1
|
Costa GB, Ferreira LA, Delgado MA, Soares AN, Junior CJC. Preoperative Gabapentin for Pain Control: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernioplasty. J Perianesth Nurs 2024; 39:1006-1011. [PMID: 38935013 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The perioperative use of gabapentin has been suggested to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption. However, there is a variation in clinical practice, the type of surgery and the administration time seem to be distinct between the available studies. We assess whether gabapentin administered before surgery reduces postoperative pain in patients who have undergone inguinal hernioplasty. DESIGN This is a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial. METHODS Seventy-seven patients scheduled for inguinal hernioplasty were randomized in two groups to receive gabapentin (900 mg) or placebo in the perioperative period. The primary outcome was analgesia measured by visual analog scale up to 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes such as morphine consumption, nausea, headache, and sedation have been also described. FINDINGS Patients who received gabapentin had lower postoperative pain scores compared to the control group, P < .001. The postoperative morphine use was significantly lower in the gabapentin (5.3%) versus placebo group (74.4%), P < .001. No significant difference between groups was observed for the occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The perioperative administration of gabapentin was effective in reducing postoperative pain and had an important effect in decreasing morphine use. Together, our data reveal a long-lasting opioid-sparing effect of gabapentin in patients who underwent inguinal hernioplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glaucio Boechat Costa
- Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Saúde Santa Casa BH, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Luana Assis Ferreira
- Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Saúde Santa Casa BH, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Marina Ayres Delgado
- Hospital das Clínicas de Belo Horizonte, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | - Aleida Nazareth Soares
- Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Saúde Santa Casa BH, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Célio José Castro Junior
- Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Saúde Santa Casa BH, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thompson A, Fleischmann KE, Smilowitz NR, de Las Fuentes L, Mukherjee D, Aggarwal NR, Ahmad FS, Allen RB, Altin SE, Auerbach A, Berger JS, Chow B, Dakik HA, Eisenstein EL, Gerhard-Herman M, Ghadimi K, Kachulis B, Leclerc J, Lee CS, Macaulay TE, Mates G, Merli GJ, Parwani P, Poole JE, Rich MW, Ruetzler K, Stain SC, Sweitzer B, Talbot AW, Vallabhajosyula S, Whittle J, Williams KA. 2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2024; 150:e351-e442. [PMID: 39316661 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
AIM The "2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from August 2022 to March 2023 to identify clinical studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE Recommendations from the "2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery" have been updated with new evidence consolidated to guide clinicians; clinicians should be advised this guideline supersedes the previously published 2014 guideline. In addition, evidence-based management strategies, including pharmacological therapies, perioperative monitoring, and devices, for cardiovascular disease and associated medical conditions, have been developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lisa de Las Fuentes
- Former ACC/AHA Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines member; current member during the writing effort
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin Chow
- Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography representative
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Purvi Parwani
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance representative
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thompson A, Fleischmann KE, Smilowitz NR, de Las Fuentes L, Mukherjee D, Aggarwal NR, Ahmad FS, Allen RB, Altin SE, Auerbach A, Berger JS, Chow B, Dakik HA, Eisenstein EL, Gerhard-Herman M, Ghadimi K, Kachulis B, Leclerc J, Lee CS, Macaulay TE, Mates G, Merli GJ, Parwani P, Poole JE, Rich MW, Ruetzler K, Stain SC, Sweitzer B, Talbot AW, Vallabhajosyula S, Whittle J, Williams KA. 2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 84:1869-1969. [PMID: 39320289 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
AIM The "2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from August 2022 to March 2023 to identify clinical studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE Recommendations from the "2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery" have been updated with new evidence consolidated to guide clinicians; clinicians should be advised this guideline supersedes the previously published 2014 guideline. In addition, evidence-based management strategies, including pharmacological therapies, perioperative monitoring, and devices, for cardiovascular disease and associated medical conditions, have been developed.
Collapse
|
4
|
Samaan F, Zil-E-Ali A, Alamarie B, Paracha AW, Nwaneri N, Aziz F. History of Preoperative Use of Gabapentin Before Lower Extremity Bypass Predisposes Patients to a High Risk of Opioid Use and Dependence in a Dose-Dependent Manner. J Surg Res 2024; 303:352-360. [PMID: 39413696 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study assesses the association of preoperative use of gabapentinoids (GBPs) with postoperative risk of opioid-related disorders in peripheral artery disease patients undergoing lower extremity bypass operation. METHODS This is a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of patients undergoing peripheral artery bypass in TriNetX, a multicenter national database. Two study groups were constituted based on the preoperative history of prescribed GBPs. Primary outcomes were opioid-related disorders and mortality. The outcomes were reported at two-time endpoints that is, at 1 and 5 y. RESULTS This study population included a total of 23,706 patients. After propensity score-matched analysis, each group contained 5130 patients. The primary outcomes showed a significant increase in postoperative opioid-related disorders at the 1 and 5-y time points between GBPs and no GBPs groups: 1-y outcome (2.0% versus 1.1%; adj. P = 0.007) and 5-y outcome (4.5% versus 3.5%; adj. P = 0.035). Logistic regression analysis revealed an increase in the 1-y (adjusted odds ratio= 1.664; 95% CI [1.217, 2.273], P = 0.001) and 5-y (OR = 1.353; 95% CI [1.107, 1.653], P = 0.003) odds of opioid-related disorders in patients on GBPs. A secondary analysis showed a significant dose-dependent increase in the associated risk of 5-y opioid-related disorders in patients with a history of prescribed gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing lower extremity bypass with a history of gabapentin use, there is an associated increased long-term risk of opioid-related disorders in a dose-dependent fashion. Overall, this study highlights weighing risks and benefits of prescribing GBPs for pain control versus their long-term associated risk of opioid-related disorders among other adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadi Samaan
- Office of Medical Education, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Ahsan Zil-E-Ali
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
| | - Billal Alamarie
- Office of Medical Education, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Abdul Wasay Paracha
- Office of Medical Education, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Nkemjika Nwaneri
- Office of Medical Education, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Faisal Aziz
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roca Ruiz LJ, Ruiz Ibán MÁ, Díaz Heredia J, López-Millán JM. Consensus on the preoperative management of patients with chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain to improve postoperative outcomes: Delphi results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:e364-e376. [PMID: 38182020 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate preoperative management of patients with chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain who are candidates for surgery owing to rotator cuff disease or glenohumeral osteoarthritis may improve surgery and patient outcomes, but published evidence in this regard is scarce. Therefore, the availability of recommendations on preoperative interventions based on expert consensus may serve as guidance. METHODS A Delphi study was conducted to develop a preoperative management algorithm based on a national expert consensus. A Delphi questionnaire was developed by a scientific committee following a systematic review of the relevant literature published during the past 10 years using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) criteria. It consisted of 48 statements divided into 5 blocks (block I, assessment and diagnosis of preoperative pain; block II, preoperative function and psychosocial aspects; block III, therapeutic objectives; block IV, treatment; and block V, follow-up and referral), and 28 experienced shoulder surgeons from across the country were invited to answer. RESULTS All participants responded to the Delphi questionnaire in the first round, and 25 responded in the second round (89.3% of those invited). Overall, 46 of 49 final statements reached a consensus, on the basis of which a final preoperative management algorithm was defined by the scientific committee. First, surgeons should assess shoulder pain intensity and characteristics, shoulder functionality, and psychosocial aspects using specific validated questionnaires. Preoperative therapeutic objectives should include shoulder pain control, depression and/or nocturnal sleep improvement, opioid consumption adjustment, and substance abuse cessation. Postoperative objectives regarding the degree of shoulder pain reduction or improvement in functionality and/or quality of life should be established in agreement with the patient. Treatment of preoperative chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain should comprise nonpharmacologic as well as pharmacologic interventions. Follow-up of the shoulder pain levels, treatment adherence, and mental health status of these patients may be carried out by the surgical team (surgeon and anesthesiologist) together with the primary care team. Patients with very intense shoulder pain levels may be referred to a pain unit following specific protocols. CONCLUSION A preoperative management algorithm for patients with chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain who are candidates for surgery owing to rotator cuff disease or glenohumeral osteoarthritis was defined based on a national expert consensus. Main points include comprehensive patient management starting with an objective assessment of shoulder pain and function, as well as quality of life; establishment of preoperative and postoperative therapeutic targets; prescription of individualized therapeutic interventions; and multidisciplinary patient follow-up. Implementation of these recommendations into clinical practice may result in better preoperative shoulder pain management and more successful surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Javier Roca Ruiz
- Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Service, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain; Department of Surgery, University of Seville, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel Ruiz Ibán
- Department of Surgery, Health and Medical Sciences, University of Alcaláde Henares, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Area of Traumatology and Orthopedics, CEU San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain; Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Jorge Díaz Heredia
- Department of Surgery, Health and Medical Sciences, University of Alcaláde Henares, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Area of Traumatology and Orthopedics, CEU San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Manuel López-Millán
- Department of Surgery, University of Seville, Spain; Pain Unit, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Service, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li R, Li W, Yao X. The efficacy of gabapentin supplementation for pain control after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy: A meta-analysis study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37908. [PMID: 38905436 PMCID: PMC11192016 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gabapentin supplementation may have some potential in pain control after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of gabapentin supplementation on postoperative pain management for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. METHODS PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of gabapentin supplementation on the pain control of lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. RESULTS Five randomized controlled trials were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy, gabapentin supplementation was associated with significantly lower pain scores at 2 hours (MD = -2.75; 95% CI = -3.09 to -2.41; P < .00001), pain scores at 4 hours (MD = -2.28; 95% CI = -3.36 to -1.20; P < .0001), pain scores at 24 hours (MD = -0.70; 95% CI = -0.86 to -0.55; P < .00001) and anxiety score compared to control intervention (MD = -1.32; 95% CI = -1.53 to -1.11; P < .00001), but showed no obvious impact on pain scores at 12 hours (MD = -0.58; 95% CI = -1.39 to 0.22; P = .16). In addition, gabapentin supplementation could significantly decrease the incidence of vomiting in relative to control intervention (OR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.12-0.81; P = .02), but they had similar incidence of nausea (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.15-1.73; P = .28). CONCLUSIONS Gabapentin supplementation benefits to pain control after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruhui Li
- Department of Orthopedic Ward 3, Tianshui Cooperation of Chinese and Westem Medicine Hospital, Gansu, China
| | - Wenbin Li
- Department of Orthopedic Ward 3, Tianshui Cooperation of Chinese and Westem Medicine Hospital, Gansu, China
| | - Xiongbin Yao
- Department of Orthopedic Ward 3, Tianshui Cooperation of Chinese and Westem Medicine Hospital, Gansu, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cao B, Xu Q, Shi Y, Zhao R, Li H, Zheng J, Liu F, Wan Y, Wei B. Pathology of pain and its implications for therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2024; 9:155. [PMID: 38851750 PMCID: PMC11162504 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-01845-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Pain is estimated to affect more than 20% of the global population, imposing incalculable health and economic burdens. Effective pain management is crucial for individuals suffering from pain. However, the current methods for pain assessment and treatment fall short of clinical needs. Benefiting from advances in neuroscience and biotechnology, the neuronal circuits and molecular mechanisms critically involved in pain modulation have been elucidated. These research achievements have incited progress in identifying new diagnostic and therapeutic targets. In this review, we first introduce fundamental knowledge about pain, setting the stage for the subsequent contents. The review next delves into the molecular mechanisms underlying pain disorders, including gene mutation, epigenetic modification, posttranslational modification, inflammasome, signaling pathways and microbiota. To better present a comprehensive view of pain research, two prominent issues, sexual dimorphism and pain comorbidities, are discussed in detail based on current findings. The status quo of pain evaluation and manipulation is summarized. A series of improved and innovative pain management strategies, such as gene therapy, monoclonal antibody, brain-computer interface and microbial intervention, are making strides towards clinical application. We highlight existing limitations and future directions for enhancing the quality of preclinical and clinical research. Efforts to decipher the complexities of pain pathology will be instrumental in translating scientific discoveries into clinical practice, thereby improving pain management from bench to bedside.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Cao
- Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Qixuan Xu
- Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Yajiao Shi
- Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, Ministry of Education/National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Ruiyang Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Hanghang Li
- Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Jie Zheng
- Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, Ministry of Education/National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Fengyu Liu
- Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, Ministry of Education/National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
| | - You Wan
- Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, Ministry of Education/National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
| | - Bo Wei
- Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giakas JA, Israel HA, Ali AH, Kaar SG. Does the addition of post-operative gabapentin reduce the use of narcotics after orthopedic surgery? PHYSICIAN SPORTSMED 2024; 52:283-290. [PMID: 37545473 DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2023.2246177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of post-operative gabapentin administration as an analgesic agent and its effect on narcotic use after orthopedic surgery in an outpatient sports medicine practice by comparing patients prior to and after initiating the routine use of gabapentin as part of a standardized post-operative pain medication regimen. We hypothesized that adding gabapentin to a multimodal post-operative pain regimen would decrease the number of requested pain medication refills and have no detrimental effect on Visual Analogue Scale and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores at these early post-operative visits. METHODS All outpatient surgical patients, <90 years of age, undergoing outpatient orthopedic surgery by the study's senior author were included between 08/05/2021 and 02/22/2022. Patients were allowed 1 narcotic refill post-operatively and only in the first 3 weeks. The primary outcome was difference in percentage of patients who requested a narcotic refill within 3 weeks post-op. Two- and 6-week Visual Analogue Scale and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores, and baseline health and demographic data. T-tests were run on continuous variables, Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact Test were run on dichotomous variables, and Mann-Whitney U test was run on all other categorical variables. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all tests. RESULTS There was a significant difference in narcotic refills at 3 weeks: 23 pre-gabapentin patients and 9 post-gabapentin patients (22.8% vs 9.0%, respectively: P = .006). There were no differences between 2- and 6-week Visual Analogue Scale and 2-week Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores. There was a significant difference in 6-week SANE between groups: mean difference = 6.4 (P = .027) though less than the established MCID. CONCLUSION Addition of gabapentin to a post-operative multimodal pain regimen reduced the use of narcotics after orthopedic sports medicine surgeries while also providing equivalent pain control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian A Giakas
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Heidi A Israel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ashley H Ali
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Scott G Kaar
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kuo YF, Kim E, Westra J, Wilkes D, Raji MA. Pain Control Associated With Gabapentinoid Prescription After Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:941-947.e1. [PMID: 37871858 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gabapentinoid (GABA) prescribing has substantially increased as a nonopioid analgesics for surgical conditions. We examined the effectiveness of GABA use for postoperative pain control among patients receiving total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS This retrospective cohort study using 2016 to 2019 data from a 20% national sample of Medicare enrollees included patients aged 66 and over years who received an elective TKA, were discharged to home, received home health care, and had both admission and discharge assessments of pain (n = 35,186). Study outcomes were pain score difference between admission and discharge and less-than-daily pain interfering with activity at discharge. Opioid and GABA prescriptions after surgery and receipt of nerve block within 3 days of surgery were also assessed. RESULTS There were 30% of patients who had a pain score decrease of 3 to 4 levels and 55.8% had pain score decreases of 1 to 2 levels. In multivariable analyses, receiving a nerve block was significantly associated with pain score reduction. A GABA prescription increased the magnitude of pain score reduction among those receiving a nerve block. Results from inverse probability weighted analysis with propensity score showed that coprescribing of GABA and low-dose opioid was associated with significantly lower pain scores. CONCLUSIONS Post-TKA opioid use was not associated with pain score reduction. Receiving a nerve block was associated with a modest pain score reduction. Co-prescribing GABA with low-dose opioid or receiving a nerve block was associated with increasing magnitudes of pain reduction. Further research should identify alternatives to opioid use for managing postoperative TKA pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Fang Kuo
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Office of Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Emily Kim
- John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Jordan Westra
- Office of Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Denise Wilkes
- Department and Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Mukaila A Raji
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Harder T, Harder J, Baum G, Cox C, Harder J, Hernandez E, MacKay B. Antineuropathic Pain Management After Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2024; 16:93012. [PMID: 38505138 PMCID: PMC10950197 DOI: 10.52965/001c.93012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The opioid crisis has become a present concern in the medical field. In an effort to address these complications, antineuropathic pain medications have been considered as alternatives to prescribed opioids. Objective This review focuses on the analgesic effects of neuromodulators, such as gabapentin, duloxetine, and pregabalin, that provide room for less dependence on narcotic analgesics following orthopedic surgery. Methods During the database searches, 1,033 records were identified as a preliminary result. After duplicates were removed, an initial screen of each article was completed which identified records to be removed due to absence of a full-text article. Articles were excluded if they were not either prospective or retrospective, showcased an irrelevant medication (such as tricyclic antidepressants) which are not pertinent to this review, or deemed to be unrelated to the topic. Results Ultimately, 19 articles were selected. Three different drugs, gabapentin, pregabalin, and duloxetine, were analyzed to compile data on the effectiveness of preventing opioid overuse and addiction following hand surgery. This review identifies potential evidence that peri-operative gabapentin, pregabalin, and duloxetine administration decreases post-operative pain and lowers opioid dependency. Conclusion Gabapentin, pregabalin, and duloxetine have potential to further decrease post-operative pain and lower opioid dependency. This review creates an opening for further research in hand surgery to assess an updated protocol for pain management to reduce opioid dependency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gracie Baum
- Orthopaedic Surgery Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
| | - Cameron Cox
- Orthopaedic Surgery Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
| | - Justin Harder
- Orthopaedic Surgery Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
| | - Evan Hernandez
- Community, Family, and Addiction Sciences Texas Tech University
- Department of Orthopaedic Hand Surgery Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
| | - Brendan MacKay
- Orthopaedic Surgery Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Koltenyuk V, Mrad I, Choe I, Ayoub MI, Kumaraswami S, Xu JL. Multimodal Acute Pain Management in the Parturient with Opioid Use Disorder: A Review. J Pain Res 2024; 17:797-813. [PMID: 38476879 PMCID: PMC10928917 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s434010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The opioid epidemic in the United States has led to an increasing number of pregnant patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) presenting to obstetric units. Caring for this complex patient population requires an interdisciplinary approach involving obstetricians, anesthesiologists, addiction medicine physicians, psychiatrists, and social workers. The management of acute pain in the parturient with OUD can be challenging due to several factors, including respiratory depression, opioid tolerance, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Patients with a history of OUD can present in one of three categories: 1) those with untreated OUD; 2) those who are currently abstinent from opioids; 3) those being treated with medications to prevent withdrawal. A patient-centered, multimodal approach is essential for optimal peripartum pain relief and prevention of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), previously referred to as medication-assisted therapy (MAT), include opioids like methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. These are prescribed for pregnant patients with OUD, but appropriate dosing and administration of these medications are critical to avoid withdrawal in the mother. Non-opioid analgesics such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be used in a stepwise approach, and regional techniques like neuraxial anesthesia and truncal blocks offer opioid-sparing options. Other medications like ketamine, clonidine, dexmedetomidine, nitrous oxide, and gabapentinoids show promise for pain management but require further research. Overall, a comprehensive pain management strategy is essential to ensure the well-being of both the mother and the fetus in pregnant patients with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ismat Mrad
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Ian Choe
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Mohamad Ibrahim Ayoub
- Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sangeeta Kumaraswami
- Department of Anesthesiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Jeff L Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Madden K, Pallapothu S, Young Shing D, Adili A, Bhandari M, Carlesso L, Khan M, Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Krsmanovic A, Nowakowski M, Packham T, Romeril E, Tarride JE, Thabane L, Tushinski DM, Wallace C, Winemaker M, Shanthanna H. Opioid reduction and enhanced recovery in orthopaedic surgery (OREOS): a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:30. [PMID: 38360686 PMCID: PMC10868001 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01457-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knee arthritis is a leading cause of limited function and long-term disability in older adults. Despite a technically successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA), around 20% of patients continue to have persisting pain with reduced function, and low quality of life. Many of them continue using opioids for pain control, which puts them at risk for potential long-term adverse effects such as dependence, overdose and risk of falls. Although persisting pain and opioid use after TKA have been recognised to be important issues, individual strategies to decrease their burden have limitations and multi-component interventions, despite their potential, have not been well studied. In this study, we propose a multi-component pathway including personalized pain management, facilitated by a pain management coordinator. The objectives of this pilot trial are to evaluate feasibility (recruitment, retention, and adherence), along with opioid-free pain control at 8 weeks after TKA. METHODS This is a protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial using a 2-arm parallel group design. Adult participants undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty will be considered for inclusion and randomised to control and intervention groups. Participants in the intervention group will receive support from a pain management coordinator who will facilitate a multicomponent pain management pathway including (1) preoperative education on pain and opioid use, (2) preoperative risk identification and mitigation, (3) personalized post-discharge analgesic prescriptions and (4) continued support for pain control and recovery up to 8 weeks post-op. Participants in the control group will undergo usual care. The primary outcomes of this pilot trial are to assess the feasibility of participant recruitment, retention, and adherence to the interventions, and key secondary outcomes are persisting pain and opioid use. DISCUSSION The results of this trial will determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial for the implementation of a multicomponent pain pathway to improve pain control and reduce harms using a coordinated approach, while keeping an emphasis on patient centred care and shared decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospectively registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04968132).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Madden
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada.
- Department of Health Research Methods, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| | | | | | - Anthony Adili
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Mohit Bhandari
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Lisa Carlesso
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Moin Khan
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Adrijana Krsmanovic
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Matilda Nowakowski
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Tara Packham
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Eric Romeril
- Hamilton Health Sciences-Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jean-Eric Tarride
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Center for Health Economics and Policy Analyses, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Daniel M Tushinski
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences-Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Christine Wallace
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Harsha Shanthanna
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu J, Yin J, Yin J, Zhou M, Chen L, Dong X, Li Y. Effect of esketamine-based opioid-sparing anesthesia strategy on postoperative pain and recovery quality in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trail. Heliyon 2024; 10:e24941. [PMID: 38317936 PMCID: PMC10839621 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Opioid-sparing anesthesia reduces intraoperative use of opioids and postoperative adverse reactions. The current study investigated the effect of esketamine-based opioid-sparing anesthesia on total laparoscopic hysterectomy patients' recovery. Methods Ninety patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly assigned to esketamine-based group (group K) or opioid-based group (group C). The allocation to groups was unknown to patients, surgeons, and postoperative medical staff. The inability to implement blinding for anesthesiologists was due to the distinct procedures followed by the various groups while administering drugs. The QoR-40 and VAS were used to measure recovery quality. Postoperative adverse events, perioperative opioid consumption, and intraoperative hemodynamics were secondary endpoints. Results There was an absence of notable discrepancy in the baseline data observed between the two groups. The QoR-40 scores exhibited greater values in group K when compared to group C on the first day following the surgical procedure (160.91 ± 9.11 vs 151.47 ± 8.35, respectively; mean difference 9.44 [95 %CI: 5.78-13.11]; P < 0.01). Within 24 h of surgery, the VAS score of group K was lower at rest and during movement. (P < 0.05 for each). Group K had much lower rates of nausea and vomiting within 24 h of surgery. (P < 0.05 for each). Group K received significantly lower total doses of sufentanil and remifentanil than group C. (17.28 ± 2.59 vs 43.43 ± 3.52; 0.51 ± 0.15 vs 1.24 ± 0.24). The proportion of patients who used ephedrine in surgery was higher in group C than in group K (P < 0.05). Conclusions Esketamine-based opioid-sparing anesthesia strategy is feasible and enhanced recuperation following surgery by decreasing adverse effects associated with opioids and pain scores compared to an opioid-based anesthetic regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialei Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Suzhou First People's Hospital, Suzhou, China
| | - Jiangwen Yin
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Jieting Yin
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Menghan Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Long Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Xiwei Dong
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Razak A, Corman B, Servider J, Mavarez-Martinez A, Jin Z, Mushlin H, Bergese SD. Postoperative analgesic options after spine surgery: finding the optimal treatment strategies. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:191-200. [PMID: 38155560 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2298824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spine surgery is one of the most common types of surgeries performed in the United States; however, managing postoperative pain following spine surgery has proven to be challenging. Patients with spine pathologies have higher incidences of chronic pain and resultant opioid use and potential for tolerance. Implementing a multimodal plan for postoperative analgesia after spine surgery can lead to enhanced recovery and outcomes. AREAS COVERED This review presents several options for analgesia following spine surgery with an emphasis on multimodal techniques to best aid this specific patient population. In addition to traditional therapeutics, such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and opioids, we discuss intrathecal morphine administration and emerging regional anesthesia techniques. EXPERT OPINION Several adjuncts to improve analgesia following spine surgery are efficacious in the postoperative period. Intrathecal morphine provides sustained analgesia and can be instilled intraoperatively by the surgical team under direct visualization. Local anesthetics deposited under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist trained in regional techniques also provide the opportunity for single injections or continuous analgesia via an indwelling catheter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Razak
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Corman
- Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - John Servider
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Ana Mavarez-Martinez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Zhaosheng Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Harry Mushlin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Sergio D Bergese
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lerner DK, Gray M, Liu K, Al-Awady A, Omorogbe A, Ninan S, Goldrich DY, Schaberg M, Del Signore A, Govindaraj S, Iloreta AM. Gabapentin and postoperative pain and opioid consumption: A double-blind randomized controlled trial of perioperative pain management for sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104108. [PMID: 37948826 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The link between post-operative narcotic prescription and opioid misuse has spurred a nationwide effort to reduce perioperative opioid use. Previous work has suggested that perioperative gabapentin may reduce post-operative pain and opioid consumption across different procedures, although the optimal regimen remains to be defined. METHODS Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with or without septoplasty were randomized to receive a 7-day pre- and post-operative course of placebo or gabapentin, starting at 300 mg daily and titrated to 300 mg three times daily, in a double-blind fashion. Primary endpoint was pain level using a validated visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included post-operative opioid consumption and side effects, as well as modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopy, Lund-Mackay, and SNOT-22 scores. RESULTS Analysis of 35 patients (20 gabapentin, 15 control) showed no significant difference in mean postoperative VAS (p = 0.18) or postoperative opioid consumption between the placebo and gabapentin groups (2.3 and 4.8 oxycodone tablets respectively, p = 0.18). 15 of 35 patients did not require any post-operative oxycodone tablets, and only two patients required more than six tablets. CONCLUSION Preliminary results show no significant change in pain after FESS with or without septoplasty in patients taking 7-day pre- and post-operative gabapentin versus placebo. Results also showed no significant difference in opioid consumption between the treatment and placebo groups. Post-operative pain scores and opioid requirements are both quite low following FESS. Many patients do not need opioids at all, suggesting that routine initial post-operative opioid prescriptions can be limited accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David K Lerner
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mingyang Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Abdurrahman Al-Awady
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aisosa Omorogbe
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sen Ninan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Y Goldrich
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Madeleine Schaberg
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anthony Del Signore
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alfred Marc Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Coviello C, Sivam SK. Considerations for Functional Nasal Surgery in the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Population. Facial Plast Surg 2023; 39:642-647. [PMID: 37328151 DOI: 10.1055/a-2111-9255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and nasal obstruction are common in the general population and frequently treated by otolaryngologists and facial plastic surgeons. Understanding the appropriate pre-, peri-, and postoperative management of OSA patients undergoing functional nasal surgery is important. OSA patients should be appropriately counseled in the preoperative period on their increased anesthetic risk. In OSA patients who are continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) intolerant, the role of drug-induced sleep endoscopy should be discussed with the patient, and depending on the surgeon's practice may prompt referral to a sleep specialist. Should multilevel airway surgery be indicated, it can safely be performed in most OSA patients. Surgeons should communicate with the anesthesiologist regarding an airway plan given this patient population's higher propensity for having a difficult airway. Given their increased risk of postoperative respiratory depression, extended recovery time should be given to these patients and the use of opioids as well as sedatives should be minimized. During surgery, one can consider using local nerve blocks to reduce postoperative pain and analgesic use. After surgery, clinicians can consider opioid alternatives such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Neuropathic agents, such as gabapentin, require further research in their indications for managing postoperative pain. CPAP is typically held for a period of time after functional rhinoplasty. The decision on when to restart CPAP should be individualized to the patient based on their comorbidities, OSA severity, and surgical maneuvers performed. More research would provide further guidance in this patient population to shape more specific recommendations regarding their perioperative and intraoperative course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Coviello
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Sunthosh Kumar Sivam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bills S, Wills B, Boyd S, Elbeery J. Impact of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol on Postoperative Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery. J Pharm Pract 2023; 36:1397-1403. [PMID: 35968826 DOI: 10.1177/08971900221119013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are perioperative care pathways designed to achieve early recovery after procedures. ERAS protocols have shown shortened recovery time, and lower opioid utilization and postoperative complication rates. Evidence to support the use of ERAS protocols is robust, however, minimal data exists in cardiac surgery patients. Methods: This observational cohort compared adults receiving post-operative care after coronary artery bypass or valve procedures who received an ERAS protocol containing acetaminophen, gabapentin, and methocarbamol to historical controls. The primary outcome of this study was postoperative opioid use during the first 72-hours following cardiac surgery. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, average pain scores 72-hours postoperatively, and incidence of opioid-related complications. Results: Total cumulative 72-hour post-operative opioid consumption showed a trend toward reduction in opioid use in patients who received the ERAS protocol vs the historic control group [75.8 mg vs 105.4 mg oral morphine equivalents (P = .09)]. Median postoperative lengths of stay and pain scores were similar between groups. Opioid related complications including constipation and respiratory depression occurred more frequently in the control group compared to the ERAS group [47.7% vs 60.5% (P < .05) and 57.1% vs 62.7% (P < .05) respectively]. Conclusions: Use of an ERAS protocol shows a promising trend toward less postoperative opioid use in cardiac surgery patients. Lower rates of opioid-related adverse events, including constipation and respiratory depression, were observed in the ERAS protocol group. This study indicates that ERAS protocols have a potential role for cardiac surgery patients postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Bills
- Department of Pharmacy, Vidant Medical Center, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Brittany Wills
- Department of Pharmacy, Vidant Medical Center, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Samara Boyd
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, East Carolina Heart and Vascular Institute, Vidant Medical Center, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Joseph Elbeery
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, East Carolina Heart and Vascular Institute, Vidant Medical Center, Greenville, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Turk R, Hamid N. Postoperative Pain Control Following Shoulder Arthroplasty: Rethinking the Need for Opioids. Orthop Clin North Am 2023; 54:453-461. [PMID: 37718084 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
The use of opioid pain medication regimens to control perioperative pain has led to significant patient and societal consequences. There are several alternative, opioid-sparing and opioid-minimizing pain regimens that have been shown to provide equal, if not superior, pain relief with fewer secondary consequences. This article provides an in-depth review of the current evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and feasibility of a perioperative opioid-sparing clinical pathway for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robby Turk
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA; Atrium Health, Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
| | - Nady Hamid
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA; Atrium Health, Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA; OrthoCarolina, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lascano D, Zamora AK, Mahdi E, Ourshalimian S, Russell CJ, Kim E, Kelley-Quon LI. Gabapentin is Associated With Decreased Postoperative Opioid Use and Length of Stay After Appendectomy in Children With Perforated Appendicitis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2023; 58:1935-1941. [PMID: 37029026 PMCID: PMC10771856 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gabapentin is increasingly used as an off-label, opioid-sparing pain medication in children. We investigated perioperative gabapentin administration and postoperative opioid use in children who underwent appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of healthy children ages 2-18 years undergoing appendectomy for perforated appendicitis from 2014 to 2019 was performed using the Pediatric Health Information System®. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was conducted with 1:1 matching based on patient and hospital characteristics. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to evaluate an association between gabapentin, postoperative opioid use, and postoperative length of stay. RESULTS Of 29,467 children with perforated appendicitis who underwent appendectomy, 236 (0.8%) received gabapentin. In 2014, <10 children received gabapentin, but by 2019, 110 children received gabapentin. On univariate analysis of the PSM cohort, children receiving gabapentin had decreased total postoperative opiate use (2.3 SD ± 2.3 versus 3.0 SD ± 2.5 days, p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, children receiving gabapentin had 0.65 fewer days of postoperative total opioid use (95% CI: -1.09, -0.21) and spent 0.69 fewer days in the hospital after surgery (95% CI: -1.30, -0.08). CONCLUSION While overall use is infrequent, gabapentin is increasingly administered to children with perforated appendicitis who undergo an appendectomy and is associated with decreased postoperative opioid use and reduced postoperative length of stay. Multimodal pain management strategies incorporating gabapentin may reduce postoperative opioid consumption, but further studies of drug safety are needed for this off-label use in children undergoing surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny Lascano
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Abigail K Zamora
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaa Mahdi
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shadassa Ourshalimian
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christopher J Russell
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eugene Kim
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lorraine I Kelley-Quon
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bang YJ, Lee EK, Kim CS, Hahm TS, Jeong H, Cho YJ, Noh JJ, Lee YY, Choi CH, Lee JW, Jeong JS. The Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery for Gynecologic Malignancy: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg 2023; 137:525-533. [PMID: 36727850 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery for gynecologic malignancy via midline-laparotomy leads to severe postoperative pain. Adequate pain control while sparing opioid consumption does offer benefits in postoperative complications and recovery. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) provides simple and effective analgesia. In this randomized trial, we compared postoperative opioid consumption in patients who received either ITM or a sham procedure. METHODS We enrolled 68 adult patients undergoing open gynecologic oncology surgery from June 2021 to November 2021. They were randomly allocated to the ITM group (ITM; 200 μg injection) or sham group (sham procedure) to achieve a final 1:1 ratio between groups. We compared opioid consumption and pain severity during 72 hours after surgery. The variables regarding postoperative recovery and patient-centered outcomes were collected. The primary outcome is cumulative intravenous (IV) opioid consumption 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS The median (interquartile range) cumulative IV opioid consumption during 24 hours after surgery was 18 mg (12-29) in the ITM group and 36 mg (27-42) in the sham group (median difference, 13; 95% confidence interval, 7.2-20.7; P < .001). Patient satisfaction regarding pain control was statistically significantly higher in the ITM group than in the sham group at postoperative 24 and 48 hours ( P < .001 and P = .005, respectively). There were no significant differences in the variables associated with postoperative recovery and frequency of complications requiring treatment. CONCLUSIONS ITM is a safe and effective analgesic method after curative intent laparotomy for gynecologic malignancy. ITM provides better pain relief, reduces opioid consumption, and improves patient satisfaction without additional evident adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Jeong Bang
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Lee
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung Su Kim
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Soo Hahm
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Heejoon Jeong
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Jee Cho
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joseph J Noh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo-Young Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chel Hun Choi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Won Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Seon Jeong
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen O, Cadwell JB, Matsoukas K, Hagen J, Afonso AM. Perioperative gabapentin usage in pediatric patients: A scoping review. Paediatr Anaesth 2023; 33:598-608. [PMID: 37073498 PMCID: PMC10464522 DOI: 10.1111/pan.14674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a recent focus among anesthesiologists on reducing the use of perioperative opioids in favor of multimodal analgesic regimens. Gabapentin has played an integral role in this evolution of practice. This comprehensive review assesses the current clinical evidence on the efficacy of perioperative gabapentin regarding postoperative pain and opioid requirements among the pediatric surgery population. DATA SOURCES Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science Review. METHODS This scoping review of the above databases includes all studies examining the use of gabapentin perioperatively in pediatric patients and its association with postoperative pain intensity and postoperative opioid consumption through July 2021. The inclusion criteria encompassed all studies evaluating gabapentin in the perioperative pediatric population through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies. Relevant metadata from each study were abstracted and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. RESULTS Fifteen papers met the inclusion criteria for this review, including 11 RCTs and 4 retrospective studies. Sample sizes ranged from 20 to 144 patients. Administered doses varied widely, mainly between 5 and 20 mg/kg. The studies included primarily orthopedic (10) and neck surgery cases (3). Seven papers had gabapentin provided preoperatively only, two postoperative only, and six both pre- and postoperatively. Of the studies assessing postoperative pain, 6/11 studies saw a decrease in postoperative pain in at least one period for the gabapentin group. Of the studies considering opioid requirements, 6/10 reported a reduction, 1/10 an increase, and 3/10 no difference in opioid requirements for the gabapentin groups. Yet, most of these pain and opioid requirement findings were only significant at one to two time points in the study follow-up periods, and the actual decreases had minimal clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS The current data on perioperative gabapentin in pediatric patients are insufficient to support the routine use of gabapentin in pediatric patients. Additional high-quality RCTs with more standardized protocols for gabapentin administration and outcome measures are necessary to provide more definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joshua B. Cadwell
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Konstantina Matsoukas
- Medical Library, Information Systems, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - John Hagen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anoushka M. Afonso
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hanba C, Lewis C. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery Requiring Microvascular Reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2023; 56:801-812. [PMID: 37380326 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2023.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
It has been demonstrated since the 1990's that surgical outcomes can be improved through protocolized perioperative interventions. Since then, multiple surgical societies have engaged in adopting Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Societal recommendations to improve patient satisfaction, decrease the cost of interventions, and improve outcomes. In 2017, ERAS released consensus recommendations detailing the perioperative optimization of patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction. This population was identified as a high resource demand, oftentimes burdened with challenging comorbidity, and poorly described cohort for which a perioperative management protocol could help to optimize outcomes. The following pages aim to further detail perioperative strategies to streamline patient recovery after head and neck reconstructive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Curtis Hanba
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Carol Lewis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Towfighi P, Hill A, Crossley JR, Walsh A, Leonard JA, Giurintano JP, Pierce ML, Reilly MJ. A retrospective analysis of pain and opioid usage in head and neck free flap reconstruction. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 9:153-159. [PMID: 37383327 PMCID: PMC10296052 DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Investigate opioid usage and postoperative pain in patients undergoing head and neck free flap surgery. Methods A retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction at two academic centers was performed. Data captured included demographics, postoperative inpatient pain, pain at postoperative visits, morphine equivalent doses (MEDs) administration, medication history, and comorbidities. Data were analyzed using regression models, χ 2 tests, and student's t-tests. Results Seventy-three percent of patients were discharged with opioid medication, with over half (53.4%) continuing to take opioids at their second postoperative visit, and over one-third (34.2%) continuing to take them around 4-month postoperatively. One out of every five (20.3%) opioid-naïve patients chronically took opioids postoperatively. There was a poor association between inpatient postoperative pain scores and daily MEDs administered (R 2 = 0.13, 0.17, and 0.22 in postoperative Days 3, 5, and 7, respectively). Neither preoperative radiotherapy nor postoperative complications were associated with an increase in opioid usage. Conclusions For patients undergoing head and neck free flap operations, opioid medications are commonly used for postoperative analgesia. This practice may increase the chance an opioid-naïve patient uses opioids chronically. We found a poor association between MEDs administered and patient-reported pain scores, which suggests that standardized protocols aimed at optimizing analgesia while reducing opioid administration may be warranted. Level of Evidence: 3 (Retrospective cohort study).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parhom Towfighi
- Georgetown University School of MedicineWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Alison Hill
- Georgetown University School of MedicineWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Jason R. Crossley
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Amanda Walsh
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - James A. Leonard
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Jonathan P. Giurintano
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Matthew L. Pierce
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Michael J. Reilly
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tubog TD, Harmer CM, Bramble RS, Bayaua NE, Mijares M. Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin on Postoperative Pain Management After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Perianesth Nurs 2023; 38:322-330. [PMID: 36414492 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Examine the efficacy and safety of perioperative gabapentin in bariatric surgical patients. DESIGN Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. METHODS An exhaustive search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and other gray literature. Only randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of gabapentin in bariatric surgery were included. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) were used to estimate outcomes with suitable effect models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Risk of Bias and GRADE system. FINDINGS Four trials consisting of 283 patients were analyzed. The use of gabapentin significantly lowered the cumulative pain score in the first 24 hours after surgery by an average of 1.04 (MD, -1.04; 95% CI, -1.45 to -0.63; P < .00001). Gabapentin also reduced the overall morphine equivalent consumption by 7.89 mg (MD, -7.89; 95% CI, -13.56 to -2.2; P = .006). However, gabapentin did not affect the incidence of PONV (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-1.00; P = .05), somnolence (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.57-2.73; P = .57), dizziness (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.40-2.54; P = .99), and headache (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.25-2.30; P = .62). Substantial heterogeneity, imprecision of the effect size, and potential publication bias were limitations of this review. CONCLUSIONS The use of gabapentin is effective in the management of postoperative pain in bariatric surgery. However, there is limited data regarding the opioid-sparing effect and adverse effect profiles of gabapentin in the bariatric surgical population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tito D Tubog
- Graduate Programs of Nurse Anesthesia, Texas Wesleyan University, Fort Worth, TX.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sun W, Wang J, Wang J, Fan J, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Han R. Esketamine combined with pregabalin on acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing resection of spinal neoplasms: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:144. [PMID: 36841794 PMCID: PMC9960454 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07178-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative pain management is one of the most challenging issues for patients with spinal neoplasms. Inadequate postoperative analgesia usually leads to severe postsurgical pain, which could cause patients to suffer from many other related complications. Meanwhile, there is no appropriate analgesic strategy for patients with spinal neoplasms. METHODS/DESIGN This is a protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial to evaluate the effect of esketamine combined with pregabalin on postsurgical pain in spinal surgery. Patients aged 18 to 65 years scheduled for spinal neoplasm resection will be randomly allocated into the combined and control groups in a 1:1 ratio. In the combined group, esketamine will be given during the during the surgery procedure until 48-h postoperative period, and pregabalin will be taken from 2 h before the surgery to 2 weeks postoperatively. The control group will receive normal saline and placebo capsules at the same time points. Both groups received a background analgesic regimen by using patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (containing 100 μg sufentanil and 16 mg ondansetron) until 2 days after surgery. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of this trial, all the researchers and patients will be blinded until the completion of this study. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with acute moderate-to-severe postsurgical pain (visual analog scale, VAS ≥ 40, range: 0-100, with 0, no pain; 100, the worst pain) during the 48-h postoperative period. The secondary outcomes will include the maximal VAS scores (when the patients felt the most intense pain over the last 24 h before being interviewed) at 0-2 h, 2-24 h, 24-48 h, and 48-72 h after leaving the operating room and 24 h before discharge; the incidence of acute moderate-to-severe postsurgical pain at each other time point; chronic postsurgical pain assessment; neuropathic pain assessment; and the incidence of drug-related adverse events and other postoperative complications, such as postoperative delirium and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). DISCUSSION The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of esketamine combined with pregabalin on acute postsurgical pain in patients undergoing resection of spinal neoplasms. The safety of this perioperative pain management strategy will also be examined. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05096468. Registered on October 27, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanchen Sun
- grid.24696.3f0000 0004 0369 153XDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4th Ring Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China 100070
| | - Juan Wang
- grid.24696.3f0000 0004 0369 153XDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4th Ring Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China 100070
| | - Jing Wang
- grid.24696.3f0000 0004 0369 153XDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4th Ring Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China 100070
| | - Jingyi Fan
- grid.24696.3f0000 0004 0369 153XDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4th Ring Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China 100070
| | - Yang Zhou
- grid.24696.3f0000 0004 0369 153XDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4th Ring Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China 100070
| | - Yunzhen Wang
- grid.24696.3f0000 0004 0369 153XDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4th Ring Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China 100070
| | - Ruquan Han
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4th Ring Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, People's Republic of China, 100070.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wahlstrom D, Toscano C, Havard D. Enhanced recovery after orthognathic surgery: a retrospective comparison study of 56 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 61:171-175. [PMID: 36781310 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been demonstrated to expedite recovery and decrease hospital stay from multiple surgical specialties. This study sought to determine how an ERAS protocol would improve patient outcomes with regards to inpatient postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain scores following orthognathic surgeries. This was a retrospective study comparing patients who underwent orthognathic surgery with and without an ERAS protocol. The primary measurables included opioid consumption, antiemetic medical consumption, nausea and vomiting incidences, and pain scores between the two groups during their hospital stays. A total of 56 patients were retrospectively analysed comparing ERAS protocol to non-ERAS protocol. The maximum pain score of the ERAS group was 5.50 out of 10 compared to the control group of 7.50 out of 10 (p<0.001). Morphine equivalent consumption during their time in the ward was statistically significant (51.4 mg control versus 9.4 mg ERAS group). ERAS protocol is safe and effective for decreasing postoperative pain and nausea. The ERAS protocol is not only applicable for orthognathic surgery but should be highly considered for other maxillofacial surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devin Wahlstrom
- DMD, MAJ, USA, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
| | - Corey Toscano
- DMD, CAPT, USAF, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Drew Havard
- DMD, CDR, USN, Naval Medical Research Unit, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lindner BK, Lakhani SA, Cooper M, Nguyen BM, Vranic G, Yi SY, Abrams P. Evaluation of a multidisciplinary, multimodal pain management protocol following pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14856. [PMID: 36398867 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients undergoing solid-organ transplantation demonstrate pain arising from both the surgical intervention and pre-existing comorbidities. High levels of opioid use both pre- and post-transplant are associated with unfavorable transplant outcomes. Patient education, multimodal therapy, and discharge planning have all been demonstrated to reduce opioid use after transplant. METHODS This is a single-center, retrospective study analyzing patients before and after implementation of a multimodal, multidisciplinary pain management protocol. Morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) use during the index transplant hospitalization and the need for opioids at discharge was compared between the pre- and post-protocol groups. RESULTS A total of 52 patients were included in the study, 31 in the pre and 21 in the post-protocol groups. Inpatient MME use was reduced from 135.5 to 67.5 MMEs after protocol implementation. Additionally, the number of patients discharged on opioids following transplant decreased from 90.3% to 47.6%. Pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and return of bowel function was not different between groups. CONCLUSION The implementation of a multimodal, multidisciplinary pain management protocol significantly decreased opioid use during the post-surgical hospitalization and in the 6 months following transplantation. A combination of non-opioid analgesics, patient education, and discharge planning can be beneficial elements in pancreas transplant pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K Lindner
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Washington DC, USA
| | - Shahzia A Lakhani
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Brian M Nguyen
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Gayle Vranic
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Soo Y Yi
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Peter Abrams
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rugg CM, Ginder JH, Bharadwaj A, Vomer R, Dale GA, Ketterly J, Zarzour H, Amendola A, Lau BC. Perioperative Management in the Collegiate Athlete: An Integrated Approach. Sports Med Int Open 2023; 7:E1-E8. [PMID: 37101550 PMCID: PMC10125641 DOI: 10.1055/a-2051-7756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Collegiate athletes face rigorous physical, academic, and emotional demands. While significant attention has been paid to injury prevention among young athletes in the past two decades, orthopedic injury rates remain high among collegiate athletes, and a significant number will undergo surgical management for injuries each year. In this narrative review, we describe techniques for perioperative management of pain and stress after surgery in collegiate athletes. In particular, we outline pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of surgical pain, with a goal of minimizing opiate consumption. We emphasize a multi-disciplinary approach to optimizing post-operative recovery in collegiate athletes help minimize reliance on opiate pain medication. Additionally, we recommend that institutional resources should be harnessed to support athletes in their well-being, from a nutritional, psychological and sleep standpoint. Critical to success in perioperative pain management is the communication among the athletic medicine team members and with the athlete and family to address pain and stress management and encourage timely, safe return to play.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rock Vomer
- Orthopedics, Division of Sports Medicine, Duke University, Durham,
United States
| | | | | | - Hap Zarzour
- Athletics, Duke University, Durham, United States
| | | | - Brian C. Lau
- Orthopedics, Duke University, Durham, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chen C, Tighe PJ, Lo-Ciganic WH, Winterstein AG, Wei YJ. Perioperative Use of Gabapentinoids and Risk for Postoperative Long-Term Opioid Use in Older Adults Undergoing Total Knee or Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:2149-2157.e3. [PMID: 35577053 PMCID: PMC9588599 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gabapentinoids are recommended by guidelines as a component of multimodal analgesia to manage postoperative pain and reduce opioid use. It remains unknown whether perioperative use of gabapentinoids is associated with a reduced or increased risk of postoperative long-term opioid use (LTOU) after total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA). METHODS Using Medicare claims data from 2011 to 2018, we identified fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years who were hospitalized for a primary TKA/THA and had no LTOU before the surgery. Perioperative use of gabapentinoids was measured from 7 days preadmission through 7 days postdischarge. Patients were required to receive opioids during the perioperative period and were followed from day 7 postdischarge for 180 days to assess postoperative LTOU (ie, ≥90 consecutive days). A modified Poisson regression was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of postoperative LTOU in patients with versus without perioperative use of gabapentinoids, adjusting for confounders through propensity score weighting. RESULTS Of 52,788 eligible Medicare older beneficiaries (mean standard deviation [SD] age 72.7 [5.3]; 62.5% females; 89.7% White), 3,967 (7.5%) received gabapentinoids during the perioperative period. Postoperative LTOU was 3.8% in patients with and 4.0% in those without perioperative gabapentinoids. After adjusting for confounders, the risk of postoperative LTOU was similar comparing patients with versus without perioperative gabapentinoids (RR = 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91-1.26, P = .408). Sensitivity and bias analyses yielded consistent results. CONCLUSION Among older Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a primary TKA/THA, perioperative use of gabapentinoids was not associated with a reduced or increased risk for postoperative LTOU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Chen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Patrick J Tighe
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Almut G Winterstein
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida Colleges of Medicine and Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Yu-Jung Wei
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bongiovanni T, Anderson TS, Marcum ZA. Perioperative Gabapentin Use in Older Adults: Revisiting Multimodal Pain Management. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:1127-1128. [PMID: 36121647 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.3757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tasce Bongiovanni
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine
| | - Timothy S Anderson
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Park CM, Inouye SK, Marcantonio ER, Metzger E, Bateman BT, Lie JJ, Lee SB, Levin R, Kim DH. Perioperative Gabapentin Use and In-Hospital Adverse Clinical Events Among Older Adults After Major Surgery. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:1117-1127. [PMID: 36121671 PMCID: PMC9486639 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.3680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Gabapentin has been increasingly used as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen to reduce opioid use in perioperative pain management. However, the safety of perioperative gabapentin use among older patients remains uncertain. Objective To examine in-hospital adverse clinical events associated with perioperative gabapentin use among older patients undergoing major surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study using data from the Premier Healthcare Database included patients aged 65 years or older who underwent major surgery at US hospitals within 7 days of hospital admission from January 1, 2009, to March 31, 2018, and did not use gabapentin before surgery. Data were analyzed from June 14, 2021, to May 23, 2022. Exposures Gabapentin use within 2 days after surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was delirium, identified using diagnosis codes, and secondary outcomes were new antipsychotic use, pneumonia, and in-hospital death between postoperative day 3 and hospital discharge. To reduce confounding, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed. Risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) with 95% CIs were estimated. Results Among 967 547 patients before propensity score matching (mean [SD] age, 76.2 [7.4] years; 59.6% female), the rate of perioperative gabapentin use was 12.3% (119 087 patients). After propensity score matching, 237 872 (118 936 pairs) gabapentin users and nonusers (mean [SD] age, 74.5 [6.7] years; 62.7% female) were identified. Compared with nonusers, gabapentin users had increased risk of delirium (4040 [3.4%] vs 3148 [2.6%]; RR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.23-1.34]; RD, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.75 [0.61-0.89] per 100 persons), new antipsychotic use (944 [0.8%] vs 805 [0.7%]; RR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.07-1.29]; RD, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.05-0.19] per 100 persons), and pneumonia (1521 [1.3%] vs 1368 [1.2%]; RR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03-1.20]; RD, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.04-0.22] per 100 persons), but there was no difference in in-hospital death (362 [0.3%] vs 354 [0.2%]; RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.88-1.18]; RD, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.05] per 100 persons). Risk of delirium among gabapentin users was greater in subgroups with high comorbidity burden than in those with low comorbidity burden (combined comorbidity index <4 vs ≥4: RR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.13-1.27] vs 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30-1.51]; RD, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.28-0.53] vs 2.66 [95% CI, 2.08-3.24] per 100 persons) and chronic kidney disease (absence vs presence: RR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.19-1.33] vs 1.38 [95% CI, 1.27-1.49]; RD, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.42-0.69] vs 1.97 [95% CI, 1.49-2.46] per 100 persons). Conclusion and Relevance In this cohort study, perioperative gabapentin use was associated with increased risk of delirium, new antipsychotic use, and pneumonia among older patients after major surgery. These results suggest careful risk-benefit assessment before prescribing gabapentin for perioperative pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Mi Park
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sharon K. Inouye
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Edward R. Marcantonio
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eran Metzger
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brian T. Bateman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jessica J. Lie
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Su Been Lee
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raisa Levin
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dae Hyun Kim
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Badin D, Ortiz-Babilonia CD, Gupta A, Leland CR, Musharbash F, Parrish JM, Aiyer AA. Prescription Patterns, Associated Factors, and Outcomes of Opioids for Operative Foot and Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:2187-2201. [PMID: 35901447 PMCID: PMC10476710 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain management after foot and ankle surgery must surmount unique challenges that are not present in orthopaedic surgery performed on other parts of the body. However, disparate and inconsistent evidence makes it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from individual studies. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES In this systematic review, we asked: what are (1) the patterns of opioid use or prescription (quantity, duration, incidence of persistent use), (2) factors associated with increased or decreased risk of persistent opioid use, and (3) the clinical outcomes (principally pain relief and adverse events) associated with opioid use in patients undergoing foot or ankle fracture surgery? METHODS We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for our review. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science on October 15, 2021. We included studies published from 2010 to 2021 that assessed patterns of opioid use, factors associated with increased or decreased opioid use, and other outcomes associated with opioid use after foot or ankle fracture surgery (principally pain relief and adverse events). We excluded studies on pediatric populations and studies focused on acute postoperative pain where short-term opioid use (< 1 week) was a secondary outcome only. A total of 1713 articles were assessed and 18 were included. The quality of the 16 included retrospective observational studies and two randomized trials was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria and the Jadad scale, respectively; study quality was determined to be low to moderate for observational studies and good for randomized trials. Mean patient age ranged from 42 to 53 years. Fractures studied included unimalleolar, bimalleolar, trimalleolar, and pilon fractures. RESULTS Proportions of postoperative persistent opioid use (defined as use beyond 3 or 6 months postoperatively) ranged from 2.6% (546 of 20,992) to 18.5% (32 of 173) and reached 39% (28 of 72) when including patients with prior opioid use. Among the numerous associations reported by observational studies, two or more preoperative opioid prescriptions had the strongest overall association with increased opioid use, but this was assessed by only one study (OR 11.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.16 to 13.30]; p < 0.001). Meanwhile, spinal and regional anesthesia (-13.5 to -41.1 oral morphine equivalents (OME) difference; all p < 0.01) and postoperative ketorolac use (40 OME difference; p = 0.037) were associated with decreased opioid consumption in two observational studies and a randomized trial, respectively. Three observational studies found that opioid use preoperatively was associated with a higher proportion of emergency department visits and readmission (OR 1.41 to 17.4; all p < 0.001), and opioid use at 2 weeks postoperatively was associated with slightly higher pain scores compared with nonopioid regimens (β = 0.042; p < 0.001 and Likert scale 2.5 versus 1.6; p < 0.05) in one study. CONCLUSION Even after noting possible inflation of the harms of opioids in this review, our findings nonetheless highlight the need for opioid prescription guidelines specific for foot and ankle surgery. In this context, surgeons should utilize short (< 1 week) opioid prescriptions, regional anesthesia, and multimodal pain management techniques, especially in patients at increased risk of prolonged opioid use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Badin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carlos D. Ortiz-Babilonia
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Arjun Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | - Farah Musharbash
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James M. Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Amiethab A. Aiyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hahn J, Jo Y, Yoo SH, Shin J, Yu YM, Ah YM. Risk of major adverse events associated with gabapentinoid and opioid combination therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1009950. [PMID: 36304170 PMCID: PMC9593000 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1009950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The use of opioid-gabapentinoid combinations has increased, raising several safety concerns. However, meta-analysis studies focusing on this issue are limited. Objective: To evaluate the risk of central nervous system (CNS) depression, gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events, and mortality of combination therapy compared with those of opioid therapy and to explore the differences in the results according to study design and indications. Methods: Relevant studies were selected (published before 30 January 2022) by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. The pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the outcomes were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed according to study characteristics. Quality assessment was conducted using the Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in non-RCTs tool for non-randomized trials. Results: Adverse events were reported in 26 RCTs and 7 non-RCTs, and mortality was reported in 10 non-RCTs. Compared to opioid therapy, dizziness, cognitive dysfunction, and respiratory depression in combination therapy significantly increased in non-RCTs (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.82-5.85; OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.51-6.50; OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.31-2.24, respectively), and a similar trend for dizziness and cognitive dysfunction was also identified in the RCT analysis, although the difference was not significant. Combination therapy for cancer pain was associated with the highest risk of sedation in subgroup analysis. Combination therapy significantly decreased the risk of GI adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, and constipation. The mortality risk associated with combination therapy was higher than that associated with opioid therapy (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.26-6.05). Conclusion: Opioid-gabapentinoid combination therapy could be associated with an increased risk of CNS depression and mortality, despite tolerable GI adverse events. These data suggest that combination therapy requires close monitoring of CNS depression, especially in cancer patients. Caution is needed in interpreting the clinical meanings owing to the lack of risk difference in respiratory depression in the RCT-only analysis and the absence of RCT or prospective studies investigating mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jongsung Hahn
- School of Pharmacy, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, South Korea
- KIURI Research Center, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Youngkwon Jo
- Department of Pharmacy and Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, South Korea
| | - So Hee Yoo
- Department of Pharmacy and Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Jaekyu Shin
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Yun Mi Yu
- Department of Pharmacy and Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, South Korea
- Department of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Regulatory Sciences, Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Young-Mi Ah
- College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Perioperative pain management is one of the domains in which Anesthesiologists are intricately involved, and which is immensely important. Adequate postoperative analgesia is central to avoid both the acute as well as chronic complications of uncontrolled postoperative pain. Preventive analgesia has been identified as an approach to mitigate the phenomenon of central sensitization, which plays an important role in the development of chronic pain after surgery. As an over-reliance on opioids for peri- and postoperative pain control is associated with opioid dependence and hyperalgesia, multimodal analgesia has taken center stage. Multimodal analgesia, in theory, will optimize perioperative pain control, reduce the chance of central sensitization, and avoid the detrimental effects of opioid overuse. Multiple classes of systemic analgesic medications have been used to accomplish these tasks, and the aim of this article is to outline these medications, their mechanisms of action, as well as the evidence behind their individual roles in multimodal analgesia. Regional anesthesia has also been embraced as a key component of multimodal analgesia in orthopedic surgery; however, over the past several years, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) emerged as a viable alternative, particularly in total knee arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana O'Neill
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Philipp Lirk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yang HH, Wu TJ, Suh JD, Wang MB, Holliday MA, Beswick DM, Zhang H, Wells C, McCormick J, Maxim T, Regev A, Chandy ZK, Lee JT. Postoperative Gabapentin's Effect on Opioid Consumption and Pain Control Following Sinonasal Surgery. Laryngoscope 2022; 133:1065-1072. [PMID: 35833722 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigates the impact of postoperative gabapentin on opioid consumption and pain control following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and/or septoplasty. METHODS Patients who underwent ESS and/or septoplasty at a single institution from 2021 to 2022 were enrolled. All patients received postoperative hydrocodone-acetaminophen for pain control. Half of the patients were also prescribed gabapentin for the first postoperative day in addition to hydrocodone-acetaminophen. Subjects completed the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire 24 h and 7 days after surgery. We conducted a multivariable regression analysis to assess opioid consumption and improvement in pain scores in the first week between gabapentin and non-gabapentin groups. RESULTS A total of 102 subjects, 51 in each arm, were enrolled. The mean age was 52 years and 53% of participants were female. Controlling for important baseline demographic, clinical, and surgically related variables, the addition of postoperative gabapentin was associated with a 44% (9.5 mg from 21.6 mg) reduction in opioids consumed in the first postoperative week (B = -9.54, 95% C.I. = [-17.84, -1.24], p = 0.025). In addition, patients in both arms exhibited similar improvement in pain severity and sleep interference in the first 7 days (B = -1.59, 95% C.I. = [-5.03, 1.84], p = 0.36). CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the impact of postoperative gabapentin on opioid consumption and pain control following ESS and/or septoplasty. Our analysis demonstrated that postoperative gabapentin effectively reduced opioid use during the first postoperative week without compromising pain control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Ho Yang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tara J Wu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Suh
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael A Holliday
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Huan Zhang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Christine Wells
- Office of Academic Research and Computing, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Justin McCormick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Tom Maxim
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Aviva Regev
- Department of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Zachariah K Chandy
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jivianne T Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Do U, El-Kefraoui C, Pook M, Balvardi S, Barone N, Nguyen-Powanda P, Lee L, Baldini G, Feldman LS, Fiore JF. Feasibility of Prospectively Comparing Opioid Analgesia With Opioid-Free Analgesia After Outpatient General Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2221430. [PMID: 35849399 PMCID: PMC9294998 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.21430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The overprescription of opioids to surgical patients is recognized as an important factor contributing to the opioid crisis. However, the value of prescribing opioid analgesia (OA) vs opioid-free analgesia (OFA) after postoperative discharge remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized clinical trial (RCT) to assess the comparative effectiveness of OA vs OFA after outpatient general surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This parallel, 2-group, assessor-blind, pragmatic pilot RCT was conducted from January 29 to September 3, 2020 (last follow-up on October 2, 2020). at 2 university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Participants were adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing outpatient abdominal (ie, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or hernia repair) or breast (ie, partial or total mastectomy) general surgical procedures. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to drugs used in the trial, preoperative opioid use, conditions that could affect assessment of outcomes, and intraoperative or early complications requiring hospitalization. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive OA (around-the-clock nonopioids and opioids for breakthrough pain) or OFA (around-the-clock nonopioids with increasing doses and/or addition of nonopioid medications for breakthrough pain) after postoperative discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Main outcomes were a priori RCT feasibility criteria (ie, rates of surgeon agreement, patient eligibility, patient consent, treatment adherence, loss to follow-up, and missing follow-up data). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity and interference, analgesic intake, 30-day unplanned health care use, and adverse events. Between-group comparison of outcomes followed the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS A total of 15 surgeons were approached; all (100%; 95% CI, 78%-100%) agreed to have patients recruited and adhered to the study procedures. Rates of patient eligibility and consent were 73% (95% CI, 66%-78%) and 57% (95% CI, 49%-65%), respectively. Seventy-six patients were randomized (39 [51%] to OA and 37 [49%] to OFA) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 55.5 [14.5] years; 50 [66%] female); 40 (53%) underwent abdominal surgery, and 36 (47%) underwent breast surgery. Seventy-five patients (99%; 95% CI, 93%-100%) adhered to the allocated treatment; 1 patient randomly assigned to OFA received an opioid prescription. Seventeen patients (44%) randomly assigned to OA consumed opioids after discharge. Seventy-three patients (96%; 95% CI, 89%-99%) completed the 30-day follow-up. The rate of missing questionnaires was 37 of 3724 (1%; 95% CI, 0.7%-1.4%). All the a priori RCT feasibility criteria were fulfilled. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this pilot RCT support the feasibility of conducting a robust, full-scale RCT to inform evidence-based prescribing of analgesia after outpatient general surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04254679.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uyen Do
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Charbel El-Kefraoui
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Makena Pook
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Saba Balvardi
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Natasha Barone
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Philip Nguyen-Powanda
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gabriele Baldini
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Liane S. Feldman
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Julio F. Fiore
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ziadni MS, You DS, Keane R, Salazar B, Jaros S, Ram J, Roy A, Tanner N, Salmasi V, Gardner M, Darnall BD. "My Surgical Success": Feasibility and Impact of a Single-Session Digital Behavioral Pain Medicine Intervention on Pain Intensity, Pain Catastrophizing, and Time to Opioid Cessation After Orthopedic Trauma Surgery-A Randomized Trial. Anesth Analg 2022; 135:394-405. [PMID: 35696706 PMCID: PMC9259046 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Behavioral pain treatments may improve postsurgical analgesia and recovery; however, effective and scalable options are not widely available. This study tested a digital perioperative behavioral medicine intervention in orthopedic trauma surgery patients for feasibility and efficacy for reducing pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and opioid cessation up to 3 months after surgery. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at an orthopedic trauma surgery unit at a major academic hospital to compare a digital behavioral pain management intervention (“My Surgical Success” [MSS]) to a digital general health education (HE) intervention (HE; no pain management skills). The enrolled sample included 133 patients; 84 patients were randomized (MSS, n = 37; HE, n = 47) and completed study procedures. Most patients received their assigned intervention within 3 days of surgery (85%). The sample was predominantly male (61.5%), White (61.9%), and partnered (65.5%), with at least a bachelor’s degree (69.0%). Outcomes were collected at 1–3 months after intervention through self-report e-surveys and electronic medical record review; an intention-to-treat analytic framework was applied. Feasibility was dually determined by the proportion of patients engaging in their assigned treatment and an application of an 80% threshold for patient-reported acceptability. We hypothesized that MSS would result in greater reductions in pain intensity and pain catastrophizing after surgery and earlier opioid cessation compared to the digital HE control group. RESULTS: The engagement rate with assigned interventions was 63% and exceeded commonly reported rates for fully automated Internet-based e-health interventions. Feasibility was demonstrated for the MSS engagers, with >80% reporting treatment acceptability. Overall, both groups improved in the postsurgical months across all study variables. A significant interaction effect was found for treatment group over time on pain intensity, such that the MSS group evidenced greater absolute reductions in pain intensity after surgery and up to 3 months later (treatment × time fixed effects; F[215] = 5.23; P = .024). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for time to opioid cessation or for reductions in pain catastrophizing (F[215] = 0.20; P = .653), although the study sample notably had subclinical baseline pain catastrophizing scores (M = 14.10; 95% confidence interval, 11.70–16.49). CONCLUSIONS: Study findings revealed that a fully automated behavioral pain management skills intervention (MSS) may be useful for motivated orthopedic trauma surgery patients and reduce postsurgical pain up to 3 months. MSS was not associated with reduced time to opioid cessation compared to the HE control intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Dokyoung S You
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ryan Keane
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Brett Salazar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
| | - Sam Jaros
- Department of Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jesmin Ram
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Anuradha Roy
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Natalie Tanner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
| | - Vafi Salmasi
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Michael Gardner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
| | - Beth D Darnall
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hamilton C, Alfille P, Mountjoy J, Bao X. Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review. J Thorac Dis 2022; 14:2276-2296. [PMID: 35813725 PMCID: PMC9264080 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objective Thoracic surgery causes significant pain which can negatively affect pulmonary function and increase risk of postoperative complications. Effective analgesia is important to reduce splinting and atelectasis. Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have been used for decades and are effective at treating acute post-thoracotomy pain, although both have risks and adverse effects. The advancement of thoracoscopic surgery, a focus on multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesics, and the development of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques have greatly expanded the options for acute pain management after thoracic surgery. Despite the expansion of surgical techniques and analgesic approaches, there is no clear optimal approach to pain management. This review aims to summarize the body of literature regarding systemic and regional anesthetic techniques for thoracic surgery in both thoracotomy and minimally invasive approaches, with a goal of providing a foundation for providers to make individualized decisions for patients depending on surgical approach and patient factors, and to discuss avenues for future research. Methods We searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 2021 using the terms “thoracic surgery”, “thoracic surgery AND pain management”, “thoracic surgery AND analgesia”, “thoracic surgery AND regional anesthesia”, “thoracic surgery AND epidural”. We considered articles written in English and available to the reader. Key Content and Findings There is a wide variety of strategies for treating acute pain after thoracic surgery, including multimodal opioid and non-opioid systemic analgesics, regional anesthesia including TEA and paravertebral blocks (PVB), and a recent expansion in the use of novel fascial plane blocks especially for thoracoscopy. The body of literature on the effectiveness of different approaches for thoracotomy and thoracoscopy is a rapidly expanding field and area of active debate. Conclusions The optimal analgesic approach for thoracic surgery may depend on patient factors, surgical factors, and institutional factors. Although TEA may provide optimal analgesia after thoracotomy, PVB and emerging fascial plane blocks may offer effective alternatives. A tailored approach using multimodal systemic therapies and regional anesthesia is important, and future studies comparing techniques are necessary to further investigate the optimal approach to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey Hamilton
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul Alfille
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeremi Mountjoy
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xiaodong Bao
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abdallah NM, Bakeer AH. A Multimodal Analgesic Protocol with Gabapentin-dexmedetomidine for Post-operative Pain Management after Modified Radical Mastectomy Surgery: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.9698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aim: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is accompanied by severe acute postoperative pain. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral gabapentin plus dexmedetomidine infusion as an analgesic multimodal protocol in patients undergoing MRM.
Methods: This prospective randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study included 30 females scheduled for MRM from June 2021 to December 2021. They were randomly divided into two groups. GD Group (n=15) received oral gabapentin 400 mg and IV infusion of Dexmedetomidine 0.4 µg/kg/h over 10 min after a bolus of 0.5 µg/kg before induction of general anesthesia. Placebo Group (n=15) received a placebo capsule and saline infusion identical to the GD Group. The primary outcome measure was total morphine consumption, and secondary outcomes were pain and sedation scores and intraoperative fentanyl consumption.
Results: Pain score was significantly lower in the GD Group than the Placebo group, starting immediately postoperative up to 24 hours except after 18 hours. The total intraoperative fentanyl consumption and postoperative morphine consumption were significantly lower in the GD Group. The sedation score was significantly higher in the GD Group compared to the Placebo group immediately postoperative and after 2 hours. The heart rate and mean arterial pressure were within the clinically accepted ranges intra- and postoperatively in the two groups.
Conclusion: Preemptive oral gabapentin plus dexmedetomidine IV infusion is a safe and effective analgesic alternative for patients undergoing MRM.
Collapse
|
40
|
Ludwig K, Wexelman B, Chen S, Cheng G, DeSnyder S, Golesorkhi N, Greenup R, James T, Lee B, Pockaj B, Vuong B, Fluharty S, Fuentes E, Rao R. Home Recovery After Mastectomy: Review of Literature and Strategies for Implementation American Society of Breast Surgeons Working Group. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5799-5808. [PMID: 35503389 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11799-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practices regarding recovery after mastectomy vary significantly, including overnight stay versus discharge same day. Expanded use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) algorithms and the recent COVID pandemic have led to increased number of patients who undergo home recovery after mastectomy (HRAM). METHODS The Patient Safety Quality Committee of the American Society of Breast Surgeons created a multispecialty working group to review the literature evaluating HRAM after mastectomy with and without implant-based reconstruction. A literature review was performed regarding this topic; the group then developed guidance for patient selection and tools for implementation. RESULTS Multiple, retrospective series have reported that patients discharged day of mastectomy have similar risk of complications compared with those kept overnight, including risk of hematoma (0-5.1%). Multimodal strategies that improve nausea and analgesia improve likelihood of HRAM. Patients who undergo surgery in ambulatory surgery centers and by high-volume breast surgeons are more likely to be discharged day of surgery. When evaluating unplanned return to care, the only significant factors are African American race and increased comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS Review of current literature demonstrates that HRAM is a safe option in appropriate patients. Choice of method of recovery should consider patient factors, such as comorbidities and social situation, and requires input from the multidisciplinary team. Preoperative education regarding pain management, drain care, and after-hour access to medical care are crucial components to a successful program. Additional investigation is needed as these programs become more prevalent to assess quality measures such as unplanned return to care, complications, and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kandice Ludwig
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | | | | | - Gloria Cheng
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ted James
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Brooke Vuong
- Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Siegel MG. Published Multimodal Anesthetic Protocols Using Gabapentin Risk Substantial Side Effects and Are Not Recommended. Arthroscopy 2022; 38:1381-1382. [PMID: 35501001 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
42
|
Bercu C, Hemal A, Badlani G, Dutta R, Pathak R. Evaluation of a Novel Multimodal Opioid-Free Postoperative Pain Management Pathway Following Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Series in the Veteran Population. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e419-e423. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
43
|
Jildeh TR, Okoroha KR. Author Reply to "Published Multimodal Anesthetic Protocols Using Gabapentin Risk Substantial Side Effects and Are Not Recommended". Arthroscopy 2022; 38:1383-1385. [PMID: 35501002 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Toufic R Jildeh
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Kelechi R Okoroha
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sieberg CB, Karunakaran KD, Kussman B, Borsook D. Preventing pediatric chronic postsurgical pain: Time for increased rigor. Can J Pain 2022; 6:73-84. [PMID: 35528039 PMCID: PMC9067470 DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2021.2019576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) results from a cascade of events in the peripheral and central nervous systems following surgery. Several clinical predictors, including the prior pain state, premorbid psychological state (e.g., anxiety, catastrophizing), intraoperative surgical load (establishment of peripheral and central sensitization), and acute postoperative pain management, may contribute to the patient's risk of developing CPSP. However, research on the neurobiological and biobehavioral mechanisms contributing to pediatric CPSP and effective preemptive/treatment strategies are still lacking. Here we evaluate the perisurgical process by identifying key problems and propose potential solutions for the pre-, intra-, and postoperative pain states to both prevent and manage the transition of acute to chronic pain. We propose an eight-step process involving preemptive and preventative analgesia, behavioral interventions, and the use of biomarkers (brain-based, inflammatory, or genetic) to facilitate timely evaluation and treatment of premorbid psychological factors, ongoing surgical pain, and postoperative pain to provide an overall improved outcome. By achieving this, we can begin to establish personalized precision medicine for children and adolescents presenting to surgery and subsequent treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine B. Sieberg
- Biobehavioral Pediatric Pain Lab, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Keerthana Deepti Karunakaran
- Biobehavioral Pediatric Pain Lab, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Barry Kussman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, & Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - David Borsook
- Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sean C Mackey
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Clarification of Conflict of Interest Disclosures. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:553. [PMID: 35442404 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
47
|
Abstract
This review summarizes current evidence related to perioperative opioid prescription fulfillment and use and discusses the role of personalized anesthesia care in mitigating opioid-related harms without compromising analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B. Larach
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN)
| | - Jennifer M. Hah
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine (Stanford, CA)
| | - Chad M. Brummett
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School (Ann Arbor, MI)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Strategies aimed at preventing long-term opioid use in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:238. [PMID: 35277150 PMCID: PMC8917706 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05044-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Long-term opioid use, which may have significant individual and societal impacts, has been documented in up to 20% of patients after trauma or orthopaedic surgery. The objectives of this scoping review were to systematically map the research on strategies aiming to prevent chronic opioid use in these populations and to identify knowledge gaps in this area.
Methods
This scoping review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. We searched seven databases and websites of relevant organizations. Selected studies and guidelines were published between January 2008 and September 2021. Preventive strategies were categorized as: system-based, pharmacological, educational, multimodal, and others. We summarized findings using measures of central tendency and frequency along with p-values. We also reported the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations presented in clinical guidelines.
Results
A total of 391 studies met the inclusion criteria after initial screening from which 66 studies and 20 guidelines were selected. Studies mainly focused on orthopaedic surgery (62,1%), trauma (30.3%) and spine surgery (7.6%). Among system-based strategies, hospital-based individualized opioid tapering protocols, and regulation initiatives limiting the prescription of opioids were associated with statistically significant decreases in morphine equivalent doses (MEDs) at 1 to 3 months following trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Among pharmacological strategies, only the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and beta blockers led to a significant reduction in MEDs up to 12 months after orthopaedic surgery. Most studies on educational strategies, multimodal strategies and psychological strategies were associated with significant reductions in MEDs beyond 1 month. The majority of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines were of low level of evidence.
Conclusions
This scoping review advances knowledge on existing strategies to prevent long-term opioid use in trauma and orthopaedic surgery patients. We observed that system-based, educational, multimodal and psychological strategies are the most promising. Future research should focus on determining which strategies should be implemented particularly in trauma patients at high risk for long-term use, testing those that can promote a judicious prescription of opioids while preventing an illicit use, and evaluating their effects on relevant patient-reported and social outcomes.
Collapse
|
49
|
Zhao D, Baek J, Hume AL, McPhillips EA, Lapane KL. Geographic Variation in the Use of Gabapentinoids and Opioids for Pain in a Commercially Insured Adult Population in the United States. J Pain Res 2022; 15:443-454. [PMID: 35177933 PMCID: PMC8846606 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s345521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gabapentinoids have been prescribed off-label for almost all types of pain. The geographic variation in the use of gabapentinoids as analgesics remains unknown. Objective To describe the geographic variation in gabapentinoids, opioids and concurrent use of both for pain by US state and metropolitan statistical area (MSA). Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study on December 1, 2018, among commercially insured adults aged 18–64 years without epilepsy or opioid use disorders using IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases. We described the geographic variation in the analgesic regimens (gabapentinoids, opioids and concurrent use of both) by state and MSA, and assessed factors associated with the geographic variation using multilevel logistic regression. Results We included 9,314,197 beneficiaries; 1.4% had gabapentinoids, 1.5% had opioids and 0.3% had concurrent use of both. The majority of gabapentinoid use lacked an FDA-approved indication. Use of the analgesic regimens varied across states (gabapentinoids (median (interquartile range)): 1.4% (1.2–1.7%); opioids: 1.5% (1.2–1.9%); both: 0.3% (0.2–0.4%)) and MSAs (gabapentinoids: 1.6% (1.3–2.0%); opioids: 1.8% (1.3–2.3%); both: 0.3% (0.2–0.5%)). Demographics explained the largest proportion of the between-state and between-MSA variation. The pattern of the geographic variation in gabapentinoids was similar to that of opioids across states and MSAs. Conclusion Gabapentinoids were as commonly used as opioids for pain in a commercially insured population (mostly off-label). The geographic variation in gabapentinoids was similar to that of opioids, which suggests that gabapentinoids may be widely used as alternatives or adjuvants to opioids across the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danni Zhao
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Jonggyu Baek
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Anne L Hume
- Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Emily A McPhillips
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Kate L Lapane
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
- Correspondence: Kate L Lapane, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA, Email
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lans J, Westenberg RF, Gottlieb RE, Valerio IL, Chen NC, Eberlin KR. Long-Term Opioid Use Following Surgery for Symptomatic Neuroma. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38:137-143. [PMID: 35100646 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying patients at risk for prolonged opioid use following surgery for symptomatic neuroma would be beneficial for perioperative management. The aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with postoperative opioid use of >4 weeks in patients undergoing neuroma surgery. METHODS After retrospective identification, 77 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic neuroma of the upper or lower extremity were enrolled. Patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, and a custom medication questionnaire at a median of 9.7 years (range: 2.5-16.8 years) following surgery. Neuroma excision followed by nerve implantation (n = 39, 51%), nerve reconstruction/repair (n = 18, 23%), and excision alone (n = 16, 21%) were the most common surgical treatments. RESULTS Overall, 27% (n = 21) of patients reported opioid use of more than 4 weeks postoperatively. Twenty-three patients (30%) reported preoperative opioid use of which 11 (48%) did not report opioid use for >4 weeks, postoperatively. In multivariable logistic regression, preoperative opioid use was independently associated with opioid use of >4 weeks, postoperatively (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-14.3, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION Neuroma surgery reduces opioid use in many patients but patients who are taking opioids preoperatively are at risk for longer opioid use. Almost one-third of patients reported opioid use longer than 4 weeks, postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Lans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Ritsaart F Westenberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Rachel E Gottlieb
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Ian L Valerio
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery, and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Neal C Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Kyle R Eberlin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery, and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|