Use of Immunotherapy With Programmed Cell Death 1 vs Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PD-L1-CD80 interactions are required for intracellular signaling necessary for dendritic cell migration

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) interactions are targets for immunotherapies aimed to reinvigorate T cell function. Recently, it was documented that PD-L1 regulates dendritic cell (DC) migration through intracellular signaling events. In this study, we find that both preclinical murine and clinically available human PD-L1 antibodies limit DC migration. We show that cis interactions between PD-L1 and CD80 are critical for promoting migration and define specific regions within these proteins necessary for migration. Furthermore, we demonstrate that αPD-L1 significantly impedes DC migration in a B16 melanoma tumor model. Last, we outline how blocking cis PD-L1:CD80 interactions or mutation of the intracellular domain of PD-L1, in an imiquimod-induced murine model of psoriasis, limits DC migration to the lymph node, decreases interleukin-17 production by CD4+ T cells in the lymph node, and reduces epidermal thickening. Therefore, PD-L1 and CD80 interactions are important regulators of DC migration to the draining lymph node.

Development of a peptide-based tumor-activated checkpoint inhibitor for cancer immunotherapy

Antibody-based checkpoint inhibitors have achieved great success in cancer immunotherapy, but their uncontrollable immune-related adverse events remain a major challenge. In this study, we developed a tumor-activated nanoparticle that is specifically active in tumors but not in normal tissues. We discovered a short anti-PD-L1 peptide that blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. The peptide was modified with a PEG chain through a novel matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2)-specific cleavage linker. The modified TR3 peptide self-assembles into a micelle-like nanoparticle (TR3-M-NP), which remains inactive and unable to block the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in its native form. However, upon cleavage by MMP-2 in tumors, it releases the active peptide. The TR3-M-NP5k nanoparticle was specifically activated in tumors through enzyme-mediated cleavage, leading to the inhibition of tumor growth and extended survival compared to control groups. In summary, TR3-M-NP shows great potential as a tumor-responsive immunotherapy agent with reduced toxicities. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, we developed a bioactive peptide-based checkpoint inhibitor that is active only in tumors and not in normal tissues, thereby potentially avoiding immune-related adverse effects. We discovered a short anti-PD-L1 peptide, TR3, that blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. We chemically modified the TR3 peptide to self-assemble into a micelle-like nanoparticle (TR3-M-NP), which itself cannot block the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction but releases the active TR3 peptide in tumors upon cleavage by MMP-2. In contrast, the nanoparticle is randomly degraded in normal tissues into peptides fragments that cannot block the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. Upon intraperitoneal injection, TR3-M-NP5k was activated specifically in tumors through enzyme cleavage, leading to the inhibition of tumor growth and extended survival compared to the control groups. In summary, TR3-M-NP holds significant promise as a tumor-responsive immunotherapy agent with reduced toxicities. The bioactive platform has the potential to be used for other types of checkpoint inhibitor.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor alone or combined with chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination with standard chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) have been tested as first-line treatment in clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor alone or combined with chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC in a real world clinical care setting, and sought to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

METHODS

A retrospective, real-world study involving 35 locally advanced or metastatic UC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitor alone or in combination with chemotherapy was conducted. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. A Cox regression analysis was conducted to explore the association of baseline variables with OS.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 35 patients, 7 patients were treated with PD-1 inhibitor alone and 28 with PD-1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The median OS was 16.0 months (95% CI: 11.9-20.1), and median PFS was 12.0 months (95% CI: 8.6-15.4) for all patients. PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy was associated with better PFS than PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (HR: 0.19, p = 0.018). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurred in 5 (71.4%) patients who received PD-1 inhibitor and 24 (85.7%) patients who received PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were identified as prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC could benefit from PD-1 inhibitor alone or combined with chemotherapy in daily clinical practice. ECOG PS and NLR can be used for prognostication of survival.

Reflections on the AMBASSADOR trial: The role of adjuvant pembrolizumab in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma

Recent advances in immunotherapy have transformed treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, providing hope for cisplatin-ineligible patients. The AMBASSADOR trial evaluated adjuvant pembrolizumab in high-risk patients post-surgery, demonstrating improved disease-free survival. As overall survival data evolve, pembrolizumab is emerging as a promising adjuvant treatment option, complementing existing therapies in the treatment landscape for this disease.

Efficacy and safety of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to first-line standard therapy for recurrent or advanced cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with standard therapy (ST) have emerged as a novel treatment strategy for recurrent or advanced cervical cancer (r/a CC). However, the available data from phase 3 clinical trials have yielded mixed results. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of adding ICIs to ST in the treatment of r/a CC.

Methods

Data from four phase 3 clinical trials (KEYNOTE-826, CALLA, BEATcc, and ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18), involving 2,857 patients, were analyzed. Meta-analyses were conducted to combine hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), odds ratios (ORs) for the objective response rate (ORR), and relative risks (RRs) for adverse events (AEs).

Results

The addition of ICIs to ST significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.75), OS (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75), and ORR (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.13-1.94) compared to ST alone. However, there was a modest increase in grade 3-5 AEs (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13) with the combined therapy.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicates that the combination of ICIs with ST in the treatment of r/a CC not only demonstrates superior efficacy over ST alone but also maintains a comparable toxicity profile, offering strong evidence for an effective and relatively safe treatment approach for managing this disease.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024593895.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of imported and domestic immune checkpoint inhibitors in China: A systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Multiple brands of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including domestic and imported agents, have been approved as front-line therapy in China. However, little is known about the difference in efficacy and safety of these agents of different origins. This study aims to systematically compare the difference between National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved domestic and imported ICIs regarding their efficacy, safety, and price.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central, from inception to July 1st, 2023, for phase III trials evaluating ICIs as first- or second-line settings that have available hazard ratio (HR) for Asians or non-Asians. Studies of domestic and imported ICIs were screened and paired by the matching clinical characteristics as mirror groups. The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in efficacy between domestic and imported ICIs regarding overall survival. An effect size was derived from each mirror group and then pooled across all groups using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. Monthly treatment costs for each drug were calculated based on dosing information on National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) label and prices extracted from INSIGHT database. The difference in monthly treatment costs was compared by unpaired T-test. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42024580753.

RESULTS

Overall, domestic ICIs exhibited better efficacy regarding overall survival (HR, 0.87; 95 % CI, 0.79-0.97; P < 0.05; I2 = 0) compared with imported agents. No difference was observed regarding benefits in progression free survival (HR, 0.95; 95 % CI, 0.82-1.09; P > 0.05; I2 = 0). Consistent results were obtained through frequentists and Bayesian approaches. The differences in safety; measured by relative risk of treatment-related adverse events (TARE) of any grade, TARE of grade 3 or higher, immune-related adverse events(irAE) of any grade, irAE of grade 3 or higher, discontinuation due to treatment, and death due to treatment; were also similar between domestic and imported ICIs. Moreover, in current Chinese market, the monthly treatment prices of domestic ICIs was statistically lower than that of imported ICIs (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our research provides an essential reference of cost-effectiveness of ICIs manufactured in China for clinicians in routine practice of cancer care as well as public health authorities for decision making process.

PD-1 endocytosis unleashes the cytolytic potential of checkpoint blockade in tumor immunity

PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is a key cancer treatment. While blocking PD-1 binding to ligand is known, the role of internalization in enhancing ICB efficacy is less explored. Our study reveals that PD-1 internalization helps unlock ICB's full potential in cancer immunotherapy. Anti-PD-1 induces 50%-60% surface PD-1 internalization from human and mouse cells, leaving low to intermediate levels of resistant receptors. Complexes then appear in early and late endosomes. Both CD4 and CD8 T cells, especially CD8+ effectors, are affected. Nivolumab outperforms pembrolizumab in human T cells, while PD-1 internalization requires crosslinking by bivalent antibody. While mono- and bivalent anti-PD-1 inhibit tumor growth with CD8 tumor-infiltrating cells expressing increased granzyme B, bivalent antibody is more effective where the combination of steric blockade and endocytosis induces greater CD8+ T cell tumor infiltration and the expression of the cytolytic pore protein, perforin. Our findings highlight an ICB mechanism that combines steric blockade and PD-1 endocytosis for optimal checkpoint immunotherapy.

[Radiotherapy Combined with Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy Improves Prognosis and Demonstrates Synergistic Effects in Extensive-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer]

BACKGROUND

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is a malignant tumor with remarkable proliferative and invasive ability, which has very poor clinical prognosis due to lack of effective treatments. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and synergistic effects of radiotherapy (RT) combined with immunotherapy (IT) and chemotherapy (CT) in patients with ES-SCLC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 145 ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line CT. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-rank tests were used to evaluate survival outcomes, while propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce confounding factors.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the entire cohort were 15.7 and 6.9 mon, respectively. The IT+CT group had a significantly longer mOS compared to the CT group (17.2 vs 13.5 mon, P=0.047). Similarly, the RT+CT group demonstrated superior mOS (18.5 vs 12.3 mon, P<0.001) and mPFS (7.1 vs 6.2 mon, P=0.006) compared to the CT group. Multivariate analysis identified RT, IT, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) as independent prognostic factors for mOS (P<0.05), while gender and ECOG PS were independent predictors for mPFS (P<0.05). Following PSM, the RT+CT group continued to exhibit significant advantages in mOS (18.0 vs 12.1 mon, P<0.001) and mPFS (7.1 vs 5.5 mon, P=0.037) compared to the CT group. Notably, the RT+IT+CT group achieved a markedly longer mOS than the IT+CT group (28.5 vs 15.8 mon, P=0.017). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 27.6% of patients, with no grade 5 adverse events reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of RT, IT, and CT significantly enhances the prognosis of ES-SCLC patients. RT plays a key role in their synergistic effects and demonstrates good safety, warranting further research and clinical application.

Differences in immune-related toxicity between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study in patients with advanced cancer

Immunotherapy with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors has become an essential treatment strategy for a growing number of malignancies. These treatments have a risk for immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Pooled analyses based on clinical trials show a favorable toxicity profile for treatment with PD-L1 compared to PD-1 inhibitors. This study aimed to investigate differences in IRAEs between patients with advanced solid malignances treated with PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors in a real-world setting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at four Swedish Regions. Patients (n = 605) treated for advanced cancer with a PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor in monotherapy between June 2016 and August 2022 were included. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common malignant disease (n = 251; 41.5%), followed by malignant melanoma (n = 173; 28.6%), renal cell carcinoma (n = 71; 11.7%) and urothelial carcinoma (n = 35; 5.8%). Among patients receiving PD-L1 inhibitors, NSCLC (94.4%) was the predominant malignancy, whereas for those treated with PD-1 inhibitor, malignant melanoma constituted the most prevalent malignancy (34.5%). Discontinuation of treatment due to IRAEs overall and IRAEs grade ≥ 2 were significantly less common in patients treated with PD-L1 compared to PD-1 inhibitors [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.38 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.16-0.88) and OR: 0.63 (95% CI 0.35-0.98) respectively]. Any grade IRAE, IRAE grade ≥ 3 and multiple IRAEs were numerically more frequent in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.In conclusion, our study of patients with advanced solid malignancies in a real-world setting supports the results from clinical trials demonstrating a favorable toxicity profile for PD-L1 inhibitors versus PD-1 inhibitors.

Phenotypic insights into genetic risk factors for immune-related adverse events in cancer immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose substantial challenges in the realm of cancer immunotherapy, frequently affecting treatment efficacy and patient safety. To address the urgent need for identifying risk factors associated with irAEs, we conducted a comprehensive phenotype-wide Mendelian randomization analysis (MR-PheWAS).

METHODS

Utilizing publicly accessible genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, this investigation evaluated the impact of over 5000 exposure variables on susceptibility to irAEs using univariate Mendelian randomization (MR). We categorized these correlations and further explored potential mechanisms by which associated traits might influence irAEs through multivariate MR.

RESULTS

MR-PheWAS identified numerous risk factors for irAEs, encompassing both previously documented and novel associations. Specifically, we identified 105 traits with probable causal relationships to all-grade irAEs and 119 traits with suggestive associations. For high-grade irAEs, we categorized 122 traits as probably associated and 141 as suggestively associated. Notably, multivariate MR analyses uncovered intricate interactions, particularly highlighting how diabetes impacts all-grade irAEs through mediators such as body mass index and sex hormone-binding globulin.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has not only identified new risk factors for irAEs but also confirmed several well-established ones. Further investigation is crucial to validate and assess these identified risk factors within clinical trials. A mechanistic understanding of these causal factors is essential for improving the management and prevention of irAEs.

The Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Plus Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Combination with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objection

To report the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with bevacizumab plus anti-PD-1 (BP1) or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors (BPL) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as a first-line treatment for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients with initially uHCC received either BP1-HAIC or BPL-HAIC as first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

Between January 2020 and December 2022, a total of 136 patients with initially uHCC received triple combination therapy, with 76 in the BP1-HAIC group and 60 in the BPL-HAIC group. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-13.7 months), and the median OS was 22.4 months (95% CI, 21.3- not reached). Comparative analysis revealed no significant differences in PFS (HR, 0.91, P = 0.69) or OS (HR, 0.71, P = 0.31) between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. The ORR was 46.3% per RECIST v1.1 and 66.9% per mRECIST, with a DCR of 83.1% under both criteria. Common adverse events (AEs) included hypoalbuminemia and elevated aspartate/alanine aminotransferase, with 5.1% (7/136) experienced upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Multivariate Cox analysis identified tumor number and BCLC stage as independent prognostic factors for OS, and tumor number for PFS.

Conclusion

Triple combination therapy demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy and tumor response in initially uHCC. No notable differences in outcomes were observed between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. AEs were manageable in clinical practice.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy with Nivolumab vs. Pembrolizumab in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment option due to its favorable toxicity profile. However, selecting the most appropriate immunotherapeutic agent for neoadjuvant use-aimed at curative intent in early-stage NSCLC-based on efficacy and safety remains a critical question. This review aims to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of nivolumab and pembrolizumab when used as neoadjuvant treatments in NSCLC. A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Online Library, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and Google Scholar, utilizing the search terms "Nivolumab OR Pembrolizumab AND Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy AND non-small cell lung cancer." Out of 1444 retrieved studies, 4 retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria by providing comparative data on nivolumab and pembrolizumab within the same study cohorts. Despite the critical risk of bias and the evidence quality ranging from moderate to very low across these studies, both nivolumab and pembrolizumab demonstrated efficacy rates exceeding 30% and maintained favorable safety profiles. There is no observed superiority between nivolumab and pembrolizumab in terms of efficacy and safety for the neoadjuvant treatment of early-stage NSCLC.

Immunotherapeutic Potential of Mutated NPM1 for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disease of the blood and bone marrow that is characterized by uncontrolled clonal proliferation of abnormal myeloid progenitor cells. Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) gene mutations are the most common genetic abnormality in AML, detectable in blast cells from about one-third of adults with AML. AML NPM1mut is recognized as a separate entity in the World Health Organization classification of AML. Clinical and survival data suggest that patients with this form of AML often have a more favorable prognosis, which may be due to the immunogenicity created by the mutations in the NPM1 protein. Consequently, AML with NPM1mut can be considered an immunogenic subtype of AML. However, the underlying mechanisms of this immunogenicity and associated favorable survival outcomes need to be further investigated. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) protein and its ligand, PD-L1, play important roles in leukemogenesis through their maintenance of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Preclinical trials have shown that the use of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors and lymphoma work best in novel therapy combinations. Patients with AML NPM1mut may be better suited to immunogenic strategies that are based on the inhibition of the PD-1 immune checkpoint pathway than patients without this mutation, suggesting the genetic landscape of patients may also inform best practice for the use of PD-1 inhibitors.

Trends in the use of immunotherapy to treat soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The role of immune-oncology (IO) therapy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is underexplored. This study characterized IO use in STS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of patients with a soft tissue mass in the National Cancer Database, 2011-2021. Patients were categorized by IO receipt status. Groupwise testing and proportional trend tests were performed with Chi-squared tests. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with IO receipt.

RESULTS

Of the 103,092 patients with STS, 1935 (1.9 ​%) received or were recommended IO therapy. IO use increased 10-fold (0.24 ​%-2.5 ​% from 2011 to 2021; p ​< ​0.0001). Patients had higher odds of receiving IO when having higher grade tumors and metastatic disease, and when treated at an academic research center (all p ​< ​0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

IO use in STS is low but increasing and primarily used in the metastatic setting. Future studies should identify biomarkers of IO response and facilitators for treatment receipt.

Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: The next evolution in expanding access to liver transplantation

Immunotherapy has revolutionised the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In addition, several phase III trials of immunotherapy in combination with surgical or locoregional therapies for early-to intermediate-stage HCC have recently reported positive results, and other phase III trials in the same patient population are currently in progress. As the application of immunotherapy is shifting to include patients with earlier stages of HCC, one looming question now emerges: What is the role of immunotherapy in the pre-liver transplant population? Liver transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for HCC and confers the additional advantage of restoring a normal, healthy liver. In pre-transplant patients, immunotherapy may improve downstaging success and tumour control at the cost of some immunologic risks. These include immune-related toxicities, which are particularly relevant in a uniquely vulnerable population with chronic liver disease, and the possibility of acute rejection after transplantation. Ultimately, the goal of immunotherapy in this population will be to effectively expand access to liver transplantation while preserving pre- and post-transplant outcomes. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms supporting combination immunotherapy, summarise key recent clinical data from major immunotherapy trials, and explore how immunotherapy can be applied in the neoadjuvant setting prior to liver transplantation in selected high-risk patients.

Adverse effects of anti-cancer biologics on the ocular surface

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer immunotherapy is one of the most emerging and rapidly growing fields.Ocular side effects associated with these therapies are common and can be present in up to 70% of patients.The cornea may be involved in different pathogenic mechanisms triggered by different immunotherapeutic agents, and corneal disease varies from mild symptoms to severe corneal ulceration and melting with visual loss.We aimed to review the incidence, mechanism, and management of ocular surface side effects in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the recent use of immunotherapeutic agents in cancer patients, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, ocular surface and corneal involvement are common side effects.These patients can be at risk of sight threatening complications that warrant prompt diagnosis and careful monitoring and management.

SUMMARY

Immunotherapy- related corneal complications in cancer patients are associated with a decreased quality of life. Prompt recognition and an interdisciplinary approach between ophthalmologists and oncologists are crucial to handle immune related ocular adverse events in these patients, in order to maintain ocular surface integrity and avoid a vision threatening complication.

Clinical outcomes and synergistic effect between radiotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) experience significant therapeutic challenges and limited survival rates. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of combining immunotherapy (IT) with chemotherapy (CT) for treating ES-SCLC and to explore the synergistic effect between radiotherapy (RT) and IT.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis examined patients with ES-SCLC who received treatment at three centers. Furthermore, propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was conducted. The Kaplan‒Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare the survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 257 eligible patients with ES-SCLC were included in the analysis. Among all patients, the median overall survival (mOS) was 18.0 m in the chemoimmunotherapy (CT + IT) group and 15.7 m in the CT group (p = 0.208). The median real-world progression-free survival (mrwPFS) was 7.7 m and 6.8 m (p = 0.043) in the CT + IT and CT group, respectively. Moreover, the mOS was 22.0 m in the chemoradiotherapy (CT + RT) group and 13.6 m in the CT group (p < 0.001). The mrwPFS was 7.4 m and 6.0 m (p = 0.175) in the CT + RT group and CT group, respectively. The multivariate analyses revealed that sex, liver metastasis and RT were independent prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.05), while liver metastasis and IT were found to be independent predictive factors of real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (p < 0.05). After PSM, the mOS was 23.2 m in the CT + IT group and 13.0 m in the CT group (p = 0.008). The mrwPFS was 7.3 m and 6.2 m (p = 0.096) in the CT + IT group and the CT group, respectively. Moreover, the mOS was 21.4 m in the CT + RT group and 12.5 m in the CT group (p < 0.001). The mrwPFS was 7.3 m and 5.2 m (p = 0.220) in the CT + RT group and the CT group, respectively. Additionally, our study revealed that in the PD-1 group, RT significantly improved patient survival (36.0 m vs. 15.8 m, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

An increasing number of treatment options are being explored for ES-SCLC, and CT is the cornerstone of treatment for this disease. Combining CT with IT and RT has demonstrated remarkable efficacy and excellent safety profiles, and such treatments are worthy of further exploration.

A scoring model for the expression of genes related to programmed cell death predicts immunotherapy response and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) continues to be the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, driven by environmental factors like smoking and genetic predispositions. LUAD has a high mortality rate, and new biomarkers are urgently needed to improve treatment strategies and patient management. Programmed cell death (PCD) is involved in tumor progression and response to treatment. Therefore, there is a need for an extensive study of the role and functions of PCD-related genes (PCDRGs) in lung adenocarcinoma so as to understand the pathophysiologic features of lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Based on TCGA and GEO databases, this research is aimed at screening differentially expressed PCD-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma. We conducted GO, and KEGG analysis to establish the link between these genes and biological processes. By applying various machine learning algorithms such as CoxBoost analysis, we developed PCD-related indices (PCDI) that were used to verify their ability to predict prognosis with the use of other datasets. This was done in addition to exploring the biological functions of PCD genes associated with lung adenocarcinoma by assessing the relationship between immune cell components of tumor microenvironment and PCD genes together with examining how they affect drug sensitivity.

RESULTS

The research presented in this article offers significant insights into LUAD. The authors identified 113 PCDRGs that were differentially expressed in LUAD. These genes are implicated in various biological functions, including High risk ing apoptosis, ferroptosis, and pathways specific to non-small cell lung cancer. Notably, the PCDI proved effective in distinguishing between High risk and Low risk LUAD patients, demonstrating a higher accuracy in prognosis prediction compared to traditional clinical indicators such as age and gender. This high prediction accuracy was validated in both test and validation cohorts. Additionally, these genes showed significant correlations with immune cell infiltration and drug sensitivity in LUAD patients.

CONCLUSION

We analysed the expression and function of PCDRGs in LUAD and revealed their correlation with patient survival, the immune microenvironment and drug sensitivity. The constructed PCDI model provides a scientific basis for the personalised treatment of lung adenocarcinoma, and future optimisation of treatment strategies based on these genes may improve patient clinical outcomes.

VISTA: A promising target for overcoming immune evasion in gynecologic cancers

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment but has shown limited efficacy in gynecologic cancers. VISTA (V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation), a member of the B7 family, is emerging as another checkpoint that regulates the anti-tumor immune responses within the tumor microenvironment. This paper reviews the structure, expression, and mechanism of action of VISTA. Furthermore, it highlights recent advances in VISTA-blocking therapies and their potential in improving outcomes for patients with gynecologic cancers. By understanding the role of VISTA in mediating the immune evasion of gynecologic tumors, we can develop more effective combinatory treatment strategies that could overcome resistance to current ICB therapies.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) is a new treatment method for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Network meta-analysis assessed efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NICT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and international conferences. Outcomes were surgical resection rate, pathological complete response(pCR),event-free survival (EFS), and Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

RCTs of 3,387 patients, six treatment combinations, and two modalities were included. Meta-analysis showed that NICT yielded higher pCR and EFS rates than NCT. The toripalimab-chemotherapy combination had the highest surgical resection rate (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.05-2.73), pCR (OR = 38.84, 95% CI: 11.05-268.19) and EFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.58).This regimen worked well for patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression or squamous cell pathology. For high PD-L1 expression and patients with NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab with chemotherapy had the most efficacy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events increased with longer treatment cycles, with perioperative nivolumab combined with chemotherapy showing the worst safety profile (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00-1.76), while neoadjuvant nivolumab combined with chemotherapy alone had the best safety profile (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.68-1.21). Indirect comparison showed no survival benefit for neoadjuvant-adjuvant immunotherapy (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.65-1.35). In the indirect comparison between the two immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs), although there was no significant difference in EFS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.61-1.08), PD-1 inhibitors may still be the most effective treatment option.

CONCLUSIONS

NICT effectively and safely treats resectable NSCLC. The optimal treatment combination is typically toripalimab and chemotherapy. Treatment based on PD-L1 expression and pathological type is recommended.

Emerging Chemodynamic Nanotherapeutics for Cancer Treatment

Chemodynamic therapy (CDT) has emerged as a transformative paradigm in the realm of reactive oxygen species -mediated cancer therapies, exhibiting its potential as a sophisticated strategy for precise and effective tumor treatment. CDT primarily relies on metal ions and hydrogen peroxide to initiate Fenton or Fenton-like reactions, generating cytotoxic hydroxyl radicals. Its notable advantages in cancer treatment are demonstrated, including tumor specificity, autonomy from external triggers, and a favorable side-effect profile. Recent advancements in nanomedicine are devoted to enhancing CDT, promising a comprehensive optimization of CDT efficacy. This review systematically elucidates cutting-edge achievements in chemodynamic nanotherapeutics, exploring strategies for enhanced Fenton or Fenton-like reactions, improved tumor microenvironment modulation, and precise regulation in energy metabolism. Moreover, a detailed analysis of diverse CDT-mediated combination therapies is provided. Finally, the review concludes with a comprehensive discussion of the prospects and intrinsic challenges to the application of chemodynamic nanotherapeutics in the domain of cancer treatment.

Efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitor in gynecologic cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Over the past decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown dramatic efficacy in improving survival rates in multiple malignancies. Recently, gynecological cancer patients also showed to respond favorably to ICI treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of ICI therapy in gynecological cancers. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by retrieving literature from multiple electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The protocol used in this study has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022369529). We included a total of 12 trials involving 8 therapies and 8,034 patients. ICI group demonstrated a longer OS (HR: 0.807; 95% CI: 0.719, 0.907; p = 0.000) and greater PFS improvement (HR: 0.809; 95% CI: 0.673, 0.973; p = 0.024) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events [RR: 0.968; 95%CI: 0.936, 1.001; p = 0.061], but a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) was observed in the ICI group (RR: 3.093; 95%CI: 1.933, 4.798; p = 0.000). Although the mean changes of QOL score from baseline was not significantly different between both groups (SMD: 0.048; 95% CI: -0.106, 0.202; p = 0.542), the time to definitive QOL deterioration was longer in the ICI group (HR: 0.508; 95% CI: 0.461, 0.560; p = 0.000). Despite having a higher incidence of IRAE, ICI was shown to improve survival rates and QOL of patients. Thus, it should be considered as a new standard of care for gynecologic cancers, especially in advanced stages.

Post-Metastasectomy Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab is established as adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after resection. Patients with completely resected metastatic disease (M1 NED) seem to have greater benefit from adjuvant pembrolizumab in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS); yet, with other agents, adjuvant therapy has not been shown to improve survival. As newer therapies evolve, it is important to understand the efficacy of systemic agents in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to systematically review available trials investigating adjuvant therapy after metastasectomy in RCC.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic literature search using PubMed and Embase through January 2024. For inclusion, studies were required to include completely resected patients with known metastatic RCC. Patients with only locally advanced and/or regional nodal involvement (N1) alone were excluded. Titles and abstracts were screened to identify articles for full-text, and then a descriptive review was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 149 articles were initially identified. Ultimately 9 articles published before the end of January 2024 met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Data were extracted and organized to reflect the role of adjuvant treatment - both targeted therapies as well as immunotherapy in patients who had undergone metastasectomy and rendered M1 NED. With the exception of pembrolizumab, adjuvant therapy in M1 NED was not found to be associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pembrolizumab appears to benefit M1 NED ccRCC patients after resection even more than other high-risk ccRCC patients. Yet, this same benefit has not been seen with other agents. Future research should focus on trying to establish which M1 NED patients benefit from adjuvant treatment.

The Oncolytic virus VT1092M and an Anti-PD-L1 antibody synergize to induce systemic antitumor immunity in a murine bilateral tumor model

This study investigated the synergistic potential of an oncolytic herpes simplex virus armed with interleukin 12 (VT1092M) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for enhancing antitumor responses. The potential of this combination treatment to induce systemic antitumor immunity was assessed using bilateral subcutaneous tumor and tumor re-challenge mouse models. The antitumor efficacy of various OV and ICI treatment combinations and the underlying mechanisms were explored through diverse analytical techniques, including flow cytometry and RNA sequencing. Using VT1092M, either alone or in combination with an anti-PD-L1 antibody, significantly reduced the sizes of both the injected and untreated abscopal tumors in a bilateral tumor mouse model. The combination therapy demonstrated superior antitumor efficacy to the other treatment conditions tested, which was accompanied by an increase in T cell numbers and CD8+T cell activation. Results from the survival and tumor re-challenge experiments showed that the combination therapy elicited long-term, tumor-specific immune responses, which were associated with tumor clearance and prolonged survival. Immune cell depletion assays identified CD8+T cells as the crucial mediators of systemic antitumor immunity during combination therapy. In conclusion, the combination of VT1092M and PD-L1 blockade emerged as a potent inducer of antitumor immune responses, surpassing the efficacy of each monotherapy. This synergistic approach holds promise for achieving robust and sustained antitumor immunity, with potential implications for preventing tumor metastasis in patients with cancer.

First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in low programmed death-ligand 1-expressing population

Introduction: Inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD1) and its ligand (PDL1) have exhibited favorable long-term survival in many types of advanced-stage cancer and current approvals have to date been granted in certain tumour types irrespective of PD-L1 status. Methods: We extracted the following information: study sample size, trial period, cancer types, intervention of treatment, type of PD-L1 antibody, immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring method, number and percentage of PD-L1 < 1% population, and median follow- up time. PD-L1 expression was defined as percentage of number of PD-L1-stained tumor cells (TPS), area of tumor infiltrated by PD-L1-stained immune cells (IPS), number of PD-L1-stained cells (tumor cells, lymphocytes and macrophages; CPS). Different trials used distinct method to define low PD-L1 expression. The risk of bias of the included trials was assessed by using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. Results: Here, a total of 34 trials were included to extract individual patient data (IPD) to evaluate the survival benefit of first line PD1/PDL1 inhibitors vs. standard-of-care (SOC) in patients with PDL1 < 1%. In term of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, OS (HR = 0.90, 0.81-1.01) and PFS (HR = 1.11, 0.97-1.27) between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group and SOC group were comparable. In term of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group exhibited longer OS (median 19.5 months vs. 16.3 months; HR = 0.83, 0.79-0.88, p < 0.001) and PFS than those of SOC group (median 8.11 months vs. 6.96 months; HR = 0.82, 0.77-0.87, p < 0.001).Subgroup analysis showed that survival benefit was mainly observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (HROS = 0.74; HRPFS = 0.69; p < 0.001), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (HROS = 0.58, p < 0.001; HRPFS = 0.55, p = 0.030), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (HROS = 0.62, p = 0.005; HRPFS = 0.79, p < 0.001), melanoma (HROS = 0.53, p < 0.001) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (HRPFS = 0.35, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combinational therapy rather than monotherapy exhibit survival benefit in the low PD-L1 population in the first-line setting, and the survival benefit was mainly observed in specific tumor types.

Which Is More Suitable for First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer, PD-L1 Inhibitors Versus PD-1 Inhibitors? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In this network meta-analysis (NMA), the efficiency and safety of PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy were compared in the first-line therapy of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

We searched research databases, conference abstracts, and trial registries and subsequently chose relevant studies and extracted dates. The NMA was conducted to estimate the efficiency and safety of the PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall remission rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Studies were assessed for quality. Subgroup analyses were used to evaluate study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We included six randomized trials with a total of 3163 patients. Direct comparisons showed that patients who received either PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.87) or PD-L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy (HR: 0.74, 0.61-0.89) demonstrated significantly longer OS than those who received placebo + chemotherapy. The results of the NMA showed that no significant differences in OS (HR 0.96 95% CI: 0.72-1.3), PFS (HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.51-1.4), and ORR (OR 1.3 95% CI: 0.66-2.5) were observed for PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy compared with PD-L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy, but the Bayesian ranking revealed that patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy tended to have longer OS, PFS benefit, and better treatment response than patients receiving PD-L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy. In terms of safety, no significant difference was observed in their safety profiles.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to placebo + chemotherapy, PD-L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy significantly improved survival for ES-SCLC. According to the available data, PD-L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy had equivalent efficacy and safety; however, the level of evidence of this type of comparison is limited.

PD-L1 inhibitor versus PD-1 inhibitor plus bevacizumab with transvascular intervention in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Both atezolizumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) plus bevacizumab (A+B) and sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus bevacizumab (S+B) are recommended as the first-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in China. Different efficacy between the two regimens combined with transvascular intervention for unresectable HCC (uHCC) remain unknown. We retrospectively analyzed uHCC patients treated in three centers by simultaneous combination of A+B or S+B with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared. Totally 188 patients were included, with 92 and 96 administered A+B+TACE-HAIC (ABTH) and S+B+TACE-HAIC (SBTH), respectively. ORRs (62.0 vs. 70.8%, respectively; P = 0.257) and disease control rates (88.0 vs. 93.8%, P = 0.267) were similar between groups by the mRECIST criteria. ABTH showed no survival advantage over SBTH, with median PFS times of 11.7 months and 13.0 months, respectively (HR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.52-1.26, P = 0.35) and similar OS times (HR = 1.19, 95% CI, 0.32-4.39, P = 0.8). No significant differences were observed in grade 3-4 TRAEs between groups. Either PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor plus bevacizumab combined with TACE-HAIC have similarly excellent therapeutic efficacy with manageable adverse events, representing promising treatment options for uHCC.

Antiangiogenic-immune-checkpoint inhibitor combinations: lessons from phase III clinical trials

Antiangiogenic agents, generally antibodies or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors that target the VEGF-VEGFR pathway, are currently among the few combination partners clinically proven to improve the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This benefit has been demonstrated in pivotal phase III trials across different cancer types, some with practice-changing results; however, numerous phase III trials have also had negative results. The rationale for using antiangiogenic drugs as partners for ICIs relies primarily on blocking the multiple immunosuppressive effects of VEGF and inducing several different vascular-modulating effects that can stimulate immunity, such as vascular normalization leading to increased intratumoural blood perfusion and flow, and inhibition of pro-apoptotic effects of endothelial cells on T cells, among others. Conversely, VEGF blockade can also cause changes that suppress antitumour immunity, such as increased tumour hypoxia, and reduced intratumoural ingress of co-administered ICIs. As a result, the net clinical benefits from antiangiogenic-ICI combinations will be determined by the balance between the opposing effects of VEGF signalling and its inhibition on the antitumour immune response. In this Perspective, we summarize the results from the currently completed phase III trials evaluating antiangiogenic agent-ICI combinations. We also discuss strategies to improve the efficacy of these combinations, focusing on aspects that include the deleterious functions of VEGF-VEGFR inhibition on antitumour immunity, vessel co-option as a driver of non-angiogenic tumour growth, clinical trial design, or the rationale for drug selection, dosing and scheduling.

Based on scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq to establish tumor immune microenvironment-associated signature of skin melanoma and predict immunotherapy response

Skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM), a form of skin cancer, ranks among the most formidable and lethal malignancies. Exploring tumor microenvironment (TME)-based prognostic indicators would help improve the efficacy of immunotherapy for SKCM patients. This study analyzed SKCM scRNA-seq data to cluster non-malignant cells that could be used to explore the TME into nine immune/stromal cell types, including B cells, CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, dendritic cells, endothelial cells, Fibroblasts, macrophages, neurons, and natural killer (NK) cells. Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we employed SKCM expression profiling to identify differentially expressed immune-associated genes (DEIAGs), which were then incorporated into weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to investigate TME-associated hub genes. Discover candidate small molecule drugs based on pivotal genes. Tumor immune microenvironment-associated genes (TIMAGs) for constructing TIMAS were identified and validated. Finally, the characteristics of TIAMS subgroups and the ability of TIMAS to predict immunotherapy outcomes were analyzed. We identified five TIMAGs (CD86, CD80, SEMA4D, C1QA, and IRF1) and used them to construct TIMAS. In addition, five potential SKCM drugs were identified. The results showed that TIMAS-low patients were associated with immune-related signaling pathways, high MUC16 mutation frequency, high T cell infiltration, and M1 macrophages, and were more favorable for immunotherapy. Collectively, TIMAS constructed by comprehensive analysis of scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data is a promising marker for predicting ICI treatment outcomes and improving individualized therapy for SKCM patients.

In Search of Better Peptide-(Derived from PD-L2)-Based Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Current anti-cancer immune checkpoint therapy relies on antibodies that primarily target the PD-1/PD-L1(-L2) negative regulatory pathway. Although very successful in some cases for certain cancers, these antibodies do not help most patients who, presumably, should benefit from this type of therapy. Therefore, an unmet clinical need for novel, more effective drugs targeting immune checkpoints remains. We have developed a series of high-potency peptide inhibitors interfering with PD-1/PD-L1(-L2) protein-protein interaction. Our best peptide inhibitors are 12 and 14 amino acids long and show sub-micromolar IC50 inhibitory activity in the in vitro assay. The positioning of the peptides within the PD-1 binding site is explored by extensive modeling. It is further supported by 2D NMR studies of PD-1/peptide complexes. These results reflect substantial progress in the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors using peptidomimetics.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a systematic review

Background

Several studies have explored the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC), particularly in microsatellite stable(MSS) or mismatch repair proficient(pMMR) LARC patients. We undertook a single-arm systematic review to comprehensively evaluate the advantages and potential risks associated with the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in conjunction with nCRT for patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ASCO and ESMO were searched for related studies. The main outcomes were pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), anal preservation, and adverse effects (AEs).

Results

Fourteen articles including 533 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients were analyzed. The pooled pCR, MPR, and anal preservation rates were 36%, 66% and 86%. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 20%. Subgroup analysis showed that; dMMR/MSI-H had a pooled pCR (100%) and MPR (100%), pMMR/MSS had a pooled pCR (38%) and MPR (60%); the short-course radiotherapy and long-course radiotherapy had pooled pCR rates of 51% and 30%, respectively. The rates of pCR for the concurrent and sequential immuno-chemoradiotherapy subgroups at 30% and 40%, mirroring pCR rates for the PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitor subgroups were 32% and 40%, respectively.

Conclusion

In cases of locally advanced rectal cancer, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have shown promising response rates and acceptable toxicity profiles. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy hence has a positive outcome even in MSS LARC patients.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier CRD42023465380.

Progress of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy in immune treatment for HER2-positive tumors

BACKGROUND

Patients with HER2-positive cancers often face a poor prognosis, and treatment regimens containing anti-HER2 have become the first-line treatment options for breast and gastric cancers. However, these approaches are faced with significant challenges in terms of drug resistance. Hence, it is crucial to explore precise treatment strategies aimed at improving survival outcomes.

ADVANCEMENTS IN TREATMENT

Over the past few years, there has been rapid advancement in the realm of tumor therapy, particularly with the swift progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors, including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. They exert anti-tumor effects by disrupting immune-suppressive factors within the tumor microenvironment. However, monotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has several limitations. Consequently, numerous studies have explored combinatorial immunotherapeutic strategies and demonstrated highly promising avenues of development.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to review the clinical trials investigating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy for HER2-positive tumors. Additionally, it provides a summary of ongoing trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of these combined treatments, with the intention of furnishing valuable insights for the clinical management of HER2-positive cancer.

CONCLUSION

Combinatorial immunotherapeutic strategies involving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors hold considerable promise in the treatment of HER2-positive tumors. Continued research efforts and clinical trials are warranted to elucidate optimal treatment regimens that maximize therapeutic benefits while minimizing adverse effects.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Drug Therapeutic Status, Advances and Challenges

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer, accounting for ~90% of liver neoplasms. It is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Although there have been rapid developments in the treatment of HCC over the past decade, the incidence and mortality rates of HCC remain a challenge. With the widespread use of the hepatitis B vaccine and antiviral therapy, the etiology of HCC is shifting more toward metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Early-stage HCC can be treated with potentially curative strategies such as surgical resection, liver transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation, improving long-term survival. However, most HCC patients, when diagnosed, are already in the intermediate or advanced stages. Molecular targeted therapy, followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, has been a revolution in HCC systemic treatment. Systemic treatment of HCC especially for patients with compromised liver function is still a challenge due to a significant resistance to immune checkpoint blockade, tumor heterogeneity, lack of oncogenic addiction, and lack of effective predictive and therapeutic biomarkers.

A retrospective study of combination therapy with glucocorticoids and pirfenidone for PD-1 inhibitor-related immune pneumonitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (ICIP) is thought to be a self-limiting disease; however, an effective treatment option does not currently exist. This study aimed to determine the clinical efficacy of combination therapy with glucocorticoids and pirfenidone for ICIP related to programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 45 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who developed ICIP following PD-1 inhibitor and albumin-bound paclitaxel or carboplatin treatment at our hospital. The PD-1 inhibitor was discontinued, and glucocorticoids were used alone or in combination with pirfenidone to treat ICIP. The relevant clinical data of these patients were collected and analyzed. Compared with the glucocorticoid alone group, the glucocorticoid-pirfenidone group showed significant improvement in forced vital capacity (FVC), carbon monoxide diffusing capacity [%], peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, and 6-minute walk distance (P < .05). There were benefits with respect to the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score and the recurrence rate of ICIP, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). Adding pirfenidone to glucocorticoid treatment was shown to be safe and may be more beneficial than glucocorticoids alone for improving pulmonary interstitial lesions, reversing ICIP, and preventing its recurrence.

Overall Survival with Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Renal-Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy after surgery for renal-cell carcinoma was approved on the basis of a significant improvement in disease-free survival in the KEYNOTE-564 trial. Whether the results regarding overall survival from the third prespecified interim analysis of the trial would also favor pembrolizumab was uncertain.

METHODS

In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had an increased risk of recurrence after surgery to receive pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles (approximately 1 year) or until recurrence, the occurrence of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. A significant improvement in disease-free survival according to investigator assessment (the primary end point) was shown previously. Overall survival was the key secondary end point. Safety was a secondary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 496 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab and 498 to receive placebo. As of September 15, 2023, the median follow-up was 57.2 months. The disease-free survival benefit was consistent with that in previous analyses (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.87). A significant improvement in overall survival was observed with pembrolizumab as compared with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.87; P = 0.005). The estimated overall survival at 48 months was 91.2% in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 86.0% in the placebo group; the benefit was consistent across key subgroups. Pembrolizumab was associated with a higher incidence of serious adverse events of any cause (20.7%, vs. 11.5% with placebo) and of grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to pembrolizumab or placebo (18.6% vs. 1.2%). No deaths were attributed to pembrolizumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant pembrolizumab was associated with a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival, as compared with placebo, among participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence after surgery. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck; KEYNOTE-564 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03142334.).

Sensitive Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of PD-L1 Expression in Human Breast and Lung Carcinoma Xenografts Using the Radiometalated Peptide Ga-68-TRAP-WL12

Noninvasive imaging of the immune checkpoint protein programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1; synonyms: CD274, B7-H1) holds great promise to improve patient selection and, thus, response rates for immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) with monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD1/PD-L1 axis. The PD-L1 specific peptide WL12 (cyclo(AcY-(NMe)A-N-P-H-L-Hyp-W-S-W(Me)-(NMe)Nle-(NMe)Nle-O-C)-G-NH2) was functionalized with the Gallium-68 chelator TRAP by means of click chemistry (CuAAC). The resulting conjugate TRAP-WL12 was labeled with Gallium-68 within 16 min, with approximately 90% radiochemical yield and 99% radiochemical purity, affording Ga-68-TRAP-WL12 with molar activities typically exceeding 100 MBq/nmol. This radiotracer was characterized by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and ex vivo biodistribution in murine xenografts of nontransfected PD-L1 expressing tumor cell lines, MDA-MB-231 (human breast carcinoma), and H2009 (human lung adenocarcinoma). It showed a favorable biodistribution profile with rapid renal clearance and low background (tumor-to-blood ratio = 26.6, 3 h p.i.). Conjugation of the Ga-68-TRAP moiety to WL12 successfully mitigated the nonspecific uptake of this peptide in organs, particularly the liver. This was demonstrated by comparing Ga-68-TRAP-WL12 with the archetypical Ga-68-DOTA-WL12, for which tumor-to-liver ratios of 1.4 and 0.5, respectively, were found. Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed a low PD-L1 expression in MDA-MB-213 and H2009 xenografts that corresponds well to the clinical situation, PET showed high tumor uptakes (6.6 and 7.3% injected activity per gram of tissue (iA/g), respectively) for Ga-68-TRAP-WL12. Thus, this tracer has the potential for routine clinical PD-L1 PET imaging because it detects even very low PD-L1 expression densities with high sensitivity and may open an avenue to replace PD-L1 IHC of biopsies as the standard means to select potential responders for ICT.

Incorporation of anti-PD1 or anti PD-L1 agents to platinum-based chemotherapy for the primary treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. A meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Various randomized trials have explored the efficacy of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with first-line chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer. We aimed to summarize available data and clarify the benefit of adding immunotherapy according to the DNA mismatch repair status (deficient, dMMR or proficient, pMMR) and the specific type of agent used (anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1).

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the addition of ICIs to standard platinum-based chemotherapy enhances progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with advanced endometrial cancer both overall and based on DNA mismatch repair status.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library) and conference proceedings were searched for first line, randomized and controlled trials integrating ICIs with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer published or presented by November 1, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Five studies, comprising 2456 patients (1308 received ICIs with chemotherapy and 1148 treated with chemotherapy alone) met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis. Experimental arms included pembrolizumab, dostarlimab (anti-PD1) and durvalumab, atezolizumab and avelumab (anti-PD-L1) combined with standard three-weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy backbone. Endometrial carcinosarcoma were included in 3 out of 5 trials.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

For comparison of PFS outcomes, extrapolation of hazard ratios (HRs), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and PFS events was performed for each included study in the overall population and according to subgroups. Data analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The addition of ICIs to chemotherapy improved PFS compared to chemotherapy alone in the overall population (pooled HR, 0.63; 95 % CI, 0.52--0.76; P <.001). In the dMMR subgroup the benefit was more pronounced (pooled HR, 0.34; 95 % CI, 0.27--0.44; P <.001) and not affected by drugs used with pooled HRs of 0.39 (95 % CI, 0.28--0.55; P <.001) and 0.34 (95 % CI, 0.27--0.44; P <.001) for PD-L1 and PD1 inhibitors, respectively. For pMMR patients, a statistically significant benefit in terms of PFS was confirmed only when anti-PD1 were used (anti-PD-1: HR 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.46-0.90, P =.010 vs anti-PD-L1: HR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.73-1.03, P =.104) CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This meta-analysis confirmed the advantage in terms of PFS of adding ICIs to standard platinum-based chemotherapy. While dMMR patients benefit from the incorporation of both anti PD-1 or anti PD-L1, this benefit is confined to the association of anti-PD1 agents in pMMR patients. Updated analysis of trials is awaited to clarify the impact of immunotherapy on overall survival.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combinations as first-line systemic treatment in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with platinum-based chemotherapy (PlatinumCT) or with another ICI in the first-line setting for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have mixed results.

METHODS

Records were searched electronically from January 2019 to January 2024. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Immune-based combinations were associated with an OS (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.92; p < 0.001; I2= 84.1%) and PFS benefit in the intention-to-treat population (HR: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.51-0.89; p < 0.001; I2 = 89.7%). There was no ORR improvement with immune-based combinations (HR: 1.36; 95% CI:0.84-2.20; p < 0.001; I2 = 92.6%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and study-level meta-analysis demonstrated that the immune-based combinations in first-line treatment for patients with mUC are associated with survival benefit.

Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched retrospective study

Background

The prognosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients is poor, and the standard first-line treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is still chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy. The primary objectives of our study were to confirm the superior efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus etoposide and platinum (EP) for LS-SCLC and find crucial biomarkers.

Methods

We analyzed LS-SCLC patients from three medical centers, employing propensity score matching for group comparability. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Additionally, we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate potential predictive factors.

Results

Among 150 patients in our study, we successfully matched 41 pairs. The median overall survival (OS) was 29.5 months in the EP + ICIs group and 20.0 months in the EP group {hazard ratio (HR) =0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-1.02], P=0.059}. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly extended in the EP + ICIs group (14.6 months), compared to the EP group (8.6 months) [HR =0.42 (95% CI: 0.28-0.63), P<0.001]. After matching, patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy had a median OS of 36.1 months, significantly surpassing those receiving chemotherapy alone (19.0 months) [HR =0.51 (95% CI: 0.28-0.93), P=0.02]. And the patients in the EP + ICIs group also had longer PFS after matching [HR =0.42 (95% CI: 0.25-0.71), P=0.001]. No significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between the two groups was found (ORR: EP: 81.0%, EP + ICIs: 90.0%, P=0.14; trAEs: EP: grade 1-2, 49.3%; grade 3-4, 42.5%; EP + ICIs: grade 1-2, 40.0%; grade 3-4, 49.1%, P=0.62). The multivariate analysis presented that the history of immunotherapy [EP + PD-1 inhibitors: HR =0.33 (95% CI: 0.17-0.62), P=0.001; EP + PD-L1 inhibitors: HR =0.18 (95% CI: 0.06-0.60), P=0.005] and baseline lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) [intermediate: HR =2.22 (95% CI: 1.20-4.13), P=0.01; poor: HR =2.03 (95% CI: 0.71-5.77), P=0.18] were independent prognostic factors for PFS among all LS-SCLC cases. However, no independent prognostic factor was identified for OS.

Conclusions

Our real-world data showed promising clinical efficacy and tolerable safety of first-line programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in cases with LS-SCLC. Additionally, LIPI may serve as a valuable prognostic factor.

Inhibition of IL-25/IL-17RA improves immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors and reveals antitumor activity

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes and extended patient survival in several tumor types. However, ICIs often induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that warrant therapy cessation, thereby limiting the overall effectiveness of this class of therapeutic agents. Currently, available therapies used to treat irAEs might also blunt the antitumor activity of the ICI themselves. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify treatments that have the potential to be administered alongside ICI to optimize their use.

METHODS

Using a translationally relevant murine model of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies-induced irAEs, we compared the safety and efficacy of prednisolone, anti-IL-6, anti-TNFɑ, anti-IL-25 (IL-17E), and anti-IL-17RA (the receptor for IL-25) administration to prevent irAEs and to reduce tumor size.

RESULTS

While all interventions were adequate to inhibit the onset of irAEs pneumonitis and hepatitis, treatment with anti-IL-25 or anti-IL-17RA antibodies also exerted additional antitumor activity. Mechanistically, IL-25/IL-17RA blockade reduced the number of organ-infiltrating lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that IL-25/IL-17RA may serve as an additional target when treating ICI-responsive tumors, allowing for better tumor control while suppressing immune-related toxicities.

Critical Appraisal of Guideline Recommendations on Systemic Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review

Importance

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with antiangiogenic agents has revolutionized the treatment landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, due to rapid publication of new studies that attained their predefined primary end points, a lack of robust cross-trial comparison of first-line therapies, and diverging clinical guidelines, no clear-cut treatment flowchart and sequence of therapies are available. This critical analysis of the recommendations for the management of advanced HCC from the main scientific societies in the US and Europe adopted an integrated approach to provide information on the clinical benefit (overall survival and progression-free survival) and safety profile of these therapies using the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) score and an ad hoc network meta-analysis.

Observations

There is a major consensus among guidelines that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has a primacy as the recommended first-line treatment of choice in advanced HCC. On progression after immunotherapy-containing regimens and for patients with contraindications for immunotherapies, most guidelines maintain the established treatment hierarchy, recommending lenvatinib or sorafenib as the preferred options, followed by either regorafenib, cabozantinib, or ramucirumab. Thus far, the first-line immune-based regimen of tremelimumab plus durvalumab has been integrated only in the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidance document and the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and has particular utility for patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall, in the first-line setting, both atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus IBI305 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) and durvalumab plus tremelimumab received the highest ESMO-MCBS score of 5, indicating a substantial magnitude of clinical benefit. In a network meta-analysis, no significant differences in overall survival were found among the various combination regimens. However, the newly reported combination of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib was associated with a significantly higher risk of treatment-related adverse events compared with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (relative risk, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.25-2.03; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

This narrative review found that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is regarded as the primary standard of care for advanced HCC in the first-line setting. These findings from integrating the recommendations from scientific societies' guidelines for managing advanced HCC along with new data from cross-trial comparisons may aid clinicians in decision-making and guide them through a rapidly evolving and complex treatment landscape.

Tissue biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Cancer immunotherapy has been rejuvenated by the growing understanding of the immune system's role in tumor activity over the past two decades. During cancer initiation and progression, tumor cells employ various mechanisms that resemble peripheral immune tolerance to evade the antitumor responses of the immune system. Immune checkpoint molecules are the major mechanism of immune resistance that are exploited by tumor cells to inhibit T-cell activation and suppress immune responses. The targeting of immune checkpoint pathways has led to substantial improvements in survival rates in a number of solid cancers. However, a lack of understanding of the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) has resulted in inefficient therapy responses. A greater understanding of the TME is needed to identify patients likely to respond, and those that will have resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Advancement in spatial single-cell technologies has allowed deeper insight into the phenotypic and functional diversities of cells in the TME. In this review, we provide an overview of ICI biomarkers and highlight how high-dimensional spatially resolved, single-cell approaches provide deep molecular insights into the TME and allow for the discovery of biomarkers of clinical benefit.

Comparison of Effectiveness of Programmed Death Protein 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. The present meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies were identified through searches of databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, as well as prominent oncology conferences. The search was conducted from the inception of the databases up to January 31, 2024. A total of 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Among these studies, six were randomized trials, while four were observational studies. The pooled meta-analysis showed that PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are more effective in improving overall survival and progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone. However, when comparing PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding overall survival and progression-free survival. It is important to note that there is no head-to-head trial comparing these two interventions in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Therefore, future prospective trials are needed to define optimal therapeutic approaches in this patient population.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy in surgically resectable malignant solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has emerged as a prominent research focus recently. For potentially operable patients, neoadjuvant therapy serves as a primary method to reduce tumor load and facilitate surgical interventions.

METHODS

We retrieved articles from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and European Society of Medical Oncology websites from inception to December 2023. Statistical analyses were performed using the R software. Primary outcomes assessed included major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs).

RESULTS

29 studies encompassing 1163 patients were included. The MPR rate of neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25%-52%), and the pCR rate was 33% (95%CI: 25%-42%). These values were significantly higher than those obtained with single agent immunotherapy (p < 0.001). The pooled incidence of overall trAEs was 83% (95%CI: 73%-92%), and grade (G) 3-4 trAEs was 22% (95%CI: 15%-29%), both significantly higher than those observed with single agent immunotherapy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the efficacy of neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. Given that the majority of the included trials were phase II with small sample sizes, further multicenter phase III randomized controlled trials should be conducted to validate the findings of the review.

Inflamed immune phenotype predicts favorable clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy across multiple cancer types

BACKGROUND

The inflamed immune phenotype (IIP), defined by enrichment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within intratumoral areas, is a promising tumor-agnostic biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, it is challenging to define the IIP in an objective and reproducible manner during manual histopathologic examination. Here, we investigate artificial intelligence (AI)-based immune phenotypes capable of predicting ICI clinical outcomes in multiple solid tumor types.

METHODS

Lunit SCOPE IO is a deep learning model which determines the immune phenotype of the tumor microenvironment based on TIL analysis. We evaluated the correlation between the IIP and ICI treatment outcomes in terms of objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in a cohort of 1,806 ICI-treated patients representing over 27 solid tumor types retrospectively collected from multiple institutions.

RESULTS

We observed an overall IIP prevalence of 35.2% and significantly more favorable ORRs (26.3% vs 15.8%), PFS (median 5.3 vs 3.1 months, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.76), and OS (median 25.3 vs 13.6 months, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.75) after ICI therapy in IIP compared with non-IIP patients, respectively (p<0.001 for all comparisons). On subgroup analysis, the IIP was generally prognostic of favorable PFS across major patient subgroups, with the exception of the microsatellite unstable/mismatch repair deficient subgroup.

CONCLUSION

The AI-based IIP may represent a practical, affordable, clinically actionable, and tumor-agnostic biomarker prognostic of ICI therapy response across diverse tumor types.