Effects of metformin in obese patients with impaired glucose tolerance

Successful treatment of obesity and insulin resistance via ketogenic diet status post Roux-en-Y

This is a single case of a 65-year-old American woman who presented with substantial weight gain and insulin resistance (IR) post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. Before RYGB, she had reached 340 lbs (155 kg) and a body mass index (BMI) of 56.6 kg/m2 The surgery resulted in a 70 lbs (32 kg) weight loss, bringing her BMI, per cent total weight loss (%TWL) and per cent excess weight loss (%EWL) to 44.9 kg/m2, 20.6% and 36.8%, respectively. Unfortunately, her BMI would return to 53.6 kg/m2, nearly her pre-RYGB BMI. It was then she sought the guidance of a primary care physician with expertise in nutrition and medical management of obesity, who placed her on a ketogenic diet. One year later, she had lost 102 lbs (46.4 kg), resulting in a BMI, %TWL and %EWL of 36.6 kg/m2, 31.7%, and 63.1%, respectively, also further resulting in significant improvements of her inflammatory biomarkers. This case presentation will explore current literature, covering the effects of obesity on IR, pre-diabetes and other disease-provoking inflammatory biomarkers.

Impaired glucose tolerance and metformin: clinical and mechanistic aspects

The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) showed that metformin reduced the incidence of diabetes in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) who were at high risk of progression to type 2 diabetes. Metformin was not as efficient as intensive life style intervention, but had a clinically significant effect in obese individuals and in those with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). This review discusses the clinical implications and the mechanistic aspects of the effect of metformin in IGT and IFG. Acute actions of metformin on postprandial metabolism to improve hepatic glucose handling and improve the lipid profile could contribute to the lower incidence of diabetes. Longer term improvements in haemodynamic parameters and reduced oxidative stress are also implicated. Metformin offers a potential alternative or complement to lifestyle intervention for IGT, and deserves further evaluation in this respect.

Prediabetes: to treat or not to treat?

The incidence of diabetes is continuously increasing worldwide. Pre-diabetes (defined as impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose or both) represents an intermediate state, which often progresses to overt diabetes within a few years. In addition, pre-diabetes may be associated with increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Thus, reverting a pre-diabetic state as well as preventing the development of diabetes represents enormous challenge for the clinician. Lifestyle modification in pre-diabetic individuals was found particularly effective in the prevention of diabetes. However, compliance to lifestyle modification measures can be a crucial problem in the everyday clinical practice, especially in developing countries. During the last decade many studies support the use of anti-diabetic treatment schemes in pre-diabetic subjects to be advantageous. The American Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) as well as other minor studies and meta-analyses has convincingly demonstrated the efficacy of metformin in this patient group. In addition, results of the 10 year DPP follow up have recently been published, demonstrating the long term safety and sustainability of metformin treatment benefits in this population. In contrast to metformin, the evidence from the use of other anti-diabetic agents (thiazolidinediones, a-glucosidase inhibitors, incretin mimetics) in pre-diabetic individuals is rather inadequate and prospective data is further needed. Furthermore, large scale studies with hard clinical endpoints are needed to delineate the effect of pre-diabetes treatment on macro- and microvascular complications. In conclusion, several strategies of patient management, mainly lifestyle modification and pharmacological interventions can prevent diabetes development in subjects diagnosed with pre-diabetes or even revert pre-diabetic state. However, whether this biochemical improvement can be translated into actual clinical benefit remains to be established.

Antidiabetic agents in subjects with mild dysglycaemia: prevention or early treatment of type 2 diabetes?

Besides lifestyle, various pharmacological treatments have proven their efficacy to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals, especially in those with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and/or impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Major placebo-controlled clinical trials demonstrated favourable effects of various glucose-lowering drugs generally used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, i.e. metformin, acarbose and thiazolidinediones (glitazones). These trials showed a lower rate of progression to overt diabetes and a higher regression rate to a normal glucose status with active treatment as compared to placebo after a follow up of several years. Ongoing trials should confirm such a favourable effect with those drugs and may demonstrate a similar protective effect with other pharmacological approaches such as glinides or even basal insulin regimen. However, the reported favourable effects were generally observed while the subjects were still on treatment, and partially vanished after a rather short period of wash-out of several weeks. Therefore, the distinction between a true preventing effect and simply a masking effect is difficult with glucose-lowering drugs. In addition, as type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease, it is still questionable whether the effect corresponds to a prevention effect or only to a postponing of the development of the disease. Owing to the pathophysiology of the disease, the only way to block the progression of type 2 diabetes is probably to avoid the progressive loss of beta-cell function and/or mass. Whatsoever, these data obtained in large clinical trials bring further argument to support early treatment of diabetes, even at a prediabetic state, in order to stop the vicious circle leading to an inevitable deterioration of glycaemia in predisposed subjects.

Effect of metformin on fatty acid and glucose metabolism in freshly isolated hepatocytes and on specific gene expression in cultured hepatocytes

The short-term effect of metformin on fatty acid and glucose metabolism was studied in freshly incubated hepatocytes from 24-hr starved rats. Metformin (5 or 50 mM) had no effect on oleate or octanoate oxidation rates (CO(2)+ acid-soluble products), whatever the concentration used. Similarly, metformin had no effect on oleate esterification (triglycerides and phospholipid synthesis) regardless of whether the hepatocytes were isolated from starved (low esterification rates) or fed rats (high esterification rates). In contrast, metformin markedly reduced the rates of glucose production from lactate/pyruvate, alanine, dihydroxyacetone, and galactose. Using crossover plot experiments, it was shown that the main effect of metformin on hepatic gluconeogenesis was located upstream of the formation of dihydroxyacetone phosphate. Increasing the time of exposure to metformin (24 hr instead of 1 hr) led to significant changes in the expression of genes involved in glucose and fatty acid metabolism. Indeed, when hepatocytes were cultured in the presence of 50 to 500 microM metformin, the expression of genes encoding regulatory proteins of fatty acid oxidation (carnitine palmitoyltransferase I), ketogenesis (mitochondrial hydroxymethylgltaryl-CoA synthase), and gluconeogenesis (glucose 6-phosphatase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase) was decreased by 30 to 60%, whereas expression of genes encoding regulatory proteins involved in glycolysis (glucokinase and liver-type pyruvate kinase) was increased by 250%. In conclusion, this work suggests that metformin could reduce hepatic glucose production through short-term (metabolic) and long-term (genic) effects.

Diabetes prevalence and risk factors in polycystic ovary syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome is a reproductive disorder with a significant impact on fertility. It is secondarily, and perhaps for the individual primarily, a disorder with a marked increase risk for diabetes and glucose intolerance. Physicians need to be aware that women who have PCOS are at high risk for impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes. In the author's opinion, they should be screened for these abnormalities. Minority women with PCOS may have higher prevalence rates of glucose intolerance, and further study of minority groups is indicated. The author's data indicate that fasting glucose levels are inadequate for such screenings. Fasting glucose levels are relatively poor predictors of type 2 diabetes as determined by glucose challenge testing in PCOS. These findings may have substantial clinical relevance. They strongly suggest that all PCOS women should be screened for glucose intolerance, and that basal and 2-hour, glucose-stimulated levels rather than fasting glucose levels alone are required for such screening. Further study is necessary to document conversion rates to worsening glucose tolerance over time, as well as the cardiovascular risk associated with glucose intolerance in PCOS.

Effect of metformin on patients with impaired glucose tolerance

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of metformin on glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity and rate of conversion diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).

METHODS

Seventy subjects with IGT were randomized under double-blind conditions to receive either placebo (n = 37) or metformin (n = 33) at a dosage of 250 mg three times daily for a duration of 12 months. Glycaemic control, plasma insulin and other biochemical indexes were assessed before and after 3, 6 and 12 months.

RESULT

At 12 months the conversion rate to diabetes was 16.2% in the placebo group compared to 3.0% for the metformin group (P = 0.011). Of subjects treated with metformin for 12 months, 84.9% became normoglycaemic compared to 51.4% of those receiving the placebo. Significant improvements in fasting glucose, glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity were found at 12 months and at intermediate clinic assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin can improve glucose metabolism in IGT patients and may be a treatment option in their management of IGT subjects.

Three-month treatment with metformin or dexfenfluramine does not modify the effects of diet on anthropometric and endocrine-metabolic parameters in abdominal obesity

Abdominal obesity is connoted by hyperinsulinism and insulin insensitivity, a trend toward glucose intolerance, hypoactivity of GH/IGF-I axis and alterations of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. It has been hypothesized that treatment with metformin (MET) and dexfenfluramine (DEX) could counteract those endocrine-metabolic alterations. Thus, we studied the effects of 3-month treatment with MET or DEX on anthropometric (BMI, WHR, FM and FFM), metabolic (basal and OGTT-induced glucose) and hormonal variables (IGF-I, DHEA-S, androstendione, testosterone, fT3, fT4, TSH, basal and OGTT-induced insulin) as well as on blood pressure in 28 normotensive patients with abdominal obesity (OB, 3 M, 25 F; 47.5+/-1.5 yr [mean+/-SE], BMI 35.4+/-1.1 kg/m2, WHR 0.98+/-0.04 and 0.86+/-0.07, in M and F, respectively). All patients were on balanced hypocaloric diet (1400 Kcal/day). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with MET (no.=10, 500 mg twice daily po) or DEX (no.=10, 15 mg thrice daily po) or placebo (no.=8). Before treatment all groups had similar anthropometric, metabolic and hormonal values. After 3-month treatment with MET, DEX or placebo, weight, BMI and WHR reductions were similar in all groups (p<0.05 vs baseline in either group). In each group FFM/FM ratio showed non significant trend toward increase. No significant variations in metabolic and endocrine variables were recorded in each group after 1 and 3-month treatment. However, glucose tolerance, OGTT-induced insulin response, glucose/insulin ratio showed a similar trend toward improvement in all groups, while IGF-I, 24 h urinary cortisol, DHEA-S, androstendione, testosterone, thyroid hormone and TSH levels did not show any variation. Significant (p<0.02) and similar reductions of DBP, but not of SBP, levels were found in all groups. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that, at least after 3-month treatment, metformin and dexfenfluramine do not modify the effects of diet on anthropometric, metabolic and hormonal parameters as well as on blood pressure in patients with abdominal obesity.

Effect of metformin on food intake in obese subjects

BACKGROUND

It has been hypothesized that metformin inhibits food intake, but in humans such effect needs to be demonstrated. Our study aims at investigating the effect of metformin administration on food intake in obese, non-diabetic, normotensive patients.

METHODS

Thirty patients underwent a double-blind, randomized study. Placebo (P; n = 15) and metformin (M; n = 15) were both given for 15 days, and food intake (FI) was recorded at baseline and in the last 4 days of each treatment period.

RESULTS

M administration allowed a stronger decline in body weight (BW) (-2.8 +/- 1.6 vs. -0.3 +/- 0.4 kg P < 0.01), body fat (BF) (-1.4 +/- 1.2 vs. -0.3 +/- 1.1 kg P < 0.01), plasma leptin concentration (-5.2 +/- 8.9 vs. -1.8 +/- 10.4 ng mL-1 P < 0.05) and FI (-642 +/- 491 vs.-70 +/- 1165 kJ per 24 h P < 0.01) than P. In M-treated subjects, changes in FI significantly correlated with those in BW (r = 0.63, P < 0.007) and BF (r = 0.74, P < 0.001). Independently of sex and change in BF, the changes in FI and in fasting plasma leptin concentration (r = 0.58, P < 0.01) were still correlated.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that metformin administration is useful to inhibit FI and to lower BW and BF in obese non-diabetic patients.