% chance of receiving the recommended mental health screening, compared to 76.7% of English-speaking patients (P < .001). A multivariable model revealed decreased screening odds for Kinyarwanda (aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19-0.45) and Persian/Dari/Pashto (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.91) speaking patients and higher screening odds for Spanish (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.19-1.77), Bosnian (aOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.11-4.11), and Vietnamese (aOR 2.25 95% CI 1.64-3.08) speaking patients compared to English speaking patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight the inequities between the language groups that are probably the result of the challenges to access multilingual depression and anxiety screening instruments. Furthermore, providers may be prone to bias about who they think "needs" a mental health screening. We suggest that measures are implemented to ensure consistency in mental health screening regardless of a patients' preferred language.