1
|
Alkan A, Carrier ME, Henry RS, Kwakkenbos L, Bartlett SJ, Gietzen A, Gottesman K, Guillot G, Lawrie-Jones A, Hudson M, Hummers LK, Malcarne VL, Mayes MD, Mouthon L, Richard M, Wojeck RK, Worron-Sauvé M, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Minimal Detectable Changes of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 Profile Version 2.0 Domains, and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 in People With Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort Cross-Sectional Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2024; 76:1549-1557. [PMID: 38932481 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, chronic autoimmune disorder associated with disability, diminished physical function, fatigue, pain, and mental health concerns. We assessed minimal detectable changes (MDCs) of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 Profile version 2.0 (PROMIS-29v2.0) domains, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 in people with SSc. METHODS Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort participants completed the HAQ-DI, PROMIS-29v2.0 domains, and PHQ-8 at baseline assessments from April 2014 until August 2023. We estimated MDC95 (smallest change that can be detected with 95% certainty) and MDC90 (smallest change that can be detected with 90% certainty) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated via the percentile bootstrapping method resampling 1,000 times. We compared MDC estimates by age, sex, and SSc subtype. RESULTS A total of 2,571 participants were included. Most were female (n = 2,241; 87%), and 38% (n = 976) had diffuse SSc. Mean (±SD) age was 54.9 (±12.7) years and duration since onset of first non-Raynaud phenomenon symptom was 10.8 (±8.7) years. MDC95 estimate was 0.41 points (95% CI 0.40-0.42) for the HAQ-DI, between 4.88 points (95% CI 4.72-5.05) and 9.02 points (95% CI 8.80-9.23) for the seven PROMIS-29v2.0 domains, and 5.16 points (95% CI 5.06-5.26) for the PHQ-8. MDC95 estimates were not materially different across subgroups. CONCLUSION MDC95 and MDC90 estimates were precise and similar across age, sex, and SSc subtype groups. HAQ-DI MDC95 and MDC90 were substantially larger than previous estimates of HAQ-DI minimal important difference from several small studies. Minimally important differences of all measures should be evaluated in large studies using anchor-based methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afra Alkan
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Richard S Henry
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Linda Kwakkenbos
- Radboud University and Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Susan J Bartlett
- McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Amy Gietzen
- National Scleroderma Foundation, Buffalo, New York
| | | | | | | | - Marie Hudson
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Laura K Hummers
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Luc Mouthon
- Hôpital Cochin and Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Benedetti
- McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Brett D Thombs
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sandoval-Heglund D, Roberts E, Park J, Dall'Era M, Lanata C, Barbour KE, Greenlund KJ, Gordon C, Katz PP, Yazdany J. Economic insecurities and patient-reported outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in the USA: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2024; 6:e105-e114. [PMID: 38267097 PMCID: PMC10964913 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00296-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social determinants of health are consistently associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) outcomes. However, social determinants of health are typically measured with conventional socioeconomic status factors such as income or education. We assessed the association of economic insecurities (ie, food, housing, health care, and financial insecurity) with patient-reported outcomes in a cohort of patients with SLE. METHODS In this cross-sectional analysis, data were derived from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study based in the San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA. Participants were recruited between Feb 25, 2015, and Jan 10, 2018, from rheumatology clinics. Inclusion criteria were Bay Area residency; oral fluency in English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin; 18 years or older; ability to provide informed consent; and a physician confirmed SLE diagnosis. Food, housing, health care, and financial economic insecurities were assessed by validated screening tools. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained using PROMIS, Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (known as Neuro-QoL) Cognitive Function short form, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8, and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 instruments. Poverty was defined as household income of 125% or less of the federal poverty limit. Lower education was defined as less than college-graduate education. The association of economic insecurities with patient-reported outcomes was assessed by multivariable linear regression models adjusting for demographics, SLE disease characteristics, and comorbidities. We tested for interactions of insecurities with poverty and education. FINDINGS The final cohort included 252 participants. Mean age was 49·7 (SD 13·4) years, 228 (90%) of 252 were women and 24 (10%) were men. 80 (32%) individuals self-identified as Asian, 26 (10%) as Black, 101 (40%) as White, eight (3%) as mixed race, and 37 (15%) as other race; 59 (23%) self-identified as Hispanic. 135 (54%) individuals had at least one insecurity. Insecurities were highly prevalent, and more common in those with poverty and lower education. Adjusted multivariate analyses revealed that participants with any insecurity had significantly worse scores across all measured patient-reported outcomes. For physical function, no insecurity had an adjusted mean score of 48·9 (95% CI 47·5-50·3) and any insecurity had 45·7 (44·3-47·0; p=0·0017). For pain interference, no insecurity was 52·0 (50·5-53·5) and any insecurity was 54·4 (53·0-55·8; p=0·031). For fatigue, no insecurity was 50·5 (48·8-52·3) and any insecurity was 54·9 (53·3-56·5; p=0·0005). For sleep disturbance, no insecurity was 49·9 (48·3-51·6) and any insecurity was 52·9 (51·4-54·5; p=0·012). For cognitive function, no insecurity was 49·3 (47·7-50·9) and any insecurity was 45·6 (44·1-47·0; p=0·0011). For PHQ-8, no insecurity was 4·4 (3·6-5·1) and any insecurity was 6·1 (5·4-6·8; p=0·0013). For GAD-7, no insecurity was 3·3 (2·6-4·1) and any insecurity was 5·2 (4·5-5·9; p=0·0008). Individuals with more insecurities had worse patient-reported outcomes. There were no statistically significant interactions between insecurities and poverty or education. INTERPRETATION Having any economic insecurity was associated with worse outcomes for people with SLE regardless of poverty or education. The findings of this study provide insight into the relationship between economic insecurities and SLE outcomes and underscore the need to assess whether interventions that directly address these insecurities can reduce health disparities in SLE. FUNDING US Centers for Disease Control, Rheumatology Research Foundation, and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Roberts
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joonsuk Park
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria Dall'Era
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cristina Lanata
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kamil E Barbour
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Population Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kurt J Greenlund
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Population Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Caroline Gordon
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Patricia P Katz
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, USA; University of California San Francisco, Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Jinoos Yazdany
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Victorson D, Mishra KK, Sauer J, Langford G, Maletich C, Horowitz B, Sauer C, Sejpal SV, Kalapurakal J. Implementation Readiness and Initial Effects of a Brief Mindfulness Audio Intervention Compared With a Brief Music Control During Daily Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Pilot Study. GLOBAL ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE AND HEALTH 2024; 13:27536130241249140. [PMID: 38694593 PMCID: PMC11062214 DOI: 10.1177/27536130241249140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Background The most common and debilitating side effects of radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) are fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression. Previous research has reported palliative benefits from certain self-management approaches, such as mindfulness meditation. Objective To develop, pre-test, and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and initial benefit of brief, audio-based mindfulness delivered during daily RT for PC compared to a relaxing music control. Methods Following intervention development, participants were randomized to either brief guided mindfulness audio recordings or a relaxing music control during daily RT. A pre-testing phase was first conducted to determine optimal program start time, length, and content most associated with retention. A final program (n = 26) was delivered daily, starting on day one of week 2 of RT and lasting 4 consecutive weeks. Feasibility was defined as ≥70% on enrollment rate, retention, and audio program adherence. Acceptability was measured with a 12-item post-study survey. A secondary focus compared between group changes on patient reported outcomes of fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and related outcomes at baseline and follow up assessments. Descriptive statistics and general linear models were used. Results Overall, 76% (n = 38) of approached men enrolled. Pre-testing retention rates were <70% while the final program's retention rate was 89%. The majority of acceptability criteria were met in both conditions, with relatively higher ratings in the mindfulness arm. Compared to music controls, mindfulness participants demonstrated significantly less uncertainty intolerance at 4-weeks (P = .046, d = .95); and significantly lower fatigue scores (P = .049, d = 1.3) and lower sleep disturbance scores (P = .035, d = 1.1) at the 3 months follow up. Conclusion The final intervention met feasibility and acceptability criteria. Pre-testing refinements played a key role for optimal program delivery and retention. Audio-based mindfulness delivered during RT for PC hold potential to help decrease RT-related physical and emotional side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Victorson
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Joseph Sauer
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- University of Illinois-Chicago Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Grace Langford
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Carly Maletich
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bruriah Horowitz
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christina Sauer
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - John Kalapurakal
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Darnall BD, Burns JW, Hong J, Roy A, Slater K, Poupore-King H, Ziadni MS, You DS, Jung C, Cook KF, Lorig K, Tian L, Mackey SC. Empowered Relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, and health education for people with chronic pain: a comparison of outcomes at 6-month Follow-up for a randomized controlled trial. Pain Rep 2024; 9:e1116. [PMID: 38288134 PMCID: PMC10824382 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We previously conducted a 3-arm randomized trial (263 adults with chronic low back pain) which compared group-based (1) single-session pain relief skills intervention (Empowered Relief; ER); (2) 8-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic back pain; and (3) single-session health and back pain education class (HE). Results suggested non-inferiority of ER vs. CBT at 3 months post-treatment on an array of outcomes. Methods Here, we tested the durability of treatment effects at 6 months post-treatment. We examined group differences in primary and secondary outcomes at 6 months and the degree to which outcomes eroded or improved from 3-month to 6-month within each treatment group. Results Empowered Relief remained non-inferior to CBT on most outcomes, whereas both ER and CBT remained superior to HE on most outcomes. Outcome improvements within ER did not decrease significantly from 3-month to 6-month, and indeed ER showed additional 3- to 6-month improvements on pain catastrophizing, pain bothersomeness, and anxiety. Effects of ER at 6 months post-treatment (moderate term outcomes) kept pace with effects reported by participants who underwent 8-session CBT. Conclusions The maintenance of these absolute levels implies strong stability of ER effects. Results extend to 6 months post-treatment previous findings documenting that ER and CBT exhibit similarly potent effects on outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D. Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - John W. Burns
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Juliette Hong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Anuradha Roy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Kristin Slater
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Heather Poupore-King
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Dokyoung S. You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Corinne Jung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Kate Lorig
- Department of Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Lu Tian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science and (by courtesy) Statistics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Sean C. Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun K, Eudy AM, Harris N, Pisetsky DS, Criscione-Schreiber LG, Sadun RE, Doss J, Clowse MEB, Rogers JL. Using PROMIS-29 to determine symptom burdens in the context of the Type 1 and 2 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) model: a cross sectional study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:136. [PMID: 38127169 PMCID: PMC10739689 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00678-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To account for heterogeneity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and bridge discrepancies between patient- and physician-perceived SLE activity, we developed the Type 1 and 2 SLE model. We examined PROMIS-29 scores, a composite patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure, through the lens of the model. METHODS Patients completed PROMIS-29 and the polysymptomatic distress scale (PSD). Rheumatologists completed the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), and physician's global assessments (PGAs) for Type 1 and 2 SLE. We defined Type 1 SLE using SLEDAI, Type 1 PGA, and active nephritis, and Type 2 SLE using PSD and Type 2 PGA. We compared PROMIS-29 T-scores among Type 1 and 2 SLE groups and explored whether PROMIS-29 can predict Type 1 and 2 SLE activity. RESULTS Compared to the general population, patients with isolated Type 1 SLE reported greater pain and physical dysfunction but less depression and improved social functions; patients with high Type 2 SLE (irrespective of Type 1 activity) reported high levels of pain, fatigue, and social and physical limitations. Patients with minimal Type 1 and 2 SLE had less depression and greater physical functioning with other domains similar to national norms. PROMIS-29 predicted Type 2 but not Type 1 SLE activity. CONCLUSION PROMIS-29 similarities in patients with high Type 2 SLE, with and without active Type 1 SLE, demonstrate the challenges of using PROs to assess SLE inflammation. In conjunction with the Type 1 and 2 SLE model, however, PROMIS-29 identified distinct symptom patterns, suggesting that the model may help clinicians interpret PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Sun
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 2978, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Amanda M Eudy
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 2978, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Nathaniel Harris
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 2978, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - David S Pisetsky
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 2978, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lisa G Criscione-Schreiber
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 2978, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Rebecca E Sadun
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 2978, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jayanth Doss
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 2978, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Megan E B Clowse
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 2978, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jennifer L Rogers
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 2978, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Terkawi AS, Popat RA, Mackey S. Characterization and burden of localized back pain versus back pain with chronic overlapping pain conditions. Pain Pract 2023; 23:904-913. [PMID: 37392043 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is the most common cause of years lived with disability (YLD). Chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs) is a relatively new taxonomy for widespread pain. Researchers have postulated that patients with COPCs have more pain-related impact than those with isolated pain conditions. We know little about the combination of COPCs with cLBP. This study aims to characterize patients with isolated cLBP compared to those with cLBP and associated COPCs across multiple domains of physical, psychological, and social functioning. METHODS Using Stanford's CHOIR registry-based learning health system, we performed a cross-sectional study on patients with localized cLBP (group L) versus cLBP with COPCs (group W). We used demographic, PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), and legacy survey data to characterize the physical, psychological, social, and global health outcomes. We further subdivided the COPCs into intermediate and severe based on the number of body regions involved. We used descriptive statistics and generalized linear regression models to characterize and compare the pain groups. RESULTS Among 8783 patients with cLBP, 485 (5.5%) had localized cLBP (Group L) without widespread pain. Compared to Group L, patients in Group W were more likely to be females, younger, and reported longer duration of pain. Although the mean pain scores were significantly higher in group W, this difference did not appear clinically significant (average pain scores MD -0.73, 95% CI [-0.91 to -0.55]). Group W had significantly worse outcomes in all PROMIS outcomes. However, outcomes with large clinical differences (Cohen's d > 0.5) were fatigue (MD = -7.0, 95% CI [-8.0 to -6.1]); sleep impairment (MD = -6.2, 95% CI [-7.1 to -5.3]); sleep disturbance (MD = -5.3, 95% CI [-6.2 to -4.5]); pain behavior (MD = -2.2, 95% CI [-2.5 to -1.8]); physical function (MD = 4.0, 95% CI [3.2-5.0]); pain interference (MD = -3.4, 95% CI [-4.0 to -2.8]); and anxiety (MD = -4.9, 95% CI [-5.7 to -4.0]). Adjusted analysis controlling for age, gender, BMI category, and duration of pain confirmed worsening of all outcomes with more widespread pain. CONCLUSION COPCs are a common presentation with cLBP. The combination of COPCs with cLBP is associated with significantly worse physical, psychological, social, and global health outcomes. This information may identify patients with COPCs and cLBP to optimally risk and treatment stratify their care and individualize their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Rita A Popat
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sean Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prieto-Centurion V, Holm KE, Casaburi R, Porszasz J, Basu S, Bracken NE, Gallardo R, Gonzalez V, Illendula SD, Sandhaus RA, Sullivan JL, Walsh LJ, Gerald LB, Krishnan JA. A Hybrid Effectiveness/Implementation Clinical Trial of Adherence to Long-Term Oxygen Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20:1561-1570. [PMID: 37683098 PMCID: PMC10632931 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202302-104oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Interventions to promote adherence to long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are needed. Objectives: To examine the real-world effectiveness of phone-based peer coaching on LTOT adherence and other outcomes in a pragmatic trial of patients with COPD. Methods: In a hybrid effectiveness/implementation pragmatic trial, patients were randomized to receive phone-based proactive coaching (educational materials, five phone-based peer coaching sessions over 60 d), reactive coaching (educational materials, peer coaching when requested), or usual care. Study staff members collected baseline and outcome data via phone at 30, 60, and 90 days after randomization. Adherence to LTOT over 60 days, the primary effectiveness outcome, was defined as mean LTOT use ⩾17.7 h/d. LTOT use was calculated using information about home oxygen equipment use in worksheets completed by study participants. Comparisons of adherence to LTOT between each coaching group and the usual care group using multivariable logistic regression models were prespecified as the primary analyses. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included Patient Reported Outcome Management Information System measures for physical, emotional, and social health. We assessed early implementation domains in the reach, adoption, and implementation framework. Results: In 444 participants, the proportions who were adherent to LTOT at 60 days were 74% in usual care, 84% in reactive coaching, and 70% in proactive coaching groups. Although reach, adoption by stakeholder partners, and intervention fidelity were acceptable, complete LTOT adherence data were available in only 73% of participants. Reactive coaching (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; 97.5% confidence interval, 0.80-3.90) and proactive coaching (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 97.5% confidence interval, 0.34-1.46) did not improve adherence to LTOT compared with usual care. However, proactive coaching significantly reduced depressive symptoms and sleep disturbance compared with usual care and reduced depressive symptoms compared with reactive coaching. Unexpectedly, LTOT adherence was significantly lower in the proactive compared with the reactive coaching group. Conclusions: The results were inconclusive about whether a phone-based peer coaching strategy changed LTOT adherence compared with usual care. Further studies are needed to confirm the potential benefits of proactive peer coaching on secondary effectiveness outcomes and differences in LTOT adherence between proactive and reactive peer coaching. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02098369).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristen E. Holm
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Richard Casaburi
- Lindquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Janos Porszasz
- Lindquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | | | - Nina E. Bracken
- Breathe Chicago Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy
- Office of Population Health Sciences, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Richard Gallardo
- Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute, San Diego, California
| | - Vanessa Gonzalez
- School of Public Health, and
- American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation, Darien, Illinois; and
| | - Sai D. Illendula
- Breathe Chicago Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy
- Office of Population Health Sciences, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | - Lynn B. Gerald
- Breathe Chicago Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy
- Office of Population Health Sciences, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jerry A. Krishnan
- Breathe Chicago Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy
- Office of Population Health Sciences, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aguirre A, DeQuattro K, Shiboski S, Katz P, Greenlund KJ, Barbour KE, Gordon C, Lanata C, Criswell LA, Dall'Era M, Yazdany J. Medication Cost Concerns and Disparities in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among a Multiethnic Cohort of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2023; 50:1302-1309. [PMID: 37321640 PMCID: PMC10543599 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Concerns about the affordability of medications are common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the relationship between medication cost concerns and health outcomes is poorly understood. We assessed the association of self-reported medication cost concerns and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a multiethnic SLE cohort. METHODS The California Lupus Epidemiology Study is a cohort of individuals with physician-confirmed SLE. Medication cost concerns were defined as having difficulties affording SLE medications, skipping doses, delaying refills, requesting lower-cost alternatives, purchasing medications outside the United States, or applying for patient assistance programs. Linear regression and mixed effects models assessed the cross-sectional and longitudinal association of medication cost concerns and PROs, respectively, adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, income, principal insurance, immunomodulatory medications, and organ damage. RESULTS Of 334 participants, medication cost concerns were reported by 91 (27%). Medication cost concerns were associated with worse Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ; beta coefficient [β] 5.9, 95% CI 4.3-7.6; P < 0.001), 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8; β 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-4.0; P < 0.001), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS; β for physical function -4.6, 95% CI -6.7 to -2.4; P < 0.001) scores after adjusting for covariates. Medication cost concerns were not associated with significant changes in PROs over 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION More than a quarter of participants reported at least 1 medication cost concern, which was associated with worse PROs. Our results reveal a potentially modifiable risk factor for poor outcomes rooted in the unaffordability of SLE care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Aguirre
- A. Aguirre, MD, M. Dall'Era, MD, J. Yazdany, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, California;
| | - Kimberly DeQuattro
- K. DeQuattro, MD, Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen Shiboski
- S. Shiboski, PhD, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Patricia Katz
- P. Katz, PhD, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Kurt J Greenlund
- K.J. Greenlund, PhD, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kamil E Barbour
- K.E. Barbour, PhD, MPH, Lupus and Interstitial Cystitis Programs, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Caroline Gordon
- C. Gordon, MD, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Cristina Lanata
- C. Lanata, MD, Genomics of Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease Section, National Human Genome Research Section, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lindsey A Criswell
- L.A. Criswell, MD, MPH, DSc, Genomics of Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease Section, National Human Genome Research Section, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland USA
| | - Maria Dall'Era
- A. Aguirre, MD, M. Dall'Era, MD, J. Yazdany, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jinoos Yazdany
- A. Aguirre, MD, M. Dall'Era, MD, J. Yazdany, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schroeder MN, Wu JM, Margulies SL, Willis-Gray MG. PROMIS pain intensity and interference after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2023; 34:2415-2420. [PMID: 37145124 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05547-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaires provide valid comparisons across disciplines. Pain measures can be used to track functional outcomes. Limited PROMIS pain data exist in gynecological surgery. We sought to use pain intensity and pain interference short forms to assess pain and recovery after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. METHODS The PROMIS pain intensity and pain interference questionnaires were given to patients undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) or minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) at baseline, 1 week, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Clinical minimally important change was defined as a difference of 2-6 T-score points. Mean pain intensity and pain interference T-scores were compared at baseline, 1 week and 6 weeks with ANOVA. Multiple linear regression assessed 1-week scores adjusted for apical suspension type, advanced prolapse, concurrent hysterectomy, concurrent anterior or posterior repair, and concurrent sling. RESULTS At 1 week, all apical suspension groups showed minimally important change in pain intensity and pain interference T-scores. Between groups at 1 week, pain interference was higher in USLS (66.3±6.6) and MISC (65.5±5.9) than in SSLF (59.2±9.8), p=0.01. Multiple linear regression showed an association of hysterectomy with increases in pain intensity and pain interference. USLS had a higher proportion of concurrent hysterectomy (100%) than SSLF (0%) and MISC (30.8%), p<0.01. No difference was found based on apical suspension type alone. CONCLUSIONS No differences were found in PROMIS pain intensity and pain at 1 week postoperatively after apical suspension procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle N Schroeder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Jennifer M Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samantha L Margulies
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Marcella G Willis-Gray
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Houwen T, Theeuwes HP, Verhofstad MHJ, de Jongh MAC. From numbers to meaningful change: Minimal important change by using PROMIS in a cohort of fracture patients. Injury 2023; 54 Suppl 5:110882. [PMID: 37923506 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes measurement Information System (PROMIS®) is slowly increasing in patients with a fracture. Yet, minimal important change of PROMIS in patients with fractures has been addressed in a very limited number of studies. As the minimal important change (MIC) is important to interpret PROMIS-scores, the goal is to estimate the MIC for PROMIS physical function (PF), PROMIS pain interference (PI) and PROMIS ability to participate in social roles and activities (APSRA) in patients with a fracture. Secondly, the smallest detectable change was determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS A longitudinal cohort study on patients ≥ 18 years receiving surgical or non-surgical care for fractures was conducted. Patients completed PROMIS PF V1.1, PROMIS PI V1.1 and PROMIS APSRA V2.0. For follow-up, patients completed three additional anchor questions evaluating patient-reported improvement on a seven point rating scale. The predictive modeling method was used to estimate the MIC value of all three PROMIS questionnaires. RESULTS Hundred patients with a mean age of 55.4 ± 12.6 years were included of which sixty (60%) were female. Seventy-two (72%) patients were recovering from a surgical procedure. PROMIS-CAT T-scores of all PROMIS measures showed significant correlations with their anchor questions. The predictive modeling method showed a MIC value of +2.4 (n = 98) for PROMIS PF, -2.9 (n = 96) for PROMIS PI and +3.2 (n = 91) for PROMIS APSRA. CONCLUSION By using the anchor based predictive modeling method, PROMIS MIC-values for improvement of respectively +2.4 points on a T-score metric for PROMIS-PF, -2.9 for PROMIS-PI and +3.2 for PROMIS APSRA give the impression of being meaningful to patients. These values can be used in clinical practice for managing patient expectations; to inform on treatment results; and to assess if patients experience significant change. This in order to encourage patient centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thymen Houwen
- Network Emergency Care Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Trauma Research Unit Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilco P Theeuwes
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Michael H J Verhofstad
- Trauma Research Unit Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska A C de Jongh
- Network Emergency Care Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pawar N, Taylor KE, Yang M, Deepak P, Kim W, Paley MA, Matloubian M, Carvidi A, Ciorba MA, Demissie E, El‐Qunni A, Huang K, Kinnett B, McMorrow LE, Paez D, Poole M, Rose A, Schriefer RE, Kim AH, Nakamura M, Katz P, Gensler LS. Sleep Disturbance and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Disease. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:1849-1856. [PMID: 36479599 PMCID: PMC9877722 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Immunocompromised patients with chronic inflammatory disease (CID) may have experienced additional psychosocial burden during the COVID-19 pandemic due to their immunocompromised status. This study was undertaken to determine if vaccination would result in improved patient-reported outcomes longitudinally among individuals with CID undergoing SARS-CoV-2 vaccination regardless of baseline anxiety. METHODS Data are from a cohort of individuals with CID from 2 sites who underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Participants completed 3 study visits before and after 2 messenger RNA vaccine doses in the initial vaccination series when clinical data were collected. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-item Health Profile and expressed as T scores, with 2 groups stratified by high and low baseline anxiety. Mixed-effects models were used to examine longitudinal changes, adjusting for age, sex, and study site. RESULTS A total of 72% of the cohort was female with a mean ± SD age of 48.1 ± 15.5 years. Overall, sleep disturbance improved following both doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, and anxiety decreased after the second dose. Physical function scores worsened but did not meet the minimally important difference threshold. When stratifying by baseline anxiety, improvement in anxiety, fatigue, and social participation were greater in the high anxiety group. Physical function worsened slightly in both groups, and sleep disturbance improved significantly in the high anxiety group. CONCLUSION Sleep disturbance decreased in a significant and meaningful way in patients with CID upon vaccination. In patients with higher baseline anxiety, social participation increased, and anxiety, fatigue, and sleep disturbance decreased. Overall, results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may improve mental health and well-being, particularly among those with greater anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niti Pawar
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| | - Kimberly E. Taylor
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| | - Monica Yang
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| | - Parakkal Deepak
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Wooseob Kim
- Division of Immunobiology, Department of Pathology & ImmunologyWashington University School of Medicine
| | - Michael A. Paley
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Mehrdad Matloubian
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| | - Alex Carvidi
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| | - Matthew A. Ciorba
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Emanuel Demissie
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| | - Alia El‐Qunni
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Katherine Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Baylee Kinnett
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Lily E. McMorrow
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Diana Paez
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| | - Mackenzie Poole
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Abigail Rose
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Rebecca E. Schriefer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Alfred H.J. Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Mary Nakamura
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| | - Patricia Katz
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| | - Lianne S. Gensler
- University of California, School of Medicine Division of RheumatologySan FranciscoCA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Beukelman T, Long MD, Rhee RL, Kappelman MD, Merkel PA, Nowell WB, Clinton C, Ringold S, Del Gaizo V, Price B, Shaw DG, Venkatachalam S, Cuthbertson D, Xie F, Zhang X, Curtis JR. Assessment of Real-World Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Initiating Biologic Agents for the Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases: An Observational Study in Four Patient-Powered Research Networks. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2023; 14:171-180. [PMID: 37333063 PMCID: PMC10276583 DOI: 10.2147/prom.s392174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The most reliable and meaningful approach for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the evaluation of real-world clinical effectiveness of biologics in the treatment of autoimmune diseases is u ncertain. This study aimed to assess and compare the proportions of patients who had abnormalities in PROs measuring important general health domains at the initiation of treatment with biologics, as well as the effects of baseline abnormalities on subsequent improvement. Methods PROs were collected for patient participants with inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and vasculitis using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments. Scores were reported as T-scores normalized to the general population in the United States. Baseline PROs scores were collected near the time of biologic initiation, and follow-up scores were collected 3 to 8 months later. In addition to summary statistics, the proportion of patients with PROs abnormalities (scores ≥5 units worse than the population norm) was determined. Baseline and follow-up scores were compared, and an improvement of ≥5 units was considered significant. Results There was wide variation across autoimmune diseases in baseline PROs scores for all domains. For example, the proportion of participants with abnormal baseline pain interference scores ranged from 52% to 93%. When restricted to participants with baseline PROs abnormalities, the proportion of participants experiencing an improvement of ≥5 units was substantially higher. Conclusion As expected, many patients experienced improvement in PROs following initiation of treatment with biologics for autoimmune diseases. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of participants did not exhibit abnormalities in all PROs domains at baseline, and these participants appear less likely to experience improvement. For PROs to be reliably and meaningfully included in the evaluation of real-world medication effectiveness, more knowledge and careful consideration are needed to select the most appropriate patient populations and subgroups for inclusion and evaluation in studies measuring change in PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Beukelman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Millie D Long
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rennie L Rhee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael D Kappelman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Peter A Merkel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics; Division of Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Cassie Clinton
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sarah Ringold
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Rheumatology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Vincent Del Gaizo
- Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and PARTNERS PPRN, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Brian Price
- Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation and IBD-Partners, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dianne G Shaw
- Vasculitis Patient Powered Research Network, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - David Cuthbertson
- Health Informatics Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Fenglong Xie
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Xian Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Robot-Assisted Gait Training with Trexo Home: Users, Usage and Initial Impacts. CHILDREN 2023; 10:children10030437. [PMID: 36979997 PMCID: PMC10047646 DOI: 10.3390/children10030437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
Robotic gait training has the potential to improve secondary health conditions for people with severe neurological impairment. The purpose of this study was to describe who is using the Trexo robotic gait trainer, how much training is achieved in the home and community, and what impacts are observed after the initial month of use. In this prospective observational single-cohort study, parent-reported questionnaires were collected pre- and post-training. Of the 70 participants, the median age was 7 years (range 2 to 24), 83% had CP, and 95% did not walk for mobility. Users trained 2–5 times/week. After the initial month, families reported a significant reduction in sleep disturbance (p = 0.0066). Changes in bowel function, positive affect, and physical activity were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that families with children who have significant mobility impairments can use a robotic gait trainer frequently in a community setting and that sleep significantly improves within the first month of use. This intervention holds promise as a novel strategy to impact multi-modal impairments for this population. Future work should include an experimental study design over a longer training period to begin to understand the relationship between training volume and its full potential.
Collapse
|
14
|
Orbai AM, Coates LC, Deodhar A, Helliwell PS, Ritchlin CT, Leibowitz E, Kollmeier AP, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Sheng S, Jiang Y, Liu Y, Han C. Meaningful Improvement in General Health Outcomes with Guselkumab Treatment for Psoriatic Arthritis: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 Results from a Phase 3 Study. THE PATIENT 2022; 15:657-668. [PMID: 35768650 PMCID: PMC9584870 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Phase 3 DISCOVER-1 study of guselkumab is the first randomized controlled trial to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures to assess the effects of treatment on general health outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS Patients (N = 381) with active PsA were randomized 1:1:1 to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at Week 0, Week 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo with Week 24 crossover to guselkumab Q4W. The PROMIS-29 Profile contains four items for each of seven domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and social participation) and one pain-intensity item. Raw domain scores are converted to standardized T-scores, with norms based on a US general population mean of 50 (1 standard deviation (SD) = 10). T-score changes of ≥ 5 are considered clinically meaningful. Least-squares mean PROMIS-29 T-score changes from baseline to Week 24 and Week 52 were summarized for the guselkumab and placebo groups; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using a mixed model for repeated measures. The proportions of patients who achieved clinically meaningful improvement in PROMIS-29 T-scores were also summarized at Week 24 and Week 52; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS In the DISCOVER-1 patient population, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores at baseline were ~ 1 SD worse for physical function and pain interference and were numerically worse for social participation, fatigue, and sleep disturbance compared with the US general population. At Week 24, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores improved in guselkumab-treated patients, approaching US population norms; T-scores continued to improve through Week 52. Significantly higher proportions of patients in both guselkumab treatment arms (31-52% across domains) had clinically meaningful improvements in pain interference, fatigue, physical function, sleep, and social participation at Week 24 versus placebo (all nominal p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION In patients with active PsA, guselkumab treatment provided clinically meaningful reductions in fatigue and pain and improvement in physical function and social participation, as measured by the PROMIS-29 Profile. These improvements were maintained through 1 year. CLINICALTRIALS GOV: Registration number, NCT03162796; Submission date 19 May 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana-Maria Orbai
- Psoriatic Arthritis Program, Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center, Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue Baltimore, MFL Center Tower Suite 4100, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - Laura C Coates
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Atul Deodhar
- Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Philip S Helliwell
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christopher T Ritchlin
- Department of Medicine, Allergy/Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Alexa P Kollmeier
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Hsia
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Xie L Xu
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Shihong Sheng
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Yusang Jiang
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
- Cytel, Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, USA
| | - Yan Liu
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Chenglong Han
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van Balen EC, Hassan S, Smit C, Driessens M, Beckers EAM, Coppens M, Eikenboom JC, Hooimeijer HL, Leebeek FWG, Mauser‐Bunschoten EP, van Vulpen LFD, Schols SEM, Rosendaal F, van der Bom JG, Gouw SC. Socioeconomic participation of persons with hemophilia: Results from the sixth hemophilia in the Netherlands study. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2022; 6:e12741. [PMID: 36051543 PMCID: PMC9414229 DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Treatment availability and comprehensive care have resulted in improved clinical outcomes for persons with hemophilia. Recent data on socioeconomic participation in the Netherlands are lacking. This study assessed participation in education, in the labor market, and social participation for persons with hemophilia compared with the general male population. Methods Dutch adults and children (5-75 years) of all hemophilia severities (n = 1009) participated in a questionnaire study that included sociodemographic, occupational, and educational variables. Clinical characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records. General population data were extracted from Statistics Netherlands. Social participation was assessed with the PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities short form, with a minimal important difference set at 1.0. Results Data from 906 adults and children were analyzed. Participation in education of 20 to 24 year olds was 68% (general male population: 53%). Educational attainment was higher compared with Dutch males, especially for severe hemophilia. Absenteeism from school was more common than in the general population. The employment-to-population ratio and occupational disability were worse for severe hemophilia than in the general population (64.3% vs. 73.2% and 14.7% vs. 4.8%, respectively), but similar for nonsevere hemophilia. Unemployment was 5.4% (general male population: 3.4%). Absenteeism from work was less common (38% vs. 45.2%). Mean PROMIS score was similar to or higher than in the general population (54.2; SD 8.9 vs. 50; SD 10). Conclusion Socioeconomic participation of persons with nonsevere hemophilia was similar to the general male population. Some participation outcomes for persons with severe hemophilia were reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erna C. van Balen
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterThe Netherlands
| | - Shermarke Hassan
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterThe Netherlands
| | - Cees Smit
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterThe Netherlands
| | | | - Erik A. M. Beckers
- Department of HematologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Michiel Coppens
- Department of Vascular MedicineAmsterdam Cardiovascular SciencesAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jeroen C. Eikenboom
- Department of Internal MedicineDivision of Thrombosis and HemostasisLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Hélène L. Hooimeijer
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Frank W. G. Leebeek
- Department of HematologyErasmus University Medical CenterErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Evelien P. Mauser‐Bunschoten
- Center for Benign HaematologyThrombosis and HaemostasisVan CreveldkliniekUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUniversity UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Lize F. D. van Vulpen
- Center for Benign HaematologyThrombosis and HaemostasisVan CreveldkliniekUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUniversity UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Saskia E. M. Schols
- Department of HematologyRadboud university medical centerNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Hemophilia Treatment Center Nijmegen‐Eindhoven‐MaastrichtNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Frits R. Rosendaal
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterThe Netherlands
| | - Johanna G. van der Bom
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterThe Netherlands
- Center for Clinical Transfusion ResearchSanquin Research/LUMCLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Samantha C. Gouw
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterThe Netherlands
- Pediatric HematologyEmma Children’s HospitalAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang M, Keller S, Lin JMS. Assessing sleep and pain among adults with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS® sleep and pain short forms. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:3483-3499. [PMID: 35896905 PMCID: PMC9331042 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03199-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcome measurement information system® (PROMIS) short forms for assessing sleep disturbance, sleep-related impairment, pain interference, and pain behavior, among adults with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). METHODS Data came from the Multi-Site ME/CFS study conducted between 2012 and 2020 at seven ME/CFS specialty clinics across the USA. Baseline and follow-up data from ME/CFS and healthy control (HC) groups were used to examine ceiling/floor effects, internal consistency reliability, differential item functioning (DIF), known-groups validity, and responsiveness. RESULTS A total of 945 participants completed the baseline assessment (602 ME/CFS and 338 HC) and 441 ME/CFS also completed the follow-up. The baseline mean T-scores of PROMIS sleep and pain measures ranged from 57.68 to 62.40, about one standard deviation above the national norm (T-score = 50). All four measures showed high internal consistency (ω = 0.92 to 0.97) and no substantial floor/ceiling effects. No DIF was detected by age or sex. Known-groups comparisons among ME/CFS groups with low, medium, and high functional impairment showed significant small-sized differences in scores (η2 = 0.01 to 0.05) for the two sleep measures and small-to-medium-sized differences (η2 = 0.01 to 0.15) for the two pain measures. ME/CFS participants had significantly worse scores than HC (η2 = 0.35 to 0.45) for all four measures. Given the non-interventional nature of the study, responsiveness was evaluated as sensitivity to change over time and the pain interference measure showed an acceptable sensitivity. CONCLUSION The PROMIS sleep and pain measures demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties supporting their use in ME/CFS research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manshu Yang
- Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, 142 Flagg Road, Kingston, RI, 02881, USA.
| | - San Keller
- American Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jin-Mann S Lin
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ahmed O, Lee A, Vachharajani N, Chang SH, Park Y, Khan AS, Chapman WC, Doyle MM. Reviewing Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:69-77. [PMID: 35703964 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With improved survivorship in liver transplantation (LT), there is an emerging focus on functional recovery and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after surgery. The present study aimed to assess HRQoL after LT using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective analysis of LT recipients between 2020 and 2021. A total of 238 patients were contacted by phone at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using the PROMIS 29-Profile. Scores were recorded and computed using the HealthMeasures Scoring Service. RESULTS PROMIS was available for 174 patients at 3 (n = 58), 6 (n = 57), and 12 months (n = 59). Overall, mean PROMIS scores were 47.6 ± 3, 47.6 ± 3, and 47.6 ± 3 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Most domains improved postoperatively by 12 months except for anxiety and sleep disturbance measures. The lowest domain in the immediate postoperative period was physical functioning, but this had the closest return to normative population values. Pain interference was above the population reference during the initial postoperative period, improving by 12 months where they were below mean population values. Depression and fatigue scores improved by 6 months and appeared to stabilize by 12 months post-LT. Patients demonstrated increased social participation, and scores were remarkably higher than general population means at each timepoint. CONCLUSION LT can impact physical, mental, and social health which, in this setting, remains largely unexplored using PROMIS instruments. We report that although overall patient well being can improve, some mental health domains require further consideration during the postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Ahmed
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - Angela Lee
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - Neeta Vachharajani
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - Su-Hsin Chang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery (Chang, Park), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Yikyung Park
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery (Chang, Park), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Adeel S Khan
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - William C Chapman
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - Mb Majella Doyle
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Su S, Marrie RA, Bernstein CN. Factors Associated With Social Participation in Persons Living With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2022; 5:59-67. [PMID: 35368323 PMCID: PMC8972209 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) imposes a significant burden on health-related quality of life, particularly in social domains. We sought to investigate the factors that limit social participation in patients with IBD. Methods We assessed a cohort of 239 Manitobans with IBD. We collected sociodemographic information, medical comorbidities, disease phenotype, symptom activity and psychiatric comorbidity (using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV). Participants completed the eight-item Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA) questionnaire, which assesses participation restriction, including problems experienced in social interaction, employment, transportation, community, social and civic life. Results Poorer social participation scores were associated with earning less than $50,000 CAD income annually (P < 0.001), actively smoking (P = 0.006), higher symptom scores (P < 0.001 for CD, P = 0.004 for UC), and having an increasing number of chronic medical conditions (R = −0.30). History of depression (P < 0.001) and anxiety (P = 0.001) and having active depression (P < 0.001) and anxiety (P = 0.001) all predicted poor social participation scores. IBD phenotype or disease duration was not predictive. Based on multivariable linear regression analysis, significant predictors of variability in social participation were medical comorbidity, psychiatric comorbidity, psychiatric symptoms and IBD-related symptoms. Conclusions The factors that predict social participation by IBD patients include income, smoking, medical comorbidities, IBD symptom burden, and psychiatric comorbidities. Multivariable linear regression suggests that the most relevant factors are medical comorbidity, psychiatric comorbidity, psychiatric symptoms and IBD symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Su
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ruth Ann Marrie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van Balen EC, Haverman L, Hassan S, Taal EM, Smit C, Driessens MH, Beckers EAM, Coppens M, Eikenboom J, Hooimeijer HL, Leebeek FWG, van Vulpen LFD, Schols SEM, Terwee CB, Rosendaal FR, van der Bom JG, Gouw SC. Validation of PROMIS Profile-29 in adults with hemophilia in the Netherlands. J Thromb Haemost 2021; 19:2687-2701. [PMID: 34245088 PMCID: PMC8596807 DOI: 10.1111/jth.15454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Profile-29 questionnaire is widely used worldwide, but it has not yet been validated in the Netherlands, nor in persons with hemophilia. OBJECTIVE To validate the Dutch-Flemish version of the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.01 in adults with hemophilia. METHODS Dutch males with hemophilia (all severities) completed questionnaires that contained sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the PROMIS-29, RAND-36, and the Hemophilia Activities List (HAL). Structural validity of each subscale was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was calculated for each subscale with sufficient model fit in CFA. Construct validity was assessed by testing hypotheses about (1) correlations of each PROMIS-29 subscale with corresponding scales of RAND-36 and domains of HAL, and (2) mean differences in T-scores between subgroups with different hemophilia severities, self-reported joint impairment, and HIV infection status. We considered ≥75% of data in accordance with the hypotheses evidence for construct validity. RESULTS In total, 770 persons with hemophilia participated in this cross-sectional study. CFA revealed sufficient structural validity for five subscales: Physical Function, Depression, Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, and Pain Interference. Internal consistency was high and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.79 for Sleep Disturbance to 0.96 for Pain Interference. Differences between clinical subgroups were in the expected direction. Construct validity was confirmed for Physical Function, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, and Pain Intensity. CONCLUSION This study revealed sufficient evidence for structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity for most PROMIS Profile-29 subscales among people with hemophilia in the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erna C. van Balen
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Lotte Haverman
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial CareAmsterdam Reproduction and DevelopmentAmsterdam Public HealthEmma Children’s HospitalAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Shermarke Hassan
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth M. Taal
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Cees Smit
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Erik A. M. Beckers
- Department of HematologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Michiel Coppens
- Department of Vascular MedicineAmsterdam Cardiovascular SciencesAmsterdam University Medical CentersUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Eikenboom
- Department of Internal MedicineDivision of Thrombosis and HemostasisLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Hélène L. Hooimeijer
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Lize F. D. van Vulpen
- Department of Benign HematologyVan CreveldkliniekUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Saskia E. M. Schols
- Department of HematologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenthe Netherlands
- Hemophilia Treatment Center Nijmegen‐Eindhoven‐MaastrichtNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Caroline B. Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data ScienceAmsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Frits R. Rosendaal
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Johanna G. van der Bom
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Center for Clinical Transfusion ResearchSanquin Research/LUMCLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Samantha C. Gouw
- Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric HematologyEmma Children’s HospitalAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Uhrenholt L, Høstgaard S, Pedersen JF, Christensen R, Dreyer L, Leffers HCB, Taylor PC, Strand V, Jacobsen S, Voss A, Gregersen JW, Kristensen S. Patient-reported outcome measures in systemic lupus erythematosus by a web-based application: A randomized, crossover, agreement study. Lupus 2021; 30:2124-2134. [PMID: 34719299 DOI: 10.1177/09612033211051641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but not widely used in clinical practice. However, interest in incorporating PROMs into the management of SLE is increasing as PROMs provide a unique insight into the patient's perception of lupus disease activity. The objective was to assess agreement in PROMs answered using a web app versus an outpatient touchscreen among patients with SLE. METHODS In a crossover RCT, SLE patients answered the following PROMs in a random order using the web app and the outpatient touchscreen: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) Global Health, SLAQ Symptom, SLAQ Total, SLAQ Worsening, Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Fatigue VAS, Patient Global Health VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and an Anchoring Question. Equivalence between the two device types was demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the difference in PROM scores was within the prespecified equivalence margin. Agreement between the two device types was assessed using mixed linear models. RESULTS Thirty-four patients with SLE were included. Equivalence was demonstrated between the two device types for SLAQ Global Health with a difference of -0.21 (95% CI: -0.65 to 0.23). Moreover, equivalence was also found for HAQ-DI, Pain VAS, and Fatigue VAS whereas only comparability within the limits of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) was demonstrated for VAS Patient Global Health. Statistical comparability was demonstrated for SLAQ Total, SLAQ Worsening, PASS, and Anchoring Question (no predefined MCID/equivalence margins available). However, a statistically significant difference between device types was observed for the SLAQ Symptom of -0.56 (95% CI: -1.10 to -0.01). The difference was, however, very small when considering the scale range of 0-24; thus, it was not judged to be of clinical relevance. Preference for the web app was very high (91.2%). CONCLUSION For the first time ever, equivalence and comparability between two electronic device types for various PROMs were demonstrated among patients with SLE. Implementation of the device is expected to improve the management of SLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Uhrenholt
- Department of Rheumatology, 53141Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, 1004Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, 542252the Parker Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.,DANBIO, 70590Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Simone Høstgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, 1004Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Julie F Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, 1004Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, 542252the Parker Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 11286Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lene Dreyer
- Department of Rheumatology, 53141Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, 1004Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Henrik C B Leffers
- Copenhagen Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, 53146Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter C Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, 6396University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Vibeke Strand
- Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, 6429Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Søren Jacobsen
- Copenhagen Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, 53146Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, 4321University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Voss
- Department of Rheumatology, 11286Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jon W Gregersen
- Department of Nephrology, 53141Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Salome Kristensen
- Department of Rheumatology, 53141Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, 1004Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Multidimensional Perioperative Recovery Trajectories in a Mixed Surgical Cohort: A Longitudinal Cluster Analysis Utilizing National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Measures. Anesth Analg 2021; 134:279-290. [PMID: 34591809 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain trajectories have been described in numerous surgical settings where preoperative characteristics have been used to predict trajectory membership. Suboptimal pain intensity trajectories have been linked to poor longitudinal outcomes. However, numerous biopsychosocial modulators of postoperative pain may also have distinct longitudinal trajectories that may inform additional targets to improve postoperative recovery. METHODS Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, thoracic surgery, spine surgery, major abdominal surgery, or mastectomy completed Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures and additional scales preoperatively and at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. A k-means clustering for longitudinal data was utilized to explore and describe distinct pain impact (PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function) trajectories and associated changes in additional biopsychosocial measures. Follow-up analyses examined participant demographics and clinical characteristics associated with trajectory memberships. RESULTS Three postoperative biopsychosocial symptom clusters were identified across all patients (n = 402): low (35%), average (47%), and high (18%) performance cluster trajectories. Participants undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), spinal surgery, reporting presurgical opioid use, and higher pain catastrophizing scale scores were found to be associated with the low performance trajectory. Patients within the low performance trajectory, while demonstrating small improvements by 6 months, remained mild to moderately impaired in both pain impact and physical health outcomes. Alternatively, participants in the average performance trajectory demonstrated improvement in pain impact to population norms compared to baseline and demonstrated continued improvement across physical and psychological outcomes. Patients within the high performance cluster started within population norms across all measures at baseline and returned to baseline or exceeded baseline values by 6 months postoperatively. Self-reported opioid utilization was significantly higher in the low performance cluster across all time points. While a larger proportion of average performance patients reported opioid utilization during the first postoperative month compared to the high performance cluster, no differences were detected at 6 months postoperatively between these 2 clusters. CONCLUSIONS These pain impact trajectories build upon previous unidimensional pain intensity trajectories and suggest that additional distinct biopsychosocial measures may have unique trajectories related to cluster assignment. Additionally, these findings highlight the importance of continued pain impact surveillance through the perioperative recovery period to detect patients at risk of experiencing a poor trajectory and subsequently poor longitudinal health outcomes.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kasturi S, Price LL, Paushkin V, Salmon JE, McAlindon TE, Mandl LA. Impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Results from a multi-center prospective cohort. Lupus 2021; 30:1747-1755. [PMID: 34284676 DOI: 10.1177/09612033211033981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the initial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS Patients with SLE participating in a multi-center longitudinal cohort study in New York and Boston were invited to complete a supplemental web-based questionnaire in the summer of 2020. Participants completed standardized patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and a combination of Likert scale and open-ended questions exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their health and access to health care. Changes in PROs were evaluated with paired t-tests and frequencies of worsened symptoms were calculated. A thematic qualitative analysis was conducted on free text responses. RESULTS Of 97 patients invited, 63 (65%) completed a supplemental questionnaire. Nearly 50% of respondents exhibited increases in anxiety (47.5%) and depression (48.3%) and over 40% scored worse in measures of pain interference, fatigue, and cognitive abilities. Respondents with pre-existing diagnoses of anxiety did not differ from other participants in PRO scores, but were more than three times as likely to report worsened health status. Patients denied difficulties accessing medications (85%) or medical care (84%) and over 50% participated in telehealth visits. Anxiety and increased health risks due to immunosuppression were recurring themes in free text responses. CONCLUSIONS SLE patients experienced a significant physical and emotional toll in the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Comprehensive patient-centered care, including monitoring and addressing anxiety and health-related quality of life, is critical to improving health outcomes in this population during the ongoing health crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanthini Kasturi
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Lori Lyn Price
- Institute of Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, 1867Tufts Medical Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, USA.,Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, USA
| | - Vasilissa Paushkin
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Jane E Salmon
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Timothy E McAlindon
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Lisa A Mandl
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) was identified as a core systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) outcome in 1999. More than 20 years later, however, generic PRO measures evaluating impact in SLE are used mainly for research. Generic and disease-targeted PRO tools have unique advantages. Significant progress in identification of patient disease-relevant PRO concepts and development of new PRO tools for SLE has occurred over the past 20 years. Further research needs to focus on responsiveness and minimally important differences of existing, promising PRO tools to facilitate their use in SLE patient care and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narender Annapureddy
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, 1160 21st Avenue, Suite T3113 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Meenakshi Jolly
- Department of Medicine, Rush University, 1611 West Harrison Street, Suite 510, Chicago, IL 60615, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kroenke K, Stump TE, Chen CX, Kean J, Damush TM, Bair MJ, Krebs EE, Monahan PO. Responsiveness of PROMIS and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) Depression Scales in three clinical trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:41. [PMID: 33541362 PMCID: PMC7860196 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01674-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PROMIS depression scales are reliable and valid measures that have extensive normative data in general population samples. However, less is known about how responsive they are to detect change in clinical settings and how their responsiveness compares to legacy measures. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the responsiveness of the PROMIS and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) depression scales in three separate samples. METHODS We used data from three clinical trials (two in patients with chronic pain and one in stroke survivors) totaling 651 participants. At both baseline and follow-up, participants completed four PROMIS depression fixed-length scales as well as legacy measures: Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item and 2-item scales (PHQ-9 and PHQ-2) and the SF-36 Mental Health scale. We measured global ratings of depression change, both prospectively and retrospectively, as anchors to classify patients as improved, unchanged, or worsened. Responsiveness was assessed with standardized response means, statistical tests comparing change groups, and area-under-curve analysis. RESULTS The PROMIS depression and legacy scales had generally comparable responsiveness. Moreover, the four PROMIS depression scales of varying lengths were similarly responsive. In general, measures performed better in detecting depression improvement than depression worsening. For all measures, responsiveness varied based on the study sample and on whether depression improved or worsened. CONCLUSIONS Both PROMIS and PHQ depression scales are brief public domain measures that are responsive (i.e., sensitive to change) and thus appropriate as outcome measures in research as well as for monitoring treatment in clinical practice. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01236521, NCT01583985, NCT01507688.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Kroenke
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc, 1101 West 10th St., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Timothy E Stump
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Chen X Chen
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jacob Kean
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Teresa M Damush
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc, 1101 West 10th St., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Matthew J Bair
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc, 1101 West 10th St., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Erin E Krebs
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Patrick O Monahan
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:2729-2754. [PMID: 34247326 PMCID: PMC8481206 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 208] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
We define the minimal important change (MIC) as a threshold for a minimal within-person change over time above which patients perceive themselves importantly changed. There is a lot of confusion about the concept of MIC, particularly about the concepts of minimal important change and minimal detectable change, which questions the validity of published MIC values. The aims of this study were: (1) to clarify the concept of MIC and how to use it; (2) to provide practical guidance for estimating methodologically sound MIC values; and (3) to improve the applicability of PROMIS by summarizing the available evidence on plausible PROMIS MIC values. We discuss the concept of MIC and how to use it and provide practical guidance for estimating MIC values. In addition, we performed a systematic review in PubMed on MIC values of any PROMIS measure from studies using recommended approaches. A total of 50 studies estimated the MIC of a PROMIS measure, of which 19 studies used less appropriate methods. MIC values of the remaining 31 studies ranged from 0.1 to 12.7 T-score points. We recommend to use the predictive modeling method, possibly supplemented with the vignette-based method, in future MIC studies. We consider a MIC value of 2-6 T-score points for PROMIS measures reasonable to assume at this point. For surgical interventions a higher MIC value might be appropriate. We recommend more high-quality studies estimating MIC values for PROMIS.
Collapse
|
26
|
Katz P, Dall’Era M, Trupin L, Rush S, Murphy LB, Lanata C, Criswell LA, Yazdany J. Impact of Limited Health Literacy on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021; 73:110-119. [PMID: 32741118 PMCID: PMC7775267 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Health disparities in patient-reported outcomes by income and education are well documented; however, the impact of health literacy on patient-reported outcomes has received less attention. We examined independent effects of income, education, and health literacy on patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS Data from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study (n = 323 participants) were used. Health literacy was assessed with a validated 3-item measure (ability to understand written information, reliance on others to understand written information, confidence in completing written forms). Patient-reported outcomes were administered by interview in English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin. Generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcomes were examined using the following: 10 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short forms; the 8 Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey subscales; and 3 patient-reported SLE disease activity and damage measures. We conducted 2 sets of multivariable analyses: the first examined education, income, or health literacy individually; the second included all 3 simultaneously. All multivariable models included age, sex, race/ethnicity, language, disease duration, and physician-assessed disease activity and damage. RESULTS More than one-third of participants (38%) had limited health literacy (LHL), including >25% with greater than high school education. In multivariable analyses simultaneously considering education, income, and health literacy, LHL was associated with significantly worse scores on all patient-reported outcomes except disease damage. In contrast, disparities by income were seen in only 3 PROMIS scales, 3 SF-36 subscales, and 1 disease activity measure. No disparities by education level were noted. CONCLUSION We found significantly worse patient-reported outcome scores among individuals with LHL, even after controlling for disease activity and damage. Whether disparities are due to actual differences in health or measurement issues requires further study.
Collapse
|
27
|
Patient-reported experience with patient-reported outcome measures in adult patients seen in rheumatology clinics. Qual Life Res 2020; 30:1073-1082. [PMID: 33170400 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02692-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly utilized in the evaluation of patients with rheumatic diseases. The aim of our study was to assess the patient experience with completing PROMs within rheumatology clinics, and identify patient characteristics associated with a more positive experience. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of adult patients seen in rheumatology clinics between 1/1/2017 and 6/30/2017. Patients were included in the study if they completed at least one patient-reported experience question following completion of PROMs. Patient characteristics associated with more positive experiences were identified through multivariable proportional odds models. RESULTS 12,597 adult patients (mean age 59 ± 15; 76% female; 84% white) completed PROMs, as well as questions on their experience completing PROMs. Patients agreed/strongly agreed that PROM questions were easy to understand (97%), useful (84%), helped their physician understand their health (78%), improved communication with their provider (78%) and improved control over their own care (70%). Predictors of better experience with PROMs included being younger, non-white, having lower income, and being a new patient. Worse self-reported health also predicted better experience with PROMs. CONCLUSION Our study found a positive patient experience with PROMs, which is a crucial component of their successful implementation and utilization. Findings from this study suggest PROMs may be particularly beneficial in new patients, minorities, those with lower income, and worse self-reported quality of life. Collecting PROMs could provide opportunities to improve patient-provider communication and enhance control over care for rheumatology patients who could most benefit.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kwan A, Bingham K, Touma Z. Measures of Anxiety in Rheumatic Diseases. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 Suppl 10:630-644. [PMID: 33091269 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Kwan
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathleen Bingham
- University of Toronto and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zahi Touma
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Izadi Z. Health‐Related Quality of Life Measures in Adult Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 Suppl 10:577-592. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.24245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
30
|
Chu P, Ju YES, Hinze AM, Kim AH. Measures of Sleep in Rheumatologic Diseases: Sleep Quality Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatologic Diseases. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 Suppl 10:410-430. [PMID: 33091275 PMCID: PMC7586459 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Chu
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Yo-El S. Ju
- Sleep Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Alicia M. Hinze
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Alfred H.J. Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|