Cost of Pediatric Severe Sepsis Hospitalizations

Delays to Antibiotics in the Emergency Department and Risk of Mortality in Children With Sepsis

Importance

Pediatric consensus guidelines recommend antibiotic administration within 1 hour for septic shock and within 3 hours for sepsis without shock. Limited studies exist identifying a specific time past which delays in antibiotic administration are associated with worse outcomes.

Objective

To determine a time point for antibiotic administration that is associated with increased risk of mortality among pediatric patients with sepsis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study used data from 51 US children's hospitals in the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes collaborative. Participants included patients aged 29 days to less than 18 years with sepsis recognized within 1 hour of emergency department arrival, from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2021. Piecewise regression was used to identify the inflection point for sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality, and logistic regression was used to evaluate odds of sepsis-attributable mortality after adjustment for potential confounders. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to February 2024.

Exposure

The number of minutes from emergency department arrival to antibiotic administration.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality. Sepsis-attributable 30-day mortality was a secondary outcome.

Results

A total of 19 515 cases (median [IQR] age, 6 [2-12] years) were included. The median (IQR) time to antibiotic administration was 69 (47-116) minutes. The estimated time to antibiotic administration at which 3-day sepsis-attributable mortality increased was 330 minutes. Patients who received an antibiotic in less than 330 minutes (19 164 patients) had sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality of 0.5% (93 patients) and 30-day mortality of 0.9% (163 patients). Patients who received antibiotics at 330 minutes or later (351 patients) had 3-day sepsis-attributable mortality of 1.2% (4 patients), 30-day mortality of 2.0% (7 patients), and increased adjusted odds of mortality at both 3 days (odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.20-9.93; P = .02) and 30 days (odds ratio, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.59-8.30; P = .002) compared with those who received antibiotics within 330 minutes.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort of pediatric patients with sepsis, 3-day and 30-day sepsis-attributable mortality increased with delays in antibiotic administration 330 minutes or longer from emergency department arrival. These findings are consistent with the literature demonstrating increased pediatric sepsis mortality associated with antibiotic administration delay. To guide the balance of appropriate resource allocation with time for adequate diagnostic evaluation, further research is needed into whether there are subpopulations, such as those with shock or bacteremia, that may benefit from earlier antibiotics.

Host gene expression signatures to identify infection type and organ dysfunction in children evaluated for sepsis: a multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is defined as dysregulated host response to infection that leads to life-threatening organ dysfunction. Biomarkers characterising the dysregulated host response in sepsis are lacking. We aimed to develop host gene expression signatures to predict organ dysfunction in children with bacterial or viral infection.

METHODS

This cohort study was done in emergency departments and intensive care units of four hospitals in Queensland, Australia, and recruited children aged 1 month to 17 years who, upon admission, underwent a diagnostic test, including blood cultures, for suspected sepsis. Whole-blood RNA sequencing of blood was performed with Illumina NovaSeq (San Diego, CA, USA). Samples with completed phenotyping, monitoring, and RNA extraction by March 31, 2020, were included in the discovery cohort; samples collected or completed thereafter and by Oct 27, 2021, constituted the Rapid Paediatric Infection Diagnosis in Sepsis (RAPIDS) internal validation cohort. An external validation cohort was assembled from RNA sequencing gene expression count data from the observational European Childhood Life-threatening Infectious Disease Study (EUCLIDS), which recruited children with severe infection in nine European countries between 2012 and 2016. Feature selection approaches were applied to derive novel gene signatures for disease class (bacterial vs viral infection) and disease severity (presence vs absence of organ dysfunction 24 h post-sampling). The primary endpoint was the presence of organ dysfunction 24 h after blood sampling in the presence of confirmed bacterial versus viral infection. Gene signature performance is reported as area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and 95% CI.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 25, 2017, and Oct 27, 2021, 907 patients were enrolled. Blood samples from 595 patients were included in the discovery cohort, and samples from 312 children were included in the RAPIDS validation cohort. We derived a ten-gene disease class signature that achieved an AUC of 94·1% (95% CI 90·6-97·7) in distinguishing bacterial from viral infections in the RAPIDS validation cohort. A ten-gene disease severity signature achieved an AUC of 82·2% (95% CI 76·3-88·1) in predicting organ dysfunction within 24 h of sampling in the RAPIDS validation cohort. Used in tandem, the disease class and disease severity signatures predicted organ dysfunction within 24 h of sampling with an AUC of 90·5% (95% CI 83·3-97·6) for patients with predicted bacterial infection and 94·7% (87·8-100·0) for patients with predicted viral infection. In the external EUCLIDS validation dataset (n=362), the disease class and disease severity predicted organ dysfunction at time of sampling with an AUC of 70·1% (95% CI 44·1-96·2) for patients with predicted bacterial infection and 69·6% (53·1-86·0) for patients with predicted viral infection.

INTERPRETATION

In children evaluated for sepsis, novel host transcriptomic signatures specific for bacterial and viral infection can identify dysregulated host response leading to organ dysfunction.

FUNDING

Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund Genomic Health Futures Mission, Children's Hospital Foundation Queensland, Brisbane Diamantina Health Partners, Emergency Medicine Foundation, Gold Coast Hospital Foundation, Far North Queensland Foundation, Townsville Hospital and Health Services SERTA Grant, and Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre.

Impact of a Coordinated Sepsis Response on Time to Treatment in a Pediatric Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is responsible for 75 000 pediatric hospitalizations annually, with an associated mortality rate estimated between 11% and 19%. Evidence supports the use of timely fluid resuscitation and antibiotics to decrease morbidity and mortality. Our emergency department did not meet the timeliness goals for fluid and antibiotic administration suggested by the 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign.

METHODS

In November 2018, we implemented a sepsis response team utilizing a scripted communication tool and a dedicated sepsis supply cart to address timeliness barriers. Performance was evaluated using statistical process control charts. We conducted observations to evaluate adherence to the new process. Our aim was to meet the Surviving Sepsis Campaign's timeliness goals for first fluid and antibiotic administration (20 and 60 minutes, respectively) within 8 months of our intervention.

RESULTS

We observed sustained decreases in mean time to fluids. We also observed a shift in the proportion of patients receiving fluids within 20 minutes. No shifts were observed for timely antibiotic administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a dedicated emergency department sepsis response team with designated roles and responsibilities, directed communication, and easily accessible supplies can lead to improvements in the timeliness of fluid administration in the pediatric population.

Sociodemographic Factors are Associated with Care Delivery and Outcomes in Pediatric Severe Sepsis

IMPORTANCE

Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and disparate outcomes exist between racial/ethnic groups despite improvements in sepsis management. These observed differences are often related to social determinants of health (SDoH). Little is known about the role of SDoH on outcomes in pediatric sepsis.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the differences in care delivery and outcomes in children with severe sepsis based on race/ethnicity and neighborhood context (as measured by the social vulnerability index).

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective, cross-sectional study was completed in a quaternary care children's hospital. Patients 18 years old or younger who were admitted between May 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022, met the improving pediatric sepsis outcomes (IPSO) collaborative definition for severe sepsis. Composite measures of social vulnerability, care delivery, and clinical outcomes were stratified by race/ethnicity.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome of interest was admission to the PICU. Secondary outcomes were sepsis recognition and early goal-directed therapy (EGDT).

RESULTS

A total of 967 children met the criteria for IPSO-defined severe sepsis, of whom 53.4% were White/non-Hispanic. Nearly half of the cohort (48.7%) required PICU admission. There was no difference in illness severity at PICU admission by race (1.01 vs. 1.1, p = 0.18). Non-White race/Hispanic ethnicity was independently associated with PICU admission (odds ratio [OR] 1.35 [1.01-1.8], p = 0.04). Although social vulnerability was not independently associated with PICU admission (OR 0.95 [0.59-1.53], p = 0.83), non-White children were significantly more likely to reside in vulnerable neighborhoods (0.66 vs. 0.38, p < 0.001). Non-White race was associated with lower sepsis recognition (87.8% vs. 93.6%, p = 0.002) and less EGDT compliance (35.7% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Non-White race/ethnicity was independently associated with PICU admission. Differences in care delivery were also identified. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate these findings.

Multiuser immersive virtual reality simulation for interprofessional sepsis recognition and management

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is a leading cause of pediatric mortality. While there has been significant effort toward improving adherence to evidence-based care, gaps remain. Immersive multiuser virtual reality (MUVR) simulation may be an approach to enhance provider clinical competency and situation awareness for sepsis.

METHODS

A prospective, observational pilot of an interprofessional MUVR simulation assessing a decompensating patient from sepsis was conducted from January to June 2021. The study objective was to establish validity and acceptability evidence for the platform by assessing differences in sepsis recognition between experienced and novice participants. Interprofessional teams assessed and managed a patient together in the same VR experience with the primary outcome of time to recognition of sepsis utilizing the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique analyzed using a logistic regression model. Secondary outcomes were perceived clinical accuracy, relevancy to practice, and side effects experienced.

RESULTS

Seventy-two simulations included 144 participants. The cumulative odds ratio of recognizing sepsis at 2 min into the simulation in comparison to later time points by experienced versus novice providers were significantly higher with a cumulative odds ratio of 3.70 (95% confidence interval: 1.15-9.07, p = .004). Participants agreed that the simulation was clinically accurate (98.6%) and will impact their practice (81.1%), with a high degree of immersion (95.7%-99.3%), and the majority of side effects were perceived as mild (70.4%-81.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel MUVR simulation demonstrated significant differences in sepsis recognition between experienced and novice participants. This validity evidence along with the data on the simulation's acceptability supports expanded use in training and assessment.

International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock

Importance

Sepsis is a leading cause of death among children worldwide. Current pediatric-specific criteria for sepsis were published in 2005 based on expert opinion. In 2016, the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) defined sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, but it excluded children.

Objective

To update and evaluate criteria for sepsis and septic shock in children.

Evidence Review

The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) convened a task force of 35 pediatric experts in critical care, emergency medicine, infectious diseases, general pediatrics, nursing, public health, and neonatology from 6 continents. Using evidence from an international survey, systematic review and meta-analysis, and a new organ dysfunction score developed based on more than 3 million electronic health record encounters from 10 sites on 4 continents, a modified Delphi consensus process was employed to develop criteria.

Findings

Based on survey data, most pediatric clinicians used sepsis to refer to infection with life-threatening organ dysfunction, which differed from prior pediatric sepsis criteria that used systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, which have poor predictive properties, and included the redundant term, severe sepsis. The SCCM task force recommends that sepsis in children be identified by a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points in children with suspected infection, which indicates potentially life-threatening dysfunction of the respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological systems. Children with a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points had in-hospital mortality of 7.1% in higher-resource settings and 28.5% in lower-resource settings, more than 8 times that of children with suspected infection not meeting these criteria. Mortality was higher in children who had organ dysfunction in at least 1 of 4-respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological-organ systems that was not the primary site of infection. Septic shock was defined as children with sepsis who had cardiovascular dysfunction, indicated by at least 1 cardiovascular point in the Phoenix Sepsis Score, which included severe hypotension for age, blood lactate exceeding 5 mmol/L, or need for vasoactive medication. Children with septic shock had an in-hospital mortality rate of 10.8% and 33.5% in higher- and lower-resource settings, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

The Phoenix sepsis criteria for sepsis and septic shock in children were derived and validated by the international SCCM Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force using a large international database and survey, systematic review and meta-analysis, and modified Delphi consensus approach. A Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 identified potentially life-threatening organ dysfunction in children younger than 18 years with infection, and its use has the potential to improve clinical care, epidemiological assessment, and research in pediatric sepsis and septic shock around the world.

Sepsis epidemiology in Australan and New Zealand children (SENTINEL): protocol for a multicountry prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis affects 25.2 million children per year globally and causes 3.4 million deaths, with an annual cost of hospitalisation in the USA of US$7.3 billion. Despite being common, severe and expensive, therapies and outcomes from sepsis have not substantially changed in decades. Variable case definitions, lack of a reference standard for diagnosis and broad spectrum of disease hamper efforts to evaluate therapies that may improve sepsis outcomes. This landscape analysis of community-acquired childhood sepsis in Australia and New Zealand will characterise the burden of disease, including incidence, severity, outcomes and cost. Sepsis diagnostic criteria and risk stratification tools will be prospectively evaluated. Sepsis therapies, quality of care, parental awareness and understanding of sepsis and parent-reported outcome measures will be described. Understanding these aspects of sepsis care is fundamental for the design and conduct of interventional trials to improve childhood sepsis outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This prospective observational study will include children up to 18 years of age presenting to 12 emergency departments with suspected sepsis within the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative network in Australia and New Zealand. Presenting characteristics, management and outcomes will be collected. These will include vital signs, serum biomarkers, clinician assessment of severity of disease, intravenous fluid administration for the first 24 hours of hospitalisation, organ support therapies delivered, antimicrobial use, microbiological diagnoses, hospital and intensive care unit length-of-stay, mortality censored at hospital discharge or 30 days from enrolment (whichever comes first) and parent-reported outcomes 90 days from enrolment. We will use these data to determine sepsis epidemiology based on existing and novel diagnostic criteria. We will also validate existing and novel sepsis risk stratification criteria, characterise antimicrobial stewardship, guideline adherence, cost and report parental awareness and understanding of sepsis and parent-reported outcome measures.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was received from the Royal Children's Hospital of Melbourne, Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/69948/RCHM-2021). This included incorporated informed consent for follow-up. The findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at academic conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12621000920897; Pre-results.

Pediatric Sepsis Diagnosis, Management, and Sub-phenotypes

Sepsis and septic shock are major causes of morbidity, mortality, and health care costs for children worldwide, including >3 million deaths annually and, among survivors, risk for new or worsening functional impairments, including reduced quality of life, new respiratory, nutritional, or technological assistance, and recurrent severe infections. Advances in understanding sepsis pathophysiology highlight a need to update the definition and diagnostic criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock, whereas new data support an increasing role for automated screening algorithms and biomarker combinations to assist earlier recognition. Once sepsis or septic shock is suspected, attention to prompt initiation of broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobial therapy, fluid resuscitation, and vasoactive medications remain key components to initial management with several new and ongoing studies offering new insights into how to optimize this approach. Ultimately, a key goal is for screening to encompass as many children as possible at risk for sepsis and trigger early treatment without increasing unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics and preventable hospitalizations. Although the role for adjunctive treatment with corticosteroids and other metabolic therapies remains incompletely defined, ongoing studies will soon offer updated guidance for optimal use. Finally, we are increasingly moving toward an era in which precision therapeutics will bring novel strategies to improve outcomes, especially for the subset of children with sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and sepsis subphenotypes for whom antibiotics, fluid, vasoactive medications, and supportive care remain insufficient.

A nomogram to predict 28-day mortality in neonates with sepsis: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-III database

Background

Sepsis is the second-leading cause of death in neonates. We established a predictive nomogram to identify critically ill neonates early and reduce the time to treatment.

Methods

It is a retrospective case-control study based on the MIMIC-III database. The study population comprised 924 neonates diagnosed with sepsis.

Results

Neonates with sepsis included in the MIMIC-III database were enrolled, including 880 surviving neonates and 44 neonates who died. In the derivation dataset, stepwise regression and the Lasso algorithm were employed to select predictive variables, and the neonatal sequential organ failure assessment score (nSOFA) was calculated simultaneously. Bootstrap resampling was utilized to perform internal validation. The results indicated that the Lasso algorithm displayed superior discrimination, sensitivity, and specificity relative to stepwise regression and nSOFA scores. After 500 bootstrap resampling tests, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the Lasso algorithm was 0.912 (95% CI: 0.870-0.977). The nomogram based on the Lasso algorithm outperformed stepwise regression and nSOFA scores in terms of calibration and the clinical net benefit. This nomogram can assist in prognosticating neonatal severe sepsis and aid in guiding clinical practice while concurrently improving patient outcomes.

Conclusions

The established nomogram revealed that jaundice, corticosteroid use, weight, serum calcium, inotropes and base excess are all important predictors of 28-day mortality in neonates with sepsis. This nomogram can facilitate the early identification of neonates with severe sepsis. However, it still requires further modification and external validation to make it widely available.

Detrimental effects of PCSK9 loss-of-function in the pediatric host response to sepsis are mediated through independent influence on Angiopoietin-1

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is associated with significant mortality. Yet, there are no efficacious therapies beyond antibiotics. PCSK9 loss-of-function (LOF) and inhibition, through enhanced low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) mediated endotoxin clearance, holds promise as a potential therapeutic approach among adults. In contrast, we have previously demonstrated higher mortality in the juvenile host. Given the potential pleiotropic effects of PCSK9 on the endothelium, beyond canonical effects on serum lipoproteins, both of which may influence sepsis outcomes, we sought to test the influence of PCSK9 LOF genotype on endothelial dysfunction.

METHODS

Secondary analyses of a prospective observational cohort of pediatric septic shock. Genetic variants of PCSK9 and LDLR genes, serum PCSK9, and lipoprotein concentrations were determined previously. Endothelial dysfunction markers were measured in day 1 serum. We conducted multivariable linear regression to test the influence of PCSK9 LOF genotype on endothelial markers, adjusted for age, complicated course, and low- and high-density lipoproteins (LDL and HDL). Causal mediation analyses to test impact of select endothelial markers on the association between PCSK9 LOF genotype and mortality. Juvenile Pcsk9 null and wildtype mice were subject to cecal slurry sepsis and endothelial markers were quantified.

RESULTS

A total of 474 patients were included. PCSK9 LOF was associated with several markers of endothelial dysfunction, with strengthening of associations after exclusion of those homozygous for the rs688 LDLR variant that renders it insensitive to PCSK9. Serum PCSK9 was not correlated with endothelial dysfunction. PCSK9 LOF influenced concentrations of Angiopoietin-1 (Angpt-1) upon adjusting for potential confounders including lipoprotein concentrations, with false discovery adjusted p value of 0.042 and 0.013 for models that included LDL and HDL, respectively. Causal mediation analysis demonstrated that the effect of PCSK9 LOF on mortality was mediated by Angpt-1 (p = 0.0008). Murine data corroborated these results with lower Angpt-1 and higher soluble thrombomodulin among knockout mice with sepsis relative to the wildtype.

CONCLUSIONS

We present genetic and biomarker association data that suggest a potential direct role of the PCSK9-LDLR pathway on Angpt-1 in the developing host with septic shock and warrant external validation. Further, mechanistic studies on the role of PCSK9-LDLR pathway on vascular homeostasis may lead to the development of pediatric-specific sepsis therapies.

Implementing Pediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines: Improving Compliance With Lactate Measurement in the PICU

The 2020 pediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign (pSSC) recommends measuring lactate during the first hour of resuscitation for severe sepsis/shock. We aimed to improve compliance with this recommendation for patients who develop severe sepsis/shock while admitted to the PICU.

DESIGN

Structured, quality improvement initiative.

SETTING

Single-center, 26-bed, quaternary-care PICU.

PATIENTS

All patients with PICU-onset severe sepsis/shock from December 2018 to December 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Creation of a multidisciplinary local sepsis improvement team, education program targeting frontline providers (nurse practitioners, resident physicians), and peer-to-peer nursing education program with feedback to key stakeholders.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome measure was compliance with obtaining a lactate measurement within 60 minutes of the onset of severe sepsis/shock originating in our PICU using a local Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes database and definitions. The process measure was time to first lactate measurement. Secondary outcomes included number of IV antibiotic days, number of vasoactive days, number of ICU days, and number of ventilator days. A total of 166 unique PICU-onset severe sepsis/shock events and 156 unique patients were included. One year after implementation of our first interventions with subsequent Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, overall compliance increased from 38% to 47% (24% improvement) and time to first lactate decreased from 175 to 94 minutes (46% improvement). Using a statistical process control I chart, the preshift mean for time to first lactate measurement was noted to be 179 minutes and the postshift mean was noted to be 81 minutes demonstrating a 55% improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This multidisciplinary approach led to improvement in time to first lactate measurement, an important step toward attaining our target of lactate measurement within 60 minutes of septic shock identification. Improving compliance is necessary for understanding implications of the 2020 pSSC guidelines on sepsis morbidity and mortality.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Young Adult Patients with Severe Sepsis Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Units Versus Medical/Surgical Intensive Care Units

Purpose: Young adults receive severe sepsis treatment across pediatric and adult care settings. However, little is known about young adult sepsis outcome differences in pediatric versus adult hospital settings. Material and Methods: Using Truven MarketScan database from 2010-2015, we compared in-hospital mortality and hospital length of stay in young adults ages 18-26 treated for severe sepsis in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) versus Medical ICUs (MICUs)/Surgical ICUs (SICUs) using logistic regression models and accelerated time failure models, respectively. Comorbidities were identified using Complex Chronic Conditions (CCC) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results: Of the 18 900 young adults hospitalized with severe sepsis, 163 (0.9%) were treated in the PICU and 952 (5.0%) in the MICU/SICU. PICU patients were more likely to have a comorbid condition compared to MICU/SICU patients. Compared to PICU patients, MICU/SICU patients had a lower odds of in-hospital mortality after adjusting for age, sex, Medicaid status, and comorbidities (adjusting for CCC, odds ratio [OR]: 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.89; adjusting for CCI, OR: 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.94). There was no difference in adjusted length of stay for young adults with severe sepsis (adjusting for CCC, Event Time Ratio [ETR]: 1.14, 95% CI 0.94-1.38; adjusting for CCI, ETR: 1.09, 95% CI 0.90-1.33). Conclusions: Young adults with severe sepsis experience higher adjusted odds of mortality when treated in PICUs versus MICU/SICUs. However, there was no difference in length of stay. Variation in mortality is likely due to significant differences in the patient populations, including comorbidity status.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Sepsis Presenting in Inpatient Pediatric Settings

OBJECTIVE

The pediatric sepsis literature lacks studies examining the inpatient setting, yet sepsis remains a leading cause of death in children's hospitals. More information is needed about sepsis arising in patients already hospitalized to improve morbidity and mortality outcomes. This study describes the clinical characteristics, process measures, and outcomes of inpatient sepsis cases compared with emergency department (ED) sepsis cases within the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes data registry from 46 hospitals that care for children.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes sepsis cases from January 2017 to December 2019 with onset in inpatient or ED. We used descriptive statistics to compare inpatient and ED sepsis metrics and describe inpatient sepsis outcomes.

RESULTS

The cohort included 26 855 cases; 8.4% were inpatient and 91.6% were ED. Inpatient cases had higher sepsis-attributable mortality (2.0% vs 1.4%, P = .025), longer length of stay after sepsis recognition (9 vs 5 days, P <.001), more intensive care admissions (57.6% vs 54.1%, P = .002), and greater average vasopressor use (18.0% vs 13.6%, P <.001) compared with ED. In the inpatient cohort, >40% of cases had a time from arrival to recognition within 12 hours. In 21% of cases, this time was >96 hours. Improved adherence to sepsis treatment bundles over time was associated with improved 30-day sepsis-attributable mortality for inpatients with sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient sepsis cases had longer lengths of stay, more need for intensive care, and higher vasopressor use. Sepsis-attributable mortality was significantly higher in inpatient cases compared with ED cases and improved with improved sepsis bundle adherence.

Automated digital technologies for supporting sepsis prediction in children: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

While there have been several literature reviews on the performance of digital sepsis prediction technologies and clinical decision-support algorithms for adults, there remains a knowledge gap in examining the development of automated technologies for sepsis prediction in children. This scoping review will critically analyse the current evidence on the design and performance of automated digital technologies to predict paediatric sepsis, to advance their development and integration within clinical settings.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review will follow Arksey and O'Malley's framework, conducted between February and December 2022. We will further develop the protocol using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. We plan to search the following databases: Association of Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Google Scholar, Institute of Electric and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Studies will be included on children >90 days postnatal to <21 years old, predicted to have or be at risk of developing sepsis by a digitalised model or algorithm designed for a clinical setting. Two independent reviewers will complete the abstract and full-text screening and the data extraction. Thematic analysis will be used to develop overarching concepts and present the narrative findings with quantitative results and descriptive statistics displayed in data tables.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval for this scoping review study of the available literature is not required. We anticipate that the scoping review will identify the current evidence and design characteristics of digital prediction technologies for the timely and accurate prediction of paediatric sepsis and factors influencing clinical integration. We plan to disseminate the preliminary findings from this review at national and international research conferences in global and digital health, gathering critical feedback from multidisciplinary stakeholders. SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/veqha/?view_only=f560d4892d7c459ea4cff6dcdfacb086.

Implementation of an Automated Sepsis Screening Tool in a Children's Hospital Emergency Department: A Cost Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of implementation of an automated sepsis screening tool on the median cost of affected patient encounters.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study used propensity score-matched comparison groups to assess the difference in median cost for comparable affected patient encounters before and after the implementation of an automated sepsis screening tool in a large US children's hospital emergency department (ED) with >90 000 annual visits. All patient encounters in 2018 impacted by the automated sepsis screening tool were included and compared with a propensity score-matched comparison group drawn from patient encounters in 2012 that might have been affected by the screening tool had it been active at that time. The main outcome was the change in the median cost for comparable affected patient encounters.

RESULTS

The overall median cost for those affected by an automated sepsis screening tool decreased by 21.2%, from $6454 (IQR, $968-$21 697) to $5084 (IQR, $802-$16 618). The median cost for encounters with an associated International Classification of Diseases sepsis code decreased by 51.1%, from $58 685 (IQR, $32 224-$134 895) to $28 672 (IQR, $16 796-$60 657).

CONCLUSIONS

The median cost for comparable patient encounters decreased with implementation of an automated sepsis screening tool in the pediatric ED. Costs were decreased even more substantially for patients with sepsis. In addition to improving outcomes, an automated sepsis screening tool appears to be at least cost-effective and may be cost-saving, an incentive for more widespread use of this technology.

New and Progressive Medical Conditions After Pediatric Sepsis Hospitalization Requiring Critical Care

Importance

Children commonly experience physical, cognitive, or emotional sequelae after sepsis. However, little is known about the development or progression of medical conditions after pediatric sepsis.

Objective

To quantify the development and progression of 4 common conditions in the 6 months after sepsis and to assess whether they differed after hospitalization for sepsis vs nonsepsis among critically ill children.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study of 101 511 children (<19 years) with sepsis or nonsepsis hospitalization used a national administrative claims database (January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2018). Data management and analysis were conducted from April 1, 2020, to July 7, 2022.

Exposures

Intensive care unit hospitalization for sepsis vs all-cause intensive care unit hospitalizations, excluding sepsis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were the development of 4 target conditions (chronic respiratory failure, seizure disorder, supplemental nutritional dependence, and chronic kidney disease) within 6 months of hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were the progression of the 4 target conditions among children with the condition before hospitalization. Outcomes were identified via diagnostic and procedural codes, durable medical equipment codes, and prescription medications. Differences in the development and the progression of conditions between pediatric patients with sepsis and pediatric patients with nonsepsis who survived intensive care unit hospitalization were assessed using logistic regression with matching weights.

Results

A total of 5150 survivors of pediatric sepsis and 96 361 survivors of nonsepsis intensive care unit hospitalizations were identified; 2593 (50.3%) were female. The median age was 9.5 years (IQR, 3-15 years) in the sepsis cohort and 7 years (IQR, 2-13 years) in the nonsepsis cohort. Of the 5150 sepsis survivors, 670 (13.0%) developed a new target condition, and 385 of 1834 (21.0%) with a preexisting target condition had disease progression. A total of 998 of the 5150 survivors (19.4%) had development and/or progression of at least 1 condition. New conditions were more common among sepsis vs nonsepsis hospitalizations (new chronic respiratory failure: 4.6% vs 1.9%; odds ratio [OR], 2.54 [95% CI, 2.19-2.94]; new supplemental nutritional dependence: 7.9% vs 2.7%; OR, 3.17 [95% CI, 2.80-3.59]; and new chronic kidney disease: 1.1% vs 0.6%; OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.25-2.19]). New seizure disorder was less common (4.6% vs 6.0%; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66-0.89]). Progressive supplemental nutritional dependence was more common (1.5% vs 0.5%; OR, 2.95 [95% CI, 1.60-5.42]), progressive epilepsy was less common (33.7% vs 40.6%; OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.65-0.86]), and progressive respiratory failure (4.4% vs 3.3%; OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.89-2.04]) and progressive chronic kidney disease (7.9% vs 9.2%; OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.18-3.91]) were similar among survivors of sepsis vs nonsepsis admitted to an intensive care unit.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this national cohort of critically ill children who survived sepsis, 1 in 5 developed or had progression of a condition of interest after sepsis hospitalization, suggesting survivors of pediatric sepsis may benefit from structured follow-up to identify and treat new or worsening medical comorbid conditions.

"These Are Our Kids": Qualitative Interviews With Clinical Leaders in General Emergency Departments on Motivations, Processes, and Guidelines in Pediatric Sepsis Care

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Sepsis is a leading cause of pediatric death requiring emergency resuscitation. Most children with sepsis are treated in general emergency departments (EDs); however, research has focused on pediatric EDs. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators to pediatric sepsis care in general EDs, including care processes, the role of guidelines, and incentivized metrics.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with key informant physician and nurse leaders overseeing pediatric sepsis in general EDs in 2021, including medical directors, nurse managers, and quality coordinators. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using deductive domains based on steps of sepsis care, pediatric readiness, and structural dynamics. Domains were analyzed across interviews in matrices, using thematic analysis within domains.

RESULTS

Twenty-one clinical leaders representing 26 hospitals, including trauma levels I to IV, were interviewed. The themes included the following: (1) motivation to improve pediatric sepsis care based on moral imperative and location; (2) need for actionable pediatric sepsis guidelines; (3) children's hospitals' role in education, protocols, transfer, and consultation; and (4) mixed feelings about reportable metrics, particularly in EDs with low pediatric volume. Sepsis care process challenges included diagnosis, intravenous access, and antibiotic delivery but varied among hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Leaders in general EDs were motivated to provide high-quality pediatric sepsis care but disagreed on whether reportable metrics would drive improvements. They universally sought direct support from their nearest children's hospitals and actionable guidelines. Efforts to address pediatric sepsis quality in general EDs should prioritize guideline design, responsive pediatric transfer and consultation systems, and locally specific process improvement.

Validation of the Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions in the Pediatric Emergency Department

IMPORTANCE

Pediatric sepsis definitions have evolved, and some have proposed using the measure used in adults to quantify organ dysfunction, a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or more in the setting of suspected infection. A pediatric adaptation of SOFA (pSOFA) showed excellent discrimination for mortality in critically ill children but has not been evaluated in an emergency department (ED) population.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate test characteristics of the pSOFA score for predicting in-hospital mortality among (1) all patients and (2) patients with suspected infection treated in pediatric EDs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study took place from January 1, 2012, to January 31, 2020 in 9 US children's hospitals included in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Registry. The data was analyzed from February 1, 2020, to April 18, 2022. All ED visits for patients younger than 18 years were included.

EXPOSURES

ED pSOFA score was assigned by summing maximum pSOFA organ dysfunction components during ED stay (each 0-4 points). In the subset with suspected infection, visit meeting criteria for sepsis (suspected infection with a pSOFA score of 2 or more) and septic shock (suspected infection with vasoactive infusion and serum lactate level >18.0 mg/dL) were identified.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Test characteristics of pSOFA scores of 2 or more during the ED stay for hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 3 999 528 (female, 47.3%) ED visits were included. pSOFA scores ranged from 0 to 16, with 126 250 visits (3.2%) having a pSOFA score of 2 or more. pSOFA scores of 2 or more had sensitivity of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62-0.67) and specificity of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97-0.97), with negative predictive value of 1.0 (95% CI, 1.00-1.00) in predicting hospital mortality. Of 642 868 patients with suspected infection (16.1%), 42 992 (6.7%) met criteria for sepsis, and 374 (0.1%) met criteria for septic shock. Hospital mortality rates for suspected infection (599 502), sepsis (42 992), and septic shock (374) were 0.0%, 0.9%, and 8.0%, respectively. The pSOFA score had similar discrimination for hospital mortality in all ED visits (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.79-0.82) and the subset with suspected infection (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.80-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In a large, multicenter study of pediatric ED visits, a pSOFA score of 2 or more was uncommon and associated with increased hospital mortality yet had poor sensitivity as a screening tool for hospital mortality. Conversely, children with a pSOFA score of 2 or less were at very low risk of death, with high specificity and negative predictive value. Among patients with suspected infection, patients with pSOFA-defined septic shock demonstrated the highest mortality.

Health Resource Use in Survivors of Pediatric Septic Shock in the United States

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate postdischarge health resource use in pediatric survivors of septic shock and determine patient and hospitalization factors associated with health resource use.

DESIGN

Secondary analyses of a multicenter prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Twelve academic PICUs.

PATIENTS

Children greater than or equal to 1 month and less than 18 years old hospitalized for community-acquired septic shock who survived to 1 year.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For 308/338 patients (91%) with baseline and greater than or equal to one postdischarge survey, we evaluated readmission, emergency department (ED) visits, new medication class, and new device class use during the year after sepsis. Using negative binomial regression with bidirectional stepwise selection, we identified factors associated with each outcome. Median age was 7 years (interquartile range, 2-13), 157 (51%) had a chronic condition, and nearly all patients had insurance (private [n = 135; 44%] or government [n = 157; 51%]). During the year after sepsis, 128 patients (42%) were readmitted, 145 (47%) had an ED visit, 156 (51%) started a new medication class, and 102 (33%) instituted a new device class. Having a complex chronic condition was independently associated with readmission and ED visit. Documented infection and higher sum of Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction--2 hematologic score were associated with readmission, whereas younger age and having a noncomplex chronic condition were associated with ED visit. Factors associated with new medication class use were private insurance, neurologic insult, and longer PICU stays. Factors associated with new device class use were preadmission chemotherapy or radiotherapy, presepsis Functional Status Scale score, and ventilation duration greater than or equal to 10 days. Of patients who had a new medication or device class, most had a readmission (56% and 61%) or ED visit (62% and 67%).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with septic shock represent a high-risk cohort with high-resource needs after discharge. Interventions and targeted outcomes to mitigate postdischarge resource use may differ based on patients' preexisting conditions.

Pediatric Septic Shock Collaborative Improves Emergency Department Sepsis Care in Children

OBJECTIVES

The pediatric emergency department (ED)-based Pediatric Septic Shock Collaborative (PSSC) aimed to improve mortality and key care processes among children with presumed septic shock.

METHODS

This was a multicenter learning and improvement collaborative of 19 pediatric EDs from November 2013 to May 2016 with shared screening and patient identification recommendations, bundles of care, and educational materials. Process metrics included minutes to initial vital sign assessment and to first and third fluid bolus and antibiotic administration. Outcomes included 3- and 30-day all-cause in-hospital mortality, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, hours on increased ventilation (including new and increases from chronic baseline in invasive and noninvasive ventilation), and hours on vasoactive agent support. Analysis used statistical process control charts and included both the overall sample and an ICU subgroup.

RESULTS

Process improvements were noted in timely vital sign assessment and receipt of antibiotics in the overall group. Timely first bolus and antibiotics improved in the ICU subgroup. There was a decrease in 30-day all-cause in-hospital mortality in the overall sample.

CONCLUSIONS

A multicenter pediatric ED improvement collaborative showed improvement in key processes for early sepsis management and demonstrated that a bundled quality improvement-focused approach to sepsis management can be effective in improving care.

Utility of specific laboratory biomarkers to predict severe sepsis in pediatric patients with SIRS

OBJECTIVE

To identify the association between readily available laboratory biomarkers and the development of severe sepsis in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, ED patient encounters from June 2018 to June 2019 that triggered an automated sepsis alert based on SIRS criteria were analyzed. Encounters were included if the patient had any of the following laboratory tests sent within 6 h of ED arrival: C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), lactic acid, and procalcitonin. For each of the biomarkers, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was created for our primary outcome, severe sepsis within 24 h of ED disposition, and our secondary outcome, severe sepsis with a positive bacterial culture. For each ROC curve, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and created cutoff points to achieve 90% sensitivity and 90% sensitivity for the primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 4349/61,195 (7.1%) encounters triggered an automated sepsis alert. Of those, 1207/4349 (27.8%) had one of the candidate biomarkers sent within 6 h of ED arrival and were included in the study. A total of 100/1207 (8.3%) met criteria for severe sepsis within 24 h of arrival, and 41/100 severe sepsis cases (41%) were deemed culture-positive. Procalcitonin had the highest AUC for identifying severe sepsis [0.62 (95% CI 0.52-0.73)] while ESR and CRP had the highest AUC for culture-positive sepsis [0.68 (95% CI 0.47-0.89) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.53-0.81), respectively]. At 90% sensitivity for detecting severe sepsis, all of the biomarker threshold values fell within that laboratory test's normal range. At 90% specificity for severe sepsis, threshold values were as follows: procalcitonin 2.72 ng/mL, CRP 16.79 mg/dL, ESR 79.5 mm/h and lactic acid 3.6 mmol/L.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that CRP, ESR, lactic acid, and procalcitonin elevations were all specific, but not sensitive, in identifying children in the ED with SIRS who go on to develop severe sepsis.

Pediatric Sepsis in Community Emergency Care Settings: Guideline Concordance and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Bundled pediatric sepsis care has been associated with improved outcomes in tertiary pediatric emergency departments. Sepsis care at nontertiary sites where most children seek emergency care is not well described. We sought to describe the rate of guideline-concordant care, and we hypothesized that guideline-concordant care in community pediatric emergency care settings would be associated with decreased hospital length of stay (LOS).

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study of children with severe sepsis presenting to pediatric community emergency and urgent care sites included children 60 days to 17 years with severe sepsis. The primary predictor was concordance with the American College of Critical Care Medicine 2017 pediatric sepsis resuscitation bundle, including timely recognition, vascular access, intravenous fluids, antibiotics, vasoactive agents as needed.

RESULTS

From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017, 90 patients with severe sepsis met inclusion criteria; 22 (24%) received guideline-concordant care. Children receiving concordant care had a median hospital LOS of 95.3 hours (50.9-163.8 hours), with nonconcordant care, LOS was 88.3 hours (57.3-193.2 hours). In adjusted analysis, guideline-concordant care was not associated with hospital LOS (incident rate ratio, 0.99 [0.64-1.52]). The elements that drove overall concordance were timely recognition, achieved in only half of cases, vascular access, and timely antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency care for pediatric sepsis in the community settings studied was concordant with guidelines in only 24% of the cases. Future study is needed to evaluate additional drivers of outcomes and ways to improve sepsis care in community emergency care settings.

The epidemiology of sepsis in paediatric intensive care units in Brazil (the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database in Pediatric population, SPREAD PED): an observational study

BACKGROUND

Data on the prevalence and mortality of paediatric sepsis in resource-poor settings are scarce. We aimed to assess the prevalence and in-hospital mortality of severe sepsis and septic shock treated in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Brazil, and risk factors for mortality.

METHODS

We performed a nationwide, 1-day, prospective point prevalence study with follow-up of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, using a stratified random sample of all PICUs in Brazil. Patients were enrolled at each participating PICU on a single day between March 25 and 29, 2019. All patients occupying a bed at the PICU on the study day (either admitted previously or on that day) were included if they were aged 28 days to 18 years and met the criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock at any time during hospitalisation. Patients were followed up until hospital discharge or death, censored at 60 days. Risk factors for mortality were assessed using a Poisson regression model. We used prevalence to generate national estimates.

FINDINGS

Of 241 PICUs invited to participate, 144 PICUs (capacity of 1242 beds) included patients in the study. On the day of the study, 1122 children were admitted to the participating PICUs, of whom 280 met the criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock during hospitalisation, resulting in a prevalence of 25·0% (95% CI 21·6-28·8), with a mortality rate of 19·8% (15·4-25·2; 50 of 252 patients with complete clinical data). Increased risk of mortality was associated with higher Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (relative risk per point increase 1·21, 95% CI 1·14-1·29, p<0·0001), unknown vaccination status (2·57, 1·26-5·24; p=0·011), incomplete vaccination status (2·16, 1·19-3·92; p=0·012), health care-associated infection (2·12, 1·23-3·64, p=0·0073), and compliance with antibiotics (2·38, 1·46-3·86, p=0·0007). The estimated incidence of PICU-treated sepsis was 74·6 cases per 100 000 paediatric population (95% CI 61·5-90·5), which translates to 42 374 cases per year (34 940-51 443) in Brazil, with an estimated mortality of 8305 (6848-10 083).

INTERPRETATION

In this representative sample of PICUs in a middle-income country, the prevalences of severe sepsis or septic shock and in-hospital mortality were high. Modifiable factors, such as incomplete vaccination and health care-associated infections, were associated with greater risk of in-hospital mortality.

FUNDING

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.

TRANSLATION

For the Portuguese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Aligning Patient Safety and Stewardship: A Harm Reduction Strategy for Children

Purpose of review

Review important patient safety and stewardship concepts and use clinical examples to describe how they align to improve patient outcomes and reduce harm for children.

Recent findings

Current evidence indicates that healthcare overuse is substantial. Unnecessary care leads to avoidable adverse events, anxiety and distress, and financial toxicity. Increases in antimicrobial resistance, venous thromboembolism, radiation exposure, and healthcare costs are examples of patient harm associated with a lack of stewardship. Studies indicate that many tools can increase standardization of care, improve resource utilization, and enhance safety culture to better align safety and stewardship.

Summary

The principles of stewardship and parsimonious care can improve patient safety for children.

Prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in children admitted to public and private hospitals in Latin America: a multicenter observational study

OBJECTIVE

To report the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in children admitted to public and private hospitals.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of the Latin American Pediatric Sepsis Study (LAPSES) data, a cohort study that analyzed the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in critically ill children with sepsis on admission at 21 pediatric intensive care units in five Latin American countries.

RESULTS

Of the 464 sepsis patients, 369 (79.5%) were admitted to public hospitals and 95 (20.5%) to private hospitals. Compared to those admitted to private hospitals, sepsis patients admitted to public hospitals did not differ in age, sex, immunization status, hospital length of stay or type of admission but had higher rates of septic shock, higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2), and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) scores, and higher rates of underlying diseases and maternal illiteracy. The proportion of patients admitted from pediatric wards and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals. Multivariate analysis did not show any correlation between mortality and the type of hospital, but mortality was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission in patients from public hospitals.

CONCLUSION

In this sample of critically ill children from five countries in Latin America, the prevalence of septic shock within the first 24 hours at admission and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals than in private hospitals. Higher sepsis-related mortality in children admitted to public pediatric intensive care units was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission but not with the type of hospital. New studies will be necessary to elucidate the causes of the higher prevalence and mortality of pediatric sepsis in public hospitals.

Economic Analysis of Mandated Protocolized Sepsis Care in New York Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Initial evidence suggests that state-level regulatory mandates for sepsis quality improvement are associated with decreased sepsis mortality. However, sepsis mandates require financial investments on the part of hospitals and may lead to increased spending. We evaluated the effects of the 2013 New York State sepsis regulations on the costs of care for patients hospitalized with sepsis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using state discharge data from the U.S. Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project and a comparative interrupted time series analytic approach. Costs were calculated from admission-level charge data using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios.

SETTING

General, short stay, acute care hospitals in New York, and four control states: Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, and New Jersey.

PATIENTS

All patients hospitalized with sepsis between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

The 2013 New York mandate that all hospitals develop and implement protocols for sepsis identification and treatment, educate staff, and report performance data to the state.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The analysis included 1,026,664 admissions in 520 hospitals. Mean unadjusted costs per hospitalization in New York State were $42,036 ± $60,940 in the pre-regulation period and $39,719 ± $59,063 in the post-regulation period, compared with $34,642 ± $52,403 pre-regulation and $31,414 ± $48,155 post-regulation in control states. In the comparative interrupted time series analysis, the regulations were not associated with a significant difference in risk-adjusted mean cost per hospitalization (p = 0.12) or risk-adjusted mean cost per hospital day (p = 0.44). For example, in the 10th quarter after implementation of the regulations, risk-adjusted mean cost per hospitalization was $3,627 (95% CI, -$681 to $7,934) more than expected in New York State relative to control states.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandated protocolized sepsis care was not associated with significant changes in hospital costs in patients hospitalized with sepsis in New York State.

New Medical Device Acquisition During Pediatric Severe Sepsis Hospitalizations

OBJECTIVES

Severe sepsis is a significant cause of healthcare utilization and morbidity among pediatric patients. However, little is known about how commonly survivors acquire new medical devices during pediatric severe sepsis hospitalization. We sought to determine the rate of new device acquisition (specifically, tracheostomy placement, gastrostomy tube placement, vascular access devices, ostomy procedures, and amputation) among children surviving hospitalizations with severe sepsis. For contextualization, we compare this to rates of new device acquisition among three comparison cohorts: 1) survivors of all-cause pediatric hospitalizations; 2) matched survivors of nonsepsis infection hospitalizations; and 3) matched survivors of all-cause nonsepsis hospitalization with similar organ dysfunction.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Nationwide Readmission Database (2016), including all-payer hospitalizations from 27 states.

PATIENTS

Eighteen-thousand two-hundred ten pediatric severe sepsis hospitalizations; 532,738 all-cause pediatric hospitalizations; 16,173 age- and sex-matched nonsepsis infection hospitalizations; 15,025 organ dysfunction matched all-cause nonsepsis hospitalizations; and all with live discharge.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 18,210 pediatric severe sepsis hospitalizations, 1,024 (5.6%) underwent device placement. Specifically, 3.5% had new gastrostomy, 3.1% new tracheostomy, 0.6% new vascular access devices, 0.4% new ostomy procedures, and 0.1% amputations. One-hundred forty hospitalizations (0.8%) included two or more new devices. After applying the Nationwide Readmissions Database sampling weights, there were 55,624 pediatric severe sepsis hospitalizations and 1,585,194 all-cause nonsepsis hospitalizations with live discharge in 2016. Compared to all-cause pediatric hospitalizations, severe sepsis hospitalizations were eight-fold more likely to involve new device acquisition (6.4% vs 0.8%; p < 0.001). New device acquisition was also higher in severe sepsis hospitalizations compared with matched nonsepsis infection hospitalizations (5.1% vs 1.2%; p < 0.01) and matched all-cause hospitalizations with similar organ dysfunction (4.7% vs 2.8%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide, all-payer cohort of U.S. pediatric severe sepsis hospitalizations, one in 20 children surviving severe sepsis experienced new device acquisition. The procedure rate was nearly eight-fold higher than all-cause, nonsepsis pediatric hospitalizations, and four-fold higher than matched nonsepsis infection hospitalizations.

Identification and Management of Pediatric Sepsis: A Medical Student Curricular Supplement for PICU and NICU Rotations

INTRODUCTION

Medical students frequently report lack of confidence and skill in managing ill pediatric patients. We aimed to implement targeted learning interventions to address these knowledge gaps, specifically focusing on pediatric sepsis. Our objective was to create a curriculum to advance knowledge and confidence in identifying and managing pediatric sepsis.

METHODS

We designed this curriculum to augment medical student pediatric ICU (PICU) and neonatal ICU (NICU) rotations. We first emailed students a pretest and upon completion, we emailed students a series of brief educational videos. Students then participated in a simulation experience designed to assess their ability to diagnose and manage severe sepsis. We provided immediate debriefing after each session. Upon completion of the simulation experience, we emailed students a posttest (identical to the pretest). The pre-/posttest included multiple-choice questions to assess the students' ability to recognize and manage pediatric sepsis and septic shock, as well as Likert-scale questions assessing confidence levels in diagnosis and management of pediatric sepsis. We performed paired Student t tests comparing knowledge-based question scores and Likert-scale results.

RESULTS

Of students, 40 enrolled in and 30 completed the curriculum between 2015 and 2020. When comparing pre- and posttest results, we found a significant improvement in knowledge scores (33% mean increase, 95% CI [22%-45%], p < .001) and confidence levels (mean increase in Likert scale score of 1.5, 95% CI [1.2-1.7], p < .001).

DISCUSSION

Results suggested that the curriculum advanced students' knowledge scores and improved self-reported confidence in managing theoretical pediatric patients with sepsis.

Inpatient Pediatric CKD Health Care Utilization and Mortality in the United States

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on inpatient health care use is unknown. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of pediatric CKD among children hospitalized in the United States and examine the association of CKD with hospital outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional national survey of pediatric discharges.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Hospital discharges of children (aged>28 days to 19 years) with a chronic medical diagnosis included in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database for 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2016.

PREDICTOR

Presence of primary or coexisting CKD as identified by diagnosis codes.

OUTCOMES

Length of stay (LOS), cost, and mortality.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Multivariable analysis using Poisson, gamma, and logistic regressions were performed for LOS, cost, and mortality, respectively.

RESULTS

A chronic medical condition was present in 6,524,745 estimated discharges during the study period and CKD was present among 3.9% of discharges (96.1% without CKD). Those with CKD had a longer LOS (median of 2.8 [IQR, 1.4-6.0] days compared with 1.8 [IQR, 1.0-4.4] days for those without a CKD diagnosis; P<0.001). Median cost was higher in the CKD group compared with the group without CKD, at $8,755 (IQR, $4,563-18,345) and $5,016 (IQR, $2,860-10,109) per hospitalization, respectively (P<0.001). Presence of CKD was associated with a longer LOS (29.9% [95% CI, 27.2%-32.6%] longer than those without CKD), higher cost (61.3% [95% CI, 57.4%-65.4%] greater than those without CKD), and higher risk for mortality (OR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.40-1.63]).

LIMITATIONS

Lack of access to and adjustment for confounders including patient readmission and laboratory data.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric CKD was associated with longer LOS, higher costs, and higher risk for mortality compared with hospitalizations with other chronic illnesses. Further studies are needed to better understand the health care needs and delivery of care to hospitalized children with CKD.

Improving sepsis recognition and management

Sepsis is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality world-wide, with over half of the cases occurring in the pediatric population. The World Health Organization has challenged healthcare providers and organizations to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of sepsis.¹ While the pediatric definition for sepsis was first introduced in 2005, it has not changed since that time, and does not fully represent what occurs during sepsis. The updated adult definition focuses on the dysregulation of the host response to infection leading to life-threatening organ dysfunction. Aligning with this definition, the new Pediatric Surviving Sepsis guidelines target sepsis with end-organ dysfunction and septic shock. Recommendations include utilizing automated trigger tools embedded in the electronic health record to improve timing of recognition, as well as utilization of a standardized approach to the management, and early escalation to critical care if the patient is not responding to interventions. Rapid fluid resuscitation utilizes lactated ringers rather than normal saline due to potential concerns of worse outcomes with a large chloride infusion. 40-60 ml/kg is the recommended fluid goal in the first hour, watching for development of fluid overload which can also lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Broad-spectrum antibiotics should be initiated by the end of the first hour, especially in cases of septic shock. Implementation of systems capitalizing on the ability of the electronic health record to constantly screen patients, paired with rapid response teams who can assess and approach sepsis with a standardized algorithm can significantly improve the recognition and management of patients with sepsis, and save lives.^11-13.

Aluminum Adjuvant Improves Survival Via NLRP3 Inflammasome and Myeloid Non-Granulocytic Cells in a Murine Model of Neonatal Sepsis

ABSTRACT

Neonatal sepsis leads to significant morbidity and mortality with the highest risk of death occurring in preterm (<37 weeks) and low birth weight (<2,500 g) infants. The neonatal immune system is developmentally immature with well-described defects in innate and adaptive immune responses. Immune adjuvants used to enhance the vaccine response have emerged as potential therapeutic options, stimulating non-specific immunity and preventing sepsis mortality. Aluminum salts ("alum") have been used as immune adjuvants for over a century, but their mechanism of action remains poorly understood. This study aims to identify potential mechanisms by which pretreatment with alum induces host protective immunity to polymicrobial sepsis in neonatal mice. Utilizing genetic and cell-depletion studies, we demonstrate here that the prophylactic administration of aluminum adjuvants in neonatal mice improves sepsis survival via activation of the nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor family, pyrin-domain-containing 3 inflammasome and dendritic cell activation. Furthermore, this beneficial effect is dependent on myeloid, non-granulocytic Gr1-positive cells, and MyD88-signaling pathway activation. These findings suggest a promising therapeutic role for aluminum-based vaccine adjuvants to prevent development of neonatal sepsis and improve mortality in this highly vulnerable population.

Hospital outcomes for children with severe sepsis in the USA by race or ethnicity and insurance status: a population-based, retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Disparities in outcomes of adult sepsis are well described by insurance status and race and ethnicity. There is a paucity of data looking at disparities in sepsis outcomes in children. We aimed to determine whether hospital outcomes in childhood severe sepsis were influenced by race or ethnicity and insurance status, a proxy for socioeconomic position.

METHODS

This population-based, retrospective cohort study used data from the 2016 database release from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). The 2016 KID included 3 117 413 discharges, accounting for 80% of national paediatric discharges from 4200 US hospitals across 47 states. Using multilevel logistic regression, clustered by hospital, we tested the association between race or ethnicity and insurance status and hospital mortality, adjusting for individual-level and hospital-level characteristics, in children with severe sepsis. The secondary outcome of length of hospital stay was examined through multilevel time to event (hospital discharge) regression, with death as a competing risk.

FINDINGS

12 297 children (aged 0-21 years) with severe sepsis with or without shock were admitted to 1253 hospitals in the 2016 KID dataset. 1265 (10·3%) of 12 297 patients did not have race or ethnicity data recorded, 15 (0·1%) were missing data on insurance, and 1324 (10·8%) were transferred out of hospital, resulting in a final cohort of 9816 children. Black children had higher odds of death than did White children (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1·19, 95 % CI 1·02-1·38; p=0·028), driven by higher Black mortality in the south (1·30, 1·04-1·62; p=0·019) and west (1·58, 1·05-2·38; p=0·027) of the USA. We found evidence of longer hospital stays for Hispanic children (adjusted hazard ratio 0·94, 95% CI 0·88-1·00; p=0·049) and Black children (0·88, 0·82-0·94; p=0·0002), particularly Black neonates (0·53, 95% CI 0·36-0·77; p=0·0011). We observed no difference in survival between publicly and privately insured children; however, other insurance status (self-pay, no charge, and other) was associated with increased mortality (adjusted OR 1·30, 95% CI 1·04-1·61; p=0·021).

INTERPRETATION

In this large, representative analysis of paediatric severe sepsis in the USA, we found evidence of outcome disparities by race or ethnicity and insurance status. Our findings suggest that there might be differential sepsis recognition, approaches to treatment, access to health-care services, and provider bias that contribute to poorer sepsis outcomes for racial and ethnic minority patients and those of lower socioeconomic position. Studies are warranted to investigate the mechanisms of poorer sepsis outcomes in Black and Hispanic children.

FUNDING

None.

What's the Cost? Measuring the Economic Impact of Pediatric Sepsis

Sepsis, life-threatening organ dysfunction secondary to infection, hospitalizes nearly 75,000 children each year in the United States. Most children survive sepsis. However, there is increasing recognition of the longer-term consequences of pediatric sepsis hospitalization on both the child and their family, including medical, psychosocial, and financial impacts. Here, we describe family spillover effects (the impact of illness on caregivers) of pediatric sepsis, why measurement of family spillover effects is important, and the ways in which family spillover effects can be measured.

Use of Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid, and Thiamine in Adults with Septic Shock

Rationale: In December 2016, a single-center study describing significant improvements in mortality among a small group of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with hydrocortisone, high-dose ascorbic acid, and thiamine (HAT therapy) was published online.Objectives: This study aims to describe the administration of HAT therapy among U.S. adults with septic shock before and after study publication and to compare outcomes between patients who received and did not receive HAT therapy.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 379 acute care hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database including patients discharged from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2018. Exposure was quarter year of hospital discharge; postpublication was defined as January 2017 onward (July 2017 for effectiveness analyses). The primary outcome was receipt of HAT at least once during hospitalization. We conducted unadjusted segmented regression analyses to examine temporal trends in HAT administration. In patients with early septic shock, we compared the association of early HAT therapy (within 2 d of hospitalization) with hospital mortality using multivariable modeling and propensity score matching.Measurements and Main Results: Among 338,597 patients, 3,574 (1.1%) received HAT therapy, 98.7% in the postpublication period. HAT administration increased from 0.03% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.04) before publication to 2.65% (95% CI, 2.46-2.83) in the last quarter, with a significant step up in use after December 2016 (P < 0.001). Receipt of early HAT was associated with higher hospital mortality (28.2% vs. 19.7%; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.02-1.33]; primary propensity-matched model adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.02-1.40]).Conclusions: Publication of a single-center retrospective study was associated with significantly increased administration of HAT. Among patients with early septic shock, receipt of HAT was not associated with mortality benefit.

Comparison of Outpatient Health Care Use Before and After Pediatric Severe Sepsis

This cohort study examined the number and type of outpatient health visits before and after hospitalization for pediatric severe sepsis.

Design, Implementation, and Validation of a Pediatric ICU Sepsis Prediction Tool as Clinical Decision Support

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is an uncontrolled inflammatory reaction caused by infection. Clinicians in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) developed a paper-based tool to identify patients at risk of sepsis. To improve the utilization of the tool, the PICU team integrated the paper-based tool as a real-time clinical decision support (CDS) intervention in the electronic health record (EHR).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to improve identification of PICU patients with sepsis through an automated EHR-based CDS intervention.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of all patients admitted to the PICU from May 2017 to May 2019. A CDS intervention was implemented in May 2018. The CDS intervention screened patients for nonspecific sepsis criteria, temperature dysregulation and a blood culture within 6 hours. Following the screening, an interruptive alert prompted nursing staff to complete a perfusion screen to assess for clinical signs of sepsis. The primary alert performance outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value. The secondary clinical outcome was completion of sepsis management tasks.

RESULTS

During the 1-year post implementation period, there were 45.0 sepsis events per 1,000 patient days over 10,805 patient days. The sepsis alert identified 392 of the 436 sepsis episodes accurately with sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 95.6%, positive predictive value of 46.0%, and negative predictive value of 99.7%. Examining only patients with severe sepsis confirmed by chart review, test characteristics fell to a sensitivity of 73.3%, a specificity of 92.5%. Prior to the initiation of the alert, 18.6% (13/70) of severe sepsis patients received recommended sepsis interventions. Following the implementation, 34% (27/80) received these interventions in the time recommended, p = 0.04.

CONCLUSION

An EHR CDS intervention demonstrated strong performance characteristics and improved completion of recommended sepsis interventions.