1
|
Hamano T, Nagata M, Matsubara R, Ikebata Y, Ito T, Ibe A, Fujita Y, Kusaka Y, Tokunaga T, Enomoto S, Endo Y, Ueno A, Shirafuji N, Ikawa M, Hayashi K, Yamamura O, Nakamoto Y. Effectiveness of a self-reporting yes/no survey for dementia screening-trial in Fukui, Japan. Front Aging Neurosci 2023; 14:1029614. [PMID: 36688170 PMCID: PMC9845620 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1029614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Early intervention for dementia patients is extremely important for the prevention of dementia. However, so far, it is not clear as to what kind of screening will be useful for the early detection of dementia. Objective: We aimed to investigate the relationship between the results of a short self-reporting yes/no survey selected in Kihon Checklist, developed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare to identify older adults who are at risk of requiring support/care, and other original items developed by Dementia Prevention Team, Fukui, Japan, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, and determine the diagnostic efficacy of the self-reporting yes/no survey. Methods: Self-reporting yes/no surveys were conducted for 87,687 individuals aged ≥65 years, living in Fukui, Japan, and did not have Long-Term Care Insurance, Japan. According to the survey results, selected individuals were advised to visit a local hospital to be assessed with MMSE. Results: Individuals who could not make a call by looking up phone numbers and manage their own deposits and savings at the bank or automatic teller machine (ATM) had an increased risk of low MMSE score (≤23; odds ratio: 2.74 [1.89-3.97]; 95% confidence interval: 2.12 [1.46-3.07]). Conclusions: Self-reporting yes/no survey could effectively screen for dementia. Not being able to make a call by looking up phone numbers and not being able to manage their own deposits and savings at the bank or ATM are signs of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadanori Hamano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan,Department of Aging and Dementia (DAD), Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan,Life Science Innovation Center, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan,*Correspondence: Tadanori Hamano
| | - Miwako Nagata
- Department of Neurology, Nakamura Hospital, Echizen-city, Japan
| | | | | | - Tatsuhiko Ito
- Department of Psychiatry, Sukoyaka Silver Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ibe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ibe Hospital, Echizen-cho, Japan
| | - Youshi Fujita
- Department of Neurology, Fujita Neurological Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Yukinori Kusaka
- Department of Environmental Health, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tokunaga
- Research Promotion Office, Shinseikai Toyama Hospital, Toyama, Japan
| | - Soichi Enomoto
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan,Department of Aging and Dementia (DAD), Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Endo
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Asako Ueno
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Norimichi Shirafuji
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Masamichi Ikawa
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Kouji Hayashi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Osamu Yamamura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Yasunari Nakamoto
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taylor-Rowan M, Nafisi S, Owen R, Duffy R, Patel A, Burton JK, Quinn TJ. Informant-based screening tools for dementia: an overview of systematic reviews. Psychol Med 2023; 53:580-589. [PMID: 34030753 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291721002002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informant-based questionnaires may have utility for cognitive impairment or dementia screening. Reviews describing the accuracy of respective questionnaires are available, but their focus on individual questionnaires precludes comparisons across tools. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews to assess the comparative accuracy of informant questionnaires and identify areas where evidence is lacking. METHODS We searched six databases to identify systematic reviews describing diagnostic test accuracy of informant questionnaires for cognitive impairment or dementia. We pooled sensitivity and specificity data for each questionnaire and used network approaches to compare accuracy estimates across the differing tests. We used grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) to evaluate the overall certainty of evidence. Finally, we created an evidence 'heat-map', describing the availability of accurate data for individual tests in different populations and settings. RESULTS We identified 25 reviews, consisting of 93 studies and 13 informant questionnaires. Pooled analysis (37 studies; 11 052 participants) ranked the eight-item interview to ascertain dementia (AD8) highest for sensitivity [90%; 95% credible intervals (CrI) = 82-95; 'best-test' probability = 36]; while the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) was most specific (81%; 95% CrI = 66-90; 'best-test' probability = 29%). GRADE-based evaluation of evidence suggested certainty was 'low' overall. Our heat-map indicated that only AD8 and IQCODE have been extensively evaluated and most studies have been in the secondary care settings. CONCLUSIONS AD8 and IQCODE appear to be valid questionnaires for cognitive impairment or dementia assessment. Other available informant-based cognitive screening questionnaires lack evidence to justify their use at present. Evidence on the accuracy of available tools in primary care settings and with specific populations is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Taylor-Rowan
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK
| | - Sara Nafisi
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK
| | - Rhiannon Owen
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Robyn Duffy
- Older People's Psychology Service, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow G12 0XH, UK
| | - Amit Patel
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Jennifer K Burton
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK
| | - Terence J Quinn
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burton JK, Fearon P, Noel-Storr AH, McShane R, Stott DJ, Quinn TJ. Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the detection of dementia within a secondary care setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD010772. [PMID: 34278561 PMCID: PMC8406705 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010772.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of dementia relies on the presence of new-onset cognitive impairment affecting an individual's functioning and activities of daily living. The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) is a questionnaire instrument, completed by a suitable 'informant' who knows the patient well, designed to assess change in functional performance secondary to cognitive change; it is used as a tool for identifying those who may have dementia. In secondary care there are two specific instances where patients may be assessed for the presence of dementia. These are in the general acute hospital setting, where opportunistic screening may be undertaken, or in specialist memory services where individuals have been referred due to perceived cognitive problems. To ensure an instrument is suitable for diagnostic use in these settings, its test accuracy must be established. OBJECTIVES To determine the accuracy of the informant-based questionnaire IQCODE for detection of dementia in a secondary care setting. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following sources on the 28th of January 2013: ALOIS (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), MEDLINE (Ovid SP), EMBASE (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), BIOSIS Previews (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), Web of Science Core Collection (includes Conference Proceedings Citation Index) (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), CINAHL (EBSCOhost) and LILACS (BIREME). We also searched sources specific to diagnostic test accuracy: MEDION (Universities of Maastricht and Leuven); DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects - via the Cochrane Library); HTA Database (Health Technology Assessment Database via the Cochrane Library) and ARIF (Birmingham University). We also checked reference lists of relevant studies and reviews, used searches of known relevant studies in PubMed to track related articles, and contacted research groups conducting work on IQCODE for dementia diagnosis to try to find additional studies. We developed a sensitive search strategy; search terms were designed to cover key concepts using several different approaches run in parallel and included terms relating to cognitive tests, cognitive screening and dementia. We used standardised database subject headings such as MeSH terms (in MEDLINE) and other standardised headings (controlled vocabulary) in other databases, as appropriate. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected those studies performed in secondary-care settings, which included (not necessarily exclusively) IQCODE to assess for the presence of dementia and where dementia diagnosis was confirmed with clinical assessment. For the 'secondary care' setting we included all studies which assessed patients in hospital (e.g. acute unscheduled admissions, referrals to specialist geriatric assessment services etc.) and those referred for specialist 'memory' assessment, typically in psychogeriatric services. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles generated by electronic database searches, and reviewed abstracts of all potentially relevant studies. Two independent assessors checked full papers for eligibility and extracted data. We determined quality assessment (risk of bias and applicability) using the QUADAS-2 tool, and reporting quality using the STARD tool. MAIN RESULTS From 72 papers describing IQCODE test accuracy, we included 13 papers, representing data from 2745 individuals (n = 1413 (51%) with dementia). Pooled analysis of all studies using data presented closest to a cut-off of 3.3 indicated that sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.94); specificity 0.66 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.75); the positive likelihood ratio was 2.7 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.6) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.14 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.22). There was a statistically significant difference in test accuracy between the general hospital setting and the specialist memory setting (P = 0.019), suggesting that IQCODE performs better in a 'general' setting. We found no significant differences in the test accuracy of the short (16-item) versus the 26-item IQCODE, or in the language of administration. There was significant heterogeneity in the included studies, including a highly varied prevalence of dementia (10.5% to 87.4%). Across the included papers there was substantial potential for bias, particularly around sampling of included participants and selection criteria, which may limit generalisability. There was also evidence of suboptimal reporting, particularly around disease severity and handling indeterminate results, which are important if considering use in clinical practice. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The IQCODE can be used to identify older adults in the general hospital setting who are at risk of dementia and require specialist assessment; it is useful specifically for ruling out those without evidence of cognitive decline. The language of administration did not affect test accuracy, which supports the cross-cultural use of the tool. These findings are qualified by the significant heterogeneity, the potential for bias and suboptimal reporting found in the included studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Burton
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Patricia Fearon
- Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - David J Stott
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow , UK
| | - Terry J Quinn
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burton JK, Stott DJ, McShane R, Noel-Storr AH, Swann-Price RS, Quinn TJ. Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the early detection of dementia across a variety of healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD011333. [PMID: 34275145 PMCID: PMC8406787 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011333.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) is a structured interview based on informant responses that is used to assess for possible dementia. IQCODE has been used for retrospective or contemporaneous assessment of cognitive decline. There is considerable interest in tests that may identify those at future risk of developing dementia. Assessing a population free of dementia for the prospective development of dementia is an approach often used in studies of dementia biomarkers. In theory, questionnaire-based assessments, such as IQCODE, could be used in a similar way, assessing for dementia that is diagnosed on a later (delayed) assessment. OBJECTIVES To determine the accuracy of the informant-based questionnaire IQCODE for the early detection of dementia across a variety of health care settings. SEARCH METHODS We searched these sources on 16 January 2016: ALOIS (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), MEDLINE Ovid SP, Embase Ovid SP, PsycINFO Ovid SP, BIOSIS Previews on Thomson Reuters Web of Science, Web of Science Core Collection (includes Conference Proceedings Citation Index) on Thomson Reuters Web of Science, CINAHL EBSCOhost, and LILACS BIREME. We also searched sources specific to diagnostic test accuracy: MEDION (Universities of Maastricht and Leuven); DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, in the Cochrane Library); HTA Database (Health Technology Assessment Database, in the Cochrane Library), and ARIF (Birmingham University). We checked reference lists of included studies and reviews, used searches of included studies in PubMed to track related articles, and contacted research groups conducting work on IQCODE for dementia diagnosis to try to find additional studies. We developed a sensitive search strategy; search terms were designed to cover key concepts using several different approaches run in parallel, and included terms relating to cognitive tests, cognitive screening, and dementia. We used standardised database subject headings, such as MeSH terms (in MEDLINE) and other standardised headings (controlled vocabulary) in other databases, as appropriate. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected studies that included a population free from dementia at baseline, who were assessed with the IQCODE and subsequently assessed for the development of dementia over time. The implication was that at the time of testing, the individual had a cognitive problem sufficient to result in an abnormal IQCODE score (defined by the study authors), but not yet meeting dementia diagnostic criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles generated by the electronic database searches, and reviewed abstracts of all potentially relevant studies. Two assessors independently checked the full papers for eligibility and extracted data. We determined quality assessment (risk of bias and applicability) using the QUADAS-2 tool, and reported quality using the STARDdem tool. MAIN RESULTS From 85 papers describing IQCODE, we included three papers, representing data from 626 individuals. Of this total, 22% (N = 135/626) were excluded because of prevalent dementia. There was substantial attrition; 47% (N = 295) of the study population received reference standard assessment at first follow-up (three to six months) and 28% (N = 174) received reference standard assessment at final follow-up (one to three years). Prevalence of dementia ranged from 12% to 26% at first follow-up and 16% to 35% at final follow-up. The three studies were considered to be too heterogenous to combine, so we did not perform meta-analyses to describe summary estimates of interest. Included patients were poststroke (two papers) and hip fracture (one paper). The IQCODE was used at three thresholds of positivity (higher than 3.0, higher than 3.12 and higher than 3.3) to predict those at risk of a future diagnosis of dementia. Using a cut-off of 3.0, IQCODE had a sensitivity of 0.75 (95%CI 0.51 to 0.91) and a specificity of 0.46 (95%CI 0.34 to 0.59) at one year following stroke. Using a cut-off of 3.12, the IQCODE had a sensitivity of 0.80 (95%CI 0.44 to 0.97) and specificity of 0.53 (95C%CI 0.41 to 0.65) for the clinical diagnosis of dementia at six months after hip fracture. Using a cut-off of 3.3, the IQCODE had a sensitivity of 0.84 (95%CI 0.68 to 0.94) and a specificity of 0.87 (95%CI 0.76 to 0.94) for the clinical diagnosis of dementia at one year after stroke. In generaI, the IQCODE was sensitive for identification of those who would develop dementia, but lacked specificity. Methods for both excluding prevalent dementia at baseline and assessing for the development of dementia were varied, and had the potential to introduce bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Included studies were heterogenous, recruited from specialist settings, and had potential biases. The studies identified did not allow us to make specific recommendations on the use of the IQCODE for the future detection of dementia in clinical practice. The included studies highlighted the challenges of delayed verification dementia research, with issues around prevalent dementia assessment, loss to follow-up over time, and test non-completion potentially limiting the studies. Future research should recognise these issues and have explicit protocols for dealing with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Burton
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - David J Stott
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow , UK
| | | | | | | | - Terry J Quinn
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fage BA, Chan CC, Gill SS, Noel-Storr AH, Herrmann N, Smailagic N, Nikolaou V, Seitz DP. Mini-Cog for the detection of dementia within a community setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD010860. [PMID: 34259337 PMCID: PMC8278980 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010860.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease and related forms of dementia are becoming increasingly prevalent with the aging of many populations. The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease relies on tests to evaluate cognition and discriminate between individuals with dementia and those without dementia. The Mini-Cog is a brief, cognitive screening test that is frequently used to evaluate cognition in older adults in various settings. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to determine the accuracy of the Mini-Cog for detecting dementia in a community setting. Secondary objectives included investigations of the heterogeneity of test accuracy in the included studies and potential sources of heterogeneity. These potential sources of heterogeneity included the baseline prevalence of dementia in study samples, thresholds used to determine positive test results, the type of dementia (Alzheimer's disease dementia or all causes of dementia), and aspects of study design related to study quality. Overall, the goals of this review were to determine if the Mini-Cog is a cognitive screening test that could be recommended to screen for cognitive impairment in community settings. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), Science Citation Index (Web of Science), BIOSIS previews (Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), and the Cochrane Dementia Group's developing register of diagnostic test accuracy studies to March 2013. We used citation tracking (using the database's 'related articles' feature, where available) as an additional search method and contacted authors of eligible studies for unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all cross-sectional studies that utilized the Mini-Cog as an index test for the diagnosis of dementia when compared to a reference standard diagnosis of dementia using standardized dementia diagnostic criteria. For the current review we only included studies that were conducted on samples from community settings, and excluded studies that were conducted in primary care or secondary care settings. We considered studies to be conducted in a community setting where participants were sampled from the general population. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Information from studies meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted including information on the characteristics of participants in the studies. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria and summarized using risk of bias applicability and summary graphs. We extracted information on the diagnostic test accuracy of studies including the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals of these measures and summarized the findings using forest plots. Study specific sensitivities and specificities were also plotted in receiver operating curve space. MAIN RESULTS Three studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1620 participants. The sensitivities of the Mini-Cog in the individual studies were reported as 0.99, 0.76 and 0.99. The specificity of the Mini-Cog varied in the individual studies and was 0.93, 0.89 and 0.83. There was clinical and methodological heterogeneity between the studies which precluded a pooled meta-analysis of the results. Methodological limitations were present in all the studies introducing potential sources of bias, specifically with respect to the methods for participant selection. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There are currently few studies assessing the diagnostic test accuracy of the Mini-Cog in community settings. The limited number of studies and the methodological limitations that are present in the current studies make it difficult to provide recommendations for or against the use of the Mini-Cog as a cognitive screening test in community settings. Additional well-designed studies comparing the Mini-Cog to other brief cognitive screening tests are required in order to determine the accuracy and utility of the Mini-Cog in community based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce A Fage
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Calvin Ch Chan
- School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Sudeep S Gill
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | | | - Nathan Herrmann
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nadja Smailagic
- Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Dallas P Seitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seitz DP, Chan CC, Newton HT, Gill SS, Herrmann N, Smailagic N, Nikolaou V, Fage BA. Mini-Cog for the detection of dementia within a primary care setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD011415. [PMID: 34261197 PMCID: PMC8406662 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011415.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia are becoming increasingly common with the aging of most populations. The majority of individuals with dementia will first present for care and assessment in primary care settings. There is a need for brief dementia screening instruments that can accurately detect dementia in primary care settings. The Mini-Cog is a brief, cognitive screening test that is frequently used to evaluate cognition in older adults in various settings. OBJECTIVES To determine the accuracy of the Mini-Cog for detecting dementia in a primary care setting. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, MEDLINE, Embase and four other databases, initially to September 2012. Since then, four updates to the search were performed using the same search methods, and the most recent was January 2017. We used citation tracking (using the databases' 'related articles' feature, where available) as an additional search method and contacted authors of eligible studies for unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA We only included studies that evaluated the Mini-Cog as an index test for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia or related forms of dementia when compared to a reference standard using validated criteria for dementia. We only included studies that were conducted in primary care populations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted and described information on the characteristics of the study participants and study setting. Using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria we evaluated the quality of studies, and we assessed risk of bias and applicability of each study for each domain in QUADAS-2. Two review authors independently extracted information on the true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives and entered the data into Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). We then used RevMan 5 to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals. We summarized the sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Cog in the individual studies in forest plots and also plotted them in a receiver operating characteristic plot. We also created a 'Risk of bias' and applicability concerns graph to summarize information related to the quality of included studies. MAIN RESULTS There were a total of four studies that met our inclusion criteria, including a total of 1517 total participants. The sensitivity of the Mini-Cog varied between 0.76 to 1.00 in studies while the specificity varied between 0.27 to 0.85. The included studies displayed significant heterogeneity in both methodologies and clinical populations, which did not allow for a meta-analysis to be completed. Only one study (Holsinger 2012) was found to be at low risk of bias on all methodological domains. The results of this study reported that the sensitivity of the Mini-Cog was 0.76 and the specificity was 0.73. We found the quality of all other included studies to be low due to a high risk of bias with methodological limitations primarily in their selection of participants. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is a limited number of studies evaluating the accuracy of the Mini-Cog for the diagnosis of dementia in primary care settings. Given the small number of studies, the wide range in estimates of the accuracy of the Mini-Cog, and methodological limitations identified in most of the studies, at the present time there is insufficient evidence to recommend that the Mini-Cog be used as a screening test for dementia in primary care. Further studies are required to determine the accuracy of Mini-Cog in primary care and whether this tool has sufficient diagnostic test accuracy to be useful as a screening test in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dallas P Seitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Calvin Ch Chan
- School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Hailey T Newton
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Sudeep S Gill
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Nathan Herrmann
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nadja Smailagic
- Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Bruce A Fage
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Nieuwkerk AC, Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Accuracy of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly for Detecting Preexisting Dementia in Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke: A Population-Based Study. Stroke 2021; 52:1283-1290. [PMID: 33682451 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.031961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
[Figure: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid C van Nieuwkerk
- Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital and University of Oxford, United Kingdom (A.S.v.N., S.T.P., P.M.R.)
| | - Sarah T Pendlebury
- Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital and University of Oxford, United Kingdom (A.S.v.N., S.T.P., P.M.R.).,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, United Kingdom (S.T.P.)
| | - Peter M Rothwell
- Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital and University of Oxford, United Kingdom (A.S.v.N., S.T.P., P.M.R.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Taylor-Rowan M, Nafisi S, Patel A, Burton JK, Quinn TJ. Informant-based screening tools for diagnosis of dementia, an overview of systematic reviews of test accuracy studies protocol. Syst Rev 2020; 9:271. [PMID: 33243282 PMCID: PMC7694897 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01530-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robust diagnosis of dementia requires an understanding of the accuracy of the available diagnostic tests. Informant questionnaires are frequently used to assess for dementia in clinical practice. Recent systematic reviews have sought to establish the diagnostic test accuracy of various dementia informant screening tools. However, most reviews to date have focused on a single diagnostic tool and this does not address which tool is 'best'. A key aim of the overview of systematic reviews is to present a disparate evidence base in a single, easy to access platform. METHODS We will conduct an overview of systematic reviews in which we 'review the systematic reviews' of diagnostic test accuracy studies evaluating informant questionnaires for dementia. As an overview of systematic reviews of test accuracy is a relatively novel approach, we will use this review to explore methods for visual representation of complex data, for highlighting evidence gaps and for indirect comparative analyses. We will create a list of informant tools by consulting with dementia experts. We will search 6 databases (EMBASE (OVID); Health and Psychosocial Instruments (OVID); Medline (OVID); CINAHL (EBSCO); PSYCHinfo (EBSCO) and the PROSPERO registry of review protocols) to identify systematic reviews that describe the diagnostic test accuracy of informant questionnaires for dementia. We will assess review quality using the AMSTAR-2 (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) and assess reporting quality using PRISMA-DTA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies) checklists. We will collate the identified reviews to create an 'evidence map' that highlights where evidence does and does not exist in relation to informant questionnaires. We will pool sensitivity and specificity data via meta-analysis to generate a diagnostic test accuracy summary statistic for each informant questionnaire. If data allow, we will perform a statistical comparison of the diagnostic test accuracy of each informant questionnaire using a network approach. DISCUSSION Our overview of systematic reviews will provide a concise summary of the diagnostic test accuracy of informant tools and highlight areas where evidence is currently lacking in this regard. It will also apply network meta-analysis techniques to a new area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Taylor-Rowan
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
| | - Sara Nafisi
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Amit Patel
- Department of Health Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, England
| | - Jennifer K Burton
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Terry J Quinn
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hamre C, Fure B, Helbostad JL, Wyller TB, Ihle-Hansen H, Vlachos G, Ursin MH, Tangen GG. Impairments in spatial navigation during walking in patients 70 years or younger with mild stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2020; 27:601-609. [PMID: 32316862 DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1755814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Spatial navigation, the ability to determine and maintain a route from one place to another, is needed for independence in everyday life. Knowledge about impairments in spatial navigation in people with mild stroke is scarce.Objectives: To explore impairments in spatial navigation in patients ≤70 years after first-ever mild ischemic stroke (NIHSS≤3) and to explore which variables are associated with these impairments 12 months later.Methods: Patients were examined in the acute phase, and after 3 and 12 months. To assess impairments in spatial navigation, we used the Floor Maze Test (FMT), with time and FMT-errors as outcomes. Patients' perceived navigational skills were collected using self-report. Logistic regression was used to explore which variables (sociodemographic data, stroke characteristics, cognition, and mobility) were associated with impaired navigation ability.Results: Ninety-seven patients (20 females) were included. The mean (SD) age was 55.5 (11.4) years. Timed FMT improved significantly from the acute phase to 12 months (p = <.001). At 12 months, 24 (24.7%) of the participants walked through the maze with errors, and 22 (22.7%) reported spatial navigational problems. The Trail Making Test (TMT)-B was the only variable from the acute phase associated with FMT-errors at 12 months, and being female was the only variable associated with self-reported navigational problems at 12 months.Conclusion: Nearly one in four patients experienced spatial navigation problems 12 months after a mild stroke. Executive function (TMT-B), measured in the acute phase, was associated with navigational impairments (FMT-errors) at 12 months, and being female was associated with self-reported navigational problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotta Hamre
- Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo University Hospital (OUS), Oslo, Norway.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, OUS, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo (UiO), Oslo, Norway.,Department of Neurology, OUS, Oslo, Norway
| | - Brynjar Fure
- Department of Internal Medicine, Central Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden.,Department of Neurology, Central Hospital, Karlstad and Örebro, Sweden.,School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jorunn Lægdheim Helbostad
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Torgeir Bruun Wyller
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, OUS, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo (UiO), Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege Ihle-Hansen
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, OUS, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Neurology, OUS, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Marie Helene Ursin
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Trust, Bærum, Norway
| | - Gro Gujord Tangen
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, OUS, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tönsberg, Norway.,Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, UiO, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Petersen MS. Assessing the Prevalence of Undetected Possible Dementia in Faroese Nursing Homes. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2020; 48:30-38. [PMID: 31319414 DOI: 10.1159/000501607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To assess the prevalence of possible dementia among nursing home residents in the Faroe Islands. METHOD This cross-sectional study, undertaken in 2017, included all nursing homes in the Faroe Islands (n = 30), housing 591 residents. All residents were invited to participate, except those with an existing clinical diagnosis of dementia or living in dementia units (n = 207). A total of 232 residents participated, while 39 declined and 113 were unable to give consent, had died, or were not permanent residents at the time of examination. Cognitive screening was carried out using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline (IQCODE). RESULTS Possible dementia was found in 49% to 78% of the participants depending on the method used. According to both MMSE and IQCODE (AND rule), possible dementia was present in 105 participants (49%). According only to IQCODE, 119 participants (55%) scored above the cut-off (≥3.6), according to MMSE alone, 162 participants (72%) scored below the cut-off (≤24 on MMSE), while 175 participants (78%) screened positive according to either MMSE or IQCODE (OR rule). A rough estimate of the prevalence of possible dementia in the entire nursing home population (n = 591) including residents with known dementia and those with possible dementia from this study was between 61% and 73%. CONCLUSION A high percentage (49-78%) of the participating nursing home residents without a pre-dementia diagnosis were assessed to have possible dementia based on screening with standardized tools, indicating a high degree of dementia underdiagnoses in Faroese nursing homes. This high prevalence of dementia is of significance for the clinical practice, running, and planning of nursing homes and pinpoints a need to act upon this, not only in the Faroes but also worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Skaalum Petersen
- Department of Occupational Medicine and Public Health, The Faroese Hospital System, Tórshavn, Faeroe Islands, .,Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre of Health Science, University of the Faroe Islands, Tórshavn, Faeroe Islands,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Biffi A, Murphy MP, Kubiszewski P, Kourkoulis C, Schwab K, Gurol ME, Greenberg SM, Viswanathan A, Anderson CD, Rosand J. APOE genotype, hypertension severity and outcomes after intracerebral haemorrhage. Brain Commun 2019; 1:fcz018. [PMID: 32954261 PMCID: PMC7425529 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcz018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Intracerebral haemorrhage in the elderly is a severe manifestation of common forms of cerebral small vessel disease. Nearly 60% of intracerebral haemorrhage survivors will develop clinical manifestations of small vessel disease progression including recurrent haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, dementia, late-life depression and gait impairment within 5 years. Blood pressure measurements following intracerebral haemorrhage are strongly associated with this risk. However, aggressive blood pressure lowering in the elderly carries substantial risks. In order to determine whether there might be an opportunity to select individuals at the highest risk for small vessel disease progression for aggressive blood pressure reduction, we investigated whether APOE gene variants ɛ2/ɛ4 modify the association between blood pressure and small vessel disease clinical progression after intracerebral haemorrhage. We conducted a single-centre longitudinal study at a tertiary care referral centre (Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, MA, USA), analysing 716 consecutive survivors of acute intracerebral haemorrhage, enrolled from January 2006 to December 2016. We conducted research interviews at the time of enrolment and obtained APOE genotypes from peripheral venous blood samples. We followed patients longitudinally by means of validated phone-based research encounters, aimed at gathering measurements of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as well as information on small vessel disease clinical outcomes (including recurrent haemorrhage, incident ischaemic stroke, incident dementia, incident depression and incident gait impairment). APOE ε4 and systolic blood pressure were associated with the risk of recurrent haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke and post-haemorrhage dementia, depression and gait impairment (all P < 0.05). APOE ε4 and systolic blood pressure interacted to increase the risk of recurrent haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, dementia and gait impairment (all interaction P < 0.05). Among patients with elevated blood pressure following intracerebral haemorrhage (average systolic blood pressure 120–129 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg) only those with one or more APOE ε4 copies were at increased risk for one or more small vessel disease outcomes (hazard ratio = 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.17–3.31). Among haemorrhage survivors with hypertension (stage 1 and beyond) APOE genotype also stratified risk for all small vessel disease outcomes. In conclusion, APOE genotype modifies the already strong association of hypertension with multiple small vessel disease clinical outcomes among intracerebral haemorrhage survivors. These data raise the possibility that genetic screening could inform blood pressure treatment goals in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Biffi
- Henry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meredith P Murphy
- Henry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patryk Kubiszewski
- Henry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christina Kourkoulis
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristin Schwab
- Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mahmut Edip Gurol
- Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven M Greenberg
- Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anand Viswanathan
- Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher D Anderson
- Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan Rosand
- Henry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hendry K, Green C, McShane R, Noel‐Storr AH, Stott DJ, Anwer S, Sutton AJ, Burton JK, Quinn TJ. AD-8 for detection of dementia across a variety of healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3:CD011121. [PMID: 30828783 PMCID: PMC6398085 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011121.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia assessment often involves initial screening, using a brief tool, followed by more detailed assessment where required. The AD-8 is a short questionnaire, completed by a suitable 'informant' who knows the person well. AD-8 is designed to assess change in functional performance secondary to cognitive change. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the informant-based AD-8 questionnaire, in detection of all-cause (undifferentiated) dementia in adults. Where data were available, we described the following: the diagnostic accuracy of the AD-8 at various predefined threshold scores; the diagnostic accuracy of the AD-8 for each healthcare setting and the effects of heterogeneity on the reported diagnostic accuracy of the AD-8. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following sources on 27 May 2014, with an update to 7 June 2018: ALOIS (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), MEDLINE (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), BIOSIS Previews (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), Web of Science Core Collection (includes Conference Proceedings Citation Index) (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), CINAHL (EBSCOhost) and LILACS (BIREME). We checked reference lists of relevant studies and reviews, used searches of known relevant studies in PubMed to track related articles, and contacted research groups conducting work on the AD-8 to try to find additional studies. We developed a sensitive search strategy and used standardised database subject headings as appropriate. Foreign language publications were translated. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected those studies which included the AD-8 to assess for the presence of dementia and where dementia diagnosis was confirmed with clinical assessment. We only included those studies where the AD-8 was used as an informant assessment. We made no exclusions in relation to healthcare setting, language of AD-8 or the AD-8 score used to define a 'test positive' case. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles generated by electronic database searches, and reviewed abstracts of potentially relevant studies. Two independent assessors checked full papers for eligibility and extracted data. We extracted data into two-by-two tables to allow calculation of accuracy metrics for individual studies. We then created summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios using the bivariate approach and plotting results in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space. We determined quality assessment (risk of bias and applicability) using the QUADAS-2 tool. MAIN RESULTS From 36 papers describing AD-8 test accuracy, we included 10 papers. We utilised data from nine papers with 4045 individuals, 1107 of whom (27%) had a clinical diagnosis of dementia. Pooled analysis of seven studies, using an AD-8 informant cut-off score of two, indicated that sensitivity was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 0.96); specificity was 0.64 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.82); the positive likelihood ratio was 2.53 (95% CI 1.38 to 4.64); and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.21). Pooled analysis of five studies, using an AD-8 informant cut-off score of three, indicated that sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.96); specificity was 0.76 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.89); the positive likelihood ratio was 3.86 (95% CI 2.03 to 7.34); and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.24).Four studies were conducted in community settings; four were in secondary care (one in the acute hospital); and one study was in primary care. The AD-8 has a higher relative sensitivity (1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.21), but lower relative specificity (0.51, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.09) in secondary care compared to community care settings.There was heterogeneity across the included studies. Dementia prevalence rate varied from 12% to 90% of included participants. The tool was also used in various different languages. Among all the included studies there was evidence of risk of bias. Issues included the selection of participants, conduct of index test, and flow of assessment procedures. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The high sensitivity of the AD-8 suggests it can be used to identify adults who may benefit from further specialist assessment and diagnosis, but is not a diagnostic test in itself. This pattern of high sensitivity and lower specificity is often suited to a screening test. Test accuracy varies by setting, however data in primary care and acute hospital settings are limited. This review identified significant heterogeneity and risk of bias, which may affect the validity of its summary findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty Hendry
- University of GlasgowInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesNew Lister BuildingGlasgow Royal InfirmaryGlasgowUKG4 OSF
| | - Claire Green
- University of GlasgowInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesNew Lister BuildingGlasgow Royal InfirmaryGlasgowUKG4 OSF
| | - Rupert McShane
- University of OxfordRadcliffe Department of MedicineJohn Radcliffe HospitalLevel 4, Main Hospital, Room 4401COxfordOxfordshireUKOX3 9DU
| | - Anna H Noel‐Storr
- University of OxfordRadcliffe Department of MedicineJohn Radcliffe HospitalLevel 4, Main Hospital, Room 4401COxfordOxfordshireUKOX3 9DU
| | - David J Stott
- University of GlasgowInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesNew Lister BuildingGlasgow Royal InfirmaryGlasgowUKG4 OSF
| | - Sumayya Anwer
- University of BristolPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolCanynge Hall, 39 Whatley RoadBristolUKBS8 2PS
| | - Alex J Sutton
- University of LeicesterDepartment of Health Sciences2nd Floor (Room 214e),Adrian BuildingLeicesterUKLE1 7RH
| | - Jennifer K Burton
- University of GlasgowAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesNew Lister Building, Glasgow Royal InfirmaryGlasgowUKG4 0SF
| | - Terry J Quinn
- University of GlasgowInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesNew Lister BuildingGlasgow Royal InfirmaryGlasgowUKG4 OSF
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ding Y, Niu J, Zhang Y, Liu W, Zhou Y, Wei C, Liu Y. Informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE) for assessing the severity of dementia in patients with Alzheimer's disease. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:146. [PMID: 29914396 PMCID: PMC6006922 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0837-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) is widely used as a complementary screening tool for dementia. However, there are few studies concerning the efficacy of the IQCODE for assessing the severity of cognitive impairments in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the IQCODE for assessing the severity of dementia in patients with AD. Methods According to the clinical dementia rating (CDR), 394 patients with AD were enrolled and classified into three groups: mild, moderate and severe groups. The IQCODE scores of each group were determined by interviewing the informants with the short version of the 16-item IQCODE. The correlations of the IQCODE score with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) and the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) were analysed. Statistical analyses were conducted to examine the differences in the IQCODE scores among the three groups. Results The validity coefficients of the IQCODE with the MMSE, DRS and ADAS-Cog were − 0.528, − 0.436, and 0.477, respectively. The sensitivity was 66.1%, and the specificity was 59.8% when using a cut-off score of 65 to discriminate between mild-moderate dementia. When 75 was used as the threshold between moderate-severe dementia, the sensitivity and the specificity were 73.9 and 67.7%, respectively. Conclusions The IQCODE is moderately effective for assessing the severity of cognitive impairment in patients with AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunlong Ding
- Department of Neurology, JingJiang People's Hospital, No. 28, Zhongzhou Road, Jingjiang, CN 214500, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiali Niu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, JingJiang People's Hospital, No. 28, Zhongzhou Road, Jingjiang, CN 214500, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yanrong Zhang
- Department of Neurology, JingJiang People's Hospital, No. 28, Zhongzhou Road, Jingjiang, CN 214500, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wenpeng Liu
- Department of Neurology, JingJiang People's Hospital, No. 28, Zhongzhou Road, Jingjiang, CN 214500, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yan Zhou
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital at Fudan University, No. 12, Urumqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, CN, China
| | - Can Wei
- Department of Neurology, JingJiang People's Hospital, No. 28, Zhongzhou Road, Jingjiang, CN 214500, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Neurology, JingJiang People's Hospital, No. 28, Zhongzhou Road, Jingjiang, CN 214500, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Christie J. Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the Early Diagnosis of Dementia Across a Variety of Healthcare Settings. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2018; 39:445-446. [PMID: 29775136 DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2018.1472958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Christie
- a Senior Lecturer/University of Manchester, Division of Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health , The University of Manchester , Oxford Road, Manchester , UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cognitive tests to help diagnose dementia in symptomatic people in primary care and the community. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:149-150. [PMID: 29472227 PMCID: PMC5819977 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x695249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
|
16
|
Seitz DP, Chan CCH, Newton HT, Gill SS, Herrmann N, Smailagic N, Nikolaou V, Fage BA. Mini-Cog for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias within a primary care setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 2:CD011415. [PMID: 29470861 PMCID: PMC6491332 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011415.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia are becoming increasingly common with the aging of most populations. The majority of individuals with dementia will first present for care and assessment in primary care settings. There is a need for brief dementia screening instruments that can accurately diagnose dementia in primary care settings. The Mini-Cog is a brief, cognitive screening test that is frequently used to evaluate cognition in older adults in various settings. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Cog for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease dementia and related dementias in a primary care setting. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, MEDLINE, Embase and four other databases, initially to September 2012. Since then, four updates to the search were performed using the same search methods, and the most recent was January 2017. We used citation tracking (using the databases' 'related articles' feature, where available) as an additional search method and contacted authors of eligible studies for unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA We only included studies that evaluated the Mini-Cog as an index test for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia or related forms of dementia when compared to a reference standard using validated criteria for dementia. We only included studies that were conducted in primary care populations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted and described information on the characteristics of the study participants and study setting. Using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria we evaluated the quality of studies, and we assessed risk of bias and applicability of each study for each domain in QUADAS-2. Two review authors independently extracted information on the true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives and entered the data into Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). We then used RevMan 5 to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals. We summarized the sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Cog in the individual studies in forest plots and also plotted them in a receiver operating characteristic plot. We also created a 'Risk of bias' and applicability concerns graph to summarize information related to the quality of included studies. MAIN RESULTS There were a total of four studies that met our inclusion criteria, including a total of 1517 total participants. The sensitivity of the Mini-Cog varied between 0.76 to 1.00 in studies while the specificity varied between 0.27 to 0.85. The included studies displayed significant heterogeneity in both methodologies and clinical populations, which did not allow for a meta-analysis to be completed. Only one study (Holsinger 2012) was found to be at low risk of bias on all methodological domains. The results of this study reported that the sensitivity of the Mini-Cog was 0.76 and the specificity was 0.73. We found the quality of all other included studies to be low due to a high risk of bias with methodological limitations primarily in their selection of participants. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is a limited number of studies evaluating the accuracy of the Mini-Cog for the diagnosis of dementia in primary care settings. Given the small number of studies, the wide range in estimates of the accuracy of the Mini-Cog, and methodological limitations identified in most of the studies, at the present time there is insufficient evidence to recommend that the Mini-Cog be used as a screening test for dementia in primary care. Further studies are required to determine the accuracy of Mini-Cog in primary care and whether this tool has sufficient diagnostic test accuracy to be useful as a screening test in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dallas P Seitz
- Queen's UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry752 King Street WestKingstonONCanadaK7L 4X3
| | - Calvin CH Chan
- Queen's UniversitySchool of Medicine49 King Street EastKingstonONCanadaK7L 2Z5
| | - Hailey T Newton
- Queen's UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry752 King Street WestKingstonONCanadaK7L 4X3
| | - Sudeep S Gill
- Queen's UniversityDepartment of MedicineSt. Mary's of the Lake Hospital340 Union StreetKingstonONCanadaK7L 5A2
| | - Nathan Herrmann
- Sunnybrook Research InstituteHurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program2075 Bayview AvenueRoom FG‐05TorontoONCanadaM4N 3M5
| | - Nadja Smailagic
- University of CambridgeInstitute of Public HealthForvie SiteRobinson WayCambridgeUKCB2 0SR
| | | | - Bruce A Fage
- University of TorontoDepartment of PsychiatryTorontoONCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Martínez G, Vernooij RWM, Fuentes Padilla P, Zamora J, Bonfill Cosp X, Flicker L. 18F PET with florbetapir for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11:CD012216. [PMID: 29164603 PMCID: PMC6486090 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012216.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-florbetapir uptake by brain tissue measured by positron emission tomography (PET) is accepted by regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agencies (EMA) for assessing amyloid load in people with dementia. Its added value is mainly demonstrated by excluding Alzheimer's pathology in an established dementia diagnosis. However, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) revised the diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease and confidence in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease may be increased when using amyloid biomarkers tests like 18F-florbetapir. These tests, added to the MCI core clinical criteria, might increase the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of a testing strategy. However, the DTA of 18F-florbetapir to predict the progression from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) or other dementias has not yet been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVES To determine the DTA of the 18F-florbetapir PET scan for detecting people with MCI at time of performing the test who will clinically progress to ADD, other forms of dementia (non-ADD), or any form of dementia at follow-up. SEARCH METHODS This review is current to May 2017. We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), BIOSIS Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), Web of Science Core Collection, including the Science Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science) and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) (http://www.who.int/ictrp/search/en/). We also searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group's specialised register of dementia studies (http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois/). We checked the reference lists of any relevant studies and systematic reviews, and performed citation tracking using the Science Citation Index to identify any additional relevant studies. No language or date restrictions were applied to the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that had prospectively defined cohorts with any accepted definition of MCI at time of performing the test and the use of 18F-florbetapir scan to evaluate the DTA of the progression from MCI to ADD or other forms of dementia. In addition, we only selected studies that applied a reference standard for Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis, for example, National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles and abstracts identified in electronic-database searches. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data to create two-by-two tables, showing the binary test results cross-classified with the binary reference standard. We used these data to calculate sensitivities, specificities, and their 95% confidence intervals. Two independent assessors performed quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool plus some additional items to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS We included three studies, two of which evaluated the progression from MCI to ADD, and one evaluated the progression from MCI to any form of dementia.Progression from MCI to ADD was evaluated in 448 participants. The studies reported data on 401 participants with 1.6 years of follow-up and in 47 participants with three years of follow-up. Sixty-one (15.2%) participants converted at 1.6 years follow-up; nine (19.1%) participants converted at three years of follow-up.Progression from MCI to any form of dementia was evaluated in five participants with 1.5 years of follow-up, with three (60%) participants converting to any form of dementia.There were concerns regarding applicability in the reference standard in all three studies. Regarding the domain of flow and timing, two studies were considered at high risk of bias. MCI to ADD;Progression from MCI to ADD in those with a follow-up between two to less than four years had a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI 30 to 93) and a specificity of 71% (95% CI 54 to 85) by visual assessment (n = 47, 1 study).Progression from MCI to ADD in those with a follow-up between one to less than two years had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 78 to 95) and a specificity of 58% (95% CI 53 to 64) by visual assessment, and a sensitivity of 87% (95% CI 76 to 94) and a specificity of 51% (95% CI 45 to 56) by quantitative assessment by the standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR)(n = 401, 1 study). MCI to any form of dementia;Progression from MCI to any form of dementia in those with a follow-up between one to less than two years had a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI 9 to 99) and a specificity of 50% (95% CI 1 to 99) by visual assessment (n = 5, 1 study). MCI to any other forms of dementia (non-ADD);There was no information regarding the progression from MCI to any other form of dementia (non-ADD). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although sensitivity was good in one included study, considering the poor specificity and the limited data available in the literature, we cannot recommend routine use of 18F-florbetapir PET in clinical practice to predict the progression from MCI to ADD.Because of the poor sensitivity and specificity, limited number of included participants, and the limited data available in the literature, we cannot recommend its routine use in clinical practice to predict the progression from MCI to any form of dementia.Because of the high financial costs of 18F-florbetapir, clearly demonstrating the DTA and standardising the process of this modality are important prior to its wider use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Martínez
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
- Institut Català de Neurociències AplicadesAlzheimer Research Center and Memory Clinic of Fundació ACEBarcelonaSpain
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
| | - Paulina Fuentes Padilla
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
| | - Javier Zamora
- Ramon y Cajal Institute for Health Research (IRYCIS), CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid (Spain) and Women's Health Research Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of LondonClinical Biostatistics UnitLondonMadridUK
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavilion 18BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
- Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSant Antoni Maria Claret, 167Pavilion 18 (D‐13)BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
| | - Leon Flicker
- University of Western AustraliaWestern Australian Centre for Health & Ageing ‐ WACHACrawleyPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia6014
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Martínez G, Vernooij RWM, Fuentes Padilla P, Zamora J, Flicker L, Bonfill Cosp X. 18F PET with flutemetamol for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11:CD012884. [PMID: 29164602 PMCID: PMC6486287 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-flutemetamol uptake by brain tissue, measured by positron emission tomography (PET), is accepted by regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agencies (EMA) for assessing amyloid load in people with dementia. Its added value is mainly demonstrated by excluding Alzheimer's pathology in an established dementia diagnosis. However, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) revised the diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease and the confidence in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease may be increased when using some amyloid biomarkers tests like 18F-flutemetamol. These tests, added to the MCI core clinical criteria, might increase the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of a testing strategy. However, the DTA of 18F-flutemetamol to predict the progression from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) or other dementias has not yet been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVES To determine the DTA of the 18F-flutemetamol PET scan for detecting people with MCI at time of performing the test who will clinically progress to ADD, other forms of dementia (non-ADD) or any form of dementia at follow-up. SEARCH METHODS The most recent search for this review was performed in May 2017. We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), BIOSIS Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), Web of Science Core Collection, including the Science Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science) and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) (http://www.who.int/ictrp/search/en/). We also searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group's specialised register of dementia studies (http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois/). We checked the reference lists of any relevant studies and systematic reviews, and performed citation tracking using the Science Citation Index to identify any additional relevant studies. No language or date restrictions were applied to the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that had prospectively defined cohorts with any accepted definition of MCI at time of performing the test and the use of 18F-flutemetamol scan to evaluate the DTA of the progression from MCI to ADD or other forms of dementia. In addition, we only selected studies that applied a reference standard for Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis, for example, National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles and abstracts identified in electronic-database searches. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data to create two-by-two tables, showing the binary test results cross-classified with the binary reference standard. We used these data to calculate sensitivities, specificities, and their 95% confidence intervals. Two independent assessors performed quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool plus some additional items to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS Progression from MCI to ADD was evaluated in 243 participants from two studies. The studies reported data on 19 participants with two years of follow-up and on 224 participants with three years of follow-up. Nine (47.4%) participants converted at two years follow-up and 81 (36.2%) converted at three years of follow-up.There were concerns about participant selection and sampling in both studies. The index test domain in one study was considered unclear and in the second study it was considered at low risk of bias. For the reference standard domain, one study was considered at low risk and the second study was considered to have an unclear risk of bias. Regarding the domains of flow and timing, both studies were considered at high risk of bias. MCI to ADD;Progression from MCI to ADD at two years of follow-up had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 52 to 100) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI 44 to 97) by quantitative assessment by SUVR (n = 19, 1 study).Progression from MCI to ADD at three years of follow-up had a sensitivity of 64% (95% CI 53 to 75) and a specificity of 69% (95% CI 60 to 76) by visual assessment (n = 224, 1 study).There was no information regarding the other two objectives in this systematic review (SR): progression from MCI to other forms of dementia and progression to any form of dementia at follow-up. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Due to the varying sensitivity and specificity for predicting the progression from MCI to ADD and the limited data available, we cannot recommend routine use of 18F-flutemetamol in clinical practice. 18F-flutemetamol has high financial costs; therefore, clearly demonstrating its DTA and standardising the process of the 18F-flutemetamol modality is important prior to its wider use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Martínez
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
- Institut Català de Neurociències AplicadesAlzheimer Research Center and Memory Clinic of Fundació ACEBarcelonaSpain
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
| | - Paulina Fuentes Padilla
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
| | - Javier Zamora
- Ramon y Cajal Institute for Health Research (IRYCIS), CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid (Spain) and Women's Health Research Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of LondonClinical Biostatistics UnitLondonMadridUK
| | - Leon Flicker
- University of Western AustraliaWestern Australian Centre for Health & Ageing ‐ WACHACrawleyPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia6014
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavilion 18BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
- Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSant Antoni Maria Claret, 167Pavilion 18 (D‐13)BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Martínez G, Vernooij RWM, Fuentes Padilla P, Zamora J, Flicker L, Bonfill Cosp X. 18F PET with florbetaben for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11:CD012883. [PMID: 29164600 PMCID: PMC6485979 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-florbetaben uptake by brain tissue, measured by positron emission tomography (PET), is accepted by regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agencies (EMA) for assessing amyloid load in people with dementia. Its added value is mainly demonstrated by excluding Alzheimer's pathology in an established dementia diagnosis. However, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) revised the diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease and confidence in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease may be increased when using some amyloid biomarkers tests like 18F-florbetaben. These tests, added to the MCI core clinical criteria, might increase the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of a testing strategy. However, the DTA of 18F-florbetaben to predict the progression from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) or other dementias has not yet been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVES To determine the DTA of the 18F-florbetaben PET scan for detecting people with MCI at time of performing the test who will clinically progress to ADD, other forms of dementia (non-ADD), or any form of dementia at follow-up. SEARCH METHODS The most recent search for this review was performed in May 2017. We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), BIOSIS Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), Web of Science Core Collection, including the Science Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science) and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) (http://www.who.int/ictrp/search/en/). We also searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group's specialised register of dementia studies (http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois/). We checked the reference lists of any relevant studies and systematic reviews, and performed citation tracking using the Science Citation Index to identify any additional relevant studies. No language or date restrictions were applied to electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that had prospectively defined cohorts with any accepted definition of MCI at time of performing the test and the use of 18F-florbetaben scan to evaluate the DTA of the progression from MCI to ADD or other forms of dementia. In addition, we only selected studies that applied a reference standard for Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis, for example, the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles and abstracts identified in electronic-database searches. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data to create two-by-two tables, showing the binary test results cross-classified with the binary reference standard. We used these data to calculate sensitivities, specificities, and their 95% confidence intervals. Two independent assessors performed quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool plus some additional items to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS Progression from MCI to ADD, any other form of dementia, and any form of dementia was evaluated in one study (Ong 2015). It reported data on 45 participants at four years of follow-up; 21 participants met NINCDS-ADRDA criteria for Alzheimer's disease dementia at four years of follow-up, the proportion converting to ADD was 47% of the 45 participants, and 11% of the 45 participants met criteria for other types of dementias (three cases of FrontoTemporal Dementia (FTD), one of Dementia with Lewy body (DLB), and one of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)). We considered the study to be at high risk of bias in the domains of the reference standard, flow, and timing (QUADAS-2). MCI to ADD; 18F-florbetaben PET scan analysed visually: the sensitivity was 100% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84% to 100%) and the specificity was 83% (95% CI 63% to 98%) (n = 45, 1 study). Analysed quantitatively: the sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 84% to 100%) and the specificity was 88% (95% CI 68% to 97%) for the diagnosis of ADD at follow-up (n = 45, 1 study). MCI to any other form of dementia (non-ADD); 18F-florbetaben PET scan analysed visually: the sensitivity was 0% (95% CI 0% to 52%) and the specificity was 38% (95% CI 23% to 54%) (n = 45, 1 study). Analysed quantitatively: the sensitivity was 0% (95% CI 0% to 52%) and the specificity was 40% (95% CI 25% to 57%) for the diagnosis of any other form of dementia at follow-up (n = 45, 1 study). MCI to any form of dementia;18F-florbetaben PET scan analysed visually: the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 61% to 93%) and the specificity was 79% (95% CI 54% to 94%) (n = 45, 1 study). Analysed quantitatively: the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 61% to 93%) and the specificity was 84% (95% CI 60% to 97%) for the diagnosis of any form of dementia at follow-up (n = 45, 1 study). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although we were able to calculate one estimation of DTA in, especially, the prediction of progression from MCI to ADD at four years follow-up, the small number of participants implies imprecision of sensitivity and specificity estimates. We cannot make any recommendation regarding the routine use of 18F-florbetaben in clinical practice based on one single study with 45 participants. 18F-florbetaben has high financial costs, therefore, clearly demonstrating its DTA and standardising the process of the 18F-florbetaben modality are important prior to its wider use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Martínez
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
- Institut Català de Neurociències AplicadesAlzheimer Research Center and Memory Clinic of Fundació ACEBarcelonaSpain
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
| | - Paulina Fuentes Padilla
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
| | - Javier Zamora
- Ramon y Cajal Institute for Health Research (IRYCIS), CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid (Spain) and Women's Health Research Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of LondonClinical Biostatistics UnitLondonMadridUK
| | - Leon Flicker
- University of Western AustraliaWestern Australian Centre for Health & Ageing ‐ WACHACrawleyPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia6014
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavilion 18BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
- Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSant Antoni Maria Claret, 167Pavilion 18 (D‐13)BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hunt HA, Van Kampen S, Takwoingi Y, Llewellyn DJ, Pearson M, Hyde CJ. The comparative diagnostic accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the General Practitioner assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) for identifying dementia in primary care: a systematic review protocol. Diagn Progn Res 2017; 1:14. [PMID: 31093543 PMCID: PMC6460787 DOI: 10.1186/s41512-017-0014-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved dementia identification is a global health priority, and general practitioners (GPs) are often the first point of contact for people with concerns about their cognition. However, GPs often express uncertainty in using assessment tools and the evidence based on which tests are most accurate in identifying dementia is unclear. In particular, there is little certainty around how the accuracy of available brief cognitive assessments compares within a clinical family practice setting.Grounded in existing brief cognitive assessment evidence, we will compare the diagnostic test accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to the General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) against the best available reference standard when used within a family practice setting. METHODS We will employ robust systematic review methods to assess studies of diagnostic accuracy where both the MMSE and GPCOG have been evaluated as direct comparisons, i.e. within the same study population. This approach will enable us to minimise between-study heterogeneity, to eliminate the risk of bias due to confounding and increase the opportunity to make clinically useful and useable comparisons of diagnostic accuracy across both the MMSE and GPCOG. This systematic review will be conducted using a pragmatic search strategy, refining searches that build upon studies identified as part of our overview of systematic reviews of the diagnostic accuracy of brief cognitive assessments for identifying dementia in primary care. DISCUSSION Through this systematic review, we aim to improve existing evidence on how the diagnostic accuracy of MMSE and GPCOG compares when used to identify dementia within the family practice setting. We also aim to make clinical practice recommendations based upon the variations in diagnostic accuracy identified between the MMSE and GPCOG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet A. Hunt
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, Devon EX1 1TE UK
| | - Sanne Van Kampen
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC building, Tamar Science Park, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA UK
| | - Yemisi Takwoingi
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - David J. Llewellyn
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, Devon EX1 1TE UK
| | - Mark Pearson
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, Devon EX1 1TE UK
| | - Christopher J. Hyde
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, Devon EX1 1TE UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Creavin ST, Noel-Storr AH, Richard E, Creavin AL, Cullum S, Ben-Shlomo Y, Purdy S. Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people. Hippokratia 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sam T Creavin
- University of Bristol; School of Social and Community Medicine; Carynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Anna H Noel-Storr
- University of Oxford; Radcliffe Department of Medicine; Room 4401c (4th Floor) John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington Oxford UK OX3 9DU
| | - Edo Richard
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center; Department of Neurology; Nijmegen Netherlands
| | - Alexandra L Creavin
- University of Bristol; School of Social and Community Medicine; Carynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Sarah Cullum
- University of Auckland; Department of Psychological Medicine; Auckland New Zealand 1142
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- Canynge Hall; Dept of Social Medicine; Whiteladies Road Bristol UK BS8 2PR
| | - Sarah Purdy
- University of Bristol; Faculty of Health Sciences; Senate House, Tyndall Avenue Bristol UK BS8 1TH
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Reliability and construct validity of the Early Dementia Questionnaire (EDQ). BMC Geriatr 2016; 16:202. [PMID: 27903242 PMCID: PMC5131430 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-016-0384-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early Dementia Questionnaire (EDQ) was developed as a screening tool to detect patients with early dementia in primary care. It was developed based on 20 symptoms of dementia. From a preliminary study, EDQ had been shown to be a promising alternative for screening of early dementia. This study was done to further test on EDQ’s reliability and validity. Methods Using a systematic random sampling, 200 elderly patients attending primary health care centers in Kuching, Sarawak had consented to participate in the study and were administered the EDQ. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) was used to exclude patients with depression. Those who scored >21 MMSE, were retested using the EDQ. Reliability was determined by Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency and construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (principle component with varimax rotation). Test retest Intraclass Correlation Coeeficient (ICC) was used to determine the reliability of the scale. Results The result showed that the sensitivity and specificity for EDQ was 71.2% and 59.5%. The overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was good which was 0.874. Confirmatory factor analysis on 4 factors indicated that the Cronbach’s alpha for each domain were acceptable with memory (0.741), concentration (0.764), emotional and physical symptoms (0.754) and lastly sleep and environment (0.720). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient between the first EDQ score and the retest EDQ score among those with MMSE of >21 showed a very strong overall agreement, ICC = 0.764, N = 160, P <0.001. Conclusions The results of the validation study showed that Early Dementia Questionnaire (EDQ) is a valid and reliable tool to be used as a screening tool to detect early dementia in primary care.
Collapse
|
23
|
Harrison JK, Stott DJ, McShane R, Noel‐Storr AH, Swann‐Price RS, Quinn TJ. Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the early diagnosis of dementia across a variety of healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11:CD011333. [PMID: 27869298 PMCID: PMC6477966 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011333.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) is a structured interview based on informant responses that is used to assess for possible dementia. IQCODE has been used for retrospective or contemporaneous assessment of cognitive decline. There is considerable interest in tests that may identify those at future risk of developing dementia. Assessing a population free of dementia for the prospective development of dementia is an approach often used in studies of dementia biomarkers. In theory, questionnaire-based assessments, such as IQCODE, could be used in a similar way, assessing for dementia that is diagnosed on a later (delayed) assessment. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of IQCODE in a population free from dementia for the delayed diagnosis of dementia (test accuracy with delayed verification study design). SEARCH METHODS We searched these sources on 16 January 2016: ALOIS (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), MEDLINE Ovid SP, Embase Ovid SP, PsycINFO Ovid SP, BIOSIS Previews on Thomson Reuters Web of Science, Web of Science Core Collection (includes Conference Proceedings Citation Index) on Thomson Reuters Web of Science, CINAHL EBSCOhost, and LILACS BIREME. We also searched sources specific to diagnostic test accuracy: MEDION (Universities of Maastricht and Leuven); DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, in the Cochrane Library); HTA Database (Health Technology Assessment Database, in the Cochrane Library), and ARIF (Birmingham University). We checked reference lists of included studies and reviews, used searches of included studies in PubMed to track related articles, and contacted research groups conducting work on IQCODE for dementia diagnosis to try to find additional studies. We developed a sensitive search strategy; search terms were designed to cover key concepts using several different approaches run in parallel, and included terms relating to cognitive tests, cognitive screening, and dementia. We used standardised database subject headings, such as MeSH terms (in MEDLINE) and other standardised headings (controlled vocabulary) in other databases, as appropriate. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected studies that included a population free from dementia at baseline, who were assessed with the IQCODE and subsequently assessed for the development of dementia over time. The implication was that at the time of testing, the individual had a cognitive problem sufficient to result in an abnormal IQCODE score (defined by the study authors), but not yet meeting dementia diagnostic criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles generated by the electronic database searches, and reviewed abstracts of all potentially relevant studies. Two assessors independently checked the full papers for eligibility and extracted data. We determined quality assessment (risk of bias and applicability) using the QUADAS-2 tool, and reported quality using the STARDdem tool. MAIN RESULTS From 85 papers describing IQCODE, we included three papers, representing data from 626 individuals. Of this total, 22% (N = 135/626) were excluded because of prevalent dementia. There was substantial attrition; 47% (N = 295) of the study population received reference standard assessment at first follow-up (three to six months) and 28% (N = 174) received reference standard assessment at final follow-up (one to three years). Prevalence of dementia ranged from 12% to 26% at first follow-up and 16% to 35% at final follow-up.The three studies were considered to be too heterogenous to combine, so we did not perform meta-analyses to describe summary estimates of interest. Included patients were poststroke (two papers) and hip fracture (one paper). The IQCODE was used at three thresholds of positivity (higher than 3.0, higher than 3.12 and higher than 3.3) to predict those at risk of a future diagnosis of dementia. Using a cut-off of 3.0, IQCODE had a sensitivity of 0.75 (95%CI 0.51 to 0.91) and a specificity of 0.46 (95%CI 0.34 to 0.59) at one year following stroke. Using a cut-off of 3.12, the IQCODE had a sensitivity of 0.80 (95%CI 0.44 to 0.97) and specificity of 0.53 (95C%CI 0.41 to 0.65) for the clinical diagnosis of dementia at six months after hip fracture. Using a cut-off of 3.3, the IQCODE had a sensitivity of 0.84 (95%CI 0.68 to 0.94) and a specificity of 0.87 (95%CI 0.76 to 0.94) for the clinical diagnosis of dementia at one year after stroke.In generaI, the IQCODE was sensitive for identification of those who would develop dementia, but lacked specificity. Methods for both excluding prevalent dementia at baseline and assessing for the development of dementia were varied, and had the potential to introduce bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Included studies were heterogenous, recruited from specialist settings, and had potential biases. The studies identified did not allow us to make specific recommendations on the use of the IQCODE for the future diagnosis of dementia in clinical practice. The included studies highlighted the challenges of delayed verification dementia research, with issues around prevalent dementia assessment, loss to follow-up over time, and test non-completion potentially limiting the studies. Future research should recognise these issues and have explicit protocols for dealing with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Harrison
- University of EdinburghCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology and the Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research CentreDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Room S164251 Little France CrescentEdinburghUKEH16 4SB
| | - David J Stott
- University of GlasgowInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesNew Lister BuildingGlasgow Royal InfirmaryGlasgowStrathclydeUKG4 0SFR
| | - Rupert McShane
- University of OxfordRadcliffe Department of MedicineJohn Radcliffe HospitalLevel 4, Main Hospital, Room 4401COxfordOxfordshireUKOX3 9DU
| | - Anna H Noel‐Storr
- University of OxfordRadcliffe Department of MedicineJohn Radcliffe HospitalLevel 4, Main Hospital, Room 4401COxfordOxfordshireUKOX3 9DU
| | | | - Terry J Quinn
- University of GlasgowInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesNew Lister BuildingGlasgow Royal InfirmaryGlasgowStrathclydeUKG4 0SFR
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Towards improving diagnosis of memory loss in general practice: TIMeLi diagnostic test accuracy study protocol. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2016; 17:79. [PMID: 27430736 PMCID: PMC4950265 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0475-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background People with cognitive problems, and their families, report distress and uncertainty whilst undergoing evaluation for dementia and perceive that traditional diagnostic evaluation in secondary care is insufficiently patient centred. The James Lind Alliance has prioritised research to investigate the role of primary care in supporting a more effective diagnostic pathway, and the topic is also of interest to health commissioners. However, there are very few studies that investigate the accuracy of diagnostic tests for dementia in primary care. Methods We will conduct a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study to evaluate the accuracy of a range of simple tests for diagnosing all-cause-dementia in symptomatic people aged over 70 years who have consulted with their general practitioner (GP). We will invite eligible people to attend a research clinic where they will undergo a range of index tests that a GP could perform in the surgery and also be assessed by a specialist in memory disorders at the same appointment. Participating GPs will request neuroimaging and blood tests and otherwise manage patients in line with their usual clinical practice. The reference standard will be the consensus judgement of three experts (neurologist, psychiatrist and geriatrician) based on information from the specialist assessment, GP records and investigations, but not including items in the index test battery. The target condition will be all-cause dementia but we will also investigate diagnostic accuracy for sub-types where possible. We will use qualitative interviews with patients and focus groups with clinicians to help us understand the acceptability and feasibility of diagnosing dementia in primary care using the tests that we are investigating. Discussion Our results will help clinicians decide on which tests to perform in someone where there is concern about possible dementia and inform commissioning of diagnostic pathways.
Collapse
|
25
|
Martínez G, Flicker L, Vernooij RWM, Fuentes Padilla P, Zamora J, Roqué i Figuls M, Urrútia G, Bonfill Cosp X. 18F PET ligands for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Martínez
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre; C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167 Pavelló 18 Planta 0 Barcelona Barcelona Spain 08025
| | - Leon Flicker
- University of Western Australia; Western Australian Centre for Health & Ageing - WACHA; Crawley Perth Western Australia Australia 6014
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre; C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167 Pavelló 18 Planta 0 Barcelona Barcelona Spain 08025
| | - Paulina Fuentes Padilla
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre; C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167 Pavelló 18 Planta 0 Barcelona Barcelona Spain 08025
| | - Javier Zamora
- Ramon y Cajal Institute for Health Research (IRYCIS), CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid (Spain) and Queen Mary University of London; Clinical Biostatistics Unit; Ctra. Colmenar km 9,100 Madrid Madrid Spain 28034
| | - Marta Roqué i Figuls
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP); Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau); Sant Antoni Maria Claret 171 Edifici Casa de Convalescència Barcelona Catalunya Spain 08041
| | - Gerard Urrútia
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP); Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau); Sant Antoni Maria Claret 171 Edifici Casa de Convalescència Barcelona Catalunya Spain 08041
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau); Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167 Pavilion 18 (D-13) Barcelona Catalunya Spain 08025
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167 Pavilion 18 (D-13) Barcelona Catalunya Spain 08025
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The short-term and long-term relationship between delirium and cognitive trajectory in older surgical patients. Alzheimers Dement 2016; 12:766-75. [PMID: 27103261 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 271] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As the relationship between delirium and long-term cognitive decline has not been well-explored, we evaluated this association in a prospective study. METHODS SAGES is an ongoing study involving 560 adults age 70 years or more without dementia scheduled for major surgery. Delirium was assessed daily in the postoperative period using the Confusion Assessment Method. General Cognitive Performance (GCP) and the Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly were assessed preoperatively then repeatedly out to 36 months. RESULTS On average, patients with postoperative delirium had significantly lower preoperative cognitive performance, greater immediate (1 month) impairment, equivalent recovery at 2 months, and significantly greater long-term cognitive decline relative to the nondelirium group. Proxy reports corroborated the clinical significance of the long-term cognitive decline in delirious patients. DISCUSSION Cognitive decline after surgery is biphasic and accelerated among persons with delirium. The pace of long-term decline is similar to that seen with mild cognitive impairment.
Collapse
|
27
|
Klimiec E, Dziedzic T, Kowalska K, Szyper A, Pera J, Potoczek P, Slowik A, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A. PRospective Observational POLIsh Study on post-stroke delirium (PROPOLIS): methodology of hospital-based cohort study on delirium prevalence, predictors and diagnostic tools. BMC Neurol 2015; 15:94. [PMID: 26084453 PMCID: PMC4472262 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-015-0351-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2015] [Accepted: 06/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Between 10 % to 48 % of patients develop delirium in acute phase of stroke. Delirium determinants and its association with other neuropsychiatric disturbances in stroke are poorly understood. The wildly accepted predictive model of post-stroke delirium is still lacking. Methods/design This is a prospective, observational, single-center study in patients with acute phase of stroke. We aim to include 750 patients ≥18 years with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack admitted to the stroke unit within 48 hours after stroke onset. The goals of the study are: 1) to determine frequency of delirium and subsyndromal delirium in Polish stroke patients within 7 days after admission to the hospital; 2) to determine factors associated with incidence, severity and duration of delirium and subsyndromal delirium and to create a predictive model for post-stroke delirium; 3) to determine the association between delirium and its cognitive, psychiatric, behavioral and functional short and long-term consequences; 4) to validate scales used for delirium diagnosis in stroke population. Patients will be screened for delirium on daily basis. The diagnosis of delirium will be based on DSM-V criteria. Abbreviated version of Confusion Assessment Method and Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit will be used for delirium and sub-delirium screening. Severity of delirium symptoms will be assessed by Delirium Rating Scale Revised 98 and Cognitive Test for Delirium. Patients who survive will undergo extensive neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric and functional assessment 3 and 12 months after the stroke. Discussion This study is designed to provide information on clinical manifestation, diagnostic methods and determinants of delirium spectrum disorders in acute stroke phase and their short and long-term consequences. Collected information allow us to create a predictive model for post-stroke delirium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elzbieta Klimiec
- Department of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Botaniczna 3, 31-503, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Tomasz Dziedzic
- Department of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Botaniczna 3, 31-503, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Katarzyna Kowalska
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Botaniczna 3, 31-503, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Aleksandra Szyper
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Botaniczna 3, 31-503, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Joanna Pera
- Department of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Botaniczna 3, 31-503, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Paulina Potoczek
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Botaniczna 3, 31-503, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Agnieszka Slowik
- Department of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Botaniczna 3, 31-503, Krakow, Poland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fage BA, Chan CCH, Gill SS, Noel-Storr AH, Herrmann N, Smailagic N, Nikolaou V, Seitz DP. Mini-Cog for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias within a community setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD010860. [PMID: 25922857 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010860.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease and related forms of dementia are becoming increasingly prevalent with the aging of many populations. The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease relies on tests to evaluate cognition and discriminate between individuals with dementia and those without dementia. The Mini-Cog is a brief, cognitive screening test that is frequently used to evaluate cognition in older adults in various settings. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Cog for detecting Alzheimer's disease dementia and related dementias in a community setting.Secondary objectives included investigations of the heterogeneity of test accuracy in the included studies and potential sources of heterogeneity. These potential sources of heterogeneity included the baseline prevalence of dementia in study samples, thresholds used to determine positive test results, the type of dementia (Alzheimer's disease dementia or all causes of dementia), and aspects of study design related to study quality. Overall, the goals of this review were to determine if the Mini-Cog is a cognitive screening test that could be recommended to screen for cognitive impairment in community settings. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), Science Citation Index (Web of Science), BIOSIS previews (Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), and the Cochrane Dementia Group's developing register of diagnostic test accuracy studies to March 2013. We used citation tracking (using the database's 'related articles' feature, where available) as an additional search method and contacted authors of eligible studies for unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all cross-sectional studies that utilized the Mini-Cog as an index test for the diagnosis of dementia when compared to a reference standard diagnosis of dementia using standardized dementia diagnostic criteria. For the current review we only included studies that were conducted on samples from community settings, and excluded studies that were conducted in primary care or secondary care settings. We considered studies to be conducted in a community setting where participants were sampled from the general population. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Information from studies meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted including information on the characteristics of participants in the studies. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria and summarized using risk of bias applicability and summary graphs. We extracted information on the diagnostic test accuracy of studies including the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals of these measures and summarized the findings using forest plots. Study specific sensitivities and specificities were also plotted in receiver operating curve space. MAIN RESULTS Three studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1620 participants. The sensitivities of the Mini-Cog in the individual studies were reported as 0.99, 0.76 and 0.99. The specificity of the Mini-Cog varied in the individual studies and was 0.93, 0.89 and 0.83. There was clinical and methodological heterogeneity between the studies which precluded a pooled meta-analysis of the results. Methodological limitations were present in all the studies introducing potential sources of bias, specifically with respect to the methods for participant selection. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There are currently few studies assessing the diagnostic test accuracy of the Mini-Cog in community settings. The limited number of studies and the methodological limitations that are present in the current studies make it difficult to provide recommendations for or against the use of the Mini-Cog as a cognitive screening test in community settings. Additional well-designed studies comparing the Mini-Cog to other brief cognitive screening tests are required in order to determine the accuracy and utility of the Mini-Cog in community based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce A Fage
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|