1
|
Ackermann D, Hersch J, Jordan D, Clinton-Gray E, Bracken K, Janda M, Turner R, Bell K. Participant Motivators and Expectations in the MEL-SELF Randomized Clinical Trial of Patient-Led Surveillance for Recurrent Melanoma: Content Analysis of Survey Responses. JMIR DERMATOLOGY 2024; 7:e58136. [PMID: 39418647 DOI: 10.2196/58136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 08/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data exist on the motivations and expectations of participants when enrolling in dermatology clinical trials, including melanoma early detection trials. Understanding participant motivators for research engagement has been identified as a prioritized area for trial methodology research. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to determine motivators of participation and expectations from trial involvement among patients enrolled in the MEL-SELF randomized clinical trial of patient-led surveillance for new or recurrent melanoma. METHODS The MEL-SELF trial is recruiting patients previously treated for localized melanoma, who own a smartphone, have a partner to assist with skin self-examination (SSE), and attend routinely scheduled follow-up at specialist and primary care skin clinics in Australia. We evaluated responses from the first 100 randomized participants to 2 open-ended questions about their motivations and expectations for participating in the trial, administered through the internet-based baseline questionnaire. A total of 3 coders independently coded the free-text responses and resolved discrepancies through consensus. Qualitative content analysis by an iterative process was used to group responses into themes. Responses from potential participants who were not randomized and the 404 participants randomized subsequently into the trial, were also checked for new themes. Coding and analysis were conducted in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS Out of the 100 survey participants, 98 (98%) answered at least 1 of the 2 questions. Overall, responses across the motivation and expectation items indicated 3 broad themes: community benefit, perceived personal benefit, and trusting relationship with their health care provider. The most common motivators for participation were related to community benefit. These included progressing medical research, benefitting future melanoma patients who may have similar experiences, and broader altruistic sentiments such as "helping others" or "giving back." The most common expectations from the trial related to personal benefit. These included perceived improved outcomes such as earlier diagnosis and treatment, access to additional care, and increased self-empowerment to take actions themselves that benefit their health. Patients expressed a desire to gain health-related knowledge and skills and were interested in the potential advantages of teledermatology. There were no new themes in responses from those who were not randomized or were randomized subsequent to the first 100. CONCLUSIONS We report a tailorable, patient-focused approach to identify drivers of research engagement in clinical research. Clinical trials offer an opportunity to collate a substantial evidence base on determinants of research participation and to identify context-specific factors. Results from the MEL-SELF trial emphasized notable altruism, self-empowerment, and perceived advantages of teledermatology as specific motivators. These findings informed consent processes, recruitment, retention, response to trial tasks, and intervention adherence for the MEL-SELF host trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12621000176864. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379527.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deonna Ackermann
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dana Jordan
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emily Clinton-Gray
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karen Bracken
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Robin Turner
- Biostatistics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Katy Bell
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Biggs K, Hullock K, Dix C, Lane JA, Green H, Treweek S, Shiely F, Shepherd V, Willis A, Isaacs T, Cooper C. Time to STEP UP: methods and findings from the development of guidance to help researchers design inclusive clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2024; 24:227. [PMID: 39358688 PMCID: PMC11445965 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02342-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is important to design clinical trials to include all those who may benefit from the intervention being tested. Several frameworks have been developed to help researchers think about the barriers to inclusion of particular under-served groups when designing a trial, but there is a lack of practical guidance on how to implement these frameworks. This paper describes the ACCESS project, the findings from each phase of the project and the guidance we developed (STEP UP) on how to design more inclusive trials. METHODS Development of the STEP UP guidance had five phases: (1) Scoping literature review, (2) 'roundtable' discussion meetings, (3) redesign of trials, (4) interviews and (5) guidance document development, with input from public contributors and the ACCESS team. RESULTS Over 40 experts contributed to the ACCESS project-patients and the public, clinicians, NHS research staff, trialists and other academics. The scoping review identified several strategies being used to improve inclusion, mostly around recruitment settings, but there was little evaluation of these strategies. The 'roundtable' discussions identified additional strategies being used across the UK and Ireland to improve inclusion, which were grouped into: Communication, Community engagement, Recruitment sites, Patient information, Flexibility, Recruitment settings, Consent process, Monitoring, Training for researchers and Incentives. These strategies were used to redesign three existing trials by applying one of the three INCLUDE frameworks (ethnicity, socioeconomic disadvantage, impaired capacity to consent) to one trial each, to produce the key recommendations for the guidance. Issues around implementation were explored in stakeholder interviews and key facilitators were identified: funders requesting information on inclusion, having the time and funding to implement strategies, dedicated staff, flexibility in trial protocols, and considering inclusion of under-served groups at the design stages. The STEP UP guidance is freely available at http://step-up-clinical-trials.co.uk . CONCLUSION Researchers should consider inclusivity to shape initial trial design decisions. Trial teams and funders need to ensure that trials are given both the resources and time needed to implement the STEP UP guidance and increase the opportunities to recruit a diverse population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Biggs
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - K Hullock
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - C Dix
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - J A Lane
- Bristol Medical School, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - H Green
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- COUCH Health, Manchester, UK
| | - S Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - F Shiely
- HRB Clinical Research Facility and School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - V Shepherd
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - A Willis
- HRB Clinical Research Facility and School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - T Isaacs
- IOE, UCL's Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| | - C Cooper
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Y, Zhong Q, Lv W, Long Q, Wang MP, Chen JL, Willey JA, Whittemore R, Guo J. Camp-style lifestyle modification program (CAMP) for diabetes prevention among rural women with prior GDM: study protocol for a three-arm cluster hybrid type 2 randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:2570. [PMID: 39304869 PMCID: PMC11414119 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20080-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensive lifestyle interventions were effective to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) history. However, reaching these mothers and maintaining participation in lifestyle interventions is suboptimal in real-world settings. Effective, feasible and sustainable new lifestyle interventions are needed. The objectives of this three-arm trial are to (1) compare diabetes risk outcomes of an evidence-based intensive lifestyle modification (ILSM) intervention, a camp-style lifestyle modification program (CAMP) intervention, and usual care among women with GDM history; and (2) evaluate the comparative efficacy of the CAMP versus ILSM intervention on implementation outcomes. METHODS A three-arm cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) using a hybrid type 2 implementation design will be conducted in two counties in Hunan province in China. Six towns from each county will be randomly selected and assigned to CAMP, ILSM, and the usual care group (25 women from each of 12 towns, 100 women in each arm). The ILSM includes six biweekly in-person sessions and 3-month telephone health consultations, while the CAMP consists of a 2-day camp-based session and 3-month health consultations via a popular social media platform. Both interventions share the same session content, including six lifestyle skills. Efficacy (T2DM risk score and behavioral, anthropometric, psychosocial, and glycemic variables) and implementation outcomes (recruitment, acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and cost-effectiveness) will be collected at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month. Pre-planned ANOVA F-test and generalized estimating equations will be included to test time-by-arm interactions. DISCUSSION The CAMP intervention is expected to have better reach, better attendance, and comparable effectiveness in reducing the risk of T2DM, thus improving postpartum care for GDM in China. The delivery of a concentrated format supplemented with technology-based support may provide an efficient and effective delivery model for implementing maternal health promotion programs in primary care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200058150) on 31st March 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Chen
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China
| | - Qinyi Zhong
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Wencong Lv
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Qing Long
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China
| | - Man Ping Wang
- School of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 100872, China
| | - Jyu-Lin Chen
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA
| | - James Allen Willey
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA
| | | | - Jia Guo
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hussain A, Ahmed H, Mansur W. Cultural Appropriation for Improved Knowledge Acquisition in Medical Education [Letter]. ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2024; 15:759-760. [PMID: 39130673 PMCID: PMC11316475 DOI: 10.2147/amep.s485530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ambar Hussain
- University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Henna Ahmed
- University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Warda Mansur
- Queen Mary’s University of London, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Conway S, Flood T. A single centre service evaluation of patients' experiences participating in radiotherapy clinical trials during and post COVID-19 in Northern Ireland, UK. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:1418-1426. [PMID: 38955645 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy (RT) clinical trials allow patients to access cutting-edge innovative cancer treatments. Clinical Research Therapy Radiographers (CRRs) play an important role in the management and care of RT trial patients. The COVID-19 pandemic caused major disruption to RT trial delivery. Measures to mitigate COVID-19 risk continue to have an effect on patient contact and communication within cancer centres in the United Kingdom (UK). This study aimed to explore patient perspectives regarding their recent RT trial experience in Northern Ireland (NI), UK. METHODS A single centre service evaluation was conducted in NI. Patients who were recruited into a RT clinical trial from January 2020 to January 2023 were invited to participate. Surveys were posted to 50 participants in April 2023. Quantitative and qualitative data was captured and analysed using descriptive statistics and Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis framework respectively. Ethical approval was obtained through Ulster University and the NHS Trust. RESULTS Forty-three of the 50 invited participants responded (86%). Forty-two respondents (79%) had a prostate cancer diagnosis. Forty-one (98%) participants indicated that CRRs were always approachable, polite and courteous and would recommend taking part in a RT trial to friends and family. Identified areas for improvement included aspects regarding consent and participant decision-making. CONCLUSION This study suggests that despite the implemented measures to suspend research and mitigate COVID-19 risk, patients remained highly satisfied with the quality of care that they received through their participation in RT trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The results of this service evaluation will facilitate maintenance and improvement of patient focused delivery of cancer trials within the host centre. This study builds on evidence highlighting the importance of the CRR role and role development for radiographers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Conway
- Lead Clinical Research Therapy Radiographer (Trials), NICTN, EAST PODIUM C-FLOOR, Belfast City Hospital, 51 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB, UK.
| | - T Flood
- Lecturer in Radiotherapy and Oncology, Ulster University, Derry∼Londonderry Campus, Northland Rd, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferguson JE, Hagel Campbell E, Bangerter A, Cross LJS, Allen KD, Behrens K, Branson M, Calvert C, Friedman JK, Hennessy S, Meis LA, Taylor BC, Burgess DJ. Email recruitment for chronic pain clinical trials: results from the LAMP trial. Trials 2024; 25:491. [PMID: 39030622 PMCID: PMC11264665 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08301-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment for clinical trials and large-scale studies is challenging, especially for patients with complex conditions like chronic pain. Email recruitment has the potential to increase efficiency, to reduce costs, and to improve access for underrepresented patient populations. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness, efficiency, and equitability of email versus postal mail recruitment for the Learning to Apply Mindfulness to Pain (LAMP) study, a three-site clinical trial of mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain. METHODS Patients with chronic pain diagnoses were recruited from three United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities using the VA electronic health record (EHR). Recruitment materials were sent using either postal mail (n = 7986) or email (n = 19,333). Patients in the email recruitment group were also mailed introductory postcards before any emails. Mailing addresses and email addresses were obtained from the EHR. Effectiveness was measured by the response rate of patients who logged into the secure LAMP study website. Efficiency was measured by the number of days from when the recruitment materials were sent to when patients logged into the LAMP portal as well as the estimated costs of each recruitment approach. To assess equitability, we examined whether email recruitment was less effective for underrepresented populations, based on demographic information from the EHR. RESULTS Effectiveness-unadjusted response rates were greater for email versus postal-mail recruitment (18.9% versus 6.3%), and adjusted response rates were over three times greater for email recruitment (RR = 3.5, 95% CI 3.1-3.8) based on a multivariable analysis controlling for age, gender, race, ethnicity, rurality, and site. Efficiency-email recruitment had a significantly lower mean response time (1 day versus 8 days) and a lower cost. Equity-email recruitment led to higher response rates for all subpopulations, including older, non-White, Hispanic, rural, and female Veterans. CONCLUSIONS Email recruitment is an effective, efficient, and equitable way to recruit VA patients to large-scale, chronic pain clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04526158. Patient enrollment began on December 4, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John E Ferguson
- Divisions of PM&R and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Emily Hagel Campbell
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Ann Bangerter
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Lee J S Cross
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
| | - Kelli D Allen
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kimberly Behrens
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Mariah Branson
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Collin Calvert
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jessica K Friedman
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sierra Hennessy
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
| | - Laura A Meis
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Women's Health Sciences Division, Veterans Affairs, MA, Boston, USA
| | - Brent C Taylor
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Diana J Burgess
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ryan EG, Gao CX, Grantham KL, Thao LTP, Charles-Nelson A, Bowden R, Herschtal A, Lee KJ, Forbes AB, Heritier S, Phillipou A, Wolfe R. Advancing randomized controlled trial methodologies: The place of innovative trial design in eating disorders research. Int J Eat Disord 2024; 57:1337-1349. [PMID: 38469971 DOI: 10.1002/eat.24187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials can be used to generate evidence on the efficacy and safety of new treatments in eating disorders research. Many of the trials previously conducted in this area have been deemed to be of low quality, in part due to a number of practical constraints. This article provides an overview of established and more innovative clinical trial designs, accompanied by pertinent examples, to highlight how design choices can enhance flexibility and improve efficiency of both resource allocation and participant involvement. Trial designs include individually randomized, cluster randomized, and designs with randomizations at multiple time points and/or addressing several research questions (master protocol studies). Design features include the use of adaptations and considerations for pragmatic or registry-based trials. The appropriate choice of trial design, together with rigorous trial conduct, reporting and analysis, can establish high-quality evidence to advance knowledge in the field. It is anticipated that this article will provide a broad and contemporary introduction to trial designs and will help researchers make informed trial design choices for improved testing of new interventions in eating disorders. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: There is a paucity of high quality randomized controlled trials that have been conducted in eating disorders, highlighting the need to identify where efficiency gains in trial design may be possible to advance the eating disorder research field. We provide an overview of some key trial designs and features which may offer solutions to practical constraints and increase trial efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth G Ryan
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Caroline X Gao
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Orygen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kelsey L Grantham
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Le Thi Phuong Thao
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anaïs Charles-Nelson
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rhys Bowden
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alan Herschtal
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katherine J Lee
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew B Forbes
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephane Heritier
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrea Phillipou
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Orygen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Mental Health, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rory Wolfe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Halewijn KF, Bohnen AM, Pasmans SGMA, Bindels PJE, Elshout G. Reasons for unsuccessful recruitment of children with atopic dermatitis in primary care in the Netherlands to a cohort study with an embedded pragmatic, randomised controlled open-label trial: a survey. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078942. [PMID: 38754875 PMCID: PMC11097857 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Rotterdam Eczema Study was an observational cohort study with an embedded pragmatic randomised controlled open-label trial. It was conducted in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) in the Dutch primary care system. The objective of the trial was to determine whether a potent topical corticosteroid (TCS) is more effective than a low-potency TCS. OBJECTIVE We are aiming to communicate transparently about the poor recruitment for the trial part and to explore the reasons why recruitment was weak. DESIGN We used a survey to find out what patients in the cohort did when they experienced a flare-up. METHODS Descriptive statistics were used to present the baseline characteristics of participants in the trial and the results of the survey. RESULTS In total, 367 patients were included in the cohort. Of these, 32 were randomly assigned to a trial treatment; they had a median age of 4.0 years (IQR 2.0-9.8). A total of 69 of the 86 children (80.2%) who could participate in the survey responded. 39 (56.5%) suffered a flare-up during the follow-up (making them potentially eligible for inclusion in the trial). 26 out of 39 (66.7%) increased their use of an emollient and/or TCS themselves. Only 12 of the 39 (30.7%) contacted their general practitioner (GP) as instructed in the study protocol, but 8 out of these 12 did not meet the inclusion criteria for the trial. CONCLUSION The main reason why cohort participants did not take part in the trial was that they did not contact their GPs when they experienced an AD flare-up. Furthermore, the majority of patients who contacted their GPs did not match the inclusion criteria of the trial. We expect that the lessons learnt from this study will be useful when developing future studies of children with AD in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlijn F van Halewijn
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur M Bohnen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne G M A Pasmans
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick J E Bindels
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs Elshout
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baillot A, Asselin M, Bernard P, Lapointe J, Bond DS, Romain AJ, Garneau PY, Biertho L, Tchernof A, Blackburn P, Langlois MF, Brunet J. Acceptability and Feasibility of the Telehealth Bariatric Behavioral Intervention to Increase Physical Activity Before Bariatric Surgery: A Single-Case Experimental Study (Part I). Obes Surg 2024; 34:1639-1652. [PMID: 38483742 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07161-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity (PA) can play an important role in optimizing metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) outcomes. However, many MBS patients have difficulty increasing PA, necessitating the development of theory-driven counseling interventions. This study aimed to (1) assess the feasibility and acceptability of the TELEhealth BARIatric behavioral intervention (TELE-BariACTIV) trial protocol/methods and intervention, which was designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) in adults awaiting MBS and (2) estimate the effect of the intervention on MVPA. METHODS This trial used a repeated single-case experimental design. Twelve insufficiently active adults awaiting MBS received 6 weekly 45-min PA videoconferencing counseling sessions. Feasibility and acceptability data (i.e., refusal, recruitment, retention, attendance, and attrition rates) were tracked and collected via online surveys, and interviews. MVPA was assessed via accelerometry pre-, during, and post-intervention. RESULTS Among the 24 patients referred to the research team; five declined to participate (refusal rate = 20.8%) and seven were ineligible or unreachable. The recruitment rate was 1.2 participants per month between 2021-09 and 2022-07. One participant withdrew during the baseline phase, and one after the intervention (retention rate = 83.3%). No participant dropouts occurred during the intervention and 98.6% of sessions were completed. Participants' anticipated and retrospective acceptability of the intervention was 3.2/4 (IQR, 0.5) and 3.0/4 (IQR, 0.2), respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in MVPA [Tau-U = 0.32(0.11; 0.51)] from pre- to post-intervention. CONCLUSION Despite a low recruitment rate, which could be explained by circumstances (COVID-19 pandemic), results support feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the TELE-Bari-ACTIV intervention for increasing MVPA in patients awaiting MBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Baillot
- École Interdisciplinaire de Santé, Université du Québec en Outaouais, 283 Boul. Alexandre-Taché, Gatineau, Québec, J8X 3X7, Canada.
- Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- Centre de Recherche en Médecine Psychosociale, Centre Intégré de Santé et Services, Sociaux de L'Outaouais, Gatineau, Québec, Canada.
| | | | - Paquito Bernard
- Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Université du Québec À Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Josyanne Lapointe
- Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Université du Québec À Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Dale S Bond
- Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital/HealthCare, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Ahmed Jérôme Romain
- Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- School of Kinesiology and Physical Activity Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pierre Y Garneau
- Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Laurent Biertho
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec et Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - André Tchernof
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec et École de Nutrition, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Patricia Blackburn
- Division of Kinesiology, Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec À Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie-France Langlois
- CHUS Research Center and Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Jennifer Brunet
- Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Cancer Therapeutic Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Michaels M, Weiss ES, Sae‐Hau M, Illei D, Lilly B, Szumita L, Connell B, Lee M, Cooks E, McPheeters M. Strategies for increasing accrual in cancer clinical trials: What is the evidence? Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7298. [PMID: 38770644 PMCID: PMC11106681 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the importance of clinical trial participation among cancer patients, few participate-and even fewer patients from ethnic and racial minoritized groups. It is unclear whether suggested approaches to increase accrual are successful. We conducted a scoping review to identify evidence-based approaches to increase participation in cancer treatment clinical trials that demonstrated clear increases in accrual. Notably, more stringent than other published reviews, only those studies with comparison data to measure a difference in accrual rates were included. METHODS We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science for English-language articles published from January 1, 2012, to August 8, 2022. Studies were included if they were conducted in the United States, described single or multicomponent interventions, and provided data to measure accrual relative to baseline levels or that compared accrual rates with other interventions. RESULTS Sixteen articles were included: six with interventions addressing patient barriers, two addressing provider barriers, seven describing institutional change, and one describing policy change. Key themes emerged, such as a focus on patient education, cultural competency, and building the capacity of clinics. Few studies provide comparative accrual data, making it difficult to identify with certainty any effective, evidence-based approaches for increasing accrual. Some patient- and system-level interventions studies showed modest increases in accrual primarily through pre-post measurement. CONCLUSION Despite an extensive body of literature about the barriers that impede cancer treatment trial accrual, along with numerous recommendations for how to overcome these barriers, results reveal surprisingly little evidence published in the last 10 years on interventions that increase accrual relative to baseline levels or compared with other interventions. As clinical trials are a primary vehicle through which we improve cancer care, it is critical that evidence-based approaches are used to inform all efforts to increase accrual. Strategies for increasing participation in cancer clinical trials must be developed and rigorously evaluated so that these strategies can be disseminated, participation in trials can increase and become more equitable, and trial results can become more generalizable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margo Michaels
- Health Access and Action ConsultingNewtonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | - Dora Illei
- RTI InternationalResearch Triangle ParkNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Leah Szumita
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma SocietyNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | | | - Eric Cooks
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma SocietyNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Foucher J, Azizi L, Öijerstedt L, Kläppe U, Ingre C. The usage of population and disease registries as pre-screening tools for clinical trials, a systematic review. Syst Rev 2024; 13:111. [PMID: 38654383 PMCID: PMC11040983 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02533-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to outline the use of population and disease registries for clinical trial pre-screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS The search was conducted in the time period of January 2014 to December 2022 in three databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection. References were screened using the Rayyan software, firstly based on titles and abstracts only, and secondly through full text review. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the List of Included Studies and quality Assurance in Review tool, enabling inclusion of publications of only moderate to high quality. RESULTS The search originally identified 1430 citations, but only 24 studies were included, reporting the use of population and/or disease registries for trial pre-screening. Nine disease domains were represented, with 54% of studies using registries based in the USA, and 62.5% of the studies using national registries. Half of the studies reported usage for drug trials, and over 478,679 patients were identified through registries in this review. Main advantages of the pre-screening methodology were reduced financial burden and time reduction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The use of registries for trial pre-screening increases reproducibility of the pre-screening process across trials and sites, allowing for implementation and improvement of a quality assurance process. Pre-screening strategies seem under-reported, and we encourage more trials to use and describe their pre-screening processes, as there is a need for standardized methodological guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Foucher
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Louisa Azizi
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linn Öijerstedt
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulf Kläppe
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Caroline Ingre
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hudek N, Carroll K, Semchishen S, Vanderhout S, Presseau J, Grimshaw J, Fergusson DA, Gillies K, Graham ID, Taljaard M, Brehaut JC. Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR reporting checklist: a systematic methodology review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2024; 24:85. [PMID: 38589803 PMCID: PMC11000410 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02195-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruiting participants to clinical trials is an ongoing challenge, and relatively little is known about what recruitment strategies lead to better recruitment. Recruitment interventions can be considered complex interventions, often involving multiple components, targeting a variety of groups, and tailoring to different groups. We used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) reporting checklist (which comprises 12 items recommended for reporting complex interventions) to guide the assessment of how recruitment interventions are described. We aimed to (1) examine to what extent we could identify information about each TIDieR item within recruitment intervention studies, and (2) observe additional detail for each item to describe useful variation among these studies. METHODS We identified randomized, nested recruitment intervention studies providing recruitment or willingness to participate rates from two sources: a Cochrane review of trials evaluating strategies to improve recruitment to randomized trials, and the Online Resource for Research in Clinical triAls database. First, we assessed to what extent authors reported information about each TIDieR item. Second, we developed descriptive categorical variables for 7 TIDieR items and extracting relevant quotes for the other 5 items. RESULTS We assessed 122 recruitment intervention studies. We were able to extract information relevant to most TIDieR items (e.g., brief rationale, materials, procedure) with the exception of a few items that were only rarely reported (e.g., tailoring, modifications, planned/actual fidelity). The descriptive variables provided a useful overview of study characteristics, with most studies using various forms of informational interventions (55%) delivered at a single time point (90%), often by a member of the research team (59%) in a clinical care setting (41%). CONCLUSIONS Our TIDieR-based variables provide a useful description of the core elements of complex trial recruitment interventions. Recruitment intervention studies report core elements of complex interventions variably; some process elements (e.g., mode of delivery, location) are almost always described, while others (e.g., duration, fidelity) are reported infrequently, with little indication of a reason for their absence. Future research should explore whether these TIDieR-based variables can form the basis of an approach to better reporting of elements of successful recruitment interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Hudek
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Kelly Carroll
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Seana Semchishen
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Shelley Vanderhout
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Justin Presseau
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Ian D Graham
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Jamie C Brehaut
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anastasi JK, Capili B, Norton M, McMahon DJ, Marder K. Recruitment and retention of clinical trial participants: understanding motivations of patients with chronic pain and other populations. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2024; 4:1330937. [PMID: 38606348 PMCID: PMC11006977 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1330937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to present and discuss the issues, challenges, and strategies related to recruitment and retention in clinical trials involving participants with chronic pain. The randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) is widely regarded as the gold standard for evaluating clinical interventions. However, it is crucial to acknowledge and address the challenges associated with recruiting and retaining participants. To prioritize the experience of the study population, targeted outreach strategies and a patient-centric approach are necessary. Researchers should consider incorporating recruitment and retention strategies during the study design phase. Implementing multi-pronged recruitment methods, leveraging relationships with community providers, and involving representatives of the patient population are helpful approaches. Effective communication and maintaining a professional environment are vital for optimizing engagement and supporting the successful execution of clinical trials involving participants with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce K. Anastasi
- Division of Special Studies in Symptom Management, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bernadette Capili
- Heilbrunn Family Center for Research Nursing, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Margaret Norton
- Division of Special Studies in Symptom Management, New York University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Nursing, St. Joseph's University, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| | - Donald J. McMahon
- Division of Special Studies in Symptom Management, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Karen Marder
- Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang Y, Yang S, Han Y, Zou G, Wang R, Liu L. Quality reporting of randomized controlled trials on SGLT2 inhibitors for heart failure: a comprehensive assessment. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6819. [PMID: 38514865 PMCID: PMC10958037 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57514-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide clinicians with the best evidence of the effectiveness of an intervention, and complete and transparent trial reports help to critically assess and use trial results. The objective of our study was to assess the quality of reporting in RCTs of sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for heart failure (HF) and identify factors associated with improved reporting quality. Two researchers conducted a comprehensive search in four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane). The quality of each report was assessed using a 25-point Overall Quality Score (OQS) based on the guidelines provided in the 2010 Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement. We included a total of 58 relevant RCTs. The median OQS in the 2010 CONSORT statement was 15 (range 7.5-24). The missing items were primarily found in the 'Methods' and 'Results' sections of the 2010 CONSORT statement. Multivariate regression modeling revealed that a more recent publication year, high impact factor, and large sample size were significant predictors of OQS improvement. The findings suggest that the overall quality of reported RCTs of SGLT2 inhibitors in HF is unsatisfactory, which reduces their potential usefulness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YueGuang Yang
- Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, People's Republic of China
| | - ShunWen Yang
- Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, People's Republic of China
| | - YuBo Han
- The First Department of Cardiovascular, First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, People's Republic of China
| | - GuoLiang Zou
- The First Department of Cardiovascular, First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, People's Republic of China
| | - RuiNan Wang
- The First Department of Cardiovascular, First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Liu
- The First Department of Cardiovascular, First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baysari MT, Van Dort BA, Stanceski K, Hargreaves A, Zheng WY, Moran M, Day RO, Li L, Westbrook J, Hilmer SN. Qualitative study of challenges with recruitment of hospitals into a cluster controlled trial of clinical decision support in Australia. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080610. [PMID: 38479736 PMCID: PMC10936458 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify barriers to hospital participation in controlled cluster trials of clinical decision support (CDS) and potential strategies for addressing barriers. DESIGN Qualitative descriptive design comprising semistructured interviews. SETTING Five hospitals in New South Wales and one hospital in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS Senior hospital staff, including department directors, chief information officers and those working in health informatics teams. RESULTS 20 senior hospital staff took part. Barriers to hospital-level recruitment primarily related to perceptions of risk associated with not implementing CDS as a control site. Perceived risks included reductions in patient safety, reputational risk and increased likelihood that benefits would not be achieved following electronic medical record (EMR) implementation without CDS alerts in place. Senior staff recommended clear communication of trial information to all relevant stakeholders as a key strategy for boosting hospital-level participation in trials. CONCLUSION Hospital participation in controlled cluster trials of CDS is hindered by perceptions that adopting an EMR without CDS is risky for both patients and organisations. The improvements in safety expected to follow CDS implementation makes it challenging and counterintuitive for hospitals to implement EMR without incorporating CDS alerts for the purposes of a research trial. To counteract these barriers, clear communication regarding the evidence base and rationale for a controlled trial is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa T Baysari
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bethany Annemarie Van Dort
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristian Stanceski
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Wu Yi Zheng
- Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maria Moran
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard O Day
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical Campus, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ling Li
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Johanna Westbrook
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah N Hilmer
- Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Arundel CE, Clark LK, Parker A, Beard D, Coleman E, Cooper C, Devane D, Eldridge S, Galvin S, Gillies K, Hewitt CE, Sutton C, Torgerson DJ, Treweek S. Trial Forge Guidance 4: a guideline for reporting the results of randomised Studies Within A Trial (SWATs). Trials 2024; 25:183. [PMID: 38475795 PMCID: PMC10935912 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08004-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence to support decisions on trial processes is minimal. One way to generate this evidence is to use a Study Within A Trial (SWAT) to test trial processes or explore methodological uncertainties. SWAT evidence relies on replication to ensure sufficient power and broad applicability of findings. Prompt reporting is therefore essential; however, SWAT publications are often the first to be abandoned in the face of other time pressures. Reporting guidance for embedded methodology trials does exist but is not widely used. We sought therefore to build on these guidelines to develop a straightforward, concise reporting standard, which remains adherent to the CONSORT guideline. METHODS An iterative process was used to develop the guideline. This included initial meetings with key stakeholders, development of an initial guideline, pilot testing of draft guidelines, further iteration and pilot testing, and finalisation of the guideline. RESULTS We developed a reporting guideline applicable to randomised SWATs, including replications of previous evaluations. The guideline follows the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement and provides example text to ensure ease and clarity of reporting across all domains. CONCLUSIONS The SWAT reporting guideline will aid authors, reviewers, and journal editors to produce and review clear, structured reports of randomised SWATs, whilst also adhering to the CONSORT guideline. TRIAL REGISTRATION EQUATOR Network - Guidelines Under Development ( https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-clinical-trials/#SWAT ). Registered on 25 March 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Arundel
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - L K Clark
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - A Parker
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - D Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - E Coleman
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - C Cooper
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - D Devane
- HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - S Eldridge
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - S Galvin
- HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - K Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - C E Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - C Sutton
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D J Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - S Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kolls BJ, Muir KW, Savitz SI, Wechsler LR, Pilitsis JG, Rahimi S, Beckman RL, Holmes V, Chen PR, Albers DS, Laskowitz DT. Experience with a hybrid recruitment approach of patient-facing web portal screening and subsequent phone and medical record review for a neurosurgical intervention trial for chronic ischemic stroke disability (PISCES III). Trials 2024; 25:150. [PMID: 38419030 PMCID: PMC10900735 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07988-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment of participants is the greatest risk to completion of most clinical trials, with 20-40% of trials failing to reach the targeted enrollment. This is particularly true of trials of central nervous system (CNS) therapies such as intervention for chronic stroke. The PISCES III trial was an invasive trial of stereotactically guided intracerebral injection of CTX0E03, a fetal derived neural stem cell line, in patients with chronic disability due to ischemic stroke. We report on the experience using a novel hybrid recruitment approach of a patient-facing portal to self-identify and perform an initial screen for general trial eligibility (tier 1), followed by phone screening and medical records review (tier 2) prior to a final in-person visit to confirm eligibility and consent. METHODS Two tiers of screening were established: an initial screen of general eligibility using a patient-facing web portal (tier 1), followed by a more detailed screen that included phone survey and medical record review (tier 2). If potential participants passed the tier 2 screen, they were referred directly to visit 1 at a study site, where final in-person screening and consent were performed. Rates of screening were tracked during the period of trial recruitment and sources of referrals were noted. RESULTS The approach to screening and recruitment resulted in 6125 tier 1 screens, leading to 1121 referrals to tier 2. The tier 2 screening resulted in 224 medical record requests and identification of 86 qualifying participants for referral to sites. The study attained a viable recruitment rate of 6 enrolled per month prior to being disrupted by COVID 19. CONCLUSIONS A tiered approach to eligibility screening using a hybrid of web-based portals to self-identify and screen for general eligibility followed by a more detailed phone and medical record review allowed the study to use fewer sites and reduce cost. Despite the difficult and narrow population of patients suffering moderate chronic disability from stroke, this strategy produced a viable recruitment rate for this invasive study of intracranially injected neural stem cells. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03629275.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad J Kolls
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Box 2900 Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Keith W Muir
- School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Sean I Savitz
- Institute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lawrence R Wechsler
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Scott Rahimi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Peng R Chen
- The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Daniel T Laskowitz
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Box 2900 Bryan Research Building, 311 Research Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wyatt TH, Li X, Fancher S, Samih Mitoubsi A, Pardue J. Recruitment Barriers of an mHealth Pediatric Asthma Pilot Study. West J Nurs Res 2024; 46:152-159. [PMID: 38112079 DOI: 10.1177/01939459231217919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Successful participant recruitment for pediatric studies can be challenging and even result in study discontinuation. In conducting a 2-year pilot study for a pediatric mobile health (mHealth) asthma intervention, a group of researchers experienced multiple barriers and failures in all 4 areas of recruitment: generating initial contacts, screening, consenting, and enrollment and retention. The main failures that resulted in minimal participant enrollment were poor participation, communication issues, and difficulties related to recruiting in an emergency department during a pandemic. The following is a report on this study's recruitment efforts, including preliminary and adapted strategies, the results of these strategies, and considerations for researchers who conduct studies with children. The research team concluded that frequent and clear communication, flexibility, and a willingness to alter initial recruitment plans are essential elements for recruitment success in pediatric studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tami H Wyatt
- College of Nursing, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Xueping Li
- Department of Industrial Systems and Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Blasini R, Strantz C, Gulden C, Helfer S, Lidke J, Prokosch HU, Sohrabi K, Schneider H. Evaluation of Eligibility Criteria Relevance for the Purpose of IT-Supported Trial Recruitment: Descriptive Quantitative Analysis. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e49347. [PMID: 38294862 PMCID: PMC10867759 DOI: 10.2196/49347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials (CTs) are crucial for medical research; however, they frequently fall short of the requisite number of participants who meet all eligibility criteria (EC). A clinical trial recruitment support system (CTRSS) is developed to help identify potential participants by performing a search on a specific data pool. The accuracy of the search results is directly related to the quality of the data used for comparison. Data accessibility can present challenges, making it crucial to identify the necessary data for a CTRSS to query. Prior research has examined the data elements frequently used in CT EC but has not evaluated which criteria are actually used to search for participants. Although all EC must be met to enroll a person in a CT, not all criteria have the same importance when searching for potential participants in an existing data pool, such as an electronic health record, because some of the criteria are only relevant at the time of enrollment. OBJECTIVE In this study, we investigated which groups of data elements are relevant in practice for finding suitable participants and whether there are typical elements that are not relevant and can therefore be omitted. METHODS We asked trial experts and CTRSS developers to first categorize the EC of their CTs according to data element groups and then to classify them into 1 of 3 categories: necessary, complementary, and irrelevant. In addition, the experts assessed whether a criterion was documented (on paper or digitally) or whether it was information known only to the treating physicians or patients. RESULTS We reviewed 82 CTs with 1132 unique EC. Of these 1132 EC, 350 (30.9%) were considered necessary, 224 (19.8%) complementary, and 341 (30.1%) total irrelevant. To identify the most relevant data elements, we introduced the data element relevance index (DERI). This describes the percentage of studies in which the corresponding data element occurs and is also classified as necessary or supplementary. We found that the query of "diagnosis" was relevant for finding participants in 79 (96.3%) of the CTs. This group was followed by "date of birth/age" with a DERI of 85.4% (n=70) and "procedure" with a DERI of 35.4% (n=29). CONCLUSIONS The distribution of data element groups in CTs has been heterogeneously described in previous works. Therefore, we recommend identifying the percentage of CTs in which data element groups can be found as a more reliable way to determine the relevance of EC. Only necessary and complementary criteria should be included in this DERI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romina Blasini
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Cosima Strantz
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Gulden
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sven Helfer
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jakub Lidke
- Data Integration Center, Medical Faculty, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Keywan Sohrabi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany
| | - Henning Schneider
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liang JE, Liang MY, Zhang EE, Peng YY, Chen LL, Deng JY, Lin T, Fu J, Zhang JN, Li SL, Li F, Xiao HM, Huang WM, Liu YH. Factors influencing willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials and strategies for effective recruitment. Int J Ophthalmol 2024; 17:157-163. [PMID: 38239943 PMCID: PMC10754671 DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.01.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To explore the factors influencing individuals' willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials. METHODS A questionnaire survey was conducted from January to April 2021 among patients and their family members at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, in Guangzhou, China. The survey gathered data on respondents' willingness, demographic and socioeconomic profiles, as well as their reasons and concerns regarding engagement in clinical trials. RESULTS Of the 1078 residents surveyed (mean age 31.2±13.1y; 65.8% females) in Guangzhou, 749 (69.5%) expressed a willingness to participate in future ophthalmic clinical trials. Specific characteristics associated with greater willingness included a younger age, lower annual income, higher education, prior participation experience, previous ophthalmic treatment, and a better understanding of clinical trials. With the exception of age, these characteristics were significantly linked to a higher willingness. The primary barrier to participation, expressed by 64.8% of those willing and 54.4% of those unwilling, was "Uncertain efficacy". In terms of motivations, the willing group ranked "Better therapeutic benefits" (35.0%), "Professional monitoring" (34.3%), and "Trust in healthcare professionals" (33.1%) as their top three reasons, whereas the unwilling participants indicated "Full comprehension of the protocol" (46.2%) as the key facilitator. CONCLUSION This study reveals a substantial willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials and demonstrates the predictive role of demographic and socioeconomic factors. Variations in motivators and concerns between willing and unwilling participants highlight the significance of tailored recruitment strategies. Importantly, the need for and trust in healthcare professionals stand out as powerful motivations, underscoring the importance of enhancing physician-patient relationships, adopting patient-centered communication approaches, and addressing individualized needs to improve accrual rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-En Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Meng-Yin Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - En-En Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yu-Ying Peng
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ling-Ling Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia-Yu Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ting Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jun Fu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia-Ni Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shao-Li Li
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Fei Li
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hui-Ming Xiao
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Wen-Min Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yu-Hong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pollock KG, Dickerson C, Kainth M, Lawton S, Hurst M, Sugrue DM, Arden C, Davies DW, Martin AC, Sandler B, Gordon J, Farooqui U, Clifton D, Mallen C, Rogers J, Hill NR, Camm AJ, Cohen AT. Undertaking multi-centre randomised controlled trials in primary care: learnings and recommendations from the PULsE-AI trial researchers. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:7. [PMID: 38166641 PMCID: PMC10759575 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02246-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conducting effective and translational research can be challenging and few trials undertake formal reflection exercises and disseminate learnings from them. Following completion of our multicentre randomised controlled trial, which was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, we sought to reflect on our experiences and share our thoughts on challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations for researchers undertaking or considering research in primary care. METHODS Researchers involved in the Prediction of Undiagnosed atriaL fibrillation using a machinE learning AlgorIthm (PULsE-AI) trial, conducted in England from June 2019 to February 2021 were invited to participate in a qualitative reflection exercise. Members of the Trial Steering Committee (TSC) were invited to attend a semi-structured focus group session, Principal Investigators and their research teams at practices involved in the trial were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview. Following transcription, reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken based on pre-specified themes of recruitment, challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations that formed the structure of the focus group/interview sessions, whilst also allowing the exploration of new themes that emerged from the data. RESULTS Eight of 14 members of the TSC, and one of six practices involved in the trial participated in the reflection exercise. Recruitment was highlighted as a major challenge encountered by trial researchers, even prior to disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers also commented on themes such as the need to consider incentivisation, and challenges associated with using technology in trials, especially in older age groups. CONCLUSIONS Undertaking a formal reflection exercise following the completion of the PULsE-AI trial enabled us to review experiences encountered whilst undertaking a prospective randomised trial in primary care. In sharing our learnings, we hope to support other clinicians undertaking research in primary care to ensure that future trials are of optimal value for furthering knowledge, streamlining pathways, and benefitting patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sarah Lawton
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Michael Hurst
- Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Ltd, Uxbridge, UK
| | | | - Chris Arden
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Anne-Céline Martin
- Service de Cardiologie, Université de Paris, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, INSERM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, Paris, France
| | | | - Jason Gordon
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK.
| | | | - David Clifton
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Nathan R Hill
- Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Ltd, Uxbridge, UK
| | - A John Camm
- Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, Molecular & Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Alexander T Cohen
- Department of Haematological Medicine, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hirt J, Beer T, Cavalli S, Cereghetti S, Pusterla ERG, Zeller A. Recruiting Persons With Dementia: A Systematic Review of Facilitators, Barriers, and Strategies. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2024; 39:15333175241276443. [PMID: 39137907 PMCID: PMC11322929 DOI: 10.1177/15333175241276443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
Study recruitment of persons with dementia is challenging. We aimed to assess facilitators, barriers, and strategies to identify and approach persons with dementia for recruitment to dementia care studies. We systematically searched MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and other sources (ORRCA [Online Resource for Research in Clinical triAls]; pertinent evidence syntheses; citation searching) and narratively summarised the results (PROSPERO CRD42022342600). Facilitators and barriers consisted of "characteristics of participants, researchers, clinical contact persons", "study characteristics", and "communication with participants". The highest number of participants were recruited by study information in electronic and print formats, as well as by networking and collaboration. Advertisements proved to be the most expensive way of recruitment. There is limited evidence on the impact of recruitment strategies to identify persons with dementia for recruitment to dementia care studies. Our analysis of facilitators and barriers may inform research teams in designing strategies to identify persons with dementia for recruitment purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Hirt
- Department of Health, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St.Gallen, Switzerland
- Pragmatic Evidence Lab, Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Beer
- Department of Health, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Cavalli
- Centre of Competence on Ageing, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Cereghetti
- Centre of Competence on Ageing, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - Elia R. G. Pusterla
- Centre of Competence on Ageing, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - Adelheid Zeller
- Department of Health, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brunet J, Price J, Baillot A, Dann E, Vani MF. Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6278. [PMID: 38282235 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question. METHODS Articles were identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed publication in English from 2000 onward with accessible full-text, (2) reported data on the feasibility and/or acceptability of psychosocial interventions and/or study methods, (3) included at least one measure of body image or reported a body-related theme, and (4) sample comprised women diagnosed with breast cancer. All study designs were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. RESULTS Sixty-two articles were included. Participants and comparator groups varied as did interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and study methods were inconsistently operationalized and reported across studies. Evidence of feasibility and acceptability was heterogeneous within and across studies, though mostly positive. CONCLUSION Published psychosocial interventions for body image and study methods are generally feasible and acceptable. Findings should be used to advance the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions designed to improve outcomes (body image or otherwise) for women diagnosed with breast cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42021269062, 11 September 2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Brunet
- School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Cancer Therapeutic Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Institut du Savoir Montfort, Hôpital Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenson Price
- School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aurélie Baillot
- Institut du Savoir Montfort, Hôpital Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Département des Sciences Infirmières, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche en Médecine Psychosociale, Gatineau, Québec, Canada
| | - Erica Dann
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Madison F Vani
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
McCarthy C, Pericin I, Smith SM, Moriarty F, Clyne B. Recruiting general practitioners and older patients with multimorbidity to randomized trials. Fam Pract 2023; 40:810-819. [PMID: 37014975 PMCID: PMC10745264 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmad039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients with multimorbidity are under-represented in experimental research. OBJECTIVE To explore the barriers and facilitators to general practitioner (GP) and older patient recruitment and retention in a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHOD This descriptive study uses qualitative and quantitative data from a cluster RCT, designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a medicines optimization intervention. The SPPiRE cluster RCT enrolled 51 general practices and 404 patients aged ≥65 years and prescribed ≥15 medicines. Quantitative data were collected from all recruited practices and 32 additional practices who were enrolled, but unable to recruit sufficient participants. Qualitative data were collected from purposive samples of intervention GPs (18/26), patients (27/208), and researcher logs and analysed thematically using inductive coding. RESULTS Enrolment rates for practices and patients were 37% and 25%, respectively. Barriers to GP recruitment were lack of resources and to patient recruitment were difficulty understanding trial material and concern about medicines being taken away. GPs' primary motivation was perceived importance of the research question, whereas patients' primary motivation was trust in their GP. All general practices were retained. Thirty-five patients (8.6%) were lost to follow-up for primary outcomes, mainly because they had died and 45% did not return patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). CONCLUSION Patient retention for the primary outcome was high, as it was collected directly from patient records. Patient completion of PROM data was poor, reflecting difficulty in understanding trial material. Recruiting older patients with multimorbidity to clinical trials is possible but requires significant resource and planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN12752680.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline McCarthy
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Ivana Pericin
- School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Susan M Smith
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Frank Moriarty
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Barbara Clyne
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mahmud FH, Clarke ABM, Elia Y, Curtis J, Benitez-Aguirre P, Cameron FJ, Chiesa ST, Clarson C, Couper JJ, Craig ME, Dalton RN, Daneman D, Davis EA, Deanfield JE, Donaghue KC, Jones TW, Marshall SM, Neil A, Marcovecchio ML. Socioeconomic representativeness of Australian, Canadian and British cohorts from the paediatric diabetes AdDIT study: comparisons to regional and national data. BMC Med 2023; 21:506. [PMID: 38124088 PMCID: PMC10734126 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03222-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given limited data regarding the involvement of disadvantaged groups in paediatric diabetes clinical trials, this study aimed to evaluate the socioeconomic representativeness of participants recruited into a multinational clinical trial in relation to regional and national type 1 diabetes reference populations. METHODS Retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of a subset of adolescent type 1 diabetes cardiorenal intervention trial (AdDIT) participants from Australia (n = 144), Canada (n = 312) and the UK (n = 173). Validated national measures of deprivation were used: the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage (IRSD) 2016 (Australia), the Material Resources (MR) dimension of the Canadian Marginalisation index 2016 (Canada) and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2015 (UK). Representativeness was assessed by comparing the AdDIT cohort's distribution of deprivation quintiles with that of the local paediatric type 1 diabetes population (regional), and the broader type 1 diabetes population for which the trial's intervention was targeted (national). RESULTS Recruited study cohorts from each country had higher proportions of participants with higher SES, and significant underrepresentation of lower SES, in relation to their national references. The socioeconomic make-up in Australia mirrored that of the regional population (p = 0.99). For Canada, the 2nd least deprived (p = 0.001) and the most deprived quintiles (p < 0.001) were over- and under-represented relative to the regional reference, while the UK featured higher regional and national SES bias with over-representation and under-representation from the least-deprived and most-deprived quintiles (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Significant national differences in trial participation of low SES participants were observed, highlighting limitations in access to clinical research and the importance of reporting sociodemographic representation in diabetes clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01581476. Registered on 20 April 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farid H Mahmud
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, RM 5446 Black Wing, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
| | - Antoine B M Clarke
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, RM 5446 Black Wing, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Yesmino Elia
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, RM 5446 Black Wing, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Curtis
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, RM 5446 Black Wing, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Paul Benitez-Aguirre
- Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fergus J Cameron
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Scott T Chiesa
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jennifer J Couper
- Departments of Endocrinology and Diabetes and Medical Imaging, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Maria E Craig
- Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics & Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Neil Dalton
- Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Denis Daneman
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, RM 5446 Black Wing, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Elizabeth A Davis
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - John E Deanfield
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kim C Donaghue
- Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Timothy W Jones
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Sally M Marshall
- Faculty of Clinical Medical Sciences, Diabetes Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, 4Th Floor William Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Neil
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chapman R, Zeissler ML, Meinert E, Mullin S, Whipps S, Whipps J, Hockey K, Hockey P, Carroll CB. Incorporating usability evaluation into iterative development of an online platform to support research participation in Parkinson's disease: a mixed methods protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e078638. [PMID: 38114283 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many people with Parkinson's (PwP) are not given the opportunity or do not have adequate access to participate in clinical research. To address this, we have codeveloped with users an online platform that connects PwP to clinical studies in their local area. It enables site staff to communicate with potential participants and aims to increase the participation of the Parkinson's community in research. This protocol outlines the mixed methods study protocol for the usability testing of the platform. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will seek user input to finalise the platform's design, which will then be deployed in a limited launch for beta testing. The beta version will be used as a recruitment tool for up to three studies with multiple UK sites. Usability data will be collected from the three intended user groups: PwP, care partners acting on their behalf and site study coordinators. Usability questionnaires and website analytics will be used to capture user experience quantitatively, and a purposive sample of users will be invited to provide further feedback via semistructured interviews. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics, and a thematic analysis undertaken for interview data. Data from this study will inform future platform iterations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Plymouth (3291; 3 May 2022). We will share our findings via a 'Latest News' section within the platform, presentations, conference meetings and national PwP networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Chapman
- Applied Parkinson's Research Group, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Marie-Louise Zeissler
- Applied Parkinson's Research Group, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Edward Meinert
- Centre for Health Technology, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Mullin
- Applied Parkinson's Research Group, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Sue Whipps
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Representative, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - John Whipps
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Representative, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Kate Hockey
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Representative, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Philip Hockey
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Representative, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Camille B Carroll
- Applied Parkinson's Research Group, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Karthic A, Orgil Z, Tram NK, Rice-Weimer J, Stevens J, Olbrecht VA. Application of behavioral economic strategies to enhance recruitment into a pediatric randomized clinical trial for postoperative pain relief: A randomized clinical trial. Paediatr Anaesth 2023; 33:1091-1098. [PMID: 37712489 DOI: 10.1111/pan.14755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A major challenge in conducting clinical trials is recruitment. Trial under-enrollment leads to underpowered studies. Behavioral economics offers strategies that may enhance trial recruitment. This study assessed the impact of behavioral economic strategies versus a standard biological approach to recruit children into a randomized clinical trial assessing a biofeedback-based virtual reality intervention for postoperative pain management. We hypothesized the behavioral economics-informed approach would increase enrollment into the future trial, intention to adhere to therapy, acceptability of the intervention, and perceived efficacy while decreasing perception of treatment burden and risk. METHODS This single-center, prospective, randomized trial recruited patients 12-18 years old undergoing surgery requiring postoperative admission and narcotic administration. Patient-parent dyads were randomized to watch a behavioral economics-informed (n = 64) or standard biological (n = 66) recruitment video about a study designed to assess impact of a virtual reality pain management intervention. RESULTS There was no difference in rates of intention to enroll in the study between groups (behavioral economics: 75%, control: 79%, p = 0.744) or in median response scores to questions regarding intention to adhere to therapy (4.0 [3.0, 4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0, 4.0], p=0.084), acceptability of therapy (4.0 [3.0, 4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0, 4.0], p = 0.376), perceptions of treatment burden (3.0 [3.0, 4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0, 4.0], p=0.251), and efficacy (3.0 [3.0, 4.0] vs. 3.0 [3.0, 4.0], p = 0.914). Patients in the behavioral economics group were less likely to perceive risk associated with virtual reality versus the control group (behavioral economics: 2.0 [1.0, 2.0], control: 2.0 [2.0, 3.0], p = 0.023). DISCUSSION A behavioral economics-informed video did not increase patients' intentions to enroll into a clinical trial assessing the impact of virtual reality intervention for postoperative pain management. CONCLUSION Either approach would be sufficient for patient recruitment for this type of clinical trial since the overall intention to enroll rate was 77%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anitra Karthic
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Zandantsetseg Orgil
- Department of Clinical Research Services, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Nguyen K Tram
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Julie Rice-Weimer
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jack Stevens
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Vanessa A Olbrecht
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Smith V, Delaney H, Hunter A, Torgerson D, Treweek S, Gamble C, Mills N, Stanbury K, Dempsey E, Daly M, O'Shea J, Weatherup K, Deshpande S, Ryan MA, Lowe J, Black G, Devane D. The development and acceptability of an educational and training intervention for recruiters to neonatal trials: the TRAIN project. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:265. [PMID: 37951890 PMCID: PMC10638723 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02086-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suboptimal or slow recruitment affects 30-50% of trials. Education and training of trial recruiters has been identified as one strategy for potentially boosting recruitment to randomised controlled trials (hereafter referred to as trials). The Training tRial recruiters, An educational INtervention (TRAIN) project was established to develop and assess the acceptability of an education and training intervention for recruiters to neonatal trials. In this paper, we report the development and acceptability of TRAIN. METHODS TRAIN involved three sequential phases, with each phase contributing information to the subsequent phase(s). These phases were 1) evidence synthesis (systematic review of the effectiveness of training interventions and a content analysis of the format, content, and delivery of identified interventions), 2) intervention development using a Partnership (co-design/co-creation) approach, and 3) intervention acceptability assessments with recruiters to neonatal trials. RESULTS TRAIN, accompanied by a comprehensive intervention manual, has been designed for online or in-person delivery. TRAIN can be offered to recruiters before trial recruitment begins or as refresher sessions during a trial. The intervention consists of five core learning outcomes which are addressed across three core training units. These units are the trial protocol (Unit 1, 50 min, trial-specific), understanding randomisation (Unit 2, 5 min, trial-generic) and approaching and engaging with parents (Unit 3, 70 min, trial-generic). Eleven recruiters to neonatal trials registered to attend the acceptability assessment training workshops, although only four took part. All four positively valued the training Units and resources for increasing recruiter preparedness, knowledge, and confidence. More flexibility in how the training is facilitated, however, was noted (e.g., training divided across two workshops of shorter duration). Units 2 and 3 were considered beneficial to incorporate into Good Clinical Practice Training or as part of induction training for new staff joining neonatal units. CONCLUSION TRAIN offers a comprehensive co-produced training and education intervention for recruiters to neonatal trials. TRAIN was deemed acceptable, with minor modification, to neonatal trial recruiters. The small number of recruiters taking part in the acceptability assessment is a limitation. Scale-up of TRAIN with formal piloting and testing for effectiveness in a large cluster randomised trial is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Smith
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network (HRB-TMRN), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - H Delaney
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network (HRB-TMRN), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - A Hunter
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network (HRB-TMRN), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - D Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - S Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, Trial Forge, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - C Gamble
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - N Mills
- QuinteT, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - K Stanbury
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - E Dempsey
- INFANT Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - M Daly
- Irish Neonatal Health Alliance, Public and Patient Involvement Contributor, Bray, Co-Wicklow, Ireland
| | - J O'Shea
- Public and Patient Involvement Contributor, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK
| | - K Weatherup
- Public and Patient Involvement Contributor, Oxford, UK
| | | | - M A Ryan
- INFANT Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - J Lowe
- Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - G Black
- Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| | - D Devane
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network (HRB-TMRN), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wang RR, Schweitzer JB, Hernandez S, Molina SC, Keegan TH. Strategies for recruitment and retention of adolescent and young adult cancer patients in research studies. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e240. [PMID: 38028342 PMCID: PMC10663769 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We conducted a literature review to identify commonly used recruitment and retention strategies in research among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors 15-39 years of age and examine the effectiveness of these strategies based on the reported recruitment and retention rates. We identified 18 publications published after 2010, including 14 articles describing recruitment strategies and four articles discussing retention strategies and addressing reasons for AYA cancer patients dropping out of the studies. In terms of recruitment, Internet and social networking strategies were used most frequently and resulted in higher participation rates of AYA cancer survivors compared to other conventional methods, such as hospital-based outreach, mailings, and phone calls. In terms of retention, investigators used monetary incentives in all four studies and regular emails in two studies. There was no association between the number of strategies employed and the overall recruitment (p = 0.09) and retention rates (p = 0.33). Future research and planned studies testing recruitment and retention strategies are needed to identify optimal, modern communication procedures to increase AYA participation and adherence. More education should be provided to AYAs to increase their knowledge of research studies and strengthen the connection between AYA cancer survivors and their health providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruixiao Rachel Wang
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Julie B. Schweitzer
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MIND Institute, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Samantha Hernandez
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Silvia C. Molina
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Theresa H.M. Keegan
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT), University of California, Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Elfghi M, Jordan F, Sultan S, Tawfick W. SWAT 84: effects of same-day consent vs delayed consent on the recruitment and retention of trial participants-an observational SWAT. Trials 2023; 24:691. [PMID: 37880796 PMCID: PMC10601271 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07727-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The recruitment process in a randomized trial can be challenging. Poor recruitment can have a negative impact on the allocated budget and estimated completion date of the study and may result in an underpowered study. We aimed to perform a Study Within A Trial (SWAT) to evaluate the impact of same-day consent or delayed consent on recruitment and retention in the host trial. METHODS This SWAT is designed as a prospective cohort design. The host trial was a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an intensive lifestyle modification programme in participants with peripheral arterial disease. Researchers screened the participants for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Informed consents were obtained from the participants who were willing to participate in the study on a standardized consent form. Participants were given the option to consent on the same day or to delay their consent. Following the consent, the participants were allocated to two groups (same-day consent vs. delayed consent) based on pre-determined criteria for SWAT. One hundred sixteen participants were consented to take part in the host trial. Seventy-five participants were randomized to the host trial. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who withdrew consent at the recruitment phase. Secondary outcomes were reasons for consent withdrawal and dropout, attrition rate, and adherence with the host trial intervention. RESULTS There was a significantly lower consent-withdrawal rate in same-day consent (17.4%, n = 8/46), compared to the delayed consent group (47.1%, n = 33/70), p = 0.001. There was a significantly lower dropout rate in participants randomized following same-day consent (10.5%, n = 4/38), compared to those randomized after delayed consent (29.7%, n = 11/37), p = 0.038. Transport was the main reason mentioned for consent withdrawal and dropout. In participants randomized to the host trial intervention arm, there was a significant difference in adherence (percentage of the 12-week programme completed) between same-day consent (96.7% ± 4.9) and delayed consent participants (86.4% ± 11.2), p = 0.003, as well as number of weeks completed (mean difference = - 1.547, 95% confidence intervals (- 2.237 to - 0.85)), p = 0.02. CONCLUSION This SWAT found evidence that participants who gave consent on the same day seemed to have better adherence and fewer-withdrawal and dropout rates. SWAT REGISTRATION The SWAT was registered on the Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research, SWAT 84.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Elfghi
- School of Medicine, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.
| | - F Jordan
- School of Medicine, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - S Sultan
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway (UCHG), Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - W Tawfick
- School of Medicine, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway (UCHG), Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Boxall C, Renz S, Eminton Z, Nuttall J, Saji A, Cluff C, Wilcox C, Muller I, Layton AM, Soulsby I, Santer M. Factors that influence women's enrolment and ongoing participation in a partially decentralised randomised controlled dermatology trial: a qualitative interview study with participants in the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial. Trials 2023; 24:661. [PMID: 37821899 PMCID: PMC10568833 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07630-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of decentralised clinical trials (which bring trials to patients through remote processes and technology versus central on-site visits) has been thought to be a potential solution to common recruitment and retention barriers. However, there is a lack of evidence to understand the experiences, needs and preferences of the public to inform trial methodologies that appeal to different populations. We report participant experiences of SAFA, a partially decentralised randomised clinical trial, to inform the methodology used in future dermatology trials that aim to appeal to women aged 18 and over. METHODS Participants of the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial were invited to take part in a qualitative semi-structured interview to explore their experience and perspectives of taking part in the trial. Questions focused on their experience of using decentralised methods to access and enrol in the trial (e.g. social media advertising), in addition to the decentralised trial visit and data collection methods used throughout. Interviews were conducted remotely, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Twelve SAFA participants (all women, age range 22-36 years) were interviewed. Initially, participants were influenced to enrol by trusted online information, the feeling of validation the trial provided, and the convenience and flexibility offered by the decentralised methods and research staff made participants feel valued and enabled them to engage in the trial with minimal interference to existing commitments. SAFA participants were generally accepting of trial demands, such as the text-heavy paperwork and on-site visits for blood collection and highlighted several areas relevant for trial conduct going forwards including where decentralised methods may (and may not) be accepted and how trial accessibility and understanding could be improved. CONCLUSIONS The study has shown that decentralised methods used by responsive and approachable staff were widely accepted in the SAFA trial. Interviewees found the methods adopted in the SAFA trial helped the trial to fit with their needs and promoted a sense of feeling valued that encouraged ongoing trial engagement. Decentralised methods should be considered favourably when designing a dermatology trial as they can potentially enhance both recruitment and retention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN 12892056. Registered on October 15, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherish Boxall
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Susanne Renz
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Zina Eminton
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Jacqueline Nuttall
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Alan Saji
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Charlotte Cluff
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Christopher Wilcox
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Ingrid Muller
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | | | - Irene Soulsby
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Miriam Santer
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ying X, Ehrhardt S. Pilot Trial Characteristics, Postpilot Design Modifications, and Feasibility of Full-Scale Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2333642. [PMID: 37707813 PMCID: PMC10502523 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Pilot trials often lead to study design changes in subsequent full-scale trials. Yet, it remains unclear whether these modifications improve the feasibility of the larger trial. Objective To compare feasibility estimates between pilot and full-scale trials and identify pilot trial characteristics and modifications associated with equivalent or improved feasibility in the full-scale trial. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used pilot trials published between January 2005 and December 2018 and their corresponding full-scale trials. PubMed was searched for trials on February 19, 2022. Exposures Pilot trial characteristics and postpilot trial design modifications. Main Outcomes and Measures The outcome of interest was difference in 3 feasibility parameters: successful screening probability, enrollment rate, and retention probability. These metrics were defined as equivalent or improved if the full-scale trial's estimate was within or exceeding 10% of the pilot trial's estimate. Results A total of 249 pairs of pilot and full-scale trials were analyzed, with 43%, 77%, and 82% of full-scale trials having equivalent or improved successful screening probabilities, enrollment rates, and retention probabilities, respectively. When pilot trials used feasibility progression criteria (relative risk [RR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.02-5.97) and maintained masking for participants (RR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04-4.33) or health care practitioners (RR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.03-3.97) consistent with the full-scale trial, the likelihood of achieving equivalent or improved screening success in full-scale trials increased. Increasing study sites after the pilot was associated with higher likelihood of equivalent or improved enrollment rates (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08). Adding extra content to the intervention (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-0.98), changing to active control (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.48-0.99), administrating the control treatment more frequently (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.29-0.93), different follow-up lengths (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97), and more follow-up visits (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98) were associated with lower likelihood of equivalent or improved retention probability in the full-scale trial. Conclusions and relevance In this cohort study of pilot and full-scale trial pairs, pilot trial characteristics and postpilot modifications had varying associations with full-scale trial's feasibility. If full-scale trials planned for masking, it was desirable to use it in the pilot. Modifications increasing participant burden might decrease full-scale trial feasibility. Trialists and funders should consider both pilot trial data and proposed design changes when assessing full-scale trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangji Ying
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephan Ehrhardt
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Amin S, Sangadi I, Allman-Farinelli M, Badve SV, Boudville N, Coolican H, Coulshed S, Foster S, Fernando M, Haloob I, Harris DC, Hawley CM, Holt J, Howell M, Kumar K, Johnson DW, Lee VW, Mai J, Rangan A, Roger SD, Sud K, Torres V, Vilayur E, Rangan GK. Participant Perceptions in a Long-term Clinical Trial of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Kidney Med 2023; 5:100691. [PMID: 37602144 PMCID: PMC10432794 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective The development of new therapies for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease requires clinical trials to be conducted efficiently. In this study, the factors affecting the recruitment and retention of participants enrolled in a 3-year randomized controlled trial in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease were investigated. Study Design Qualitative study. Setting & Participants All participants (N=187) were invited to complete a 16-item questionnaire at the final study visit of the primary trial. Participants were recruited to complete a semistructured interview using purposeful sampling according to age, self-reported gender, and randomization group. Analytical Approach Descriptive statistics were used for demographic data and questionnaires. The interview transcripts underwent inductive thematic coding. Results One hundred and forty-six of the 187 randomized participants (79%) completed the post-trial questionnaire, and 31 of the 187 participants (21%) completed the interview. Most participants (94%) rated their global satisfaction with the trial as high (a score of 8 or more out of 10). Altruism, knowledge gain, and access to new treatments were the main motivators for recruitment. The main reasons for considering leaving the study were concerns about the risk of intervention and family or work issues. Strategies that favored retention included flexibility in attending different study sites, schedule flexibility, staff interactions, and practical support with parking and reminders. The main burden was time away from work with lost wages, and burden associated with magnetic resonance imaging scans and 24-hour urine output collections. Limitations The study population was restricted to participants in a single nondrug clinical trial, and the results could be influenced by selection and possible social desirability bias. Conclusions Participants reported high levels of satisfaction that occurred as a function of the trial meeting participants' expectations. Furthermore, retention was a balance between the perceived benefits and burden of participation. Consideration of these perspectives in the design of future clinical trials will improve their efficiency and conduct. Plain-Language Summary Advances in the clinical practice of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) require affected individuals to voluntarily participate in long-term multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this qualitative post hoc study of a 3-year RCT of increased water intake in ADPKD, altruism, knowledge gain, and access to a nondrug treatment positively influenced the decision to volunteer. Ongoing participation was enabled by building flexibility into the study protocol and staff prioritizing a participant's needs during study visits. Although participants completed the required tests, most were considered burdensome. This study highlights the importance of incorporating protocol flexibility into trial design; the preference for interventions with a low risk of adverse effects; and the urgent requirement for robust surrogate noninvasive biomarkers to enable shorter RCTs in ADPKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneha Amin
- Michael Stern Laboratory for Polycystic Kidney Disease, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Irene Sangadi
- Michael Stern Laboratory for Polycystic Kidney Disease, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Sunil V. Badve
- St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Neil Boudville
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Helen Coolican
- Polycystic Kidney Disease Australia, Roseville, Australia
| | | | - Sheryl Foster
- Department of Radiology, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales
- Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mangalee Fernando
- Department of Renal Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Imad Haloob
- Department of Renal Medicine, Bathurst Hospital, Bathurst, Australia
| | - David C.H. Harris
- Michael Stern Laboratory for Polycystic Kidney Disease, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carmel M. Hawley
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jane Holt
- Department of Renal Medicine, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Martin Howell
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - David W. Johnson
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Vincent W. Lee
- Michael Stern Laboratory for Polycystic Kidney Disease, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jun Mai
- Department of Renal Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Southwestern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anna Rangan
- School of Nursing, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Kamal Sud
- Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Kidney Research Centre, Nepean Hospital and Nepean Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Vicente Torres
- Translational Polycystic Kidney Disease Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Eswari Vilayur
- Department of Nephrology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Gopala K. Rangan
- Michael Stern Laboratory for Polycystic Kidney Disease, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Meskell P, Biesty LM, Dowling M, Roche K, Meehan E, Glenton C, Devane D, Shepperd S, Booth A, Cox R, Chan XHS, Houghton C. Factors that impact on recruitment to vaccine trials in the context of a pandemic or epidemic: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 9:MR000065. [PMID: 37655964 PMCID: PMC10472890 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000065.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 pandemic on 11 March 2020. Vaccine development and deployment were swiftly prioritised as a method to manage and control disease spread. The development of an effective vaccine relies on people's participation in randomised trials. Recruitment to vaccine trials is particularly challenging as it involves healthy volunteers who may have concerns around the potential risks and benefits associated with rapidly developed vaccines. OBJECTIVES To explore the factors that influence a person's decision to participate in a vaccine trial in the context of a pandemic or epidemic. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was June 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with an identifiable qualitative component. We included studies that explored the perspectives of adults aged 18 years or older who were invited to take part in vaccine trials in the context of a pandemic or epidemic. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We assessed the title, abstracts and full texts identified by the search. We used a sampling frame to identify data-rich studies that represented a range of diseases and geographical spread. We used QSR NVivo to manage extracted data. We assessed methodological limitations using an adapted version of the Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative studies. We used the 'best-fit framework approach' to analyse and synthesise the evidence from our included studies. We then used the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) assessment to assess our confidence in each finding and develop implications for practice. MAIN RESULTS We included 34 studies in our review. Most studies related to HIV vaccine trials. The other studies related to Ebola virus, tuberculosis, Zika virus and COVID-19. We developed 20 key findings, under three broad themes (with seven subthemes), that described the factors that people consider when deciding whether to take part in a vaccine trial for a pandemic or epidemic disease. Our GRADE-CERQual confidence was high in nine of the key findings, moderate in 10 key findings and low in one key finding. The main reason for downgrading review findings were concerns regarding the relevance and adequacy of the underlying data. As a result of the over-representation of HIV studies, our GRADE-CERQual assessment of some findings was downgraded in terms of relevance because the views described may not reflect those of people regarding vaccine trials for other pandemic or epidemic diseases. Adequacy relates to the degree of richness and quantity of data supporting a review finding. Moderate concerns about adequacy resulted in a downgrading of some review findings. Some factors were considered to be under the control of the trial team. These included how trial information was communicated and the inclusion of people in the community to help with trial information dissemination. Aspects of trial design were also considered under control of the trial team and included convenience of participation, provision of financial incentives and access to additional support services for those taking part in the trial. Other factors influencing people's decision to take part could be personal, from family, friends or wider society. From a personal perceptive, people had concerns about vaccine side effects, vaccine efficacy and possible impact on their daily lives (carer responsibilities, work, etc.). People were also influenced by their families, and the impact participation may have on relationships. The fear of stigma from society influenced the decision to take part. Also, from a societal perspective, the level of trust in governments' involvement in research and trial may influence a person's decision. Finally, the perceived rewards, both personal and societal, were influencing factors on the decision to participate. Personal rewards included access to a vaccine, improved health and improved disease knowledge, and a return to normality in the context of a pandemic or epidemic. Potential societal rewards included helping the community and contributing to science, often motivated by the memories of family and friends who had died from the disease. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review identifies many of the factors that influence a person's decision to take part in a vaccine trial, and these reflect findings from reviews that examine trials more broadly. However, we also recognise some factors that become more important in connection with a vaccine trial in the context of a pandemic or epidemic. These factors include the potential stigma of taking part, the possible adverse effects of a vaccine, the added motivation for helping society, the role of community leaders in trial dissemination, and the level of trust placed in governments and companies developing vaccines. These specific influences need to be considered by trial teams when designing, and communicating about, vaccine trials in the context of a pandemic or epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Meskell
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Linda M Biesty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Maura Dowling
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Elaine Meehan
- Ageing Research Centre, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | | | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sasha Shepperd
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, ScHARR, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rebecca Cox
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Xin Hui S Chan
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Morrissey E, Murphy A, Murphy P, O'Grady L, Byrne M, Casey M, Dolan E, Duane S, Durand H, Gillespie P, Hayes P, Hobbins A, Hynes L, McEvoy JW, Newell J, Molloy G. Supporting GPs and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: Protocol for a pilot cluster RCT of the MIAMI intervention. HRB Open Res 2023; 6:6. [PMID: 38779427 PMCID: PMC11109531 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13661.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for stroke and heart disease. Recent international guidelines have stated that 'poor adherence to treatment - in addition to physician inertia - is the most important cause of poor blood pressure control'. The MaxImising Adherence, Minimising Inertia (MIAMI) intervention, which has been developed using a systematic, theoretical, user-centred approach, aims to support general practitioners (GPs) and people with hypertension to maximise medication use, through the facilitation of adequate information exchange within consultations about long-term antihypertensive medication use and adherence skill development. The aim of the MIAMI pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to gather and analyse feasibility data to allow us to (1) refine the intervention, and (2) determine the feasibility of a definitive RCT. Methods: GP practices (n = 6) will be recruited and randomised to the intervention arm (n = 3) or usual care control arm (n = 3). Each practice will recruit 10 patient participants. For a patient to be eligible they must have a diagnosis of hypertension, be on two or more anti-hypertensive medications, must not be achieving recommended blood pressure levels, and be over the age of 65 years. Participants in the intervention arm will meet their GP and receive the MIAMI intervention twice over three months. Quantitative data collection will take place at baseline and three month follow up. A pilot health economic analysis and a qualitative sub-study will also be incorporated into the study. Discussion: This pilot cluster RCT of the MIAMI intervention will allow us to gather valuable acceptability and feasibility data to further refine the intervention so it optimally designed for both GP and patient use. In particular, the qualitative component will provide an insight into GP and patient experiences of using the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Patrick Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Louise O'Grady
- School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Molly Byrne
- School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Monica Casey
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Eamon Dolan
- Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sinead Duane
- J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- HRB Trials Methodology Research Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Hannah Durand
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Paddy Gillespie
- Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, Institute for Lifecourse and Society, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CURAM, SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices (13/RC/2073_P2), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Peter Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Anna Hobbins
- Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, Institute for Lifecourse and Society, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CURAM, SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices (13/RC/2073_P2), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Lisa Hynes
- Croí, The West of Ireland Cardiac and Stroke Foundation, Galway, Ireland
| | - John William McEvoy
- National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - John Newell
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - MIAMI PPI group
- School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland
- J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- HRB Trials Methodology Research Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
- Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, Institute for Lifecourse and Society, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CURAM, SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices (13/RC/2073_P2), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Croí, The West of Ireland Cardiac and Stroke Foundation, Galway, Ireland
- National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Gerard Molloy
- School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jacob N, Howick J, Svobodova M, Treweek S, Gillies K, Edwards A, Bower P, Bostock J, Hood K. Co-production of guidance and resources to implement principled participant information leaflets (PrinciPILs). NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2023; 3:42. [PMID: 39290321 PMCID: PMC11406117 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13423.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
Background The way information about potential benefits and harms of trial is presented within participant information leaflets (PILs) varies widely and may cause unnecessary 'nocebo' effects. The Medical Research Council (MRC) funded a project that developed seven principles to reduce this variation. However, guidance has not been produced to facilitate the implementation of the principles. Stakeholder involvement is recommended to optimise the way these principles are disseminated and explained. To co-produce recommendations for developing: (1) user-friendly guidance for users of the principles; and (2) resources that support the implementation of the principles. Methods We held a co-production workshop with representation from the following professional groups: the Health Research Authority (HRA), research ethics committee members, and trial managers. Two rounds of discussions focused on generating recommendations for guidance and resources that support the implementation of the seven principles. Extensive low inference style ethnographic notes were taken, and the data were analysed thematically using deductive codes. The data was collected on October 14, 2022. Results 25 participants attended a hybrid workshop. Participants recommended that both researchers designing PILs and research ethics committee members should use the principles, and that that they should be simple, mention both benefits and harms explicitly, include examples of visual representations, and provide the evidence base for the principles. Conclusions We were able to co-produce recommendations for developing and implementing the seven principles within PILs. These recommendations can now be implemented to reduce unexplained variation in the way potential benefits and harms are shared within PILs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Jacob
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Jeremy Howick
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
- Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare,, University of Leicester, Leicester, England, UK
| | | | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Jennifer Bostock
- Lay Research Advisor, Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Willis TA, Wright-Hughes A, Skinner C, Farrin AJ, Hartley S, Walwyn R, Weller A, Althaf M, Wilson S, Gale CP, Foy R. The detection and management of attempted fraud during an online randomised trial. Trials 2023; 24:494. [PMID: 37537678 PMCID: PMC10401790 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07517-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online studies offer an efficient method of recruiting participants and collecting data. Whilst delivering an online randomised trial, we detected unusual recruitment activity. We describe our approach to detecting and managing suspected fraud and share lessons for researchers. METHODS Our trial investigated the single and combined effects of different ways of presenting clinical audit and feedback. Clinicians and managers who received feedback from one of five United Kingdom national clinical audit programmes were emailed invitations that contained a link to the trial website. After providing consent and selecting their relevant audit, participants were randomised automatically to different feedback versions. Immediately after viewing their assigned feedback, participants completed a questionnaire and could request a financial voucher by entering an email address. Email addresses were not linked to trial data to preserve participant anonymity. We actively monitored participant numbers, questionnaire completions, and voucher claims. RESULTS Following a rapid increase in trial participation, we identified 268 new voucher claims from three email addresses that we had reason to believe were linked. Further scrutiny revealed duplicate trial completions and voucher requests from 24 email addresses. We immediately suspended the trial, improved security measures, and went on to successfully complete the study. We found a peak in questionnaires completed in less than 20 seconds during a likely contamination period. Given that study and personal data were not linked, we could not directly identify the trial data from the 268 duplicate entries within the 603 randomisations occurring during the same period. We therefore excluded all 603 randomisations from the primary analysis, which was consequently based on 638 randomisations. A sensitivity analysis, including all 961 randomisations over the entire study except for questionnaire completions of less than 20 seconds, found only minor differences from the primary analysis. CONCLUSION Online studies offering incentives for participation are at risk of attempted fraud. Systematic monitoring and analysis can help detect such activity. Measures to protect study integrity include linking participant identifiers to study data, balancing study security and ease of participation, and safeguarding the allocation of participant incentives. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN41584028. Registration date is August 17, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Willis
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | | | - Clare Skinner
- Research Governance, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda J Farrin
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Suzanne Hartley
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca Walwyn
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ana Weller
- Centre for Human-Computer Interaction Design, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Mohamed Althaf
- Centre for Human-Computer Interaction Design, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Wilson
- Centre for Human-Computer Interaction Design, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Chris P Gale
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Huang X, Qin X, Li M, Li Y, Shen L, Jin G, Wang Y, Liu J, Li X. Impact of caregivers' psychological and caregiving status on recruitment, conversion, and retention in stem cell therapy trials for cerebral palsy: A prospective survey analysis. Nurs Open 2023; 10:5293-5305. [PMID: 37431277 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To examine specific correlates that may affect retention outcomes of neural stem cell therapy trials in families screened for cerebral palsy. DESIGN A prospective correlational study. METHODS Primary caregivers completed surveys of psychological resilience, care burden and family caregiver tasks. The overall data and differences between groups were analysed and compared. RESULTS Resilience was negatively correlated with the care ability and closely related to the monthly household income and educational level of the caregivers. Factors affecting the final retention rate included the type of disease, number of combined disorders, monthly household income, primary caregivers' education level and resilience. CONCLUSION Economic level, literacy and psychological status may affect trial retention. These findings can provide tips for preparing for subsequent screening, identification and intervention in stem cell clinical trials. IMPLICATION FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE The study results may provide nursing care tips to make recruitment more efficient, reduce trial costs, support patient-centredness and accelerate trial progress. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The target population involves the primary caregivers of children living with cerebral palsy. However, neither patients nor the public contributed to the design or conduct of the study, analysis, or interpretation of the data, or preparation of the manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoli Huang
- Stem Cell Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Innovation Institute of Stem Cell and Precision Medicine, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Xixian Qin
- Stem Cell Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Innovation Institute of Stem Cell and Precision Medicine, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Mengyao Li
- Stem Cell Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Innovation Institute of Stem Cell and Precision Medicine, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Ying Li
- Stem Cell Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Innovation Institute of Stem Cell and Precision Medicine, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Liming Shen
- Stem Cell Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Innovation Institute of Stem Cell and Precision Medicine, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Guo Jin
- Dalian Innovation Institute of Stem Cell and Precision Medicine, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Yachen Wang
- Stem Cell Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Innovation Institute of Stem Cell and Precision Medicine, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Stem Cell Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Innovation Institute of Stem Cell and Precision Medicine, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Xiaoyan Li
- Stem Cell Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Innovation Institute of Stem Cell and Precision Medicine, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shiely F, Murphy D, Millar SR. Clinical research nurse predictions of trial failure, recruitment and retention: a case for their early inclusion in trial design. Trials 2023; 24:458. [PMID: 37464255 PMCID: PMC10353190 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07504-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical research nurses are a key part of the clinical trial team but typically get involved later in the trial, usually during recruitment. The purpose of our study was to establish if CRNs who read the trial protocol can predict the performance of the trial. METHODS We randomly selected 18 trial protocols with three statuses, terminated, withdrawn, and completed, from ClinicalTrials.gov, between 2014 and 2018 inclusive. We gave the protocols to five CRNs, asked them to make a judgement and provide a reason for that judgement (via a 12-item questionnaire) on the status of the trial (terminated, withdrawn or completed), if the trial met its recruitment target, if it recruited on time, and if it retained its participants. We also asked if it was likely a CRN was involved in the design of the trial. The CRNs were blinded to the study outcomes, did not receive any training on how to read a protocol and were prohibited from using/abstained from using the internet while completing the task. RESULTS Twenty-three questionnaires on 23 trial protocols (18 different trials) were completed by 5 CRNs. The CRNs correctly predicted the trial status 48%, 95% CI: 29-67% (11/23) of the time; successful/unsuccessful recruitment 74%, 95% CI: 54-87% (17/23) of the time; on-time recruitment 70%, 95% CI: 49-84% (16/23) of the time; and participant retention 52%, 95% CI: 33-71% (12/23). CRNs identified 100% (sensitivity) of sites that hit their target and 63%, 95% CI: 36-84% (specificity) of sites that missed their target. CONCLUSIONS CRNs are very good judges of trial recruitment and site performance issues and are a vital part of the clinical trial team. Taken with the ESP (Estimating Site Performance) study, we have made a strong case for broadening the trial team at the trial design stage. Early engagement of a broad skillset can potentially offset problems of recruitment, retention and trial failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Shiely
- Trials Research and Methodologies Unit, HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
- HRB Trials Methodology Research Network (HRB TMRN), Cork, Ireland.
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
| | - Danielle Murphy
- Trials Research and Methodologies Unit, HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- HRB Trials Methodology Research Network (HRB TMRN), Cork, Ireland
| | - Seán R Millar
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhu L, Yang Z, Deng H, Zhang Y, Liao X, Clarke M. Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews. Syst Rev 2023; 12:120. [PMID: 37443094 PMCID: PMC10347811 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02270-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the number of citations for Cochrane Methodology Reviews after they have been updated or co-published in another journal, and the effect of co-publishing the review on the co-publishing journal's impact factor (IF). METHODS We identified all Cochrane Methodology Reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) before 2018 and searched for co-published versions in the Web of Science Core Collection database up to 16 August 2022. The included reviews were in two cohorts: those that had been published and updated in CDSR and those that had been published in CDSR and co-published in another journal. The primary outcome measured the citation number to updated and original reviews in the first five years after publication of the updated review, and assessed the citation number of co-published and non-co-published reviews in the first five years after publication of the co-published version. The secondary outcome was the ratio of an adjusted IF and the actual IF of the co-publishing journal. RESULTS Eight updated and six original reviews were identified for the updated cohort of reviews, and four co-published reviews were included in the co-published cohort. The original reviews continued to be cited after the update was published but the median for the total number of citations was non-significantly higher for the updated reviews than for their original version[161 (Interquartile range (IQR) 85, 198) versus 113 (IQR 15, 433)]. The median number of total citations [362 (IQR 179, 840) versus 145 (IQR 75, 445)] and the median number of citations to the review in the first five years after co-publication combined and in each of those years was higher in the co-published group than in the non-co-published group. One of the three journals that co-published Reviews in the first year and two journals in the second year had a lower IF after co-publication. CONCLUSIONS Earlier versions of Cochrane Methodology Reviews continue to be cited after an update is published, which raises doubts about whether those citing are using the most recent evidence or are aware of the update. Co-publication facilitates broader application and dissemination of Cochrane methodology evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linlin Zhu
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Ziyu Yang
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Hongyu Deng
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yonggang Zhang
- Department of Periodical Press and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Xiaoyang Liao
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Mike Clarke
- Northern Ireland Methodology Hub, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, Northern Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Knapp P, Moe-Byrne T, Martin-Kerry J, Sheridan R, Roche J, Coleman E, Bower P, Higgins S, Stones C, Graffy J, Preston J, Gamble C, Young B, Perry D, Dahlmann-Noor A, Abbas M, Khandelwal P, Ludden S, Azuara-Blanco A, McConnell E, Mandall N, Lawson A, Rogers CA, Smartt HJM, Heys R, Stones SR, Taylor DH, Ainsworth S, Ainsworth J. Providing multimedia information to children and young people increases recruitment to trials: pre-planned meta-analysis of SWATs. BMC Med 2023; 21:244. [PMID: 37403173 PMCID: PMC10320935 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02936-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials are often beset by problems with poor recruitment and retention. Information to support decisions on trial participation is usually provided as printed participant information sheets (PIS), which are often long, technical, and unappealing. Multimedia information (MMI), including animations and videos, may be a valuable alternative or complement to a PIS. The Trials Engagement in Children and Adolescents (TRECA) study compared MMI to PIS to investigate the effects on participant recruitment, retention, and quality of decision-making. METHODS We undertook six SWATs (Study Within A Trial) within a series of host trials recruiting children and young people. Potential participants in the host trials were randomly allocated to receive MMI-only, PIS-only, or combined MMI + PIS. We recorded the rates of recruitment and retention (varying between 6 and 26 weeks post-randomisation) in each host trial. Potential participants approached about each host trial were asked to complete a nine-item Decision-Making Questionnaire (DMQ) to indicate their evaluation of the information and their reasons for participation/non-participation. Odds ratios were calculated and combined in a meta-analysis. RESULTS Data from 3/6 SWATs for which it was possible were combined in a meta-analysis (n = 1758). Potential participants allocated to MMI-only were more likely to be recruited to the host trial than those allocated to PIS-only (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.05, 2.28; p = 0.03). Those allocated to combined MMI + PIS compared to PIS-only were no more likely to be recruited to the host trial (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.53, 1.50; p = 0.67). Providing MMI rather than PIS did not impact on DMQ scores. Once children and young people had been recruited to host trials, their trial retention rates did not differ according to intervention allocation. CONCLUSIONS Providing MMI-only increased the trial recruitment rate compared to PIS-only but did not affect DMQ scores. Combined MMI + PIS instead of PIS had no effect on recruitment or retention. MMIs are a useful tool for trial recruitment in children and young people, and they could reduce trial recruitment periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences & the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
| | | | | | | | - Jenny Roche
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Elizabeth Coleman
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jenny Preston
- Institute of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Carrol Gamble
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Daniel Perry
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Mohamed Abbas
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anna Lawson
- Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Idnay B, Butler A, Fang Y, Li Z, Lee J, Ta C, Liu C, Ruotolo B, Yuan C, Chen H, Hripcsak G, Larson E, Weng C. Principal Investigators' Perceptions on Factors Associated with Successful Recruitment in Clinical Trials. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE PROCEEDINGS. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2023; 2023:281-290. [PMID: 37350899 PMCID: PMC10283115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Participant recruitment continues to be a challenge to the success of randomized controlled trials, resulting in increased costs, extended trial timelines and delayed treatment availability. Literature provides evidence that study design features (e.g., trial phase, study site involvement) and trial sponsor are significantly associated with recruitment success. Principal investigators oversee the conduct of clinical trials, including recruitment. Through a cross-sectional survey and a thematic analysis of free-text responses, we assessed the perceptions of sixteen principal investigators regarding success factors for participant recruitment. Study site involvement and funding source do not necessarily make recruitment easier or more challenging from the perspective of the principal investigators. The most commonly used recruitment strategies are also the most effort inefficient (e.g., in-person recruitment, reviewing the electronic medical records for prescreening). Finally, we recommended actionable steps, such as improving staff support and leveraging informatics-driven approaches, to allow clinical researchers to enhance participant recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yilu Fang
- Department of Biomedical Informatics
| | - Ziran Li
- Department of Biomedical Informatics
| | | | - Casey Ta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics
| | - Cong Liu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics
| | | | - Chi Yuan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics
| | | | | | - Elaine Larson
- 3School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Howick J, Svobodova M, Treweek S, Jacob N, Gillies K, Bostock J, Bower P, Edwards A, Hood K. Patient reported outcomes and recruitment rates following the introduction of principled patient information leaflets (PrinciPILs): Protocol for a meta-analysis. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2023; 3:29. [PMID: 39139272 PMCID: PMC11319896 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13420.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
Background The way potential benefits and harms of trial interventions are shared within patient information leaflets (PILs) varies widely and may cause unnecessary harms ("nocebo effects"). The aim of this meta-analysis will be to evaluate the influence on recruitment rates and early effects on patient reported adverse events of principled patient information leaflets (PrinciPILs) compared with standard PILs. Methods Eligible studies will include those that report the effects on recruitment and patient reported adverse events of PrinciPILs compared to standard PILs. We will include in this meta-analysis all the standard PILs in studies within trials (SWATs) of PrinciPILs that were developed as part of the Medical Research Council (MRC) funded PrinciPIL project. By publishing this as a living meta-analysis, we will allow the meta-analysis to be updated with future SWATs of PrinciPILs. We will use the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to evaluate the risk of bias for each outcome. We will report the total number of studies and participants analysed and the characteristics of included studies (including details of intervention, comparators, outcomes). For dichotomous data, we will calculate the risk difference and the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes we will use weighted mean differences with 95% CIs or standardized mean differences with 95% CIs. We will investigate heterogeneity by visually inspecting the forest plot and by considering the I 2 test result. We will assess the certainty warranted for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Ethics approval is not applicable since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. Discussion We will discuss the limitations of the meta-analysis including study risk of bias, inconsistency, heterogeneity, and imprecision. A general interpretation of the results and important implications will be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Howick
- Centre for Trials Research (CTR), College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Martina Svobodova
- Centre for Trials Research (CTR), College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Nina Jacob
- Centre for Trials Research (CTR), College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Jennifer Bostock
- Centre for Trials Research (CTR), College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research (CTR), College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Elam AR, Mobolaji I, Flaharty K, Niziol LM, Woodward MA, Zhang J, Musch DC, Johnson L, Kershaw M, Bicket AK, Saaddine J, John D, Newman-Casey PA. Engagement in the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine Program: Comparing the Effect of Clinic versus Community-Based Recruitment Strategies. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2023; 6:266-276. [PMID: 36332906 PMCID: PMC10149556 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effectiveness of adding community-based recruitment to clinic-based recruitment to engage participants in a glaucoma detection program. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS Anyone ≥ 18 years of age who does not meet exclusion criteria. METHODS The Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine (MI-SIGHT) program tests a novel way of improving glaucoma detection in communities with populations at high risk for disease, including people who identify as Black and Hispanic and those living with low socioeconomic status. The MI-SIGHT program is conducted in a free clinic (Ypsilanti, MI) and in a federally qualified health center (FQHC) (Flint, MI). Community engagement methods were used to identify outreach strategies to enhance recruitment. Participants were asked "How did you hear about the MI-SIGHT program?" and responses were summarized overall and by clinic and compared between clinic-based and community-based recruitment strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Proportion recruited by location, within or outside of the clinic. RESULTS In total, 647 participants were recruited in the first 11 months of the study, 356 (55.0%) at the free clinic over 11 months and 291 (45.0%) at the FQHC over 6 months. Participants were on average 54.4 years old (standard deviation = 14.2); 60.9% identified as female, 45.6% identified as Black, 37.8% identified as White, 9.6% identified as Hispanic, and 10.9% had less than high school education. Participants reported hearing about the MI-SIGHT program from a clinic phone call (n = 168, 26.1%), a friend (n = 112, 17.4%), nonmedical clinic staff (n = 100, 15.5%), a clinic doctor (n = 77, 11.9%), an in-clinic brochure or flyer (n = 51, 7.9%), a community flyer (n = 44, 6.8%), the clinic website or social media (n = 28, 4.3%), or an "other" source (n = 65, 10.1%). Recruiting from the community outside the medical clinics increased participation by 265% at the free clinic and 46% at the FQHC. CONCLUSIONS The Community Advisory Board recommendation to use community-based recruitment strategies in addition to clinic-based strategies for recruitment resulted in increased program participation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela R Elam
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | - Leslie M Niziol
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Maria A Woodward
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jason Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - David C Musch
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | - Amanda K Bicket
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jinan Saaddine
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Denise John
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Paula Anne Newman-Casey
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stensland KD, Sales AE, Vedapudi VK, Damschroder LJ, Skolarus TA. Exploring implementation outcomes in the clinical trial context: a qualitative study of physician trial stakeholders. Trials 2023; 24:297. [PMID: 37106368 PMCID: PMC10142148 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07304-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer clinical trials can be considered evidence-based interventions with substantial benefits, but suffer from poor implementation leading to low enrollment and frequent failure. Applying implementation science approaches such as outcomes frameworks to the trial context could aid in contextualizing and evaluating trial improvement strategies. However, the acceptability and appropriateness of these adapted outcomes to trial stakeholders are unclear. For these reasons, we interviewed cancer clinical trial physician stakeholders to explore how they perceive and address clinical trial implementation outcomes. METHODS We purposively selected 15 cancer clinical trial physician stakeholders from our institution representing different specialties, trial roles, and trial sponsor types. We performed semi-structured interviews to explore a previous adaptation of Proctor's Implementation Outcomes Framework to the clinical trial context. Emergent themes from each outcome were developed. RESULTS The implementation outcomes were well understood and applicable (i.e., appropriate and acceptable) to clinical trial stakeholders. We describe cancer clinical trial physician stakeholder understanding of these outcomes and current application of these concepts. Trial feasibility and implementation cost were felt to be most critical to trial design and implementation. Trial penetration was most difficult to measure, primarily due to eligible patient identification. In general, we found that formal methods for trial improvement and trial implementation evaluation were poorly developed. Cancer clinical trial physician stakeholders referred to some design and implementation techniques used to improve trials, but these were infrequently formally evaluated or theory-based. CONCLUSION Implementation outcomes adapted to the trial context were acceptable and appropriate to cancer clinical trial physician stakeholders. Use of these outcomes could facilitate the evaluation and design of clinical trial improvement interventions. Additionally, these outcomes highlight potential areas for the development of new tools, for example informatics solutions, to improve the evaluation and implementation of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian D Stensland
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, NCRC, Building 16, 100S-12, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Anne E Sales
- University of Missouri and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Laura J Damschroder
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ted A Skolarus
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, NCRC, Building 16, 100S-12, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Coffey T, Duncan E, Morgan H, Gillies K. Developing strategies to address disparities in retention communication during the consent discussion: development of a behavioural intervention. Trials 2023; 24:296. [PMID: 37101245 PMCID: PMC10134580 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07268-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials are essential to evidence-based medicine. Their success relies on recruitment and retention of participants: problems with either can affect validity of results. Past research on improving trials has focused on recruitment, with less on retention, and even less considering retention at the point of recruitment, i.e., what retention-relevant information is shared during consent processes. The behaviour of trial staff communicating this information during consent is likely to contribute to retention. So, developing approaches to mitigate issues in retention at the point of consent is necessary. In this study, we describe the development of a behavioural intervention targeting the communication of information important to retention during the consent process. METHODS We applied the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel to develop an intervention aimed at changing the retention communication behaviours of trial staff. Building on findings from an interview study to understand the barriers/facilitators to retention communication during consent, we identified behaviour change techniques that could moderate them. These techniques were grouped into potential intervention categories and presented to a co-design group of trial staff and public partners to discuss how they might be packaged into an intervention. An intervention was presented to these same stakeholders and assessed for acceptability through a survey based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS Twenty-six behaviour change techniques were identified with potential to change communication of retention-information at consent. Six trial stakeholders in the co-design group discussed means for implementing these techniques and agreed the available techniques could be most effective within a series of meetings focussed on best practices for communicating retention at consent. The proposed intervention was deemed acceptable through survey results. CONCLUSION We have developed an intervention aimed at facilitating the communication of retention at informed consent through a behavioural approach. This intervention will be delivered to trial staff and will add to the available strategies for trials to improve retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Coffey
- Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Eilidh Duncan
- Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Heather Morgan
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Boisvert-Huneault C, Trigos Herraez D, Pinter A, Kobayashi S, Bell S, Kallsen K, Gloede T, Yagi N, Brunette S, Datsenko Y, Baehner F, Clerisme-Beaty E, Van de Kerkhof P. Understanding potential participation barriers to improve trial design and outcomes: clinical trial simulation in palmoplantar pustulosis as a case study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e064159. [PMID: 37094891 PMCID: PMC10151841 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluate the experiences and perceptions of patients participating in a simulated clinical trial and identify ways to enhance future patient-centric trial designs. DESIGN International, multicentre, non-interventional, virtual clinical trial visits with patient debriefs and advisory boards. SETTING Virtual clinic visits and accompanying advisory boards. PARTICIPANTS Nine patients with palmoplantar pustulosis for simulated trial visits; 14 patients and patient representatives for advisory boards. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Qualitative responses to trial documentation, visit schedule and logistics, and trial design were collected during patient debriefs. Results were discussed at two virtual advisory board meetings. RESULTS Patients identified key barriers to participation and potential difficulties encountered when attending trial visits and completing assessments. They also proposed recommendations to overcome these challenges. Patients recognised the need for comprehensive informed consent forms, but recommended use of non-technical language, brevity and additional support to aid understanding. Other trial documentations should be relevant to the disease and include known efficacy and safety of the study drug. Patients were concerned about receiving placebo, stopping existing medications and being unable to receive the study drug after trial completion; therefore, patients and physicians recommended an open-label extension following trial completion. Trial visits were too numerous (n=20) and too long (3-4 hours each); patients recommended improvements to the design to make best use of their time and reduce unnecessary waiting. They also requested financial and logistical support. Patients expressed a desire for study outcomes that matter to them, related to their ability to undertake normal daily activities and not be a burden to others. CONCLUSIONS Simulated trials are an innovative method for assessing trial design and acceptance from a patient-centric perspective, enabling specific improvements to be made prior to trial initiation. Incorporation of recommendations from simulated trials could enhance trial recruitment and retention, and optimise trial outcomes and data quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Trigos Herraez
- EUROPSO, European Umbrella Federation for Psoriasis Associations, Polzela, Slovenia
| | - Andreas Pinter
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Satomi Kobayashi
- Department of Dermatology, Seibo International Catholic Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stacie Bell
- National Psoriasis Foundation, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Tristan Gloede
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Steven Brunette
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA
| | - Yakov Datsenko
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Biberach, Germany
| | - Frank Baehner
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lander J, Bitzer EM, von Sommoggy J, Pawellek M, Altawil H, John C, Apfelbacher C, Dierks ML. How do parents access, appraise, and apply health information on early childhood allergy prevention? A focus group and interview study. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1123107. [PMID: 37139377 PMCID: PMC10149846 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1123107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background When parents want to make health-related decisions for their child, they need to be able to handle health information from a potentially endless range of sources. Early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP) is a good example: recommendations have shifted from allergen avoidance to early introduction of allergenic foods. We investigated how parents of children under 3 years old access, appraise and apply health information about ECAP, and their respective needs and preferences. Methods We conducted 23 focus groups and 24 interviews with 114 parents of children with varied risk for allergies. The recruitment strategy and a topic guide were co-designed with the target group and professionals from public health, education, and medicine. Data were mostly collected via video calls, recorded and then transcribed verbatim. Content analysis according to Kuckartz was performed using MAXQDA and findings are presented as a descriptive overview. Results Parents most frequently referred to family members, friends, and other parents as sources of ECAP information, as well as healthcare professionals (HCPs), particularly pediatricians. Parents said that they exchanged experiences and practices with their peers, while relying on HCPs for guidance on decision-making. When searching for information online, they infrequently recalled the sources used and were rarely aware of providers of "good" health information. While parents often reported trying to identify the authors of information to appraise its reliability, they said they did not undertake more comprehensive information quality checks. The choice and presentation of ECAP information was frequently criticized by all parent groups; in particular, parents of at-risk children or with a manifested allergy were often dissatisfied with HCP consultations, and hence did not straightforwardly apply advice. Though many trusted their HCPs, parents often reported taking preventive measures based on their own intuition. Conclusion One suggestion to react upon the many criticisms expressed by parents regarding who and how provides ECAP information is to integrate central ECAP recommendations into regular child care counseling by HCPs-provided that feasible ways for doing so are identified. This would assist disease prevention, as parents without specific concerns are often unaware of the ECAP dimension of issues such as nutrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Lander
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Bitzer
- Department of Public Health and Health Education, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Julia von Sommoggy
- Medical Sociology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maja Pawellek
- University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO), University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hala Altawil
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| | - Cosima John
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| | - Christian Apfelbacher
- Institute for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marie-Luise Dierks
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Al P, Hey S, Weijer C, Gillies K, McCleary N, Yee ML, Inglis J, Presseau J, Brehaut J. Changing patient preferences toward better trial recruitment: an ethical analysis. Trials 2023; 24:233. [PMID: 36973759 PMCID: PMC10044713 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07258-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
While randomized controlled trials are essential to health research, many of these trials fail to recruit enough participants. Approaching recruitment through the lens of behavioral science can help trialists to understand influences on the decision to participate and use them to increase recruitment. Although this approach is promising, the use of behavioral influences during recruitment is in tension with the ethical principle of respect for persons, as at least some of these influences could be used to manipulate potential participants. In this paper, we examine this tension by discussing two types of behavioral influences: one example involves physician recommendations, and the other involves framing of information to exploit cognitive biases. We argue that despite the apparent tension with ethical principles, influencing trial participants through behavior change strategies can be ethically acceptable. However, we argue that trialists have a positive obligation to analyze their recruitment strategies for behavioral influences and disclose these upfront to the research ethics committee. But we also acknowledge that since neither trialists nor ethics committees are presently well equipped to perform these analyses, additional resources and guidance are needed. We close by outlining a path toward the development of such guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pepijn Al
- Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
| | - Spencer Hey
- Prism Analytic Technologies, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Charles Weijer
- Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Philosophy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nicola McCleary
- Centre for Implementation Research, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Juliette Inglis
- Patient partner, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Patient partner, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Justin Presseau
- Centre for Implementation Research, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jamie Brehaut
- Centre for Implementation Research, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Al-Shami KM, Ahmed WS, Alzoubi KH. Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:895-903. [PMID: 37013082 PMCID: PMC10066730 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s402769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Biospecimen repositories and big data generated from clinical research are critically important in advancing patient-centered healthcare. However, ethical considerations arising from reusing clinical samples and health records for subsequent research pose a hurdle for big-data health research. This study aims to assess the public's opinions in Jordan toward providing blanket consent for using biospecimens and health records in research. Participants and Methods A cross-sectional study utilizing a self-reported questionnaire was carried out in different cities in Jordan, targeting adult participants. Outcome variables included awareness of clinical research, participation in clinical research, and opinions toward providing open access to clinical samples and records for research purposes. Descriptive analysis was utilized for reporting the outcome as frequency (percentages) out of the total responses. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate the association between independent variables and the outcome of interest. Results A total of 1033 eligible participants completed the questionnaire. Although the majority (90%) were aware of clinical research, only 24% have ever participated in this type of research. About half (51%) agreed on providing blanket consent for the use of clinical samples, while a lower percentage (43%) agreed on providing open access to their health records. Privacy concerns and lack of trust in the researcher were cited as major barriers to providing blanket consent. Participation in clinical research and having health insurance were predictors for providing open access to clinical samples and records. Conclusion The lack of public trust in Jordan toward data privacy is evident from this study. Therefore, a governance framework is needed to raise and maintain the public's trust in big-data research that warrants the future reuse of clinical samples and records. As such, the current study provides valuable insights that will inform the design of effective consent protocols required in data-intensive health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal M Al-Shami
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan
- Faculty of Biosciences, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Wesam S Ahmed
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Karem H Alzoubi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|