Phase 2 trial of temozolomide using protracted low-dose and whole-brain radiotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer and breast cancer patients with brain metastases

The efficiency and safety of temozolomide and PD-1/L1 inhibitors in pretreated NSCLC with brain metastasis: a retrospective cohort

OBJECTIVE

Previous research has shown that both temozolomide (TMZ) and PD-1/L1 inhibitors (PD-1/L1) alone exhibit certain potential in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM), in this study, we will explore combining the two in order to seek new effective treatment options for NSCLC with BM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During 2021.1 to 2023.12, we collected the date of these pretreated-NSCLC with BM who accept the treatment of TMZ and PD-1/L1, the objective response ratio (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were set as the primary endpoint, meanwhile, the toxicity of such regimen was also recorded.

RESULTS

About 42 patients are enrolled, our primary analysis demonstrated that the ORR of such regimen toward NSCLC with BM was 26.19%, with Approximate intracranial and extracranial lesion ORR was 6% and 20% respectively, the DCR was about 64.29%, the mean PFS and OS was about 4 m and 8.5 m. Further analysis indicated that the efficiency correlated with the diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (ds-GPA) score. Moreover, the toxicity can also be tolerated, indicating the application potential of such regimen against NSCLC with BM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results exhibited that with tolerated toxicity, the combination of TMZ and PD-1/L1 shows promising efficiency against NSCLC with BM, this would be of great significance for the treatment of NSCLC with brain metastasis. However, due to the limitation of sample and retrospective property, the real value of such regimen needed to be further confirmed in the future.

Systemic Treatment for Brain Metastasis and Leptomeningeal Disease in Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer with brain metastasis (BCBM) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD) are important clinical problems. Traditionally, patients with metastases to the brain and meninges were excluded from clinical trials; hence, robust, evidence-based treatment recommendations are lacking. In this review, we outline the systemic treatment options and ongoing clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies have added to the systemic treatment options available. Antibody-drug conjugates have changed the therapeutic landscape. Combination treatment modalities that target multiple mechanisms including disruption of the blood brain barrier are increasingly being studied. Breast cancer with brain metastases and LMD is a heterogenous disease. While the prognosis remains grim, with more systemic treatment options, patients with BCBM are now living longer. Many ongoing clinical trials hold promise to further improve outcomes.

The influence of the blood-brain barrier in the treatment of brain tumours

Brain tumours have a poor prognosis and lack effective treatments. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents a major hurdle to drug delivery to brain tumours. In some locations in the tumour, the BBB may be disrupted to form the blood-brain tumour barrier (BBTB). This leaky BBTB enables diagnosis of brain tumours by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; however, this disruption is heterogeneous throughout the tumour. Thus, relying on the disrupted BBTB for achieving effective drug concentrations in brain tumours has met with little clinical success. Because of this, it would be beneficial to design drugs and drug delivery strategies to overcome the 'normal' BBB to effectively treat the brain tumours. In this review, we discuss the role of BBB/BBTB in brain tumour diagnosis and treatment highlighting the heterogeneity of the BBTB. We also discuss various strategies to improve drug delivery across the BBB/BBTB to treat both primary and metastatic brain tumours. Recognizing that the BBB represents a critical determinant of drug efficacy in central nervous system tumours will allow a more rapid translation from basic science to clinical application. A more complete understanding of the factors, such as BBB-limited drug delivery, that have hindered progress in treating both primary and metastatic brain tumours, is necessary to develop more effective therapies.

The Efficacy of First-Generation EGFR-TKI Combined With Brain Radiotherapy as the First-Line Treatment for Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With Brain Metastases and EGFR Sensitive Mutations: A Retrospective study

Background:

It was controversial that whether LUAD patients with brain metastases (BMs) and EGFR sensitive mutations should be conducted using brain radiotherapy when treated with first-generation EGFR-TKI. Herein, a retrospective study was designed to compare the efficacy of first-generation EGFR-TKI combined with brain radiotherapy and EGFR-TKI alone as first-line treatment for these LUAD patients.

Patients and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed the status of patients with advanced LUAD carrying EGFR sensitive mutations who received first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment in our center. iPFS was the first time of intracranial progression or death from the diagnosis of BMs, PFS was the time of progression of any site or death from the diagnosis of BMs, and OS was the time of confirmed BMs to death or the last follow-up time. Differences in characteristics between groups were compared using the Chi-square test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the iPFS, PFS, and OS. Univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and subgroup analysis were conducted by Cox regression model.

Results:

There were 77 patients (77/134, 57.5%) in the TKI + RT group and 57 patients (57/134, 42.5%) in the TKI group. TKI + RT group had a significant higher intracranial ORR and DCR, and the combination therapy was independently significantly associated with a longer iPFS (18.9 vs. 10.5 months, P = 0.0009), systematic PFS (12.5 vs. 8.4 months, P = 0.0071) and OS (30.8 vs. 22.7 months, P = 0.0183). Females, non-smokers, and younger patients benefited more from the combination therapy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the combination therapy could improve the iPFS in patients with more than 3 BMs (P = 0.005); however, it couldn’t improve the OS for these patients.

Conclusion:

Our study confirmed the effect of the combination of EGFR-TKI and brain radiotherapy as first-line treatment for LUAD patients with BMs and EGFR sensitive mutations.

Complete response of radioresistant brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer with temozolomide: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs) have been found as subjects of poor prognosis. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), surgery, and stereotactic radiosurgery, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), or some combinations are the most commonly employed strategies for the treatment of treatments BMs. However, some patients are resistant to all these treatments.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We present an NSCLC patient with progression of BMs after treatment with WBRT and EGFR-TKIs. The patient was diagnosed with multiple metastases on July 9, 2014, and treated with docetaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy followed with gefitinib as the maintenance therapy. The patient showed recurrence of BMs after 8-months of chemotherapy. WBRT with 30 Gy was administrated in 10 fractions. Tumor progression of the brain was diagnosed with an magnetic resonance imaging scan after 2-months of WBRT.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed as pulmonary adenocarcinoma with diffuse metastases in both lungs and multiple metastases in bone and brain. Progression of BMs was confirmed through magnetic resonance imaging.

INTERVENTIONS

This patient was administered temozolomide (150 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 28-day cycle). As a whole, 6 cycles were performed after the progression of BMs from August 2015.

OUTCOMES

The patient got complete brain remission and lived without discomfort. The intracranial lesion did not progress until the progression of the lung lesion and led to death on February 20, 2019. The intracranial progression-free survival was 42 months, whereas the overall survival was 55 months.

LESSONS

For patients with NSCLC and BMs, temozolomide can be used as a treatment option, especially in patients with EGFR-TKIs resistance or without driver mutations.

De-escalating cancer treatments during COVID 19 pandemic: Is metronomic chemotherapy a reasonable option?

•

COVID 19 pandemic represents an emergency for public health services.

•

The reorganization of the healthcare system has had an important impact on the management of cancer patients.

•

Oral treatments and de-escalation strategies are encouraged.

•

Oral metronomic chemotherapy could be a reasonable treatment option in some cancer patients subgroups during COVID 19 pandemic.

COVID 19 pandemic represents an emergency for public health services and containment measures to reduce the risk of infection have been promptly activated worldwide.

The healthcare systems reorganization has had a major impact on the management of cancer patients who are considered at high risk of infection.

Recommendations and guidelines on how to manage cancer patients during COVID 19 pandemic have been published. Oral administration of chemotherapy is recommended to limit the access of cancer patients to hospital facilities and in some cases to guarantee the continuum of care.

Low-dose metronomic administration of chemotherapy with different drugs and schedules has emerged in the last years as a possible alternative to conventional chemotherapy, due to its promising tumor control rates and excellent safety profiles. Moreover, given that many metronomic schedules use the oral route administration, it could represent a therapeutic strategy to ensure continuum of cancer care during COVID 19 pandemic.

In this review we have selected all the clinical studies that have used the metronomic strategy, especially with oral drugs, in order to identify the subgroups of cancer patients who can benefit most from a metronomic approach even during COVID 19 pandemic.

Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from systemic cancers can involve the brain parenchyma, leptomeninges (pia, subarachnoid space and arachnoid mater), and dura. Leptomeningeal metastases (LM), also known by different terms including neoplastic meningitis and carcinomatous meningitis, occur in both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. This review will focus exclusively on LM arising from solid tumors with a goal of providing the reader an understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, prognostication, current management and future directions.

Phase II Study of Systemic High-dose Methotrexate and Intrathecal Liposomal Cytarabine for Treatment of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis From Breast Cancer

Metastatic breast cancer frequently leads to brain metastases and, less commonly, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC). Once cerebrospinal fluid involvement occurs, the prognosis is poor. There are limited treatment options available, but none offer significant survival benefit. Methotrexate, given systemically at high doses (3.5-8 gm/m²), achieves cytotoxic concentrations in the CSF and has been shown to prolong survival in patients with LC. Intrathecal liposomal cytarabine has been shown to increase time to neurologic progression in patients with breast cancer and LC. The combination of these 2 agents in LC has not been studied extensively. Here, we present the results of the phase II study with this combination showing promising efficacy and very good tolerability.

Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Clinical Experience

Metronomic chemotherapy, continuous and dose-dense administration of chemotherapeutic drugs with lowered doses, is being evaluated for substituting, augmenting, or appending conventional maximum tolerated dose regimens, with preclinical and clinical studies for the past few decades. To date, the principle mechanisms of its action include impeding tumoral angiogenesis and modulation of hosts' immune system, affecting directly tumor cells, their progenitors, and neighboring stromal cells. Its better toxicity profile, lower cost, and easier use are main advantages over conventional therapies. The evidence of metronomic chemotherapy for personalized medicine is growing, starting with unfit elderly patients and also for palliative treatment. The literature reviewed in this article mainly demonstrates that metronomic chemotherapy is advantageous for selected patients and for certain types of malignancies, which make it a promising therapeutic approach for filling in the gaps. More clinical studies are needed to establish a solidified role for metronomic chemotherapy with other treatment models in modern cancer management.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with concomitant temozolomide for brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma

Short-term efficacy, adverse effects and the impact on quality of life (QoL) of a concomitant treatment with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with brain metastases (BMs) from lung adenocarcinoma were evaluated. This study sought to confirm the benefit of adding TMZ to IMRT in patients with BMs from lung adenocarcinoma. Nine patients were enrolled and received a dose of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions to clinical tumor volume (CTV) according to IMRT, then additional dose of 9 Gy in 3 fractions of IMRT was delivered to gross tumor volume (GTV) only with concomitant TMZ (75 mg/m²/day) orally during RT for 3 weeks. One patient achieved complete response (CR) (11.1%), 6 patients obtained partial response (PR) (66.7%), and there were no patients in progression. Therefore, objective response (OR) reached 77.8%. The main adverse effects included neutropenia, anemia, vomiting, fatigue and dizziness. Grade ≥3 of hematologic toxicities did not occur. However, the other 9 patients who received only intensity-modulated radiation had much worse results. The CR was 0, PR rate was 44.4%, OR rate was 44.4%. The results indicated that the benefit of adding TMZ to IMRT was confirmed in patients with BMs from lung adenocarcinoma. The treatment was active, a significant OR was observed, and achieved an improvement in QoL demonstrated by QoL grade (p<0.05).

Non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastases treated with intrathecal therapy plus osimertinib and temozolomide and whole-brain radiation therapy: a case report

RATIONALE

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an important cause of mortality in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As the symptoms of LM and its early clinical manifestations are nonspecific, early diagnosis of LM is difficult. However, there are few treatment options for LM, which leads to a poor prognosis; thus, increased clinical attention is necessary. The effects of most systemic chemotherapies on metastatic brain tumors (brain metastases and LMs) are limited as they cannot pass the blood-brain barrier; therefore, whole-brain radiation therapy is a therapeutic option. Osimertinib is a potent and irreversible third-generation oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). It binds to EGFR with high affinity when the EGFR T790M mutation is present together with sensitizing mutations. The clinical efficacy of osimertinib in NSCLC patients carrying the T790M mutation has been demonstrated in clinical trial NCT02468661. Intrathecal injection of chemotherapeutic drugs can be directed to a specific lesion. Temozolomide is one such drug, and its effect has been confirmed.

PATIENT AND INTERVENTIONS

We treated a 38-year-old patient with NSCLC who carried the EGFR L858R mutation. We administered a combination of oral osimertinib and oral temozolomide plus an intrathecal injection of cytarabine and whole-brain radiation therapy for symptomatic multiple brain metastases.

OUTCOMES

The patient showed a marked response to this combination therapy. To date (after ~18 months), no recurrence or new lesions have been observed and he is asymptomatic. His disease-free survival surpasses that achieved with any monotherapy for LM.

LESSONS

This is the first report to demonstrate the response to combination therapy in an NSCLC patient with LM. These findings indicate the potential utility of chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy combined with local treatment, as each treatment acts via a different mechanism, enhancing their therapeutic effects.

Effectiveness of temozolomide combined with whole brain radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

BACKGROUND

We performed a retrospective analysis to compare the efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) versus WBRT alone as first-line treatment for brain metastases (BM).

METHODS

Seventy-eight non-small cell lung cancer patients with BM were observed, including 45 patients who received WBRT plus TMZ (TMZ + WBRT) and 33 patients who received WBRT alone (WBRT). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events.

RESULTS

The TMZ + WBRT arm achieved significant improvement in ORR (P = 0.0108) compared to the WBRT arm. PFS in the TMZ + WBRT arm was significantly longer than in the RT arm (6.0 vs. 3.5 months; P = 0.038). OS was not significantly different between the two arms. Although increased adverse reactions were experienced in the TMZ + WBRT arm, patients were tolerant of the side effects. Statistically significant differences in neurocognitive function and quality of life were observed between the arms at six months.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant TMZ + WBRT compared to WBRT alone significantly increases ORR and median PFS in patients with BM, but no remarkable difference in median OS was found. Adding TMZ to the treatment strategy could prevent neurocognitive function and quality of life from deteriorating. Although the addition of TMZ increases the incidence of adverse effects, no significant difference was observed. Thus, TMZ is safe and effective.

Meta-analysis of whole-brain radiotherapy plus temozolomide compared with whole-brain radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer

The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the efficiency of whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus temozolomide (TMZ) with WBRT for the treatment of brain metastases from non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For dichotomous variables, outcomes were reported as relative risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to investigate the following outcome measures: overall response rate, headache, gastrointestinal adverse reactions, and hematological adverse reactions. Twelve randomized controlled trials involving 925 participants (480 received WBRT plus TMZ; 445 received WBRT) were included in the meta‐analysis. There was a significant difference between the overall response rate (RR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.24–1.57; Z = 5.51; P < 0.00001), gastrointestinal adverse reactions (RR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.05–2.04; Z = 2.27; P = 0.02), and hematological adverse reactions (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.04–2.02; Z = 2.21; P = 0.03) of patients treated with WBRT plus TMZ compared with patients treated with WBRT alone. There was no significant difference between headaches (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.93–1.02; Z = 1.13; P = 0.26) in patients treated with WBRT plus TMZ compared with patients treated with WBRT alone. In conclusion, the currently available evidence shows that WBRT plus TMZ increases the overall response rate in patients with brain metastases of NSCLC compared with WBRT alone.

Medical management of brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease in patients with breast carcinoma

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and accounts for the second highest number of cancer-related deaths. With patients surviving longer due to advances in systemic control, the incidence of CNS involvement is increasing; however, the management of CNS metastases has not undergone parallel advancements. The blood–brain barrier limits the efficacy of most systemic chemotherapies, and the utilization of surgery and radiation beyond first-line therapy is limited. We will explore the recent developments in the medical management of breast cancer brain metastasis. Beyond traditional chemotherapy, we will also discuss targeted therapies and immunotherapies which may provide a survival benefit to this population and thus, offer further treatment options and a path for future research and treatment advances.

Combined treatment for non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer patients with brain metastases with whole brain radiotherapy and temozolomide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Brain metastasis is the leading cause of death among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer patients. The standard treatment for brain metastases is radiotherapy. The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has been tested. However, the management of brain metastases has yet to be successful. Here, we aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone or in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in NSCLC and breast cancer patients with brain metastases. A systematic review of PubMed, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and WANFANG (WANGFANG data) involving 870 patients were conducted. Fourteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were independently identified by two reviewers. The primary outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. The ORR was better with combination therapy of WBRT and TMZ than with WBRT alone (RR = 1.34, p < 0.00001) and subgroup analysis showed a significantly superior ORR in NSCLC patients (RR = 1.38, p < 0.00001), but not in breast cancer patients (RR = 1.03, p = 0.86). OS and PFS did not significantly differ between combination therapy and WBRT alone. A higher rate of toxicity was observed in combination therapy than in WBRT alone (RR = 1.83, p = 0.0006). No advantages of concurrent WBRT and TMZ were observed in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Combination therapy was associated with improved ORR in NSCLC patients, especially in Chinese patients. As a "surrogate endpoint" for OS, ORR may allow a conclusion to be made about the management of NSCLC with brain metastases with the combination of WBRT and TMZ. However, it needs to be validated to show that improved ORR predicts the treatment effects on the clinical benefit. The ORR may be valid for a particular indication such as status of MGMT promoter methylation.

Challenges in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases

Brain metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, yet little is known about the optimal treatment of brain disease in this group of patients. Although these patients are at lower risk for brain metastases relative to those with HER2-positive and triple-negative disease, they comprise the majority of women diagnosed with breast cancer. Surgery and radiation continue to have a role in the treatment of brain metastases, but there is a dearth of effective systemic therapies due to the poor penetrability of many systemic drugs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Additionally, patients with brain metastases have long been excluded from clinical trials, and few studies have been conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of systemic therapies specifically for the treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer brain metastases. New approaches are on the horizon, such as nanoparticle-based cytotoxic drugs that have the potential to cross the BBB and provide clinically meaningful benefits to patients with this life-threatening consequence of HR-positive breast cancer.

Systemic therapy of brain metastases: non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma

Brain metastases (BM) occur frequently in many cancers, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, and melanoma. The development of BM is associated with poor prognosis and has an adverse impact on survival and quality of life. Commonly used therapies for BM such as surgery or radiotherapy are associated with only modest benefits. However, recent advances in systemic therapy of many cancers have generated considerable interest in exploration of those therapies for treatment of intracranial metastases.This review discusses the epidemiology of BM from the aforementioned primary tumors and the challenges of using systemic therapies for metastatic disease located within the central nervous system. Cumulative data from several retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that molecularly targeted systemic therapies may be an effective option for the treatment of BM from NSCLC, breast cancer, and melanoma, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with other therapies. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further characterize the efficacy and safety profiles of these targeted agents for the treatment of BM.

Perillyl Alcohol and Its Drug-Conjugated Derivatives as Potential Novel Methods of Treating Brain Metastases

Metastasis to the central nervous system remains difficult to treat, and such patients are faced with a dismal prognosis. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), despite being partially compromised within malignant lesions in the brain, still retains much of its barrier function and prevents most chemotherapeutic agents from effectively reaching the tumor cells. Here, we review some of the recent developments aimed at overcoming this obstacle in order to more effectively deliver chemotherapeutic agents to the intracranial tumor site. These advances include intranasal delivery to achieve direct nose-to-brain transport of anticancer agents and covalent modification of existing drugs to support enhanced penetration of the BBB. In both of these areas, use of the natural product perillyl alcohol, a monoterpene with anticancer properties, contributed to promising new results, which will be discussed here.

Comparison of the effectiveness of whole-brain radiotherapy plus temozolomide versus whole-brain radiotherapy in treating brain metastases based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Temozolomide (TMZ) combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been tested by many randomized controlled trials in the treatment of brain metastases (BMs) in China and other countries. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine (i) the log odds ratios (LORs) of objective response (ORR) and adverse effects (AEs) for all-grade, and (ii) the T value of mean overall survival in patients with BMs treated with WBRT combined with TMZ versus WBRT alone. PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang Data were searched for articles published up to 28 January 2015. Eligible studies were selected according to the PRISMA statement. ORR, AEs, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects models. Eighteen studies were included in our analysis. A total of 1028 participants were enrolled. Summary LORs of ORR were 1.0239 (P<0.0001) on comparing WBRT plus TMZ with WBRT ORR (n=17). The overall mean difference of mean overall survival (n=17) between TMZ plus WBRT and WBRT was 2.2505 weeks (P=0.02185). There was a significant difference between WBRT plus TMZ and WBRT alone with a LOR of AEs for all-grade of (i) 0.923 for gastrointestinal toxicity and (ii) 0.7978 for myelosuppression. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also performed. The 18 eligible randomized controlled trials demonstrated that the combination of WBRT and TMZ significantly improves the ORR and is statistically insignificant in prolonging the survival of patients with BMs. In addition, an increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity and myelosuppression was significant for all-grade.

Phase II randomized study of whole-brain radiation therapy with or without concurrent temozolomide for brain metastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND

To improve the therapeutic index of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer, we investigated the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with temozolomide (TMZ) in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II multicenter prospective randomized study included patients with newly diagnosed intraparenchymal BMs from breast cancer, unsuitable for surgery or radiosurgery. All patients received conformal WBRT (3 Gy × 10-30 Gy), with or without concomitant TMZ administered at a dosage of 75 mg/m(2)/day during the irradiation period. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) 6 weeks after the end of treatment, defined as a partial or complete response on systematic brain MRI (modified WHO criteria). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), neurologic symptoms, and tolerability.

RESULTS

Between February 2008 and November 2010, 100 patients were enrolled in the study (50 in the WBRT + TMZ arm, 50 in the WBRT arm). Median age was 55 years (29-79). Median follow-up was 9.4 months [1.0-68.1]. ORRs at 6 weeks were 36% in the WBRT arm and 30% in the WBRT + TMZ arm (NS). In the WBRT arm, median PFS was 7.4 months and median OS was 11.1 months. In the WBRT + TMZ arm, median PFS was 6.9 months and median OS was 9.4 months. Treatment was well tolerated in this arm: the most common ≥grade 2 acute toxicity was reversible lymphopenia.

CONCLUSION

WBRT combined with TMZ did not significantly improve local control and survival in patients with BMs from breast cancer. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00875355.

Chemotherapy and biological treatment options in breast cancer patients with brain metastasis: an update

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cause of CNS metastasis. Ten to 20% of all, and 38% of human epidermal growth factor-2(+), metastatic BC patients experience brain metastasis (BM). Prolonged survival with better control of systemic disease and limited penetration of drugs to CNS increased the probability of CNS metastasis as a sanctuary site of relapse. Treatment of CNS disease has become an important component of overall disease control and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Current standard therapy for BM is whole-brain radiotherapy, surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy for selected cases, corticosteroids and systemic chemotherapy. Little progress has been made in chemotherapy for the treatment of BM in patients with BC. Nevertheless, new treatment choices have emerged. In this review, we aimed to update current and future treatment options in systemic treatment for BM of BC.

EXPERT OPINION

Cornerstone local treatment options for BM of BC are radiotherapy and surgery in selected cases. Efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics is limited. Among targeted therapies, lapatinib has activity in systemic treatment of BM particularly when used in combination with capecitabine. Novel agents are currently investigated.

Phase I study of bendamustine with concurrent whole brain radiation therapy in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors

A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose of bendamustine with concurrent whole brain radiation (WBR) in patients with brain metastases (BM) from solid tumors. Four doses of intravenous weekly bendamustine were administered with 3 weeks of WBR at three dose levels (60, 80, and 100 mg/m(2)) according to a standard 3 + 3 phase I design. A total of 12 patients with solid tumor BM were enrolled in the study (six with non-small cell lung cancer, four with melanoma, one with breast cancer, and one with neuroendocrine carcinoma). The first two dose levels had three patients each, and the third dose level had six total patients. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies of bendamustine demonstrated no significant differences from pharmacokinetic characteristics of bendamustine in other studies. No DLTs were noted at any dose levels, and no grade 4 toxicities occurred. The MTD of weekly bendamustine with concurrent WBR was 100 mg/m(2). The majority of trial patients died from progressive systemic disease rather than their brain disease. The combination of weekly bendamustine with concurrent WBR was acceptably tolerated. The efficacy of this combination may be evaluated in a phase II trial with stratification by histologies.

Profound prevention of experimental brain metastases of breast cancer by temozolomide in an MGMT-dependent manner

PURPOSE

Brain metastases of breast cancer cause neurocognitive damage and are incurable. We evaluated a role for temozolomide in the prevention of brain metastases of breast cancer in experimental brain metastasis models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Temozolomide was administered in mice following earlier injection of brain-tropic HER2-positive JIMT-1-BR3 and triple-negative 231-BR-EGFP sublines, the latter with and without expression of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). In addition, the percentage of MGMT-positive tumor cells in 62 patient-matched sets of breast cancer primary tumors and resected brain metastases was determined immunohistochemically.

RESULTS

Temozolomide, when dosed at 50, 25, 10, or 5 mg/kg, 5 days per week, beginning 3 days after inoculation, completely prevented the formation of experimental brain metastases from MGMT-negative 231-BR-EGFP cells. At a 1 mg/kg dose, temozolomide prevented 68% of large brain metastases, and was ineffective at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg. When the 50 mg/kg dose was administered beginning on days 18 or 24, temozolomide efficacy was reduced or absent. Temozolomide was ineffective at preventing brain metastases in MGMT-transduced 231-BR-EGFP and MGMT-expressing JIMT-1-BR3 sublines. In 62 patient-matched sets of primary breast tumors and resected brain metastases, 43.5% of the specimens had concordant low MGMT expression, whereas in another 14.5% of sets high MGMT staining in the primary tumor corresponded with low staining in the brain metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Temozolomide profoundly prevented the outgrowth of experimental brain metastases of breast cancer in an MGMT-dependent manner. These data provide compelling rationale for investigating the preventive efficacy of temozolomide in a clinical setting.

Current approaches to the treatment of metastatic brain tumours

Metastatic tumours involving the brain overshadow primary brain neoplasms in frequency and are an important complication in the overall management of many cancers. Importantly, advances are being made in understanding the molecular biology underlying the initial development and eventual proliferation of brain metastases. Surgery and radiation remain the cornerstones of the therapy for symptomatic lesions; however, image-based guidance is improving surgical technique to maximize the preservation of normal tissue, while more sophisticated approaches to radiation therapy are being used to minimize the long-standing concerns over the toxicity of whole-brain radiation protocols used in the past. Furthermore, the burgeoning knowledge of tumour biology has facilitated the entry of systemically administered therapies into the clinic. Responses to these targeted interventions have ranged from substantial toxicity with no control of disease to periods of useful tumour control with no decrement in performance status of the treated individual. This experience enables recognition of the limits of targeted therapy, but has also informed methods to optimize this approach. This Review focuses on the clinically relevant molecular biology of brain metastases, and summarizes the current applications of these data to imaging, surgery, radiation therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

Temozolomide for treatment of brain metastases: A review of 21 clinical trials

Brain metastases from solid tumours are associated with poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment. Temozolomide can be used for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme as well as melanoma. It has also been shown to have activity in patients with brain metastases from various malignancies, since it can cross the blood-brain barrier. To better understand the efficacy of temozolomide in the treatment of brain metastases, we carried out a review of 21 published clinical trials to determine whether temozolomide would benefit patients with brain metastases from solid tumours. Information regarding complete response, partial response, stable disease, objective response and objective response rate were collected to assess clinical outcomes. A modest therapeutic effect was observed when temozolomide was used as a single agent, however, the combination of temozolomide with whole-brain radiotherapy and/or other anticancer drugs exhibited encouraging activity. Thus, future high quality studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in cancer

Both apoptosis and autophagy are highly conserved processes that besides their role in the maintenance of the organismal and cellular homeostasis serve as a main target of tumor therapeutics. Although their important roles in the modulation of tumor therapeutic strategies have been widely reported, the molecular actions of both apoptosis and autophagy are counteracted by cancer protective mechanisms. While apoptosis is a tightly regulated process that is implicated in the removal of damaged or unwanted cells, autophagy is a cellular catabolic pathway that is involved in lysosomal degradation and recycling of proteins and organelles, and thereby is considered an important survival/protective mechanism for cancer cells in response to metabolic stress or chemotherapy. Although the relationship between autophagy and cell death is very complicated and has not been characterized in detail, the molecular mechanisms that control this relationship are considered to be a relevant target for the development of a therapeutic strategy for tumor treatment. In this review, we focus on the molecular mechanisms of apoptosis, autophagy, and those of the crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy in order to provide insight into the molecular mechanisms that may be essential for the balance between cell survival and death as well as their role as targets for the development of novel therapeutic approaches.

Temozolomide added to whole brain radiotherapy in patients with multiple brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentric Austrian phase II study

BACKGROUND

This multicentric randomized phase II study investigated the feasibility and toxicity of temozolomide (TMZ) added to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by adjuvant TMZ in patients with multiple brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with multiple brain metastases from NSCLC aged ≥ 18 years, classified according to recursive partitioning analysis class I or II and with adequate organ functions were eligible. Treatment consisted of WBRT + TMZ 75 mg/m² for 2 weeks followed at day 28 by TMZ 100 mg/m²/day 2 weeks on/2 weeks off for up to 6 months (radiochemotherapy, RCT) or WBRT alone (radiotherapy, RT).

RESULTS

The study enrolled only 35 patients (22 patients in RCT and 13 in RT) and had to be closed prematurely due to poor accrual. The toxicity was mainly due to TMZ with WHO grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 3/22 versus 0/13, leucocytopenia in 1/22 versus 0/13 and lymphocytopenia in 7/22 versus 12/13 patients in RCT and RT respectively. Thirteen patients in RCT and six in RT progressed systemically and dropped out before first restaging of the response in brain. Median time to progression (TTP) was 2.4 months (95 % CI: 2-2.6 months) and 2.0 months (95 % CI: 0.5-3.5 months), median overall survival (OAS) was 3 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.1 months) and 6.3.months (95 % CI: 0.2-7.6 months) in RCT and RT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Like other studies before on patients with brain metastases, insufficient number of recruited patients does not allow conclusions on efficacy and toxicity as the study closed prematurely.

Development of a preclinical therapeutic model of human brain metastasis with chemoradiotherapy

Currently, survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastasis ranges from 2 to 16 months. In experimental brain metastasis studies, only 10% of lesions with the highest permeability exhibited cytotoxic responses to paclitaxel or doxorubicin. Therefore, radiation is the most frequently used treatment, and sensitizing agents, which synergize with radiation, can improve the efficacy of the therapy. In this study we used 435-Br1 cells containing the fluorescent protein (eGFP) gene and the photinus luciferase (PLuc) gene to develop a new brain metastatic cell model in mice through five in vivo/in vitro rounds. BR-eGFP-CMV/Luc-V5 brain metastatic cells induce parenchymal brain metastasis within 60.8 ± 13.8 days of intracarotid injection in all mice. We used this model to standardize a preclinical chemoradiotherapy protocol comprising three 5.5 Gy fractions delivered on consecutive days (overall dose of 16.5 Gy) which improved survival with regard to controls (60.29 ± 8.65 vs. 47.20 ± 11.14). Moreover, the combination of radiotherapy with temozolomide, 60 mg/Kg/day orally for five consecutive days doubled survival time of the mice 121.56 ± 52.53 days (Kaplan-Meier Curve, p < 0.001). This new preclinical chemoradiotherapy protocol proved useful for the study of radiation response/resistance in brain metastasis, either alone or in combination with new sensitizing agents.

Chemotherapy in the management of brain metastases: the emerging role of fotemustine for patients with melanoma and NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

An estimated 20 - 40% of cancer patients will develop brain metastases that are the most common intracranial tumors in adults. Patients with cerebral metastases represent a variegate group where selection of the most appropriate treatment depends on many patient- and disease-related factors. The impact of therapeutic option on overall survival is lacking and it is important to consider quality of life (QOL) when treating patients with brain metastases.

AREAS COVERED

A considerable proportion of patients are treated with palliative approaches such as whole-brain radiotherapy. The role of chemotherapy was limited in the past. Recently, several chemotherapeutic agents have been identified as potentially useful. This article examines the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety and tolerability of fotemustine (FTM) for the management of patients with cerebral metastasis from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

EXPERT OPINION

FTM is a third-generation nitrosourea that has proved its efficacy on brain metastases of melanoma and showed promising results for the treatment of brain metastasis of NSCLC because of its ability to pass the blood-brain barrier.

Etoposide and Temozolomide in Combination for the Treatment of Progressive Small-Cell Lung Cancer Central Nervous System Metastases: Two Cases

Introduction

Progression of central nervous system (CNS) metastases from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) after radiation therapy is associated with a poor prognosis.

Case reports

We present two cases of patients with progressive CNS metastases from SCLC treated with oral temozolomide and etoposide. Sustained clinical responses and radiographic stability were demonstrated. The palliative chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated.

Discussion

A regimen of oral temozolomide and etoposide for progressive CNS metastases from SCLC is well tolerated and may be associated with sustained stability of disease.

Modulating autophagy: a strategy for cancer therapy

Autophagy is a process in which long-lived proteins, damaged cell organelles, and other cellular particles are sequestered and degraded. This process is important for maintaining the cellular microenvironment when the cell is under stress. Many studies have shown that autophagy plays a complex role in human diseases, especially in cancer, where it is known to have paradoxical effects. Namely, autophagy provides the energy for metabolism and tumor growth and leads to cell death that promotes tumor suppression. The link between autophagy and cancer is also evident in that some of the genes that regulate Carcinogenesis, oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, participate in or impact the autophagy process. Therefore, modulating autophagy will be a valuable topic for cancer therapy. Many studies have shown that autophagy can inhibit the tumor growth when autophagy modulators are combined with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. These findings suggest that autophagy may be a potent target for cancer therapy.

Innovative therapeutic strategies in the treatment of brain metastases

Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial tumors and their incidence is increasing. Untreated brain metastases are associated with a poor prognosis and a poor performance status. Metastasis development involves the migration of a cancer cell from the bulk tumor into the surrounding tissue, extravasation from the blood into tissue elsewhere in the body, and formation of a secondary tumor. In the recent past, important results have been obtained in the management of patients affected by BM, using surgery, radiation therapy, or both. Conventional chemotherapies have generally produced disappointing results, possibly due to their limited ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. The advent of new technologies has led to the discovery of novel molecules and pathways that have better depicted the metastatic process. Targeted therapies such as bevacizumab, erlotinib, gefitinib, sunitinib and sorafenib, are all licensed and have demonstrated improved survival in patients with metastatic disease. In this review, we will report current data on targeted therapies. A brief review about brain metastatic process will be also presented.

[Systemic treatment of brain metastases from breast cancer: cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapies]

Prevalence of brain metastases is increasing in breast cancer. Brain metastases represent a poor-prognosis disease for which local treatments continue to play a major role. In spite of the presence of a physiological blood-brain barrier limiting their activity, some systemic treatments may display a significant antitumor activity at the central nervous system level. In HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases not previously treated with whole brain radiotherapy, capecitabine and lapatinib combination obtains a volumetric reponse in two thirds of patients (LANDSCAPE study). If confirmed, these results could modify in selected patients the layout of therapeutic strategies. Promoting novel targeted approaches and innovative therapeutic combinations is a critical need to improve survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastases.

Emerging treatment options for the management of brain metastases in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

The widespread use of trastuzumab in the past decade has led to a significant and measureable improvement in the survival of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpressing breast cancer, and in many ways has redefined the natural history of this aggressive breast cancer subtype. Historically, survival in patients with HER2-positive disease was dictated by the systemic disease course, and what appears to be the central nervous system (CNS) tropism associated with HER2-amplified tumors was not clinically evident. With improved systemic control and prolonged survival, the incidence of brain metastases has increased, and CNS disease, often in the setting of well-controlled extracranial disease, is proving to be an increasingly important and clinically challenging cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. This review summarizes the known clinical data for the systemic treatment of HER2-positive CNS metastases and includes information about ongoing clinical trials of novel therapies as well as emerging strategies for early detection and prevention.

Combining stereotactic radiosurgery and systemic therapy for brain metastases: a potential role for temozolomide

Brain metastases are unfortunately very common in the natural history of many solid tumors and remain a life-threatening condition, associated with a dismal prognosis, despite many clinical trials aimed at improving outcomes. Radiation therapy options for brain metastases include whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS avoids the potential toxicities of WBRT and is associated with excellent local control (LC) rates. However, distant intracranial failure following SRS remains a problem, suggesting that untreated intracranial micrometastatic disease is responsible for failure of treatment. The oral alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ), which has demonstrated efficacy in primary malignant central nervous system tumors such as glioblastoma, has been used in early phase trials in the treatment of established brain metastases. Although results of these studies in established, macroscopic metastatic disease have been modest at best, there is clinical and preclinical data to suggest that TMZ is more efficacious at treating and controlling clinically undetectable intracranial micrometastatic disease. We review the available data for the primary management of brain metastases with SRS, as well as the use of TMZ in treating established brain metastases and undetectable micrometastatic disease, and suggest the role for a clinical trial with the aims of treating macroscopically visible brain metastases with SRS combined with TMZ to address microscopic, undetectable disease.

Systemic treatment of brain metastases in HER2-positive breast cancer: current status and future directions

In recent years, brain metastases have emerged as a main challenge affecting the morbidity and mortality of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In the era following trastuzumab, approximately 30% of these patients develop brain metastases. Trastuzumab does not cross the blood-brain barrier, hence its role is limited to controlling extra-CNS metastases. Lapatinib emerged as a potential candidate; however, its use as a single agent was associated with modest responses. Combination with capecitabine was associated with good results, particularly in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases. In this article, we discuss the role of trastuzumab and lapatinib in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases. We also highlight the complex structure of the blood-brain barrier and elucidate different potential strategies that could be useful in improving drug delivery.

Whole-brain irradiation with concomitant daily fixed-dose temozolomide for brain metastases treatment: a randomised phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This randomised phase II study evaluated the use of Temozolomide (TMZ) concomitant with 30 Gray (Gy) of Whole-brain irradiation (WBI) for 2 weeks without adjuvant TMZ vs. WBI alone in patients with Brain metastases (BM) from solid tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients were randomised into the following groups: 28 patients received WBI (30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks) concomitant with once-daily 200 mg TMZ on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, and 300 mg TMZ on Tuesdays and Thursdays (TMZ plus WBI arm). Twenty-seven patients received the same schedule of WBI alone (control arm).

RESULTS

The objective response (OR) was 78.6% for the TMZ plus WBI arm, (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.4-93.8%) and 48.1% (29.3-66.9%) for the control arm (p=0.019). Median Progression-free survival (PFS) of BM was 11.8 months (CI, 4.7-8.9 months) and 5.6 months (4.9-6.2 months) for the TMZ plus WBI and control arms, respectively, (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; CI, 0.09-0.65; p=0.005). Overall survival (OS) of 8.0 Months for the TMZ plus WBI arm and 8.1 months for the control arm, were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

A daily fixed dose of TMZ during WBI without adjuvant TMZ was well tolerated and significantly improved local control of BM compared with WBI alone. These findings require confirmation in a phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01015534).

Burden of breast cancer with brain metastasis: a French national hospital database analysis

OBJECTIVE

Incidence of breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM) is increasing, especially among patients over-expressing HER2. Epidemiology on this sub-type of cancer is scarce, since cancer registries carry no information on the HER2 status. A retrospective database analysis was conducted to estimate the burden of BCBM, especially among HER2-positive patients in a secondary objective.

METHODS

Patients with a new diagnosis of BCBM carried out between January and December 2008 were identified from the national hospital database using the International Disease Classification. Patients receiving a targeted anti-HER2 therapy were identified from the national pharmacy database. Hospital and pharmacy claims were linked to estimate the burden of HER2-positive patients. Data on hospitalizations were extracted to describe treatment patterns and healthcare costs during a 1-year follow-up. Predictors of treatment cost were analyzed through multi-linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Two thousand and ninety-nine BCBM patients were identified (mean age (SD) = 57.8 (13.6)), of whom 12.2% received a targeted anti-HER2 therapy; 79% of patients had brain metastases associated with extracranial metastases, and the attrition rate reached 82%. Patients received mostly palliative care (47.4%), general medical care (40.6%), and chemotherapy (35.0%). The total annual hospital cost of treatment was 8,426,392€, representing a mean cost of 22,591€ (±14,726) per patient, mainly influenced by extracranial metastases, surgical acts, and HER2-overexpression (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The database linkage of hospital and pharmacy claims is a relevant approach to identify sub-type of cancer. Chemotherapy was widely used as a systemic treatment for breast cancer rather than for local treatment of brain metastases whose morbi-mortality remains high. The variability of treatment costs suggests clinical heterogeneity and, thus, extensive individualization of protocols.