B Cell Depletion and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Responses in Neuroimmunologic Patients

A machine learning approach to identify groups of patients with hematological malignant disorders

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) is crucial to reduce the severity of COVID-19. Despite vaccination efforts, over a third of HM patients remain unresponsive, increasing their risk of severe breakthrough infections. This study aims to leverage machine learning's adaptability to COVID-19 dynamics, efficiently selecting patient-specific features to enhance predictions and improve healthcare strategies. Highlighting the complex COVID-hematology connection, the focus is on interpretable machine learning to provide valuable insights to clinicians and biologists.

METHODS

The study evaluated a dataset with 1166 patients with hematological diseases. The output was the achievement or non-achievement of a serological response after full COVID-19 vaccination. Various machine learning methods were applied, with the best model selected based on metrics such as the Area Under the Curve (AUC), Sensitivity, Specificity, and Matthew Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Individual SHAP values were obtained for the best model, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to these values. The patient profiles were then analyzed within identified clusters.

RESULTS

Support vector machine (SVM) emerged as the best-performing model. PCA applied to SVM-derived SHAP values resulted in four perfectly separated clusters. These clusters are characterized by the proportion of patients that generate antibodies (PPGA). Cluster 1, with the second-highest PPGA (69.91%), included patients with aggressive diseases and factors contributing to increased immunodeficiency. Cluster 2 had the lowest PPGA (33.3%), but the small sample size limited conclusive findings. Cluster 3, representing the majority of the population, exhibited a high rate of antibody generation (84.39%) and a better prognosis compared to cluster 1. Cluster 4, with a PPGA of 66.33%, included patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma on corticosteroid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodology successfully identified four separate patient clusters using Machine Learning and Explainable AI (XAI). We then analyzed each cluster based on the percentage of HM patients who generated antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination. The study suggests the methodology's potential applicability to other diseases, highlighting the importance of interpretable ML in healthcare research and decision-making.

[Clinical courses and costs for hospitalizations of potentially immunocompromised COVID-19 patients in Germany]

BACKGROUND

 Patients at increased risk of inadequate immune response to COVID-19 vaccinations due to their underlying disease or therapy are potentially vulnerable to severe COVID-19 courses. The aim is to assess the population size, clinical courses and hospitalization costs of these patients in Germany.

METHODS

 This retrospective cohort study is based on extrapolations of a representative sample of statutory health insurance (SHI) claims data from 2020. Clinical COVID-19 courses, hospitalization costs and durations are compared between the insured group at increased risk for inadequate immune response to COVID-19 vaccinations (risk group) and the insured group without this risk.

RESULTS

 There are approximately 1.82 million SHI-insured individuals in the risk group, of whom an estimated 240 000 insured individuals do not develop a humoral immune response after 3 COVID-19 vaccinations. The risk group shows higher proportions with COVID-19 (relative risk [RR] 1.21; 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 1.20-1.23), hospitalizations for COVID-19 (RR 3.40; 95 % CI 3.33-3.48), hospitalizations for COVID-19 with intensive care treatment (RR 1.36; 95 % CI 1.30-1.42), and mortality (RR 5.14; 95 % CI 4.97-5.33) compared with the group without risk. In addition, hospitalizations in the risk group are on average 18 % longer (15.36 days vs. 13.00 days) and 19 % more expensive (12 371 € vs. 10 410 €). Expected hospitalization costs in the risk group are four times greater than in the group without risk (4115 € vs. 1017 €).

CONCLUSIONS

 The risk group is vulnerable to COVID-19 and requires additional resources in the German hospital sector. This results in a need for further protective measures. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of different viral variants, active and passive immunizations, and therapies on clinical COVID-19 courses and their costs.

From neglect to spotlight: the underappreciated role of B cells in cutaneous inflammatory diseases

The skin, covering our entire body as its largest organ, manifests enormous complexities and a profound interplay of systemic and local responses. In this heterogeneous domain, B cells were considered strangers. Yet, recent studies have highlighted their existence in the skin and their distinct role in modulating cutaneous immunity across various immune contexts. Accumulating evidence is progressively shedding light on the significance of B cells in maintaining skin health and in skin disorders. Herein, we integrate current insights on the systemic and local contributions of B cells in three prevalent inflammatory skin conditions: Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and Atopic Dermatitis (AD), underscoring the previously underappreciated importance of B cells within skin immunity. Moreover, we address the potential adverse effects of current treatments used for skin diseases, emphasizing their unintentional consequences on B cells. These comprehensive approaches may pave the way for innovative therapeutic strategies that effectively address the intricate nature of skin disorders.

COVID-19 in patients with anemia and haematological malignancies: risk factors, clinical guidelines, and emerging therapeutic approaches

Extensive research in countries with high sociodemographic indices (SDIs) to date has shown that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be directly associated with more severe outcomes among patients living with haematological disorders and malignancies (HDMs). Because individuals with moderate to severe immunodeficiency are likely to undergo persistent infections, shed virus particles for prolonged periods, and lack an inflammatory or abortive phase, this represents an overall risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. In cases suffering from HDMs, further investigation is needed to achieve a better understanding of triviruses and a group of related variants in patients with anemia and HDMs, as well as their treatment through vaccines, drugs, and other methods. Against this background, the present study aimed to delineate the relationship between HDMs and the novel COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Besides, effective treatment options for HDM cases were further explored to address this epidemic and its variants. Therefore, learning about how COVID-19 manifests in these patients, along with exploiting the most appropriate treatments, may lead to the development of treatment and care strategies by clinicians and researchers to help patients recover faster. Video Abstract.

Era of COVID-19 in Multiple Sclerosis Care

The unprecedented scope of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in numerous disruptions to daily life, including for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). This article reviews how disruptions in multiple sclerosis (MS) care prompted innovations in delivery of care (eg, via telemedicine) and mobilized the global MS community to rapidly adopt safe and effective practices. We discuss how our understanding of the risks of COVID-19 in PwMS has evolved along with recommendations pertaining to disease-modifying therapies and vaccines. With lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic, we examine potential questions for future research in this new era of MS care.

Sustained cell-mediated but not humoral responses in rituximab-treated rheumatic patients after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2

OBJECTIVES

B-cell depleting monoclonal antibodies are associated with increased COVID-19 severity and impaired immune response to vaccination. We aimed to assess the humoral and cell mediated (CMI) immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in rituximab (RTX)-treated rheumatic patients.

METHODS

Serum and whole blood samples were collected from RTX-treated rheumatic patients 3-6 months after last vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Serum was tested by ELISA for quantitative detection of anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Cell-mediated variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 immunity (CMI) was assessed by interferon-γ release assay Covi-FERON FIA. Patients were interviewed for breakthrough COVID-19 infection (BTI) 3 months post sampling.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were studied after a median (IQR) of 179 (117-221.5) days from last vaccine to sampling. Forty (66.7%) patients had positive Covi-FERON and 23 (38.3%) had detectable anti-spike IgG. Covi-FERON positive patients had lower median RTX cumulative dose [6 (4-10.75) vs 11 (6.75-14.75) grams, (P = 0.019)]. Patients with positive anti-spike IgG had received fewer RTX cycles [2 (2-4) vs 6 (4-8), P = 0.002] and cumulative dose [4 (3-7) vs 10 (6.25-13) grams, P = 0.002] and had shorter time from last vaccination to sampling [140 (76-199) vs 192 (128-230) days, P = 0.047]. Thirty-seven percent were positive only for Covi-FERON and 7% only for anti-spike IgG. Twenty (33.3%) BTI occurred post sampling, exclusively during Omicron variant predominance. The proportion of patients with CMI response against Delta variant was lower in patients who experienced BTI (25% vs 55%, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Four out of ten RTX-treated vaccinated patients show lasting cell-mediated immune response despite undetectable anti-spike antibodies. Cumulative RTX dose affects both humoral and cell-mediated responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Cell-mediated immune responses call for attention as a vaccine efficacy marker against SARS-CoV-2.

Immunogenicity and safety of vaccines in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Seroconversion rate of vaccines varies and requires further elucidation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) under treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). We aimed to investigate this in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE(PubMed) and Cochrane databases were searched based on a pre-specified protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42020202018). Studies reporting on patients with MS, diagnosed with McDonald criteria getting vaccinated with any type of vaccine were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of patients being seropositive and experience adverse events after vaccination. Outcomes were expressed as proportions with respective 95% confidence interval (CI). Two reviewers independently screened and reviewed existing literature and assessed study quality with the Methodological index for non-randomized studies.

RESULTS

Of 295 articles, 45 studies were analyzed. Seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccines was 76% (95% CI, 70-80; I2 = 95%; 20 studies including 5601 patients. Protection was lower in patients treated with anti-CD20 antibodies and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators compared to untreated patients or treatment with other DMTs. Relapse occurred in 2% (95% CI, 1-3; I2 = 86%; 16 studies including 7235 patients). Seroconversion after seasonal influenza vaccines was 82% (95% CI, 65-91; I2 = 90%; 6 studies including 490 patients). Relapse rate was similar to this after COVID-19 vaccination.

CONCLUSION

The majority of MS patients vaccinated for COVID-19 or seasonal influenza mount an adequate immune response without safety concerns. Data on other vaccines are limited.

Cross-direct effects in settings with two mediators

When multiple mediators are present, there are additional effects that may be of interest beyond the well-known natural (NDE) and controlled direct effects (CDE). These effects cross the type of control on the mediators, setting one to a constant level and one to its natural level, which differs across subjects. We introduce five such estimands for the cross-CDE and -NDE when two mediators are measured. We consider both the scenario where one mediator is influenced by the other, referred to as sequential mediators, and the scenario where the mediators do not influence each other. Such estimands may be of interest in immunology, as we discuss in relation to measured immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We provide identifying expressions for the estimands in observational settings where there is no residual confounding, and where intervention, outcome, and mediators are of arbitrary type. We further provide tight symbolic bounds for the estimands in randomized settings where there may be residual confounding of the outcome and mediator relationship and all measured variables are binary.

Long-Term Immune Response Profiles to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Infection in People with Multiple Sclerosis on Anti-CD20 Therapy

Our objective was to analyze longitudinal cellular and humoral immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) on B-cell depleting treatment (BCDT) compared to pwMS without immunotherapy. We further evaluated the impact of COVID-19 infection and vaccination timing. PwMS (n = 439) on BCDT (ocrelizumab, rituximab, ofatumumab) or without immunotherapy were recruited for this prospective cohort study between June 2021 and June 2022. SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific antibodies and interferon-γ release of CD4 and CD8 T-cells upon stimulation with spike protein peptide pools were analyzed at different timepoints (after primary vaccination, 3 and 6 months after primary vaccination, after booster vaccination, 3 months after booster). Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 was consistently lower whereas T-cell response was higher in patients with BCDT compared to controls. Cellular and humoral responses decreased over time after primary vaccination and increased again upon booster vaccination, with significantly higher antibody titers after booster than after primary vaccination in both untreated and B-cell-depleted pwMS. COVID-19 infection further led to a significant increase in SARS-CoV-2-specific responses. Despite attenuated B-cell responses, a third vaccination for patients with BCDT seems recommendable, since at least partial protection can be expected from the strong T-cell response. Moreover, our data show that an assessment of T-cell responses may be helpful in B-cell-depleted patients to evaluate the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients with autoimmune diseases are among the susceptible groups to COVID-19 infection because of the complexity of their conditions and the side effects of the immunosuppressive drugs used to treat them. They might show impaired immunogenicity to COVID-19 vaccines and have a higher risk of developing COVID-19. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis, this research sought to summarize the evidence on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety in patients with autoimmune diseases following predefined eligibility criteria. Research articles were obtained from an initial search up to 26 September 2022 from PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, MedRxiv, bioRxiv, SSRN, EuroPMC, and the Cochrane Center of Randomized Controlled Trials (CCRCT). Of 76 eligible studies obtained, 29, 54, and 38 studies were included in systematic reviews of efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety, respectively, and 6, 18, and 4 studies were included in meta-analyses for efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety, respectively. From the meta-analyses, patients with autoimmune diseases showed more frequent breakthrough COVID-19 infections and lower total antibody (TAb) titers, IgG seroconversion, and neutralizing antibodies after inactivated COVID-19 vaccination compared with healthy controls. They also had more local and systemic adverse events after the first dose of inactivated vaccination compared with healthy controls. After COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, patients with autoimmune diseases had lower TAb titers and IgG seroconversion compared with healthy controls.

Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and mechanism of action of obexelimab for the treatment of patients with IgG4-related disease: an open-label, single-arm, single centre, phase 2 pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Obexelimab is a bifunctional, non-cytolytic, humanised monoclonal antibody that binds CD19 and Fc gamma receptor IIb to inhibit B cells, plasmablasts, and CD19-expressing plasma cells. We aimed to evaluate the safety, clinical efficacy, and pharmacodynamic effects of obexelimab in patients with active IgG4-related disease.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, single-arm, single centre, phase 2 pilot trial at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, MA, USA. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years and had active IgG4-related disease confirmed by an IgG4-related disease responder index score of 3 or more. Patients received 5 mg/kg of obexelimab intravenously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Patients on glucocorticoids at baseline were expected to discontinue usage within 2 months following enrolment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a decrease of 2 or more from baseline in the IgG4-related disease responder index at day 169 (ie, primary responders). Patients who achieved a decrease of 2 or more at any visit were designated as responders. Adverse events were graded on a scale of 1-5 (ie, mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, or death) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading scale (version 4.3). Exploratory analyses were quantification of B-cell CD19 receptor occupancy, plasmablast, total B-cell and CD4+ cytotoxic T-cell count by flow cytometry, and immunoglobulin concentrations by nephelometry. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02725476.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 24, 2016, and Dec 21, 2016, we enrolled 15 patients. The median age was 63 years (IQR 52-65). Ten (67%) of 15 patients were male, five (33%) were female, and 12 (80%) were White. At baseline, 12 (80%) of 15 patients had an elevated median serum IgG4 concentration of 220 mg/dL (IQR 124-441), and the median IgG4-related disease responder index score was 12 (IQR 7-13). 12 (80%) of 15 patients achieved the primary endpoint (ie, primary responders), 14 (93%) were defined as responders. Reductions from baseline in serum B cells and plasmablasts were observed following treatment with obexelimab. However, in most patients with follow-up data, serum B cells recovered to 75% of baseline concentrations within 42 days of the final obexelimab dose. 13 (87%) of 15 patients reported adverse events, one of which (an infusion reaction) resulted in treatment discontinuation.

INTERPRETATION

All patients except for one had clinical responses to obexelimab treatment. Both reductions in circulating B cells without evidence of apoptosis during obexelimab treatment and their rapid rebound after treatment discontinuation suggest that obexelimab might lead to B-cell sequestration in lymphoid organs or the bone marrow. These results support the continued development of obexelimab for the treatment of IgG4-related disease.

FUNDING

Xencor, Zenas BioPharma, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

ECTRIMS/EAN consensus on vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: Improving immunization strategies in the era of highly active immunotherapeutic drugs

BACKGROUND

With the new highly active drugs available for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), vaccination becomes an essential part of the risk management strategy.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a European evidence-based consensus for the vaccination strategy of pwMS who are candidates for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

METHODS

This work was conducted by a multidisciplinary working group using formal consensus methodology. Clinical questions (defined as population, interventions, and outcomes) considered all authorized DMTs and vaccines. A systematic literature search was conducted and quality of evidence was defined according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The recommendations were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance.

RESULTS

Seven questions, encompassing vaccine safety, vaccine effectiveness, global vaccination strategy and vaccination in sub-populations (pediatric, pregnant women, elderly and international travelers) were considered. A narrative description of the evidence considering published studies, guidelines, and position statements is presented. A total of 53 recommendations were agreed by the working group after three rounds of consensus.

CONCLUSION

This first European consensus on vaccination in pwMS proposes the best vaccination strategy according to current evidence and expert knowledge, with the goal of homogenizing the immunization practices in pwMS.

Humoral and cellular responses to repeated COVID-19 exposure in multiple sclerosis patients receiving B-cell depleting therapies: a single-center, one-year, prospective study

Multiple sclerosis patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy (aCD20-MS) are considered especially vulnerable to complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection due to severe B-cell depletion with limited viral antigen-specific immunoglobulin production. Therefore, multiple vaccine doses as part of the primary vaccination series and booster updates have been recommended for this group of immunocompromised individuals. Even though much less studied than antibody-mediated humoral responses, T-cell responses play an important role against CoV-2 infection and are induced efficiently in vaccinated aCD20-MS patients. For individuals with such decoupled adaptive immunity, an understanding of the contribution of T-cell mediated immunity is essential to better assess protection against CoV-2 infection. Here, we present results from a prospective, single-center study for the assessment of humoral and cellular immune responses induced in aCD20-MS patients (203 donors/350 samples) compared to a healthy control group (43/146) after initial exposure to CoV-2 spike antigen and subsequent re-challenges. Low rates of seroconversion and RBD-hACE2 blocking activity were observed in aCD20-MS patients, even after multiple exposures (responders after 1st exposure = 17.5%; 2nd exposure = 29.3%). Regarding cellular immunity, an increase in the number of spike-specific monofunctional IFNγ+-, IL-2+-, and polyfunctional IFNγ+/IL-2+-secreting T-cells after 2nd exposure was found most noticeably in healthy controls. Nevertheless, a persistently higher T-cell response was detected in aCD20-MS patients compared to control individuals before and after re-exposure (mean fold increase in spike-specific IFNγ+-, IL-2+-, and IFNγ+/IL-2+-T cells before re-exposure = 3.9X, 3.6X, 3.5X/P< 0.001; after = 3.2X, 1.4X, 2.2X/P = 0.002, P = 0.05, P = 0.004). Moreover, cellular responses against sublineage BA.2 of the currently circulating omicron variant were maintained, to a similar degree, in both groups (15-30% T-cell response drop compared to ancestral). Overall, these results highlight the potential for a severely impaired humoral response in aCD20-MS patients even after multiple exposures, while still generating a strong T-cell response. Evaluating both humoral and cellular responses in vaccinated or infected MS patients on B-cell depletion therapy is essential to better assess individual correlations of immune protection and has implications for the design of future vaccines and healthcare strategies.

Humoral immune response following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and infection in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis

Objective

Currently, there is no data available on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) and little is known about the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this age group. We therefore investigated humoral immune responses after Covid-19 vaccination and/or infection in POMS.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed seroconversion rates and SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody levels in 30 POMS and 1 pediatric CIS patient treated with either no disease-modifying therapy (no DMT), immunomodulatory DMT (IM-DMT), or immunosuppressive DMT (IS-DMT) from two Austrian MS centers.

Results

Median age at MS onset was 15.39 years (IQR 1.97). Median age at first COVID-19 vaccination was 17.43 years (IQR 2.76). After two vaccine doses, seroconversion (≥0.8 BAU/ml) was reached in 25/28 patients (89.3%). All patients with no DMT or IM-DMT generated robust immune responses to vaccination (seroconversion: no DMT: 6/6, IM-DMT: 7/7 (100%); median titers: no DMT: 2075 BAU (IQR 1268.50), IM-DMT: 2500 BAU (IQR 0)). In the IS-DMT group seroconversion was achieved in 12/14 patients (80%), median titers were 50.8 BAU (IQR 254.63). Titers were significantly higher in no DMT versus IS-DMT (p=0.012) and in IM-DMT versus IS-DMT (p=0.001). Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 11 of 31 patients and symptoms were mild in all cases. One relapse occurred after infection, but no relapses were documented after vaccination.

Conclusions

Generally, mRNA vaccinations were well tolerated in POMS patients with and without DMT. Immune response was significantly reduced in patients treated with IS-DMT. No unexpected adverse events or relapses related to vaccinations were observed.

Innate and Adaptive Immunity during SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Biomolecular Cellular Markers and Mechanisms

The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was caused by a positive sense single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, other human coronaviruses (hCoVs) exist. Historical pandemics include smallpox and influenza, with efficacious therapeutics utilized to reduce overall disease burden through effectively targeting a competent host immune system response. The immune system is composed of primary/secondary lymphoid structures with initially eight types of immune cell types, and many other subtypes, traversing cell membranes utilizing cell signaling cascades that contribute towards clearance of pathogenic proteins. Other proteins discussed include cluster of differentiation (CD) markers, major histocompatibility complexes (MHC), pleiotropic interleukins (IL), and chemokines (CXC). The historical concepts of host immunity are the innate and adaptive immune systems. The adaptive immune system is represented by T cells, B cells, and antibodies. The innate immune system is represented by macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, and the complement system. Other viruses can affect and regulate cell cycle progression for example, in cancers that include human papillomavirus (HPV: cervical carcinoma), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV: lymphoma), Hepatitis B and C (HB/HC: hepatocellular carcinoma) and human T cell Leukemia Virus-1 (T cell leukemia). Bacterial infections also increase the risk of developing cancer (e.g., Helicobacter pylori). Viral and bacterial factors can cause both morbidity and mortality alongside being transmitted within clinical and community settings through affecting a host immune response. Therefore, it is appropriate to contextualize advances in single cell sequencing in conjunction with other laboratory techniques allowing insights into immune cell characterization. These developments offer improved clarity and understanding that overlap with autoimmune conditions that could be affected by innate B cells (B1+ or marginal zone cells) or adaptive T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and other pathologies. Thus, this review starts with an introduction into host respiratory infection before examining invaluable cellular messenger proteins and then individual immune cell markers.

Longitudinal Postvaccine SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin G Titers, Memory B-Cell Responses, and Risk of COVID-19 in Multiple Sclerosis Over 1 Year

Background and Objectives

Some disease-modifying treatments impair response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in multiple sclerosis (MS), potentially increasing the risk of breakthrough infections. We aimed to investigate longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 antibody dynamics and memory B cells after 2 and 3 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine doses and their association with the risk of COVID-19 in patients with MS on different treatments over 1 year.

Methods

Prospective observational cohort study in patients with MS undergoing SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations. Antispike (anti-S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers were measured by chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay. Frequencies of spike-specific memory B cells were measured on polyclonal stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and screening of secreted antibodies by ELISA.

Results

We recruited 120 patients with MS (58 on anti-CD20 antibodies, 9 on sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, 15 on cladribine, 24 on teriflunomide (TFL), and 14 untreated) and collected 392 samples up to 10.8 months after 2 vaccine doses. When compared with untreated patients, anti-CD20 antibodies (β = −2.07,p< 0.001) and S1P modulators (β = −2.02,p< 0.001) were associated with lower anti-S IgG, while TFL and cladribine were not. Anti-S IgG decreased with months since vaccine (β = −0.14,p< 0.001), independently of treatments. Within anti-CD20 patients, anti-S IgG remained higher in those with greater baseline B-cell counts and were not influenced by postvaccine anti-CD20 infusions. Anti-S IgG increase after a 3rd vaccine was mild on anti-CD20 and S1P modulators. Spike-specific memory B-cell responses were weaker on S1P modulators and anti-CD20 than on TFL and influenced by postvaccine anti-CD20 infusions. The frequency of breakthrough infections was comparable between DMTs, but the risk of COVID-19 was predicted by the last measured anti-S IgG titer before infection (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.37–0.86,p= 0.008).

Discussion

Postvaccine anti-S IgG titers decrease over time regardless of MS treatment and are associated with breakthrough COVID-19. Both humoral and specific memory B-cell responses are diminished on S1P modulators. Within anti-CD20–treated patients, B-cell count at first vaccine determines anti-S IgG production, whereas postvaccine anti-CD20 infusions negatively affect spike-specific memory B cells.

The optimal interval before receiving SARS-COV-2 vaccination for patients who have received Anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibodies

The optimal interval before receiving SARS-COV-2 vaccination for patients who have received anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibodies remains unclear. We considered original studies up to 29 October 2022 and conducted searches in Embase,Medrxiv, PubMed, and SSRN. We excluded search results that did not match our research question's subject. Human immune response outcomes were analysed inpatients who had previously received anti-CD20 antibody therapy. We analyzed the collected results using sensitivity curves and forest plots. Twenty-eight studies with a total of 1455 subjects receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies were included in the present analysis. The humoral immune response rates to the time between the last anti-CD20 treatment and vaccination for 3-6 months, 6 months,6-9 months, and 9-12 months were 0.23 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.36), 0.36 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.58), 0.49 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.64) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.77),respectively. The humoral immune response rates were.16 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.57) when B cell was 0/ul, and 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.61)when B cells were more than 5/ul. The humoral immune response rate for multiple sclerosis was 0.39 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.60) and 0.48 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.68) for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The area underneath the curve(AUC) was 0.69 with a cut-off value of 5.5 months. The present results suggested that the optimal interval for SARS-COV-2 vaccination after the final dose of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody was 5.5 months.

Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2 Antigen in Patients Treated with Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibodies: It Is Not All about B Cell Recovery

Anti-CD20 therapies decrease the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 immunization. We aimed to determine the extent of the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in correlation with peripheral B-cell dynamics among patients with central nervous system inflammatory disorders treated with anti-CD20 medications. We retrospectively included patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy after antigen contact who were divided into responders (>7 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL) and non-responders (<7 BAU/mL). In participants with first antigen contact prior to therapy, we investigated the recall response elicited once under treatment. We included 80 patients (responders n = 34, non-responders n = 37, recall cohort n = 9). The B-cell counts among responders were significantly higher compared to non-responders (mean 1012 cells/µL ± SD 105 vs. mean 17 cells/µL ± SD 47; p < 0.001). Despite very low B-cell counts (mean 9 cells/µL ± SD 20), humoral response was preserved among the recall cohort (mean 1653 BAU/mL ± SD 2250.1) and did not differ significantly from responders (mean 735 BAU/mL ± SD 1529.9; p = 0.14). Our data suggest that peripheral B cells are required to generate antibodies to neo-antigens but not for a recall response during anti-CD20 therapy. Evaluation of B-cell counts and pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies might serve as biomarkers for estimating the immune competence to mount a humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 antigens.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: Lessons learnt a year in

It has been over a year since people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have been receiving vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). With a negligible number of cases in which vaccination led to a relapse or new onset MS, experts around the world agree that the potential consequences of COVID-19 in pwMS by far outweigh the risks of vaccination. This article reviews the currently available types of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the immune responses they elicit in pwMS treated with different DMTs. Findings to date highlight the importance of vaccine timing in relation to DMT dosing to maximize protection, and of encouraging pwMS to get booster doses when offered.

Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 third vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls: A prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Third vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is recommended for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), usually six months after the last vaccination.

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter study on 292 pwMS and 46 healthy controls (HC), who had all received two vaccinations prior to study enrollment, SARS-CoV-2 IgG response was measured in the month before and 2-4 months after third vaccination. PwMS were categorized as follows: untreated (N-DMT, n = 32), receiving disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with expected humoral response (er-DMT: interferon-beta preparations, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab, cladribine, alemtuzumab; n = 120) or no expected humoral response (nr-DMT: S1PMs, CD20mAb; n = 140).

RESULTS

PwMS on nr-DMT had significantly lower median antibody levels before (12.1 U/ml [0.4-2500]) and after third vaccination (305 U/ml [0.4-2500]) in comparison to other groups (p<0.001). We did not find differences in antibody levels after homologous (n = 281; 2500 [0.4-2500]) and heterologous (n = 57; 2500 [0.4-2500]) vaccination regime regardless of the DMT group. The DMT group (β= -0.60; 95% CI -1195.73, -799.10; p<0.001) was associated with antibody levels after third vaccination, while time to revaccination (6 months [1-13]) was not. After third vaccination, seropositivity was reached in 75.8% and 82.2% of pwMS on anti-CD20 mAbs and S1PMs, respectively. Complete B-cell depletion significantly decreased the probability of seroconversion even after the third vaccination (OR 0.14; p = 0.021), whereas time interval to last DMT intake and time to revaccination did not. Twenty-two patients reported a SARS-CoV-2 infection (3 N-DMT, 9 er-DMT, 10 nr-DMT), one being asymptomatic and the rest having a mild course.

CONCLUSION

Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 third vaccination in pwMS is excellent. While reduced by S1PMs and CD20mAb, protective response is still expected in the majority of patients.

Impact of vaccination on COVID-19 outcome in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 continues to challenge neurologists in counselling persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) regarding disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and vaccination. The objective here was to characterize predictors of COVID-19 outcome in pwMS.

METHODS

We included pwMS with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from a nationwide population-based registry. COVID-19 outcome was classified as either mild or severe. Impact of DMT, specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and vaccination on COVID-19 outcome was determined by multivariable models adjusted for a-priori-risk (determined by a cumulative risk score comprising age, disability and comorbidities).

RESULTS

Of 317 pwMS with COVID-19 (mean age 41.8 years [SD 12.4], 72.9% female, median EDSS 1.5 [range 0-8.5], 77% on DMT [16% on antiCD20]), 92.7% had a mild course and 7.3% a severe course with 2.2% dying from COVID-19. Ninety-seven pwMS (30.6%) were fully vaccinated. After a median 5 months from vaccination to SARS-CoV-2 infection (range 1-9), severe COVID-19 occurred in 2.1% of fully vaccinated pwMS compared to 9.5% in unvaccinated pwMS (p=0.018). A-priori-risk robustly predicted COVID-19 severity (R2 0.605; p<0.001). Adjusting for a-priori-risk, anti-CD20 treatment was associated with increased COVID-19 severity (odds ratio [OR] 3.3; R2 0.113; p=0.003), but exposure to any other DMT was not. Fully vaccinated pwMS showed a significantly decreased risk for severe COVID-19 (OR 0.21, R2 0.144, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a population-based MS cohort, COVID-19 course is primarily predicted by a-priori-risk (depending on age, disability and comorbidities) explaining about 60% of variance. Anti-CD20 treatment is associated with a moderately increased risk, while reassuringly vaccination provides protection from severe COVID-19.

Evaluation of humoral and cellular response to third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients treated with B-cell depleting therapy

OBJECTIVE

to investigate the responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in a cohort of immunosuppressed patients affected by immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID).

METHODS

we have measured humoral and cellular immunity using quantitative IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibody (anti-S-IgG), neutralization assays and specific interferon-gamma (IFN-g) release assay (IGRA) before and after the third dose of BNT162b2. The response of those on anti-CD20 (n = 18) was then compared with healthy controls (HC, n = 18) and IMID naïve to anti-CD20 drugs (n = 13).

RESULTS

a third BNT162b2 dose is highly immunogenic in IMID patients naïve to anti-CD20, as 100% of the subjects seroconverted compared to the 55% in anti-CD20. The rate of IGRA response was of 79% in anti-CD20, 50% in IMID naïve to anti-CD20, 100% in HC. Among those who have seroconverted, IMID patients had significantly reduced anti-S-IgG and neutralization titers compared to HC, whereas no significant difference was observed when comparing anti-CD20 and HC. Furthermore, 13% of anti-CD20 and 7.7% of IMID were simultaneously negative for both neutralizing antibodies and IGRA after three doses.

CONCLUSION

these data draw attention to the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination in treated IMID, taking specific groups into consideration for vaccination program.

Multiple sclerosis in the era of COVID-19: disease course, DMTs and SARS-CoV2 vaccinations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As of January 21st 2022, over 340 million are confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including nearly 5.6 million deaths. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is neurotropic and affects the neural parenchyma through direct viral invasion from the nasal mucosa and postinfectious cytokine storm. Further challenges of SARS-CoV-2 infection are nowadays linked to variants of concern. Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory and progressive degenerative disorder of the central nervous system commonly affecting young adults and potentially generating irreversible disability. Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have been considered 'extra' vulnerable because of the immune-mediated nature of the disease, the disability status, and the immunomodulatory therapies potentially increasing the risk for viral infection. Today multiple sclerosis neurologists are faced with several challenges in the management of pwMS to both prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and protection from disease worsening. We aimed to highlight today's most relevant facts about the complex management of pwMS in the COVID-19 era.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of COVID-19 among pwMS does not differ from the general population. The prognosis of COVID-19 among pwMS is driven by older age, male sex, nonambulatory status, comorbidity as in the general population, as well as by corticosteroid treatment and B-cell depleting agents which decrease seropositivity from SARS-CoV-2 infection and immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

SUMMARY

Disease modifying treatments (DMTs) should be regularly continued in relation to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but an ad hoc timing is required with B-cell depleting agents. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is recommended in pwMS with willingness improving through health education programs. Multiple sclerosis does not seem to worsen after SARS-Cov2 vaccination but COVID-19 may enhance disease activity.

Comparing humoral immune response to SARS-CoV2 vaccines in people with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls: An Austrian prospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

SARS-CoV2 vaccination is recommended for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), but response may be limited by disease-modifying-treatments (DMTs). The aim of this study was to compare the rates of humoral immune response and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwMS and healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective study on 456 pwMS and 116 HCs, SARS-CoV-2-IgG response was measured 3 months after the first vaccine dose. The primary endpoint was defined as proportion of patients developing antibodies (seroconversion). Secondary endpoints included antibody level, safety and efficacy.

RESULTS

Compared to 97.4% in HCs, seroconversion occurred in 96.7% (88/91) untreated pwMS, 97.1% of patients (135/139) on immunomodulatory DMTs and 61.1% (138/226; p < 0.001) on immunosuppressive DMTs. Seroconversion was lowest in patients on antiCD20 monoclonal antibodies (CD20 mAbs; 52.6%) followed by sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor-modulators (S1PMs; 63.6%). In the S1PM subgroup, seroconversion increased with lymphocyte count (odds ratio [OR] 1.31 per 0.1 G/L; p = 0.035). In pwMS on CD20 mAbs, B-cell depletion decreased seroconversion (OR 0.52; p = 0.038), whereas time since last DMT did not. Safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwMS was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Humoral response to SARS-CoV2 vaccines in pwMS is generally excellent. While reduced by immunosuppressive DMTs, most importantly by B-cell-depleting CD20 mAbs and S1PMs, seroconversion is still expected in the majority of patients. SARS-CoV2 vaccination should be offered to every MS patient.

Vaccination and immunotherapies in neuroimmunological diseases

Neuroimmunological diseases and their treatment compromise the immune system, thereby increasing the risk of infections and serious illness. Consequently, vaccinations to protect against infections are an important part of the clinical management of these diseases. However, the wide variety of immunotherapies that are currently used to treat neuroimmunological disease — particularly multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders — can also impair immunological responses to vaccinations. In this Review, we discuss what is known about the effects of various immunotherapies on immunological responses to vaccines and what these effects mean for the safe and effective use of vaccines in patients with a neuroimmunological disease. The success of vaccination in patients receiving immunotherapy largely depends on the specific mode of action of the immunotherapy. To minimize the risk of infection when using immunotherapy, assessment of immune status and exclusion of underlying chronic infections before initiation of therapy are essential. Selection of the required vaccinations and leaving appropriate time intervals between vaccination and administration of immunotherapy can help to safeguard patients. We also discuss the rapidly evolving knowledge of how immunotherapies affect responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and how these effects should influence the management of patients on these therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In this Review, the authors discuss how various immunotherapies for neuroimmunological diseases interact with vaccination responses, including responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, and the implications for the safe and effective use of vaccines in patients with these diseases.

Vaccination against infection is an essential part of the management of neuroimmunological diseases.

All indicated vaccinations should be administered before initiation of immunotherapy whenever possible; appropriate intervals between vaccination and treatment vary with treatment and vaccination.

Inactivated vaccines are considered safe in neuroimmunological diseases but live vaccines are generally contraindicated during immunotherapy.

Vaccination responses during immunotherapy can be diminished or abrogated, depending on the treatment and vaccination; antibody titre testing to monitor responses can be considered where appropriate.

Vaccinations must be avoided during relapses or exacerbations of neuroimmunological diseases.

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is recommended for patients with neuroimmunological disease but some immunotherapies limit the immune response; therefore, timing should be considered carefully.

Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management

Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and provide some benefit to patients with primary progressive MS. They are highly precise by specifically targeting molecules displayed on cells involved in distinct immune mechanisms of MS pathophysiology. They not only differ in the target antigen they recognize but also by the mode of action that generates their therapeutic effect. Natalizumab, an [Formula: see text]4[Formula: see text]1 integrin antagonist, works via binding to cell surface receptors, blocking the interaction with their ligands and, in that way, preventing the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. On the other hand, the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab work via eliminating selected pathogenic cell populations. However, potential adverse effects may be serious and can necessitate treatment discontinuation. Most importantly, those are the risk for (opportunistic) infections, but also secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies also carry the risk of infusion/injection-related reactions, primarily in early phases of treatment. By careful patient selection and monitoring during therapy, the occurrence of these potentially serious adverse effects can be minimized. Monoclonal antibodies are characterized by a relatively long pharmacologic half-life and pharmacodynamic effects, which provides advantages such as permitting infrequent dosing, but also creates disadvantages regarding vaccination and family planning. This review presents an overview of currently available monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of RMS, including their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for risk management, vaccination, and family planning.