Preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal carcinoma. A report of surgical morbidity

Oxaliplatin with Raltitrexed and Preoperative Radiotherapy in T3-T4 Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer. A Dose Finding Study

Aims and background

The availability of new drugs offers the opportunity to improve the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer. Raltitrexed and oxaliplatin are effective in advanced colorectal cancer with acceptable toxicity and can act as radiation enhancers as shown in phase 1-11 studies. The aim of the study was thus to determine the recommended dose of oxaliplatin concomitantly administered with raltitrexed and concurrent preoperative radiotherapy in patients with stage 11-111 extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

Methods

From September 2001 to September 2002, 18 consecutive patients with T3/T4 rectal cancer were treated at our Institution with preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery after 6-8 weeks. Pelvic radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions in 5 weeks followed by a 5.4 Gy boost at 1.8 Gy daily. Concomitant chemotherapy consisted of 3 mg/m2/iv of raltitrexed on days 1, 19, 38 of radiotherapy treatment with incremental doses of oxaliplatin according to dose finding rules (4 dose levels: 65, 85, 110, 130 mg/m2). Dose-limiting toxicity for oxaliplatin was defined as either grade 3-4 hematological or grade 3-4 gastrointestinal or neurological toxicity. We studied a minimum of 3 patients at each dose level.

Results

Three patients were treated at 65, 85, and 110 mg/m2/iv, respectively, while 9 patients were recruited at the last dose level. Neither grade 3-4 gastrointestinal nor neurological toxicity were documented. Dose-limiting toxicity was documented in 2/9 subjects at the 130 mg/m2 level consisting of grade 3 transient asymptomatic leukopenia. Thirteen patients developed transient increase of one or more liver enzymes (grade 3-4) and 2 patients developed grade 3 perineal dermatitis. All patients received the programmed dose of radiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen was not completed in 4 cases due to grade 2 protracted leukopenia.

Conclusions

The maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin was not reached at the maximum dose level (IV); 130 mg/m2 can therefore be defined as the recommended dose. The combination of oxaliplatin with raltitrexed and radiotherapy can be considered feasible and well tolerated.

Preoperative Concomitant Radiochemotherapy with A 5-Fluorouracil plus Folinic Acid Bolus in the Combined Treatment of Locally Advanced Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer: A Long-Term Analysis on 27 Patients

Aims and background

Many studies of preoperative chemoradiation in resectable rectal cancer have focused on downstaging and sphincter-saving procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome in resectable rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation and surgery by only one surgical team irrespective of the tumor downstaging.

Material and methods

From 1992 to 2001, in a cooperative study between the Institute of Semeiotica Chirurgica and the Division of Radiotherapy of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 27 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with preoperative chemoradiation, followed by surgery after 4-6 weeks, and, just for 6 of them, by adjuvant chemotherapy. Seventeen patients were staged T3 N1 (63%), 4 patients T3N0 (15%), 4 patients T3N2 (15%) and 2 T4N2 (7.5%). Twenty-three patients (85.1%) had signs of nodal involvement at combined imaging. Radiation therapy was delivered to the posterior pelvis at a dose of 45 Gy to the tumor (clinical target volume) and the whole pelvis (planning target volume). Fractionation was conventional: 1.8 Gy/day, 5 fractions a week. Radiotherapy was started on Monday for all patients and was delivered with a linear accelerator. Concomitant chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m2/day, as an intravenous bolus on days 1-5 and 29-33 of radiotherapy) and folinic acid (L-isomer) (10 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus on days 1-5 and 29-33). This chemotherapy was generally administered about 1 hr before radiotherapy. Data were analyzed on July 2002; median follow-up was 59 months (range, 20-116 months). No patient was lost during the follow-up.

Results

All patients completed the treatment. Grade >3 acute toxicity occurred in 11% of the patients and late toxicity was 15%. A pathologic complete response was recorded in 22% of patients; sphincter-preserving surgery was feasible in 44%. Seven patients died: 2 of them perioperatively, 1 patient died with local recurrence, and 1 died with distant metastases; 3 patients died during the follow-up for other causes. Five-year local control was 95% and overall survival was 84%.

Conclusions

Our study, although limited in number, demonstrated good results in local control and disease-free survival with a limited toxicity.

Integrated Treatment with Doxifluridine and Radiotherapy in Recurrent or Primary Unresectable Rectal Cancer. A Feasibility Study

Aims and Background

When combined with radiotherapy, fluoropyrimidines have been shown to have synergistic effects on various tumor types. Doxifluridine (5-dFUR) is a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug that is transformed into 5-FU in neoplastic tissue, which suggests that it may improve the activity of radiotherapy. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of radiotherapy and oral 5-dFUR plus I-leucovorin in terms of pathologically complete remissions in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

Eleven patients with locally recurrent (n = 7) or primary unresectable rectal cancer (n = 4) were treated with three cycles of oral I-leucovorin 25 mg/dose followed by 5-dFUR 750 mg/m2 twice daily for four days every 12, in combination with pelvic radiation at a standard dose of 45 Gy over five weeks. The tumor burden was assessed by means of CT and endoscopic ultrasound at baseline and at least four weeks after the end of the treatment and before surgery.

Results

Four patients achieved an objective response, 6 disease stabilization and 1 had progressive disease. After a median time of five weeks from the end of treatment 8 patients underwent radical resection and a pathologically complete remission was documented in 2. Seven of these patients are still alive and disease free after a median follow-up of 18 months. The major side effects were grade 3 diarrhea in one case, and grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting in three cases. No significant hematological toxicity was observed.

Conclusions

This combination of radiation and 5-dFUR plus I-leucovorin led to an interesting rate of resectability, with pathological downstaging being documented in two cases. These preliminary results show an encouraging local control of an otherwise unresectable disease. Combined preoperative therapy with oral fluoropyrimidine plus I-leucovorin together with radiation may be an attractive approach in patients with operable rectal cancer.

Descriptive characteristics of colon and rectal cancer recurrence in a Danish population-based study

BACKGROUND

Recurrence is a common outcome among patients that have undergone an intended curative resection for colorectal cancer. However, data on factors that influence colorectal cancer recurrence are sparse. We report descriptive characteristics of both colon and rectal cancer recurrence in an unselected population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified 21,152 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed between May 2001 and December 2011 and registered with the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Recurrences were identified in 3198 colon and 1838 rectal cancer patients during follow-up. We calculated the frequency, proportion, and incidence rates of colon and rectal cancer recurrence within descriptive categories, and the cumulative five- and ten-year incidences of recurrence, treating death as a competing risk. We used a Cox proportional hazard model to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Recurrence risk was highest in the first three years of follow-up. Patients <55 years old at initial diagnosis (incidence rate for colon: 7.2 per 100 person-years; 95% CI: 6.5-7.9; rectum: 8.1 per 100 person-years; 95% CI: 7.2-9.0) and patients diagnosed with stage III cancer (colon HR: 5.70; 95% CI: 4.61-7.06; rectal HR: 7.02; 95% CI: 5.58-8.82) had increased risk of recurrence. Patients diagnosed with stage III cancer from 2009 to 2011 had a lower incidence of recurrence than those diagnosed with stage III cancer in the years before. Cumulative incidences of colon and rectal cancer recurrence were similar for both cancer types among each descriptive category.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, increases in colorectal cancer recurrence risk were associated with younger age and increasing stage at diagnosis. Cumulative incidence of recurrence did not differ by cancer type. Descriptive characteristics of colon and rectal cancer recurrence may help to inform patient-physician decision-making, and could be used to determine adjuvant therapies or tailor surveillance strategies so that recurrence may be identified early, particularly within the first 3 years of follow-up.

Development of in situ gelling and bio adhesive 5-Fluorouracil enema

In this study, a novel 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) enema with good bio adhesion and temperature sensitivity was developed using in situ gelling technology. The preparation was formulated as a free-flowing liquid before use, while a layer of gel film was quickly formed when administered in the rectum, with a large contact surface area. It also demonstrated good biocompatibility, appropriate gel strength and bio adhesive force with excellent adhesion to rectal mucosa and prolonged action time, allowing more effective drug absorption and diffusion to surrounding tissues. Poloxamer 407 and poloxamer 188 were applied to adjust the gelling temperature. With the addition of carbopol and polycarbophil (bio adhesive substances), the solubility of 5-FU and gel strength increased, the temperature of gelation and the surface area of drug contact on mucous epithelium decreased. Decreased adhesive force between the preparation and the mucous membrane of the rectum was demonstrated with improving carbopol and polycarbophil's concentration. In vitro release demonstrated that 5-FU in situ gelling enema with different bases had a rapid and almost complete drug release. We used an optimized formulation of P407/P188/polycarbophil/5-FU (17/2.5/0.2/1.0) for animal experiments. The result showed that the drug evenly covered the surface of the rectum and there was no leakage in 6 hours. The in situ gelling enema showed significantly higher rectal tissue levels of 5-FU compared with suppository and intravenous administration, indicating that 5-FU could be well absorbed due to the enlarged releasing area, longer retention time and larger amount of dissolved active ingredients. Systemically, 5-FU levels in the enema group were similar to those in the suppository group and significantly lower than the intravenous group. The enema was not associated with morphological damage to rectal tissue. These results suggest that the bio adhesive and in situ gelling enema could be a more effective rectal delivery system of 5-FU.

Unnecessary surgery can be avoided by judicious use of PET/CT scanning in colorectal cancer patients

AIM

This study aims to determine the role of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in changing the management plan in patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) and to evaluate the role of PET/CT in patients with an unexplained rise in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 consecutive patients with CRC, who had PET/CT, were identified between 2008 and 2010. All patients had CT scans prior to the PET/CT. Data were collected from clinic letters, CT and PET CT reports and pathology results and cross-checked with the patient's notes.

RESULTS

Patients were aged between 43 and 85 years [33 males, 27 females]. CEA was raised in 37 patients and normal in 23. Results of PET/CT were compared with that of CT scan and 33 out of the 60 patients (55%) had PET/CT results which were different to that of CT scan and 27 patients (45%) had similar PET/CT and CT results. PET scan appropriately altered the management in 23/60 patients (38%) and avoided unnecessary surgery in 14 patients. PET/CT had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 84%. In patients with an unexplained rise in CEA, PET/CT was positive in only one out of ten (10%) patients.

CONCLUSION

PET/CT is valuable in deciding the management outcome in patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer. Unnecessary surgery might be avoided by careful use of PET/CT scanning in colorectal cancer patients. PET/CT might not be of value in patients with an unexplained rise in CEA.

[Rectal cancer: situation where a referral center is needed]

One of the objectives of the French strategic plan for cancer 2009-2013 is to structure the need for referral surgery, particularly for low rectal carcinoma. However, low rectal cancer is not the only situation in the field of rectal surgery where expert unit are needed for the referral of appropriate patients. We developed the multidisciplinary strategies for low rectal cancer, advanced rectal cancer, recurrent rectal cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Optimal management of these difficult situations can give a chance of long term survival while a non-optimal management could jeopardise the future of patients by changing a potentially curable disease into an incurable one.

Preoperative radiochemotherapy in t3 operable low rectal cancers: a gold standard?

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiation followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) has become a standard treatment of preoperatively staged T3 low rectal cancers in many institutions; however, a direct comparison of generalized preoperative versus selective adjuvant chemoradiation has never been assessed in a clinical practice setting.

PATIENTS

Over a 4-year period, 80 patients with T3 primary low adenocarcinoma of the rectum, judged operable at preoperative staging, were offered preoperative chemoradiation. Forty-seven patients (Group I) accepted the neoadjuvant treatment and 33 (Group II) preferred immediate surgery and postoperative chemoradiation if indicated.

RESULTS

Major postoperative complications occurred in 21% of Group I versus in 11% of Group II (p = 0.3) patients. After a mean follow-up of 92 months, the local recurrence rate was 4 and 9% (p = 0.4), metastasis rate was 30 and 24% (p = 0.5), 5-year survival probability was 0.79 (95% CI = 0.49-0.92) and 0.82 (95% CI = 0.70-1.00) (log-rank test, p = 0.6) for Group I and Group II, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In T3 operable low rectal cancers, selective postoperative radiochemotherapy yielded similar long-term results regarding recurrence rate and survival as extended preoperative chemoradiation.

Reoperation for recurrent colorectal cancer

Recurrence of colorectal carcinoma represents a significant challenge. As the majority of recurrences involve more than just the anastomosis, surgical resection is ordinarily a major undertaking. Curative resection may require resection of other organs and structures, resulting in complex reconstructive procedures and substantial morbidity. In addition, carefully selected patients with distant metastases to sites such as the liver and lungs may also undergo potentially curative resection. Long-term survival following curative surgery for recurrence, however, ranges from only 15 to 40%. In addition to resection for curative intent, some patients may benefit from palliative procedures designed to relieve symptoms. Surgery alone is not usually sufficient therapy in these patients. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy play a vital adjunctive role in the management of recurrent disease. This article strives to review the risk factors and patterns of recurrence, selection of individuals for resection of recurrent disease, and outcomes of surgical procedures.

An interval >7 weeks between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery improves pathologic complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We assessed whether the time interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery affects the operative and postoperative morbidity and mortality, the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, and disease recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

One-hundred and thirty-two patients with locally advanced low- and mid-rectal cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical resection (October 2000 to December 2006). Data on the neoadjuvant regime, neoadjuvant-surgery interval, final pathology, type of operation, operative time, intraoperative blood transfusions, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, disease recurrence, and mortality were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the neoadjuvant-surgery interval: </=7 weeks (group A, n = 48), and >7 weeks (group B, n = 84).

RESULTS

The groups were demographically comparable except for the group A patients being younger at operation. The median interval between chemoradiation and surgery was 56 days (range 13-173 days). Thirty-seven patients (28%) had a pCR and near pCR. Fifty three patients (40%) had complications. There was no in-hospital mortality. Surgery type, operative time, number of intraoperative blood transfusions, postoperative complications, and length of hospitalization were not influenced by the interval length. The pCR and near pCR rates were higher with longer interval: 17% in group A, 35% in group B (P = 0.03). Patients operated at an interval >7 weeks had significantly better disease-free survival (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A neoadjuvant-surgery interval >7 weeks was associated with higher rates of pCR and near pCR, decreased recurrence and improved disease-free survival.

Influence of the neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy as a factor in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer by expert surgeon. A comparative study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Total mesorectal excision and surgeon experience are prognostic factors in rectal cancer surgery, in terms of local recurrence and conservative sphincter surgery. Pre-operative radiation-chemotherapy can even improve those results. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of pre-operative radiation therapy (PRT) on the results of surgical treatment for rectal cancer comparing two consecutive series of patients operated on by surgeons with experience in rectal cancer surgery according to whether they had received PRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 118 patients with rectal cancer, divided into two groups: group I, 57 patients without pre-operative radiation-chemotherapy, and group II, 61 patients with rectal cancer who received pre-operative radiation-chemotherapy. Both groups were homogeneous. The short-term results (surgical technique, post-operative stay, post-operative complications) and long-term results (local recurrences, liver metastases and both overall and tumour-related survival) were analysed.

RESULTS

The rate of anterior resection in the lower third was significantly higher (p = 0.037) in group II than in group I (56 vs 23%), the rate of abdominoperineal resection in the middle third was significantly lower (p = 0.046) in group II (3.5 vs 21%). The incidence of post-operative complications was similar in both groups, but the rate of anastomotic leaks was higher in group II. The local recurrences was lower in group II (p = 0.002), but the disease free survival and the overall survival was similar in both groups. At the multivariate analysis, the only prognostic factor for the local recurrence was the use of pre-operative radiation-chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Besides surgeon experience and total mesorectal excision, a very important prognostic factor is the administration of pre-operative radiation-chemotherapy in cases of locally advanced rectal cancer, as it does not increase post-operative morbidity and mortality and significantly influences the rate of local recurrences and the conservative sphincter surgery.

Saving the sphincter in rectal cancer: are we prepared to change practice?

Total mesorectal excision and preoperative radiation with or without chemotherapy has led to a reduction in local recurrence rates in patients with rectal cancer. This article examines the effect such treatment has on the rate of sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancers close to the anal sphincter mechanism and looks at the evidence for changing clinical practice.

Contemporary Imaging for Colorectal Cancer

With improvements in therapy for colorectal cancer, accurate imaging has taken on an increased significance. Preoperative diagnosis of metastatic disease helps identify patients who could undergo combined resection or might benefit from systemic therapy before surgery. Accurate imaging of rectal cancer is critical in evaluating locally advanced disease treatable by combined modality therapy, including chemoradiation and surgery. Postoperative imaging enhances identification of recurrent disease that might be amenable to salvage surgery.

Analysis of Early Postoperative Morbidity Among Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with and without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The impact of neoadjuvant treatment and their subsequent early complications in the treatment of rectal cancer has not been adequately assessed. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate early postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients with rectal cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by surgery, compared with patients treated with surgery alone. We also identified independent risk factors associated with early major complications.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2004, 273 consecutive patients underwent treatment for rectal cancer. A total of 170 patients (group A) received preoperative radiotherapy with a total of 45-50.4 Gy (180 cGy per day) and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, followed by surgery; 103 patients (group B) were treated with surgery alone. Dependent variables related to patients, treatment, radiotherapy, and tumor were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar with regard to age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and tumor location but not for ileostomy (27% in group A vs. 6.8% in group B). The number of complications was similar in both groups (43.1% in group A vs. 44.6% in group B). No differences in wound infection (8.2% vs. 7.8%), intra-abdominal abscess (4.7% vs. 4.9%), anastomotic dehiscence (4.2% vs. 3.8%), postoperative hemorrhage (3.5% vs. 3.9%), urinary complications (6.5% vs. 4.9%), paralytic ileus (8.9% vs. 9.7%), or general complications (7.1% vs. 9.6%) were found. The global mortality in the first 30 days after surgery was .7%. An ASA score of III-IV and surgery duration longer than 3 hours were identified as independent prognostic factors for early complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer treated with surgery is not associated with a higher incidence of early postoperative complications. The patient's preoperative clinical condition and lengthy surgery time are prognostic factors for early complications.

Preliminary results of phase I trial of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT), leucovorin plus irinotecan and radiation therapy for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical attempts for locally recurrent rectal cancer often fail due to local re-recurrence and distant metastasis. Preoperative chemoradiation may enhance better local control and survival. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of oral uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV), and irinotecan combined with radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of the triple drug regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer received escalating doses of irinotecan on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (starting at 30 mg/m2, with 10 mg increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of UFT (300 mg/m2) plus LV (75 mg/day) on days 3 to 7, 10 to 14, 17 to 21, and 24 to 28. Radiation was given 5 days per week totaling 40 to 50 Gy (2Gy/day).

RESULTS

Six patients were treated at the starting dose, and 2 received the full scheduled chemoradiotherapy. The other 4 patients had grade 3 diarrhea and diarrhea was the DLT. One patient had partial response and he had subsequently radical surgical resection. Median progression free survival for local recurrence was 320 days.

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan plus UFT/LV with concomitant radiotherapy in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer was not feasible due to diarrhea in this setting. Modification of the treatment is needed.

Outcome after curative resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Few biologic markers have been studied as prognostic factors in recurrent rectal carcinoma patients. We sought to determine the influence of clinical, pathologic, and biologic (p53, bcl-2, and ki-67) variables on survival after curative resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer who received surgery with curative intent.

RESULTS

From 1988 to 1998, 134 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer underwent operative exploration. Curative resection was performed in 85 patients. Median follow-up was 43 (range, 1.3-149) months. On multivariate analysis, negative predictors of overall survival included an elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level (P=0.02; hazard ratio 2.41; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.19-4.89) and an R1 resection margin (P = 0.01; hazard ratio, 2.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.27-6.21). In 26 patients for whom biologic variables were available, p53, bcl-2, and ki-67 did not significantly impact disease-specific survival or overall survival. Five-year disease-specific survival, overall survival, and pelvic control rates were 46, 36, and 51 percent respectively. Of the 50 patients who relapsed, time to second local recurrence was longer than time to development of metastasis (median, 16.5 vs. 9 months). Median survival for patients with metastatic recurrence was 26.l vs. 41.5 months for those with a subsequent local recurrence alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately two-thirds of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer can be resected for cure. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and an R0 resection margin were the only significant predictors of overall survival. p53, bcl-2, and ki-67 did not impact survival outcomes.

Effects of Irradiation Combined with Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) Suppository in Rabbit VX2 Rectal Tumors

To decrease local recurrence and increase disease free survival, various preoperative therapies for patients with advanced rectal cancer have been studied. Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (CDDP) has become one of the most widely used cancer chemotherapeutic drugs. It has also been found to have radiosensitizing properties. In this experimental study, the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy using a novel CDDP suppository, and one with mixed micelles, was examined in a rabbit VX2 rectal tumor model. Rabbits were divided into four groups: control group, irradiation (R) group, CDDP suppository plus irradiation (CR) group, and mixed micelles plus CDDP suppository plus irradiation (CMR) group. Tumor growth ratios were reduced significantly in the CR and CMR groups as compared with the ratio in the control group. Microscopically, response rates of main tumors were 0%, 33.3%, 70.0%, and 91. 7%, respectively. The number of metastatic lymph nodes in the CR and CMR groups decreased significantly compared to the control group and the R group. The microscopic response rates of metastatic lymph nodes were 0%, 11.1%, 40.0%, and 41.7%, respectively. Lung metastases were observed in three rabbits in the R group, and in one rabbit in the CMR group. Tissue platinum concentrations both in tumors and in regional lymph nodes increased significantly when mixed micelles were used. Chemoradiotherapy using the CDDP suppository and mixed micelles was effective for local control in the rabbit VX2 rectal tumor model.

Chemoradiation with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in preoperative treatment of stage II-III resectable rectal cancer: Phase I and II studies

PURPOSE

Two separate studies were conducted, the first to evaluate the maximal tolerated dose and the second the efficacy of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin in conjunction with preoperative chemoradiation in patients with resectable T3 rectal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 48 patients received radiotherapy (50 Gy) administered to the posterior pelvis 5 d/wk for 5 weeks. Combination raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (60 to 130 mg/m(2)) was administered on Days 1, 19, and 38.

RESULTS

The recommended dose of oxaliplatin is 130 mg/m(2) (maximal tolerated dose not reached). No patients developed Grade 4 acute toxicity. Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 9 patients (18.7%). It was hematologic in 1 patient and GI in 1 patient; 7 patients had an asymptomatic increase of transaminase. Surgery was performed in 47 (98%) of 48 patients. Of the 47 patients, 42 underwent sphincter-saving surgery; in 19, the tumor at diagnosis was located <30 mm from the anorectal ring. Chemoradiation in combination with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin produced high rates of tumor response. The overall tumor downstaging rate was 73% for T and N stages. A complete pathologic tumor response (pT0) or microscopic tumor foci (pTmic) was observed in 28 patients. The tumor regression grade (TRG), using the Mandard scoring system, was TRG1 in 16 patients (43.2%), TRG2 in 12 (32.4%), TRG3 in 12 (32.4%), TRG4 in 6 (16.2%), and TRG5 in 1 patient (2.7%).

CONCLUSION

Raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin combined with pelvic radiotherapy was effective and well tolerated in patients with resectable T3 rectal carcinoma.

Phase I study of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin by continuous infusion chronotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximal tolerated dose of chronomodulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) given concurrently with radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-five patients with T3, T4 or recurrent rectal cancer received concurrent radiotherapy to a minimal dose of 4500 cGy. Chemotherapy was administered by a programmable pump in chronomodulated fashion, with 62.5% of the total dose given within 7 hours around 9:30 pm. The starting doses were LV at 5 mg/m2/d and 5-FU at 150 mg/m2/d. LV was escalated in 5-mg/m2 increments to 20 mg/m2/d; 5-FU was then escalated in 25 mg/m2 increments to the maximal tolerated dose.

RESULTS

Diarrhea and stomatitis were dose limiting, with Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurring in 16% and 5% of patients, respectively. Thirty-seven patients (84%) received their scheduled dose of radiotherapy (range, 4500-6000 cGy). Thirty-two patients had clinical T3 disease; all were treated with definitive surgery; 23 (71%) underwent sphincter-sparing surgery with complete resection in 28 (87%). Ten patients (31%) had no evidence of tumor in the pathologic specimen.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using chronomodulated 5-FU and LV is feasible. The recommended Phase II dose is 5-FU 200 mg/m2 and LV 20 mg/m2 daily for 5 weeks.

Pelvic wall involvement denotes a poor prognosis in T4 rectal cancer

PURPOSE

An aggressive surgical approach with en bloc resection of involved structures is often possible with anterior rectal cancers that invade adjacent visceral organs, but is rarely possible in tumors that invade the pelvic wall. However, most staging systems include both situations in the same group of T4 rectal cancers. We performed a retrospective study of patients with stage T4 rectal cancer undergoing surgery to assess the influence of different organ involvement on resectability and survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 84 patients with T4 rectal cancer treated at the University of Minnesota and affiliated hospitals over a ten-year period. Forty-seven patients (56 percent) were staged for local invasion on the basis of final pathology, 19 (23 percent) on the basis of operative findings, and 18 (21 percent) on the basis of ultrasound images. Patients were divided into two groups, those with or without pelvic wall involvement. Resectability, local control, and overall survival were compared between groups. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed with Cox proportional and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (37 percent) had involvement of the pelvic wall, whereas 53 patients (63 percent) had visceral involvement only. All 29 patients with distant metastasis died of their disease. Forty-seven of the 55 patients without distant metastasis underwent tumor resection. Age and pelvic wall involvement were the only two factors independently associated with the probability of resection in logistic regression analysis (P = 0.0067 and P = 0.037, respectively). The only factor that affected median survival in patients without distant metastasis was tumor resection (49.1 months for resection vs. 6.1 months for no resection, P = 0.017). Patients with visceral involvement had a longer median survival (49.2 months) than those with pelvic wall involvement (13.2 months), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.058).

CONCLUSION

Rectal cancers with pelvic and visceral involvement have different rates of resectability and median survival. These differences should be reflected in the TNM classification system.

Preoperative chemoradiation with raltitrexed ('Tomudex') for T2/N+ and T3/N+ rectal cancers: a phase I study

The use of raltitrexed ('Tomudex') as concomitant chemotherapy during preoperative radiotherapy in chemonaïve patients with stage II/III rectal cancer has been examined in this study and its recommended dose in conjunction with radiotherapy investigated. Forty-five Gray (Gy) of radiotherapy (1.8 Gy daily, 5 days per week) was delivered to the posterior pelvis, followed by a 5.4 Gy boost. Single doses of raltitrexed (2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 mg/m(2)) were administered on days 1, 19 and 38. Only 1 of the 15 patients entered experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 leucopenia) at the 3.0 mg/m(2) dose level. The overall response rate was 80% (five complete responses, seven partial responses). These preliminary data suggest that raltitrexed is a well tolerated and effective treatment when combined with preoperative radiotherapy in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. The recommended dose of raltitrexed for future phase II studies will be 3.0 mg/m(2).

Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses: effects of combined preoperative high-dose radiotherapy and intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil

To study the effects of preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) on the healing of colonic anastomosis, the rectosigmoid colon in male Wistar rats was irradiated up to an end dose of 41.6 Gy (RT) or sham-irradiated (SR). During the last 5 days of the irradiation schedule, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was administered intraperitoneally in either a high dose (20 mg/kg, chemotherapy-high dose [CH]) or a low dose (10 mg/kg, chemotherapy-low dose [CL]). Animals were randomly arranged into six groups: group I, control (SR + saline intraperitoneally); group II, RT only; group III, SR + CL; group IV, RT + CL; group V, SR + CH; group VI, RT + CH. Four days after RCT, a side-to-side anastomosis was constructed between the irradiated rectosigmoid and the nonirradiated caecum. Animals were killed 10 days postoperatively. No significant differences were found in the anastomotic bursting pressure or the bursting wall tension. In group VI, mitoses were less (P < 0.01) and mucosal ulceration was more (P = 0.03) pronounced compared to group I. Sclerotic arteries were seen in all irradiated groups and in animals that received high-dose 5-FU alone. 5-FU administration in high or low dose, with or without RT, induced more inflammation in the submucosa compared to controls (P < 0.05). Conclusively, RCT has no detrimental effect on the mechanical strength of colonic anastomosis in this rat model. However, RCT with high-dose 5-FU induces more histological alterations at the anastomotic site.

Optimising treatment for resectable rectal cancer: is preoperative therapy beneficial?

Preoperative radiotherapy is becoming the standard of care for resectable locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Its practice is no longer limited to a few specialised cancer centres. Adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy can reduce the risk of local recurrence by 50% compared with surgery alone and it has a moderate effect in improving survival. Treatment-related toxicity is superior to that after postoperative radiotherapy. Early results of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy are promising, with a low toxicity profile and a high pathological response rate. Advances in technology, endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging enable selection of appropriate patients for preoperative radiotherapy.

Ten years of preoperative chemoradiation for extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer: acute toxicity, tumor response, and sphincter preservation in three consecutive studies

PURPOSE

To compare acute toxicity, tumor response, and sphincter preservation in three schedules of concurrent chemoradiation in resectable transmural and/or node-positive extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1990 and 1999, 163 consecutive patients were treated according to the following combined modalities: FUMIR: between 1990 and 1995, 83 patients were treated with bolus i.v. mitomycin C (MMC), 10 mg/m(2) day 1, plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1-4, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy (37.8 Gy). PLAFUR-4: between 1995 and 1998, 40 patients were treated with cisplatin (c-DDP) 60 mg/m(2) given as slow infusion (1-4 h) on days 1 and 29, plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2), days 1-4 and 29-32 with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy). PLAFUR-5: between 1998 and 1999, 40 patients were treated with c-DDP 60 mg/m(2) given as slow infusion (during 1-4 h) on days 1 and 29, plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2), days 1-5 and 29-33 with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy).

RESULTS

Grade > or = 3 acute toxicity occurred in 14%, 5%, and 17% of patients treated in the FUMIR, PLAFUR-4, and PLAFUR-5 studies, respectively (p = 0.201). In the FUMIR, PLAFUR-4, and PLAFUR-5 studies, clinical response rate was 77%, 70%, and 83%, respectively. Tumor downstaging occurred in 57%, 68%, and 58% of patients, respectively. Pathologic complete response was recorded in 9% (FUMIR), 23% (PLAFUR-4), and 20% (PLAFUR-5) of patients. Sphincter-preserving surgery was feasible in 44% (FUMIR), 40% (PLAFUR-4), and 61% (PLAFUR-5) of patients having a distance between the anal-rectal ring and the lower pole of the tumor of 0-30 mm, and in 95%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, in those having a distance of 31-50 mm. Comparing FUMIR vs. PLAFUR, the clinical response rate was similar in the two series: a partial response was observed in 62/81 (77%) patients with FUMIR treatment, and in 61/80 (76%) patients with PLAFUR treatment. Tumor downstaging was observed in 46/81 (57%) patients and in 50/80 (68%) patients, respectively. The pathologic complete response rate was statistically higher in the PLAFUR series: 7/81 (9%) patients with FUMIR treatment and 17/80 (21%) patients with PLAFUR treatment (p = 0.04). Major downstaging (pT0+ pTmic+ pT1) in the FUMIR group was reported in 12/81 (15%) patients versus 31/80 (39%) patients in the PLAFUR group (p = 0.0006). The anal sphincter was preserved in 63/81 (78%) patients with FUMIR treatment and in 69/80 (86%) patients with PLAFUR treatment. The perioperative morbidity was statistically lower with PLAFUR: a perioperative morbidity was experienced by 20/81 (25%) patients with FUMIR treatment and by 9/80 (11%) patients with PLAFUR treatment (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, higher radiation dose (50.4 Gy vs. 37.8 Gy), a second course of concurrent 5-FU, and the use of c-DDP instead of MMC improved the pathologic response rate without increasing acute toxicity and perioperative morbidity. The use of 5-FU 5-day infusion (PLAFUR-5) resulted in higher toxicity with a similar response rate compared to 4-day infusion (PLAFUR-4).

T4 rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation to the posterior pelvis followed by multivisceral resection: patterns of failure and limitations of treatment

PURPOSE

To analyze the overall pattern of treatment failure and sites of pelvic disease recurrence relative to the radiation fields used in treating patients with clinically staged T4 rectal cancer with preoperative chemoradiation followed by multivisceral resection.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1990 and 1998, 45 patients with T4 rectal cancer were treated with preoperative chemoradiation. Clinical staging was according to the system of the American Joint Cancer Committee and was based on endoscopic ultrasonography, chemotherapy (CT), and physical examination. A diagnosis of T4 disease required evidence of invasion of a contiguous structure on CT (n = 31) or endorectal ultrasonography (n = 6), vaginal mucosal involvement on pelvic examination (n = 6), or a combination of these findings (n = 2). Chemoradiation was delivered with 18 MV photons using a 3-field belly-board technique. The median total dose was 45 Gy in all patients (range 45-63). Nine patients received a boost with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (n = 5, 1.8-18 Gy), intraoperative RT (n = 3, 10-20 Gy), or interstitial brachytherapy (n = 1, 20 Gy). All patients received concurrent chemotherapy consisting of protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2), 5 d/wk). Resection was not performed in 13 (29%) of the 45 patients because of metastases detected before resection or patient refusal. Multivisceral resection and pelvic exenteration was required in 21 (66%) and 11 (34%) of 32 patients, respectively. We compared the location of pelvic disease recurrence with the RT simulation films. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the 4-year actuarial pelvic and distant recurrent rates and the overall survival rate.

RESULTS

The median length of follow-up was 31.0 months for all patients and 40.0 months for patients alive at last follow-up. When only the resected cases were considered, the local recurrence rate was 20%. Distant metastases occurred in 44% of cases; the overall survival rate was 69%. When all patients were considered, the local recurrence rate was similar (24%), but the rate of distant recurrence (51%) was higher and the overall survival rate lower (50%). Pelvic disease was controlled in all 8 patients whose disease responded well to chemoradiation (either a histologically complete response or microscopic residual disease). Three of 4 patients with close or positive margins had pelvic recurrences despite intraoperative RT and brachytherapy. Nine of the 10 pelvic recurrences occurred in the radiation field. Elective external iliac nodal irradiation was not used, and nodal metastases were not seen in that region. In 1 case, marginal recurrence occurred in a common iliac node at the superior edge of the treatment field.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite aggressive multimodality therapy including multivisceral resection, a high rate of pelvic and distant disease recurrence occurred in patients with clinically staged T4 disease. Regional disease recurred almost exclusively in the radiation field. The intraoperative RT and interstitial brachytherapy doses used did not prevent pelvic disease recurrence in patients with close or positive margins. Novel strategies such as higher preoperative doses of RT with or without altered fractionation or more effective radiosensitizers are needed to improve locoregional control in patients with T4 disease. Future strategies must also include more effective systemic therapy.

Influence of preoperative combined radiochemotherapy on surgical outcome and colonic anastomotic healing: experimental study in the rat

PURPOSE

To study the influence of combined preoperative hyperfractionated irradiation with intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on surgical outcome and colonic anastomotic healing in a rat model.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats were given 41.6 Gy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) or sham irradiation, with intraperitoneal 5-FU at low dose (10 mg/kg) or high dose (20 mg/kg). Animals were arranged in 6 groups: RT + low-dose 5-FU (RCT-L), RT + high-dose 5-FU (RCT-H), sham RT + low-dose 5-FU (CT-L), sham RT + high-dose 5-FU (CT-H), RT alone (R), and a control group (sham RT + intraperitoneal saline). Side-to-side colonic anastomoses were constructed from one irradiated and one nonirradiated limb 4 days after radiochemotherapy. Animals were sacrificed 10 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, more complications occurred in group RCT-H (50% versus 0%, p = 0.01). Adhesion formation was more intense in groups RCT-H and CT-H (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). After therapy, white blood cell counts dropped significantly in all irradiated animals (p < 0.01), and platelet counts decreased significantly in group RCT-H (p = 0.01). No significant differences were noticed in anastomotic bursting pressure when the treated groups were compared to each other or to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy has no adverse effect on the strength of colonic anastomosis in this rat model. However, the combined RT with high-dose 5-FU does increase operative morbidity and adhesion formation.

[Abdominoperineal resection for locally recurrent rectal cancers following anterior resection]

STUDY AIM

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the short and long term results of abdominoperineal resection for local recurrence following low anterior resection of a rectal adenocarcinoma and to determine the prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1978 to December 1996, 35 patients (17 women, 18 men) with a mean age of 59.4 years, underwent an abdominoperineal resection for local recurrence after low anterior resection of a rectal adenocarcinoma. The primary tumor was below the peritoneum in 29 cases, and the mean security margin was 3 cm under the tumor. Tumor staging at the time of primary surgery included 23 Dukes B, 11 Dukes C, and 1 Dukes D. The mean time elapsed between low anterior resection and local recurrence was 16.4 months. The histological diagnosis of recurrence was obtained preoperatively in 29 cases (82.8%).

RESULTS

Resection was curative in 12 patients and palliative only in 23 patients. The recurrence was intramural in 3 cases, extramural in 10 cases, and mixed in 22 cases. Ten patients had an extended "en bloc" resection including one or several adjacent organs, and a synchronous metastasis was resected in 2 cases. The mortality rate was 2.8% (n = 1) and the morbidity rate was 23% (n = 8). The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were respectively 77 and 30.2% with the univariate analysis of prognosis factors of survival, there were four pretherapeutic factors (age, staging of the primary tumor, delay of the recurrence, CEA rate) and four therapeutic factors (curative resection, extramural recurrence, staging of the recurrence, postoperative radiotherapy). The curative or not curative type of resection was the only independent predictor of survival with multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study seem to justify an abdominoperineal resection for local recurrence after low anterior resection whenever possible. Long-term results may possibly be improved by using adjuvant treatment.

Polymorphisms of the repeated sequences in the enhancer region of the thymidylate synthase gene promoter may predict downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an important target enzyme for the fluoropyrimidines. TS gene promoter possesses regulatory tandemly repeated (TR) sequences that are polymorphic in humans, depending on ethnic factors. These polymorphisms have been reported to influence TS expression. TS expression levels affect tumor downstaging after preoperative fluoruracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiation. Tumor downstaging correlates with improved local control and disease-free survival. The aim of this study is to correlate TR polymorphisms with downstaging and disease-free survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients with rectal cancer underwent tumor resection after preoperative 5-FU-based chemoradiation. Tumor downstaging was evaluated by comparing the pretreatment T stage with the pathologic stage observed in the surgical specimen. TS polymorphism genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the corresponding TS promoter region, and products of amplification were electrophoresed, obtaining products of 220 bp (2/2), 248 bp (3/3), or both (2/3). The TS polymorphism genotype results were subsequently compared with the downstaging observed and with disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Patients who were homozygous for triple TR (3/3) had a lower probability of downstaging than patients who were homozygous with double TR or heterozygous patients (2/2 and 2/3): 22% versus 60% (P =.036; logistic regression). Furthermore, a trend toward improved 3-year disease-free survival was detected in the 2/2 and 2/3 groups, compared with that in the 3/3 group (81% v 41%; P =.17).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggests that TS repetitive-sequence polymorphisms are predictive for tumor downstaging. TR sequences in TS promoter may be useful as a novel means of predicting response to preoperative 5-FU-based chemoradiation.

[Curative treatment of local and regional rectal cancer recurrences]

How to select patients likely to benefit from reoperation? When a neoadjuvant treatment is still feasible, is it useful to perform preoperative radiation or chemoradiation? What can be expected after resection of local recurrences in terms of survival and quality of life? Does surveillance of patients operated for rectal carcinoma influence resectability of local recurrences and results? These are the main questions concerning the management of local recurrences after resection of a rectal carcinoma.

Feasibility and first results of multimodality treatment, combining EBRT, extensive surgery, and IOERT in locally advanced primary rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the outcome of aggressive multimodality treatment with preoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), extended circumferential margin excision (ECME) and intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-eight patients with primary locally advanced rectal cancer, but without distant metastases, received multimodality treatment. CT-scan showed extension to other structures in 15 patients (39%) and definite infiltration into the surrounding structures in 23 patients (61%). All patients received preoperative EBRT (dose range 25-61 Gy) and 82% received 50.4 Gy. The resection types were: 12 low anterior resections (31%), 14 abdomino-perineal resections (37%), 6 abdomino-transsacral resections (16%), and 6 pelvic exenterations (16%). The IOERT dose ranged from 10 to 17.5 Gy depending on the completeness of the resection.

RESULTS

There was no perioperative mortality. The resection margins were microscopically negative in 31 patients (82%), microscopically positive in 4 (10%), and positive with gross residual disease in 3 patients (8%). Pelvic recurrences were observed in 5 patients (13%) including 3 IOERT infield failures. The overall 3-year local control, disease-free survival (DFS), and survival rates were 82%, 65%, and 72%, respectively. Negative resection margins were the most significant prognostic factor with regard to DFS (p = 0.0003) and distant control (p = 0.002) compared with cancer involved surgical margins.

CONCLUSION

A high percentage of curative resections can be achieved in this group of patients with locally advanced rectal cancers. Adding IOERT to preoperative EBRT and ECME achieves high local control rates and possibly improves survival.

Combined modality therapy of rectal cancers

Rectal cancer accounts for about 10% of new cancer cases each year. It strikes men and women at nearly the same rate, generally in the range of 50-80 years of age, with rising incidence with age. Despite simple screening procedures rectal cancer is often advanced when discovered. Current trends in the management of cancer have focused on organ preservation and improved quality of life without compromising the overall survival. During the last decade substantial progress has been made in treatment modalities: new and improved radiation techniques (conformal radiotherapy, altered fractionation, brachytherapy), chemotherapy (protracted infusion, use of radiosensitizers) and development of surgical procedures-enabling safer postoperative irradiation. In patients with advanced/unresectable disease aggressive combined chemoradiation can be added prior to surgery to downstage the tumour and increase the proportion treated with anal-rectal-sparing procedures. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy regimens are as safe and tolerable as the standard postoperative treatment. In this presentation indications for preoperative radiochemotherapy will be discussed in detail, together with treatment-related side effects, prognostic parameters, tumour response and outcome. Different irradiation settings and chemotherapy schedules are described. In patients with primary resectable disease (mainly Dukes C) several prospective randomised trials have shown less local recurrence with postoperative combined modality therapy.

Extensive surgery after high-dose preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

This was a pilot study of high-dose preoperative concurrent radiation and chemotherapy before extensive surgery in patients with locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer. Here we report on curative resectability, acute toxicities during chemoradiotherapy, surgical complications, local control, and three-year survival rates achieved with this aggressive multimodal regimen.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 1997, 35 previously nonirradiated patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer were entered in the study. All patients presented with tumor contiguous or adherent to adjacent pelvic organs and were not deemed amenable to primary curative surgery. A total radiation dose of 50.4 Gy with a small-volume boost of 5.4 to 9 Gy was delivered in conventional fractionation (single dose, 1.8 Gy). 5-Fluorouracil was scheduled as a continuous infusion of 1,000 mg/m2/day on Days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33. Six weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients were reassessed for resectability, and radical surgery was attempted whenever feasible.

RESULTS

After preoperative chemoradiotherapy 28 of 35 patients (80 percent) underwent resection with curative intent. In 16 of 35 patients (57 percent) extended resection of adjacent organs was performed. Resections with negative margins were achieved in 17 patients (61 percent); 9 patients had microscopic, and 2 patients had gross residual disease. There was no postoperative mortality. Fourteen patients (44 percent) experienced postoperative complications. Toxicity from chemoradiotherapy occurred mainly as diarrhea (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3; 23 percent), dermatitis (Grade 3; 11 percent), and leucopenia (Grade 3; 11 percent). One patient died of tumortoxic multiple organ failure during chemoradiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 27 months, local re-recurrence after curative resection was observed in only three patients (18 percent); six patients developed distant metastases. Three-year actuarial survival rate was significantly improved after complete resection (82 percent) as compared with noncurative surgery (38 percent; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

A combination of high-dose preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by extended surgery can achieve clear resection margins in more than 60 percent of patients with recurrent rectal tumor not amenable to primary surgery. An encouraging trend evolved for this multimodal treatment to improve long-term local control and survival rate.

Chemoradiation with or without intraoperative radiation therapy in patients with locally recurrent rectal carcinoma: prognostic factors and long term outcome

BACKGROUND

Rectal carcinoma patients with local recurrence are reported to have a dismal prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of combined modality therapy on clinical outcome and to determine the prognostic impact of a "presurgical" staging system.

METHODS

Between September 1989 and June 1997, 47 patients (with a median follow-up of 80 months) with locally recurrent, nonmetastatic rectal carcinoma were classified according to the extent of pelvic sidewall involvement as determined by pretreatment computed tomography (CT) scan. They received preoperative external beam radiation (45-47 grays [Gy] in 34 patients; 23.4 Gy in 13 preirradiated patients) plus concomitant 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)/day as a 96-hour continuous infusion on Days 1-4 + 29-32) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m(2) as a bolus intravenously on Day 1 + 29). After 4-6 weeks, the patients were evaluated for surgical resection and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) procedure (10-15 Gy) or, in unresectable patients, a boost dose was planned by chemoradiation (23.4 Gy) or brachytherapy. Thereafter, adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for a total of six to nine courses) was prescribed.

RESULTS

During chemoradiation, 2 patients (4.3%) developed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3-4 acute toxicity. Twenty-five patients (53. 2%) had an objective response after chemoradiation. Twenty-one patients (45%) underwent radical surgical resection. The overall 5-year survival and local control rates were 22% and 32%, respectively. The classification system significantly predicted survival (P = 0.008). Radically resected patients had better local control and survival (P < 0.0001); in patients treated with IORT, the 5-year local control and survival rates were 79% and 41%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from the current study suggest that combined modality therapy was well tolerated and improved resectability, local control, and survival. The classification system appears to be a reliable tool with which to predict clinical outcome in patients with locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.

Preoperative chemoradiation with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer: acute toxicity, tumor response, sphincter preservation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of preoperative external radiation therapy intensified by systemic chemotherapy including bolus cisplatin (c-DDP) and 4-day infusional 5-fluorouracil (PLAFUR-4) on tumor response and sphincter preservation in patients with extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer with acceptable toxicity, and to compare the results to our previous experience with bolus mitomycin c (MMC) and 4-day infusion 5-FU (FUMIR).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1995 and March 1998, 40 consecutive patients with resectable extraperitoneal adenocarcinoma of the rectum were treated with preoperative chemoradiation: slow infusion i.v. c-DDP, 60 mg/m2, day 1 and 29 plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m2, days 1-4 and 29-32, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy (45 Gy whole pelvis followed by 5.4 Gy boost). All but 3 patients had T3 disease. Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after the end of chemoradiation.

RESULTS

No patient had Grade 4 acute toxicity. Grade 3 hematological toxicity was observed only in 2 (5%) patients. No patient had major gastrointestinal, skin, or urological acute toxicity. All patients had radical surgery. There was no perioperative mortality; perioperative morbidity rate was 12%. Overall, 23% (9 of 40) of patients had a complete pathological response and 10% (4 of 40) of patients had rare isolated residual cancer cells (Tmic). Comparing the stage at the diagnostic workup with the pathological stage, tumor downstaging was observed in 27 (68%) patients; nodal status downstaging was detected in 24 (60%) patients. Thirty-four (85%) patients had a sphincter-saving surgical procedure. In 4 of 10 (40%) patients who were definitive candidates for an abdominoperineal resection (APR), the sphincter was preserved, as it was in 13 of 13 (100%) probable candidates. Lengthening of the distance between the anorectal ring and the lower pole of the tumor > or =20 mm was observed in 9 (23%) patients. None of the patients had soilage after the sphincter-saving procedure. In our previous experience with FUMIR the complete pathological response was 9%, the sphincter-saving surgical procedure was performed in 66% cases, and the Grade 3+ toxicity was observed in 13% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of c-DDP to 5-FU (PLAFUR-4) in a neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy schedule improved the pathological response rate in comparison with our previous experience. Toxicity was low indeed, thus we commenced another study adding one more day of 5-FU infusion (PLAFUR-5) to further improve our results.

Preoperative combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer does not affect early postoperative morbidity and mortality in low anterior resection

PURPOSE

It is not yet known whether preoperative combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer affects postoperative mortality and morbidity. We therefore evaluated early postoperative complications in patients given adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery for middle and lower rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 1998, 41 patients underwent combined preoperative pelvic radiotherapy and chemotherapy at our institution. Most of the patients had 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/day/25 fractions) during five weeks plus 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m2/day) and low-dose leucovorin (10 mg/m2/day) bolus on Days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33. Surgery was performed four to six weeks after completion of adjuvant therapy. The 41 patients (Group A) were retrospectively compared with 30 patients (Group B) who, in the same period, underwent surgery without preoperative adjuvant therapy. The groups were homogeneous for age, gender, preoperative risk factors, operating surgeon, and pathologic stage. Mean distance of the tumor from the anal verge was shorter in Group A patients (P = 0.031).

RESULTS

There were seven major postoperative complications in each group. No significant differences were found between the groups for morbidity and mortality rates. Considering all patients, more postoperative complications were found in patients scored as American Society of Anesthesiologists 3, in those with a preoperative hemoglobin value < 10 g/dl, and in those without a diverting stoma (P = 0.0048, P = 0.0453, and P = 0.0033, respectively). At multivariate analysis, independent predictors of major complications were American Society of Anesthesiologists score (relative risk, 343; P = 0.022), diverting stoma (relative risk, 159; P = 0.010), type of surgical procedure (relative risk, 38.9; P = 0.048), preoperative hemoglobin value (relative risk, 9.72; P = 0.061), and intraoperative blood loss (relative risk, 1; P = 0.027). In Group A patients, the absence of diverting stomas was associated with major postoperative complications (P = 0.0307), and independent predictors of major complications were American Society of Anesthesiologists score (relative risk, 56; P = 0.111) and absence of a diverting stoma (relative risk, 22.42; P = 0.222).

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative complications after resection for middle and lower rectal adenocarcinoma are affected by intraoperative and preoperative risk factors and absence diverting stomas, but not by preoperative adjuvant therapy.

Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rates of tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTX/XRT) that delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2/day) was given to 117 patients. The pretreatment stage distribution, as determined by endorectal ultrasound (u), included uT2N0 in 2%, uT3N0 in 47%, uT3N1 in 49%, and uT4N0 in 2% of cases; endorectal ultrasound was not performed in 13% of cases (15 patients). Approximately 6 weeks after completion of CTX/XRT, surgery was performed.

RESULTS

The pathological tumor stages were Tis-2N0 in 26%, T2N1 in 5%, T3N0 in 21%, T3N1 in 15%, T4N0 in 5%, and T4NI in 1%; a complete response (CR) to preoperative CTX/XRT was pathologically confirmed in 32 (27%) of patients. Tumor downstaging occurred in 72 (62%) cases. Only 3% of cases had pathologic evidence of progressive disease. Pretreatment tumor size (< 5 cm vs. > or = 5 cm) was the only factor predictive of tumor downstaging (p < 0.04). A decrease of > 1 T-stage level was accomplished in 45% of those downstaged. Overall, a sphincter-saving (SP) procedure was possible in 59% of patients and an abdominoperineal resection (APR) was required in 41 % of cases. Factors predictive of SP included downstaging (p < 0.03), age > 40 years (p < 0.007), pretreatment tumor distance, 3 to 6 cm from the anal verge (p < 0.00001), tumor size <6 cm (p < 0.02), mobility (p < 0.004), tumor stage <T4 (p < 0.01), and uN negative (p < 0.008). SP was performed in 23 patients (72%) with a CR and in 48 (67%) of downstaged cases. Among the 69 tumors located < 6 cm from the anal verge, 29 (42%) were resected with a SP. The level of response was important for tumors located < 6 cm from the anal verge because a SP was performed in 9 of the 17 (53%) CRs in this group while only 20 of 52 patients (38%) had a SP when residual disease was present after CTX/XRT. For tumors located > 6 cm from the anal verge, SP was performed in 14 of the 15 (93%) patients with a CR and 32 of 33 (97%) of patients with residual disease (p < 0.00004).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant tumor downstaging results from preoperative chemoradiation allowing sphincter sparing surgery in over 40% of patients whose tumors were located < 6 cm from the anal verge and who otherwise would have required colostomy.

The effect of preoperative radiation therapy on glucose utilization and cell kinetics in patients with primary rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Proliferating cells in neoplasms usually show rapid cell cycle times and high rates of glycolysis. Tumor glucose utilization (TuGluc), potential cell doubling time (Tpot), and the effect of radiotherapy (RT) were evaluated in patients with primary rectal carcinoma.

METHODS

2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (18F-FDG) was administered and dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) performed to determine TuGluc. Cell kinetics were measured with flow cytometry after labeling with iodo-deoxy-uridine. Two groups of patients were investigated prospectively: 1) those patients undergoing surgery only and 2) those patients undergoing surgery after receiving 30 gray of RT. Twenty consecutive patients with a cT3-NX-M0 tumor and age > 50 years were selected and randomized. One patient was excluded because of unexpected liver metastases and another had incomplete data.

RESULTS

At baseline, the TuGluc for Group 1 was 222+/-104 nmol/mL/minute (mean +/- 1 standard deviation), and was 215+/-126 nmol/mL/minute for Group 2 (P > 0.8). After RT TuGluc decreased to 77+/-39 nmol/mL/minute (P = 0.008). Tpot was 3.4+/-1.2 days for Group 1 and 2.6+/-2.0 days for Group 2 at baseline (P > 0.2). Two weeks after RT, Tpot slowed to 5.7+/-3.6 days (P = 0.04). A weak negative correlation (correlation coefficient = -0.36) was found between TuGluc and Tpot. After RT, the proportion of labeled cells had not changed from baseline levels (P > 0.2), suggesting undisturbed proliferation, but the DNA synthesis time had increased. The significant decrease of TuGluc indicated cell loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor FDG uptake and cell kinetics are not correlated strongly in rectal carcinoma. Preoperative RT results in an overall loss of tumor cells (tumor reduction) and an increase in Tpot, although proliferation of the viable cell fraction is maintained.

Preoperative radiation with concurrent 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion for locally advanced unresectable rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To determine the percentage of complete responders and the resectability rate for patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the rectum treated by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusional chemotherapy and pelvic radiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 1992 and June 1996, 29 patients with a diagnosis of locally advanced unresectable rectal cancer received preoperative 5 FU by continuous intravenous infusion at a dose of 225 mg/m2/day concurrent with pelvic radiation (median 54 Gy/28 fractions). All patients were clinical stage T4 on the bases of organ invasion or tumor fixation. Median time for surgical resection was 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for the group was 28 months (range 5-57 months). Six patients were felt to be persistently unresectable or developed distant metastases and did not undergo surgical resection. Of the 29 patients, 23 proceeded to surgery, 18 were resectable for cure, 13 by abdominoperineal resection, 3 by anterior resection and 2 by local excision. Of the 29 patients, 4 (13%) had a complete response, and 90% were clinically downstaged. Of the 18 resected patients, 1 has died of his disease, 17 are alive, and 15 disease-free. The regimen was well tolerated; there was only one treatment-related complication, a wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

The combination of 5 FU infusion and pelvic radiation in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer is well tolerated and provides a baseline for comparison purposes with future combinations of newer systemic agents and radiation.

[Preoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy for cancer of the rectum]

PURPOSE

To evaluate retrospectively treatment-related morbidity of concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1992 and 1995, 38 patients (median age: 60) were treated for locally advanced resectable rectal cancer. Median dose of radiotherapy was 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks. Chemotherapy consisted of two courses of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin administered during the first and the fifth weeks of radiotherapy. Median dose of 5-fluorouracil was 350 mg/m2/day, and median dose of leucovorin was 20 mg/m2/day, day 1 to day 5. Surgery was performed 5 weeks after completion of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Before surgery, one patient died of febrile neutropenia and sepsis after two cycles of chemotherapy and 45 Gy. Main pre-operative grade 3-4 toxicities were respectively: neutropenia: 3%; nausea/vomiting: 3%; diarrhea: 3%; proctitis: 5%; radiation dermatitis: 8%. Twenty-six patients underwent a low anterior resection and 11 an abdomino-perineal resection. A temporary colostomy was performed in 12 patients. Pathologic complete response rate was 27%. There was one post-operative death due to thromboembolic disease. Major post-operative grade 3-4 complications were: pelvic infection: 14%; abdominal infection: 5%; perineal sepsis: 8%; anastomotic dehiscence: 8%; cardiac failure: 5%. Delayed perineal wound healing was observed in six patients. No significant prognosic factor of post-operative complications has been observed. Median duration of hospitalization was 22 days. With a median follow-up of 24 months, 2-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 82 and 64%.

CONCLUSION

Tolerance of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy was acceptable. Ongoing controlled studies will assess the impact of this combined treatment on survival.

The role of radiotherapy in the surgical management of gastrointestinal cancer

Surgery is the main mode of treatment in most gastrointestinal malignancies. Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy is playing an increasing role as an adjunct to improve local control, survival and palliation. The principles of radiotherapy and the rationale for combination therapy are presented. The current role of radiation therapy in the GI tract is discussed by various sites. New and investigational radiotherapy techniques are outlined.

Suppository administration of chemotherapeutic drugs with concomitant radiation for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative radiation with combined chemotherapy is effective in shrinking advanced rectal cancer locally and facilitating subsequent surgery. Suppository delivery of 5-fluorouracil is associated with less toxicity and higher rectal tissue concentrations than intravenous administration. This prompted us to evaluate suppository and intravenous administration of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C with concomitant radiation to determine associated toxicity.

METHODS

Rectal, liver, lymph node, and lung tissue and systemic and portal blood were collected serially from male Sprague Dawley rats to determine drug concentrations following suppository or intravenous delivery of 5-fluorouracil or mitomycin C. Thirty-six animals were randomly assigned to treatment groups and received 5-fluorouracil suppositories, mitomycin C suppositories, or an equivalent intravenous dose of 5-fluorouracil or mitomycin C 30 minutes before radiation therapy. Before and 3, 6, 10, and 15 days following this treatment, blood was collected, colonoscopy was performed, and rectal tissue was harvested for histologic examination.

RESULTS

Mitomycin C suppository was significantly less toxic compared with intravenous delivery, and higher rectal tissue concentrations were observed from 10 to 30 minutes (P < 0.05). Compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil administration and radiation, 5-fluorouracil suppository and radiation resulted in additive myelosuppression at day 6 (P < 0.05) with rapid recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

5-Fluorouracil and mitomycin C suppository delivery combined with radiation causes less systemic toxicity and is more effective than intravenous administration.

Pre-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy for non-resectable rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment results of combined pre-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by surgery for patients with initially non-resectable primary rectal cancer were reviewed.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with locally advanced non-resectable rectal cancer were treated with pre-operative irradiation consisting of 50.4-54 Gy plus concomitant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) delivered during the 1st and 5th weeks of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Following pre-operative therapy, the resectability rate was 91%, with all but one patient undergoing complete resection. The pathologic complete response rate was 10%. The overall peri-operative and postoperative complication rate was 0.8 complications per patient. There was no postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This early experience indicates that high resectability rates are achievable with pre-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy for non-resectable rectal cancer while maintaining acceptable postoperative morbidity.