Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab or Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With First-line, Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KEYNOTE-062 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Opportunities and challenges of immuno-oncology: A bibliometric analysis from 2014 to 2023

The emergence of immuno-oncology (IO) has led to revolutionary changes in the field of cancer treatment. Despite notable advancements in this field, a thorough exploration of its full depth and extent has yet to be performed. This study provides a comprehensive overview of publications pertaining to IO. Publications on IO from 2014 to 2023 were retrieved by searching the Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC). VOSviewer software and Citespace software were used for the visualized analysis. A total of 1,874 articles have been published in the IO domain. The number of publications and citations has been increasing annually. This study also examines the primary research directions within the field of IO. In conclusion, this study offers a comprehensive overview of the opportunities and challenges associated with IO, illuminating the current status of research and indicating potential future trajectories in this rapidly progressing field. This study provides a comprehensive survey of the current research status and hot spots within the field of IO. It will assist researchers in comprehending the current research emphasis and development trends in this field and offers guidance for future research directions.

Discussion on the mechanism of HER2 resistance in esophagogastric junction and gastric cancer in the era of immunotherapy

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a critical biomarker and therapeutic target in gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancers, despite the initial success of HER2-targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab, resistance to these drugs has emerged as a major impediment to effective long-term treatment. This review examines the mechanisms of drug resistance in HER2-positive G/GEJ cancer, the primary mechanisms of resistance explored include alterations in the HER2 receptor itself, such as mutations and changes in expression levels, as well as downstream signaling pathways, and interactions with the tumor microenvironment (TME). Furthermore, the review discusses the Novel therapeutic approaches, including the use of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and combination therapies are assessed for their potential to enhance outcomes. By integrating recent research findings and clinical trials, this review aims to provide oncologists and researchers with insights into developing more effective treatments for patients with drug-resistant HER2-positive G/GEJ cancer.

The role of the tumor microenvironment and inflammatory pathways in driving drug resistance in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in progression and low responsiveness to chemotherapy of gastric cancer (GC). The cascade of events that culminate with a sustained and chronic activation of inflammatory pathways underlies gastric tumorigenesis. Infiltrating immune cells enrolling in crosstalk with cancer cells that regulate inflammatory and immune status, generating an immunosuppressive TME that influences the response to therapy. Here we discuss the role of TME and the activation of inflammatory pathways to comprehend strategies to improve drug response. Furthermore, we provides systematic insight the role of TME cytotypes and related signatures reinforcing the critical roles of TAMs and Tregs, in promoting GC chemoresistance and tumor progression.

Efficacy of the first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of phase III trials including unreported PD-L1 subgroups

The treatment paradigm for gastroesophageal cancers is evolving with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first-line therapy, making it crucial to understand their efficacy across patient subgroups, especially concerning PD-L1 expression. We performed a meta-analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials targeting the effectiveness of ICIs with or without chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves of all-comer populations and subgroups according to reported PD-L1 cut-offs were extracted from published reports. Using KMSubtraction algorithm, unreported PD-L1 subgroup survival data were reconstructed by utilizing published KM survival curves. Thirteen first-line phase III RCTs involving 11,795 patients with GEA or ESCC were included. For GEA, ICI with or without chemotherapy showed longer OS in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score ≥1 (HR 0.77, 95 % confidence intervals [CI] 0.71-0.83 for ICI plus chemotherapy; HR 0.86, 95 %CI 0.75-1.01 for ICI alone) compared to chemotherapy alone, showing less benefits in low PD-L1 subgroups. ICI, with or without chemotherapy displayed survival benefits among PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥1 % for ESCC (HR 0.62, 95 %CI 0.52-0.74 for ICI plus chemotherapy; HR 0.67, 95 %CI 0.54-0.84 for ICI alone) compared to chemotherapy alone. ICI combinations were similarly beneficial for Asian and global patients with GEA or ESCC. In conclusion, this meta-analysis, which includes unreported PD-L1 subgroups show benefit of ICIs with or without chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced gastroesophageal cancers, particularly among patients with high PD-L1 expression.

Tumor immune microenvironment remodeling after neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer: Update and new challenges

Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignant tumor with one of the highest morbidity and death rates in the world. Neoadjuvant therapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and NAC combined with immunotherapy, can improve the resection and long-term survival rates. However, not all patients respond well to neoadjuvant therapy. It has been confirmed that immune cells in the tumor immune microenvironment, including T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells, can affect the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy. This paper summarizes current preclinical and clinical evidence to more fully describe the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on the immune microenvironment of GC, to provide the impetus to identify biomarkers to predict the potency of neoadjuvant therapy, and to identify the mechanisms of drug resistance, which should promote the development of individualized and accurate treatments for GC patients.

Advanced biomaterials for the targeted delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors to solid tumors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the way cancer is treated by engaging the patient's own immune system to attack cancer. ICIs can also achieve favorable outcomes in patients whose cancers are unresponsive or resistant to first-line therapies. Despite these exciting prospects, ICIs are ineffective in many patients and cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in up to 89 % of patients. Therefore, there is a clear clinical need to reduce irAEs while maintaining or improving the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs. The local administration of ICIs through intratumoral injection or peritumoral administration has been shown to increase the potency of these therapeutics while reducing irAEs and extending survival in preclinical models. However, the rapid systemic distribution of intratumorally delivered drugs (hours) prevents this strategy from achieving even better efficacy and reduced toxicity; this is particularly problematic for ICIs due to their long biological (weeks), consequently acting at non-target sites for weeks before being cleared by the body. Engineered biomaterials have the potential to enhance local administration by improving permeation and retention, employing antibody-mediated targeting, leveraging tumor microenvironment sense-and-respond systems, or taking advantage of cell trafficking. This paper reviews the cutting-edge delivery strategies shown to improve the safety and efficacy of drugs targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 and identifies the most promising strategies for clinical translation.

The efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The combination chemotherapy of alpha-PD-1/PD-L1 has become the standard treatment option for some cancer patients. However, studies have shown that not all patients benefit from improved survival rates, especially the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal cancer (GC/GEJC) remains highly controversial. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at comparing the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in GC/GEJC patients.

METHOD

By searching relevant databases, RCTs published up to November 2024 were collected, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall survival (OS) and PFS were calculated. Meanwhile, the odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated.

RESULT

A total of 6842 patients were included in seven trials. In the summary analysis of OS, compared with the chemotherapy group, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with the chemotherapy group showed significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.76-0.85; p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.71-0.81; p < 0.0001). Additionally, there were significant differences in the incidence of TRAEs (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.21-2.02; p = 0.0001) and grade 3-4 TRAEs (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.30-1.58; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

When compared to chemotherapy, the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy improves survival but with higher toxicity risks, requiring careful benefit-risk evaluation in clinical practice.

Fungal dimeric xanthones as anticancer agents by novelly stimulating sodium-calcium exchanger 1

Multitude of natural products have the ability to demonstrate inhibitory effects on cancer cells by regulating ion channels/transporters functions. Eighteen xanthone dimers (Xds), including five new dimers diaporxanthones H, I, J-L (1, 2, and 12-14), were isolated and characterized through co-culture and chemical conversion methods. ECD Cotton effect analyses and chemical communication method provided fundamental role in addressing the challenges of elucidating their absolute configurations. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis showed that eight xanthone-xanthone Xds (2-7, 15 and 16) demonstrated marked cytotoxic effects against gastric cancer (GC) cell line AGS, with undetectable inhibition on human colon cancer cells. The anti-proliferative potency of Xds was 2-5 fold higher than positive control drug cisplatin. Mechanistic studies were conducted on a high-yield compound, 12-O-deacetyl-phomoxanthone A (4). Compound 4 activated Na+/Ca2+ exchanger 1 (NCX1), thereby causing an increase in cellular Ca2+ signaling and subsequent inhibition of the downstream PI3K/AKT/β-catenin pathway, ultimately leading to GC cell death. Like anti-GC, Xds also possessed anti-melanoma activity in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate Xds have effective cytotoxic actions against GC and melanoma by targeting NCX1/Ca2+ signaling in cancer cells.

Tebotelimab plus niraparib in previously treated locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors: A phase 1b dose escalation and expansion study

BACKGROUND

This open-label, single-arm, phase 1b dose escalation and expansion study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04178460) explored the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of tebotelimab, a programmed cell death protein 1 × lymphocyte-activation gene 3 bispecific monoclonal antibody, in combination with niraparib, a poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in patients with gastric cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), biliary tract carcinoma (BTC), and endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

In the escalation phase, patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who failed ≥2 prior systemic treatments received tebotelimab (120, 300, or 600 mg) intravenously once every 2 weeks (Q2W). In the expansion phase, patients with previously treated gastric cancer, TNBC, BTC, or endometrial carcinoma received tebotelimab at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). All patients received niraparib orally once daily with an individualized starting dose.

RESULTS

From June 11, 2020, to January 29, 2022, 60 patients were enrolled. All received ≥1 dose of the study drug. The RP2D for tebotelimab was determined to be 600 mg Q2W, without dose-limiting toxicities observed. Grade ≥3 and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 39 patients (65.0%) and 25 patients (41.7%), respectively, with no treatment-related death. Immune-related TEAEs occurred in 28 patients (46.7%). In those who had target lesions at baseline and received the RP2D, the investigator-assessed, confirmed overall response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, was 5.3% (one of 19), 20.0% (two of 10), 8.3% (one of 12), and 0% (zero of three) for gastric cancer, TNBC, BTC, and endometrial carcinoma, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tebotelimab plus niraparib preliminarily demonstrated a tolerated and manageable safety profile and limited antitumor activity in patients with previously treated solid tumors.

Study of immunosenescence in the occurrence and immunotherapy of gastrointestinal malignancies

In human beings heterogenous, pervasive and lethal malignancies of different parts of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract viz., tumours of the oesophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, and rectum, represent gastrointestinal malignancies. Primary treatment modality for gastric cancer includes chemotherapy, surgical interventions, radiotherapy, monoclonal antibodies and inhibitors of angiogenesis. However, there is a need to improve upon the existing treatment modality due to associated adverse events and the development of resistance towards treatment. Additionally, age has been found to contribute to increasing the incidence of tumours due to immunosenescence-associated immunosuppression. Immunosenescence is the natural process of ageing, wherein immune cells as well as organs begin to deteriorate resulting in a dysfunctional or malfunctioning immune system. Accretion of senescent cells in immunosenescence results in the creation of a persistent inflammatory environment or inflammaging, marked with elevated expression of pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive cytokines and chemokines. Perturbation in the T-cell pools and persistent stimulation by the antigens facilitate premature senility of the immune cells, and senile immune cells exacerbate inflammaging conditions and the inefficiency of the immune system to identify the tumour antigen. Collectively, these conditions contribute positively towards tumour generation, growth and eventually proliferation. Thus, activating the immune cells to distinguish the tumour cells from normal cells and invade them seems to be a logical strategy for the treatment of cancer. Consequently, various approaches to immunotherapy, viz., programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors etc are being extensively evaluated for their efficiency in gastric cancer. In fact, PD-1 inhibitors have been sanctioned as late late-line therapy modality for gastric cancer. The present review will focus on deciphering the link between the immune system and gastric cancer, and the alterations in the immune system that incur during the development of gastrointestinal malignancies. Also, the mechanism of evasion by tumour cells and immune checkpoints involved along with different approaches of immunotherapy being evaluated in different clinical trials will be discussed.

Epidemiology, pathogenesis, biology and evolving management of MSI-H/dMMR cancers

Deficiency in DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) is a common pathway of carcinogenesis across different tumour types and confers a characteristic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) molecular phenotype. The prevalence of the MSI-H/dMMR phenotype is highest in endometrial and colorectal cancers, and this phenotype is associated with a distinct tumour biology, prognosis and responsiveness to various anticancer treatments. In a minority of patients, MSI-H/dMMR cancers result from an inherited pathogenic variant in the context of Lynch syndrome, which has important implications for familial genetic screening. Whether these hereditary cancers have a different biology and clinical behaviour to their sporadic counterparts remains uncertain. Interest in this tumour molecular subtype has increased following the discovery of the high sensitivity of metastatic MSI-H/dMMR cancers to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in a histology-agnostic manner, which reflects the genomic hypermutation resulting from dMMR that renders these tumours highly immunogenic and immune infiltrated. This vulnerability is now also being exploited in early stage disease settings. Despite this common biological foundation, different MSI-H/dMMR cancers have histotype-specific features that correspond to their particular cell or tissue of origin, which might be associated with differences in prognosis and sensitivity to ICIs. In this Review, we provide an overview of the epidemiology, biology, pathogenesis, clinical diagnosis and treatment of MSI-H/dMMR tumours as a histology-agnostic cancer phenomenon. We also highlight peculiarities associated with specific pathogenetic alterations and histologies of MSI-H/dMMR tumours.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are inconsistent across studies. This study sheds light on the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in advanced HCC patients.

METHODS

Several databases were comprehensively searched up to January 13, 2025, to identify studies assessing pembrolizumab for advanced HCC. Outcome indicators included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), rash, adverse events (AEs), and severe adverse events (SAEs). Pooled effects were estimated through hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). R 4.4.1. was employed for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies involving 2964 patients were encompassed. Meta-analysis indicated that pembrolizumab demonstrated an ORR of 28% in single-arm analyses. Pembrolizumab significantly improved ORR in comparison to placebo (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.32-5.03) but showed no significant advantage over nivolumab. Pembrolizumab markedly enhanced PFS (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.69-0.85) and OS (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.88) compared to placebo, but no significant differences were observed when compared to nivolumab. Pembrolizumab significantly raised the risk of rash in comparison to placebo (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.55-3.31) but showed no significant difference versus nivolumab. The pembrolizumab group showed a higher incidence of AEs (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.42-2.64) and SAEs (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.04-4.25) than the placebo group, with no significant difference between pembrolizumab and nivolumab.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proves that pembrolizumab may have promising therapeutic effects in patients with advanced HCC, although no clear advantage over nivolumab was observed. The occurrence of AEs warrants attention in clinical practice.

CD2AP shapes a stromal reduced tumor microenvironment and contributes to immunotherapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks as the fifth most prevalent malignant tumor and stands as the fourth leading contributor to cancer-related fatalities on a global scale. The specific link between CD2 Associated Protein (CD2AP) expression and the tumor microenvironment (TME) remains unclear, and further exploration is needed to understand its potential role in immune response and as a target for immunotherapy in GC. Utilizing RNA sequencing data acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for a pan-cancer analysis, a comprehensive evaluation was carried out to determine the expression pattern and immunological involvement of CD2AP. Systematic association of CD2AP with immunological features within the stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) TME was subsequently performed, encompassing factors like cancer immunity cycles, immune checkpoints, immunomodulators, tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs). We found that CD2AP was enhanced expression in the TME of a variety of malignancies. CD2AP contributes to forming a stromal reduced TME in GC and improve the efficacy of immunotherapy. It was observed that patients with elevated levels of CD2AP, along with high scores on their CD4, CD20, and CD57 immune markers, tended to experience the most favorable prognosis. Furthermore, an IRS was constructed to accurately assess the prognosis of STAD patients. Since CD2AP was associated with the formation of stromal reduced TME in STAD, the expression of CD2AP can improve the effect of immunotherapy of STAD. CD2AP could emerge as a novel prognostic biomarker for STAD, offering a fresh avenue for molecular targeted therapy.

Phase II Study (NO LIMIT, WJOG13320G) of First-Line Nivolumab Plus Low-Dose Ipilimumab for Microsatellite Instability-High Advanced Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer

PURPOSE

Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer (AGC), accounting for 5%-6% of all AGC cases, has shown an enhanced responsiveness to immunotherapy. We performed a single-arm phase II study to evaluate the combination of nivolumab (NIVO) and low-dose (LD) ipilimumab (IPI) for first-line treatment of MSI-H AGC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with MSI-H AGC received NIVO (240 mg once every 2 weeks) and IPI (1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker analysis. MSI-H status was confirmed with an MSI-IVD Kit (Falco).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. The ORR was 62.1% (95% CI, 42.3 to 79.3), with a complete response rate of 10.3%. The DCR was 79.3% (95% CI, 60.3 to 92.0). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 93.1% of patients, with those of grade ≥3 manifesting in 37.9% of patients. At the data cutoff (median follow-up of 9.0 months), treatment had been discontinued in 21 patients, with such discontinuation being due to TRAEs in 12 (41.4%) patients. However, after exclusion of one patient with progressive disease, the remaining 11 patients showed long-term antitumor efficacy after treatment discontinuation (range of response duration, 0.9+ to 15.6+ months). The median PFS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 13.7 months to not reached [NR]) and the median OS was NR (95% CI, 13.7 months to NR), with a 12-month OS rate of 79.5%.

CONCLUSION

NIVO plus LD-IPI showed robust and durable antitumor efficacy as a first-line treatment for MSI-H AGC. Although TRAEs often led to treatment discontinuation, treatment efficacy was subsequently sustained in most patients.

Predictive biomarkers in the era of immunotherapy for gastric cancer: current achievements and future perspectives

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the primary contributors to cancer-related mortality on a global scale. It holds a position within the top five most prevalent malignancies both in terms of occurrence and fatality rates. Immunotherapy, as a breakthrough cancer treatment, brings new hope for GC patients. Various biomarkers, such as the expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), the microsatellite instability (MSI) status, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, demonstrate potential to predict the effectiveness of immunotherapy in treating GC. Nevertheless, each biomarker has its own limitations, which leads to a significant portion of patients continue to be unresponsive to immunotherapy. With the understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), genome sequencing technology, and recent advances in molecular biology, new molecular markers, such as POLE/POLD1mutations, circulating tumor DNA, intestinal flora, lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3), and lipid metabolism have emerged. This review aims to consolidate clinical evidence to offer a thorough comprehension of the existing and emerging biomarkers. We discuss the mechanisms, prospects of application, and limitations of each biomarker. We anticipate that this review will open avenues for fresh perspectives in the investigation of GC immunotherapy biomarkers and promote the precise choice of treatment modalities for gastric cancer patients, thereby advancing precision immuno-oncology endeavors.

Haematological toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors in digestive system tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the hematologic toxicity profiles, toxicity spectrum, and safety rankings of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used for digestive system tumors. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was anemia, while secondary outcomes included neutropenia, neutrophil count decreased, thrombocytopenia, platelet count decreased, leukopenia, white blood cell (WBC) count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and febrile neutropenia (FN). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor type, country category, study phase, ICI regimen, control group, chemotherapy regimen, ICI plus different chemotherapy regimens. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data according to pre-specified criteria, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.4 software was utilized to visualize the risk of bias assessments. Stata 16.0 was used to conduct network meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. 25 phase II and III RCTs (n = 15216) were included. The general safety of ICIs ranked from high to low for grade 1-5 anemia were as follows: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab. For grade 3-5 anemia, the general safety profile of the ICIs were as follows, from highest to lowest: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, and camrelizumab. Compared to chemotherapy, treatment-related hematologic toxicities with ICIs occurred primarily in grade 1-5 anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and WBC count decreased. Taking ICI monotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab were generally safer than taking chemotherapy, one ICI drug with chemotherapy, or two ICI drugs with chemotherapy. In terms of grade 1-5 hematologic toxicities, tislelizumab had the highest risk of neutropenia and leukopenia; the primary treatment-adverse events (AEs) for sintilimab was neutrophil count decreased and WBC count decreased; the primary treatment-related AE associated with nivolumab was platelet count decreased; camrelizumab posed the highest risk for lymphocyte count decreased. In terms of grade 3-5 hematologic toxicities, pembrolizumab was predominantly linked to neutropenia; sintilimab showed the greatest risk for neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and lymphocyte count decreased; avelumab was most associated with WBC count decreased. FN primarily manifested as grade 3-5, with camrelizumab having the highest risk. Among agents used in gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, avelumab demonstrated the most favorable safety profile for anemia. Each treatment regimen has its unique safety profile. Early identification and management of ICI-related hematologic toxicities are essential in clinical practice.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024571508.

Viral oncogenesis in cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutics

The year 2024 marks the 60th anniversary of the discovery of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), the first virus confirmed to cause human cancer. Viral infections significantly contribute to the global cancer burden, with seven known Group 1 oncogenic viruses, including hepatitis B virus (HBV), human papillomavirus (HPV), EBV, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). These oncogenic viruses induce cellular transformation and cancer development by altering various biological processes within host cells, particularly under immunosuppression or co-carcinogenic exposures. These viruses are primarily associated with hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, cervical cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma, and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Understanding the mechanisms of viral oncogenesis is crucial for identifying and characterizing the early biological processes of virus-related cancers, providing new targets and strategies for treatment or prevention. This review first outlines the global epidemiology of virus-related tumors, milestone events in research, and the process by which oncogenic viruses infect target cells. It then focuses on the molecular mechanisms by which these viruses induce tumors directly or indirectly, including the regulation of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, induction of genomic instability, disruption of regular life cycle of cells, immune suppression, chronic inflammation, and inducing angiogenesis. Finally, current therapeutic strategies for virus-related tumors and recent advances in preclinical and clinical research are discussed.

Comparison of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients with low PD-L1 expression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) + chemotherapy became standard her2-GC first line treatment.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to investigate whether ICIs + chemo provides benefit for patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

Design

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library as well as the 2019 to 2024 Annual Meetings of the European Society for Medical Oncology, the American Association for Cancer Research, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the ASCO Symposium on Gastrointestinal Oncology (ASCO-GI) and the ClinicalTrials.gov database.

Methods

This systematic review included phase III randomized controlled trials comparing first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced gastric cancer. KMSubtraction was used to estimate survival data for those trials that did not report data for the PD-L1 low-expression population.

Results

We included a total of nine randomized clinical trials. In patients with combined positive score (CPS) < 1 and CPS < 5, monoclonal antibody + chemotherapy did not show an improvement in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) (CPS < 1 OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.08; PFS: HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.73-1.07. CPS < 5 OS: HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.79-1.08; PFS: HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.53-1.14). However, in trials using dual antibodies, patients with PD-L1 CPS < 5 achieved improvements in PFS (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.52-0.80). In trials using tumor area positivity (TAP) scoring, the subgroup with TAP < 5% did not achieve benefits in OS or PFS from immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (OS: HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.75-1.13; PFS: HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.13).

Conclusion

Our study results indicate that in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, monoclonal antibody combined with chemotherapy does not provide a survival benefit compared to chemotherapy alone for patients with low PD-L1 expression. However, it is noteworthy that in the COMPASSION-15 trial, patients with CPS < 5 achieve significant improvements in OS and PFS, which may be related to the bispecific antibodies and needs to be validated by further studies.

Trial registration

This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024568972).

Pathologic complete response after Sintilimab combined with FOLFOX therapy in MSI-H type patients with locally advanced GC: a case report

As one of the most common gastrointestinal tumors, Gastric Cancer (GC) poses a serious threat to human health due to its high morbidity and mortality. The current treatment strategy is a comprehensive treatment program mainly based on surgery, especially for advanced GC patients. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has completely changed this status quo, and the synergistic effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has significantly improved the resection and radical rate and overall survival of patients with advanced local GC. We present a case of locally advanced GC (cT4N0Mx) with microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) and PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS)=2. The patient received neoadjuvant therapy with Sintilimab combined with FOLFOX (folinic acid (leucovorin), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin), and significantly reduced tumor volume after 3 cycles of treatment. Then she underwent subtotal gastrectomy with gastrojejunostomy and D2 lymph node dissection. The postoperative pathological results showed that no cancerous tissue remained in the tumor tissue, and pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved. The first cycle of adjuvant therapy with the same protocol was received after surgery. During adjuvant therapy, patients mainly experienced side effects such as dyspepsia, nausea and mild myelosuppression. Therefore, immunotherapy with Sintilimab combined with FOLFOX chemotherapy has the potential to be an effective treatment option for patients with resectable locally advanced MSI-H GC.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer patients: A real-world study

OBJECTIVE

Previous trials have revealed better treatment efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatments than chemotherapy alone in advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients, but real-world evidence is still lacking. Hence, this real-world study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatments compared with chemotherapy alone in advanced GC patients.

METHODS

In total, 102 advanced GC patients were allocated into a combination group (receiving chemotherapy combined with a PD-1 inhibitor as a first-line treatment) (n = 48) or a chemotherapy group (receiving chemotherapy only as a first-line treatment) (n = 54) according to their actual treatment regimens.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) was greater in the combination group than in the chemotherapy group (25.0 % versus 9.3 %, P = 0.033), whereas the disease control rate (DCR) was not different between the groups (83.3 % versus 66.7 %, P = 0.054). Progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged in the combination group than in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.018). The median (95 % confidence interval) PFS was 19.7 (12.2-27.2) months in the combination group and 16.5 (7.3-25.7) months in the chemotherapy group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy were independently associated with an increased ORR (odds ratio: 4.180, P = 0.024), increased DCR (odds ratio: 2.928, P = 0.049), and prolonged PFS (hazard ratio: 0.388, P = 0.030). No difference was found in total or each specific grade III-IV adverse reaction between the groups (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment shows better treatment efficacy with similar safety to that of chemotherapy alone in advanced GC patients.

The Evolving Role of Immunotherapy for Gastroesophageal Malignancies

The incorporation of immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for advanced, unresectable, or metastatic gastroesophageal cancers (GECs), with improved survival outcomes. These improvements in outcomes for advanced GECs have led to clinical trials evaluating the role of immunotherapy in patients with resectable early-stage GECs. However, there remains a high burden of morbidity and mortality, and ongoing trials utilizing novel immunotherapy agents and combinations are underway. This review summarizes the findings of previous and ongoing clinical trials related to immunotherapy for patients with early- and late-stage GECs.

Molecular mechanisms of metastatic peritoneal dissemination in gastric adenocarcinoma

Peritoneal dissemination portends a dismal prognosis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma in the context of limited effective treatments. The underlying cellular processes that drive gastric peritoneal carcinomatosis remain unclear, limiting the application of novel targeted therapies. In this comprehensive review, we aimed to identify and summarize all existing context-dependent molecular mechanisms that have been implicated in peritoneal dissemination and peritoneal carcinomatosis establishment from primary gastric adenocarcinoma. We applied a multilevel examination including data from in vivo murine models using human gastric cancer cell lines, in vitro technique-based studies, ex vivo models, and genomic/proteomic and molecular profiling analyses to report on various aspects of gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis biology. Mechanisms promoting peritoneal dissemination were grouped into three main functional categories: (1) intrinsic cancer cell biology, (2) cancer cell-peritoneal surface adhesion, and (3) peritoneal tumor microenvironment. We identified significant overlap among the three categories, indicating a complex interplay between multiple molecular mechanisms. By interrupting these pathways, peritoneal-directed therapies have the potential to improve quality and length of life in patients with high-risk primary gastric cancer.

Reshaping the immune microenvironment and reversing immunosenescence by natural products: Prospects for immunotherapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) represents a global health-care challenge. Recent progress in immunotherapy has elicited attracted considerable attention as a viable treatment option through modulating the host immune system and unleashing pre-existing immunity, which has profoundly revolutionized oncology, especially GC. Nonetheless, low clinical response and intrinsic and acquired resistance remain persistently challenging. The microenvironment of GC comprising multifarious stromal cell types has remarkable immunosuppressive elements that may impact the efficacy of immunotherapy. Immunosenescence is increasingly regarded as a factor that contributes to cancer development, remodels the tumor microenvironment and affects the efficacy of immunotherapy. Natural products are at the forefront of traditional medicine. Senotherapeutics is a class of drugs and natural products capable of delaying, preventing, or reversing the senescence process (i.e., senolytics) or suppressing senescence-associated secretory phenotype (i.e., senomorphics). Emerging evidence supports that natural products can improve the efficacy of existing immunotherapy and expand their indications in GC mainly based upon remodeling the immunosuppressive microenvironment and reversing immunosenescence. The review provides an integrated review of previously reported and ongoing clinical trials with immunotherapeutic regimens in GC and discusses current challenges. Next, we focus on natural compounds that exert anti-GC functions and possess immunomodulatory properties. More attention is paid to the potential of these natural compounds in modulating the immune microenvironment and immunosenescence. Lastly, we discuss the nanomedicine that can overcome the deficiencies of natural products. Altogether, our review suggests the enormous potential of natural compounds in GC immunotherapy, and provides an important direction for future research.

Lenvatinib suppress FGF19-FGFR4 signaling to enhance antitumor immune response in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 4 is overexpressed in gastric cancer (GC) and is a potential therapeutic target for GC. Since the FGF/FGFR signaling is involved in tumor microenvironment inducing the formation of an immunosuppression, lenvatinib is expected to inhibit FGFR4 leading to reduced tumor PD-L1 levels and regulatory T cell (Treg) infiltration, improving pembrolizumab efficacy. This study explored the background of the molecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab.

METHODS

Expression of FGFR4 and its specific ligand FGF19 was assessed by immunohistochemical staining and clinicopathological relevance was also examined. The effect of lenvatinib on FGF19-FGFR4 signaling was evaluated using cellular experiments. Lastly, the expression of FGFR4 on Treg cells was evaluated by immunostaining and flow cytometry. The Cancer Genome Atlas cBioPortal and Gene Expression Omnibus microarray databases were accessed to support these results.

RESULTS

High FGFR4 expression was associated with histological type and venous invasion and predominantly detected in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and Epstein-Barr virus-positive GC. Bioinformatics data suggested that FGF19-FGFR4 signaling was activated in GC, and cellular experiments showed that lenvatinib reduced FGFR4 and PD-L1 expression in GC cells. Results of integrating various analyses suggested that FGFR4 did not seem to be enough expressed on Treg cells in GC.

CONCLUSIONS

The FGF19-FGFR4 signaling has a pivotal role in gastric tumorigenesis and may be involved in immunosuppression through PD-L1 modification. But, lenvatinib may not regulate immune editing by directly inhibiting FGFR4 on Treg cells.

Gastric cancer

Gastric cancer remains a major health challenge worldwide, with nearly 1 million new cases annually contributing to more than 650 000 deaths. Epidemiologically, gastric cancer shows substantial geographical variation in incidence, with higher rates in Asia, South America, and eastern Europe, and a rapid increase in early-onset cases among people younger than 50 years. Key risk factors for gastric cancer include Helicobacter pylori infection, diet, obesity, smoking, and genetic predisposition. Early detection through comprehensive diagnostic procedures is crucial for optimising treatment outcomes. Standard treatment approaches for locally advanced gastric cancer include surgical resection, particularly D2 lymphadenectomy, complemented by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is increasing implementation of minimally invasive surgical techniques for operable disease and integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies for advanced stages. Emerging therapies, such as novel targeted treatments and next-generation immunotherapies, show promise in improving survival and quality of life. Future directions in the management of gastric cancer focus on precision medicine, continued advancement in immunotherapy, novel early detection methods, and a multidisciplinary approach to care. These strategies aim to enhance the overall effectiveness of treatment and prognosis worldwide.

Predictive value of CPS combined with inflammatory markers for pathological remission of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after adjuvant immunochemotherapy

Objective

To explore the predictive value of the combined positive score (CPS) and the neutrophil-to- platelet count ratio (NPR) for surgical pathological remission in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) who have undergone neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICC).

Method

Patients with LAHNSCC who underwent NICC and surgery from May 2021 to September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. CPS, NPR and other clinically relevant parameters were collected, which includes gender, age, tumor types, multiple cancer, differentiation, T staging, N staging, immunotherapy cycles and postoperative pathological remission degree.

Result

Patients with a higher CPS were significantly associated with a higher pathological complete response (PCR) of the primary site (PPCR) (P = 0.034) and a higher PCR of the lymph nodes (LPCR) (P = 0.085). Specifically, patients with a CPS of ≥20 demonstrated a higher rate of severe pathologic tumor response (PTR), with values of 80.8% compared to 66.7% and 50%. Notably, even patients with a CPS <1 had a relatively high severe PTR rate of 66.7%. Moreover, patients with NPR <0.024 exhibited a higher severe PTR, regardless of the CPS subgroups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Higher CPS can be considered a good predictor of higher PCR after NICC in patients with LAHNSCC. Patients with CPS <1 can still achieve a higher PTR. Patients with NPR <0.024 can help achieve a higher severe PTR in patients with LAHNSCC regardless of the CPS.CPS combined with NPR may have a better predicted value for surgical PTR of HNSCC after NICC.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in combination with S-1 plus oxaliplatin sequenced by camrelizumab-based maintenance therapy as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Background

S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is a first-line standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy, including SOX have also shown promising outcomes in such patients. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus SOX sequenced by camrelizumab-based maintenance therapy as a first-line treatment for advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Methods

In total, 31 patients with an age of 18 years or older and newly diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma who underwent camrelizumab in combination with SOX followed by camrelizumab plus S-1 from February 2020 to December 2023 were enrolled in the study. All patients were regularly followed up every 1-2 months. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). And the safety profiles were also assessed.

Results

As of December 31, 2023, 25 male and 6 female patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 14.6 months. The median PFS time of the patients treated with the combination regimen was 7.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.0-11.6]. In addition, the median overall survival (OS) time was 13.3 months (95% CI: 10.3-16.4), and the median duration of response (DoR) was 5.0 months (95% CI: 2.0-8.1). Moreover, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 71.0% and 87.1%, respectively. Further, the most commonly observed grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) (9.7%) and a decreased neutrophil count (6.5%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

First-line treatment with camrelizumab in combination with SOX sequenced by camrelizumab-based maintenance therapy demonstrated favorable outcomes for and was well tolerated by patients with advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Thus, it might serve as a first-line standard-of-care treatment for such patients. However, prospective randomized studies should be carried out to confirm the findings.

The application of organoids in investigating immune evasion in the microenvironment of gastric cancer and screening novel drug candidates

Gastric cancer (GC) is a prevalent digestive system tumor, the fifth most diagnosed cancer worldwide, and a leading cause of cancer deaths. GC is distinguished by its pronounced heterogeneity and a dynamically evolving tumor microenvironment (TME). The lack of accurate disease models complicates the understanding of its mechanisms and impedes the discovery of novel drugs. A growing body of evidence suggests that GC organoids, developed using organoid culture technology, preserve the genetic, phenotypic, and behavioral characteristics. GC organoids hold significant potential for predicting treatment responses in individual patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current clinical treatment strategies for GC, as well as the history, construction and clinical applications of organoids. The focus is on the role of organoids in simulating the TME to explore mechanisms of immune evasion and intratumoral microbiota in GC, as well as their applications in guiding clinical drug therapy and facilitating novel drug screening. Furthermore, we summarize the limitations of GC organoid models and underscore the need for continued technological advancements to benefit both basic and translational oncological research.

Predictive role of inflammatory markers for the efficacy of first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have become a new first-line treatment option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. However, it is still controversial whether to choose chemotherapy alone or ICIs plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment option due to a lack of ideal predictive biomarkers for the efficacy. This study intended to explore the predictive value of inflammatory markers for the efficacy of first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy in this disease.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 131 patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who received first-line treatment between July, 2020 and June, 2023. Among them, 76 received first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy and 55 received chemotherapy alone. Firstly, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to explore the correlation between inflammatory markers and efficacy of first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy. Subsequently, the predictive value of combined baseline and dynamic changes in inflammatory markers was explored. Moreover, the predictive value of baseline inflammatory markers was further verified by comparing efficacy of ICIs plus chemotherapy with that of chemotherapy alone.

RESULTS

In patients receiving first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy, low baseline monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in peripheral blood was significantly associated with better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and was an independent prognostic factor for OS. In addition, dynamic early changes of MLR also played predictive role. Patients whose MLR was lower at baseline and after two cycles of treatment had better OS (P = 0.009). Furthermore, compared to chemotherapy alone, patients with a lower baseline MLR were more likely to benefit from first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

MLR could serve as a new biomarker to predict the efficacy of first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. And it is helpful to select the candidates for first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy, which is worthy of further study.

Immune evasion strategies in AFP-producing gastric carcinoma: characterized by HLA-G expression and HLA class I deficiency

Alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinoma (AFPGC) is an aggressive subtype of gastric cancer characterized by a primitive cellular phenotype and poor prognosis. The tumor immunology of AFPGC remains largely unexplored. Given its embryonic-like properties, AFPGC is hypothesized to employ distinct immune evasion strategies, with the oncofetal protein human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G-a key mediator of maternal-fetal immune tolerance-likely playing a pivotal role. To test this, we assessed the expression of HLA-G, along with other key immune evasion markers, including HLA class I (HLA-I) deficiency and PD-L1 expression, in 39 cases of AFPGC, and compared them with those of 44 Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive, 57 microsatellite instability (MSI), 54 intestinal-type, and 45 diffuse-type gastric carcinomas. HLA-G expression was significantly higher in AFPGCs (71%) than in other subtypes (7-28%; P < 0.001). HLA-I deficiency (≥ 1% of tumor cells) was most prevalent in AFPGC (69%), followed by MSI tumors (56%), with lower rates in other subtypes (22-29%). PD-L1 positivity (combined positive score ≥ 5) was observed in 41% of AFPGCs, lower than in EBV-positive (77%) and MSI tumors (44%), but higher than in intestinal-type (13%) and diffuse-type (9%) carcinomas. Furthermore, CD8-positive T-cell infiltration was found to be lowest in AFPGC compared to the other subtypes. These findings suggest that AFPGC employs multiple immune evasion mechanisms, notably through increased HLA-G expression and HLA-I deficiency, likely linked to its primitive cellular phenotype and reactivation of immunogenic oncofetal antigens. Such immune evasion features may underlie the aggressiveness of AFPGC and present promising targets for immunotherapeutic interventions.

T-bet+CD8+ T cells govern anti-PD-1 responses in microsatellite-stable gastric cancers

More than 90% of advanced gastric cancers (GC) are microsatellite-stable (MSS). Compared to the high response rate of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) GCs, only 10% of unstratified MSS GCs respond to ICIs. In this study, we apply semi-supervised learning to stratify potential ICI responders in MSS GCs, achieving high accuracy, quantified by an area under the curve of 0.924. Spatial analysis of the tumor microenvironment of ICI-sensitive GCs reveals a high level of T-bet+ CD8 + T cell infiltration in their tumor compartments. T-bet+ CD8 + T cells exhibit superior anti-tumor activity due to their increased ability to infiltrate tumors and secrete cytotoxic molecules. Adoptive transfer of T-bet+ CD8 + T cells boosts anti-tumor immunity and confers susceptibility to ICIs in immune-ignorant MSS GCs in a humanized mouse model. Spatial RNA sequencing suggests a positive-feedback loop between T-bet+ T cells and PD-L1+ tumor cells, which eventually drives T cell exhaustion and can therefore be leveraged for ICI therapy. In summary, our research provides insights into the underlying mechanism of anti-tumor immunity and deepens our understanding of varied ICI responses in MSS GCs.

Multiple primary tumors patient developed microsatellite stable gastric cancer after cadonilimab treatment for liver cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Multiple primary malignant tumors refer to the occurrence of two or more primary malignant tumors in the same organ or multiple organs or tissues at the same time or successively in the same patient, and can occur anywhere in the body. The treatment guidelines for patients with multiple primary malignant tumors are currently controversial.

CASE SUMMARY

A 51-year-old male patient with liver cancer and portal hypertension received 42 months of co-treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. After that, the disease was rated stable disease. The patient was then diagnosed with gastric cancer. Since the patient was not sensitive to anti-programmed death ligand 1 immunosuppressive agents, a co-treatment with oxaliplatin, tegafur, apatinib, and cadonilimab was selected after multidisciplinary consultation and the patient's agreement. After four cycles of treatment, partial response and stable disease were observed in gastric and liver cancers, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed considering the high-risk factors of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastroesophageal varices. Postoperative pathology showed that the Tumor Regression Grade was 1. Moreover, the genetic testing of postoperative tumor specimens indicated negative programmed death ligand 1 and microsatellite stability. In addition, the latest follow-up indicated an 8 and 40-month progression-free survival in gastric and liver cancer patients, respectively. Currently, the patient is receiving postoperative immunotherapy with cadonilimab.

CONCLUSION

Cadonilimab not only treats microsatellite stability gastric cancer patients but can also be used for liver cancer treatment.

The effective molecular characteristics of PD-1 inhibitor combination regimen as the first-line treatment for Chinese patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer: a real-world retrospective analysis study

Background

The prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive was poor. To illustrate the underlying effective and distinctive molecular characteristics of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in the treatment of GC with HER2 positive, we analyzed the survival outcome of PD-1 inhibitors combination regimen as the first-line treatment for GC patients with HER2-positive in China.

Methods

This retrospective real-world study compared the prognoses of first-line systemic treatment of PD-1 inhibitors combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy (PTC group) and trastuzumab and chemotherapy (TC group) in Chinese patients with HER2-positive GC, and then further to identify the specific and molecular characteristics of PD-1 inhibitors treatment by hierarchical analysis. The patients were matched using propensity score matching (PSM). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were used as the primary and secondary endpoints of the study.

Results

A total of 95 patients with HER2-positive GC receiving first-line treatment at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2019 to September 2022 were included. The median OS (24.67 vs. 16.00 months, P=0.01) and median PFS (15.57 vs. 7.57 months, P=0.008) of patients with HER2-positive GC who received PTC regimen were longer than those treated by TC regimen as first-line systemic treatment after PSM analysis. In hierarchical analysis, we discovered that programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive expression in tumor tissues was not a predictor of PD-1 inhibitors in HER2-positive GC. However, PD-L1 was an indicator of better survival outcomes by combined trastuzumab treatment in all GC patients. Furthermore, in the subgroup analysis, we found that the median OS for the PTC group was longer by nearly 8 months than the TC group in patients with HER2 gene copy number [HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test] more than six, while the median OS for the PTC group was longer by approximately 12 months than the TC group in patients with HER2-positive GC with TP53 mutations.

Conclusions

The results suggested that patients with HER2-positive GC could benefit from PD-1 inhibitors combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy, especially patients with HER-2 FISH more than six and TP53 mutations.

The current landscape of gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer diagnosis and treatment in China: a comprehensive nationwide cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer globally and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite its alarming prevalence, limited comparative evidence exists on its treatment efficacy and prognosis across diverse China populations.

METHODS

To address this, our study used a large-scale dataset from the National Cancer Information Database, including data from 220,304 patients from 53 leading hospitals across 27 provinces in China.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2023, early-stage (Stages I-II) gastric cancer diagnoses increased to 35.63% of all cancer cases. Our study evaluated the neoadjuvant treatment strategies, adjuvant post-operative therapy, first- and second-line management for progressive stages, alongside current gastric cancer treatment guidelines in China. Notably, immunotherapy accounted for 16.17% and 23.28% of first- and second-line treatments for late-stage gastric cancers, and 14.56% and 5.00% for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, respectively. Analysis of survival rates revealed that the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates were 74.07%, 54.89%, 44.21%, 37.97%, and 33.53%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates across stages I-IV were 85.07%, 49.34%, 35.56%, and 13.15%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings offer critical insights into the current state of gastric cancer treatment in China and can inform future initiatives to improve therapeutic outcomes for patients with gastric cancer.

First-Line Sugemalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: The GEMSTONE-303 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Gastric cancer, including gastroesophageal junction cancer, is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide, with high mortality. Sugemalimab is a fully human anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody. The combination of sugemalimab and chemotherapy showed promising antitumor activity and safety in a phase 1b study among patients with treatment-naive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This combination was further evaluated in the GEMSTONE-303 phase 3 trial.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of sugemalimab in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with placebo plus CAPOX as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 5 or greater.

Design, Setting, and Participants

GEMSTONE 303 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 54 sites in China that enrolled patients from April 9, 2019, through December 29, 2021, with follow-up to July 9, 2023. A total of 479 eligible patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 CPS of 5 or greater who did not receive any prior systemic therapy were randomized.

Intervention

Patients received sugemalimab (1200 mg intravenously) (n = 241) or placebo (n = 238) every 3 weeks for up to 24 months, plus CAPOX every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles.

Main outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were overall survival and investigator-assessed progression-free survival.

Results

Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups. Most patients were male (71.4% in sugemalimab group, 74.8% in placebo group). Median follow-up was 25.1 months in the sugemalimab group and 26.3 months in the placebo group. The sugemalimab group demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival (median, 15.6 months [95% CI, 13.3-17.8] vs 12.6 months [95% CI, 10.6-14.1]; hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.61-0.92]; P = .006) and progression-free survival (median, 7.6 months [95% CI, 6.4-7.9] vs 6.1 months [95% CI, 5.1-6.4]; hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.54-0.81]; P < .001). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 53.9% of patients in the sugemalimab group and 50.6% in the placebo group.

Conclusions and Relevance

Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival with a manageable safety profile in previously untreated patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03802591.

Quadruple therapy with immunotherapy and chemotherapy as first-line conversion treatment for unresectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

The treatment of gastric cancer remains highly challenging, particularly in cases of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease. Although chemotherapy and immunotherapy have shown some efficacy in such patients, significant limitations persist in extending survival and enhancing safety. To address these challenges, we designed an innovative first-line quadruple conversion therapy regimen that integrates a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor with chemotherapy, and we successfully implemented this therapy regimen in the treatment of a patient with unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 55-year-old male who was diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma and presented with intermittent epigastric pain and multiple lymph node metastases in the abdominal cavity, with the metastasis being notably large in size. The tumor tissue was negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry. Considering the patient's status, the multidisciplinary team decided to administer sintilimab in combination with albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel), S-1, and oxaliplatin as a quadruple drug conversion therapy. After 4 cycles of conversion therapy, the patient's epigastric pain was significantly alleviated, his stool color normalized, the volume of the primary tumor and lymph node metastases was markedly reduced, and the tumor marker levels decreased to within the normal range. The patient subsequently underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with abdominal lymph node dissection, and postoperative pathological biopsy revealed a pathological complete response and R0 resection, after which the patient recovered to an excellent physical status.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma successfully treated with quadruple therapy with a PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy as a first-line conversion regimen. This first-line conversion therapy with the quadruple regimen may be effective and safe for unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor for first-line therapy of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a network meta-analysis

Background

This study conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate and rank the safety and efficacy of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients with advanced GC/GEJC.

Results

A total of six RCT studies were ultimately included in the analysis, involving 6,294 patients. Among them, 256 patients received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (pembrolizumab), 3,029 patients received a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (1,047 with pembrolizumab, 1,154 with nivolumab, 327 with sintilimab, and 501 with tislelizumab), and 3,009 received either chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus placebo. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy had the highest SUCRA value for OS (85.2%), while nivolumab plus chemotherapy had the highest SUCRA values for both PFS and ORR (96.8% and 82.9%). Four PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy significantly improved median OS and ORR compared with chemotherapy. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, and nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved median PFS compared with chemotherapy. For TRAEs of grade 3 or worse, pembrolizumab monotherapy had the highest SUCRA value. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, as well as sintilimab plus chemotherapy, did not increase the overall incidence of TRAEs and the incidence of grade 3 or worse TRAEs.

Conclusions

In the first-line treatment of advanced GC/GEJC, PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy have been demonstrated to significantly improve OS, PFS, and ORR compared with chemotherapy. Among them, sintilimab plus chemotherapy achieved the highest SUCRA value for OS, and nivolumab plus chemotherapy achieved the highest SUCRA values for PFS and ORR. Regarding safety, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy and sintilimab plus chemotherapy did not increase the overall incidence of TRAEs and the incidence of grade 3 or worse TRAEs, with good tolerability and safety.

Spatial dissection of tumour microenvironments in gastric cancers reveals the immunosuppressive crosstalk between CCL2+ fibroblasts and STAT3-activated macrophages

BACKGROUND

A spatially resolved, niche-level analysis of tumour microenvironments (TME) can provide insights into cellular interactions and their functional impacts in gastric cancers (GC).

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to translate the spatial organisation of GC ecosystems into a functional landscape of cellular interactions involving malignant, stromal and immune cells.

DESIGN

We performed spatial transcriptomics on nine primary GC samples using the Visium platform to delineate the transcriptional landscape and dynamics of malignant, stromal and immune cells within the GC tissue architecture, highlighting cellular crosstalks and their functional consequences in the TME.

RESULTS

GC spatial transcriptomes with substantial cellular heterogeneity were delineated into six regional compartments. Specifically, the fibroblast-enriched TME upregulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation and immunosuppressive response in malignant and TME cells, respectively. Cell type-specific transcriptional dynamics revealed that malignant and endothelial cells promote the cellular proliferations of TME cells, whereas the fibroblasts and immune cells are associated with procancer and anticancer immunity, respectively. Ligand-receptor analysis revealed that CCL2-expressing fibroblasts promote the tumour progression via JAK-STAT3 signalling and inflammatory response in tumour-infiltrated macrophages. CCL2+ fibroblasts and STAT3-activated macrophages are co-localised and their co-abundance was associated with unfavourable prognosis. We experimentally validated that CCL2+ fibroblasts recruit myeloid cells and stimulate STAT3 activation in recruited macrophages. The development of immunosuppressive TME by CCL2+ fibroblasts were also validated in syngeneic mouse models.

CONCLUSION

GC spatial transcriptomes revealed functional cellular crosstalk involving multiple cell types among which the interaction between CCL2+ fibroblasts and STAT3-activated macrophages plays roles in establishing immune-suppressive GC TME with potential clinical relevance.

Host Tissue Factors Predict Immune Surveillance and Therapeutic Outcomes in Gastric Cancer

The immune composition of solid tumors is typically inferred from biomarkers, such as histologic and molecular classifications, somatic mutational burden, and PD-L1 expression. However, the extent to which these biomarkers predict the immune landscape in gastric adenocarcinoma-an aggressive cancer often linked to chronic inflammation-remains poorly understood. We leveraged high-dimensional spectral cytometry to generate a comprehensive single-cell immune landscape of tumors, normal tissue, and lymph nodes from patients in the Western Hemisphere with gastric adenocarcinoma. The immune composition of gastric tumors could not be predicted by traditional metrics such as tumor histology, molecular classification, mutational burden, or PD-L1 expression via IHC. Instead, our findings revealed that innate immune surveillance within tumors could be anticipated by the immune profile of the normal gastric mucosa. Additionally, distinct T-cell states in the lymph nodes were linked to the accumulation of activated and memory-like CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Unbiased reclassification of patients based on tumor-specific immune infiltrate generated four distinct subtypes with varying immune compositions. Tumors with a T cell-dominant immune subtype, which spanned The Cancer Genome Atlas molecular subtypes, were exclusively associated with superior responses to immunotherapy. Parallel analysis of metastatic gastric cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade showed that patients who responded to immunotherapy had a pretreatment tumor composition that corresponded to a T cell-dominant immune subtype from our analysis. Taken together, this work identifies key host-specific factors associated with intratumoral immune composition in gastric cancer and offers an immunological classification system that can effectively identify patients likely to benefit from immune-based therapies.

Advancements in immunotherapy for gastric cancer: Unveiling the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors and emerging strategies

Gastric cancer (GC) is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates. Approximately two-thirds of GC patients are diagnosed at an advanced or metastatic stage. Conventional treatments for GC, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, offer limited prognostic improvement. Recently, immunotherapy has gained attention for its promising therapeutic effects in various tumors. Immunotherapy functions by activating and regulating the patient's immune cells to target and eliminate tumor cells, thereby reducing the tumor burden in the body. Among immunotherapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the most advanced. ICIs disrupt the inhibitory protein-small molecule (PD-L1, CTLA4, VISTA, TIM-3 and LAG3) interactions produced by immune cells, reactivating these cells to recognize and attack tumor cells. However, adverse reactions and resistance to ICIs hinder their further clinical and experimental development. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the advancements in ICIs for GC is crucial. This article discusses the latest developments in clinical trials of ICIs for GC and examines combination therapies involving ICIs (targeted therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy), alongside ongoing clinical trials. Additionally, the review investigates the tumor immune microenvironment and its role in non-responsiveness to ICIs, highlighting the function of tumor immune cells in ICI efficacy. Finally, the article explores the prospects and limitations of new immunotherapy-related technologies, such as tumor vaccines, nanotechnologies, and emerging therapeutic strategies, aiming to advance research into personalized and optimized immunotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Case Report: Second-line favourable effect of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in a patient with metastatic hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. HAS is characterized by both adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma like differentiation, which often produces alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and responds poorly to systemic chemotherapy. Herein we report a case of 62-year-old male diagnosed with liver metastatic HAS, who progressed rapidly after first-line cisplatin + fluorouracil chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. However, the patient achieved favourable outcome after second-line oxaliplatin + capecitatine chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. This case indicated that the chemotherapy regimen might influence the efficacy of immune check-point inhibiors plus chemotherapy.

Evaluating comparative effectiveness of pembrolizumab-based therapy versus chemotherapy in treatment of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Gastric cancer, especially cancer of the gastro-esophageal junction, ranks among the first five cancers in the world with the highest mortality rates. It has poor survival rates for the advanced stages. Traditional chemotherapy, while standard, often results in significant side effects and limited efficacy. The objective of this meta-analysis and systemic review is to ascertain if pembrolizumab-based therapies for advanced gastric cancer are more effective and safer than standard chemotherapy. The focus consisted of RCTs with adults suffering from gastric carcinoma who received pembrolizumab every 3 weeks (200 mg) intra-related dose or with at least comparable chemotherapy regimen. Outcomes assessed are as follows: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). All potential sources regarding the search of outcome measures were applied: Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane library, and last search in June 2024 was carried out. Out of 568 articles screened, four RCTs comprising 2,831 patients met the inclusion criteria. Analysis indicated that pembrolizumab alone did not significantly improve OS compared to chemotherapy (HR 0.87). However, when combined with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab dramatically enhanced OS (HR 0.80) and PFS (HR 0.78). ORR was superior in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group (RR 1.24), while pembrolizumab monotherapy showed no significant difference from chemotherapy alone. Safety analysis revealed a higher frequency of adverse events in the pembrolizumab-based therapy groups compared to chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab together with chemotherapy improves greater survival and higher levels of response rate in patients with severe gastric cancer, especially with high PD-L1 expression. But it has rather more adverse events, allowing patient monitoring with care.

Treatment Selection for Patients with HER2-Negative Metastatic Gastric Cancer Expressing Claudin 18.2 and PD-L1

Combination therapy of chemotherapy and zolbetuximab demonstrated a significant survival benefit compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, claudin (CLDN) 18.2-positive metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). Consequently, it has been approved as a standard first-line therapy for these patients. Combination therapy of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-either nivolumab or pembrolizumab-is a standard first-line therapy for patients with HER2-negative mGCs that are positive for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as defined by a combined positive score (CPS). Although approximately 13-22% of CLDN-positive mGCs are also CPS-positive, optimal treatment for mGC patients expressing both CLDN and PD-L1 remains undetermined due to the absence of direct comparative studies between zolbetuximab and ICIs. Treatment selection under this condition has become a critical issue. In this review, we discuss the appropriate treatment selection for HER2-negative mGC patients who are double-positive for CLDN 18.2 and PD-L1 based on clinical data and differences in the mechanism of action and safety profile between zolbetuximab and ICI.

Regulation of immunogenic cell death and potential applications in cancer therapy

Immunogenic cell death (ICD), a type of regulatory cell death, plays an important role in activating the adaptive immune response. Activation of the tumor-specific immune response is accompanied by the cell surface exposure of calreticulin and heat-shock proteins, the secretion of adenosine triphosphate, and the release of high mobility group box-1. In this review, we summarize and classify the latest types of ICD inducers and their molecular mechanisms, and discuss the effects and potential applications of inducing ICD by chemotherapy drugs, targeted drugs, and oncolytic viruses in clinical research. We also explore the potential role of epigenetic modifiers in the induction of ICD, and clarify the synergistic anti-tumor effects of nano-pulse stimulation, radiosensitizers for radiotherapy, photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and other physical stimulation, combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy induced-ICD, in multimodal immunotherapy. In addition, we elucidate the molecular mechanism of ICD in detail, including the calcium imbalance, mitochondrial stress, and the interactions in the tumor microenvironment. Ultimately, this review aims to offer deeper insight into the factors and mechanisms of ICD induction and provide a theoretical basis for the future development of ICD-based immunotherapy.

The efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced, HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (Chemo) have been approved as an initial treatment strategy for metastatic or recurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). However, since programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have just recently been investigated for the treatment of unresectable GC/GEJC, there is ongoing debate regarding their safety and effectiveness for prespecified subgroups. The purpose of this research is to establish a foundation toward stratified decision-making by methodically assessing the merits and drawbacks of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemo in the clinical utilization of advanced HER2-negative GC/GEJC according to certain prominent large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In addition, we limitedly explored the favorable short-term efficacy of PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibodies for the above-mentioned tumors.

Methods

The researchers retrieved several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library, to collect all the relevant literature published since the establishment of the databases until October 30, 2024, and then screened to determine the qualified literature and extracted the relevant information. We only included RCTs for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with or without chemo in advanced GC or GEJC. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). A subgroup analysis for the median overall survival (mOS) was conducted for the following variables: microsatellite instability (MSI) status, PD-L1 expression, combined positive scores (CPS), metastasis status, and primary tumor location. When moderate heterogeneity was found, a random-effect model was applied. The outcome indicators were then statistically analyzed, taking advantage of Review Manager 5.4. Hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) were selected as the effect values for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 7 eligible RCTs and 6537 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemo significantly improved patients' OS compared with chemo alone, especially in the tumor cell PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% [HR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.48, 0.81); a p-value = 0.0004], PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 [HR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.57, 0.77); a p-value < 0.00001], and MSI-H subgroups [HR = 0.40, 95% CI (0.28, 0.59); a p-value < 0.00001]. Moreover, distinct primary tumor location (GC or GEJC) and the presence of liver metastases could also benefit from the additive or sustained effect of anti-cancer chemo-immunotherapy.

Conclusion

For patients with advanced HER2-negative GC/GEJC, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemo have almost demonstrated consistent synergistic anti-tumor benefits to survival outcomes when compared to chemo alone. However, the subgroup analysis in this meta-study revealed that neither PD-L1 expression level nor MSI status could fully predict the efficacy of the dual treatment model but faced a higher possibility of serious treatment-related adverse events (sTRAEs), particularly in the synchronous therapy arm. Therefore, urging the need for more investigations into the development of collaborative prognostic forecasting models for achieving precise stratification, established harmonized testing standards and methods for PD-L1 expression and positivity, optimal CPS threshold for benefits, as well as alternative molecular biomarkers for the reason that certain indicators alone may not discriminate responders clearly. Lastly, dual anti-therapy might be a useful tactic for the population with low PD-L1 expression in the future.

Advances and challenges in gastric cancer testing: the role of biomarkers

Advances in the identification of molecular biomarkers and the development of targeted therapies have enhanced the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Several established biomarkers have been widely integrated into routine clinical diagnostics of gastric cancer to guide personalized treatment. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was the first molecular biomarker to be used in gastric cancer with trastuzumab being the first approved targeted therapy for HER2-positive gastric cancer. Programmed death-ligand 1 positivity and microsatellite instability can guide the use of immunotherapies, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab. More recently, zolbetuximab has been approved for patients with claudin 18.2-positive diseases in some countries. More targeted therapies, including savolitinib for MET-positive patients, are currently under clinical investigation. However, the clinical application of these diagnostic approaches could be hampered by many existing challenges, including invasive and costly sampling methods, variability in immunohistochemistry interpretation, high costs and long turnaround times for next-generation sequencing, the absence of standardized and clinically validated diagnostic cut-off values for some biomarkers, and tumor heterogeneity. Novel testing and analysis techniques, such as artificial intelligence-assisted image analysis and multiplex immunohistochemistry, and emerging therapeutic strategies, including combination therapies that integrate immune checkpoint inhibitors with targeted therapies, offer potential solutions to some of these challenges. This article reviews recent progress in gastric cancer testing, outlines current challenges, and explores future directions for biomarker testing and targeted therapy for gastric cancer.

Applications and challenges of immunotherapy in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma: current status and future perspectives

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) remains a significant global public health challenge, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. Progress in tumor immunology has introduced immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) pathways, demonstrating substantial potential in GAC therapy. Clinical research indicates that ICIs, particularly when combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapies, significantly enhance treatment efficacy in advanced GAC and specific molecular subtypes, including microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients. However, immunotherapy is also associated with a range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), necessitating effective management strategies to ensure treatment safety and maintain patients' quality of life. Future studies should focus on identifying new therapeutic targets, optimizing patient selection, and developing personalized treatment approaches to further improve the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in GAC.

Mapping the landscape of gastric cancer immunotherapy: Bibliometric insights into advances and hotspots

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has surfaced as a promising therapeutic modality for gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive review of advancements, current status, and research trends in GC immunotherapy is essential to inform future investigative efforts.

AIM

To delineate the trends, advancements, and focal points in immunotherapy for GC.

METHODS

We performed a bibliometric analysis of 2906 articles in English concerning GC immunotherapy published from 2000 to December 20, 2023, indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. Data analysis and visualization were facilitated by CiteSpace (6.1.6R), VOSviewer v.1.6.17, and GraphPad Prism v8.0.2.

RESULTS

There has been an increase in the annual publication rate of GC immunotherapy research. China leads in publication volume, while the United States demonstrates the highest citation impact. Fudan University is notable for its citation frequency and publication output. Co-citation analysis and keyword frequency revealed and highlighted a focus on GC prognosis, the tumor microenvironment (TME), and integrative immunotherapy with targeted therapy. Emerging research areas include gastroesophageal junction cancer, adoptive immunotherapy, and the role of Treg cell in immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

GC immunotherapy research is an expanding field attracting considerable scientific interest. With the clinical adoption of immunotherapy in GC, the primary goals are to enhance treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. Unlike hematological malignancies, GC's solid TME presents distinct immunological challenges that may attenuate the cytotoxic effects of immune cells on cancer cells. For instance, although CAR-T therapy is effective in hematological malignancies, it has underperformed in GC settings. Current research is centered on overcoming immunosuppression within the TME, with a focus on combinations of targeted therapy, adoptive immunotherapy, Treg cell dynamics, and precise prognosis prediction in immunotherapy. Additionally, immunotherapy's role in treating gastroesophageal junction cancer has become a novel research focus.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, has shown potential for treating advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. This meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy and safety, alone or combined with chemotherapy, in this population.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched up to October 31, 2024. Twelve studies comprising 4,069 patients were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and grade ≥ 3 AEs. Effect sizes were calculated using mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy significantly improved OS (MD = 1.92 months; 95% CI: 0.94 to 2.91) and ORR (MD = 11.05%; 95% CI: 6.29 to 15.82) compared to chemotherapy alone. Pembrolizumab monotherapy did not show a significant effect on OS (MD = 0.24 months; 95% CI: -1.15 to 1.63) and was associated with a significant reduction in PFS (MD = -2.28 months; 95% CI: -2.85 to -1.71) compared to chemotherapy alone. For safety, pembrolizumab monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of AEs (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.81) and grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.51) compared to chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy did not significantly alter the risk of AEs (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.13) or grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.27) compared to chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy improves survival and response rates with a manageable safety profile in advanced gastric and GEJ cancers. Monotherapy shows limited efficacy, highlighting the need for combination strategies and patient selection.

Biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer 2025: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)

Gastroesophageal carcinomas, including gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), pose a global health challenge due to their heterogeneity. The approach to diagnosis and treatment should first differentiate between GEA and ESCC. Over the past decade, therapies for metastatic or advanced GEA/ESCC have expanded, with several new therapeutic targets alongside trastuzumab for metastatic HER2-positive GEA. Four key biomarkers are essential for targeted therapy: HER2 overexpression/amplification, deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI), PD-L1, and Claudin18.2 expression. Immunohistochemistry is the recommended method for these biomarkers evaluation. In addition, the assessment of biomarkers like FGFR2b is likely to become routine in the near future. Experts from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have formed a consensus to optimize biomarker detection and usage in clinical practice. Their recommendations aim to improve personalized treatment strategies for GEA and ESCC patients, integrating new diagnostic insights into routine care.