Inflammatory back pain in ankylosing spondylitis: a reassessment of the clinical history for application as classification and diagnostic criteria

Etiological Diagnosis of Uveitis: Contribution of the of the Extra-Ophthalmological Clinical Examination

PURPOSE

Determining uveitis etiology is a challenge. It is based primarily on demographic data and the characteristics of eye examination. It is not clear to what extent extraocular physical signs contribute to elucidating the etiology. This study aimed to establish the contribution of the clinical extra-ophthalmological features for the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1307 patients with uveitis referred to our tertiary center between 2003 and 2021. Uveitis was classified according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature. Clinical features were collected at diagnosis by internists before the etiological diagnosis was made. The main outcome description was the contribution of clinical features.

RESULTS

Clinical extra-ophthalmological features contributed to the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis in 363 (27.8%) patients. The joint and the skin examinations were the most useful for etiological investigations, respectively in 12.3% and 11.8% of patients. Five etiologies of uveitis accounted for 80% of the cases: sarcoidosis, HLA-B27-related uveitis, Behçet's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Clinical extra-ophthalmological features were particularly important in the etiological diagnosis of acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that clinical extra-ophthalmological features are essential for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis in more than a quarter of patients. It demonstrates once again the value of collaboration between ophthalmologists and other specialists experienced in performing extra-ophthalmological clinical examinations, particularly in patients with acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis.

Prevalence of Axial Spondyloarthritis in Young People With Chronic Low Back Pain at a Hospital-Based Health Management Organization: A 10-Year Database Study

INTRODUCTION

There is scarce information on the prevalence of axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) using the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria and even less in Latin America. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of axSpA by applying the ASAS 2009 criteria to a medical records review study of young people with chronic low back pain (LBP) at a university hospital-based health management organization.

METHODS

Electronic medical records from the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires health management organization were reviewed to estimate the prevalence of axSpA (radiographic axSpA [r-axSpA] and nonradiographic axSpA [nr-axSpA]) using the ASAS 2009 axSpA criteria in all patients with chronic LBP (≥3 months) aged <45 years at the first LBP appointment, observed between 2009 and 2019.

RESULTS

Among 795 young people with CLBP, the estimated prevalence of axSpA was 5.78% (r-axSpA, 2.76%; nr-axSpA, 3.02%). Ten of 46 patients (21.74%) with axSpA (all nr-axSpA) were undiagnosed, with an undiagnosed axSpA prevalence of 1.26%. The median interval between the first LBP appointment and diagnosis was 34.6 months for axSpA (58.7 vs. 23.1 months for r-axSpA vs. nr-axSpA). Previously diagnosed r-axSpA and nr-axSpA patients had comparable use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (45% vs. 36%) and delays between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug failure and bDMARD initiation (median, 2.76 vs. 2.66 months).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort of young persons with chronic LBP, the prevalence of axSpA was approximately 6%, with a high prevalence of undiagnosed axSpA, which could explain the low prevalence of axSpA reported in previous studies in Latin America.

Looking back on 51 years of the Carol Nachman Prize in Rheumatology-significance for the field of spondyloarthritis research

The city and casino of Wiesbaden, capital of the German state Hessen, have endowed the Carol Nachman Prize to promote research work in the field of rheumatology since 1972. The prize, endowed with 37,500 €, is the second highest medical award in Germany and serves to promote clinical, therapeutic, and experimental research work in the field of rheumatology. In June 2022, the 50-year anniversary was celebrated. In the symposium preceding the award ceremony, an overview was given on the significance of spondyloarthritis for the work of the awardees in the past 30 years. This overview has now been put together to inform the interested community of the work performed, including the opinion of the awardees regarding what they consider to be their most important contribution.

Polymyalgia rheumatica in a patient presenting with persisting bilateral buttock pain - a case report

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory conditions often mimic musculoskeletal presentations, causing diagnostic delays in primary and secondary care. Physiotherapists can play a pivotal role in the early recognition, triage, and onward referral for inflammatory conditions such as polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). While PMR is relatively rare, recognition of its characteristic presentation, alongside elevated serum inflammatory markers, is a much-needed step to initiate appropriate intervention following specialized rheumatological consultation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This case details the assessment and diagnosis of a 62-year-old male referred to a secondary care spine center for persisting bilateral buttock pain presumed to be of spinal origin. A thorough initial evaluation by an orthopedic-triage physiotherapist raised the suspicion of PMR upon identification of the following salient inflammatory features: sudden onset of bilateral buttock and shoulder pain and stiffness, morning stiffness lasting one hour, pain aggravated by prolonged inactivity, and a positive response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication.

OUTCOMES

Further investigations revealed elevated inflammatory markers warranting prompt rheumatology consultation and subsequently confirming the diagnosis of PMR. Early initiation of high dose oral corticosteroid therapy resulted in immediate relief of pain and associated symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the significance of recognizing salient inflammatory features in persistent musculoskeletal complaints, particularly in the context of the evolving scope of physiotherapy roles internationally. While further investigations and rheumatological consultation are required for the definitive diagnosis of many inflammatory conditions, including PMR, greater clinician awareness of salient inflammatory features can aid the earlier identification and subsequent triage of such cases.

The ATTRACT study: screening for the early identification of axial psoriatic arthritis in a cohort of Italian psoriatic patients

OBJECTIVE

There is growing interest in the early identification of patients with axial PsA (axPsA). We aimed to evaluate whether a dermatology-based screening strategy could help to identify axPsA patients.

METHODS

The dermatologist-centred screening (DCS) questionnaire was administrated by dermatologists to consecutive patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria [(i) age ≥18 years and (ii) clinical diagnosis of psoriasis made by a dermatologist] to identify patients eligible (affirmative answers 1-3c of the DCS) for rheumatological evaluation. Clinical, laboratory, genetic and imaging data were collected from all referred patients.

RESULTS

Among the 365 patients screened, 265 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 124/265 (46.8%) were eligible for rheumatological referral. Diagnosis of axPsA, with or without peripheral PsA (pPsA), was made in 36/124 (29.0%) patients; pPsA without axial involvement was found in 21/124 (16.9%) patients. Back pain at screening was recorded in 174 (66%) patients, with 158 (60%) reporting a back pain duration longer than 3 months and 140 (53%) reporting back pain onset before the age of 45 years. Active inflammatory and/or structural post-inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joints and/or spine were observed in all axPsA patients. Patients with PsA showed a numerically longer duration of back pain and higher CRP levels in comparison with patients with psoriasis without PsA.

CONCLUSION

The DCS tool proved to be a valuable screening strategy for detecting and characterizing patients with axPsA in a real-life cohort of psoriasis patients in a dermatological setting and helped to identify a substantial number of patients affected by undiagnosed pPsA.

Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Ankylosing Spondylitis by Baseline C-Reactive Protein Level: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis assessed the effect of baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) on the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) use in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), as well as patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

Phase II (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01786668) and phase III (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03502616) data from patients with active AS were used. Endpoints (weeks 12, 16, and 48), including 20% and 40% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS), AS Disease Activity Score with CRP low disease activity, 50% improvement in Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI50), and PROs (pain and fatigue), were stratified by baseline CRP (mg/L) as follows: < 5 (normal), ≥ 5 (elevated), < 10, and ≥ 10. Safety outcomes were evaluated between < 5 and ≥ 5 mg/L subgroups.

RESULTS

Overall, 372 patients were included (69.6% ≥ 5mg/L; 50.8% ≥ 10 mg/L). At baseline in the < 5mg/L group, more placebo-treated than TOF-treated patients received concomitant nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or sulfasalazine (SSZ). Week 12 efficacy and PRO responses were generally higher for TOF vs placebo, regardless of baseline CRP. The treatment effect (placebo-adjusted response) at week 12 was generally numerically higher in ≥ 5 mg/L and ≥ 10 mg/L vs < 5 mg/L and < 10 mg/L groups. Incidence rates for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and "all infections" were numerically higher for TOF vs placebo in patients in the < 5 mg/L group, but similar for TOF vs placebo in patients in the ≥ 5 mg/L group.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of baseline CRP, TOF was more efficacious vs placebo at week 12. The placebo-adjusted efficacy and PRO responses were generally numerically higher in patients with CRP ≥ 5 mg/L and ≥ 10 mg/L vs < 5 mg/L and < 10 mg/L. The higher concomitant NSAID/SSZ exposure may have improved efficacy responses in the baseline < 5 mg/L placebo group, and ultimately affected the TOF treatment effect. Safety was consistent with previous studies of TOF use in AS, with numerically higher incidence rates for TEAEs and "all infections" for TOF vs placebo in patients with CRP < 5 mg/L.

Sensitivity to change of structural outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis after 10 years of follow up. Data from the DESIR cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sensitivity to change in structural imaging outcomes over 10 years of follow-up in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

Patients with axSpA from the Devenir des Spondyloarthropathies Indifferénciées Récentes cohort were included. Radiographs and MRIs of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) and spine were obtained at baseline and at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years. The yearly rate of change of each structural outcome was analysed using generalised estimating equation models, including all patients with ≥1 score from ≥1 reader from ≥1 reading wave, using the time (years) as an explanatory variable and adjusting for reader and wave. All outcomes were standardised, and the relative standardised rate of change was calculated (ie, the standardised rate of an outcome divided by the rate of a reference outcome).

RESULTS

A total of 659 patients (46% males and mean age 33.6 years) were included. The most sensitive outcome to change in the SIJ (both MRI and radiographs) was the presence of ≥3 fatty lesions at a specific timepoint, with a relative standardised rate of change per year of 5.28 using the modified New York criteria as reference.Similarly, the most sensitive to change (in both MRI and radiographs) outcome in the spine was the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS; relative standardised yearly change 1.76) using ≥1 syndesmophyte as reference.

CONCLUSION

MRI structural outcomes in the SIJ (ie, fatty lesions) are more sensitive to change than radiographic outcomes. Conversely, the mSASSS remains the most sensitive method, even when compared with MRI of the spine.

Ten-year clinical outcome of recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis: Results from the DESIR inception Cohort

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the 10-year clinical outcome of patients with recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS STUDY DESIGN

The DESIR cohort is an inception cohort of axSpA patients.

METHODS DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT

The diagnosis and management of patients were based on the decision of the treating rheumatologist.

METHODS STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Both complete cases and imputed data analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 708 enrolled patients, 45 were excluded due to a change in the baseline diagnosis, 3 patients died, and 300 were lost to follow-up over the 10years. In the completer population, one patient required bilateral total hip replacement, and 56 patients received a pension due to invalidity. The prevalence of main extra-musculoskeletal features increased from baseline to year 10: psoriasis from 18% to 30%, acute anterior uveitis from 10% to 18%, and inflammatory bowel disease from 5% to 10%. The most frequent comorbidity was hypertension, with an increase from 5% to 15% from baseline to year 10. In the imputed data analysis the estimated proportions of patients with an acceptable status at year 10 were 70% [95% CI: 63; 77] for acceptable PASS, 43% [95% CI: 37; 49] for BASDAI<3, and 48% [95% CI: 41; 56] for ASDAS<2.1.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that despite a quite favorable 10-year outcome exists for severe outcomes, a large proportion of patients present with an important disease burden reflected by patient-reported outcomes. This information can be valuable for providing patients with information at the time of diagnosis.

A lower frequency of inflammatory back pain in male patients with ankylosing spondylitis compared with female patients

In routine rheumatology practice, we noticed that a significant number of male ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients did not experience inflammatory back pain (IBP). Based on this observation, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of IBP in male AS patients and compare it to that in female patients. Patients with AS who fulfilled the modified New York criteria were subjected to a face-to-face interview with a standardized questionnaire that addressed the IBP components based on the Berlin criteria. The study also included 63 patients with chronic mechanical back pain (MBP). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity, Function, and Metrology Indexes (BASDAI, BASFI, and BASMI) were evaluated in patients with AS. There were 181 patients with AS (124 males, mean age 41.2 years; 57 females, mean age 44.6 years) and 63 patients with MBP (28 males, mean age 47.2 years; 35 females, mean age 43.5 years). The prevalence of IBP was found to be 87.7% in female and 66.1% in male patients with AS (p = 0.002). The specificity of the criteria was determined to be high both in females (85.7%) and males (89.2%). Female patients with AS had higher BASDAI levels than males (p = 0.048), but no difference was found in BASFI, BASMI, or serum CRP levels between genders. A considerable proportion of male patients with AS did not experience IBP, although they had similar CRP levels compared with females.

Predictors of treatment failure of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with axial spondyloarthritis with focus on haptoglobin, haptoglobin polymorphism and zonulin

According to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ASAS-EULAR) recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), patients should undergo at least two courses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) therapy. In our study, we enrolled axSpA patients both at onset and in a flare who had already been treated with NSAIDs ineffectively. Subsequently, according to the recommendations, they received modified NSAID treatment as another attempt to the first-line drug therapy and were monitored from there. We aimed to identify risk factors for treatment failure after 4 weeks (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4) especially amongst zonulin and haptoglobin concentrations, and haptoglobin polymorphism. Treatment failure was observed in 71% of patients, and the following variables were contributed for occurrence of this state: higher zonulin levels, ankylosing spondylitis, X-ray sacroiliitis, magnetic resonance imaging sacroiliitis, long duration of symptoms, high BASDAI, and high value of spinal pain intensity on visual analogue scale. In addition, the following positive correlations were found: haptoglobin concentration with C-reactive protein (r = 0.56; p = 0.0004), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (r = 0.62; p < 0.0001), as well as between zonulin levels and white blood count (r = 0.5; p = 0.0003). The results of the study presented the identified factors related to the standard treatment failure in axSpA, amongst them zonulin levels. They might be applied to point out the patients for whom the search for a more appropriate method of treatment should be considered.

A Good Response to Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs Does Not Discriminate Patients With Longstanding Axial Spondyloarthritis From Controls With Chronic Back Pain

OBJECTIVE

To compare the response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with longstanding axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and controls with back pain (nonspondyloarthritis [non-SpA]).

METHODS

Consecutive outpatients with chronic back pain (axSpA or non-SpA), were prospectively recruited. Any previous NSAIDs were withdrawn 2 days before study start (baseline). Back pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS; range 0-10) starting at 2 hours after baseline and several times thereafter up to 4 weeks. "Any response" to NSAIDs was defined as improvement of back pain on the NRS > 2 units, and "good response" as improvement > 50%, compared to baseline.

RESULTS

Among 233 patients included, 68 had axSpA (29.2%) and 165 had non-SpA back pain (70.8%). The mean age was 42.7 (SD 10.7) vs 49.3 (SD 11.1) years, symptom duration 15.1 (SD 11.1) years vs 14.6 (SD 11.9) years, and pain score 5.9 (SD 2.3) vs 6.3 (SD 2.0), respectively. Overall, of patients with axSpA or non-SpA back pain, 30.9% vs 29.1% of patients showed any response and 23.5% vs 16.4% of patients showed a good response after 4 weeks, respectively (P value not significant). No differences were found in the rapidity of response or between subgroups of patients based on demographics, including different stages of axSpA.

CONCLUSION

No major differences in the response to NSAIDs were found between patients with axSpA and those with non-SpA with longstanding chronic back pain. The item in the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria on "response to NSAIDs" needs more study.

Impact of daily physical therapy over 2 weeks on spinal mobility including objective electronic measurements and function in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

Background

Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are often compromised by impaired function and mobility. The standardized 2-week inpatient program 'multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment' (MRCT) was designed for patients with axSpA. The Epionics SPINE (ES) is an objective tool validated to assess mobility.

Objective

To investigate the impact of MRCT on physical function and mobility including range of motion (RoM) and kinematics (RoK).

Design

Single-center interventional, observational trial.

Methods

Patients with axSpA presenting with high disease activity and impaired physical function were consecutively recruited to undergo MRCT. Assessments performed before (V1) and after (V2) the intervention included Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis functional index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), the ankylosing spondylitis physical performance index (ASPI), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and ES measurements.

Results

At baseline, the 80 patients included had: BASDAI 5.5 ± 1.5, BASFI 5.6 ± 2.0, BASMI 4.2 ± 1.8, SPPB 13.8 ± 1.8, and ASPI 37.3 ± 18.1 s. Clinically relevant improvements between V1 versus V2 were noted for BASFI, BASMI, and all other assessments (p < 0.001), and also for ES measures of RoK (all p < 0.003) and RoM (all p < 0.04), while a positive trend was seen for flexion and extension (RoM). There was no significant effect of changes in medication (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The 2-weeks MRCT was associated with definite improvements of function and mobility. Importantly, the effect of this extensive physical activity was confirmed by using the ES as an objective tool to assess spinal mobility. The ES demonstrated for the first time that the RoK of spinal mobility can significantly improve related to an exercise intervention.

Trial registration

Ethical Committee: Ruhr-Universität (reference-number: 19-6735-BR).

Association of nociplastic and neuropathic pain components with the presence of residual symptoms in patients with axial spondyloarthritis receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of nociplastic (NoP) and neuropathic pain (NP) components with residual symptoms in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

METHODS

78 patients with r-axSpA from the GErman SPondyloarthritis Inception Cohort receiving a bDMARD for at least 3 months were included in this analysis. The Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and the PainDETECT (PD) questionnaire were used to quantify the NoP and the NP components, respectively. Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) were used as measures of residual symptoms. C reactive protein (CRP) was used as a measure of systemic inflammatory activity. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses of disease activity were performed. The regions of the WPI score and items of the PD score were used for cluster analyses.

RESULTS

Linear multivariable regression analysis showed that WPI and PD were independently associated with ASDAS (b=0.1, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.17, and b=0.05, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.08, respectively) and BASDAI (b=0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.39, and b=0.17, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.25, respectively) in r-axSpA patients receiving stable treatment with bDMARDs. Furthermore, WPI and PD were found to be significantly associated with the presence of relevant residual symptoms as defined by BASDAI ≥4 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.15, and OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.85, respectively). The effects were present also in patients with normal level of CRP. Cluster analysis revealed three distinct pain distribution profiles and four specific sensory symptom constellations allowing differentiation of different pain subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Both NoP and NP components seem to be associated with residual symptoms in patients with r-axSpA receiving treatment with bDMARDs.

Performance of clinical, laboratory and imaging features for diagnosing spondyloarthritis-a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The Berlin algorithm was developed to help diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but new studies suggest some features typical of SpA are less specific than previously assumed. Furthermore, evidence is lacking for other SpA subtypes (e.g. peripheral SpA). We aimed to review the evidence on the performance of SpA features for diagnosing each SpA subtype.

METHODS

Systematic literature review of studies reporting the diagnostic performance of ≥ 1 SpA feature in patients with suspected SpA. The external reference was the rheumatologist's diagnosis of SpA. Meta-analysis was performed, separately for each SpA subtype, to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios. Meta-regression assessed the effect of covariates (e.g. feature's prevalence) on each feature's performance.

RESULTS

Of 13 844 articles screened, 46 were included. Sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging, damage on pelvic radiographs and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) had the best balance between LR+ and LR- (LR + 3.9-17.0, LR- 0.5-0.7) for diagnosing axSpA. HLA-B27 had an LR+ lower than anticipated (LR + =3.1). Inflammatory back pain (IBP) had low LR + (LR+∼1), but substantially decreased the likelihood of axSpA when absent (LR-=0.3). Conversely, peripheral features and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations showed high LR + (LR+ 1.6-5.0), but were as common in axSpA as no-axSpA (LR-∼1). The specificity of most features was reduced in settings when these were highly prevalent. Limited data precluded a detailed analysis on diagnosing other SpA subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Imaging features and CRP have good diagnostic value for axSpA. However, the specificity of other features, especially HLA-B27 and IBP, is lower than previously known.

Clinically relevant differences in spinal mobility related to daytime performance in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) suffer from clinical symptoms like morning stiffness and back pain. Mobility of patients with axSpA is often impaired. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of patients with axSpA regarding mobility measures including performance-based tests and objective electronic assessments with the Epionics SPINE device (ES) at different times of the day compared with healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

Observational trial, consecutive inpatients with axSpA (n=100) and 20 HCs were examined in the morning (V1: before 10:00 am) and in the afternoon (V2: after 02:00 pm) by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), the AS physical performance index (ASPI), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and ES measurements, including range of motion (RoM) and range of kinematics (RoK).

RESULTS

The assessments of patients with axSpA performed in the morning clearly differed from those in the afternoon, especially regarding performance-based tests. Significant improvements were seen for BASMI (4.0±3.8 to 3.8±1.9; p<0.001), ASPI (36.2±18.3 to 28.8±11.9 s; p<0.001), SPPB (10.1±1.5 to 10.7±1.4 points; p<0.001) and for ES measures of speed (RoK; p<0.018) but not for RoM, except for lateral flexion (13.3±7.4 to 14.7±8.2°; p=0.002). This time of assessment-related variability was not observed in HC.

CONCLUSION

The spinal mobility of patients with axSpA was worse in the morning but significantly improved in the afternoon. This was captured best by performance-based measures and was not seen in HC. The diurnal variation of mobility has implications for clinical studies, suggesting that the time of assessments needs to be standardised.

A Patient Survey Exploring the Burden of Inflammatory Back Pain in Patients With Known Psoriasis

Background In the United Kingdom, diagnostic delay remains a challenge in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Psoriasis is a frequently identified extra-musculoskeletal manifestation associated with axSpA. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in psoriasis patients at a specialized psoriasis dermatology clinic in a London NHS Trust. Our primary goal was to identify psoriasis patients with IBP who were not referred to a rheumatologist, potentially leading to axSpA diagnostic delays. Additionally, we aimed to investigate factors contributing to these delays and strategies to address them. Methodology A patient survey consisting of 22 questions was used to assess the prevalence of IBP among 66 psoriasis patients attending a weekly specialized psoriasis dermatology clinic within a London NHS Trust between May and July 2023. The survey comprised patient demographic information along with inquiries about the existence of back pain exceeding three months. The Berlin Criteria was utilized to identify IBP among patients who reported experiencing back pain for over three months. Additionally, the survey sought information on prior diagnosis of axSpA and whether participants had consulted healthcare professionals regarding their back pain. Results Of the 66 patients invited, 51 (77%) completed the survey. The average age of the patients was 50 years (range = 19-74 years), with 58.8% being female. The mean duration of psoriasis was 15.7 years (range = 2-44 years). Overall, 45% (23/51) reported back pain lasting over three months. Among the patients who reported back pain for more than three months, 13 met the Berlin Criteria for IBP (25% of the total surveyed), and only four of these patients had a diagnosis of axSpA. Notably, seven patients (14% of the total surveyed) potentially had undiagnosed axSpA. General practitioners (GPs) were commonly consulted for back pain, yet only 39% of those with prolonged back pain had seen a rheumatologist. Despite experiencing prolonged back pain, 17% of patients had not sought healthcare advice for their symptoms. Conclusions This study highlights that IBP is a common yet underdiagnosed comorbidity in psoriasis patients. Dermatologists, GPs, and other allied healthcare professionals play a crucial role in detecting early axSpA. However, limited awareness of IBP hinders its identification in psoriasis patients and subsequent referral to rheumatologists. This highlights the need for improving awareness and education regarding axSpA among dermatologists and allied healthcare professionals as well as the public and patients to ensure timely diagnosis. The development of simple and easy-to-administer screening questionnaires to aid non-rheumatologists in identifying patients with IBP together with simplified referral pathways would increase onward referrals of appropriate patients to rheumatologists.

What is the best referral strategy for axial spondyloarthritis? A prospective multicenter study in patients with suspicious chronic low back pain

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of referral strategies for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in patients with suspicious chronic inflammatory low back pain (LBP), to estimate the value of inflammatory back pain (IBP) for referral, and to identify the predictive factors of the final diagnosis of axSpA in Middle Eastern Arab countries.

METHODS

The study was multicentric, prospective, and conducted in LBP first-line clinics (rheumatology, internal, family medicine, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, and neurology). Consecutive adult patients aged under 45years were included in case of LBP suspicious of inflammatory nature according to the first-line physician. The rheumatologist's final diagnosis was the gold standard. The diagnostic properties of ten referral strategies (Brandt I, II, III, Hermann, RADAR, RADAR 2/3, MASTER, Braun, CAFASPA, and ASAS) and of IBP were calculated. A multivariable logistic regression identified the clinical predictive factors of axSpA.

RESULTS

In 515 referred patients, axSpA was confirmed in 48%, refuted in 43%, and diagnosis remained inconclusive in 9%. The optimal referral strategy was the MASTER (PLR 3.3), which comprises IBP, good response to NSAIDs, positive HLA-B27, and SpA family history. Considering strategies without HLA-B27, the RADAR 2/3 had a PLR of 2.9 (IBP, good response to NSAIDs, any extra-musculoskeletal manifestation). The predictive factors for axSpA were MRI sacroiliitis, positive HLA-B27, high CRP, psoriasis, IBP, and longer symptom duration. Of all patients, 35% were self-referred, 16% were referred by primary care physicians, and 15% by neuro/orthopedic surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Optimizing physicians' awareness of these clinical features may enhance referral in axSpA.

Burden of disease and impact on quality of life in chronic back pain - a comparative cross-sectional study of 150 axial spondyloarthritis and 150 orthopedic back pain patients

Objective

Chronic back pain (CBP) constitutes one of the most common complaints in primary care and a leading cause of disability worldwide. CBP may be of mechanical or inflammatory character and may lead to functional impairment and reduced quality of life. In this study, we aimed to assess and compare burden of disease, functional capacity, quality of life and depressive symptoms in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients with orthopedic chronic back pain patients (OBP). We further aimed to identify factors associated with quality of life.

Methods

Cross-sectional survey of a cohort of 300 CBP patients including 150 patients from a University Hospital Orthopedic Back Pain Outpatient Clinic with OBP and 150 patients with confirmed axSpA from a University Hospital Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic. Questionnaire-based assessment of pain character (Inflammatory Back Pain, MAIL-Scale), functional status (FFbH, BASFI), quality of life (WHOQOL-Bref) and depressive symptoms (Phq9) and retrospective medical chart analysis.

Results

Both, OBP and axSpA patients reported on average intermediate pain levels of mostly mixed pain character. Both groups demonstrated a reduced health-related quality of life and the presence of depressive symptoms. However, axSpA patients reported a significantly better subjective quality of life, more satisfaction with their health status and better functional capacity compared to OBP patients (all p < 0.001). In a multivariate regression model, depressive symptoms, mechanical back pain, pain level and age were negative predictors of subjective quality of life, whereas functional capacity was a positive predictor.

Conclusion

Chronic back pain was associated with a high morbidity and reduced quality of life regardless of pain character. We identified multiple factors associated with reduced quality of life. Awareness and addressing of these factors may help to overcome unmet needs and improve quality of life for these patients.

Diagnosis Value of Patient Evaluation Components Applicable in Primary Care Settings for the Diagnosis of Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews

Low back pain ranks as the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Although best practice guidelines share a consistent diagnostic approach for the evaluation of patients with low back pain, confusion remains as to what extent patient history and physical examination findings can inform management strategies. The aim of this study was to summarize evidence investigating the diagnostic value of patient evaluation components applicable in primary care settings for the diagnosis of low back pain. To this end, peer-reviewed systematic reviews were searched in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases from 1 January 2000 to 10 April 2023. Paired reviewers independently reviewed all citations and articles using a two-phase screening process and independently extracted the data. Of the 2077 articles identified, 27 met the inclusion criteria, focusing on the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis, radicular syndrome, non- specific low back pain and specific low back pain. Most patient evaluation components lack diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of low back pain when considered in isolation. Further research is needed to develop evidence-based and standardized evaluation procedures, especially for primary care settings where evidence is still scarce.

Sleep behaviour differs in women and men with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis with impact on quality of life and depressive symptoms

OBJECTIVES

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may have a profound impact on sleep and health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess sleep quality and quality of life and determine associated factors in patients treated with spondyloarthritides (SpA).

METHODS

Cross-sectional questionnaire-based assessment of sleep behaviour, quality of life, functional impairment and depression (Regensburg Insomnia Scale, WHO Quality of Life questionnaire, Funktionsfragebogen Hannover questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory II, Patient health questionnaire 9) and retrospective medical chart analysis of a monocentric cohort of 330 patients with SpA (n=168 PsA and n=162 axSpA).

RESULTS

46.6% of patients with SpA demonstrated abnormal sleep behaviour. Linear regression models showed HLA-B27 positivity, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, depressive symptoms, functional capacity and disease duration to be predictive of insomnia symptoms in axSpA, respectively, depressive symptoms, female sex and Disease Activity Score 28 in patients with PsA. Patients with unrestful sleep had a significantly reduced health-related quality of life (p<0.001) as well as significantly more depressive symptoms (p<0.001). Satisfaction with health was rated significantly lower (p<0.001), indicating poor sleep as a burden on general well-being.In particular, female patients had a significantly worse sleep quality with a prolonged sleep latency (p=0.009), increased sleep disturbances (p=0.014) and unrestful sleep (p<0.001) as well as a reduced physical and mental health-related quality of life (p=0.015, p<0.001) and more depressive symptoms (p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

Despite treatment, many patients with SpA demonstrate abnormal sleep behaviour with symptoms of insomnia and a reduced quality of life with significant differences between male and female patients. An interdisciplinary and holistic approach may be needed to address unmet needs.

Patient Survey Exploring the Burden of Inflammatory Back Pain in Patients With Uveitis

Background  In the UK, diagnostic delays remain a challenge in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Studies have shown that acute anterior uveitis is the most common extra-articular manifestation associated with axSpA. As part of a National Axial Spondyloarthritis Society (NASS) Aspiring to Excellence quality improvement project, this study aimed to ascertain the burden of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in patients attending a uveitis clinic and to establish the number of these patients who had not been referred to a rheumatologist, thereby contributing to the diagnostic delay. The secondary aims were to explore the factors contributing to the diagnostic delay. Methods  A 22-question patient survey was created to identify the burden of back pain in patients attending a specialist uveitis clinic at a London NHS Trust. Participants were recruited when attending their clinic appointments. Survey content included patient demographics and whether they had experienced back pain for longer than three months. The Berlin Criteria was used to identify the presence of inflammatory back pain, and it was also ascertained whether participants had a previous diagnosis of axSpA. Participants were asked if they had seen any healthcare professionals regarding their back pain and the total number of consultations they had had with each profession. Results  A cohort of 50 patients who attended the uveitis clinic at the Royal Free London NHS Trust completed the survey between February and July 2022. The mean age of the respondents was 52 years with a mean length of time with uveitis of 6.57 years. Of them, 64% were female and 36% were male. Forty per cent (40%) of participants (20 respondents) reported experiencing back pain for more than three months and 12% (six respondents) had a diagnosis of axSpA. Of those who reported back pain for more than three months, the mean age of onset of back pain was 28.6 years. Of the 14 participants (28%) who had back pain and were not diagnosed with axSpA, nine (18%) fulfilled the Berlin criteria for IBP. All participants had seen a GP or allied health professional specifically for their back pain. On average, respondents had seen two allied healthcare professionals, but only 40% (eight) of respondents with back pain had been seen by a rheumatologist. Conclusions  In this study, the data highlights that inflammatory back pain is common in patients with uveitis and the majority of patients with inflammatory back pain had not been referred to a rheumatology service and potentially have undiagnosed axSpA. Contributing factors to this potential delay in diagnosis include a lack of awareness of axSpA and its presenting features and associated conditions and a lack of onward referral for a specialist rheumatology opinion. This highlights the need for public, patient and healthcare professional education and the development of timely referral pathways to reduce delays in diagnosis.

Axial Spondyloarthritis and Diagnostic Challenges: Over-diagnosis, Misdiagnosis, and Under-diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims to review the challenges in axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis and identify the possible contributing factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The inability to reach an accurate diagnosis in a timely fashion can lead to treatment delays and worse disease outcomes. The lack of validated diagnostic criteria and the misuse of the currently available classification criteria could be contributing. There is also significant inter-reader variability in interpreting images, and the radiologic definitions of axial spondyloarthritis continue to be re-defined to improve their positive predictive value. The role of inflammatory back pain features, serologic biomarkers, genetics, and their diagnostic contribution to axial spondyloarthritis continues to be investigated. There is still a significant amount of delay in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis. Appreciating the factors that contribute to this delay is of utmost importance to close the gap. It is similarly important to recognize other conditions that may present with symptoms that mimic axial spondyloarthritis so that misdiagnosis and wrong treatment can be avoided.

Screening for spondyloarthritis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) can be associated with various musculoskeletal (IBD-MSK) manifestations that could be difficult to classify for gastroenterologists. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with IBD-MSK and the prevalence of spondyloarthritis (SpA). In this observational cross-sectional study, we included patients with IBD-MSK complaints (peripheral or back pain). All patients underwent a standardized rheumatology evaluation including clinical, biological and imaging evaluations (MRI of spine and sacroiliac joints and ultrasonography of enthesis). We included 183 IBD patients (60.7% women; median [interquartile range] age 45 [36-56] years); 159 (87%) had joint pain. In 43 (23.5%) and 25/175 (14.3%) patients, enthesis abnormalities were found on ultrasonography and sacroiliitis on MRI, respectively. SpA was diagnosed in 54 (29.5%) patients. IBD-related arthralgia and degenerative spine disease were diagnosed in 105 (57.4%) and 72 (39.3%) patients. Sixteen (29.6%) SpA patients initiated a new conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). A biologic DMARD was initiated in 10 patients or changed in 3. More than half of IBD-MSK patients had IBD-related arthralgia, and about one-third had definite SpA. Ultrasonography of enthesis and systematic MRI of sacroiliac joints seem useful for SpA classification and differential diagnosis in these patients who often have musculoskeletal pain complaints. Therapeutics were changed in most patients, which highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach for managing IBD with extra-intestinal symptoms.

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis

Among the variety of clinical manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) – including peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis, and axial disease – spondylitis is the least studied. There is no generally accepted definition of axial PsA (axPsA), nor is there any common terminology or diagnostic criteria for it. In the rheumatology community, there is also no consensus regarding radiological and MRI assessment of axial involvement in PsA patients, while disease activity indexes and the therapeutic tactics are borrowed from those used in treating axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, despite a range of similarities in immunopathogenetic mechanisms of axPsA and axSpA, there are also certain differences that may affect the treatment response in these patients. The aim of this review is the analysis of data on axial disease in PsA. The article discusses the genetic features, clinical presentations, imaging techniques, differential diagnostics and treatment options of axPsA.

An overview of psoriatic arthritis including clinical manifestations, assessment, diagnostic criteria, investigations, drug management and GRAPPA guidelines

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and often progressive inflammatory disease, occurring in up to 30% of patients with psoriasis. Assessment of patients with PsA requires consideration of all disease domains, including peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin psoriasis, psoriatic nail disease, uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease. Co-morbidities and related conditions should all be considered including: obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, anxiety/depression, liver disease, chronic infections, malignancy, osteoporosis, fibromyalgia and reproductive health.

Awareness and knowledge of the common features of inflammatory back pain among primary care physicians in the western region of Saudi Arabia

Often, there is a delay in the diagnosis of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in the primary care setting. This may be attributed to the inability of healthcare providers to distinguish between inflammatory and mechanical back pain. This study aimed to evaluate primary care physicians' current practices for assessing patients with IBP using clinical, radiographic, and laboratory tests. A questionnaire-based survey was emailed to all primary care physicians in the western region of Saudi Arabia by the Saudi Commission of Health Specialists from February to May 2021. The questionnaire included data about axial spondyloarthropathy based on the Calin, Berlin, and European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group criteria. A total of 103 primary care physicians responded who represented around 24% of primary care physicians at primary healthcare. The most often perceived IBP symptoms include a response to NSAIDs, morning stiffness lasting >30 minutes, age of onset <45 years old, duration of back pain >3 months, and improvement with exercise. The most frequently questioned patient or family history conditions were peripheral arthritis (92.2%), family history of spondyloarthritis (83.5%), and inflammatory bowel disease (97.6%). The most-reported investigations were CRP/ESR (86.4%) and spinal radiography (66%). For treatment of IBP, NSAIDs were most prescribed (48.6%), followed by physiotherapy (45.6%) and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (41.7%). Primary care physicians were more confident in management of mechanical back pain than IBP (P < .001). Primary care physicians have good knowledge of IBP symptoms but not of disease-specific features and modest confidence in evaluating patients with IBP, indicating the need for educational programs and a more effective, feasible referral strategy.

Axial Pain and Arthritis in Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease: US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data

Objective

To estimate the nationally representative prevalence of chronic axial pain, inflammatory back pain (IBP), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and peripheral arthritis in persons diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Patients and Methods

US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from the 1976-1980 and 2009-2010 survey cycles.

Results

In NHANES 1976-1980, the chronic axial pain prevalence in participants with diagnosed ulcerative colitis (UC) was 19.5% vs 7.2% in the general population (P<.01). Neck or upper back, lower back, and Amor criteria-based axial pain were also significantly increased (11.2%, 14.5%, and 13.0%, respectively, vs 3%-5% in the general population (P<.01). In those with diagnosed UC, 40% had axial pain onset at an age older than 45 years; 30.2% reported peripheral arthralgias, and 12.2% reported peripheral arthritis. Arthritis findings on examination were uncommon. In NHANES 2009-2010, axial pain in those diagnosed with IBD had similar patterns.

Conclusion

Despite high rates of chronic axial pain in those with IBD, few cases met the IBP and axSpA classification criteria. This apparent discrepancy is unexplained. However, in IBD, axial pain onset at an age older than 45 years is common; and these may not meet IBP and axSpA age criteria. Also, neck pain was increased in those with IBD but is not included in most IBP and axSpA criteria. Peripheral arthralgias and chronic arthritis symptoms were common, but examination findings were not, suggesting that tenosynovitis or enthesitis is more likely than frank arthritis to occur in patients with UC.

Correspondence between patient-reported flare and disease activity score variation in axial spondyloarthritis: a 12-months web-based study

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to determine thresholds of variations of BASDAI and pain associated with patient-reported outbreak or resolution of flare and to test performance of ASAS preliminary definitions of flare.

METHODS

SpA patients registered on the Spondy+ platform were invited to fill BASDAI and global pain on numeric rating scales every week during one year and to tell if they experienced flare since last week. Performance of BASDAI and pain variations (ΔBASDAI and Δpain) to detect occurrence and resolution of flare was determined with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Ninety-one of the 99 axSpA patients included reported at least one episode of flare. Area under the ROC curve was significantly higher for ΔBASDAI than for Δpain to predict outbreak of flare (0.81 vs. 0.77, p<0.05) without statiscally significant difference to predict flare resolution (0.78 vs. 0.80). Best sensitivity/specificity compromise was obtained for ΔBASDAI of 0.2 and 0.4 points to predict flare outbreak or resolution, respectively. All the ASAS definitions obtained a specificity higher than 95% whereas sensitivity was lower than 40%.

CONCLUSION

ΔBASDAI appeared as a suitable variable to monitor occurrence and resolution of patient-reported flare in axSpA.

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as a quantitative tool for evaluating disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

AIM

To determine the correlations between four quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted images (IVIM DWI) and the semi-quantitative Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) score of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and five clinical activity indices in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

AND METHODS

A total of 75 patients with axSpA and complete clinical activity indices and SIJ MRI were enrolled to this prospective study. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate correlations between MRI parameters and clinical activity indices after controlling for confounders. All data were further analysed using Pearson's correlation coefficients (r).

RESULTS

Only pure diffusion coefficient (D) and incoherent perfusion related microcirculation (D∗) were found to be independently positively correlated with several clinical activity indices (all p<0.05). Positive correlations were observed between D and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Patient Global Assessment (PGA), extent of influence of pain, with r of 0.605, 0.402, 0.319, and 0.485 (all p<0.0125). D∗ correlated positively with BASDAI, BASFI, and PGA (r=0.436, 0.356, 0.301, respectively; all p<0.0125).

CONCLUSION

D and D∗ derived from IVIM DWI could be associated with some disease activity indices in patients with axSpA; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and SPARCC scores were not correlated with these indices. IVIM DWI may be a useful tool for the quantitative assessment of disease activity in patients with axSpA.

Axial Spondyloarthritis in Japan

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The differences in the epidemiology and management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) among regions and countries largely depend on the positivity of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 and the health care system. This review article focused on axSpA in Japan, where the prevalence of HLA-B27 is extremely low (0.3%) and the universal health insurance system typically provides a 70% or more copayment by the government.

RECENT FINDINGS

A nationwide survey was conducted in Japan in 2018, which estimated that there were 3200 patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2400-3900) with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a term interchangeable with radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA), and 800 patients (95% CI: 530-1100) had non-radiographic (nr)-axSpA. These data indicate a prevalence of 2.6/100,000 or 0.0026% for AS and 0.6/100,000 or 0.0006% for nr-axSpA. Patients with AS, but not those with nr-axSpA, are designated as suffering from intractable diseases in Japan; thus, their medical expenses are reduced by grant under the Act on Medical Care for Patients with Intractable Diseases. As of February 2022, infliximab, adalimumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab have been approved for AS, and secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab have been approved for nr-axSpA. An algorithm for nr-axSpA in Japan has been developed for the proper diagnosis and use of these therapeutic agents. A low prevalence of axSpA, especially that of nr-axSpA, was found in Japan. Early referral and the resultant diagnosis and appropriate treatment of these patients by rheumatologists are crucial issues in Japan, as in other countries.

2021 clinical practice guideline for the early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Colombian Association of Rheumatology

BACKGROUND

Axial Spondyloarthritis is a rheumatic condition affecting young patients with social and occupational consequences. Diagnosis delay is associated with functional impairment and impact on quality of life, requiring a multidisciplinary approach.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a set of recommendations based on the best available evidence for early detection, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

METHODS

A working group was established, questions were developed, outcomes were graded, and a systematic search for evidence was conducted. A multidisciplinary panel of members was established (including patient representatives), minimizing bias in relation to conflicts of interest. The GRADE approach "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" was used to assess the quality of the evidence as well as the direction and strength of recommendations. In total, 11 recommendations with regard to diagnosis (n = 2), pharmacological treatment (n = 6), non-pharmacological treatment (n = 2) and monitoring (n = 1) are presented.

RESULTS

Sacroiliac joint radiography as the first diagnostic method, and the use of disease activity scales for patient monitoring (ASDAS or BASDAI), are recommended. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the first treatment option; in case of intolerance or residual pain, acetaminophen or opioids are recommended. In patients with axial involvement, it is recommended not to use conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or systemic or local glucocorticoids. In patients with failure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-TNF or anti-IL17A is recommended. In those patients presenting with anti-TNF failure, starting an anti-IL17A is recommended. Exercise, physical and occupational therapy are recommended as part of treatment. It is recommended not to use unconventional therapies as the only treatment option.

CONCLUSIONS

This set of recommendations provides an updated guide on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

Prevalence of Inflammatory Back Pain in a Low-Income Population

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory back pain (IBP) is a major criterion in identifying axial spondyloarthritis. Whether socioeconomic issues impact prevalence of IBP assessed using standardized questionnaires has not been assessed. We determined IBP prevalence and performance of IBP questionnaires in a low-income, low-literacy population.

METHODS

Individuals were interviewed in Fortaleza, Brazil, for the prevalence of IBP using Calin's, Berlin, and ASAS IBP questionnaires; monthly family income (US dollars), literacy (>/≤8 school years [SYs]), and smoking habit (present/absent) were registered.

RESULTS

Two hundred nineteen individuals were included (mean age, 38.2 ± 12.9 years), 110 (50.2%) men, 58 (26.4%) White, and 38 (17.3%) smokers. Overall, 152 (69.4%) declared

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report on IBP prevalence in a low-income, low-literacy population. Chronic back pain was highly prevalent with almost 15% having IBP using ASAS criteria. Inflammatory back pain prevalence looked similar using ASAS and Berlin criteria; values were higher using Calin's criteria. Literacy or income did not influence IBP prevalence in this population, which was higher among women. The higher prevalence of IBP using Calin's criteria in this population should be taken into account as it might impact studies aiming to determine prevalence of axial spondyloarthritis in clinical studies in this scenario.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Back Pain/epidemiology
• Brazil/epidemiology
• Female
• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Poverty
• Prevalence
• Spondylarthritis/epidemiology
• Surveys and Questionnaires

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Jobson Lopes de Oliveira From the Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
Guilherme Ferreira Maciel da Silva From the Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
Igor Albuquerque Nogueira From the Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
Artur Queirós Azevedo From the Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
Xenofon Baraliakos Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Francisco Airton Castro Rocha From the Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil

Collapse

Factors predicting axial spondyloarthritis among first-degree relatives of probands with ankylosing spondylitis: a family study spanning 35 years

Objective

Factors predicting axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients need to be defined. We investigated the predictive value of the probands’ HLA-B27 and radiographic sacroiliitis status on disease occurrence among their FDR. We also assessed the predictive value of features of the clinical history, including chronic inflammatory back pain (CIBP) and acute anterior uveitis (AAU), among the FDR and how they can be used to improve classification and diagnosis of axSpA.

Methods

In 1985, we studied 363 AS probands and 806 FDR who underwent rheumatologic examination, completed questionnaires, provided blood samples for HLA-typing and underwent radiography of sacroiliac joints. At follow-up in 2018–2019, 125 patients and 360 FDR were available for study, and completed a postal questionnaire about axSpA features. FDRs were asked to report whether after 1985 they had been diagnosed by Swiss rheumatologists as having axSpA.

Results

Among HLA-B27(+) FDR, axSpA occurred in 25.4%–26.3%, independent of the radiographic sacroiliitis status of the proband. AAU occurred in 13/34 (38.2%) FDR with axSpA vs 29/251 (11.6%) FDR without axSpA (p=0.00004, OR=4.74 95% CI 2.15 to 10.47). The presence of CIBP at baseline did not predict later occurrence of axSpA but combining CIBP and pain/discomfort at the thoracic spine and at anterior (ventral) chest wall ever, assessed at follow-up in 2018–2019, provided 83.1% sensitivity and 87.2% specificity for current axSpA.

Conclusion

Occurrence of AAU among FDR of axSpA probands should prompt screening for axSpA. Moreover, co-occurrence of CIBP and pain/discomfort in the thoracic spine and at anterior chest wall as a three-question tool may further enhance clinical suspicion of axSpA among these FDR.

Characterising axial psoriatic arthritis: correlation between whole spine MRI abnormalities and clinical, laboratory and radiographic findings

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of inflammatory and structural lesions using whole spine MRI in patients with psoriatic disease, and to assess their correlation with clinical features and with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) classification criteria.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with whole spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJ) MRI, selected from 2 populations: (1) active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), irrespective of axial symptoms; (2) psoriasis with confirmed or suspected PsA and axSpA symptoms. MRI spondylitis and/or sacroiliitis (MRI-SpA) was defined according to Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) consensus and by radiologist impression. Agreement between MRI-SpA and different inflammatory back pain (IBP) definitions (Berlin/ASAS/rheumatologist criteria) and the axSpA classification criteria were calculated considering MRI as gold standard. Logistic regression determined MRI-SpA-associated factors.

RESULTS

93 patients were analysed (69.9% PsA; 30.1% psoriasis). Back pain was present in 81.7%, defined as IBP in 36.6%-57%. MRI-SpA was found in 9.7% of patients by ASAS definition and in 12.9% by radiologist impression, of which 25% had isolated spondylitis.Low agreement was found between the three IBP definitions and MRI-SpA. Rheumatologist criteria was the most sensitive (50%-55.6%) while ASAS and Berlin criteria were the most specific (61.9%-63%). axSpA criteria had poor sensitivity for MRI-SpA (22.2%-25%). Late onset of back pain or asymptomatic patients accounted for most cases with MRI-SpA not meeting axSpA or IBP criteria. Male sex was associated with MRI-SpA (OR 6.91; 95% CI 1.42 to 33.59) in multivariable regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of MRI-defined axSpA was low and showed poor agreement with IBP and axSpA criteria.

Evaluation of long-term TNFi effectiveness after a first switch in early axial spondyloarthritis considering time-varying prescription bias: an inverse-probability weighting analysis of the DESIR cohort

Objective

To evaluate long-term effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) after a first switch, and their associated factors in an early axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) population, considering time-varying prescription bias.

Methods

Observational prospective cohort (DEvenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifférenciées Récentes) with 5 years of follow-up, including 708 TNFi-naïve patients with early axSpA. Long-term effectiveness of TNFi after a first switch (ASAS40 response after at least 2 visits under treatment) were estimated using marginal structural models (implementing inverse-probability weighting and iterative propensity scores). Factors associated with the outcome were explored by multivariate Cox regression models.

Results

The hazard to present an ASAS40 response after a first TNFi switch was increased (HR=2.4 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.0)); this response ratio was slightly lower compared with the response in TNFi naïve patients after a first TNFi (HR=3.3 (95% CI 2.9 to 3.8)). HLA-B27 positive was the only factor independently associated with ASAS40 response after a first TNFi switch.

Conclusion

After application of innovative methods to overcome time-varying prescription bias, the magnitude of the TNFi response after a first switch was found to be numerically lower but clinically relevant from the response in TNFi-naïve patients.

Expert recommendations on early diagnosis and referral of axial spondyloarthritis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Axial spondyloarthritis is a chronic inflammatory disorder that primarily involves the axial skeleton (sacroiliac joints and spine), causing stiffness, severe pain and fatigue. In some patients, definitive structural damage of sacroiliac joints is visible on imaging and is known as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Some patients do not have a clear radiographic damage of the sacroiliac joints, and this subtype is known as non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Early diagnosis is important for reducing the risk of irreversible structural damage and disability. Management of axial spondyloarthritis is challenging in Saudi Arabia because of inadequate disease knowledge and the unavailability of local guidelines. Therefore, this expert consensus is intended to provide recommendations, including the referral pathway, the definition of remission and the treat-to-target approach, to all healthcare professionals for the management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. A Delphi technique of consensus was developed by involving an expert panel of 10 rheumatologists, 1 dermatologist and 1 general physician. The experts offered consensus-based recommendations based on a review of available scientific evidence and clinical experience for the referral, screening and management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

Risk Factors for Spinal Structural Damage in a Chinese Cohort With Ankylosing Spondylitis

OBJECTIVES

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 270 Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in order to identify potential risk factors for severity of spinal structural damage.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy AS patients fulfilled the Modified New York Criteria. Computed tomography (CT) was used to scan sacroiliac and hip joints, and radiography was used to scan anteroposterior and lateral lumbar spine, as well as lateral cervical spine. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index and modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) were scored in duplicate.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three patients had low mSASSS (mSASSS, <10), and 87 patients had high mSASSS (mSASSS, ≥10). Univariate analysis revealed that AS age of onset, body mass index (BMI), smoking duration, duration of symptoms, diagnostic delay, hip involvement, and sacroiliitis grade were significantly associated with the risk of having high mSASSS after adjustment (all p's < 0.05). Hip involvement interacted significantly with BMI and smoking duration in a graded manner. Particularly, relative to patients with low BMI-negative hip involvement, those with high BMI-negative hip involvement, low BMI-positive hip involvement, and high BMI-positive hip involvement had a 1.94-fold, 3.29-fold, and 5.07-fold increased risk of high mSASSS (95% confidence interval, 0.84-4.47, 1.37-7.89, and 1.97-13.06, p = 0.118, 0.008, and 0.001, respectively). Finally, a nomogram graph based on 7 significant risk factors was generated with substantial prediction accuracy (concordance index, 0.906).

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified 7 potential risk factors for the severity of spinal structural damage in Chinese AS patients. Importantly, positive hip involvement, combined with high BMI or long smoking duration, was associated with a remarkably increased risk of having severe spinal structural damage.

A Road Map of the Axial Spondyloarthritis Continuum

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by inflammatory low back pain, inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses, and other extra-articular or systemic manifestations. Although our understanding of the natural history of axSpA has been limited by incomplete knowledge of disease pathogenesis, axSpA is increasingly understood as a spectrum of axial, peripheral, and extra-articular inflammatory conditions that includes nonradiographic axSpA and radiographic axSpA, also known as ankylosing spondylitis. In this narrative review, we present a road map of this axSpA continuum, highlighting genetic risk factors for the development of axSpA, triggers of disease, and reasons for and implications of diagnostic delay. We present a detailed overview of the spectrum of axSpA clinical manifestations and highlight factors known to influence the risk of disease progression. Finally, we provide some expert commentary on the practical use of this road map to assist health care providers in the identification of axSpA in clinical practice.

Patient Perspectives on Biologics for Axial Spondyloarthritis in a Cross-sectional Study in a Predominantly Female Population: Treatment Satisfaction, Wear-off Between Doses, and Use of Supplemental Medication

Introduction

There is limited information regarding treatment experience of patients with axial spondyloarthritis/ankylosing spondylitis (axSpA/AS) receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Here we characterize patient experiences and perspectives, including satisfaction among those currently treated with bDMARD therapy for axSpA/AS. We also assess the use of supplemental medication during perceived wear-off between doses.

Methods

Adult participants from the United States within the ArthritisPower registry with physician-diagnosed axSpA/AS were invited to complete electronic patient-reported outcome measures and an online survey about their perspectives of treatment. Analysis compared patient characteristics and treatment satisfaction by whether wear-off in axSpA/AS between bDMARD doses was reported.

Results

Of 128 patients currently taking a DMARD, the mean age was 46.9 (10.3) years, 82.0% were female, and 93.8% were White. A total of 78 (60.9%) perceived wear-off with their current bDMARD before the next dose, 19 (14.8%) did not experience wear-off and 31 (24.2%) were unsure about wear-off. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score indicated poor disease control in all patients receiving bDMARDs (6.4 [1.8]); worse for those perceiving wear-off between doses versus those who did not perceive wear-off or were unsure (6.8 [1.6] vs. 5.9 [2.0], p = 0.011). Patients experiencing wear-off reported being ‘very satisfied’ or ‘somewhat satisfied’ with their treatment less frequently than patients without wear-off (73.1 vs. 89.5%, respectively). Of patients reporting wear-off, 82.1% (n = 64) used supplemental medications during wear-off (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [68.8%, n = 44], muscle relaxants [42.2%, n = 27], and/or opioids [37.5%, n = 24]).

Conclusions

In a predominantly female sample of bDMARD-treated patients with axSpA/AS and high disease activity, the majority expressed treatment satisfaction. However, most experienced wear-off between doses and relied on supplemental medications, including opioids, to manage symptoms.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00417-6.

Patient perspectives on health care provider practices leading to an axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis: an exploratory qualitative research study

BACKGROUND

The average time to a diagnosis for people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is 7-10 years. Delayed diagnosis may result in increased structural damage, worse physical function, and worse quality of life relative to patients with a timely axSpA diagnosis. Understanding patient experiences may provide insights for how to reduce diagnostic delays.

OBJECTIVE

To provide foundational knowledge about patient experiences with healthcare providers leading to an axSpA diagnosis.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory qualitative research study with six focus groups interviews with participants recruited from three rheumatology clinics within the United States (MA (n = 3); CO (n = 2); PA (n = 1)) that included a total of 26 adults (10 females, 16 males) with rheumatologist confirmed diagnosis of axSpA in 2019. Focus groups were ~ 2 h, audio recorded, transcribed, and subject to dual coding. The codes reviewed were in relation to the patients' diagnostic experiences.

RESULTS

Patients described frustrating and lengthy diagnostic journeys. They recognized that the causes of diagnostic delays in axSpA are multifactorial (e.g., no definitive diagnostic test, disease characteristics, lack of primary care provider's awareness about axSpA, trust). Patients described how doctors minimized or dismissed complaints about symptoms or told them that their issues were psychosomatic. Patients believed the healthcare system contributed to diagnostic delays (e.g., lack of time in clinical visits, difficulty accessing rheumatologists, health insurance challenges). Advice to physicians to reduce the diagnostic delay included allowing time for patients to give a complete picture of their illness experience, listening to, and believing patients, earlier referral to rheumatology, provision of HLA-B27 gene testing, and that physicians need to partner with their patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients desire a definitive test that could be administered earlier in the course of axSpA. Until such a test is available, patients want clinicians who listen to, believe, and partner with them, and who will follow them until a diagnosis is reached. Educating primary care clinicians about guidelines and referral for diagnosis of axSpA could reduce diagnostic delay.

Biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis and low back pain: a comprehensive review

The spectrum of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) (including both non-radiographic and radiographic AxSpA), also known as ankylosing spondylitis AS, has achieved growing recognition. With the development of treatments not only effective in controlling disease activity but also in slowing radiographic progression, and given the cost and risk profiles of these novel treatments and the limitations of current clinical criteria, imaging and peripheral blood biomarkers (C-reactive protein, HLA-B27 testing), the need for better biomarkers has never been greater. The purpose of this review is to present up-to-date information on the biomarkers for the diagnosis for assessing disease diagnosis, activity, treatment response, and radiographic progression of AxSpA, and entails multiple search strings used to identify articles of interest published in PubMed and the Cochrane database up to May 1, 2021. We present the current status of research in serologic biomarkers such as cytokines, adipokines, matrix metalloproteinases, calprotectin, CD74, antibodies, bone turnover markers, and circulating protein fragments of cartilage and connective tissue degradation and other biomarkers. Despite a great deal of work, most serologic results have been disappointing and to date none perform better than CRP. Recent promising preliminary data for some has been published, but require further confirmation. Transcriptomic biomarkers such as micro-RNAs and genetic biomarkers also show promise to assist in diagnosis and possibly for radiographic severity, including a recently developed panel of genetic risk markers used in a polygenic risk score instrument in AS diagnosis. These need further confirmation and application in AS as well as in nr-AxSpA.

Classification Criteria in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What Have We Learned; Where Are We Going?

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a chronic inflammatory condition that can have a predominately peripheral or axial presentation. Axial SpA (axSpA) affects the axial skeleton with either radiographic (r-axSpA) or nonradiographic (nr-axSpA) changes. Radiographic changes are a late disease feature and earlier disease stages can be identified by incorporating other imaging methods. The diagnosis of axSpA is a clinical diagnosis and classification criteria are not aimed to be diagnostic tools. The split between r-axSpA and nr-axSpA is artificial and we should move toward the unifying concept of axSpA. Our understanding of genetics, biomarkers, and immunopathophenotypes will drive further refinement of classification criteria.

Early identification of axial spondyloarthritis in a multi-ethnic Asian population

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

To address the diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), we have cross-culturally adapted the Hamilton axSpA questionnaire, a self-administered screening questionnaire, in the Singapore population. In this study, we compared the performance of various scoring methods for this questionnaire in detecting axSpA.

METHOD

The questionnaire was self-administered by eligible subjects. Scoring methods included method A, the original questionnaire scoring, and methods B-E, scoring developed based on the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for inflammatory back pain (IBP) and the referral, classification and both referral and classification of axSpA, respectively. The reference standard was diagnosis by a rheumatologist. Since the ASAS criteria-based scoring methods were mainly based on clinical axSpA features, self-report and rheumatologist-assessment of clinical axSpA features were also compared in subjects with axSpA.

RESULTS

Of 1418 subjects (age: 54 ± 14 years, female: 73%) recruited, 46 were diagnosed with axSpA by a rheumatologist. Sensitivities of methods A-E were 35%, 61%, 63%, 48% and 83%, respectively. Self-report of clinical axSpA features exceeded rheumatologist-assessment for arthritis (83 vs 26%), good response to NSAIDs (37 vs 30%), enthesitis (35 vs 30%), dactylitis (20 vs 2%) and family history for axSpA (13 vs 4%). The reverse was true for IBP (41 vs 63%) and uveitis (4 vs 15%).

CONCLUSIONS

A self-administered questionnaire using the ASAS referral and classification criteria-based scoring yielded relatively high sensitivity in detecting axSpA in subjects newly referred to rheumatology clinics. This supports its evaluation as a screening and referral tool in the general population in future studies. Key Points • A self-administered questionnaire could be used as a screening and referral tool. • ASAS referral and classification criteria-based scoring yielded relatively high sensitivity. • Inaccurate perception of clinical axSpA features was observed in axSpA patients.

Axial spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) encompasses both radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA. It is a chronic inflammatory disease with a predilection for involving the axial skeleton. The most common presenting symptoms are chronic back pain and spinal stiffness but peripheral and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations occur also frequently. The diagnosis of axSpA relies on the recognition of a clinical pattern of the disease, based on clinical, laboratory and imaging features. The Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axSpA are valid and well implemented for research purposes. Sustained disease activity, measured by validated tools such as the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, leads to irreversible structural damage and poor functioning and therefore should be abrogated. As part of the management algorithm, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remain as the first line of pharmacological treatment besides physiotherapy. As a second line, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor and interleukin-17 inhibitor are available but recently Janus kinase inhibitors have also shown efficacy in improving symptoms of the disease.

Algorithm for the referral of patients with inflammatory back pain from primary care in Malaysia

Chronic low back pain, defined as back pain lasting for more than three months, can be divided into mechanical or inflammatory back pain (IBP). IBP typically starts in patients below the age of 40, is improved with activity and worsens with rest. IBP is strongly associated with axial spondyloarthritis. Early recognition of IBP among primary care physicians is essential for timely diagnosis and intervention to ensure the best outcomes for patients with axial spondyloarthritis. This paper describes the Malaysian Society of Rheumatology's recently developed Inflammatory Back Pain Referral Algorithm for primary care physicians, which aims to facilitate the early identification and referral of IBP patients to rheumatologists.

Factors associated with remission at 5-year follow-up in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis: results from the DESIR cohort

Objective

The factors contributing to long-term remission in axial SpA (axSpA) are unclear. We aimed to characterize individuals with axSpA at the 5-year follow-up to identify baseline factors associated with remission.

Methods

We included all patients from the DESIR cohort (with recent-onset axSpA) with an available Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score–CRP (ASDAS-CRP) at 5-year follow-up. Patients in remission (ASDAS-CRP < 1.3) were compared with those with active disease by demographic, clinical, biological and imaging characteristics. A logistic model stratified on TNF inhibitor (TNFi) exposure was used.

Results

Overall, 111/449 patients (25%) were in remission after 5 years. Among those never exposed to TNFi, 31% (77/247) were in remission compared with 17% (34/202) of those exposed to TNFi. Patients in remission after 5 years were more likely to be male, HLA-B27+, have a lower BMI, and a higher education level. Baseline factors associated with 5-year remission in patients never exposed to TNFi included lower BASDAI [adjusted odds ratio (OR_a) 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8, 0.9) and history of peripheral arthritis (OR_a 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2, 5.3). In those exposed to TNFi, remission was associated with higher education level (OR_a 2.9, 95% CI: 1.6, 5.1), lower enthesitis index (OR_a 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7, 0.9), lower BASDAI (OR_a 0.9, 95% CI: 0.9, 0.9) and lower BMI (OR_a 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7, 0.9).

Conclusion

This study highlights the difficulty in achieving 5-year remission in those with recent-onset axSpA, especially for the more active cases, despite the use of TNFi. Socio-economic factors and BMI are implicated in the outcome at 5 years.