Outcomes in adolescents and young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma treated on US cooperative group protocols: An adult intergroup (E2496) and Children's Oncology Group (COG AHOD0031) comparative analysis

Should adolescents and young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma be treated as children or adults?

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is one of the most common cancers in adolescents and young adults (AYA). Paediatric and adult therapeutic strategies diverge while sharing the common objective: maintaining optimal efficacy with less long-term toxicity. However, few studies have compared the outcome of AYA treated according to one or the other approaches. Among the 148 patients aged 15-25 years, treated at Saint-Louis Hospital for newly diagnosed HL between 2012 and 2018, 71 were treated according to an adult protocol and 77 were treated according to a paediatric one. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were, respectively, 100% and 85%, with no significant difference between treatment groups (85% in paediatric vs. 86% in adult, p = 0.7). Overall, the 5-year PFS was 100% for early favourable stages and 78% for advanced stages. A higher risk of short-term steroid and vincristine-related toxicities was observed in paediatric regimen, whereas a higher risk of late toxicities was expected in adult regimen, due to higher anthracyclines, procarbazine, bleomycin and radiotherapy exposure. These results confirm the excellent outcome of AYA patients with HL, whatever the treatment strategies. They justify a tailor-made therapeutic decision and highlight the importance of managing AYA patients in dedicated units with trained professionals.

Real-World Data on Lymphoma in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA)-Report From the Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry (LaRDR)

Introduction

Lymphoma is a common malignancy among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) which is generally defined as 15-39 years. Relative to other age groups, lymphoma in AYAs remains understudied with heterogeneous treatment options.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients aged 18-60 years in the Australasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry (LaRDR) with new diagnoses of the common subtypes of lymphoma in AYAs between January 2016 and April 2023. The subtypes are classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and Burkitt lymphoma (BL). Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment and outcome data were collected, and comparisons were made between AYAs (18-39 years) and older adults (OAs) (aged 40-60).

Results

AYAs had higher rates of cHL and PMBCL whereas OAs presented more frequently with DLBCL. AYAs with cHL and PMBCL had higher rates of early-stage and low-risk disease than OAs. In contrast, both AYAs and OAs were more likely to present with advanced-stage DLBCL and BL. AYAs with cHL were more likely to be treated with BEACOPP as compared to OAs who were more commonly treated with ABVD. There was no significant difference in treatment regimens for DLBCL, PMBCL or BL between AYAs and OAs. AYAs with cHL had better overall survival (OS) compared to OAs; specifically, cHL AYAs had better OS and DLBCL AYAs had better progression-free survival (PFS) and OS compared to OAs.

Conclusion

The study provides valuable data on patient and disease characteristics, treatments used and outcomes in AYA compared to OA aged 40-60 years. Registry data such as from LaRDR can help improve treatment standardisation and AYA patient outcomes.

Trial Registration

The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: The LYSA pragmatic guidelines

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a distinct entity among hematological malignancies of B-cell origin. It is characterized by its unique histopathological features and generally favorable prognosis. Over the years, advancements in understanding its pathogenesis, coupled with refined diagnostic and evaluation modalities, as well as therapeutic strategies, have significantly transformed the landscape of HL management. In this article, we present a comprehensive set of recommendations for the management of HL, encompassing various aspects of diagnosis, risk stratification, evaluation, and treatment. These recommendations are based on the latest evidence-based guidelines, expert consensus opinions, and clinical trial data, aiming to provide clinicians with a practical framework for delivering optimal care to patients with HL.

Hodgkin lymphoma and liquid biopsy: a story to be told

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represents a neoplasm primarily affecting adolescents and young adults, necessitating the development of precise diagnostic and monitoring tools. Specifically, classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), comprising 90% of cases, necessitating tailored treatments to minimize late toxicities. Although positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has enhanced response assessment, its limitations underscore the urgency for more reliable progression predictive tools. Genomic characterisation of rare Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells is challenging but essential. Recent studies employ single-cell molecular analyses, mass cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) to unveil mutational landscapes. The integration of liquid biopsies, particularly circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), extracellular vesicles (EVs), miRNAs and cytokines, emerge as groundbreaking approaches. Recent studies demonstrate ctDNA's potential in assessing therapy responses and predicting relapses in HL. Despite cHL-specific ctDNA applications being relatively unexplored, studies emphasize its value in monitoring treatment outcomes. Overall, this review underscores the imperative role of liquid biopsies in advancing HL diagnosis and monitoring.

Palliative Care in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

Palliative care (PC) aims to improve quality of life (QOL) for patients with serious illness and their families by recognizing and alleviating the physical, emotional, social, existential, and spiritual suffering of patients and their communities. Because adolescents and young adults (AYAs, age 15-39 years) with cancer commonly report distress across all these domains and because that distress translates to their QOL during and after their cancers, PC is particularly relevant for this population. Here, we review the evidence for PC among AYAs with cancer, including its rationale, gaps, opportunities, and implications for care delivery. For example, nearly 90% of AYAs with cancer report distressing symptoms during their treatment, those who survive report ongoing unmet psychosocial and physical health needs, and those who die from their cancers are highly likely to receive medically intense care that is discordant with their goals and values. AYA communication and decision making can be challenging because of ethical and developmental considerations regarding the patient's autonomy and competing priorities of patients and caregivers. PC interventions (including primary PC delivered by oncologists, routine PC subspecialty care, symptom tracking, advance care planning, and psychosocial programs promoting AYA resilience) are all associated with improved patient-centered outcomes. However, PC is inconsistently integrated into AYA oncology care, and access to PC programs is not equitable; marginalized groups continue to experience poorer outcomes. Ongoing and future research and clinical initiatives must continue to bridge these gaps. Improving the QOL of AYAs with cancer is a shared goal of the larger clinical oncology community, and including PC in AYA cancer care delivery can help attain that goal.

Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma in Adolescents and Young Adults

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represents one of the more common cancers occurring in adolescent and young adults (AYAs) age 15-39 years. Despite a generally high cure rate, age-related differences in HL biology and the optimal therapeutic approaches including supportive care and risks for long-term adverse effects in the AYA population remain understudied. After an overview of HL epidemiology and biology in the AYA population, this review will cover frontline pediatric and adult treatment approaches. Recently completed and ongoing studies will foster harmonization of risk group definition and trial eligibility criteria across the AYA spectrum, enabling more rapid progress. In addition to treatment approaches, an evolving holistic care approach to AYA HL will result in enhanced understanding of unique challenges, and continued improved short- and long-term outcome for these patients.

[Characteristics of radiotherapy for adolescents and young adults]

Radiotherapy for adolescents and young adults is complex in several aspects. The population is very heterogeneous and has characteristics derived from both paediatric and adult populations both in terms of pathology (anatomical pathology, response to treatment) and the patient's physical, biological and psychological characteristics. This article reviews the characteristics to be taken into account in adolescent and young adult patients radiotherapy and more particularly in some of the most common diseases.

Disparities in care and outcomes for adolescent and young adult lymphoma patients

Though survival outcomes among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with lymphoma have improved over the last three decades, socially vulnerable populations including non-White, low-income, and publicly insured groups continue to trail behind on survival curves. These disparities, while likely the result of both biological and non-biological factors, can be largely attributed to inequities in care over the full cancer continuum. Nationally representative studies have demonstrated that from diagnosis through therapy and into long-term survivorship, socially vulnerable AYAs with lymphoma face barriers to care that impact their short and long-term survival. Thus, improving outcomes for all AYAs with lymphoma requires dedicated study to understand, and then address the unique challenges faced by non-White and low-income lymphoma populations within this age group.

Significance of E-lesions in Hodgkin lymphoma and the creation of a new consensus definition: a report from SEARCH

The International Staging Evaluation and Response Criteria Harmonization for Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma (SEARCH for CAYAHL) seeks to provide an appropriate, universal differentiation between E-lesions and stage IV extranodal disease in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). A literature search was performed through the PubMed and Google Scholar databases using the terms "Hodgkin disease," and "extranodal," "extralymphatic," "E lesions," "E stage," or "E disease." Publications were reviewed for the number of participants; median age and age range; diagnostic modalities used for staging; and the definition, incidence, and prognostic significance of E-lesions. Thirty-six articles describing 12 640 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most articles reported staging per the Ann Arbor (72%, 26/36) or Cotswolds modification of the Ann Arbor staging criteria (25%, 9/36), and articles rarely defined E-lesions or disambiguated "extranodal disease." The overall incidence of E-lesions for patients with stage I-III HL was 11.5% (1330/11 602 unique patients). Available stage-specific incidence analysis of 3888 patients showed a similar incidence of E-lesions in stage II (21.2%) and stage III (21.9%), with E-lesions rarely seen with stage I disease (1.1%). E-lesions likely remain predictive, but we cannot unequivocally conclude that identifying E-lesions in HL imparts prognostic value in the modern era of the more selective use of targeted radiation therapy. A harmonized E-lesion definition was reached based on the available evidence and the consensus of the SEARCH working group. We recommend that this definition of E-lesion be applied in future clinical trials with explicit reporting to confirm the prognostic value of E-lesions.

Healthcare Utilization Disparities of Adolescent and Young Adults Compared to the Older Lymphoma Population

BACKGROUND

Adolescent and Young Adults (AYAs) are an underserved, high-risk population. Identifying health care utilization patterns, and particularly acute care visits, is important as these are high-intensity, expensive services. We investigated whether differences exist in health care utilization between the AYA lymphoma population compared to their older adult counterparts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two correlated outcomes were used to measure health care utilization: 4 or more acute visits (emergency department or urgent care) and number of nonacute visits (office or telephone visits). We studied 442 patients with aggressive lymphoma patients 15 years or older at time of diagnosis managed at our cancer center within 2 years of their diagnosis. A multivariate generalized linear mixed model simultaneously estimated the effect of baseline predictors on 4 or more acute care visit with robust Poisson regression and nonacute visit counts with negative binomial regression allowing for a within-subject random effect.

RESULTS

AYAs had increased risk of having ≥4 acute visits (RR = 1.96; P = .047) compared to their older counterparts. Obesity (RR = 2.04, P = .015) and living less than 50 miles from the cancer center (RR = 3.48, P = .015) were independently associated with higher risk of acute care usage. Acute care visits for psychiatric or substance use related reasons were significantly higher (P = .0001) among AYA (10/114, 8.8%) vs. non-AYA (3/328, 0.9%).

CONCLUSION

Disease-targeted interventions to address high acute health care utilization is needed amongst AYAs. Additionally, early multidisciplinary involvement after cancer diagnosis particularly with psychiatric expertise amongst AYAs and palliative care involvement in both groups is needed.

Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Hodgkin lymphoma

The goal of therapy in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is to maximize overall survival while minimizing the morbidity of curative therapy. Key findings from recent Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials include: (i) superior event-free survival with the addition of brentuximab vedotin (Bv) in frontline regimens for high-risk disease, (ii) successful reduction in myeloablative regimens with demonstrated safety and efficacy of Bv and checkpoint inhibitor therapy in relapsed disease, and (ii) the potential to select a population that can be salvaged after relapse without receiving a stem cell transplant. The COG HL committee will lead a National cancer Institute National Clinical Trials Network phase 3 trial to evaluate the combination of Bv/nivolumab in early-stage disease. Ongoing advances in technology and blood biomarkers are increasing the ability to deliver biologically driven, personalized treatment for HL.

A cross-sectional study evaluating health-related quality of life of Chinese pediatric patients with hematological malignancies using EQ-5D-Y

Background

The study aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to estimate the health utility of pediatric patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) in China.

Method

A cross-sectional study recruited a series of pediatric inpatients diagnosed with HM from November 2018 to May 2019 in the Shanghai Children's Medical Center. Subjects were interviewed to collect sociodemographic information about themselves and their guardians. The EQ-5D-Y was completed by each patient to rate their own HRQoL, which later derived the health utility. The health status was also assessed by clinicians following the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) system. Upon the descriptive analysis and univariate analysis, multivariate generalized linear models were built to explore the associations of risk factors with HRQoL measures of utility, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and the five EQ-5D-Y domains.

Results

The 96 subjects had a mean age of 10.5 years and included 62 (64.4%) boys. There were 46 (47.9%) and 25 (26.0%) children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, respectively. The means (SD) of utility and EQ-VAS scores were 0.88 (0.10) and 85.8 (15.1), respectively. Twenty-six (27.1%) patients were graded poor health by the ECOG standard (score 2/3). Both univariate and multivariate analyses found strong correlations between ECOG and HRQoL. After adjusting for covariates, poor ECOG score was significantly associated with an impaired utility and VAS of -0.103 and -8.65, respectively. With regard to individual HRQoL domains, worse ECOG was more likely to report health problems with an increased risk of 2.94 to 12.50; residence, income, guardians' education, and disease duration were also found to be significantly related to either the utility or certain health domains.

Conclusion

The HRQoL of Chinese pediatric patients with HM is considered relatively poor and of great concern to healthcare. With the strong correlations between EQ-5D-Y-related HRQoL measures and the traditional clinical index ECOG, the EQ-5D-Y is able to provide valuable evidence for clinical decision-making at the individual level. At the same time, its health utility can inform resource allocation at a macro level.

Using Teamwork to Bridge the Adolescent and Young Adult Gap

PURPOSE

Individuals diagnosed with cancer age between 15 and 39 years (adolescents and young adults [AYAs]) have not seen improvement in survival compared with children or older adults; clinical trial accrual correlates with survival. Unique unmet needs among AYAs related to psychosocial support and fertility preservation (FP) are associated with health-related quality of life.

METHODS

We enhanced existing structures and leveraged faculty/staff across pediatric/adult oncology to create novel teams focused on AYA (age 15-39 years) care at a single center, with minimal dedicated staff and no change to revenue streams. We aimed to influence domains shown to drive survival and health-related quality of life: clinical trial enrollment, physician/staff collaboration, psychosocial support, and FP. We captured metrics 3 months after patients presented to the institution and compared them before/after Program implementation using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Among 139 AYAs (age 15-39 years) from the pre-Program era (January 2016-February 2019: adult, n = 79; pediatric, n = 60), and 279 from the post-Program era (February 2019-March 2022: adult, n = 215; pediatric, n = 64), there was no change in clinical trial enrollment(P ≥ .3), whereas there was an increase in the proportion of AYAs referred for supportive care and psychology (pediatric: P ≤ .02; adult: P ≤ .001); whose oncologists discussed FP (pediatric: 15% v 52%, P < .0001; adult: 37% v 50%, P = .0004); and undergoing FP consults (pediatric: 8% v39%, P < .0001; adult 23% v 38%, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

This team-based framework has effected change in most targeted domains. To affect all domains and design optimal interventions, it is crucial to understand patient-level and facility-level barriers/facilitators to FP and clinical trial enrollment.

Survival of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC) versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD), the de facto standard of care in adult-onset Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), has not been directly compared to doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC), a pediatric-aimed regimen designed to reduce late effects. We aimed to describe the single-institution experience of using both regimens in patients with pediatric HL.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated a total of 224 patients diagnosed with HL between 1999 and 2018 at Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), of which 93 patients were eligible having received ABVD (n = 46) or ABVE-PC (n = 47) chemotherapy as their initial treatment. Descriptive analyses were performed using the Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method. Events included death, relapse, and secondary malignancy. We also describe the use of radiation therapy, pulmonary toxicity, and cardiomyopathy determined by shortening fraction <29%. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the patients receiving ABVE-PC or ABVD in regard for stage, risk group, or prognostic variables, such as the presence or absence of "B" symptoms, bulky disease, and extra-nodal involvement. A greater proportion of patients treated with ABVE-PC received consolidating external beam radiation treatment (XRT) either by randomization or by response compared to ABVD (59.6% vs. 32.6%, respectively, p = .01). While not statistically significant, response to therapy, assessed by positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) where available, mirrored the use for radiation (rapid response 58.3% vs. 90.0%, n = 34, p = .11). The median dose of anthracycline (doxorubicin) was the same in patients receiving ABVE-PC versus ABVD (200 vs. 200 mg/m² , interquartile range 200-250 vs. 200-300 mg/m² , p = .002). There was no difference in event-free survival (p = .63) or overall survival (p = .37) with a median follow-up length of 3.9 years.

CONCLUSIONS

ABVD and ABVE-PC achieved similar survival outcomes in our single-institution cohort.

Impact of locus of care on outcomes in adolescents and young adults with osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma treated at pediatric versus adult cancer centers: An IMPACT cohort study

BACKGROUND

Location of cancer care (LOC; pediatric vs. adult center) impacts outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with some cancer types. Data on the impact of LOC on survival in AYA with osteosarcoma (OSS) and Ewing sarcoma (EWS) are limited OBJECTIVES: To compare differences in demographics, disease/treatment characteristics, and survival in a population-based cohort of AYA with OSS or EWS treated at pediatric versus adult centers METHODS: The Initiative to Maximize Progress in Adolescent Cancer Therapy (IMPACT) cohort captured demographic, disease, and treatment data for all AYA (15-21 years old) diagnosed with OSS and EWS in Ontario, Canada between 1992 and 2012. Patients were linked to provincial administrative health care databases. Outcomes were compared between patients treated in pediatric versus adult centers.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-seven AYA were diagnosed with OSS (LOC: 47 pediatric, 90 adult) and 84 with EWS (38 pediatric, 46 adult). AYA treated at pediatric centers were more likely to be enrolled in a clinical trial (OSS 55% vs. 1%, p < .001; EWS 53% vs. 2%, p < .001) and received higher cumulative chemotherapy doses. Five-year event-free survival (EFS ± standard error) in OSS and EWS were 47% ± 4% and 43% ± 5%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the impact of LOC (pediatric vs. adult center) on EFS in OSS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-2.27, p = .69) and EWS (adjusted HR 1.82, 95% CI: 0.97-3.43, p = .06) was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Despite disparities in trial participation and chemotherapy doses, outcomes did not differ by LOC suggesting that AYA with bone tumors can be treated at either pediatric or adult centers.

Survival by age in paediatric and adolescent patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective pooled analysis of children's oncology group trials

BACKGROUND

Adolescents with Hodgkin lymphoma have worse disease outcomes than children. Whether these differences persist within clinical trials is unknown. We examined survival, by age, in patients receiving response-adapted therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma on Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials.

METHODS

Patients (aged 1-21 years) diagnosed with classical Hodgkin lymphoma and enrolled between Sept 23, 2002, and Jan 19, 2012, on one of three phase 3 COG trials in the USA and Canada were eligible for inclusion. The three COG trials were defined by risk group according to Ann Arbor stage, B-symptoms, and bulk (AHOD0431 [low risk; NCT00302003], AHOD0031 [intermediate risk; NCT00025259], or AHOD0831 [high risk; NCT01026220]). The outcomes of this study were event-free survival (death, relapse, or subsequent neoplasm) and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards models estimated survival, adjusting for disease and treatment factors both overall and in patients with mixed cellularity or non-mixed cellularity (nodular sclerosing and not-otherwise-specified) disease.

FINDINGS

Of 2155 patients enrolled on the three trials, 1907 (88·4%; 968 [50·8%] male and 939 [49·2%] female; 1227 [64·3%] non-Hispanic White) were included in this analysis. After a median follow-up of 7·4 years (IQR 4·3-10·2), older patients (aged ≥15 years) had worse unadjusted 5-year event-free survival (80% [95% CI 78-83]) than did younger patients (aged <15 years; 86% [83-88]; HR 1·38 [1·11-1·71]; p=0·0038). Older patients also had worse unadjusted 5-year overall survival than did younger patients (96% [95% CI 95-97] vs 99% [98-99]; HR 2·50 [1·41-4·45]; p=0·0012). In patients with non-mixed cellularity histology, older patients had a significantly increased risk of having an event than did younger patients with the same histology (HR 1·32 [1·03-1·68]; p=0·027). Older patients with mixed cellularity had significantly worse 5-year event-free survival than did younger patients in unadjusted (77% [95% CI 65-86] for older patients vs 94% [88-97] for younger patients; HR 2·93 [1·37-6·29]; p=0·0039) and multivariable models (HR 3·72 [1·56-8·91]; p=0·0032). Overall, older patients were more likely to die than younger patients (HR 3·08 [1·49-6·39]; p=0·0025).

INTERPRETATION

Adolescents (≥15 years) treated on COG Hodgkin lymphoma trials had worse event-free survival and increased risk of death compared with children (<15 years). Our findings highlight the need for prospective studies to examine tumour and host biology, and to test novel therapies across the age spectrum.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health, St Baldrick's Foundation, and Lymphoma Research Foundation.

Initial cancer treatment and survival in children, adolescents, and young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a treatable tumor affecting children, adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15-39 years old). Population-based studies report worse survival for non-White children and AYAs but have limited data on individual therapeutic exposures. This study examined overall and HL-specific survival in a population-based cohort of patients while adjusting for sociodemographic factors and treatment.

METHODS

Data for 4807 patients younger than 40 years with HL (2007-2017) were obtained from the California Cancer Registry. Individual treatment information was extracted from text fields; chemotherapy regimens were defined by standard approaches for pediatric and adult HL. Multivariable Cox models examined the influence of patient and treatment factors on survival.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 4.4 years, 95% of the patients were alive. Chemotherapy differed by age, with 70% of 22- to 39-year-olds and 41% of <22-year-olds receiving doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (P < .001). In multivariable models, older patients (22-39 vs < 21 y; hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.10), Black (vs White patients); HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.25-2.88), and Hispanic patients (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.06-1.99) experienced worse survival; among those < 21 y, Black race was associated with a 3.3-fold increased risk of death (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.43-7.42).

CONCLUSIONS

In children and AYAs with HL, older age and non-White race/ethnicity predicted worse survival after adjustments for treatment data. Further work is needed to identify the biological and nonbiological factors driving disparities in these at-risk populations.

Patterns of Cancer Care and Association with Survival among Younger Adolescents and Young Adults: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Younger adolescents and young adults (AYA) may receive care from either adult or pediatric oncologists. We explored patterns of care in this population and whether survival is associated with provider type.

METHODS

Utilizing the California Cancer Registry, we examined a cohort of 9,993 AYAs diagnosed with cancer aged 15 to 24 years from 1999 to 2008. Provider type (adult/pediatric) was determined by individual physician identifiers. For provider type, multivariable logistic regression models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, diagnosis, and stage. For observed survival, Cox proportional hazard models were additionally adjusted for provider type. ORs and HR with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined.

RESULTS

Most patients saw adult providers (87.3% overall; 72.7% aged 15-19 years). Patients with acute leukemia, sarcoma, and central nervous system (CNS) malignancies more often saw pediatric providers [OR (95% CI) adult versus pediatric 0.48 (0.39-0.59), 0.74 (0.60-0.92), 0.76 (0.60-0.96), respectively]; those with germ cell tumors and other cancers, including carcinomas, more often saw adult providers [2.26 (1.72-2.98), 1.79 (1.41-2.27), respectively]. In aggregate and for most cancers individually, there was no survival difference by provider type [overall HR (95% CI) 1.00 (0.86-1.18)]. Higher survival was associated with pediatric providers for CNS malignancies [1.63 (1.12-2.37)] and rhabdomyosarcoma [2.22 (1.03-4.76)], and with adult providers for non-Hodgkin lymphoma [0.61 (0.39-0.96)].

CONCLUSIONS

Most AYAs 15 to 24 years old are treated by medical oncologists. In general, survival was not associated with provider type.

IMPACT

Current patterns of care for this population support increased collaboration between medical and pediatric oncology, including joint clinical trials.

Superior outcomes with paediatric protocols in adolescents and young adults with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Survival disparities by locus of care (LOC; paediatric versus adult) among adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) are well documented. Whether similar disparities exist among AYA with aggressive mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is unknown. We identified all Ontario, Canada AYA aged 15-21 years at diagnosis of B-NHL between 1992 and 2012. Demographic, disease, treatment and outcome data were chart abstracted. The impact of LOC on event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined, adjusted for patient and disease covariates. Among 176 AYA with B-NHL, 62 (35·2%) received therapy at paediatric centres. The 5-year EFS and OS [± standard error (SE)] for the overall cohort were 72·2 [3·4]% and 76·1 [3·2]% respectively. Both EFS and OS were superior among paediatric centre AYA [EFS (± SE) 82·2 (4·9)% vs. 66·7 (4·4)%, P = 0·02; OS 85·5 (4·5)% vs. 71·1 (4·3)%, P = 0·03]. Adjusted for histology, stage and time period, adult centre AYA had inferior EFS [hazard ratio (HR) 2·4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·1-4·9, P = 0·02] and OS (HR 2·5, 95% CI 1·1-5·7, P = 0·03). Sensitivity analyses restricted to the latest time period, when most adult centre AYA received rituximab, demonstrated similar disparities. Similar to AYA with ALL, AYA with B-NHL may benefit from being treated with paediatric protocols. Studies prospectively validating these results are warranted.

Ability of final PET/CT to predict response to first-line treatment in real patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Up to 25% of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and a negative interim PET/CT will progress. Unfortunately, there are few published studies on the predictive value of PET/CT performed after finishing treatment. The objective of our study was to assess the role of the final PET/CT (fPET/CT) in predicting progression in a retrospective series of patients treated in the last 10 years with a homogeneous protocol (ABVD + / - radiotherapy). We reviewed a cohort of 227 patients with newly diagnosed cHL. fPET/CT was performed on 212 patients (93%). In patients with a positive fPET, progression-free survival at 60 months was 17% (94% if fPET was negative, p = 0.000). The positive and negative predictive values for the fPET were 76% and 94%, respectively (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.000). In the subgroup of patients with advanced-stage cHL, progression-free survival at 60 months was 91% with negative fPET and 0% with positive fPET (p = 0.000). However, fPET was negative in 19 of the 29 patients with a positive interim PET/CT (only 2 showed progression). In conclusion, fPET is a useful tool to predict treatment failure in patients with newly diagnosed cHL, especially advanced-stage disease.

Multidisciplinary Management of Adolescent and Young Adult Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Successful management of adolescent and young adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) requires a multidisciplinary approach to care with special attention paid to the unique medical, logistical, and psychosocial challenges faced by this group. The emotional and social changes and big life transitions that occur between the ages of 15 and 39 result in a broad scope of supportive care needs that differ from children or adults in similar circumstances. Currently, care of adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with HL may be fractured across the pediatric-adult cancer care continuum resulting in this group being less well studied than pediatric or adult patients in general. In order to optimize outcomes, these patients need access to medical oncologists and radiation oncologists, advanced practice providers (APPs), psychologists/social work, financial support services, fertility specialists, survivorship care, and advocates with AYA expertise that can help navigate the healthcare system. A strong AYA support system established early with targeted education and resources may influence treatment compliance and likelihood of long-term follow-up. Surveys of the AYA cancer population have identified areas of opportunity for the healthcare team to collaborate to identify needs, design interventions to meet them, and ultimately develop evidence-based guidelines that will enable us to offer AYAs with HL the quality care they deserve.

Photon or Proton Therapy for Adolescent and Young Adult Tumors Focused on Long-Term Survivors

Background

This study was conducted to evaluate late toxicities in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who received photon or proton therapy.

Methodology

A total of 106 AYA patients who received proton and photon therapy and were followed-up for more than two years were retrospectively evaluated. The median age of patients was 22 years (range, 15-29 years). A total of 47 patients were male and 59 were female. A total of 35 and 71 patients received photon and proton therapy, respectively. All but one patient received radiotherapy with curative intent. The target disease was benign and malignant in 28 and 78 patients, respectively.

Results

The median follow-up period in all patients was 62 months (range: 24-293 months). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 20 patients. There was one case of grade 5 toxicity (myelodysplastic syndrome), which was probably due to chemotherapy. No other secondary cancers were observed. Regarding life events, 15 and 88 patients were married and unmarried at the start of radiotherapy, respectively. Of the 88 unmarried patients, five were married after radiotherapy. Occupation and education were evaluated in 71 patients. Of the 71 patients, 33 were students, 21 were employed, and 16 were unemployed. Of the 33 students, eight were employed and 11 were at a higher educational grade after radiotherapy. Of the 21 employed patients, 17 had the same jobs and four had lost their jobs after radiotherapy. For the 16 unemployed patients, all remained unemployed.

Conclusions

This study is one of the largest studies to focus on life after radiation therapy among AYAs and suggests that cancer treatment has an influence on life events.

Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Nonclassic Presentation

Hodgkin lymphoma classically presents as lymphadenopathy with contiguous spread with or without associated B symptoms including night sweats, weight loss, and fever. With timely diagnosis and treatment, this is a potentially curable disease. This report describes a unique case of Hodgkin lymphoma that presented with localized back pain without overt evidence of lymph node involvement. This nonclassic presentation offers a diagnostic challenge that emphasizes the importance of keeping a broad differential in an adolescent or young adult patient with lytic bone lesions.

AYA Considerations for Aggressive Lymphomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lymphoma is the one of the most common cancer diagnoses among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 15-39. Despite significant advances in outcomes observed in older adults and younger children, improvements in AYAs have lagged behind. The reasons for this are likely multifactorial including disparities in access to health insurance, low rates of enrollment to clinical trials, potential differences in disease biology, and unique psychosocial challenges. Here we will review Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL), two of the most common aggressive lymphomas that occur in AYAs. We will discuss the current knowledge about disease biology in AYAs, adult and pediatric treatment strategies, novel targeted therapies, and ongoing AYA clinical trials in these lymphoma subtypes. We also will review unique considerations for treatment-related toxicities in AYAs and psychosocial issues relevant to this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pediatric and adult trials in HL and PMBCL have demonstrated that treatment with dose-intense chemotherapeutic regimens with or without radiation results in high cure rates but can also be associated with long-term toxicity which must be considered in this young population. Novel targeted agents such as the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin and/or antibodies targeted against PD-1/PD-L1 have demonstrated activity in the relapsed setting and are currently being evaluated in the upfront setting, which may reduce our reliance on therapies associated with long-term toxicity. AYA-focused clinical trials are currently underway to better elucidate the optimal therapy for lymphomas in this age group. There is an urgent need for clinical trials including AYAs in order to increase the knowledge of age-specific outcomes, toxicities, disease biology, and the need to develop comprehensive AYA care models that meet the unique and complex care needs of this patient population.

The risk of late effects following pediatric and adult radiotherapy regimens in Hodgkin lymphoma

PURPOSE

Adolescent young adults (AYA) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are treated according to either pediatric or adult protocols, however, the best strategy has yet to be established. We describe the AYA patients referred for radiotherapy and quantify the risk of radiation-induced late effects and the corresponding life years lost (LYL) following pediatric and adult regimens.

METHODS

Patients ≤24 years irradiated for HL were included. For each patient, organs at risk (OARs) were contoured and dosimetric parameters were extracted. Estimated excess hazard ratios of radiation-induced late effects were calculated from dose-response models and LYL attributable to various late effects were estimated.

RESULTS

In total, 77 patients were analyzed (pediatric regimen: 15; adult regimen: 62). Age, clinical stage, and the number of patients enrolled in protocols were significantly different between the groups. Pediatric patients had more advanced disease, which resulted in larger target volumes and higher doses to most OARs, despite a lower prescribed dose compared to adult regimens. LYL estimates were all higher with the pediatric regimens. Total LYL with pediatric and adult treatment regimens were 3.2 years and 2.3 years, respectively. Due to the clinical stage variation and heterogeneity in disease location, a direct comparison of the estimated risks of late effects was only exploratory.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric regimens selected patients with more advanced disease to radiotherapy resulting in larger target volumes and higher doses to the OARs. Target volume rather than prescribed dose impacted OAR exposure. Consequently, the estimated risk of radiation-induced late effects and corresponding LYL was increased when compared to adult regimens.

Hodgkin Lymphoma in Adolescent and Young Adults: Real-World Data from a Single Tertiary Cancer Center in India

Purpose: There is lack of consensus on management of adolescent and young adult (AYA) Hodgkin lymphoma with respect to chemotherapy approach (adult or pediatric). Hence we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy in AYA Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients and Methods: It is a retrospective, observational, single-center study. From January 2013 to December 2016, all consecutive patients with AYA (15-25 years, all stages) were analyzed. The primary endpoint of the study was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints were complete response rates (CR) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 220 patients (70% men) with median age 20 years were evaluated. A significant proportion of patients had adverse features such as stage III/IV disease (63%), bulky disease (63%), extranodal involvement (37%), and marrow involvement (22%). After two cycles and end of therapy, 77% patients achieved complete response. Primary progressive disease was seen in 6% patients. With a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 19 (8.6%) patients relapsed, 1 patient developed second malignancy, and 6 patients died. Three-year EFS and OS were 81.3% and 97%, respectively. Bleomycin-induced lung injury was seen in 16% patients. On multivariate analysis stage at presentation, bone marrow involvement, partial response at interim positron emission tomography and International prognosis score (IPS) >3 were predictors of poor EFS. Conclusion: ABVD is an effective and safe regimen in AYA Hodgkin lymphoma. Advanced disease with high IPS (>3) score needs an early escalation approach to escBEACOPP regimen.

[Influence of age on indications and modalities of radiation therapy: What to keep in mind for adolescents and young adults?]

When using radiation therapy for adolescents and young adults (AYA), paediatricians, adults' oncologists and radiation oncologists need to keep in mind several particularities through the whole therapeutic process. They embrace the indication, target volumes, prescribed dose, treatment techniques and follow-up. Indeed, the young age and the cancer features that characterised this population influence the modalities of irradiation. This article highlights the key points of AYA care with radiation therapy.

Comparison of Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Children and Adolescents. A Twenty Year Experience with MH'96 and LH2004 AIEOP (Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology) Protocols

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) represent a distinct group of patients. The objectives of this study were: To compare adolescent prognosis to that of younger children; to compare the results achieved with the two consecutive protocols in both age groups; to analyze clinical characteristics of children and adolescents. Between 1996 and 2017, 1759 patients aged <18 years were evaluable for the study. Five hundred and sixty patients were treated with the MH’96 protocol and 1199 with the LH2004 protocol. Four hundred and eighty-two were adolescents aged ≥15 years. Patients in both age groups showed very favorable prognoses. In particular, OS improved with the LH2004 protocol, especially in the adolescent group and in the low risk group, where radiation therapy was spared. Adolescent characteristics differed significantly from the children’s according to sex, histology, and the presence of symptoms. Remarkable is the decrease both in mixed cellularity in the children and in low stages in both age groups in the LH2004 protocol with respect to MH’96 protocol. Based on our experience, adopting pediatric protocols for AYA does not compromise patient outcomes.

Treatment patterns and outcomes in adolescents and young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma in pediatric versus adult centers: An IMPACT Cohort Study

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a common adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer. While outcome disparities between pediatric vs. adult centers [locus of care (LOC)] have been demonstrated in other AYA cancers such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia, they have not been well studied in HL. We therefore compared population‐based treatment patterns and outcomes in AYA HL by LOC. The IMPACT Cohort includes data on all Ontario, Canada AYA (15‐21 years) diagnosed with HL between 1992 and 2012. Linkage to population‐based health administrative data identified late effects. We examined LOC‐based differences in treatment modalities, cumulative doses, event‐free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and late effects. Among 954 AYA, 711 (74.5%) received therapy at adult centers. Pediatric center AYA experienced higher rates of radiation therapy but lower cumulative doses of doxorubicin and bleomycin. 10‐year EFS did not differ between pediatric vs. adult cancer vs. community centers (83.8% ± 2.4% vs. 82.8% ± 1.6% vs. 82.7%±3.0%; P = .71); LOC was not significantly associated with either EFS or OS in multivariable analyses. Higher incidences of second malignancies in pediatric center AYA and of cardiovascular events in adult center AYA were observed, but were not significant. In conclusion, while pediatric and adult centers used different treatment strategies, outcomes were equivalent. Differences in treatment exposures are however likely to result in different late‐effect risks. Protocol choice should be guided by individual late‐effect risk.

Adolescents and young adults with classical Hodgkin lymphoma in northern Tunisia: insights from an adult single-institutional study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to extensively describe the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic outcomes of adolescents and young adults (AYA) population with classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL). Then, a comparison between AYAs and adults and between the subgroups of AYAs treated with the same adult protocol was accomplished to further inform on optimal therapy approach of choice for adolescent patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this mono-centric, retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records. We analyzed 112 consecutive North Tunisian patients, including 66 AYAs (15 to 39 years) and 46 adults (≥40years) affected by cHL treated from 2000 to 2015 at Salah Azaiez Institute. Then, we performed a comparative analysis between AYA and 46 adult patients and a subgroup analysis between adolescents and young adults. All patients were treated according to the national protocol for HL, edited by the Tunisian Society of Hematology. The treatment included chemotherapy and involved-field radiotherapy (RT) at a dose of 20 or 30 Grays (Gy) for responders and 36Gy for non-responders.

RESULTS

AYA patients presented with adverse features with nodular sclerosis subtype (p=3.88×10^-02) and mediastinal mass involvement (p=9.40×10^-04). At a median follow-up of 51 and 32 months for AYAs and adults, respectively, no statistical difference in terms of 3 and 5-years overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) was shown. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, in AYAs, the ABVD regimen has an impact on 3-years EFS (p=4.63×10^-02). The 36Gy RT was associated with the best 3-years EFS (p=9.24×10^-03). Besides, AYA patients with advanced-stage had the worst 3-years OS (76%) (p=2.41×10^-02). Although the adolescents and young adults shared similar clinical presentation, we noted that the adolescent group had the worst 3-years EFS (48%), but the best 3-years OS (91%). We identified 15% of primary refractory patients and a rate of toxicity of 5.3% in AYA.

CONCLUSION

The treatment approach used is well tolerated by adult patients. However, the AYA patients and particularly adolescent subgroup had more advanced disease at diagnosis and should be treated more intensively in dedicated units. RT dose<36Gy and ABVD chemotherapy were associated with lower EFS in this population.

Pediatric hodgkin lymphoma: disparities in survival by race

The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with disparities in overall survival (OS) by race in pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients. We evaluated clinical features and survival among patients ≤21 years of age diagnosed with stage I-IV HL from 2004 to 2015 from the National Cancer DataBase (NCDB) using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Among 11,546 patients with pediatric HL, 9285 patients met eligibility criteria. Black patients experienced a 5-year OS of 91.5% vs 95.9% in White patients (p < .0001). After adjusting for confounders, Black race was associated with a significantly decreased OS (HR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.12-1.99; p < .01). In stratified analysis by ages ≤15 years, 16-18 years, and >18 years, Black race was associated with poorer OS among compared to Whites with rates of 95.4% vs 97.7%, 87.1% vs 96.1%, and 91.6% vs 94.6% respectively. Overall, Black pediatric HL patients had lower overall survival in this study.

Late mortality and chronic health conditions in long-term survivors of early-adolescent and young adult cancers: a retrospective cohort analysis from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment outcomes among survivors of cancer diagnosed during adolescence and early young adulthood have not been characterised independently of survivors of cancers diagnosed during childhood. We aimed to describe chronic health conditions and all-cause and cause-specific mortality among survivors of early-adolescent and young adult cancer.

METHODS

The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) is a retrospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up of 5-year survivors diagnosed with cancer before the age of 21 years at 27 academic institutions in the USA and Canada between 1970 and 1999. We evaluated outcomes among survivors of early-adolescent and young adult cancer (aged 15-20 years at diagnosis) and survivors diagnosed at age younger than 15 years (matched on primary cancer diagnosis, including leukaemia, lymphoma, CNS tumours, neuroblastoma, Wilms tumour, soft-tissue sarcomas, and bone cancer) by comparing both groups to siblings of the same age. Mortality was ascertained with the National Death Index. Chronic health conditions were classified with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were estimated with age-specific, sex-specific, and calendar year-specific US rates. Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for chronic health conditions and 95% CIs.

FINDINGS

Among 5804 early-adolescent and young adult survivors (median age 42 years, IQR 34-50) the SMR compared to the general population for all-cause mortality was 5·9 (95% CI 5·5-6·2) and among 5804 childhood cancer survivors (median age 34 years; 27-42), it was 6·2 (5·8-6·6). Early-adolescent and young adult survivors had lower SMRs for death from health-related causes (ie, conditions that exclude recurrence or progression of the primary cancer and external causes, but include the late effects of cancer therapy) than did childhood cancer survivors (SMR 4·8 [95% CI 4·4-5·1] vs 6·8 [6·2-7·4]), which was primarily evident more than 20 years after cancer diagnosis. Early-adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and childhood cancer survivors were both at greater risk of developing severe and disabling, life-threatening, or fatal (grade 3-5) health conditions than siblings of the same age (HR 4·2 [95% CI 3·7-4·8] for early adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and 5·6 [4·9-6·3] for childhood cancer survivors), and at increased risk of developing grade 3-5 cardiac (4·3 [3·5-5·4] and 5·6 [4·5-7·1]), endocrine (3·9 [2·9-5·1] and 6·4 [5·1-8·0]), and musculoskeletal conditions (6·5 [3·9-11·1] and 8·0 [4·6-14·0]) when compared with siblings of the same age, although all these risks were lower for early-adolescent and young adult survivors than for childhood cancer survivors.

INTERPRETATION

Early-adolescent and young adult cancer survivors had higher risks of mortality and severe and life threatening chronic health conditions than the general population. However, early-adolescent and young adult cancer survivors had lower non-recurrent, health-related SMRs and relative risks of developing grade 3-5 chronic health conditions than childhood cancer survivors, by comparison with siblings of the same age, which were most notable more than 20 years after their original cancer. These results highlight the need for long-term screening of both childhood and early-adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute and American Lebanese-Syrian Associated Charities.

Improved survival for adolescents and young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma and continued high survival for children in the Netherlands: a population-based study during 1990-2015

Population‐based studies that assess long‐term patterns of incidence, major aspects of treatment and survival are virtually lacking for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) at a younger age. This study assessed the progress made for young patients with HL (<25 years at diagnosis) in the Netherlands during 1990–2015. Patient and tumour characteristics were extracted from the population‐based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Time trends in incidence and mortality rates were evaluated with average annual percentage change (AAPC) analyses. Stage at diagnosis, initial treatments and site of treatment were studied in relation to observed overall survival (OS). A total of 2619 patients with HL were diagnosed between 1990 and 2015. Incidence rates increased for 18–24‐year‐old patients (AAPC + 1%, P = 0·01) only. Treatment regimens changed into less radiotherapy and more ‘chemotherapy only’, different for age group and stage. Patients aged 15–17 years were increasingly treated at a paediatric oncology centre. The 5‐year OS for children was already high in the early 1990s (93%). For patients aged 15–17 and 18–24 years the 5‐year OS improved from 84% and 90% in 1990–1994 to 96% and 97% in 2010–2015, respectively. Survival for patients aged 15–17 years was not affected by site of treatment. Our present data demonstrate that significant progress in HL treatment has been made in the Netherlands since 1990.

The Path to Perfect Pediatric Posology - Drug Development in Pediatrics

Reluctance to enroll pediatric subjects in clinical trials has left gaps in information about dosing, safety, and efficacy of medications. Pharmacotherapeutic information for pediatric patients may be available for only a small range of ages and may be deficient, as children respond differently as they grow and mature from prematurity to adolescence. Current regulations, however, require early planning for the participation of children in drug development, as pediatric plans must be submitted at the end of phase 1 (European Union) or the end of phase 2 (United States). These plans are extensive, outlining planned studies, subjects to be enrolled, dose and dosage form justification, planned observations, and statistical analysis as well as planned modeling, simulation, and extrapolation analyses. The extent to which efficacy information in adults can be extrapolated to children depends on how similar the disease is in adults and each of the 5 pediatric age groups. Extrapolation may not be possible for conditions that do not occur in adults, requiring a complete development plan in adults, or extrapolation may be complete because of similar pathology and response to treatment. Pharmacokinetic and safety information cannot be extrapolated and must be collected in children of all ages, unless a waiver is granted. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, optimal design, population pharmacokinetics, and scavenged samples are all examples of new methodologies being used to study pediatric therapeutics. Clinicaltrials.gov and EU Clinical Trials registry are good sources of results of pediatric trials, although sponsors are also working toward prompt publication of study results in peer-reviewed journals.

Contemporary Outcomes for Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in the U.S.: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

BACKGROUND

Advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a curable malignancy, although outcomes remain poor in certain patients. It remains unclear if recent advances have improved their population-level survival over time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified patients aged ≥18 years with stage III or IV classical HL as the first primary malignancy, diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 and treated with chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by date of diagnosis into three groups (2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014) to assess the trends in overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 9,042 patients with a median age of 41 years were included. The use of frontline radiation therapy decreased in each period (21.3% [2000-2004] vs. 15.5% [2005-2009] vs. 10.7% [2010-2014]; p < .001). Three-year OS was significantly higher for patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 (81.8%) and 2005 and 2009 (80.6%) compared with 2000 and 2004 (78.5%; p = .0008 and .02, respectively). Whereas outcomes were poorest in the age >60 cohort, similar improvements were also seen in 3-year OS over the three time periods within this patient population. On multivariate analysis, diagnosis in the earlier period and minority race were associated with higher mortality. Females and married patients had significantly lower mortality risk.

CONCLUSION

Survival of patients with advanced-stage HL has continued to improve over time, suggesting the impact of evolving treatment approaches. Three-year OS in the contemporary period remains inadequate at 81.8%, highlighting the need for continued research to improve their outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This article evaluates contemporary outcomes for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in the U.S. using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Although overall survival (OS) has improved in each 5-year period since 2000, the 3-year OS from 2010 to 2014 remains inadequate at 81.8% and is limited by patient demographics. New therapies are indicated to improve clinical outcomes in advanced-stage HL.

Use of recommended posttreatment services for adolescent and young adult survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a leading cancer diagnosis for adolescents and young adults (AYAs), with an overall 5-year survival rate of >80%. However, to the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding posttreatment patterns of care. In the current study, the authors characterized the use of guideline-recommended services in a cohort of AYA survivors of HL in Kaiser Permanente Southern California.

METHODS

Patients with HL who were diagnosed between ages 15 and 39 years between 2000 and 2010 were identified. The authors calculated the number of patients who received recommended short-term care within 2 years after treatment cessation for those who remained enrolled and alive from 2001 through 2015. Use of recommended late-effects screening for breast cancer and cardiovascular disease was examined. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between receipt of recommended care and patient, cancer, and treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 354 patients were identified, with a mean age at the time of diagnosis of 26 years (standard deviation, 6.9 years). Approximately 12% of patients had stage I disease, 59% had stage II disease, 17% had stage III disease, and 13% of patients had stage IV disease. Nearly all patients received chemotherapy (95%), 51% received radiotherapy, and 5% received care from a pediatric oncologist. Overall, approximately 49% of patients received recommended short-term care. Of those patients eligible for cardiovascular screening at 10 years posttreatment (60 patients), 53% received at least 1 screening. Of those patients eligible for breast cancer screening (21 patients), approximately 50% underwent at least 1 screening. Regression results indicated that those patients treated by a pediatric oncologist were >3 times as likely to receive recommended short-term care.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study highlight gaps in the delivery of posttreatment care to AYA survivors of HL. By determining areas in need of improvement, these findings can guide the development of tailored interventions with which to improve care.

Epidemiology, outcome, targeted agents and immunotherapy in adolescent and young adult non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma

The epidemiology, outcome and targeted immunotherapy in adolescent and young adult non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma were discussed during the 6th International Symposium on Childhood, Adolescent and Young Adult Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma September 26th-29th 2018 in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. This review summarizes some of those presentations, as well as other current and novel antibody therapy, immune check-point inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, cancer vaccines and cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy.

Risk-adapted therapy for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma

More than 80% of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma are now cured with contemporary treatment approaches. The ongoing challenge is how to further improve outcomes by identifying both high-risk patients who may benefit from more intensive frontline therapy to reduce the risk of relapse as well as lower-risk patients who may do just as well with less intensive therapy. Numerous trials have used an interim positron emission tomography (PET) response-adapted approach to evaluate early escalation or deescalation of therapy for patients with a positive or negative interim PET scan, respectively. Recent trials have incorporated novel agents, including brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the immune checkpoint inhibitors, in the frontline setting. Based on results of the ECHELON-1 trial, the Food and Drug Administration approved BV in combination with adriamycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapy for stage III to IV Hodgkin lymphoma. Improved methods to assess higher risk at diagnosis using quantitative PET metrics, such as metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis, and incorporation of emerging biomarkers may further refine patient selection for more intensive upfront therapy. The ultimate goal is to achieve the highest level of efficacy for an individual patient while minimizing the short- and long-term toxicities.

Lymphoma in Adolescents and Young Adults: Current Perspectives

Lymphomas in adolescents and young adults represent approximately one quarter of all cancers in this age group. Historically, adolescent and young adult cancer patients represent a unique population with diverging issues surrounding psychosocial hardships/barriers, economics, and lack of standardization of therapeutic approaches.Furthermore, the biologic differences within the adolescent and young adult population seen in various lymphoma subtypes likely play a role in overall outcomes for this group. Without an organized approach to clinical and translational research for adolescent and young adult patients within specialized treatment centers, this population may continue to experience inferior results. Here we look at the current perspectives of adolescent and young adult lymphomas with respect to disease biology, clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of this unique lymphoma population.

Do Deauville Scores Improve the Clinical Utility of End-of-Therapy FDG PET Scans for Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of Deauville scores in interpretation of end-of-chemotherapy FDG PET scans.

CONCLUSION

Deauville scores improve the clinical utility of end-of-chemotherapy PET, as evidenced by an increase in positive predictive value to 72.7% from 44.4% on the basis of report alone. The negative predictive value remains greater than 95%.

Current considerations in AYA Hodgkin lymphoma

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) commonly occurs in adolescents and young adults (AYA), defined by the National Cancer Institute as people diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 15 and 39 years. Despite therapeutic advances, the AYA population has derived less incremental benefit compared to both paediatric and adult counterparts. Although the exact aetiology is unclear, contributing factors probably include differences in disease biology, delayed diagnosis, decreased participation in clinical trials and treatment adherence secondary to complex social factors. As such, while HL remains highly curable, there is not a clear consensus regarding the management of patients within this age range, specifically whether paediatric or adult regimens are preferred or how best to incorporate emerging therapeutic advancements. Ongoing clinical trials, as well as continued collaborative efforts are required to address the needs of this population, investigate the potential for unique biological factors and allow for optimization of treatment. Here we review current prognostic and treatment strategies for paediatric and adult patients with HL and highlight complexities around the management of this patient population.

Incidence and outcomes of lymphoid malignancies in adolescent and young adult patients in the United States

Lymphoma incidence and survival in adolescent and young adult (AYA, defined as 15-39 years of age) and adult patients (>39 years) were assessed using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. From 2000 to 2014, 431 721 lymphoma cases were reported to SEER, 9% in AYA patients. In the AYA group, the highest age-adjusted incidence rate was for classical Hodgkin lymphoma [HL; 3·4 per 100 000 person-years; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3·38-3·49] followed by diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 1·56, 95% CI, 1·53-1·60) and for adults, it was plasma cell neoplasms (14·17, 95% CI, 14·07-14·27), DLBCL (13·86, 95% CI, 13·76-13·96) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL; 13·19, 95% CI, 13·09-13·29). HL comprised 42% of lymphoma cases for AYAs, but only 4% in adults. The occurrence of DLBCL among AYAs and adults was similar, 18% and 20%, respectively. Twenty-eight percent of AYAs compared with 9% of adults presented with stage II disease, and 21% of AYAs compared with 10% of adults had B-symptoms. Extranodal disease was less common (33%) in AYAs than adults (59%). Overall, AYA patients with lymphoma have better 2- and 5-year relative survival rates (RSRs) compared to adults. When restricted to HL and DLBCL, RSR of AYA patients exceeds adult RSR.

The management of Hodgkin lymphoma in adolescents and young adults: burden of disease or burden of choice?

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) comprise the largest age group affected by Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Despite excellent overall survival of AYA patients with HL due to advances in treatment regimens, therapy-associated late effects continue to be a concern in HL survivors, especially for younger patients who have decades of life remaining. Since the first clinical trial for HL with chemotherapy in 1964, subsequent protocols have attempted to reduce chemotherapy-induced toxicities and yet maintain high overall survival rates. Today, new analytic methods applied to data from survivorship cohorts, such as the recently described cumulative burden of disease metric, can be used to inform changes for future protocols. Although pediatric and adult trial consortia have followed this process, the AYA population, an age cohort split between pediatric and adult health care services, faces many barriers to care and is the least likely to be enrolled in clinical trials. AYA patients with HL theoretically have a choice to be treated in pediatric or adult protocols when presented with these options. Recent efforts by the National Clinical Trials Network, the Children's Oncology Group, and others have been made to ensure that the burden of choice for the AYA population is not greater than the burden of disease.

Adolescent and young adult Hodgkin lymphoma: Raising the bar through collaborative science and multidisciplinary care

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is one of the most common cancers in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population (15-39 years). Despite continued improvements in HL outcomes, AYAs have not exhibited survival gains to the same extent as other age groups. At present, details about tumor biology, optimal therapeutic approaches, supportive care needs, and long-term toxicities in AYAs with HL remain understudied. Herein, we summarize the current state of the AYA population with HL, specifically focusing on how collaborations across the pediatric and medical oncology divide, coupled with multidisciplinary patient care, can further optimize outcomes for this group of patients.