Risk of tuberculosis in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists due to incomplete prevention of reactivation of latent infection

Tuberculin skin test repetition after TNF-α inhibitors in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis: a long-term retrospective cohort in endemic area

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the tuberculin skin test (TST) conversion in chronic inflammatory arthropathies (CIA) patients on TNFα inhibitors (TNFi) and without previous latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment.

METHODS

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with negative LTBI were retrospectively evaluated for TST conversion and active tuberculosis (TB) after six months of exposition to TNFi. Two groups were compared: patients who repeated TST (TST-repetition) during the follow-up and patients who did not (non-TST-repetition).

RESULTS

A total of 355 CIA patients on TNFi were screened and 138 (38.9%) did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 217 CIA patients, 81 (37.3%) repeated TST during TNFi treatment. TST conversion rate was observed in 18 (22.2%) patients without significant differences among CIA (p = 0.578). The number of TB cases was low (n = 10; 4.6%) and was similar in TST-repetition and non-TST-repetition groups [2 (2.5%) vs. 8 (5.9%), p = 0.328]. Of note, 30% of active TB occurred early (6-12 months of TNFi exposure) and the median (full range) time to incident TB was 1.3 (0.6-10.6) years, whereas the median (full range) time to TST repetition was later [3.3 (0.5-13.4) years]. The incidence of active TB was lower among RA patients than AS patients [342 (95% CI 41 - 1446) vs. 1.454 (95% CI 594-2993)/100,000 patient-years, p = 0.049].

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that TST repetition is associated with a high conversion rate, suggesting the need for recommended treatment. The delayed repetition of TST and low number of active TB cases hampered the evaluation of this strategy effectiveness to prevent active infection. Larger studies with systematic repetition patterns are necessary. In addition, the study highlights the need for a greater surveillance for TB in AS patients.

(Re-)introduction of TNF antagonists and JAK inhibitors in patients with previous tuberculosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common complication associated with treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. However, there is uncertainty about the risk of TB relapse in patients with TB and comorbidities requiring treatment with these agents.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of TB relapse in patients (re-)started on TNF antagonists or JAK inhibitors.

METHODS

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Cochrane Library databases until 11 December 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case reports and case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with current or previous TB who were (re-)started on TNF antagonists or JAK inhibitors.

INTERVENTIONS

(Re-)introduction of TNF antagonists and JAK inhibitors.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

All studies meeting entry criteria were included regardless of quality.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Categorical data are presented as frequencies and percentages. For non-normally distributed aggregated data, we calculated the pooled weighted median with 95% CI. For individual patient data, the median and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 5018 articles screened for eligibility, 67 publications reporting on 368 TB patients who (re-)initiated treatment with TNF antagonists for underlying diseases were included. The median age was 42.5 years (95% CI: 40.4-42.5) and the proportion of female patients was 36.6% (n = 74) of patients whose sex was reported. A total of 14 patients (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.1-6.3%) developed TB relapse after a median of 8.5 months (interquartile range, 6.8-14.8 months) following (re-)initiation of anti-TNF treatment. Furthermore, among 251 articles screened for eligibility, 11 reports on TB patients who were (re-)started on JAK inhibitors for underlying diseases were identified. The median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 48.5-68.5 years) and 45.5% (n = 5) were female. Only one patient (9.1%; 95% CI: 0.2-41.3%) had TB reactivation 10 months after starting treatment with ruxolitinib. In addition, 94 patients who were treated with TNF antagonists and two patients temporarily treated with JAK inhibitors for the prevention or treatment of paradoxical reactions were analysed. None of the publications reported microbiological failure or worsening of TB-related symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

(Re-)initiation of TNF antagonists and JAK inhibitors may be relatively safe in patients with current or previous TB and the need for further treatment of underlying diseases.

Evaluation of serious infections, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, during treatment with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: does line of therapy matter?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate if and how the incidence of serious infection (SI) and active tuberculosis (TB) differ among seven biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in patients with RA considering the line of therapy.

METHODS

Patients with RA from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA) cohort who initiated etanercept, certolizumab, infliximab, adalimumab, abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab from the first to fifth line of therapy were included. Follow-up extended up to 3 years. The primary outcome was SI and the secondary outcome was TB. Event rates were calculated and compared using Cox proportional hazards models, controlling for confounding with inverse probability of treatment weights. Comparisons were made overall and stratified by line of therapy. Sensitivity analysis was restricted to all treatment courses from 2009 (tocilizumab availability) until the end of the study (2018).

RESULTS

Among 33 897 treatment courses (62 513 patient-years) the incidence of SI was 4.4/100 patient-years (95% CI 4.2, 4.5). After adjustment, hazards ratios (HRs) of SI were slightly higher with adalimumab and infliximab compared with etanercept. However, no clear pattern was observed when stratifying by line of therapy in terms of incidence rate or HR. Sensitivity analyses showed similar HRs among these treatments. Regarding TB, all 49 cases occurred during the first three lines of treatment and rarely since 2009.

CONCLUSION

The risk of serious infections does not appear to be influenced by the line of therapy in patients with RA. However, the risk of TB seems to be more frequent during the initial lines of treatment or prior to 2009.

The risk of tuberculosis infection in Saudi patients receiving adalimumab, etanercept, and tocilizumab therapy

BACKGROUND

The risk of infection including tuberculosis (TB) infection or reactivation during biological therapy with the current various clinical application is a major concern. This risk may be higher in countries endemic to TB. Our aim of this study is to determine the risk of TB infection in patients receiving 3 biological treatments, Adalimumab, Etanercept and Tocilizumab.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study extending over 2 years follow-up for all patients receiving Adalimumab, Etanercept and Tocilizumab for various clinical indications in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

RESULT

Over the period of 2015-2019, A total of 410 patients received Adalimumab, 271 received Etanercept and 58 patients received Tocilizumab. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common indication for therapy in all groups and for Adalimumab the most common indication was inflammatory bowel disease, for Etanercept was psoriatic arthritis and for Tocilizumab was juvenile idiopathic arthritis. After a mean follow up period of 36 ± 8.9 months for patients receiving Adalimumab, 21.5 ± 8.4 months for patients receiving Etanercept and 21 ± 2.5 months for patients receiving Tocilizumab there were no reported cases of TB infection in all groups. Only one patient was diagnosed with latent TB 7 months later after starting Adalimumab and tow patients after starting Etanercept. The overall Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRA) positivity rate was 9.7%. There was significant association between IGRA positivity rate and patient age. The cutoff age in which IGRA positivity has significantly increased was 53.20 years.

CONCLUSION

In our study, patients receiving Etanercept, Adalimumab and Tocilizumab had no increased risk of TB infection. Only 0.3% of patients treated with Adalimumab and 0.9% of patients treated with Etanercept converted to a positive IGRA during therapy.

Management of postinfectious inflammatory arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postinfectious inflammatory arthritis can result from various pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. Prompt identification and treatment of acute infection is vital, but some cases progress to chronic arthritis despite successful treatment of infection. Postinfectious inflammatory arthritis varies from mild, self-limited arthralgia to severe, refractory arthritis, necessitating ongoing disease-modifying treatment. This review explores the spectrum of postinfectious inflammatory arthritis to provide insights into effective management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research continues regarding the benefit of antimicrobial therapy, beyond treatment of the acute infection, to diminish the severity of postinfectious inflammatory arthritis. Following treatment of acute infection, most cases are self-limited so treatment is symptomatic. However, a difficult-to-predict fraction of cases develop chronic postinfectious inflammatory arthritis that can be challenging to manage. Recently, as more biologic, and targeted synthetic DMARDs have become available, treatment options have expanded.

SUMMARY

In this article, we use the term 'postinfectious inflammatory arthritis' rather than 'reactive arthritis' because it describes a broader spectrum of diseases and emphasizes the common pathogenesis of a postinfectious inflammatory process. We summarize the conventional therapies and recent management developments for the most frequently encountered postinfectious inflammatory arthritides.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Developing Tuberculosis in Patients Who Received Prophylactic Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment with Experience of Biologic Medications

Biologic medications have dramatically improved the treatment outcomes of immunological inflammatory diseases, but their immunosuppressive effects put patients at risk for tuberculosis (TB). We investigated the risk factors for developing TB in patients treated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) who also had experience of using biologic medications. At Keio University Hospital, we retrospectively investigated patients treated with anti-mycobacterial drugs before or concurrently with biologic medications from January 2012 to August 2020. Patients in the 'follow-on cases group' who had a positive TB screening test after initiating biologic medications and subsequently started LTBI treatment were excluded. We researched and compared the patient characteristics for TB and non-TB patient groups. Of the 146 eligible patients, 5 (3.4%) developed TB. The incidence rate was 600/100000 person-years. There were no significant differences between TB and non-TB patient groups in the history of TB, interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), duration of biologic medication therapy, LTBI treatment periods, concomitant use of calcineurin inhibitors or anti-rheumatic drugs. The percentage of patients who received prednisolone at a dose of ≥15 mg for more than 1 month was higher in those who developed TB than in those who did not (40.0 vs. 7.1%, p = 0.054); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Regular monitoring of TB is necessary for long-term concomitant use of high prednisolone doses during and after the administration of biologic medications.

2022 EULAR recommendations for screening and prophylaxis of chronic and opportunistic infections in adults with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Objectives

To develop EULAR recommendations for screening and prophylaxis of chronic and opportunistic infections in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD).

Methods

An international Task Force (TF) (22 members/15 countries) formulated recommendations, supported by systematic literature review findings. Level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned for each recommendation. Level of agreement was provided anonymously by each TF member.

Results

Four overarching principles (OAP) and eight recommendations were developed. The OAPs highlight the need for infections to be discussed with patients and with other medical specialties, in accordance with national regulations. In addition to biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for which screening for latent tuberculosis (TB) should be performed, screening could be considered also before conventional synthetic DMARDs, glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. Interferon gamma release assay should be preferred over tuberculin skin test, where available. Hepatitis B (HBV) antiviral treatment should be guided by HBV status defined prior to starting antirheumatic drugs. All patients positive for hepatitis-C-RNA should be referred for antiviral treatment. Also, patients who are non-immune to varicella zoster virus should be informed about the availability of postexposure prophylaxis should they have contact with this pathogen. Prophylaxis againstPneumocystis jiroveciiseems to be beneficial in patients treated with daily doses >15–30 mg of prednisolone or equivalent for >2–4 weeks.

Conclusions

These recommendations provide guidance on the screening and prevention of chronic and opportunistic infections. Their adoption in clinical practice is recommended to standardise and optimise care to reduce the burden of opportunistic infections in people living with AIIRD.

Systematic literature review informing the 2022 EULAR recommendations for screening and prophylaxis of chronic and opportunistic infections in adults with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on the screening and prophylaxis of opportunistic and chronic infections in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD).

METHODS

SLR (inception-12/2021) based on the following search domains: (1) infectious agents, (2) AIIRD, (3) immunosuppressives/immunomodulators used in rheumatology, (4) screening terms and (5) prophylaxis terms. Articles were retrieved having the terms from (1) AND (2) AND (3) plus terms from (4) OR(5). Databases searched: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

studies on postoperative infections, paediatric AIIRD, COVID-19, vaccinations and non-Εnglish literature. Study quality was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomised controlled trials (RCTs), RoB-Cochrane for RCTs, AMSTAR2 for SLRs.

RESULTS

From 5641 studies were retrieved, 568 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, with 194 articles finally included. For tuberculosis, tuberculin skin test (TST) is affected by treatment with glucocorticoids and conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and its performance is inferior to interferon gamma release assay (IGRA). Agreement between TST and IGRA is moderate to low. For hepatitis B virus (HBV): risk of reactivation is increased in patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen. Anti-HBcore positive patients are at low risk for reactivation but should be monitored periodically with liver function tests and/or HBV-viral load. Risk for Hepatitis C reactivation is existing but low in patients treated with biological DMARDs. For Pneumocystis jirovecii, prophylaxis treatment should be considered in patients treated with prednisolone ≥15-30 mg/day for >2-4 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Different screening and prophylaxis approaches are described in the literature, partly determined by individual patient and disease characteristics.

Comparison of developing tuberculosis following tumor necrosis factor inhibition and interleukin-6 inhibition in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide observational study in South Korea, 2013–2018

Background

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors increase the risk of tuberculosis (TB) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study compared the incidence of TB after treatment with TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab in patients with RA, separately in those who were treated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and those without evidence of LTBI.

Methods

This study included patients with RA who initiated TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab between December 2013 and August 2018. Patient data were collected from the nationwide database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment service in South Korea. The incidence of TB was compared among different biologic drugs in patients with or without LTBI treatment.

Results

Of 4736 patients, 1168 were treated for LTBI and 48 developed TB (554.9 per 100,000 person-years). When compared based on etanercept, infliximab showed a higher risk of TB (adjusted incidence rate ratio 2.71, 95% confidence interval 1.05–7.01), especially in patients without evidence of LTBI. Other TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab showed a comparable incidence of TB, regardless of treatment for LTBI. There was no significant difference in TB incidence after biologic therapy between patients with and without LTBI treatment (627.9/100,000 vs. 529.5/100,000 person-years). In patients treated for LTBI, no differential risk of TB was observed among biologic drugs.

Conclusions

The incidence of TB was not significantly different among biologic drugs in the current era, except for infliximab in patients who were not treated for LTBI. Treatment of LTBI might alleviate the drug-specific risk of TB in patients with RA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02842-6.

Active tuberculosis infection in moroccan patients with rheumatic diseases under biologic therapy: A multicenter national study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of active tuberculosis (TB) infection in Moroccan patients with rheumatic diseases under biologic therapy, and to describe the demographic characteristics of these patients as well as to explore potential risk factors.

Methods

This 14-year nationally representative multicenter study enrolled Moroccan patients with rheumatic diseases who had been treated with biologic therapy. Patient medical records were reviewed retrospectively for demographic characteristics, underlying rheumatic diseases, associated comorbidities, and TB-related data.

Results

In total, 1407 eligible patients were studied, detailed records were obtained for only 130 patients; 33 cases with active TB were identified at an estimated prevalence rate of 2.3%. The mean age was 42.9 ± 12 years and 75.8% were males. Ankylosing spondylitis accounted for 84.8% of active TB cases, and the majority of the cases (31/33) occurred among antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) users. A total of 8 out of 33 patients were positive at initial latent TB infection (LTBI) screening by tuberculin skin test and/or interferon-gamma release assay. Consumption of unpasteurized dairy products (odds ratio [OR], 34.841; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-389.7; P = 0.04), diabetes (OR, 38.468; 95% CI, 1.6-878.3; P = 0,022), smoking (OR, 3.941; 95% CI, 1-159.9; P = 0.047), and long biologic therapy duration (OR, 1.991; 95% CI, 1.4-16.3; P = 0.001) were identified as risk factors for developing active TB.

Conclusion

Moroccan patients with rheumatic diseases under anti-TNF-α agents are at an increased TB risk, especially when risk factors are present. Strict initial screening and regular monitoring of LTBI is recommended for patients living in high TB prevalence areas.

Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and systemic immune disease characterized by inflammation of peripheral and/or axial joints and entheses in patients with psoriasis (PsO). Extra-articular and extracutaneous manifestations and numerous comorbidities can also be present. These recommendations replace the previous version published in May 2013. A systematic review of the literature retrieved 191 articles that were used to formulate 12 recommendations in response to 12 clinical questions, divided into 4 sections: diagnosis, non-pharmacological treatment, conventional drug therapy and biologic therapy. These guidelines provide evidence-based information on the clinical management for PsA patients. For each recommendation, the level of evidence (highest available), degree of strength (Oxford) and degree of expert agreement (interrater reliability) are reported.

The risk of tuberculosis infection in 410 Saudipatients receiving adalimumab therapy

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor-a used to treat various autoimmune disorders. Adalimumab poses a risk for tuberculosis (TB) infection, especially in countries where TB is endemic.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the rate of TB infection after adalimumab therapy in Saudi Arabia.

DESIGN

Medical record review.

SETTINGS

Tertiary care center in Riyadh.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from the electronic healthcare records of all patients who received adalimumab treatment from 2015 to 2019.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Occurrence of TB after adalimumab therapy.

SAMPLE SIZE

410 patients (median ([QR] age, 37 [28], range 4-81 years), 40% males RESULTS: Rheumatoid arthritis was the most frequent indication (n=153, 37%). The patients were followed for a mean of 36 (8.9) months. No case of TB infection or reactivation was observed. An inter-feron-gamma release assay (IGRA) was requested in 353/391 (90.3%) patients, prior to initiating therapy. The IGRA was positive in 26 cases (6.6%). The IGRA-positive patients received isoniazid prophylactically. Bacterial infectious complications of adalimumab therapy occurred in 12 (2.9%) patients. Urinary tract infection was the most frequent complication (culture requested in 48 patients, positive in 8).

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab treatment was not associated with a risk of TB disease or TB reactivation in our cohort over the follow-up observation period. No TB reactivation occurred with adalimumab therapy when TB prophylaxis was used. The positive IGRA rate in patients on adalimumab treatment was low (7%).

LIMITATIONS

Single center and one geographical area in Saudi Arabia.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Development of Spinal Tuberculosis in an Adolescent With Crohn's Disease After Infliximab Therapy: A Case Report With Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) spondylitis, also known as Pott's disease, is a severe form of extrapulmonary TB. Infliximab treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) patients increases the risk of TB, and is likely to increase the risk of TB spondylitis as well.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a rare case of TB spondylitis development in a 16-year-old female with CD. She had a close household contact of active pulmonary TB and received contact investigation. She was diagnosed with latent TB 1 month before the diagnosis of CD, and had started a latent TB treatment regimen with isoniazid for 9 months. At 5 months from the start of latent TB treatment, infliximab was started. Approximately 1 year after infliximab treatment, her infusion interval was shortened from every 8 weeks to every 4 weeks owing to secondary loss of response due to nonimmunogenic pharmacokinetic failure. One month later, miliary TB developed and infliximab was stopped. She received a miliary TB treatment regimen for 6 months, curing the disease. Three months later, spinal TB was incidentally detected on abdominal computed tomography. She received a TB treatment regimen for 12 months, curing spinal TB. Currently, she is receiving vedolizumab to treat CD and is in clinical remission. Although this patient has sufficiently been treated at each stage of TB development, particularly for latent TB and miliary TB, TB spondylitis still developed.

CONCLUSION

Considering that TB spondylitis developed despite sufficient treatment at each stage, pediatric gastroenterologists should stay cautious when using anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with a history of latent TB.

Tuberculosis screening and management of latent tuberculosis infection prior to biologic treatment in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A longitudinal population-based analysis using claims data

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Screening for tuberculosis before treating with biologic agents is recommended in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We conducted this study to identify adherence to the recommended practice in a real-world setting in Japan.

METHODS

We used a community-based insurance claims database in a city in the Greater Tokyo Area in Japan. Between July 2012 and January 2019, we enrolled patients with IMIDs in the age range 15 to 74 years who had initiated biologic therapy. Tuberculosis screening was defined as (a) interferon-γ release assay and/or a tuberculin skin test (IGRA/TST) and (b) IGRA/TST and X-ray and/or CT scan (X-ray/CT) within 2 months before starting biologic agents. We analyzed the proportions of patients who underwent tuberculosis screening and their association with the patient- and treatment-related factors and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).

RESULTS

Of 421 patients presumed to have initiated biologic therapy, 202 (48%) underwent IGRA/TST and 169 (40%) underwent IGRA/TST and X-ray/CT. Patients aged 65 to 74 years were more likely to undergo tuberculosis screening than those aged 45 to 64 years. Compared to infliximab, IGRA/TST was less frequently performed in patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, abatacept, and tocilizumab. Treatment for LTBI was provided to 67 (16%) patients. Proportions of patients receiving LTBI treatment did not significantly differ according to the screening status.

CONCLUSION

There was low adherence to the recommendations for tuberculosis screening and prophylactic treatment before biologic therapy. It is necessary to continue alerting clinical practitioners to the importance of screening for tuberculosis and treatment for LTBI.

Tuberculosis-Related Uveitis in Patients under Anti-TNF-alpha Therapy: A Case Series

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF) have emerged as an effective treatment in noninfectious uveitis (NIU). Anti-TNF may increase the predisposition to infectious disease as tuberculosis (TB). TB-related uveitis in the context of an uveitogenic concurrent systemic immune-mediated disease under anti-TNF treatment remain a diagnostic challenge, deserving special focus on this rare context. Retrospective chart review of patients on anti-TNF drugs for systemic immune-mediated diseases that developed a multicentric microbiologically confirmed active TB with concurrent intraocular involvement.Three patients were recorded. Screening for TB before starting anti-TNF resulted negative in two patients. The other patient had received anti-tuberculous treatment in the past. All showed a microbiologically confirmed extraocular TB after unexpected atypical reactivation of the uveitis shifting to chronic granulomatous pattern.Specialists should be aware of TB reactivation, even with previous negative screening, when ocular uveitis signs and activity do not match with the expected pattern in a patient on anti-TNF drugs.

Is chemoprophylaxis necessary for all latent tuberculosis infection patients receiving IL-17 inhibitors? A cohort study

The tuberculosis (TB) burden is high in China, with a 32% prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in Beijing. Screening for LTBI and the chemoprophylaxis of positive patients are recommended prior to biologic therapy. To evaluate the TB-related safety of secukinumab (SEC) in a cohort of plaque psoriasis patients with LTBI receiving different treatments. Plaque psoriasis patients eligible for SEC treatment were screened for TB. LTBI patients (QuantiFeron-TB test positive, QFT+) receiving SEC were closely monitored by chest radiograph, ESR or hs-CRP, and blood counts every 12 to 20 weeks for active TB infection. QFT_patients receiving SEC treatment were screened for LTBI every 6 to 12 months. Of 42 patients treated with SEC, 19 were QFT+ (45.24%). A QFT_patient became QFT+ after 6 months treatment. Two patients started SEC treatment from 2015 to 2016 and were followed up 268 and 216 weeks later, respectively. Three patients received chemoprophylaxis, 17 did not because of safety concerns or being unable to complete the process. During the 16- to 268-week follow-up, no signs of TB reactivation were observed in the 20 LTBI patients receiving SEC. Plaque psoriasis patients with LTBI who received no chemoprophylaxis could be safely treated with SEC.

Ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: revisiting screening of latent tuberculosis infection and its follow-up during anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in an endemic area

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively evaluate the performance and distinctive pattern of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) screening and treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) under anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy and determine the relevance of re-exposure and other risk factors for TB development.

METHODS

A total of 135 and 83 patients with AS and PsA, respectively, were evaluated for LTBI treatment before receiving anti-TNF drugs via the tuberculin skin test (TST), chest radiography, and TB exposure history assessment. All subjects were evaluated for TB infection at 3-month intervals.

RESULTS

The patients with AS were more often treated for LTBI than were those with PsA (42% versus 30%, p=0.043). The former also presented a higher frequency of TST positivity (93% versus 64%, p=0.002), although they had a lower frequency of exposure history (18% versus 52%, p=0.027) and previous TB (0.7% versus 6%, p=0.03). During follow-up [median, 5.8 years; interquartile range (1QR), 2.2-9.0 years], 11/218 (5%) patients developed active TB (AS, n=7; PsA, n=4). TB re-exposure was the main cause in seven patients (64%) after 12 months of therapy (median, 21.9 months; IQR, 14.2-42.8 months) and five LTBI-negative patients. TB was identified within the first year in four patients (36.3%) (median, 5.3 months; IQR, 1.2-8.8 months), two of whom were LTBI-positive. There was no difference in the TB-free survival according to the anti-TNF drug type/class; neither synthetic drug nor prednisone use was related to TB occurrence (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Known re-exposure is the most critical factor for incident TB cases in spondyloarthritis. There are also some distinct features in AS and PsA LTBI screening, considering the higher frequency of LTBI and TST positivities in patients with AS. Annual risk reassessment taking into consideration these peculiar features and including the TST should be recommended for patients in endemic countries.

QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube test can be used for screening latent tuberculosis before biological treatment in a Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-vaccinated country: the HUR-BIO single-center real-life results

OBJECTIVES

The Turkish population is vaccinated with Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and the BCG vaccination decreases the specificity of the tuberculin skin test (TST). The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of active tuberculosis (TBC) among rheumatic patients who were screened only with the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test for latent TBC prior to biological treatment.

METHODS

The Hacettepe University Biological Database (HUR-BIO) was used for latent TBC assessment. Consecutive patients were evaluated from July 2015 to October 2016 by a questionnaire that included the patients' demographic characteristics, treatment history, and symptoms of active TBC. A total of 664 patients were interviewed by physicians. TBC statuses of the 671 non-interviewed patients were checked from the Turkish National Tuberculosis Registry records. Mean TBC incidence per year was calculated for anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents.

RESULTS

A total of 1335 (58.2% female) patients with the mean age of 44.2 ± 12.9 years were included. Of the patients, 836 (62.6%) had spondyloarthropathy, 432 (32.4%) had rheumatoid arthritis, and 67 (5%) had other rheumatologic diseases. The total biological drug exposure was 2292 patient-years (2043 patient-years for anti-TNF-α, 249 patient-years for non-TNF-α inhibitors). Positive and indeterminate QFT-GIT results were found in 258 (19.3%) and 23 (1.7%) patients, respectively. The median follow-up time after the onset of biological agent was 19.4 months (IQR = 29.5). Pulmonary TBC was found in 3 (0.2%) of the 1335 patients. The annual incidence of TBC was 147/100,000 patient-years for all TNF-α inhibitors (249/100,000 and 123/100,000 patient-years for QFT-GIT-positive and negative patients, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

TBC incidence increased by nearly seven times the Turkish national TBC incidence. The QFT-GIT Test appears acceptable to determine latent TBC before biological agent use. Consequently, the QFT-GIT Test can be appropriately used in BCG-vaccinated countries. Key Points • Our study contributes to filling the gap in the literature by reflecting real-life data about TBC frequency after QFT-GIT use in patients receiving biological agents. • The frequency of active TBC will remain within acceptable limits when only QFT-GIT is used in the screening of latent TBC prior to the use of biological agents in a population where the majority are vaccinated with BCG. • Using the QFT-GIT alone for latent TBC screening prior to biologic treatment in countries with high BCG vaccination rates reduces the number of patients needing isoniazid (INH) treatment.

Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in patients receiving biologic agents

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection is recommended in patients receiving biologics. However, evidence is weak regarding the efficacy of treatment regimens in this population, and the real-world practice pattern has not been elucidated.

METHODS

Using a large-scale health insurance claims database in Japan, we identified patients who started treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or other biologics. Treatment with isoniazid within 12 months of starting a biologic was summarized to evaluate the duration of treatment for latent tuberculosis infection and the time between start of isoniazid and initiation of a biologic.

RESULTS

Among 2064 patients starting biologics, 10% received treatment for latent tuberculosis infection with isoniazid. Among the patients with biologics and isoniazid, isoniazid was started in the same month as initiating biologics or 1 month before in 82%. In addition to the recommended 6- and 9-month treatments, 20% of patients were receiving isoniazid at 12 months after starting treatment and 20% received a prescription for 350 days or more.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients starting biologics, treatment for latent tuberculosis infection was provided for different durations, including not only the recommended periods but also longer periods. Research on safety and effectiveness of the treatment in this population is necessary.

Infectious complications of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis during targeted and biological therapies: a viewpoint in 2020

Biological therapies have improved the outcomes of several major inflammatory, autoimmune and also neoplastic disorders. Those directed towards cytokines or other soluble mediators, cell-surface molecules or receptors or various components of intracellular signalling pathways may be associated with the occurrence of infections whose diversity depends on the particular immune target. In this context and following a keynote lecture given by one of us at the European League Against Rheumatism meeting on June 2018, a multidisciplinary group of experts deeply involved in the use of targeted and biological therapies in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis decided to summarise their recent vision of the immunological basis and epidemiology of infections occurring during targeted and biological therapies, and provide useful indications for their management and prevention.

Pharmacovigilance of Biopharmaceuticals in Rheumatic Diseases, Adverse Events, Evolution, and Perspective: An Overview

Since we have gained an understanding of the immunological pathophysiology of rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, treatment based on biological drugs has become a fundamental axis. These therapies are oriented towards the regulation of cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, and the modulation of cell-mediated immunity (B cells and T cells) by anti CD20 or anti CTAL-4 agents, and can increase the risk of associated infections or adverse events (AE). In this context, the entry of biotherapeutics represented a challenge for pharmacovigilance, risk management and approval by the main global regulatory agencies regarding biosimilars, where efficacy and safety are based on comparability exercises without being an exact copy in terms of molecular structure. The objective of this review is divided into three fundamental aspects: (i) to illustrate the evolution and focus of pharmacovigilance at the biopharmaceutical level, (ii) to describe the different approved recommendations of biopharmaceuticals (biological and biosimilars) and their use in rheumatic diseases (RDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other less frequent RD like cryopyrin-associated autoinflammatory syndromes (CAPS), and (iii) to identify the main AE reported in the post-marketing phase of RD biopharmaceuticals.

Mycobacterial infections due to PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors that block programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have improved outcomes for many cancer subtypes but do exhibit toxicity, in the form of immune-related adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the emerging toxicities of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors including acute or reactivation of tuberculosis (TB) and atypical mycobacterial infection (AMI).

METHODS

This study was completed as a retrospective review using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) for incidence of TB and AMI due to PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors compared with other FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved drugs. The statistical methods included disproportionality signal analysis using the reporting OR (ROR) to compare cases. The 95% Wald CI was reported to assess the precision of the ROR.

RESULTS

Out of the 10 146 481 adverse events (AEs) reported to FAERS for all drugs between 1 January 2015 and 31 March 2020, 73 886 AEs were due to the five FDA approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Seventy-two cases of TB were due to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Specifically, 45 cases (62.5%) due to nivolumab, 18 (25%) due to pembrolizumab, 5 (7%) due to atezolizumab and 4 (5.5%) due to durvalumab. There were 13 cases of AMI: 9 (69.3%) due to nivolumab, 2 (15.3%) due to pembrolizumab and 1 (7.7%) each due to durvalumab and atezolizumab. Avelumab was not attributed to any AE of TB or AMI. From analysis of the FAERS database, the calculated ROR for TB due to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was 1.79 (95% CI, 1.42 to 2.26) (p<0.0001) and for AMI was 5.49 (95% CI, 3.15 to 9.55) (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors used in the treatment of cancer subtypes is associated with increased TB and AMI risk. Although this complication is rare, clinicians using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors should be aware of the risks.

Herpes Zoster, Hepatitis C, and Tuberculosis Risk with Apremilast Compared to Biologics, DMARDs and Corticosteroids to Treat Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Purpose

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are associated with an increased infection risk. In this cohort study of patients with treated psoriasis or PsA, we used MarketScan (2014–2018) to estimate rates of herpes zoster, hepatitis C (HepC) and tuberculosis (TB) with apremilast compared to other systemic treatments.

Materials and Methods

Patients were exposed from first apremilast [APR], DMARD, TNF-inhibitor [TNF], IL-inhibitor [IL], or corticosteroids [CS] prescription after March 21, 2014. Study exposures were APR, DMARDs only, TNF-only, IL-only, CS-only, DMARDs+CS, TNF+DMARDs and/or CS, IL+DMARDs and/or CS. Cases had treated herpes zoster, HepC, or TB event. We calculated incidence rates (IRs) [95% confidence intervals] per 1000 patient-years.

Results

The study population included 131,604 patients. For herpes zoster (N=2271), IRs were highest for users of DMARDs+CS (12.5 [9.8–15.7]), CS-only (12.5 [10.4–14.1]), and TNF+DMARDs and/or CS (11.9 [10.6–13.4]), compared with DMARDs only (9.9 [8.7–11.2]). IRs were lowest for users of IL-only (6.7 [5.8–7.8]) and APR (7.0 [5.8–8.4]). IRs of HepC (N=150) and TB (N=81) were low and between-treatment differences were not significant.

Conclusion

Rates of herpes zoster varied by treatment: highest among those who received polytherapy, lowest in users of apremilast only. IRs for HepC and TB were low for all exposures.

Infection risk in patients undergoing treatment for inflammatory arthritis: non-biologics versus biologics

Introduction: Despite the therapeutic effectiveness of biologics targeting immune cells or cytokines in patients with inflammatory arthritis, which reflects their pathogenic roles, an increased infection risk is observed in those undergoing biological treatment. However, there are limited data regarding the comparison of infection risks in inflammatory arthritis patients treated with non-biologics (csDMARDs), biologics (bDMARDs), including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and non-TNF inhibitors, or targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs.Areas covered: Through a review of English-language literature as of 30 June 2019, we focus on the existing evidence on the risk of infections caused by bacteria, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and hepatitis virus in inflammatory arthritis patients undergoing treatment with csDMARDs, bDMARDs, or tsDMARDs.Expert opinion: While the risks of bacterial and mycobacterial infection are increased in arthritis patients treated with csDMARDs, the risks are further higher in those receiving bDMARDs therapy, particularly TNF inhibitors. Regarding HBV infection, antiviral therapy may effectively prevent HBV reactivation in patients receiving bDMARDs, especially rituximab. However, more data are needed to establish effective preventive strategies for HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients. It seems safe to use cyclosporine and TNF inhibitors in patients with HCV infection, while those undergoing rituximab therapies should be frequently monitored for HCV activity.Abbreviations: ABT: abatacept; ADA: adalimumab; AS: ankylosing spondylitis; bDMARDs: biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; CKD: chronic kidney disease; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CS: corticosteroids; CsA: cyclosporine A; csDMARDs: conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; CZP: certolizumab; DAAs: direct-acting antiviral agents; DM: diabetes mellitus; DOT: directly observed therapy; EIN: Emerging Infections Network; ETN: etanercept; GOL: golimumab; GPRD: General Practice Research Database; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HBVr: HBV reactivation; HBsAg+: HBsAg-positive; HBsAg-/anti-HBc+: HBsAg-negative anti-HBc antibodies-positive; HCV: hepatitis C virus; HCQ: hydroxychloroquine: IFX: infliximab; IL-6: interleukin-6; JAK: Janus kinase; LEF: leflunomide; LTBI: latent tuberculosis infection; mAb: monoclonal antibody; MTX: methotrexate; OR: odds ratio; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; PMS: post-marketing surveillance; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; TNFi: tumor necrosis factor inhibitor; SCK: secukinumab; SSZ: sulfasalazine; TOZ: tocilizumab; RCT: randomized controlled trial; RR: relative risk; RTX: rituximab; 3HP: 3-month once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine; TB: tuberculosis; tsDMARDs: targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; UTK: ustekinumab; WHO: World Health Organization.

Incidence of tuberculosis in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy for rheumatic diseases: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The TNF inhibitors were the first immunobiologicals used to treat rheumatic diseases, but their use is associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis. The primary objective is to estimate the incidence of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatic diseases exposed to anti-TNF therapy. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the incidence of tuberculosis by region and subgroups of diseases, to review the presentation of tuberculosis in these patients, and to assess the time elapsed between onset of anti-TNF therapy and development of active granulomatous disease.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and LILACS. The primary endpoint was described as incidence and secondary outcomes, through subgroup analyses and comparisons of means.

RESULTS

We included 52 observational studies. Among the exposed patients, 947 cases of tuberculosis were documented (62.2% pulmonary), with a cumulative incidence of 9.62 cases per 1000 patients exposed. TB incidence across different continents was distributed as follows: South America, 11.75 cases/1000 patients exposed; North America, 4.34 cases/1000 patients exposed; Europe, 6.28 cases/1000 patients exposed; and Asia, 13.47 cases/1000 patients exposed. There were no significant differences in TB incidence among the described diseases. The mean time elapsed from start of anti-TNF therapy until the endpoint was 18.05 months.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of TB in patients with rheumatic diseases exposed TNF inhibitor considering all countries was 9.62 cases per 1000 patients exposed. TB incidence was higher in South America and Asia compared with North America and Europe. Most cases occurred in the first XX months of use, and the pulmonary form predominated.Key Points• Higher incidence of tuberculosis in patients exposed to anti-TNF compared with the general population.• Higher incidence of TB in countries of South America and Asia compared with North America and Europe.

A population-based study of tuberculosis incidence among rheumatic disease patients under anti-TNF treatment

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The advent of immunobiologic therapy with TNF inhibitors agents, has been associated with a significant increase in incident cases of tuberculosis in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of tuberculosis in patients receiving TNF inhibitors therapy for rheumatic diseases. As secondary objectives, we sought to evaluate mortality and the clinical impact of screening for latent tuberculosis infection.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with rheumatic diseases of Public Health System from the Brazilian state, a high TB incidence area, who received prescriptions of TNF inhibitors agents between 2006 and 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 5853 rheumatic disease patients were included. Patients were predominantly women (68.7%) aged 49.5 (± 14.7) years old. Forty-three cases of TB were found (2.86 cases per 1000 person-years; 18 times higher than in the general population). Adalimumab and certolizumab users presented a higher risk for TB development compared to etanercept users (RR: 3.11, 95%CI 1.16-8.35; 7.47, 95%CI 1.39-40.0, respectively). In a subgroup of patients, screening for latent tuberculosis infection was performed in 86% of patients, and 30.2% had a positive tuberculin skin test. Despite latent TB treatment, TB was diagnosed in 2 out of 74 (2.7%) patients. Overall, TB diagnosis did not increase mortality.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study of rheumatic disease patients from a high incident area, TNF inhibitor exposure was associated with an 18-time increased TB incidence. Adalimumab and certolizumab were associated with greater and earlier TB diagnosis compared to etanercept.

Tuberculosis in biologic users for rheumatic diseases: results from the South African Biologics Registry (SABIO)

Objectives

To evaluate the rate of tuberculosis (TB) in biologic users for rheumatic diseases in South Africa, the effectiveness of our latent TB infection (LTBI) programme, risk factors and outcome.

Methods

TB cases were collected from the South African Biologics Registry (SABIO), rheumatologists and pharmaceutical companies. Demographics, LTBI screening and treatment, biological and disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapies, TB diagnosis and outcomes were recorded.

Results

96 TB cases were collected from 1999 to June 2017: rheumatoid arthritis 55, ankylosing spondylitis 27, psoriatic arthritis 4, and juvenile inflammatory arthritis 10. The TB rate was 1240/100 000 person years for biologic users (n=96) versus the biologic naive cohort of 0/100 000 years with an incidence rate difference of 0.0124 (p<0.0001). 60/96 had pulmonary and 36/96 had extra-pulmonary TB. Reactivation TB occurred in 45/96 cases. TB occurred in all biologics licenced in South Africa, the majority in monoclonal inhibitors (1683/100 000 person years) compared with etanercept (861/100 000 person years) and non-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (681/100 000 person years). The incidence rate ratio for monoclonal inhibitors compared with etanercept was 1.96 (p=0.005) and 2.47 (p=0.002) compared with non-TNF inhibitors with no significant difference between non-TNF inhibitors and etanercept (p=0.336). From those (12.9%) who screened LTBI positive, 14 developed TB, while the majority (77) screened LTBI negative. Black race, male sex, younger age and residence in the Western Cape were statistical risk factors. Two drug resistant TB cases and six deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Reactivation and new onset TB is a significant risk for all biologics users in SA. Screening for LTBI is an imperative preventative strategy.

[Interpretation of tuberculosis and hepatitis screening before immunosuppressive treatment]

An unrecognized latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) may be reactivated under immunosuppressive therapy and become life threatening. Diagnosing LTBI requires the combination of targeted patient history and physical examination with the results of an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and in addition, a chest X‑ray is needed to rule out active tuberculosis. Established therapies for LTBI reduce the reactivation risk by approximately 80%. For the initial screening of an HBV infection HBsAg and anti-HBc are determined. Hereby, HBsAg carriers (high HBV reactivation risk, indications for antiviral prophylaxis) and serologically resolved HBV infections (low HBV reactivation risk, use of prophylaxis only in high-risk immunosuppression) can be reliably detected. A previously unrecognized HCV infection, with an increased risk of developing liver cirrhosis during immunosuppression, can be detected in screening by anti-HCV antibodies and be successfully treated with antivirals without interferon.

Mycobacterial Infections With Ruxolitinib: A Retrospective Pharmacovigilance Review

BACKGROUND

Ruxolitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKI) 1/2 approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) and polycythemia vera (PV). These patients may be at risk for developing opportunistic infections. We assessed the number of patients that developed typical (Mycobacterium tuberculosis [MTB]) and atypical mycobacterial infections (AMI) while on treatment with ruxolitinib by utilizing the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse events reporting system (FAERS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study utilizing FAERS, a pharmacovigilance database. We queried FAERS for cases of MTB and AMI secondary to ruxolitinib between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018. Disproportionality signal analysis was done by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR). ROR was considered significant when the lower limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) was > 1.

RESULTS

There were 91 reported cases of MTB associated with ruxolitinib compared with 4575 cases from all other drugs. The ROR was significant at 9.2 (95% CI, 7.5-11.4). There were 23 reports of AMI with ruxolitinib compared with 1287 reported with all other drugs. The ROR was significant at 8.3 (95% CI, 5.5-12.6). Twelve (13.2%) patients with MTB and 8 (34.8%) with AMI died.

CONCLUSION

Patients on ruxolitinib are at increased risk of developing MTB and AMI. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and consider screening patients for latent MTB prior to initiating ruxolitinib.

The role of registries in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

Registries characterize the effectiveness and safety of therapeutic interventions in daily clinical practice. Data from registries enable mining the records of tens of thousands of patients towards determining the effectiveness, safety, and cost-benefit of any given therapeutic. The strengths of registries include real-life settings, greater power than clinical trials to detect rare events, and the study of multiple outcomes and several research questions. Registries also have their weaknesses. They are expensive, less accurate than clinical trials, affected by channelling bias, often require links to external sources or use historic and selected control cohorts or combine datasets to increase power, and have the risk of multiple confounders. Since the beginning of biological era, registries were developed to profile emerging treatments. This article reviews the role of registries in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Practical Guidelines for Managing Patients With Psoriasis on Biologics: An Update

The paradigm for treating inflammatory diseases has shifted dramatically in the past 10 to 20 years with the discovery of targeted therapeutics or "biologic" agents. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis, and psoriasis, among others, are reaping the benefits of decades of bench to bedside research, allowing them to live more productive lives with less side effects than traditional systemic therapies. Despite these advances, many physicians unfamiliar with biologics are left to care for the basic needs of these patients and may be unaware of the multisystem comorbidities associated with psoriasis and the screening, monitoring, and other special considerations required of biologics patients. This can be overwhelming to primary care physicians and inadvertently expose patients to undue risks. The aim of this review is to provide a practical approach for all health care providers caring for patients with psoriasis being treated with biologics to facilitate communication with their treating dermatologist and ultimately provide patients with more comprehensive care.

Tuberculosis, hepatitis B and herpes zoster in tofacitinib-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis

There is currently interest in the risk of infections during treatment with new targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), specifically the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib. Tofacitinib has been studied extensively in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and has been shown to be effective and generally safe. East Asian countries have a high background rate of tuberculosis (TB) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the risk of recurrence or reactivation of infections such as TB, HBV and herpes zoster during DMARD therapy is of particular interest in the region. This paper reviews available data on the risk of TB, HBV and herpes zoster infections, including recurrence/reactivation of infections, during treatment with tofacitinib, with a focus on east Asia.

2018 APLAR axial spondyloarthritis treatment recommendations

INTRODUCTION

Despite the availability of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) recommendations proposed by various rheumatology societies, we considered that a region-specific guideline was of substantial added value to clinicians of the Asia-Pacific region, given the wide variations in predisposition to infections and other patient factors, local practice patterns, and access to treatment across countries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic reviews were undertaken of English-language articles published between 2000 and 2016, identified from MEDLINE using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The strength of available evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Recommendations were developed through consensus using the Delphi technique.

RESULTS

Fourteen axial SpA treatment recommendations were developed based on evidence summaries and consensus. The first 2 recommendations cover non-pharmacological approaches to management. Recommendations 3 to 5 describe the following: the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as first-line symptomatic treatment; the avoidance of long-term corticosteroid use; and the utility of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for peripheral or extra-articular manifestations. Recommendation 6 refers to the indications for biological DMARDs (bDMARDs). Recommendation 7 deals specifically with screening for infections endemic to Asia, prior to use of bDMARDs. Recommendations 7 to 13 cover the role of bDMARDs in the treatment of active axial SpA and include related issues such as continuing therapy and use in special populations. Recommendation 14 deals with the utility of surgical intervention in axial SpA.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations provide up-to-date guidance for treatment of axial SpA to help meet the needs of patients and clinicians in the Asia-Pacific region.

2018 update of the APLAR recommendations for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

AIM

To update recommendations based on current best evidence concerning the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), focusing particularly on the role of targeted therapies, to inform clinicians on new developments that will impact their current practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of relevant literature from 2014 to 2016 concerning targeted therapies in RA was conducted. The RA Update Working Group evaluated the evidence and proposed updated recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach, to describe the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Recommendations were finalized through consensus using the Delphi technique.

RESULTS

This update provides 16 RA treatment recommendations based on current best evidence and expert clinical opinion. Recommendations 1-3 deal with the use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The next three recommendations (4-6) cover the need for screening and management of infections and comorbid conditions prior to starting targeted therapy, while the following seven recommendations focus on use of these agents. We address choice of targeted therapy, switch, tapering and discontinuation. The last three recommendations elaborate on targeted therapy for RA in special situations such as pregnancy, cancer, and major surgery.

CONCLUSION

Rheumatoid arthritis remains a significant health problem in the Asia-Pacific region. Patients with RA can benefit from the availability of effective targeted therapies, and these updated recommendations provide clinicians with guidance on their use.

Relative risk of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatic diseases managed with anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha therapy: A nationwide cohort study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapy is known to raise the risk of granulomatous infections, leading to development of risk management strategies at national or global level. This study aimed to determine the relative risk (RR) of tuberculosis (TB) due to anti-TNF-α usage in patients with rheumatologic diseases (RDs) in a nationwide basis.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study included patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that treated with or without anti-TNF-α agents, as registered in the national prescription information system between years 2013 and 2015. Two-year RR of TB after anti-TNF-α therapy initiation was calculated in this RD population, including main subgroups.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The study cohort included 413 500 RD patients, where anti-TNF-α(+) arm (n = 2117) had mean age of 41.9 ± 13.4 years and male distribution of 54.3%. Four patients among anti-TNF-α users developed TB compared to 128 patients in anti-TNF-α-naïve group (189 vs 31 cases per 100 000 patients, respectively), yielding a 2-year RR of 6.07 (95% CI, 2.25-16.42) with an attributable risk of 0.16%. These RRs (95% CI), which were particularly pronounced, were 5.39 (1.69-7.17) in men, 6.12 (2.26-16.55) in adults, and 5.70 (1.41-23.08) in RA and 13.46 (1.58-114.40) in PsA patients. There was no difference between the anti-TNF-α users who developed and undeveloped TB regarding drug utilization characteristics, except significantly less immunosuppressive drug exposure in TB patients.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This study is the first prescription-based nationwide study to suggest an elevated RR of TB in a comparably younger population with a broad spectrum of RDs managed with any approved anti-TNF-α drug in Turkey.

Tuberculin test conversion in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis receiving biological therapy

OBJECTIVE

The blockade of inflammatory mediators produced by biological therapies is associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections, as for example Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MT). Given the endemic situation of tuberculosis (TB) in some countries and immunosuppression/anergy of patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis, we wonder whether it is necessary to monitor the MT infection after starting the biological treatment. To evaluate the frequency of the tuberculin skin test (TST) conversion and its association with an active TB infection and other disease variables.

METHODS

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and spondyloarthritis (SpA) receiving treatment with anti-TNF, tocilizumab, and/or abatacept agents were included into the study. Patients had to have a negative TST (<5 mm) at the baseline, and a second TST was performed 2-22 months after the initiation of biologic therapy. The TST conversion was considered as a variation ≥5 mm between the two TSTs performed within an interval between 2 months and 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients were included into the study, and 78.8% were women, with a median schooling duration of 12 years. A total of 74.1% of patients had RA, 16.5% psoriatic arthritis, and 4.7% AIJ and ankylosing spondylitis. Regarding treatment, 75.3% received anti-TNF therapy (31.8% etanercept, 21.2% adalimumab, 17.6% infliximab, 3.5% golimumab, and 1.2% certolizumab), 15.3% tocilizumab, and 9.4% abatacept. Eight patients (9.4%) developed a TST conversion. The shift was more frequent in men (62.5%) than in women (37.5%) (p=0.009), and in those with a prolonged disease duration (X 226±109 vs X130±105 [p=0.017]). This association remained after adjusting for other variables. All patients who developed a TST conversion received prophylactic isoniazid, and only one patient with other risk factors developed active TB.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of a TST conversion in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis was low and was associated with male gender and longer disease duration.

Special aspects of biologics treatment in psoriasis: management in pregnancy, lactation, surgery, renal impairment, hepatitis and tuberculosis

Background of the article: Biologics are modern immunomodulatory drugs, whose use in the treatment of psoriasis has led to remarkable results in psoriatic patients. The administration of these agents in special population groups, such as patients with chronic infections and renal impairment, as well as perioperative, pregnant or lactating patients, has not been thoroughly addressed, mostly because these patients are excluded from clinical studies. Materials and methods: This report is an updated systematic overview of the use of biologics in the above-mentioned types of patients and was conducted according to the PRISMA Guidelines for systematic reviews. Articles derived from the databases PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS, published between 1999 and 2018, were analyzed for the study. Results: Research efforts as well as clinical reporting are necessary in order to provide more insight on the management of these therapeutic dilemmas. Conclusion: The aim of this review, other than providing a summarized update on the clinical knowledge on this special topic, is also to raise awareness for the need to conduct larger systematic studies in order to adequately evaluate the use of biologics in these special patient categories and therefore draw definite conclusions on their safety profile.

Serial Tuberculin Skin Tests Improve the Detection of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

AIM

To assess the likelihood of detecting latent tuberculosis infection [LTBI] by the positive conversion of a serial tuberculin skin test [TST] at 1 year in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients with negative baseline two-step TST.

METHODS

In this multicentre prospective cohort study, we evaluated rate and predictors of conversion of TST at 1 year in patients with negative baseline TST. We also evaluated management of patients who had a positive TST at baseline or a conversion at 1 year. In all patients we assessed TB cases occurring during follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 192 IBD patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] and 220 IBD controls not receiving anti-TNF, 35 [8.5%, 95% CI 5.7-11.3] had positive conversion (median TST induration 13 mm, interquartile range [IQR] 9-16). Ten anti-TNF cohort patients [5.2%, 95% CI 2.5-9.5] versus 25 controls [11.4%, 95% CI 7.5-16.3] had TST conversion [p = 0.029]. In multivariate analysis, conversion was associated with smoking habit (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95% CI 1.08-3.97; p = 0.028). Anti-TNF-treated patients had a lower conversion rate [OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.83; p = 0.013]. The likelihood of conversion correlates with fewer immunosuppressive therapies between baseline TST and TST at 1 year [p = 0.042]. One case of active TB [isoniazid-resistant strain] occurred in a patient with positive baseline TST receiving anti-TNF [0.05 events/100 patient-years].

CONCLUSIONS

Serial TST at 1 year can detect LTBI in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy with negative baseline TST. Serial TST seems to be advisable to reduce the risk of TB cases associated with inability to detect LTBI in pre-treatment screening.

Risk of infection associated with anti-TNF-α therapy

INTRODUCTION

The advent, more than two decades ago, of monoclonal antibodies and soluble receptors targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α has revolutionized the therapeutic approach to otherwise difficult-to-treat autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. However, due to the pleiotropic functions played by this pro-inflammatory cytokine (with particular relevance in granuloma maintenance), TNF-α blockade may increase the incidence of serious infections. Areas covered: The present review summarizes the biological rationale supporting the impact of anti-TNF-α therapy on the host's susceptibility to infection. The structure, mode of action, and indications of available agents are reviewed, as well as the clinical evidence coming from clinical trials and observational registries. We discuss the impact of patient- and disease-related factors influencing the occurrence of infection. Finally, strategies for risk minimization are also covered, with particular attention to recommendations for screening of latent tuberculosis infection and management of chronic hepatitis B infection. Expert commentary: Methodological limitations (confounding by indication bias, patient dropout, or switching therapies) should be considered when interpreting observational data. Clinicians must individualize the infection risk assessment not only on the basis of the specific anti-TNF-α agent used or the expected duration of therapy, but also by taking into account the baseline susceptibility of a given patient.

A Prospective Study to Monitor for Tuberculosis During Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapies have revolutionised the treatment of immune-mediated diseases including inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] and rheumatological disorders. However, biologic treatments are associated with an increased risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis. Data from regular monitoring for latent tuberculosis infection [LTBI] during biologic treatment are lacking.

METHODS

Consecutive patients eligible for biologic therapies were screened for LTBI and prospectively followed up for 3 years. Incidence and risk factors of latent tuberculosis tests conversion (interferon gamma release assays [IGRA], tuberculin skin tests [TST], and chest radiography [CXR]) with clinical outcomes were studied.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients [83 IBD; 25 rheumatological disorders] were included. At baseline, 18/108 [16.7%] patients [five IBD; 13 rheumatological disorders] were tested positive for LTBI. Of these, 14/18 [77.8%] patients received isoniazid monotherapy for 9 months. Of the remainder, 17/90 [18.9%] patients had LTBI test conversion while on biologic therapies and of these 14/17 [82.4%] received isoniazid monotherapy for 9 months. Age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use, travel history, disease type, and immunosuppressive therapy were not associated with LTBI test conversion. In subjects with IGRA conversion, serial IGRA levels normalised after completion of isoniazid except in one patient whose IGRA remained persistently elevated despite isoniazid and who subsequently developed active TB.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion of LTBI is common and occurred early during biologic therapy in an area with intermediate TB burden. Subjects with latent TB tests conversion and persistently high IGRA levels may have an increased risk of TB reactivation or development of active TB, and they require close observation or intensive workup for active TB.

Patients immunodéprimés, quel pathogène pour quel déficit immunitaire ? (en dehors de l’infection à VIH)

Le nombre de patients immunodéprimés ne cesse d’augmenter en raison de l’amélioration du pronostic global du cancer et de l’utilisation croissante d’immunosuppresseurs tant en transplantation qu’au cours des maladies auto-immunes. Les infections sévères restent la première cause d’admission en réanimation dans cette population et sont dominées par les atteintes respiratoires. On distingue les déficits primitifs, volontiers révélés dans l’enfance, des déficits secondaires (médicamenteux ou non), les plus fréquents. Dans tous les cas, les sujets sont exposés à des infections inhabituelles de par leur fréquence, leur type et leur sévérité. À côté des pyogènes habituels, les infections opportunistes et la réactivation d’infections latentes font toute la complexité de la démarche diagnostique. Celle-ci doit être rigoureuse, orientée par le type de déficit, les antécédents, les prophylaxies éventuelles et la présentation clinicoradiologique. Elle permettra seule de guider le traitement probabiliste et les examens étiologiques, l’absence de diagnostic étant associée à une mortalité élevée.

Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients who are Candidate for Biological Therapies in Spain? A Multidisciplinary Survey

INTRODUCTION

Treatment with biological therapies increases the incidence of tuberculous disease. The introduction of systematic screening for latent tuberculosis infection in patients who are to receive these therapies has reduced this risk. In 2016, the consensus document on the prevention and treatment of tuberculosis in patients who are candidates for biological treatment was published in Spain. The main objective of this study was to evaluate adherence to these guidelines.

METHODS

Multicenter, descriptive, observational study via an anonymous online survey sent to medical societies involved in biologics.

RESULTS

We received 747 responses. Most respondents performed screening at the right time in the right patients (93.7%). Only 36.6% of respondents requested the appropriate diagnostic test, while 56.3% correctly recommended chemoprophylaxis. Up to 96% were familiar with the recommended chemoprophylaxis regimens, while only 63.9% initiated them at the right time. The specialist area that participated most and screened most patients for latent tuberculosis infection was rheumatology (54%). In most cases, pulmonologists were involved in an advisory capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows poor overall adherence to recommendations, with only 56% of respondents reporting appropriate compliance. The incidence of tuberculous disease in patients who are to receive biological therapies could be reduced further by emphasizing the importance of the right diagnostic test and use of the diagnostic algorithm for latent tuberculosis infection.

Preventive therapy for tuberculosis in rheumatological patients undergoing therapy with biological drugs

INTRODUCTION

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) accounts for almost a quarter of the world population, and, in 5-10% of the subjects with impaired immune-response against M. tuberculosis growth, it may progress to active tuberculosis (TB). In this review, we focus on the need to propose a screening for LTBI including preventive therapy offer in rheumatic patients undergoing therapy with biological drugs. Areas covered: We report on evidence that biologics are associated with an increased risk of active TB reactivation. This effect seems to be mainly limited to treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, while non-anti-TNF-targeted biologics are not likely associated to any increased risk. We introduce the concept that the patients' coexisting host-related risk factors, such as comorbidities, are crucial to identify those at higher risk to reactivate TB. We report that preventive TB therapy is well tolerated in patients treated with biological drugs. Expert commentary: Availability of non-anti-TNF targeted biologics, that are not associated with an increased risk of TB reactivation, offers a great opportunity to tailor a therapeutic intervention at low/absent TB risk. After proper LTBI screening investigations, preventive TB therapy has been demonstrated to be effective and well-tolerated to reduce the risk of TB reactivation in rheumatic patients requiring biological drugs.

[Infections during Immunosuppression]

Infections during Immunosuppression Abstract. Immunomodulating and immunosuppressive therapies are being used more and more frequently. Depending on the mechanism of action and the underlying disease, there is an increased risk of infection with these therapies. In everyday clinical practice, the individual risk of infection depends on a large number of patients, and environmental as well as pathogen-specific factors. Elderly and multimorbid patients are at particular risk of infection. Classical bacterial infections with possible atypical manifestation, hepatitis B virus, herpes viruses, mycobacteria and other granulomatous infections are prevalent. Typical clinical signs of infections may be missing and laboratory chemical parameters may fail as diagnostic tools. Systematic screening for latent or chronic infections prior to initiation and close monitoring of patients during immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy are necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality.