New Insights into Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Lessons Learned from the ROBUUST Collaborative Study

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, representing only 5-10% of urothelial carcinoma. The mainstay of treatment for high-risk patients is radical nephroureterectomy. Given the aggressive behavior of this disease, additional treatments could be required perioperatively in terms of chemotherapy (CHT), either in a neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. On the other hand, low-risk and selected cases can be managed with kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). The ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STudy (ROBUUST) is an ongoing international, multicenter registry of patients undergoing surgery for UTUC. After conducting a literature search in February 2025 using the MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase databases, we identified 14 studies based on the ROBUUST data analyses. There are several key topics concerning UTUC that remain under debate and were therefore addressed in these studies, focusing on preoperative evaluation and planning, surgical techniques and intraoperative procedures, additional perioperative treatments, and outcomes. The ROBUUST registry has served as a valuable source for a growing body of investigations focusing on various aspects of UTUC treatment planning, decision-making, and outcomes, providing innovative tools and enabling large-scale, novel analyses.

Differences in inflammation among black and white individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Despite persisting health disparities between Black and White individuals, racial differences in inflammation have yet to be comprehensively examined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if significant differences in circulating levels of inflammatory markers between Black and White populations exist.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified through systematic searches of four electronic databases in January 2022. Additional studies were identified via reference lists and e-mail contact.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies included full-text empirical articles that consisted of Black and White individuals and reported statistics for inflammatory markers for each racial group. Of the 1368 potentially eligible studies, 84 (6.6 %) representing more than one million participants met study selection criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Risk of bias was assessed via meta regressions that considered relevant covariates. Data heterogeneity was tested using both the Cochrane Q-statistic and the standard I2 index. Random effects models were used to calculate estimates of effect size from standardized mean differences.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcome measures included 12 inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), Fibrinogen, Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1).

RESULTS

Several markers had robust sample sizes for analysis, including CRP (White N = 934,594; Black N = 55,234), Fibrinogen (White N = 80,880; Black N = 18,001), and IL-6 (White N = 20,269; Black N = 14,675). Initial results indicated significant effects on CRP (k = 56, pooled Hedges' g = 0.24), IL-6 (k = 33, g = 0.15), and Fibrinogen (k = 19, g = 0.49), with Black individuals showing higher levels. Results also indicated significant effects on sICAM-1 (k = 6, g = -0.46), and Interleukin-10 (k = 4, g = -0.18), with White individuals showing higher levels. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robust effects for CRP, IL-6, Fibrinogen, and sICAM-1 while also revealing significant effects on TNF-α (k = 18, g = -0.17) and Interleukin-8 (k = 5, g = -0.19), with White individuals showing higher levels of both.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Current meta-analytic results provide evidence for marked racial differences in common circulating inflammatory markers and illustrate the complexity of the inflammatory profile differences between Black and White individuals. Review Pre-Registration: PROSPERO Identifier - CRD42022312352.

The impact of immune-related adverse events on survival outcomes in a racially diverse population, with a focus on non-Hispanic Black patients

INTRODUCTION

The development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has been associated with improved survival outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this association's extent across race and ethnicity remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between the development of irAEs and treatment outcomes across racially diverse groups treated at a safety net hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with advanced NSCLC treated between 2015 and 2020. The incidence of irAEs across racial subgroups was compared using logistic regression analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the development of irAEs and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 138 NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), of whom 50% identified as non-Hispanic Black (NHB). Incidence of irAEs was 28%, with no significant difference between NHB and other racial groups. However, females [OR 2.3, 95% CI, (1.1-4.8)] and patients with Medicaid or MassHealth insurance had a higher incidence of irAEs [OR 2.7 (1.2-5.7)]. Additionally, patients with irAEs had a lower risk of disease progression (multivariable HR 0.46, 95% CI, 0.23-0.92) compared to those without irAEs. The association between irAEs and improved progression free survival (PFS) in NHB patients was similar to the other racial group [median PFS 246 vs 181 days; HR 0.87 (0.58-1.29)].

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated a similar incidence of irAEs in NHB patients with NSCLC as compared to other racial groups. Patients who developed irAEs experienced significantly improved survival outcomes. This association remained independent of race and ethnicity, underscoring the importance of providing unbiased treatment recommendations.

Structural racism and breast cancer stage at presentation in a South Florida majority-minority population: a retrospective study

Background

Residential segregation, both economic, racial and ethnic, is a social determinant of health that contributes to disparities in breast cancer outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine the association of economic and racial and ethnic residential segregation, as measured by the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), with breast cancer stage at presentation.

Methods

In this retrospective two-institution study, we included patients with stage I-IV breast cancer from 2005 to 2017. Using five-year estimates from the American Community Survey (2009-2013), five ICE variables were computed to create five models, controlling for economic segregation, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) segregation, NHB/economic segregation, Hispanic segregation, and Hispanic/economic segregation. Multi-level logistic regression models determined the association between economic and racial segregation on breast cancer stage at presentation.

Findings

4898 patients were included: 56% Hispanic, 27% Non-Hispanic White, 17% NHB. Those living in the most economically marginalised neighbourhoods [by quartiles (Q)] [ORQ1 1.38 (95% CI: 1.14-1.68), p < 0.05, majority NHB neighbourhoods [ORQ11.51 (95% CI: 1.01-2.27)], majority Hispanic neighbourhoods [ORQ1 1.29 (95% CI: 1.06-1.56)], the most NHB and economically segregated neighbourhoods [NHB and economic: ORQ1 1.64 (95% CI: 1.28-2.09), and the most Hispanic and economically segregated neighbourhoods [Hispanic and economic: ORQ1 1.60 (95% CI: 1.24-1.68)] had significantly increased odds of presenting with later stage disease compared to the reference group in each category.

Interpretation

This study, to our knowledge, is the first to evaluate stage at presentation by ICE, which allows us to evaluate the association between racial and economic residential segregation and breast cancer disparities. Our findings suggest that structural racism influences stage at presentation. To address these disparities, effective interventions are needed to account for the social and environmental contexts in which cancer patients live and can access care.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R37CA288502. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The research was also supported by a University of Miami School of Medicine DREAM Scholar Award, a NIH/NCI T32CA211034, an American Surgical Association Fellowship Award, a Breast Cancer Research Foundation, an ASCO Career Development Award, a Florida Department of Health Bankhead Cole Cancer Research Program, a NIH/NCI 5P30 240139-02 Sylvester Cancer Control Support Grant Transdisciplinary Pilot Grant, and a NIH/NCI K12CA226330.

Stage-Specific Tumoral Gene Expression Profiles of Black and White Patients with Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Black patients with colon cancer (CC) exhibit more aggressive tumor biology and higher treatment resistance than white patients, even after adjusting for clinical and demographic factors. We investigated stage-specific transcriptional differences in tumor profiles of Black and white patients with CC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with CC from The Cancer Genome Atlas Colon Adenocarcinoma database were categorized by disease stage and propensity-score matched between Black and white patients. Differential gene expression and pathway enrichment analyses were performed for each stage. Logistic regression and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) models were developed using consistently differentially expressed genes.

RESULTS

Of 247 patients, 128 had localized (22% Black), 81 had regional (74% Black), and 38 had distant disease (29% Black). Differential expression analysis revealed differences in 312 genes for localized, 105 for regional, and 199 for distant stages between Black and white patients. Pathway enrichment analysis showed downregulation of the IL-17 pathway in Black patients with localized disease. In total, five genes exhibited race-specific transcriptional differences across all stages: RAMACL, POLR2J3, POLR2J2, MUC16, and PRSS21. Logistic regression and QDA model performance indicated that these genes represent racial differences [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.863 and 0.880].

CONCLUSIONS

Significant transcriptional differences exist in CC between Black and white patients changing dynamically across disease stages, and involving genes with broad functions. Key findings include IL-17 pathway downregulation in Black patients with localized disease and a five-gene signature consistent across all stages. These findings may explain aspects of racial disparities in CC, emphasizing the need for race-specific research and treatment strategies.

Racial/ethnic differences in survival and treatment response with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) remains under investigation, particularly about its effectiveness across different ethnicities. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the potential benefits of adding PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors for treatment, stratified by ethnicity.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors to treat patients with resectable NSCLC. The outcomes evaluated were disease-free survival/event-free survival (DFS/EFS), major pathological response (MPR), and pathological complete response (pCR). Hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for all endpoints using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. Statistical analyses were performed with R Software, version 4.2.3.

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs comprising 3,827 patients with NSCLC were included. In populations of Asian descent, PD1/PD-L1 significantly improved DFS/EFS (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44-0.78), MPR (RR 5.76; 95% CI 3.58-9.28), and pCR (RR 25.00; 95% CI 6.17-101.36). Similarly, patients of European ancestry experienced significantly improved DFS/EFS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65-0.90), MPR (RR 2.75; 95% CI 2.00-3.77), and pCR (RR 4.53; 95% CI 2.69-7.6) with PD1/PD-L1 therapy. Notably, patients with mixed ethnicity also demonstrated significant improvement in MPR (RR 4.05; 95% CI 2.60-6.33) and pCR (RR 8.44; 95% CI 3.75-19.00) when receiving PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive meta-analysis suggests that incorporating PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors into treatments offers a promising benefit for patients with resectable NSCLC, regardless of ethnicity. Future studies with in-depth molecular characterization of patients can further refine these findings and potentially guide the development of personalized treatment strategies based on individual ethnic backgrounds.

Survival Outcomes by Race Following Surgical Treatment for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Discrepancies in survival outcomes of various genitourinary tract malignancies have been documented across different racial and ethnic groups. Here we sought to examine long-term survival outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) when stratified by race.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective analysis using the ROBUUST (ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer Study) registry identified patients undergoing RNU for UTUC between 2015 and 2022 at 12 centers across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Patients were stratified by race (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian) and primary outcomes of interest-including recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) - were assessed using univariate analysis, multivariate Cox regression modeling, and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

1446 patients (white n = 652, black n = 70, Hispanic n = 87, and Asian n = 637) who underwent RNU for treatment of the UTUC were included in our analysis. Cox regression modeling demonstrated pathologic nodal staging to be a significant predictor of RFS (HR 2.25; P = .0010), MFS (HR 2.50; P = .0028), and OS (HR 5.11; P < .0001). When using whites as the reference group, there were no significant differences in RFS, MFS, or OS across racial groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike other genitourinary tract malignancies, our study failed to demonstrate a survival disadvantage among minority racial groups with UTUC who underwent RNU. Furthermore, a significant difference in RFS, MFS, and OS was not identified across whites, blacks, Asians, or Hispanics with UTUC who underwent RNU.

The effect of thyroid cancer on the survival of patients with digestive system tumors using SEER database

The number of cancer survivors worldwide is increasing every year, making secondary primary cancers (SPC) is a growing health threat. Studies have been conducted to investigate the risk of occurrence between digestive system tumors (DST) and thyroid cancer (TC). However, existing studies have tended to focus more on the risk of developing SPC and less on the impact of SPC on the survival of cancer survivors. In this study, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we aimed to explore the impact of TC on the survival of patients with DST by data between 2000 and 2018. The study employed the standardized incidence ratio to assess the relative risk of SPC, propensity score matching was conducted to mitigate confounding effects, Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional risk model and competitive risk model were used to analyze the factors affecting the overall survival and cancer-specific survival. We furthermore explored the influence of pathological types and radiotherapy of TC on the survival of DST patients. 518,901 patients with DST only, 801 patients with TC occurring earlier than DST (TC-1st), and 744 patients with DST occurring earlier than TC (DST-1st) were included. The total incidence rate of small intestine cancer after TC was higher than that of the general population, and the incidence of TC after DST was higher than in the general population. DST patients with a history of TC had better overall survival and lower cancer-specific mortality and this difference was particularly significant in patients with DST-1st. In addition, radiotherapy for TC had no effect on cancer-specific mortality in patients with DST.

Associations Between Perceived Discrimination, Screening Mammography, and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: A Prospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite higher breast cancer screening rates, black women still are more likely to have late-stage disease diagnosed. This disparity is influenced in part by structural and interpersonal racism. This prospective study sought to determine how interpersonal factors, including perceived discrimination, influence screening and stage of disease at diagnosis.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study analyzed adult women with stages I to IV breast cancer from the Miami Breast Cancer Disparities Study. Perceived discrimination and mistrust of providers were assessed using previously validated questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the odds of screening mammography utilization and late-stage breast cancer at diagnosis.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 342 patients (54.4 % Hispanic, 15.8 % white, and 17.3 % black). Multivariate regression, after control for both individual- and neighborhood-level factors, showed that a higher level of perceived discrimination was associated with greater odds of late-stage disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06; range, 1.01-1.12); p = 0.022) and lower odds of screening mammography (aOR, 0.96; range, 0.92-0.99; p = 0.046). A higher level of perceived discrimination also was negatively correlated with multiple measures of provider trust.

DISCUSSION

This study identified that high perceived level of discrimination is associated with decreased odds of ever having a screening mammogram and increased odds of late-stage disease. Efforts are needed to reach women who experience perceived discrimination and to improve the patient-provider trust relationship because these may be modifiable risk factors for barriers to screening and late-stage disease presentation, which ultimately have an impact on breast cancer survival.

Amplification of MYC and Its Enhancer Correlates With Genetic Ancestry in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

In lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), Black patients show significantly higher incidence and lower overall survival than White patients. Although socioeconomic factors likely contribute to this survival disparity, genomic factors have yet to be elucidated in LUSC.

METHODS

Using 416 LUSC tumor samples in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we assessed genomic and transcriptomic profiles by ancestry. We replicated our analyses in pan-cancer data from TCGA, the American Association of Cancer Research (AACR) Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE), and Columbia University Medical Center.

RESULTS

We found increased MYC amplification, LUSC-specific MYC enhancer amplification, and chromosome arm 8q (chr8q) gain to be significantly associated with genetic AFR (African) ancestry in LUSC in TCGA. Furthermore, expression of MYC target genes was significantly enriched in AFR samples. Local ancestry analysis identified correlation of chr8q gain with AFR ancestry at the MYC locus in TCGA. We also found a significant correlation between chr8q and AFR ancestry in multiple cancer types and pan-cancer in TCGA. Similarly, in a pan-cancer subset of AACR GENIE data, we found a significant correlation between chr8q gain and race.

CONCLUSION

Together, our data suggest that ancestry may influence amplification of not only MYC but also its enhancer in LUSC. They also suggest a role for genetic ancestry in chr8q aneuploidy in cancer. These studies further define and expand patients who may benefit from future anti-MYC therapeutic approaches.

Disparities in US Lung Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment

BACKGROUND

Disparities within clinical trial enrollment are well-documented, reducing the generalizability of results. Although nearly 30 years have passed since Congress passed the NIH Revitalization Act to encourage the participation of minoritized populations in clinical trials, these patients continue to be underrepresented. This study aimed to investigate lung cancer clinical trial enrollment disparities for race/ethnicity, sex, and age.

METHODS

We queried the National Institutes of Health: US National Library of Medicine database of clinical trials for all US-based lung cancer clinical trials completed between 2004 and 2021 and collected data on race and ethnicity, gender, and age breakdown. This data was compared to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database data. Independent sample t-tests and Kruskal-Wallis's approach were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Of 311 eligible trials with exclusive US enrollment, 136 (44%) reported race and ethnicity breakdown for the patient cohort representing 9869 patients. Hispanic, Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, Non-Hispanic Black, and Non-Hispanic Unreported participants were underrepresented (p = 0.001, p = 0.005, p = 0.014, p = 0.002, respectively). Non-Hispanic White participants were overrepresented (p = 0.018). Disparities worsened from 2017 to 2021 for Hispanic patients (p = 0.03). No significant differences were found for sex or age.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities for clinical lung cancer trial enrollment have not shown statistically significant improvement since 2004, and representation remains unequal, especially for racial and ethnic minorities.

An elevated rate of whole-genome duplications in cancers from Black patients

In the United States, Black individuals have higher rates of cancer mortality than any other racial group. Here, we examine chromosome copy number changes in cancers from more than 1800 self-reported Black patients. We find that tumors from self-reported Black patients are significantly more likely to exhibit whole-genome duplications (WGDs), a genomic event that enhances metastasis and aggressive disease, compared to tumors from self-reported white patients. This increase in WGD frequency is observed across multiple cancer types, including breast, endometrial, and lung cancer, and is associated with shorter patient survival. We further demonstrate that combustion byproducts are capable of inducing WGDs in cell culture, and cancers from self-reported Black patients exhibit mutational signatures consistent with exposure to these carcinogens. In total, these findings identify a type of genomic alteration that is associated with environmental exposures and that may influence racial disparities in cancer outcomes.

Association between social determinants of health and survival among the US cancer survivors population

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities in mortality persist among US cancer survivors, with social determinants of health (SDoH) may have a significant impact on these disparities.

METHODS

A population-based cohort study of a nationally representative sample of adult cancer survivors, who participated in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2018 was included. Sociodemographic characteristics and SDoH were self-reported using standardized questionnaires in each survey cycle. The SDoH was examined by race and estimated for associations with primary outcomes, which included all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. Multiple mediation analysis was performed to assess the contribution of each unfavorable SDoH to racial disparities to all-cause and cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Among 5163 cancer survivors (2724 [57.7%] females and 3580 [69.3%] non-Hispanic White individuals), only 881 (24.9%) did not report an unfavorable SDoH. During the follow-up period of up to 249 months (median 81 months), 1964 deaths were recorded (cancer, 624; cardiovascular, 529; other causes, 811). Disparities in all-cause and cancer-specific mortality were observed between non-Hispanic Black and White cancer survivors. Unemployment, lower economic status, education less than high school, government or no private insurance, renting a home or other arrangements, and social isolation were significantly and independently associated with worse overall survival. Unemployment, lower economic status, and social isolation were significantly associated with cancer-specific mortality. Compared to patients without an unfavorable SDoH, the risk of all-cause mortality was gradually increased in those with a cumulative number of unfavorable SDoHs (1 unfavorable SDoH: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% CI 1.25-1.89; 2 unfavorable SDoHs: HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.46-2.24; 3 unfavorable SDoHs: HR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.97-2.97; 4 unfavorable SDoHs: HR = 3.22, 95% CI 2.48-4.19; 5 unfavorable SDoHs: HR = 3.99, 95% CI 2.99-5.33; 6 unfavorable SDoHs: HR = 6.34 95% CI 4.51-8.90). A similar trend existed for cancer-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort study of a nationally representative sample of US cancer survivors, a greater number of unfavorable SDoH was associated with increased risks of mortality from all causes and cancer. Unfavorable SDoH levels were critical risk factors for all-cause and cancer-specific mortality, as well as the underlying cause of racial all-cause mortality disparities among US cancer survivors.

Estimating the impact of enhanced care at minority-serving hospitals on disparities in the treatment of breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancers

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to quantify disparities in cancer treatment delivery between minority-serving hospitals (MSHs) and non-MSHs for breast, prostate, nonsmall cell lung, and colon cancers from 2010 to 2019 and to estimate the impact of improving care at MSHs on national disparities.

METHODS

Data from the National Cancer Database (2010-2019) identified patients who were eligible for definitive treatments for the specified cancers. Hospitals in the top decile by minority patient proportion were classified as MSHs. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics compared the odds of receiving definitive treatment at MSHs versus non-MSHs. A simulation was used to estimate the increase in patients receiving definitive treatment if MSH care matched the levels of non-MSH care.

RESULTS

Of 2,927,191 patients from 1330 hospitals, 9.3% were treated at MSHs. MSHs had significant lower odds of delivering definitive therapy across all cancer types (adjusted odds ratio: breast cancer, 0.83; prostate cancer, 0.69; nonsmall cell lung cancer, 0.73; colon cancer, 0.81). No site of care-race interaction was significant for any of the cancers (p > .05). Equalizing treatment rates at MSHs could result in 5719 additional patients receiving definitive treatment over 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings underscore systemic disparities in definitive cancer treatment delivery between MSHs and non-MSHs for breast, prostate, nonsmall cell lung, and colon cancers. Although targeted improvements at MSHs represent a critical step toward equity, this study highlights the need for integrated, system-wide efforts to address the multifaceted nature of racial and ethnic health disparities. Enhancing care at MSHs could serve as a pivotal strategy in a broader initiative to achieve health care equity for all.

Racial Disparities in Treatment and Outcomes of Pediatric Hepatoblastoma

Pediatric Hepatoblastoma is a rare malignancy of the liver. This study used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify 1068 patients diagnosed with hepatoblastoma from 2004 to 2020. χ 2 and Analysis of Variance testing, as well as Kaplan-Meier, Cox Regression, and multinomial logistic regression models were used. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 27, and statistical significance was set at α=0.05. Our results found Black patients experienced a significantly lower median survival rate compared with White patients, a difference which persisted after controlling for covariates. Black patients were also less likely to receive surgery and chemotherapy and more likely to be from low-income households than White patients. White patients had a significantly shorter inpatient hospital stay compared to Black patients and were more likely to receive treatment at more than 1 CoC accredited facility. There was no significant difference in grade, size of tumor, metastasis, or time of diagnosis to surgery. This study showed Black patients experienced inferior overall survival when diagnosed and treated for hepatoblastoma compared to White patients.

Higher area deprivation index is associated with poorer local control and overall survival in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation impacts outcomes in various cancers. We examined this association in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients using the area deprivation index (ADI).

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study on NPC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy from 1980 to 2023. ADI was used as the primary exposure measure. Higher ADI indicates higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation.

RESULTS

Of 561 patients, those with higher ADI (6-10 vs. 1-5) presented more commonly with AJCC stage III/IV compared to I/II (87% vs. 76%, p = 0.03). Increasing ADI decile score correlated with poorer overall survival (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28, p = 0.04). Local control was worse in patients from the most deprived quartile in the cohort ADI 5-10 (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.01-4.41, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

NPC patients from more disadvantaged neighborhoods undergoing radiotherapy had worse local control and survival outcomes. Interventions to address structural determinants of health and neighborhood disparities may improve these outcomes.

Financial (dis)incentives to surgical management of head and neck cancer care

BACKGROUND

Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) often require complex surgical reconstruction. This retrospective, cross-sectional study compares financial factors influencing HNC and breast cancer (BC) care to examine care disparities.

METHODS

Pricing data from 2012 to 2021 was abstracted from the CMS Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool. Nonprofit and research support was quantified by searching the NIH, IRS, and GuideStar databases. New York State Department of Health data from 2015 to 2019 was analyzed to compare costs, charges, and payer mix.

RESULTS

HNC reconstructive procedures reimburse lower than comparable breast procedures (p < 0.05). Nonprofit and research support for HNC is disproportionately low relative to disease burden. Patients hospitalized for HNC surgical procedures generated higher costs and lower charges than patients with BC (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Comparatively low procedure reimbursement, low nonprofit support, and high cost of care for patients with HNC relative to patients with BC may contribute to care disparities for patients with HNC.

Racial disparities in initiation of chemotherapy among breast cancer patients with discretionary treatment indication in the state of Georgia

PURPOSE

The majority of breast cancer patients are diagnosed with early-stage estrogen receptor (ER) positive disease. Despite effective treatments for these cancers, Black women have higher mortality than White women. We investigated demographic and clinical factors associated with receipt of chemotherapy among those with a discretionary indication who are at risk for overtreatment.

METHODS

Using Georgia Cancer Registry data, we identified females diagnosed with ER positive breast cancer who had a discretionary indication for chemotherapy (2010-2017). We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associating patient demographic and clinical characteristics with chemotherapy initiation overall, and comparing non-Hispanic Black (NHB) with non-Hispanic White (NHW) women within strata of patient factors.

RESULTS

We identified 11,993 ER positive breast cancer patients with a discretionary indication for chemotherapy. NHB patients were more likely to initiate chemotherapy compared with NHW women (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.28, 1.56). Race differences in chemotherapy initiation were pronounced among those who did not receive Oncotype DX testing (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.31, 1.65) and among those residing in high socioeconomic status neighborhoods (OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.70, 3.61). However, we observed equitable chemotherapy receipt among patients who received Oncotype DX testing (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.14), were diagnosed with grade 1 disease (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.37), and those resided in rural areas (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.76, 1.36).

CONCLUSION

We observed racial disparities in the initiation of chemotherapy overall and by sociodemographic and clinical factors, and more equitable outcomes when clinical guidelines were followed.

Patient- and system-level factors associated with racial/ethnic disparities in the delivery of guideline-concordant therapy among US patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Disparities in gastric cancer (GC) outcomes show a higher disease burden among minorities. We aimed to evaluate the associations between sociodemographic and system-level factors and guideline-concordant treatment among GC patients.

METHODS

Cohort study with GC patients in the National Cancer Data Base (2006-2018) treated with upfront resection or neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We used logistic regression to identify associations between deviations from guideline-concordant therapy and patient- and system-level factors, and Cox regression models to assess risk of death.

RESULTS

The cohort included 43 597 GC patients treated with endoscopic resection (8.9%), surgery only (47.1%), surgery and adjuvant therapy (20.6%), or NAT followed by surgery (23.5%). A total of 31 470 patients (72.2%) received guideline-concordant therapy. Relative to Non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, [95% confidence intervals 1.10-1.28]) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (APIs) (OR 1.12 [1.03-1.23]) had an increased risk of deviations from treatment guidelines. Medicare/Medicaid increased the risk of deviations while treatment at high-volume facilities decreased its risk for all races/ethnicities. Deviations from guidelines were associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio 1.56 [1.50-1.63].

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities in the delivery of guideline-concordant therapy among GC patients are affected by several sociodemographic factors at the patient- and system-level.

Trial of Electronic Medical Record Integrated Next-Generation Sequencing Ordering in Veterans Affairs Cancer Care

PURPOSE

Previous studies document underuse of next-generation sequencing (NGS). We examined the impact to oncology care for veterans of incorporating NGS ordering into the Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic medical record (EMR) at two New York City VA Medical Centers.

METHODS

We identified patients with non-small cell lung cancer and prostate cancer with oncology clinic visits and NGS testing indications between January and December 2021. Patients were divided into external ordering (EO) with visits before we implemented an EMR ordering system for NGS in July 2021, and internal ordering (IO) with visits after this date. The primary outcome was proportion of NGS testing performed in EO versus IO groups. Secondary outcomes were time between metastatic disease diagnosis to receipt of test by vendor, time of metastatic diagnosis to result, and proportion of testing by race.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were identified, 116 EO and 52 IO patients. Between IO and EO periods, testing significantly increased from 52% to 87% (P ≤ .01); it was conducted more quickly, with time from metastatic diagnosis to sample receipt by the NGS vendor improving to median 37 days from 299 days (P = .03); and the time from documented metastatic disease to a test result improved to median 56 days from 309 days (P = .03). The proportion of tissue received by the vendor was not significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant differences in testing according to self-reported race.

CONCLUSION

Integration of NGS ordering in the EMR led to increased proportion and speed of testing for a vulnerable patient population served by the country's largest health system.

Racial/ethnic disparities in inpatient palliative care utilization and hospitalization outcomes among patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Research has shown that racial/ethnic disparities exist in outcomes for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, but there are no studies assessing inpatient palliative care utilization and hospitalization outcomes in this population. We examined racial/ethnic disparities in palliative care utilization and hospitalization outcomes among CRC and early-onset CRC patients.

METHODS

Using National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data collected between 2016 and 2018, cross-sectional analyses were performed. Descriptive analyses were done, stratified by race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to examine racial/ethnic differences in palliative care utilization, inpatient mortality, chemotherapy/radiotherapy use, length of stay and total hospital charges among hospitalized patients with CRC and early-onset CRC.

RESULTS

Blacks had higher odds (AOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.16) of receiving palliative care consultation while Hispanics had lower odds (AOR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.84-0.96) compared to Whites. Blacks had 1.1 times higher odds (95% CI: 1.01-1.18) of inpatient mortality relative to Whites while Hispanics had 16% (AOR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.93) lower odds of inpatient mortality. Compared to Whites, Blacks (AOR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.64-2.41), Hispanics (AOR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.94-3.19) and colorectal cancer patients in the other category (AOR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.35-2.18) were more likely to receive inpatient treatment with chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Furthermore, Black patients were 1.1 times (95% CI: 1.06-1.14) more likely to have a length of stay more than 5 days. Blacks (𝛃: $3,096.7; 95% CI: $1,207.0-$4,986.5) Hispanic (𝛃: $10,237.5; 95% CI: $7,558.2-$12,916.8) and other patients (𝛃: $6,332.0; 95% CI: $2,830.9-$9, 833.2) had higher hospital charges relative to their White counterparts. Among patients with early onset CRC, Blacks had higher palliative care use (AOR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.10-1.51) and inpatient mortality (AOR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.06-1.79) while Hispanics reported $5,589.7 (95% CI: $683.2-$10,496.2) higher total hospital charges and were more likely to receive inpatient chemotherapy/radiotherapy (AOR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.70-3.63).

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to explore specific cultural, socioeconomic, and political factors that explain these disparities and identify ways to narrow the gap. Meanwhile, the healthcare sector will need to assess what strategies might be helpful in addressing these disparities in outcomes in the context of other socioeconomic and cultural factors that may be affecting the patients.

Meta-analysis of sex and racial subgroup participation rates and differential treatment effects for trials in solid tumor malignancies leading to US Food and Drug Administration registration between 2010 and 2021

BACKGROUND

The lack of sociodemographic diversity in clinical trials limits the generalizability of results. The authors examined participation rates and effect modification by sex and race in oncology trials.

METHODS

The authors extracted outcome data stratified by sex and race for registration trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval (2010-2021). Effect modification by race and sex was examined using quantitative and qualitative methods. A random-effects meta-analysis and pairwise comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes was conducted by sex and race.

RESULTS

Ninety-five trials with 123 end points and 54,365 patients provided information on sex. Trial patients were more often male (n = 35,482; 65% vs. 56% male patients in US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] data), although the proportion of male patients was similar after adjusting by tumor type (60% in FDA data vs. 58% in SEER data). There was no difference in pooled outcomes among male versus female patients (PFS: hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.07; p = .89; OS: hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.07; p = .90). In total, 111 trials including 74,217 patients provided information on race, and 68% of patients identified as White, compared with 72.3% in US SEER incidence data. Black patients were under-represented compared with US SEER incidence data, although ethnicity was poorly reported throughout the data set. In the authors' network meta-analysis by race, there were no statistically significant differences in PFS or OS outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in PFS or OS outcomes were identified when the analyses were stratified by sex or race. Certain racial minorities remain under-represented, and clearer reporting of race and ethnicity is needed. Representation of female patients in FDA trials is similar to that in SEER data after adjusting for tumor type.

Shiftwork, long working hours and markers of inflammation in a national US population-based sample of employed black and white men and women aged ≥45 years

OBJECTIVES

Work schedule demands contribute to circadian disruption and may influence health via an inflammatory response. We examined the impact of shiftwork and long work hours on inflammation in a national US sample.

METHODS

Participants included 12 487 employed black and white men and women aged ≥45 years enrolled in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study who completed an occupational questionnaire (2011-2013) and clinical examination (2013-2016). Cross-sectional associations between shiftwork and work hours with log-transformed high-sensitivity C reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) count were examined by multiple linear regression analysis, overall and by race-sex subgroups.

RESULTS

Overall, rotating shift workers had higher log-CRP concentration compared with day workers (β=0.09, 95% CI:0.02 to 0.16) and findings for WBC were null. Black women had the highest geometric mean CRP (2.82 mg/L), while white men had the highest WBC (6.35×109/L). White men who worked afternoons had higher log-CRP compared with those who worked days (β=0.20, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.33). Black men engaged in shiftwork <10 years working ≥55 hours/week had higher log-CRP and log-WBC compared with those working days <55 hours/week (β=0.33, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.64 and β=0.10, 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.19). Among shift workers, non-retired white women working forward and backward shift rotations had higher log-CRP compared with those working forward only (β=0.49, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Shift workers had higher inflammatory markers compared with day workers and race-sex disparities should be examined further. These findings highlight a potential biological pathway linking work schedule demands and chronic disease.

Race and Ethnicity Impacts Overall Survival of Patients with Appendiceal Cancer Who Undergo Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Appendiceal cancer treatment may include cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). We investigated whether patient race/ethnicity influences outcomes and overall survival for patients with appendiceal cancer who undergo CRS/HIPEC. We queried the National Cancer Database for adult patients with appendiceal cancer treated with CRS/HIPEC from 2006 to 2018. Patients were stratified by race/ethnicity: non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and Other. Sociodemographics and outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-rank tests assessed differences in overall survival (OS). Cox Multivariate Regression evaluated factors associated with OS. In total, 2532 patients were identified: 2098 (82.9%) NHW, 186 (7.3%) NHB, 127 (5.0%) Hispanic, and 121 (4.8%) Other patients. The sociodemographics were statistically different across groups. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes were similar. OS was significantly different by race/ethnicity (p = 0.0029). NHB patients compared to Hispanic patients had the shortest median OS (106.7 vs. 145.9 months, p = 0.0093). Race/ethnicity was independently associated with OS: NHB (HR: 2.117 [1.306, 3.431], p = 0.0023) and NHW (HR: 1.549 [1.007, 2.383], p = 0.0463) patients compared to Hispanic patients had worse survival rates. Racial/ethnic disparities exist for patients with appendiceal cancer undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Despite having similar tumor and treatment characteristics, OS is associated with patient race/ethnicity.

Surgical Treatment at an Academic Medical Center is Associated with Statistically Insignificant Lung Cancer Survival Outcome Differences Related to ZIP Code

BACKGROUND

Low socioeconomic status is a well-characterized adverse prognostic factor in large lung cancer databases. However, such characterizations may be confounded as patients of lower socioeconomic status are more often treated at low-volume, non-academic centers. We evaluated whether socioeconomic status, as defined by ZIP code median income, was associated with differences in lung cancer resection outcomes within a high-volume academic medical center.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing resection for non-small cell lung cancer were identified from a prospectively maintained database (2011-18). Patients were assigned an income value based on the median income of their ZIP code as determined by census-based geographic data. We stratified the population into income quintiles representative of SES and compared demographics (chi-square), surgical outcomes, and survival (Kaplan-Meier).

RESULTS

We identified 1,693 patients, representing 516 ZIP codes. Income quintiles were Q1: $24,421-53,151; Q2:$53,152-73,982; Q3:$73,983-99,063; Q4:$99,064-123,842; and Q5:$123,843-250,001. Compared to Q5 patients, Q1 patients were younger (median 69 vs. 73, p < 0.001), more likely male (44 vs. 36%, p = 0.035), and more likely Asian, Black, or self-identified as other than white, Asian, or Black. (67 vs. 11%, p =  < 0.001). We found minor differences in surgical outcomes and no significant difference in 5-year survival between Q1 and Q5 patients (5-year: 86 vs. 85%, p = 0.886).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical care patterns at a high-volume academic medical center are similar among patients from varying ZIP codes. Surgical treatment at such a center is associated with no survival differences based upon socioeconomic status as determined by ZIP code. Centralization of lung cancer surgical care to high-volume centers may reduce socioeconomic outcome disparities.

Racial/ethnic disparities in the cause of death among patients with prostate cancer in the United States from 1995 to 2019: a population-based retrospective cohort study

Background

Racial/ethnic disparities in prostate cancer are reported in the United States (US). However, long-term trends and contributors of racial/ethnic disparities in all-cause and cause-specific death among patients with prostate cancer remain unclear. We analysed the trends and contributors of racial/ethnic disparities in prostate cancer survivors according to the cause of death in the US over 25 years.

Methods

In this retrospective, population-based longitudinal cohort study, we identified patients diagnosed with first primary prostate cancer between 1995 and 2019, with follow-up until Dec 31, 2019, using population-based cancer registries' data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. We calculated the cumulative incidence of death for each racial/ethnic group (Black, white, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander [API], and American Indian or Alaska Native [AI/AN] people), by diagnostic period and cause of death. We quantified absolute disparities using rate changes for the 5-year cumulative incidence of death between racial/ethnic groups and diagnostic periods. We estimated relative (Hazard ratios [HR]) racial/ethnic disparities and the percentage of potential factors contributed to racial/ethnic disparities using Cox regression models.

Findings

Despite a decreasing trend in the cumulative risk of death across five racial/ethnic groups, AI/AN and Black patients consistently had the highest rate of death between 1995 and 2019 with an adjusted HR of 1.48 (1.40-1.58) and 1.40 (1.38-1.42) respectively. The disparities in all-cause mortality between AI/AN and white patients increased over time, with adjusted HR 1.32 (1.17-1.49) in 1995-1999 and 1.95 (1.53-2.49) in 2015-2019. Adjustment of stage at diagnosis, initial treatment, tumor grade, and household income explained 33% and 24% of the AI/AN-white and Black-white disparities in all-cause death among patients with prostate cancer.

Interpretation

The enduring racial/ethnic disparities in patients with prostate cancer, call for new interventions to eliminate health disparities. Our study provides important evidence and ways to address racial/ethnic inequality.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support, the Open Research Fund from Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education of China.

Impact of a Cancer Health Education Curriculum Among Milwaukee Public High School Students

In Milwaukee and nationwide, cancer incidence, late-stage diagnosis, and mortality are notably higher among some racial/ethnic populations. Cancer education has the potential to impact cancer burden and reduce cancer disparities. In particular, the addition of a service-learning component to academic curriculums has been shown to improve student learning as well as positively impact the surrounding community. This study implemented a cancer health education curriculum (CHEC) at a Milwaukee public high school with the goal of addressing cancer knowledge, fear and fatalism beliefs, and risk behaviors. The curriculum included interactive learning sessions and a service-learning final project. Five-hundred twenty-one students also completed pre- and post-surveys assessing cancer knowledge, fear and fatalism, risk behaviors, cancer-related communication, and a qualitative question asking what they hoped to gain (pre) or did gain (post) from the course. Results indicate (1) a significant improvement in cancer knowledge (p < 0.0001), (2) a decrease in cancer fear and fatalism (p < 0.0001), (3) an increase in fruit consumption (p < 0.0001), (4) a decrease in screen time (p = 0.0004), and (5) an increase in how often students spoke with their family about cancer (p < 0.0001). Qualitative data reflect important gains such as increased interest in sharing their knowledge about cancer with their community. Providing cancer education and leveraging a service-learning requirement led to notable changes in high school students' cancer knowledge, fear and fatalism, and risk behaviors. Students also communicated more with family/friends about cancer. Such efforts could have broader implications for student, family, and community cancer burden.

Strategic Messaging to Promote Policies that Advance Racial Equity: What Do We Know, and What Do We Need to Learn?

Policy Points Many studies have explored the impact of message strategies to build support for policies that advance racial equity, but few studies examine the effects of richer stories of lived experience and detailed accounts of the ways racism is embedded in policy design and implementation. Longer messages framed to emphasize social and structural causes of racial inequity hold significant potential to enhance support for policies to advance racial equity. There is an urgent need to develop, test, and disseminate communication interventions that center perspectives from historically marginalized people and promote policy advocacy, community mobilization, and collective action to advance racial equity.

CONTEXT

Long-standing racial inequities in health and well-being are shaped by racialized public policies that perpetuate disadvantage among Black, Brown, Indigenous, and people of color. Strategic messaging can accelerate public and policymaker support for public policies that advance population health. We lack a comprehensive understanding of lessons learned from work on policy messaging to advance racial equity and the gaps in knowledge it reveals.

METHODS

A scoping review of peer-reviewed studies from communication, psychology, political science, sociology, public health, and health policy that have tested how various message strategies influence support and mobilization for racial equity policy domains across a wide variety of social systems. We used keyword database searches, author bibliographic searches, and reviews of reference lists from relevant sources to compile 55 peer-reviewed papers with 80 studies that used experiments to test the effects of one or more message strategies in shaping support for racial equity-related policies, as well as the cognitive/emotional factors that predict their support.

FINDINGS

Most studies report on the short-term effects of very short message manipulations. Although many of these studies find evidence that reference to race or use of racial cues tend to undermine support for racial equity-related policies, the accumulated body of evidence has generally not explored the effects of richer, more nuanced stories of lived experience and/or detailed historical and contemporary accounts of the ways racism is embedded in public policy design and implementation. A few well-designed studies offer evidence that longer-form messages framed to emphasize social and structural causes of racial inequity can enhance support for policies to advance racial equity, though many questions require further research.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude by laying out a research agenda to fill numerous wide gaps in the evidentiary base related to building support for racial equity policy across sectors.

Associations between perceived racial discrimination, racial residential segregation, and cancer screening adherence among low-income African Americans: a multilevel, cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVES

African Americans suffer disproportionately from cancer compared to their White counterparts. Racism may be an important determinant, but the literature on its association with cancer screening is limited. We examine associations between racism and cancer screening among a sample of African Americans.

DESIGN

Guided by the Public Health Critical Race Praxis and the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, we conducted a multilevel, cross-sectional study using cancer risk assessment data collected from 405 callers to the 2-1-1 Texas helpline. We merged these data with contextual data from the U.S. Census Bureau. We assessed perceived racial discrimination using the Experiences of Discrimination Scale and racial residential segregation using the Location Quotient for Racial Residential Segregation. We used multilevel regression models to test hypothesized associations between each indicator of racism and four cancer screening adherence outcomes (Pap test, mammography, colorectal cancer screening [CRCS], and any cancer screening).

RESULTS

Participants were 18-83 years old (mean = 45 years). Most (81%) were non-adherent to at least one recommended screening. Approximately 42% reported experiencing discrimination and 73% lived in a segregated neighborhood. Discrimination was non-significantly related to lower odds of mammography (aOR = 0.68; 95%CI: 0.38-1.22), CRCS (aOR = 0.79; 95%CI: 0.41-1.52), and any cancer screening adherence (aOR = 0.88; 95%CI: 0.59-1.32). Segregation was related to greater odds of mammography (non-significant; aOR = 1.43; 95%CI: 0.76-2.68) and CRCS (significant; aOR = 2.80; 95%CI: 1.21-6.46) but not associated with any cancer screening. Neither indicator of racism was associated with Pap test screening adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Racism has a nuanced association with cancer screening among low-income, medically underserved African Americans. Specifically, discrimination appears to be associated with lower odds of screening, while segregation may be associated with higher odds of screening in certain situations. Future research is needed to better explicate relations between indicators of racism and cancer screening among African Americans.

Racial and ethnic disparities in mortality among breast cancer survivors after a second malignancy

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic differences in survival after a first cancer are well established but have not been examined after a second primary cancer (SPC) despite the increasing incidence among survivors.

METHODS

We examined 39 029 female breast cancer survivors who developed an SPC between 2000 and 2014 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for competing risks data was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality after SPCs comparing Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian, and Non-Hispanic Black survivors with Non-Hispanic White survivors. Models were adjusted for sociodemographics, tumor characteristics, and treatments of the first and second cancer. Analyses were stratified by SPC type.

RESULTS

During 17 years of follow-up, there were 15 117 deaths after SPCs. The risk of cancer death was 12% higher among Non-Hispanic Black survivors (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.19) and 8% higher among Hispanic survivors (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.16) compared with Non-Hispanic White survivors. In subgroup analyses, the strongest associations were observed among Non-Hispanic Black survivors with a second breast or uterine cancer and among Hispanic survivors with a second breast cancer. Non-Hispanic Black survivors also experienced a 44% higher risk of cardiovascular disease death after SPC diagnosis than Non-Hispanic White survivors (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher cancer mortality among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic survivors and higher cardiovascular mortality among Non-Hispanic Black survivors exist among women who survive a first breast cancer to develop an SPC. Studies focused on identifying the contributors to these disparities are needed to enable implementation of effective mitigation strategies.

Characteristics Contributing to Survival Differences Between Black and White Patients Following Cystectomy

PURPOSE

Examine patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics effect on the disparity between black and white patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who undergo radical cystectomy (RC).

METHODS

1,286 black patients in the 2004 to 2016 National Cancer Database fit inclusion criteria. A tapered match was performed from 17,374 white patients sequentially matched to the black cohort on demographics (age, gender, insurance, income, education, county, diagnosis year), presentation (demographic variables, stage, grade, tumor size, Charlson score), and treatment (demographic and presentation variables, lymph node count, hospital volume, neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NAC], treatment delay), creating 3 matched cohorts. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare cohorts. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare 5-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

5-year OS rate was 40.4% and 35.6% for unmatched white and black cohorts (P < 0.001), respectively. Following demographics and presentation match, 5-year OS rate for white patients decreased to 39.2% (P = 0.003) and 39.10% (P = 0.019), respectively. After treatment match, 5-year OS rate decreased to 36.7% for white patient (P = 0.32). Following presentation match, 7.2% of black patients vs. 5.8% of white patients had treatment delay, and 10.1% of black patients vs. 11.2% of white patients received NAC. The treatment match resulted in a 0.3% difference between groups for treatment delay and NAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis demonstrates that disparity between black and white patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer exists in demographic-, presentation-, and treatment-related variables. Treatment variables may be a large contributing factor to survival disparities. Further research is needed to identify social, biological, and organizational inputs that contribute to these disparities.

Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Health Care: Is the Current Food and Drug Administration Regulation Sufficient?

Given the growing use of machine learning (ML) technologies in health care, regulatory bodies face unique challenges in governing their clinical use. Under the regulatory framework of the Food and Drug Administration, approved ML algorithms are practically locked, preventing their adaptation in the ever-changing clinical environment, defeating the unique adaptive trait of ML technology in learning from real-world feedback. At the same time, regulations must enforce a strict level of patient safety to mitigate risk at a systemic level. Given that ML algorithms often support, or at times replace, the role of medical professionals, we have proposed a novel regulatory pathway analogous to the regulation of medical professionals, encompassing the life cycle of an algorithm from inception, development to clinical implementation, and continual clinical adaptation. We then discuss in-depth technical and nontechnical challenges to its implementation and offer potential solutions to unleash the full potential of ML technology in health care while ensuring quality, equity, and safety. References for this article were identified through searches of PubMed with the search terms "Artificial intelligence," "Machine learning," and "regulation" from June 25, 2017, until June 25, 2022. Articles were also identified through searches of the reference list of the articles. Only papers published in English were reviewed. The final reference list was generated based on originality and relevance to the broad scope of this paper.

The EMory BrEast imaging Dataset (EMBED): A Racially Diverse, Granular Dataset of 3.4 Million Screening and Diagnostic Mammographic Images

Supplemental material is available for this article. Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Machine Learning © RSNA, 2023.

Receipt of Targeted Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Professional society guidelines recommend treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with targeted therapies, including epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, depending on the presence or absence of certain mutations. Since most studies of first-line targeted therapies have been limited by sample size, there is a need for larger studies using data from routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with receipt of first-line targeted therapies among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer for whom RAS or BRAF mutation data in the tumor were available and investigate whether targeted therapy is associated with survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used deidentified data from an electronic health record-derived database to include patients from 800 sites of patient care across the US who were diagnosed with de novo metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2020 (n = 9134).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Receipt of first-line targeted therapy, categorized as ever having received EGFR inhibitors, VEGF inhibitors, or neither. The secondary outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

The study population included 9134 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (IQR, 53-71 years), 5019 (54.9%) were male, and 5692 (62.3%) were White. The median follow-up period was 15 months. Overall, 713 patients (7.8%) received EGFR inhibitors and 5081 patients (55.6%) received VEGF inhibitors as part of their first-line treatment. Among patients with RAS wild-type (RAS-WT) tumors, 625 patients (15.5%) received EGFR inhibitors and 2053 patients (50.9%) received VEGF inhibitors. In patients with RAS mutant (RAS-Mut) tumors, 50 patients (1.1%) received EGFR inhibitors and 2682 patients (59.7%) received VEGF inhibitors; among those with BRAF-mutant (BRAF-Mut) tumors, 38 patients (6.3%) received EGFR inhibitors and 346 patients (57.2%) received VEGF inhibitors. More than one-third of the patients (36.6%) received neither EGFR inhibitors nor VEGF inhibitors. Compared with patients younger than age 40 years, those aged 80 years or older had significantly lower odds to receive targeted therapies (EGFR or VEGF inhibitors in patients with RAS-WT tumors: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.79; and VEGF inhibitors in patients with RAS-Mut tumors: aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.90). Improved survival was associated with EGFR inhibitor therapy in patients with RAS-WT tumors (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98). Unlike in clinical trials, however, no survival benefit was noted with use of VEGF inhibitors among patients with RAS-WT (aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91-1.11) or RAS-Mut (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10) tumors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study showed mixed results on survival benefits associated with targeted therapy. In addition, given that some of the results differed from those of randomized clinical trials, this study highlights the importance of using data originating from routine clinical care.

Disparities in head and neck cancer incidence and trends by race/ethnicity and sex

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology of head and neck cancer (HNC) sites differ substantially. This study compares HNC incidence trends by site and demographic subgroups.

METHODS

We used the U.S. Cancer Statistics Public Use Database to calculate HNC incidence rates per 100 000. We assessed trends with annual percent change (APC) longitudinally from 2001 to 2017.

RESULTS

The oropharyngeal cancer incidence APC decreased from 4.38% (95% CI: 3.6, 5.1) to 2.93% (2.5, 3.3) in 2008 among White males. Oral cavity cancer incidence rose in Other race males (APC 2.5% [1.6, 3.36]) and White females (APC: 0.96% [0.7, 1.2]). Although decreasing (APC: -1.15% [-1.48, -0.83]), laryngeal cancer incidence remained disproportionately high among Black males.

CONCLUSIONS

Notable incidence trends occurred in non-White groups at non-oropharyngeal sites. With parity of smoking rates by race, differing sexual behaviors, and shifting demographics by race and sex, future studies of HNC trends should consider stratifying analyses to understand health disparities.

Racial Disparities in Clinical Outcomes on Investigator-Initiated Breast Cancer Clinical Trials at an Urban Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Black women are 40% more likely to die of breast cancer compared to White women. Inadequate representation of Black patients in clinical trials may contribute to health care inequity. We aimed to assess breast cancer clinical outcomes in Non-Hispanic Black (Black) versus Non-Hispanic White (White) women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) enrolled on investigator-initiated clinical trials at Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, given the significant number of patients from underrepresented minority groups seen at Winship.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Black and White women with MBC on investigator-initiated trials at Emory between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression models were used to assess clinical response and treatment toxicities. Differences in overall survival between groups was assessed using quantile analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-two women with MBC were included (66% White vs. 34% Black). Black patients had less clinical benefit from the trial therapy as only 57% had partial response or stable disease as best response compared to 78% of White women (P = .09). Quantile analysis showed significant difference in mean survival between Whites and Blacks by the end of follow up (64 vs. 38 months). There were no significant differences in toxicities between groups.

CONCLUSION

Participation rates of Black women with MBC on investigator-initiated clinical trials at an urban cancer center were higher compared to key national trials. Black women had worse treatment response and survival. These results reinforce the need for assessment of tumor differences by ancestry and continued improvement in minority representation on clinical trials.

Exploring the intersectionality of race/ethnicity with rurality on breast cancer outcomes: SEER analysis, 2000-2016

PURPOSE

Disparities in breast cancer survival have been observed within marginalized racial/ethnic groups and within the rural-urban continuum for decades. We examined whether there were differences among the intersectionality of race/ethnicity and rural residence on breast cancer outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis among 739,448 breast cancer patients using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 18 registries years 2000 through 2016. We conducted multilevel logistic-regression and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and hazard ratios (AHRs), respectively, for breast cancer outcomes including surgical treatment, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, late-stage disease, and risk of breast cancer death. Rural was defined as 2013 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) of 4 or greater.

RESULTS

Compared with non-Hispanic white-urban (NH-white-U) women, NH-black-U, NH-black-rural (R), Hispanic-U, and Hispanic-R women, respectively, were at increased odds of no receipt of surgical treatment (NH-black-U, AOR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.91-2.05; NH-black-R, AOR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.52-1.94; Hispanic-U, AOR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.52-1.65; and Hispanic-R, AOR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.18-1.67), late-stage diagnosis (NH-black-U, AOR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.29-1.34; NH-black-R, AOR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.36; Hispanic-U, AOR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.23-1.27; and Hispanic-R, AOR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.27), and increased risks for breast cancer death (NH-black-U, AHR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.43-1.50; NH-black-R, AHR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.32-1.53; and Hispanic-U, AHR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.13).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of rurality, NH-black and Hispanic women had significantly increased odds of late-stage diagnosis, no receipt of treatment, and risk of breast cancer death.

Molecular Heterogeneity of Cervical Cancer Among Different Ethnic/Racial Populations

The study aimed to find differential gene mutation profile and gene expression status among different ethnic/racial human populations relevant for cervical cancer pathogenesis. The study was based on freely available datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) of cervical cancer samples in Genomic Data Commons (GDC) data portal. We identified that choline metabolism in cancer and Ras signaling pathways were significantly associated with the Hispanic and Latino group of cervical cancer patients. In these pathways, mutations in the PIK3CA gene, especially E545K, were significantly associated with the Hispanic and LATINO group. We found that AFF3 gene mutation was associated with downregulation of its expression only among the White racial category of cervical cancer cases. Additionally, hypomethylation of the CpG position in the S shore region of the PM20D1 gene was associated with overexpression among the Asian category of cervical cancer cases. Heterogeneity of the molecular profile of AFF3 and PM20D1 gene among racial groups reflects the potential of differential targeted therapy of cervical cancer.

Disparities in cancer genetics care by race/ethnicity among pan-cancer patients with pathogenic germline variants

BACKGROUND

Germline risk assessment is increasing as part of cancer care; however, disparities in subsequent genetic counseling are unknown.

METHODS

Pan-cancer patients were prospectively consented to tumor-normal sequencing via custom next generation sequencing panel (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets) inclusive of germline analysis of ≥76 genes from January 2015 through December 2019 (97.5% research nonbillable) with protocol for genetics referral. Rates of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PVs) and downstream counseling were compared across ancestry groups (mutually exclusive groups based on self-reported race/ethnicity and Ashkenazi Jewish [AJ] heritage) using nonparametric tests and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 15,775 patients (59.6%, non-Hispanic [NH]-White; 15.7%, AJ; 20.5%, non-White [6.9%, Asian; 6.8%, Black/African American (AA); 6.7%, Hispanic; 0.1%, Other], and 4.2%, unknown), 2663 (17%) had a PV. Non-White patients had a lower PV rate (n = 433, 13.4%) compared to NH-Whites (n = 1451, 15.4%) and AJ patients (n = 683, 27.6%), p < .01, with differences in mostly moderate and low/recessive/uncertain penetrance variants. Among 2239 patients with new PV, 1652 (73.8%) completed recommended genetic counseling. Non-White patients had lower rates of genetic counseling (67.7%) than NH-White (73.7%) and AJ patients (78.8%), p < .01, with lower rates occurring in Black/AA (63%) compared to NH-White patients, even after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.97; p = .036). Non-White, particularly Black/AA and Asian, probands had a trend toward lower rates and numbers of at-risk family members being seen for counseling/genetic testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite minimizing barriers to genetic testing, non-White patients were less likely to receive recommended cancer genetics follow-up, with potential implications for oncologic care, cancer risk reduction, and at-risk family members.

LAY SUMMARY

Genetic testing is becoming an important part of cancer care, and we wanted to see if genetics care was different between individuals of different backgrounds. We studied 15,775 diverse patients with cancer who had genetic testing using a test called MSK-IMPACT that was covered by research funding. Clinically important genetic findings were high in all groups. However, Black patients were less likely to get recommended counseling compared to White patients. Even after removing many roadblocks, non-White and especially Black patients were less likely to get recommended genetics care, which may affect their cancer treatments and families.

PEARL: A Guide for Developing Community-Engaging and Culturally-Sensitive Education Materials

Community outreach and engagement has been a regular activity of the National Cancer Institute at its designated Cancer Centers. However, in 2016, community outreach and engagement became a required activity for all cancer centers. Yet there is a gap in the literature that provides guidelines for developing materials that resonate with communities. We developed the PEARL rubric to fulfill that gap from our work developing culturally sensitive breast cancer education materials for African American and Immigrant African women. We conducted a targeted literature review to understand the approaches that have been used for developing education materials for communities. We reviewed the literature and distilled key elements into our PEARL guide for creating culturally appropriate education materials. PEARL consists of five elements: Plain language and understandability, Explicit data, statistics, and graphs, Affirmative framing, Representative content, and Local connection. PEARL is a modern comprehensive guide that researchers can use for creating culturally sensitive materials. It is designed to guide researchers develop educational materials who have little to no experience in community engagement.

Disparities in awareness of and willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials between African American and White cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Cancer clinical trials (CCTs) are essential for cancer care, yet the evidence is scarce when it comes to racial disparities in CCT participation among cancer survivors in the Midwest. This study aimed to 1) assess disparities in the awareness of and willingness to participate in CCTs between African American and White cancer survivors; and 2) compare perceptions about CCTs between the two racial groups.

METHODS

The study was based on cross-sectional data from the survey "Minority Patient Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials" that collected information from 147 Black and White cancer survivors from Nebraska between 2015 and 2016. Chi-square tests and logistic regressions were used to assess differences between Black and White cancer survivors regarding their awareness, willingness, and perceptions associated with CCT participation.

RESULTS

After adjusting for the effects of socio-demographic, health status, and psychosocial variables, Black cancer survivors were much less likely than White cancer survivors to be aware of CCTs (AOR 0.26; CI 0.08-0.81), to express willingness to participate in CCTs (AOR 0.03; CI 0.01, 0.32) and to actually participate in CCTs (AOR 0.13; CI 0.04-0.38). Black cancer survivors reported a lower level of trust in physicians and were less likely than White cancer survivors to believe that CCTs make a significant contribution to science.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to White cancer survivors, Black cancer survivors had much lower awareness of and willingness to participate in CCTs. Part of these differences might be related to the differential perception of CCTs, psychosocial factors, and trust in physicians between the two groups.

Drivers of racial, regional, and socioeconomic disparities in late-stage breast cancer mortality

BACKGROUND

The authors identified tumor, treatment, and patient characteristics that may contribute to differences in breast cancer (BC) mortality by race, rurality, and area-level socioeconomic status (SES) among women diagnosed with stage IIIB-IV BC in Georgia.

METHODS

Using the Georgia Cancer Registry, 3084 patients with stage IIIB-IV primary BC (2013-2017) were identified. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing mortality among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) versus non-Hispanic White (NHW), residents of rural versus urban neighborhoods, and residents of low- versus high-SES neighborhoods by tumor, treatment, and patient characteristics. The mediating effects of specific characteristics on the association between race and BC mortality were estimated.

RESULTS

Among the study population, 41% were NHB, 21% resided in rural counties, and 72% resided in low SES neighborhoods. The authors observed mortality disparities by race (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13, 1.41) and rurality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.30), but not by SES (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.91, 1.19). In the stratified analyses, racial disparities were the most pronounced among women with HER2 overexpressing tumors (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.53, 3.45). Residing in a rural county was associated with increased mortality among uninsured women (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.31, 3.86), and the most pronounced SES disparities were among younger women (<40 years: HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.88, 2.42).

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variation in racial, regional, and socioeconomic disparities in late-stage BC mortality by tumor, treatment, and patient characteristics.

In search of lost time: Delays in adjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma among under-resourced patient populations

BACKGROUND

The initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma within 12 weeks after surgery is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. This study seeks to identify factors associated with delayed adjuvant chemotherapy and whether delays impact survival in under-resourced populations.

METHODS

Patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received a definitive resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy between 2006 and 2017 were queried from the National Cancer Database. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to determine the relationship between socioeconomic/clinical variables and delayed adjuvant chemotherapy. Kaplan Meier curves compared survival between under-resourced patients receiving delayed versus timely adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among 25,008 patients, timely adjuvant chemotherapy varied by stage (stage 1: 67.9% vs stage 2: 75.8% vs stage 3: 89.2%; P < .001). Older age (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.03; P < .001), Non-Hispanic Black race (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.41; P < .001), increasing comorbidity score (odds ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.23; P < .001), 30-day readmission (odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.63; P < .001), and undergoing a Whipple (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.44; P < .001) were associated with delayed adjuvant chemotherapy. Conversely, the highest neighborhood median income quartile (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.97; P = .021), private insurance (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.76; P < .001), Medicare (odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.88; P = .003), and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (odds ratio 0.05, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.06; P < .001) were associated with timely adjuvant chemotherapy. Non-Hispanic Black patients and patients with the lowest neighborhood education had worse overall survival when receiving delayed versus timely adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Timely adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was only achieved in 73.3% of patients. Age, race, comorbidities, median income, and insurance were identified as barriers. Delayed adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with worse survival among under-resourced populations.

Association of Medicaid Expansion with Racial Disparities in Cancer Stage at Presentation

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the independent association of Medicaid expansion on stage of presentation among patients of Black and White race with colorectal (CRC), breast, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A cohort study of patients with CRC, breast cancer, or NSCLC (2009-2017) in the National Cancer Database was performed. Difference-in-differences (DID) analysis was used to compare changes in tumor stage at diagnosis between Medicaid expansion (MES) and non-expansion states (non-MES) before and after expansion. Predictive margins were calculated by race, year, and insurance status to account for effect heterogeneity. Stage migration was determined by measuring the combined proportional increase in stage I and decrease in stage IV disease at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Black patients gained less Medicaid coverage than White patients (6.0% vs 13.1%, p < 0.001) after expansion. Among Black and White patients, there was a shift towards increased early-stage diagnosis (DID 3.5% and 3.5%, respectively; p < 0.001) and decreased late-stage diagnosis (DID White: -3.5%; Black -2.5%; p < 0.001) in MES compared to non-MES following expansion. Overall stage migration was greater for White compared to Black patients with CRC (10.3% vs. 5.1%) and NSCLC (8.1% vs. 6.7%) after expansion. Stage migration effects in patients with breast cancer were similar by race (White 4.8% vs. Black 4.5%).

CONCLUSION

An increased proportion of Black and White patients residing in Medicaid expansion states presented with earlier stage cancer following Medicaid expansion. However, because the proportion of Black patients is higher in non-expansion states, national racial disparities in cancer stage at presentation appear worse following Medicaid expansion.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Mortality Related to Access to Care for Major Cancers in the United States

Importance: The reasons underlying racial/ethnic mortality disparities for cancer patients remain poorly understood, especially regarding the role of access to care. Participants: Over five million patients with a primary diagnosis of lung, breast, prostate, colon/rectum, pancreas, ovary, or liver cancer during 2004-2014, were identified from the National Cancer Database. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for total mortality associated with race/ethnicity, and access to care related factors (i.e., socioeconomic status [SES], insurance, treating facility, and residential type) for each cancer. Results: Racial/ethnic disparities in total mortality were observed across seven cancers. Compared with non-Hispanic (NH)-white patients, NH-black patients with breast (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.29), ovarian (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.23), prostate (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.33), colorectal (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.12) or pancreatic (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.05) cancers had significantly elevated mortality, while Asians (13-31%) and Hispanics (13-19%) had lower mortality for all cancers. Racial/ethnic disparities were observed across all strata of access to care related factors and modified by those factors. NH-black and NH-white disparities were most evident among patients with high SES or those with private insurance, while Hispanic/Asian versus NH-white disparities were more evident among patients with low SES or those with no/poor insurance. Conclusions and Relevance: Racial/ethnic mortality disparities for major cancers exist across all patient groups with different access to care levels. The influence of SES or insurance on mortality disparity follows different patterns for racial/ethnic minorities versus NH-whites. Impact: Our study highlights the need for racial/ethnic-specific strategies to reduce the mortality disparities for major cancers.

Sociodemographic and Facility-Related Disparities in the Delivery of Guideline-Concordant Therapy Among Patients With Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE:

Evidence on health disparities among patients treated with multimodality therapy protocols is still limited. We aimed to evaluate the associations between patient-level and system-level factors and the receipt of guideline-concordant therapy among patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA).

METHODS:

This is a national cohort study of patients with stage I-III EA in the National Cancer Database (2006-2018) treated with either upfront resection or neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Clinical and pathologic staging data were used for defining guideline-concordant therapy. Logistic regression models were built to identify independent associations between deviations from treatment guidelines and clinical, sociodemographic, and hospital-related factors.

RESULTS:

Among 18,803 patients with EA treated at 1,049 hospitals, 4,511 had an endoscopic resection, 4,866 had upfront resection, and 9,426 had neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. A total of 16,002 patients (85.1%) received guideline-concordant therapy. Patients who were age 70 years or older (odds ratio [OR] 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.60), had a Charlson-Deyo modified score of ≥ 1, and were treated at hospitals with a safety-net burden of ≥ 10% (OR 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.25) had higher risk of deviations from guidelines, whereas treatment at high-volume facilities (OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95) and diagnosis after 2011 decreased this risk. Relative to cT0-1N0 patients, those with cT2N0 disease had the highest risk of deviations from guideline-concordant therapy (OR 3.76; 95% CI, 3.30 to 4.29). Among patients treated at high-volume facilities, safety-net burden over 10% increased the risk of deviations (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.57).

CONCLUSION:

The delivery of guideline-concordant therapy among patients with EA varies significantly across clinical stage groups and is associated with several sociodemographic disparities. This knowledge should be a resource for future quality improvement strategies intended to address inequitable care within vulnerable populations.

Racial Disparities in Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Does Aggressive Surgical Treatment Overcome Cancer Health Inequities?

Background

Advanced cancer states perpetuate health-related disparities. Peritoneal-based cancers are clinically advanced cancers that present a significant clinical dilemma. Peritoneal cancers are managed aggressively with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). While racial and ethnic disparities are prevalent in cancer, there are no studies investigating if racial disparities exist in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis managed with CRS and HIPEC. We hypothesized that this advanced disease state further delineates racial disparities.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis receiving CRS and HIPEC at a single institution from January 1, 2017-October 4, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to compare racial groups. The Cox Proportional Hazards Model and Log Rank Test were used for multivariate and overall survival analysis.

Results

In total, 67 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC, of which 41 (61.2%) were White, 20 (29.8%) were Black, 3 (4.5%) were Asian, and 3 (4.5%) were Other race. When compared to White patients, Black patients had lower income (p=0.0011), higher incidence of hypertension (p=0.0231), and lower performance status (p=0.0441). Cancer type, including colorectal, appendiceal, ovarian, etc., was similar between groups (p=0.8703). Despite these differences in sociodemographic and morbidity factors, when comparing Black patients to White patients, there were no differences in peritoneal cancer index score (13.2 vs. 12.3, p=0.6932), estimated blood loss (748 vs. 655 mL, p=0.6332), minor/major complication rates (1.1 vs. 1.2, p=0.7281; 0.4 vs. 0.7, p=0.3470, respectively), 30-day readmission rates (25.0% vs. 17.1%, p=0.6210), disease recurrence (40.0% vs. 51.2%, p=0.3667), or 30-day mortality (0.0% vs. 2.4%, p=1.0000). Overall survival was similar for Black and White patients (p=0.2693). The occurrence of a major complication was the only factor associated with overall survival (HR 2.188 [1.502, 3.188], p< 0.0001).

Conclusions

Despite differences in patient socioeconomic factors and comorbid conditions, outcomes were similar between Black and White patients receiving CRS and HIPEC at our institution. While larger studies with more diverse patient populations are needed to confirm these findings, our data provide evidence that aggressive surgical management across diverse patient populations allows for equitable outcomes.

Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Care for Black Patients: Barriers and Solutions

Racial disparities in colorectal cancer for Black patients have led to a significant mortality difference when compared to White patients, a gap which has remained to this day. These differences have been linked to poorer quality insurance and socioeconomic status in addition to lower access to high-quality health care resources, which are emblematic of systemic racial inequities. Disparities impact nearly every point along the colorectal cancer care continuum and include barriers to screening, surgical care, oncologic care, and surveillance. These critical faults are the driving forces behind the mortality difference Black patients face. Health care systems should strive to correct these disparities through both cultural competency at the provider level and public policy change at the national level.

And It'll Come Back Real Baby Fine: Black Women's Experiences With Hair Loss and Regrowth After Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Treatment

In this study, I use a modified grounded theory, intersectional approach to understand the wellness-illness experience for black women experiencing breast cancer. I use interviews from 38 breast cancer survivors from Nashville, Durham-Chapel Hill, and Atlanta conducted between 2014 and 2015 to explore variations in perceptions of hair loss and regrowth. Universally, hair loss from chemotherapy treatments is a stressful experience, which cause women to question their health and femininity. Hair loss is a crisis in which women feel less beautiful and more sick. Interesting patterns steeped in race and beauty emerged from women's narratives as they experienced hair regrowth. Black women's stories of hair loss associated with chemotherapy are influenced by values associated racialized ideologies about beauty. Good, baby fine, soft and thick, loosely curled, straight, wavy, and beautiful are just some of the words many women chose to describe their chemically altered hair. The dialogue around hair regrowth and texture is problematic given Eurocentric standards of feminine beauty, notions that coincide the long ties between chemicals and hair straightening in the black community.