Meta-analysis of recurrence pattern after resection for pancreatic cancer

Prognostic significance of right subdiaphragmatic washing cytology in patients with endometrial cancer

Cancer cells in the right subdiaphragmatic lavage may reflect peritoneal dissemination, but its prognostic significance is unknown. This study investigated recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence patterns in patients with curatively resected endometrial cancer by cytology collection site. Peritoneal cytology was collected at the beginning of surgery by washing the pelvic and right subdiaphragmatic cavity separately. The analysis included 465 patients with the median follow-up duration of 121 months. Of these, 62 (13%) patients had positive pelvic cytology and 22 (5%) patients had positive right subdiaphragmatic cytology. Patients positive for right subdiaphragmatic cytology were all positive for pelvic cytology, showing the worst RFS and OS among the study population. Multivariate analyses showed positive right subdiaphragmatic cytology, not pelvic cytology, significantly correlated with shorter RFS and OS when adjusted for clinicopathological factors. Patients with both pelvic and right subdiaphragmatic positive cytology had significantly higher peritoneal recurrence rates than those negative at both sites. However, patients with only positive pelvic cytology showed no significant difference in the recurrence rate. Our results suggest that the prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology may differ depending on the collection site in endometrial cancer and provide new insights to select patients for adjuvant therapy.

Impact of resection margin status on recurrence and survival in patients with resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

To improve outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, a complete resection is crucial. However, evidence regarding the impact of microscopically positive surgical margins (R1) on recurrence is conflicting due to varying definitions and limited populations of patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we aimed to determine the impact of the resection margin status on recurrence and survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma stratified by local tumor stage.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study on patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing pancreatectomy at a high-volume academic center (2012-2022). R1 was subclassified into microscopic invasion of the margin (R1 direct) or carcinoma present within 1 mm but not directly involving the margin (R1 <1 mm). Overall survival and time to recurrence were assessed by log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of 472 included patients, 154 (33%) had an R1 resection. Of those 50 (32%) had R1 <1 mm and 104 (68%) R1 direct. The most commonly involved margin was the uncinate (41%) followed by the pancreatic neck (16%) and vascular margins (9%). Overall, a stepwise shortening of time to recurrence and overall survival was observed with an increasing degree of margin involvement (median time to recurrence: R0 39.3 months, R1 <1 mm 16.0 months, and R1 direct 13.4 months, all comparisons P < .05). Multivariable analyses confirmed the independent prognostic value of R1 direct across all surgical stages.

CONCLUSION

The resection margin status portends an independent prognostic value. Moreover, this association persists in patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Increasing the R0-resection rate is the most important potentially influenceable prognostic factor for improving surgery-related outcomes.

Optimal treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer having positive peritoneal cytology: A nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort study supervised by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer (PaCa) having positive peritoneal cytology (PPC).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with PPC treated at 78 high-volume centers between January 2012 and December 2020. Prognoses after resection (S-group) and initiation of nonsurgical treatment (N-group) were compared. Prognostic factors for survival in both groups were analyzed. Detailed characteristics of conversion surgery (CS) in the N-group were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 568 enrolled patients were classified into an S-group (n = 445) or an N-group (n = 123). Median survival times (MSTs) were 19.0 months and 19.3 months, respectively, with no significant difference in prognosis (p = .845). The intervenable prognostic factors for survival were adjuvant treatment in the S-group (p < .001) and CS in the N-group (p < .001). Following CS, the MST was prolonged to 45.6 months, and peritoneal or liver recurrence decreased considerably. CS can be expected if PPC is diagnosed before neoadjuvant treatment and when combination treatment is initiated.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection may not be beneficial for improving survival when PPC is evident. Chemotherapy aiming for CS may be the optimal treatment for such patients.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant S-1-based chemoradiotherapy in resectable and borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of S-1-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with resectable or borderline-resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with PDAC who underwent S-1-based NACRT at our institute between 2010 and 2017.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the study, including 15 (37.5%) with resectable PDAC and 25 (62.5%) with borderline-resectable PDAC. The NACRT completion and resection rates were 85.0% (n = 34) and 67.5% (n = 27), respectively. Several grade 3 adverse events were observed, including leukopenia (25.0%), anorexia (17.5%), neutropenia (10.0%), thrombocytopenia (7.5%), febrile neutropenia (2.5%), elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (2.5%) levels, and hyponatremia (2.5%). The R0 resection rate was 70.4% (n = 19/27) in patients who underwent pancreatectomy. Grades 1, 2, and 3 according to the College of American Pathologists grading system were observed in 1 (3.7%), 12 (44.4%), and 14 (51.9%) patients, respectively. Over a median follow-up period of 32.9 months (interquartile range, 9.1-68.0), the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 81.4%, 45.5%, and 30.3%, respectively, in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the curative-intent surgery cohort (n = 27), the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 88.9%, 48.2%, and 37.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1-based NACRT is safe and yields acceptable long-term outcomes for patients with resectable or borderline-resectable PDAC.

NGF-mediated crosstalk: unraveling the influence of metabolic deregulation on the interplay between neural and pancreatic cancer cells and its impact on patient outcomes

Neural invasion is one of the most common routes of invasion in pancreatic cancer and it is responsible for the high rate of tumor recurrence after surgery and the pain generation associated with pancreatic cancer. Several molecules implicated in neural invasion are also responsible for pain onset including NGF belonging to the family of neutrophins. NGF released by cancer cells can sensitize sensory nerves which in turn results in severe pain. NGF receptors, TrkA and P75NTR, are expressed on both PDAC cells and nerves, strongly suggesting their role in neural invasion. The crosstalk between the nervous system and cancer cells has emerged as an important regulator of pancreatic cancer and its microenvironment. Nerve cells influence the pancreatic tumor microenvironment and these interactions are important for cancer metabolism reprogramming and tumor progression. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge on the interaction between nerves and pancreatic cancer cells and its impact on cancer metabolism.

Patterns, timing and predictors of recurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international multicentre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Most patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) develop recurrence. No previous studies have investigated predictors of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC. Our study aimed to determine timing, pattern and predictors of any-site and local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PD for PDAC between June 2012 and May 2015 (29 centres, eight countries) were included. The primary outcome was recurrence pattern (none, local-only, distant-only or mixed local/distant). Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, investigations, operation details, complications, histology, adjuvant therapies, recurrence and survival. Univariable tests and regression analysis investigated factors associated with any-site and local-only recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 866 patients, 573 (66 %) developed recurrence: 170 (20 %) developed local-only recurrence, 164 (19 %) developed mixed local/distant recurrence, and 239 (28 %) developed distant-only recurrence. Local-only or lung-only recurrence had a more favourable prognosis than other recurrence patterns. Predictors of any-site recurrence were preoperative biliary stenting, venous resection and poorly-differentiated, node-positive tumours. Predictors of local-only recurrence were preoperative radiological lymphadenopathy, well-differentiated tumours, fewer than 15 resected lymph nodes and intraoperative blood transfusion.

DISCUSSION

Ensuring radical resection and avoiding intraoperative blood transfusion may reduce the risk of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.

Quantification of PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden in biologically distinct advanced pancreatic cancers responding to pembrolizumab: case reports

Background

The advent of checkpoint therapy is one of the most important recent advancements in cancer therapy. Though checkpoint therapy is a mainstay in some cancers, it has been largely ineffective in treating cancers of the pancreas. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are seldom responsive to checkpoint inhibition.

Case presentations

Here we present two cases of advanced pancreatic cancers that either failed to respond or recurred following conventional treatments. Tissue from each tumor was sequenced and analyzed for PD-L1 expression. Each patient was started on checkpoint blockade after assessing for a predictive biomarker, either the combined positive score or the tumor mutational burden. In each case, checkpoint blockade led to durable radiographic responses.

Conclusions

We therefore propose that it is reasonable to assess combined positive score and tumor mutational burden in refractory or recurrent pancreatic cancers when initiation of ICB is being considered.

Prediction of Isolated Local Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing postoperative fibrosis from isolated local recurrence (ILR) after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is challenging. A prognostic model that helps to identify patients at risk of ILR can assist clinicians when evaluating patients' postoperative imaging. This nationwide study aimed to develop a clinically applicable prognostic model for ILR after PDAC resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational cohort study was performed, including all patients who underwent PDAC resection in the Netherlands (2014-2019; NCT04605237). On the basis of recurrence location (ILR, systemic, or both), multivariable cause-specific Cox-proportional hazard analysis was conducted to identify predictors for ILR and presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A predictive model was developed using Akaike's Information Criterion, and bootstrapped discrimination and calibration indices were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 1194/1693 patients (71%) with recurrence, 252 patients (21%) developed ILR. Independent predictors for ILR were resectability status (borderline versus resectable, HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.03-1.96; P = 0.03, and locally advanced versus resectable, HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.68-1.82; P = 0.66), tumor location (head versus body/tail, HR 1.50; 95% CI 1.00-2.25; P = 0.05), vascular resection (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.41-2.45; P < 0.001), perineural invasion (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.01-2.13; P = 0.02), number of positive lymph nodes (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08; P = 0.02), and resection margin status (R1 < 1 mm versus R0 ≥ 1 mm, HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.25-2.14; P < 0.001). Moderate performance (concordance index 0.66) with adequate calibration (slope 0.99) was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide study identified factors predictive of ILR after PDAC resection. Our prognostic model, available through www.pancreascalculator.com , can be utilized to identify patients with a higher a priori risk of developing ILR, providing important information in patient evaluation and prognostication.

Integrated bulk and single-cell profiling characterize sphingolipid metabolism in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Abnormal sphingolipid metabolism (SM) is closely linked to the incidence of cancers. However, the role of SM in pancreatic cancer (PC) remains unclear. This study aims to explore the significance of SM in the prognosis, immune microenvironment, and treatment of PC.

METHODS

Single-cell and bulk transcriptome data of PC were acquired via TCGA and GEO databases. SM-related genes (SMRGs) were obtained via MSigDB database. Consensus clustering was utilized to construct SM-related molecular subtypes. LASSO and Cox regression were utilized to build SM-related prognostic signature. ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms were employed to assess the tumour immune microenvironment. OncoPredict package was used to predict drug sensitivity. CCK-8, scratch, and transwell experiments were performed to analyze the function of ANKRD22 in PC cell line PANC-1 and BxPC-3.

RESULTS

A total of 153 SMRGs were acquired, of which 48 were linked to PC patients' prognosis. Two SM-related subtypes (SMRGcluster A and B) were identified in PC. SMRGcluster A had a poorer outcome and more active SM process compared to SMRGcluster B. Immune analysis revealed that SMRGcluster B had higher immune and stromal scores and CD8 + T cell abundance, while SMRGcluster A had a higher tumour purity score and M0 macrophages and activated dendritic cell abundance. PC with SMRGcluster B was more susceptible to gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin. Then SM-related prognostic model (including ANLN, ANKRD22, and DKK1) was built, which had a very good predictive performance. Single-cell analysis revealed that in PC microenvironment, macrophages, epithelial cells, and endothelial cells had relatively higher SM activity. ANKRD22, DKK1, and ANLN have relatively higher expression levels in epithelial cells. Cell subpopulations with high expression of ANKRD22, DKK1, and ANLN had more active SM activity. In vitro experiments showed that ANKRD22 knockdown can inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of PC cells.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the important significance of SM in PC and identified SM-associated molecular subtypes and prognostic model, which provided novel perspectives on the stratification, prognostic prediction, and precision treatment of PC patients.

Evaluation of a new scoring system for assessing nerve invasion in resected pancreatic cancer: A single-center retrospective analysis

Nerve invasion (NI) is a characteristic feature of pancreatic cancer. Traditional dichotomous statements on the presence of NI are unreasonable because almost all cases exhibit NI when sufficient pathological sections are examined. The critical implications of NI in pancreatic cancer highlight the need for a more effective criterion. This study included 511 patients, who were categorized into a training group and a testing group at a ratio of 7:3. According to the traditional definition, NI was observed in 91.2 % of patients using five pathological slides in our study. The prevalence of NI increased as more pathological slides were used. The criterion of 'two points of intraneural (endoneural) invasion in the case of four pathological slides' has the highest receiver operating characteristic (ROC) score. Based on this new criterion, NI was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) and was also correlated with tumor recurrence (P = 0.004). Interestingly, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimen is an independent favorable factor for patients with high NI. In the high NI group, patients who received a gemcitabine-based regimen exhibited a better prognosis than those who did not receive the gemcitabine-based regimen for OS (P = 0.000) and DFS (P = 0.001). In conclusion, this study establishes assessment criteria to evaluate the severity of NI in order to predict patient outcomes.

Prognostic Factors for Early Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

More than half of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) recur within 12 months after curative-intent resection. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify all reported prognostic factors for early recurrence in resected PDACs.

METHODS

After a systematic literature search, a meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Separate analyses were performed for adjusted vs unadjusted effect estimates as well as reported odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, and evidence was rated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendations.

RESULTS

After 2903 abstracts were screened, 65 studies were included. Of these, 28 studies (43.1%) defined early recurrence as evidence of recurrence within 6 months, whereas 34 (52.3%) defined it as evidence of recurrence within 12 months after surgery. Other definitions were uncommon. Analysis of unadjusted ORs and HRs revealed 41 and 5 prognostic factors for early recurrence within 6 months, respectively. When exclusively considering adjusted data, we identified 25 and 10 prognostic factors based on OR and HR, respectively. Using a 12-month definition, we identified 38 (OR) and 15 (HR) prognostic factors from unadjusted data and 38 (OR) and 30 (HR) prognostic factors from adjusted data, respectively. On the basis of frequency counts of adjusted data, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9, N status, nondelivery of adjuvant therapy, grading, and tumor size based on imaging were identified as key prognostic factors for early recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported prognostic factors of early recurrence vary considerably. Identified key prognostic factors could aid in the development of a risk stratification framework for early recurrence. However, prospective validation is necessary.

Molecular diagnosis for detecting KRAS mutation in peritoneal washing fluid of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Positive peritoneal washing cytology is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, its sensitivity is relatively low. This study evaluated the performance of peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-directed PCR clamping as a molecular-based peritoneal washing cytology for sensitive detection of KRAS mutation in PDAC. Intraoperative peritoneal washing fluid (IPWF) obtained from patients with PDAC who underwent surgery was analyzed. PNA-directed PCR clamping was performed on DNA extracted from IPWF. Among 54 patients enrolled, threshold cycle (Ct) was significantly lower in patients with positive peritoneal washing cytology than in those with negative peritoneal washing cytology (P < 0.001) and in patients with peritoneal dissemination than in those without peritoneal dissemination (P < 0.01). The optimal Ct cut-off to predict KRAS mutations in IPWF was 36.42 based on a receiver operating characteristic curve. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for molecular diagnosis were 100%, 80.0%, and 85.2%, respectively. Peritoneal dissemination recurrence was significantly more frequent in patients with a positive molecular diagnosis than in those with a negative diagnosis (38.9 vs. 8.0%, P = 0.013). The genomic approach might be clinically valuable for a more precise tumor cell detection in IPWF.

Peritoneal washing cytology status as a crucial prognostic determinant in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative-intent resection following preoperative chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Prognostic implications of peritoneal washing cytology (CY) in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing surgical resection following preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic significance and predictors of a positive CY status (CY+) after preoperative CRT.

METHODS

Clinical data from 141 patients with localized PDAC who underwent curative-intent resection after preoperative CRT were retrospectively analyzed to examine the association between CY+ and clinicopathological factors and survival.

RESULTS

CY+ was observed in six patients (4.3%). The CY+ group exhibited significantly higher preoperative serum levels of CA19-9 and a substantially greater incidence of tumor location in the pancreatic body or tail, along with pathological invasion to the anterior pancreatic capsule, than the CY- group. The CY+ group had a significantly higher incidence of peritoneal recurrence compared with the CY- group (83.3% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.002). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery were significantly shorter in the CY+ group than in the CY- group (CY+ vs. CY-: 18.3 vs. 46.2 months, p = 0.001, and 8.9 vs. 17.7 months, p = 0.009, respectively). Multivariate analyses identified CY+ as an independent prognostic factor for worse OS (hazard ratio 5.00, 95% confidence interval 1.03-12.31) and RFS (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 1.04-6.43). Local invasion grade on imaging before CRT, limited histological response to CRT, and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors of worse OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

Despite the relatively low incidence of CY+ after preoperative CRT, it emerged as an independent prognostic factor in patients with localized PDAC undergoing curative-intent resection following preoperative CRT.

Recurrence pattern and its risk factors in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - A retrospective analysis of 272 patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the patterns of recurrence and their associated risk factors in patients who underwent resection for pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 272 patients, who underwent Ro/R1-resection of PDAC from 2005 to 2020 at the University Hospital Erlangen. Risk factors for different recurrence patterns and the prognostic value of recurrence pattern on the overall survival after recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

61 % of the patients experienced recurrence, mostly within the first 12 postoperative months (62 %) and in the form of metastases (87 %). The median overall survival from recurrence was 9.2 months. The preoperative absence of diabetes and the presence of lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for recurrence and a preoperative CA19-9 exceeding 97 U/ml for early recurrence. Additionally, lymph node metastases were associated with a higher risk of metastatic recurrence. Early recurrence, but not the site of recurrence, was identified as an independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival from recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of recurrence and especially of early and metastatic recurrence are associated with a worse overall survival. Patients lacking preoperative diabetes, having high preoperative CA19-9 values and lymph node metastases are particularly at risk for (early) recurrence.

Surveillance after surgery for pancreatic cancer: a global scoping review of guidelines and a nordic Survey of contemporary practice

OBJECTIVES

Most patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection eventually develop disease recurrence. ‍This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support routine surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery, with a secondary aim of analyzing the implementation of surveillance strategies in the Nordic countries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to identify clinical practice guidelines globally and research studies relating to surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection. This was followed by a survey among 20 pancreatic units from four Nordic countries to assess their current practice of follow-up for operated patients.

RESULTS

Altogether 16 clinical practice guidelines and 17 research studies were included. The guidelines provided inconsistent recommendations regarding postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer. The clinical research data were mainly based on retrospective cohort studies with low level of evidence and lead-time bias was not addressed. Active surveillance was recommended in Sweden and Denmark, but not in Norway beyond the post-operative/adjuvant period. Finland had no national recommendations for surveillance. The Nordic survey revealed a wide variation in reported practice among the different units. About 75% (15 of 20 units) performed routine postoperative surveillance. Routine CA 19-9 testing was used by 80% and routine CT by 67% as part of surveillance. About 73% of centers continued follow-up until 5 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Evidence for routine long-term (i.e. 5 years) surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery remains limited. Most pancreatic units in the Nordic countries conduct regular follow-up, but protocols vary.

Emerging role of local treatment in the era of advanced systemic treatment in pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of pancreatic cancer cases are diagnosed with distant metastases, commonly in the liver, leading to poor prognosis. With modern chemotherapy regimens extending patient survival and stabilizing metastasis, there has been a rise in the use of local treatments. However, the effectiveness for local treatment remains unclear.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting the survival outcomes of pancreatic cancer cases with isolated synchronous or metachronous liver metastases who underwent curative-intent local treatment. Hazard ratios were combined using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The full texts of 102 studies were screened, and 14 retrospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. Among patients with synchronous liver metastases, overall survival was significantly better in those who underwent curative-intent local treatment than in those who did not (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.52). Among patients with metachronous liver metastases, overall survival was also significantly better in those who underwent curative-intent local treatment than in those who did not (HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Curative-intent local treatment may be a feasible option for highly selected pancreatic cancer cases with liver metastases. However, the optimal strategy for local treatments should be explored in future studies.

Radicality and safety of total mesopancreatic excision in pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic head cancer patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) often experience disease recurrence, frequently associated with a positive margin status (R1). Total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) has emerged as a potential approach to increase surgical radicality and minimize locoregional recurrence. However, its effectiveness and safety remain under evaluation.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize current evidence on TMpE outcomes. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to March 2024 to identify studies comparing TMpE with standard pancreatoduodenectomy (sPD). The risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) was pooled using a random effects model.

RESULTS

From 452 studies identified, 9 studies with a total of 738 patients were included, with 361 (49%) undergoing TMpE. TMpE significantly improved the R0 resection rate (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.11-1.38; P < 0.05), reduced blood loss (MD -143.70 ml; 95% CI -247.92, -39.49; P < 0.05), and increased lymph node harvest (MD 7.27 nodes; 95% CI 4.81, 9.73; P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in hospital stay, postoperative complications, or mortality between TMpE and sPD. TMpE also significantly reduced overall recurrence (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.81; P < 0.05) and local recurrence (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.24-0.63; P < 0.05). Additionally, the risk of pancreatic fistula was lower in the TMpE group (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.85; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Total mesopancreas excision significantly increases the R0 resection rate and reduces locoregional recurrence while maintaining an acceptable safety profile when compared with standard pancreatoduodenectomy. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted to determine the optimal surgical approach for total mesopancreatic resection.

Progression of Site-specific Recurrence of Pancreatic Cancer and Implications for Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To analyze postrecurrence progression in the context of recurrence sites and assess implications for postrecurrence treatment.

BACKGROUND

Most patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) recur within 2 years. Different survival outcomes for location-specific patterns of recurrence are reported, highlighting their prognostic value. However, a lack of understanding of postrecurrence progression and survival remains.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included surgically treated patients with PDAC at NYU Langone Health (2010-2021). Sites of recurrence were identified at the time of diagnosis and further follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression analyses were applied to assess survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Recurrence occurred in 57.3% (196/342) patients with a median time to recurrence of 11.3 months (95% CI: 12.6-16.5). The first site of recurrence was local in 43.9% of patients, liver in 23.5%, peritoneal in 8.7%, lung in 3.6%, whereas 20.4% had multiple sites of recurrence. Progression to secondary sites was observed in 11.7%. Only lung involvement was associated with significantly longer survival after recurrence compared with other sites (16.9 vs 8.49 months, P = 0.003). In local recurrence, 21 (33.3%) patients were alive after 1 year without progression to secondary sites. This was associated with a CA19-9 of <100 U/mL at the time of primary diagnosis ( P = 0.039), nodal negative disease ( P = 0.023), and well-moderate differentiation ( P = 0.042) compared with patients with progression.

CONCLUSION

Except for lung recurrence, postrecurrence survival after PDAC resection is associated with poor survival. A subset of patients with local-only recurrence do not quickly succumb to systemic spread. This is associated with markers for favorable tumor biology, making them candidates for potential curative re-resections when feasible.

Axon guidance cue SEMA3A promotes the aggressive phenotype of basal-like PDAC

OBJECTIVE

The dysregulation of the axon guidance pathway is common in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet our understanding of its biological relevance is limited. Here, we investigated the functional role of the axon guidance cue SEMA3A in supporting PDAC progression.

DESIGN

We integrated bulk and single-cell transcriptomic datasets of human PDAC with in situ hybridisation analyses of patients' tissues to evaluate SEMA3A expression in molecular subtypes of PDAC. Gain and loss of function experiments in PDAC cell lines and organoids were performed to dissect how SEMA3A contributes to define a biologically aggressive phenotype.

RESULTS

In PDAC tissues, SEMA3A is expressed by stromal elements and selectively enriched in basal-like/squamous epithelial cells. Accordingly, expression of SEMA3A in PDAC cells is induced by both cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic determinants of the basal-like phenotype. In vitro, SEMA3A promotes cell migration as well as anoikis resistance. At the molecular level, these phenotypes are associated with increased focal adhesion kinase signalling through canonical SEMA3A-NRP1 axis. SEMA3A provides mouse PDAC cells with greater metastatic competence and favours intratumoural infiltration of tumour-associated macrophages and reduced density of T cells. Mechanistically, SEMA3A functions as chemoattractant for macrophages and skews their polarisation towards an M2-like phenotype. In SEMA3Ahigh tumours, depletion of macrophages results in greater intratumour infiltration by CD8+T cells and better control of the disease from antitumour treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we show that SEMA3A is a stress-sensitive locus that promotes the malignant phenotype of basal-like PDAC through both cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic mechanisms.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the latest on diagnosis, molecular profiling, and systemic treatments

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and is expected to be ranked second in the next 10 years due to poor prognosis and a rising incidence. Distant metastatic PDAC is associated with the worst prognosis among the different phases of PDAC. The diagnostic options for PDAC are convenient and available for staging, tumor response evaluation, and management of resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. However, imaging is crucial in PDAC diagnosis, monitoring, resectability appraisal, and response evaluation. The advancement of medical technologies is evolving, hence the use of imaging in PDAC treatment options has grown as well as the utilization of ctDNA as a tumor marker. Treatment options for metastatic PDAC are minimal with the primary goal of therapy limited to symptom relief or palliation, especially in patients with low functional capacity at the point of diagnosis. Molecular profiling has shown promising potential solutions that would push the treatment boundaries for patients with PDAC. In this review, we will discuss the latest updates from evidence-based guidelines regarding diagnosis, therapy response evaluation, prognosis, and surveillance, as well as illustrating novel therapies that have been recently investigated for PDAC, in addition to discussing the molecular profiling advances in PDAC.

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and portal vein infusion chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Although adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy improves the overall survival (OS) of patients with resected pancreatic cancer, its efficacy requires further improvement. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant portal vein infusion (PVI) chemotherapy followed by GEM therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and heparin (2000 IU/day) PVI chemotherapy were combined with systemic administration of mitomycin C (4 mg; days 6, 13, 20, and 27) and cisplatin (10 mg; days 7, 14, 21, and 28) for 4 weeks (PI4W), followed by GEM (1000 mg/m2; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for 6 months). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints were OS and treatment completion.

RESULTS

Between November 2010 and August 2013, 53 patients who underwent complete resection were enrolled, including 30, 20, and 3 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies and distal and total pancreatectomies, respectively. In total, 51 (96.2%) patients underwent R0 resection, of whom 3, 2, 12, 35, 0, and 1 had stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV cancer, respectively, and 47 (88.7%) patients completed PI4W. The median RFS was 22.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years RFS: 64.9%, 38.1%, 38.1%, and 38.1%, respectively), whereas the median OS was 32.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years OS:86.6%, 47.2%, 44.4%, and 44.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with PI4W followed by GEM for 6 months after surgery may be beneficial in patients undergoing curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

Preoperative predictive factors for positive peritoneal cytology results in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The clinical importance of positive peritoneal cytology results in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas remains controversial. We evaluated the prognosis of these patients and the predictive preoperative risk factors for positive peritoneal cytology results.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent curative-intent surgery at our institution between May 2010 and June 2020. Preoperative risk factors for positive peritoneal cytology results were identified using logistic regression analysis. A scoring model was constructed using the total number of significant independent predictors for positive peritoneal cytology results.

RESULTS

Of 233 patients, 18 (7.7%) had positive peritoneal cytology results. The recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were markedly worse in patients with positive peritoneal cytology results than in those with negative peritoneal cytology results (recurrence-free survival: 6.0 months vs. 16.6 months, p = 0.050; cancer-specific survival: 19.4 months vs. 47.5 months, p = 0.034). Tumor location (odds ratio: 3.760, 95% confidence interval: 1.099-11.818, p = 0.023), tumor size > 25 mm (odds ratio: 3.410, 95% confidence interval: 1.031-11.277, p = 0.046), preoperative serosal invasion (odds ratio: 5.193, 95% confidence interval: 1.099-24.531, p = 0.038), and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level > 5.6 ng/mL (odds ratio: 3.816, 95% confidence interval: 1.248-10.667, p = 0.019) were identified as significant independent predictive factors. Our predictive model's optimal cutoff and positive predictive values for positive peritoneal cytology results were 3 and 27.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The indications for curative-intent surgery should be considered carefully in patients with high-risk factors for positive peritoneal cytology results.

Recurrent disease detection after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using a recurrence-focused surveillance strategy (RADAR-PANC): protocol of an international randomized controlled trial according to the Trials within Cohorts design

BACKGROUND

Disease recurrence remains one of the biggest concerns in patients after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, most patients experience local and/or distant PDAC recurrence within 2 years. High-level evidence regarding the benefits of recurrence-focused surveillance after PDAC resection is missing, and the impact of early detection and treatment of recurrence on survival and quality of life is unknown. In most European countries, recurrence-focused follow-up after surgery for PDAC is currently lacking. Consequently, guidelines regarding postoperative surveillance are based on expert opinion and other low-level evidence. The recent emergence of more potent local and systemic treatment options for PDAC recurrence has increased interest in early diagnosis. To determine whether early detection and treatment of recurrence can lead to improved survival and quality of life, we designed an international randomized trial.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial is nested within an existing prospective cohort in pancreatic cancer centers in the Netherlands (Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project; PACAP) and the United Kingdom (UK) (Pancreas Cancer: Observations of Practice and survival; PACOPS) according to the "Trials within Cohorts" (TwiCs) design. All PACAP/PACOPS participants with a macroscopically radical resection (R0-R1) of histologically confirmed PDAC, who provided informed consent for TwiCs and participation in quality of life questionnaires, are included. Participants randomized to the intervention arm are offered recurrence-focused surveillance, existing of clinical evaluation, serum cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 testing, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of chest and abdomen every three months during the first 2 years after surgery. Participants in the control arm of the study will undergo non-standardized clinical follow-up, generally consisting of clinical follow-up with imaging and serum tumor marker testing only in case of onset of symptoms, according to local practice in the participating hospital. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include quality of life, patterns of recurrence, compliance to and costs of recurrence-focused follow-up, and the impact on recurrence-focused treatment.

DISCUSSION

The RADAR-PANC trial will be the first randomized controlled trial to generate high level evidence for the current clinical equipoise regarding the value of recurrence-focused postoperative surveillance with serial tumor marker testing and routine imaging in patients after PDAC resection. The Trials within Cohort design allows us to study the acceptability of recurrence-focused surveillance among cohort participants and increases the generalizability of findings to the general population. While it is strongly encouraged to offer all trial participants treatment at time of recurrence diagnosis, type and timing of treatment will be determined through shared decision-making. This might reduce the potential survival benefits of recurrence-focused surveillance, although insights into the impact on patients' quality of life will be obtained.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04875325 . Registered on May 6, 2021.

Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon

Pancreatic surgery is nowadays considered one of the most complex surgical approaches and not unscathed from complications. After the surgical procedure, cross-sectional imaging is considered the non-invasive reference standard to detect early and late compilations, and consequently to address patients to the best management possible. Contras-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) should be considered the most important and useful imaging technique to evaluate the surgical site. Thanks to its speed, contrast, and spatial resolution, it can help reach the final diagnosis with high accuracy. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered as a second-line imaging approach, especially for the evaluation of biliary findings and late complications. In both cases, the radiologist should be aware of protocols and what to look at, to create a robust dialogue with the surgeon and outline a fitted treatment for each patient.

Isolated lung metastases from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC): Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of a different disease

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis, mostly due to the high rate of distant dissemination. However, growing evidence shows that isolated lung recurrence or metastases (ILM) from PDAC are not only less common, but also correlated with a better prognosis. Lung-only recurrence after surgery occurs later in time and is associated with more favorable prognostic characteristics of the primary tumor. Moreover, recent findings suggest that this specific site of metastases is characterized by an immunologically "hot" microenvironment and a more favorable molecular profile that could possibly justify its clinical behavior. Thus, ILM from PDAC emerge as a distinct entity, that might also benefit from a different therapeutic approach, possibly with the integration of surgery and de-intensified chemotherapy regimens, especially in selected patients. In this review we delve into the current scientific evidence on the clinical and biological characteristics of isolated LM from PDAC, also focusing on concerns with their diagnostic process and the therapeutic options for the management of this subset of patients.

Surgery for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Defining Biologic Resectability

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is most often metastatic at diagnosis. As systemic therapy continues to improve alongside advanced surgical techniques, the focus has shifted toward defining biologic, rather than technical, resectability. Several centers have reported metastasectomy for oligometastatic PDAC, yet the indications and potential benefits remain unclear. In this review, we attempt to define oligometastatic disease in PDAC and to explore the rationale for metastasectomy. We evaluate the existing evidence for metastasectomy in liver, peritoneum, and lung individually, assessing the safety and oncologic outcomes for each. Furthermore, we explore contemporary biomarkers of biological resectability in oligometastatic PDAC, including radiographic findings, biochemical markers (such as CA 19-9 and CEA), inflammatory markers (including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and scoring indices), and liquid biopsy techniques. With careful consideration of existing data, we explore the concept of biologic resectability in guiding patient selection for metastasectomy in PDAC.

Prognostication for recurrence patterns after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Backgrounds/Aims

This study aimed to investigate patterns and factors affecting recurrence after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for PDAC (2011-21) and consented to data and tissue collection (Barts Pancreas Tissue Bank) were followed up until May 2023. Clinico-pathological variables were analysed using Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Of 91 people (42 males [46%]; median age, 71 years [range, 43-86 years]) with a median follow-up of 51 months (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 40-61 months), the recurrence rate was 72.5% (n = 66; 12 loco-regional alone, 11 liver alone, 5 lung alone, 3 peritoneal alone, 29 simultaneous loco-regional and distant metastases, and 6 multi-focal distant metastases at first recurrence diagnosis). The median time to recurrence was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.6-10.5 months). Median survival after recurrence was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.3 months). Stratification by recurrence location revealed significant differences in time to recurrence between loco-regional only recurrence (median, 13.6 months; 95% CI, 11.7-15.5 months) and simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence (median, 7.5 months; 95% CI, 4.6-10.4 months; p = 0.02, pairwise log-rank test). Significant predictors for recurrence were systemic inflammation index (SII) ≥ 500 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.5; 95% CI, 1.4-14.3), lymph node ratio ≥ 0.33 (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.4-5.8), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7).

Conclusions

Timing to loco-regional only recurrence was significantly longer than simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence. Significant predictors for recurrence were SII, lymph node ration, and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Tumor location, clinicopathological features, and perioperative and prognostic outcomes in patients who underwent pancreatic resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

/Objective: Preoperative treatment of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is gaining popularity worldwide. However, the characteristics of tumors located in the pancreatic head (Ph), or those in the body or tail (Pbt), after surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinicopathological features, perioperative outcomes, and prognosis of patients with resectable PDAC who underwent NACRT followed by curative pancreatic resection, focusing on distinguishing between Ph and Pbt PDACs.

METHODS

We included 107 patients with resectable PDAC who underwent curative resection following NACRT between 2009 and 2023. Clinicopathological features, perioperative and prognostic outcomes, recurrence patterns, and prognoses were compared between Ph and Pbt PDAC groups.

RESULTS

Tumors were found in the Ph and Pbt in 64 and 43 patients, respectively. Albumin levels and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios after NACRT were significantly lower in the Ph group than in the Pbt group. The Pbt group showed significantly higher rates of positive peritoneal lavage cytology and serosal, arterial, and portal vein invasion than the Ph group did. Overall and recurrence-free survival were similar between the two groups. The most common site of initial postoperative recurrence was the lung only in both groups; however, the rate of peritoneal dissemination only was significantly higher in the Pbt group than in the Ph group.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognoses based on tumor locations in the Ph and Pbt after surgery following NACRT are similar. Following the resection of resectable Pbt PDAC, the possibility of peritoneal dissemination recurrence should be considered.

Influence of aberrant right hepatic artery on survival after pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

PURPOSE

The presence of an aberrant right hepatic artery (aRHA), arising from the superior mesenteric artery, is a common variant of the liver vascular anatomy. Considering that tumor spread occurs along vessels, the question arises, whether the presence of an aRHA influences the oncologic outcome after resection for cancer of the pancreatic head.

METHODS

Patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, who underwent resection from 2011 to 2020 at the Frankfurt University Hospital, Germany, were analyzed retrospectively. Surgical records and computed tomography imaging were reviewed for the presence of aRHA. Overall and disease-free survival as well as hepatic recurrence were analyzed according to the presence of aRHA.

RESULTS

aRHA was detected in 21 out of 145 patients (14.5%). The median overall survival was 26 months (95%CI 20.8-34.4), median disease-free survival was 12.1 months (95%CI 8.1-17.3). There was no significant difference in overall survival (26.1 versus 21.4 months, adjusted hazard ratio 1.31, 95%CI 0.7-2.46, p = 0.401) or disease-free survival (14.5 months versus 12 months, adjusted hazard ratio 0.98, 95%CI 0.57-1.71, p = 0.957) without and with aRHA. The hepatic recurrence rate was 24.4.% with conventional anatomy versus 30.8% with aRHA (adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95%CI 0.3-5.38, p = 0.669). In the multivariable analysis, only lymphatic vessel invasion was an independent prognostic factor for hepatic recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an aRHA does not seem to influence the long-term survival and hepatic recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.

Uncovering the clinicopathological features of early recurrence after surgical resection of pancreatic cancer

To identify risk factors and biomarker for early recurrence in patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who undergo curative resection. Early recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer is an obstacle to long-term survival. We retrospectively reviewed 162 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence within 12 months of surgery. We selected S100A2 as a biomarker and investigated its expression using immunohistochemistry. Of the total, 79.6% (n = 129) of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery and 117 (72.2%) experienced recurrence, of which 73 (45.1%) experience early recurrence. In multivariate analysis, age < 60 years, presence of lymph node metastasis, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with early recurrence (all P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with high S100A2 expression (H-score > 5) was significantly lower in the early recurrence group (41.5% vs. 63.3%, P = 0.020). The cumulative incidence rate of early recurrence was higher in patients with an S100A2 H-score < 5 (41.5% vs. 63.3%, P = 0.012). The median overall survival of patients with higher S100A2 expression was longer than those with lower S100A2 expression (median 30.1 months vs. 24.2 months, P = 0.003). High-risk factors for early recurrence after surgery for pancreatic cancer include young age, lymph node metastasis, and no adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant treatment or intensive adjuvant therapy after surgery may improve the prognosis of patients with high-risk signatures. In patients who receive adjuvant therapy, high S100A2 expression is a good predictor.

Preoperative evaluating early recurrence in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by using CT radiomics

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of a radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced CT for preoperatively predicting early recurrence after curative resection in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-six patients with resectable PDAC who underwent curative resection were included and allocated to training set (131 patients) and validation set (55 patients). Radiomics features were extracted from arterial phase and portal venous phase images. The Mann-Whitney U test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used for feature selection and radiomics signature construction. The radiomics model based on radiomics signature and clinical features was developed by the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Performance of the radiomics model was investigated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The radiomics signature, consisting of three arterial phase and three venous phase features, showed optimal prediction performance for early recurrence in both training (AUC = 0.73) and validation sets (AUC = 0.66). Multivariate logistic analysis identified the radiomics signature (OR, 2.58; 95% CI 2.36-3.17; p = 0.002) and clinical stage (OR, 1.60; 95% CI 1.15-2.30; p = 0.007) as independent predictors. The AUC values for risk evaluation of early recurrence using the radiomics model incorporating clinical stage were 0.80 (training set) and 0.75 (validation set).

CONCLUSION

The radiomics-based model integrating with clinical stage can predict early recurrence after upfront surgery in patients with resectable PDAC.

Anatomical and Biological Considerations to Determine Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains associated with poor outcomes with a 5-year survival of 12% across all stages of the disease. These poor outcomes are driven by a delay in diagnosis and an early propensity for systemic dissemination of the disease. Recently, aggressive surgical approaches involving complex vascular resections and reconstructions have become more common, thus allowing more locally advanced tumors to be resected. Unfortunately, however, even after the completion of surgery and systemic therapy, approximately 40% of patients experience early recurrence of disease. To determine resectability, many institutions utilize anatomical staging systems based on the presence and extent of vascular involvement of major abdominal vessels around the pancreas. However, these classification systems are based on anatomical considerations only and do not factor in the burden of systemic disease. By integrating the biological criteria, we possibly could avoid futile resections often associated with significant morbidity. Especially patients with anatomically resectable disease who have a heavy burden of radiologically undetected systemic disease most likely do not derive a survival benefit from resection. On the contrary, we could offer complex resections to those who have locally advanced or oligometastatic disease but have favorable systemic biology and are most likely to benefit from resection. This review summarizes the current literature on defining anatomical and biological resectability in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Postoperative Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level as a Good Indicator of Ineffective Response to the Currently Recommended S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The intensity of adjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) has not been stratified according to the risk after resection. This study was designed to identify patients with PDACs in whom the current S-1 adjuvant treatment is ineffective.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDACs from 2009 to 2020 at Sendai Open Hospital and were receiving S-1 adjuvant treatment. The independent risk factors for recurrence and survival were determined by using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. The effects of S-1 adjuvant treatment and detailed patterns of recurrence were evaluated in patients with high-risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 118 patients with PDAC received S-1 adjuvant treatment. Postoperative nonnormalized carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) was a predictive risk factor for recurrence (p < 0.010; hazard ratio [HR], 3.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.26-6.62) and survival (p = 0.008; HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.24-4.11) after S-1 adjuvant treatment. In 24 patients with nonnormalized postoperative CA19-9, S-1 monotherapy was ineffective in preventing recurrence, even during the treatment period, compared with that noted in patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment. The recurrence rate during adjuvant treatment was 41.7%; in all cases, recurrence was caused by distant metastasis. The total recurrence rate was up to 95.8%, and distant recurrence was especially frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

The current S-1 adjuvant treatment regimen is ineffective for patients with postoperative nonnormalized CA19-9. The postoperative CA19-9 level may be a good indicator for further aggressive treatment. This study may lead to further discussions on intensity stratification of adjuvant treatments for PDAC.

The significance of peri-neural invasion in patients with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single-center experience in China

BACKGROUND

The significance of peri-neural invasion (PNI) in resected patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) has been rarely explored. Our study was performed to evaluate the significance of PNI in resected HCCA patients in terms of tumor biological features and long-term survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed surgically-treated HCCA patients between June, 2000 and June 2018. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 239 resected HCCA patients were included (No. PNI: 138). PNI indicated more aggressive tumor biological features. Major vascular reconstruction was more frequently performed in patients with PNI (34.8% vs 24.8%, P = 0.064). Patients with PNI shared a significantly higher percentage of surgical margin width <5 mm (29.0% vs 16.8%, P = 0.02). The proportion of patients with T1-2 disease (31.2% vs 40.6%, P = 0.085) or I-II disease (21% vs 34.7%, P = 0.014) was significantly lower in patients with PNI. The overall morbidity rate was significantly higher in patients with PNI (P = 0.042). A much worse overall survival (OS) (P = 0.0003) or disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.0011) in patients with PNI. Even after matching vital prognostic factors, a significantly worse OS (P = 0.0003) or DFS (P = 0.0002) was still observed in patients with PNI. PNI was an independent prognostic factor in both OS (P = 0.011) and DFS (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

PNI indicated more aggressive tumor biological features and more advanced tumor stage in patients with resected HCCA. PNI can be an independent prognostic factor in both OS and DFS. Future multi-center studies covering various races or populations are required for further validation.

Efficacy of local treatment for isolated liver metastasis after pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Although attempts of local treatment for isolated liver recurrence in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have increased, the efficacy remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of local treatment for recurrent liver lesions after pancreatectomy on the survival of patients with PDAC.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with isolated liver recurrence after pancreatectomy at a high-volume center were included. We classified these patients based on the treatment options after recurrence and performed propensity score matching to minimize confounding.

RESULTS

Median with interquartile range survival after recurrence was significantly longer for patients who underwent local treatment for recurrent liver lesions plus chemotherapy (22.0 [17.0-29.0] months) than those treated with chemotherapy alone (13.0 [7.0-21.0] months, p = .027). In multivariate analysis, not only local treatment for recurrent liver lesions plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.55 [0.32-0.94]; p = .030) but also indicators for systemically controlled tumor such as late recurrence (0.57 [0.35-0.92]; p = .021), chemotherapy for ≥6 months (0.25 [0.15-0.42]; p < .001), and disease control by chemotherapy (0.36 [0.22-0.60]; p < .001) were identified as favorable prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

PDAC patients with stable recurrent liver lesions should be considered a candidate for local treatment.

Prognostic impact of resection margin status on survival after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A greater than 1 mm tumour-free resection margin (R0 >1 mm) is a prognostic factor in upfront-resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. After neoadjuvant treatment (NAT); however, the prognostic impact of resection margin (R) status remains controversial.

METHODS

Randomised and non-randomised studies assessing the association of R status and survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after NAT were sought by systematic searches of MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL. Hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% CI were collected to generate log HR using the inverse-variance method. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed and the results presented as weighted HR. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were conducted to account for different surgical procedures and varying length of follow-up, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies with a total of 4929 patients were included. Based on univariable data, R0 greater than 1 mm was significantly associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.57-1.97; P<0.00001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.39-1.97; P<0.00001). Using adjusted data, R0 greater than 1 mm was significantly associated with prolonged OS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.39-1.97; P<0.00001) and DFS (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.30-2.39; P=0.0003). Results for R1 direct were comparable in the entire cohort; however, no prognostic impact was detected in sensitivity analysis including only partial pancreatoduodenectomies.

CONCLUSION

After NAT, a tumour-free margin greater than 1 mm is independently associated with improved OS as well as DFS in patients undergoing surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.

Advances in the management of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains among the malignancies with the worst outcomes. Survival has been improving, but at a slower rate than other cancers. Multimodal treatment, including chemotherapy, surgical resection, and radiotherapy, has been under investigation for many years. Because of the anatomical characteristics of the pancreas, more emphasis on treatment selection has been placed on local extension into major vessels. Recently, the development of more effective treatment regimens has opened up new treatment strategies, but urgent research questions have also become apparent. This review outlines the current management of pancreatic cancer, and the recent advances in its treatment. The review discusses future treatment pathways aimed at integrating novel findings of translational and clinical research.

Total Superior Mesenteric Artery Nerve Plexus Preservation During Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) nerve plexus (PLsma) dissection has been performed to achieve R0 resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in high-volume centers. However, full-extent PLsma preservation in PD is employed in our institution. The feasibility of the PLsma preservation strategy was investigated.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2020, 156 patients underwent PLsma preservation PD for PDAC at our institution. Of these, 118 patients had resectable PDAC (R group) and 38 patients had borderline resectable artery (BR-A group). Clinical and oncological outcomes focusing on local recurrence, patient prognoses, and morbidities (including postoperative refractory diarrhea) were retrospectively analyzed and our postoperative outcomes were compared with those of other institutions.

RESULTS

Pathological R0 resection by PLsma preservation PD was achieved in 96 R group patients (81.4%) and 27 BR-A group patients (71.1%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 15.0 days in both groups. Local site-only recurrence was observed in 10.2% (12/118) of R-group and 10.5% (4/38) of BR-A-group patients, whereas distant site-only recurrence occurred in 21.2% (25/118) of R-group and 28.9% (11/38) of BR-A-group patients. Median survival times were 64.3 months (R group) and 35.4 months (BR-A group, p = 0.07). Median disease-free survival (DFS) times were 31.0 months (R group) and 12.0 months (BR-A group). No diarrhea requiring opioids was observed in either group. These results were equal or superior to those of PLsma dissection PD in other institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

PLsma preservation in PD was feasible compared to PLsma dissection in recurrence and overall survival.

Currently Debated Topics on Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Narrative Review on Surgical Treatment of Borderline Resectable, Locally Advanced, and Synchronous or Metachronous Oligometastatic Tumor

BACKGROUND

Previously considered inoperable patients (borderline resectable, locally advanced, synchronous oligometastatic or metachronous pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC)) are starting to become resectable thanks to advances in chemo/radiotherapy and the reduction in operative mortality.

METHODS

This narrative review presents a chosen literature selection, giving a picture of the current state of treatment of these patients.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is generally recognized as the treatment of choice before surgery. However, despite the increased efficacy, the best pathological response is still limited to 10.9-27.9% of patients. There are still limited data on the selection of possible NAT responders and how to diagnose non-responders early. Multidetector computed tomography has high sensitivity and low specificity in evaluating resectability after NAT, limiting the resection rate of resectable patients. Ca 19-9 and Positron emission tomography are giving promising results. The prediction of early recurrence after a radical resection of synchronous or metachronous metastatic PDAC, thus identifying patients with poor prognosis and saving them from a resection of little benefit, is still ongoing, although some promising data are available.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, high-level evidence demonstrating the benefit of the surgical treatment of such patients is still lacking and should not be performed outside of high-volume centers with interdisciplinary teams of surgeons and oncologists.

Predicting post-recurrence survival for patients with pancreatic cancer recurrence after primary resection: A Bi-institutional validated risk classification

BACKGROUND

Over 80% of patients will develop disease recurrence after radical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aims to develop and validate a clinical risk score predicting post-recurrence survival (PRS) at time of recurrence.

METHODS

All patients who had recurrence after undergoing pancreatectomy for PDAC at the Johns Hopkins Hospital or at the Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht during the study period were included. Cox proportional hazard model was used to develop the risk model. Performance of the final model was assessed in a test set after internal validation.

RESULTS

Of 718 resected PDAC patients, 72% had recurrence after a median follow-up of 32 months. The median overall survival was 21 months and the median PRS was 9 months. Prognostic factors associated with shorter PRS were age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.00-1.04), multiple-site recurrence (HR 1.57; 95%CI 1.08-2.28), and symptoms at time of recurrence (HR 2.33; 95%CI 1.59-3.41). Recurrence-free survival longer than 12 months (HR 0.55; 95%CI 0.36-0.83), FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.45; 95%CI 0.25-0.81; HR 0.58; 95%CI 0.26-0.93, respectively) were associated with a longer PRS. The resulting risk score had a good predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.73).

CONCLUSION

This study developed a clinical risk score based on an international cohort that predicts PRS in patients who underwent surgical resection for PDAC. This risk score will become available on www.evidencio.com and can help clinicians with patient counseling on prognosis.

Oncostatin-M and OSM-Receptor Feed-Forward Activation of MAPK Induces Separable Stem-like and Mesenchymal Programs

Patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently present with advanced metastatic disease and exhibit a poor response to therapy, resulting in poor outcomes. The tumor microenvironment cytokine Oncostatin-M (OSM) initiates PDAC plasticity, inducing the reprogramming to a stem-like/mesenchymal state, which enhances metastasis and therapy resistance. Using a panel of PDAC cells driven through epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by OSM or the transcription factors ZEB1 or SNAI1, we find that OSM uniquely induces tumor initiation and gemcitabine resistance independently of its ability to induce a CD44HI/mesenchymal phenotype. In contrast, while ZEB1 and SNAI1 induce a CD44HI/mesenchymal phenotype and migration comparable with OSM, they are unable to promote tumor initiation or robust gemcitabine resistance. Transcriptomic analysis identified that OSM-mediated stemness requires MAPK activation and sustained, feed-forward transcription of OSMR. MEK and ERK inhibitors prevented OSM-driven transcription of select target genes and stem-like/mesenchymal reprogramming, resulting in reduced tumor growth and resensitization to gemcitabine. We propose that the unique properties of OSMR, which hyperactivates MAPK signaling when compared with other IL6 family receptors, make it an attractive therapeutic target, and that disrupting the OSM-OSMR-MAPK feed-forward loop may be a novel way to therapeutically target the stem-like behaviors common to aggressive PDAC.

IMPLICATIONS

Small-molecule MAPK inhibitors may effectively target the OSM/OSMR-axis that leads to EMT and tumor initiating properties that promote aggressive PDAC.

Semaphorin 3 C enhances putative cancer stemness and accelerates peritoneal dissemination in pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Semaphorins, axon guidance cues in neuronal network formation, have been implicated in cancer progression. We previously identified semaphorin 3 C (SEMA3C) as a secreted protein overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We, therefore, hypothesized that SEMA3C supports PDAC progression. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical features of SEMA3C, especially its association with chemo-resistance and peritoneal dissemination.

METHODS

In resected PDAC tissues, we assessed the relationship between SEMA3C expression and clinicopathological features by immunohistochemistry. In vitro studies, we have shown invasion assay, pancreatosphere formation assay, colony formation assay, cytotoxicity assay, and activation of SEMA3C downstream targets (c-Met, Akt, mTOR). In vivo, we performed a preclinical trial to confirm the efficacy of SEMA3C shRNA knockdown and Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel (GnP) in an orthotopic transplantation mouse model and in peritoneal dissemination mouse model.

RESULTS

In resected PDAC tissues, SEMA3C expression correlated with invasion and peritoneal dissemination after surgery. SEMA3C promoted cell invasion, self-renewal, and colony formation in vitro. We further demonstrated that SEMA3C knockdown increased Gem-induced cytotoxicity by suppressing the activation of the Akt/mTOR pathway via the c-Met receptor. Combination therapy with SEMA3C knockdown and GnP reduced tumor growth and peritoneal dissemination.

CONCLUSIONS

SEMA3C enhances peritoneal dissemination by regulating putative cancer stemness and Gem resistance and activates phosphorylation of the Akt/mTOR pathway via c-Met. Our findings provide a new avenue for therapeutic strategies in regulating peritoneal dissemination during PDAC progression.

Spatially restricted tumour-associated and host-associated immune drivers correlate with the recurrence sites of pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will experience recurrence after resection. Here, we investigate spatially organised immune determinants of PDAC recurrence.

DESIGN

PDACs (n=284; discovery cohort) were classified according to recurrence site as liver (n=93/33%), lung (n=49/17%), local (n=31/11%), peritoneal (n=38/13%) and no-recurrence (n=73/26%). Spatial compartments were identified by fluorescent imaging as: pancytokeratin (PanCK)+CD45- (tumour cells); CD45+PanCK- (leucocytes) and PanCK-CD45- (stromal cells), followed by transcriptomic (72 genes) and proteomic analysis (51 proteins) for immune pathway targets. Results from next-generation sequencing (n=194) were integrated. Finally, 10 tumours from each group underwent immunophenotypic analysis by multiplex immunofluorescence. A validation cohort (n=109) was examined in parallel.

RESULTS

No-recurrent PDACs show high immunogenicity, adaptive immune responses and are rich in pro-inflammatory chemokines, granzyme B and alpha-smooth muscle actin+ fibroblasts. PDACs with liver and/or peritoneal recurrences display low immunogenicity, stemness phenotype and innate immune responses, whereas those with peritoneal metastases are additionally rich in FAP+ fibroblasts. PDACs with local and/or lung recurrences display interferon-gamma signalling and mixed adaptive and innate immune responses, but with different leading immune cell population. Tumours with local recurrences overexpress dendritic cell markers whereas those with lung recurrences neutrophilic markers. Except the exclusive presence of RNF43 mutations in the no-recurrence group, no genetic differences were seen. The no-recurrence group exhibited the best, whereas liver and peritoneal recurrences the poorest prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate distinct inflammatory/stromal responses in each recurrence group, which might affect dissemination patterns and patient outcomes. These findings may help to inform personalised adjuvant/neoadjuvant and surveillance strategies in PDAC, including immunotherapeutic modalities.

The role of local treatment including pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with isolated synchronous liver metastasis: Propensity score-matched analyses

BACKGROUND

In an era of more effective chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the paradigm of local treatment is changing. However, the efficacy of local treatment in patients with isolated liver metastasis remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatectomy ± local treatment for metastasis (cytoreductive surgery) in PDAC patients with isolated synchronous liver metastasis.

METHODS

In total, 239 patients with isolated liver metastasis were extracted from Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH). For comparison, another 12 637 patients were extracted from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Propensity score matching was performed to minimize confounding in both cohorts. Survival analyses stratified by the treatment delivered were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

In the SNUH cohort, the median (interquartile range) survival was 20.5 (13.0-42.0) months for patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy versus 12.0 (10.0-18.0) months for those who received chemotherapy alone (P < .001). With the NCDB cohort, the median (interquartile range) survival was 15.6 (8.9-31.2) months for patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy versus 7.4 (3.4-13.2) months for those who received chemotherapy alone (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with isolated synchronous liver metastasis should be considered for cytoreductive surgery in addition to effective chemotherapy.

Smoking is Not Associated with Lung Metastasis in Pancreatic Cancer

Smoking is a risk factor for pulmonary metastasis in various malignancies. We investigated this association for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a retrospective 1:2 case-control study of consecutive patients who underwent PDAC resection (2011-2021). Cases ultimately developed lung metastases and controls did not. Of 744 patients we identified 53 cases and 106 matched controls. Twenty-five (47%) cases and 50 (47%) matched controls had a history of smoking (p = 1.0). This indicates that smoking is not associated with increased risk of pulmonary metastasis in resectable PDAC. Further research is needed to elucidate tumor and parenchymal factors influencing metastatic site.