1
|
Grützmann K, Kraft T, Meinhardt M, Meier F, Westphal D, Seifert M. Network-based analysis of heterogeneous patient-matched brain and extracranial melanoma metastasis pairs reveals three homogeneous subgroups. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2024; 23:1036-1050. [PMID: 38464935 PMCID: PMC10920107 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, can metastasize to different organs. Molecular differences between brain and extracranial melanoma metastases are poorly understood. Here, promoter methylation and gene expression of 11 heterogeneous patient-matched pairs of brain and extracranial metastases were analyzed using melanoma-specific gene regulatory networks learned from public transcriptome and methylome data followed by network-based impact propagation of patient-specific alterations. This innovative data analysis strategy allowed to predict potential impacts of patient-specific driver candidate genes on other genes and pathways. The patient-matched metastasis pairs clustered into three robust subgroups with specific downstream targets with known roles in cancer, including melanoma (SG1: RBM38, BCL11B, SG2: GATA3, FES, SG3: SLAMF6, PYCARD). Patient subgroups and ranking of target gene candidates were confirmed in a validation cohort. Summarizing, computational network-based impact analyses of heterogeneous metastasis pairs predicted individual regulatory differences in melanoma brain metastases, cumulating into three consistent subgroups with specific downstream target genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konrad Grützmann
- Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Theresa Kraft
- Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Matthias Meinhardt
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), D-01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Dana Westphal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), D-01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Seifert
- Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), D-01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Niedermeyer S, Schmutzer-Sondergeld M, Weller J, Katzendobler S, Kirchleitner S, Forbrig R, Harter PN, Baumgarten LV, Schichor C, Stoecklein V, Thon N. Neurosurgical resection of multiple brain metastases: outcomes, complications, and survival rates in a retrospective analysis. J Neurooncol 2024:10.1007/s11060-024-04744-w. [PMID: 38904924 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04744-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigates the outcomes of microsurgical resection of multiple brain metastasis (BMs). METHODS This retrospective, monocentric analysis included clinical data from all consecutive BM patients, who underwent simultaneous resection of ≥ 2 BMs between January 2018 and May 2023. Postoperative neurological and functional outcomes, along with perioperative complications, as well as survival data were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 47 patients, with a median age of 61 years (IQR 48-69), underwent 73 craniotomies (median 2; range 1-3) for resection of 104 BMs. Among patients, 80.8% presented with symptomatic BMs, causing focal neurological deficits in 53% of cases. Gross total resection was achieved in 87.2% of BMs. Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores improved in 42.6% of patients, remained unchanged in 46.8%, and worsened in 10.6% after surgery. Perioperative complications were observed in 29.8% of cases, with transient complications occurring in 19.2% and permanent deficits in 10.6%. The 30-days mortality rate was 2.1%. Logistic regression identified eloquent localization (p = 0.036) and infratentorial craniotomy (p = 0.018) as significant predictors of postoperative complications. Concerning overall prognosis, patients with permanent neurological deficits post-surgery (HR 11.34, p = 0.007) or progressive extracranial disease (HR: 4.649; p = 0.006) exhibited inferior survival. CONCLUSION Microsurgical resection of multiple BMs leads to clinical stabilization or functional improvement in most patients. Although transient complications do not affect overall survival, the presence of persistent neurological deficits (> 3 months post-surgery) and progressive extracranial disease negatively impact overall survival. This highlights the importance of careful patient selection for resection of multiple BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Niedermeyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - M Schmutzer-Sondergeld
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - J Weller
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - S Katzendobler
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - S Kirchleitner
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - R Forbrig
- Department of Neuroradiology, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - P N Harter
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian- University Munich, Feodor-Lynen Strasse 23, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L V Baumgarten
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - C Schichor
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - V Stoecklein
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - N Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amouzegar A, Tawbi HA. Local and Systemic Management Options for Melanoma Brain Metastases. Cancer J 2024; 30:102-107. [PMID: 38527263 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Development of brain metastasis is one of the most serious complications of advanced melanoma, carrying a significant burden of morbidity and mortality. Although advances in local treatment modalities such as stereotactic radiosurgery and breakthrough systemic therapies including immunotherapy and targeted therapies have improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma, management of patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) remains challenging. Notably, patients with MBMs have historically been excluded from clinical trials, limiting insights into their specific treatment responses. Encouragingly, a growing body of evidence shows the potential of systemic therapies to yield durable intracranial responses in these patients, highlighting the need for inclusion of patients with MBMs in future clinical trials. This is pivotal for expediting the advancement of novel therapies tailored to this distinct patient population. In this review, we will highlight the evolving landscape of MBM management, focusing on local and systemic treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afsaneh Amouzegar
- From the Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Samlowski W. The Effect of Non-Overlapping Somatic Mutations in BRAF, NRAS, NF1, or CKIT on the Incidence and Outcome of Brain Metastases during Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy of Metastatic Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:594. [PMID: 38339344 PMCID: PMC10854687 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Previous studies suggested that somatic BRAF and NRAS mutations in metastatic melanoma increase the risk for brain metastases. The risk related to other non-overlapping "driver" mutations is unknown. We performed a retrospective evaluation of the incidence, timing, and outcome of brain metastases in a population of melanoma patients that underwent uniform next-gen sequencing. All patients were treated with initial checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Seventeen of 88 patients (20.0%) developed brain metastases. Eleven patients had brain metastases at diagnosis (12.9%). These were all patients with BRAF V600 or NF1 mutations. Only six patients with NRAS, NF1, KIT, or BRAF mutations (including fusions/internal rearrangements experienced delayed CNS progression following immunotherapy (7.1%)). No "quadruple negative" patient developed brain metastases. Patients with brain metastases at diagnosis had a better outcome than those with delayed intracranial progression. Current predictive markers, (LDH, tumor mutation burden, and PDL1) were poorly correlated with the development of brain metastases. Treatment with immunotherapy appears to reduce the incidence of brain metastases. Next-gen molecular sequencing of tumors in metastatic melanoma patients was useful in identifying genetic subpopulations with an increased or reduced risk of brain metastases. This may allow eventual personalization of screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfram Samlowski
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89148, USA; ; Tel.: +1-702-321-3930
- Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Nevada (Reno), Reno, NV 89557, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Almohaimeed HM, Almars AI, Al Abdulmonem W, Alghsham RS, Aljohani ASM, Alharbi YM, Badahdah FA, Alkhudhairy BSM, Soliman MH. Molecular dynamics exploration of Lupenone: therapeutic implications for glioblastoma multiforme and alzheimer's amyloid beta pathogenesis. Metab Brain Dis 2024; 39:77-88. [PMID: 38129732 DOI: 10.1007/s11011-023-01319-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Neuro-oncological and neurodegenerative disorders, represented paradigmatically by glioblastoma and Alzheimer's disease, respectively, persist as formidable challenges in the biomedical realm. The interconnected molecular underpinnings of these conditions necessitate rigorous and novel therapeutic examinations. This comprehensive research was anchored on the premise of unveiling the therapeutic potential and specificity of Lupenone, a potent phytoconstituent, in targeting the molecular pathways underpinning both glioblastoma and Alzheimer's amyloid beta pathology. This was gauged through its interactions with key protein structures, 5H08 and 2ZHV. An integrative approach was adopted, marrying advanced proteomics and modern computer-aided drug design techniques. Molecular docking of Lupenone with 5H08 and 2ZHV was meticulously executed, with subsequent molecular dynamics simulations providing insights into the stability, viability, and intricacies of these interactions. Lupenone demonstrated profound binding affinities, evidenced by robust docking scores of -9.54 kcal/mol for 5H08 and -10.59 kcal/mol for 2ZHV. These interactions underscored Lupenone's eminent therapeutic potential in mitigating glioblastoma and modulating the amyloid beta pathology inherent to Alzheimer's. The introduction of Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) further magnified the therapeutic prospects, accentuating Lupenone's efficacy. The findings of this study not only underscore the therapeutic acumen of Lupenone in addressing the challenges posed by glioblastoma and Alzheimer's but also lay a strong foundation for its consideration as a leading candidate in future neuro-oncological and neurodegenerative research endeavors. Given the compelling in-silico data, a clarion call is made for its empirical validation in holistic in-vivo settings, potentially pioneering a new therapeutic epoch in both glioblastoma and Alzheimer's interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailah M Almohaimeed
- Department of Basic Science, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amany I Almars
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Science, King Abdulaziz University, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waleed Al Abdulmonem
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ruqaih S Alghsham
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah S M Aljohani
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yousef Mesfer Alharbi
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fatima Ahmed Badahdah
- Surgical Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, PSMMC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Mona H Soliman
- Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt.
- Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Al-Sharm, Yanbu El-Bahr, Yanbu, 46429, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang P, Kuil LE, Buil LCM, Freriks S, Beijnen JH, van Tellingen O, de Gooijer MC. Acquired and intrinsic resistance to vemurafenib in BRAF V600E -driven melanoma brain metastases. FEBS Open Bio 2024; 14:96-111. [PMID: 37953496 PMCID: PMC10761933 DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.13730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BRAFV600 -mutated melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) are responsive to BRAF inhibitors, but responses are generally less durable than those of extracranial metastases. We tested the hypothesis that the drug efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp; ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; ABCG2) expressed at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) offer MBMs protection from therapy. We intracranially implanted A375 melanoma cells in wild-type (WT) and Abcb1a/b;Abcg2-/- mice, characterized the tumor BBB, analyzed drug levels in plasma and brain lesions after oral vemurafenib administration, and determined the efficacy against brain metastases and subcutaneous lesions. Although contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated that the integrity of the BBB is disrupted in A375 MBMs, vemurafenib achieved greater antitumor efficacy against MBMs in Abcb1a/b;Abcg2-/- mice compared with WT mice. Concordantly, P-gp and BCRP are expressed in MBM-associated brain endothelium both in patients and in A375 xenografts and expression of these transporters limited vemurafenib penetration into A375 MBMs. Although initially responsive, A375 MBMs rapidly developed therapy resistance, even in Abcb1a/b;Abcg2-/- mice, and this was unrelated to pharmacokinetic or target inhibition issues. Taken together, we demonstrate that both intrinsic and acquired resistance can play a role in MBMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Zhang
- Division of PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine and Institute of Brain and Brain‐Inspired ScienceShandong UniversityChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Qilu HospitalShandong UniversityChina
| | - Laura Esmee Kuil
- Division of PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Sciences and EpidemiologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Levi Conrad Maria Buil
- Division of PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Mouse Cancer ClinicThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Stephan Freriks
- Division of PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Mouse Cancer ClinicThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jos Hendrik Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer Institute/MC Slotervaart HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of ScienceUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands
| | - Olaf van Tellingen
- Division of PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Mouse Cancer ClinicThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Mark Cornelis de Gooijer
- Division of PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK
- The Christie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kawahara D, Jensen A, Yuan J, Nagata Y, Watanabe Y. Predicting the BRAF mutation with pretreatment MRI radiomics features for melanoma brain metastases receiving Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Clin Radiol 2023; 78:e934-e940. [PMID: 37690975 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
AIM To develop a model using radiomics features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) to predict the BRAF mutation in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of 220 tumours were classified into two groups. One was a group whose BRAF mutation was identified, and the other group whose BRAF mutation was not identified. We extracted 1,962 radiomics features from gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI treatment-planning images. Synthetic Minority Over-sampling TEchnique (SMOTE) was performed to address the unbalanced data-related issues. A single-layer neural network (NN) was used to build predictive models with radiomics features. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated to assess the model performance. RESULTS The prediction performance for the final evaluation without the SMOTE had an accuracy of 77.14%, a specificity of 82.44%, a sensitivity of 81.85%, and an AUC of 0.79. The application of SMOTE improved the prediction model to an accuracy of 83.1%, a specificity of 87.07%, a sensitivity of 78.82%, and an AUC of 0.82. CONCLUSION The current study showed the feasibility of generating a highly accurate NN model for the BRAF mutation prediction. The prediction performance improved with SMOTE. The model assists physicians to obtain more accurate expectations of the treatment outcome without a genetic test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Kawahara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | | | - J Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Y Nagata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Y Watanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Not OJ, Wind TT, Ismail RK, Bhattacharya A, Jalving M, Blank CU, Aarts MJB, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Boers-Sonderen MJ, van den Eertwegh AJM, de Groot JWB, Haanen JB, Kapiteijn E, Bloem M, Piersma D, van Rijn RS, Stevense-den Boer M, van der Veldt AAM, Vreugdenhil G, Wouters MWJM, Blokx WAM, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Fehrmann RSN, Hospers GAP. A Survival Tree of Advanced Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112922. [PMID: 37296885 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced melanoma that develop brain metastases (BM) remains unpredictable. In this study, we aimed to identify prognostic factors in patients with melanoma BM who are treated with ICIs. Data from advanced melanoma patients with BM treated with ICIs in any line between 2013 and 2020 were obtained from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Patients were included from the time of the treatment of BM with ICIs. Survival tree analysis was performed with clinicopathological parameters as potential classifiers and overall survival (OS) as the response variable. In total, 1278 patients were included. Most patients were treated with ipilimumab-nivolumab combination therapy (45%). The survival tree analysis resulted in 31 subgroups. The median OS ranged from 2.7 months to 35.7 months. The strongest clinical parameter associated with survival in advanced melanoma patients with BM was the serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. Patients with elevated LDH levels and symptomatic BM had the worst prognosis. The clinicopathological classifiers identified in this study can contribute to optimizing clinical studies and can aid doctors in giving an indication of the patients' survival based on their baseline and disease characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier J van Not
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs T Wind
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rawa K Ismail
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arkajyoti Bhattacharya
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mathilde Jalving
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marye J Boers-Sonderen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfonsus J M van den Eertwegh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem B de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncology Center, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - John B Haanen
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Manja Bloem
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Einthovenweg 20, 2333 ZC Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Djura Piersma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, 7512 KZ Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn S van Rijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Marion Stevense-den Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Vreugdenhil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, 5504 DB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Einthovenweg 20, 2333 ZC Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willeke A M Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf S N Fehrmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hasanov M, Milton DR, Bea Davies A, Sirmans E, Saberian C, Posada EL, Opusunju S, Gershenwald JE, Torres-Cabala CA, Burton EM, Colen R, Huse JT, Glitza Oliva IC, Chung C, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Yeboa DN, Kim BYS, Prabhu SS, McCutcheon IE, Weinberg J, Lang FF, Tawbi HA, Li J, Haydu LE, Davies MA, Ferguson SD. Changes In Outcomes And Factors Associated With Survival In Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases. Neuro Oncol 2022:6889653. [PMID: 36510640 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUD Treatment options for patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) have changed significantly in the last decade. Few studies have evaluated changes in outcomes and factors associated with survival in MBM patients over time. The aim of this study is to evaluate changes in clinical features and overall survival (OS) for MBM patients. METHODS Patients diagnosed with MBMs from 1/1/2009-12/31/2013 (Prior Era; PE) and 1/1/2014-12/31/2018 (Current Era; CE) at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were included in this retrospective analysis. The primary outcome measure was OS. Log-rank test assessed differences between groups; multivariable analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazards models and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). RESULTS 791 MBM patients (PE, n=332; CE, n=459) were included in analysis. Median OS from MBM diagnosis was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.9 - 12.4) and improved in the CE versus PE (14.4 vs. 10.3 months, P < .001). Elevated serum LDH was the only factor associated with worse OS in both PE and CE patients. Factors associated with survival in CE MBM patients included patient age, primary tumor Breslow thickness, prior immunotherapy, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), symptomatic MBMs, and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Several factors associated with OS in the PE were not significant in the CE. RPA demonstrated that elevated serum LDH and prior immunotherapy treatment are the most important determinants of survival in CE MBM patients. CONCLUSIONS OS and factors associated with OS have changed for MBM patients. This information can inform contemporary patient management and clinical investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merve Hasanov
- Department of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alicia Bea Davies
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth Sirmans
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chantal Saberian
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eliza L Posada
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sylvia Opusunju
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rivka Colen
- Center for Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Medical Imaging, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, PA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Betty Y S Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sujit S Prabhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tan XL, Le A, Scherrer E, Tang H, Kiehl N, Han J, Jiang R, Diede SJ, Shui IM. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for melanoma brain metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1025664. [PMID: 36568199 PMCID: PMC9773194 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1025664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background More than 60% of all stage IV melanoma patients develop brain metastases, while melanoma brain metastases (MBM) is historically difficult to treat with poor prognosis. Objectives To summarize clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in MBM patients. Methods A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, and a literature search for relevant studies was performed on November 1, 2020. Weighted average of median overall survival (OS) was calculated by treatments. The random-effects model in conducting meta-analyses was applied. Results A total of 41 observational studies and 12 clinical trials with our clinical outcomes of interest, and 31 observational studies addressing prognostic factors were selected. The most common treatments for MBM were immunotherapy (IO), MAP kinase inhibitor (MAPKi), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), SRS+MAPKi, and SRS+IO, with median OS from treatment start of 7.2, 8.6, 7.3, 7.3, and 14.1 months, respectively. Improved OS was observed for IO and SRS with the addition of IO and/or MAPKi, compared to no IO and SRS alone, respectively. Several prognostic factors were found to be significantly associated with OS in MBM. Conclusion This study summarizes pertinent information regarding clinical outcomes and the association between patient characteristics and MBM prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang-Lin Tan
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States,*Correspondence: Xiang-Lin Tan,
| | - Amy Le
- Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Emilie Scherrer
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States,Seagen Inc., Bothell, WA, United States
| | - Huilin Tang
- Integrative Precision Health, LLC, Carmel, IN, United States
| | - Nick Kiehl
- Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Jiali Han
- Integrative Precision Health, LLC, Carmel, IN, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Johannet P, Simons M, Qian Y, Azmy N, Mehnert JM, Weber JS, Zhong J, Osman I. Risk and tropism of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with stage II and III cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 2022; 128:3620-3629. [PMID: 36006879 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent data suggest that patients with stage III melanoma are at high risk for developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Because a subset of patients with stage II melanoma experiences worse survival outcomes than some patients with stage III disease, the authors investigated the risk of CNS metastasis in stage II melanoma to inform surveillance guidelines for this population. METHODS The authors examined clinicopathologic data prospectively collected from 1054 patients who had cutaneous melanoma. The χ2 test, the cumulative incidence, and Cox multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between baseline characteristics and the development of CNS metastases. RESULTS Patients with stage III melanoma had a higher rate of developing brain metastases than those with stage II melanoma (100 of 468 patients [21.4%] vs. 82 of 586 patients [14.0%], respectively; p = .002). However, patients who had stage IIC melanoma had a significantly higher rate of isolated first recurrences in the CNS compared with those who had stage III disease (12.1% vs. 3.6%; p = .002). The risk of ever developing brain metastases was similarly elevated for patients who had stage IIC disease (hazard ratio [HR], 3.16; 95% CI, 1.77-5.66), stage IIIB disease (HR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.63-4.91), and stage IIIC disease (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.81-4.74), and the risk was highest in patients who had stage IIID disease (HR, 8.59; 95% CI: 4.11-17.97). CONCLUSIONS Patients with stage IIC melanoma are at elevated risk for first recurrence in the CNS. Surveillance strategies that incorporate serial neuroimaging should be considered for these individuals until more accurate predictive markers can be identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Johannet
- Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Morgan Simons
- Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yingzhi Qian
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadine Azmy
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Janice M Mehnert
- Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weber
- Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Judy Zhong
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Iman Osman
- Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.,Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Melanoma Mediated Disruption of Brain Endothelial Barrier Integrity Is Not Prevented by the Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Proteases. BIOSENSORS 2022; 12:bios12080660. [PMID: 36005056 PMCID: PMC9405625 DOI: 10.3390/bios12080660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
We have previously shown that human melanoma cells rapidly decrease human brain endothelial barrier strength. Our findings showed a fast mechanism of melanoma mediated barrier disruption, which was localised to the paracellular junctions of the brain endothelial cells. Melanoma cells are known to release molecules which cleave the surrounding matrix and allow traversal within and out of their metastatic niche. Enzymatic families, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and proteases are heavily implicated in this process and their complex nature in vivo makes them an intriguing family to assess in melanoma metastasis. Herein, we assessed the expression of MMPs and other proteases in melanoma conditioned media. Our results showed evidence of a high expression of MMP-2, but not MMP-1, -3 or -9. Other proteases including Cathepsins D and B were also detected. Recombinant MMP-2 was added to the apical face of brain endothelial cells (hCMVECs), to measure the change in barrier integrity using biosensor technology. Surprisingly, this showed no decrease in barrier strength. The addition of potent MMP inhibitors (batimastat, marimastat, ONO4817) and other protease inhibitors (such as aprotinin, Pefabloc SC and bestatin) to the brain endothelial cells, in the presence of various melanoma lines, showed no reduction in the melanoma mediated barrier disruption. The inhibitors batimastat, Pefabloc SC, antipain and bestatin alone decreased the barrier strength. These results suggest that although some MMPs and proteases are released by melanoma cells, there is no direct evidence that they are substantially involved in the initial melanoma-mediated disruption of the brain endothelium.
Collapse
|
13
|
Eggen AC, Hospers GAP, Bosma I, Kramer MCA, Reyners AKL, Jalving M. Anti-tumor treatment and healthcare consumption near death in the era of novel treatment options for patients with melanoma brain metastases. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:247. [PMID: 35247992 PMCID: PMC8897874 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09316-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective systemic treatments have revolutionized the management of patients with metastatic melanoma, including those with brain metastases. The extent to which these treatments influence disease trajectories close to death is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to gain insight into provided treatments and healthcare consumption during the last 3 months of life in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Methods Retrospective, single-center study, including consecutive patients with melanoma brain metastases diagnosed between June-2015 and June-2018, referred to the medical oncologist, and died before November-2019. Patient and tumor characteristics, anti-tumor treatments, healthcare consumption, presence of neurological symptoms, and do-not-resuscitate status were extracted from medical charts. Results 100 patients were included. A BRAF-mutation was present in 66 patients. Systemic anti-tumor therapy was given to 72% of patients during the last 3 months of life, 34% in the last month, and 6% in the last week. Patients with a BRAF-mutation more frequently received systemic treatment during the last 3 (85% vs. 47%) and last month (42% vs. 18%) of life than patients without a BRAF-mutation. Furthermore, patients receiving systemic treatment were more likely to visit the emergency room (ER, 75% vs. 36%) and be hospitalized (75% vs. 36%) than those who did not. Conclusion The majority of patients with melanoma brain metastases received anti-tumor treatment during the last 3 months of life. ER visits and hospitalizations occurred more often in patients on anti-tumor treatment. Further research is warranted to examine the impact of anti-tumor treatments close to death on symptom burden and care satisfaction.
Collapse
|
14
|
Caulfield JI, Kluger HM. Emerging Studies of Melanoma Brain Metastasis. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:585-594. [PMID: 35212922 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01237-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Among solid tumors, melanoma has the highest propensity for brain dissemination. Although newer treatment approaches have resulted in excellent control or elimination of brain metastasis in many patients, they remain the cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Here, we review recent preclinical and clinical studies to detail current understanding of the incidence, prognosis, biological characteristics, and treatments for melanoma brain metastases. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical trials tailored to this patient population have demonstrated prolonged disease control with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging clinical challenges include radiation necrosis and perilesional edema, phenomena that are rarely seen in other organs. Recent preclinical studies have resulted in improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment in the brain, providing insights into additional treatment approaches. The biological basis of brain tumor homing and survival within the central nervous system remain understudied. Additional preclinical and clinical studies will enhance our ability to prevent and treat brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine I Caulfield
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jablonska PA, Fong CH, Kruser T, Weiss J, Liu ZA, Takami H, Narita Y, de Moraes FY, Dasgupta A, Ong CK, Yang JCH, Lee JH, Pavlakis N, Kongkham P, Butler M, Shultz DB. Recommended first-line management of brain metastases from melanoma: A multicenter survey of clinical practice. Radiother Oncol 2022; 168:89-94. [PMID: 35121033 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) and surgery (Sx) are effective in treating brain metastases. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown activity against asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM). BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be used to treat BRAF V600 mutation positive (BRAF+) MBM. METHOD We conducted an international survey among experts from medical oncology (MO), clinical oncology (CO), radiation oncology (RO), and neurosurgery (NS) about treatment recommendations for patients with asymptomatic BRAF+ or BRAF mutation negative (BRAF-) MBM. Eighteen specific clinical scenarios were presented and a total of 267 responses were collected. Answers were grouped and compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS In most MBM scenarios, survey respondents, regardless of specialty, favored RT in addition to systemic therapy. However, for patients with BRAF+ MBM, MO and CO were significantly more likely than RO and NS to recommend BRAF/MEK inhibitors alone, without the addition of RT, including the majority of MO (51%) for patients with 1-3 MBM, all <2cm. Likewise, for BRAF- MBM, MO and CO more commonly recommended single or dual agent ICI only and dual agent ICI therapy alone was the most common recommendation from MO or CO for MBM <2cm. When at least 1 of 3 MBM (BRAF+ or BRAF-) was >2cm, upfront Sx was recommended by all groups with the exception that MO and RO recommended RT for BRAF- MBM. CONCLUSIONS In most clinical settings involving asymptomatic MBM, experts recommended RT in addition to systemic therapy. However, recommendations varied significantly according to specialty, with MO and CO more commonly recommending dual systemic therapy alone for up to 9 BRAF- MBM <2cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chin Heng Fong
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Jessica Weiss
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zhihui Amy Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hirokazu Takami
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Narita
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Archya Dasgupta
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - James C H Yang
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jih Hsiang Lee
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nicholas Pavlakis
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Paul Kongkham
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Canada
| | - Marcus Butler
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David B Shultz
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Burke AM, Carrasquilla M, Jean WC, Collins BT, Anaizi AN, Atkins MB, Gibney GT, Collins SP. Volume of Disease as a Predictor for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Melanoma Brain Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immune Checkpoint Therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 11:794615. [PMID: 35096594 PMCID: PMC8789649 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.794615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives Clinical trials of anti-Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA-4) therapies have demonstrated a clinical benefit with low rates of neurologic adverse events in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). While the combined effect of these immunotherapies (ITs) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has yielded impressive results with regard to local control (LC) and overall survival (OS), it has also been associated with increased rates of radiation necrosis (RN) compared to historical series of SRS alone. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with IT in combination with SRS to report on predictors of clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods Patients were included if they had MBMs treated with SRS within 1 year of receiving anti-PD-1 and/or CTLA-4 therapy. Clinical outcomes including OS, LC, intracranial death (ID), and RN were correlated with type and timing of IT with SRS, radiation dose, total volume, and size and number of lesions treated. Results Twenty-nine patients with 171 MBMs were treated between May 2012 and May 2018. Patients had a median of 5 lesions treated (median volume of 6.5 cm3) over a median of 2 courses of SRS. The median dose was 21 Gy. Most patients were treated with ipilimumab (n = 13) or nivolumab-ipilimumab (n = 10). Most patients underwent SRS concurrently or within 3 months of receiving immunotherapy (n = 21). Two-year OS and LC were 54.4% and 85.5%, respectively. In addition, 14% of patients developed RN; however, only 4.7% of the total treated lesions developed RN. The median time to development of RN was 9.5 months. Patients with an aggregate tumor volume >6.5 cm3 were found to be at increased risk of ID (p = 0.05) and RN (p = 0.03). There was no difference in OS, ID, or RN with regard to type of IT, timing of SRS and IT, number of SRS courses, SRS dose, or number of cumulative lesions treated. Conclusions In our series, patients treated with SRS and IT for MBMs had excellent rates of OS and LC; however, patients with an aggregate tumor volume >6.5 cm3 were found to be at increased risk of ID and RN. Given the efficacy of combined anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 therapy for MBM management, further study of optimal selection criteria for the addition of SRS is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aidan M Burke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Walter C Jean
- George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Amjad N Anaizi
- Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Geoffrey T Gibney
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
A Case of Metastatic CNS Melanoma of Unknown Primary Presenting with Seizures. Case Rep Med 2022; 2022:3099750. [PMID: 35035488 PMCID: PMC8758325 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3099750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Seizures are a common occurrence. The goal of evaluating a seizure is to identify the etiology and to determine the likelihood of recurrence as well as guide management. We present a unique presentation of a 47-year-old female that presented with late onset seizures admitted due to status epilepticus. Brain magnetic resonance indicated diffuse supratentorial hemorrhagic lesions. Neurological workup including brain vessel imaging, CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis as well as CSF and serological workup for vasculitis failed to demonstrate the cause of her brain lesions. Ultimately, a brain biopsy showed metastatic melanoma of unknown primary origin.
Collapse
|
18
|
Gutsche R, Lohmann P, Hoevels M, Ruess D, Galldiks N, Visser-Vandewalle V, Treuer H, Ruge M, Kocher M. Radiomics outperforms semantic features for prediction of response to stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases. Radiother Oncol 2021; 166:37-43. [PMID: 34801629 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases show different patterns of contrast enhancement, potentially reflecting hypoxic and necrotic tumor regions with reduced radiosensitivity. An objective evaluation of these patterns might allow a prediction of response to radiotherapy. We therefore investigated the potential of MRI radiomics in comparison with the visual assessment of semantic features to predict early response to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, 150 patients with 308 brain metastases from solid tumors (NSCLC in 53% of patients) treated by stereotactic radiosurgery (single dose of 17-20 Gy) were evaluated. The response of each metastasis (partial or complete remission vs. stabilization or progression) was assessed within 180 days after radiosurgery. Patterns of contrast enhancement in the pre-treatment T1-weighted MR images were either visually classified (homogenous, heterogeneous, necrotic ring-like) or subjected to a radiomics analysis. Random forest models were optimized by cross-validation and evaluated in a hold-out test data set (30% of metastases). RESULTS In total, 221/308 metastases (72%) responded to radiosurgery. The optimal radiomics model comprised 10 features and outperformed the model solely based on semantic features in the test data set (AUC, 0.71 vs. 0.56; accuracy, 69% vs. 54%). The diagnostic performance could be further improved by combining semantic and radiomics features resulting in an AUC of 0.74 and an accuracy of 75% in the test data set. CONCLUSION The developed radiomics model allowed prediction of early response to radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases and outperformed the visual assessment of patterns of contrast enhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Gutsche
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Germany; RWTH Aachen University, Germany; Dept. of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Mauritius Hoevels
- Dept. of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Ruess
- Dept. of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, Germany; Dept. of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- Dept. of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Harald Treuer
- Dept. of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Maximilian Ruge
- Dept. of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang X, Haaland B, Hu-Lieskovan S, Colman H, Holmen SL. First line immunotherapy extends brain metastasis free survival, improves overall survival, and reduces the incidence of brain metastasis in patients with advanced melanoma. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 4:e1419. [PMID: 34137219 PMCID: PMC8714542 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy have improved the prognosis of melanoma patients but brain metastasis remains a major challenge. Currently, it is unclear how existing therapies can be best used to prevent or treat brain metastasis in melanoma patients. AIMS We aimed to assess brain metastasis free survival (BMFS), overall survival (OS), incidence of brain metastases, and sequencing strategies of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. METHODS AND RESULTS We retrospectively analyzed 683 patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma treated with first line (1L) immunotherapy (N = 266) or targeted therapy (N = 417). The primary outcome was BMFS. Secondary outcomes included OS of all patients and incidence of brain metastases in patients without documented brain metastases prior to 1L therapy. The median BMFS was 13.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.4-16.0] among all patients. The median BMFS for patients receiving 1L immunotherapy was 41.9 months [95% CI: 22.8-not reached (NR)] and targeted therapy was 11.0 months (95% CI: 8.8-12.5). Median OS results were qualitatively similar to BMFS results. The cumulative incidence of brain metastases for patients receiving 1L targeted therapy was higher than for patients receiving 1L immunotherapy (P < .001). Patients receiving 1L anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 combination immunotherapy only or followed by second line (2L) targeted therapy had better BMFS (HR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, P = .001), improved OS (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.30-0.81, P = .005), and reduced incidence of brain metastases (HR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, P = .047) than patients receiving 1L combination BRAF and MEK targeted therapy followed by 2L immunotherapy. CONCLUSION Patients with advanced BRAF mutant melanoma treated with 1L immunotherapy have significantly longer BMFS and OS, and reduced incidence of brain metastases, compared with those treated with 1L targeted therapy. Further studies evaluating the ability of immunotherapy and targeted therapy to improve OS and prevent brain metastases are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuechen Wang
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Benjamin Haaland
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Siwen Hu-Lieskovan
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Howard Colman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sheri L Holmen
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Colditz M, Lee S, Eastgate M, Elder S, Brandis P, Anderson D, Withers T, Jeffree R, Pinkham M, Olson S. Surgical series of metastatic cerebral melanoma: Clinical association of resection, BRAF-mutation status, and survival. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2020.101075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
21
|
Badloe J, Mast M, Petoukhova A, Franssen JH, Ghariq E, van der Voort van Zijp N, Wiggenraad R. Impact of PTV margin reduction (2 mm to 0 mm) on pseudoprogression in stereotactic radiotherapy of solitary brain metastases. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2021; 17:40-47. [PMID: 34007906 PMCID: PMC8111033 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the influence of PTV-margin (0 mm versus 2 mm) on the incidence of pseudoprogression (PP) and local tumour control (LC) in patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for solitary brain metastases. Methods Patients were treated on Novalis LINAC. Three dose schedules were used depending on the PTV-size. The PTV-margin was 2-mm prior to 2015 and 0-mm thereafter. MRI-scans were made every three months including a perfusion MRI-scan when pseudoprogression was suspected. We examined the relation of pseudoprogression and local control with the size of PTV-margin. Besides this, the association of dose-volume data of the whole brain (minus GTV) and pseudoprogression was investigated. Results 121 patients were analyzed (2-mm margin in 84 patients; 0-mm margin in 37 patients). There was no difference in GTV (7.6 cc versus 9.1 cc p = 0.2). At 24 months there was no difference in incidence of pseudoprogression (49% and versus 33%, p = 0.5) and local control in the 2-mm and 0-mm group (82% and versus 79%, p = 1.0). The size of PTV-margin was not associated with PP. Both margin and volume of brain receiving 12 Gy (V12) were not associated with pseudoprogression in patients treated with single fraction. Conclusions PTV-margin reduction did not reduce the incidence of pseudoprogression in LINAC-based-SRT for single brain metastases. We did not find a significant association of GTV-PTV margin or V12Gy with the incidence of pseudoprogression in solitary metastases treated with a single fraction. LC rates were similar, indicating margin reduction seems to be safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Badloe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Mast
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Anna Petoukhova
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Huib Franssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Elyas Ghariq
- Department of Radiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ruud Wiggenraad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wilkes JG, Patel A, McClure E, Pina Y, Zager JS. Developments in therapy for brain metastases in melanoma patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22:1443-1453. [PMID: 33688795 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1900117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Cutaneous melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. While cytotoxic agents, interferon, or interleukin-2, have been used with some success in extracranial disease, limited efficacy is demonstrated in MBM. The rare patient with long-term survival presented with limited intracranial disease amenable to surgery or radiation therapy. However, the development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy over the last decade has significantly improved overall survival in this formerly devastating presentation of metastatic melanoma.Areas covered: This article reviews the mechanism of brain metastasis, challenges with treating the central nervous system, historical treatment of MBM, and outcomes in clinical trials with targeted therapy and immunotherapy.Expert opinion: The MBM patient population now, more than ever, requires a multidisciplinary approach with surgery, radiation therapy, and the use of newer systemic therapies such as immunotherapy agents and targeted therapy agents. MBM has traditionally been excluded from clinical trials for systemic therapy due to poor survival. However, recent data show overall survival rates have significantly improved, supporting the need for inclusion of MBM patients in systemic therapy clinical trials. Understanding the mechanisms of therapeutic activity in the brain, resistance mechanisms, and the appropriate multi-modality treatment approach requires further investigation. Nevertheless, these therapies continue to give some hope to patients with historically poor survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin G Wilkes
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ayushi Patel
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Erin McClure
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yolanda Pina
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tawbi HA, Forsyth PA, Hodi FS, Lao CD, Moschos SJ, Hamid O, Atkins MB, Lewis K, Thomas RP, Glaspy JA, Jang S, Algazi AP, Khushalani NI, Postow MA, Pavlick AC, Ernstoff MS, Reardon DA, Puzanov I, Kudchadkar RR, Tarhini AA, Sumbul A, Rizzo JI, Margolin KA. Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Melanoma and Asymptomatic or Symptomatic Brain Metastases (CheckMate 204). Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1961-1973. [PMID: 33880555 PMCID: PMC8563325 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with melanoma and asymptomatic brain metastases (MBM), nivolumab plus ipilimumab provided an intracranial response rate of 55%. Here, we present the first report for patients who were symptomatic and/or required corticosteroids and updated data for asymptomatic patients. Methods Patients with measurable MBM, 0.5-3.0 cm, were enrolled into Cohort A (asymptomatic) or Cohort B (stable neurologic symptoms and/or receiving corticosteroids). Nivolumab, 1 mg/kg, and ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg, were given intravenously every 3 weeks ×4, followed by nivolumab, 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or 24 months. The primary endpoint was intracranial clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease ≥6 months). Results Symptomatic patients (N = 18) received a median of one nivolumab and ipilimumab combination dose and had an intracranial CBR of 22.2%. Two of 12 patients on corticosteroids had CR; 2 responded among the 6 not on corticosteroids. Median intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.2 and 8.7 months, respectively. In contrast, with 20.6 months of follow-up, we confirmed an intracranial CBR of 58.4% in asymptomatic patients (N = 101); median duration of response, PFS, and OS were not reached. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions Nivolumab plus ipilimumab provides durable clinical benefit for asymptomatic patients with MBM and should be considered for first-line therapy. This regimen has limited activity in MBM patients with neurologic symptoms and/or requiring corticosteroids, supporting the need for alternative approaches and methods to reduce the dependency on corticosteroids. Clinical trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02320058.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Stergios J Moschos
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, The University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Omid Hamid
- Department of Translational Research & Immunotherapy, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedars-Sinai Affilliate, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Department of Medical Oncology,Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington DC
| | - Karl Lewis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - Reena P Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, CA
| | - John A Glaspy
- Department of Medicine, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sekwon Jang
- Department of Medicine, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Virginia Commonwealth University, Fairfax, VA
| | - Alain P Algazi
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nikhil I Khushalani
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Michael A Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anna C Pavlick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Marc S Ernstoff
- Department of Immuno-Oncology, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Ragini R Kudchadkar
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ahmad A Tarhini
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Anne Sumbul
- Biostatistics, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ
| | - Jasmine I Rizzo
- Oncology Clinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ
| | - Kim A Margolin
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Borzillo V, Di Franco R, Giannarelli D, Cammarota F, Scipilliti E, D’Ippolito E, Petito A, Serra M, Falivene S, Grimaldi AM, Simeone E, Festino L, Vanella V, Trojaniello C, Vitale MG, Madonna G, Ascierto PA, Muto P. Ipilimumab and Stereotactic Radiosurgery with CyberKnife ® System in Melanoma Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Monoinstitutional Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081857. [PMID: 33924595 PMCID: PMC8068853 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Retrospective studies have shown a survival advantage in combining ipilimumab with radiotherapy in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). However, these studies did not clarify the correct timing between the two methods. The aims of our study were to demonstrate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery on MBMs in combination with ipilimumab and estimate the correct timing of treatments to improve patients’ outcomes. Abstract The median overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) of patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) are poor even with immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or radiotherapy (RT). The aims of the study were to evaluate the association and timing of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT)/radiosurgery (SRS) performed with the CyberKnife® System and ipilimumab (IPI). A total of 63 MBMs patients were analyzed: 53 received RT+IPI and 10 RT alone. Therefore, the patients were divided into four groups: RT PRE-PI (>4 weeks before IPI) (18), RT CONC-IPI (4 weeks before/between first and last cycle/within 3 months of last cycle of IPI) (20), RT POST-IPI (>3 months after IPI) (15), and NO-IPI (10). A total of 127 lesions were treated: 75 with SRS (one fraction) and 24 with SRT (three to five fractions). The median follow-up was 10.6 months. The median OS was 10.6 months for all patients, 10.7 months for RT+IPI, and 3.3 months for NO-IPI (p = 0.96). One-year LC was 50% for all patients, 56% for RT+IPI, and 18% for NO-IPI (p = 0.08). The 1-year intracranial control was 45% for all patients, 44% for RT+IPI, and 51% for NO-IPI (p = 0.73). IPI with SRS/SRT in MBMs treatment could improve LC. However, the impact and timing of the two modalities on patients’ outcomes are still unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Borzillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (R.D.F.); (F.C.); (E.S.); (E.D.); (A.P.); (M.S.); (P.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-08159031764; Fax: +39-0815903809
| | - Rossella Di Franco
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (R.D.F.); (F.C.); (E.S.); (E.D.); (A.P.); (M.S.); (P.M.)
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Statistical Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute-IRCCS, 00144 Rome, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio Cammarota
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (R.D.F.); (F.C.); (E.S.); (E.D.); (A.P.); (M.S.); (P.M.)
| | - Esmeralda Scipilliti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (R.D.F.); (F.C.); (E.S.); (E.D.); (A.P.); (M.S.); (P.M.)
| | - Emma D’Ippolito
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (R.D.F.); (F.C.); (E.S.); (E.D.); (A.P.); (M.S.); (P.M.)
| | - Angela Petito
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (R.D.F.); (F.C.); (E.S.); (E.D.); (A.P.); (M.S.); (P.M.)
| | - Marcello Serra
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (R.D.F.); (F.C.); (E.S.); (E.D.); (A.P.); (M.S.); (P.M.)
| | - Sara Falivene
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Asl Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy;
| | - Antonio M. Grimaldi
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.G.); (E.S.); (L.F.); (V.V.); (C.T.); (M.G.V.); (G.M.); (P.A.A.)
| | - Ester Simeone
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.G.); (E.S.); (L.F.); (V.V.); (C.T.); (M.G.V.); (G.M.); (P.A.A.)
| | - Lucia Festino
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.G.); (E.S.); (L.F.); (V.V.); (C.T.); (M.G.V.); (G.M.); (P.A.A.)
| | - Vito Vanella
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.G.); (E.S.); (L.F.); (V.V.); (C.T.); (M.G.V.); (G.M.); (P.A.A.)
| | - Claudia Trojaniello
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.G.); (E.S.); (L.F.); (V.V.); (C.T.); (M.G.V.); (G.M.); (P.A.A.)
| | - Maria Grazia Vitale
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.G.); (E.S.); (L.F.); (V.V.); (C.T.); (M.G.V.); (G.M.); (P.A.A.)
| | - Gabriele Madonna
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.G.); (E.S.); (L.F.); (V.V.); (C.T.); (M.G.V.); (G.M.); (P.A.A.)
| | - Paolo A. Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.G.); (E.S.); (L.F.); (V.V.); (C.T.); (M.G.V.); (G.M.); (P.A.A.)
| | - Paolo Muto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (R.D.F.); (F.C.); (E.S.); (E.D.); (A.P.); (M.S.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Váraljai R, Horn S, Sucker A, Piercianek D, Schmitt V, Carpinteiro A, Becker KA, Reifenberger J, Roesch A, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, Sure U, Schadendorf D, Helfrich I. Integrative Genomic Analyses of Patient-Matched Intracranial and Extracranial Metastases Reveal a Novel Brain-Specific Landscape of Genetic Variants in Driver Genes of Malignant Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040731. [PMID: 33578810 PMCID: PMC7916600 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Development of brain metastases in advanced melanoma patients is a frequent event that limits patients' quality of life and survival. Despite recent insights into melanoma genetics, systematic analyses of genetic alterations in melanoma brain metastasis formation are lacking. Moreover, whether brain metastases harbor distinct genetic alterations beyond those observed at different anatomic sites of the same patient remains unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND RESULTS In our study, 54 intracranial and 18 corresponding extracranial melanoma metastases were analyzed for mutations using targeted next generation sequencing of 29 recurrently mutated driver genes in melanoma. In 11 of 16 paired samples, we detected nucleotide modifications in brain metastases that were absent in matched metastases at extracranial sites. Moreover, we identified novel genetic variants in ARID1A, ARID2, SMARCA4 and BAP1, genes that have not been linked to brain metastases before; albeit most frequent mutations were found in ARID1A, ARID2 and BRAF. Conclusion: Our data provide new insights into the genetic landscape of intracranial melanoma metastases supporting a branched evolution model of metastasis formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renáta Váraljai
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
| | - Susanne Horn
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Faculty Rudolf-Schönheimer-Institute for Biochemistry, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Antje Sucker
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
| | - Daniela Piercianek
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Verena Schmitt
- Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Alexander Carpinteiro
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.C.); (K.A.B.)
| | - Katrin Anne Becker
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.C.); (K.A.B.)
| | - Julia Reifenberger
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| | - Alexander Roesch
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
| | - Jörg Felsberg
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| | - Ulrich Sure
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
| | - Iris Helfrich
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-1648; Fax: +49-201-723-5525
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ahluwalia M, Ali MA, Joshi RS, Park ES, Taha B, McCutcheon I, Chiang V, Hong A, Sinclair G, Bartek J, Chen CC. An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdaa152. [PMID: 33506199 PMCID: PMC7810198 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains a mainstay therapy in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases (BM). While prognostic scales have been developed for melanoma patients who underwent SRS treatment for BM, the pertinence of these scales in the context of molecularly targeted therapies remains unclear. Methods Through a multi-institutional collaboration, we collated the survival patterns of 331 melanoma BM patients with known BRAF mutation status treated with SRS. We established a prognostic scale that was validated in an independent cohort of 174 patients. All patients with BRAF mutations in this series were treated with BRAF inhibitors. Prognostic utility was assessed using Net Reclassification Index (NRI > 0) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) metrics. Results In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, BRAF mutation status, KPS, number of metastases, and cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV) independently contributed to survival prognostication for melanoma patients with SRS-treated BM (P < .05 for all variables). These variables were incorporated into a prognostic scale using the disease-specific graded prognostic assessment (ds-GPA) framework. This integrated melanoma ds-GPA scale was validated in 2 independent cohorts collated through a multi-institutional collaboration. In terms of order of prognostic importance, BRAF mutation status exerted the greatest influence on survival, while KPS, the number of metastases, and CITV exhibited comparable, lesser impacts. Conclusions Optimal survival prognostication for SRS-treated patients with melanoma BM requires an integrated assessment of patient characteristics (KPS), tumor characteristics (CITV and number of metastases), and the mutational profile of the melanoma (BRAF mutation status).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mir A Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rushikesh S Joshi
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Eun Suk Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Birra Taha
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ian McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Angela Hong
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia
| | - Georges Sinclair
- Department of Oncology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Xia Y, Xu F, Xiong M, Yang H, Lin W, Xie Y, Xi H, Xue Q, Ye T, Yu L. Repurposing of antipsychotic trifluoperazine for treating brain metastasis, lung metastasis and bone metastasis of melanoma by disrupting autophagy flux. Pharmacol Res 2021; 163:105295. [PMID: 33176207 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Targeted therapies and immunotherapy have brought substantial benefits to patients with melanoma. However, brain metastases remain the biggest threat to the survival and quality of life of melanoma patients. One of the major challenges to an effective therapy is the inability of drugs to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Anti-schizophrenic drugs can cross the BBB, and many of them have demonstrated anti-cancer effects. Repurposing existing drugs for new clinical indications is an alluring strategy for anticancer drug discovery. Herein, we applied this strategy and screened a small collection of existing anti-schizophrenic drugs to use as anti-melanoma agents. Among them, trifluoperazine dihydrochloride (TFP) exhibited promising potencies for suppressing the growth and metastasis of melanoma, both in vitro and in vivo. TFP obviously suppressed the viability of melanoma cells within the micromolar range and inhibited the growth of melanoma in the subcutaneous mice models. Notably, intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of TFP (40 mg/kg/day) obviously inhibited the growth of intra-carotid-injection established melanoma brain metastasis and extended the survival of brain metastasis-bearing mice. Moreover, TFP significantly suppressed lung metastasis and bone metastasis of melanoma in preclinical metastasis models. Mechanistically, TFP caused G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and mitochondrial-dependent intrinsic apoptosis of melanoma cells. In addition, TFP treatment increased the expression of microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta-II (LC3B-II) and p62 in vitro, suggesting an inhibition of autophagic flux. TFP decreased LysoTracker Red uptake after treatment, indicating impaired acidification of lysosomes. Moreover, the colocalization of LC3 with lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1), a lysosome marker, was also suppressed after TFP treatment, suggesting that TFP might block the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes, which led to autophagosome accumulation. Taken together, our data highlight the potential of repurposing TFP as a new adjuvant drug for treating melanoma patients with brain, lung, and bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Xia
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, Sichuan University-University of Oxford Huaxi Joint Centre for Gastrointestinal Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fuyan Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, Sichuan University-University of Oxford Huaxi Joint Centre for Gastrointestinal Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Meiping Xiong
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Yang
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wentao Lin
- Department of Plastic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yao Xie
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Huizhi Xi
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, Sichuan University-University of Oxford Huaxi Joint Centre for Gastrointestinal Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiang Xue
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, Sichuan University-University of Oxford Huaxi Joint Centre for Gastrointestinal Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tinghong Ye
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, Sichuan University-University of Oxford Huaxi Joint Centre for Gastrointestinal Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Luoting Yu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, Sichuan University-University of Oxford Huaxi Joint Centre for Gastrointestinal Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liermann J, Winkler JK, Syed M, Neuberger U, Reuss D, Harrabi S, Naumann P, Ristau J, Weykamp F, El Shafie RA, König L, Debus J, Hassel J, Rieken S. Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Immunotherapy in Melanoma Brain Metastases Is Feasible and Effective. Front Oncol 2020; 10:592796. [PMID: 33178618 PMCID: PMC7593445 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.592796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established treatment for brain metastases in the management of metastasized melanoma. The increasing use of checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma therapy leads to combined treatment schemes consisting of immunotherapy and SRS that need to be evaluated regarding safety and feasibility. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 36 patients suffering from cerebral metastasized melanoma. Between November 2011 and May 2016, altogether 66 brain metastases were treated with single-fraction SRS (18-20 Gy prescribed to the 80% isodose) in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor (ipilimumab: 82%, pembrolizumab: 14% or nivolumab: 4%), administered within 3 months before or after SRS. Toxicity was evaluated with focus on the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) radiation necrosis (CRN). Overall survival (OS), freedom from local progression (FFLP), freedom from central nervous system radiation necrosis (FFCRN), and freedom from distant intracranial progression (FFDIP) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 25 months (range: 2-115 months). Two patients (6%) presented with cerebral edema CTCAE °III and another two patients (6%) presented with one-sided muscle weakness CTCAE °III after SRS. One of these four symptomatic cases correlated with an observed CRN, the other three symptomatic cases were related to local tumor progression (n = 2) or related to the performance of additional whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). No further CTCAE °III or °IV toxicity was seen. During follow-up, seven of the growing contrast-enhanced lesions were resected, revealing two cases of CRN and five cases of local tumor progression. Altogether, the observed CRN rate of the irradiated metastases was 6-17% at the time of analysis, ranging due to the radiologically challenging differentiation between CRN and local tumor progression. The observed ranges of the 1- and 2-years FFLP rates were 82-85% and 73-80%, respectively. The median FFDIP was 6.1 months, the median OS was 22.2 months. Conclusion: In the presented cohort, the combination of SRS and checkpoint inhibitors in the management of cerebral metastasized melanoma was safe and effective. Compared to historic data on SRS only, the observed CRN rate was acceptable. To gain resilient data on the incidence of CRN after combined treatment schemes, prospective trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia K Winkler
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Syed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulf Neuberger
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Reuss
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Naumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jessica Hassel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nintedanib and a bi-specific anti-VEGF/Ang2 nanobody selectively prevent brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis 2020; 37:637-648. [PMID: 32918638 PMCID: PMC7666285 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10055-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) are an ever-increasing challenge in oncology, threatening quality of life and survival of many cancer patients. The majority of BM originate from lung adenocarcinoma, and stage III patients have a risk of 40–50% to develop BM in the first years of disease onset. As therapeutic options are limited, prevention of their occurrence is an attractive concept. Here we investigated whether Nintedanib (BIBF 1120), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting the VEGF pathway approved for lung adenocarcinoma, and the dual anti-VEGF-A/Ang2 nanobody BI836880 have the potential to prevent BM formation. A mouse model of brain metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma was used in which tumor cells were injected intracardially. Metastases formation occurred inside and outside of the brain and was followed by MRI, IVIS, and immunohistochemistry. BM were reduced in volume and number by both Nintedanib and the dual anti-VEGF-A/Ang2 nanobody, which translated into improved survival. Both compounds were able to normalize cerebral blood vessels at the site of brain metastatic lesions. Extracranial metastases, however, were not reduced, and meningeal metastases only partially. Interestingly, unspecific control IgG also lead to brain vessel normalization and reduction of brain and meningeal metastases. This data indicates a brain-specific group effect of antiangiogenic compounds with respect to metastasis prevention, most likely by preventing an early angiogenic switch. Thus, Nintedanib and BI836880 are promising candidates for future BM preventive study concepts in lung adenocarcinoma patients.
Collapse
|
30
|
Machado MADÁ, de Moura CS, Chan K, Curtis JR, Hudson M, Abrahamowicz M, Jamal R, Pilote L, Bernatsky S. Real-world analyses of therapy discontinuation of checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma patients. Sci Rep 2020; 10:14607. [PMID: 32884119 PMCID: PMC7471311 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71788-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The 'real-world' patient population of metastatic melanoma is not fully represented in clinical trials investigating checkpoint inhibitors. We described therapy discontinuation in an unselected population-based cohort of adults with metastatic melanoma who started therapy with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or nivolumab/ipilimumab from January 2015 to August 2017. Therapy discontinuation was defined as a gap between doses beyond 120 days, and/or initiation of another cancer therapy. We estimated drug-specific rate ratios for therapy discontinuation adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, health care use, and past cancer therapies. We included 876 metastatic melanoma patients initiating pembrolizumab (44.3%), nivolumab/ipilimumab (31.2%), and nivolumab (24.5%). At 12 months of follow-up, the probabilities of therapy discontinuation were 49.9% (95% confidence interval, CI 43.6-56.5) for pembrolizumab, 58.8% (95% CI 50.5-67.3) for nivolumab, and 59.2% (95% CI 51.7-66.8) for nivolumab/ipilimumab. Stratified analyses based on prior cancer therapy, brain metastases at baseline, and sex showed similar trends. In multivariable analyses, compared with pembrolizumab, patients starting nivolumab (rate ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.08-1.77) or nivolumab/ipilimumab (rate ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.65) were more likely to discontinue therapy. Our findings indicate frequent discontinuations of checkpoint inhibitors at one year. The lower discontinuation associated with pembrolizumab should be confirmed in further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cristiano Soares de Moura
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Kelvin Chan
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama At Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Marie Hudson
- Jewish General Hospital and Lady Davis Research Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Canada
| | - Michal Abrahamowicz
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Rahima Jamal
- Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Louise Pilote
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sasha Bernatsky
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Soffietti R, Ahluwalia M, Lin N, Rudà R. Management of brain metastases according to molecular subtypes. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:557-574. [PMID: 32873927 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0391-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of brain metastases has markedly increased in the past 20 years owing to progress in the treatment of malignant solid tumours, earlier diagnosis by MRI and an ageing population. Although local therapies remain the mainstay of treatment for many patients with brain metastases, a growing number of systemic options are now available and/or are under active investigation. HER2-targeted therapies (lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib and trastuzumab emtansine), alone or in combination, yield a number of intracranial responses in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. New inhibitors are being investigated in brain metastases from ER-positive or triple-negative breast cancer. Several generations of EGFR and ALK inhibitors have shown activity on brain metastases from EGFR and ALK mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold promise in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer without druggable mutations and in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The survival of patients with brain metastases from melanoma has substantially improved after the advent of BRAF inhibitors and ICIs (ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab). The combination of targeted agents or ICIs with stereotactic radiosurgery could further improve the response rates and survival but the risk of radiation necrosis should be monitored. Advanced neuroimaging and liquid biopsy will hopefully improve response evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy.
| | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Center Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nancy Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Acute neurological adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibition therapy in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Melanoma Res 2020; 29:516-521. [PMID: 30870272 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The common adverse effects of immune checkpoint blockade therapy are well recognised. However, neurological adverse effects of checkpoint inhibitor therapy are less widely appreciated, and their clinical management remains challenging. Therefore, we report our experience of managing acute, life-threatening neurological toxicity during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Five male patients with stage IV melanoma underwent anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy (monotherapy or combination therapy with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 antibodies) and developed severe neurological symptoms and signs including headache, hemiparesis and dysarthria. The initial diagnosis of brain metastases actually occurred after initiation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in three of the patients, whereas two patients had pre-existing central nervous metastases and developed cerebral oedema and haemorrhage during immunotherapy. A rapidly fatal outcome occurred in two patients treated with immunotherapy following the development of BRAF-inhibitor and MEK-inhibitor resistance. Four of the patients died owing to neurological complications, and one achieved a complete cerebral response. Immunotherapy and tumour progression can both result in the development of neurological symptoms and signs, making it difficult to determine causality. However, the temporal relationship between the development of neurological symptoms and the first administration of therapy means that patients should be closely monitored for the development of neurological sequelae, which may even herald the presence of occult brain metastases. The decision on whether to continue immunotherapy must balance the risks of symptom - versus disease progression. However, in our case series, it is encouraging to note that the initial acute neurological symptoms were often transient. Nevertheless, pretherapeutic brain imaging to exclude occult brain metastases and stratify the risk of intracerebral oedema and haemorrhage should be considered.
Collapse
|
33
|
Becco P, Gallo S, Poletto S, Frascione MPM, Crotto L, Zaccagna A, Paruzzo L, Caravelli D, Carnevale-Schianca F, Aglietta M. Melanoma Brain Metastases in the Era of Target Therapies: An Overview. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061640. [PMID: 32575838 PMCID: PMC7352598 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is the third most common type of tumor that causes brain metastases. Patients with cerebral involvement have a dismal prognosis and their treatment is an unmet medical need. Brain involvement is a multistep process involving several signaling pathways such as Janus kinase/signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK/STAT), Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Protein Kinase B (PI3K/AKT), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN). Recently therapy that targets the MAPK signaling (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and immunotherapy (anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 agents) have changed the therapeutic approaches to stage IV melanoma. In contrast, there are no solid data about patients with brain metastases, who are usually excluded from clinical trials. Retrospective data showed that BRAF-inhibitors, alone or in combination with MEK-inhibitors have interesting clinical activity in this setting. Prospective data about the combinations of BRAF/MEK inhibitors have been recently published, showing an improved overall response rate. Short intracranial disease control is still a challenge. Several attempts have been made in order to improve it with combinations between local and systemic therapies. Immunotherapy approaches seem to retain promising activity in the treatment of melanoma brain metastasis as showed by the results of clinical trials investigating the combination of anti-CTL4 (Ipilimumab) and anti-PD1(Nivolumab). Studies about the combination or the sequential approach of target therapy and immunotherapy are ongoing, with immature results. Several clinical trials are ongoing trying to explore new approaches in order to overcome tumor resistance. At this moment the correct therapeutic choices for melanoma with intracranial involvement is still a challenge and new strategies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Becco
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Susanna Gallo
- Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I-Largo Turati 62, 10128 Torino, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Stefano Poletto
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Mirko Pio Manlio Frascione
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Luca Crotto
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Alessandro Zaccagna
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Luca Paruzzo
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Daniela Caravelli
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Fabrizio Carnevale-Schianca
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Massimo Aglietta
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ramos RI, Bustos MA, Wu J, Jones P, Chang SC, Kiyohara E, Tran K, Zhang X, Stern SL, Izraely S, Sagi-Assif O, Witz IP, Davies MA, Mills GB, Kelly DF, Irie RF, Hoon DSB. Upregulation of cell surface GD3 ganglioside phenotype is associated with human melanoma brain metastasis. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:1760-1778. [PMID: 32358995 PMCID: PMC7400791 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma metastasis to the brain is one of the most frequent extracranial brain tumors. Cell surface gangliosides are elevated in melanoma metastasis; however, the metabolic regulatory mechanisms that govern these specific changes are poorly understood in melanoma particularly brain metastases (MBM) development. We found ganglioside GD3 levels significantly upregulated in MBM compared to lymph node metastasis (LNM) but not for other melanoma gangliosides. Moreover, we demonstrated an upregulation of ST8SIA1 (GD3 synthase) as melanoma progresses from melanocytes to MBM cells. Using RNA‐ISH on FFPE specimens, we evaluated ST8SIA1 expression in primary melanomas (PRM) (n = 23), LNM and visceral metastasis (n = 45), and MBM (n = 39). ST8SIA1 was significantly enhanced in MBM compared to all other specimens. ST8SIA1 expression was assessed in clinically well‐annotated melanoma patients from multicenters with AJCC stage III B‐D LNM (n = 58) with 14‐year follow‐up. High ST8SIA1 expression was significantly associated with poor overall survival (HR = 3.24; 95% CI, 1.19–8.86, P = 0.02). In a nude mouse human xenograft melanoma brain metastasis model, MBM variants had higher ST8SIA1 expression than their respective cutaneous melanoma variants. Elevated ST8SIA1 expression enhances levels of cell surface GD3, a phenotype that favors MBM development, hence associated with very poor prognosis. Functional assays demonstrated that ST8SIA1 overexpression enhanced cell proliferation and colony formation, whereby ST8SIA1 knockdown had opposite effects. Icaritin a plant‐derived phytoestrogen treatment significantly inhibited cell growth in high GD3‐positive MBM cells through targeting the canonical NFκB pathway. The study demonstrates GD3 phenotype associates with melanoma progression and poor outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romela Irene Ramos
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Matias A Bustos
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Jinfeng Wu
- Department of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peter Jones
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Shu Ching Chang
- Medical Data Research Center, Providence St. Joseph Health Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Eiji Kiyohara
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Tran
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Xiaoqing Zhang
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Stacey L Stern
- Department of Biostatistics, JWCI, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Sivan Izraely
- Department of Cell Research and Immunology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Orit Sagi-Assif
- Department of Cell Research and Immunology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Isaac P Witz
- Department of Cell Research and Immunology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Systems Biology and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gordon B Mills
- Department of Cell Development and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) Knight Cancer Institute Portland, OR, USA
| | - Daniel F Kelly
- Pacific Neuroscience Institute, JWCI, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Reiko F Irie
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Dave S B Hoon
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Santa Monica, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT With greater understanding of underlying biology and development of effective BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy, along with remarkable advances in local treatment such as stereotactic radiosurgery, melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) is witnessing continually improving outcome, with 1-year overall survival rate approaching 85%. Given disease complexity and myriad treatment options, all patients with MBM should ideally be evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting to allow an individualized treatment approach based on prognostic groups, molecular classification, number and size of brain metastasis, and performance status. With improving outcome, pendulum has now swayed to focus more on effective treatment modalities with minimal neurological toxicity while maintaining quality of life. Surgery is usually considered in symptomatic and large MBMs, while stereotactic radiosurgery considered in 1-4 lesions, and now also being explored for up to 15 brain metastases for improved local control. The role of whole brain radiotherapy is diminishing given its neurocognitive toxicities and is reserved for patients with diffuse brain involvement. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has largely been ineffective without evidence for survival benefit. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the cornerstone of management for melanoma brain metastasis with durable intracranial tumor control and excellent toxicity profile. For patients with asymptomatic MBMs, ipilimumab and nivolumab have shown intracranial response near 60% and provides comparable clinical benefit in MBMs as for extracranial metastases. For patients with driver BRAF mutation, BRAFi-/MEKi-targeted agents are proven to be effective in MBM with high rate intracranial responses (44-59%). However, the durability of intracranial responses induced by BRAFi/MEKi seems to be shorter than that of extracranial disease. Emerging data support novel combination of systemic therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, which appears to be safe and effective; however, potential benefits and risks should be evaluated prospectively. Promising ongoing trials will further expand therapeutic evidence in MBM, and patients should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anupam Rishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Shi DD, Arnaout O, Bi WL, Buchbinder EI, Cagney DN, Insco ML, Liu D, Schoenfeld JD, Aizer AA. Severe Radiation Necrosis Refractory to Surgical Resection in Patients with Melanoma and Brain Metastases Managed with Ipilimumab/Nivolumab and Brain-Directed Stereotactic Radiation Therapy. World Neurosurg 2020; 139:226-231. [PMID: 32330622 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors has drastically changed the management of patients with melanoma and brain metastases. Specifically, combination therapy with ipilimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitor, and nivolumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor, has become a preferred systemic therapy option for patients with melanoma and asymptomatic brain metastases. However, the efficacy and toxicity profile of these agents in combination with brain-directed radiation therapy is not well described. CASE DESCRIPTION In this case series, we highlight a series of patients with melanoma demonstrating severe radiation necrosis immediately refractory to surgical resection following brain-directed stereotactic radiation therapy with concurrent ipilimumab and nivolumab. Three patients described in this series each received stereotactic radiation therapy to a dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions to a melanoma brain metastasis. These areas developed radiographic evidence of necrosis, which was managed surgically and progressed immediately and rapidly after resection. Re-resection, bevacizumab, steroids, and/or discontinuation of nivolumab was used to mitigate further necrosis with varying efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Patients with metastatic melanoma receiving brain-directed radiation therapy with concurrent ipilimumab and nivolumab are at risk for developing severe, surgically refractory radiation necrosis and should be closely followed clinically and with imaging. The exact mechanism for such severe necrosis is unknown, and future studies are needed to better understand this pathophysiology and identify optimal treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana D Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Omar Arnaout
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wenya L Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elizabeth I Buchbinder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel N Cagney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan L Insco
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan D Schoenfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Shofty B, Artzi M, Shtrozberg S, Fanizzi C, DiMeco F, Haim O, Peleg Hason S, Ram Z, Bashat DB, Grossman R. Virtual biopsy using MRI radiomics for prediction of BRAF status in melanoma brain metastasis. Sci Rep 2020; 10:6623. [PMID: 32313236 PMCID: PMC7170839 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63821-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced melanoma and constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Between 40% and 60% of melanomas harbor BRAF mutations. Selective BRAF inhibitor therapy has yielded improvement in clinical outcome; however, genetic discordance between the primary lesion and the metastatic tumor has been shown to occur. Currently, the only way to characterize the genetic landscape of a brain metastasis is by tissue sampling, which carries risks and potential complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of radiomics analysis for non-invasive identification of BRAF mutation in patients with melanoma brain metastases, based on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. We applied a machine-learning method, based on MRI radiomics features for noninvasive characterization of the BRAF status of brain metastases from melanoma (BMM) and applied it to BMM patients from two tertiary neuro-oncological centers. All patients underwent surgical resection for BMM, and their BRAF mutation status was determined as part of their oncological work-up. Their routine preoperative MRI study was used for radiomics-based analysis in which 195 features were extracted and classified according to their BRAF status via a support vector machine. The BRAF status of 53 study patients, with 54 brain metastases (25 positive, 29 negative for BRAF mutation) was predicted with mean accuracy = 0.79 ± 0.13, mean precision = 0.77 ± 0.14, mean sensitivity = 0.72 ± 0.20, mean specificity = 0.83 ± 0.11 and with a 0.78 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for positive BRAF mutation prediction. Radiomics-based noninvasive genetic characterization is feasible and should be further verified using large prospective cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Shofty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| | - Moran Artzi
- Sagol Brain Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Shai Shtrozberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Fanizzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco DiMeco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Oz Haim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Shira Peleg Hason
- Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Zvi Ram
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Dafna Ben Bashat
- Sagol Brain Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Rachel Grossman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
You H, Baluszek S, Kaminska B. Supportive roles of brain macrophages in CNS metastases and assessment of new approaches targeting their functions. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:2949-2964. [PMID: 32194848 PMCID: PMC7053204 DOI: 10.7150/thno.40783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastases to the central nervous system (CNS) occur frequently in adults and their frequency increases with the prolonged survival of cancer patients. Patients with CNS metastases have short survival, and modern therapeutics, while effective for extra-cranial cancers, do not reduce metastatic burden. Tumor cells attract and reprogram stromal cells, including tumor-associated macrophages that support cancer growth by promoting tissue remodeling, invasion, immunosuppression and metastasis. Specific roles of brain resident and infiltrating macrophages in creating a pre-metastatic niche for CNS invading cancer cells are less known. There are populations of CNS resident innate immune cells such as: parenchymal microglia and non-parenchymal, CNS border-associated macrophages that colonize CNS in early development and sustain its homeostasis. In this study we summarize available data on potential roles of different brain macrophages in most common brain metastases. We hypothesize that metastatic cancer cells exploit CNS macrophages and their cytoprotective mechanisms to create a pre-metastatic niche and facilitate metastatic growth. We assess current pharmacological strategies to manipulate functions of brain macrophages and hypothesize on their potential use in a therapy of CNS metastases. We conclude that the current data strongly support a notion that microglia, as well as non-parenchymal macrophages and peripheral infiltrating macrophages, are involved in multiple stages of CNS metastases. Understanding their contribution will lead to development of new therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
|
39
|
Cohen JV, Wang N, Venur VA, Hadfield MJ, Cahill DP, Oh K, Brastianos PK. Neurologic complications of melanoma. Cancer 2020; 126:477-486. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Revised: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Justine V. Cohen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Neuro‐Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts
| | - Nancy Wang
- Division of Neuro‐Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts
| | - Vyshak A. Venur
- Division of Neuro‐Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts
| | - Matthew J. Hadfield
- Division of Internal Medicine University of Connecticut Hartford Connecticut
| | - Daniel P. Cahill
- Division of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts
| | - Kevin Oh
- Division of Radiation Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts
| | - Priscilla K. Brastianos
- Division of Medical Oncology and Neuro‐Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wu H, Xia L, Jia D, Zou H, Jin G, Qian W, Xu H, Li T. PD-L1 + regulatory B cells act as a T cell suppressor in a PD-L1-dependent manner in melanoma patients with bone metastasis. Mol Immunol 2020; 119:83-91. [PMID: 32001420 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The five-year survival rate of melanoma worsens significantly with advancing tumor stage. We hypothesized that regulatory B cells (Breg) might have participated in the pathogenesis of melanoma. In this study, the PD-L1+ Breg cells were investigated. The expression of PD-L1 by circulating B cells was very low in healthy controls. In melanoma patients, on the other hand, the expression of PD-L1 by circulating B cells was significantly elevated in a manner that was positively associated with tumor stage, with the highest level in stage IV bone metastasis patients. Compared to total B cells, PD-L1+ B cells presented higher IgM and higher IgD expression, and were almost exclusively CD20+CD27-, suggesting that the PD-L1+ B cells exhibited a naive B cell-like phenotype. Healthy naive B cells, which presented little PD-L1, and stage I and stage II melanoma patient naive B cells, which presented detectable but low PD-L1, were unable to suppress T cell response. However, stage III and stage IV naive B cells, which presented moderate PD-L1, could significantly suppress T cell response in a PD-L1-dependent manner. We further found that the level of PD-L1+ B cells was significantly higher in bone metastasis than in the primary tumors. Overall, we demonstrated that PD-L1+ B cells were upregulated in advanced melanoma and were enriched in metastasis compared to primary tumors. Furthermore, PD-L1+ naive B cells could act as a T cell suppressor in a PD-L1-dependent manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Wu
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Liming Xia
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dongdong Jia
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hanhui Zou
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Gu Jin
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wenkang Qian
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Haichao Xu
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Carr MJ, Sun J, Eroglu Z, Zager JS. An evaluation of encorafenib for the treatment of melanoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 21:155-161. [PMID: 31790307 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1694664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: In the treatment of advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma, selective regulation of the MAPK pathway with BRAF and MEK inhibition has emerged as one of the mainstays of therapy.Areas covered: The authors present the current data on encorafenib as a compound, its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties. This review includes current data on encorafenib therapy as a single agent as well as in combination with the MEK-inhibitor binimetinib and other systemic therapies.Expert opinion: BRAF inhibition with encorafenib exhibits substantial antitumor activity with less paradoxical MAPK pathway activation leading to treatment resistance. Combination therapy with MEK inhibitors improves response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma compared to prior treatment regimens. Serious adverse events, including the development of cutaneous malignancies, are reported at lower rates with combination therapy, while less severe events such as pyrexia can be more common. Existing data is lacking for a recommendation of triplet therapy, although results from multiple ongoing trials are highly anticipated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
van Opijnen MP, Dirven L, Coremans IEM, Taphoorn MJB, Kapiteijn EHW. The impact of current treatment modalities on the outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastases: A systematic review. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:1479-1489. [PMID: 31583684 PMCID: PMC7004107 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) still have a very poor prognosis. Several treatment modalities have been investigated in an attempt to improve the management of MBM. This review aimed to evaluate the impact of current treatments for MBM on patient‐ and tumor‐related outcomes, and to provide treatment recommendations for this patient population. A literature search in the databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane was conducted up to January 8, 2019. Original articles published since 2010 describing patient‐ and tumor‐related outcomes of adult MBM patients treated with clearly defined systemic therapy were included. Information on basic trial demographics, treatment under investigation and outcomes (overall and progression‐free survival, local and distant control and toxicity) were extracted. We identified 96 eligible articles, comprising 95 studies. A large variety of treatment options for MBM were investigated, either used alone or as combined modality therapy. Combined modality therapy was investigated in 71% of the studies and resulted in increased survival and better distant/local control than monotherapy, especially with targeted therapy or immunotherapy. However, neurotoxic side‐effects also occurred more frequently. Timing appeared to be an important determinant, with the best results when radiotherapy was given before or during systemic therapy. Improved tumor control and prolonged survival can be achieved by combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy or targeted therapy. However, more randomized controlled trials or prospective studies are warranted to generate proper evidence that can be used to change the standard of care for patients with MBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P van Opijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Ida E M Coremans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen H W Kapiteijn
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Targeted BRAF and MEK inhibition has become an appropriate first-line treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced cutaneous melanoma. The authors present an overview of the MAPK pathway as well as the other major pathways implicated in melanoma development. Melanoma brain metastases are a devastating complication of melanoma that can be traced to derangements in cell signaling pathways, and the current evidence for targeted therapy is reviewed. Finally, activating KIT mutations are rarely found to cause melanomas and may provide an actionable target for therapy. The authors review the current evidence for targeted KIT therapy and summarize the ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 North McKinley Drive, 4th Floor, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 North McKinley Drive, 4th Floor, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Nikhil I Khushalani
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 North McKinley Drive, 4th Floor, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Erickson AW, Das S. The Impact of Targeted Therapy on Intracranial Metastatic Disease Incidence and Survival. Front Oncol 2019; 9:797. [PMID: 31508362 PMCID: PMC6716495 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) is a common and severe complication of primary cancers. Current treatment options for IMD include surgical resection and radiation therapy, although there has been recent interest in targeted therapy in the management of IMD. As of yet, insufficient data exist to support the recommendation of targeted therapies in the treatment of IMD. Paradoxically, targeted therapy has been hypothesized to play a role in the development of IMD in patients with primary cancers. This is based on the observations that patients who receive targeted therapy for primary cancer experience prolonged survival, and that prolonged survival has been associated with increased incidence of IMD. Few data exist to clarify if treatment of primary cancers with targeted therapies influences IMD incidence. Here, we discuss the role of targeted therapy in IMD management, review the current literature on IMD incidence and targeted therapy use in primary cancer, and propose the need for future studies to inform physicians in choosing treatment options and counseling patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders W Erickson
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
You H, Baluszek S, Kaminska B. Immune Microenvironment of Brain Metastases-Are Microglia and Other Brain Macrophages Little Helpers? Front Immunol 2019; 10:1941. [PMID: 31481958 PMCID: PMC6710386 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are common intracranial neoplasms and their frequency increases with prolonged survival of cancer patients. New pharmaceuticals targeting oncogenic kinases and immune checkpoint inhibitors augment both overall and progression-free survival in patients with brain metastases, but are not fully successful in reducing metastatic burden and still a majority of oncologic patients die due to dissemination of the disease. Despite therapy advancements, median survival of patients with brain metastases is several months, although it may vary in different types or subtypes of cancer. Contribution of the innate immune system to cancer progression is well established. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), instead of launching antitumor responses, promote extracellular matrix degradation, secrete immunosuppressive cytokines, promote neoangiogenesis and tumor growth. While their roles as pro-tumorigenic cells facilitating tissue remodeling, invasion and metastasis is well documented, much less is known about the immune microenvironment of brain metastases and roles of specific immune cells in those processes. The central nervous system (CNS) is armed in resident myeloid cells: microglia and perivascular macrophages which colonize CNS in early development and maintain homeostasis in brain parenchyma and at brain-blood vessels interfaces. In this study we discuss available data on the immune composition of most common brain metastases, focusing on interactions between metastatic cancer cells and microglia, perivascular and meningeal macrophages. Cancer cells ‘highjack’ several CNS protective mechanisms and may employ microglia and CNS-border associated macrophages into helping cancer cells to colonize a pre-metastatic niche. We describe emerging molecular insights into mechanisms governing communication between microglia and metastatic cancer cells that culminate in activation of CNS resident microglia and trafficking of monocytic cells from the periphery. We present mechanisms controlling those processes in brain metastases and hypothesize on potential therapeutic approaches. In summary, microglia and non-parenchymal brain macrophages are involved in multiple stages of a metastatic disease and, unlike tumor cells, are genetically stable and predictable, which makes them an attractive target for anticancer therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua You
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,School of Laboratory Medicine, YouJiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, China.,Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Szymon Baluszek
- Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bozena Kaminska
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Rulli E, Legramandi L, Salvati L, Mandala M. The impact of targeted therapies and immunotherapy in melanoma brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer 2019; 125:3776-3789. [PMID: 31287564 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted therapies (TT), combination immunotherapy (CMI), and monoimmunotherapy (MI) in combination with radiotherapy (CRI) or not are commonly used in patients with melanoma brain metastases, but studies that directly compare these strategies are lacking. The current meta-analysis aimed to better elucidate their activity and efficacy. METHODS A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and conference proceedings up to January 2019 was performed to identify trials investigating combination TT, monotargeted TT (mono TT), MI, CMI, and CRI in melanoma brain metastases. The outcomes considered were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the objective response rate (ORR) as evaluated at both intracranial and extracranial sites. Random effects models were used to compare the different therapeutic strategies. RESULTS A total of 15 trials were included that provided 1132 patients for analyses. CMI demonstrated a statistically significant better OS compared with MI (P = .03, P = .05, and P = .03, respectively, at 6 months, 18 months, and 24 months) and combination TT (P = .04 and P = .03, respectively, at 18 months and 24 months). CMI demonstrated a statistically significant better PFS compared with combination TT (P < .001 at 12 months and 18 months), MI (P = .02, P < .02, and P = .05, respectively, at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months), and mono TT (P < .001 at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months). The intracranial objective response rate was higher with CMI compared with mono TT (P < .001) and MI (P < .001), whereas there was no difference between CMI and combination TT. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current meta-analysis suggested that CMI increases long-term PFS and OS compared with MI and combination TT. Combination TT and CMI are associated with a similar intracranial response rate. The role of systemic therapy in combination with radiotherapy remains to be better elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Rulli
- Department of Oncology, Mario Negri IRCCS Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Legramandi
- Department of Oncology, Mario Negri IRCCS Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Salvati
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mario Mandala
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Pope John XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Incidence and prognosis of brain metastases in cutaneous melanoma patients: a population-based study. Melanoma Res 2019; 29:77-84. [PMID: 30379726 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) from cutaneous melanoma are associated with poor prognosis. Population-based data describing the associated factors of incidence and prognosis of BM from melanoma are still lacking. We identified 121 255 melanoma patients diagnosed during 2010-2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, and identified predictive factors for incidence and survival of BM patients by using multivariable logistic and Cox's proportional hazard regression, respectively. We identified 1547 patients with BM at the time of diagnosis of malignant cutaneous melanoma, representing 1.3% of the entire cohort and 35.4% of the subset with metastatic disease. The characteristics associated with higher BM incidence were male sex, age 40-60 years, melanoma location of face/head/neck, histologic type of nodular, higher T-stage, ulceration and extracranial metastases. The median overall survival and median cutaneous melanoma specific survival of patients with BM was 5 and 6 months, respectively. The relative factors of poor survival were older age and more extracranial metastatic sites. In summary, we provided insight into the epidemiology of BM from cutaneous melanoma. These results may provide significant help to improve the screening strategy of BM strategy and update the existing prognosis evaluation system.
Collapse
|
49
|
Abu-Gheida I, Chao S, Murphy E, Suh J, Stevens GH, Mohammadi AM, McNamara M, Yu JS. Targeted Therapy After Brain Radiotherapy for BRAF-Mutated Melanoma With Extensive Ependymal Disease With Prolonged Survival: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Front Oncol 2019; 9:168. [PMID: 30972290 PMCID: PMC6443873 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma brain metastasis with ependymal spread/metastases is uncommon. These cases are frequently classified together with leptomeningeal disease. However, the commonalities and differences in the underlying pathophysiology and clinical outcomes between these two types of spread are not clear. Very few reports on long term outcome and durable central nervous system (CNS) disease control have been reported in the literature. Here, we report a case of a 45 year-old Caucasian lady with BRAF-V600E mutant metastatic melanoma to the brain who had whole brain radiotherapy followed by two Gamma knife radiosurgery treatments for localized disease progression. She then developed extensive ependymal disease progression with no evidence of leptomeningeal spread. She was treated with a repeat course of whole brain radiotherapy and maintained on BRAF and MEK inhibitors with durable CNS disease control for more than a year. This study reviews the management of BRAF-V600E mutant melanoma with ependymal involvement. Management using radiation therapy with maintenance targeted therapy seems to be a reasonable approach to this challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Abu-Gheida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Samuel Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Erin Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - John Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Glen H Stevens
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Michael McNamara
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jennifer S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Herman H, Fazakas C, Haskó J, Molnár K, Mészáros Á, Nyúl-Tóth Á, Szabó G, Erdélyi F, Ardelean A, Hermenean A, Krizbai IA, Wilhelm I. Paracellular and transcellular migration of metastatic cells through the cerebral endothelium. J Cell Mol Med 2019; 23:2619-2631. [PMID: 30712288 PMCID: PMC6433661 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer and melanoma are among the most frequent cancer types leading to brain metastases. Despite the unquestionable clinical significance, important aspects of the development of secondary tumours of the central nervous system are largely uncharacterized, including extravasation of metastatic cells through the blood-brain barrier. By using transmission electron microscopy, here we followed interactions of cancer cells and brain endothelial cells during the adhesion, intercalation/incorporation and transendothelial migration steps. We observed that brain endothelial cells were actively involved in the initial phases of the extravasation by extending filopodia-like membrane protrusions towards the tumour cells. Melanoma cells tended to intercalate between endothelial cells and to transmigrate by utilizing the paracellular route. On the other hand, breast cancer cells were frequently incorporated into the endothelium and were able to migrate through the transcellular way from the apical to the basolateral side of brain endothelial cells. When co-culturing melanoma cells with cerebral endothelial cells, we observed N-cadherin enrichment at melanoma-melanoma and melanoma-endothelial cell borders. However, for breast cancer cells N-cadherin proved to be dispensable for the transendothelial migration both in vitro and in vivo. Our results indicate that breast cancer cells are more effective in the transcellular type of migration than melanoma cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hildegard Herman
- Institute of Life Sciences, Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania
| | - Csilla Fazakas
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
| | - János Haskó
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Kinga Molnár
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary.,Theoretical Medicine Doctoral School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ádám Mészáros
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary.,Doctoral School of Biology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ádám Nyúl-Tóth
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gábor Szabó
- Medical Gene Technology Unit, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Erdélyi
- Medical Gene Technology Unit, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Aurel Ardelean
- Institute of Life Sciences, Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania
| | - Anca Hermenean
- Institute of Life Sciences, Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania
| | - István A Krizbai
- Institute of Life Sciences, Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania.,Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Imola Wilhelm
- Institute of Life Sciences, Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania.,Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary.,Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|