British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 index is valid for assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

[What is proven in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus?]

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with variable clinical presentation and organ involvement. Early diagnosis and rapid achievement of low disease activity or remission reduces organ damage and improves prognosis. Therapeutic principles can be divided into so-called basic measures and immunosuppressive treatment. Novel drugs have been developed in recent years, with new classes of agents being added for the treatment of SLE. These include biologic therapies and approved therapeutic options for the treatment of lupus nephritis. In light of improved treatment options, good disease control can now frequently be achieved; with savings on glucocorticoids, combination therapies are increasingly being used. Of great importance is the consistent use of basic measures, which include the use of hydroxychloroquine, optimization of cardiovascular risk factors, UV protection, bone-protective measures, and the implementation of vaccinations. In the treatment of lupus nephritis, conservative therapeutic measures for nephroprotection play a crucial role in renal prognosis. Finally, non-pharmacological therapy options such as exercise therapy are of great importance for improving quality of life.

Does baricitinib reduce disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Baricitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor that has recently been approved for treating certain autoimmune disorders. This meta-analysis pooled the conflicting results from all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We systemically searched four electronic databases. RCTs comparing baricitinib versus placebo were included. Our outcomes were pooled as the risk ratio (RR) in the random effects model. Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved a SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response. A total of three RCTs, comprising 1849 patients, were included. Baricitinib 4 mg was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients who attained SRI-4 response at week 24 (RR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.05, 1.35], P < 0.01). However, this did not reach statistical significance with baricitinib 4 mg at week 52 and baricitinib 2 mg at both week 24 and week 52 (RR = 1.13, 95% CI [0.96, 1.34], P = 0.15; RR = 1.09, 95% CI [0.96, 1.24], P = 0.20; RR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.92, 1.19], P = 0.50, respectively). The risk for serious infections was higher in the baricitinib 4 mg group (RR = 2.23, 95% CI [1.13, 4.37], P = 0.02). Baricitinib 2 mg did not show any clinical benefit. In contrast, baricitinib 4 mg might have the potential to reduce SLE disease activity; however, further research is required to evaluate its long-term efficacy. Until higher-quality evidence is developed, the benefits and risks of baricitinib should be considered before initiating its therapy. Key Points • Baricitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor that has recently been approved for treating certain autoimmune disorders; however, its efficacy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still inconclusive. • In our meta-analysis, baricitinib 2 mg did not show any clinical benefit. In contrast, baricitinib 4 mg significantly reduced SLE activity in terms of SRI-4 response at week 24. However, this did not reach statistical significance at week 52. • Further studies are required to investigate the long-term efficacy of baricitinib 4 mg in patients with SLE.

Obexelimab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Exploration of Response Based on Gene Pathway Co-Expression Patterns: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial

OBJECTIVE

Obexelimab is an investigational, bifunctional, noncytolytic monoclonal antibody that binds CD19 and FcyRIIb to inhibit B cells, plasmablasts, and plasma cells. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of obexelimab in the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

During screening, patients with active, non-organ-threatening SLE received corticosteroid injections to ameliorate symptoms while immunosuppressants were withdrawn (≤10 mg/day prednisone equivalent and ≤400 mg/day hydroxychloroquine allowed). Patients with improved disease activity were randomized 1:1 to obexelimab 5 mg/kg intravenously or placebo once every 2 weeks until week 32 or loss of improvement (LOI).

RESULTS

In this study, 104 patients were randomized. Analysis of the primary endpoint, proportion of patients reaching week 32 without LOI, used an efficacy-evaluable (EE) population defined as patients who completed the study or withdrew for flare or treatment-related toxicity. This endpoint did not reach statistical significance: 21 of 50 obexelimab-treated patients (42.0%) versus 12 of 42 patients (28.6%) treated with a placebo (P = 0.183). Time to LOI was increased in obexelimab-treated patients versus patients treated with a placebo in the EE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, P = 0.025) and intention-to-treat (HR 0.59, P = 0.062) populations. In obexelimab-treated patients, B cells decreased approximately 50%, and trough concentration and inclusion in baseline gene expression clusters with high B cell pathway modules were associated with increased time to LOI. Obexelimab was associated with infusion reactions but was generally safe and well-tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Although the primary endpoint was not reached, secondary analysis showed time to LOI was significantly increased in obexelimab-treated patients, and analysis of patient subsets defined by gene expression patterns at baseline suggests a responding subpopulation.

Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE: Are we there yet?

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a great heterogenicity in course and clinical manifestations. Although prognosis improved in the last decades of the 20th century, mortality remains higher than in the general population and uncontrolled disease activity and therapy-related adverse effects have been identified as major contributors to damage accrual and poor outcomes. Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE represents a great challenge even to the expert rheumatologist. Global disease activity indices are tools developed to assess activity across multiple organ systems. Several disease activity indices have been developed over the years, each with its own strengths and weaknesses, and knowing them is essential for understanding research studies, such as clinical trials, in which they are used. Organ-specific activity indices have been developed concurrently to represent organ involvement such as glomerulonephritis, cutaneous and musculoskeletal lupus manifestations. Regarding damage, the SLICC/ACR damage index has proven to be an effective tool for damage accrual assessment, yet not devoid of drawbacks. This review provides an overview of the most frequently utilized indices developed for the assessment of activity and damage in SLE highlighting their pros and cons when applied to the research and clinical setting.

[What is proven in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus?]

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with variable clinical presentation and organ involvement. Early diagnosis and rapid achievement of low disease activity or remission reduces organ damage and improves prognosis. Therapeutic principles can be divided into so-called basic measures and immunosuppressive treatment. Novel drugs have been developed in recent years, with new classes of agents being added for the treatment of SLE. These include biologic therapies and approved therapeutic options for the treatment of lupus nephritis. In light of improved treatment options, good disease control can now frequently be achieved; with savings on glucocorticoids, combination therapies are increasingly being used. Of great importance is the consistent use of basic measures, which include the use of hydroxychloroquine, optimization of cardiovascular risk factors, UV protection, bone-protective measures, and the implementation of vaccinations. In the treatment of lupus nephritis, conservative therapeutic measures for nephroprotection play a crucial role in renal prognosis. Finally, non-pharmacological therapy options such as exercise therapy are of great importance for improving quality of life.

Protocol for virtual physical examination in an observational, longitudinal study evaluating virtual outcome measures in SLE

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of data on the use of telemedicine (TM) in SLE. SLE outcome measures remain complex, and clinicians and clinical trialists have raised concerns about the accuracy of virtual disease activity measures. This study evaluates the level of agreement between virtual SLE outcome measures and face-to-face (F2F) encounter. Here, we describe the study design, virtual physical examination protocol and demographics for the first 50 patients evaluated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an observational, longitudinal study of 200 patients with SLE with varying levels of disease activity from 4 academic lupus centres serving diverse populations. Each study participant will be evaluated at a baseline and a follow-up visit. At each visit, participants are evaluated by the same physician first via a videoconference-based TM and then a F2F encounter. For this protocol, virtual physical examination guidelines relying on physician-directed patient self-examination were established. SLE disease activity measures will be completed immediately after the TM encounter and repeated after the F2F encounter for each visit. The degree of agreement between TM and F2F disease activity measures will be analysed using the Bland-Altman method. An interim analysis is planned after the enrolment of the first 50 participants.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been reviewed by the Columbia University Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB Protocol #: AAAT6574). The full results of this study will be published after the final data analysis of 200 patients. The abrupt shift to TM visits due to the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted clinical practice and clinical trials. Establishing a high level of agreement between SLE disease activity measures obtained with videoconference TM and F2F at the same time point, will allow for improved assessment of disease activity when F2F data cannot be acquired. This information may guide both medical decision-making and provide reliable outcome measures for clinical research.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies following vaccination are associated with lymphocyte count and serum immunoglobulins in SLE

OBJECTIVES

Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus are known to have dysregulated immune responses and may have reduced response to vaccination against COVID-19 while being at risk of severe COVID-19 disease. The aim of this study was to identify whether vaccine responses were attenuated in SLE and to assess disease- and treatment-specific associations.

METHODS

Patients with SLE were matched by age, sex and ethnic background to healthcare worker healthy controls (HC). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein antibodies were measured at 4-8 weeks following the second COVID-19 vaccine dose (either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) using a CE-marked combined ELISA detecting IgG, IgA and IgM (IgGAM). Antibody levels were considered as a continuous variable and in tertiles and compared between SLE patients and HC and associations with medication, disease activity and serological parameters were determined.

RESULTS

Antibody levels were lower in 43 SLE patients compared to 40 HC (p < 0.001). There was no association between antibody levels and medication, lupus disease activity, vaccine type or prior COVID infection. Higher serum IgA, but not IgG or IgM, was associated with being in a higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody level tertile (OR [95% CI] 1.820 [1.050, 3.156] p = 0.033). Similarly, higher lymphocyte count was also associated with being in a higher tertile of anti-SARS-CoV-2 (OR 3.330 [1.505, 7.366] p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients with SLE have lower antibody levels following 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines compared to HC. In SLE lower lymphocyte counts and serum IgA levels are associated with lower antibody levels post vaccination, potentially identifying a subgroup of patients who may therefore be at increased risk of infection.

The BILAG-2004 index is associated with development of new damage in SLE

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether BILAG-2004 index is associated with the development of damage in a cohort of SLE patients. Mortality and development of damage were examined.

METHODS

This was a multicentre longitudinal study. Patients were recruited within 12 months of achieving fourth ACR classification criterion for SLE. Data were collected on disease activity, damage, SLE-specific drug exposure, cardiovascular risk factors, antiphospholipid syndrome status and death at every visit. This study ran from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse mortality and development of new damage. Poisson regression was used to examine potential explanatory variables for development of new damage.

RESULTS

A total of 273 SLE patients were recruited with total follow-up of 1767 patient-years (median 73.4 months). There were 6348 assessments with disease activity scores available for analysis. During follow-up, 13 deaths and 114 new damage items (in 83 patients) occurred. The incidence rate for development of damage was higher in the first 3 years before stabilizing at a lower rate. Overall rate for damage accrual was 61.1 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 50.6, 73.8). Analysis showed that active disease scores according to BILAG-2004 index (systems scores of A or B, counts of systems with A and BILAG-2004 numerical score) were associated with development of new damage. Low disease activity (LDA) states [BILAG-2004 LDA and BILAG Systems Tally (BST) persistent LDA] were inversely associated with development of damage.

CONCLUSIONS

BILAG-2004 index is associated with new damage. BILAG-2004 LDA and BST persistent LDA can be considered as treatment targets.

Improving measures of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem disease with varied manifestations and course. Variation in presentation among patients, and within the same patient, there may be varied manifestations over time. It has been difficult to measure the extent of disease activity accurately. Several investigators and groups have developed definitions of disease activity and methods to measure it. Consequently, there are currently several instruments to measure disease activity as well as damage in patients with SLE.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers currently available evidence on measures of disease activity in SLE. It discusses potential avenues for further development of new measures and the refinement of existing tools to improve disease activity measures in research and clinical care settings.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the complexity and heterogeneity of the disease, further work and tools are needed to assess disease activity better. Organ-specific measures for cutaneous, renal, and joint manifestations are needed for a detailed assessment of disease activity in conjunction with the use of disease generic tools (e.g. SLEDAI). New tools such as the SLE Disease Activity Index-Glucocorticoid Index (SLEDAI-2 KG) incorporating glucocorticoid doses to describe disease activity, SLE-DAS and SLEDAI-2 K RI-50 to record partial improvements could also be helpful.

Causal cascade of direct and indirect effects of anifrolumab on patient-reported outcomes: structural equation modelling of two Phase 3 trials

OBJECTIVES

SLE significantly impairs health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In this post hoc analysis, structural equation modelling was used to examine the 'causal cascade' of interaction between anifrolumab, disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in pooled data from the phase 3 TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials.

METHODS

Data were pooled from the TULIP-1 (n = 364) and TULIP-2 (n = 362) randomized, placebo-controlled, 52-week trials of intravenous anifrolumab (300 mg every 4 weeks for 48 weeks). We evaluated changes from baseline to week 24 and week 52 in four clinical (BICLA, BILAG-2004, SLEDAI-2K and changes in glucocorticoid dosage) and six PRO measures (SF-36, FACIT-F, EQ-5D, LupusQoL, PHQ-8 and pain NRS) in our hypothesized model of interactions.

RESULTS

Our hypothesized model had an acceptable fit to the pooled TULIP trial data. At week 24, significant paths revealed that when compared with placebo, anifrolumab treatment improved disease activity as measured by BICLA, BILAG-2004, SLEDAI-2K and changes to glucocorticoid dosage. In turn, these clinical measures reduced pain, which improved fatigue, physical functioning, mood/emotions and HRQoL. When the model incorporated number of glucocorticoid tapers as the measure of change in glucocorticoid dosage, treatment effects of anifrolumab on glucocorticoid tapers were not retained at week 52. However, at week 52 treatment indirectly improved HRQoL through its direct effects on BICLA.

CONCLUSIONS

Anifrolumab is associated with significant patient-reported improvements in aspects of HRQoL including pain, fatigue, mood and physical function. These benefits are from the direct effect of anifrolumab treatment on disease activity and reduction in glucocorticoid dosage.

The BILAG2004-Pregnancy Index is a valid disease activity outcome measure for pregnant SLE patients

Objectives

This study was to determine whether the BILAG2004-Pregnancy Index (BILAG2004-P) has construct/criterion validity and is sensitive to change.

Methods

This was an observational multicentre study that recruited pregnant SLE patients. Data were collected on disease activity [using the BILAG2004-P and Physician Global Assessment (PGA)], investigations and therapy at each assessment. The overall BILAG2004-P score as determined by the highest score achieved by any system was used in the analysis. Cross-sectional analysis was used for construct and criterion validity. The comparison was with C3, C4 and anti-dsDNA for construct validity, while it was with change in therapy and PGA in criterion validity. Sensitivity to change was assessed by determining the relationship between the change in BILAG2004-P and the change in therapy between two consecutive visits.

Results

A total of 97 patients with 112 pregnancies were recruited. There were 610 assessments available for construct/criterion validity analysis (98.2% of pregnancies had more than one assessment) and 497 observations for sensitivity to change analysis. Increasing BILAG2004-P scores were associated with low C3. The active BILAG2004-P score (grade A or B) was associated with an increase in therapy and the PGA of active disease. There was an increasing likelihood of higher overall scores with an increase in therapy and the PGA of active disease. In the sensitivity to change analysis, an increase in the BILAG2004-P score was associated with an increase in therapy and inversely associated with a decrease in therapy. A decrease in the BILAG2004-P score was associated with a decrease in therapy and inversely associated with an increase in therapy.

Conclusion

The BILAG2004-P has criterion validity and is sensitive to change.

Comparison of Responsiveness of British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 Index, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000, and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 Systems Tally

OBJECTIVE

To compare the responsiveness of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 index (BILAG-2004) and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity indices and to determine whether there was any added value in combining BILAG-2004, BILAG-2004 system tally (BST), or simplified BST (sBST) with SLEDAI-2K.

METHODS

This was a multicenter longitudinal study of SLE patients. Data were collected on BILAG-2004, SLEDAI-2K, and therapy on consecutive assessments in routine practice. The external responsiveness of the indices was assessed by determining the relationship between change in disease activity and change in therapy between 2 consecutive visits. Comparison of indices and their derivatives was performed by assessing the main effects of the indices using logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis was used to describe the performance of these indices individually and in various combinations, and comparisons of area under the curve were performed.

RESULTS

There were 1,414 observations from 347 patients. Both BILAG-2004 and SLEDAI-2K maintained an independent relationship with change in therapy when compared. There was some improvement in responsiveness when continuous SLEDAI-2K variables (change in score and score of previous visit) were combined with BILAG-2004 system scores. Dichotomization of BILAG-2004 or SLEDAI-2K resulted in poorer performance. BST and sBST had similar responsiveness as the combination of SLEDAI-2K variables and BILAG-2004 system scores. There was little benefit in combining SLEDAI-2K with BST or sBST.

CONCLUSION

The BILAG-2004 index had comparable responsiveness to SLEDAI-2K. There was some benefit in combining both indices. Dichotomization of BILAG-2004 and SLEDAI-2K leads to suboptimal performance. BST and sBST performed well on their own; sBST is recommended for its simplicity and clinical meaningfulness.

Vitronectin, a Novel Urinary Proteomic Biomarker, Promotes Cell Pyroptosis in Juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective

Identifying new markers of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) is critical event to predict patient stratification and prognosis. The aim of the present study is to analyze alteration of urinary protein expression and screen potential valuable biomarkers in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE).

Methods

The urine was collected from the patients with or without JSLE and detected by mass spectrometry to analyze proteomic changes. ELISA was used to verify the Vitronectin (VTN) changes in a new set of patients. The clinical correlation was performed to analyze between VTN and clinical pathological parameters. WB and ELISA were used to analyze VTN-mediated cell pyroptosis.

Results

Herein, we have identified a group of 105 differentially expressed proteins with ≥1.3-fold upregulation or ≤0.77-fold downregulation in JSLE patients. These proteins were involved in several important biological processes, including acute phase inflammatory responses, complement activation, hemostasis, and immune system regulation through Gene Ontology and functional enrichment analysis. Interestingly, urinary ephrin type-A receptor 4 (EPHA4) and VTN were significantly reduced in both inactive and active JSLE patients, and VTN treatment in THP-1 derived macrophages led to a significant increased cell pyroptosis by activation of Nod-like receptor family protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes, resulting in caspase-1 activation, cleaved gasdermin D (GSDMD), and IL-18 secretion. Most importantly, the urinary VTN was also linearly correlated with clinical characteristics of JSLE, implying that VTN could be a specific diagnostic biomarker to distinguish inactive and active JSLE.

Conclusion

This study provided a novel role of VTN in pyroptosis in JSLE through the urinary proteomic profile for JSLE, which could be a nonintrusive monitoring strategy in clinical diagnosis.

Serum amyloid A-to-albumin ratio as a potential biomarker to predict the activity, severity, and poor prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus

Objectives

To evaluate the predictive value of serum amyloid A‐to‐albumin ratio (SAR) for active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), severe active SLE, and poor prognosis of SLE.

Methods

One hundred and eighty‐six patients with SLE undergoing treatment in our hospital were selected. The demographic characteristics, clinical data, and disease prognosis of all patients were collected and analyzed.

Results

There were significant differences in SLEDAI, total glyceride (TG), serum amyloid A (SAA), SAR, urinary microalbumin‐to‐creatinine ratio (ACR), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), albumin (ALB), complement 3 (C3), anti‐dsDNA, anti‐Sm positive rate, and anti‐dsDNA positive rate between active SLE and stable SLE patients. TG, SAR, C3, ACR, and positive anti‐dsDNA were independent influencing factors of active SLE, and the odds ratio (OR) values were 2.342, 10.921, 0.832, 1.451, and 2.476, respectively. The area under curves (AUCs) of SAA, ALB, and SAR for predicting active SLE and severe active SLE were 0.743, 0.724, 0.787, 0.711, 0.686, and 0.733, respectively. The AUC of SAR for predicting the poor prognosis of active SLE was 0.719. High SAR, high ACR, low C3, and positive anti‐dsDNA were high risk factors for poor prognosis. Kaplan–Meier (K‐M) survival analysis showed that patients with high SAR, high ACR, low C3, and positive anti‐dsDNA had shorter continuous remission time than that with low SAR, low ACR, high C3, and negative anti‐dsDNA.

Conclusion

SAR had high predictive value for active SLE, severe active SLE, and poor prognosis of SLE. High SAR may be a potential marker for predicting the activity and prognosis of Chinese patients with SLE.

Epidemiology of disease-activity related ophthalmological manifestations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Ophthalmic complications in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) are broad and can occur in up to a third of patients. The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 Index identifies 13 ocular manifestations of active SLE, as opposed to those related to previous disease activity and/or the consequences of therapy. We conducted a systematic review of published literature to determine the frequency of ophthalmic manifestations of active SLE.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE from their respective inceptions to July 2020 was conducted to identify cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies.

RESULTS

22 studies meeting eligibility criteria were included. Most studies featured small sample sizes and were judged to have a high risk of methodological bias. The number and quality of studies did not allow us to confidently estimate the incidence of the conditions. No studies reported epidemiological data for orbital inflammation/myositis/proptosis. The prevalence of each of the other ocular manifestations, with the exception of retinal vaso-occlusive disease, was consistently less than 5%. Retinal vasculitis, uveitis and isolated cotton wool spots tended to be associated with more active SLE disease.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of eye disease due to SLE activity is uncommon, but clinicians should be aware that some conditions tend to be associated with more active systemic disease. Further studies to determine the incidence and risk factors for these ophthalmic manifestations are needed.

BSR guideline on the management of adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) 2018: baseline multi-centre audit in the UK

OBJECTIVES

To assess the baseline care provided to patients with SLE attending UK Rheumatology units, audited against standards derived from the recently published BSR guideline for the management of adults with SLE, the NICE technology appraisal for belimumab, and NHS England's clinical commissioning policy for rituximab.

METHODS

SLE cases attending outpatient clinics during any 4-week period between February and June 2018 were retrospectively audited to assess care at the preceding visit. The effect of clinical environment (general vs dedicated CTD/vasculitis clinic and specialized vs non-specialized centre) were tested. Bonferroni's correction was applied to the significance level.

RESULTS

Fifty-one units participated. We audited 1021 episodes of care in 1003 patients (median age 48 years, 74% diagnosed >5 years ago). Despite this disease duration, 286 (28.5%) patients had active disease. Overall in 497 (49%) clinic visits, it was recorded that the patient was receiving prednisolone, including in 28.5% of visits where disease was assessed as inactive. Low documented compliance (<60% clinic visits) was identified for audit standards relating to formal disease-activity assessment, reduction of drug-related toxicity and protection against comorbidities and damage. Compared with general clinics, dedicated clinics had higher compliance with standards for appropriate urine protein quantification (85.1% vs 78.1%, P ≤ 0.001). Specialized centres had higher compliance with BILAG Biologics Register recruitment (89.4% vs 44.4%, P ≤ 0.001) and blood pressure recording (95.3% vs 84.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

This audit highlights significant unmet need for better disease control and reduction in corticosteroid toxicity and is an opportunity to improve compliance with national guidelines. Higher performance with nephritis screening in dedicated clinics supports wider adoption of this service-delivery model.

Clinical disease activity and flare in SLE: Current concepts and novel biomarkers

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex and heterogeneous systemic autoimmune disease associated with innate and adaptive immune dysregulation. SLE occurs primarily in females of childbearing age, with increased prevalence and severity in minority populations. Despite improvements in treatment modalities, SLE patients frequently experience periods of heightened disease activity and flare that can lead to permanent organ damage, increased morbidity, and early mortality. Such outcomes impair quality of life and inflict a significant socioeconomic burden. Predicting changes in SLE disease activity could allow for closer monitoring and preemptive treatment, but existing clinical, demographic and serologic markers have been only modestly predictive. Novel, proactive approaches to clinical disease management are thus critically needed. Panels of blood biomarkers can detect a breadth of immune pathway dysregulation that captures SLE heterogeneity and disease activity. Alterations in the balance of pro-inflammatory and regulatory soluble mediators have been associated with changes in clinical disease activity and are detectable several weeks prior to clinical flare occurrence. A soluble mediator score has been highly predictive of impending flare in both European American and African American SLE patients, and this score does not require a priori knowledge of specific pathway activation in the patient. We review current concepts of disease activity and flare in SLE, focusing on the potential of novel blood biomarkers to characterize and predict changes in disease activity. Measuring the disordered immune response in SLE in this way promises to improve disease management and prevent organ damage in SLE.

The assessment of patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: where are we now?

The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), a chronic autoimmune thrombophilia with an increased mortality and morbidity, has been recognized for more than three decades. Unlike other autoimmune rheumatic conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, myositis and Sjögren's syndrome, relatively few attempts have been made to develop activity, damage or disease-specific quality of life indices for APS. In this review of the literature, we consider those attempts that have been made to develop assessment tools for patients with APS, but also reflect upon the nature of the condition, to discuss, in particular, whether an activity index is appropriate for this disease.

Scoring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity with simple, rapid outcome measures

Objective

Existing methods for grading lupus flares or improvement require definition-based thresholds as increments of change. Visual analogue scales (VAS) allow rapid, continuous scaling of disease severity. We analysed the performance of the SELENA SLEDAI Physician’s Global Assessment (SSPGA) and the Lupus Foundation of America-Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL) as measures of improvement or worsening in SLE.

Methods

We evaluated the agreement between prospectively collected measures of lupus disease activity [SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index 2004 (BILAG 2004), Cutaneous Lupus Area and Severity Index (CLASI), SSPGA and LFA-REAL] and response [(SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 and BILAG-Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA)] in a clinical trial.

Results

Fifty patients (47 females, mean age 45 (±11.6) years) were assessed at 528 consecutive visits (average 10.6 (±4.1) visits/patient). Changes in disease activity compared with baseline were examined in 478 visit pairs. SSPGA and LFA-REAL correlated with each other (r=0.936), and with SLEDAI and BILAG (SSPGA: r=0.742 (SLEDAI), r=0.776 (BILAG); LFA-REAL: r=0.778 (SLEDAI), r=0.813 (BILAG); all p<0.0001). Changes (∆) in SSPGA and LFA-REAL compared with screening correlated with each other (r=0.857) and with changes in SLEDAI and BILAG (∆SSPGA: r=0.678 (∆SLEDAI), r=0.624 (∆BILAG); ∆LFA-REAL: r=0.686 (∆SLEDAI) and 0.700 (∆BILAG); all p<0.0001). Changes in SSPGA and LFA-REAL strongly correlated with SRI-4 and BICLA by receiver operating characteristic analysis (p<0.0001 for all). Additionally, LFA-REAL correlated to individual BILAG organ scores (musculoskeletal: r=0.842, mucocutaneous: r=0.826 (p<0.0001 for both)).

Conclusion

SSPGA and LFA-REAL are reliable surrogates of common SLE trial end points and could be used as continuous or dichotomous response measures. Additionally, LFA-REAL can provide individualised scoring at the symptom or organ level.

Trial registration number

NCT02270957.

Fatigue in systemic lupus: the role of disease activity and its correlates

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to a variety of negative health outcomes resulting from inflammation in various organ systems. Although treatment continues to advance, fatigue remains one of the most salient, poorly understood and addressed patient complaints. Understanding the mechanisms of fatigue can help guide the development of interventions to improve health outcomes. The aim of this research was to evaluate the contribution of six variables (disease activity, insomnia, depression, stress, pain and physical health) to fatigue in SLE without concomitant fibromyalgia (FM).

METHODS

A total of 116 ethnically diverse, primarily female participants (91%) with SLE, receiving care at university medical centers, completed assessments of disease activity and quality of life outcomes (FACIT-FT, Insomnia Severity Index, Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4), Pain Inventory, Depression-PHQ-9, and LupusPRO-physical function). All patients met the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE and did not have a known diagnosis of FM. Multivariate linear and stepwise regression analyses were conducted with fatigue (FACIT-FT) as the dependent variable, and the above six variables as independent variables.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age was 39.80 (13.87) years; 50% were African American, 21% Caucasian, 13% Hispanic, 9% Asian and 8% other. Mean (SD) FACIT-FT was 20.09 (12.76). Collectively, these six variables explained 57% of the variance in fatigue. In the multivariate model, depression, stress and pain were significantly and independently associated with fatigue, but not disease activity, sleep or physical health. Stress had the largest effect on fatigue (β 0.77, 95% CI 0.17-1.38, p = 0.01), followed by depression (β 0.66, 95% CI 0.21-1.10, p = 0.005). On stepwise regression analysis, only stress, depression and pain were retained in the model, and collectively explained 56% of the variance in fatigue. All three remained independent correlates of fatigue, with the largest contribution being stress (β 0.84, 95% CI 0.27-1.42, p = 0.005), followed by depression (β 0.79, 95% CI 0.44-1.14, p < 0.001) with fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Stress, depression and pain are the largest independent contributors to fatigue among patients with SLE, without concurrent FM. Disease activity, sleep and physical health were not associated with fatigue. The evaluation of stress, depression and pain needs to be incorporated during assessments and clinical trials of individuals with SLE, especially within fatigue. This stress-depression-fatigue model requires further validation in longitudinal studies and clinical trials. Significance and innovation: • Disease activity, sleep, pain, stress, depression, and physical health have been reported individually to be associated with fatigue in lupus. This analysis evaluated the role of each and all of these six variables collectively in fatigue among patients with SLE without a known diagnosis of FM. • Disease activity, sleep and physical health were not significantly related to fatigue, but depression, stress and pain were. • The results emphasize the need to evaluate and treat fatigue in individuals with SLE utilizing a biopsychosocial approach, particularly in the realm of clinical trials. Behavioral medicine interventions are shown to be most effective for the treatment of depression, stress and pain.

Cytokine profiling in active and quiescent SLE reveals distinct patient subpopulations

BACKGROUND

Patients with SLE display marked clinical and immunlogical heterogeneity. The purpose of the study was to investigate patterns of serum cytokines in patients with active and stable systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to determine how they relate to clinical phenotype.

METHODS

Serum levels of 10 cytokines were measured retrospectively in a cohort of patients with SLE and in healthy controls using a high-sensitivity multiplex bead array. Disease activity was determined using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) indices. Logistic regression models were used to determine the association between cytokine levels and active SLE. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis was then used to identify subgroups of patients on the basis of cytokine levels.

RESULTS

Serum chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 (CXCL10) and CXCL13 were significantly higher in patients with SLE compared to healthy controls. Two cytokines (pentraxin-related protein (PTX3) and CXCL10) were significantly higher in patients with active disease after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Measurement of four cytokines (CXCL10, IL-10, IL-21 and PTX3) significantly improved the performance of a model to identify patients with clinically active disease. Cluster analysis revealed that the patients formed 3 distinct groups, characterised by higher levels of interferon alpha (IFNα) and B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) (group 1), increased CXCL10 and CXCL13 (group 2) or low levels of cytokines (group 3). Group 2 had significantly lower serum complement and higher anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies and increased prevalence of inflammatory arthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiplex analysis has identified a serum cytokine signature for active SLE. Within the SLE population distinct cytokine subgroups were identified, with differing clinical and immunological phenotypes that appeared stable over time. Assessment of cytokine profiles may reveal unique insights into disease heterogeneity.

IL-16/miR-125a axis controls neutrophil recruitment in pristane-induced lung inflammation

Severe lung inflammation and alveolar hemorrhage can be life-threatening in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients if not treated early and aggressively. Neutrophil influx is the driver key of this pathology, but little is known regarding the molecular events regulating this recruitment. Here, we uncover a role for IL-16/mir-125a in this pathology and show not only that IL-16 is a target for miR-125a but that reduced miR-125a expression in SLE patients associates with lung involvement. Furthermore, in the pristane model of acute "SLE-like" lung inflammation and alveolar hemorrhage, we observed reduced pulmonary miR-125a and enhanced IL-16 expression. Neutrophil infiltration was markedly reduced in the peritoneal lavage of pristane-treated IL-16-deficient mice and elevated following i.n. delivery of IL-16. Moreover, a miR-125a mimic reduced pristane-induced IL-16 expression and neutrophil recruitment and rescued lung pathology. Mechanistically, IL-16 acts directly on the pulmonary epithelium and markedly enhances neutrophil chemoattractant expression both in vitro and in vivo, while the miR-125a mimic can prevent this. Our results reveal a role for miR-125a/IL-16 in regulating lung inflammation and suggest this axis may be a therapeutic target for management of acute lung injury in SLE.

Influence of autoimmunity and inflammation on endothelial function and thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between autoimmunity and endothelial activation/damage (ICAM-1 and vWF serum levels) and the degree of prothrombotic activity (thrombin-antithrombin complexes-TAT serum levels) in SLE. In 60 clinically stable SLE patients, levels of the following parameters were estimated in their serum: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies in both IgG and IgM classes (aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM, respectively), antiβ2GPI antibodies in both IgG and IgM classes (antiβ2GPI-IgG and antiβ2GPI-IgM, respectively), ICAM, von Willebrand factor (vWF), TAT, CRP, C3c, C4, and IL-6. ICAM-1 values exceeded the upper reference limit in 9 (15%) patients. vWF levels were increased in 21 (35%) patients. In all patients with elevated ICAM-1 values, vWF were also increased. TAT concentrations were elevated in 12 (20%) people. ICAM-1 were significantly higher in patients with elevated aCL-IgM (> 30 MPL vs ≤ 30 MPL; p < 0.05). Similarly, ICAM-1 were significantly higher in patients with elevated antiβ2-GPI-IgM (> 20 SMU vs ≤ 20 SMU; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in ICAM-1 levels in relation to LA-positivity. vWF were not significantly different in relation to antiphospholipid antibodies nor the inflammation marker levels. TAT were significantly higher in patients with elevated aCL-IgM (> 30 MPL vs ≤ 30 MPL; p < 0.05). In one third of young patients with stable SLE, signs of endothelial activation/damage were found, as shown by elevated plasma ICAM-1 or vWF. Increased prothrombotic tendency manifested by elevated TAT was found in one fifth of the patients. Elevated anticardiolipin (IgM) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (IgM) antibodies influence endothelial dysfunction and enhance prothrombotic state.

Does erythrocyte sedimentation rate reflect and discriminate flare from infection in systemic lupus erythematosus? Correlation with clinical and laboratory parameters of disease activity

To examine disease activity parameters in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) experiencing flare, infection, both, or neither condition, focusing on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). This study is a retrospective analysis of 371 consecutive inpatient SLE cases from 2006 to 2015. Cases were classified as flare (n = 147), infection (n = 48), both (n = 23), or neither (n = 135). ESR levels were correlated to C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, anti-dsDNA antibodies, complement C3 reduction, serositis, and erythrocyturia with proteinuria (Pearson's correlation). ESR levels were related to an age- and gender-adapted cut-off value (ESRp). We analyzed mean values of age, ESR, ESRp, CRP, ferritin and distribution of anti-dsDNA antibodies, C3 reduction, serositis, and erythrocyturia with proteinuria. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated via receiver operating characteristic or two-by-two table. Association of parameters with disease activity and infection was tested via two-sided chi square test. ESR correlated moderately with CRP in cases with flare and/or infection (r = 0.505-0.586). While ESR and CRP were normal in remission, mean values overlapped in cases with flare, infection, or both. ESRp was higher in flare than in infection (p = 0.048). ESR lost association to activity in infected cases, CRP to infection in flaring cases. ESRp, serositis, and anti-dsDNA antibodies were related to disease activity regardless of infections. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were most sensitive for detecting flares (74%), while serositis, proteinuria with erythrocyturia, anti-dsDNA antibodies, C3 reduction, and ESRp values ≥ 2 were most specific. ESR levels were raised by flares, infections, and age; adapting them to age and gender increased their diagnostic value. Obtaining several parameters remains necessary to differentiate flare from infection.

Lupus community panel proposals for optimising clinical trials: 2018

Formidable impediments stand in the way of treatment development for lupus. These include the unwieldy size of current trials, international competition for scarce patients, complex outcome measures and a poor understanding of these outcomes in the world at large. The heterogeneity of the disease itself coupled to superimposition of variegated background polypharmacy has created enough immunological noise to virtually ensure the failure of lupus treatment trials, leaving an understandable suspicion that at least some of the results in testing failed drugs over the years may not have been negative, but merely uninterpretable. The authors have consulted with many clinical trial investigators, biopharmaceutical developers and stakeholders from government and voluntary sectors. This paper examines the available evidence that supports workable trial designs and proposes approaches to improve the odds of completing interpretable treatment development programs for lupus.

Urine Biomarkers to Predict Response to Lupus Nephritis Therapy in Children and Young Adults

OBJECTIVE

To delineate urine biomarkers that forecast response to therapy of lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Starting from the time of kidney biopsy, patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus who were diagnosed with LN were studied serially. Levels of 15 biomarkers were measured in random spot urine samples, including adiponectin, α-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), ceruloplasmin, hemopexin, hepcidin, kidney injury molecule 1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, lipocalin-like prostaglandin D synthase (LPGDS), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), transferrin, and vitamin D binding protein (VDBP).

RESULTS

Among 87 patients (mean age 15.6 yrs) with LN, there were 37 treatment responders and 50 nonresponders based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria. At the time of kidney biopsy, levels of TGF-β (p < 0.0001) and ceruloplasmin (p = 0.006) were significantly lower among responders than nonresponders; less pronounced differences were present for AGP, hepcidin, LPGDS, transferrin, and VDBP (all p < 0.05). By Month 3, responders experienced marked decreases of adiponectin, AGP, transferrin, and VDBP (all p < 0.01) and mean levels of these biomarkers were all outstanding (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve ≥ 0.9) for discriminating responders from nonresponders. Patient demographics and extrarenal disease did not influence differences in biomarker levels between response groups.

CONCLUSION

Low urine levels of TGF-β and ceruloplasmin at baseline and marked reduction of AGP, LPGDS, transferrin, or VDBP and combinations of other select biomarkers by Month 3 are outstanding predictors for achieving remission of LN. If confirmed, these results can be used to help personalize LN therapy.

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus azathioprine in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) versus azathioprine (AZA) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease.

METHODS

A multicentre, 24-month, superiority, open-label, randomised controlled trial (NCT01112215) was conducted with 240 patients (120 per arm) receiving either EC-MPS (target dose: 1440 mg/day) or AZA (target dose: 2 mg/kg/day) in addition to prednisone and/or antimalarials. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission, assessed by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), at 3 and 24 months. Secondary endpoints included time to clinical remission, BILAG A and B flare rates, time to flare, corticosteroid reduction and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Proportion of patients achieving clinical remission (clinical SLEDAI=0) was higher in the EC-MPS group at 3 (32.5% vs 19.2%; treatment difference, 13.3 (CI 2.3 to 24), p=0.034) and 24 months (71.2% vs 48.3%; treatment difference, 22.9 (CI 10.4 to 34.4), p<0.001). EC-MPS was superior with respect to time to clinical remission (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.91; p=0.017). BILAG A/B and B flares occurred more frequently in the AZA group (71.7% vs 50%, p=0.001 and 21.67% vs 8.3%, p=0.004, respectively). EC-MPS was superior with respect to time to first BILAG A/B (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.56; p=0.0004) and BILAG A flare (HR 2.84; 95% CI 1.37 to 5.89; p=0.003). AEs were similar in both groups except for leucopenia that occurred more frequently with AZA.

CONCLUSIONS

EC-MPS was superior to AZA in treating SLE and preventing further relapses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01112215; Results.

The lupus impact tracker is responsive to changes in clinical activity measured by the systemic lupus erythematosus responder index

Objective The lupus impact tracker (LIT) is a 10-item patient reported outcome tool to measure the impact of systemic lupus erythematosus or its treatment on patients' daily lives. Herein, we describe the responsiveness of the LIT and LupusQoL to changes in disease activity, using the systemic lupus erythematosus responder index (SRI). Methods A total of 325 adult systemic lupus erythematosus patients were enrolled in an observational, longitudinal, multicentre study, conducted across the USA and Canada. Data (demographics, LIT, LupusQoL, BILAG, SELENA-SLEDAI) were obtained three months apart. Modified SRI was defined as: a decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI (4 points); no new BILAG A, and no greater than one new BILAG B; and no increase in the physician global assessment. Standardised response mean and effect size for LIT and LupusQoL domains were calculated among SRI responders and non-responders. Wilcoxon's test was used to compare the LIT and LupusQoL variation by SRI responder status. Results Of the participants 90% were women, 53% were white, 33% were of African descendant and 17% were Hispanic. Mean (SD) age and SELENA-SLEDAI at baseline were 42.3 (16.2) years and 4.3 (3.8), respectively. Mean (SD) LIT score at baseline was 39.4 (22.9). LIT standardised response mean (effect size) among SRI responders and non-responders were -0.69 (-0.36) and -0.20 (-0.12), respectively ( P = 0.02). For LupusQoL, two domains were responsive to SRI: standardised response mean (effect size) for physical health and pain domains were 0.42 (0.23) and 0.65 (0.44), respectively. Conclusions LIT is moderately responsive to SRI in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Inclusion of this tool in clinical care and clinical trials may provide further insights into its responsiveness. This is the first systemic lupus erythematosus patient reported outcome tool to be evaluated against composite responder index (SRI) used in clinical trials.

Biomarkers in lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) has significant impact on the outcome of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In the absence of any new breakthrough for management of LN over the last few years, using existing treatment modalities in a more effective manner is the mainstay of improving outcomes. For effectively using the drugs, disease activity needs to be assessed accurately and more objectively, which is not possible with present clinical assessment tools. Biomarkers help in accurate assessment of disease activity and enable the physician to individualize the therapy. Conventional disease activity markers have limitations which need to be addressed and research in the area of biomarker discovery in LN has immensely expanded over the last two decades as evident by the literature. Moreover, biomarkers for LN should be different from the markers of overall disease activity as LN requires significant immunosuppression, unlike other non-renal manifestations of SLE. Newly discovered biomarkers exhibit qualities pertaining to different aspects of disease activity and damage. In this review, we discuss the established as well as new biomarkers of SLE in the light of their role in LN diagnosis, follow-up, prediction of renal flare and correlation with renal histology findings.

Measuring disease activity in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: the challenges of administrative burden and responsiveness to patient concerns in clinical research

Measuring lupus disease activity accurately remains a challenging and demanding task given the complex multi-system nature of lupus, an illness known for its variability between patients and within the same patient over time. Many have attempted to define what disease activity means and how it should be measured, and several instruments were devised for a standardized assessment of disease activity and outcome domains in clinical research. Several of these measuring tools have been able to detect clinical improvement and have demonstrated adequate reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change in observational studies, and some were found to be useful in randomized controlled trials. However, several failed clinical trials have confronted these metrics, as they were not intended for clinical trials. The Outcome Measures Rheumatology group and the US Food and Drug Administration have recommended using measures of disease activity, cumulative organ damage, health-related quality of life, and adverse events as outcomes of interest. Composite responder indices that determine disease global improvement, ensure no significant worsening in unaffected organ systems, and include a physician’s global assessment have been used in randomized clinical trials. Yet unmet therapeutic needs were further challenged by the complex content and psychometric information of the updated instruments, including increased administrative burden associated with demanding training and cost of instruments, and small effect size associated with responsiveness to patient concerns. Nevertheless, with the progress of novel targeted therapy, refining the disease activity metrics is essential. Selection of the disease activity endpoints which is a defining aspect of clinical trial design must be tailored to the outcome of interest and measured by a reliably rated scale characterized by minimal administrative burden. An optimal scale should be simple and practical and incorporate elements of patient concerns.

Advances in the assessment of lupus disease activity and damage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on the advances in the assessment of disease activity and damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last couple of years, the development of composite responder indices has led to better description of the changes in disease activity, especially for clinical trials. It has been recognized that newer composite responder indices such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI) and BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) capture more comprehensive clinical response as they integrate global lupus assessment, system-based assessment, physician's global assessment and treatment failure defined as an increase in the dose of steroid and/or immunosuppressant. The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Responder Index 50 (SRI-50) may be more practical for capturing response in clinical practice. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG 2004) Index may capture flare slightly better than the other available flare indices whilst also capturing response.

SUMMARY

This review will provide an insight into the various tools available to assess disease activity and damage in lupus, with a particular focus on the new responder indices currently in use.

Anti-factor Xa antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and their effects upon coagulation assays

Introduction

The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and functional effects of antibodies directed against Factor (F)Xa and other serine proteases (SP) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Methods

Serum from patients with APS (n = 59), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; n = 106), other autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD; n = 63) and 40 healthy controls (HC) were tested for IgG activity against thrombin (Thr), FXa, FVIIa, phosphatidylserine (PS)/FXa and antithrombin (AT)-III by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Anti-FXa positive IgG were purified to measure their avidity by chaotropic ELISA and functional effects upon clotting time (FXa-ACT) and FXa enzymatic activity (± AT-III).

Results

Anti-FXa IgG were found in patients with SLE (49.1%) and APS (33.9%) (P <0.05) but not in ARD controls and HC. In contrast, anti-Thr and anti-PS/FXa IgG were identified in other ARD and anti-FVIIa IgG were low in all groups. The avidity of APS-IgG to FXa was significantly higher than SLE-IgG (P <0.05). Greatest prolongation of FXa-ACT was observed with APS-IgG and greatest inhibitory effect upon FXa enzymatic activity was found with APS-IgG followed by SLE-IgG compared to HC-IgG. ATIII inhibition of FXa was significantly reduced by APS-IgG compared with HC and SLE (P <0.05) and did not correlate with binding to AT-III.

Conclusion

APS anti-FXa IgG have higher avidity to FXa and greater effects upon the enzymatic and coagulant activity of FXa compared with SLE anti-FXa IgG. Further studies of anti-FXa antibodies in APS, SLE and other non-autoimmune thrombotic disease cohorts are now required to evaluate whether targeting FXa with selective inhibitors in patients bearing anti-FXa antibodies may be an effective treatment strategy.

The role of disease activity score 28 in the evaluation of articular involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the application of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) to assess joint involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Sixty-nine SLE patients, complaining of joint symptoms, and 44 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were enrolled. In SLE patients disease activity was assessed with SLEDAI-2K. DAS28 was calculated in all the patients.

RESULTS

Thirty SLE patients (43.5%) showed clinical signs of arthritis. Mean DAS28 was 4.0±1.4, 22 patients (31.9%) had low disease activity, 29 (42.0%) moderate, and 18 (26.1%) high. We dichotomized SLE patients according to the presence (Group 1) or absence (Group 2) of articular involvement according to SLEDAI-2K: 56.3% of the patients of the second group had a moderate/high activity according to DAS28. We compared SLE patients with 44 RA patients (M/F 9/35, mean age 55.6±14.5 years; mean disease duration 140.4±105.6 months). No significant differences were found regarding the values of DAS28 between SLE and RA patients. On the contrary, the values of tender and swollen joint count were significantly higher in RA compared to SLE patients (P=0.0002 and P=0.0001, resp.).

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest the use of the DAS28 in the assessment of joint involvement in SLE patients.

Evaluation of epratuzumab as a biologic therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus

B cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Some of the current biologic therapies target B cells or B-cell activating factors. Epratuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody, which targets CD22 on B cells. This review focuses on the safety and efficacy of epratuzumab in systemic lupus erythematosus based on the information from various published clinical trials and presentations at international meetings. Epratuzumab acts as a B-cell modulator through inhibition of B-cell receptor signaling. It has been shown to be efficacious in open-label and Phase I and Phase II randomized controlled trials. The drug has steroid-sparing properties and treatment is associated with significant improvements in Health Related Quality of Life and its safety profile is comparable to placebo.

Which outcome measures in SLE clinical trials best reflect medical judgment?

Objectives

To compare two measures of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) response: the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) and the Systemic Lupus Responder Index (SRI) against a clinician's assessment of improvement.

Methods

Ninety-one lupus patients were identified with two visits at which Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and BILAG had been scored and with active disease (SLEDAI≥6) at the first visit. A physician rated the disease activity at the second visit as clinically significant improvement, no change or worsening. SRI and BICLA were scored both with and without the medication criteria often used in trials to restrict response definitions.

Results

68 patients were considered improved, 17 same and 6 worse at follow-up. SRI versus BICLA, performed without considering medication changes, captured physician-rated improvement with 85% vs 76% sensitivity and 74% vs 78% specificity. With medication limits both instruments had 37% sensitivity and 96% specificity for physician-assessed improvement. Seven patients considered improved by the clinician met the BICLA but not the SRI definition of improvement by failing to achieve a four-point improvement in SLEDAI. 13 clinician-rated responders met SRI but not BICLA by improving in less than all organs.

Conclusions

Shortfalls of SRI and BICLA may be due to BICLA only requiring partial improvement but in all organs versus SRI requiring full improvement in some manifestation(s) and not all organs. SRI and BICLA with medication restrictions are less likely to denote response when the physician disagrees and could provide stringent proof of efficacy in appropriately powered clinical trials.

Changes in Farr radioimmunoassay and EliA fluorescence immunoassay anti-dsDNA in relation to exacerbation of SLE

Measuring anti-dsDNA levels could support treatment adjustment during follow-up of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We investigated whether patients with exacerbations of SLE showed changes in anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels prior to the exacerbation using the Farr and EliA assay and examined which assay showed highest specificity and predictive value for exacerbations. Changes in anti-dsDNA of ≥ 25% prior to exacerbation were considered of clinical significance. Exacerbations were retrospectively abstracted from medical records. Eighteen of 48 patients showed one or more exacerbations. We found 22 exacerbations with complete lab work-up, all accompanied by ≥ 25% change in anti-dsDNA in one or both assays. Only 10 exacerbations showed concordant changes in anti-dsDNA in both assays. Changes in anti-dsDNA had a low predictive value for exacerbations of SLE, but the specificity of anti-dsDNA changes for patients with exacerbations was higher for EliA than Farr. We conclude that despite the limited relation between anti-dsDNA changes and exacerbations of SLE, anti-dsDNA testing could still support clinical decision making when used in the correct setting. We conclude that EliA is preferable over Farr for assaying anti-dsDNA during follow-up of patients with SLE because of higher specificity, less "hands-on" time and absence of radioactivity.

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a predictor of renal and overall SLE disease activity

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to assess whether erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels correlate with the level of disease activity at each visit and whether a change in ESR could be useful in predicting changes in disease activity.

METHODS

Thousands of visits in a prospective systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort were analyzed to assess the association of ESR and level of disease activity. We explored whether ESR was cross-sectionally associated with disease activity, whether changes in ESR were associated with changes in disease activity, and whether changes in ESR predicted future changes in disease activity. Visits when patients had cancer, infection, pregnancy or were in renal failure were excluded.

RESULTS

After adjusting for confounding factors, mild (25-50 mm/h), moderate (51-75 mm/h), and marked (>75 mm/h) elevations in ESR levels at a given visit correlated with the SELENA-SLEDAI, the Physician Global Assessment (PGA), fatigue, renal, joint, rash, serositis, hematological visual analogue scale (VAS), hematuria and proteinuria (p<0.0001) levels at that visit. A change in ESR between two visits was highly correlated with a concurrent change in PGA, renal, fatigue and joint VAS (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant correlation between change in ESR between two visits and change in disease activity at a future visit. The subgroup analysis of patients who do not have anti-dsDNA and low complement levels as a feature of their disease showed ESR to be positively associated with SLEDAI, PGA, renal and joint VAS at that visit (p<0.0001), but there were few significant associations between changes in ESR and changes in disease activity.

CONCLUSION

ESR is associated with disease activity in SLE measured by the SELENA-SLEDAI, the PGA, and with organ-specific activity including serositis, rash, joint, renal and hematological VAS. Grouping baseline ESR into four levels does associate with both global and organ-specific disease activity. A change in ESR between two visits was highly correlated with a change in PGA, renal, fatigue and joint VAS. In patients without anti-dsDNA and low complement levels, ESR was positively associated with SLEDAI, PGA, renal and joint VAS at the same visit. Until more specific biomarkers are validated, serial ESR does have some utility in following disease activity in SLE.

Ten developments in the use of biologicals for systemic lupus erythematosus

Belimumab has recently been approved, and several other types of biological therapy with different mechanisms of action are currently in phase II and III studies. This review puts these approaches in context, emphasizing mechanistic categories and clinical trial designs. Most of the promising approaches involve B cell depletion or modulation. Post-approval experience with belimumab is critically reviewed.