Association of Acute Endophthalmitis With Intravitreal Injections of Corticosteroids or Anti-Vascular Growth Factor Agents in a Nationwide Study in France

[Implantable intravitreal corticosteroids in chronic noninfectious uveitis]

BACKGROUND

Uveitis leads to blindness in 10-15% of all cases in industrialized nations. The prevalence varies depending on the literature, ranging from 9 to 730 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Local and systemic steroid applications, along with treatment involving immunomodulators, are the primary treatment options. In cases of chronic and refractory uveitis, especially with the manifestation of uveitic macular edema, intravitreal corticosteroids can contribute to reduce or completely replace systemic immunomodulatory therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologics or corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

This review article presents the currently available intravitreal corticosteroid implants used in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. The indications, effectiveness, and side effect profiles are discussed within the context of the current literature. A total of 6 randomized controlled studies about FAc and DEX implants with more than 100 patients were included in this review. One subgroup analysis from a multicentric randomized study with 315 patients has been included as well. The outcome is discussed in this article.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety profile of intravitreal corticosteroids in uveitic macular edema have been evaluated in several studies in recent years. In some studies, they have been compared to systemic treatment options. With long-acting corticosteroid implants the number of relapses can be reduced and the time interval between relapses can be prolonged. Short-acting corticosteroid implants represent a treatment option during acute uveitic activity. The adverse effects of corticosteroids can be well-controlled in most cases. In phakic and/or young patients, however, adverse effects (such as cataract development) should be discussed in depth before treatment initiation as most corticosteroids are applied as long-term treatment.

Clinical Outcomes and Experiences with Prefilled Syringes Versus Vials for Intravitreal Administration of Anti-VEGF Treatments: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have been the standard treatment for retinal diseases for almost two decades. These treatments are administered via intravitreal injection using single-use vials or prefilled syringes (PFS). In this systematic review, we evaluate health care resource use and clinical outcomes and experiences with PFS for intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF treatments.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2015 to February 8, 2024 to identify literature reporting outcomes regarding procedural efficiency, health care resource use, patient and clinician experiences, and safety for currently approved anti-VEGFs (ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab) administered using PFS. Comparators were vial-based injections of the same anti-VEGFs.

RESULTS

A total of 36 publications met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic literature review; the majority were non-randomized studies, with a small number of reviews, case series, survey studies, and opinion articles. Publications reported that preparation times were significantly shorter for PFS (40.3-57.9 s) versus vials (ranibizumab, 62.8-98.0 s; aflibercept, 71.9-79.5 s), with no differences in product stability between PFS and vials. Clinicians expressed a preference for PFS and thought PFS were faster, easier to use, and had increased safety versus vials. Publications consistently reported significantly lower rates of endophthalmitis per injection with PFS versus vials (ranibizumab PFS, 0-0.02%; aflibercept PFS, 0.01-0.02%; ranibizumab vial, 0.02-0.05%; aflibercept vial, 0.02-0.06%). Four publications reported increased rates of transient vision loss after aflibercept PFS injection versus vial-based injection. No publications reported outcomes regarding health care resource use or patient experiences.

CONCLUSION

The available literature supports the increased procedural efficiency of PFS versus vial-based intravitreal injection of anti-VEGFs. PFS are positively perceived by clinicians and have a safety benefit in the form of a decreased risk of endophthalmitis versus vials.

Cognitive bias evaluation on the choice of treatment in common retinal disorders among retina specialists in 2023

PURPOSE

The study aimed to discern the intent to treat with the therapeutic agents prescribed first or second line in the following eye conditions: neovascular age-related macular Degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and myopic maculopathy with choroidal neovascularization (MMNV). The study also aimed to distinguish the ophthalmologists' intended treatment for their patients from those that they would prescribe for themselves if they were affected by the above macular conditions.

METHODS

The study utilized an online survey of 243 French ophthalmologists practicing medical retina, with males accounting for 54.3% of the participants. Data was obtained using a questionnaire that focused on the ophthalmologists' experience with various agents as well as their first and second line choices for nAMD, DME, RVO, and MMNV.

RESULTS

The vast majority of French ophthalmologists (99%) had experience with the most widely used anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs); ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept. Fewer than 8% reported experience with anti-VEGF drug reservoirs, biosimilars, or faricimab. The study findings also showed ranibizumab and aflibercept as the commonly prescribed first line choices for the above-mentioned ocular conditions. For the second line choice, the study showed that aflibercept and dexamethasone intravitreal implants were the most common across the four retinal conditions studied. The only difference in intent to treat for "patients" versus "yourself" was for biosimilars (0% to 0.8%, P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings regarding the first and second line choices for the mentioned ocular disorders were found to agree with the findings of published literature currently used in practice, with a tendency to prefer ranibizumab as first line therapy for neovascular disorders and aflibercept as first line therapy for macular edema. In addition, there were no differences between choices for first and second line therapy for patients vs. ophthalmologists.

One-Year Anti-VEGF Therapy Outcomes in Diabetic Macular Edema Based on Treatment Intensity: Data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry

PURPOSE

To compare 1-year outcomes of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based on the proportion of visits where intravitreal VEGF inhibitor injections were delivered.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

There were 2288 treatment-naive eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy from October 31, 2015 to October 31, 2021 from the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry.

METHODS

Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n = 1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n = 1116).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean visual acuity (VA) change after 12 months of treatment.

RESULTS

The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment was 3.6 (2.8-4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4-5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (P = 0.005). The mean (95% CI) central subfield thickness (CST) change was -69 (-76 to -61) μm and -85 (-92 to -78) μm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (P = 0.002). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the number of injections received over 12 months of treatment and the change in VA (P < 0.001). Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a moderately greater CST reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

This registry analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

From randomised controlled trials to real-world data: Clinical evidence to guide management of diabetic macular oedema

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are generally considered the gold-standard for providing scientific evidence for treatments' effectiveness and safety but their findings may not always be generalisable to the broader population treated in routine clinical practice. RCTs include highly selected patient populations that fit specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Although they may have a lower level of certainty than RCTs on the evidence hierarchy, real-world data (RWD), such as observational studies, registries and databases, provide real-world evidence (RWE) that can complement RCTs. For example, RWE may help satisfy requirements for a new indication of an already approved drug and help us better understand long-term treatment effectiveness, safety and patterns of use in clinical practice. Many countries have set up registries, observational studies and databases containing information on patients with retinal diseases, such as diabetic macular oedema (DMO). These DMO RWD have produced significant clinical evidence in the past decade that has changed the management of DMO. RWD and medico-administrative databases are a useful resource to identify low frequency safety signals. They often have long-term follow-up with a large number of patients and minimal exclusion criteria. We will discuss improvements in healthcare information exchange technologies, such as blockchain technology and FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), which will connect and extend databases already available. These registries can be linked with existing or emerging retinal imaging modalities using artificial intelligence to aid diagnosis, treatment decisions and provide prognostic information. The results of RCTs and RWE are combined to provide evidence-based guidelines.

Outcomes of a Multicenter 10-Year Review of Postinjection Endophthalmitis and Associated Systemic Medical Comorbidities

Purpose: To investigate whether any systemic medical conditions may be associated with a higher risk for developing postinjection endophthalmitis. Methods: This case-control study is a retrospective review within the Emory Eye Center from 2009 to 2019 and The Cleveland Clinic Foundation from 2012 to 2019. Each case was matched in a 1:4 case-to-control ratio. The associations between medical comorbidities and endophthalmitis were explored using multivariable logistic regression models on the combined sample. Results: Sixty-six individuals were diagnosed with injection-associated endophthalmitis. Systemic immunocompromised status was found to be a risk factor associated with developing endophthalmitis with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.17 (P = .009). Other conditions with increased risk approaching statistical significance included a history of pulmonary disease (aOR, 1.74; P = .08) and a history of smoking (aOR, 1.72; P = .06). Conclusions: This is the first report to our knowledge demonstrating that immunocompromised status is associated with an increased risk for developing postinjection endophthalmitis. While this study may be limited due to its retrospective nature, the result may nevertheless serve as a guidance for risk counseling. Future analysis using a large-scale database will be needed.

Impact of Prefilled Syringes and Masking on Postintravitreal Injection Endophthalmitis

Purpose: To compare rates of endophthalmitis (1) following intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapies with glass-vial preparation (GVP) vs prefilled syringes (PFS) and (2) before and after masking protocols were implemented. Methods: Medical records within a multicenter retina practice in Houston, Texas, from January 2015 to August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was rate of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection. Results: A total of 307 349 injections were performed during the study period and 101 cases of endophthalmitis were identified (0.033%). PFS use was associated with a decreased risk of endophthalmitis (relative risk [RR], 0.320; 95% CI, 0.198-0.518, P < .001); 54 cases of endophthalmitis occurred in the GVP group of aflibercept and ranibizumab (0.052%) compared with 24 in the PFS group (0.017%). There was no difference in the endophthalmitis rates with or without universal masking (RR, 0.953; 95% CI 0.616-1.473, P = .91). Discussion: PFS use was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of endophthalmitis while the use of surgical face masks did not appear to significantly impact the rate of endophthalmitis.

Reduced Incidence of Intravitreal Injection-Related Endophthalmitis With Prefilled Syringes

Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics of intravitreal injection-related endophthalmitis cases with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications manufactured as prefilled syringes or non-prefilled preparations. Methods: This retrospective chart review comprised eyes that received intravitreal anti-VEGF at a single-specialty retina practice from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019. Eyes diagnosed with injection-related endophthalmitis were identified. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from medical records, including the type of anti-VEGF agent, baseline and follow-up corrected visual acuity (VA), and microbiologic findings. Results: The review identified 88 cases of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection-related endophthalmitis and 325 990 total injections. Total injections included 32 045 (9.8%) bevacizumab (BEV), 93 073 (28.6%) ranibizumab (RAN), 122 947 (37.7%) aflibercept (AFL), and 77 925 (23.9%) ranibizumab prefilled syringe (RANPFS). Ten of the endophthalmitis cases were related to BEV, 21 to RAN, 45 to AFL, and 12 to RANPFS. The endophthalmitis rate was lowest for RANPFS (0.0154%) (BEV, 0.0312%; RAN, 0.0226%; AFL, 0.0366%) (P = .030). Thirty-four (41.5%) of 82 samples were culture positive. RANPFS had a significantly lower rate of culture-proven postinjection endophthalmitis than the other agents (P = .003). The mean VA for endophthalmitis cases related to RANPFS vs non-prefilled agents was similar at presentation (Snellen 20/2092 vs 20/2327) and at the 3-month follow-up (Snellen 20/201 vs 20/272) (both P > .05). Conclusions: Anti-VEGF medications in prefilled syringes may reduce the risk for medication contamination during injection preparation. RANPFS was associated with a lower rate of injection-related endophthalmitis than non-prefilled anti-VEGF medications.

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on surgical procedures for retinal detachment in France: a national database study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The COVID-19 crisis and the decisions made regarding population lockdown may have changed patient care. We aimed to investigate the incidence rate of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) cases during the COVID-19 lockdown period.

METHODS

In this nationwide database study, we identified hospital and clinic admissions of French residents for a first episode of RRD in France from 2017 to the lockdown period in 2020. The monthly hospital incidence rates of RRD procedures per 100 000 inhabitants before, during and after lockdown were computed for the whole country. Finally, we assessed the influence of viral incidence on the RRD incidence rate, comparing two regions with highly contrasting viral penetration.

RESULTS

From January to July, the average monthly national hospital incidence rate of RRD decreased from a mean of 2.59/100 000 inhabitants during 2017-2019 to 1.57/100 000 inhabitants in 2020. Compared with 2019, during the 8-week lockdown period in 2020, a 41.6% decrease in the number of RRD procedures was observed (p<0.001) with the weekly incidence of RRD decreasing from 0.63/100 000 inhabitants in 2019 to 0.36/100 000 inhabitants. During the 4-month post-lockdown period, no increased activity related to postponed procedures was observed. No difference was found in the rate of RRD surgery when comparing two regions with highly contrasting viral incidence.

CONCLUSION

Containment may have been responsible for a decrease in the number of surgical procedures for RRD, without any compensating post-lockdown activity in France. These results might help increase awareness of the management of RRD emergencies.

Associations between Serial Intravitreal Injections and Dry Eye

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of serial intravitreal injections (IVIs) on the ocular surface and meibomian glands (MGs) in patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

DESIGN

Retrospective, controlled, observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with nAMD receiving unilateral IVIs with anti-VEGF agents. The fellow eye was used as control.

METHODS

Tear film and ocular surface examinations were performed on a single occasion at a minimum of 4 weeks after IVI. A pre-IVI asepsis protocol with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) was applied.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Upper and lower MG loss, tear meniscus height (TMH), bulbar redness (BR) score, noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity (TOsm), Schirmer test, corneal staining, fluorescein tear film break-up time (TBUT), meibomian gland expressibility (ME), and meibum quality.

RESULTS

Ninety patients with a mean age of 77.5 years (standard deviation [SD], 8.4; range 54-95) were included. The median number of IVIs in treated eyes was 19.5 (range, 2-132). Mean MG loss in the upper eyelid was 19.1% (SD, 11.3) in treated eyes and 25.5% (SD, 14.6) in untreated fellow eyes (P = 0.001). For the lower eyelid, median MG loss was 17.4% (interquartile range [IQR], 9.4-29.9) in treated eyes and 24.5% (IQR, 14.2-35.2) in fellow eyes (P < 0.001). Mean BR was 1.32 (SD, 0.46) in treated eyes versus 1.44 (SD, 0.45) in fellow eyes (P = 0.017). Median TMH was 0.36 mm (IQR, 0.28-0.52) in treated eyes and 0.32 mm (IQR, 0.24-0.49) in fellow eyes (P = 0.02). There were no differences between treated and fellow eyes regarding NIBUT, TOsm, Schirmer test, corneal staining, fluorescein TBUT, ME, or meibum quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated IVIs with anti-VEGF with preoperative PVP-I application was associated with reduced MG loss, increased tear volume, and reduced signs of inflammation compared with fellow nontreated eyes in patients with nAMD. This regimen may thus have a beneficial effect on the ocular surface.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Do new drugs for diabetic macular edema offer a safer option?

INTRODUCTION

The last decade has witnessed important advances in retinal drug discovery, administered intravitreally, allowing high intraocular concentration and low systemic passage. However, local and systemic adverse events have been described and should be discussed before proposing treatment. In diabetes mellitus specifically, the choice of molecule and treatment regimen should limit the therapeutic burden, avoiding the need for frequent ophthalmological appointments, in patients receiving multi-disciplinary care.

AREAS COVERED

We aim to review and discuss the risk/benefit ratio of the main intravitreal therapies currently proposed for diabetic macular edema (DME), and how these treatments could be tailored to each individual patient.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-VEGF injections and steroid implants are currently the two therapeutic options proposed in cases of DME. New molecules in these two classes have recently been approved and are currently being studied under phase IV observations to establish their efficacy and tolerance. The preferred therapeutic option is determined based on the ocular condition and the patient profile. As new treatments are developed, new adverse events will also enter into consideration, and retinal physicians must therefore be able to call on a range of therapeutic options and question the risk/benefit ratio of each of them before proposing a treatment.

Epidemiology of Treated Diabetes Ocular Complications in France 2008-2018-The LANDSCAPE French Nationwide Study

AIM

LANDSCAPE aimed to estimate the annual incidence and prevalence of treated diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) between 2008 and 2018.

METHODS

This French nationwide observational study used data from the French National Health Insurance Databases covering 99% of the French population. Data about healthcare consumption were used to identify adults treated with anti-VEGFs or dexamethasone implants (for DME) and with pan-retinal photocoagulation (for PDR). All French patients newly treated between 2008 and 2018 were included. Incidence and prevalence of treated DME and PDR were estimated for the age-matched general population and the population with diabetes in France. Sociodemographic characteristics and medical history were described in both populations.

RESULTS

We identified 53,584 treated DME patients and 127,273 treated PDR patients between 2008 and 2018, and 11,901 DME and 11,996 PDR new incident patients in 2018. The treated DME incidence in 2018 was 2.5 per 10,000 in the general population and 37.3 per 10,000 in the population with diabetes. Prevalence in 2018 was 9.5 and 143.7 per 10,000 in the respective populations. Treated PDR incidence in 2018 was 2.3 per 10,000 in the general population and 31.2 per 10,000 in the population with diabetes. Prevalence in 2018 was 19.9 and 270.3 per 10,000 in the respective populations. Incidence and prevalence were not age-dependent. Incidence of treated PDR incidence was relatively stable from 2008-2018. Incidence of treated DME incidence rose from 2012-2018, probably due to widening access to newly available treatments, such as anti-VEGFs.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide exhaustive nationwide data on the incidence and prevalence of treated diabetic ocular complications in France over a 10-year period.

Incidence of severe rise in intraocular pressure after intravitreous injection of aflibercept with prefilled syringes

Our aim was to analyze the intraocular pressure (IOP) changes following different intravitreous injection (IVI) procedures with or without prefilled syringes (PFS) and to elaborate their possible causes. Clinical study and laboratory assessment. 173 eyes of 141 patients. The IOP was prospectively measured pre- and postoperatively in three groups of patients receiving IVI either with ranibizumab (RP), aflibercept PFS (AP) or aflibercept vials (AV). The AP emptying volume (EV) was assessed using 40 aflibercept PFS vials: the plunger was aligned precisely (normal volume, NV) or right below the indication line (high volume, HV) and the drug was ejected with (wP) or without forced pressure (nP). Primary outcome was post-treatment IOP with type of IVI and pre-treatment IOP as fixed factors. Secondary outcome was identification of possibly confounding factors (age, sex, pathology, presence of pseudophakia, spherical error, and number of injections) and IOP > 30 mmHg post-treatment. An IOP rise above 30 mmHg was observed in 8/38 (22%), 16/51 (31%) and 35/86 (41%) cases in the RP, AV and AP groups, respectively (p = 0.129). Pre-treatment IOP was the only predictive variable for IOP rise (p < 0.001). The EV values in the NVnP, NVwP, HVnP and HVwP groups were 56.06 ± 10.32, 70.69 ± 4.56, 74.22 ± 7.41 and 81.63 ± 3.67 µl, respectively (p < 0.001). We observed a marked, although not significantly higher incidence of IOP elevations with the aflibercept PFS. One possible reason may be the error-proneness of administering the correct volume with the AP. Caution should be taken when using the aflibercept PFS in order to prevent potential optic nerve damage in cases with marked elevation in IOP.

Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Intravitreal Injections: Impact on the Incidence of Acute Endophthalmitis-A Nationwide Study in France from 2009 to 2018

Background: The dramatic increase in intravitreal injections (IVTs) has been accompanied by a greater need for safer procedures. The ongoing debate about topical antibiotic prophylaxis after IVTs emphasizes the importance of large-scale studies. We aimed to study the role of topical antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the risk of acute endophthalmitis after IVTs. Methods: Population-based cohort study, in France, from 2009 to 2018, including all French patients receiving IVTs of corticosteroids or anti-VEGF agents. Results: A total of 5,291,420 IVTs were performed on 605,434 patients. The rate of topical antibiotic prophylaxis after IVTs progressively decreased during the study period, with a sharp drop in 2014 (from 84.6% in 2009 to 27.4% in 2018). Acute endophthalmitis occurred in 1274 cases (incidence rate = 0.0241%). Although antibiotic prophylaxis did not alter the risk of endophthalmitis (p = 0.06), univariate analysis showed an increased risk after fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside prophylaxis. This increased risk was not found in multivariate analysis. However, we observed an increased risk related to the use of fixed combinations of fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides with corticosteroids (IRR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.57–2.27%, antibiotics combined with corticosteroids). Conclusion: These results are consistent with the literature. Endophthalmitis rates after IVTs did not decrease with topical antibiotic prophylaxis. The use of a combination of antibiotics and corticosteroids doubles the risk of endophthalmitis and should be avoided. Avoiding antibiotic prophylaxis would reduce the costs and the potential risks of antibiotic resistance.

Incidence and visual outcomes of acute endophthalmitis post intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors in a single referral center

BACKGROUND

To describe the incidence and factors predicting visual outcome in patients with infectious endophthalmitis following intravitreal anti-VEGF injection.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-site, cohort study. Patients with acute endophthalmitis within 6 weeks of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection who were referred to our practice after inciting injection or were injected by us between January 2010 and July 2017 were included. All patients received intravitreal antibiotics with either vitreous/anterior chamber tap (TAP) or pars plana vitrectomy. Visual outcomes pre/post treatment, baseline variables (age, gender, ocular disease) and cultures results were studied.

RESULTS

Seventy eyes of 69 patients were included. Presenting VA was the strongest factor associated with final visual outcome after adjusting for other variables including culture status and baseline VA (p = .0002). Cultures were positive in 62.8% of eyes and were associated with worse visual outcome (p = .0087). Growth of Streptococcus or microorganisms other than coagulase negative Staphylococci (CNS) was also associated with worse prognosis, regardless of baseline and presenting VA (p = .0002). The crude incidence of post-injection endophthalmitis was 0.028% in our practice (40 eyes in 143,628 injections) during the study time. No significant difference was found between pre-filled bevacizumab versus ranibizumab or aflibercept drawn from a vial.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, single center, retrospective study, the incidence of acute endophthalmitis post anti-VEGF injection was relatively low. Worse visual acuity at presentation of endophthalmitis and growth of Streptococcus or organisms other than CNS were associated with the worst visual outcomes.

Incidence and Visual Outcomes of Endophthalmitis After Intravitreal Injection of Dexamethasone Implant vs Ranibizumab

Purpose

To compare the incidence and visual outcomes of endophthalmitis after injection of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant and injection of intravitreal ranibizumab.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study assessed endophthalmitis in eyes receiving an intravitreal injection of a 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant (DEX group), 0.5 mg ranibizumab (R5 group), or 0.3 mg ranibizumab (R3 group) between January 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018, at 2 large retina practices in the United States.

Results

Suspected endophthalmitis occurred in 5 eyes after 4973 DEX injections, 43 eyes after 163 974 R5 injections, and 6 eyes after 18 954 R3 injections. Suspected endophthalmitis was significantly more common in the DEX group (1/995) than in the R5 group (1/3813) (P = .008) but not than in the R3 group (1/3159) (P = .10). Visual acuity outcomes were similar in the 3 groups.

Conclusions

Suspected endophthalmitis might be more common after 0.7 mg dexamethasone injections than after 0.5 mg ranibizumab injections. Culture-positive endophthalmitis rates were similar across all 3 medications.

Epidemiology of Acute Endophthalmitis after Intraocular Procedures: A National Database Study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the causes of postoperative acute endophthalmitis at the national level longitudinally.

DESIGN

Cohort study from 2009 to 2018 in France.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients diagnosed with acute endophthalmitis after intraocular procedures.

METHODS

The French medical-administrative database was used. Endophthalmitis cases and intraocular procedures were identified based on billing codes in all French hospitals and private practices.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The incidence of acute endophthalmitis within 42 days of the procedure.

RESULTS

From January 1, 2009, to October 31, 2018, 7522 cases of acute endophthalmitis occurred after 14 438 854 intraocular procedures. Most cases occurred after standalone cataract surgery (4808 cases for 7 316 077 procedures; 63.92%), followed by after intravitreal (IVT) injections (1296 cases for 5 455 631 IVT injections; 17.23%), vitreoretinal surgery (698 for 442 263 procedures; 9.28%), anterior segment surgery (245 cases; 3.26%), combined cataract and vitreoretinal surgery (191 cases; 2.54%), cornea surgery (142 cases; 1.89%), and glaucoma surgery (80 cases; 1.06%). The overall incidence of acute endophthalmitis was 1 per 1920 procedures (0.0521%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0520-0.0522). The surgery with the highest incidence of endophthalmitis was scleral and globe surgery, with an incidence of 0.1827% (95% CI, 0.1757-0.1898), followed by vitreoretinal surgery combined with cataract surgery, with an incidence of 0.1685% (95% CI, 0.1663-0.1706). The incidence of endophthalmitis after IVT injections was stable over the study period, and patients receiving IVT injections were the oldest, aged 75.4 years (standard deviation, 12.0 years; P < 0.001). The onset of endophthalmitis after IVT procedures, i.e, after receiving IVT injections or undergoing vitreoretinal surgery, was earlier than that after the other procedures (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The profile of patients referred for acute endophthalmitis has been evolving over the past decade, with a decrease in the raw number of endophthalmitis cases after cataract surgery as opposed to an increase in the number of patients presenting with endophthalmitis after IVT injections.

Complications of intravitreal injections: 2022

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights the complications of both intravitreal injection procedure as well as different intravitreal medications including antivascular endothelial growth factors, antibiotics, antivirals, antifungals, methotrexate, and steroids. Techniques for reducing rates of endophthalmitis will also be discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intravitreal vancomycin can cause hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis resulting in severe vision loss. Intravitreal brolucizumab is associated with intraocular inflammation and retinal vasculitis resulting in significant vision loss. Face mask use by both patient and physician is not associated with increased risk of endophthalmitis and may decrease culture positive endophthalmitis.

SUMMARY

Intravitreal injections continue to be one of the most commonly performed procedures by ophthalmologists. Although the injections are generally well tolerated, sight-threatening complications can occur including endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and/or retinal vasculitis. Adverse events associated with specific medications are outlined below. Several safety measures have been shown to reduce rates of endophthalmitis, the most concerning complication of this procedure.

Incidence and Prevalence of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in France between 2008 and 2018

Purpose

This study aimed to estimate the incidence and prevalence of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the French population between 2008 and 2018.

Design

This was a retrospective, longitudinal population study using health care consumption data from the Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS; the French National Health Information Database), which covers approximately 99% of the French population.

Participants

We identified individuals treated for nAMD from the French population 50 years of age and older. Identification criteria were nAMD diagnosis or reimbursement of nAMD treatments (anti–vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injection or dynamic phototherapy with verteporfin). Exclusion criteria were high myopia, diagnosis of other retinal diseases, and other treatments for macular diseases (dexamethasone implant, laser therapy, etc.).

Methods

We calculated incidence and prevalence based on the age-matched general population in France. Adjustment for age and sex was also performed for incidence.

Main Outcome Measures

Incidence and prevalence of nAMD in the French population between 2008 and 2018.

Results

Between 2008 and 2018, we identified 342 961 patients with nAMD (67.5% women). Mean ± standard deviation age at nAMD diagnosis or first treatment increased from 78.8 ± 8.1 years in 2008 to 81.2 ± 7.9 years in 2018. In 2018, annual incidence was 0.149% and prevalence was 1.062% for the French population 50 years of age or older. Incidence was stable over the 10-year period. Annual incidence increased with age (0.223%, 0.380%, and 0.603% in those 60 years of age or older, 70 years of age or older, and 80 years of age or older, respectively), with similar trends for prevalence. No major differences were observed among the 14 regions of France for incidence or prevalence. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration incidence in 2018 was not impacted by the availability of primary or ophthalmology care in patients’ localities.

Conclusions

The LANDSCAPE study provides exhaustive nationwide data on incidence and prevalence of nAMD in France over a 10-year period.

Board Certification Is Associated With a Reduced Risk of Endophthalmitis After Intravitreal Injections

Purpose:

This work investigates associations between physician qualifications and the risk of postintravitreal injection endophthalmitis.

Methods:

This retrospective analysis of data from medical claims studied Medicare beneficiaries undergoing 1 or more intravitreal injections between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether board certification status or retina subspecialty training was associated with lower risk of postinjection endophthalmitis, controlling for patient's age, race, and sex, type of agent injected, diagnosis, and year of injection. The main outcome measure was odds ratio (OR) of receiving a diagnosis of endophthalmitis in the 14 days after intravitreal injection. Clinical outcome and quality of care were not evaluated in this study.

Results:

A total of 2 907 324 intravitreal injections were performed on 219 640 patients by 4315 ophthalmologists, 3196 (74%) of whom were retina specialists and 4021 (92%) of whom were certified by the American Board of Ophthalmology (ABO). Overall, there were 1088 (0.037%) cases of postinjection endophthalmitis, of which 1024 (0.037%) were injected by ABO-certified ophthalmologists and 64 (0.050%) by non–board-certified ophthalmologists. Injections by ABO-certified ophthalmologist had 28% reduced odds of endophthalmitis (OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.523-0.996, P = .05). Higher odds of endophthalmitis were observed for corticosteroid injections (OR = 3.91; 95% CI, 2.75-5.56, P < .001) and aflibercept injections (OR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.19-1.80, P < .001). Patients' sex and race, the diagnosis associated with the injection, and providers' retina subspeciality training were not associated with the rate of endophthalmitis ( P < .20 for all comparisons).

Conclusions:

We found evidence that endophthalmitis may be reduced when ABO-certified physicians perform an intravitreal injection.

Mid-Term Impact of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents on Intraocular Pressure

The effect of intraocular injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on intraocular pressure (IOP) has not been clearly stated. We extracted data from the electronic health records at Dijon University Hospital of 750 patients who were unilaterally injected with anti-VEGF agents between March 2012 and March 2020. These were treatment-naïve patients who had received at least three injections of the same treatment (aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab) in one eye only, and had IOP measurements before and after the injections. Fellow untreated eyes were used as comparators. A clinically significant IOP rise was determined as an IOP above 21 mmHg and an increase of at least 6 mmHg compared to baseline, or the need for IOP-lowering agents. We found an overall slight increase in IOP between treated and untreated eyes at 6 months (+0.67 ± 3.33 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 0.33–1.02, p < 0.001). Ranibizumab had a higher final IOP at 1 and 3 months. Age, sex, and the number of injections were not associated with IOP variation. Ranibizumab was associated with a higher rate of increase in clinically significant IOP at 6 months (p = 0.03). Our study confirms that anti-VEGF injections constitute a relatively safe treatment regarding their impact on IOP.

Strabismus outcomes after surgery: the nationwide SOS France study

PURPOSE

To describe the types of strabismus operated on, the surgical procedures performed, and the 2-year reoperation rate in France.

METHODS

Entire population 5-year cross-sectional analysis of a national medico-administrative database in France between January 2013 and December 2017 included all patients who underwent a first strabismus surgery, with a 2-year follow-up. Patient identification was based on the diagnostic codes of the 10th International Classification of Diseases and surgical procedures on the codes of the Common Classification of Medical Acts. A subgroup analysis comparing non-paralytic and paralytic strabismus was performed.

RESULTS

Among the 56,654 patients included (women: 50.8%), 26,892 (47.5%) patients were under 10 years old. Overall, 52,711 (93%) were diagnosed with non-paralytic strabismus and 3,943 (7%) with paralytic strabismus. Among the non-paralytics, the most frequent diagnosis was esotropia (21,282, 37.6%), followed by exotropia (14,392, 25.4%) and vertical strabismus (2,017, 3.6%). Among the paralytics, fourth cranial nerve palsy (1,499, 2.6%) was more frequent than sixth cranial nerve palsy (691, 1.2%) and third cranial nerve palsy (431, 0.8%). The 2-year reoperation rate was 7.7% (4,362 patients), the lowest for non-paralytic (7.4%) and the highest for paralytic (11.4%).

CONCLUSION

This first French population-based study about strabismus will contribute to the evaluation of practices at a national level and permit comparisons between countries. Although the 2-year reoperation rate was found to be 1 out of 13 patients, it should be interpreted with caution. Long-term follow-up is still warranted due to considerable variability of the type and severity of strabismus as well as surgical practices.

Real-world incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-VEGF injection: Common Data Model in ophthalmology

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections using data from the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM).

METHODS

Patients with endophthalmitis that developed within 6 weeks after intravitreal anti-VEGF injections were identified in 3 large OMOP CDM databases.

RESULTS

We identified 23,490 patients who received 128,123 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. The incidence rates of endophthalmitis were 15.75 per 10,000 patients and 2.97 per 10,000 injections. The incidence rates of endophthalmitis for bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept (per 10,000 injections) were 3.64, 1.39, and 0.76, respectively. The annual incidence has remained below 5.00 per 10,000 injections since 2011 despite the increasing number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Bevacizumab presented a higher incidence rate for endophthalmitis than ranibizumab and aflibercept (incidence rate ratio, 3.17; p=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-VEGF injections has stabilized since 2011 despite the explosive increase in anti-VEGF injections. The off-label use of bevacizumab accounted for its disproportionately high incidence of endophthalmitis. The OMOP CDM, which includes off-label uses, laboratory data, and a scalable standardized database, could provide a novel strategy to reveal real-world evidence, especially in ophthalmology.

Safety of Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Intravitreal Injection in Office-Based vs Operating Room Settings: A Meta-analysis

Importance

Compared with the operating room (OR), office-based intravitreal injection (IVI) is considered a more cost-effective and convenient approach, yet clinical outcomes of IVIs with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents in different settings (office-based vs OR) have not been systematically evaluated.

Objective

To evaluate the safety outcomes of IVI with anti-VEGF agents in the OR vs office-based setting.

Data Sources

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to July 2020.

Study Selection

Eligible studies reporting on patients who received IVIs with anti-VEGF drugs with a clearly stated injection setting of the office or OR.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the rates of endophthalmitis (EO) and culture-positive EO.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rates of EO and culture-positive EO following anti-VEGF IVIs in the OR and office-based setting.

Results

Thirty-one studies with a total of 1 275 815 injections were included. Comparative analysis suggested no difference between rates of EO after IVIs performed in the office and OR settings (odds ratio, 3.06; 95% CI, 0.07-139.75; P = .57; I2 = 80%) were identified, yet a higher rate of culture-positive EO was found in the office setting (odds ratio, 21.52; 95% CI, 2.39-193.55; P = .006; I2 = 0%). The pooled rates of EO following anti-VEGF IVIs were 0.03% (95% CI, 0.03-0.04) and 0.02% (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) in office and OR settings, respectively, and the pooled rates of culture-positive EO were 0.01% (95% CI, 0.01-0.02) and 0.01% (95% CI, 0-0.02). The pooled rates of other ocular and systemic adverse events were low.

Conclusions and Relevance

The rate of clinically suspected or culture-positive EO following anti-VEGF IVIs was low whether the procedure was performed in the office or OR setting. Bacterial spectrum could differ between the 2 settings. This meta-analysis could not determine if it is more appropriate to give treatment in the OR for safety reasons in low-income compared with higher-income regions in the world.

Ocular Therapeutics and Molecular Delivery Strategies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of vision loss in geriatric population. Intravitreal (IVT) injections are popular clinical option. Biologics and small molecules offer efficacy but relatively shorter half-life after intravitreal injections. To address these challenges, numerous technologies and therapies are under development. Most of these strategies aim to reduce the frequency of injections, thereby increasing patient compliance and reducing patient-associated burden. Unlike IVT frequent injections, molecular therapies such as cell therapy and gene therapy offer restoration ability hence gained a lot of traction. The recent approval of ocular gene therapy for inherited disease offers new hope in this direction. However, until such breakthrough therapies are available to the majority of patients, antibody therapeutics will be on the shelf, continuing to provide therapeutic benefits. The present review aims to highlight the status of pre-clinical and clinical studies of neovascular AMD treatment modalities including Anti-VEGF therapy, upcoming bispecific antibodies, small molecules, port delivery systems, photodynamic therapy, radiation therapy, gene therapy, cell therapy, and combination therapies.

Eye disorders other than diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes

AIM

While diabetic retinopathy is the most specific complication of chronic hyperglycaemia, numerous other ocular conditions also can involve the eyes of people with diabetes. Cataract, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, retinal vascular occlusion, and acute ischaemic optic neuropathy combine to impair vision in people with diabetes, especially when they are old. This report provides a critical analysis and an overview of the current knowledge of the main ocular disorders (excluding diabetic retinopathy) and their association in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

A literature search strategy was conducted for all English-language literature with a systematic review of key references until 2021.

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes have a high-to-moderate increased risk for most of the usual ocular disorders we reviewed with the exception of age-related macular degeneration. Exposure to chronic hyperglycaemia promotes the development of many eye disorders while acute glucose changes are involved in refractive disorders, diabetic papillopathy and acute cataract.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes, beyond diabetic retinopathy, increases the risk of numerous eye disorders leading to low vision with implications for daily diabetes management. Even in the absence of clearly demonstrated benefit from glucose control in all eye conditions, achieving good glycaemic control and adherence to diabetes treatment will likely help avoid an additional risk of visual impairment in people with diabetes. In perspective, interesting findings suggesting a preventive effect of metformin use on age-related macular degeneration occurrence justify further studies.

Are direct oral anticoagulants an economically attractive alternative to low molecular weight heparins in lung cancer associated venous thromboembolism management?

Venous thromboembolism is highly prevalent in lung cancer patients. Low molecular weight heparins are recommended for long term treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism. Direct oral anticoagulants are however an interesting alternative as they are administered orally and don't require monitoring. There are currently studies comparing both their efficacy and tolerance for cancer patients and more and more guidelines suggest considering direct oral anticoagulants for cancer associated venous thromboembolism treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the budgetary impact that direct oral anticoagulants use would have for lung cancer associated venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention in France. An economic model was made to evaluate the cost of venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention among patients with primary lung cancer in France by two strategies: current guidelines versus direct oral anticoagulants use. The model was fed with clinical and economic data extracted from the French national health information system. The analysis was conducted from the national mandatory Health insurance point of view. The time horizon of the study was the evaluation of the annual management cost. Lung cancer associated venous thromboembolism management's mean cost was estimated of 836€ per patient, that is a total cost of about 40 million euros per year at a national level. A 76% decrease of this cost can be expected with direct oral anticoagulants use. However, despite their benefits, these treatments raise new issues (medication interactions, bleeding management), and would likely not be recommended for all patients.

Systemic Immunosuppression and Risk of Endophthalmitis After Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of systemic immunosuppressive therapy on the rates and outcomes of endophthalmitis following intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective, single-center, comparative cohort study examining eyes undergoing intravitreal anti-VEGF injections from January 2016 to September 2019. Cohorts were created based on concurrent immunosuppressive therapy at time of injection.

RESULTS

Of 270,347 anti-VEGF injections administered, 1,300 injections (0.48%) were administered while on systemic immunosuppressive therapy. The odds of endophthalmitis occurring in the immunosuppression group was 9.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-24.3; P < .001) times higher than the no-immunosuppression group. Symptom onset occurred 2.51 (95% CI, 0.15-4.870; P = .040) days earlier in the immunosuppression cohort; visual acuity at 6 months after treatment was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on systemic immunosuppressive medications undergoing intravitreal injections may be at increased risk for post-injection endophthalmitis and may have earlier symptom onset. However, visual outcomes were similar between the two groups. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:S17-S22.].

[Clinical and economic impact of an ambulatory cataract surgery center without anesthesia in an area with poor ophthalmologic coverage]

INTRODUCTION

The Ambulatory Clinic for Cataract Surgery (CACC) is a public department of the Bourges Medical Center, with a fast-track protocol without perioperative anesthesia care launched in 2015. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of the CACC in terms of access to cataract surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients undergoing cataract surgery between 2012 and 2018. Data were collected from the French PMSI database. In order to evaluate the impact of the CACC, the surgical activity and change in indicators of patient flow and usage, as well as clinical and economic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2018, with the same number of ophthalmologists, surgical activity increased by 50.2% in the Cher (vs. a mean increase of 22.7% in France). The patient loss ratio decreased by 5.9 points, the attraction and self-sufficiency ratios increased by 2.3 and 8.6 points respectively. The standardized rate of healthcare utilization for cataract surgery increased by 4.3 points (from 11.6 to 15.9 surgeries per 1000 inhabitants). As a result, Cher became the second highest French Department in 2018 in terms of utilization rate despite its 96th place out of 109 Departments in terms of density of ophthalmologists.

CONCLUSION

The ambulatory cataract surgery center without anesthesia for selected patients might represent a solution in medical deserts to improve access to cataract surgery without increasing costs.

The Influence of Universal Face Mask Use on Endophthalmitis Risk after Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

Purpose

Routine use of face masks for patients and physicians during intravitreal anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections has increased with the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This study evaluates the impact of universal face mask use on rates and outcomes of post-injection endophthalmitis (PIE).

Design

Retrospective, multicenter, comparative cohort study.

Participants

Eyes receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections from October 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020, at 12 centers.

Methods

Cases were divided into a “no face mask” group if no face masks were worn by the physician or patient during intravitreal injections or a “universal face mask” group if face masks were worn by the physician, ancillary staff, and patient during intravitreal injections.

Main Outcome Measures

Rate of endophthalmitis, microbial spectrum, and visual acuity (VA).

Results

Of 505 968 intravitreal injections administered in 110 547 eyes, 85 of 294 514 (0.0289%; 1 in 3464 injections) cases of presumed endophthalmitis occurred in the “no face mask” group, and 45 of 211 454 (0.0213%; 1 in 4699) cases occurred in the “universal face mask” group (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–1.18; P = 0.097). In the “no face mask” group, there were 27 cases (0.0092%; 1 in 10 908 injections) of culture-positive endophthalmitis compared with 9 cases (0.004%; 1 in 23 494) in the “universal face mask” group (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22–0.99; P = 0.041). Three cases of oral flora–associated endophthalmitis occurred in the “no face mask” group (0.001%; 1 in 98 171 injections) compared with 1 (0.0005%; 1 in 211 454) in the “universal face mask” group (P = 0.645). Patients presented a mean (range) 4.9 (1–30) days after the causative injection, and mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA at endophthalmitis presentation was 2.04 (~20/2200) for “no face mask” group compared with 1.65 (~20/900) for the “universal face mask” group (P = 0.022), although no difference was observed 3 months after treatment (P = 0.764).

Conclusions

In a large, multicenter, retrospective study, physician and patient face mask use during intravitreal anti-VEGF injections did not alter the risk of presumed acute-onset bacterial endophthalmitis, but there was a reduced rate of culture-positive endophthalmitis. Three months after presentation, there was no difference in VA between the groups.

Incidence and outcomes of endophthalmitis with in-house compounded intravitreal bevacizumab injections: A multicentric study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence rate and outcomes of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of in-house compounded bevacizumab.

METHODS

In this multicentric study performed from 2014 to 2018, patients who were injected with in-house compounded and sterilized bevacizumab were observed for endophthalmitis. In-house compounded syringes were prepared in compounding pharmacy using sterile standard operating guidelines. All cases of acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection were recorded and followed up for final anatomical and visual outcome after management.

RESULTS

A total of 50,361 bevacizumab injections were administered. Incidence of post-injection endophthalmitis was 0.0377%. Incidence of culture-positive endophthalmitis was 0.0178%, with 55.5% culture positivity for Staphylococcus species. A significant improvement in the final visual outcome was noted (p<0.05), and overall five patients (26.3%) achieved visual acuity of 6/18 or more.

CONCLUSIONS

In-house compounded injections of bevacizumab can reduce post-injection endophthalmitis to a minimum, with maintenance of proper asepsis and strict protocols by the compounding pharmacy.

[Treatment of postoperative endophthalmitis : Operate or only inject?]

BACKGROUND

Postoperative endophthalmitis is among the most feared complications encountered after intraocular surgery. A prompt diagnosis and initiation of treatment are crucial for the visual prognosis, which also depends on the causative microorganism. Despite advances in prevention and the availability of more epidemiological data, most of the evidence for treatment dates back to a single study, the early vitrectomy study (EVS) carried out in the early 1990s. The EVS showed that vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics was superior to intravitreal antibiotics alone, only when visual acuity was light perception or below. The addition of systemic antibiotics did not have any benefits. Over the last 30 years, however, surgical techniques have continued to evolve and the medicinal options have also been expanded. Moreover, the EVS examined only endophthalmitis after cataract surgery and strictly speaking the results cannot be transferred to endophthalmitis from other causes.

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses the current evidence for the different treatment modalities of the most important types of postoperative endophthalmitis.

CONCLUSION

The EVS provided important guidelines for the initial management of endophthalmitis and these guidelines remain relevant to this day; however, in view of the refinement of surgical techniques, novel treatment options, especially the nowadays continuously growing number of intravitreal injections and even some new antibiotics, it would be desirable if new controlled trials addressing the treatment of endophthalmitis would be performed.

Incidence of Acute Endophthalmitis After Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Lahore

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the incidence, management, and visual outcome of acute endophthalmitis in patients following intravitreal bevacizumab injection in a tertiary care setup. It was a prospective and single-center database study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients receiving intravitreal bevacizumab injections for various retinal vascular diseases from January 2019 to September 2020. The study was carried out at the Institute of Ophthalmology, Mayo Hospital, Lahore over a period of 21 months. Preformed bevacizumab injections were administered intravitreally on patients of various retinal vascular diseases under strict aseptic measures and by following the standard guidelines. The patients were put on follow-ups for a duration of four weeks to see any signs of acute endophthalmitis.

RESULTS

A total of 3051 injections were administered in 1104 eyes of 743 patients during the above-mentioned study period. The incidence of endophthalmitis was found to be 0.0328% (1/3051). The patient, who developed endophthalmitis, was treated with topical and intravitreal antibiotics followed by vitrectomy that resulted in clinically significant improvement in vision.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal bevacizumab injection was low and could be prevented by taking strict aseptic measures during administration.

The Impact of Physician Face Mask Use on Endophthalmitis After Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of physician face mask use on rates and outcomes of postinjection endophthalmitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative cohort study.

METHODS

Setting: Single-center. StudyPopulation: Eyes receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections from July 1, 2013, to September 1, 2019.

INTERVENTION

Cases were divided into "Face Mask" group if face masks were worn by the physician during intravitreal injections or "No Talking" group if no face mask was worn but a no-talking policy was observed during intravitreal injections. MainOutcomeMeasures: Rate of endophthalmitis, visual acuity, and microbial spectrum.

RESULTS

Of 483,622 intravitreal injections administered, 168 out of 453,460 (0.0371%) cases of endophthalmitis occurred in the No Talking group, and 9 out of 30,162 (0.0298%) cases occurred in the Face Mask group (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.57; P = .527). Sixteen cases of oral flora-associated endophthalmitis were found in the No Talking group (1 in 28,341 injections), compared to none in the Face Mask group (P = .302). Mean logMAR visual acuity at presentation in cases that developed culture-positive endophthalmitis was significantly worse in the No Talking group compared to the Face Mask group (17.1 lines lost from baseline acuity vs 13.4 lines lost; P = .031), though no difference was observed at 6 months after treatment (P = .479).

CONCLUSION

Physician face mask use did not influence the risk of postinjection endophthalmitis compared to a no-talking policy. However, no cases of oral flora-associated endophthalmitis occurred in the Face Mask group. Future studies are warranted to assess the role of face mask use to reduce endophthalmitis risk, particularly attributable to oral flora.

Endophthalmitis following Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: Changes in Incidence and Outcomes over a 9-Year Period

Aims: To evaluate whether the incidence, microbial spectrum, and visual outcomes of endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections have changed over time.Methods: Retrospective cohort study of endophthalmitis in eyes receiving intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor between 2009-2012 and 2016-2017 at a single, large retina practice.Results: A total of 283,315 injections resulted in 96 suspected infectious endophthalmitis cases. Comparing 2009-2012 and 2016-2017, the rate of suspected endophthalmitis changed from 1 in 2,663 injections to 1 in 3,195 injections (p = .37). Visual outcomes 6 months after endophthalmitis were significantly better during the latter period (p = .04), with an average loss of 6.3 lines of VA in 2009-2012 compared to a loss of 3.6 lines in 2016-2017. In multivariate analysis, a "no-talking" policy during injections resulted in a trend towards a decrease in endophthalmitis incidence (p = .08). Cessation of post-injection topical antibiotic use did not independently decrease endophthalmitis incidence (p = .24) when the effect of a "no-talking" policy was taken into account. A lower rate of endophthalmitis was seen after prefilled vs. conventionally prepared ranibizumab syringe use for injection (0.014% vs. 0.035%, respectively), though this difference did not meet statistical significance (p = .16).Conclusion: The incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection decreased and visual outcomes improved between the periods of 2009-2012 and 2016-2017. A "no-talking" policy during injections was associated with a trend toward a decrease in endophthalmitis rate.

Exogenous Fungal Endophthalmitis: Clues to Aspergillus Aetiology with a Pharmacological Perspective

Exogenous fungal endophthalmitis (EXFE) represents a rare complication after penetrating ocular trauma of previously unresolved keratitis or iatrogenic infections, following intraocular surgery such as cataract surgery. The usual latency period between intraocular inoculation and presentation of symptoms from fungal endophthalmitis is several weeks to months as delayed-onset endophthalmitis. Aspergillus spp., is the most common causative mould pathogen implicated in this ocular infection and early diagnosis and prompt antimicrobial treatment, concomitantly in most cases with expert surgical attention, reduce unfavorable complications and increase the possibility of eye function preservation. Topical, intravitreal and systemic antifungal molecules are the mainstay of a medical approach to the disease and azoles, polyenes and in particular cases echinocandins are the pharmacological classes most commonly used in clinical practice. This review discusses pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic of antifungal agents in their principal modes of administration with a focus on their ability to achieve high drug concentration in the vitreous and ocular tissues.

Intravitreal enzyme replacement inhibits progression of retinal degeneration in canine CLN2 neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

CLN2 neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis is a rare recessive hereditary retinal and neurodegenerative disease resulting from deleterious sequence variants in TPP1 that encodes the soluble lysosomal enzyme tripeptidyl peptidase-1 (TPP1). Children with this disorder develop normally, but starting at 2-4 years of age begin to exhibit neurological signs and visual deficits. Vision loss that progresses to blindness is associated with progressive retinal degeneration and impairment of retinal function. Similar progressive loss of retinal function and retinal degeneration occur in a dog CLN2 disease model with a TPP1 null sequence variant. Studies using the dog model were conducted to determine whether intravitreal injection of recombinant human TPP1 (rhTPP1) administered starting after onset of retinal functional impairment could slow or halt the progression of retinal functional decline and degeneration. TPP1-null dogs received intravitreal injections of rhTPP1 in one eye and vehicle in the other eye beginning at 23.5-25 weeks of age followed by second injections at 34-40 weeks in 3 out of 4 dogs. Ophthalmic exams, in vivo ocular imaging, and electroretinography (ERG) were repeated regularly to monitor retinal structure and function. Retinal histology was evaluated in eyes collected from these dogs when they were euthanized at end-stage neurological disease (40-45 weeks of age). Intravitreal rhTPP1 injections were effective in preserving retinal function (as measured with the electroretinogram) and retinal morphology for as long as 4 months after a single treatment. These findings indicate that intravitreal injection of rhTPP1 administered after partial loss of retinal function is an effective treatment for preserving retinal structure and function in canine CLN2 disease.

Comparative Safety of Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparative Studies

Background: Since the efficacy of ranibizumab (RBZ), bevacizumab (BVZ) and aflibercept (AFB) is comparable in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the long-term safety profiles of these agents, including ocular safety. Methods: Systematic review identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RBZ, BVZ and AFB directly published before March 2019. Serious ocular adverse events (SOAE) of special interest were endophthalmitis, pseudo-endophthalmitis, retinal pigment epithelium tear and newly identified macular atrophy. Results: Thirteen RCTs selected for meta-analysis (4952 patients, 8723 people-years follow-up): 10 compared RBZ vs. BVZ and three RBZ vs. AFB. There were no significant differences in almost all adverse events (systemic and ocular) between BVZ, RBZ and AFB in up to two years’ follow-up. Macular atrophy was reported heterogeneously and not reported as SOAE in most trials. Conclusions: Direct comparison of RBZ, BVZ and AFB safety profiles in the RCT network meta-analytical setting have not revealed a consistent benefit of these three commonly used anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in AMD. Network model ranking highlighted potential benefits of RBZ in terms of a systemic safety profile; however, this appears a hypothesis rather than a conclusion. Newly identified macular atrophy is underestimated in RCTs—future real-world data should be focused on SOAE.

Issues with Intravitreal Administration of Anti-VEGF Drugs

Purpose

To provide an update of summary of risk factors and side effects of long-term use and contamination of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

Methods

We reviewed relevant publications of the topic of contamination of anti-VEGF injections and long-term side effects due to this reason.

Results

Due to the long-term use of anti-VEGF drugs and the higher number of injections worldwide, various studies have shown side effects in recent years, ranging from increased intraocular pressure to visual disturbing silicone oil vesicles in the vitreous cavity. Several studies have demonstrated that both the drug and the processing, storage, environmental factors and the material and design of the syringes have a decisive influence on these side effects.

Conclusion

The risks of deposits from syringes in the eye can be significantly reduced by various optimizations in transport, storage and syringe and cannula selection.

Prophylaxis measures for postinjection endophthalmitis

Intravitreal injections have become the most commonly performed ophthalmic procedure, transforming modern retina practice. Postinjection endophthalmitis, while rare, remains the most feared potential complication. Prophylaxis measures including topical antisepsis, hand hygiene, gloves, masks, and drapes have all been proposed to help prevent postinjection endophthalmitis; however, there remains significant variation in protocol, given the lack of agreement among retina specialists on which steps are crucial to prevent endophthalmitis. With millions of injections performed annually, collating data have helped us better understand risk factors for endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection. We summarize the consensus guidelines for intravitreal injection technique and comprehensively review the literature on prevention of postinjection endophthalmitis.

Pro Re Nata Dexamethasone Implant for Treatment-Naive Phakic Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

To determine the utility and safety of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant as primary therapy (pro re nata [PRN]) in phakic eyes with early treatment-naive diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Prospective, case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with diabetes mellitus whose eyes were phakic and had early treatment-naive clinically significant macular edema.

METHODS

Patients whose eyes were phakic with DME (<3 months) were included if the central subfield thickness (CST) was >300 μm and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) between 0.3 and 1.0 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution. A comprehensive ocular and systemic examination was performed and the implant injected PRN using a standardized technique. Patients had follow-up at least monthly for 2 years. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze categorical variables in terms of size and proportions. The repeated-measures analysis of variance test was used to determine the change in CDVA, CST, intraocular pressure, and hard exudate area over time.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the determination of the change in CDVA at month 24 from baseline. Secondary outcome measures included determining the change in CST, median number of injections, proportion gaining 15 letters, and complications, if any.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients (85 males) were included. At 2 years, mean CDVA improved from 0.62 to 0.4 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution, and median CST improved from 397 to 236 μm. The median number of injections was 1.6. Cataract developed in 3 patients with a clear lens, and 31 patients required topical antiglaucoma therapy. Proliferative disease developed in 4 patients, which was managed with panretinal photocoagulation. None of the study patients required rescue therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with treatment-naive phakic eyes who had DME, primary therapy with the intravitreal dexamethasone implant PRN (for 2 years) resulted in significantly improved mean CDVA. A fifth of the patients required control of intraocular pressure, and new-onset cataract developed in 3 of 153 patients.