Lower motor neuron syndromes defined by patterns of weakness, nerve conduction abnormalities, and high titers of antiglycolipid antibodies

Evidence for spontaneous regulation of the humoral IgM anti-GM1 autoimmune response by IgG antibodies in multifocal motor neuropathy patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a peripheral nerve disorder characterized by slow progressive distal asymmetric weakness with minimal or no sensory impairment. Currently, a vast evidence supports a direct pathogenic role of IgM anti-GM1 antibodies on disease pathogenesis. Patients with MMN seropositive for GM1-specific IgM antibodies have significantly more weakness, disability and axon loss than patients without these antibodies. During the screening for IgM anti-GM1 antibodies in a cohort of patients with neuropathy we noticed an absence or significant reduction of natural IgM anti-GM1 autoreactivity in some patients with MMN, suggesting a mechanism of self-control of autoreactivity. We aim to understand the lack of natural reactivity against GM1 in MMN patients.

METHODS

The presence of free IgM anti-GM1 reactivity or its complex to blocking IgG was analysed by combining high performance thin layer chromatography-immunostaining, soluble binding inhibition assays, Protein-G or GM1-affinity columns and dot blot assays.

RESULTS

We identified in MMN patients an immunoregulation of IgM anti-GM1 antibodies mediated by IgG immunoglobulins characterized by: (i) lack of natural IgM anti-GM1 autoreactivity as a result of a immunoregulatory IgG-dependent mechanism; (ii) presence of natural and disease-associated IgM anti-GM1/IgG blocking Ab complexes in sera; and (iii) high levels of IgG blocking against natural IgM anti-GM1 antibodies (Abs.

INTERPRETATION

Our observations unmask a spontaneous IgG-dependent mechanism of immunoregulation against IgM anti-GM1 antibodies that could explain, in part, fluctuations in the usually slowly progressive clinical course that characterizes the disease and, at the same time, allows the identification of an autoimmune response against GM1 ganglioside in seronegative patients.

Update on therapy of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies

Chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy, and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), are a group of disorders deemed to be caused by an immune response against peripheral nerve antigens. Several immune therapies have been reported to be variably effective in these neuropathies including steroids, plasma exchange, and high-dose intravenous (IVIg) or subcutaneous (SCIg) immunoglobulins. These therapies are however far from being invariably effective and may be associated with a number of side effects leading to the use of immunosuppressive agents whose efficacy has not been so far confirmed in randomized trials. More recently, new biological agents, such as rituximab, have proved to be effective in patients with neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy and are currently tested in CIDP.

An Overview of Acute Flaccid Myelitis

Acute Flaccid Myelitis is defined by the presence of Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) and a spinal cord lesion on magnetic resonance imaging that is primarily limited to the grey matter. AFM is a difficult situation to deal with when you have a neurologic illness. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a large number of cases were discovered in the United States in 2014, with 90% of cases occurring in children. Although the exact cause of AFM is unknown, mounting evidence suggests a link between AFM and enterovirus D68 (EV-D68). In 2014, an outbreak of AFM was discovered in the United States. The condition was initially linked to polioviruses; however, it was later found that the viruses were caused by non-polioviruses Enteroviruses D-68 (EV-D68). The number of cases has increased since 2014, and the disease has been declared pandemic in the United States. The sudden onset of muscle weakness, usually in an arm or leg, as well as pain throughout the body, the change in patient's facial expression (facial weakness), and shortness of breath, ingesting, and speaking are all common symptoms in patients suffering from neurologic disease. This article includes graphic and histogram representations of reported AFM incidents and criteria for causality, epidemiology, various diagnostic approaches, signs and symptoms, and various investigational guidelines. It also includes key statements about recent clinical findings related to AFM disease.

Antibody testing in neuropathy associated with anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein antibodies: where we are after 40 years

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis of Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy is based on the presence of elevated titers of IgM anti-MAG antibodies, which are typically associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and a slowly progressive, distal demyelinating phenotype. The condition, however, can be under or over diagnosed in patients with mildly elevated antibody titers, absent monoclonal gammopathy, or an atypical presentation. The purpose of this paper is to examine recent advances in our understanding of the currently available anti-MAG antibody assays, their reliability, and their use in deciding treatment or monitoring the response to therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Higher titers of anti-MAG antibodies are more likely to be associated with the typical MAG phenotype or response to therapy. Mildly elevated antibody levels can occur in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Testing for cross-reactivity with HNK1 can add to the specificity of the antibody assays. Patients with MAG neuropathy can present with an atypical phenotype and in the absence of a detectable monoclonal gammopathy.

SUMMARY

Assays for anti-MAG antibodies by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay can be improved by testing for antibody binding at multiple serum dilutions, the inclusion of antigen-negative microwells as internal controls for each sample, testing for cross-reactivity with HNK1, and formal validation. The diagnosis needs to be considered in patients with demyelinating neuropathy, even in the absence of a monoclonal gammopathy or typical phenotype. The change in antibody levels needs to be considered in evaluating the response to therapy with B-cell depleting agents.

Clinical electrophysiology of axonal polyneuropathies

Axonal neuropathies encompass a wide range of acquired and inherited disorders with electrophysiologic characteristics that arise from the unique neurophysiology of the axon. Accurate interpretation of nerve conduction studies and electromyography requires an in-depth understanding of the pathophysiology of the axon. Here we review the unique neurophysiologic properties of the axon and how they relate to clinical electrodiagnostic features. We review the length-dependent Wallerian or "dying-back" processes as well as the emerging body of literature from acquired axonal neuropathies that highlights the importance of axonal disease at the nodes of Ranvier. Neurophysiologic features of individual inherited and acquired axonal diseases, including primary nerve disease as well as systemic immune mediated, metabolic, and toxic diseases involving the peripheral nerve, are reviewed. This comprehensive review of electrodiagnostic findings coupled with the current understanding of pathophysiology will aid the clinician in the evaluation of axonal polyneuropathies.

A Man With Distal Asymmetric Leg Weakness

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

To discuss a case of adult-onset asymmetric distal leg weakness in a patient who presented with weakness and atrophy of the posterior compartment of the left leg.

KEY QUESTIONS

1. What is the differential diagnosis of asymmetric distal leg weakness?2. How would a clinician approach diagnostic testing for such a patient?3. What is the final diagnosis for this patient?4. How to treat this patient?

Cerebrospinal fluid findings in Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies

The classic immunologic alteration of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), albuminocytologic dissociation, has been known since the original paper by Guillain, Barré, and Strohl. Albuminocytologic dissociation has been also described in other forms of the GBS spectrum, such as axonal motor or motor-sensory forms (AMAN, AMSAN), the anti-GQ1b spectrum of Miller Fisher syndrome, and Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis. Cytokines, chemokines, antibodies, complement components, and molecules with a putative neuroprotective role or indicating axonal damage have also been examined using different methods. Besides these candidate approaches, proteomics has been recently applied to discover potential biomarkers. The overall results support the immunopathogenesis of GBS, but albuminocytologic dissociation remained the only consistent CSF biomarker supporting the diagnosis of GBS. Chronic inflammatory neuropathies also comprise a heterogeneous group of diseases. Increased protein in the CSF is a supportive factor of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, especially in the absence of definite electrophysiologic criteria. A number of other markers have also been investigated in the CSF of patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies, similar to GBS. However, none has been used in supporting diagnosis, differentiating among syndromes, or predicting the clinical course and treatment responses.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005, 2008 and 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

On 22 September 2014 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS for trials of MMN. We also searched two trials registers for ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one RCT of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in MMN. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with IVIg, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for IVIg. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for IVIg or improving muscle strength in MMN. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsy Presenting as an Acute Brachial Plexopathy: A Lover's Palsy

It is generally regarded that patients with hereditary neuropathy to pressure palsies, due to a deletion in the PMP22 gene, show recurrent pressure palsy and generalised peripheral neuropathy (pes cavus and hammer toes sometimes develop). Brachial plexopathy is rarely identified as a first presentation of hereditary neuropathy to pressure palsies. We describe a young man who developed a painless flail upper limb with a clinical diagnosis of a brachial plexopathy after his partner slept on his arm – a PMP22 deletion was found. His father, who had a symmetrical polyneuropathy without recurrent mononeuropathies, shared the PMP22 deletion.

Sensitivity and predictive value of anti-GM1/galactocerebroside IgM antibodies in multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Increased titres of serum IgM antibodies to GM1 ganglioside are often associated with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Testing for IgM antibodies to other antigens including GM2, the mixture of GM1 and galactocerebroside (GM1/GalC) and the disulfated heparin disaccharide NS6S were reported to increase the sensitivity of antibody testing in MMN even if it is unclear whether the specificity and positive (PPV) or negative predictive value (NPV) for MMN were also affected.

METHODS

We measured IgM antibodies to GM1, GM2, galactocerebroside, GM1/GalC and NS6S in 40 consecutive patients with MMN and 142 controls with other neuropathies or related diseases and compared their sensitivity, specificity and PPV for MMN.

RESULTS

With the only exception of anti-GM2 and, partially, anti-NS6S antibodies, IgM antibodies to the antigens tested were more frequent in MMN than in controls. Increased titres of anti-GM1 IgM were found in 48% of MMN patients with a specificity of 93% and PPV for MMN of 66%. Anti-GM1/GalC antibodies were present in all anti-GM1 positive MMN patients and in 11 additional patients (28%) with MMN raising the sensitivity of antibody testing to 75%. The specificity (85%) and PPV (59%) for MMN was, however, moderately reduced compared to anti-GM1 IgM, even if they rose with increasing anti-GM1/GalC titres. IgM antibodies to GM2, NS6S and galactocerebroside were found in 8%, 23% and 60% of MMN patients but had a low specificity and PPV for MMN.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing for anti-GM1/GalC IgM significantly increased the sensitivity of antibody testing in MMN compared to anti-GM1 alone (p=0.021) and may represent a preferred option for GM1 reactivity testing in MMN.

Multifocal motor neuropathy, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, and other chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy variants

Chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathies (CADP) constitute an important group of immune neuromuscular disorders affecting myelin. This article discusses CADP with emphasis on multifocal motor neuropathy, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy, and less common variants. Although each of these entities has distinctive laboratory and electrodiagnostic features that aid in their diagnosis, clinical characteristics are of paramount importance in diagnosing specific conditions and determining the most appropriate therapies. Knowledge regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of these disorders continues to expand, resulting in improved opportunities for identification and treatment.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) was first described in 1988 as a purely motor neuropathy affecting multiple motor nerves. The diagnosis was based entirely on demonstrating electrophysiological evidence of a conduction block (CB) that selectively affected motor axons, with sparing of sensory axons even through the site of motor CB. Subsequently, a similar disorder was reported but with absence of demonstrable CB on routine nerve conduction studies and there is still some debate as to whether MMN without CB is related to MMN. MMN is thought to be an inflammatory neuropathy related to an immune attack on motor nerves. The conventional hypothesis is that the primary pathology is segmental demyelination, but recent research raises the possibility of a primary axonopathy. Anti-GM1 antibodies can be found in some patients but it is unclear whether these antibodies are pathogenic. Intravenous immunoglobulin is the mainstay of treatment but other immunosuppressive treatments can also be effective.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005 and 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (4 October 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011, Issue 3 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2011), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2011), and LILACS (January 1982 to September 2011) for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one randomised controlled trial of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in multifocal motor neuropathy. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with intravenous immunoglobulin, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for intravenous immunoglobulin or improving muscle strength. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (October 8 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from January 1966 to October 8 2008), and EMBASE (from January 1980 to October 8 2008), for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were to be included and one was found. Prospective and retrospective case series and case reports were considered in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found the first randomised controlled trial of multifocal motor neuropathy. This study, which randomised 28 patients, showed that mycophenolate mofetil did not significantly improve strength or function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the only randomised placebo-controlled trial of any immunosuppressive agent, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Autoimmune-mediated polyneuropathy triggered by borrelial infection?

A patient with proven borrelial infection of the central nervous system (CNS) and progressive weakness of the arms was treated with antibiotics. Although the initially elevated CXCL13 concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid decreased, indicating effective treatment of the infection, weakness progressed. Investigation revealed multiple nerve conduction blocks and the presence of GM1 antibodies, suggesting a multifocal motor neuropathy; the patient improved on treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins. This report of an autoimmune-mediated polyneuropathy in a patient with borrelial CNS infection indicates that such patients might respond to immunomodulatory therapy if antibiotic treatment is not effective.

How useful are anti-neural IgM antibodies in the diagnosis of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies?

Antibodies against several neural antigens have been associated with different chronic immune-mediated neuropathies but their practical clinical relevance remains unclear. To determine the possible diagnostic usefulness of these antibodies we reviewed the clinical correlate of IgM antibodies to the myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), sulfatide, the gangliosides GM1, GM2, GD1a and GD1b in 539 consecutive patients examined for neuropathy or related diseases in our Neuropathy Clinics and tested for these antibodies in our laboratory since 1985. 302 patients (56%) had an established diagnosis of definite or possible chronic immune-mediated neuropathy while 237 had a neuropathy of non-immune-mediated origin or of unknown aetiology or a closely related disease. Antibodies to one or more antigen were more frequent (chi(2)=63.32; p<0.00001) in patients with chronic immune-mediated neuropathy (37.7%) than with other neuropathy or related diseases (7.2%) and their presence was associated in 87% of the patients with an immune-mediated neuropathy, incrementing by 31% the probability of having this form. Testing for MAG permitted to identify 24.8% of patients with an immune-mediated neuropathy, GM1 an additional 9.9%, while GM2, GD1b, GD1a and sulfatide altogether an additional 3% of the patients. Concerning clinical correlations, all 75 patients with anti-MAG IgM had neuropathy and IgM monoclonal gammopathy (PN+IgM) with a positive predictive value for this neuropathy of 100%. A similarly high predictive value for neuropathy (91.4%) was observed among 269 patients with IgM monoclonal gammopathy including 103 patients without neuropathy. Anti-sulfatide IgM, though rare, were also significantly and constantly associated with PN+IgM and permitted to identify few patients not bearing anti-MAG IgM. Anti-GM1 IgM were significantly associated with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) (29.2%) but where also found in a few patients with other immune or non-immune neuropathies or related diseases with a positive predictive value for MMN of 25.5%. Anti-GM2 IgM were also significantly associated with MMN and increased the sensitivity (36.2%) for MMN obtained with anti-GM1 IgM only, without affecting its specificity and positive predictive value. Anti-GD1a, GD1b, though not significantly more frequent in patients with immune-mediated neuropathy, were associated in 80 to 100% of patients with these neuropathies. In conclusion anti-neural IgM antibodies may help in identifying patients with a chronic immune-mediated neuropathy, even if only anti-MAG and anti-sulfatide IgM appear to be strictly associated with a definite clinical syndrome.

Lewis rats immunized with GM1 ganglioside do not develop peripheral neuropathy

Elevated levels of anti-GM1 antibodies are associated with motor nerve syndromes. Although there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that anti-GM1 antibodies may be causing the disease, their precise role remains unclear. In order to study the role of anti-GM1 antibodies in the pathogenesis of peripheral neuropathy, eight Lewis rats were injected with GM1 ganglioside mixed with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and emulsified with Freund's adjuvant and three rats were immunized with GM1 in liposomes. Although IgM class anti-GM1 antibodies were detected in all animals immunized with GM1, none of the animals exhibited overt signs of neuropathy during 6 months after initial immunization. IgG antibody to GM1 was not produced in any of the animals. There was no pathological evidence of nerve damage. These studies suggest that elevated levels of IgM anti-GM1 antibodies by themselves do not cause nerve damage in rats.

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy

Several diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy have been proposed in recent years and a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and various other immunomodulatory drugs has been suggested in several trials and uncontrolled studies. The objectives were to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation and treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. Disease experts and a patient representative considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in July 2004 and prepared statements which were agreed in an iterative fashion. The Task Force agreed good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy and investigations to be considered. The principal recommendations and good practice points were: (i) IVIg (2 g/kg given over 2-5 days) should be considered as the first line treatment (level A recommendation) when disability is sufficiently severe to warrant treatment. (ii) Corticosteroids are not recommended (good practice point). (iii) If initial treatment with IVIg is effective, repeated IVIg treatment should be considered (level C recommendation). The frequency of IVIg maintenance therapy should be guided by the individual response (good practice point). Typical treatment regimens are 1 g/kg every 2-4 weeks or 2 g/kg every 4-8 weeks (good practice point). (iv) If IVIg is not or not sufficiently effective then immunosuppressive treatment may be considered. Cyclophosphamide, ciclosporin, azathioprine, interferon beta1a, or rituximab are possible agents (good practice point). (v) Toxicity makes cyclophosphamide a less desirable option (good practice point).

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society

BACKGROUND

Several diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) have been proposed in recent years, and a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and various other immunomodulatory drugs has been suggested in several trials and uncontrolled studies.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this guideline was to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation, and treatment of MMN.

METHODS

Disease experts and a representative of patients considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in July 2004 and prepared statements that were agreed in an iterative fashion.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Task Force agreed on good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for MMN and investigations to be considered. The principal recommendations and good practice points were as follows: (1) IVIg (2 g/kg given over 2-5 days) should be considered as the first line of treatment (level A recommendation) when disability is sufficiently severe to warrant treatment; (2) corticosteroids are not recommended (good practice point); (3) if initial treatment with IVIg is effective, repeated IVIg treatment should be considered (level C recommendation). The frequency of IVIg maintenance therapy should be guided by the individual response (good practice point). Typical treatment regimens are 1 g/kg every 2-4 weeks or 2 g/kg every 4-8 weeks (good practice point); (4) if IVIg is not (or not sufficiently) effective, then immunosuppressive treatment may be considered. Cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, azathioprine, interferon-beta1a, or rituximab are possible agents (good practice point); and (5) toxicity makes cyclophosphamide a less desirable option (good practice point).

Brachio-cervical inflammatory myopathies: Clinical, immune, and myopathologic features

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patients with inflammatory myopathies who present with weakness in the proximal regions of the arms.

METHODS

Clinical, laboratory, and myopathologic features were evaluated in 10 patients, identified consecutively over 12 years, with inflammatory myopathies and weakness that was most severe in the proximal regions of the arms. The features of these brachio-cervical inflammatory myopathy (BCIM) syndromes were compared with those of other inflammatory and immune-mediated myopathies evaluated during the same period.

RESULTS

Patients with BCIM developed progressive weakness at ages 24-82 years (mean +/- SD age 55 +/- 9 years). Posterior neck weakness occurred in 60% of patients, while motor neuron disease was the referring diagnosis in 30%. All patients had other systemic autoimmune disorders, including myasthenia gravis (40%) and rheumatoid arthritis (20%). Antinuclear antibodies were present in all patients. Serum creatine kinase levels were usually moderately high (mean 910 IU/liter). Active myopathy was identified in muscle biopsy samples from the patients. Focal collections of mononuclear cells, some predominantly B cells, were present in perivascular and perimysial regions. MxA- and CD123-positive dendritic cells were present in the endomysium. C5b-9 components of complement were present diffusely in endomysial connective tissue. Most patients improved in strength after receiving corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

Patients with BCIM syndromes have progressive weakness in the proximal regions of the arms and neck. The predominant myopathologic findings are active myopathy, C5b-9 staining of endomysium, focal perivascular and perimysial inflammation, often with a prominent B cell component, and endomysial dendritic cells. Corticosteroid treatment of BCIM is often followed by improvement in strength.

A new type of anti-ganglioside antibodies present in neurological patients

High titers of anti-GA1 antibodies have been associated with neurological syndromes. In most cases, these antibodies cross-react with the structurally related glycolipids GM1 and GD1b, although specific anti-GA1 antibodies have also been reported. The role of specific anti-GA1 antibodies is uncertain since the presence of GA1 in the human nervous system has not been clarified. A rabbit was immunized with GD1a and its sera were screened for antibody reactivity by standard immunoassay methods (HPTLC-immunostaining and ELISA). Anti-GD1a antibodies were not detected but, unexpectedly, anti-GA1 IgG-antibodies were found. Antibody binding to GA1 was inhibited by soluble GA1 but also by GD1a. These results indicate that the rabbit produced antibodies that recognize epitopes present on the glycolipids, that are absent or not exposed on solid phase adsorbed GD1a. We investigated the presence of these unusual anti-ganglioside antibodies in normal and neurological patient sera. Approximately, 10% of normal human sera contained low titer of specific anti-GA1 IgG-antibodies but none of them recognized soluble GD1a. High titers of IgG-antibodies reacting only with GA1 were detected in 12 patient sera out of 325 analyzed. Of these, 6 sera showed binding that was inhibited by soluble GD1a and four of them also by GM1. This new type of anti-ganglioside antibodies should be considered important elements for understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases as well as their diagnosis.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW

To conduct a critical review of recent studies on the clinical and therapeutic aspects of multifocal motor neuropathy, and to analyse their implications for patient management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have contributed to defining the specific position of multifocal motor neuropathy within the spectrum of chronic immune-mediated polyneuropathies. One study compared features of this condition with multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, while others have focused on pathological alterations at the site of conduction blocks. A further study described six new cases of multifocal acquired motor neuropathy, which should be considered as a variant of multifocal motor neuropathy. Several Cochrane reviews and review articles have shown evidence of the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins in the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. The issue of long-term intravenous immunoglobulins in multifocal motor neuropathy, however, has yielded controversial results. Two studies have shown progressive motor deterioration in most patients, correlated with electrophysiological signs indicative of axonal degeneration, while a third study found signs of sustained clinical and electrophysiological improvement after a mean follow up of 7.25 years.

SUMMARY

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a distinct clinical entity that differs from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, although they share some electrophysiological characteristics. Although the aetiology remains unsolved, frequent association with high-titer antibodies against ganglioside GM1, together with an often positive response to intravenous immunoglobulins further support an autoimmune mechanism. New therapeutic strategies are required, however, that focus on the effects and the costs of treatment over long-term follow up.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a distinct clinical entity characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and minimal sensory abnormality. The diagnostic feature of this condition is the presence of multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of regular intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. Immunosuppressive agents have been used as primary, second-line or adjunctive agents for its treatment. This review was undertaken to identify and review systematically randomised controlled trials of immunosuppressive agents. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin will be the subject of a separate review.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register for all trials of multifocal motor neuropathy published, using 'multifocal motor neuropathy' OR 'chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy' OR ' conduction block' OR ' motor neuropathy' AND 'immunosuppressive agents', 'immunosuppressants', 'corticosteroids', 'plasma exchange', 'azathioprine', 'cyclophosphamide', 'cyclosporin', 'ciclosporin', 'methotrexate', and 'mycophenolate', 'immunomodulatory agents', 'interferon', 'total lymphoid irradiation' or 'bone marrow transplantation' as search terms. In addition we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE for 2000 and 2001 and CINAHL, LILACS for all years. We updated the register search in February 2004 and searched MEDLINE (January 1966 to end May 2004) and EMBASE (January 1980 to end May 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised clinical trials in which allocation was not random but was intended to be unbiased (e.g. alternate allocation) were to have been selected. Since no such trials were discovered, all prospective and retrospective case series were included in the 'background' or 'discussion' sections of the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All studies on multifocal motor neuropathy or lower motor neuron weakness with conduction block and no sensory abnormality were scrutinised for data on patients treated with any form of immunosuppressive agents besides intravenous immunoglobulin. The information on the outcome of treatment was then collated and summarised.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised controlled trials of any immunosuppressive agents for multifocal motor neuropathy. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion of the review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomised controlled trials to indicate whether immunosuppressive agents are beneficial in multifocal motor neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: current concepts and controversies

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is now a well-defined purely motor multineuropathy characterized by the presence of multifocal partial motor conduction blocks (CB), frequent association with anti-GM1 IgM antibodies, and usually a good response to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. However, several issues remain to be clarified in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy of this condition including its nosological position and its relation to other chronic dysimmune neuropathies; the degree of CB necessary for the diagnosis of MMN; the existence of an axonal form of MMN; the pathophysiological basis of CB; the pathogenetic role of antiganglioside antibodies; the mechanism of action of IVIg treatments in MMN and the most effective regimen; and the treatment to be used in unresponsive patients. These issues are addressed in this review of the main clinical, electrophysiological, immunological, and therapeutic features of this neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetrical weakness of limbs without sensory loss. The clinical presentation of MMN mimics that of lower-motor-neuron disease, but in nerve-conduction studies of patients with MMN motor-conduction block has been found. By contrast with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, treatment with prednisolone and plasma exchange is generally ineffective in MMN and even associated with clinical worsening in some patients. Of the immunosuppressants, cyclophosphamide has been reported as effective but only anecdotally. Various open trials and four placebo-controlled trials have shown that treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to improvement of muscle strength in patients with MMN. Although clinical, pathological, imaging, immunological, and electrophysiological studies have improved our understanding of MMN over the past 15 years, further research is needed to elucidate pathogenetic disease mechanisms in the disorder.

Assessment of disease progression in motor neuron disease

Motor neuron disease (MND) is characterised by progressive deterioration of the corticospinal tract, brainstem, and anterior horn cells of the spinal cord. There is no pathognomonic test for the diagnosis of MND, and physicians rely on clinical criteria-upper and lower motor neuron signs-for diagnosis. The presentations, clinical phenotypes, and outcomes of MND are diverse and have not been combined into a marker of disease progression. No single algorithm combines the findings of functional assessments and rating scales, such as those that assess quality of life, with biological markers of disease activity and findings from imaging and neurophysiological assessments. Here, we critically appraise developments in each of these areas and discuss the potential of such measures to be included in the future assessment of disease progression in patients with MND.

Clinicopathological and virological analyses of familial human T-lymphotropic virus type I–associated polyneuropathy

Human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) is known to be the causative agent of the chronic myelopathy, HTLV-I--associated myelopathy (HAM), and on rare occasions infection is also associated with the development of polyneuropathy. Here the authors present an HTLV-I--positive family of whom four members developed a chronic demyelinating polyneuropathy without HAM. Four female patients in a family from Hokkaido in Japan developed distal dominant paresthesia and muscle weakness in the second and third decades of their life. Neurological findings at ages ranging from 50 to 65 years included mild painful sensorimotor disturbances with atrophy of the distal parts of the extremities but without pyramidal signs or hyperactive tendon reflexes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of brain and spinal cord were unremarkable. Serum HTLV-I antibody levels were elevated at 1:8192 to 1:32,768, whereas those in cerebrospinal fluid were low at 1:4 to 1:8. Electrophysiological studies revealed polyphasic compound muscle action potentials with denervation potentials on nerve conduction studies and neurogenic patterns by electromyography, which were consistent with signs of chronic motor dominant demyelinating polyneuropathy. Sural nerve biopsy showed decreased myelinated fibers, occurrence of globule formation, myelin ovoid and remyelinated fibers, and an infiltration of CD68-positive macrophages with occasional CD4-positive T cells in the nerve fascicles. The polyneuropathy was responsive to steroid therapy. Analyses of serological human leukocyte antigen (HLA) types indicated that none of the patients possessed a high-risk HLA type known to be associated with adult T-cell leukemia (ATL), whereas they did have high responsive alleles to HTLV-I env similar to that observed in HAM. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the HTLV-I tax region demonstrated the B subgroup in all patients. This study suggests that HTLV-I infection can result in the development of a familial form of polyneuropathy that is associated with distinct HLA class I alleles, which might possibly involve a distinct virus subtype.

Neuropathies motrices multifocales avec blocs de conduction persistants : 18 ans après

Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks was firstly reported in 1986 and outlined from the group of purely motor diseases of the peripheral nervous system. The main criterion is the presence of conduction blocks located only on the motor nerves; additionally 30 percent of patients have IgM subclass serum antibodies directed against GM1 ganglioside. The clinical picture is a multifocal, asymmetrical, neuropathy, starting and predominant in the upper limbs, occurring in males aged 50 years and more, and having a progressive course. There is no biological sign besides elevated anti-GM1 antibodies. CSF analysis discloses mild increased protein count. The course is unpredictable, the neuropathy may be strictly limited to one or two motor nerves, or spread to other motor nerves in the four limbs. There is no involvement of the sensory and the cranial nerves, no involvement of the autonomic and the central nervous system. The pathophysiology is unknown, animal models do not allow to confirm the role of humoral immunity, and the role of anti-GM1 antibodies is controversial. Randomized controlled trials have assessed the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins which dramatically improve strength in 70-80 percent of patients in the short term, but remain unable to prevent motor deterioration in most patients, together with the occurrence of new conduction blocks. Corticosteroids and plasma exchanges do not improve the patients and may be followed by transient worsening. Long-term efficacy of immunosuppressive agents is not known.

On the early diagnosis of IVIg-responsive chronic multifocal acquired motor axonopathy

Multifocal acquired motor axonopathy (MAMA) is a treatable, immune mediated motor neuropathy with purely axonal electrophysiological features. Distinction from degenerative neuronopathies such as progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) or early motor neuron disease (MND) can be difficult because of the similar clinical and electrophysiological findings. Here, we report the clinical, electrophysiological and laboratory findings in 6 patients with MAMA. Electrophysiological testing showed purely axonal findings with evidence of pathological spontaneous activity and chronic neurogenic changes. Of particular note, pathological spontaneous activity in paraspinal myotoms was not detectable in any of the patients even though it had been documented in peripheral muscles of the corresponding myotome(s). Elevated serum ganglioside antibody levels,most frequently anti-GD1a antibodies, were present in all 6 patients. IV Ig treatment led to clinical improvement in all but one patient, who showed an allergic response when exposed to IVIg. Our findings indicate that paraspinal EMG and anti-GD1a antibodies can facilitate the early identification of treatable, IVIg responsive, patients with MAMA.

Peripheral nervous system and central nervous system pathology in rapidly progressive lower motor neuron syndrome with immunoglobulin M anti-GM1 ganglioside antibody

Pathological studies, including novel teased peripheral nerve fiber studies, were performed in a patient who presented with a rapidly progressive, lower motor neuron syndrome and high titer of immunoglobulin M anti-GM1 ganglioside antibody. In the central nervous system, there was a severe loss of motor neurons and central chromatolysis with ubiquitin immunopositive cytoplasmic inclusions in residual motor neurons. In the peripheral nervous system, axonal degeneration of myelinated fibers in the anterior nerve roots was evident. Pathologic evidence of sensory nerve involvement was also found despite the absence of clinical or electrophysiological sensory abnormalities. Sectional studies of single myelinated nerve fibers from an antemortem sural nerve biopsy showed remyelination and globular paranodal swellings due to focal complex myelin folding and degeneration in 13% of fibers. Postmortem studies of the sural nerves 4 weeks later showed paranodal demyelination (90% of fibers), but no paranodal swellings and similar findings were present in samples of the ulnar, radial, median, tibial, and common peroneal nerves. Paranodal abnormalities of enlargement of the adaxonal space, myelin degeneration, and axonal compaction were found on cross-sectional studies of individual teased fibers, which on conventional light microscopic assessment appeared normal. These changes suggest a disturbance of paranodal axonal-myelin adhesion due to binding of the anti-GM1 ganglioside antibody to the common epitope known to be present on the myelin sheath and nodal axolemma in the paranodal region of both motor and sensory nerves.

Serum IgM anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies in lower motor neuron syndromes

Lower motor neuron syndromes (LMNS) are heterogenous conditions, which include patients with progressive lower motor neuron disease (LMND) and cases with the clinical phenotype of motor neuropathy (MN). The aim of this study was to estimate the IgM anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies titer and the ratio of the light chains in order to define the presence of autoimmunity process in particular cases with LMNS. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with LMND and 15 patients were diagnosed with MN (10 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block, five patients with MN without conduction block). Total of 103 patients with classical amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and 50 healthy, age-matched persons were also tested. The IgM anti-GM1 ganglioside titer and the ratio of lambda/kappa light chains in serum were determined using the ELISA technique. High titer of IgM anti-GM1 antibodies were detected in serum of 46% LMND patients, 80% of MN patients, and 18% of the classical ALS cases. An elevated ratio of lambda/kappa light chains appeared in 18% of LMND patients, and in 67% of the MN cases. The lambda/kappa light chains ratio was normal in all ALS patients. The presence of elevated titer of IgM anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies and the changed ratio of the light chains supports the presence of autoimmune process in LMNS and may provide clues for their management.

Autoimmune neuropathies

Autoimmune neuropathies are common and treatable disorders of the peripheral nerves, which should be properly recognized. This article discusses their diagnosis, differential diagnosis and proper treatment.

Plasmapheresis in immunologically mediated polyneuropathies

One of the most common uses of therapeutic plasmapheresis is for the treatment of immunologically mediated polyneuropathies. This paper discusses the use of plasmapheresis in Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, polyneuropathies associated with paraproteins, lower motor neuron syndromes, and polyneuropathies associated with HIV. As the pathogenesis of immunologically mediated polyneuropathies becomes better understood, newer therapies for these syndromes will evolve: however, therapeutic plasmapheresis is likely to continue to play a central role in the treatment of many of these diseases.

Physiology of conduction block in multifocal motor neuropathy and other demyelinating neuropathies

Conduction block is an important functional consequence of demyelination whereby nervous transmission is abolished. Its mechanism has been discussed with respect to the loss of insulation due to disruption of myelin. Recent development of threshold tracking techniques, which enabled noninvasive assessment of axonal membrane potentials and ion channels, has provided evidence that axonal excitability changes significantly and contributes to conduction failure. This view, based upon axo-glial interaction, clarifies the mechanism of muscle fatigue and fasciculation associated with peripheral demyelination and possibly explains selective motor involvement in multifocal motor neuropathy.

Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of multifocal motor neuropathy

At this time, there are no widely accepted criteria for the diagnosis of multifocal motor neuropathy. Furthermore, there is insufficient empirical data to define clinical and laboratory features that may reliably separate certain lower motor neuron syndromes with overlapping features as distinct. The AAEM therefore developed five criteria through a formal consensus process that are described in this document to act as a guide for diagnosing multifocal motor neuropathy with a high level of confidence (definite multifocal motor neuropathy) or with a moderate level of confidence (probable motor neuropathy). In brief, the diagnosis requires clinical weakness without objective sensory loss or upper motor neuron signs in the distribution of two or more named nerves that is due to conduction block in two or more motor nerves outside of common entrapment sites. Furthermore, normal results are required for sensory nerve conduction studies.

Anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies in Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether anti-GM1 antibodies are increased in Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

Serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG anti-GM1 antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 147 patients with PD and in 186 age-matched normal control subjects. Sera were assayed at initial dilution of 1:800 for IgM and 1:200 for IgG and were considered positive at absorbance values exceeding the value of 0.05 for IgM and 0.1 for IgG.

RESULTS

Forty patients with PD (27.2%) had sera positive for IgM anti-GM1 antibodies, whereas only five normal controls (2.7%) resulted positive (P < 0.0001). Most of patients (75%) with positive sera had a tremor-dominant form of PD. Only two patients with PD (1.4%) and none of normal controls had sera positive for IgG anti-GM1 antibodies.

CONCLUSION

A consistent portion of parkinsonians, mainly with a tremor-dominant form of PD, may have increased circulating IgM anti-GM1 antibodies.

Severe sensory ataxia and demyelinating polyneuropathy with IgM anti-GM2 and GalNAc-GD1A antibodies

Several polyneuropathy syndromes have been described with polyclonal serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) or immunoglobulin M (IgM) binding to gangliosides GM2 and GalNAc-GD1a that contain the terminal trisaccharide moiety GalNAc(beta1-4)Gal(alpha2-3)NeuAc. We describe the clinical and electrodiagnostic features in two patients with serum IgM monoclonal anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a antibodies. These patients had slowly progressive, panmodal sensory loss with severe sensory ataxia. Electrodiagnostic testing showed demyelinating features. Prominent improvement in gait ataxia occurred after treatment with human immune globulin but not after other immunomodulating therapies. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay and thin-layer chromatography demonstrate that the patient's serum monoclonal IgM bound to gangliosides GM2 and GalNac-GD1a but not to gangliosides without the GalNAc(beta1-4)Gal(alpha2-3)NeuAc moiety. This neuropathy differs from previously reported neuropathy syndromes associated with polyclonal GM2 and GalNAc-GD1a antibodies and from other chronic demyelinating polyneuropathies. We conclude that a distinct syndrome of chronic demyelinating neuropathy with sensory ataxia, unresponsive to corticosteroids, is associated with monoclonal IgM binding to gangliosides with a terminal GalNAc(beta1-4)Gal(alpha2-3)NeuAc trisaccharide moiety. Diagnosis of this syndrome is important to direct appropriate treatment.

Evidence for axonal membrane hyperpolarization in multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block

Multiple nerve excitability measurements were used to investigate axonal membrane properties of patients diagnosed with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Six patients were selected, all with evidence of distal focal motor conduction block involving the median nerve in the forearm. In all patients, the median nerve was stimulated at the wrist, just distal to the site of block, and the resulting compound muscle action potentials were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis. Stimulus-response behaviour, the strength--duration time constant, threshold electrotonus to 100 ms polarizing currents, a current-threshold relationship and the recovery of excitability following supramaximal activation were recorded using a protocol described recently. When compared with control values, patients demonstrated significantly greater superexcitability, a 'fanning out' of threshold electrotonus recordings, and a significant change in the slope of the current--threshold relationship. These abnormalities in axonal membrane excitability parameters closely resembled those in normal axons hyperpolarized following release from ischaemia. To test for axonal hyperpolarization, DC depolarizing currents were applied to the nerves of three patients, and all the excitability parameters were normalized by depolarization. Attempts to trace excitability measures proximally towards the site of block were unsuccessful, as the nerve became inexcitable in all cases. It is suggested that the distal hyperpolarization is probably linked to focal depolarization and that the clinical features of MMN are consistent with a depolarizing/hyperpolarizing lesion.

Glycosphingolipid antibodies in serum in patients with sciatica

STUDY DESIGN

Serum antibody titers against 10 different glycosphingolipids were investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in three groups of patients: patients with acute sciatica (Group IA, radicular pain for 32 +/- 36 days, n = 68), a subgroup of these patients 4 years later (Group IB, n = 23), and patients undergoing lumbar discectomy because of disc herniation (Group II, n = 37).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the immunologic response in sciatica patients by analyzing circulating autoantibodies against glycosphingolipids, molecules highly expressed in cells from the nervous system, and the possible correlation of such antibodies to clinical and imaging findings as well as to subjective symptoms.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The titers of glycosphingolipid antibodies are elevated in neurologic diseases with autoimmune stimulation such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

METHODS

Antiglycosphingolipid antibodies were assayed by a microtiter enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Antibody titers were related to a healthy population by a method that judges all positive results (positive result = patient sera/pooled blood donor serum >2, at titer 1/400) as indicating a pathologic condition.

RESULTS

Increased levels of circulating antibodies against one or more glycosphingolipids were detected in 71% of patients with acute sciatica, in 61% of sciatica patients at a 4-year follow-up visit (eight antigens analyzed) and in 54% in patients undergoing discectomy. These frequencies were somewhat higher than, and in the last group similar to, those reported for generalized nervous system disorders with autoimmune involvement. In the acute sciatica patients, positive neurologic findings were associated with increased levels of two of the examined antibodies: 3'LM1 (immunoglobulin M and/or immunoglobulin G), P = 0.023, and GD1a (immunoglobulin M), P = 0.017.

CONCLUSION

The presence of glycosphingolipid antibodies in patients with sciatica and disc herniation suggests an activation of the immune system and thus a process possibly involved in the pathophysiology of sciatica. The autoimmune response was not limited to antibodies against one specific glycosphingolipid target; rather, an overall increase in autoantibodies against nervous system-associated glycosphingolipids was observed. These results encourage further studies of the pathophysiologic and clinical relevance of autoimmune responses in patients with sciatica and disc herniation.