Daridorexant, a New Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist to Treat Insomnia Disorder

Effect of daridorexant on sleep architecture in patients with chronic insomnia disorder: a pooled post hoc analysis of two randomized phase 3 clinical studies

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Post hoc analysis to evaluate the effect of daridorexant on sleep architecture in people with insomnia, focusing on features associated with hyperarousal.

METHODS

We studied sleep architecture in adults with chronic insomnia disorder from two randomized phase 3 clinical studies (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03545191 and NCT03575104) investigating 3 months of daridorexant treatment (placebo, daridorexant 25 mg, daridorexant 50 mg). We analyzed sleep-wake transition probabilities, EEG spectra, and sleep spindle properties including density, dispersion, and slow oscillation phase coupling. The wake EEG similarity index (WESI) was determined using a machine learning algorithm analyzing the spectral profile of the EEG.

RESULTS

At month 3, daridorexant 50 mg decreased wake-to-wake transition probabilities (p < .05) and increased the probability of transitions from wake-to-N1 (p < .05), N2 (p < .05), and REM sleep (p < .05), as well as from N1-to-N2 (p < .05) compared to baseline and placebo. Daridorexant 50 mg decreased relative beta power during wake (p = .011) and N1 (p < .001) compared to baseline and placebo. During the wake, relative alpha power decreased (p < .001) and relative delta power increased (p < .001) compared to placebo. Daridorexant did not alter EEG spectra bands in N2, N3, and REM stages or in sleep spindle activity. Daridorexant decreased the WESI score during wake compared to baseline (p = .004). Effects with 50 mg were consistent between months 1 and 3 and less pronounced with 25 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

Daridorexant reduced EEG features associated with hyperarousal as indicated by reduced wake-to-wake transition probabilities and enhanced spectral features associated with drowsiness and sleep during wake and N1.

CLINICAL TRIALS

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03545191: study to assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-541468 (daridorexant) in adult and elderly participants with insomnia disorder. URL: Study Details | study to assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-541468 (daridorexant) in adult and elderly participants with insomnia disorder | ClinicalTrials.gov ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03575104:study to assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-541468 (daridorexant) in adult and elderly participants who experience difficulties sleeping. URL: study details | study to assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-541468 (daridorexant) in adult and elderly participants who experience difficulties sleeping | ClinicalTrials.gov.

Daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

This Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder.

PATIENTS/METHODS

490 patients with insomnia disorder from 95 sites in Japan were randomized to daridorexant 50 mg (n = 163), 25 mg (n = 163) or placebo (n = 164) for 4 weeks, followed by a 7-day placebo run-out and a 30-day safety follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoints, in hierarchical order, were change from baseline at Week 4 in subjective total sleep time (sTST) and subjective latency to sleep onset (sLSO), for daridorexant 50 mg vs placebo. sTST and sLSO were also evaluated (secondary endpoints) for daridorexant 25 mg vs placebo. Safety endpoints included adverse events and next-morning sleepiness (Visual Analog Scale, VAS).

RESULTS

Daridorexant 50 mg significantly increased sTST and decreased sLSO versus placebo at Week 4 (least-squares mean difference [LSMD]: sTST 20.3 min [95 % CI 11.4, 29.2] p < 0.001; sLSO -10.7 min [-15.8, -5.5] p < 0.001). Daridorexant 25 mg also significantly improved both endpoints versus placebo (LSMD: sTST 9.2 min [0.3, 18.1] p = 0.042; sLSO -7.2 min [-12.3, -2.0] p = 0.006). Overall incidence of adverse events was similar across groups (50 mg: 22 %; 25 mg: 18 %; placebo 23 %); somnolence, the most common event, increased with increasing dose (50 mg: 6.8 %; 25 mg: 3.7 %; placebo 1.8 %). However, daridorexant did not increase VAS next-morning sleepiness. No rebound or withdrawal-related symptoms were observed after treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japanese patients with insomnia disorder, daridorexant (25 and 50 mg) was well tolerated and significantly improved subjective sleep outcomes, with no evidence of residual effects.

Dose-response of daridorexant in insomnia disorder: An analysis of Phase 2 and 3 studies

OBJECTIVE

Daridorexant is approved for the treatment of insomnia at two dose levels (25 and 50 mg). Dose-efficacy and -safety response relationships were evaluated using Phase 2 and 3 data.

METHODS

Data (N = 2153) from one Phase 2 (daridorexant 5, 10, 25, 50 mg, placebo once daily for 1 month) and two Phase 3 studies (daridorexant 10 and 25 or 25 and 50 mg, placebo once daily for 3 months) were pooled. Dose-response analyses at 1 month of double-blind treatment were performed using a linear regression and a two-stage meta-analysis approach. Efficacy endpoints were polysomnography-derived wake after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep (LPS), self-reported total sleep time and the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire total score (only Phase 3 data for the latter). Safety endpoints were the incidence of total adverse events (AEs) and AEs corresponding to somnolence/fatigue.

RESULTS

Dose-responses for all efficacy endpoints were significant in the observed dose range (both statistical approaches, p < 0.01). All dose-response relationships were linear except for LPS (two-stage meta-analysis) which showed a change in slope above 10 mg without reaching a plateau. No significant dose-response was observed for any AE (both approaches, p > 0.05). The incidence of AEs corresponding to somnolence/fatigue was low at all doses and, without linear assumption (two-stage meta-analysis) there was no dose-dependency (p = 0.369).

CONCLUSIONS

The data support the use of 50 mg as the preferred daridorexant dose in patients with insomnia disorder to provide the greatest opportunity for efficacy with no increased risk for AEs, including somnolence/fatigue, compared to lower doses.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of daridorexant in Japanese subjects: Results from phase 1 and 2 studies

Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist for the treatment of insomnia. We report results from the first two randomised, double-blind clinical studies of daridorexant in Japanese subjects. In the Phase 1 study, daridorexant (10, 25, 50 mg) or placebo were administered in the morning for 4 days in 24 young (mean age 26.9 years) and 24 older (mean age 69.7 years) healthy Japanese adults. Daridorexant reached a peak plasma concentration within 1.0 h across every dose and age group. For all doses, the mean plasma concentration of daridorexant showed a similar change between the age groups. Exposure parameters increased dose-dependently with minimal/no accumulation upon repeated dosing. The terminal half-life was ~8 h. In the Phase 2, four-period, four-way crossover study, 47 Japanese subjects (mean age 50.4 years) with insomnia disorder were randomised to receive four treatments (daridorexant 10, 25, 50 mg, placebo) during four treatment periods, each consisting of two treatment nights (5-12 day washout between treatment periods). Subjects continued their fourth treatment for 12 further days. A statistically significant dose-response relationship (multiple-comparison procedure-modelling, p < 0.0001) was found in the reduction of polysomnography-measured wake after sleep onset (WASO; primary endpoint) and latency to persistent sleep (secondary endpoint) from baseline to days 1/2. Statistically significant dose-response relationships were also observed for secondary subjective endpoints from baseline to days 1/2 (sWASO, latency to sleep onset). All daridorexant doses were well tolerated, with no treatment discontinuations and no next-morning residual effects. These results supported further investigation of daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder.

Comparative short-term safety and efficacy of hypnotics: A quantitative risk-benefit analysis

Several professional societies have provided recommendations for prescribing medications for insomnia. None has provided an integrative analysis that concurrently quantifies safety and efficacy (e.g., risk-benefit ratios). This represents an important gap for informing clinician decision-making. Accordingly, the aim of the present review is to provide such an analysis for five classes of sleep-promoting medications. Adverse event data values were extracted from the most recent FDA-approved package inserts and converted to an integer before being placebo-adjusted and standardized as a rate per 1000 (AEr). Efficacy data, pre-to-post self-reported data for active and placebo conditions were acquired from pivotal trials identified in "white papers" and systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Weighted effect sizes were calculated for subjective sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset and total sleep time, and then were averaged by medication class for each sleep continuity variable. Overall efficacy was represented by a single variable, SWT (sleep latency + wake time after sleep onset + total sleep time). Risk-benefit was represented using a simple ratio value. For safety, it was found that melatonin receptor agonists had the lowest adverse event rate (AEr = 43.1), and non-benzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists had the highest rate (AEr = 255.0). For efficacy, it was found that the pre-to-post placebo adjusted effect sizes were largest for benzodiazepines (effect size = 1.94) and smallest for melatonin receptor agonists (effect size = 0.109). For risk-benefit, histamine antagonist had the most favourable profile (risk-benefit = 69.5), while melatonin receptor agonist had the least favourable profile (risk-benefit = 395.7). Overall, the combined metric for risk-benefit suggests that treatment with a histamine antagonist is optimal and potentially represents the best first-line therapy for the medical management of insomnia.

Daridorexant treatment for chronic insomnia: a real-world retrospective single-center study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic insomnia disorder (CID) significantly impacts well-being and daily functioning. Daridorexant, a double orexin receptor blocker, has shown efficacy in randomized clinical trials and has been recently approved for the treatment of CID in adult patients. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe real-world data on daridorexant effectiveness and safety in adult patients with CID.

METHODS

Consecutive patients initiating on-label daridorexant at the Sleep Medicine Centre, University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata were enrolled. Baseline and 30-day follow-up (FU) evaluations included patients' and CID characteristics, comorbidities, and clinicians' and patients' subjective ratings of changes with the Clinical and Patient Global Impression-Improvement scores (CGI-Is and PGI-Is), as well as Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores in a subgroup of patients.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients initiated 50-mg daily dosage. At FU, 58% of both patients and clinicians rated CID as improved on CGI-Is and PGI-Is, with no differences based on comorbidities, sex, or number of previous medications. No significant predictors of CGI-Is and PGI-Is improvement were identified. At FU, ISI scores (n = 24) significantly decreased from 18.25 ± 3.21 to 12.08 ± 6.12 (Z = 8.000; p < 0.001). Of these, eight patients (33.3%) had absence of insomnia symptoms, and no patients reported a worsening in ISI score categories.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests daridorexant to be effective and safe in real-world CID treatment whether used as a first-ever treatment, switch, or add-on, as reflected by subjective and objective measures and the absence of serious treatment-related adverse events. Future research on larger cohorts should explore daridorexant potential across diverse patient characteristics.

Intervention effect of electroacupuncture therapy on drug reducing and discontinuation of insomnia patients with long-term excessive use of zolpidem

OBJECTIVE

To explore therapeutic interventions after drug withdrawal reduction for insomnia patients who used zolpidem excessively for a long time.

METHODS

A total of 86 patients with simple insomnia were randomly rolled into treatment (Tre) group (electroacupuncture therapy under low-dose zolpidem+relaxation treatment intervention, n=40) and control (Ctrl) group (low-dose zolpidem+relaxation treatment intervention, n=40), all of which received treatment and intervention for four weeks.

RESULTS

As a result, after the dosage of zolpidem was gradually reduced, the deep sleep time of patients in the two groups was reduced in the first stage. However, with the prolongation of treatment time, the reduction trend of the two groups was gradually alleviated, but no great difference was found between groups (P>0.05). In the second stage of treatment, the deep sleep time of patients in the two groups gradually recovered and increased, and that in Tre group was greater than that in Ctrl group, and the upward trend was significant but differed slightly between groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the insomnia severity index (ISI) scores of the two groups gradually decreased, and that in Tre group was drastically inferior to those of Ctrl group on days 14 and 28 after treatment (both Ps<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, electroacupuncture therapy can effectively alleviate the effect of zolpidem on sleep quality in patients with insomnia after drug discontinuation and promote the recovery of deep sleep time in patients, thereby alleviating the side effects and drug dependence of patients.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Stroke: Determining the Mechanisms Behind their Association and Treatment Options

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) can be a sequela of stroke caused by vascular injury to vital respiratory centers, cerebral edema, and increased intracranial pressure of space-occupying lesions. Likewise, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) contributes to increased stroke risk through local mechanisms such as impaired ischemic cerebrovascular response and systemic effects such as promoting atherosclerosis, hypercoagulability, cardiac arrhythmias, vascular-endothelial dysfunction, and metabolic syndrome. The impact of OSA on stroke outcomes has been established, yet it receives less attention in national guidelines on stroke management than hyperglycemia and blood pressure dysregulation. Furthermore, whether untreated OSA worsens stroke outcomes is not well-described in the literature. This scoping review provides an updated investigation of the correlation between OSA and stroke, including inter-relational pathophysiology. This review also highlights the importance of OSA treatment and its role in stroke outcomes. Knowledge of pathophysiology, the inter-relationship between these common disorders, and the impact of OSA therapy on outcomes affect the clinical management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. In addition, understanding the relationship between stroke outcomes and pre-existing OSA will allow clinicians to predict outcomes while treating acute stroke.

Emerging and upcoming therapies in insomnia

Insomnia, commonly treated with benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor agonists, presents challenges due to associated serious side effects such as abuse and dependence. To address these concerns, many researches have been conducted to develop and advance both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs), which include suvorexant, daridorexant and lemborexant, have recently been approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as a novel pharmacotherapeutic alternative. Unlike BZD receptor agonists that act as positive allosteric modulators of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A subunit alpha 1 receptor, DORAs function by binding to both orexin receptor types 1 and 2, and inhibiting the action of the wake-promoting orexin neuropeptide. These drugs induce normal sleep without sleep stage change, do not impair attention and memory performance, and facilitate easier awakening. However, more real-world safety information is needed. Selective orexin-2 receptor antagonists (2-SORAs) is under clinical developments. This review provides an overview of the mechanism of action in relation to insomnia, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety information of DORAs and SORA. According to insomnia management guidelines, the first-line treatment for chronic insomnia is cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). Although it has proven effective in improving sleep-related quality of life, it has several restrictions limitations due to a face-to-face format. Recently, prescription digital therapy such as Somryst® was approved by US FDA. Somryst®, a smartphone app-based CBT-I, demonstrated meaningful responses in patients. However, digital limitations may impact scalability. Overall, these developments offer promising alternatives for insomnia treatment, emphasizing safety, efficacy, and accessibility.

Efficacy and safety of Dimdazenil in the adult insomnia patients: a phase II randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and parallel-group study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dimdazenil, a positive allosteric modulator with selectivity for α1, α5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors, on sleep variables in patients with insomnia disorder.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults (18-65 years) with insomnia disorder were randomized (1:1:1:1 to receive daily oral placebo, Dimdazenil (1.5, 2.5, or 5 mg) for 14 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the total sleep time (TST) on day 1/2 and day 13/14, measured by polysomnography. The secondary outcome measures included (1) latency to persistent sleep (LPS), sleep efficiency (SE), wake after sleep onset (WASO) and number of awakenings (NAW) on days 1/2 and day 13/14, and (2) the average subjective sleep latency (sSL), total sleep time (sTST), wake after sleep onset (sWASO) and number of awakenings (sNAW) recorded in sleep diary and sleep questionnaire, and the evaluation of insomnia severity index. Rebound insomnia, withdrawal, and treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 569 patients screened, 288 (76.4% female) were randomized and received one dose. For the primary outcomes, TST was significantly improved in the Dimdazenil 1.5, 2.5, and 5 mg group compared with the placebo group at day 1/2, and significantly improved in the Dimdazenil 2.5 and 5 mg groups compared with the placebo group at day 13/14. The Least Squares Means (standard errors) and 95% Confidence Intervals for the three active doses compared to placebo are 25.5 (8.31), (9.16, 41.89) for the 1.5 mg dose; 17.4 (8.19), (1.29, 33.55) for the 2.5 mg dose; 22.8 (8.15), (6.72, 38.80) for the 5 mg dose on day 1/2. Corresponding data on day 13/14 are 7.6 (8.07), (-8.24, 23.53) and 19.3 (8.06), (3.43, 35.17) and 18.2 (7.95), (2.49, 33.80). LPS was significantly reduced in the Dimdazenil 5 mg group compared with the placebo group on day 1/2. SE was significantly improved in the Dimdazenil 1.5 and 5 mg group compared with the placebo group at day 1/2. In the subjective sleep parameters, sSL on average was significantly lower in the Dimdazenil 1.5, 2.5, and 5 mg groups compared with the placebo group. sTST on average was significantly higher in the Dimdazenil 1.5, 2.5, and 5 mg groups compared with the placebo group. The most common TEAEs were dizziness, vertigo, and weakness with no clinically relevant treatment-related serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Dimdazenil of 1.5, 2.5, and 5 mg improved certain objective and subjective sleep outcomes in people with insomnia disorder, with a favorable safety profile. These findings suggested that Dimdazenil may represent a promising new treatment for insomnia disorder, a prevalent condition with limited effective and safe treatments available.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, multidose, placebo parallel controlled phase II clinical study of EVT201 in the treatment of insomnia disorders (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org), with the number of CTR20150664.

Clinical safety and narcolepsy-like symptoms of dual orexin receptor antagonists in patients with insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are emerging treatments for insomnia. This meta-analysis study aimed to assess the safety of FDA-approved DORAs (suvorexant, lemborexant, and daridorexant), focusing on narcolepsy-like symptoms associated with these drugs.

METHODS

Five prominent databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic. Primary safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and serious TEAEs. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), sleep paralysis, and hallucinations were categorized as adverse events (AEs)-related narcolepsy-like symptoms.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs with 7703 patients were included. DORAs were associated with a higher risk of TEAEs (risk ratio [RR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.15) and treatment-related TEAEs (RR, 1.69; 95% CI: 1.49 to 1.92) when compared to placebo. The DORA group exhibited a significantly higher risk of EDS (RR, 2.15; 95% CI: 1.02 to 4.52) and sleep paralysis (RR, 3.40; 95% CI: 1.18 to 9.80) compared to the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis achieved a comparative evaluation of the clinical safety and tolerability of FDA-approved DORAs for primary insomnia, specifically focusing on AEs-related narcolepsy-like symptoms. This study contributes to understanding the safety profile of FDA-approved DORAs for treating insomnia.

The Function of Sleep and the Treatment of Primary Insomnia

BACKGROUND

Approximately 21 900 women and 35 300 men developed lung cancer in Germany in 2018, and 16 999 women and 27 882 men died of it. The outcome mainly depends on the tumor stage. In early stages (stage I or II), treatment can be curative; unfortunately, because early-stage lung cancers are generally asymptom - atic, 74% of women and 77% of men already have advanced-stage disease (stage III or IV) at the time of diagnosis. Screening with low-dose computed tomography is an option enabling early diagnosis and curative treatment.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective search of the literature on screening for lung cancer.

RESULTS

In the studies of lung cancer screening that have been published to date, sensitivity ranged from 68.5% to 93.8%, and specificity from 73.4% to 99.2%. A meta-analysis by the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection revealed a 15% reduction in lung cancer mortality when low-dose computed tomography was used in persons who were judged to be at high risk for lung cancer (risk ratio [RR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [0.77; 0.95]). 1.9% of subjects died in the screening arm of the meta-analysis, and 2.2% in the control group. The observation periods ranged from 6.6 to 10 years; false-positive rates ranged from 84.9% to 96.4%. Malignant findings were confirmed in 45% to 70% of the biopsies or resective procedures that were performed.

CONCLUSION

Systematic lung cancer screening with low-dose CT lowers mortality from lung cancer in (current or former) heavy smokers. This benefit must be weighed against the high rate of false-positive findings and overdiagnoses.

Effects of new hypnotic drugs on cognition: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Insomnia is a common disease, and the application of various types of sleeping pills for cognitive impairment is controversial, especially as different doses can lead to different effects. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the cognitive impairment caused by different sleeping pills to provide a theoretical basis for guiding clinicians in the selection of medication regimens.

Objective

To evaluate whether various different doses (low, medium and high) of anti-insomnia drugs, such as the dual-orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), zopiclone, eszopiclone and zolpidem, induce cognitive impairment.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to September 20th, 2022 for keywords in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the therapeutic effects of DORA, eszopiclone, zopiclone and zolpidem on sleep and cognitive function. The primary outcomes were indicators related to cognitive characteristics, including scores on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and daytime alertness. The secondary outcomes were the indicators associated with sleep and adverse events. Continuous variables were expressed as the standard mean difference (SMD). Data were obtained through GetData 2.26 and analyzed by Stata v.15.0.

Results

A total of 8702 subjects were included in 29 studies. Eszopiclonehigh significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 3.00, 95 % CI: 1.86 to 4.13) compared with the placebo, and eszopiclonehigh significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.65 to 6.77; SMD = 3.95, 95 % CI: 1.38 to 6.51; SMD = 3.26, 95 % CI: 0.38 to 6.15; and SMD = 3.23, 95 % CI: 0.34 to 6.11) compared with zolpidemlow, zolpidemhigh, DORAlow, and eszopiclonemid, respectively. Compared with the placebo, zopiclone, zolpidemmid, and eszopiclonehigh, DORA significantly increased the TST (SMD = 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.11 to 3.67; SMD = 6.00, 95 % CI: 2.73 to 9.27; SMD = 1.89, 95 % CI: 0.90 to 2.88; and SMD = 1.70, 95 % CI: 0.42 to 2.99, respectively).

Conclusion

We recommend DORA as the best intervention for insomnia because it was highly effective in inducing and maintaining sleep without impairing cognition. Although zolpidem had a more pronounced effect on sleep maintenance, this drug is better for short-term use. Eszopiclone and zopiclone improved sleep, but their cognitive effects have yet to be verified.

Abuse potential assessment of the dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant in rats

BACKGROUND

Drugs that act on the central nervous system (CNS) and have sedative effects can lead to abuse in humans. New CNS-active drugs often require evaluation of their abuse potential in dedicated animal models before marketing approval. Daridorexant is a new dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) with sleep-promoting properties in animals and humans. It was approved in 2022 in the United States and Europe for the treatment of insomnia disorder.

AIMS

Nonclinical evaluation of abuse potential of daridorexant using three specific rat models assessing reinforcement, interoception, and withdrawal.

METHODS

Reinforcing effects of daridorexant were assessed in an operant rat model of intravenous drug self-administration. Similarity of interoceptive effects to those of the commonly used sleep medication zolpidem was tested in an operant drug discrimination task. Withdrawal signs indicative of physical dependence were evaluated upon sudden termination of chronic daridorexant treatment. Rat experiments were conducted at a dose range resulting in daridorexant plasma concentrations equaling or exceeding those achieved at the clinically recommended dose of 50 mg in humans.

RESULTS

Daridorexant had no reinforcing effects, was dissimilar to zolpidem in the drug discrimination task, and did not induce any withdrawal-related signs upon treatment discontinuation that would be indicative of physical dependence.

OUTCOMES

Daridorexant showed no signs of abuse or dependence potential in rats. Our data indicate that daridorexant, like other DORAs, has a low potential for abuse in humans.

Opportunities and challenges with decentralized trials in Neuroscience

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), that is, studies integrating elements of telemedicine and mobile/local healthcare providers allowing for home-based assessments, are an important concept to make studies more resilient and more patient-centric by taking into consideration participant's views and shifting trial activities to better meet the needs of trial participants. There are however, not only advantages but also challenges associated with DCTs. An area to be addressed by appropriate statistical methodology is the integration of data resulting from a possible mix of home and clinic assessments at different visits for the same variable, especially in adjusting for sources of possible systematic differences. One source of systematic bias may be how a participant perceives their disease and treatment in their home versus in a clinical setting. In this paper, we will discuss these issues with a focus on Neuroscience when participants have the choice between home and clinic assessments to illustrate how to identify systematic biases and describe appropriate approaches to maintain clinical trial scientific rigor. We will describe the benefits and challenges of DCTs in Neuroscience and then describe the relevance of home versus clinic assessments using the estimand framework. We outline several options to enable home assessments in a study. Results of simulations will be presented to help deciding between design and analysis options in a simple scenario where there might be differences in response between clinic and home assessments.

New drug approvals for 2022: Synthesis and clinical applications

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved a total of 37 new drugs in 2022, which are composed of 20 chemical entities and 17 biologics. In particular, 20 chemical entities, including 17 small molecule drugs, 1 radiotherapy, and 2 diagnostic agents, provide privileged scaffolds, breakthrough clinical benefits, and a new mechanism of action for the discovery of more potent clinical candidates. The structure-based drug development with clear targets and fragment-based drug development with privileged scaffolds have always been the important modules in the field of drug discovery, which could easily bypass the patent protection and bring about improved biological activity. Therefore, we summarized the relevant valuable information about clinical application, mechanism of action, and chemical synthesis of 17 newly approved small molecule drugs in 2022. We hope this timely and comprehensive review could bring about creative and elegant inspiration on the synthetic methodologies and mechanism of action for the discovery of new drugs with novel chemical scaffolds and extended clinical indications.

Comparative efficacy of hypnotics in young and middle-aged adults with insomnia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Insomnia is highly prevalent in modern society. However, the hierarchical selection of hypnotics in young and middle-aged adults with insomnia remains unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and daytime drowsiness associated with different hypnotics for treating insomnia in young and middle-aged adults.

METHODS

We searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I databases from inception until December 15, 2021. We also manually searched reference lists and relevant publications. The literature search, data collection, and risk of bias evaluation were all carried out separately by pairs of reviewers. We included randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared hypnotics approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The R and Stata software were both used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 117 RCTs comprising 22,508 participants with the age of 18 to 65 years were included. Assessment of the efficacy of the hypnotics and adverse events (drowsiness) revealed that zolpidem improved all objective sleep parameters (oTST, oSOL, oWASO, and oSE), zopiclone increased oTST and oSE and reduced oSOL, and daridorexant increased oTST and reduced oWASO. Regarding subjective sleep outcomes, zolpidem exhibited beneficial effects on sTST, sSOL, and sWASO. Zaleplon reduced sSOL, and zopiclone was the recommended hypnotic for improving SQ. Zolpidem was associated with drowsiness effect (odds ratio = 1.82; 95% confidence interval = 1.25 to 2.65). The results of sensitivity analysis remained unchanged after the exclusion of studies reporting long-term effects.

CONCLUSION

Zolpidem is recommended for managing sleep-onset insomnia and sleep maintenance insomnia but should be used with caution because of daytime drowsiness effects. Daridorexant is recommended as a promising agent for managing sleep maintenance insomnia.

Insomnia in neurological disorders: Prevalence, mechanisms, impact and treatment approaches

Insomnia is more prevalent in neurological disorders compared to the general population, with rates ranging from 11 to 74.2% in neurodegenerative disorders, 20 to 37% in vascular diseases, 13.3 to 50% in inflammatory diseases, 28.9 to 74.4% in epilepsy, and nearly 70% in migraines. Insomnia in neurological disorders stems from a variety of factors, encompassing physical and neuropsychiatric factors, behavioral patterns, and disruptions in the biological clock and circadian rhythm. There are bidirectional connections between neurological disorders and insomnia. Insomnia in neurological disorders worsens symptoms, resulting in heightened depressive symptoms, elevated mortality rates, reduced quality of life, and intensified acute symptoms. Managing comorbid sleep disorders, especially in the presence of psychiatric comorbidities, is crucial. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the first-line recommendation for insomnia management in neurological disorders. Other treatments are second-line strategies. Melatonin may demonstrate effectiveness in addressing insomnia, with soporific and chronobiotic effects. Furthermore, it has the potential to alleviate "sundowning" and behavioral disturbances, while generally being well-tolerated. Other treatment options that may be of interest include morning bright light therapy, sedative antidepressants, new orexin dual antagonists and levodopa specifically indicated for Parkinson's disease. Benzodiazepines and z-drugs can be used primarily during acute phases to prevent pharmacotolerance and minimize side effects. However, they should be avoided in patients with neurological disorders and not used in patients over 75 years old due to the risk of falls and confusion. In neurological disorders, insomnia has a profound impact on daytime functioning, making its management crucial. Effective treatment can result in improved outcomes, and additional research is necessary to investigate alternative therapeutic options and enhance patient care.

Effects of different interventions on insomnia in adults: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Insomnia is a common sleep disorder. There are many clinical-intervention methods for treating this condition, but thus far, the most effective method has not been determined.

METHODS

We conducted a network meta-analysis by including random evidence of insomnia improvement in people over 18 years old, without other physical diseases. From January 1, 1990 to June 15, 2022, we searched multiple electronic databases for randomized controlled trials of different insomnia-related, clinical-intervention methods. R software was used to analyze 10 indices, in order to evaluate the effect of sleep improvement. Primary outcomes comprised Pittsburgh sleep quality-index (PSQI) scores and insomnia severity-index (ISI) scores.

RESULTS

Finally, 122 randomized controlled trials were included in our study. For the PSQI scores, we found the sequence of intervention measures by effect to be as follows: electroacupuncture, acupuncture, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), essential oils, herbal medicine, traditional Western medicine, Tai Chi and Baduanjin, music, supplements, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), and exercise. The results for ISI were similar to those for PSQI, but with slight differences.

CONCLUSION

Our research results indicate that various measures have a certain effect on improving sleep, among which the effect of instruments is more prominent. The curative effect of placebo groups was better than that of blank control groups. There is essentially no statistical difference in detailed classification within the same intervention category.

Daridorexant: Comprehensive Review of A New Oral Agent for the Treatment of Insomnia

OBJECTIVE

To review the current pharmacology, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of daridorexant in patients with insomnia.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of PubMed (March 1, 2018, to October 19, 2022) and ClinicalTrials.gov search was conducted using the following terms: daridorexant and ACT-541468. Additional articles were identified by hand from references.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

We included English-language articles evaluating daridorexant pharmacology, efficacy, or safety in humans for the management of insomnia.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Daridorexant has a peak plasma concentration of 1-2 hours, terminal half-life of 8 hours, and absolute bioavailability of 61%. Wake after sleep onset (WASO) significantly decreased from baseline to months 1 and 3 in daridorexant 25 (-18.40 and -22.97 min, P < 0.0001) and 50 mg (-28.98 and -29.41 min, P < 0.0001) groups compared with placebo. Latency to persistent sleep (LPS) significantly decreased from baseline to months 1 and 3 for daridorexant 25 mg (-28.17 and -30.73 min, P = 0.0005 and P = 0.0015) and 50 mg (-31.20 and -34.80 min, P < 0.0001).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING AGENTS

Daridorexant can be administered in diverse patient populations because of its tolerability and favorable safety profile. However, due to the lack of large scale studies that directly compare dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs), there is not enough data to recommend 1 DORA over another.

CONCLUSIONS

Daridorexant is well tolerated and has demonstrated significant reductions in LPS and WASO in the treatment of insomnia in adult patients.

Daridorexant, an Orexin Receptor Antagonist for the Management of Insomnia

BACKGROUND

Insomnia is a common sleep disorder that is diagnosed primarily by patients' subjective reported symptoms. Daridorexant is a new dual orexin receptor antagonist that was recently approved by Food and Drug Administration for insomnia characterized by difficulty falling asleep and/or maintaining sleep.

MECHANISM OF ACTION, PHARMACODYNAMICS, AND PHARMACOKINETICS

The orexin neuropeptide signaling system plays a role in wakefulness, and blocking the wake-promoting neuropeptides results in diminished wake signaling, thus exerting a sedative effect using an entirely different mechanism of action than the classical sleep promoting agents. The drug has quick onset of action, high volume of distribution, and high protein binding. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic parameters were similar in patients of different sex and age and were not significantly affected by race, body size, or mild-to-moderate kidney impairment. Dose limitation to 25 mg in moderate liver impairment and no use in severe liver impairment are recommended. The drug undergoes hepatic CYP3A4 metabolism; thus, caution with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers is warranted.

CLINICAL TRIALS

The drug was approved based on phase 3 trials involving study 1 and study 2. Study 1 noted daridorexant at doses of 25 and 50 mg demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in wake time after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, and self-reported total sleep time against placebo at months 1 and 3. Similarly in study 2, compared with placebo, the 25 mg dose demonstrated statistically significant improvement in wake time after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, and self-reported total sleep time at months 1 and 3. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for daridorexant and placebo, with nasopharyngitis and headache most frequently reported.

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCE

Daridorexant is a novel agent with demonstrated efficacy in sleep onset and maintenance and decrease in daytime sedation. Preliminary results from a 1-year extension study note similar incidences of mild-to-moderate side effects as noted in previous trials. Further studies are needed to establish its place in the pharmacological treatment of insomnia.

Daridorexant as a novel pharmacotherapeutic approach in insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Insomnia is a multi-factorial disorder with conventional treatment options that are not satisfactory for many patients. This metaanalysis analyzed the safety and efficacy of daridorexant.

METHODS

An electronic database search for RCTs was conducted on Medline via PubMed, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov using the terms 'Daridorexant,' 'RCT,' 'Insomnia' trials evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of daridorexant for insomnia were included. The data were synthesized using Cochrane review manager version 5.4.1. Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool and GRADEpro-GDT were used to assess the methodological and evidence quality, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 109 searched studies, four trials were included. The risk of treatment-emergent adverse events with 25 mg daridorexant [risk ratio (RR) = 1.12 (0.88, 1.43), p = 0.36; I2 = 0%] and 50 mg daridorexant [RR = 1.25 (0.88, 1.79), p = 0.22; I2 = 28%] and serious adverse events with 25 mg [RR = 0.86 (0.23, 3.19), p = 0.82, I2 = 56%] and 50 mg [RR = 1.32 (0.29, 6.08), p = 0.72, I2 = 52%] was comparable to placebo [Moderate quality evidence]. Risk of nasopharyngitis was also comparable to placebo. The efficacy parameters like wake after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, and subjective total sleep time showed significant improvement with daridorexant. The risk of bias is low for three studies and some concern for one.

CONCLUSION

Daridorexant is a safer and efficacious agent for induction and maintenance of sleep for chronic insomnia.

PROSPERO

The registration number is CRD42022335233.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifiers are NCT03575104, NCT03545191, NCT03679884, and NCT02839200).

Number, Duration, and Distribution of Wake Bouts in Patients with Insomnia Disorder: Effect of Daridorexant and Zolpidem

BACKGROUND

Daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in early 2022, reduces wake after sleep onset without reducing the number of awakenings in patients with insomnia. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to explore the effect of daridorexant on the number, duration, and distribution of night-time wake bouts, and their correlation with daytime functioning.

METHODS

Adults with insomnia disorder were randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1 to placebo, zolpidem 10 mg, or daridorexant 5, 10, 25, or 50 mg in a phase II dose-finding study, and 1:1:1 to placebo or daridorexant 25 or 50 mg in a pivotal phase III study. We analyzed polysomnography data for daridorexant 25 and 50 mg, zolpidem 10 mg, and placebo groups. Polysomnography was conducted at baseline, then on Days 1/2, 15/16, and 28/29 in the phase II study, and Months 1 and 3 in the phase III study. The number, duration, and distribution of wake bouts (≥ 0.5 min) were assessed.

RESULTS

Data from 1111 patients (phase II study: daridorexant 50 mg [n = 61], zolpidem 10 mg [n = 60], placebo [n = 60]; phase III study: daridorexant 25 mg [n = 310], daridorexant 50 mg [n = 310], placebo [n = 310]) were analyzed. Long wake bouts were defined as > 6 min. Compared with placebo, daridorexant 50 mg reduced overall wake time (p < 0.05; all time points, both studies), the odds of experiencing long wake bouts (p < 0.001; Months 1 and 3, phase III study), and the cumulative duration of long wake bouts (p < 0.01; all time points, both studies). Reductions in long wake bouts were sustained through the second half of the night and correlated with improvements in daytime functioning. An increase in the cumulative duration of short wake bouts was observed with daridorexant 50 mg (p < 0.01 vs placebo, Months 1 and 3, phase III study); this was uncorrelated with daytime functioning.

CONCLUSION

Daridorexant reduced the number and duration of longer wake bouts throughout the night compared with placebo, corresponding with improved daytime functioning.

CLINICAL TRIALS

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02839200 (registered July 20, 2016), NCT03545191 (registered June 4, 2018).

Daridorexant, a Recently Approved Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonists (DORA) in Treatment of Insomnia

Insomnia is one of the major challenges in medical science nowadays as it leads to great socio-economic burden by impairing daytime function as well as the development of exhaustion, depression, and memory disturbance in affected individuals. Several important classes of drugs have been tried, including the BZDs and non-BZD hypnotics. Available drugs to combat this disease have the limitations of abuse potential, tolerance, and cognitive impairment. In some instances, withdrawal symptoms have been observed upon the abrupt cessation of those drugs. The Orexin system has been very recently targeted as a therapeutic option to overcome those limitations. Treatment of insomnia with Daridorexant as a Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist (DORA) has been evaluated in several preclinical and clinical studies. Available information obtained from those studies has shown a promising future for this drug in the management of insomnia. Beyond its effectiveness in insomnia, it has been successfully used in patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnoea, chronic obstructed airway disease (COAD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), hypertension, and cardiovascular disorders. Larger studies need to address the safety issues as well as obtain robust pharmacovigilance information to safeguard the risk-benefit aspect of this drug in insomniac adults.

Different doses of dual orexin receptor antagonists in primary insomnia: a Bayesian network analysis

Background: Systematic comparisons of the doses of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) for people with insomnia are limited. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials. gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before 31 October 2022. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the confidence in network meta-analysis (CINeMA) framework. Results: We pooled 7257 participants from 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Moderate to high certainty evidence demonstrated suvorexant (20 and 40 mg) and daridorexant (10 and 50 mg) as the most effective in latency to persistent sleep (LPS) reduction. Lemborexant at 5 and 10 mg was the most effective in subjective sleep onset time (sTSO) reduction. For wake time after sleep onset (WASO), all drugs except daridorexant 5 mg were more effective than placebo. Lemborexant 5 mg was among the best in subjective WASO (sWASO) (moderate to high certainty) and had the highest surface under the curve ranking area (SUCRA) values for sWASO (100%). For total sleep time (TST), suvorexant and daridorexant, except the respective minimum doses, were more effective than placebo, while suvorexant 40 mg and lemborexant 10 mg may have been the most effective for subjective TST (sTST) (low to very low certainty). Suvorexant 40 mg (RR 1.09), suvorexant 80 mg (RR 1.65), and daridorexant 25 mg (RR 1.16) showed a higher safety risk than placebo. Conclusion: Suvorexant 20 mg, lemborexant 5 mg, lemborexant 10 mg, and daridorexant 50 mg represent suitable approaches for insomnia. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, PROSPERO (CRD42022362655).

Cannabidiol as a candidate pharmacotherapy for sleep disturbance in alcohol use disorder

Among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), it is estimated that the majority suffer from persistent sleep disturbances for which few candidate medications are available. Our aim wass to critically review the potential for cannabidiol (CBD) as a treatment for AUD-induced sleep disturbance. As context, notable side effects and abuse liability for existing medications for AUD-induced sleep disturbance reduce their clinical utility. CBD modulation of the endocannabinoid system and favorable safety profile have generated substantial interest in its potential therapeutic use for various medical conditions. A number of preclinical and clinical studies suggest promise for CBD in restoring the normal sleep-wake cycle and in enhancing sleep quality in patients diagnosed with AUD. Based on its pharmacology and the existing literature, albeit primarily preclinical and indirect, CBD is a credible candidate to address alcohol-induced sleep disturbance. Well-designed RCTs will be necessary to test its potential in managing this challenging feature of AUD.

Use of Daridorexant among Patients with Chronic Insomnia: A Retrospective Observational Analysis

Insomnia is the most prevalent sleep disorder, affecting millions worldwide and taking a heavy toll on patient health with significant social and economic impact. Even though there are multiple different types of insomnia medications and behavioral therapies, there are still many individuals for whom treatment remains ineffective. The objective of this retrospective study was to analyze the effectiveness of daridorexant in a cohort of chronic insomnia patients largely transitioned from GABA-A positive allosteric modulators (benzodiazepines, zolpidem or eszopiclone) or other frequently prescribed insomnia medications (including trazodone, atypical antipsychotics or tricyclic antidepressants). A total of 86 patients were treated in the course of ordinary practice and the primary analytic endpoint was the change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score following ≥ 30 nights of treatment with daridorexant. Results from 80 of the 86 patients with full data (65% female, mean age 53.5 years, 18.8% with comorbid obstructive sleep apnea, 91.3% transitioned from a different medication) showed a mean improvement in ISI score of 7.0 ± 0.54 points (SEM) (p < 0.0001) from 18.0 to 11.0. Overall, 78% of the cohort demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement as defined by at least a six-point drop in ISI. Total sleep time increased by 54 ± 1.0 min (SEM) (p < 0.0001) from 6.0 h to 6.9 h. Mean sleep latency decreased by 23.9 ± 2.4 min (SEM) (p < 0.0001) from 58.8 min to 34.9 min. Wake after sleep onset decreased by 31.6 ± 3.2 min (SEM) (p < 0.001) from 42.8 min to 11.3 min. Sleep efficiency improved by 10.5 ± 1.1% (SEM) (p < 0.0001) from 79.3% to 89.8%. No significant adverse events were noted during the study duration. Keeping in mind this study's limitations, these data suggest that for insomnia patients with an incomplete response to current therapy, switching to daridorexant is safe and may be an effective alternative treatment.

Do Insomnia Treatments Improve Daytime Function?

A scientific advisory panel of seven U.S. and Canadian sleep experts performed a clinical appraisal by comparing general medical opinion, assessed via a survey of practicing clinicians, regarding insomnia treatment, with the available scientific evidence. This clinical appraisal focuses on the specific statement, "Treatments for insomnia have uniformly been shown to significantly improve the associated daytime impairment seen with insomnia." The advisory panel reviewed and discussed the available body of evidence within the published medical literature to determine what discrepancies may exist between the currently published evidence base and general medical opinion. The advisory panels' evaluation of this statement was also compared with the results of a national survey of primary care physicians, psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and sleep specialists in the United States. Contrary to general medical opinion, the expert advisory panel concluded that the medical literature did not support the statement. This gap highlights the need to educate the general medical community regarding insomnia treatment efficacy in pursuit of improved treatment outcomes.

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Insomnia Drugs: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of 153 Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological treatment is common in practice and widely used for the management of insomnia. However, evidence comparing the relative effectiveness, safety, and certainty of evidence among drug classes and individual drugs for insomnia are still lacking. This study aimed to determine the relative effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of drugs for insomnia.

METHODS

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from inception to January 10, 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared insomnia drugs with placebo or an active comparator in adults with insomnia. We conducted random-effects frequentist network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty, categorize interventionsand present the findings.

RESULTS

A total of 148 articles met our eligibility criteria; these included 153 trials which enrolled 46,412 participants and assessed 36 individual drugs from eight drug classes. Compared with placebo, both subjectively and objectively measured total sleep time were significantly improved with non-benzodiazepine (subjective: mean difference [MD] 25.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.49-34.64, low certainty; objective: MD 22.34, 95% CI 7.64-37.05, high certainty), antidepressants (subjective: MD 54.40, 95% CI 34.96-75.83, low certainty; objective: MD 35.64, 95% CI 13.05-58.24, high certainty), and orexin receptor antagonists (subjective: MD 21.62, 95% CI 0.84-42.40, high certainty; objective: MD 31.81, 95% CI 2.66-60.95, high certainty); of which doxepin, almorexant, suvorexant, and lemborexant were among the relatively effective drugs with relatively good tolerability and lower risks of any adverse events (AEs). Both subjectively and objectively measured sleep onset latency were significantly shortened with non-benzodiazepines (subjective: MD - 10.12, 95% CI - 13.84 to - 6.40, moderate certainty; objective: MD - 12.11, 95% CI - 19.31 to - 4.90, moderate certainty) and melatonin receptor agonists (subjective: MD - 7.73, 95% CI - 15.21 to - 0.26, high certainty; objective: MD - 7.04, 95% CI - 12.12 to - 1.95, moderate certainty); in particular, zopiclone was among the most effective drugs with a lower risk of any AEs but worse tolerability. Non-benzodiazepines could significantly decrease both subjective and objective measured wake time after sleep onset (subjective: MD - 16.67, 95% CI - 21.79 to - 11.56, moderate certainty; objective: MD - 13.92, 95% CI - 22.71 to - 5.14, moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-benzodiazepines probably improve total sleep time, sleep onset latency, and wake time after sleep onset. Other insomnia drug classes and individual drugs also showed potential benefits in improving insomnia symptoms. However, the choice of insomnia drugs should be based on the phenotype of insomnia presented, as well as each drug's safety and tolerability. Protocol registration PROSPERO (CRD42019138790).

Current models of insomnia disorder: a theoretical review on the potential role of the orexinergic pathway with implications for insomnia treatment

Insomnia disorder is considered as a stress-related disorder associated with hyperarousal, stress and emotion dysregulation and the instability of the 'flip-flop' switch system. The orexinergic system is well known for its key role in sleep and arousal processes but also in the allostatic system regulating stress and emotions and may thus be of major interest for insomnia and its treatment. Accordingly, we discuss the potential role of orexins on sleep processes, brain systems modulating stress and emotions with potential implications for insomnia pathophysiology. We reviewed available data on the effect of dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) on sleep and brain systems modulating stress/emotions with implications for insomnia treatment. We present our findings as a narrative review. Few data in animals and humans have reported that disrupted sleep and insomnia may be related to the overactivation of orexinergic system, while some more consistent data in humans and animals reported the overactivation of orexins in response to acute stress and in stress-related disorders. Taken together these findings may let us hypothesise that an orexins overactivation may be associated with stress-related hyperarousal and the hyperactivation of arousal-promoting systems in insomnia. On the other hand, it is possible that by rebalancing orexins with DORAs we may regulate both sleep and allostatic systems, in turn, contributing to a 'switch off' of hyperarousal in insomnia. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to clarify the role of the orexin system in insomnia and to evaluate the effects of DORAs on sleep, stress and emotions regulating systems.

Effect of a dual orexin receptor antagonist on Alzheimer's disease: Sleep disorders and cognition

Orexin is a neuropeptide produced by the lateral hypothalamus that plays an important role in regulating the sleep-wake cycle. The overexpression of the orexinergic system may be related to the pathology of sleep/wakefulness disorders in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In AD patients, the increase in cerebrospinal fluid orexin levels is associated with parallel sleep deterioration. Dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) can not only treat the sleep-wakefulness disorder of AD but also improve the performance of patients with cognitive behavior disorder. It is critical to clarify the role of the orexin system in AD, study its relationship with cognitive decline in AD, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of DORA.

Targeting Orexin Receptors for the Treatment of Insomnia: From Physiological Mechanisms to Current Clinical Evidence and Recommendations

After a detailed description of orexins and their roles in sleep and other medical disorders, we discuss here the current clinical evidence on the effects of dual (DORAs) or selective (SORAs) orexin receptor antagonists on insomnia with the aim to provide recommendations for their further assessment in a context of personalized and precision medicine. In the last decade, many trials have been conducted with orexin receptor antagonists, which represent an innovative and valid therapeutic option based on the multiple mechanisms of action of orexins on different biological circuits, both centrally and peripherally, and their role in a wide range of medical conditions which are often associated with insomnia. A very interesting aspect of this new category of drugs is that they have limited abuse liability and their discontinuation does not seem associated with significant rebound effects. Further studies on the efficacy of DORAs are required, especially on children and adolescents and in particular conditions, such as menopause. Which DORA is most suitable for each patient, based on comorbidities and/or concomitant treatments, should be the focus of further careful research. On the contrary, studies on SORAs, some of which seem to be appropriate also in insomnia in patients with psychiatric diseases, are still at an early stage and, therefore, do not allow to draw definite conclusions.

Orexin dual receptor antagonists, zolpidem, zopiclone, eszopiclone, and cognitive research: A comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis

Background

About one-third of adults have trouble sleeping, ranging from occasional difficulty to chronic insomnia, along with difficulty maintaining sleep. Many studies reported that the long-term use of hypnotics can cause brain dysfunction and damage cognition.

Objective

The objective of the study is to evaluate whether low, medium, and high doses of orexin dual receptor antagonists (DORA), zopiclone (ZOP), eszopiclone (ESZ), and zolpidem (ZST) can impair cognition.

Methods

From the beginning through September 20, 2022, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the therapeutic effects of DORA, eszopiclone, and zopiclone for sleep and cognitive function were included. The primary outcomes were indices related to the cognitive profile, including memory, alertness, execution and control function, and attention and orientation. The secondary outcomes were indices related to sleep and adverse events. The standard mean difference (SMD) was generated for continuous variables. Certain data were captured from figures by GetData 2.26 and analyzed using RStudio 4.2.

Results

Finally, a total of 8,702 subjects were included in 29 studies. Compared with the placebo, the DSST (Digit Symbol Substitution Test) scores of low, medium, and high doses of DORA were SMD = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.33-1.20; SMD = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11-2.05; and SMD = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.33-1.36, respectively. The DSST scores of zolpidem at low, medium, and high doses were SMD = -0.39; 95% CI: 0.85-0.07; SMD = -0.88, 95% CI: -2.34-0.58; and SMD = -0.12, 95% CI: -0.85-0.60, respectively. Zopiclone's DSST scale score was SMD = -0.18; 95% CI: -0.54-0.18. In addition, the total sleep time (TST) of low, medium, and high doses of DORA was SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: -0.15-0.70; SMD = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.87-1.86; and SMD = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.89-3.30, respectively. The TST of zolpidem with low, medium, and high doses was SMD = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.18-1.83; SMD = 1.94, 95% CI: 0.46-3.43; and SMD = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.86-2.56, respectively. The TST of low, medium, and high doses of eszopiclone was relatively SMD = 2.03, 95% CI: -0.21-4.27; SMD = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.35-3.42; and SMD = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.60-2.82. Zopiclone's TST was SMD = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.36-3.58.

Conclusion

We recommend DORA as the best intervention for insomnia because it is highly effective in inducing and maintaining sleep without impairing cognition. Although zolpidem has a more pronounced effect on maintaining sleep, it is best to reduce its use because of its side effects. Eszopiclone and zopiclone improved sleep quality, but their safety in cognition remains to be verified.

Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Daridorexant in Patients with Insomnia Disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist for the treatment of insomnia. In two phase III, 12-week studies in patients with insomnia disorder, daridorexant improved sleep and daytime functioning while maintaining a favorable safety profile. The objective of this 40-week extension study was to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of daridorexant.

METHODS

Adults with insomnia disorder who completed the 12-week studies were invited to enroll in this double-blind extension study. Patients originally randomised to daridorexant (10 mg/25 mg/50 mg) remained on their respective treatments; patients randomised to placebo were re-randomised to daridorexant 25 mg or placebo. The 40-week treatment period was followed by a 7-day placebo run-out. The primary objective was to assess safety/tolerability. Exploratory objectives were to evaluate the efficacy of daridorexant on sleep (self-reported total sleep time) and daytime functioning (Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire).

RESULTS

In total, 804 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 801 received at least one dose of the study treatment and 550 patients (68.4%) completed the study. Overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar across groups (35-40%). Daridorexant did not induce next-morning sleepiness and no withdrawal-related symptoms or rebound were observed after treatment discontinuation. Improvements in sleep and daytime functioning were maintained through to the end of the study and were most pronounced with daridorexant 50 mg. Daridorexant 50 mg, compared with placebo, increased self-reported total sleep time by a least-squares mean of 20.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2, 36.5), 15.8 (95% CI - 0.8, 32.5) and 17.8 (95% CI - 0.4, 35.9) minutes and decreased (i.e., improved) Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire total scores by a least-squares mean of - 9.3 (95% CI - 15.1, - 3.6), - 9.5 (95% CI - 15.4, - 3.5) and - 9.1 (95% CI - 15.6, - 2.7), at weeks 12, 24 and 36 of the extension study, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with daridorexant, for up to 12 months, was generally safe and well tolerated. Exploratory efficacy analyses suggest that the sustained improvements in sleep and daytime functioning with daridorexant 50 mg support its use for long-term treatment of insomnia disorder, without concerns of new safety signals.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03679884) [first posted: 21 September, 2018], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03679884 .

Safety and efficacy of daridorexant in the treatment of insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Daridorexant is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist used in treating insomnia disorder. Daridorexant improves sleep quality without impairing daytime functioning. We assess the safety and efficacy of this novel drug in the treatment of insomnia. We performed a systematic search for electronic databases in SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane library. Seven randomized controlled trials were included in this review, with 2425 participants enrolled. Daridorexant was superior to placebo in reducing wake time after sleep onset (MD = -13.26; 95% CI, -15.48 to -11.03; P < 0.00001), latency to persistent sleep (MD = -7.23; 95% CI, -9.60 to -4.85; P < 0.00001), with increasing the total sleep time (MD = 14.80; 95% CI, 11.18-18.42; P < 0.00001) and subjective total sleep time (MD = 14.80; 95% CI, 11.18-18.42], P < 0.00001). The 25 mg and 50 mg were the most officious doses. Treatment with daridorexant has resulted in a slightly higher incidence of adverse events [risk ratio (RR) = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35;, P = 0.005], specifically somnolence (RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13-3.23; P = 0.005) and fatigue (RR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.21-3.36; P = 0.007). Daridorexant is superior to placebo in improving sleep quality. However, the drug resulted in a slightly higher incidence of adverse events, including somnolence and fatigue.

Orexin Receptor Antagonists and Insomnia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review recent evidence on the use of orexin receptor antagonists (ORAs) for treating insomnia. We evaluate studies on five dual ORAs and one selective ORA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research on suvorexant in recent years gradually focus on comorbid insomnia, while lemborexant and daridorexant were still being validated in primary insomnia. Almorexant is now mainly used as a commercial specific inhibitor of the orexin system in animal studies due to safety issues. Although filorexant has also shown a certain sleep-promoting effect, there are few clinical or experimental studies on sleep-related aspects of filorexant in recent years. As for selective ORAs, orexin receptor 2 antagonist seltorexant still has not yet reached phase 3. High-quality clinical trials in insomnia populations are needed which directly compare authorized ORAs and investigate non-approved ORAs, the use of ORAs in comorbid insomnia, and the orexin signaling system pathophysiology in insomnia.

Daridorexant: A New Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist for Insomnia

Objective: To review the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of daridorexant in treating insomnia characterized by difficulties with sleep onset and/or sleep maintenance in adult patients. Data Sources: A literature search was performed through PubMed using the following key terms: daridorexant, ACT-541468, orexin, insomnia, and sleep. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Selected articles included those which described clinical studies of the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, or tolerability of daridorexant. Data Synthesis: Daridorexant works through antagonism of the dual orexin receptor. It is the third agent in this class of medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Daridorexant, at a dose of 25 mg to 50 mg, was shown to be effective in improving sleep parameters in phase 3 clinical studies and was well tolerated. Adverse event rates from phase 2 and 3 clinical trials were low with fatigue, nasopharyngitis, gait disturbance, somnolence, diarrhea, and headache most commonly reported. Conclusions: All currently available agents for treating insomnia have received a "weak" recommendation in the clinical practice guidelines, including the dual orexin receptor antagonist class of medications. Initial data suggest that with routine use daridorexant does not impair next day functioning, a common issue with other agents used to treat insomnia. In addition, daridorexant appears to be as safe and effective in treating insomnia in patients of all ages including those ≥65 years of age.

A Comprehensive Review of Daridorexant, a Dual-Orexin Receptor Antagonist as New Approach for the Treatment of Insomnia

Insomnia affects 4.4-4.8% of the world's population, but because the effect of hypnotic drugs is limited and may cause harmful side-effects, scientists are turning their attention to developing drugs that act on the orexin system. Daridorexant, a selective dual-orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), has exhibited promising results in both animal and human studies. Its activity was evaluated based on the physiology-based pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic model. The use of daridorexant is considered safe, with no clinically significant side-effects including deprivation of next-morning residual effects. In this manuscript we conducted a comprehensive review of daridorexant including pharmacodynamics, animal and human research, pharmacokinetics and safety.

Efficacy and Safety of Daridorexant in Older and Younger Adults with Insomnia Disorder: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial

Background and Objective

The dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant, studied in two phase III trials, dose-dependently improved objective and subjective sleep variables and daytime functioning in adults with insomnia. Because treatment of insomnia in older adults is challenging and has limited options, the purpose of the current analysis was to further analyse the phase III trial studying the higher doses of daridorexant, those that showed efficacy (daridorexant 50 mg, daridorexant 25 mg and placebo, nightly for 3 months), and compare the safety and efficacy of daridorexant in patients aged ≥ 65 (‘older adults’) to those aged < 65 years (‘younger adults’).

Methods

Analyses by age (≥ 65 years, n = 364; < 65 years, n = 566) were performed on data from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Trial 1 in adult patients with insomnia (NCT03545191). Efficacy endpoints included a change from baseline at month 1 and month 3 in polysomnography-measured wake after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS), self-reported total sleep time (sTST) and daytime functioning assessed using the validated Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ). Safety endpoints included adverse events and the Visual Analog Scale for morning sleepiness.

Results

At baseline, mean [standard deviation] WASO was numerically greater (110 [39] vs 92 [38] min) in older than younger adults, while LPS was comparable (~ 65 min). Mean baseline IDSIQ total and all domain scores were numerically lower (i.e. better) in older adults. Daridorexant caused similar reductions in WASO and LPS, and similar increases in sTST, from baseline, in both age groups; improvements were numerically greater with daridorexant 50 mg than 25 mg. At month 3, daridorexant 50 mg, compared with placebo, decreased WASO by a least-squares mean of 19.6 (95% confidence interval 9.7, 29.5) in older patients versus 17.4 min (10.7, 24.0) in younger patients and decreased LPS by a least-squares mean of 14.9 (7.5, 22.3) in older patients versus 9.7 min (3.7, 15.7) in younger patients. Daridorexant 50 mg increased sTST from baseline to month 3 by a least-squares mean of 59.9 (49.6, 70.3) in older patients versus 57.1 min (48.9, 65.3) in younger patients. Daridorexant 50 mg progressively improved IDSIQ total and domain scores from week 1 onwards similarly in both groups; daridorexant 25 mg improved IDSIQ scores, but only in younger adults. In both age groups, in comparison with placebo, the overall incidence of adverse events was comparable, and there were fewer falls on daridorexant. Daridorexant improved Visual Analog Scale morning sleepiness in both groups; daridorexant 50 mg increased the mean (standard deviation) Visual Analog Scale morning sleepiness score by 15.9 (20.7) in older adults and by 14.9 (18.7) in younger adults from baseline to month 3. In older adults, there was one case of sleep paralysis, and no cases of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or complex sleep behaviour.

Conclusions

In older patients with insomnia, as in younger patients, the efficacy of daridorexant is maximal on night-time and daytime variables at the higher dose of 50 mg. Older patients particularly require this dose to improve daytime functioning. Older patients are not at an increased risk of adverse events or residual effects the next morning after night-time administration of daridorexant, even at 50 mg. The dose of daridorexant does not need to be decreased for older patients.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03545191) [first posted: 4 June, 4 2018], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03545191.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40266-022-00977-4.

The burden of chronic insomnia (difficulty in falling/staying asleep or not getting enough sleep) increases with age yet treatment options in older patients are limited. In older patients, because of a risk of side effects, guidelines suggest caution when prescribing sleep medications and, for some drugs, recommend starting at a lower dose. Daridorexant was approved in 2022 for the treatment of insomnia in adults following positive results in two trials that showed daridorexant significantly improved night-time sleep and daytime functioning over 3 months of treatment in adults with insomnia. Approximately 40% of patients taking part in these trials were aged 65 years or older. This current analysis compared the safety and benefits of daridorexant in older adults (aged at least 65 years) and younger adults (aged less than 65 years) in the trial that administered the highest two doses of daridorexant, 25 and 50 mg. The results showed that the benefits of daridorexant were comparable in both age groups over 3 months; compared with placebo, daridorexant improved night-time sleep (reduced time awake during the night, reduced time to fall asleep and increased total sleep time) and daytime functioning—patients had less daytime sleepiness and a better mood and feeling of alertness. In older patients, the benefits, particularly for daytime functioning, were greatest at the higher 50-mg dose, without any increase in side effects. Both doses of daridorexant were equally well tolerated in the two age groups, indicating that treatment with daridorexant at 50 mg can be safely started in older patients.

Daridorexant for the treatment of insomnia disorder: findings and implications

PURPOSE

The involvement of the orexin system in the physiopathology of insomnia has been rapidly increasing in understanding. In this sense, daridorexant was the third orexin receptor antagonist approved by the FDA in January 2022. This review aims to summarize the chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and tolerability profile of daridorexant for the treatment of insomnia disorder.

METHODS

We performed a review of daridorexant for the treatment of insomnia disorder. The search was carried out in Medline via PubMed, Embase, and clinical trials, up to March 2022.

RESULTS

Daridorexant 25 and 50 mg had more significant improvement for the wake after sleep onset (WASO), latency to persistent sleep (LPS), and subjective total sleep time (sTST) than placebo. In addition, daridorexant 50 mg was better for Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) than placebo. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis and headache.

CONCLUSION

Daridorexant was efficacious and safe. Studies that evaluate the long-term safety and compare daridorexant with benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine receptor agonists, sedative antidepressants, and other orexin receptor antagonists are required.

Daridorexant for the Treatment of Insomnia

Purpose of Review

Insomnia is a complex sleeping disorder that affects the lives of many individuals worldwide. Insomnia often occurs in the presence of coexisting comorbidities making it a complex disorder that requires a multifactorial approach to therapy. First-line therapy is cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). Pharmacotherapy for insomnia falls into four classes based on mechanism of action: benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs), histamine receptor antagonists, melatonin receptor agonists, and dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs).

Recent Findings

Daridorexant is a dual orexin type 1 and types 2 (OX1 and OX2) receptor antagonist that was recently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of adults suffering from insomnia. It was shown to be effective in reducing insomnia symptoms, increasing daytime functioning, and improving the overall quality of sleep. Daridorexant offers patients relief from insomnia while avoiding the severe side effects and dependency issues of traditional treatments like benzodiazepines and sedatives.

Summary

In this article, we review the most recent data on insomnia treatments and summarize the safety and efficacy of daridorexant in treating insomnia.

AlCl3-Mediated CHF2 Transfer and Cyclocondensation of Difluoromethoxy Functionalized o-Phenylenediamines to Access N-Substituted Benzimidazoles

Herein, we report for the first time a transition-metal-free frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) catalyzed CHF₂ group migration from an oxygen atom to the neighboring nitrogen atom, which led to the synthesis of N-substituted benzimidazoles at room temperature with excellent yields, broad functional group tolerance, and a short reaction time. The oxygen-attached difluoromethane acted as a C1 source in the synthesis of N-substituted benzimidazoles in the presence of AlCl₃ by cleaving one C-O bond and two C-F bonds, resulting in formation of two new C-N bonds.

The orexin story, sleep and sleep disturbances

The orexins, also known as hypocretins, are two neuropeptides (orexin A and B or hypocretin 1 and 2) produced by a few thousand neurons located in the lateral hypothalamus that were independently discovered by two research groups in 1998. Those two peptides bind two receptors (orexin/hypocretin receptor 1 and receptor 2) that are widely distributed in the brain and involved in the central physiological regulation of sleep and wakefulness, orexin receptor 2 having the major role in the maintenance of arousal. They are also implicated in a multiplicity of other functions, such as reward seeking, energy balance, autonomic regulation and emotional behaviours. The destruction of orexin neurons is responsible for the sleep disorder narcolepsy with cataplexy (type 1) in humans, and a defect of orexin signalling also causes a narcoleptic phenotype in several animal species. Orexin discovery is unprecedented in the history of sleep research, and pharmacological manipulations of orexin may have multiple therapeutic applications. Several orexin receptor antagonists were recently developed as new drugs for insomnia, and orexin agonists may be the next-generation drugs for narcolepsy. Given the broad range of functions of the orexin system, these drugs might also be beneficial for treating various conditions other than sleep disorders in the near future.

Driving Performance after Bedtime Administration of Daridorexant, Assessed in a Sensitive Simulator

Use of hypnotics is often associated with next-morning residual effects and a higher risk of motor vehicle accidents. Measuring next-morning effects on driving performance is therefore advised by regulatory agencies. Here, we examined driving performance following administration of daridorexant, a new dual orexin receptor antagonist developed to treat insomnia. Sixty healthy male and female subjects (50-79 years of age) were randomized in a placebo- and active-controlled, four-way cross-over study. Each subject received evening administration of daridorexant 50 and 100 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg, and placebo, in separate treatment phases of 4 days. Simulated driving performance was assessed after initial (day 2) and repeated dosing (day 5), 9 hours postdose. Standard deviation of the lateral position (SDLP) was the main outcome. On both days, with zopiclone, SDLP increased significantly compared with placebo, which confirmed sensitivity of the simulator. With daridorexant, on day 2, the placebo-corrected mean (97.5% confidence interval) SDLP increased by 2.19 cm (0.46-3.93) and 4.43 cm (2.72-6.15) for 50 and 100 mg, respectively. On day 5, SDLP values for both daridorexant doses were significantly below the prespecified threshold of impairment (2.6 cm) and statistically not different from placebo. Daridorexant showed a lower self-rated driving quality and higher effort compared to placebo on day 2 but not on day 5. In non-insomnia subjects, daridorexant impaired simulated driving after initial but not after repeated dosing. Subjects should be cautioned about driving until they know how daridorexant affects them.

Hypocretins (orexins): The ultimate translational neuropeptides

The hypocretins (Hcrts), also known as orexins, are two neuropeptides produced exclusively in the lateral hypothalamus. They act on two specific receptors that are widely distributed across the brain and involved in a myriad of neurophysiological functions that include sleep, arousal, feeding, reward, fear, anxiety and cognition. Hcrt cell loss in humans leads to narcolepsy with cataplexy (narcolepsy type 1), a disorder characterized by intrusions of sleep into wakefulness, demonstrating that the Hcrt system is nonredundant and essential for sleep/wake stability. The causal link between Hcrts and arousal/wakefulness stabilisation has led to the development of a new class of drugs, Hcrt receptor antagonists to treat insomnia, based on the assumption that blocking orexin-induced arousal will facilitate sleep. This has been clinically validated: currently, two Hcrt receptor antagonists are approved to treat insomnia (suvorexant and lemborexant), with a New Drug Application recently submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration for a third drug (daridorexant). Other therapeutic applications under investigation include reduction of cravings in substance-use disorders and prevention of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, given the apparent bidirectional relationship between poor sleep and worsening of the disease. Circuit neuroscience findings suggest that the Hcrt system is a hub that integrates diverse inputs modulating arousal (e.g., circadian rhythms, metabolic status, positive and negative emotions) and conveys this information to multiple output regions. This neuronal architecture explains the wealth of physiological functions associated with Hcrts and highlights the potential of the Hcrt system as a therapeutic target for a number of disorders. We discuss present and future possible applications of drugs targeting the Hcrt system for the treatment of circuit-related neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative conditions.

Orexin Signaling: A Complex, Multifaceted Process

The orexin system comprises two G protein-coupled receptors, OX1 and OX2 receptors (OX1R and OX2R, respectively), along with two endogenous agonists cleaved from a common precursor (prepro-orexin), orexin-A (OX-A) and orexin-B (OX-B). For the receptors, a complex array of signaling behaviors has been reported. In particular, it becomes obvious that orexin receptor coupling is very diverse and can be tissue-, cell- and context-dependent. Here, the early signal transduction interactions of the orexin receptors will be discussed in depth, with particular emphasis on the direct G protein interactions of each receptor. In doing so, it is evident that ligands, additional receptor-protein interactions and cellular environment all play important roles in the G protein coupling profiles of the orexin receptors. This has potential implications for our understanding of the orexin system's function in vivo in both central and peripheral environments, as well as the development of novel agonists, antagonists and possibly allosteric modulators targeting the orexin system.

Daridorexant: First Approval

Daridorexant (Quviviq™; Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.) is an orally administered dual orexin type 1 and type 2 (OX₁ and OX₂) receptor antagonist (DORA) being developed for the treatment of insomnia. It was selected from a pool of drug candidates on the basis of an expected effect duration of ≈ 8 h at a dose of 25 mg, with a half-life intended to minimize residual effects that might impair daytime functioning. Based on the results of two pivotal phase III trials, daridorexant was recently approved in the USA for the treatment of adult patients with insomnia characterized by difficulties with sleep onset and/or sleep maintenance. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of daridorexant leading to this first approval.