1
|
Gao B, Gorgen ARH, Bhatt R, Tano ZE, Morgan KL, Vo K, Zarandi SS, Ali SN, Jiang P, Patel RM, Clayman RV, Landman J. Avoiding "Needless" nephrectomy: What is the role of small renal mass biopsy in 2024? Urol Oncol 2024; 42:236-244. [PMID: 38643022 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Current guidelines do not mandate routine preoperative renal mass biopsy (RMB) for small renal masses (SRMs), which results in a considerable rate (18%-26%) of needless nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy for benign renal tumors. In light of this ongoing practice, a narrative review was conducted to examine the role of routine RMB for SRM. First, arguments justifying the current non-biopsy approach to SRM are critically reviewed and contested. Second, as a standalone procedure, RMB is critically assessed; RMB was found to have higher sensitivity, specificity, and an equal or lower complication rate when compared with other commonly preoperatively biopsied solid organ tumors (e.g., breast, prostate, lung, pancreas, thyroid, and liver). Based on the foregoing information, we propose a paradigm shift in SRM management, advocating for an updated policy in which partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy for SRM invariably occurs only after a preoperative biopsy confirms that a SRM is indeed malignant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Gao
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA.
| | | | - Rohit Bhatt
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Zachary E Tano
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Kalon L Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Kelvin Vo
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | | | - Sohrab N Ali
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Pengbo Jiang
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Roshan M Patel
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Ralph V Clayman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Jaime Landman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feinberg A, Gessner KH, Deal AM, Heiling HM, Myers S, Raynor MC, Milowsky MI, Wobker SE, Commander CW, Lazard AJ, Bjurlin MA, Smith AB, Johnson DC, Wallen EM, Kim WY, Tan HJ. Decisional Conflict Among Patients Newly Diagnosed With Clinical T1 Renal Masses: A Prospective Study. J Urol 2024; 212:320-330. [PMID: 38717916 PMCID: PMC11233232 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Because multiple management options exist for clinical T1 renal masses, patients may experience a state of uncertainty about the course of action to pursue (ie, decisional conflict). To better support patients, we examined patient, clinical, and decision-making factors associated with decisional conflict among patients newly diagnosed with clinical T1 renal masses suspicious for kidney cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS From a prospective clinical trial, participants completed the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), scored 0 to 100 with < 25 associated with implementing decisions, at 2 time points during the initial decision-making period. The trial further characterized patient demographics, health status, tumor burden, and patient-centered communication, while a subcohort completed additional questionnaires on decision-making. Associations of patient, clinical, and decision-making factors with DCS scores were evaluated using generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measures per patient. RESULTS Of 274 enrollees, 250 completed a DCS survey; 74% had masses ≤ 4 cm in size, while 11% had high-complexity tumors. Model-based estimated mean DCS score across both time points was 17.6 (95% CI 16.0-19.3), though 50% reported a DCS score ≥ 25 at least once. On multivariable analysis, DCS scores increased with age (+2.64, 95% CI 1.04-4.23), high- vs low-complexity tumors (+6.50, 95% CI 0.35-12.65), and cystic vs solid masses (+9.78, 95% CI 5.27-14.28). Among decision-making factors, DCS scores decreased with higher self-efficacy (-3.31, 95% CI -5.77 to -0.86]) and information-seeking behavior (-4.44, 95% CI -7.32 to -1.56). DCS scores decreased with higher patient-centered communication scores (-8.89, 95% CI -11.85 to -5.94). CONCLUSIONS In addition to patient and clinical factors, decision-making factors and patient-centered communication relate with decisional conflict, highlighting potential avenues to better support patient decision-making for clinical T1 renal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Feinberg
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kathryn H Gessner
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hillary M Heiling
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Shannon Myers
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Mathew C Raynor
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Sara E Wobker
- Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Clayton W Commander
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison J Lazard
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Marc A Bjurlin
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - David C Johnson
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Eric M Wallen
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William Y Kim
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hung-Jui Tan
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blachura T, Matusik PS, Kowal A, Radzikowska J, Jarczewski JD, Skiba Ł, Popiela TJ, Chrzan R. Diagnostic accuracy of the Clear Cell Likelihood Score and selected MRI parameters in the characterization of indeterminate renal masses - a single-institution study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04484-5. [PMID: 38980404 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04484-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) and value of other selected magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features in the characterization of indeterminate small renal masses (SRMs). METHODS Fifty patients with indeterminate SRMs discovered on MRI between 2012 and 2023 were included. The ccLS for the characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) was calculated and compared to the final diagnosis (ccRCC vs. 'all other' masses). RESULTS The ccLS = 5 had a satisfactory accuracy of 64.0% and a very high specificity of 96.3%; however, its sensitivity of 26.1% was relatively low. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis revealed that from the selected MRI features, only T1 ratio and arterial to delayed enhancement (ADER) were good discriminators between ccRCC and other types of renal masses (area under curve, AUC = 0.707, p = 0.01; AUC = 0.673, p = 0.03; respectively). The cut-off points determined in ROC analysis using the Youden index were 0.73 (p = 0.01) for T1 ratio and 0.99 for ADER (p = 0.03). The logistic regression model demonstrated that ccLS = 5 and T1 ratio (OR = 15.5 [1.1-218.72], p = 0.04; OR = 0.002 [0.00-0.81], p = 0.04) were significant predictors of ccRCC. CONCLUSIONS The ccLS algorithm offers an encouraging method for the standardization of imaging protocols to aid in the diagnosis and management of SRMs in daily clinical practice by enhancing detectability of ccRCC and reducing the number of unnecessary invasive procedures for benign or indolent lesions. However, its diagnostic performance needs multi-center large cohort studies to validate it before it can be incorporated as a diagnostic algorithm and will guide future iterations of clinical guidelines. The retrospective nature of our study and small patient population confined to a single clinical center may impact the generalizability of the results; thus, future studies are required to define whether employment of the T1 ratio or ADER parameter may strengthen the diagnostic accuracy of ccRCC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Blachura
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| | - Patrycja S Matusik
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital, Kraków, 30-688, Poland.
- Chair of Radiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland.
| | - Aleksander Kowal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Cancer Centre and Traumatology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Julia Radzikowska
- Student's Scientific Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| | | | - Łukasz Skiba
- Student's Scientific Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| | - Tadeusz J Popiela
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
- Chair of Radiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| | - Robert Chrzan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
- Chair of Radiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Collins KK, Smith CF, Ford T, Roberts N, Nicholson BD, Oke JL. Adequacy of clinical guideline recommendations for patients with low-risk cancer managed with monitoring: systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 169:111280. [PMID: 38360377 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review was to summarize national and international guidelines that made recommendations for monitoring patients diagnosed with low-risk cancer. It appraised the quality of guidelines and determined whether the guidelines adequately identified patients for monitoring, specified which tests to use, defined monitoring intervals, and stated triggers for further intervention. It then assessed the evidence to support each recommendation. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, we searched PubMed and Turning Research into Practice databases for national and international guidelines' that were written in English and developed or updated between 2012 and 2023. Quality of individual guidelines was assessed using the AGREE II tool. RESULTS Across the 41 published guidelines, 48 different recommendations were identified: 15 (31%) for prostate cancer, 11 (23%) for renal cancer, 6 (12.5%) for thyroid cancer, and 10 (21%) for blood cancer. The remaining 6 (12.5%) were for brain, gastrointestinal, oral cavity, bone and pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma cancer. When combining all guidelines, 48 (100%) stated which patients qualify for monitoring, 31 (65%) specified which tests to use, 25 (52%) provided recommendations for surveillance intervals, and 23 (48%) outlined triggers to initiate intervention. Across all cancer sites, there was a strong positive trend with higher levels of evidence being associated with an increased likelihood of a recommendation being specific (P = 0.001) and the evidence for intervals was based on expert opinion or other guidance. CONCLUSION With the exception of prostate cancer, the evidence base for monitoring low-risk cancer is weak and consequently recommendations in clinical guidelines are inconsistent. There is a lack of direct evidence to support monitoring recommendations in the literature making guideline developers reliant on expert opinion, alternative guidelines, or indirect or nonspecific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiana K Collins
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
| | - Claire Friedemann Smith
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Tori Ford
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Nia Roberts
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3BG, UK
| | - Brian D Nicholson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Jason L Oke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brink LVD, Ruiter AEC, Lagerveld BW, Graafland NM, Bex A, Beerlage HP, van Moorselaar JRA, Zondervan PJ. The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) on Treatment Decision Making for Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): 5-Year Data Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:610-617.e1. [PMID: 38402089 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the impact of a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients in a locoregional renal cancer network by evaluating shared decision making (SDM) and adherence to MTB recommendations. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study included all cases from a Dutch renal cancer network with suspicion of or histologically confirmed RCC discussed in MTBs between 2017-2022. Main endpoints were distribution of cases presented, proportion of recommendations with multiple treatment options enabling shared decision making (SDM), definite treatment after SDM and adherence to MTB recommendations. Further endpoints were definite treatment per tumor stage stratified by age and inclusion in clinical trials. Outcomes were displayed as means and proportions (%). Pearson's Chi-Squared test was used to analyze the effect of age on definite treatment advice. RESULTS Overall, 2651 cases were discussed, of which 1900 (72%) were new referrals and 751 (28%) rediscussions. Majority of cases were cT1a-b tumors (46%) and 22% were local recurrences or metachronous metastatic. Adherence to MTB recommendation was 96% and in 30% multiple treatment options were recommended, allowing for SDM. In 45% of cases with cT1a tumors multiple treatment options were recommended by the MTB, resulting in (cryo)ablation (32%) and AS (30%) as most frequent definite treatments after SDM. Among patients with cT3-4 tumors the inclusion rate in clinical trials was 47%. CONCLUSIONS A network MTB creates opportunity to discuss multiple treatment options and clinical trials in SDM with patients at a high rate of adherence to MTB recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luna van den Brink
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Annebeth E C Ruiter
- OLVG (Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis), Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brunolf W Lagerveld
- OLVG (Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis), Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels M Graafland
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Harrie P Beerlage
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen R A van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia J Zondervan
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bak R, Jensen JB, Pelant T, Haase RN, Nielsen TK. Active Surveillance of Small Renal Masses in a Large Danish Cohort: Assessing Proficiency in Patient Selection. J Kidney Cancer VHL 2024; 11:54-62. [PMID: 38567125 PMCID: PMC10985781 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i1.318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Small renal masses (SRMs) are often benign or early-stage cancers with low metastatic potential. The risk of overtreating SRMs is a particular concern in elderly or comorbid patients, for whom the risks associated with active surveillance (AS) are lower than the risks of surgical management. The aim is to systematically analyse a large cohort of AS patients to provide valuable insights into patient selection and outcomes concerning delayed intervention (DI) and AS termination. We retrospectively analysed data from 563 AS patients across three institutions from 2012 to 2023. Patients were classified into three groups: those currently in AS (n=283), those who underwent DI (n=75), and those who terminated AS (n=205). DI patients were younger, and had larger initial tumour size and higher growth rates (GRs) than AS patients. A significant number of patients terminated their AS, mainly due to comorbidities and death from non-kidney cancer causes, suggesting unsuitability for initial AS enrolment. AS appears to be a safe initial management strategy for SRMs, with an overall low GR and only one patient developing metastasis. The patient selection for AS appears inconsistent, highlighting the need for improved criteria to identify AS candidates, especially considering comorbidities and the possibility of subsequent active treatment in the event of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmine Bak
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Bjerregaard Jensen
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tau Pelant
- Department of Urology, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Gødstrup, Denmark
| | | | - Tommy Kjærgaard Nielsen
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Capibaribe DM, Nolazco JI, Chang SL, Reis LO. Navigating the labyrinth: A comprehensive approach to managing renal masses in young patients. Investig Clin Urol 2024; 65:105-107. [PMID: 38454818 PMCID: PMC10925734 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20230401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - José Ignacio Nolazco
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Urology Division, Hospital Universitario Austral, Universidad Austral, Pilar, Argentina
| | - Steven Lee Chang
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leonardo O Reis
- UroScience, State University of Campinas, Unicamp, Campinas, Brazil
- Urologic Oncology Department, School of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ziewers S, Fischer ND, Börner JH, Kaufmann L, Tamm A, Yang Y, Jungmann F, Dotzauer R, Sparwasser P, Hoefner T, Tsaur I, Haferkamp A, Mager R. Clinical Impact and Management of Incidental Renal Findings on Pre-TAVI CT Scan from the Urologist's Perspective. Urol Int 2024; 108:219-225. [PMID: 38354722 DOI: 10.1159/000537808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to investigate prevalence and impact of incidental renal masses (IRMs) accompanying increasing computed tomography (CT) work-up for symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (sAVS) of the elderly with regard to the relevance of urological consultation for overall survival (OS). METHODS A retrospective analysis of pre-transcatheter aortic-valve implantations (TAVIs) CT scans of patients with sAVS (N = 1,253) harboring IRM was performed for 2014-2019. According to the clinical management, groups 1 (urologic consultation) and 2 (findings ignored) were formed and analyzed in terms of OS. RESULTS The prevalence of IRM was 9% (119/1,253). In 19% (23/119), urological advice was sought (group 1). At baseline, group 1 showed a significantly higher rate of malignancy-specific lesions compared to 2 (p < 0.01). Other clinical parameters (e.g., age, cardiological scores, comorbidities) did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). In group 1, 4 (17%) findings were histologically confirmed, of which 3 (13%) underwent surgery. There was no significant difference in median OS at a median follow-up of 24.7 months between groups 1 and 2 with 35.7 (95% CI, 5.9; 65.4) and 47.4 months (95% CI, 33.0; 61.7), respectively (p = 0.4). In Cox regression analysis, chronic kidney disease but not urologic work-up or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure emerged as an independent unfavorable predictor of OS (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.37; 4.36, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION For the first time, a TAVI population with IRM was analyzed from the urologist's perspective. Urologic co-evaluation and work-up does not confer a significant benefit in terms of OS in this particular population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Ziewers
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nikita Druva Fischer
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jan Hendrik Börner
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lilly Kaufmann
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Alexander Tamm
- Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Florian Jungmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Robert Dotzauer
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Sparwasser
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Hoefner
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Rene Mager
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Semko SL, Voylenko OA, Pikul MV, Stakhovskyi OE, Kononenko OA, Vitruk IV, Stakhovsky EO, Hrechko B. Comparison of aggressiveness in central versus peripheral T1a clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:31.e9-31.e15. [PMID: 38151425 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to estimate the difference between peripheral and central small renal lesions in terms of their oncologic potential. METHODS Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of patients with small renal masses (T1a) who underwent surgical treatment between January 2008 and July 2019 at the affiliated hospital. Only patients with ccRCC pathology were included. Cases were divided into 2 groups depending on tumor location (central or peripheral) based on the R.E.N.A.L and local nephrometry scoring. Presence of nodal involvement, distant metastases, ISUP grade and endophytic growth were defined as aggressiveness predictors. Statistical analyses was performed using a standard statistical software (IBM SPPS Statistics Ver. 22), with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Associations between tumor location and Fuhrman grade, exo-/endophytic growth, TNM classification, and type of operation were tested using the Pearson χ² test and 1-way ANOVA test. RESULTS Patients with centrally located tumors had a higher incidence of clinical and pathological lymph node involvement (P = 0.02, χ2 = 5.1). Patients in both groups had an equal number of distant metastases at the time of diagnosis (P = 0.3, χ2 = 0.8). The operation time was significantly longer in patients with central lesions, which obviously showed higher tumor complexity in this group (P < 0.005). Pathological evaluation revealed differences between ISUP grades in both groups (P < 0.005, χ2 = 29.9). Central masses were characterized by higher aggressiveness, indicating a worse prognosis. Furthermore, the cases in the first group were more often endophytic (P = 0.03, χ2 = 0.9). Nevertheless, this did not affect the surgical strategy in most cases with a tendency toward partial nephrectomy. Eventually, organ-sparing treatment was preferable in both groups (P = 0.13, χ2 = 2.29). CONCLUSION Centrally located kidney cancer has showed in present study a higher incidence of high ISUP grade, regional nodal involvement and endophytic growth type. Endophytic growth type was associated with worse ISUP grading. Distribution of ISUP grade was not age depended, thus showing no difference by this criterion, when comparing different age groups. Higher ISUP grade was strongly associated with presence of distant metastases in T1a kidney tumors. Further analysis is needed to investigate aggressiveness of centrally located T1a RCC, as it may influence current conservative management options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofiya L Semko
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncological Urology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
| | - Oleg A Voylenko
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncological Urology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Maksym V Pikul
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncological Urology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Oleksandr E Stakhovskyi
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncological Urology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Oleksii A Kononenko
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncological Urology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Iurii V Vitruk
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncological Urology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Eduard O Stakhovsky
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncological Urology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Bohdan Hrechko
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncological Urology, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kinnear N, Kucheria A, Ogbechie C, Adam S, Haidar O, Cotter Fonseca P, Brodie A, Pullar B, Adshead J. Concordance between renal tumour biopsy and robotic-assisted partial and radical nephrectomy histology: a 10-year experience. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:45. [PMID: 38240940 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01821-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
We aimed to assess concordance between renal tumour biopsy (RTB) and surgical pathology from robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) or robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN). Patients with preoperative RTB undergoing RAPN or RARN for suspected malignancy (9 September 2013-9 September 2023) were enrolled retrospectively from three sites. Patients were excluded if the tumour had prior cryotherapy or if biopsy or nephrectomy histology were unavailable or inconclusive. The primary outcome was concordance with the presence/absence of malignancy. Secondary outcomes were concordance with tumour subtype, World Health Organisation nuclear grade (patients with RTB clear cell or papillary RCC only), false-negative rate, false-positive rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). In the enrolment period, 332 and 132 patients underwent RAPN and RARN, respectively. Of these, 160 received preoperative RTB, with nine patients excluded, leaving 151 eligible patients. Median age was 63 years, and 49 (32%) were female. On surgical specimens, 144 patients had malignant histology. RTB was highly concordant with presence/absence of malignancy (147/151, 97%). Concordance with tumour subtype occurred in 141 patients (93%), while concordance with nuclear grade was seen in 42/66 patients (64%, RTB grade missing in 53 patients). False-negative rate, false-positive rate, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 2%, 14%, 98%, 86%, 99%, and 67%, respectively. Limitations include absence of complication data and exclusion of patients biopsied without surgery. In patients undergoing RAPN or RARN, preoperative RTB has high concordance with surgical pathology, both in the presence of malignancy and RCC subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ned Kinnear
- Lister Hospital, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK.
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | | | | | - Sana Adam
- Lister Hospital, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ringe KI, Wang J, Deng Y, Pi S, Geahchan A, Taouli B, Bashir MR. Abbreviated MRI Protocols in the Abdomen and Pelvis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 59:58-69. [PMID: 37144673 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Abbreviated MRI (AMRI) protocols rely on the acquisition of a limited number of sequences tailored to a specific question. The main objective of AMRI protocols is to reduce exam duration and costs, while maintaining an acceptable diagnostic performance. AMRI is of increasing interest in the radiology community; however, challenges limiting clinical adoption remain. In this review, we will address main abdominal and pelvic applications of AMRI in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and prostate, including diagnostic performance, pitfalls, limitations, and cost effectiveness will also be discussed. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina I Ringe
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ying Deng
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shan Pi
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Amine Geahchan
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bachir Taouli
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Borregales LD, Pecoraro A, Roussel E, Mari A, Grosso AA, Checcucci E, Montorsi F, Larcher A, Van Poppel H, Porpiglia F, Capitanio U, Minervini A, Albersen M, Serni S, Amparore D, Campi R. Morbidity of elective surgery for localized renal masses among elderly patients: A contemporary multicenter study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107014. [PMID: 37573666 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aging population and the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are increasing worldwide. Over 25% of newly diagnosed LRM (localized renal masses) occur in patients over the eighth decade of life. The decision-making and treatment approach to LRM in this population represents a clinical dilemma due to inherited decreased functional reserve and competing mortality risks. Current literature reports conflicting evidence regarding age as a risk factor for worst surgical outcomes. As such, we aimed to evaluate the contemporary morbidity of elective surgery for LRM among elderly patients, focusing on intraoperative and postoperative complications. METHODS After Ethical Committee approval, we queried our prospectively maintained databases to identify patients with preoperative eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m [(David and Bloom, 2022) 22 and a normal contralateral kidney who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy (PN or RN) for a single cT1-T2N0M0 LRM between 1/2015-12/2021 at four high-volume European Academic Institutions. Patients were categorized by age groups: <50 yrs (young) vs. 50-75 (middle-aged) yrs vs.> 75 yrs (elderly). Postoperative complications were recorded according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. The primary objectives were the proportion of patients experiencing intraoperative (IOC), any grade (AGC), and high-grade postoperative complications (HGC), defined as CD grade 3-5. RESULTS Overall, 2469/3076 (80.2%) patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 363 (14.7%) were young, 1682 (68.1%) were middle-aged, and 424 (17.2%) were elderly. Compared to middle-aged and young patients, elderly patients had a higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index (6 vs. 4 vs. 0, p < 0.01) and a higher proportion of cT1 renal mass (87.6% vs. 93.0% vs. 93.6%, p < 0.01). No differences among the study groups were found regarding surgical approach (open vs. minimally-invasive) and type of surgery (PN vs. RN). We found that older patients experienced similar IOC (4.5% vs. 4.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.7) and AGC (23.1% vs. 20.0% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.4) compared to middle-aged and young patients, respectively. Similarly, there were no significant differences in HGC between the study cohorts (0.7% vs. 1.4% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.8). At multivariable analysis, open approach and PN significantly predicted the occurrence of AGCs, while only the open surgical approach was associated with the occurrence of HGCs. CONCLUSION In kidney cancer tertiary referral centers, the risk of IOC and postoperative HGC after PN or RN for localized renal masses (LRM) is low, despite a non-negligible risk of AGC, especially in elderly patients. Further efforts should focus on identifying multidisciplinary strategies to select patients most likely to benefit from surgery among elderly candidates with LRMs and decrease the morbidity of surgery in this specific setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo D Borregales
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carson DS, Weiss T, Zhang LX, Psutka SP. Surgical Management of Localized Disease and Small Renal Masses. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:877-892. [PMID: 37330345 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of renal cancer has increased over the past several decades, but mortality has declined. This is thought to be related in part to earlier detection of renal masses which portend excellent 5-year survival rates. Management of small renal masses and localized disease include both nonsurgical and surgical options. The choice of intervention is ultimately based on comprehensive evaluation and shared decision-making. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current surgical management options for localized renal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S Carson
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tova Weiss
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Harborview Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356510, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Daniels AB, Tirosh A, Huntoon K, Mehta GU, Spiess PE, Friedman DL, Waguespack SG, Kilkelly JE, Rednam S, Pruthi S, Jonasch EA, Baum L, Chahoud J. Guidelines for surveillance of patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease: Consensus statement of the International VHL Surveillance Guidelines Consortium and VHL Alliance. Cancer 2023; 129:2927-2940. [PMID: 37337409 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
Von Hippel‐Lindau disease is a rare inherited cancer‐predisposition syndrome. The authors report the updated recommendations for the multiorgan surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony B Daniels
- Division of Ocular Oncology and Pathology, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amit Tirosh
- Neuroendocrine Tumors Service, Sheba Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Kristin Huntoon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Debra L Friedman
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Texas, USA
| | - Steven G Waguespack
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jill E Kilkelly
- Division of Pediatric Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Surya Rednam
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sumit Pruthi
- Division of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Eric A Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Laura Baum
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jad Chahoud
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bertolotti L, Segato F, Pagnini F, Buti S, Casarin A, Celia A, Ziglioli F, Maestroni U, Pedrazzi G, Ascenti V, Martini C, Cicero C, De Filippo M. Percutaneous Ablation of T1 Renal Masses: Comparative Local Control and Complications after Radiofrequency and Cryoablation. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3059. [PMID: 37835802 PMCID: PMC10572527 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The efficacy and complication rates of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CA) in the treatment of T1 renal masses in two Northern Italy hospitals were retrospectively investigated. Eighty-two patients with 80 T1a tumors and 10 T1b tumors treated with thermal ablation from 2015 through 2020 were included. A total of 43 tumors in 38 patients were treated with RFA (2.3 ± 0.9 cm), and 47 tumors in 44 patients were treated with CA (2.1 ± 0.8 cm). The mean follow-up observation period was 26 ± 19 months. The major complications and efficacy, as measured using the technical success and local tumor recurrence rates, were recorded. There were three (6.9%) technical failures with RFA and one (2.1%) with cryoablation (p = 0.30). Among the 40 tumors that were successfully treated with RFA, 1 tumor (2.5%) developed local tumor recurrence; 5/46 tumors that were treated with cryoablation (10.8%) developed local tumor recurrence (p = 0.17). T1b lesions (4.0 ± 0.7 cm) resulted in 1/6 technically unsuccessful cases with RFA and 0/4 with CA. No recurrent disease was detected in the T1b lesions. Major complications occurred after 2.3% (1/43) of RFAs and 0/47 of cryoablation procedures. RFA and cryoablation are both effective in the treatment of renal masses. Major complications with either procedure are uncommon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Bertolotti
- Section of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (L.B.); (F.P.); (M.D.F.)
| | - Federica Segato
- G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, VR, Italy;
| | - Francesco Pagnini
- Section of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (L.B.); (F.P.); (M.D.F.)
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma–Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy;
| | - Andrea Casarin
- Department of Radiology, San Bassiano Hospital, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, VI, Italy; (A.C.); (C.C.)
| | - Antonio Celia
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, VI, Italy;
| | - Francesco Ziglioli
- Department of Urology, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (F.Z.); (U.M.)
| | - Umberto Maestroni
- Department of Urology, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (F.Z.); (U.M.)
| | - Giuseppe Pedrazzi
- Centre of Statistic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy;
| | - Velio Ascenti
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, Policlinico Universitario, University of Milan, 20133 Milano, MI, Italy;
| | - Chiara Martini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy
| | - Calogero Cicero
- Department of Radiology, San Bassiano Hospital, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, VI, Italy; (A.C.); (C.C.)
| | - Massimo De Filippo
- Section of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (L.B.); (F.P.); (M.D.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kirkpatrick IDC. Subcentimeter Echogenic Renal Lesions: Counterpoint-They Should Be Followed With Ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221:311-312. [PMID: 36946895 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Iain D C Kirkpatrick
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Manitoba, 101 Shorecrest Dr, Winnipeg, MB R3P 1P4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Barbour AB, Kirste S, Grosu AL, Siva S, Louie AV, Onishi H, Swaminath A, Teh BS, Psutka SP, Weg ES, Chen JJ, Zeng J, Gore JL, Hall E, Liao JJ, Correa RJM, Lo SS. The Judicious Use of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in the Primary Management of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3672. [PMID: 37509333 PMCID: PMC10377531 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized renal cell carcinoma is primarily managed surgically, but this disease commonly presents in highly comorbid patients who are poor operative candidates. Less invasive techniques, such as cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, are effective, but require percutaneous or laparoscopic access, while generally being limited to cT1a tumors without proximity to the renal pelvis or ureter. Active surveillance is another management option for small renal masses, but many patients desire treatment or are poor candidates for active surveillance. For poor surgical candidates, a growing body of evidence supports stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a safe and effective non-invasive treatment modality. For example, a recent multi-institution individual patient data meta-analysis of 190 patients managed with SABR estimated a 5.5% five-year cumulative incidence of local failure with one patient experiencing grade 4 toxicity, and no other grade ≥3 toxic events. Here, we discuss the recent developments in SABR for the management of localized renal cell carcinoma, highlighting key concepts of appropriate patient selection, treatment design, treatment delivery, and response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Barbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Liga Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Shankar Siva
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Emily S Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jonathan J Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Evan Hall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Knežević N, Zekulić T, Kuliš T, Penezić L, Hudolin T, Čikić B, Ferenčak V, Anđelić J, Saić H, Jurić I, El-Saleh A, Goluža E, Kaštelan Ž. TRENDS IN SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF RENAL NEOPLASMS: SINGLE CENTER RESULTS IN THE LAST DECADE. Acta Clin Croat 2023; 62:53-59. [PMID: 38966023 PMCID: PMC11221235 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.s2.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The majority of renal neoplasms can be treated surgically using open or minimally-invasive approach. Nephron-sparing surgery should be used when possible, regardless to the operative approach. In this retrospective study, we analyzed surgical trends of operative treatment of renal neoplasms in the period from February 2011 until December 2020. There were a total of 1031 procedures, 703 (68.2%) radical nephrectomies (RN) and 328 (31.8%) partial nephrectomies (PN). Laparoscopic approach was used in 211 (20.5%) (111 PN and 100 RN), while open approach was used in 820 (79.5%) (328 PN and 703 RN) cases. There were 12 procedures performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermic arrest. The median operative time was 161 minutes for open RN and 158 for open PN, 160 for laparoscopic RN, and 162 for laparoscopic PN. The most common pathology was clear cell carcinoma in 693 (67.3%), papillary carcinoma in 115 (11.2%), chromophobe carcinoma in 67 (6.5%), oncocytoma in 46 (4.5%), and angiomyolipoma in 33 (3.2%) patients. Pathologically, pT1 stage was diagnosed in 56.9%, pT2 in 5.8%, pT3 in 22.4% and pT4 in 1.2% of patients. Regional lymphadenectomy was performed in 354 (34.3%) patients, among which lymph nodes were positive in 40 (11.3%) cases. Surgical margins were positive in 27 cases when PN was performed (8.2%). In conclusion, there was an ongoing raising trend in the number of procedures in general, and also in minimally invasive and nephron-sparing surgery in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikola Knežević
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
- University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Toni Zekulić
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Tomislav Kuliš
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
- University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Luka Penezić
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
- University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Tvrtko Hudolin
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
- University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Bojan Čikić
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Vladimir Ferenčak
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Jerko Anđelić
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Hrvoje Saić
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ilija Jurić
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ahmad El-Saleh
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Eleonora Goluža
- University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Anesthesiology and ICU, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Željko Kaštelan
- Zagreb University Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Zagreb, Croatia
- University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Monda SM, Lui HT, Pratsinis MA, Chandrasekar T, Evans CP, Dall'Era MA. The Metastatic Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Primary Tumor Size and Subtype. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 52:137-144. [PMID: 37284045 PMCID: PMC10240521 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Current data on the association between tumor size, subtype, and metastases, and thresholds for intervention, for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), are largely based on single-center nephrectomy registries that may under-represent those presenting with metastatic disease. Objective We sought to assess tumor size and histologic subtype in relation to metastatic status at presentation for patients with RCC. Design setting and participants Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry data, we identified patients with a diagnosis of RCC made between 2004 and 2019, and a known size of primary tumor. We used nodal and metastatic TNM staging to assess metastatic disease at presentation. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We report the proportion of metastatic disease across varying tumor sizes for clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC), and chromophobe (chRCC) RCC. We also examine sarcomatoid RCC and RCC with sarcomatoid features (sarcRCC). Logistic regression models were used to model the likelihood of metastatic disease for each histologic subtype. Results and limitations Of 181 096 RCC patients included, 23 829 had metastatic disease. For any RCC, metastatic rates of 3.6%, 13.1%, 30.3%, and 45.1% were observed for tumors ≤4, 4-≤7, 7-≤10, and >10 cm, respectively. Metastatic rates of chRCC were low at even large sizes, 11.0% at >10 cm. In contrast, sarcRCC had high metastatic rates at all sizes, 27.1% at ≤4 cm. Metastatic rates for ccRCC and pRCC increased steadily above 3 cm. For any RCC and each evaluated subtype, tumor size was found to be associated with metastatic disease on logistic regression (p < 0.001). Conclusions The likelihood of a renal mass being metastatic varies greatly with both its subtype and size. We report higher likelihoods of metastatic disease across tumor sizes compared with what has been reported previously. These results may help clinicians pick appropriate thresholds for intervention and candidates for active surveillance. Patient summary We find that the metastatic probability of renal cell carcinoma varies greatly with subtype and increases with tumor size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M. Monda
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Hansen T. Lui
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Manolis A. Pratsinis
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Marc A. Dall'Era
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Alcalá NE, Futral CD, Miller CA, Sinks AL, Clark PE, Roy OP. Impact of diabetes and chronic kidney disease on active surveillance outcomes for small renal masses: A cohort study. Indian J Urol 2023; 39:142-147. [PMID: 37304981 PMCID: PMC10249531 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_57_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The American Cancer Society estimates 79,000 individuals will be diagnosed with kidney cancer in 2022, most of which are initially found as small renal masses (SRMs). Proper management of SRM patients includes careful evaluation of risk factors such as medical comorbidities and renal function. To investigate the importance of these risk factors, we examined their effect on crossover to delayed intervention (DI) and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing active surveillance (AS) for SRMs. Methods This is an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis of AS patients presented at kidney tumor conferences with SRMs between 2007 and 2017. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine how factors including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), diabetes, and chronic kidney disease are associated with DI and OS. Results A total of 111 cases were reviewed. In general, AS patients were elderly and had significant comorbidities. On univariate analysis, intervention was more likely to occur in patients with a younger age (P = 0.01), better kidney function (P = 0.01), and higher tumor growth rates (GRs) (P = 0.02). Higher eGFR was associated with better survival (P = 0.03), while higher tumor GRs (P = 0.014), greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.01), and larger tumors (P = 0.01) were associated with worse OS. Of the comorbidities, diabetes was found to be an independent predictor of worse OS (P = 0.01). Conclusions Patient-level factors - such as diabetes and eGFR - are associated with the rate of DI and OS among SRM patients. Consideration of these factors may facilitate better AS protocols and improve patient outcomes for those with SRMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas E. Alcalá
- Department of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Cameron D. Futral
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Caroline A. Miller
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alexander L. Sinks
- Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter E. Clark
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ornob P. Roy
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alam R, Yerrapragada A, Wlajnitz T, Watts E, Pallauf M, Enikeev D, Chang P, Wagner AA, McKiernan JM, Pierorazio PM, Allaf ME, Singla N. Evaluation of Growth Rates for Small Renal Masses in Elderly Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 50:78-84. [PMID: 37101773 PMCID: PMC10123410 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background As the adoption of active surveillance (AS) for small renal masses (SRMs) grows, the number of elderly patients enrolled for a prolonged period of time will increase. However, our understanding of comparative growth rates (GRs) in aging patients with SRMs remains poor. Objective To examine whether particular age cutoffs are associated with an increased GR for patients undergoing AS for SRMs. Design setting and participants We identified all patients with SRMs enrolled in the multi-institutional, prospective Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses (DISSRM) registry since 2009 who elected for AS. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Two definitions of GR were examined: GR from the initial image (GRi) and GR from the prior image (GRp). Image measurements were dichotomized based on patient age at the time of imaging. Multiple age cutoffs were examined: 65, 70, 75, and 80 yr. Mixed-effect linear regression examined the associations between age and GR, with controlling to account for multiple measurements from the same individual. Results and limitations We examined 2542 measurements from 571 patients. The median age at enrollment was 70.9 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 63.2-77.4) with a median tumor diameter of 1.8 cm (IQR 1.4-2.5). As a continuous variable, age was not associated with GRi (-0.0001 cm/yr, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.007 to 0.007, p = 0.97) or GRp (0.008 cm/yr, 95% CI -0.004 to 0.020, p = 0.17) after adjustment. The only age thresholds associated with an increased GR were 65 yr for GRi and 70 yr for GRp. Limitations include the one-dimensional nature of the measurements used. Conclusions Increased age for patients on AS for SRMs is not associated with increased GRs. Patient summary We examined whether patients undergoing active surveillance (AS) exhibited accelerated growth of their small renal masses (SRMs) after a certain age. No demonstrable change was seen, suggesting that AS is a safe and durable management option for aging patients with SRMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ridwan Alam
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anirudh Yerrapragada
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tina Wlajnitz
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Emelia Watts
- Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Peter Chang
- Division of Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew A. Wagner
- Division of Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James M. McKiernan
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Phillip M. Pierorazio
- Division of Urology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mohamad E. Allaf
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Singh A. What's Inside? Indian J Urol 2023; 39:94-96. [PMID: 37304988 PMCID: PMC10249527 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_105_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Singh
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Radiofrequency Ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Efficacy and Complications. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13030388. [PMID: 36766493 PMCID: PMC9914157 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades the detection rate of small renal masses has increased, due to improving diagnostic accuracy, and nephron-sparing treatments have become the first-choice curative option for small renal masses. As a minimally invasive alternative, thermal ablation has increased in popularity, offering a good clinical outcome and low recurrence rate. Radiofrequency ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave ablation are the main ablative techniques. All of them are mostly overlapping in term of cancer specific free survival and outcomes. These techniques require imaging study to assess lesions features and to plan the procedure: US, CT, and both of them together are the leading guidance alternatives. Imaging findings guide the interventional radiologist in assessing the risk of complication and possible residual disease after procedure. The purpose of this review is to compare different ablative modalities and different imaging guides, underlining the effectiveness, outcomes, and complications related to each of them, in order to assist the interventional radiologist in choosing the best option for the patient.
Collapse
|
24
|
Urine Molecular Biomarkers for Detection and Follow-Up of Small Renal Masses. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232416110. [PMID: 36555747 PMCID: PMC9785854 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232416110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Active surveillance (AS) is the best strategy for small renal masses (SRMs) management; however, reliable methods for early detection and disease aggressiveness prediction are urgently needed. The aim of the present study was to validate DNA methylation biomarkers for non-invasive SRM detection and prognosis. The levels of methylated genes TFAP2B, TAC1, PCDH8, ZNF677, FLRT2, and FBN2 were evaluated in 165 serial urine samples prospectively collected from 39 patients diagnosed with SRM, specifically renal cell carcinoma (RCC), before and during the AS via quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Voided urine samples from 92 asymptomatic volunteers were used as the control. Significantly higher methylated TFAP2B, TAC1, PCDH8, ZNF677, and FLRT2 levels and/or frequencies were detected in SRM patients' urine samples as compared to the control. The highest diagnostic power (AUC = 0.74) was observed for the four biomarkers panel with 92% sensitivity and 52% specificity. Methylated PCDH8 level positively correlated with SRM size at diagnosis, while TFAP2B had the opposite effect and was related to SRM progression. To sum up, SRMs contribute significantly to the amount of methylated DNA detectable in urine, which might be used for very early RCC detection. Moreover, PCDH8 and TFAP2B methylation have the potential to be prognostic biomarkers for SRMs.
Collapse
|
25
|
Kapur P, Zhong H, Araj E, Christie A, Cai Q, Kim D, Miyata J, Tcheuyap VT, Brandenburg O, Carrillo D, Pedrosa I, Brugarolas J, Cadeddu JA. Predicting Oncologic Outcomes in Small Renal Tumors. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:687-694. [PMID: 36115820 PMCID: PMC9812257 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients diagnosed with renal cancer today present with small renal masses (SRMs). Although these patients have a low risk of dying from their disease and many are followed with active surveillance protocols, a small subset of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) behave aggressively. Knowledge regarding features of aggressive behavior would enable better adoption of active surveillance strategies among these patients. OBJECTIVE We sought to improve prognostic models to predict metastasis-free survival after nephrectomy through focused analyses of clinicopathologic characteristics of SRMs associated with adverse outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We identified consecutive patients with surgically resected SRMs (≤4 cm) at the University of Texas Southwestern Kidney Cancer Program between 1998 and 2020. In addition, we evaluated the ability of SRMs to form tumors when implanted in mice, an indicator of tumor aggressiveness. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We examined the clinicopathologic factors associated with metastasis including prospectively performed BAP1 immunohistochemistry at our Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments laboratory. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to predict metastasis-free survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 3900 evaluable nephrectomies (from 3674 ethnically diverse patients) were identified, of which 1984 (51%) were SRMs including 1720 RCC. Of these patients with RCC (SRMRCC), 1576 did not have synchronous or metachronous larger RCCs and among these, 37 (2%) developed metastases. SRMRCC that metastasized were significantly enriched for aggressive morphologic phenotypes and engrafted in mice at comparable rates as larger metastatic tumors. BAP1 loss remained significantly associated with metastasis-free survival after accounting for TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) stage and SSIGN (stage, size, grade, and necrosis) score in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS We identified clinicopathologic features that influence metastasis-free survival for patients with SRMRCC. If validated independently, these data should assist with patient prognosis and help with active surveillance strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY We report the identification of features of aggressiveness in small renal tumors that influence the likelihood of metastases after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payal Kapur
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program at Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Hua Zhong
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ellen Araj
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program at Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Qi Cai
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David Kim
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey Miyata
- Kidney Cancer Program at Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vanina T Tcheuyap
- Kidney Cancer Program at Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Olivia Brandenburg
- Kidney Cancer Program at Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Deyssy Carrillo
- Kidney Cancer Program at Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program at Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program at Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Jeffrey A Cadeddu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program at Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Koelker M, Krimphove M, Alkhatib K, Nabi J, Kuo LE, Lipsitz SR, Choueiri TK, Chang SL, Doherty GM, Kibel AS, Trinh QD, Cole AP. Understanding Hospital-Level Patterns of Nonoperative Management for Low-risk Thyroid and Kidney Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2242210. [PMID: 36378306 PMCID: PMC9667332 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE There is a growing trend toward conservative management for certain low-risk cancers. Hospital and health-system factors may play a role in determining how these patients are managed. OBJECTIVE To explore the contribution of hospitals on patients' odds of nonoperative management for low-risk cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cross-sectional study, individuals with low-risk papillary thyroid cancer and solitary kidney masses were identified, and those receiving nonoperative management vs surgery were compared. Patients with low-risk thyroid cancer and kidney cancer from 2015 to 2017 eligible for nonoperative management according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines within the National Cancer Database were included. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to March 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES For each facility, the proportion of these patients who received operative and nonoperative management was calculated. A mixed-effects logistic regression model with a hospital-level random effects term was used to calculate factors associated with nonoperative management. Between-hospital variability was assessed using ranked caterpillar plots. RESULTS There were 19 570 individuals with low-risk thyroid cancer (15 344 women [78.4%]; mean [SD] age, 51.74 [95% CI, 51.39-52.08] years) and 41 403 with kidney cancer (25 253 men [61.0%]; mean [SD] age, 61.93 [95% CI, 61.70-62.17] years). In the group with low-risk thyroid cancer, 2.1% (419 patients) received nonoperative management, and in the group with kidney cancer, 9.5% (3928 patients) received nonoperative management. This varied between hospitals from 1.1% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.1%) in the bottom decile to 10.3% (95% CI, 8.0%-12.4%) in the top decile for low-risk thyroid cancer, and from 4.3% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.4%) in the bottom decile to 24.6% (95% CI, 22.7%-26.5%) in the top decile for small kidney masses. For both cancers, age was associated with increased odds of nonoperative treatment. The hospital-level odds of nonoperative management of thyroid and kidney cancer using unadjusted probabilities (observed proportions) were minimally correlated (Spearman ρ = .33; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that although health systems factors may be associated with the tendency to pursue nonoperative management, hospital-level factors may differ when comparing unrelated cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Koelker
- Center of Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marieke Krimphove
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Khalid Alkhatib
- Center of Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Junaid Nabi
- Center of Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lindsay E. Kuo
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stuart R. Lipsitz
- Center of Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven Lee Chang
- Center of Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gerard M. Doherty
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam S. Kibel
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Center of Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander P. Cole
- Center of Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: management of kidney cancer. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1195-1274. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
28
|
The Role of Focal Therapy and Active Surveillance for Small Renal Mass Therapy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102583. [PMID: 36289844 PMCID: PMC9599744 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Small and low-grade renal cell carcinomas have little potential for metastasis and disease-related mortality. As a consequence, the main problem remains the use of appropriately tailored treatment for each individual patient. Surgery still remains the gold standard, but many clinicians are questioning this approach and present the advantages of focal therapy. The choice of treatment regimen remains a matter of debate. This article summarizes the current treatment options in the management of small renal masses.
Collapse
|
29
|
Fogarty J, Siriruchatanon M, Makarov D, Langford A, Kang S. An Evaluation of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Treatment Planning of Small Kidney Tumors: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e41451. [PMID: 36053558 PMCID: PMC9482069 DOI: 10.2196/41451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgery is the most common treatment for localized small kidney masses (SKMs) up to 4 cm, despite a lack of evidence for improved overall survival. Nonsurgical management options are gaining recognition, as evidence supports the indolence of most SKMs. Decision aids (DAs) have been shown to improve patient comprehension of the trade-offs of treatment options and overall decision quality, and may improve consideration of all major options according to individual health priorities and preferences. Objective This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) primarily aims to evaluate the impact of a new web-based DA on treatment decisions for patients with SKM; that is, selection of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment options. Secondary objectives include an assessment of decision-making outcomes: decisional conflict, decision satisfaction, and an understanding of individual preferences for treatment that incorporate the trade-offs associated with surgical versus nonsurgical interventions. Methods Three phases comprise the construction and evaluation of a new web-based DA on SKM treatment. In phase 1, this DA was developed in print format through a multidisciplinary design committee incorporating patient focus groups. Phase 2 was an observational study on patient knowledge and decision-making measures after randomization to receive the printed DA or institutional educational materials, which identified further educational needs applied to a web-based DA. Phase 3 will preliminarily evaluate the web-based DA: in a pilot RCT, 50 adults diagnosed with SKMs will receive the web-based DA or an existing web-based institutional website at urology clinics at a large academic medical center. The web-based DA applies risk communication and information about diagnosis and treatment options, elicits preferences regarding treatment options, and provides a set of options to consider with their doctor based on a decision-analytic model of benefits/harm analysis that accounts for comorbidity, age group, and tumor features. Questionnaires and treatment decision data will be gathered before and after viewing the educational material. Results This phase will consist of a pilot RCT from August 2022 to January 2023 to establish feasibility and preliminarily evaluate decision outcomes. Previous study phases from 2018 to 2020 supported the feasibility of providing the printed DA in urology clinics before clinical consultation and demonstrated increased patient knowledge about the diagnosis and treatment options and greater likelihood of favoring nonsurgical treatment just before consultation. This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute. Recruitment will begin in August 2022. Conclusions A web-based DA has been designed to address educational needs for patients making treatment decisions for SKM, accounting for comorbidities and treatment-related benefits and risks. Outcomes from the pilot trial will evaluate the potential of a web-based DA in personalizing treatment decisions and in helping patients weigh attributes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment options for their SKMs. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05387863; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05387863 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/41451
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Fogarty
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mutita Siriruchatanon
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Danil Makarov
- Department of Urology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Aisha Langford
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Stella Kang
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Stewart GD, Klatte T, Cosmai L, Bex A, Lamb BW, Moch H, Sala E, Siva S, Porta C, Gallieni M. The multispeciality approach to the management of localised kidney cancer. Lancet 2022; 400:523-534. [PMID: 35868329 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01059-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Historically, kidney cancer was approached in a siloed single-speciality way, with urological surgeons managing the localised stages of the disease and medical oncologists caring for patients if metastases developed. However, improvements in the management of localised kidney cancer have occurred rapidly over the past two decades with greater understanding of the disease biology, diagnostic options, and innovations in curative treatments. These developments are favourable for patients but provide a substantially more complex landscape for patients and clinicians to navigate, with associated challenging decisions about who to treat, how, and when. As such, the skill sets needed to manage the various aspects of the disease and guide patients appropriately outstrips the capabilities of one particular specialist, and the evolution of a multispeciality approach to the management of kidney cancer is now essential. In this Review, we summarise the current best multispeciality practice for the management of localised kidney cancer and the areas in need of further research and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant D Stewart
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; CRUK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Cosmai
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Axel Bex
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Benjamin W Lamb
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; School of Allied Health, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Holger Moch
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Evis Sala
- CRUK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Camillo Porta
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, AOU Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Maurizio Gallieni
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Charbonneau G, Hudon C, Lavallée LT, Kassouf W, Gaboury I, Toren P, Couture F, Couture F, Foley V, Tétu A, Richard PO. Patients’ perceptions on active surveillance for the treatment of small renal masses. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:493.e17-493.e23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
32
|
Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 41:8-15. [PMID: 35633831 PMCID: PMC9130085 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Active surveillance (AS) of biopsy-proven renal oncocytomas may reduce overtreatment. However, on biopsy, the risk of misdiagnosis owing principally to entities with peculiar hybrids and overlap morphology, and phenotypes argues for early intervention. Objective To assess the benefit and harm of AS in biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma. Evidence acquisition A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from September 26 up to October 2021, for studies that analyzed the outcomes of AS in patients with biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma. Evidence synthesis A total of ten studies with 633 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. After a median follow-up of 34.5 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.6–38.4), the overall definitive treatment rate from AS to definitive treatment was 17.3% (n = 75/433, six studies). The pooled pathological agreement between the initial renal mass biopsy and the surgical pathology report was 91.1%. The main indications for surgery during follow-up were rapid tumor growth and patient request. The pooled median growth rate was 1.55 mm/yr (95% CI 0.9–2.2). No metastasis or death related to renal oncocytoma was reported. Conclusions Annual tumor growth of biopsy-proven renal oncocytoma is low. AS is oncologically safe, with favorable compliance of patients. Crossover to definitive treatment revealed a strong concordance between biopsy and final pathology. Further studies on the long-term outcomes of AS are needed. Patient summary In this study, we examined the benefit and harm of active surveillance (AS) in biopsy-proven oncocytoma. Based on the available data, AS appears oncologically safe and may represent a promising alternative to immediate treatment. Patients should be included in AS decision discussions.
Collapse
|
33
|
Development and Pilot Evaluation of a Decision Aid for Small Kidney Masses. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:935-944. [PMID: 35714722 PMCID: PMC9357200 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and pilot test a patient decision aid (DA) describing small kidney masses and risks and benefits of treatment for the masses. METHODS An expert committee iteratively designed a small kidney mass DA, incorporating evidence-based risk communication and informational needs for treatment options and shared decision making. After literature review and drafting content with the feedback of urologists, radiologists, and an internist, a rapid qualitative assessment was conducted using two patient focus groups to inform user-centered design. In a pilot study, 30 patients were randomized at the initial urologic consultation to receive the DA or existing institutional patient educational material (PEM). Preconsultation questionnaires captured patient knowledge and shared decision-making preferences. After review of the DA and subsequent clinician consultation, patients completed questionnaires on discussion content and satisfaction. Proportions between arms were compared using Fisher exact tests, and decision measures were compared using Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS Patient informational needs included risk of tumor growth during active surveillance and ablation, significance of comorbidities, and posttreatment recovery. For the DA, 84% of patients viewed all content, and mean viewing time was 20 min. Significant improvements in knowledge about small mass risks and treatments were observed (mean total scores: 52.6% DA versus 22.3% PEM, P < .001). DA use also increased the proportion of patients discussing ablation (66.7% DA versus 18.2% PEM, P = .02). Decision satisfaction measures were similar in both arms. DISCUSSION Patients receiving a small kidney mass DA are likely to gain knowledge and preparedness to discuss all treatment options over standard educational materials.
Collapse
|
34
|
Takahara K, Shiroki R. Editorial Comment to Does histologic subtype impact overall survival in observed T1a kidney cancers compared with competing risks? Implications for biopsy as a risk stratification tool. Int J Urol 2022; 29:851-852. [PMID: 35673885 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyoshi Takahara
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Shiroki
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pratsinis M, Fankhauser C, Pratsinis K, Beyer J, Bührer E, Cathomas R, Fischer N, Hermanns T, Hirschi-Blickenstorfer A, Kamradt J, Alex Kluth L, Zihler D, Mingrone W, Müller B, Nestler T, Rothschild SI, Seifert B, Templeton AJ, Terbuch A, Ufen MP, Woelky R, Gillessen S, Rothermundt C. Metastatic Potential of Small Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Implications for Surveillance of Small Testicular Masses. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 40:16-18. [PMID: 35515270 PMCID: PMC9062248 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient summary
Collapse
|
36
|
Purysko AS, Nikolaidis P, Khatri G, Auron M, De Leon AD, Ganeshan D, Gore JL, Gupta RT, Shek-Man Lo S, Lyshchik A, Savage SJ, Smith AD, Taffel MT, Yoo DC, Lockhart ME. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up and Active Surveillance of Clinically Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2021 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S156-S174. [PMID: 35550799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for most malignant renal tumors and is considered the most lethal of all urologic cancers. For follow-up of patients with treated or untreated RCC and those with neoplasms suspected to represent RCC, radiologic imaging is the most valuable component of surveillance, as most relapses and cases of disease progression are identified when patients are asymptomatic. Understanding the strengths and limitations of the various imaging modalities for the detection of disease, recurrence, or progression is essential when planning follow-up regimens. This document addresses the appropriate imaging examinations for asymptomatic patients who have been treated for RCC with radical or partial nephrectomy or ablative therapies. It also discusses the appropriate imaging examinations for asymptomatic patients with localized biopsy-proven or suspected RCC undergoing active surveillance. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paul Nikolaidis
- Panel Chair, Vice Chair, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- Panel Vice-Chair, Division Chief, Body MRI; Associate Division Chief, Abdominal Imaging; Program Director, Body MRI Fellowship, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Moises Auron
- Medical Director Blood Management; Quality and Patient Safety Officer, Department of Hospital Medicine; Member, Board of Governors, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Primary care physician-Internal medicine
| | | | | | - John L Gore
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; American Urological Association
| | - Rajan T Gupta
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Chair, ACR Meetings Subcommittee, Commission on Publications and Lifelong Learning
| | - Simon Shek-Man Lo
- Vice Chair for Strategic Planning, Director of SBRT, and Co-chair of Appointment and Promotion Committee of Department of Radiation of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; and Immediate Past President of CARROS of ACR, Fellowship Committee Chair of CARROS of ACR, ACR Assistant Councilor (on behalf of American Radium Society), Chair of the Committee for ACR Practice Parameter for Radiation Oncology
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen J Savage
- Professor and Vice Chairman of Urology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; American Urological Association
| | - Andrew D Smith
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Myles T Taffel
- Associate Section Head Abdominal Imaging, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Don C Yoo
- Rhode Island Hospital/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mark E Lockhart
- Specialty Chair, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; and Chair, ACR Appropriateness Committee
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Diagnosis and Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Where Do We Stand? Curr Urol Rep 2022; 23:99-111. [PMID: 35507213 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01093-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To present an overview of the current evidence-based studies covering diagnostic and management of SRM. RECENT FINDINGS Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 3% of the cancers. Nowadays, partial nephrectomy (PN) represents gold standard treatment. New nephron-sparing approaches such as active surveillance and ablative therapies have been increasingly used as an alternative to surgical intervention. Due to novel comprehension of RCC and widespread use of imaging techniques, diagnosis at early stage in elderly patients has increased. Treatment decision-making should be based on patient and tumour characteristics. With expanding treatment options, the management of SRMs has become a debate and should be adjusted to patient and tumour characteristics. In a shared decision manner, both active surveillance with possible delayed intervention and focal therapy should be discussed with the patient as an alternative to partial nephrectomy.
Collapse
|
38
|
Michael J, Velazquez N, Renson A, Tan HJ, Rose TL, Osterman CK, Milowsky M, Kang SK, Huang WC, Bjurlin MA. Does histologic subtype impact overall survival in observed T1a kidney cancers compared with competing risks? Implications for biopsy as a risk stratification tool. Int J Urol 2022; 29:845-851. [PMID: 35474518 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to assess if adding a biopsy proven histologic subtype to a model that predicts overall survival that includes variables representing competing risks in observed, biopsy proven, T1a renal cell carcinomas, enhances the model's performance. METHODS The National Cancer Database was assessed (years 2004-2015) for patients with observed T1a renal cell carcinoma who had undergone renal mass biopsy. Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to estimate overall survival stratified by histologic subtype. We utilized C-index from a Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the impact of adding histologic subtypes to a model to predict overall survival for each stage. RESULTS Of 132 958 T1a renal masses identified, 1614 had biopsy proven histology and were managed non-operatively. Of those, 61% were clear cell, 33% papillary, and 6% chromophobe. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a difference in overall survival between histologic subtypes (P = 0.010) with greater median overall survival for patients with chromophobe (85.1 months, hazard rate 0.45, P = 0.005) compared to clear cell (64.8 months, reference group). Adding histology to a model with competing risks alone did not substantially improve model performance (C-index 0.65 vs 0.64 respectively). CONCLUSIONS Incorporation of histologic subtype into a risk stratification model to determine prognostic overall survival did not improve modeling of overall survival compared with variables representing competing risks in patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma managed with observation. These results suggest that performing renal mass biopsy in order to obtain tumor histology may have limited utility. Future studies should further investigate the overall utility of renal mass biopsy for observed T1a kidney cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Michael
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nermarie Velazquez
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Audrey Renson
- Department of Clinical Research, NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Hung-Jui Tan
- Department of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tracy L Rose
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chelsea K Osterman
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew Milowsky
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stella K Kang
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA.,Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
| | - William C Huang
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Marc A Bjurlin
- Department of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Numakura K, Nakai Y, Kojima T, Osawa T, Narita S, Nakayama M, Kitamura H, Nishiyama H, Shinohara N. Overview of clinical management for older patients with renal cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:665-681. [PMID: 35397166 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The rapidly increasing pool of older patients being diagnosed with and surviving their cancer is creating many challenges. Regarding localized renal cell carcinoma, surgery is considered as gold standard treatment options even in older men, whereas active surveillance and ablation therapy are alternative options for a proportion of these patients. With regard to advanced disease, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) and immune check point inhibitor are standard treatment modalities, although treatment choice from multiple regimens and prevention of adverse events need to be considered. Better assessment techniques, such as comprehensive geriatric assessment to meet the unique needs of older patients, are a central focus in the delivery of high-quality geriatric oncology care. Through this process, shared decision-making should be adopted in clinical care to achieve optimal goals of care that reflect patient and caregiver hopes, needs and preferences. It is necessary to continue investigating oncological outcomes and complications associated with treatment in this population to ensure appropriate cancer care. In this narrative review, we completed a literature review of the various treatments for renal cell carcinoma in older patients that aimed to identify the current evidence related to the full range of the treatments including active surveillance, surgery, ablation therapy and systemic therapy. Prospectively designed studies and studies regarding geriatric assessment were preferentially added as references. Our goals were to summarize the real-world evidence and provide a decision framework that guides better cancer practices for older patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yasutomo Nakai
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Takahiro Osawa
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Masashi Nakayama
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | | | - Nobuo Shinohara
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rodger FE, Brown K, Leung S, Coode‐Bate J, Armitage J, Warren A, Hendry J, Stewart G, Laird A, Oades GM. Real world outcomes of biopsy‐proven oncocytic neoplasm of the kidney managed by surveillance. BJUI COMPASS 2022; 3:291-297. [PMID: 35783590 PMCID: PMC9231677 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate outcomes of patients diagnosed with oncocytic renal neoplasms on routine renal mass biopsy and to describe the natural history of these tumours when managed with surveillance as opposed to immediate intervention. To report disease‐specific survival. Patients and methods Patients were identified from a retrospective review of pathology databases from three tertiary referral centres that utilise renal mass biopsy in routine clinical practice. All patients with biopsy‐proven oncocytic tumours were included and a retrospective review of online patient records was undertaken. Results There were 184 biopsy‐proven oncocytic renal neoplasms identified in 172 patients. There were two biopsy complications (both pneumothorax, Clavien–Dindo Grade I). Of these lesions, 135 were reported as oncocytomas or oncocytic renal neoplasms that were not further classified and 37 were reported as chromophobe carcinoma (ChRCC). The median age at diagnosis was 70 (33–88). The average tumour diameter at diagnosis was 33 mm. One hundred seven tumours were initially managed with surveillance (including 13 ChRCC) with a minimum follow‐up of 6 months and a median of 39 months (6–144) whereas 49 patients underwent immediate treatment. The mean growth rate across all oncocytic renal neoplasms managed by surveillance was 3 mm/year. There was no statistically significant difference in growth rates between oncocytic renal neoplasms and ChRCC. Thirteen patients with oncocytic renal neoplasms initially managed by surveillance moved on to an active management strategy during follow‐up. The clinical indication given for a change from surveillance was tumour growth in 12 cases and patient choice in 1 case. Where definitive pathology was available, there was 85% concordance with the biopsy. There were no cases of development of metastatic disease or disease‐related morbidity or mortality during the study. Conclusions This multicentre retrospective cohort study supports the hypothesis that selected biopsy‐proven oncocytic renal neoplasms can be safely managed with surveillance in the medium term. Routine renal mass biopsy may reduce surgery for benign or indolent renal tumours and the potential associated morbidity for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora E. Rodger
- Department of Urology Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow UK
| | - Keiran Brown
- Department of Urology Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK
| | - Steve Leung
- Department of Urology The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK
| | - Jack Coode‐Bate
- Department of Urology University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust Plymouth UK
| | - James Armitage
- Department of Urology Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust Cambridge UK
| | - Anne Warren
- Department of Pathology Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust Cambridge UK
| | - Jane Hendry
- Department of Urology Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow UK
| | - Grant Stewart
- Department of Urology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Alex Laird
- Department of Urology The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
The value of sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in differentiating and staging renal cell carcinomas. Curr Urol 2022; 16:32-37. [PMID: 35633856 PMCID: PMC9132183 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Misdiagnosis of benign renal neoplasms can lead to unnecessary surgical resections, which increases the risk of other morbidities and mortality. Therefore, it is crucial to find a diagnostic modality for differentiation between benign and malignant renal masses. In the current study, we summarized published pieces of evidence concerning the use of technetium-99m (99mTc)-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) as a promising diagnostic nuclear imaging modality for the differentiation of renal neoplasms. The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We conducted a systematic electronic database search for suitable studies from inception till February 20, 2020 in 9 databases. The risk of bias was assessed for the included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. We identified 9373 records after exclusion of 8978 duplicates using EndNote software. Title and abstract screening resulted in 761 records for further full-text screening. Finally, four studies were included with total sample size of 80 patients. The overall risk of bias was low to moderate. The results of all the included studies supported using 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the differentiation between benign and malignant renal neoplasms. The use of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT could be a rapid, less invasive, promising diagnostic modality for histological diagnosis and staging of renal neoplasm, as well as monitoring post-therapy tumor's response. However, more studies with large sample sizes are essential to confirm the reliability and accuracy of this modality for usage.
Collapse
|
42
|
The changing trends of image-guided biopsy of small renal masses before intervention-an analysis of European multinational prospective EuRECA registry. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:4667-4678. [PMID: 35122492 PMCID: PMC8817647 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08556-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the use of pre-cryoablation biopsy for small renal masses (SRMs) and the effects of increasing uptake on histological results of treated SRMs. Methods From 2015 to 2019, patients with sporadic T1N0M0 SRMs undergoing percutaneous, laparoscopic, or open cryoablation from 14 European institutions within the European Registry for Renal Cryoablation (EuRECA) were included for the retrospective analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic models were used to evaluate the trends, histological results, and the factors influencing use of pre-cryoablation biopsy. Results In total, 871 patients (median (IQR) age, 69 (14), 298 women) undergoing cryoablation were evaluated. The use of pre-cryoablation biopsy has significantly increased from 42% (65/156) in 2015 to 72% (88/122) in 2019 (p < 0.001). Patients treated for a benign histology are significantly more likely to have presented later in the trend, where pre-cryoablation biopsy is more prevalent (OR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.51–0.81, p < 0.001). Patients treated for undiagnosed histology are also significantly less likely to have presented in 2018 compared to 2016 (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10–0.97, p = 0.044). Patients aged 70+ are less likely to be biopsies pre-cryoablation (p < 0.05). R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score of 10+ and a Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1 are factors associated with lower likelihood to not have received a pre-cryoablation biopsy (p < 0.05). Conclusion An increased use of pre-cryoablation biopsy was observed and cryoablation patients treated with a benign histology are more likely to have presented in periods where pre-cryoablation biopsy is not as prevalent. Comparative studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on the effect of pre-cryoablation biopsy on SRM treatments. Key Points • The use of biopsy pre-ablation session has increased significantly from 42% of all patients in 2015 to 74% in 2019. • Patients are less likely to be treated for a benign tumour if they presented later in the trend, where pre-cryoablation biopsy is more prevalent, compared to later in the trend (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51–0.81, p < 0.001). • Patients with comorbidities or a complex tumour (R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score > 10) are less likely to not undergo biopsy as a separate session to cryoablation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08556-2.
Collapse
|
43
|
Richard PO, Violette PD, Bhindi B, Breau RH, Kassouf W, Lavallée LT, Jewett M, Kachura JR, Kapoor A, Noel-Lamy M, Ordon M, Pautler SE, Pouliot F, So AI, Rendon RA, Tanguay S, Collins C, Kandi M, Shayegan B, Weller A, Finelli A, Kokorovic A, Nayak J. Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of small renal masses - Full-text. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 16:E61-E75. [PMID: 35133268 PMCID: PMC8932428 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick O. Richard
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe D. Violette
- Departments of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact (HEI) and Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bimal Bhindi
- Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rodney H. Breau
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Luke T. Lavallée
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Jewett
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John R. Kachura
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- McMaster Institute of Urology, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maxime Noel-Lamy
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Michael Ordon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen E. Pautler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Frédéric Pouliot
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Alan I. So
- Division of Urology, British Columbia Cancer Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ricardo A. Rendon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Capital Health - QEII, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Maryam Kandi
- Departments of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact (HEI) and Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- McMaster Institute of Urology, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Kokorovic
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jay Nayak
- Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Kidney cancer accounts for 2% of cancer related deaths. Historically, a patient with a solid renal mass would undergo surgery without biopsy given the previously low diagnostic yield of biopsy and the fear of tumor seeding. This led to a high rate of resection for benign masses. With the rising incidence of renal masses discovered on imaging, improvements in biopsy technique and advancements in pathologic evaluation of biopsy samples of renal masses, renal mass biopsy now plays an important role in selected patients with renal masses. Coaxial core needle biopsy is the preferred technique with a low rate of complications and a high diagnostic yield. This article will discuss indications, methods, utility, limitations and complications of renal mass biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith B Quencer
- Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pedrosa I, Cadeddu JA. How We Do It: Managing the Indeterminate Renal Mass with the MRI Clear Cell Likelihood Score. Radiology 2021; 302:256-269. [PMID: 34904873 PMCID: PMC8805575 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.210034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The widespread use of cross-sectional imaging has led to a continuous increase in the number of incidentally detected indeterminate renal masses. Frequently, these clinical scenarios involve an older patient with comorbidities and a small renal mass (≤4 cm). Despite aggressive treatment in early stages of the disease, a clear positive effect in reducing kidney cancer-specific mortality is lacking, indicating that many renal cancers exhibit an indolent oncologic behavior. Furthermore, in general, one in five small renal masses is histologically benign and may not benefit from aggressive treatment. Although active surveillance is increasingly recognized as a management option for some patients, the absence of reliable clinical and imaging predictive biologic markers of aggressiveness can contribute to patient anxiety and limit its use in clinical practice. A standardized approach to the image interpretation of solid renal masses has not been broadly implemented. The clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) derived from multiparametric MRI is useful in noninvasively identifying the clear cell subtype, the most common and aggressive form of kidney cancer. Herein, a review of the ccLS is presented, including a step-by-step guide for image interpretation and additional guidance for its implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Pedrosa
- From the Department of Radiology (I.P., J.A.C.), Department of Urology (I.P., J.A.C.), and Advanced Imaging Research Center (I.P.), University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Clements Imaging Bldg, Ste 2202, MC 9085, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Jeffrey A. Cadeddu
- From the Department of Radiology (I.P., J.A.C.), Department of Urology (I.P., J.A.C.), and Advanced Imaging Research Center (I.P.), University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Clements Imaging Bldg, Ste 2202, MC 9085, Dallas, TX 75390
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schieda N, Krishna S, Pedrosa I, Kaffenberger SD, Davenport MS, Silverman SG. Active Surveillance of Renal Masses: The Role of Radiology. Radiology 2021; 302:11-24. [PMID: 34812670 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Active surveillance of renal masses, which includes serial imaging with the possibility of delayed treatment, has emerged as a viable alternative to immediate therapeutic intervention in selected patients. Active surveillance is supported by evidence that many benign masses are resected unnecessarily, and treatment of small cancers has not substantially reduced cancer-specific mortality. These data are a call to radiologists to improve the diagnosis of benign renal masses and differentiate cancers that are biologically aggressive (prompting treatment) from those that are indolent (allowing treatment deferral). Current evidence suggests that active surveillance results in comparable cancer-specific survival with a low risk of developing metastasis. Radiology is central in this. Imaging is used at the outset to estimate the probability of malignancy and degree of aggressiveness in malignant masses and to follow up masses for growth and morphologic change. Percutaneous biopsy is used to provide a more definitive histologic diagnosis and to guide treatment decisions, including whether active surveillance is appropriate. Emerging applications that may improve imaging assessment of renal masses include standardized assessment of cystic and solid masses and radiomic analysis. This article reviews the current and future role of radiology in the care of patients with renal masses undergoing active surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Schieda
- From the Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 1H6 (N.S.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Urology (S.D.K., M.S.D.) and Radiology (M.S.D.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S.)
| | - Satheesh Krishna
- From the Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 1H6 (N.S.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Urology (S.D.K., M.S.D.) and Radiology (M.S.D.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S.)
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- From the Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 1H6 (N.S.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Urology (S.D.K., M.S.D.) and Radiology (M.S.D.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S.)
| | - Samuel D Kaffenberger
- From the Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 1H6 (N.S.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Urology (S.D.K., M.S.D.) and Radiology (M.S.D.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S.)
| | - Matthew S Davenport
- From the Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 1H6 (N.S.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Urology (S.D.K., M.S.D.) and Radiology (M.S.D.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S.)
| | - Stuart G Silverman
- From the Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 1H6 (N.S.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Urology (S.D.K., M.S.D.) and Radiology (M.S.D.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Violette PD, Jewett MAS, Richard PO. Evidence-based Urology: Trustworthy Guidelines. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 7:1243-1246. [PMID: 34794933 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Clinical guidelines for guiding clinical decision-making must be trustworthy, especially when there is controversy or a shifting paradigm. In urology, the management of small renal masses is one area in which there is currently a paradigm shift towards active surveillance. A number of international guidelines address this paradigm shift to some extent, with varying degrees of rigor. To be trustworthy, guidelines should be developed by panels that include content experts - the traditional panel members - as well as methodologists with expertise in evidence interpretation, front-line clinicians who take care of the patients who constitute the target audience, and patient partners. At a minimum, panels should integrate four key concepts: (1) guidelines provide a systematic summary of evidence used to support answerable questions, including assessment of the quality of the evidence; (2) there is a clear and transparent link between the evidence and recommendations; (3) recommendations incorporate patient values and preferences; and (4) conflicts of interest are managed optimally. In this article we address several issues in four international guidelines, with an emphasis on guideline methods and implications for guidance statements. The strengths and limitations of available recommendations are reviewed and summarized with suggestions for improving the next iterations of guidelines on the management of small renal masses. PATIENT SUMMARY: Good clinical decision-making relies on trustworthy guidelines. We assessed four international guidelines on the management of small kidney tumors that illustrate some of the key issues in developing a trustworthy guideline. Patient values and preferences are under-represented in most clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe D Violette
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Surgery, Woodstock General Hospital, Woodstock, Canada.
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick O Richard
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke and Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tsili AC, Moulopoulos LA, Varakarakis IΜ, Argyropoulou MI. Cross-sectional imaging assessment of renal masses with emphasis on MRI. Acta Radiol 2021; 63:1570-1587. [PMID: 34709096 DOI: 10.1177/02841851211052999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful complementary imaging tool for the diagnosis and characterization of renal masses, as it provides both morphologic and functional information. A core MRI protocol for renal imaging should include a T1-weighted sequence with in- and opposed-phase images (or, alternatively with DIXON technique), T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images as well as a dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence with subtraction images, followed by a delayed post-contrast T1-weighted sequence. The main advantages of MRI over computed tomography include increased sensitivity for contrast enhancement, less sensitivity for detection of calcifications, absence of pseudoenhancement, and lack of radiation exposure. MRI may be applied for renal cystic lesion characterization, differentiation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from benign solid renal tumors, RCC histologic grading, staging, post-treatment follow-up, and active surveillance of patients with treated or untreated RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina C Tsili
- Department of Clinical Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Lia-Angela Moulopoulos
- 1st Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Areteion Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Μ Varakarakis
- 2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria I Argyropoulou
- Department of Clinical Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Disease Progression in Older Patients With Renal Tumor Assigned to an Active Surveillance Protocol. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:e53-e60. [PMID: 34815184 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is a validated option for the treatment of small renal masses (SMRs), especially in older patients. This study investigates the oncologic outcomes and competitive mortality of older patients prospectively assigned to AS. METHODS We conducted a monocentric study on patients ≥75 years treated between 2011 and 2016 for a SMR. Treatment modalities, biopsy data, survivals (overall, specific, cancer progression) and delayed interventions were analyzed. RESULTS Overall, 106 patients (median age 80.5 years) were included, of which 41 were managed by AS during a follow-up of 3.4 years [0-7.1]. Seven patients (17%) had a primary biopsy with 3 confirmed renal cell carcinomas. Fourteen patients (34.1%) presented with progression (29.2% local; 4.9% metastatic), 8 (19.5%) requiring delayed interventions (75% ablative therapy and 25% radical nephrectomy). Overall survival (OS) was 68.3% and cancer specific survival was 95.1% during the study period. Competitive mortality was higher (84.6%) than cancer specific mortality (15.4%), P = .001. CONCLUSION The growth rate of progression including 4.9% metastatic progression underlines the value of AS compared to simple watchful surveillance in the treatment of SMRs in older patients. Of note, the higher competitive mortality confirm that AS should be preferred to active intervention at the beginning of the management.
Collapse
|
50
|
Hou Q, Yu X, Cheng Z, Han Z, Liu F, Dou J, Yu J, Liang P. Survival benefits analyses of T1a renal cell carcinoma patients treated with microwave ablation. Eur J Radiol 2021; 144:109951. [PMID: 34607288 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The individual decision-making reference of Microwave ablation (MWA) for T1a RCC treatment is not clear, and it may not benefit all the patients equally. Therefore, we quantitatively evaluated the distinct survival benefits of patients with T1a RCC stratified by survival predictors. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 237 patients with T1a RCC who underwent MWA over the last 16 years were retrospectively reviewed for survival benefit analysis. Cox proportional hazard models were used to control for the prognostic variables of OS, CSS, and PFS. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank analysis. Linear extrapolation was used to compute median survival periods. RESULTS The OS benefit was significantly dependent on age (HR:2.499, 95% CI: 1.245-5.016, p = 0.010) and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score (HR:3.956, 95% CI, 1.409-11.110, p = 0.009). OS in patients aged <75 years or with an age-adjusted CCI score <7 was significantly prolonged (44.68, 65.55 months) compared to OS in patients aged ≥75 years or with CCI score ≥7 (p < 0.001 for both). PFS benefit was significantly dependent on age-adjusted CCI (HR:3.325, 95% CI, 1.390-7.956, p = 0.007), patient type (HR:0.4, 95% CI, 0.214-0.745, p = 0.004), and tumour growth pattern (HR:12.562, 95% CI, 1.552-101.696, p = 0.018). PFS in incipient patients was significantly prolonged (33.75 months) compared to that in the relapsed patients (p = 0.037). Patients with an age-adjusted CCI score <7 or without tumour protruding into the renal pelvis, lived free from recurrence or metastasis (55.69 or 101.61 months) longer than that in patients with an age-adjusted CCI score ≥7 or with tumour protruding into the renal pelvis (p < 0.01 for both). None of the variables was associated with CSS benefit. CONCLUSIONS The OS and PFS benefits from MWA were not equal for all T1a RCC patients. Age ≥75 years and age-adjusted CCI ≥ 7 significantly shortened OS. Age-adjusted CCI ≥ 7, relapsed RCC, and RCC protruding into the renal pelvis significantly shortened the PFS period. For a better survival prognosis, appropriate patient triage is still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qidi Hou
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, School of Medical Technology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808, China
| | - Xiaoling Yu
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
| | - Zhigang Cheng
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Zhiyu Han
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Fangyi Liu
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jianping Dou
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jie Yu
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
| |
Collapse
|