Amacrine cells in the tiger salamander retina: morphology, physiology, and neurotransmitter identification

What the salamander eye has been telling the vision scientist's brain

Salamanders have been habitual residents of research laboratories for more than a century, and their history in science is tightly interwoven with vision research. Nevertheless, many vision scientists - even those working with salamanders - may be unaware of how much our knowledge about vision, and particularly the retina, has been shaped by studying salamanders. In this review, we take a tour through the salamander history in vision science, highlighting the main contributions of salamanders to our understanding of the vertebrate retina. We further point out specificities of the salamander visual system and discuss the perspectives of this animal system for future vision research.

Voltage- and calcium-gated ion channels of neurons in the vertebrate retina

In this review, we summarize studies investigating the types and distribution of voltage- and calcium-gated ion channels in the different classes of retinal neurons: rods, cones, horizontal cells, bipolar cells, amacrine cells, interplexiform cells, and ganglion cells. We discuss differences among cell subtypes within these major cell classes, as well as differences among species, and consider how different ion channels shape the responses of different neurons. For example, even though second-order bipolar and horizontal cells do not typically generate fast sodium-dependent action potentials, many of these cells nevertheless possess fast sodium currents that can enhance their kinetic response capabilities. Ca2+ channel activity can also shape response kinetics as well as regulating synaptic release. The L-type Ca2+ channel subtype, CaV1.4, expressed in photoreceptor cells exhibits specific properties matching the particular needs of these cells such as limited inactivation which allows sustained channel activity and maintained synaptic release in darkness. The particular properties of K+ and Cl- channels in different retinal neurons shape resting membrane potentials, response kinetics and spiking behavior. A remaining challenge is to characterize the specific distributions of ion channels in the more than 100 individual cell types that have been identified in the retina and to describe how these particular ion channels sculpt neuronal responses to assist in the processing of visual information by the retina.

Adaptation of Inhibition Mediates Retinal Sensitization

In response to a changing sensory environment, sensory systems adjust their neural code for a number of purposes, including an enhanced sensitivity for novel stimuli, prediction of sensory features, and the maintenance of sensitivity. Retinal sensitization is a form of short-term plasticity that elevates local sensitivity following strong, local, visual stimulation and has been shown to create a prediction of the presence of a nearby localized object. The neural mechanism that generates this elevation in sensitivity remains unknown. Using simultaneous intracellular and multielectrode recording in the salamander retina, we show that a decrease in tonic amacrine transmission is necessary for and is correlated spatially and temporally with ganglion cell sensitization. Furthermore, introducing a decrease in amacrine transmission is sufficient to sensitize nearby ganglion cells. A computational model accounting for adaptive dynamics and nonlinear pathways confirms a decrease in steady inhibitory transmission can cause sensitization. Adaptation of inhibition enhances the sensitivity to the sensory feature conveyed by an inhibitory pathway, creating a prediction of future input.

Joint Encoding of Object Motion and Motion Direction in the Salamander Retina

The processing of motion in visual scenes is important for detecting and tracking moving objects as well as for monitoring self-motion through the induced optic flow. Specialized neural circuits have been identified in the vertebrate retina for detecting motion direction or for distinguishing between object motion and self-motion, although little is known about how information about these distinct features of visual motion is combined. The salamander retina, which is a widely used model system for analyzing retinal function, contains object-motion-sensitive (OMS) ganglion cells, which strongly respond to local motion signals but are suppressed by global image motion. Yet, direction-selective (DS) ganglion cells have been conspicuously absent from characterizations of the salamander retina, despite their ubiquity in other model systems. We here show that the retina of axolotl salamanders contains at least two distinct classes of DS ganglion cells. For one of these classes, the cells display a strong preference for local over global motion in addition to their direction selectivity (OMS-DS cells) and thereby combine sensitivity to two distinct motion features. The OMS-DS cells are further distinct from standard (non-OMS) DS cells by their smaller receptive fields and different organization of preferred motion directions. Our results suggest that the two classes of DS cells specialize to encode motion direction of local and global motion stimuli, respectively, even for complex composite motion scenes. Furthermore, although the salamander DS cells are OFF-type, there is a strong analogy to the systems of ON and ON-OFF DS cells in the mammalian retina.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

The retina contains specialized cells for motion processing. Among the retinal ganglion cells, which form the output neurons of the retina, some are known to report the direction of a moving stimulus (direction-selective cells), and others distinguish the motion of an object from a moving background. But little is known about how information about local object motion and information about motion direction interact. Here, we report that direction-selective ganglion cells can be identified in the salamander retina, where their existence had been unclear. Furthermore, there are two independent systems of direction-selective cells, and one of these combines direction selectivity with sensitivity to local motion. The output of these cells could assist in tracking moving objects and estimating their future position.

Nonlinear spatial integration in the receptive field surround of retinal ganglion cells

Throughout different sensory systems, individual neurons integrate incoming signals over their receptive fields. The characteristics of this signal integration are crucial determinants for the neurons' functions. For ganglion cells in the vertebrate retina, receptive fields are characterized by the well-known center-surround structure and, although several studies have addressed spatial integration in the receptive field center, little is known about how visual signals are integrated in the surround. Therefore, we set out here to characterize signal integration and to identify relevant nonlinearities in the receptive field surround of ganglion cells in the isolated salamander retina by recording spiking activity with extracellular electrodes under visual stimulation of the center and surround. To quantify nonlinearities of spatial integration independently of subsequent nonlinearities of spike generation, we applied the technique of iso-response measurements as follows: using closed-loop experiments, we searched for different stimulus patterns in the surround that all reduced the center-evoked spiking activity by the same amount. The identified iso-response stimuli revealed strongly nonlinear spatial integration in the receptive field surrounds of all recorded cells. Furthermore, cell types that had been shown previously to have different nonlinearities in receptive field centers showed similar surround nonlinearities but differed systematically in the adaptive characteristics of the surround. Finally, we found that there is an optimal spatial scale of surround suppression; suppression was most effective when surround stimulation was organized into subregions of several hundred micrometers in diameter, indicating that the surround is composed of subunits that have strong center-surround organization themselves.

Ionotropic GABA Receptors and Distal Retinal ON and OFF Responses

In the vertebrate retina, visual signals are segregated into parallel ON and OFF pathways, which provide information for light increments and decrements. The segregation is first evident at the level of the ON and OFF bipolar cells in distal retina. The activity of large populations of ON and OFF bipolar cells is reflected in the b- and d-waves of the diffuse electroretinogram (ERG). The role of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), acting through ionotropic GABA receptors in shaping the ON and OFF responses in distal retina, is a matter of debate. This review summarized current knowledge about the types of the GABAergic neurons and ionotropic GABA receptors in the retina as well as the effects of GABA and specific GABAA and GABAC receptor antagonists on the activity of the ON and OFF bipolar cells in both nonmammalian and mammalian retina. Special emphasis is put on the effects on b- and d-waves of the ERG as a useful tool for assessment of the overall function of distal retinal ON and OFF channels. The role of GABAergic system in establishing the ON-OFF asymmetry concerning the time course and absolute and relative sensitivity of the ERG responses under different conditions of light adaptation in amphibian retina is also discussed.

Role of dopamine in distal retina

Dopamine is the most abundant catecholamine in the vertebrate retina. Despite the description of retinal dopaminergic cells three decades ago, many aspects of their function in the retina remain unclear. There is no consensus among the authors about the stimulus conditions for dopamine release (darkness, steady or flickering light) as well as about its action upon the various types of retinal cells. Many contradictory results exist concerning the dopamine effect on the gross electrical activity of the retina [reflected in electroretinogram (ERG)] and the receptors involved in its action. This review summarized current knowledge about the types of the dopaminergic neurons and receptors in the retina as well as the effects of dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists on the light responses of photoreceptors, horizontal and bipolar cells in both nonmammalian and mammalian retina. Special focus of interest concerns their effects upon the diffuse ERG as a useful tool for assessment of the overall function of the distal retina. An attempt is made to reveal some differences between the dopamine actions upon the activity of the ON versus OFF channel in the distal retina. The author has included her own results demonstrating such differences.

Disinhibitory recruitment of NMDA receptor pathways in retina

Glutamate release at bipolar to ganglion cell synapses activates NMDA and AMPA/kainic acid (KA) ionotropic glutamate receptors. Their relative strength determines the output signals of the retina. We found that this balance is tightly regulated by presynaptic inhibition that preferentially suppresses NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activation. In transient ON-OFF neurons, block of GABA and glycine feedback enhanced total NMDAR charge by 35-fold in the ON response and 9-fold in the OFF compared with a 1.7-fold enhancement of AMPA/KA receptors. Blocking only glycine receptors enhanced the NMDAR excitatory postsynaptic current 10-fold in the ON and 2-fold in the OFF pathway. Blocking GABA(A) or GABA(C) receptors (GABA(C)Rs or GABA(A)Rs) produced small changes in total NMDAR charge. When both GABA(A)Rs and GABA(C)Rs were blocked, the total NMDAR charge increased ninefold in the ON and fivefold in the OFF pathway. This exposed a strong GABA(C)R feedback to bipolar cells that was suppressed by serial amacrine cell synapses mediated by GABA(A)Rs. The results indicate that NMDAR currents are large but latent, held in check by dual GABA and glycine presynaptic inhibition. One example of this controlled NMDAR activation is the cross talk between ON and OFF pathways. Blocking the ON pathway increased NMDAR relative strength in the OFF pathway. Stimulus prolongation similarly increased the NMDAR relative strength in the OFF response. This NMDAR enhancement was produced by a diminution in GABA and glycine feedback. Thus the retinal network recruits NMDAR pathways through presynaptic disinhibition.

Suppression of electrical synapses between retinal amacrine cells of goldfish by intracellular cyclic-AMP

Retinal amacrine cells of the same class in cyprinid fish are homotypically connected by gap junctions. The permeability of their gap junctions examined by the diffusion of Neurobiotin into neighboring amacrine cells under application of dopamine or cyclic nucleotides to elucidate whether electrical synapses between the cells are regulated by internal messengers. Neurobiotin injected intracellularly into amacrine cells in isolated retinas of goldfish, and passage currents through the electrical synapses investigated by dual whole-patch clamp recordings under similar application of their ligands. Control conditions led us to observe large passage currents between connected cells and adequate transjunctional conductance between the cells (2.02±0.82nS). Experimental results show that high level of intracellular cyclic AMP within examined cells block transfer of Neurobiotin and suppress electrical synapses between the neighboring cells. Transjunctional conductance between examined cells reduced to 0.23nS. However, dopamine, 8-bromo-cyclic AMP or high elevation of intracellular cyclic GMP leaves gap junction channels of the cells permeable to Neurobiotin as in the control level. Under application of dopamine (1.25±0.06nS), 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (1.79±0.51nS) or intracellular cyclic GMP (0.98±0.23nS), the transjunctional conductance also remains as in the control level. These results demonstrate that channel opening of gap junctions between cyprinid retinal amacrine cells is regulated by high level of intracellular cyclic AMP.

The projective field of a retinal amacrine cell

In sensory systems, neurons are generally characterized by their receptive field, namely the sensitivity to activity patterns at the input of the circuit. To assess the role of the neuron in the system, one must also know its projective field, namely the spatiotemporal effects the neuron exerts on all of the outputs of the circuit. We studied both the receptive and projective fields of an amacrine interneuron in the salamander retina. This amacrine type has a sustained OFF response with a small receptive field, but its output projects over a much larger region. Unlike other amacrine cells, this type is remarkably promiscuous and affects nearly every ganglion cell within reach of its dendrites. Its activity modulates the sensitivity of visual responses in ganglion cells but leaves their kinetics unchanged. The projective field displays a center-surround structure: depolarizing a single amacrine suppresses the visual sensitivity of ganglion cells nearby and enhances it at greater distances. This change in sign is seen even within the receptive field of one ganglion cell; thus, the modulation occurs presynaptically on bipolar cell terminals, most likely via GABA(B) receptors. Such an antagonistic projective field could contribute to the mechanisms of the retina for predictive coding.

Three forms of spatial temporal feedforward inhibition are common to different ganglion cell types in rabbit retina

There exist more than 30 different morphological amacrine cell types, but there may be fewer physiological types. Here we studied the amacrine cell outputs by measuring the temporal and spatial properties of feedforward inhibition to four different types of ganglion cells. These ganglion cells, each with concentric receptive field organization, appear to receive a different relative contribution of the same three forms of feed-forward inhibition, namely: local glycinergic, local sustained GABAergic, and broad transient GABAergic inhibition. Two of these inhibitory components, local glycinergic inhibition and local sustained GABAergic inhibition were localized to narrow regions confined to the dendritic fields of the ganglion cells. The third, a broad transient GABAergic inhibition, was driven from regions peripheral to the dendritic area. Each inhibitory component is also correlated with characteristic kinetics expressed in all ganglion cells: broad transient GABAergic inhibition had the shortest latency, local glycinergic inhibition had an intermediate latency, and local sustained GABAergic inhibition had the longest latency. We suggest each of these three inhibitory components represents the output from a distinct class of amacrine cell, mediates a specific visual function, and each forms a basic functional component for the four ganglion cell types. Similar subunits likely exist in the circuits of other ganglion cell types as well.

Dopamine, vesicular transporters and dopamine receptor expression and localization in rat thymus and spleen

The localization of dopamine stores and the expression and localization of vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT) type-1 and 2 and of dopamine D1-like and D2-like receptor subtypes were investigated in rat thymus and spleen by immunohistochemical, immunochemical techniques and by RT-PCR. In the thymus dopamine immunoreactivity was developed in the cortico-medullary junction and in the medulla, but not in the thymic cortex. In the spleen, dopamine stores were found in reticular structures in the white pulp border and in the white pulp, but not in the red one. Both thymus and spleen expressed VMAT-1 and VMAT-2 immunoreactivity as well as dopamine D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 receptor immunoreactivity. Immunohistochemistry revealed VMAT-1, VMAT-2 and dopamine D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 receptor immunoreactivity primarily in the thymic cortical-medulla transitional zone and to a lesser extent in the medulla but not in the cortex. In the spleen, VMAT-1, VMAT-2 and dopamine D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 receptor immunoreactivity was located primarily in the white pulp border and to a lesser extent in the white pulp. These findings indicate that both thymus and spleen express a dopaminergic system characterized by the presence of dopamine, vesicular monoamine transporters and the five subtypes of dopamine receptors. The presence of these dopaminergic markers suggests that dopamine likely originating from immune cells and/or from sympathetic neuroeffector plexus is released in the lymphoid microenvironment. Based on the microanatomical localization of dopaminergic markers investigated, a role of dopamine in maturation and selection of lymphocytes and activation of immune responses is suggested.

Dendritic impulse collisions and shifting sites of action potential initiation contract and extend the receptive field of an amacrine cell

We evaluated the contributions of somatic and dendritic impulses to the receptive field dimensions of amacrine cells in the amphibian retina. For this analysis, we used the NEURON simulation program with a multicompartmental, multichannel model of an On-Off amacrine cell with a three-dimensional structure obtained through computer tracing techniques. Simulated synaptic inputs were evenly spaced along the dendritic branches and organized into eight annuli of increasing radius. The first set of simulations activated each ring progressively to simulate an area summation experiment, while a second approach activated each annulus individually. Both sets of simulations were done with and without the presence of Na channels in the dendrites and soma. Unexpectedly, the receptive field dimensions observed in the area summation simulations was often smaller than that predicted from the summation of the annular simulations. Collisions of action potentials moving in opposite directions in the dendrites largely accounted for this contraction in receptive field size for the area summation studies. The presence of dendritic Na channels increased the size of the receptive field beyond that achieved in their absence and allowed the physiological size of the receptive field to approximate the physical dimensions of the dendritic tree. This receptive field augmentation was the result of impulse generating ability in the dendrites which enhanced the signal observed at the soma. These simulations provide a plausible mechanistic explanation for physiological recordings from amacrine cells that show similar phenomena.

Inhibitory feedback shapes bipolar cell responses in the rabbit retina

Retinal bipolar cells can be divided into on and off types based on the polarity of their response to light. Bipolar activity is further shaped by inhibitory inputs, characterized here by the events that occur immediately after the onset of a light step: 1) in most off bipolar cells, excitatory current decreased, whereas inhibitory current increased. These currents reinforced each other, enhancing the light response. 2) In about half of the on cone bipolar cells, the excitatory current increased, whereas inhibitory current decreased, also reinforcing the light response. Both of these reinforcing interactions were mediated by glycinergic inhibition. 3) In the remaining on cone bipolar cells, excitation and inhibition both increased, but inhibition was delayed so that these cells responded transiently. 4) Finally, in rod bipolar cells, excitation and inhibition both increased so that inhibition suppressed excitation, reducing the light response at all time scales. The suppressive inhibition seen in on cone and rod bipolar cells was mediated by GABA. Thus morphologically diverse bipolar cells receive only four main types of inhibitory input, and the majority of "inhibitory" inputs actually serve to enhance excitation.

Narrow and wide field amacrine cells fire action potentials in response to depolarization and light stimulation

Action potentials in amacrine cells are important for lateral propagation of signals across the inner retina, but it is unclear how many subclasses of amacrine cells contain voltage-gated sodium channels or can fire action potentials. This study investigated the ability of amacrine cells with narrow (< 200 μm) and wide (> 200 μm) dendritic fields to fire action potentials in response to depolarizing current injections and light stimulation. The pattern of action potentials evoked by current injections revealed two distinct classes of amacrine cells; those that responded with a single action potential (single-spiking cells) and those that responded with repetitive action potentials (repetitive-spiking cells). Repetitive-spiking cells differed from single-spiking cells in several regards: Repetitive-spiking cells were more often wide field cells, while single-spiking cells were more often narrow field cells. Repetitive-spiking cells had larger action potential amplitudes, larger peak voltage-gated NaV currents lower action potential thresholds, and needed less current to induce action potentials. However, there was no difference in the input resistance, holding current or time constant of these two classes of cells. The intrinsic capacity to fire action potentials was mirrored in responses to light stimulation; single-spiking amacrine cells infrequently fired action potentials to light steps, while repetitive-spiking amacrine cells frequently fired numerous action potentials. These results indicate that there are two physiologically distinct classes of amacrine cells based on the intrinsic capacity to fire action potentials.

Timing and Computation in Inner Retinal Circuitry

In the vertebrate inner retina, the second stage of the visual system, different components of the visual scene are transformed, discarded, or selected before visual information is transmitted through the optic nerve. This review discusses the connections between higher-level functions of visual processing, mathematical descriptions of the neural code, inner retinal circuitry, and visual computations. In the inner plexiform layer, bipolar cells deliver spatially and temporally filtered input to approximately ten anatomical strata. These layers receive a unique combination of excitation and inhibition, causing cells in different layers to respond with different kinetics to visual input. These distinct temporal channels interact through amacrine cells, a diverse class of inhibitory interneurons, which transmit signals within and between layers. In particular, wide-field amacrine cells transmit transient inhibition over long distances within a layer. These mechanisms and properties are combined into computations to detect the presence of differential motion and suppress the visual effects of eye movements.

Characterization of glycinergic synapses in vertebrate retinas

Glycine is one of the essential neurotransmitters modulating visual signals in retina. Glycine activates Cl(-) permeable receptors that conduct either inhibitory or excitatory actions, depending on the Cl(-) electrical-chemical gradient (E (Cl)) positive or negative to the resting potential in the cells. Interestingly, both glycine-induced inhibitory and excitatory responses are present in adult retinas, and the effects are confined in the inner and outer retinal neurons. Glycine inhibits glutamate synapses in the inner plexiform layer (IPL), resulting in shaping light responses in ganglion cells. In contrast, glycine excites horizontal cells and On-bipolar dendrites in the outer plexiform layer (OPL). The function of glycinergic synapse in the outer retina represents the effect of network feedback from a group of centrifugal neurons, glycinergic interplexiform cells. Moreover, immunocytochemical studies identify glycine receptor subunits (alpha1, alpha2, alpha3 and beta) in retinas, forming picrotoxin-sensitive alpha-homomeric and picrotoxin-insensitive alpha/beta-heteromeric receptors. Glycine receptors are modulated by intracellular Ca(2+) and protein kinas C and A pathways. Extracellular Zn(2+) regulates glycine receptors in a concentration-dependent manner, nanomolar Zn(2+) enhancing glycine responses, and micromolar Zn(2+) suppressing glycine responses in retinal neurons. These studies describe the function and mechanism of glycinergic synapses in retinas.

An ionotropic GABA receptor with novel pharmacology at bullfrog cone photoreceptor terminals

Characteristics of ionotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors at bullfrog cone terminals were studied by patch clamp techniques in isolated cell and retinal slice preparations. GABA-induced inward currents from isolated cones reversed in polarity at a potential, very close to the chloride equilibrium potential, and they were completely suppressed by picrotoxin. Unexpectedly, the GABA current was dose-dependently potentiated by the well-known GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline (BIC), but was suppressed by gabazine, another GABA(A) antagonist, and imidazole-4-acetic acid (I4AA), a GABA(C) receptor antagonist. Similarly, currents induced by both GABA(A) agonist muscimol and GABA(C) agonist cis-4-aminocrotonic acid (CACA) were also potentiated by BIC. Furthermore, currents induced from cones by GABA and kainate-caused depolarization of horizontal cells in retinal slice preparations were both potentiated by BIC. All these results suggest that the ionotropic GABA receptor at the bullfrog cone terminal exhibits novel pharmacology, distinct from both traditional GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors.

Form and Function of on-off Amacrine Cells in the Amphibian Retina

on-off amacrine cells were studied with whole cell recording techniques and intracellular staining methods using intact retina-eyecup preparations of the tiger salamander ( Ambystoma tigrinum) and the mudpuppy ( Necturus maculosus). Morphological characterization of these cells included three-dimensional reconstruction methods based on serial optical sections obtained with a confocal microscope. Some cells had their detailed morphology digitized with a computer-assisted tracing system and converted to compartmental models for computer simulations. The dendrites of on-off amacrine cells have spines and numerous varicosities. Physiological recordings confirmed that on-off amacrine cells generate both large- and small-amplitude impulses attributed, respectively, to somatic and dendritic generation sites. Using a multichannel model for impulse generation, computer simulations were carried out to evaluate how impulses are likely to propagate throughout these structures. We conclude that the on-off amacrine cell is organized with multifocal dendritic impulse generating sites and that both dendritic and somatic impulse activity contribute to the functional repertoire of these interneurons: locally generated dendritic impulses can provide regional activation, while somatic impulse activity results in rapid activation of the entire dendritic tree.

Gycine and GABA interact to regulate the nitric oxide/cGMP signaling pathway in the turtle retina

Nitric oxide (NO) is a free radical that is important in retinal signal transduction and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) is a critical downstream messenger of NO. The NO/cGMP signaling pathway has been shown to modulate neurotransmitter release and gap junction coupling in horizontal cells and amacrine cells, and increase the gain of the light response in photoreceptors. However, many of the mechanisms controlling the production of NO and cGMP remain unclear. Previous studies have shown activation of NO/cGMP production in response to stimulation with N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) or nicotine, and the differential modulation of cGMP production by GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors (GABA(A)Rs and GABA(C)Rs). This study used cGMP immunocytochemistry and NO imaging to investigate how the inhibitory GABAergic and glycinergic systems modulate the production of NO and cGMP. Our data show that blocking glycine receptors (GLYR) with strychnine (STRY) produced moderate increases in cGMP-like immunoreactivity (cGMP-LI) in select types of amacrine and bipolar cells, and strong increases in NO-induced fluorescence (NO-IF). TPMPA, a selective GABACR antagonist, greatly reduced the increases in cGMP-LI stimulated by STRY, but did not influence the increase in NO-IF stimulated by STRY. Bicuculline (BIC), a GABA(A)R antagonist, however, enhanced the increases in both the cGMP-LI and NO-IF stimulated by STRY. CNQX, a selective antagonist for alpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionic acid hydrobromide/kainic acid (AMPA/KA) receptors, eliminated both the increases in cGMP-LI and NO-IF stimulated by STRY, while MK801, a selective antagonist for NMDA receptors, slightly increased the cGMP-LI and slightly decreased the NO-IF stimulated by STRY. Finally, double labeling of NO-stimulated cGMP and either GLY or GABA indicated that cGMP predominantly colocalized with GLY. Taken together, these findings support the hypothesis that GLY and GABA interact in the regulation of the NO/cGMP signaling pathway, where GLY primarily inhibits NO production and GABA has a greater effect on cGMP production. Such interacting inhibitory pathways could shape the course of signal transduction of the NO/cGMP pathway under different physiological situations.

GABA(A), GABA(C) and glycine receptor-mediated inhibition differentially affects light-evoked signalling from mouse retinal rod bipolar cells

Rod bipolar cells relay visual signals evoked by dim illumination from the outer to the inner retina. GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells contact rod bipolar cell terminals, where they modulate transmitter release and contribute to the receptive field properties of third order neurones. However, it is not known how these distinct inhibitory inputs affect rod bipolar cell output and subsequent retinal processing. To determine whether GABA(A), GABA(C) and glycine receptors made different contributions to light-evoked inhibition, we recorded light-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (L-IPSCs) from rod bipolar cells mediated by each pharmacologically isolated receptor. All three receptors contributed to L-IPSCs, but their relative roles differed; GABA(C) receptors transferred significantly more charge than GABA(A) and glycine receptors. We determined how these distinct inhibitory inputs affected rod bipolar cell output by recording light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (L-EPSCs) from postsynaptic AII and A17 amacrine cells. Consistent with their relative contributions to L-IPSCs, GABA(C) receptor activation most effectively reduced the L-EPSCs, while glycine and GABA(A) receptor activation reduced the L-EPSCs to a lesser extent. We also found that GABAergic L-IPSCs in rod bipolar cells were limited by GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibition between amacrine cells. We show that GABA(A), GABA(C) and glycine receptors mediate functionally distinct inhibition to rod bipolar cells, which differentially modulated light-evoked rod bipolar cell output. Our findings suggest that modulating the relative proportions of these inhibitory inputs could change the characteristics of rod bipolar cell output.

Populations of wide-field amacrine cells in the mouse retina

We surveyed wide-field amacrine cells in the mouse, using a large series of retinas from a transgenic strain that expresses the green fluorescent protein (GFP) in isolated retinal cells. Wide-field cells were present in surprising diversity and number. They formed groups that could be defined by arbor depth, arbor size, and soma size. By conventional criteria, these populations of cells make up 11 amacrine cell "types." Five additional types have been reported by others in the mouse. Roughly two-thirds of the wide-field amacrine cells are axon-bearing cells, which have separate dendritic and axonal arbors. The axonal arbor of a single cell sometimes covers the majority of the retinal surface. The axon-bearing cells appear to be centrifugally conducting neurons similar to those studied electrophysiologically in some other species. Although they are classified as independent morphological types, it seems likely that their physiological functions represent variations on a single organizational plan. These cells are present at every level of the inner plexiform layer, which suggests that they affect most of the mouse retina's final outputs to the brain and, by implication, almost all visual function.

Functional GABA(B) receptors are expressed at the cone photoreceptor terminals in bullfrog retina

GABA(B) receptors at the cone terminals in bullfrog retina were characterized by immunocytochemical and whole-cell patch clamp techniques in retinal slice preparations. Somata, axons and synaptic terminals (pedicles) of cones were both GABA(B) receptor (GABA(B)R) 1 and GABA(B)R2 immunoreactive. Physiologically, barium/calcium currents of cones to voltage steps were significantly reduced in size when GABA was puffed to cone terminals in the presence of picrotoxin that is supposed to block both GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors. Similar reduction in barium currents was obtained with puff application of baclofen to cone terminals. These results suggest the presence of functional GABA(B) receptors at the bullfrog cone terminals. Suppression of barium currents of cones by baclofen was dose-dependent. Moreover, barium currents of cones were potentiated by background illumination, as compared with those recorded in the dark. 6,7-Dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, an antagonist of non-NMDA receptors that hyperpolarizes horizontal cells and reduces GABA release from these cells, and saclofen, a GABA(B) receptor antagonist, both potentiated barium currents of cones in the dark, thereby mimicking the effects of background illumination. It is suggested that changes in calcium influx into the cone synaptic terminals due to activation of GABA(B) receptors may provide a negative feedback mechanism for regulating signal transmission between cones and second-order neurons in the retina by modifying the amount of glutamate released from the cones.

Dynamic predictive coding by the retina

Retinal ganglion cells convey the visual image from the eye to the brain. They generally encode local differences in space and changes in time rather than the raw image intensity. This can be seen as a strategy of predictive coding, adapted through evolution to the average image statistics of the natural environment. Yet animals encounter many environments with visual statistics different from the average scene. Here we show that when this happens, the retina adjusts its processing dynamically. The spatio-temporal receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells change after a few seconds in a new environment. The changes are adaptive, in that the new receptive field improves predictive coding under the new image statistics. We show that a network model with plastic synapses can account for the large variety of observed adaptations.

Synaptic organization of GABAergic amacrine cells in the salamander retina

The synaptic organization of GABA-immunoreactive (GABA-IR) amacrine cells in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of salamander retina was studied with the use of postembedding immuno-electron microscopy. A total of 457 GABA-IR amacrine synapses, with identified postsynaptic elements, were analyzed on photomontages of electron micrographs covering 3,618 microm2 of the IPL. GABA-IR amacrine synapses were distributed throughout the IPL, with a small peak at the proximal margin of sublamina a. The majority of the output targets (81%) were GABA(-) neurons. Most of the contacts were simple synapses with one postsynaptic element identified as a process of an amacrine cell (55%), bipolar cell (19%) or ganglion cell (26%), and serial synapses were very rare. Of the 89 postsynaptic bipolar terminals, 63% participated in a reciprocal feedback synapse with the same presynaptic GABA-IR amacrine profile. There appeared to be no preference between GABA-IR amacrine contacts with rod- or cone-dominated bipolar cells (9.1% vs. 8.9%) or in the total number of amacrine synapses in sublaminas a and b (52% vs. 47%). The preponderance of amacrine cell input to bipolar cells in the OFF layer was derived from GABA-IR cells. These findings provide ultrastructural support to the existing physiological studies regarding the functional roles of the GABAergic amacrine cells in this species. Our results have added to the data base demonstrating that, in contrast to mammals, GABA-IR amacrine cells in amphibians and other nonmammals contact other amacrine cells more frequently, suggesting greater involvement of GABAergic amacrine cells in modulating lateral inhibitory pathways.

Inner and outer retinal pathways both contribute to surround inhibition of salamander ganglion cells

Illumination of the receptive-field surround reduces the sensitivity of a retinal ganglion cell to centre illumination. The steady, antagonistic receptive-field surround of retinal ganglion cells is classically attributed to the signalling of horizontal cells in the outer plexiform layer (OPL). However, amacrine cell signalling in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) also contributes to the steady receptive-field surround of the ganglion cell. We examined the contributions of these two forms of presynaptic lateral inhibition to ganglion cell light sensitivity by measuring the effects of surround illumination on EPSCs evoked by centre illumination. GABA(C) receptor antagonists reduced inhibition attributed to dim surround illumination, suggesting that this inhibition was mediated by signalling to bipolar cell axon terminals. Brighter surround illumination further reduced the light sensitivity of the ganglion cell. The bright surround effects on the EPSCs were insensitive to GABA receptor blockers. Perturbing outer retinal signalling with either carbenoxolone or cobalt blocked the effects of the bright surround illumination, but not the effects of dim surround illumination. We found that the light sensitivities of presynaptic, inhibitory pathways in the IPL and OPL were different. GABA(C) receptor blockers reduced dim surround inhibition, suggesting it was mediated in the IPL. By contrast, carbenoxolone and cobalt reduced bright surround, suggesting it was mediated by horizontal cells in the OPL. Direct amacrine cell input to ganglion cells, mediated by GABA(A) receptors, comprised another surround pathway that was most effectively activated by bright illumination. Our results suggest that surround activation of lateral pathways in the IPL and OPL differently modulate the sensitivity of the ganglion cell to centre illumination.

Characterization of receptors for glutamate and GABA in retinal neurons

Glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are major excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters in the vertebrate retina, "a genuine neural center" (Ramón y Cajal, 1964, Recollections of My Life, C.E. Horne (Translater) MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). Photoreceptors, generating visual signals, and bipolar cells, mediating signal transfer from photoreceptors to ganglion cells, both release glutamate, which induces and/or changes the activity of the post-synaptic neurons (horizontal and bipolar cells for photoreceptors; amacrine and ganglion cells for bipolar cells). Horizontal and amacrine cells, which mediate lateral interaction in the outer and inner retina respectively, use GABA as a principal neurotransmitter. In recent years, glutamate receptors and GABA receptors in the retina have been extensively studied, using multi-disciplinary approaches. In this article some important advances in this field are reviewed, with special reference to retinal information processing. Photoreceptors possess metabotropic glutamate receptors and several subtypes of GABA receptors. Most horizontal cells express AMPA receptors, which may be predominantly assembled from flop slice variants. In addition, these cells also express GABAA and GABAC receptors. Signal transfer from photoreceptors to bipolar cells is rather complicated. Whereas AMPA/KA receptors mediate transmission for OFF type bipolar cells, several subtypes of glutamate receptors, both ionotropic and metabotropic, are involved in the generation of light responses of ON type bipolar cells. GABAA and GABAC receptors with distinct kinetics are differentially expressed on dendrites and axon terminals of both ON and OFF bipolar cells, mediating inhibition from horizontal cells and amacrine cells. Amacrine cells possess ionotropic glutamate receptors, whereas ganglion cells express both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors. GABAA receptors exist in amacrine and ganglion cells. Physiological data further suggest that GABAC receptors may be involved in the activity of these neurons. Moreover, responses of these retinal third order neurons are modulated by GABAB receptors, and in ganglion cells there exist several subtypes of GABAB receptors. A variety of glutamate receptor and GABA receptor subtypes found in the retina perform distinct functions, thus providing a wide range of neural integration and versatility of synaptic transmission. Perspectives in this research field are presented.

Immuocytochemical analysis of spatial organization of photoreceptors and amacrine and ganglion cells in the tiger salamander retina

In the present study, using double- or triple-label immunocytochemistry in conjunction with confocal microscopy, we aimed to examine the population and distribution of photoreceptors, GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells, and ganglion cells, which are basic but important parameters for studying the structure–function relationship of the salamander retina. We found that the outer nuclear layer (ONL) contained 82,019 ± 3203 photoreceptors, of which 52% were rods and 48% were cones. The density of photoreceptors peaked at ∼8000 cells/mm2 in the ventral and dropped to ∼4000 cells/mm2 in the dorsal retina. In addition, the rod/cone ratio was less than 1 in the central retina but larger than 1 in the periphery. Moreover, in the proximal region of the inner nuclear layer (INL3), the total number of cells was 50,576 ± 8400. GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells made up approximately 78% of all cells in this layer, including 43% GABAergic, 32% glycinergic, and 3% GABA/glycine colocalized amacrine cells. The density of these amacrine cells was ∼6500 cells/mm2 in the ventral and ∼3200 cells/mm2 in the dorsal area. The ratio of GABAergic to glycinergic amacrine cells was larger than 1. Furthermore, in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), among a total of 36,007 ± 2010 cells, ganglion cells accounted for 65.7 ± 1.5% of the total cells, whereas displaced GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells comprised about 4% of the cells in this layer. The ganglion cell density was ∼1800 cells/mm2 in the ventral and ∼600 cells/mm2 in the dorsal retina. Our data demonstrate that all three major cell types are not uniformly distributed across the salamander retina. Instead, they exhibit a higher density in the ventral than in the dorsal retina and their spatial arrangement is associated with the retinal topography. These findings provide a basic anatomical reference for the electrophysiological study of this species.

Inhibitory network properties shaping the light evoked responses of cat alpha retinal ganglion cells

Cat retinal ganglion cells of the Y (or alpha) type respond to luminance changes opposite those preferred by their receptive-field centers with a transient hyperpolarization. Here, we examine the spatial organization and synaptic basis of this light response by means of whole-cell current-clamp recordings made in vitro. The hyperpolarization was largest when stimulus spots approximated the size of the receptive-field center, and diminished substantially for larger spots. The hyperpolarization was largely abolished by bath application of strychnine, a blocker of glycinergic inhibition. Picrotoxin, an antagonist of ionotropic GABA receptors, greatly reduced the attenuation of the hyperpolarizing response for large spots. The data are consistent with a model in which (1) the hyperpolarization reflects inhibition by glycinergic amacrine cells of bipolar terminals presynaptic to the alpha cells, and perhaps direct inhibition of the alpha cell as well; and (2) the attenuation of the hyperpolarization by large spots reflects surround inhibition of the glycinergic amacrine by GABAergic amacrine cells. This circuitry may moderate nonlinearities in the alpha-cell light response and could account for some excitatory and inhibitory influences on alpha cells known to arise from outside the classical receptive field.

Morphological and functional organization of ON and OFF pathways in the adult newt retina

Morphological and functional organization of ON and OFF pathways in the adult newt retina were examined by intracellular recording and staining techniques and immunohistochemistry. Synaptotagmin immunoreactivity discriminated three broad bands within the IPL: the distal band (sublamina I), the middle band (sublamina II) consisting of two dense punctate bands (sublaminae II(a) and II(b)), and proximal band (sublamina III). The Lucifer-yellow labeled OFF amacrine and ganglion cells send their processes mainly in sublamina I and/or II(a) where OFF bipolar cells extend their axon terminals, while ON amacrine and ganglion cells send their processes in sublamina III and/or II(b) where ON bipolar cells extend their axon terminals. Processes of ON-OFF amacrine and ganglion cells ramify broadly in the whole thickness of the IPL. Many bipolar cells responded to light spot with a transient hyperpolarization at both light onset and offset. They are probably subtypes of ON bipolar cells, because their axon terminals branch mainly in sublaminae III and/or II(b), although a few cells ramified the axon at both sublaminae II(a) and III. Two immunohistochemical markers for bipolar cells, PKC and RB-1, identified axon terminals in sublaminae III and/or II(b). From the ramification pattern of axon terminal, they are probably subtypes of ON bipolar cells. ChAT-ir amacrine cells ramified their dendrites in either sublamina I or II(b). Altogether, present studies support the general idea of segregation of ON and OFF pathways in sublaminae a and b of the IPL.

Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry

The visual system adapts to the magnitude of intensity fluctuations, and this process begins in the retina. Following the switch from a low-contrast environment to one of high contrast, ganglion cell sensitivity declines in two distinct phases: a fast change occurs in <0.1 s, and a slow decrease over approximately 10 s. To examine where these modulations arise, we recorded intracellularly from every major cell type in the salamander retina. Certain bipolar and amacrine cells, and all ganglion cells, adapted to contrast. Generally, these neurons showed both fast and slow adaptation. Fast effects of a contrast increase included accelerated kinetics, decreased sensitivity, and a depolarization of the baseline membrane potential. Slow adaptation did not affect kinetics, but produced a gradual hyperpolarization. This hyperpolarization can account for slow adaptation in the spiking output of ganglion cells.

Electrophysiological evidence for push-pull interactions in the inner retina of turtle

The responses of the inner retinal neurons of turtle to light spots of sizes were studied in an attempt to reveal characteristics that may reflect possible interactions of the neural circuits underlying the center and surround responses. For the ON-OFF cells, the responses were also analyzed to observe whether interference or augmentation of these responses occur. The intracellular recordings revealed several such interactions, observed either in the form of altered spike activity or as changes in the transiency of the light responses. The ON-responding amacrine cell presented in this study became more sustained, while for the ON-OFF amacrine cells larger light spots tended to make the responses more transient and both the ON and OFF components became more pronounced. The spiking activity of the OFF-type ganglion cell shifted in relation to the light stimulus and the number of spikes observed upon presentation of larger spots increased. We suggest that the surround circuits activated by increasing light spots may substantially influence and reorganize not only the overall center-surround balance, but also the center response of the cells. Although it cannot be excluded that intrinsic membrane properties also influence these processes to some extent, it is more likely that lateral inhibition and disinhibitory mechanisms play the leading role in this process.

Membrane properties of an unusual intrinsically oscillating, wide-field teleost retinal amacrine cell

In the retina, amacrine cells modulate the transfer of information from bipolar to ganglion cells. The nature of the modulation depends on the synaptic input and the membrane properties of the cells. In the retina of white bass, we identified a class of bistratified, wide-field amacrine cell characterized by immunopositive labelling for GABA and calmodulin. In isolation, the cells presented resting membrane potentials averaging -69 mV although some cells settled at more depolarized values (-30 mV). Injection of depolarizing current pulses induced oscillatory membrane responses. When elicited from depolarized cells, the oscillations were short-lived (< 40 ms). For the most part, the oscillatory potentials of hyperpolarized cells remained unattenuated throughout the depolarizing pulse. The frequency of the oscillations increased logarithmically with mean membrane potential, ranging from 74 to 140 Hz. Cells exhibiting depolarized membrane potentials oscillated at twice that rate. When the membrane potential of these cells was hyperpolarized to -70 mV, the oscillations became unattenuated and slowed. We found the cells expressed voltage-gated sodium, potassium and calcium currents and calcium-dependent potassium currents. We demonstrate that the oscillatory potentials arose as a result of the interplay between calcium and potassium currents. The cells responded to local application of GABA and glycine, both of which modulate the oscillatory potentials. Glutamate and its analogues depolarized the cell and induced oscillatory potentials. Our results indicate that oscillatory responses of a type of wide-field amacrine cell are an intrinsic feature of the cell and not due to circuit properties.

Presence of thyrotropin-releasing-hormone-immunoreactive (TRHir) amacrine cells in the retina of anuran and urodele amphibians

The presence of thyrotropin-releasing-hormone-immunoreactive (TRH-ir) amacrine cells in the retina of amphibians is reported for the first time. The anuran and urodele retinas studied exhibit major differences in the distribution of TRH-ir cells. In the two urodele species investigated, most TRH-ir amacrine cells were located in the ganglion cell layer (GCL). These pear-shaped cells originate a dense TRH-ir dendritic plexus in strata 4-5 of the inner plexiform layer (IPL). A small number of TRH-ir amacrine cells were observed in the inner nuclear layer (INL). Most of these INL TRH-ir cells were multipolar neurons with radiating dendrites that originate a loose plexus in the IPL stratum 1. In the three anuran species investigated, most TRH-ir amacrine cells were located in the INL. Distribution of TRH-ir processes in the IPL of anurans was not so clearly layered as in urodeles, dendrites being observed throughout strata 1-5. In the toad retina THR-ir material was also observed in the outer plexiform layer, which suggests that toads may have some TRH-ir interplexiform neurons. In the frog and toad, TRH-ir fibers were also observed in the optic nerve, although their origin could not be ascertained. The number of TRH-ir amacrine cells per whole retina was higher in anurans than in urodeles, though urodeles have higher cell densities. The marked differences in distribution of TRH-ir amacrine cells observed between anurans and urodeles, and among the three anuran species, suggest different functions of TRH in retinal processing, perhaps related to the different specializations of the visual systems of these species.

Localization of neurotransmitters and calcium binding proteins to neurons of salamander and mudpuppy retinas

We wished to identify the different types of retinal neurons on the basis of their content of neuroactive substances in both larval tiger salamander and mudpuppy retinas, favored species for electrophysiological investigation. Sections and wholemounts of retinas were labeled by immunocytochemical methods to demonstrate three calcium binding protein species and the common neurotransmitters, glycine, GABA and acetylcholine. Double immunostained sections and single labeled wholemount retinas were examined by confocal microscopy. Immunostaining patterns appeared to be the same in salamander and mudpuppy. Double and single cones, horizontal cells, some amacrine cells and ganglion cells were strongly calbindin-immunoreactive (IR). Calbindin-IR horizontal cells colocalized GABA. Many bipolar cells, horizontal cells, some amacrine cells and ganglion cells were strongly calretinin-IR. One type of horizontal cell and an infrequently occurring amacrine cell were parvalbumin-IR. Acetylcholine as visualized by ChAT-immunoreactivity was seen in a mirror-symmetric pair of amacrine cells that colocalized GABA and glycine. Glycine and GABA colocalized with calretinin, calbindin and occasionally with parvalbumin in amacrine cells.

Immunocytochemical analysis of cholinergic amacrine cells in the tiger salamander retina

Cholinergic amacrine cells in the tiger salamander retina were observed for the first time by using antibodies against choline acetyltransferase (ChAT). ChAT-immunoreactive cells were present in the inner nuclear layer (INL) and in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), and the somas of the former population (average diameter = 15.13 microm) were slightly smaller than those of the latter population (average diameter = 16.42 microm). The processes of these cells form two distinct narrow bands in the inner plexiform layer (IPL), one located near 0.2 inner plexiform units (IU) and the other near 0.65-0.7 IU. Soma size, cell density and spatial distribution of ChAT-positive cells were quantitatively analyzed. Our results suggest that cholinergic amacrine cells in the salamander retina are very similar to their counter parts in other species, and they can be used as a model system for studying cholinergic functions in the visual system.

Melatonin modulates gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptor-mediated currents on isolated carp retinal neurons

Modulation by melatonin of gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor-mediated responses was studied in bipolar and amacrine-like cells acutely isolated from carp retina, using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Melatonin of 1 mM accelerated desensitization of the GABA(A) receptors at both bipolar and amacrine-like cells. In addition, 1 mM melatonin hardly changed the GABA(A) receptor-mediated response amplitude of bipolar cells, while it increased or decreased that of amacrine-like cells, depending on the concentration of GABA applied. These modulatory effects, which can not be blocked by luzindole, a melatonin receptor antagonist, may be due to the allosteric action caused by melatonin bound to a site of the GABA(A) receptors.

Amacrine cells of the anuran retina: morphology, chemical neuroanatomy, and physiology

Amacrine cells are third-order retinal interneurons, projecting their processes into the inner plexiform layer. Historically, they were not considered as neurons first. By the middle of the 20th century, their neuronal nature was confirmed, and their enormous diversity established. Amacrine cells have been most successfully subdivided into morphological categories based on two parameters: diameter of the dendritic field and ramification pattern in the inner plexiform layer. Works combining anatomy, physiology, and neurochemistry are scarce and in the case of the anuran retina, the situation is even worse. Correlation between morphology, neurochemistry, and physiology is little studied. Here we try to build up a database and pinpoint some of the missing data. Obtaining those could help to better understand retinal function. Sporadic attempts did not make it possible to develop a comprehensive catalog of morphologically distinct amacrine cell types in the anuran retina. The number of morphologically identified amacrine cells currently stands at 16. The list of neurochemically identified distinct cell types can be given as follows: five types GABA-containing cell types with secondary markers and at least one without; two glycinergic cell types and one interplexiform cell where glycine colocalizes with somatostatin; one dopaminergic amacrine cell and also a variant of this with interplexiform morphology; two types of serotoninergic cells; three NADPHdiaphorase-positive cells, one substance P-positive cell type without identified second marker; one CCK-positive cell type without identified second marker and the calbindin positive cells (at least one but potentially more types). This adds up to 19 cell types, out of which two are interplexiform in character. This is more than that could be identified by purely morphological means. Out of Cajal's original 13 amacrine cell types described in the frog retina, 5 parallel unequivocally with neurons defined by neurochemistry. Three others have one close match each, but their exact identity is uncertain. The remaining amacrine cells have more than one potential matches. At the same time, on one hand the amacrine cell named two-layered by Cajal so far has no match among the neurochemically identified amacrine cells. On the other hand, the interplexiform subtype of the dopaminergic cell, the somatostatin-containing glycinergic interplexiform cell, the starburst cell, and the bistratified neuropeptide Y-immunoreactive cell have no match among Cajal's cells. All in all, the number of known amacrine and interplexiform cells now stands at at least 21 in the anuran retina. Physiological characterization of amacrine cells shows that their general features seem to be rather similar to those described in tiger salamander retina. In Xenopus retina, morphologically and physiologically identified amacrine cells responded to light stimulation most frequently with ON-OFF characteristics. Immunhistochemical identification of the recorded and dye injected cells showed that amacrine cells of the "same physiological type" might have different morphology. In other words, amacrine cells with different morphology can respond similarly to illumination. Even so, small differences between almost identical responses may reflect that the cell they stem from indeed belongs to different cell types.

Catecholamine systems in the brain of vertebrates: new perspectives through a comparative approach

A comparative analysis of catecholaminergic systems in the brain and spinal cord of vertebrates forces to reconsider several aspects of the organization of catecholamine systems. Evidence has been provided for the existence of extensive, putatively catecholaminergic cell groups in the spinal cord, the pretectum, the habenular region, and cortical and subcortical telencephalic areas. Moreover, putatively dopamine- and noradrenaline-accumulating cells have been demonstrated in the hypothalamic periventricular organ of almost every non-mammalian vertebrate studied. In contrast with the classical idea that the evolution of catecholamine systems is marked by an increase in complexity going from anamniotes to amniotes, it is now evident that the brains of anamniotes contain catecholaminergic cell groups, of which the counterparts in amniotes have lost the capacity to produce catecholamines. Moreover, a segmental approach in studying the organization of catecholaminergic systems is advocated. Such an approach has recently led to the conclusion that the chemoarchitecture and connections of the basal ganglia of anamniote and amniote tetrapods are largely comparable. This review has also brought together data about the distribution of receptors and catecholaminergic fibers as well as data about developmental aspects. From these data it has become clear that there is a good match between catecholaminergic fibers and receptors, but, at many places, volume transmission seems to play an important role. Finally, although the available data are still limited, striking differences are observed in the spatiotemporal sequence of appearance of catecholaminergic cell groups, in particular those in the retina and olfactory bulb.

I4AA-Sensitive chloride current contributes to the center light responses of bipolar cells in the tiger salamander retina

Light-evoked currents in depolarizing and hyperpolarizing bipolar cells (DBCs and HBCs) were recorded under voltage-clamp conditions in living retinal slices of the larval tiger salamander. Responses to illumination at the center of the DBCs' and HBCs' receptive fields were mediated by two postsynaptic currents: DeltaI(C), a glutamate-gated cation current with a reversal potential near 0 mV, and DeltaI(Cl), a chloride current with a reversal potential near -60 mV. In DBCs DeltaI(C) was suppressed by L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (L-AP4), and in HBCs it was suppressed by 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX). In both DBCs and HBCs DeltaI(Cl) was suppressed by imidazole-4-acetic acid (I4AA), a GABA receptor agonist and GABA(C) receptor antagonist. In all DBCs and HBCs examined, 10 microM I4AA eliminated DeltaI(Cl) and the light-evoked current became predominately mediated by DeltaI(C). The addition of 20 microM L-AP4 to the DBCs or 50 microM DNQX to HBCs completely abolished DeltaI(C). Focal application of glutamate at the inner plexiform layer elicited chloride currents in bipolar cells by depolarizing amacrine cells that release GABA at synapses on bipolar cell axon terminals, and such glutamate-induced chloride currents in DBCs and HBCs could be reversibly blocked by 10 microM I4AA. These experiments suggest that the light-evoked, I4AA-sensitive chloride currents (DeltaI(Cl)) in DBCs and HBCs are mediated by narrow field GABAergic amacrine cells that activate GABA(C) receptors on bipolar cell axon terminals. Picrotoxin (200 microM) or (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4yl) methyphosphinic acid (TPMPA) (2 other GABA(C) receptor antagonists) did not block (but enhanced and broadened) the light-evoked DeltaI(Cl), although they decreased the chloride current induced by puff application of GABA or glutamate. The light response of narrow field amacrine cells were not affected by I4AA, but were substantially enhanced and broadened by picrotoxin. These results suggest that there are at least two types of GABA(C) receptors in bipolar cells: one exhibits stronger I4AA sensitivity than the other, but both can be partially blocked by picrotoxin. The GABA receptors in narrow field amacrine cells are I4AA insensitive and picrotoxin sensitive. The light-evoked DeltaI(Cl) in bipolar cells are mediated by the more strongly I4AA-sensitive GABA(C) receptors. Picrotoxin, although acting as a partial GABA(C) receptor antagonist in bipolar cells, does not suppress DeltaI(Cl) because its presynaptic effects on amacrine cell light responses override its antagonistic postsynaptic actions.

Three levels of lateral inhibition: A space-time study of the retina of the tiger salamander

The space-time patterns of activity generated across arrays of retinal neurons can provide a sensitive measurement of the effects of neural interactions underlying retinal activity. We measured the excitatory and inhibitory components associated with these patterns at each cellular level in the retina and further dissected inhibitory components pharmacologically. Using perforated and loose patch recording, we measured the voltages, currents, or spiking at 91 lateral positions covering approximately 2 mm in response to a flashed 300-microm-wide bar. First, we showed how the effect of well known lateral inhibition at the outer retina, mediated by horizontal cells, evolved in time to compress the spatial representation of the stimulus bar at ON and OFF bipolar cell bodies as well as horizontal cells. Second, we showed, for the first time, how GABA(C) receptor mediated amacrine cell feedback to bipolar terminals compresses the spatial representation of the stimulus bar at ON bipolar terminals over time. Third, we showed that a third spatiotemporal compression exists at the ganglion cell layer that is mediated by feedforward amacrine cells via GABA(A) receptors. These three inhibitory mechanisms, via three different receptor types, appear to compensate for the effects of lateral diffusion of activity attributable to dendritic spread and electrical coupling between retinal neurons. As a consequence, the width of the final representation at the ganglion cell level approximates the dimensions of the original stimulus bar.

Characterization of AMPA receptors on isolated amacrine-like cells in carp retina

In amacrine-like cells freshly dissociated from crucian carp (Carassius auratus) retina, we recorded whole-cell responses to rapid application of glutamate and kainate. Currents induced by glutamate, but not kainate, usually showed extremely rapid desensitization, and the mean time constant for the decay of the responses to 10 mM glutamate was 2.77 ms. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) failed to induce any current even with coapplication of glycine and removal of extracellular Mg2 +. 1-(4-aminophenyl)-3-Methylcarbamyl-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-3, 4-dihydro-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine (GYKI 53655), a selective alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, was found to completely block glutamate-induced currents, suggesting that the glutamate receptors on these cells are AMPA preferring. The value of EC50 for glutamate and kainate was determined to be 2.73 mM and 97.5 microM, respectively. Noise analysis of fluctuation of whole-cell currents induced by kainate of different concentrations indicated that the mean conductance of the AMPA receptor channels was 5.70 pS. Splice variant analysis of the AMPA receptors was also conducted by comparing the effects of cyclothiazide, a flip receptor-preferring modulator and 4-[2-(phenylsulphonylamino)ethylthio]-2,6-difluoro-phenoxyaceta mide (PEPA), a flop receptor-preferring modulator, on glutamate-induced responses. PEPA was much more potent than cyclothiazide at these receptors with a EC50 of 17.3 microM. The mean ratio of the potentiation by PEPA versus cyclothiazide (P/C ratio) was 4.39. These modulatory effects of cyclothiazide and PEPA were rather similar to those obtained at AMPA receptors assembled from flop variants expressed in Xenopus oocytes, suggesting that the AMPA receptor of the carp amacrine cells may predominantly consist of the flop splice variants.

Contrast rectification and distributed encoding By ON-OFF amacrine cells in the retina

The encoding of luminance contrast by ON-OFF amacrine cells was investigated by intracellular recording in the retina of the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum). Contrast flashes of positive and negative polarity were applied at the center of the receptive field while the entire retina was light adapted to a background field of 20 cd/m(2). Many amacrine cells showed remarkably high contrast gain: Up to 20-35% of the maximum response was evoked by a contrast step of only 1%. In the larger signal domain, C50, the contrast required to evoke a response 50% of the maximum, was often remarkably low: 24 of 25 cells had a C50 value of < or =10% for at least one contrast polarity. Across cells and contrast polarity, the dynamic ranges varied from extremely narrow to broad, thereby blanketing the range of reflectances associated with objects in natural environments. Although some cells resembled "contrast rectifiers," by showing similar responses to contrasts of opposite polarity, many did not. Thus for contrast gain and C50, individual cells could show a strong preference for either negative or positive contrast. In the time domain, the preference was strong and unidirectional: for equal contrast steps, the latency of the response to negative contrast was 20-45 ms shorter than that for positive contrast. The present results, when compared with those for bipolar cells, suggest that, on average, amacrine cells add some amplification, particularly for negative contrast, to the high contrast gain already established by bipolar cells. In the time domain, our data reveal a striking transformation from bipolar to amacrine cells in favor of negative contrast. These and further observations have implications for the input and output of amacrine cell circuits. The present finding of substantial differences between cells reveals a potential substrate for distributed encoding of luminance contrast within the ON-OFF amacrine cell population.

Comparable effects of flickering and steady patterns of light adaptation on photomechanical responses of cones in amphibian (Xenopus laevis) retina

The effects of two distinct patterns of light stimulus, steady and flicker, on cone photomechanical movements (PMMs) in the Xenopus laevis retina were investigated. For both patterns studied, the effects on PMMs were assessed by quantitative analysis of the cone positions in the outer retina. Steady light adaptation was found to be equally effective as flicker in causing cone contractions. This was unlike the situation previously found in the cyprinid fish retina, in which flickering light was significantly more effective than steady. This difference could be related to the light-evoked response characteristics and circuitry of dopaminergic retinal neurones in the two vertebrate classes. The role of dopamine and other possible neuromodulator(s) in light adaptive control of vertebrate retinae is discussed.

Spatial heterogeneity and function of voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels in retinal amacrine neurons

The spatial distribution of ion channels within amacrine cells of the tiger salamander retina was studied using patch recording in the retinal slice preparation. By focally puffing kainate, GABA and glycine at amacrine cell processes in the inner plexiform layer, it was determined that the cell's glutamate receptors were located in a confined region of the processes near the soma, while glycine and GABA receptors were located throughout the processes. Likewise, similar techniques in conjunction with voltage steps demonstrated that voltage-gated sodium channels were located throughout the cell and were shown to generate sodium-dependent spikes, while only the processes contained voltage-gated calcium channels. These results suggest that this form of transient amacrine cell collects its excitatory synaptic inputs in a region confined to a central annular region near the soma, that the signal is actively propagated throughout its processes by voltage-gated sodium channels and that calcium-dependent neurotransmitter release of glycine from this neuron can occur throughout its processes. Thus, excitatory signals are collected in the processes near the soma, inhibitory signals throughout the processes and excitation is probably propagated throughout the processes of the amacrine cell.

Two groups of TH-like immunoreactive neurons in the frog (Rana pipiens) retina

The morphology and distribution of TH-like immunoreactive (TH-IR) cells in the retina of Rana pipiens were studied in retinal whole mounts and in radial and horizontal sections. A large majority (96%) of the immunoreactive cells were found in the inner nuclear layer while a few cells were found in the ganglion cell layer. All TH-IR cells had round to oval somata with average diameter of 10 microm. The 2-4 primary processes of these cells distributed extensively to sublamina 1 of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and sparsely to sublamina 5. Two groups of TH-IR cells were distinguished: one, designated thin cells, had only thin (<2 microm diameter) primary processes; the second, designated thick cells, had one or more primary processes with diameter(s) exceeding 2 microm for a distance of 5 microm or more from the soma. The thin cells did not significantly differ from the thick cells in soma diameter, number of primary processes, horizontal spread of processes or vertical lamination of processes. Nearest neighbor analyses of the two types revealed that the population of TH-IR cells (thick and thin together) have an orderly distribution while the thick cells alone are more randomly distributed, indicating that the thick cells do not comprise a functional population. The total number of TH-IR cells varied between retinas; the variability was due principally to variation of thin cell density. It is hypothesized that the thick cells are a subpopulation of the TH-IR cells which are in a particular physiological state at the time of fixation.

Lateral inhibition in the inner retina is important for spatial tuning of ganglion cells

The center-surround receptive-field organization in retinal ganglion cells is widely believed to result mainly from lateral inhibition at the first synaptic level (in the outer retina). Inhibition at the second synaptic level (in the inner retina) is thought to mediate more complex response properties. Here we show that much of the sustained surround antagonism in certain on-center ganglion cells results from lateral inhibition in the inner retina, via GABAergic amacrine cells, and that the lateral conduction of this signal requires voltage-gated sodium currents. Blocking lateral inhibition in the inner retina eliminates the preference of small-center ganglion cells for small stimuli but has little effect on ganglion cells with large receptive-field centers. These results illustrate how lateral inhibition at successive synaptic stages can selectively control the size of neural receptive-field centers.

Spatiotemporal patterns at the retinal output

Edge enhancement in the retina is thought to be mediated by classical center-surround antagonism, first encountered as the interactions between horizontal cells and cones. But in the salamander retina these interactions do little to enhance edges. Instead, a robust dynamic interaction between amacrine and bipolar cells appears to be responsible for a sharp edge enhancement. To demonstrate this we recorded extracellularly from a single ganglion cell and moved a flashed square, 300 micro(m) on a side, over a 1.5 x 1.0 mm2 grid at 25-micro(m) increments. Playing back all of these recordings simultaneously simulated the pattern of responses that would have been measured from an array of ganglion cells. The emerging pattern of ganglion cell activity first faithfully represented the flashed square, but after approximately 60 ms the center of the representation collapsed, leaving a representation of only the edges. We inferred that the feedback synapse from amacrine to bipolar cells at gamma-aminobutyric acid-C (GABAC) receptors mediated this effect: bicuculline and strychnine were ineffective in altering the response pattern, but in picrotoxin the center of the representation did not collapse. The GABAergic amacrine cells thought to mediate this effect have quite narrow spread of processes, so the existence of this edge-enhancing effect suggests a mechanism quite different from classical lateral inhibition, namely the delayed inhibition of a spatially expanding input pattern.