Metformin intake is associated with better survival in ovarian cancer: a case-control study

Metformin use and survival in people with ovarian cancer: A population-based cohort study from British Columbia, Canada

OBJECTIVES

There is an active debate regarding whether metformin use improves survival in people with ovarian cancer. We examined this issue using methods designed to avoid immortal time bias-as bias that occurs when participants in a study cannot experience the outcome for a certain portion of the study time.

METHODS

We used time-dependent analyses to study the association between metformin use for all 4,951 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 1997 through 2018 in the province of British Columbia, Canada. Cox proportional hazards models were run to estimate the association between metformin and survival in the full cohort of ovarian cancer patients and among a cohort restricted to patients with diabetes.

RESULTS

Metformin use was associated with a 17 % better ovarian cancer survival in the full cohort (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.83 (95 %CI 0.67, 1.02)), and a 16 % better ovarian cancer survival for serous cancers patient's cohort (aHR = 0.84 (95 %CI 0.66, 1.07)), although both were not significant. However, a statistically significant protective effect was observed when restricting to the diabetic cohort (aHR = 0.71 (95 %CI 0.54-0.91)), which was also seen among serous cancers (aHR = 0.73 (95 %CI 0.54-0.98)).

CONCLUSION

Metformin use was associated with improved ovarian cancer survival. The lack of statistical significance in the full cohort may reflect that diabetes is associated with reduced cancer survival, and thus diabetes itself may offset the benefit of metformin when examining the full cohort. Future research should examine metformin use among non-diabetic ovarian cancer patients.

Assessing the antitumor effects of metformin on ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Developing novel therapies that outperform the existing chemotherapeutic treatments is required for treatment-resistant ovarian clear cell carcinoma. We investigated the antitumor effect of metformin on ovarian clear cell carcinoma, enhancement of the antitumor effect by its combination with chemotherapy, and its molecular regulatory mechanism. First, we evaluated the viability of ovarian clear cell carcinoma lines using the water-soluble tetrazolium-1 assay and found that metformin suppressed cell viability. Cell viability was significantly suppressed by co-treatment with cisplatin and metformin. In contrast, co-treatment with paclitaxel and metformin showed no significant difference in viability compared with the group without metformin. Western blot analysis showed increased phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase in some cell lines and suppressed phosphorylation of the mammalian target of rapamycin in a particular cell line. Flow cytometry analysis revealed a significant increase in the rate of apoptosis in the metformin-treated group and rate of cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase in a particular cell line. These results indicated that metformin may be effective against cultured ovarian clear cell carcinoma cells, particularly in combination with cisplatin.

Drug Repositioning for Ovarian Cancer Treatment: An Update

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in female reproductive organs, and its 5-year survival is below 45%. Despite the advances in surgical and chemotherapeutic options, OC treatment is still a challenge, and new anticancer agents are urgently needed. Drug repositioning has gained significant attention in drug discovery, representing a smart way to identify new clinical applications for drugs whose human safety and pharmacokinetics have already been established, with great time and cost savings in pharmaceutical development endeavors. This review offers an update on the most promising drugs repurposable for OC treatment and/or prevention.

Enhancing Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: The Emerging Role of Metformin and Statins

Ovarian cancer metastization is accompanied by the development of malignant ascites, which are associated with poor prognosis. The acellular fraction of this ascitic fluid contains tumor-promoting soluble factors, bioactive lipids, cytokines, and extracellular vesicles, all of which communicate with the tumor cells within this peritoneal fluid. Metabolomic profiling of ovarian cancer ascites has revealed significant differences in the pathways of fatty acids, cholesterol, glucose, and insulin. The proteins involved in these pathways promote tumor growth, resistance to chemotherapy, and immune evasion. Unveiling the key role of this liquid tumor microenvironment is crucial for discovering more efficient treatment options. This review focuses on the cholesterol and insulin pathways in ovarian cancer, identifying statins and metformin as viable treatment options when combined with standard chemotherapy. These findings are supported by clinical trials showing improved overall survival with these combinations. Additionally, statins and metformin are associated with the reversal of T-cell exhaustion, positioning these drugs as potential combinatory strategies to improve immunotherapy outcomes in ovarian cancer patients.

Effect of metformin use on the risk and prognosis of ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Emerging evidence suggests that metformin has a potential antitumor effect both in vitro and in vivo. Increasing epidemiological studies indicate that diabetic patients receiving metformin therapy have lower incidences of cancer and have better survival rates. However, there are limited and inconsistent studies available about the effect of metformin therapy on ovarian cancer (OC). Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to study the effect of metformin therapy on OC. Meanwhile, we systematically reviewed relevant studies to provide a framework for future research.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Web of Science, Springerlink, CNKI, VIP, SinoMed, and Wanfang up to the period of October 2018. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to derive pooled effect estimates.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 13 studies were retrieved of which 5 studies explained the prevention and 8 studies explained the treatment for OC. Our pooled results showed that metformin has a potential preventive effect on OC in diabetic women (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.34, 1.11; P<0.001). In addition, metformin can also significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.34, 0.70; P=0.002), and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.61, 0.82; P<0.001) in patients with OC, regardless of whether they had diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of metformin can potentially reduce the risk of OC among diabetics, and it also can significantly improve PFS and OS in patients with OC. A further large clinical investigation would be needed to adopt our finding in practice, however, our systematic review provides an insight for future study designs.

Molecular targets of metformin against ovarian cancer based on network pharmacology

The objective of this study was to analyze potential targets of metformin against ovarian cancer (OC) through network pharmacology. Pharmacodynamic targets of metformin were predicted using the Bioinformatics Analysis Tool for the molecular mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine (BATMAN), Drugbank, PharmMapper, SwissTargetPrediction, and TargetNet databases. R was utilized to analyze the gene expression of OC tissues, normal/adjacent noncancerous tissues, and screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) + Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) datasets. STRING 11.0 was utilized to explore the protein-protein interaction (PPI) of metformin target genes differentially expressed in OC. Cytoscape 3.8.0 was used to construct the network and screen the core targets. Additionally, gene ontology (GO) annotation and enrichment and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis were performed for the common targets of metformin and OC through the DAVID 6.8 database. A total of 95 potential common targets of metformin and OC were identified from the intersection of 255 potential pharmacodynamic targets of metformin and 10,463 genes associated with OC. Furthermore, 10 core targets were screened from the PPI network [e.g., interleukin (IL) 1B, KCNC1, ESR1, HTR2C, MAOB, GRIN2A, F2, GRIA2, APOE, PTPRC]. In addition, it was shown in GO enrichment analysis that the common targets were mainly associated with biological processes (i.e., response to stimuli or chemical, cellular processes, and transmembrane transport), cellular components (i.e., plasma membrane, cell junction, and cell projection), and molecular functions (i.e., binding, channel activities, transmembrane transporter activity, and signaling receptor activities). Furthermore, it was indicated by KEGG pathway analysis that the common targets were enriched in metabolic pathways. The critical molecular targets and molecular pathways of metformin against OC were preliminarily determined by bioinformatics-based network pharmacology analysis, providing a basis, and reference for further experimental studies.

A phase II, open-label, non-randomized, prospective study assessing paclitaxel, carboplatin and metformin in the treatment of advanced stage ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a paclitaxel, carboplatin and metformin regimen in the first-line treatment of advanced-stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma.

METHODS

Eligible subjects underwent surgery and 6 cycles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant dose-dense intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m²), carboplatin (area under the curve 5 or 6 on Day 1), and oral metformin (850 mg daily). Study participants who completed their primary therapy and attained a clinically defined complete or partial response (PR) were treated with a planned 12 cycles of paclitaxel (135 mg/m² every 21 days) and metformin (850 mg twice daily) maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty subjects received a median of 6 cycles (range, 5-6) of primary induction chemotherapy and were eligible for response evaluation; twenty-three patients exhibited a complete response, while 3 study patients obtained a PR (an overall response rate of 86.7%). Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity included neutropenia (43.3%), thrombocytopenia (10%) and anemia (36.7%). There was no incidence of grade 3-4 neuropathy although 15 patients (50%) developed grade ≤2 neurotoxicity. Additionally, we observed grade ≤2 diarrhea in 20 (66.7%) subjects. The median progression-free survival was 21 months (range, 3-52) and overall median survival was 35 months (range, 15-61). The subjects also received an aggregate 103 cycles (median, 12; range, 6-12) of maintenance chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The study results suggest that the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and metformin is associated with moderate efficacy and a reasonable toxicity profile.

Action Mechanism of Metformin and Its Application in Hematological Malignancy Treatments: A Review

Hematologic malignancies (HMs) mainly include acute and chronic leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma and other heterogeneous tumors that seriously threaten human life and health. The common effective treatments are radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which have limited options and are prone to tumor recurrence and (or) drug resistance. Metformin is the first-line drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Recently, studies identified the potential anti-cancer ability of metformin in both T2DM patients and patients that are non-diabetic. The latest epidemiological and preclinical studies suggested a potential benefit of metformin in the prevention and treatment of patients with HM. The mechanism may involve the activation of the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway by metformin as well as other AMPK-independent pathways to exert anti-cancer properties. In addition, combining current conventional anti-cancer drugs with metformin may improve the efficacy and reduce adverse drug reactions. Therefore, metformin can also be used as an adjuvant therapeutic agent for HM. This paper highlights the anti-hyperglycemic effects and potential anti-cancer effects of metformin, and also compiles the in vitro and clinical trials of metformin as an anti-cancer and chemosensitizing agent for the treatment of HM. The need for future research on the use of metformin in the treatment of HM is indicated.

Low grade serous ovarian cancer - A rare disease with increasing therapeutic options

High-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs) most commonly arise from the fimbrial end of the fallopian tube and harbor TP53 gene mutations. In contrast, low-grade serous ovarian cancers (LGSOCs) appear to have different pathological, epidemiological, and clinical features and should be seen as a distinct serous epithelial ovarian cancer subtype. Our current understanding of LGSOC is limited, and treatment has generally been derived from the more common HGSOCs due to a lack of separate trial data. LGSOCs are characterized by slow tumor growth and are assumed to develop from serous borderline ovarian tumors as precursors. These cancers are often estrogen-receptor positive and show an activated mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway together with KRAS and BRAF mutations and, rarely, TP53 mutations. These characteristics are now commonly used to guide therapeutical decision making and, consequently, a substantial part of treatment consists of maintenance with endocrine treatment, thus balancing disease stabilization and mild toxicity. Additionally, new trials are ongoing that examine the role of targeted therapies such as MEK inhibitors in combination with endocrine treatments. The purpose of this work is to summarize current knowledge and present ongoing trial efforts for LGSOCs.

Drug repositioning: A bibliometric analysis

Drug repurposing has become an effective approach to drug discovery, as it offers a new way to explore drugs. Based on the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) databases of the Web of Science core collection, this study presents a bibliometric analysis of drug repurposing publications from 2010 to 2020. Data were cleaned, mined, and visualized using Derwent Data Analyzer (DDA) software. An overview of the history and development trend of the number of publications, major journals, major countries, major institutions, author keywords, major contributors, and major research fields is provided. There were 2,978 publications included in the study. The findings show that the United States leads in this area of research, followed by China, the United Kingdom, and India. The Chinese Academy of Science published the most research studies, and NIH ranked first on the h-index. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai leads in the average number of citations per study. Sci Rep, Drug Discov. Today, and Brief. Bioinform. are the three most productive journals evaluated from three separate perspectives, and pharmacology and pharmacy are unquestionably the most commonly used subject categories. Cheng, FX; Mucke, HAM; and Butte, AJ are the top 20 most prolific and influential authors. Keyword analysis shows that in recent years, most research has focused on drug discovery/drug development, COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2/coronavirus, molecular docking, virtual screening, cancer, and other research areas. The hotspots have changed in recent years, with COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2/coronavirus being the most popular topic for current drug repurposing research.

Efficacy of Metformin as Adjuvant Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer Treatment

Background: Metformin has been reported to have an anti-tumorigenic impact against metastatic breast cancer (MBC) cells through several mechanisms. Its effect can be evaluated by using many variables such as the response rate (RR) as well as the progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted to investigate and estimate the metformin effect on MBC. About 107 subjects were included in the study and were divided into two groups: Group A included non-diabetic MBC patients treated with metformin in conjunction with chemotherapy and group B included those treated with chemotherapy alone. Both PFS and RR were used as a criteria to evaluate the treatment outcome. Associated adverse effects of metformin were also assessed. Results: The average age of the participants in group A and group B was 50 vs. 47.5, respectively. No significant differences were detected between both cohorts concerning RR levels (regression disease (RD) 27.8% vs. 12.5%, stationary disease (SD) 44.4% vs. 41.7%, progression disease (PD) 27.8% vs. 45.8%, respectively, p = 0.074). Moreover, PFS showed no significant difference between both groups (p = 0.753). There was no significant correlation between metformin concentration and their adverse effects on the study participants. Conclusion: Metformin as an adjuvant therapy to MBC undergoing chemotherapy showed no significant survival benefit as determined by RR and PFS.

Association Between Metformin Use and the Risk, Prognosis of Gynecologic Cancer

Background

For gynecological cancer patients, the beneficial effect of metformin use remains controversial due to inconsistent results of published articles. By conducting a meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effect of metformin in reducing the risk and improving the survival of gynecological cancer among women with diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods

Articles exploring association between metformin use and the risk, as well as prognosis of gynecologic cancer in DM, were searched in the databases: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, EBSCO, and PROQUEST. Articles were published before May 2022. All the studies were conducted using STATA 12.0 software.

Results

The meta-analysis showed no significant association between metformin use and risk of gynecologic cancer in DM with a random effects model [odds ratio (ORs)/relative risk (RR) = 0.91, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.77 to 1.08, I² = 84.2%, p < 0.001]. Metformin use was associated with reduced overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of gynecologic cancer in DM with random effects models [OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60, 95% CI 0.49–0.74, I² = 55.2%, p = 0.002; PFS: HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.33–0.91, I² = 69.1%, p = 0.006], whereas no significant association was showed between metformin use and recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well as cancer-specific survival (CSS) of gynecologic cancer in DM with random effects models (RFS: HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.30–1.18, I² = 73.7%, p = 0.010; CSS: HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.43–1.41, I² = 72.4%, p = 0.013).

Conclusions

In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicated that metformin may be a useful adjuvant agent for gynecological cancer with DM, especially for patients with ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer.

Shifting the Soil: Metformin Treatment Decreases the Protumorigenic Tumor Microenvironment in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Controversy persists regarding metformin's role in cancer therapy. Our recent work suggested metformin acts by impacting the tumor microenvironment (TME), normalizing the epigenetic profile of cancer-associated mesenchymal stem cells (CA-MSC). As CA-MSC can negatively impact tumor immune infiltrates, we evaluated metformin's impact on the human TME, focusing on the interplay of stroma and immune infiltrates. Tumor samples from (i) 38 patients treated with metformin and chemotherapy and (ii) 44 non-metformin matched controls were included in a tissue microarray (TMA). The TMA was used to compare the presence of CA-MSC, desmoplasia and immune infiltrates in the TME. In vitro and in vivo models examined metformin's role in alteration of the CA-MSC phenotype. The average percentage of CA-MSC was significantly lower in metformin-treated than in chemotherapy alone-treated tumors (p = 0.006). There were fewer regulatory T-cells in metformin-treated tumors (p = 0.043). Consistent with CA-MSC's role in excluding T-cells from tumor islets, the T-cells were primarily present within the tumor stroma. Evaluation of metformin's impact in vitro suggested that metformin cannot reverse a CA-MSC phenotype; however, the in vivo model where metformin was introduced prior to the establishment of the CA-MSC phenotype supported that metformin can partially prevent the reprogramming of normal MSC into CA-MSC. Metformin treatment led to a decrease in both the presence of protumorigenic CA-MSC and in immune exclusion of T cells, leading to a more immune-permissive environment. This suggests clinical utility in prevention and in treatment for early-stage disease and putatively in immune therapy.

Metformin and survival: Is there benefit in a cohort limited to diabetic women with endometrial, breast, or ovarian cancer?

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the association between metformin and survival in women with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer- 3 hormonally mediated cancers.

METHODS

We evaluated outcomes in a cohort of 6225 women with T2DM with a new diagnosis of ovarian, breast or endometrial cancer from 2010 to 2019. We classified glycemic medications at time of first cancer diagnosis into 3 tiers in accordance with ADA guidelines. Approaches compared: (i) metformin (tier 1) vs. no glycemic medication, (ii) metformin vs tier 2 medications (sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, SGLT2-inhibitors, DPP4-inhibitors, alpha glucosidase-inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists), (iii) metformin vs tier 3 medications (insulins, amylinomimetics), and (iv) tier 2 vs tier 3 medications. Analyses included Cox proportional-hazards models, Kaplan-Meier curves, and conditional logistic regression in a risk set-sampled nested case-control matched on T2DM duration- all modeling survival. Models were adjusted for demographics, cancer type, A1C, T2DM duration, and number of office visits and hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Metformin was the most used medication (n = 3232) and consistently demonstrated survival benefit compared with tier 2 and 3 medications, across all methods. Tier 3-users demonstrated highest risk of death when compared to metformin rather than tier 2 [adjHR = 1.83 (95% CI: 1.58, 2.13) vs. adjHR = 1.32 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.57)], despite similar baseline profiles between tier 1 and 2 users.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin users experienced increased survival even after accounting for surrogates of diabetes progression. Benefit extended beyond that seen in tier 2-users. Our findings, consistent with prior studies, indicate metformin use improves survival in women with T2DM and hormonally mediated women's cancers.

Divergent Metabolic Effects of Metformin Merge to Enhance Eicosapentaenoic Acid Metabolism and Inhibit Ovarian Cancer In Vivo

Metformin is being actively repurposed for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies including ovarian cancer. We investigated if metformin induces analogous metabolic changes across ovarian cancer cells. Functional metabolic analysis showed metformin caused an immediate and sustained decrease in oxygen consumption while increasing glycolysis across A2780, C200, and SKOV3ip cell lines. Untargeted metabolomics showed metformin to have differential effects on glycolysis and TCA cycle metabolites, while consistent increased fatty acid oxidation intermediates were observed across the three cell lines. Metabolite set enrichment analysis showed alpha-linolenic/linoleic acid metabolism as being most upregulated. Downstream mediators of the alpha-linolenic/linoleic acid metabolism, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), were abundant in all three cell lines. EPA was more effective in inhibiting SKOV3 and CaOV3 xenografts, which correlated with inhibition of inflammatory markers and indicated a role for EPA-derived specialized pro-resolving mediators such as Resolvin E1. Thus, modulation of the metabolism of omega-3 fatty acids and their anti-inflammatory signaling molecules appears to be one of the common mechanisms of metformin's antitumor activity. The distinct metabolic signature of the tumors may indicate metformin response and aid the preclinical and clinical interpretation of metformin therapy in ovarian and other cancers.

Metformin Use and Mortality in Women with Ovarian Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous observational studies and meta-analysis suggested a possible association between metformin use and reduced mortality in women with ovarian cancer (OC). However, clinical factors that may influence the relationship remain poorly evaluated. We performed an updated meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the above association and to observe the potential influences of study characteristics on the association.

METHODS

Relevant studies reporting the association between metformin use and mortality in women with OC in the multivariate adjusted model were identified by search of electronic databases that included PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The random-effects model was adopted to combine the results.

RESULTS

Nine studies including 10030 women with OC were included. Overall, metformin use was independently associated with reduced overall mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.93, P=0.01; I ² = 62%). Consistent results were observed for studies comparing metformin users with nondiabetic women and studies comparing metformin users with diabetic women who did not use metformin (P for subgroup analysis = 0.70). Further subgroup analyses showed consistent results in studies with metformin use before or after the diagnosis of OC, with or without adjustment of body mass index (BMI) and with or without adjustment of concurrent medications (P for subgroup analyses all >0.10).

CONCLUSION

Metformin use is associated with reduced mortality in women with OC, which may be independent of the diabetic status of the controls, timing of metformin use, or adjustment of BMI and concurrent medications. Clinical trials are needed to validate the potential benefits of metformin on survival of OC.

Perspectives of metformin use in endometrial cancer and other gynaecological malignancies

Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia play a key role in type 1 endometrial cancer pathogenesis. Most of these cancers develop on a background of overweight or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). One of the medications widely used in the treatment of T2DM is biguanide derivative, metformin, which exerts promising anticancer properties principally through activation of adenosine monophosphate kinase (AMPK) and inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. Many epidemiological studies on diabetic patients show potential preventative role of metformin in endometrial cancer patients, but data regarding its therapeutic role is still limited. So far, most of attention has been paid to the concept of metformin use in fertility sparing treatment of early-stage cancer. Another investigated alternative is its application in patients with primary advanced or recurrent disease. In this review we present the latest data on clinical use of metformin in endometrial cancer patients and potential underlying mechanisms of its activity. Finally, we present some most important clinical information regarding metformin efficacy in other gynaecological malignancies, mainly breast and ovarian cancer.

The Relationship of Diabetes Mellitus to Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are the new standard therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). Metformin, previously associated with improved chemotherapy efficacy in diabetic and nondiabetic cancer patients, was recently associated with increased ICI efficacy. In this study, we aimed to explore the correlations between diabetes mellitus (DM), metformin use, and benefit from ICI in mNSCLC patients.

METHODS

All mNSCLC patients treated with ICI in our center between February 2015 and April 2018 were identified. Demographic and clinical data were extracted retrospectively. Cox proportional hazards regression, t tests, and χ2 tests were employed to evaluate associations of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR), with DM status, metformin use, and HbA1c levels, as appropriate.

RESULTS

Of 249 mNSCLC patients treated with ICI, 57 (22.8%) had DM. Thirty-seven (64.9% of all diabetic patients) patients were treated with metformin. A significant negative correlation of DM with PFS and OS was demonstrated (HR 1.5 [1.01-2.06], p = 0.011, and HR 1.5 [1.08-2.08], p = 0.017, respectively). Metformin exposure had no significant correlation with PFS or OS in diabetic mNSCLC patients (HR 1.08 [0.61-1.93], p = 0.79, and HR 1.29 [0.69-2.39], p = 0.42, respectively). There were no differences between groups with respect to ORR and DCR.

CONCLUSION

Our data show a potential negative relationship between DM and ICI efficacy in mNSCLC patients. In contrast to reports with chemotherapy, we found no positive relationship between metformin use and ICI therapy in diabetic patients with mNSCLC. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of metformin in nondiabetic mNSCLC patients.

Molecular characteristics and tumorigenicity of ascites-derived tumor cells: mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation as a novel therapy target in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer disseminates primarily intraperitoneally. Detached tumor cell aggregates (spheroids) from the primary tumor are regarded as ‘metastatic units’ that exhibit a low sensitivity to classical chemotherapy, probably due to their unique molecular characteristics. We have analyzed the cellular composition of ascites from OvCa patients, using flow cytometry, and studied their behavior in vitro and in vivo. We conclude that ascites‐derived cultured cells from OvCa patients give rise to two subpopulations: adherent cells and non‐adherent cells. Here, we found that the AD population includes mainly CD90⁺ cells with highly proliferative rates in vitro but no tumorigenic potential in vivo, whereas the NAD population contains principally tumor cell spheroids (EpCAM⁺/CD24⁺) with low proliferative potential in vitro. Enriched tumor cell spheroids from the ascites of high‐grade serous OvCA patients, obtained using cell strainers, were highly tumorigenic in vivo and their metastatic spread pattern precisely resembled the tumor dissemination pattern found in the corresponding patients. Comparative transcriptome analyses from ascites‐derived tumor cell spheroids (n = 10) versus tumor samples from different metastatic sites (n = 30) revealed upregulation of genes involved in chemoresistance (TGM1, HSPAs, MT1s), cell adhesion and cell‐barrier integrity (PKP3, CLDNs, PPL), and the oxidative phosphorylation process. Mitochondrial markers (mass and membrane potential) showed a reduced mitochondrial function in tumoroids from tumor tissue compared with ascites‐derived tumor spheroids in flow cytometry analysis. Interestingly, response to OXPHOS inhibition by metformin and IACS010759 in tumor spheroids correlated with the extent of mitochondrial membrane potential measured by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting. Our data contribute to a better understanding of the biology of ovarian cancer spheroids and identify the OXPHOS pathway as new potential treatment option in advanced ovarian cancer.

Sphingolipids as multifaceted mediators in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological malignancy. It is commonly diagnosed at advanced stage when it has metastasised to the abdominal cavity and treatment becomes very challenging. While current standard therapy involving debulking surgery and platinum + taxane-based chemotherapy is associated with high response rates initially, the large majority of patients relapse and ultimately succumb to chemotherapy-resistant disease. In order to improve survival novel strategies for early detection and therapeutics against treatment-refractory disease are urgently needed. A promising new target against ovarian cancer is the sphingolipid pathway which is commonly hijacked in cancer to support cell proliferation and survival and has been shown to promote chemoresistance and metastasis in a wide range of malignant neoplasms. In particular, the sphingosine kinase 1-sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 axis has been shown to be altered in ovarian cancer in multiple ways and therefore represents an attractive therapeutic target. Here we review the roles of sphingolipids in ovarian cancer progression, metastasis and chemoresistance, highlighting novel strategies to target this pathway that represent potential avenues to improve patient survival.

The Role of Metformin in Ovarian Cancer: Does Metformin Increase Survival in Ovarian Neoplasm?

The role of metformin in ovarian cancer (OC) remains a topic of research and open discussion. Because OC has a high mortality rate for various reasons, finding a solution is vital. Although metformin has demonstrated a high level of evidence in preventing and increasing survival in other cancers, its role in OC is still not proven. This review highlights the function of metformin as an antineoplastic agent in OC and its effect on overall survival, progress-free survival, and recurrence-free survival. We conducted a literature search in the PubMed database using the medical subject heading keywords, ovarian neoplasm and metformin. The search yielded 94 articles, of which 86 remained after including only English language articles. Finally, 50 articles published between 1997 and 2020 were reviewed. We recommend more randomized controlled trials in the future to determine the safety and efficacy of metformin in OC.

The role of glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) in cancer with emphasis on ovarian cancer development and progression: A comprehensive review

Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) is a monomeric serine-threonine kinase discovered in 1980 in a rat skeletal muscle. It has been involved in various cellular processes including embryogenesis, immune response, inflammation, apoptosis, autophagy, wound healing, neurodegeneration, and carcinogenesis. GSK3 exists in two different isoforms, GSK3α and GSK3β, both containing seven antiparallel beta-plates, a short linking part and an alpha helix, but coded by different genes and variously expressed in human tissues. In the current review, we comprehensively appraise the current literature on the role of GSK3 in various cancers with emphasis on ovarian carcinoma. Our findings indicate that the role of GSK3 in ovarian cancer development cannot be decisively determined as the currently available data support both prooncogenic and tumor-suppressive effects. Likewise, the clinical impact of GSK3 expression on ovarian cancer patients and its potential therapeutic implications are also limited. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the pathophysiological and clinical implications of GSK3 activity in ovarian cancer.

Possible Role of Metformin as an Immune Modulator in the Tumor Microenvironment of Ovarian Cancer

Growing evidence suggests that the immune component of the tumor microenvironment (TME) may be highly involved in the progression of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), as an immunosuppressive TME is associated with worse patient outcomes. Due to the poor prognosis of HGSOC, new therapeutic strategies targeting the TME may provide a potential path forward for preventing disease progression to improve patient survival. One such postulated approach is the repurposing of the type 2 diabetes medication, metformin, which has shown promise in reducing HGSOC tumor progression in retrospective epidemiological analyses and through numerous preclinical studies. Despite its potential utility in treating HGSOC, and that the immune TME is considered as a key factor in the disease’s progression, little data has definitively shown the ability of metformin to target this component of the TME. In this brief review, we provide a summary of the current understanding of the effects of metformin on leukocyte function in ovarian cancer and, coupled with data from other related disease states, posit the potential mechanisms by which the drug may enhance the anti-tumorigenic effects of immune cells to improve HGSOC patient survival.

Cytokine Storm and Failed Resolution in COVID-19: Taking a Cue from Multiple Sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Excessive inflammatory responses and failed resolution are major common causes of tissue injury and organ dysfunction in a variety of diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), diabetes, and most recently, COVID-19, despite the distinct pathoetiology of the diseases. The promotion of the natural process of inflammatory resolution has been long recognized to improve functional recovery and disease outcomes effectively. To mitigate the excessive inflammation in MS, scientific investigations identified a group of derivatives of omega fatty acids, known as specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPM) that have been significantly effective in treating preclinical disease models of MS.

METHODS

This chapter is based on our observations from MS. It is being increasingly deliberated that the ongoing COVID-19 infection induces severe cytokine storm that ultimately triggers rampant inflammation. The impact of infection and associated mortality is much higher in patients with co-morbid diseases. Also, reports suggest a better outcome in diabetic patients with reasonable glycemic control, which certainly hints towards a hidden role of anti-hyperglycemic drugs such as metformin in alleviating disease pathology through its anti-inflammatory feature. Notably, SPM and metformin share common therapeutic features in exerting a broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory activity in human patients with a superior safety profile.

RESULTS

When there is an immediate need to encounter the fast-rampant infection of COVID-19 and control the viral-infection associated morbid inflammatory cytokine storm causing severe organ damage, SPM and metformin should be seriously considered as a potential adjunctive treatment.

CONCLUSION

Given the fact that current treatment for COVID-19 is only supportive, global research is aimed at developing safe and effective therapeutic options that can result in a better clinical course in patients with comorbid conditions. Accordingly, taking a cue from our experiences in controlling robust inflammatory response in MS and diabetes by simultaneously inhibiting inflammatory process and stimulating its resolution, combinatorial therapy of metformin and SPM in COVID-19 holds significant promise in treating this global health crisis.

Impact of metformin on survival outcome in ovarian cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Investigation of new drugs (INDs) is a tremendously inefficient process in terms of time and cost. Drug repositioning is another method used to investigate potential new agents in well-known drugs. This study assessed the survival impact of metformin medication on ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A national sample cohort of the Korean National Health Insurance Service Data was analyzed. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyzing hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after adjusting for underlying diseases and medications as confounding factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 866 eligible patients were included from among 1,025,340 cohort participants. Among them, 101 (11.7%) were metformin users. No difference in OS was observed between non-users and users. No difference in OS was observed according to age and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Long-term metformin use (≥720 days) was associated with better OS (adjusted HR=0.244; 95% CI=0.090-0.664; p=0.006). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that long-term metformin use was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (HR=0.193; 95% CI=0.070-0.528; p=0.001) but not for CSS (HR=0.599; 95% CI=0.178-2.017; p=0.408).

CONCLUSION

Long-term metformin use reduced all-cause mortality, but not CSS in ovarian cancer. Whether metformin itself reduces deaths because of ovarian cancer requires further investigation.

Metformin Antagonizes Ovarian Cancer Cells Malignancy Through MSLN Mediated IL-6/STAT3 Signaling

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, and chemotherapy remains the cornerstone for ovarian cancer management. Due to the unsatisfactory prognosis, a better understanding of the underlying molecular carcinogenesis is urgently required.

METHODS

Assays for determining cell growth, cell motility, and apoptosis were employed to evaluate the potential antitumor effects of metformin against ovarian cancer cells. Molecular biological methods were employed to explore the underlying mechanism. Human ovarian cancer samples and Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) dataset were used for uncovering the clinical significances of mesothelin (MSLN) on ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

In the present work, we found that metformin treatment led to cell growth and cell migration inhibition, and induced cell apoptosis. Metformin administration also impaired cancer cell stemness and the capillary-like structure formation capacity of SKOV3 cells. On mechanism, metformin treatment remarkably reduced mesothelin (MSLN) expression, downregulated IL-6/STAT3 signaling activity, subsequently resulted in VEGF and TGFβ1 expression. We also observed an oncogenic function of MSLN on ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our findings suggested that metformin exerts anticancer effects by suppressing ovarian cancer cell malignancy, which attributed to MSLN inhibition mediated IL6/STAT3 signaling and VEGF and TGFβ1 downregulation.

Drug Repositioning in Oncology

BACKGROUND

The worldwide increase in the occurrence of cancer associated with the limitations of immunotherapy and the emergence of resistance have impaired the prognosis of cancer patients, which leads to the search for alternative treatment methods. Drug repositioning, a well-established process approved by regulatory agencies, is considered an alternative strategy for the fast identification of drugs, because it is relatively less costly and represents lower risks for patients.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

We report the most relevant studies about drug repositioning in oncology, emphasizing that its implementation faces financial and regulatory obstacles, making the creation of incentives necessary to stimulate the involvement of the pharmaceutical industry.

DATA SOURCES

We present 63 studies in which 52 non-anticancer drugs with anticancer activity against a number of malignancies are described.

THERAPEUTIC INNOVATIONS

Some have already been the target of phase III studies, such as the Add-Aspirin trial for nonmetastatic solid tumors, as well as 9 other drugs (aprepitant, artesunate, auranofin, captopril, celecoxib, disulfiram, itraconazole, ritonavir, and sertraline) in the CUSP9* clinical trial for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Others have already been successful in repositioning such as thalidomide, zoledronic acid, celecoxib, methotrexate, and gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, drug repositioning represents a promising alternative for the treatment of oncological disorders; however, the support from funding agencies and from the government is still needed, the latter regarding regulatory issues.

Mortality and glycemic control among patients with diabetes mellitus and uterine or ovarian cancer

Aim:

To evaluate associations between survival and glycemic control in age-matched patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer, with/without diabetes mellitus (DM).

Patients & methods:

Patients with newly diagnosed ovarian or endometrial cancer with and without DM were compared.

Results:

The study included 84 patients with ovarian cancer (28, DM); 96 with endometrial cancer (48 with, 48 without DM). DM patients did not have worse overall or progression-free survival than non-DM patients. Glycemic control was not associated with either cancer.

Conclusion:

There was no association between DM and survival for patients with uterine or ovarian cancer. In addition, there was no association between uterine and ovarian cancer and glycemic control. Additional studies to confirm these observations in larger populations are required.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on survival of patients with ovarian or uterine cancer and to determine whether ovarian and uterine cancer affected glycemic control. From an institutional cancer registry, patients with ovarian or uterine cancer were identified and grouped by DM or no DM. Groups were matched by age at cancer diagnosis. DM did not decrease survival and ovarian and uterine cancer did not significantly affect glycemic control in patients with DM.

Metformin and ovarian cancer: the evidence

In recent decades, great interest in the off-label use of metformin has arisen as a result of its broad effects on different signaling pathways, with only a few side effects, and low cost. Metformin has been shown to have multiple, dose-dependent preclinical anticancer effects, which can be roughly divided into either direct effects via inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I, or indirect effects through lowered glucose, insulin and insulin-like growth factor levels. Further details on in vitro and in vivo anticancer effects specifically in ovarian cancer are continuously reported. Preclinically metformin has clear chemosensitizing effects in ovarian cancer and it is an effective negative regulator of angiogenesis. There are also some epidemiological studies on metformin use in ovarian cancer, but the results of these studies are not as promising as those preclinical studies would indicate. Most preclinical studies have involved metformin concentrations that are many times higher than the pharmacological doses used in patients, which might confound the clinical use of metformin as regards the above-mentioned aspects. In this review we evaluate preclinical and clinical evidence concerning metformin in ovarian cancer treatment.

Recycling the Purpose of Old Drugs to Treat Ovarian Cancer

The main challenge in ovarian cancer treatment is the management of recurrences. Facing this scenario, therapy selection is based on multiple factors to define the best treatment sequence. Target therapies, such as bevacizumab and polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, improved patient survival. However, despite their achievements, ovarian cancer survival remains poor; these therapeutic options are highly costly and can be associated with potential side effects. Recently, it has been shown that the combination of repurposed, conventional, chemotherapeutic drugs could be an alternative, presenting good patient outcomes with few side effects and low costs for healthcare institutions. The main aim of this review is to strengthen the importance of repurposed drugs as therapeutic alternatives, and to propose an in vitro model to assess the therapeutic value. Herein, we compiled the current knowledge on the most promising non-oncological drugs for ovarian cancer treatment, focusing on statins, metformin, bisphosphonates, ivermectin, itraconazole, and ritonavir. We discuss the primary drug use, anticancer mechanisms, and applicability in ovarian cancer. Finally, we propose the use of these therapies to perform drug efficacy tests in ovarian cancer ex vivo cultures. This personalized testing approach could be crucial to validate the existing evidences supporting the use of repurposed drugs for ovarian cancer treatment.

The common diabetes drug metformin can diminish the action of citral against Rhabdomyosarcoma cells in vitro

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare type of soft tissue sarcoma most commonly found in pediatric patients. Despite progress, new and improved drug regimens are needed to increase survival rates. Citral, a natural product plant oil can induce cell death in cancer cells. Another compound, metformin, isolated originally from French lilac and used by diabetics, has been shown to reduce the incidence of cancer in these patients. Application of citral to RMS cells showed increase in cell death, and RD and RH30 cells showed half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀ ) values as low as 36.28 μM and 62.37 μM, respectively. It was also shown that the citral initiated cell apoptosis through an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free calcium. In comparison, metformin only showed moderate cell death in RMS cell lines at a very high concentration (1,000 μM). Combinatorial experiments, however, indicated that citral and metformin worked antagonistically when used together. In particular, the ability of metformin to quench the ROS induced by citral could lead to the suppression of activity. These results clearly indicate that while clinical use of citral is a promising anti-tumor therapy, caution should be exercised in patients using metformin for diabetes.

Mesothelial Cell HIF1α Expression Is Metabolically Downregulated by Metformin to Prevent Oncogenic Tumor-Stromal Crosstalk

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in cancer progression, and, in ovarian cancer (OvCa), the primary TME is the omentum. Here, we show that the diabetes drug metformin alters mesothelial cells in the omental microenvironment. Metformin interrupts bidirectional signaling between tumor and mesothelial cells by blocking OvCa cell TGF-β signaling and mesothelial cell production of CCL2 and IL-8. Inhibition of tumor-stromal crosstalk by metformin is caused by the reduced expression of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) enzyme succinyl CoA ligase (SUCLG2). Through repressing this TCA enzyme and its metabolite, succinate, metformin activated prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs), resulting in the degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) in mesothelial cells. Disruption of HIF1α-driven IL-8 signaling in mesothelial cells by metformin results in reduced OvCa invasion in an organotypic 3D model. These findings indicate that tumor-promoting signaling between mesothelial and OvCa cells in the TME can be targeted using metformin.

Neoadjuvant metformin added to conventional chemotherapy synergizes anti-proliferative effects in ovarian cancer

Background

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death among women. Complete cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-taxene chemotherapy has been the gold standard for a long time. Various compounds have been assessed in an attempt to combine them with conventional chemotherapy to improve survival rates or even overcome chemoresistance. Many studies have shown that an antidiabetic drug, metformin, has cytotoxic activity in different cancer models. However, the synergism of metformin as a neoadjuvant formula plus chemotherapy in clinical trials and basic studies remains unclear for ovarian cancer.

Methods

We applied two clinical databases to survey metformin use and ovarian cancer survival rate. The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset, an L1000 microarray with Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) analysis, Western blot analysis and an animal model were used to study the activity of the AKT/mTOR pathway in response to the synergistic effects of neoadjuvant metformin combined with chemotherapy.

Results

We found that ovarian cancer patients treated with metformin had significantly longer overall survival than patients treated without metformin. The protein profile induced by low- concentration metformin in ovarian cancer predominantly involved the AKT/mTOR pathway. In combination with chemotherapy, the neoadjuvant metformin protocol showed beneficial synergistic effects in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusions

This study shows that neoadjuvant metformin at clinically relevant dosages is efficacious in treating ovarian cancer, and the results can be used to guide clinical trials.

Phase II clinical trial of metformin as a cancer stem cell-targeting agent in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUNDEpidemiologic studies suggest that metformin has antitumor effects. Laboratory studies indicate metformin impacts cancer stem-like cells (CSCs). As part of a phase II trial, we evaluated the impact of metformin on CSC number and on carcinoma-associated mesenchymal stem cells (CA-MSCs) and clinical outcomes in nondiabetic patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).METHODSThirty-eight patients with stage IIC (n = 1)/III (n = 25)/IV (n = 12) EOC were treated with either (a) neoadjuvant metformin, debulking surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy plus metformin or (b) neoadjuvant chemotherapy and metformin, interval debulking surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy plus metformin. Metformin-treated tumors, compared with historical controls, were evaluated for CSC number and chemotherapy response. Primary endpoints were (a) a 2-fold or greater reduction in aldehyde dehydrogenase-positive (ALDH+) CD133+ CSCs and (b) a relapse-free survival at 18 months of more than 50%.RESULTSMetformin was well tolerated. Median progression-free survival was 18.0 months (95% CI 14.0-21.6) with relapse-free survival at 18 months of 59.3% (95% CI 38.6-70.5). Median overall survival was 57.9 months (95% CI 28.0-not estimable). Tumors treated with metformin had a 2.4-fold decrease in ALDH+CD133+ CSCs and increased sensitivity to cisplatin ex vivo. Furthermore, metformin altered the methylation signature in CA-MSCs, which prevented CA-MSC-driven chemoresistance in vitro.CONCLUSIONTranslational studies confirm an impact of metformin on EOC CSCs and suggest epigenetic change in the tumor stroma may drive the platinum sensitivity ex vivo. Consistent with this, metformin therapy was associated with better-than-expected overall survival, supporting the use of metformin in phase III studies.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT01579812.

Wise Management of Ovarian Cancer: On the Cutting Edge

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Two-thirds of patients present at advanced stage at diagnosis, and the estimated 5 year survival rate is 20-40%. This heterogeneous group of malignancies has distinguishable etiology and molecular biology. Initially, single-gene sequencing was performed to identify germline DNA variations associated with EOC. However, hereditary EOC syndrome can be explained by germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in several genes. In this regard, next-generation sequencing (NGS) changed clinical diagnostic testing, allowing assessment of multiple genes simultaneously in a faster and cheaper manner than sequential single gene analysis. As we move into the era of personalized medicine, there is evidence that poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors exploit homologous recombination (HR) deficiency, especially in breast cancer gene 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) mutation carriers. Furthermore, extensive preclinical data supported the development of aurora kinase (AURK) inhibitors in specific tumor types, including EOC. Their efficacy may be optimized in combination with chemotherapeutic or other molecular agents. The efficacy of metformin in ovarian cancer prevention is under investigation. Certain mutations, such as ARID1A mutations, and alterations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR pathway, which are specific in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC), may offer additional therapeutic targets in these clinical entities. Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs) are rare and randomized trials are extremely challenging for the improvement of the existing management and development of novel strategies. This review attempts to offer an overview of the main aspects of ovarian cancer, catapulted from the molecular mechanisms to therapeutic considerations.

Oncological benefit of metformin in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and comorbid diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

Some clinical studies have suggested that metformin improved prognoses in several cancers. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and determine the utility of metformin administration.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2015, 373 consecutive patients underwent curative surgery for PDAC. Among the patients, 121 were diagnosed as having diabetes mellitus (DM) before surgery. The characteristics and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without DM were compared retrospectively. Based on their metformin intake, patients with DM were divided into two groups. OS rates between patients with and without metformin intake were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for OS among all patients and those with PDAC and DM.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the 5-year survival rates between patients with and without DM were observed. Among the 121 patients with DM, 18 received metformin and 103 did not (other medications group). The 5-year survival rate was significantly better in the metformin group than in the other medications group (66.7% and 24.4%, respectively; p = 0.034). Multivariate analysis identified pN1 (p = 0.002), metformin administration (p = 0.022), and microvascular invasion (p = 0.023) as independent prognostic factors for OS in the patients with DM. Matched-pair analysis showed that OS tended to be better in the metformin group than in the other medications group (p = 0.067).

CONCLUSIONS

History of metformin intake may contribute to favorable prognosis in patients with PDAC and pre-existing DM.

Transcriptional diversity and bioenergetic shift in human breast cancer metastasis revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing

Although metastasis remains the cause of most cancer-related mortality, mechanisms governing seeding in distal tissues are poorly understood. Here, we establish a robust method for the identification of global transcriptomic changes in rare metastatic cells during seeding using single-cell RNA sequencing and patient-derived-xenograft models of breast cancer. We find that both primary tumours and micrometastases display transcriptional heterogeneity but micrometastases harbour a distinct transcriptome program conserved across patient-derived-xenograft models that is highly predictive of poor survival of patients. Pathway analysis revealed mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation as the top pathway upregulated in micrometastases, in contrast to higher levels of glycolytic enzymes in primary tumour cells, which we corroborated by flow cytometric and metabolomic analyses. Pharmacological inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation dramatically attenuated metastatic seeding in the lungs, which demonstrates the functional importance of oxidative phosphorylation in metastasis and highlights its potential as a therapeutic target to prevent metastatic spread in patients with breast cancer.

Association of metformin use with ovarian cancer incidence and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Some clinical and basic research studies have indicated that exposure to metformin might have protective effects against ovarian cancer. However, results from epidemiologic studies have been inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of metformin use on the risk of ovarian cancer occurrence and mortality.

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched to identify studies on the association between use of metformin and risk of ovarian cancer or prognosis, up to August 2018. Relevant information for analysis was extracted. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk estimate.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles were included, of which six articles focused on ovarian cancer incidence and the others focused on prognosis. The pooled OR for ovarian cancer occurrence and mortality comparing metformin use with non-use or use of other hypoglycemic drugs was 0.76 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.93, p = 0.008) and 0.55 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.84, p = 0.006), respectively. Moderate to substantial heterogeneity was observed across included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that use of metformin was significantly associated with a lower incidence and a better prognosis of ovarian cancer in patients with diabetes. Well-designed interventional studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Impact of diabetes on prognosis of gastric cancer patients performed with gastrectomy

Objective

This study aimed to determine the impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on clinical outcomes of gastric cancer (GC) patients and explore whether metformin use and good glycemic control could reverse it.

Methods

Clinicopathologic data of consecutive GC patients who underwent gastrectomy at Nanfang Hospital between October 2004 and December 2015 were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the important factors of the disease status between non-T2DM and T2DM group. The last follow-up time was January 2019.

Results

A total of 1,692 eligible patients (1,621 non-T2DM vs. 71 T2DM) were included. After PSM, non-T2DM group (n=139) and T2DM group (n=71) were more balanced in baseline variables. The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate in T2DM group (47.0%) was inferior to that in non-T2DM group (58.0%), but did not reach statistical significance [hazard ratio (HR)=1.319, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.868−2.005, P=0.192]. While the 5-year progress-free survival (PFS) rate of T2DM group (40.6%) is significantly worse than that in non-T2DM group (56.3%) (HR=1.516, 95% CI: 1.004−2.290, P=0.045). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that T2DM was an independent risk factor for PFS but not for CSS. In T2DM group, metformin use subgroup was associated with superior 5-year CSS and PFS in compared with non-metformin use subgroup, although the difference was not statistically significant (5-year CSS: 48.0%vs. 45.4%, HR=0.680, 95% CI: 0.352−1.313, P=0.246; 5-year PFS: 43.5%vs. 35.7%, HR=0.763, 95% CI: 0.400−1.454, P=0.406). The 5-year CSS rate was 47.5% in good glycemic control subgroup and 44.1% in poor glycemic control subgroup (HR=0.826, 95% CI: 0.398−1.713, P=0.605). And both two subgroups yielded a similar 5-year PFS rate (42.2%vs. 36.3%, HR=0.908, 95% CI: 0.441−1.871, P=0.792).

Conclusions

DM promoted disease progress of GC after gastrectomy but had not yet led to the significant discrepancy of CSS. For GC patients with T2DM, metformin use was associated with superior survival but without statistical significance, while better glycemic control could not improve the prognosis.

Validation of the Survival Benefits of Metformin in Middle Eastern Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

Epidemiologic data from several populations suggest that metformin may decrease cancer risk and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and type II diabetes mellitus (DM). Although type II DM and CRC are major health problems in the Middle East, no investigations have been performed to test the effect metformin has on the outcome of patients with type II DM and CRC who are also treated with metformin.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,902 patients diagnosed with CRC at King Hussein Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2012, and identified 349 patients (18%) with type II DM; we censored the data of 28 patients because their antidiabetic medications were unknown. We then categorized these 321 patients into two groups: 192 patients treated with metformin (group A) and 129 patients treated with other antidiabetic medications (group B).

Results

Group A patients had significantly longer overall survival (89 months; 95% CI, 66 to 112 months) and progression-free survival (47 months; 95% CI, 15 to 79 months) than group B patients (overall survival: 36 months; 95% CI, 24 to 48 months; P ≤ .001; progression-free survival: 21 months; 95% CI, 13 to 29 months; P = .016). After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, aspirin use, anticholesterol treatment, and CRC stage, group A patients had a 40% reduction in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.4% to 0.85%; P = .005).

Conclusion

Our results support findings from other populations that patients with diabetes and CRC who are also treated with metformin have better outcomes than those treated with other antidiabetic medications.

Metformin plus first-line chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective open-label pilot trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of metformin plus first-line chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Epithelial ovarian cancer patients without diabetes mellitus were allocated to non-metformin group (paclitaxel plus carboplatin) or metformin group (paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus metformin). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were assigned to metformin group and 24 patients to non-metformin group. The baseline information in two groups had no significant difference. The PFS and DFS of patients with metformin intake versus without metformin intake was 23 versus 21 months (p = 0.68) and 29 versus 26 months (p = 0.61), respectively. The PFS and DFS of patients with normal weight versus obese/overweight were 23 versus 17 months (p = 0.14) and 27 versus 23 months (p = 0.50), respectively. Metformin effectively inhibited the increase of IGF-1 and maintained the IGFBP-1.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the small sample size, there was no evidence of meaningful effect on PFS by metformin even though evidence of modulation of IGF-1 signaling axis was apparent.

Repurposing quinacrine for treatment-refractory cancer

Quinacrine, also known as mepacrine, has originally been used as an antimalarial drug for close to a century, but was recently rediscovered as an anticancer agent. The mechanisms of anticancer effects of quinacrine are not well understood. The anticancer potential of quinacrine was discovered in a screen for small molecule activators of p53, and was specifically shown to inhibit NFκB suppression of p53. However, quinacrine can cause cell death in cells that lack p53 or have p53 mutations, which is a common occurrence in many malignant tumors including high grade serous ovarian cancer. Recent reports suggest quinacrine may inhibit cancer cell growth through multiple mechanisms including regulating autophagy, FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) chromatin trapping, and the DNA repair process. Additional reports also suggest quinacrine is effective against chemoresistant gynecologic cancer. In this review, we discuss anticancer effects of quinacrine and potential mechanisms of action with a specific focus on gynecologic and breast cancer where treatment-refractory tumors are associated with increased mortality rates. Repurposing quinacrine as an anticancer agent appears to be a promising strategy based on its ability to target multiple pathways, its selectivity against cancer cells, and the synergistic cytotoxicity when combined with other anticancer agents with limited side effects and good tolerability profile.

Observational Studies on the Association Between Post-diagnostic Metformin Use and Survival in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: To summarize and quantify the relationship between post-diagnostic metformin use and ovarian cancer (OC) survival. Methods: We systematically conducted an updated meta-analysis based on observational studies published up to December 31, 2018, identified from PubMed and Web of Science. Two team members independently extracted data and assessed the quality of each study. Summary Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Five cohort studies including 3,582 OC patients were included. All studies were graded as low risk of bias according to the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Post-diagnostic metformin use was associated with improved overall survival (summarized HR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.31-0.56; I 2 = 0%, P = 0.842) and progression-free survival (summarized HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.45-1.07; I 2 = 61.9%, P = 0.049) of OC patients. For OC patients with diabetes, post-diagnostic metformin use was associated with improved overall survival (summarized HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.28-0.95; I 2 = 47.6%, P = 0.149) and progression-free survival (summarized HR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.27-0.55; I 2 = 0%, P = 0.594). No significant publication bias was detected in these analyses. Conclusions: Post-diagnostic metformin use is consistently associated with better survival of OC patients regardless of diabetes status. Studies with larger sample sizes and prospective designs are required to confirm these findings and obtain detailed information, including standardized references for comparison, intensity and dose of metformin use, and further adjustment for potential confounders.

A pooled analysis of two phase II trials evaluating metformin plus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite a wealth of preclinical and observational data, prospective data regarding the use of metformin in lung cancer is extremely limited.

METHODS

We pooled individualized data from two prospective trials evaluating metformin plus platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, in non-diabetic patients with untreated advanced NSCLC. In addition to reporting on clinical efficacy and safety endpoints, we also explored metformin's activity in key molecular cohorts.

RESULTS

33 patients were included in the pooled analysis, of whom 70% were current or previous smokers. 82% had standard tissue molecular testing results available. KRAS, EGFR, and LKB1 mutation prevalence was 48%, 26%, and 8.3%, respectively. Composite median PFS was 6 months for all patients (95% CI: [1.36, 7.96]), 7.2 months for KRAS mutants (95% CI: [1.18, 9.21]), and 6.6 months for EGFR mutants (95% CI: [1.18, 15.29]). Composite median OS was 14.8 months for all patients (95% CI: [8.25, 19.99]), 17.5 months for KRAS mutants (95% CI: [8.86, 26.96]), and 13.3 months for EGFR mutants (95% CI: [2.60, 25.86]). Lymphopenia was the most common grade 3 AE (12%), followed by leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, and hypertension (9% each). There were 2 grade 4 AEs, neutropenia (21%) and sepsis (3%), and 1 grade 5 AE (colonic perforation) attributed to bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the previously shown efficacy and tolerability of metformin in combination with chemotherapy and highlight encouraging activity in key molecular cohorts. Future efforts should build on this work by prospectively studying metformin in these molecular subgroups.

Long term treatment of metformin impedes development of chemoresistance by regulating cancer stem cell differentiation through taurine generation in ovarian cancer cells

Development of resistance poses a significant challenge to effective first-line platinum based therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Stem Cells are envisaged as a critical underlying factor for therapy resistance. Thus, there is a critical need for developing approaches to diminish the enrichment of cancer stem cells and acquirement of resistance. Administration of metformin, a commonly prescribed drug against Type II diabetes exhibited promising effect in the management of ovarian cancer. However, the effect of long term administration of low dose of metformin as an adjuvant to cisplatin and paclitaxel during acquirement of chemoresistant phenotype has not been investigated so far. Using two isogenic cellular chemoresistant models (A2780 and OAW42) developed in the presence or absence of metformin, we demonstrated the ability of metformin to impede the development of resistance through increased drug sensitivity, increased proliferation, and reduced migratory abilities of the resistant cells. Metformin introduction also decreased the cancer stem cell population, expression of specific biomarkers and pluripotent genes. Further metabolic profiling of these cells using ¹H-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy revealed significant modulation in taurine and histidine levels in resistant cells developed in the presence of metformin. Intriguingly, taurine treatment considerably reduced the cancer stem cell population and chemoresistance in resistant cells, indicating a novel role of taurine in differentiation of ovarian cancer stem cells. Altogether this is the first report on the potential role of metformin for targeting the cancer stem cell population via up regulation of taurine, leading to impediment in the acquirement of chemoresistance.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on epithelial ovarian cancer survival

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with poorer outcomes in some cancers. Its effect on ovarian cancer is less clear. We consider the effect of DM on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 215 patients with EOC diagnosed between 2009 and 2016 was performed. Records were reviewed for standard demographic, pathologic and DM diagnosis data. Cox regression was used to evaluate the relationship between disease status and survival after adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI), parity, stage, grade, histology, debulking status, hypertension (HTN), menopause status and neoadjuant chemotherapy.

Results

Patients with DM (27.97, 95%CI: 23.63 to 32.30) had a significantly shorter OS rates compared to patients without DM (41.01, 95%CI: 38.84 to 43.17). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the association between OS time and DM was 4.76 (95%CI: 2.99 to 7.59, P < 0.001). Following adjustment for demographic and pathologic variables, the HR was 3.93 (95% CI: 2.01 to 7.68; P < 0.001). The PFS in patients with DM (14.10, 95%CI: 11.76 to 16.44) was significantly shorter compared to patients without DM (28.83, 95%CI: 26.13 to 31.54). The unadjusted HR for PFS and DM was 5.69 (95% CI: 3.05 to 10.61; P < 0.001). After adjustment for demographic and pathologic variables, the HR was 2.73 (95% CI, 1.18 to 6.95; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

DM can negatively effect on PFS and OS in EOC patients independent of the effect of other variables.

Metformin inhibits ovarian cancer growth and migration in vitro and in vivo by enhancing cisplatin cytotoxicity

The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether metformin can enhance the anti-cancer effect of cisplatin on epithelial ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo. CCK-8 assays were performed to detect cell viability, and flow cytometry was performed to measure cell apoptosis rates. Transwell assays were used to detect the migration and invasion ability of ovarian cancer cells. Western blotting and qRT-PCR were performed to detect protein expression. Xenograft mouse models were constructed to clarify the treatment response in vivo. Metformin alone or cisplatin alone dose-dependently inhibited SKOV3 and Hey cell proliferation. The combination of these two drugs exerted a stronger inhibitory effect with a higher apoptosis rate than administration of either drug alone. Transwell assay results revealed that metformin promoted the inhibitory effect of cisplatin on ovarian cancer cell metastasis. Metformin and cisplatin co-treatment significantly inhibited N-cadherin and MMP-9 expression. The Western blotting results revealed that metformin and cisplatin co-treatment inhibited TGFβ1 expression and Smad2 and Smad3 phosphorylation. The in vivo study results were consistent with results from the in vitro study. Data from our study suggest that metformin enhanced the anti-tumour effect of cisplatin on epithelial ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo, which provides more evidence supporting the use of metformin to treat epithelial ovarian cancer.