1
|
Schlegel P, Yin Y, Bates AS, Dorkenwald S, Eichler K, Brooks P, Han DS, Gkantia M, Dos Santos M, Munnelly EJ, Badalamente G, Serratosa Capdevila L, Sane VA, Fragniere AMC, Kiassat L, Pleijzier MW, Stürner T, Tamimi IFM, Dunne CR, Salgarella I, Javier A, Fang S, Perlman E, Kazimiers T, Jagannathan SR, Matsliah A, Sterling AR, Yu SC, McKellar CE, Costa M, Seung HS, Murthy M, Hartenstein V, Bock DD, Jefferis GSXE. Whole-brain annotation and multi-connectome cell typing of Drosophila. Nature 2024; 634:139-152. [PMID: 39358521 PMCID: PMC11446831 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07686-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has emerged as a key model organism in neuroscience, in large part due to the concentration of collaboratively generated molecular, genetic and digital resources available for it. Here we complement the approximately 140,000 neuron FlyWire whole-brain connectome1 with a systematic and hierarchical annotation of neuronal classes, cell types and developmental units (hemilineages). Of 8,453 annotated cell types, 3,643 were previously proposed in the partial hemibrain connectome2, and 4,581 are new types, mostly from brain regions outside the hemibrain subvolume. Although nearly all hemibrain neurons could be matched morphologically in FlyWire, about one-third of cell types proposed for the hemibrain could not be reliably reidentified. We therefore propose a new definition of cell type as groups of cells that are each quantitatively more similar to cells in a different brain than to any other cell in the same brain, and we validate this definition through joint analysis of FlyWire and hemibrain connectomes. Further analysis defined simple heuristics for the reliability of connections between brains, revealed broad stereotypy and occasional variability in neuron count and connectivity, and provided evidence for functional homeostasis in the mushroom body through adjustments of the absolute amount of excitatory input while maintaining the excitation/inhibition ratio. Our work defines a consensus cell type atlas for the fly brain and provides both an intellectual framework and open-source toolchain for brain-scale comparative connectomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Schlegel
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yijie Yin
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexander S Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Katharina Eichler
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Brooks
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel S Han
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marina Gkantia
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marcia Dos Santos
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eva J Munnelly
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Griffin Badalamente
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Varun A Sane
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexandra M C Fragniere
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ladann Kiassat
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Markus W Pleijzier
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tomke Stürner
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Imaan F M Tamimi
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher R Dunne
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irene Salgarella
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexandre Javier
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Siqi Fang
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Sridhar R Jagannathan
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy R Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Eyewire, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire E McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marta Costa
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Sebastian Seung
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Volker Hartenstein
- Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Davi D Bock
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
| | - Gregory S X E Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Simpson JH. Descending control of motor sequences in Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2024; 84:102822. [PMID: 38096757 PMCID: PMC11215313 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2023.102822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
The descending neurons connecting the fly's brain to its ventral nerve cord respond to sensory stimuli and evoke motor programs of varying complexity. Anatomical characterization of the descending neurons and their synaptic connections suggests how these circuits organize movements, while optogenetic manipulation of their activity reveals what behaviors they can induce. Monitoring their responses to sensory stimuli or during behavior performance indicates what information they may encode. Recent advances in all three approaches make the descending neurons an excellent place to better understand the sensorimotor integration and transformation required for nervous systems to govern the motor sequences that constitute animal behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie H Simpson
- Dept. Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology and Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schlegel P, Yin Y, Bates AS, Dorkenwald S, Eichler K, Brooks P, Han DS, Gkantia M, Dos Santos M, Munnelly EJ, Badalamente G, Capdevila LS, Sane VA, Pleijzier MW, Tamimi IFM, Dunne CR, Salgarella I, Javier A, Fang S, Perlman E, Kazimiers T, Jagannathan SR, Matsliah A, Sterling AR, Yu SC, McKellar CE, Costa M, Seung HS, Murthy M, Hartenstein V, Bock DD, Jefferis GSXE. Whole-brain annotation and multi-connectome cell typing quantifies circuit stereotypy in Drosophila. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.06.27.546055. [PMID: 37425808 PMCID: PMC10327018 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.27.546055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster combines surprisingly sophisticated behaviour with a highly tractable nervous system. A large part of the fly's success as a model organism in modern neuroscience stems from the concentration of collaboratively generated molecular genetic and digital resources. As presented in our FlyWire companion paper 1 , this now includes the first full brain connectome of an adult animal. Here we report the systematic and hierarchical annotation of this ~130,000-neuron connectome including neuronal classes, cell types and developmental units (hemilineages). This enables any researcher to navigate this huge dataset and find systems and neurons of interest, linked to the literature through the Virtual Fly Brain database 2 . Crucially, this resource includes 4,552 cell types. 3,094 are rigorous consensus validations of cell types previously proposed in the hemibrain connectome 3 . In addition, we propose 1,458 new cell types, arising mostly from the fact that the FlyWire connectome spans the whole brain, whereas the hemibrain derives from a subvolume. Comparison of FlyWire and the hemibrain showed that cell type counts and strong connections were largely stable, but connection weights were surprisingly variable within and across animals. Further analysis defined simple heuristics for connectome interpretation: connections stronger than 10 unitary synapses or providing >1% of the input to a target cell are highly conserved. Some cell types showed increased variability across connectomes: the most common cell type in the mushroom body, required for learning and memory, is almost twice as numerous in FlyWire as the hemibrain. We find evidence for functional homeostasis through adjustments of the absolute amount of excitatory input while maintaining the excitation-inhibition ratio. Finally, and surprisingly, about one third of the cell types proposed in the hemibrain connectome could not yet be reliably identified in the FlyWire connectome. We therefore suggest that cell types should be defined to be robust to inter-individual variation, namely as groups of cells that are quantitatively more similar to cells in a different brain than to any other cell in the same brain. Joint analysis of the FlyWire and hemibrain connectomes demonstrates the viability and utility of this new definition. Our work defines a consensus cell type atlas for the fly brain and provides both an intellectual framework and open source toolchain for brain-scale comparative connectomics.
Collapse
|
4
|
Shiu PK, Sterne GR, Spiller N, Franconville R, Sandoval A, Zhou J, Simha N, Kang CH, Yu S, Kim JS, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Schlegel P, Szi-chieh Y, McKellar CE, Sterling A, Costa M, Eichler K, Jefferis GS, Murthy M, Bates AS, Eckstein N, Funke J, Bidaye SS, Hampel S, Seeds AM, Scott K. A leaky integrate-and-fire computational model based on the connectome of the entire adult Drosophila brain reveals insights into sensorimotor processing. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.05.02.539144. [PMID: 37205514 PMCID: PMC10187186 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.02.539144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The forthcoming assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing over 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain. Here, we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, based on neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviors. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation. Computational activation of neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing, a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioral studies. Moreover, computational activation of different classes of gustatory neurons makes accurate predictions of how multiple taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Our computational model predicts that the sugar and water pathways form a partially shared appetitive feeding initiation pathway, which our calcium imaging and behavioral experiments confirm. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit that do not overlap with gustatory circuits, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes. Our results demonstrate that modeling brain circuits purely from connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can accurately describe complete sensorimotor transformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip K. Shiu
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Gabriella R. Sterne
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Genetics
| | - Nico Spiller
- Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, USA
| | | | - Andrea Sandoval
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Joie Zhou
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Neha Simha
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Chan Hyuk Kang
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, South Korea
| | - Seongbong Yu
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, South Korea
| | - Jinseop S. Kim
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, South Korea
| | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge
| | - Yu Szi-chieh
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire E. McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marta Costa
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge
| | | | - Gregory S.X.E. Jefferis
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Alexander Shakeel Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, The University of Oxford
- Department of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jan Funke
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, USA
| | - Salil S. Bidaye
- Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, USA
| | - Stefanie Hampel
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Andrew M. Seeds
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Kristin Scott
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhao Y, Duan J, Han Z, Engström Y, Hartenstein V. Identification of a GABAergic neuroblast lineage modulating sweet and bitter taste sensitivity. Curr Biol 2022; 32:5354-5363.e3. [PMID: 36347251 PMCID: PMC10728805 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
In Drosophila melanogaster, processing of gustatory information and controlling feeding behavior are executed by neural circuits located in the subesophageal zone (SEZ) of the brain.1 Gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) project their axons in the primary gustatory center (PGC), which is located in the SEZ.1,2,3,4 To address the function of the PGC, we need detailed information about the different classes of gustatory interneurons that frame the PGC. In this work, we screened large collections of driver lines for SEZ interneuron-specific labeling and subsequently used candidate lines to access the SEZ neuroblast lineages. We converted 130 Gal4 lines to LexA drivers and carried out functional screening using calcium imaging. We found one neuroblast lineage, TRdm, whose neurons responded to both sweet and bitter tastants, and formed green fluorescent protein (GFP) reconstitution across synaptic partners (GRASP)-positive synapses with sweet sensory neurons. TRdm neurons express the inhibitory transmitter GABA, and silencing these neurons increases appetitive feeding behavior. These results demonstrate that TRdm generates a class of inhibitory local neurons that control taste sensitivity in Drosophila.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunpo Zhao
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; Biozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; Center for Precision Disease Modeling, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.
| | - Jianli Duan
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; Center for Precision Disease Modeling, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA
| | - Zhe Han
- Center for Precision Disease Modeling, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA
| | - Ylva Engström
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Volker Hartenstein
- Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles 90095-1606, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Farnworth MS, Bucher G, Hartenstein V. An atlas of the developing Tribolium castaneum brain reveals conservation in anatomy and divergence in timing to Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Neurol 2022; 530:2335-2371. [PMID: 35535818 PMCID: PMC9646932 DOI: 10.1002/cne.25335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Insect brains are formed by conserved sets of neural lineages whose fibers form cohesive bundles with characteristic projection patterns. Within the brain neuropil, these bundles establish a system of fascicles constituting the macrocircuitry of the brain. The overall architecture of the neuropils and the macrocircuitry appear to be conserved. However, variation is observed, for example, in size, shape, and timing of development. Unfortunately, the developmental and genetic basis of this variation is poorly understood, although the rise of new genetically tractable model organisms such as the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum allows the possibility to gain mechanistic insights. To facilitate such work, we present an atlas of the developing brain of T. castaneum, covering the first larval instar, the prepupal stage, and the adult, by combining wholemount immunohistochemical labeling of fiber bundles (acetylated tubulin) and neuropils (synapsin) with digital 3D reconstruction using the TrakEM2 software package. Upon comparing this anatomical dataset with the published work in Drosophila melanogaster, we confirm an overall high degree of conservation. Fiber tracts and neuropil fascicles, which can be visualized by global neuronal antibodies like antiacetylated tubulin in all invertebrate brains, create a rich anatomical framework to which individual neurons or other regions of interest can be referred to. The framework of a largely conserved pattern allowed us to describe differences between the two species with respect to parameters such as timing of neuron proliferation and maturation. These features likely reflect adaptive changes in developmental timing that govern the change from larval to adult brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max S Farnworth
- Department of Evolutionary Developmental Genetics, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute, GZMB, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Evolution of Brains and Behaviour lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gregor Bucher
- Department of Evolutionary Developmental Genetics, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute, GZMB, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Volker Hartenstein
- Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California/Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sun LL, Liu XL, Wang YN, Berg BG, Xie GY, Chen WB, Liu Y, Wang GR, Zhao XC, Tang QB. Neuronal architecture and functional mapping of the taste center of larval Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). INSECT SCIENCE 2022; 29:730-748. [PMID: 34427391 DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The sense of taste plays a crucial role in herbivorous insects by discriminating nutrients from complex plant metabolic compounds. The peripheral coding of taste has been thoroughly studied in many insect species, but the central gustatory pathways are poorly described. In the present study, we characterized single neurons in the gnathal ganglion of Helicoverpa armigera larvae using the intracellular recording/staining technique. We identified different types of neurons, including sensory neurons, interneurons, and motor neurons. The morphologies of these neurons were largely diverse and their arborizations seemingly covered the whole gnathal ganglion. The representation of the single neurons responding to the relevant stimuli of sweet and bitter cues showed no distinct patterns in the gnathal ganglion. We postulate that taste signals may be processed in a manner consistent with the principle of population coding in the gnathal ganglion of H. armigera larvae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long-Long Sun
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China
| | - Xiao-Lan Liu
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China
| | - Ya-Nan Wang
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China
| | - Bente G Berg
- Chemosensory laboratory, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7489, Norway
| | - Gui-Ying Xie
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China
| | - Wen-Bo Chen
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China
| | - Yang Liu
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Gui-Rong Wang
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Xin-Cheng Zhao
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China
| | - Qing-Bo Tang
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Engert S, Sterne GR, Bock DD, Scott K. Drosophila gustatory projections are segregated by taste modality and connectivity. eLife 2022; 11:e78110. [PMID: 35611959 PMCID: PMC9170244 DOI: 10.7554/elife.78110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gustatory sensory neurons detect caloric and harmful compounds in potential food and convey this information to the brain to inform feeding decisions. To examine the signals that gustatory neurons transmit and receive, we reconstructed gustatory axons and their synaptic sites in the adult Drosophila melanogaster brain, utilizing a whole-brain electron microscopy volume. We reconstructed 87 gustatory projections from the proboscis labellum in the right hemisphere and 57 from the left, representing the majority of labellar gustatory axons. Gustatory neurons contain a nearly equal number of interspersed pre- and postsynaptic sites, with extensive synaptic connectivity among gustatory axons. Morphology- and connectivity-based clustering revealed six distinct groups, likely representing neurons recognizing different taste modalities. The vast majority of synaptic connections are between neurons of the same group. This study resolves the anatomy of labellar gustatory projections, reveals that gustatory projections are segregated based on taste modality, and uncovers synaptic connections that may alter the transmission of gustatory signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Engert
- University of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Davi D Bock
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Kristin Scott
- University of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hulse BK, Haberkern H, Franconville R, Turner-Evans D, Takemura SY, Wolff T, Noorman M, Dreher M, Dan C, Parekh R, Hermundstad AM, Rubin GM, Jayaraman V. A connectome of the Drosophila central complex reveals network motifs suitable for flexible navigation and context-dependent action selection. eLife 2021; 10:e66039. [PMID: 34696823 PMCID: PMC9477501 DOI: 10.7554/elife.66039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Flexible behaviors over long timescales are thought to engage recurrent neural networks in deep brain regions, which are experimentally challenging to study. In insects, recurrent circuit dynamics in a brain region called the central complex (CX) enable directed locomotion, sleep, and context- and experience-dependent spatial navigation. We describe the first complete electron microscopy-based connectome of the Drosophila CX, including all its neurons and circuits at synaptic resolution. We identified new CX neuron types, novel sensory and motor pathways, and network motifs that likely enable the CX to extract the fly's head direction, maintain it with attractor dynamics, and combine it with other sensorimotor information to perform vector-based navigational computations. We also identified numerous pathways that may facilitate the selection of CX-driven behavioral patterns by context and internal state. The CX connectome provides a comprehensive blueprint necessary for a detailed understanding of network dynamics underlying sleep, flexible navigation, and state-dependent action selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad K Hulse
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Hannah Haberkern
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Romain Franconville
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Daniel Turner-Evans
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Shin-ya Takemura
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Tanya Wolff
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Marcella Noorman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Marisa Dreher
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Chuntao Dan
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ruchi Parekh
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ann M Hermundstad
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Gerald M Rubin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Vivek Jayaraman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sterne GR, Otsuna H, Dickson BJ, Scott K. Classification and genetic targeting of cell types in the primary taste and premotor center of the adult Drosophila brain. eLife 2021; 10:e71679. [PMID: 34473057 PMCID: PMC8445619 DOI: 10.7554/elife.71679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Neural circuits carry out complex computations that allow animals to evaluate food, select mates, move toward attractive stimuli, and move away from threats. In insects, the subesophageal zone (SEZ) is a brain region that receives gustatory, pheromonal, and mechanosensory inputs and contributes to the control of diverse behaviors, including feeding, grooming, and locomotion. Despite its importance in sensorimotor transformations, the study of SEZ circuits has been hindered by limited knowledge of the underlying diversity of SEZ neurons. Here, we generate a collection of split-GAL4 lines that provides precise genetic targeting of 138 different SEZ cell types in adult Drosophila melanogaster, comprising approximately one third of all SEZ neurons. We characterize the single-cell anatomy of these neurons and find that they cluster by morphology into six supergroups that organize the SEZ into discrete anatomical domains. We find that the majority of local SEZ interneurons are not classically polarized, suggesting rich local processing, whereas SEZ projection neurons tend to be classically polarized, conveying information to a limited number of higher brain regions. This study provides insight into the anatomical organization of the SEZ and generates resources that will facilitate further study of SEZ neurons and their contributions to sensory processing and behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella R Sterne
- University of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Hideo Otsuna
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Barry J Dickson
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of QueenslandQueenslandAustralia
| | - Kristin Scott
- University of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Scheffer LK, Xu CS, Januszewski M, Lu Z, Takemura SY, Hayworth KJ, Huang GB, Shinomiya K, Maitlin-Shepard J, Berg S, Clements J, Hubbard PM, Katz WT, Umayam L, Zhao T, Ackerman D, Blakely T, Bogovic J, Dolafi T, Kainmueller D, Kawase T, Khairy KA, Leavitt L, Li PH, Lindsey L, Neubarth N, Olbris DJ, Otsuna H, Trautman ET, Ito M, Bates AS, Goldammer J, Wolff T, Svirskas R, Schlegel P, Neace E, Knecht CJ, Alvarado CX, Bailey DA, Ballinger S, Borycz JA, Canino BS, Cheatham N, Cook M, Dreher M, Duclos O, Eubanks B, Fairbanks K, Finley S, Forknall N, Francis A, Hopkins GP, Joyce EM, Kim S, Kirk NA, Kovalyak J, Lauchie SA, Lohff A, Maldonado C, Manley EA, McLin S, Mooney C, Ndama M, Ogundeyi O, Okeoma N, Ordish C, Padilla N, Patrick CM, Paterson T, Phillips EE, Phillips EM, Rampally N, Ribeiro C, Robertson MK, Rymer JT, Ryan SM, Sammons M, Scott AK, Scott AL, Shinomiya A, Smith C, Smith K, Smith NL, Sobeski MA, Suleiman A, Swift J, Takemura S, Talebi I, Tarnogorska D, Tenshaw E, Tokhi T, Walsh JJ, Yang T, Horne JA, Li F, Parekh R, Rivlin PK, Jayaraman V, Costa M, Jefferis GSXE, Ito K, Saalfeld S, George R, Meinertzhagen IA, Rubin GM, Hess HF, Jain V, Plaza SM. A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain. eLife 2020; 9:e57443. [PMID: 32880371 PMCID: PMC7546738 DOI: 10.7554/elife.57443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 479] [Impact Index Per Article: 119.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The neural circuits responsible for animal behavior remain largely unknown. We summarize new methods and present the circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Improved methods include new procedures to prepare, image, align, segment, find synapses in, and proofread such large data sets. We define cell types, refine computational compartments, and provide an exhaustive atlas of cell examples and types, many of them novel. We provide detailed circuits consisting of neurons and their chemical synapses for most of the central brain. We make the data public and simplify access, reducing the effort needed to answer circuit questions, and provide procedures linking the neurons defined by our analysis with genetic reagents. Biologically, we examine distributions of connection strengths, neural motifs on different scales, electrical consequences of compartmentalization, and evidence that maximizing packing density is an important criterion in the evolution of the fly's brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis K Scheffer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - C Shan Xu
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Zhiyuan Lu
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
| | - Shin-ya Takemura
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Kenneth J Hayworth
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Gary B Huang
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Kazunori Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Stuart Berg
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Jody Clements
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Philip M Hubbard
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - William T Katz
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Lowell Umayam
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ting Zhao
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - David Ackerman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - John Bogovic
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Tom Dolafi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Dagmar Kainmueller
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Takashi Kawase
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Khaled A Khairy
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Peter H Li
- Google ResearchMountain ViewUnited States
| | | | - Nicole Neubarth
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Donald J Olbris
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Hideo Otsuna
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Eric T Trautman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Masayoshi Ito
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | | | - Jens Goldammer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Institute of Zoology, Biocenter Cologne, University of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Tanya Wolff
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Robert Svirskas
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Erika Neace
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Chelsea X Alvarado
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Dennis A Bailey
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Samantha Ballinger
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Brandon S Canino
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Natasha Cheatham
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Michael Cook
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Marisa Dreher
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Octave Duclos
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Bryon Eubanks
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Kelli Fairbanks
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Samantha Finley
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Nora Forknall
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Audrey Francis
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Emily M Joyce
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - SungJin Kim
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Nicole A Kirk
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Julie Kovalyak
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Shirley A Lauchie
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Alanna Lohff
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Charli Maldonado
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Emily A Manley
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Sari McLin
- Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
| | - Caroline Mooney
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Miatta Ndama
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Omotara Ogundeyi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Nneoma Okeoma
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Christopher Ordish
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Nicholas Padilla
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Tyler Paterson
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Elliott E Phillips
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Emily M Phillips
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Neha Rampally
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Caitlin Ribeiro
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Jon Thomson Rymer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Sean M Ryan
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Megan Sammons
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Anne K Scott
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ashley L Scott
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Aya Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Claire Smith
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Kelsey Smith
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Natalie L Smith
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Margaret A Sobeski
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Alia Suleiman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Jackie Swift
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Satoko Takemura
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Iris Talebi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Emily Tenshaw
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Temour Tokhi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - John J Walsh
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Tansy Yang
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Feng Li
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ruchi Parekh
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Patricia K Rivlin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Vivek Jayaraman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Marta Costa
- Department of Zoology, University of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Gregory SXE Jefferis
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyCambridgeUnited States
- Department of Zoology, University of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Kei Ito
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of TokyoTokyoJapan
- Institute of Zoology, Biocenter Cologne, University of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Stephan Saalfeld
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Reed George
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ian A Meinertzhagen
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
| | - Gerald M Rubin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Harald F Hess
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Viren Jain
- Google Research, Google LLCZurichSwitzerland
| | - Stephen M Plaza
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bates AS, Schlegel P, Roberts RJV, Drummond N, Tamimi IFM, Turnbull R, Zhao X, Marin EC, Popovici PD, Dhawan S, Jamasb A, Javier A, Serratosa Capdevila L, Li F, Rubin GM, Waddell S, Bock DD, Costa M, Jefferis GSXE. Complete Connectomic Reconstruction of Olfactory Projection Neurons in the Fly Brain. Curr Biol 2020; 30:3183-3199.e6. [PMID: 32619485 PMCID: PMC7443706 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Nervous systems contain sensory neurons, local neurons, projection neurons, and motor neurons. To understand how these building blocks form whole circuits, we must distil these broad classes into neuronal cell types and describe their network connectivity. Using an electron micrograph dataset for an entire Drosophila melanogaster brain, we reconstruct the first complete inventory of olfactory projections connecting the antennal lobe, the insect analog of the mammalian olfactory bulb, to higher-order brain regions in an adult animal brain. We then connect this inventory to extant data in the literature, providing synaptic-resolution "holotypes" both for heavily investigated and previously unknown cell types. Projection neurons are approximately twice as numerous as reported by light level studies; cell types are stereotyped, but not identical, in cell and synapse numbers between brain hemispheres. The lateral horn, the insect analog of the mammalian cortical amygdala, is the main target for this olfactory information and has been shown to guide innate behavior. Here, we find new connectivity motifs, including axo-axonic connectivity between projection neurons, feedback, and lateral inhibition of these axons by a large population of neurons, and the convergence of different inputs, including non-olfactory inputs and memory-related feedback onto third-order olfactory neurons. These features are less prominent in the mushroom body calyx, the insect analog of the mammalian piriform cortex and a center for associative memory. Our work provides a complete neuroanatomical platform for future studies of the adult Drosophila olfactory system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | | | - Nikolas Drummond
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Imaan F M Tamimi
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Robert Turnbull
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Xincheng Zhao
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK; Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
| | - Elizabeth C Marin
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Patricia D Popovici
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Serene Dhawan
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Arian Jamasb
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Alexandre Javier
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | | | - Feng Li
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA
| | - Gerald M Rubin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA
| | - Scott Waddell
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, The University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK
| | - Davi D Bock
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, VT 05405, USA
| | - Marta Costa
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Gregory S X E Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miroschnikow A, Schlegel P, Pankratz MJ. Making Feeding Decisions in the Drosophila Nervous System. Curr Biol 2020; 30:R831-R840. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
14
|
McKellar CE, Siwanowicz I, Dickson BJ, Simpson JH. Controlling motor neurons of every muscle for fly proboscis reaching. eLife 2020; 9:e54978. [PMID: 32584254 PMCID: PMC7316511 DOI: 10.7554/elife.54978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe the anatomy of all the primary motor neurons in the fly proboscis and characterize their contributions to its diverse reaching movements. Pairing this behavior with the wealth of Drosophila's genetic tools offers the possibility to study motor control at single-neuron resolution, and soon throughout entire circuits. As an entry to these circuits, we provide detailed anatomy of proboscis motor neurons, muscles, and joints. We create a collection of fly strains to individually manipulate every proboscis muscle through control of its motor neurons, the first such collection for an appendage. We generate a model of the action of each proboscis joint, and find that only a small number of motor neurons are needed to produce proboscis reaching. Comprehensive control of each motor element in this numerically simple system paves the way for future study of both reflexive and flexible movements of this appendage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E McKellar
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton UniversityPrincetonUnited States
| | - Igor Siwanowicz
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Barry J Dickson
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
| | - Julie H Simpson
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Dept. of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhao W, Zhou P, Gong C, Ouyang Z, Wang J, Zheng N, Gong Z. A disinhibitory mechanism biases Drosophila innate light preference. Nat Commun 2019; 10:124. [PMID: 30631066 PMCID: PMC6328558 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07929-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Innate preference toward environmental conditions is crucial for animal survival. Although much is known about the neural processing of sensory information, how the aversive or attractive sensory stimulus is transformed through central brain neurons into avoidance or approaching behavior is largely unclear. Here we show that Drosophila larval light preference behavior is regulated by a disinhibitory mechanism. In the disinhibitory circuit, a pair of GABAergic neurons exerts tonic inhibition on one pair of contralateral projecting neurons that control larval reorientation behavior. When a larva enters the light area, the reorientation-controlling neurons are disinhibited to allow reorientation to occur as the upstream inhibitory neurons are repressed by light. When the larva exits the light area, the inhibition on the downstream neurons is restored to repress further reorientation and thus prevents the larva from re-entering the light area. We suggest that disinhibition may serve as a common neural mechanism for animal innate preference behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiqiao Zhao
- Department of Neurology of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China
- Department of Neurobiology, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China
| | - Peipei Zhou
- Department of Neurobiology, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China
| | - Caixia Gong
- Department of Neurobiology, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China
| | - Zhenhuan Ouyang
- Qiushi Academy for Advanced Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310007, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Neurology of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China
- Department of Neurobiology, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China
| | - Nenggan Zheng
- Qiushi Academy for Advanced Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310007, China.
| | - Zhefeng Gong
- Department of Neurology of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China.
- Department of Neurobiology, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Miroschnikow A, Schlegel P, Schoofs A, Hueckesfeld S, Li F, Schneider-Mizell CM, Fetter RD, Truman JW, Cardona A, Pankratz MJ. Convergence of monosynaptic and polysynaptic sensory paths onto common motor outputs in a Drosophila feeding connectome. eLife 2018; 7:40247. [PMID: 30526854 PMCID: PMC6289573 DOI: 10.7554/elife.40247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We reconstructed, from a whole CNS EM volume, the synaptic map of input and output neurons that underlie food intake behavior of Drosophila larvae. Input neurons originate from enteric, pharyngeal and external sensory organs and converge onto seven distinct sensory synaptic compartments within the CNS. Output neurons consist of feeding motor, serotonergic modulatory and neuroendocrine neurons. Monosynaptic connections from a set of sensory synaptic compartments cover the motor, modulatory and neuroendocrine targets in overlapping domains. Polysynaptic routes are superimposed on top of monosynaptic connections, resulting in divergent sensory paths that converge on common outputs. A completely different set of sensory compartments is connected to the mushroom body calyx. The mushroom body output neurons are connected to interneurons that directly target the feeding output neurons. Our results illustrate a circuit architecture in which monosynaptic and multisynaptic connections from sensory inputs traverse onto output neurons via a series of converging paths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Miroschnikow
- Department of Molecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Department of Molecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Schoofs
- Department of Molecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hueckesfeld
- Department of Molecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Feng Li
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | | | - Richard D Fetter
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.,Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
| | - James W Truman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Albert Cardona
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.,Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael J Pankratz
- Department of Molecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lowenstein EG, Velazquez-Ulloa NA. A Fly's Eye View of Natural and Drug Reward. Front Physiol 2018; 9:407. [PMID: 29720947 PMCID: PMC5915475 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Animals encounter multiple stimuli each day. Some of these stimuli are innately appetitive or aversive, while others are assigned valence based on experience. Drugs like ethanol can elicit aversion in the short term and attraction in the long term. The reward system encodes the predictive value for different stimuli, mediating anticipation for attractive or punishing stimuli and driving animal behavior to approach or avoid conditioned stimuli. The neurochemistry and neurocircuitry of the reward system is partly evolutionarily conserved. In both vertebrates and invertebrates, including Drosophila melanogaster, dopamine is at the center of a network of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators acting in concert to encode rewards. Behavioral assays in D. melanogaster have become increasingly sophisticated, allowing more direct comparison with mammalian research. Moreover, recent evidence has established the functional modularity of the reward neural circuits in Drosophila. This functional modularity resembles the organization of reward circuits in mammals. The powerful genetic and molecular tools for D. melanogaster allow characterization and manipulation at the single-cell level. These tools are being used to construct a detailed map of the neural circuits mediating specific rewarding stimuli and have allowed for the identification of multiple genes and molecular pathways that mediate the effects of reinforcing stimuli, including their rewarding effects. This report provides an overview of the research on natural and drug reward in D. melanogaster, including natural rewards such as sugar and other food nutrients, and drug rewards including ethanol, cocaine, amphetamine, methamphetamine, and nicotine. We focused mainly on the known genetic and neural mechanisms underlying appetitive reward for sugar and reward for ethanol. We also include genes, molecular pathways, and neural circuits that have been identified using assays that test the palatability of the rewarding stimulus, the preference for the rewarding stimulus, or other effects of the stimulus that indicate how it can modify behavior. Commonalities between mechanisms of natural and drug reward are highlighted and future directions are presented, putting forward questions best suited for research using D. melanogaster as a model organism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve G Lowenstein
- Department of Biology, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rickert C, Lüer K, Vef O, Technau GM. Progressive derivation of serially homologous neuroblast lineages in the gnathal CNS of Drosophila. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0191453. [PMID: 29415052 PMCID: PMC5802887 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Along the anterior-posterior axis the central nervous system is subdivided into segmental units (neuromeres) the composition of which is adapted to their region-specific functional requirements. In Drosophila melanogaster each neuromere is formed by a specific set of identified neural stem cells (neuroblasts, NBs). In the thoracic and anterior abdominal region of the embryonic ventral nerve cord segmental sets of NBs resemble the ground state (2nd thoracic segment, which does not require input of homeotic genes), and serial (segmental) homologs generate similar types of lineages. The three gnathal head segments form a transitional zone between the brain and the ventral nerve cord. It has been shown recently that although all NBs of this zone are serial homologs of NBs in more posterior segments, they progressively differ from the ground state in anterior direction (labial > maxillary > mandibular segment) with regard to numbers and expression profiles. To study the consequences of their derived characters we traced the embryonic lineages of gnathal NBs using the Flybow and DiI-labelling techniques. For a number of clonal types serial homology is rather clearly reflected by their morphology (location and projection patterns) and cell specific markers, despite of reproducible segment-specific differences. However, many lineages, particularly in the mandibular segment, show a degree of derivation that impedes their assignment to ground state serial homologs. These findings demonstrate that differences in gene expression profiles of gnathal NBs go along with anteriorly directed progressive derivation in the composition of their lineages. Furthermore, lineage sizes decrease from labial to mandibular segments, which in concert with decreasing NB-numbers lead to reduced volumes of gnathal neuromeres, most significantly in the mandibular segment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christof Rickert
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, University of Mainz, J.-J.-Becherweg 32,Mainz, Germany
- * E-mail: (CR); (GMT)
| | - Karin Lüer
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, University of Mainz, J.-J.-Becherweg 32,Mainz, Germany
| | - Olaf Vef
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, University of Mainz, J.-J.-Becherweg 32,Mainz, Germany
| | - Gerhard M. Technau
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, University of Mainz, J.-J.-Becherweg 32,Mainz, Germany
- * E-mail: (CR); (GMT)
| |
Collapse
|