The need to reexamine axillary lymph node dissection in invasive breast cancer

Assessment of the axilla in women with early-stage breast cancer undergoing primary surgery: a review

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is routinely performed in people with node-negative early breast cancer to assess the axilla. SNB has no proven therapeutic benefit. Nodal status information obtained from SNB helps in prognostication and can influence adjuvant systemic and locoregional treatment choices. However, the redundancy of the nodal status information is becoming increasingly apparent. The accuracy of radiological assessment of the axilla, combined with the strong influence of tumour biology on systemic and locoregional therapy requirements, has prompted many to consider alternative options for SNB. SNB contributes significantly to decreased quality of life in early breast cancer patients. Substantial improvements in workflow and cost could accrue by removing SNB from early breast cancer treatment. We review the current viewpoints and ideas for alternative options for assessing and managing a clinically negative axilla in patients with early breast cancer (EBC). Omitting SNB in selected cases or replacing SNB with a non-invasive predictive model appear to be viable options based on current literature.

Lymphoscintigraphy and Gamma Probe Tracing in Detecting Breast Cancer Lymph Node Involvement: Can they Replace Axillary Lymph Node Dissection?

Background

Axillary lymph node status is the most important pathological determinant of prognosis in early breast cancer. However, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) performed for pathological assessment is not without costs and morbidity. Recently, radioisotope-guided sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed as a promising technique for staging breast cancer patients.

Aim of the study

In this study we report our experience (76 patients) in radioguided sentinel node (SN) biopsy in breast cancer. The study was divided into two phases: the first represents our learning curve, necessary to establish our guidelines for its use in clinical practice, while the second phase was aimed at assessing the feasibility of SN localization using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe (GP) detection.

Methods

All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy (LS) up to two hours after tracer delivery (99mTc-micro-nanocolloid, four i.d. injections of 200 μCi/200 μL around the primary lesion) 24 hours before surgery and GP tracing during surgery. Subsequently ALND was performed for pathological assessment.

Results

SNs were identified in 73/76 patients using LS and in 72/76 using GP. In one case the SN was detected by GP alone while in two cases GP was not able to locate the SN although it had been identified by means of LS. Thirty-three of these 73 patients had axillary node involvement. In 31/33 cases the SN was the only positive node. No positive nodes were found in the remaining 40 ALNDs where SNs were identified. Thus, according to our experience 40/73 ALNDs could have been avoided. SNB seems to be a very interesting technique but further experience in lymph node radioisotope tracing is needed.

Color Doppler ultrasonography for treatment response prediction and evaluation in breast cancer

Primary systemic therapy is a well-established modality of treatment in locally advanced breast cancer. Assessment of tumor response to chemotherapy not only helps in assessing the efficacy of the regimen used but also predicts the overall outcome of the patient. The tumor vascularity is a surrogate marker of tumor burden and this can be readily assessed by color Doppler ultrasound using various indices (resistivity index, pulsatility index and maximum flow velocity). The pre- and post-chemotherapy indices can be compared with in order assess the response to chemotherapy. Among various imaging modalities, MRI and PET have the highest sensitivity in detecting the tumor response, but they are not cost effective. Color Doppler ultrasound is a promising alternative for tumor response assessment owing to its availability, reproducibility and cost–effectiveness.

Cortical morphologic features of axillary lymph nodes as a predictor of metastasis in breast cancer: in vitro sonographic study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was in vitro sonographic-pathologic correlation of findings in dissected axillary lymph nodes from breast cancer patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection and classification of the sonographic appearance of the nodes on the basis of cortical morphologic features to facilitate early recognition of metastatic disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

High-resolution sonography was used for in vitro examination of 171 lymph nodes from 19 axillae in 18 patients with unknown nodal status who underwent axillary lymph node dissection for early infiltrating breast cancer. The images were evaluated by two blinded observers, and discordant readings were referred to a third blinded observer. Each lymph node was classified as one of types 1-6 according to cortical morphologic features. Types 1-4 were considered benign, ranging from hyperechoic with no visible cortex to thickened generalized hypoechoic cortical lobulation. Type 5 (focal hypoechoic cortical lobulation) and type 6 (hypoechoic node with absent hilum) nodes were considered metastatic. The reference standard for metastatic disease was histopathologic evaluation of sectioned nodes by a single pathologist blinded to sonographic findings. Largest nodal diameter also was measured.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement was 77% for classification of nodal morphology (types 1-6) and 88% for characterization of a node as benign or malignant. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of cortical shape in prediction of metastatic involvement of axillary nodes were 77%, 80%, 36%, 96%, and 80%. Type 4 nodes had the most false-negative findings (four of 36). Node size ranged from 0.2 to 3.8 cm, and subcentimeter nodes of all types were detected.

CONCLUSION

In breast cancer, axillary lymph nodes can be classified according to cortical morphologic features. Predominantly hyperechoic nodes (types 1-3) can be considered benign. Generalized cortical lobulation (type 4) is uncommonly a false-negative finding, but metastasis, if present, is invariably detected at sentinel node mapping. The presence of asymmetric focal hypoechoic cortical lobulation (type 5) or a completely hypoechoic node (type 6) should serve as a guideline for universal performance of fine-needle aspiration for preoperative staging of breast cancer. This classification, when verified with larger samples, may serve as a useful clinical guideline if proven with results of in vivo studies.

Comparative study of lymphoedema with axillary node dissection versus axillary node sampling with radiotherapy in patients undergoing breast conservation surgery

AIMS

Our aim was to compare the incidence of lymphoedema in two groups of patients undergoing breast conservation surgery; one undergoing axillary sampling and radiotherapy to patients with positive axillary nodes, and the other undergoing axillary clearance.

METHODS

Retrospective review of records of two sequential groups of patients; one undergoing axillary sampling between January 1994 and December 1998 (Group 1) and the other undergoing axillary clearance between January 2000 and December 2002 (Group 2). Both groups had minimum of 2 years follow-up.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twelve patients were included in Group 1 and 194 in Group 2. 2.2% of the patients in Group 1 developed lymphoedema compared to 12.3% in Group 2. This was statistically significant with a P value=0.0001. In the node-positive patients, the incidence of lymphoedema in Group 1 was 6.2% compared to 15.4% in Group 2, although the differences were not statistically significant with P=0.17.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of lymphoedema in the axillary sampling group was low, although the differences were less pronounced in the node-positive patients. The effectiveness of radiotherapy as an alternative to full axillary dissection among patients with positive nodes is currently under investigation in randomised controlled trials.

Distinct hypermethylation profile of primary breast cancer is associated with sentinel lymph node metastasis

PURPOSE

Gene promoter region hypermethylation is a significant event in primary breast cancer. However, its impact on tumor progression and potential predictive implications remain relatively unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We conducted hypermethylation profiling of 151 primary breast tumors with association to known prognostic factors in breast cancer using methylation-specific PCR for six known tumor suppressor and related genes: RASSF1A, APC, TWIST, CDH1, GSTP1, and RAR-beta2. Furthermore, correlation with sentinel lymph node (SLN) tumor status was assessed as it represents the earliest stage of metastasis that is readily detected. Hypermethylation for any one gene was identified in 147 (97%) of 151 primary breast tumors. The most frequently hypermethylated gene was RASSF1A (81%).

RESULTS

Hypermethylation of the CDH1 was significantly associated with primary breast tumors demonstrating lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.008), infiltrating ductal histology (P = 0.03), and negative for the estrogen receptor (P = 0.005), whereas RASSF1A and RAR-beta2 gene hypermethylation were significantly more common in estrogen receptor-positive (P < 0.001) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (P < 0.001) tumors, respectively. In multivariate analysis, hypermethylation of GSTP1 and/or RAR-beta2 was significantly associated with patients having macroscopic SLN metastasis compared with those with microscopic or no sentinel node metastasis (odds ratio, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-10.4; P < 0.001). In paired SLN metastasis, CDH1 was the most frequently methylated gene (90%) and provides evidence in patients corroborating its role in the clinical development of metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Hypermethylation profiling of primary breast tumors is significantly associated with known pathologic prognostic factors and may have additional clinical and pathologic utility for assessing patient prognosis and predicting early regional metastasis.

Identificação do linfonodo sentinela no câncer de mama com injeção subdérmica periareolar em quatro pontos do radiofármaco

Este estudo visa identificar o linfonodo sentinela por meio da injeção exclusiva de radiofármaco periareolar subdérmico em quatro pontos, independente da topografia do tumor. A biópsia do linfonodo sentinela diminui a morbidade no estadiamento da axila. Foram realizadas 57 biópsias do linfonodo sentinela, em pacientes com câncer de mama, prospectivamente, em dois grupos: grupo A (25 pacientes) e grupo B (32 pacientes). Realizamos a injeção do radiofármaco peritumoral no grupo A, e nova técnica periareolar em quatro pontos no grupo B. A biópsia do linfonodo sentinela foi estudada por "imprint" citológico e hematoxilina e eosina, seguida de linfadenectomia axilar no grupo A e nos casos positivos do grupo B. No grupo A foram identificados 88% (22/25) de linfonodos sentinelas, não houve falso-negativo, com sensibilidade e especificidade de 100%; no grupo B foram identificados 96% (31/32) de linfonodos sentinelas e valor preditivo positivo de 100%. O número de linfonodos sentinelas variou de 1 a 7, moda de 1 e média de 2,7, a área de maior captação variou de 10 a 100 vezes. A injeção periareolar em quatro pontos se apresenta como bom método no mapeamento linfático para identificação do linfonodo sentinela. A padronização deste sítio pode ser o de escolha para identificação do linfonodo sentinela, sendo necessário maior número de casos para confirmação destes achados.

Sentinel lymph node dissection and the current status of American trials on breast lymphatic mapping

The current national sentinel lymph node (SLN) clinical trials for breast carcinoma address the prognostic and therapeutic utility of SLN dissection (SLND) in women with early-stage, clinically node-negative breast cancer. Following completion of these studies, overall survival, disease-free survival, morbidity, and quality of life of patients will be compared. Surgeon participation is crucial to the ongoing success of clinical trials in the field of breast cancer surgery.

Worldwide experience with lymphatic mapping for invasive breast cancer

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy have changed the standard of surgical care for women with invasive breast cancer. The rate of successful axillary SLN identification varies from 90% to 99%. Recurrence rates after a negative SLN biopsy have been remarkably low. Internal mammary node drainage has been noted in 8% to 22% of cases, but whether to harvest these extra-axillary sites of drainage remains controversial. Because of the low morbidity associated with the lymphatic mapping procedure, all women with invasive breast cancer should be considered as candidates for this more accurate staging technique.

Lymphoscintigraphic and intraoperative detection of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients: the nuclear medicine perspective

The concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery relates to the fact that the tumor drains in a logical way via the lymphatic system, from the first to upper levels. Therefore, (1) the first lymph node met (the sentinel node) will most likely be the first one affected by metastasis, and (2) a negative sentinel node makes it highly unlikely that other nodes are affected. Sentinel lymph node biopsy would represent a significant advantage as a mini-invasive procedure, considering that, after operation, about 70% of patients are found to be free from metastatic disease, yet axillary node dissection can lead to significant morbidity. Although the pattern of lymphatic drainage from a breast cancer can be very variable, the mammary gland and the overlying skin can be considered as a biologic unit in which lymphatics tend to follow the vasculature. Considering that tumor lymphatics are disorganized and relatively ineffective, subdermal, and peritumoral injection of small aliquots of radiotracer is preferred to intratumoral administration. (99m)Tc-labeled colloids with most of the particles in the 100-200 nm size range would be ideal for radioguided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Lymphoscintigraphy is an essential part of radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy, as images are used to direct the surgeon to the site of the node. The sentinel lymph node should have a significantly higher count than background. After removal of the sentinel node, the axilla must be re-examined to ensure all radioactive sites are identified and removed for analysis. The success rate of radioguidance in localizing the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer surgery is about 94-97% in Institutions where a high number of procedures are performed, approaching 99% when combined with the vital blue dye technique. At present, there is no definite evidence that a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy is invariably correlated with a negative axillary status, except perhaps for T(1a-b) breast cancers, with size < or =1 cm. Randomized clinical trials should elucidate the impact of avoiding axillary node dissection in patients with a negative sentinel lymph node on the long-term clinical outcome of patients.

Evaluation of novel modified tangential irradiation technique for breast cancer patients using dose–volume histograms

PURPOSE

We have previously reported that entire axillary lymph node regions could be irradiated by the modified tangential irradiation technique (MTIT). In this study, MTIT was compared with a conventional irradiation technique (CTIT) using dose-volume histograms to verify how adequately MTIT covers the breast and axillary lymph node region and the extent to which it involves the lung and heart.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-four patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated by lumpectomy, axillary dissection, and postoperative radiotherapy. Twenty-two patients were treated with MTIT and 22 with CTIT. In 25 patients, the breast tumor was on the left and in 19 on the right. During axillary dissection, surgical clips were left as markers at the border of the axillary lymph node region. MTIT was planned by setting the dorsal edge of the radiation field on a lateral-view simulator film at the dorsal edge of the humeral head and the cranial edge of the radiation field at the caudal edge of the humeral head. CTIT was planned to ensure radiation of the breast tissue without considering the axillary region. In this study, all patients underwent computed tomography, and the CT data were transmitted on-line to a radiotherapy planning system, in which the dose-distribution computed tomography images and dose-volume histograms were calculated by defining the breast, axillary region (levels I, II, and III), lung, and heart region.

RESULTS

Dose-volume histogram analysis demonstrated that breast tissue was radiated with an 86.5-100% volume (median 96.5%) by MTIT and an 83-100% volume (median, 95%) by CTIT at >95% of the isocenter dose. The axillary lymph node regions at Levels I, II, and III were irradiated with 84-100% (median, 94.5%), 59-100% (median, 89%), and 70-100% (median, 89.5%) volumes, respectively, by MTIT and with 2-84% (median, 38%), 0-53% (median, 15%), and 0-31% (median, 0%) volumes, respectively, by CTIT at >70% of the isocenter dose. The ipsilateral lung was irradiated with a 5-22% volume (median, 11.5%) by MTIT and 5-15% volume (median 9%) by CTIT at >90% of the isocenter dose. In all 25 left-sided breast cancer patients, the volumes irradiated with an 80% isocenter dose were <30 cm(3).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study demonstrated that the breast tissue was sufficiently irradiated with both CTIT and MTIT planning, the axillary lymph node areas irradiated by MTIT were much wider than those irradiated by CTIT at all levels, and the lung and heart volumes irradiated by MTIT were small.

The role of lymph node sampling and radiotherapy in the management of the axilla in early breast cancer

Management of the axilla in early breast cancer is an issue of ongoing debate. We reviewed our experience in 312 patients who underwent axillary lymph node sampling between 1994 and 1998, of whom 81 patients (24%) had axillary lymph node metastasis. There have been two axillary recurrences, one associated with local recurrence to the breast and one presenting with distant metastasis. There were no patients with isolated axillary disease as their only site of recurrence and no axillary failures in the node-positive group treated with axillary sampling and radiotherapy. Axillary lymph node sampling effectively stages the axilla. This can safely be followed by radiotherapy to the axilla in case of lymph node metastasis. Axillary lymph node sampling forms a sound basis to develop new techniques, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy currently investigated by ongoing trials.

Decentralization of breast cancer surgery in the United States

BACKGROUND

Physician volume of at least 15-30 annual breast cancer operations has been associated with higher 5-year survival rates. The authors sought to determine whether surgical volumes for breast cancer in the United States frequently reach this threshold.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of 987 surgeons who operated on 8105 Medicare patients with breast cancer during 1994-1995 in 6 areas in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results tumor registry. The 2-year physician volume of breast cancer operations was estimated among Medicare patients (approximating the on-average annual volumes for patients of all ages) and its association was examined with physician characteristics and with 3 measures of surgical care.

RESULTS

The median 2-year Medicare volume for breast cancer surgeons was 6, and 79% of physicians performed < or = 12 operations. Approximately 50% of patients were cared for by physicians who performed < or = 12 operations over 2 years, and 10% of patients were cared for by physicians who performed > or = 30 operations. Surgeon characteristics of age, female gender, general surgery board certification, and academic affiliation were associated with modestly higher volumes of breast cancer surgery. Higher surgeon volumes were associated with higher patient receipt of breast-conserving surgery, testing for hormone receptors, and lymph node dissection during mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Most physicians who perform breast cancer surgery perform few annual operations in Medicare patients, and lower volumes are associated with differences in surgical processes of care. Because patients in the Medicare age group comprise almost 50% of all incident breast cancer cases, surgical volumes for patients of all ages also are likely to be low. It is likely that only approximately 10% of patients in the United States are treated by surgeons who performing at least 30 annual operations.

Lymphedema after treatment of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is one of the major long-term complications of axillary dissection. This study was designed to investigate the risk factors that are predicted to effect the development of lymphedema after complete axillary dissection.

METHODS

Two hundred forty patients who had undergone modified radical mastectomy with complete axillary dissection were examined at least 18 months after the surgery. The effects of age, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, tamoxifen use, stage, body mass index, number of the removed and metastatic lymph nodes, and total volume of the wound drainage on the development of lymphedema were analyzed.

RESULTS

Lymphedema developed in 68 (28%) of the 240 cases. Axillary radiotherapy and body mass index were found to increase the incidence of the lymphedema.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who had the combination of full axillary dissection and axillary radiotherapy carry a significant risk of lymphedema.

The molecular detection of micrometastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The rapid evolution of molecular technology and novel markers provides the opportunity to establish a more effective means to detect micrometastatic breast cancer. Given the controversies concerning application and clinical relevance, this review critically evaluates the current status of these molecular staging technologies.

DATA SOURCES

Breast cancer literature addressing (1). molecular detection methodologies (immunohistochemistry, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and microarray analysis); (2). specific tissue applications such as lymph nodes, bone marrow aspirate, and peripheral blood; (3). expert commentary concerning the clinical applications and pitfalls of these technologies; and (4). recent data from our molecular diagnostics laboratory.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular detection technologies such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and microarray analyses are being developed that will likely have future application as cancer diagnostics. Further work is needed to establish assays that are validated by prospective clinical studies. Early identification of clinically relevant disease could lead to new treatment or staging approaches for breast cancer.

Current uses of ultrasound in the evaluation of the breast

Ultrasound is an important imaging modality in evaluating the breast. One of the most common uses of ultrasound is to help distinguish benign from malignant breast disease, primarily with gray-scale ultrasound but also with Doppler ultrasound. Another common use is to provide guidance for interventional procedures. Less common uses include assisting in staging of breast cancer and evaluating patients with implants. Recently there has been an interest in using ultrasound to screen asymptomatic women for breast cancer, as is done with mammography. Further studies must be performed to assess if this reduces mortality from breast cancer. Although primarily used to image the female breast, ultrasound also can be used to evaluate breast-related concerns in men. Uses of contrast-enhanced ultrasound are still experimental and would add an invasive component to an otherwise noninvasive study.

Failure to harvest sentinel lymph nodes identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer patients

Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy dissection has been demonstrated to have high predictive value for axillary staging in breast cancer patients. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can localize and facilitate the harvesting of sentinel lymph nodes (SNLs) with a high success rate. The failure rate of selective sentinel lymphadenectomy ranges between 2% and 8%. Details of the failures were seldom addressed. This study analyzes the causes of failure to harvest SLNs in spite of positive preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. From November 1997 through November 2000, 201 female patients with histologically confirmed and operable breast carcinoma underwent selective sentinel lymphadenectomy at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center. Among these patients, 183 (91%) received preoperative lymphoscintigraphy to identify axillary lymph nodes. The causes of failure to harvest the SLNs in this group of patients despite successful preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were analyzed. In our series, the failure rate of SLN identification was 7.0% (14/201). The failure rate for our first year was 11.1% (6/54), second year 9.1% (7/77), and third year 1.4% (1/70). The incidence of failure in spite of positive preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was 3.5% (6/170). The shine-through effect of the primary injection site and failure to visualize a blue lymph node were the main reasons for technical failure. Most of these cases occurred during our learning curve of the procedure. The possibility of failure to get the SLN should be explained to patients before surgery. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) should be done if selective SLN dissection is not successful.

Status of lymph node staging

Sentinel node biopsy has the potential to provide more accurate staging information than axillary node dissection. Given the considerable morbidity of axillary node dissection this less invasive approach is attractive. However, there are a number of issues to be resolved before the best technique of sentinel node biopsy is determined. When large studies with long-term follow up demonstrate that lymphatic mapping to identify clinically occult lymph node metastases is as effective as we hope, then full axillary node dissection can be reserved to treat patients who indeed have lymph node metastases. Around 60% of the patients could then be spared an axillary node dissection that they do not need because they do not have metastases there. Modern technology is providing more accurate prognostic information based on primary tumor characteristics. Applying these technologies to sentinel lymph nodes may render the lymph node status even more relevant than it currently is.

Will we need lymph node dissection at all in the future?

Traditionally in the treatment of primary breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) plays an important role. However, a substantial and increasing percentage of patients appear to have no nodal involvement and have been subjected to ALND unnecessarily. The first reason to perform an ALND is axillary nodal staging. After reviewing the literature, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients an adequately conducted lymphatic mapping by sentinel node procedure is equal to ALND for this purpose. The second reason to perform an ALND is to establish the extent of nodal involvement, which might have an impact on adjuvant treatment recommendations. However, there is no evidence available that patients with extensive nodal involvement (= 4 positive nodes) benefit more from adjuvant systemic treatment (either standard or high dose) in terms of reduction of odds of recurrence and mortality compared to patients with limited nodal involvement and optimally administered so-called standard adjuvant treatment. The third reason to perform an ALND is to ensure axillary tumor control. Reviewing the different treatment options, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients axillary control after axillary radiotherapy appears to be similar to axillary control after ALND. In clinically overt axillary involvement, ALND (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) may result in an improved regional control. In the near future, ALND will not be the standard of care but will be reserved for those patients with proven axillary lymph node involvement. In microscopic disease, radiotherapy may be an alternative with equal control and less morbidity.

Is there a role for axillary dissection for patients with operable breast cancer in this era of conservatism?

BACKGROUND

The trend in breast cancer surgery is toward more conservative operative procedures. The new staging technique of sentinel node biopsy facilitates the identification of pathological node-negative patients in whom axillary dissection may be avoided. However, patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy would require a thorough examination of their nodal status. An axillary -dissection provides good local control, and accurate staging and prognostic information to inform decisions about adjuvant therapy. In addition, the survival benefit of axillary treatment is still debated. The objectives of the present study were to examine the pattern of lymph node metastases in the axilla, and evaluate the merits of a level III axillary dissection.

METHODS

Between June 1997 and May 2000, 308 patients underwent a total of 320 level III dissections as part of their treatment for operable invasive breast cancer. The three axillary levels were marked intraoperatively, and the contents in each level were submitted and examined separately. The patterns of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases were examined, and factors associated with > or =4 positive nodes, and level III ALN metastases were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

An average of 25 lymph nodes were examined per case (range: 8-54), and using strict anatomical criteria, the mean numbers of ALN found in levels I, II and III were 18 (range: 2-43), 4 (range: 0-19), and 3 (range: 0-11), respectively. Axillary lymph node involvement was found in 45% of the cases (143/320). Of the 143 cases, 78% (n = 111) had involvement of level I nodes only, and 21% (n = 30) had positive ALN in levels II and, or, III, in addition to level I. Involvement of lymph nodes in level II or III without a level I metastasis was found in two cases only (0.6%). By including level II, in addition to level I, in the dissection, four cases (1%) were converted from one to three positive nodes to > or =4 positive nodes (P = 0.64). By the inclusion of level III to a level I and II dissection, three cases (1%) were converted from one to three positive nodes to > or =4 positive nodes (P = 0.74). Involvement of lymph nodes in level III was found in 22 cases (7%), and 51 cases (16%) had > or =4 positive nodes. Palpability of ALN, pathological tumour size, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), were sig-nificantly associated with level III involvement and > or =4 positive nodes by univariate and multivariate analyses. The frequencies of level III involvement and > or =4 positive nodes in patients with palpable ALN were 22% and 42%, respectively. The corresponding frequencies in patients with a clinically negative axilla, and a primary tumour which was >20 mm and LVI positive, were over 14% and 31%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Level III axillary dissection is appropriate for patients with palpable ALN, and in those with a tumour which is >20 mm and LVI positive, principally to reduce the risk of axillary recurrence. Staging accuracy is achieved with a level II dissection, or even a level I dissection alone based on strict anatomical criteria. Sentinel node biopsy is a promising technique in identifying pathological node-positive patients in whom an axillary clearance provides optimal local control and staging information.

T1 breast cancer: identification of patients at low risk of axillary lymph node metastases

OBJECTIVE

The status of the axillary lymph nodes is one of the most important prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer. A panel of molecular markers of tumor aggressiveness in addition to conventional clinical and histopathologic features were analyzed in an attempt to identify a subgroup of patients with a low risk of axillary lymph node metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from 358 patients with T1 breast cancer who underwent level I/II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were investigated. Hormone receptor status, Ki-67, S-phase fraction, DNA ploidy, HER-2/neu, p53, epidermal growth factor receptor, urokinase type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, bone marrow micrometastases as well as patient age, menopausal status, tumor site, tumor size, histologic type, tumor grade, carcinoma in situ, multifocality, and lymph vascular invasion (LVI) were studied to predict axillary lymph node status.

RESULTS

In a multivariate logistic regression analysis LVI (present v.s. not present), Ki-67 (> or = 18% v.s. < 18%), tumor size (1.1-2 cm v.s. < or = 1 cm), and histologic grade (G3 v.s. G1/2) were identified as independent predictive factors of axillary lymph node metastases. Approximately 13% of patients (n = 47) with well or moderately differentiated tumors less than or equal to 1 cm, no lymph vascular invasion, and a low Ki-67 staining were identified as having a low risk of axillary lymph node metastases of 4.3%. However, 20 patients with all four unfavorable predictive factors had a 75% incidence of axillary lymph node involvement.

CONCLUSION

Primary tumor characteristics can be used to identify a subgroup of patients with a low risk of axillary lymph node metastases in T1 breast cancer. Preoperative risk assessment might be used to omit routine ALND in those patients at low risk of axillary lymph node metastases.

Age-related variations in the use of axillary dissection: a survival analysis of 8038 women with T1-ST2 breast cancer

PURPOSE

The use of axillary dissection (AD) in women with invasive breast cancer is increasingly questioned. This study analyzes the survival in women with T1-2 breast cancer according to age and AD use.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from the Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit Database were analyzed for 8038 women aged 50-89 years referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1989 and 1998 with invasive T1-2,M0 breast cancer. Tumor and treatment characteristics were compared between women treated with and without AD (AD+ vs. AD-) according to three age groups: 50-64, 65-74 and 75+ years. Regional relapse and actuarial 5-year overall and breast cancer-specific survival were compared between AD+ and AD- women. Multivariate analysis of age, tumor and treatment factors, and adjusted hazard ratios with AD omission were performed.

RESULTS

AD was omitted more frequently with advancing age (4% vs. 8% vs. 22% in women aged 50-64, 65-74, and 75+ years, respectively, p <0.0001). Tumor characteristics were more favorable in AD- women, with fewer having Grade III disease, T2 tumors, or lymphovascular invasion (all p <0.0001). Women treated without AD were also less likely to undergo radiotherapy after lumpectomy or mastectomy (both p <0.0001). Systemic therapy use and regional relapse rates were comparable between AD- and AD+ women in each age-specific cohort. Multivariate analysis identified age, tumor size, grade, lymphovascular invasion, estrogen receptor status, clinical nodal palpability, type of surgery, and radiotherapy use as independent variables affecting survival. Hazard ratios adjusted for these variables showed AD omission to be associated with lower overall survival in the entire cohort (hazard ratio 1.52, p <0.0001) and lower breast cancer-specific survival in women aged 65-74 years (hazard ratio 1.99, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

AD was more frequently omitted with advancing age. The lack of differences in systemic therapy use, regional relapse, and breast cancer-specific survival among AD- compared with AD+ women aged 75+ years suggests that AD use may be selectively omitted in this elderly cohort. However, the lower survival associated with AD omission among women aged 65-74 years, and the lack of a survival advantage among AD- women aged 50-64 years despite more favorable tumor characteristics and comparable systemic therapy use support the hypothesis that definitive locoregional therapy has an impact on survival.

Survival of women after breast conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of older women with breast cancer are receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, substantial numbers of them are not receiving either axillary dissection or adjuvant irradiation.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether failure to perform axillary dissection or irradiation is associated with decreased survival in women with early-stage breast cancer.

METHOD

We studied 26,290 women aged > or = 25 in 1988-1993 from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data and 5,328 women aged > or = 65 in 1991-1993 from SEER-Medicare linked data, who had early-stage breast cancer and received BCS.

RESULTS

Twenty seven percent of women aged > or = 25 receiving BCS did not receive axillary dissection, most of whom (74%) were age > or = 65. Women receiving BCS with axillary dissection had lower 7-year breast cancer-specific mortality than did those without dissection (hazard ratio = 0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.44-0.63). We found an interaction between receipt of axillary dissection and radiotherapy on survival of older women after BCS. Women who received either axillary dissection or radiotherapy experienced similar survivals to those who received both axillary dissection and radiation, while women who received neither treatment experienced poorer survival (hazard ratio = 1.76, 1.23-2.52), after controlling for demographics, tumor size and comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who receive neither axillary dissection nor radiation therapy after BCS experience an increased risk of death from breast cancer. The lack of improvement in the past two decades in survival of older women with breast cancer may be explained in part by the increasing use of treatments that do not address potential tumor in axillary nodes.

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the axilla in women with breast cancer: comparison with pathology of excised nodes

Axillary lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer patients and is currently determined by surgical dissection. This study was performed to assess whether dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd) enhanced MRI is an accurate method for non-invasive staging of the axilla. 47 women with a new primary breast cancer underwent pre-operative dynamic Gd enhanced MRI of the ipsilateral axilla. Lymph node enhancement was quantitatively analysed using a region of interest method. Enhancement indices and nodal area were compared with histopathology of excised nodes using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve approach. 10 patients had axillary metastases pathologically and all had > or =1 lymph node with an enhancement index of >21% and a nodal area of >0.4 cm(2). 37 patients had negative axillary nodes pathologically. 20 of these had enhancement indices <21% and nodal areas <0.4 cm(2). Using this method, a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 56%, a positive predictive value of 38% and a negative predictive value of 100% could be achieved. Using this method of quantitative assessment, dynamic Gd enhanced MRI may be a reliable method of predicting absence of axillary nodal metastases in women with breast cancer, thereby avoiding axillary surgery in women with a negative MRI study.

Detection and Significance of Occult Axillary Metastatic Disease in Breast Cancer Patients

After clinical staging, the single most important prognostic factor for patients with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer is the presence or absence of detectable metastases to axillary lymph nodes when examined by conventional light microscopy. More sensitive methods of determination of lymph node status, such as evaluation of serial sections, immunohistochemical staining, and use of molecular biological assays increase the rate of detection of micrometastases. Although the feasibility of enhanced detection of occult axillary metastatic disease is well established, the prognostic significance of such detection is only recently starting to emerge. Furthermore, the enormous recent interest in the application of sentinel lymph node biopsy as an alternative to the evaluation of the entire axilla in patients with breast cancer makes the first-time detailed evaluation for micrometastases practically feasible. In this review the different methods of detecting micrometastatic disease in the axilla and the significance of such findings are discussed.

Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

The status of the regional nodal basin remains the most important prognostic indicator of survival. The current standard of care for the management of invasive breast cancer is the complete removal of the tumor, with documentation of negative margins by either mastectomy or lumpectomy, followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection. Data suggest that complete lymph node dissection (CLND) provides better local control of the disease and may actually offer a survival advantage. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are clearly changing this long-held paradigm and have the potential to change the standard of surgical care of the breast cancer patient. The purpose of this report is to describe the lymphatic mapping experience at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute. From April 1994 to January 1999, 1,147 consecutive breast cancer patients were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved lymphatic mapping protocol. Lymphatic mapping was performed using Tc99m-labeled sulfur colloid and isosulfan blue dye. An SLN was defined as any blue node and/or any hot node with ex vivo radioactivity counts >/=10 times an excised non-SLN or in situ radioactivity counts >/=3 times the background counts. Lymphatic mapping was successful in identifying the SLN in 1,098 of 1,147 (95.7%) cases. In the first 186 patients, all of whom underwent CLND following SLN biopsy, one false-negative biopsy was encountered for a false-negative rate of 0.83%. The method of diagnosis (excisional versus minimally invasive) does not appear to impact on lymphatic mapping. Tumor size, however, is directly related to the probability of axillary lymph node involvement. Advances in technology and the development of minimally invasive surgical techniques have heralded a new era in surgery. Lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy may actually prove to be a more accurate method of identifying metastases to the axilla by allowing a more focused pathologic examination of the axillary node(s) at highest risk for metastasis. With adequate training, this technique can be readily implemented as a valuable tool in the surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Treatment of the axilla in early breast cancer: past, present and future

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of the axilla in early breast cancer is controversial. The present study reviews the pattern and predictors of regional recurrence (RR) and prognosis after RR in patients with early breast cancer treated by conservative surgery and radiotherapy (CS + RT). Implications of the results on current practice and future directions are explored.

METHODS

Between 1979 and 1994, 1158 patients with stage I or II breast cancer were treated with CS + RT at Westmead Hospital. Two groups of patients were compared: 782 patients who underwent axillary dissection (axillary surgery group) and 229 patients who received radiotherapy (axillary RT group) as the only axillary treatment. At least 10 lymph nodes were dissected in 82% of the axillary surgery group. Of the women in the RT group, 90% received RT to the axilla and supraclavicular fossa (SCF) only and 10% also received RT to the internal mammary chain (IMC).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up period of 79 months for the axillary surgery group and 111 months for the axillary RT group, 27 patients developed a RR (2.8% and 2.2%, respectively). Seven patients (0.9%) in the axillary surgery group and three patients (1.3%) in the axillary RT group developed a RR in the axilla (P, not significant). Of the patients with SCF recurrences, 14 (1.8%) were in the axillary surgery group and one (0.4%) in the axillary RT group (P, not significant). One patient in the axillary surgery group developed concurrent axillary and SCF recurrences, while a patient in the axillary RT group developed an IMC recurrence. Twenty (74%) of the 27 patients with a RR developed a concurrent or subsequent distant relapse (30% and 44%, respectively). In the pathologically node-positive patients, the axillary recurrence rate was higher in those who had less than five nodes removed (17%) than those who had 10 or more nodes removed (0%; P = 0.01). The SCF recurrence rate was higher in patients with four or more positive axillary nodes (9.5%) than in those with 0-3 positive nodes (1.5%; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Adequate treatment of the axilla by surgery or RT alone is associated with a low rate of RR. The incidence of distant relapse was substantial in patients who developed a RR, which gives emphasis to the importance of optimizing local-regional control.

Utility of breast sentinel lymph node biopsy using day-before-surgery injection of high-dose 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid

BACKGROUND

In sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer, many centers use same-day preoperative injection of technetium 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid and intraoperative injection of blue dye for localization of SLNs. Same-day sulfur colloid injections can be problematic because of the variability in sulfur colloid migration times, which can lead to ineffective use of operating room time, and low SLN-to-background radioactivity ratios. We examined the utility of day-before-surgery injections of high dose 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid injections.

METHODS

The day before surgery, high-dose 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid was injected peritumorally, and a lymphoscintigram was obtained. Intraoperatively, after injection of blue dye, a gamma probe was used to localize SLNs. Nodes that were stained blue or were highly radioactive were considered SLNs and were removed.

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy demonstrated drainage in 107 patients (91%). Transcutaneous localization of the SLN was possible in 104 patients (89%). In three patients, all of whom had no drainage demonstrated on lymphoscintigraphy, no SLN was identified at surgery (97.5% success rate for SLN identification). A mean of 2.3 SLNs per patient were identified. Twenty-five patients (21%) had at least one histologically positive SLN. In 23 of these patients, the positive SLN was the SLN with the most radioactivity, and in the remaining two patients, the positive SLN was both blue-stained and hot.

CONCLUSION

Day-before-surgery injection of high-dose 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid results in high rates of transcutaneous and intraoperative identification of SLNs. The delay between injection and surgery did not appear to promote significant passage of sulfur colloid to second-echelon nodes.

Prognostic factors for lymphedema after primary treatment of breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema of the arm is a serious consequence of breast carcinoma treatment. Postmastectomy lymphedema of the upper limb usually is related to certain risk factors such as axillary surgery, radiotherapy, obesity, venous outflow obstruction, delayed wound healing, and infection. The objective of the current study was to identify the risk factors for secondary lymphedema after breast carcinoma treatment.

METHODS

A total of 1278 breast carcinoma patients, all of whom were residents of Florence area, Italy at the time of diagnosis and who were operated on by the same surgeon between 1989 and 1997, were included in the current analysis. The circumference of the upper arm was measured and lymphedema was defined as being present when an increase of > 5% of the sum differences between the two arms was found. The observed cumulative probability of lymphedema occurrence was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to assess the relative excess risk of lymphedema and to check for confusing factors. All patients with lymphedema who were living in the Florence area were referred to a specialist for treatment.

RESULTS

Two hundred three cases of lymphedema of the ipsilateral arm were found (15.9%). The right arm was affected in 44.5% of the cases and the left arm in 55.5%. The risk of developing late lymphedema was found to be significantly related to a pathologic T2 classification (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.06-1.94) and postoperative radiotherapy (HR = 1.35; 95%CI, 1.00-1.83). Patients who had > 30 lymph nodes removed were found to have a borderline increased risk of lymphedema (HR = 1.64; 95% CI, 0.99-2.74). Multivariate analysis identified postoperative radiotherapy (HR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.02-1.86) and the number of lymph nodes removed (HR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04-1.59) to be independent predictors of lymphedema.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrated that the risk of lymphedema was correlated with the use of postoperative radiotherapy and the number of lymph nodes removed.

Treatment implications of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and biopsy is emerging as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in determining the lymph node status of patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. The hypothesis of the technique is that the SLN is the first lymph node in the regional lymphatic basin that drains the primary tumor. Non-SLN (NSLN) metastasis in the axilla is unlikely if the axillary SLN shows no tumor involvement, and, thus, further axillary interference may be avoided. However, the optimal treatment of the axilla in which an SLN metastasis is found requires ongoing evaluation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the predictors for NSLN metastasis in the presence of a tumor-involved axillary SLN and to examine the treatment implications for patients with early-stage breast carcinoma.

METHODS

Between June 1998 and May 2000, 167 patients participated in the pilot study of SLN mapping and biopsy at Westmead Hospital. SLNs were identified successfully and biopsied in 140 axillae. All study patients also underwent ALND. The incidence of NSLN metastasis in the 51 patients with a SLN metastasis was correlated with clinical and pathologic characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 51 patients with a positive SLN, 24 patients (47%) had NSLN metastases. The primary tumor size was the only significant predictor for NSLN involvement. NSLN metastasis occurred in 25% of patients (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 10-47%) with a primary tumor size </= 20 mm and in 67% of patients (95%CI, 46-83%) with a primary tumor size > 20 mm (P = 0.005). The size of the SLN metastasis was not associated significantly with NSLN involvement. Three of 7 patients (43%) with an SLN micrometastasis (< 1 mm) had NSLN involvement compared with 38 of 44 patients (48%) with an SLN macrometastasis (> or = 1 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study did not identify a subgroup of SLN positive patients in whom the incidence of NSLN involvement was low enough to warrant no further axillary interference. At present, a full axillary dissection should be performed in patients with a positive SLN.

Microsatellite alterations detected in the serum of early stage breast cancer patients

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women. Advances in screening have resulted in an increasing trend towards detecting earlier stage tumors associated with a longer disease-free survival. Because of this prolonged latency period, it is critical to identify patients early in their disease course who are at increased risk for recurrence, whereby treatment decisions may be altered accordingly based on more precise information. Molecular markers that demonstrate prognostic importance as well as utility for assessing subclinical disease progression offer one such approach. Specifically, circulating microsatellite alterations that reflect those genetic events occurring in tumors and that can be serially assessed through a minimally invasive procedure are a logistically practical method. In this study, serum was collected preoperatively from 56 patients with early stage breast cancer (AJCC stages I/II) and assessed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) using 8 microsatellite markers. Twelve (21%) of 56 patients demonstrated LOH in their serum for at least one marker. Histopathologic correlation revealed an association between the presence of circulating LOH in serum and those tumors with increased proliferation indices as characterized by an increased diploid index, elevated MIB-1 fraction, and abnormal ploidy. These findings demonstrate the presence of circulating microsatellite alterations in the serum from patients with early stage breast cancer. The association of known poor prognostic features found in tumors with increased nuclear activity not only suggests a possible etiology for their presence, but also offers a potential blood-based surrogate marker for this disease that may demonstrate clinical utility in long-term follow-up studies.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR detection of breast cancer micrometastasis using a multigene marker panel

Real-time RT-PCR is a relatively new technology that uses an online fluorescence detection system to determine gene expression levels. It has the potential to significantly improve detection of breast cancer metastasis by virtue of its exquisite sensitivity, high throughput capacity and quantitative readout system. To assess the utility of this technology in breast cancer staging, we determined the relative expression levels of 12 cancer-associated genes (mam, PIP, mamB, CEA, CK19, VEGF, erbB2, muc1, c-myc, p97, vim and Ki67) in 51 negative-control normal lymph nodes and in 17 histopathology-positive ALNs. We then performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the sensitivity and specificity levels of each gene. Areas under the ROC curve indicated that the most accurate diagnostic markers were mam (99.6%), PIP (93.3%), CK19 (91.0%), mamB (87.9%), muc1 (81.5%) and CEA (79.4.0%). mam was overexpressed in 16 of 17 lymph nodes known to contain metastatic breast cancer at levels ranging from 22- to 2.8 x 10(5)-fold above normal mean expression, whereas PIP was overexpressed from 30- to 2.2 x 10(6)-fold above normal in 13 lymph nodes. Real-time RT-PCR analysis of pathology-negative LN from breast cancer patients revealed evidence of overexpression of PIP (6 nodes), mam (3 nodes) and CEA (1 node) in 8 of 21 nodes (38%). Our results provide evidence that mam, PIP, CK19, mamB, muc1 and CEA can be applied as a panel for detection of metastatic and occult micrometastatic disease.

Lymphoscintigraphy in Breast Cancer

A 28-year-old woman with an infiltrating ductal carcinoma in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast diagnosed by excisional biopsy underwent lumpectomy, intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and sentinel node dissection. This was followed by an immediate completion axillary node dissection using a hand-held gamma probe and isosulfan blue to map the lymphatics. Preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy showed drainage into the axilla and an apparent area of radiocolloid accumulation in the inferior hemisphere of the left breast. Because our protocol called only for removal of axillary sentinel nodes, the inferior hemisphere radiocolloid accumulation was not removed. The patient did not complete local regional therapy with breast irradiation and developed a mass in the inferior hemisphere of the left breast, which on biopsy was shown to be metastatic breast cancer in an intramammary lymph node. This case illustrates the potential value of breast lymphoscintograms to identify unusual sites of lymphatic drainage that may prove to be clinically relevant.

Breast cancer surgery--historical evolution, current status and future perspectives

The diagnosis and management of breast cancer have changed dramatically over the past two decades in response not only to new technologies but also to cultural and social aspects of the discase. Mastectomy (either radical or modified radical) was the historical mainstay of the treatment of breast cancer for decades. Although mastectomy continues to be appropriate for some patients, breast conservation has become the preferred method of treatment for many patients. Meeting the dual goal of optimum cosmesis and minimal rates of in-breast recurrences after breast-conservation therapy requires the selection and integration of appropriate diagnostic methods (including breast imaging techniques and breast biopsy techniques) its well as therapeutic methods (breast irradiation techniques, and systemic cytotoxic and hormonal therapy). To achieve optimal breast-conservation treatment, a multidisciplinary approach is neccessary. Mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction is a valuable alternative for patients who require or choose mastectomy. After tumor downstaging with induction chemotherapy, a large percentage of patients with large or locally advanced tumors will be able to undergo breast-conservation therapy Partial (levels I and II) axillary lymph node dissection remains the standard of care in the surgical management of patients with invasive breast cancer. Recently there has been intense interest in selective axillary lymph node dissection, focused mainly on the identification of patients who are likely to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection, using sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Observation of the breast cancer patient with a tumor-positive sentinel node: implications of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial

Axillary lymph node status has been the most important prognostic factor for breast cancer throughout the past century. During the past decade, intraoperative lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) has been investigated as an alternative staging modality. This technique may be as accurate as ALND, and certainly is less invasive. Adjuvant treatment recommendations, which historically were made on the basis of lymph node status alone, now take into account primary tumor features, molecular markers, and patient characteristics. This evolution of current treatment patterns is driven in part by the diminishing size of tumors, the simultaneous decrease in the presence of axillary metastases, and a better understanding of tumor-specific risk factors. How do these trends affect the interpretation of a tumor-positive sentinel node (SN)? Can an axilla with a positive SN be observed? Should it be observed? This review examines the implications of a positive SN in the context of smaller tumor size, decreased nodal disease, and increased reliance on alternative prognostic factors for treatment decisions. The historical data comparing ALND to no ALND in clinically node-negative patients is reviewed and discussed in the context of observation for a positive SN. These are the issues underlying the ACOSOG Z0010 and Z0011 trials.

Selective sentinel lymph node dissection in breast cancer: experiences from Taiwan

The significance of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) was examined in 58 Chinese breast cancer patients. The method of technetium-99m sulfur colloid injection and the intraoperative gamma probe was found to be very useful for identifying the SLN. The positive predictive value was 64.5%, and the negative predictive value was 93.2%. Findings suggest that lymph node dissection is not necessary in breast cancer patients with a negative SLN.

State-of-the-art lymph node staging for breast cancer in the year 2000

Axillary staging for breast cancer is vitally important for determining appropriate adjuvant hormone and chemotherapy. In the absence of distant metastases, axillary lymph node status remains the most accurate predictor of clinical outcome. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a minimally invasive approach with enhanced accuracy and less morbidity than conventional axillary dissection. The stage is now set for the sentinel lymphadenectomy staging to move from state-of-the-art care to the standard care in coming years.

Use of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of breast carcinoma

Ultrasound is an imaging modality commonly used to evaluate breast lesions in hopes to distinguish benign from malignant solid masses. Angiogenesis, defined as the emergence of new vessels to further the growth of tumor, has stimulated interest in the potential uses of Doppler ultrasound in patients with breast cancer. This article describes different forms of Doppler ultrasound, including color Doppler (CD), power Doppler (PD), and spectral Doppler (SD), as well as 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound and ultrasound contrast media. We review the role of Doppler ultrasound in distinguishing benign from malignant solid breast masses. We also discuss the role of ultrasound in predicting tumor grade, histology, node status, and lymphatic vascular invasion, and in monitoring breast cancer treatment.

The implementation of the sentinel node biopsy as a routine procedure for patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The sentinel node procedure for breast cancer allows for accurate staging of the axilla while the axillary node dissection can be avoided in patients with no sentinel node metastasis. This study describes those patients in whom an axillary dissection is performed, depending on the outcome of the sentinel node procedure, with particular emphasis on the use of strict criteria for the procedure and its practical limitations.

METHODS

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 115 consecutive patients. The sentinel nodes were located with the use of a gamma probe and blue dye. Axillary dissection was performed at the same time when the sentinel node procedure was positive by frozen section or not successful by the criteria used.

RESULTS

The sentinel node procedure was successful in 106 patients, with the sentinel node being both radioactive and blue in 94% of these patients. The frozen section was positive in 21 of 37 patients with sentinel node metastases. Axillary dissection could be avoided in 69 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The triple technique (with the use of lymphoscintigraphy, the gamma probe, and the blue dye) gives a high success rate of the sentinel node procedure, even when strict criteria for a successful sentinel node procedure are used. Palpation of the open axilla for metastatic nonsentinel nodes is advocated.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

The standard of care for the evaluation of axillary nodal involvement remains complete lymph node dissection. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are changing this long-held paradigm; indeed, several leading institutions already reserve complete axillary dissection for patients with metastasis to the SLN. In addition to reviewing the literature, this chapter describes our lymphatic mapping experience at the H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute with 1147 breast cancer patients. Our results, in addition to a meta-analysis of data from 12 institutions comprising an additional 1842 patients undergoing complete axillary dissection, demonstrate that SLN biopsy is an accurate method of axillary staging. Although the results from small series may exaggerate the probability of false negative results, the risk of nodal disease based on tumor size and other risk factors should be evaluated when considering the results of SLN sampling.

Sentinel node biopsy as a practical alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients: an approach to its validity

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed as an alternative to axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer. Before implementing SNB in our practice, we wished to test its validity by comparing it to the standard ALND, both in our hands and with other reported series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-two patients were included prospectively. SNB and immediate ALND were performed. For SNB, a technetium-colloid was used to produce preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma-probe search for the SN. Serial sectioning and immunostains were used on the SN. A comprehensive review of the literature was done in order to run a meta-analysis of diagnostic tests using a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) to calculate the pooled parameters of sensitivity and associated 95% confidence interval (95% CI), including our own data.

RESULTS

Our technical success rate was 96%. Local sensitivity was 96%, with a 95% CI from 85%-99%. Seven patients were upstaged by the SNB. A literature search identified 18 studies published from 1996-1999. Estimates of sensitivity ranged from 83%-100%. The pooled data meta-analysis gave a global sensitivity of 91%, with a 95% CI from 89%-93%. The area under the global SROC curve was 0.9967.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimally invasive SNB was shown to be a practical alternative to ALND. We propose to use local as well as global sensitivity and associated 95% CI to test the validity of SNB in the clinical setting. Due to limitations of ALND as the golden standard, SNB can in fact be considered a more accurate method for nodal staging.

Patients with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes

PURPOSE

To document differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale ultrasonographic (US) features between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes in women with primary breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The longitudinal-transverse axis ratio and hilar status on color Doppler flow and gray-scale US images were prospectively studied for each of 145 axillary nodes in 135 women (74 palpable nodes in 69 women, 71 nonpalpable nodes in 66 women) with primary breast cancer. Intranodal flow distribution was described as peripheral, central, or central perhilar. Resistive and pulsatility indexes and peak systolic velocity were documented. For comparison of benign and malignant features, nodes were divided into three groups: palpable and nonpalpable, palpable, and nonpalpable.

RESULTS

Color flow was demonstrated equally well in benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes for all three groups. For all nodes, peripheral flow was significantly higher in malignant (118 of 153 nodes [77%]) than benign (45 of 160 nodes [28%]) nodes (P <.001); central flow and central perhilar flow were significantly greater (P <.002 and <.001, respectively) in benign than malignant nodes. Similar differences were not observed in nonpalpable nodes. The mean longitudinal-transverse axis ratio (+/- SD) was significantly lower in malignant (1.8 +/- 0.6) than benign (2.6 +/- 0.8) nodes. Logistic regression analysis showed peripheral, central, and central perhilar flow and the mean longitudinal-transverse axis ratio to be significant independent predictors of malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features applicable to the identification of disease in palpable axillary nodes in patients with breast cancer are not applicable to nonpalpable nodes.

Implementation of new surgical technology: outcome measures for lymphatic mapping of breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in technology and the subsequent development of minimally invasive surgical techniques have heralded a new era in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The dilemma of how to train surgeons in new technologies requires teaching, certification, and outcomes reporting in a non-threatening and non-economically damaging manner. This study examines 700 cases of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer and documents surgeon-specific and institution-specific learning curves.

METHODS

Seven hundred cases of lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy were examined. All procedures were performed using a combination of vital blue dye and radiolabeled sulfur colloid. Learning curves were generated for each surgeon as a plot of failure rate versus number of cases.

RESULTS

Examination of the learning curves in this study demonstrates similar characteristics. Following a high initial failure rate, there is a rapid decrease after the first twenty cases. The learning curve, representing the mean of the five surgeons' experience, indicates that 23 cases and 53 cases are required to achieve success rates of 90% and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial reports regarding lymphatic mapping combined with this experience of 700 cases confirm the presence of a significant learning curve. Although this procedure may have an inherent failure rate, it is important to identify those factors that are under the control of the surgeon and, therefore, subject to improvement. We believe that these data provide surgeons performing lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy with a new paradigm for assessing their skill and adequacy of training.

Lymphatic Mapping with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancers <1 centimeter (T1A - T1B)

Because of its high cost and attendant morbidity, the necessity of axillary dissection in patients with small invasive primary tumors has been questioned. Lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an alternative to complete axillary dissection; however, researchers have excluded patients with T1A–T1B lesions. Seven hundred patients with newly diagnosed breast cancers underwent an Institutional Review Board-approved prospective trial of intraoperative lymphatic mapping using a combination of Lymphazurin and filtered technetium-labeled sulfur colloid. An SLN was defined as a blue node and/or hot node with a 10:1 ex vivo radioactivity ratio in the SLN verus non-SLNs. All SLNs were evaluated by both hematoxylin and eosin and cytokeratin immunohistochemical stains. Of the 700 patients, 665 (95.0%) were mapped successfully. One hundred ninety-six (28.0%) had T1A–T1B tumors. Forty patients (20.4%) with T1A–T1B tumors had metastases to the SLNs. We conclude that breast cancer SLN mapping is highly accurate and sensitive when combined dye techniques (radiocolloid and vital blue dye) are utilized. This technique is particularly useful in patients with small invasive primary tumors, which, despite their size, still demonstrate a significant rate of axillary metastasis. These patients should not be excluded from lymphatic mapping protocols.